The URL can be used to link to this page

7-11-22 Regular Commission Meeting Adopted Minutes;>s'✓'1��, MINUTES Regular City Commission Meeting Monday, July 11, 2022 - 6:30 PM Commission Chamber INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE CALL TO ORDER: Following the Pledge of Allegiance, Mayor Glasser called the meeting to order at 6:30 PM. City Clerk Bartle called the roll. ATTENDANCE: Present: Ellen Glasser, Mayor - Seat 1 Bruce Bole, Commissioner - Seat 2 Michael Waters, Commissioner - Seat 3 Candace Kelly, Commissioner - Seat 4 Brittany Norris, Mayor Pro Tem / Commissioner - Seat 5 Also Present: Shane Corbin, City Manager (CM) Brenna Durden, City Attorney (CA) Donna Bartle, City Clerk (CC) Ladayija Nichols, Deputy City Clerk (DCC) 1 APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1A. Approve minutes of the Regular Commission Meeting on January 10, 2022. Mayor Glasser asked if there were any corrections or changes needed. There were no corrections. Mayor Glasser stated the minutes stand. 2 COURTESY OF FLOOR TO VISITORS 2A. Recognition of Officer Robert Harding - 35 years of service and Commander David Cameron - 25 years of service (Chief of Police Gualillo) Police Chief Gualillo presented plaques and thanked Officer Robert Harding and Commander David Cameron. PUBLIC COMMENT Mayor Glasser explained the process for public comments and opened the Courtesy of the Floor to Visitors. City Clerk Bartle called each speaker to the podium. Lisa Griffis spoke about 5G cell phone tower concerns. 3 CITY MANAGER REPORTS 3A. 90 -Day Calendar (July - Sept. 2022) Regular City Commission July 11, 2022 3B. 3C. 3D. There was CONSENSUS to accept the 90 -Day Calendar. Dog Tethering Research Planning and Community Development Director (PCDD) Amanda Askew presented and reviewed the information included in the agenda packet. Police Chief Gualillo further explained this topic and answered questions from the Commission. The Commission agreed to leave this as an item open for more discussion with no present action. Main Street Complete Streets CM Corbin provided an update on the recent accomplishments and upcoming projects of Phase 1 Main Street Complete Streets project. PCDD Askew presented and reviewed the information included in the agenda packet and answered questions. Discussion ensued. Commissioner Norris expressed that she would like for on -street parking to remain. She also mentioned she does not favor anything that would take away parking. Commissioner Bole requested more input from the public regarding this item at the July 16, 2022, Town Hall Meeting. Mayor Glasser requested adding the AE Engineering Report Complete Streets Implementation Plan (attached hereto and made part of this Official Record as Attachment A) to the July 16, 2022, Town Hall for discussion. Attachment A to 7-11-22 Minutes Paid Parking 18th and 19th Beach Access Update CM Corbin explained this item, recommended the free 30 -minute parking be removed due to Flowbird not being able to configure this option, and answered questions from the Commission. Commissioner Waters thanked the staff for their efforts in resolving the problem. He expressed his support for quickly implementing the parking program. Commissioner Norris said she believes a quick programming fix exists to solve the 30 - minute free code in the parking app. CM Corbin reiterated Flowbird told him there is no resolution to the system's programming. CM Corbin clarified the required parking payment process on the app and at the kiosk. Regular City Commission July 11, 2022 The Commission expressed CONSENSUS to move forward on this item. 4 REPORTS AND/OR REQUESTS FROM CITY COMMISSIONERS Commissioner Bole mentioned he is meeting with the Beaches Town Center leadership and invited the Commission to present topics for him to bring up at the meeting. Commissioner Kelly expressed thanks to the Recreation Department for the work they're doing regarding summer camps. She mentioned she would not be in attendance at the Town Hall or the next meeting. Commissioner Waters thanked CM Corbin for the work with the underground fiber optic and requested this project be an item on a Town Hall agenda. Mayor Glasser spoke about Town Center parking, the need to revisit the Employee parking concerns, and the city -to -city elements of the parking issues. She also thanked Lisa Griffis for sharing information regarding the cellphone tower. Mayor Glasser said she spoke with Verizon regarding the tower and shared information regarding Ms. Griffis' concerns. She asked PC Gualillo to speak about Officer Stafford's case. PC Gualillo explained the case involving Officer Stafford was finalized and spoke about the highlights of the case. 4A. In -House Attorney (Commissioner Bole) Commissioner Bole shared his research regarding considering an in-house attorney for the City. He spoke about the data collected during his research regarding personnel and financial benefits. He requested it as a topic for the July 16, 2022 Town Hall and stated he would bring a Resolution for formal consideration by the Commission. Commissioner Norris asked about the potential salary range, additional costs for an in- house attorney, and any savings the City would potentially earn. Mayor Glasser discussed the risks and rewards of hiring a full-time attorney and supported researching this topic in more detail. CA Durden shared comments on this item and mentioned she would also like to see the data regarding the risks and gains. CA Durden stated she supports what is in the City's best interest. Mayor Glasser summarized a resolution would be created (if needed), and the topic of an in-house city attorney would be presented for formal consideration at an upcoming Commission meeting. 5 UNFINISHED BUSINESS FROM PREVIOUS MEETINGS None. Regular City Commission July 11, 2022 6 7 8 CONSENT AGENDA 6A. Acknowledge receipt of the Monthly Financial Report for May 2022. This item was pulled for discussion. Finance Director (FD) Melissa Burns spoke to concerns from the Commission. MOTION. Approve Consent Agenda Item 6A as written. Motion: Candace Kelly Second: Brittany Norris Ellen Glasser For Bruce Bole For Michael Waters For Candace Kelly (Moved By) For Brittany Norris (Seconded By) For Motion passed S to 0. COMMITTEE REPORTS None. ACTION ON RESOLUTIONS 8A. RESOLUTION NO. 22-43 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH, FLORIDA, APPROVING THE ADDITION OF PAID PARENTAL LEAVE AS A CITY BENEFIT FOR ELIGIBLE EMPLOYEES. Mayor Glasser read the Resolution as written by title. Human Resources Director (HRD) Cathy Varian explained the Resolution. Commissioner Bole asked about any past or present employees that could benefit from this new benefit. HRD responded she was unsure of the numbers of past employees but expects some younger employees wishing to add to their families to utilize the new benefit. Commissioner Kelly asked about the cost effect on the City by offering this new benefit. HRD explained there is relatively no financial cost to the City, just loss of productivity while the employee is out on leave. MOTION. Adopt Resolution No. 22-43. Motion: Brittany Norris Second: Bruce Bole Regular City Commission July 11, 2022 Ellen Glasser For Bruce Bole (Seconded By) For Michael Waters For Candace Kelly For Brittany Norris (Moved By) For Motion passed S to 0. 9 ACTION ON ORDINANCES None. 10 MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS None. 11 CITY ATTORNEY/CITY CLERK REPORTS AND/OR REQUESTS CC Bartle will be on vacation next week. 12 CLOSING COMMENTS BY CITY COMMISSIONERS AND CITY MANAGER Commissioner Bole announced the Town Hall time at 10 AM on Saturday, July 16, 2022. CM Corbin spoke about the recent water line breach. Adjustments have been made to the work schedule (Utilities and Public Works Departments) to ensure staff is available during project work hours. He also mentioned a possible presentation at the next meeting that goes over specific departments responding to emergency situations. Mayor Glasser mentioned she received complaints regarding the water line breach and thanked the utility employees for their work. She also mentioned she wrote a proclamation last week to recognize the 102nd birthday of Robert Johnson, who was a polar explorer aboard USS Bayer. She mentioned Commissioner Kelly attended the event to wave the Navy flag. 13 ADJOURNMENT There being no further discussion, Mayor Glasser declared the meeting adjourned at 8:22 PM. Attest: Donna L. Bartle, City Clerk Date Approved: 4110 Zdz.5 11� 16 '-, &111-�� Bruce Bole, Commissioner Regular City Commission July 11, 2022 Attachment A to 7-11-22 Minutes COMPLETE STREETS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN MAIN 5 l REST CORRIDn p Attachment A to 7-11-22 Minutes TABLE OF CONTENTS 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w 0 0 0 O O w a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 -- TITLE PAGE NUMBER PROJECT TEAM 3 COMPLETE STREETS VISION 4 COMPLETE STREETS POLICY 5 PROJECT APPROACH 7 TRAFFIC CALMING 8 SHORT-TERM 19 RECOMMENDATIONS LONG-TERM 27 RECOMMENDATIONS FUNDING STRATEGIES 30 NEXT STEPS 31 APPENDIX 32 Attachment A to 7-11-22 Minutes TEAM INFORMATION: • Mayor of the City of Atlantic Beach o Mayor Ellen Glasser • Commissioner Of Atlantic Beach o Commissioner Brittany Norris Seat 5 Mayor Pro Tem • City of Atlantic Beach City Manager o Shane Corbin AICP • City of Atlantic Beach Planning Director, Amanda Askew, AICP • Chief of Police, Chief Vic Gualillo • City of Atlantic Beach City Engineer, Steve Swan PE • Public Works Director, Scott Williams R!R AE Engineering, Inc. ❑i DDEC, LLC M0 Heather Neville, AICP1113 Uyen Dang, PE PLANN IN6 a c (D (D U) cu Q- 0 S 0 0 r~ S 0 o o rD LA X r+ rr O rD n0 Ln �' (D S tQlf VQ -0C rt fD n `G OO N w sL S O (D (D S Q UQ O r+ '-+ sv 0 LA CL N N^ � �, 3 o Q- -+, 0 ; c�0n o = �. r° �, 0 3 -t o cn � O=r < (D `< S _•r Di O C O Q Ln Q� cn N C" � N C i. Vf o N �, cra �* Q' L (D M m sv m m � X CL n r* O Attachment A to 7-11-22 Minute WHAT IS COMPLETE STREETS? X11 . •f: - Per the accepted definition by the US Department of Transportation, Complete Streets are streets designed and operated to enable safe use and support mobility for all users. Those include people of all ages and abilities, regardless of whether they are travelling as drivers, pedestrians, bicyclists, or public transportation riders. The concept of Complete Streets encompasses many approaches to planning, designing, and operating roadways and rights of way with all users in mind to make the transportation network safer and more efficient. Complete Street policies are set at the state, regional, and local levels and are frequently supported by roadway design guidelines. Complete Streets approaches vary based on community context. They may address a wide range of elements, such as sidewalks, bicycle lanes, bus lanes, public transportation stops, crossing opportunities, median islands, accessible pedestrian signals, curb extensions, modified vehicle travel lanes, streetscape, and landscape treatments. Complete Streets reduce motor vehicle -related crashes and pedestrian risk, as well as bicyclist risk when well-designed bicycle -specific infrastructure is included (Reynolds, 2009). They can promote walking and bicycling by providing safer places to achieve physical activity through transportation. One study found that 43% of people reporting a place to walk were significantly more likely to meet current recommendations for regular physical activity than were those reporting no place to walk (Powell, Martin, Chowdhury, 2003). While Complete Streets is a framework to construct roads, it is also a path to placemaking inclusive of all community members. The City adopted the local Complete Streets Policy October 25, 2021. This policy can be located in the appendix of this document. WHAT IS A COMPLETE STREET? D D E C A Complete Streets approach integrates people and place in the planning, design, construction, operation, and maintenance of our transportation network. 4 6 10k, Image 1: Example of Complete Street Cross Section Attachment A to 7-11-22 Minutes COMPLETE STREETS POLICY: • ! • • • • • ® �" 4 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ® 0 • • 0 0 The proposed Implementation Plan for the Main Street Complete Streets project includes various components such as leadership workshops and preliminary recommendations. Considering the newly adopted Complete Streets policy, the Team was tasked to elevate community awareness through communication within the Main Street Corridor and adjacent neighborhood roads. This allowed better understanding on how the community interacts with the City of Atlantic Beach leadership as well as local vision and technical understanding of public roads. The implementation plan providing scalable solutions for near, mid and long term programs and projects to support the policy. ' Project Timeline Capital Improvement Plan Local Budget to Build Projects Stakeholder Engagement ft— Oqt ayonOSd" am lellow In adW to Ilean t. CoWbaete r th a hf— d ft .WUng natetrowen. cnnstru._Uon 1 ngw"':mny Insp'r.tr:m -0 -Wrma'a'"� .at d.Mp .ed. Identify and Prioritize Wtl tlly as aw w" poucw. propratr anti Prolene W etrotayln ft'WN optwne ler Mure wealaprtrnt ottl errua Mmnxlnity vlebn a met rbuwq Ie mwmlie ae PbYewat sedol. oriel tan�an wrv4otttrNKal Itrpace a vgern orw eetpltwwYip awlpn b atlwr ttr t»et atbrnaMe. Final Engineering I. rind «tpkwM1w d..qn phM N to as heldn0 wllkM N ro a lft-1 th. M"a • 1- 2 years • Duration of Project 1- 2 years i 1- 2 years 1> 1- 2 years D D E C The local policy that was recently adopted is an excellent steppingstone towards addressing community needs and desires. The implementation plan will address the needs of a local municipality will support projects that staff and leadership can plan to fund and execute. Placemaking, road design and neighborhood character can have expected outcomes when policy including zoning, code and budget objectives are align. We provide near-term updates to enhance and further the intent of the policy. Attachment A to 7-11-22 Minutes PROJECT APPROACH: 0 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 An Informative Approach To address the scope set forth by the City of Atlantic Beach, the project Team chose to approach the project area of Main Street Complete Streets through education to achieve maximum results. With the very recent adoption of the Complete Streets Policy by City leadership, it is important to introduce the project through communication of community awareness in order to provide design concepts that reflected both the policy as well as the local communities desires as it related to their local neighborhood road. Concurrently, the Team conducted a detailed traffic analysis, crash analysis along with utilities coordination to further understand the complexity of short-term and long-term implementation. The following made through ME the goal of Main this, a fundame components to components of sa Attachment A to 7-11-22 MinutA TRAFFIC CALMING APPROACH WHAT IS TRAFFIC CALMING? Traffic calming is a low impact solution to achieve complete streets within the local roadway network. As a strategy it can reduce the negative effect of drivers utilizing the roadway network. It is effective in many communities where traditional road design or land development uses of an area has resulted in unintended consequence of cut through traffic and speeding. Traffic calming can alter driver behavior for any street network. The goals of traffic calming are: 1. Reduce crashes 2. Enhance quality of life for residents and visitors 3. Enhance safety The Main Street Corridor serves as a primary north south collector road of the Marsh Oaks Neighborhood. Through data collection from COAB Police Department- 2/11/202 to 2/20/2020 and 1/24/2021 to 1/31/2021, the team found that most traffic volumes are cut through traffic to avoid heavy congestion on Mayport Road intersections and direct access to the Levy Road and Dutton Island signalized intersections. To reduce cut through traffic, a series of traffic calming strategies are considered for Main Street. A balance of intersection treatment such as the existing mini roundabout are proposed to maintain residential access while reducing cut through traffic on Main Street from 2nd Avenue to Levy Road. This is where most of the residential access is being impacted. North of Levy Road are commercial use with no recommendations for traffic calming. For Traffic Calming Design Considerations: • Target speed is 20MPH • Most effective use for traffic calming devices is between 300' to 500'. • Devices should not be less than 150' from intersection or bridge approach Through a series of internal and external engagement and coordination, the following traffic calming devices are preferred for the City of Atlantic Beach. • Divided Median - create a pinch point for traffic in the center of the roadway. • Narrow Road - restrict motorists from operating at high speeds and yield to pass this device. • Mini Roundabout - reduce traffic speeds at intersections by requiring motorists to move with caution through conflict points. Attachment A to 7-11-22 Minutes PROJECT APPROACH Quantitative data was collected through several avenues. The City of Atlantic Beach provided traffic counts, right of way maps, As-builts, and other useful technical data that is provided in the appendix of this report. The Team utilized Signal 4 Analytics to gather traffic data including crashes. The Team also performed site visits to observe the existing environment and cross section. This information was utilized to begin the process of developing conceptual designs for informational purposes to guide conversation with staff internally to prepare for public meetings. Referenced Manuals: • FDOT Florida Design Manual (FDM) • Manual for Uniform Traffic Control Design (MUTCD) • FHWA Small Town and Rural Multimodal Networks • NACTO Urban Streets Design Guide • NACTO Urban Bikeway Design Guide Attachment A to 7-11-22 Minutes SITE VISIT: The project Team performed many site visits such as drive throughs and on in person foot visits. The Team conducted a community walk with City planning staff to observe existing traffic patterns, adjacent land -use, modal usage, connectivity, access and other transportation elements that may be affected by change. Site visits were conducted in the evening as well as daytime. More detailed information is referenced in the exhibit section under memo/site visit memo/Main St. City walk. Locati®ntent A to 7-11-22 Minutes MAIN STREET THE CURRENT LENGTH IS 1 MILE LONG THE EXISTING LANE CONFIGURATION HAS 2 LANES WITH SOME ON STREET PARKING IQ CURRENT POSTED SPEED IS 25 MPH TABLE 1 CORRIDOR CHARACTERISTICS: EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY EXISTING CONDTIONS: . 1. - n r e d M 1 I D - s. S . . . . . . . . . . . Existing conditions are no sidewalks along the corridor lacking ADA accessibility from West 1st Street to Levy Road. North of Levy Road has a continuous sidewalk on the East side of Main Street. No dedicated bicycle facilities within the City's bicycle network or signing/ pavement markings to designate a bicycle route. Now parking utilization with 3 parked vehicles during daytime (12/1/2021) and 1 vehicle nighttime (6p.m. 11/30/2021). The neighborhood is lined with trees with low light visibility. Some traffic calming devices are present but the spacing is not consistent with best practices for target speed design. CHARACTERISTICS: -It . 111 Ir -, M_�... ....... Main Street is classified as a local road classified in the City of Atlantic Beach roadway network. Sidewalks are nonexistent along the corridor, but curb and gutter are generally present, and lighting and utility poles are located along the west side of the roadway. There are no traffic signals along this corridor with primary intersections like Levy Road that provide access East/West of the Marsh Oaks Neighborhood District tachme tot 7-11 22nM nut RAS H SUMMARY: CRASH ANALYSIS .... • • • ......... e . ► .......... ....•.... A community-based analysis was conducted within Marsh Oaks Neighborhood with three- year crash data obtained from University of Florida's Signal Four Analytics, including both long -form and short -form crashes between November 5th, 2019, and November 11th, 2021. A total of 5 crashes were recorded on Main Street over the three-year period. No prevailing crash patterns were identified, and neither bicycle nor pedestrian related crashes were recorded. Most recorded crashes were property damage only crashes, and most crashes occurred during daylight conditions. Most of the crashes involved a parked vehicle. CRASH DATA ...... a* ... a ............. . • Many crashes are in the afternoon during Monday through Friday • Many crashes are on the State Highway system such as A1A and Mayport Rd. EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES ........... 0. *.. *... n Existing traffic volume is relatively low with an ADT of 548 for 2021 and 2258 for 2020. Posted speed along the corridor is 25MPH. Main Street Crash Statistics 3 -year ar..h data from 11/18 -11/21 e Total of, , o -hes 3/5 crash.s Involved 3/ 5 —hes during NO pedestrian and bicyclist crash ss N t k(: d vehicle daytime Do I—I—n YM IV-- ro 1111/7.71 Location: MAIN STREET Almost 85% of crashes results in non -injury < 80% AL More than 80% crashes occur during the daytime Main Street Crash Statistics 3 /r ),crash dot. 13/5crnhe.involv.d 3/5crashescl.nn l l g � N O pedestrian and Gro 11/18-11/21 bityclia trash I {f ? 04 j r 1 Less than 3% Total of ,J crashes Parked while daytime involved in alcohol F 4W 9AWmeWn 4W W 4W 4W W W 1W W 4W 4W to 7-11-22 Minutes CONNECTIVTY NETWORK: Bicycle connectivity is planned in the vicinity of the corridor, connecting Main Street, the Marsh Oaks Neighborhood, and the surrounding neighborhood. Main Street is designated as a bicycle route within the City's Bicycle Connectivity Plan. Main Street connects to other planned bicycle corridors such as Levy Road and Dutton Island Road to the Mayport Commercial District. It also connects residents to the Dutton Island Preserve and the extensive trail network as a local amenity to the City of Atlantic Beach. Main Street is designated as a cycle route for low traffic volume, a bike boulevard, or a neighborhood bikeway. WHAT IS A BIKE BOULEVARD OR A NEIGHBORHOOD BIKEWAY? ................ 6. *.. 0 . .......... 0. * *. * #. *....... ..... .......... 0.. *. *.. * .... *.**.* ...... . A Bike Boulevard or a Neighborhood Bikeway is a low stress local streets network where vehicle traffic and speed are designed to be kept at low volumes to make it safer for pedestrians and bicyclists. Many communities have called it quiet streets, slow streets, or neighborhood bikeways. A Bike Boulevard design is a complete streets strategy to enhance safety on Main Street. • Slow Streets — safe mobility for all • Prioritize pedestrian and bicyclist safety • Lower vehicular speed design Source: Rural Design Guide - Bike Boulevard There are many ways to enhance the existing neighborhood bikeway on local streets through the following: 1.Adding shared lane pavement markings ("Sharrows") to alert drivers to expect bicyclist in the streets and help people along the bicycle route 2. Improving crossing on major streets 3.Adding wayfinding signage to guide people to local and regional destinations 4. Discourage cut throughs through means of traffic calming Attachment A to 7-11-22 Minutes PROJECT COORDINATION: QUALITATIVE: .... 1 .................... . To better understand the qualitative aspects of the project area, the Team utilized several methodology, includes: • Face-to-face meetings with internal stakeholders, • One-on-one meetings with local elected officials, • Site visits on our own as well as with city staff on two occasions, • Online and printed survey, • Social media posts, • and two public meetings. City staff provided a stakeholder list inclusive of email addresses. The Team gathered stakeholder information from elected officials and survey response data. We coordinated with stakeholder via emails in three separate occasions to inform residents of upcoming surveys as well as public meetings. The Team utilized the City's mailing list to inform residents of the project. This information was then reviewed by staff to arrive at various values identified by residents and officials to drive which concepts would be provided to the community for this report. This process is useful for when there is a new program or procedure locally that requires additional information for stakeholders to make decisions upon. This process was a success to get locals engaged and thinking about potential projects instead of deciding on a project that may or may not be supported locally either by residents, other stakeholders, or have an easily available solution considering the existing right of way and infrastructure. This allowed the task to remain focused on the corridor as well as the purpose of this scope which included near-, short- and long-term concepts to address local concerns. Complete Streets is intended to provide a toolbox of scalable solutions to address needs now and in the future. This comprehension by locals was deemed as valuable a task to the project as the concepts themselves. Attachment A to 7-11-22 Minutes PUBLIC MEETING: Two public meetings were held on December 16th at 1:30 and 5:00 pm for approximately 1.5 hours. A PowerPoint presentation which is provided in the appendix of this document was presented by team members Heather Neville from AE and Uyen Dang from DDEC. An interactive component included a type of puzzle where attendees were able to select puzzle pieces reflective of what they would like to see in the cross-section but only allow them to select enough options that would fit within the available right of way. The presentation focused on providing education about Complete Streets, community Placemaking, and how we utilize quantitative data with qualitative data to arrive at an outcome that satisfies the most needs. The public meeting was showcased on the cover of the local newspaper (see appendix), which supported additional attendees to the meeting. DD EC MAIN STREET Complete Streets Implementation M4RSw OAKS where doves wmtwn7 ,'� ; ., , f '� �r r_;1 E II Attachment A to 7-11-22 Minutes PUBLIC MEETING: Through preliminary survey results, more than 90% of the community was not aware of the City of Atlantic Beach Complete Streets Policy. Residents were expected to see final design and constructability concepts. The common theme and feedback received during the meeting was speeding and access. Many suggestions from local residents who attended the meeting was project specific to Main Street and show displeasure for a prior concept been initiated in past years. Specific concern relates to sidewalks, the mini roundabout, and other small improvements that have been executed by local staff were discussed. The most important key takeaway from the public meetings was the lack of awareness by the community and the need to educate the community more on public processes to arrive at a project. Also, there are varying opinions based on individuals' relationship to the project itself and how it will impact their daily lives. This is expected however for any project to move forward there needs to be an understanding of trade-offs. The puzzle exercise utilized during the public meeting showcased this well and opened attendees' eyes to how important it is to seek input but also to be willing to accept trade-offs. The project Team developed a Complete Streets Puzzle as educational for the adopted Complete Streets Policy. The Team presented attendees with a Complete Streets postcard for share the knowledge with loved ones during the holiday season. t A to 7-11-22 nMinutes SURVEY RESULTS: The team utilized the SurveyMonkey tool to gather basic information and a basic understanding of local understanding of the Complete Streets policy and temperature on various trade-offs and types of construction opportunities available. By design, the survey was meant to be simple and easy to use and assist in the planning process in information gathering fees that this project is currently in. • 91 responses were collected. 31.87% were residents of Main Street, 43.96% were residents of Marsh Oaks, 100% were residents of Atlantic Beach and six owned a business in the neighborhood. Comments centered on a desire for safe roads with dedicated space for all modes. When posed with a trade-off question, responses were evenly distributed across the four options below: 1. Parking 2. Trees 3. Easement on property for sidewalk 4. Slower Streets • This indicates there is not a current agreement on which project to move forward with beyond improvement to connectivity for all modes. This does support a (ower community impact project in the near-term while a larger construction project and its aspects need to be further understood and weighted against trade-offs to attain community support. • 100% of responses support 20mph design speed objectives set forth by staff and supported by the Complete Streets Policy. • 73% of respondents were unaware of the updated policy change indicating the need for more communication and education. _ 31.9% 31.87% were residents of Main Street 44% 43.96% were residents of Marsh Oaks 100% 100% of responses support 20mph design speed objectives set forth by staff and supported by the Complete Streets Policy. Attachment A to 7-11-22 Minutes New program is designed for safe transportation in AB Atlantic Beach officials are seeking community in- put to implement a new program designed to facilitate safe and cohesive transportation citywide. The City Commission recently adopted the Complete Streets Policy, designed to facilitate travel for drivers, pedes- trians, bicyclists, shared mobility and mass transit op- erators. A stakeholder's open house will be held at i and 5 p.m. today in the Atlantic Beach Commission Cham- bers. The meeting will focus on traffic calming and placemaking for the Main Street and the Marsh Oaks neighborhood, and surrounding businesses. Each session will begin with a 20 -minute presenta- tion and a survey will be distributed to attendees to help measure interest in the Complete Streets policy. Consultants with AE Engineering Inc. and Traffic Spe- cialist DDEC will assist city staff in establishing short - and long-term recommendations for the project area. 11*1*� Pill RECOMMENDATIONS: The following recommendations are based on the qualitative and quantitative data collected throughout the project. They are broken down into short-, mid-, and, long- term solutions. There are quick and cost-effective options that can start to address residential concern of the Main Street Corridor and Marsh Oaks neighborhood. Some technical constraints includes existing right away, underground utilities infrastructure and existing drainage pattern. Other factors include lack of consensus on certain features such as a sidewalk. The Team have provided conceptual designs to illustrate the recommendations as it relates to future construction projects as well as programming the existing right of way as a methodology to address near- and short- term solutions. Attachment A to 7-11-22 Minut SHORT-TERM RECOMMENDATIONS: Short-term recommendations can be executed in a relatively short period of time with minimal planning and funding. Short-term concepts have the ability to secure future capital investments to ensure community vision of the Main Street corridor. The recommendations are community best practices and consistent with the Complete Streets policy. Developing additional components to the existing Complete Streets Policy is a way to support long-term capital improvements for the City. Throughout the process of this project, the Team coordinated with staff various to address other concerns and roads within the community. Some recommendations are not limited to only Main Street but can be translated to other roads within the Marsh Oaks Neighborhood. Much of the near and short-term recommendations is communication and education. They key messaging to leadership and the public about the Complete Street policy, what it means to have a Complete Street, and how to get the most out of your capital improvements to achieve the goals of the policy. To do this, the Team recommend the City take a multi -pronged approach so that there is consistency and continuum of design going forward that is supported by the community. More education and more communication about this will help also and longer-term projects as the community becomes more aware of public process and how projects come about. Policy updates: The City should consider adding second layer to the Complete Streets policy such as Vision Zero with additional initiatives that support the program. Vision Zero, reviewing existing code to ensure road design and inclusive features, as well as reviewing zoning to ensure it provides the most support to meet Complete Streets policy objectives. Parking minimums and maximums, utilization of curbs, design speed and signage, would all support how the policy is able to be utilized without conflicting with other guiding documents. This also makes the permitting process more straight forward for the general public with expected outcomes. Attachment A to 7-1N RT -TERM RECOMMENDATIONS CON'T: Complete Streets Website: Developing a City of Atlantic Beach Complete Streets website will allow localize resources for residents to have better understand of the City's new policy along with upcoming complete streets projects. Having a focused site for a complex new policy with such broad uses for so many different types of roads and Placemaking will support a more informed community. This will also help with future zoning and land development, diverse and new concepts and support long-term projects. Sharrows : Implementing the City Connectivity Plan through the usage of sharrows on low speed roads. Sharrows is a shared -lane marking indicating where cyclists can ride. Cars have to give cyclists 3 feet of space when passing. Under Florida Law, bicycles have the same rights and responsibilities as a motor vehicle. Public Education : Communication is centralize to the success of Complete Streets implementation. The Team recommends the City engage in a public education campaign maximizing the website, social media and public meeting spaces to workshop the community. This will help begin with the fundamentals and move towards developing project concepts and designs that are more inclusive of available updated cross sections and what the community currently is aware of. This will expand the options staff has to use to solve community requests readily available, reducing costs over time. Bicycle Education Campaign Attachment A to'.1'9-TERM RECOMMENDATIONS CON'T: Street Play, Cyclovia and other open street event play days are a concept currently used across many cities and counties in the State of Florida. The basis of the project teaches road users how to operate within the road while vehicles are moving about. V C) Frequently, public comments regarding road safety and speed of vehicles address how the road makes them feel. This is not to disregard public comment about those issues because we know all too well that they do exist, however motor vehicles current iteration provides for a quiet comfort use while inside a vehicle. This has impacted road users, especially those outside of a vehicle, senses to perceive information. Street Play also typically helps with local initiatives where offenders are typically each other's neighbors. This works well in many residential roads as well as main streets to educate the community all at one time and a fun and inviting way. The cost varies depending on how the municipality or other agency wants to execute this project. it can be as simple as an in street block party or as robust where we seen 5K is parades etc. Attachment A to 7-1SHIMT-TERM RECOMMENDATIONS CON'T : The goal for short- and mid- term improvement is to improve safety utilizing the latest standards and specifications to enhance the existing conditions. Short and Mid -Term Safety improvements for Main Street are the following: Lighting_ Coordinate with 1EA through the existing City franchise agreement to add new luminaries to existing utility poles. There are currently 19 poles on the West side and 18 on the east side. With many poles at the intersections, this will allow added illumination and enhance safety for all users. Pavement Markings: Update and enhance all stop bars to meet minimum standards of 24" white per FDOT Design standards. 0 o Signage: Coordinate with Public Works to check reflectivity on all regulatory signs such as "Stop" signs. Measure the retroreflectivity in accordance with ASTM D4956. ADA Accessibility_ The existing ADA accessibility is limited within the right of way. Utilize existing pavement width and implement complete streets within FHWA, MUTCD and FDM guidance to enhance pedestrian access and as interim solution while capital improvement projects may take many years to implement. With short-term and long-term vision, the recommended design and target speed is 20MPH. Due to the existing crash frequency and the crash type on Main Street, the recommendation is to remove existing parking to allow space for pedestrian and bicyclist access. Existing Mini Roundabout: The existing roundabout does not meet minimal signing and pavement markings. Utilize MUTCD for additional pavement markings and advance warning for traffic calming at the intersection. 10100 10101010100 10*10104 Attachment A to 7-11-22 SHORT- TERM IMPROVEMENTS CONT: Option 1: Pedestrian Lane A pedestrian lane is a short-term improvement on low and moderate speeds and volumes to designate space on the roadway for pedestrian usage. The implement this design, provide signing and pavement markings for a Pedestrian Lane as recommended from Chapter 5 of FHWA Small Town and Rural Multimodal Networks to be consistent with the City's Complete Streets policy and the City's bicycle network. The pedestrian lane limits are proposed on Main Street from West 1st Street to Levy Road. There is an existing sidewalk on the East side of Main Street north of Levy Road. Implementing "sharrows" north of Levy Road will alert drivers to acknowledge that there are bicyclists utilizing the right of way. D D E C What is a PEDESTRIAN LANE? Pedestrian lanes should be designed to support and promote side-by-side walking within the land. r Because of the lack of physical separation, additional width beyond this should be included for added comfort. 8 ft (2.4 m) width Is preferred. PED ONLY legend marking and/or Pedestrian symbol marking to identify the pedestrian lane to all users. 5 ft (1.5 m) width is the minimum to allow for side-by-side walking and maneuverability by users of mobility devices. Pedestrian Warning sign (Wil -2) paired with an "ON ROADWAY" legend plaque may be used to indicate to drivers to expect pedestrians within the paved road surface. R8-1 W11-2 NO PARKING ON PAVEMENT ON ROADWAY Category Recommendations • •• • • t �� Design Speed 20MPH El FDOT FDM Chapter 19 - Traditional Neighborhood Rf Lane Width 9f FDOT FDM Chapter 19 - Traditional a Neighborhood Sharrows Shared Lane Marking should be placed immediately after an FDOT Design Manual Section 233.3 Shared Lanes Markings E] r ,1 I� intersection and spaced at intervals not greater than 2009 MUTCD - Chapter 9C U i 250 feet thereafter. Shared Lane Markings. *Pedestrian Lane 6' with 2' buffer Chapter 5 of FHWA Small Town and Rural Multimodal °` on X side Networks "Parking No on street parking n n n *The complexity of the pedestrian lane is the offset of the centerline of the roadway and the existing roundabout at Main Street and 9th which will require a redesign of the intersection with minor drainage and utilities relocation. **Eliminate all parking along the corridor due to low parking utilization and most crashes are parked vehicles. _____-__-____AA Attachment A to 7-11-22 SHORT-TERM IMPROVEMENTS CON'T: Option 2: Advisory Shoulder .............................. An advisory shoulder is used to accommodate pedestrian and bicyclists on roadway segments that is too narrow. The "motorists may only enter the shoulder when there are no bicyclists" or pedestrian present. Typical application with low to moderate traffic volume. Volume criteria based on FHWA MUTCD guidance with vehicle traffic lower than 3000ADT. Recornmendatioms Reference Design Speed 20MPH FDOT FDM Chapter 19 - rj r) u u rl u Traditional Neighborhood Lane Width 16' Shared i ❑ Elr El Sharrows 1 j i= FDOT Design Manual Section 233.3 Shared Lanes Markings ❑ Recornmendatioms Reference Design Speed 20MPH FDOT FDM Chapter 19 - rj r) u u rl u Traditional Neighborhood Lane Width 16' Shared FDOT FDM Chapter 19 - Traditional Neighborhood ❑ Elr El Sharrows Shared Lane Marking should be placed immediately after an FDOT Design Manual Section 233.3 Shared Lanes Markings ❑ El intersection and spaced at intervals not greater than 2009 MUTCD - Chapter 9C Shared Lane Markings. 250 feet thereafter. Advisory Shoulder 5' each direction Chapter 5 Small Town and Rurur alt Mut Multimodal El Networks "Parking No on street parking ❑ ❑ ❑ Intersection Treatment Mountable Roundabouts **Eliminate all parking along the corridor due to low parking utilization and the majority of crashes are porhed vehicles. 1& 9& ift 9& a I& I& I& I& II& III& II& I& A Attachment A to 7 -11 -POE IMAKING AND COMPLETE STREETS: Placemaking and Complete Streets are synonymous now as the movement towards safer mobility for all has evolved. The Marsh Oaks neighborhood is filled with natural beauty and plenty of public destinations for residents and visitors alike to enjoy. Creating equal access to all road users and residents can not be under estimated as a significant way to improve the quality of life and access by harnessing the public right of way. Equally, this will provide residents within the neighborhood access to other locations around Atlantic Beach including the ocean and commercial destinations. Leveraging Complete Streets, the City could consider public art installation, respite focused parklets including benches and added trees, as well as potential for a district approach capitalizing on the beautifully named floral streets. While working on this project, the Team began referring to Marsh Oaks as the Garden District. Concepts like these can drive long term objectives, create a sense of pride in a neighborhood and establish potential themes around which design decisions can be made. ENHANCING BEAUTY IN THE COMMUNITY Attachment A t°'��'I�ii`=�t70 LONG-TERM RECOMMENDATIONS: 0000..00•00000000000060*0*•••000000 MID-TERM RECOMMENDATIONS: r r e r r r r r r e e r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r Mid-term recommendations include more robust design, striping and other construction type projects that would not require extensive rearranging of the right of way or underground utilities. These recommendations were reviewed by the team as a reflection of what the community has said that they would like to see for the Main St. Corridor. With an emphasis on safety, speed management by design, the utilization of a 20 -mph design speed accompanied by other vertical concepts including lighting and signage, these concepts can be done in relatively short amount of time depending on local budget and desire to complete these projects. LONG-TERM RECOMMENDATIONS: 0 r 2 Y 0 0 r& O O O W 0 r O r 9 r r r 0® 0 b,!< r 0 0 r 0 r r 0 r 0 0 Long-term recommendations can encompass a lot more of the elements that the community desires however as a name suggest, they are longer term due to their costs and construction requirements. A complete redesign of Main Street to include additional features would also require utility as well as tree removal or relocation. These projects typically are within the capital improvement program year five and require additional design and engineering and potentially other added needs such as real estate easements. Long-term improvements for Main Street shall consist of revisiting all underground improvements and subsurface infrastructures as a major reconstruction project. The existing as -bunts utilities provided by the City Engineering Staff are dated 1990 with Sanitary Sewer running along the centerline of the roadway. This placement of utilities may affect median planting that will not meet the City's minimum utilities separation. The existing 8" watermain is on the West side of Main Street may need to be relocated for proposed sidewalk placement. Attachment A to 7-11-22 MinutesLONG-TERMIMPROVEMENTS: Option 1: Slow Street ......... a ..... 4. 0. *.. *.. 0 ... A slow street design will include a series of lateral shift/chicane for on street parking and new intersection improvements. Utilizing striping as a traffic calming technique is less disruptive to emergency service vehicles without no vertical or horizontal elements within the roadway surface. This concept will accommodate residential parking demand and allow adequate access for emergency service vehicles. Alternating dedicated parking space through each blocks will give the visual effect of a lateral shift or chicane within the corridor and is universally recognized as a traffic calming strategy. Traffic calming striping gives the visual impression that roadway width has been reduced, which has been shown to slow vehicles down while traveling along a roadway. This type of striping will not slow down emergency service vehicles utilizing the roadway or adversely affect traffic operations. Recommendations Design Speed 20MPH FDOT FDM Chapter 19 - Traditional Neighborhood El El 0 Lane Width 10' each FDOT FDM Chapter 19 - Traditional Neighborhood k y $harrows Shared Lane Marking should be placed immediately after an FDOT Design Manual Section 233.3 Shared Lanes Markings lry,� l 1u=! intersection and spaced at intervals not greater than 2009 MUTCD -Chapter 9C❑ Shared Lane Markings. 250 feet thereafter. Sidewalk 5' FDOT FDM Chapter 19 - Ef 1:1 1:1Traditional Neighborhood Parking Street parking on the Driveway Counts El E Intersection Treatment Mountable Roundabouts Tabled Intersection ❑ ffi' Attachment A t "-22 &ffin,-Aps ES OF LONG—TERM IMPROVEMENTS: Option 2: Advisory Bike Lane .00* ......... 0 ............... Consistent with the advisory shoulder presented in a short-term option #2, the Advisory Bike Lane (ABL) will maintain the existing curb line without major reconstruction or a change in drainage pattern. This alternative will provide traditional sidewalk on both sides of the street to maintain Complete Streets. A shared use path or wide sidewalk on one side is not recommended for Main Street due to the existing residential driveways and building setbacks. Creating a 10' path will place adjacent property owners in noncompliant of residential parking and vehicle overhang of the existing right of way. What is an Advisory Bike Lane? Advisory Bike Lane is a shared space for bicyclists and motorists within narrow streets. Unlike a shared street, Advisory Bike Lanes accommodate two-way car traffic while dedicating safe space for bicyclists. Main Street is a low traffic volume (s 5,000 ADT) network with vehicular speed of less than 30MPH. These installations fall in line with the contextual guidance provided for the Advisory Shoulder treatment featured in the FHWA Small Town and Rural Multimodal Networks document. Advisory Bike Lane shall be installed from West 1st Street to Levy Road, North of Levy should be a traditional 5' bike lane due to the the 60' right of way will allow for a higher level of service. All 11& 9& M& 9& 9& 9& 11" 9& 9& 9& A Recommendations L••v Design Speed 20MPH FDOT FDM Chapter 19 - Traditional NeighborhoodLi � r-7 LLJ Lane Width 16' Shared FDOT FDM Chapter 19 - Traditional Neighborhood ❑ a-' e Shared Lane Marking should be placed FDOT Design Manual Section Sharrows immediately after an 233.3 Shared Lanes Markings El intersection and spaced at intervals not greater than 2009 MUTCD -Chapter 9C '---' 250 feet thereafter. Shared Lane Markings. Advisory Bike Lane 5 each direction Chapter 5 of FHWA Small TownE and Rural Multimodal ❑ ° ` E] Networks Sidewalk 6' FDOT FDM Chapter 19 - Traditional Neighborhood ❑ ❑ Intersection Treatment Mountable Roundabouts Tabled Intersection All 11& 9& M& 9& 9& 9& 11" 9& 9& 9& A Attac nt A- 1 - to 7-11-22 Minutes ENGINEERS ESTIMATE A detailed engineers estimate is provided in the appendix. *Long-term engineering estimate subject to change due to market conditions Planning $53,020 $53,020 $53,020 $200,000 Design $63,870 $42,580 $42,580 $600,00 Construction $258,120 $43,020 $172,080 $3,817,480 Construction 20% Contingency $51,624 $8,604 $34,416 $190,874 CEI $0 $0 $0 $190,874 Total $426,634 $147,224 $302,096 $5,571,850 A detailed engineers estimate is provided in the appendix. *Long-term engineering estimate subject to change due to market conditions Attachment A to 7-11-22 Minutes FUNDING STRATEGIES: Funding strategies directly correlate to which policies, procedures, and projects City leadership and residents desire. Funding mechanisms include the local general fund, potentially bonding for larger projects, as well as seeking grant funds from state and federal resources. Potential funds through the state include the FDOT LAP program, TAP program and Safe Routes to School. In order to attain those find these projects must be listed with the North Florida Transportation and Planning Organization(NFTPO) is a priority of Atlantic Beach and Duval county. This process is straightforward and requires a scope and fee estimate for the project to be submitted to the NFTPO board via the City's representative to the Technical Committee. There can be multiple projects listed with the TPO since there are various funding sources available as the TPO funnels all state funds to projects that are not direct grant receivership to the city. The Federal Administration has also released extensive funds available post Covid- era in order to stimulate various parts of our local economies, making it a good time to seek out those types of funds. Projects must be outlined with a scope to reflect the required bullet points within those guidelines depending on the fund source. Money currently can be used for every stage of projects including planning, design, construction, and purchase of property. The process is very straightforward however in order to receive funds there will be some steps in the City must execute depending on the funding strategy. These include things such as: • shovel ready projects i.e. having complete designs ready to go, • projects that are fully supported by the community via public meeting and votes, • potential concurrency projects across different groups including Parks and Recreation, Florida Inland Navigation, or others who might have a vested interest in creating better access to the river. There's also an element of sustainability and resiliency as it relates to a full reconstruction project and those superlatives help attain more funding for local communities to stretch local dollars. Depending on the project or projects the City selects the Team will draft scope language and general fee estimates to support the next steps. Attachment A to 7-11-22 Minutes NEXT STEPS: Next steps include the city and residents deciding on a path. The Main Street Corridor is a very beautiful local neighborhood road with low traffic, amazing trees, several neighborhood amenities, and is in good condition on the surface. Enhancements to the road will only further enhance the March Oaks community as a destination as well as great place to live. The City should consider a more robust education and communication program to let residents know about the policy and how it can support their livability on their own roads as well as how it can help direct other areas including the commercial district. • City Commission to adopt the Main Street Implementation Plan • City Staff to develop a Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for short-term and long-term options • City Staff to coordinate with the North Florida Transportation Planning Organization for projects to be on the Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP). o This will allow project to receive future funds. • City to allocate funding for planning and design of short-term option • Develop constructability plan and with City Public Works Department • Implementation of short-term recommendations Attachment A to 7-11-22 Minutes U"!I:j I 11-1 Attachment A to 7-11-22 Minutes SCOPE: , — *x�, i • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 10, Overview The scope of services for this contract includes providing Planning and Engineering staff to assist the City of Atlantic Beach on the following tasks Task 1: ,, x� n. + u a o e. e e e e r e s o s. e e> e. r e .. o e .. e s r e. e e r e. e• r♦ s e e r e • Review existing conditions of existing planning documents • Traffic analysis • Comprehensive plan • Bicycle network • Parking policy and other functionality of the corridor. Task 2: • Provide alternative corridor analysis for complete streets • Intersection improvements and connectivity nodes o including public engagement and workshops. Task 3: ... s e e e. e e .. e e e e. e e. e e ...... • Provide preliminary planning document Project Deliverables • Existing conditions memo • Initial design alternatives and workshop presentation materials • Planning document, typical sections and rendering • Prepare project website and communication strategy to engage stakeholders in Complete Streets • Workshop findings Attachment A to 7-11-22 Minutes AE ENGINEERING INC.: AE Engineering, Inc. (AE) has proudly based our headquarters in the City of Jacksonville since 2006. Our history in the area as a CEI firm means we have engineers on staff who know first hand how to manage design and cost aspects which help in the planning and design phases. AE has 16 Professional Engineers, 1 Professional Planner and now employs over 130 qualified professionals. AE is also a certified DBE and minority owned business. AE is proud of our new Planning Department with a 10 -year history in Northeast Florida focused on Strategic Planning. AE acquired VRUM Planning (VRUM) in 2020, formerly owned and founded by Director and Senior Transportation Planner, Heather Neville, AICP. VRUM's experience as a Transportation Planner, existing clients and regulatory relationships match AE's expected quality and desire to create better places for people. VRUM's support services include municipal and county level Transportation Planning and Traffic Review for bicycle, pedestrian, mobility, access, transit hub, safety, signage, sub area planning includes calculations, design and plan review as well as project management. Working with leadership on complex community concerns and defining a work plan, Heather assists in reaching successful outcomes that require policy maker approval, community support or projects defined objectives. This included working closely with the Transportation Planning Department, Parks & Recreation, GIS Systems and others. Results identified creative long-range concepts as well as practical and implementable measures including strategic funding, grant application and grant administration. ❑❑�� DDEC: DDEC is a boutique transportation engineering firm based in West Palm Beach, FL that is dedicated to reinventing the way the world moves through innovative planning, placemaking and engineering. DDEC is specialized in safety and mobility projects with special emphasis on community engagement and communications. DDEC's professional engineers are experienced in federally funded grant projects that can handle a project from conception to implementation. Founded with the core values of safe and sustainable infrastructures, DDEC is dedicated to creating change within the built environment. DDEC is also minority and women owned. Attachment A to 7-11-22 Minutes AE Engineering Inc. To: Amanda Askew, AICP Atlantic Beach, From: Heather Neville, AICP AE Engineering and Uyen Dang, PE DDEC CC: Shane Corbin, AICP City Manager Date: 12/15/2021 Re: Main Street Complete Street Task Public Engagement Outline AE and DDEC provide the following outline to promote the Public Engagement portion of the Main Street Complete Street Public Meeting. Meeting Info: • Date: 12/16/2021, Thursday • Time: 1:00PM — 2:30PM and 5:00 — 6:30PM • Location: Atlantic Beach City Commission Chamber • Materials: o Door to door flyer, 5.5"W' o Flyer PNG Format o Survey including QR Code and Electronic Sharable Link Launch locations and dates: • Stakeholder email list 12/9 and 12/14 • Nextdoor Post 12/9 and 12/15 • City Facebook Post 12/9 and 12/15 • Door to door on Main Street 12/10 Email and Nextdoor Content: • Art: Flyer The City of Atlantic Beach has engaged one of our continuing service firms, AE Engineering Inc. and Traffic Specialist DDEC to support the City's newly adopted Complete Streets Policy objectives. The first project will focus on Main Street and the Marsh Oaks neighborhood and businesses. Residents, businesses and others are invited to join the public outreach sessions. • What: Stakeholder Open House When: 12/16/2021 Where: Atlantic Beach Commission Chambers • Times: 1:OOPM - 2:30PM and 5:OOPM - 6:30PM • A Visioning Session for Main Street & Area From W 1st Street to Dutton Island Road • Focus -Traffic calming, place making AB Main Street CS Task Attachment A to 7-11-22 Minutes The program will be in an open house format with a 20 -minute presentation at the beginning of each session. Our consultant team has also prepared a survey to gauge community understanding and interest in the policy. Please consider attending, participating in the survey or sending an email with thoughts. Survey link: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/ABMainStreetCS Next steps will include making near, short- and long-term recommendations for the Main Street and Marsh Oaks Neighborhood that will support the Policy and support community needs. Thank you and we look forward to continuing to serve our community. Social Media Narrative: Art: Use Flyer We value your input! Help support AB Complete Streets! Focus Area Main Street, Marsh Oaks December 26th. Take the Survey https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/ABMainStreetCS Flyer: ,.e Ilk t CITY OF 4UTAkNIIC BEACH COMPLETE STREETS PROGRAM Ff%rUS AREA0144 . MAIN STREET 0 What: Stakeholder Open House When: 12/16/2021 ON Where: Atlantic Beach Commission Chambers Times: 1:00PM - 2:30PM and 5:00PM - 6:30PM A Visioning Session for Main Street $ Area From W ist Street to Dutton Island Road Focus - Traffic calming, place making Take the surveys Stay up to date. Follow the QR Code or https://www,surveymonkey.com/r/ABMainStreetCS Staff Contact: Amanda Askew. AICP Director of Planning and Community Development P: (904124 7 5841 E: oaskew@coab.us Consuitant Contact: Heather Neville, AICP AE Engineering Inc. P: (904) 509 6895 E:hneviltie@aeengine+eringinc.com IJA 000, 411 Attachment A .I 7.c-, ,,aV5n '0 40' .. 1 r OF ATLANTIC BEACH COMPLETE STREET PROGRAM FOCUS AREA: MAIN STREET What: Stakeholder Open House When: 2/15/2021 Where: The Urban Farm Times: 2:OOPM - 3:30PM and 6:OOPM - 7:30PM A Visioning Session for Main Street & Area From W 1st Street to Dutton Island Road Focus - Traffic calming, place making Take the survey! Stay up to date. Follow the QR Code or Visit www.COAB.com/CompleteStreet Staff Contact: Amanda Askew, Director of Planning and Community Development P: (904) 247 5841 E: aaskew@coab.us Consultant Contact: Heather Neville, AICP AE Engineering Inc. P: (904) 509 6895 E:hneville@aeengineeringinc.com I I I' \IN//AA ' A0 ,WI Attachment A B CHESCP9GREEN Minutes . _ ( CLEANUP SAN PABLO WhesGOGreen 2 ELEMENTARY cleans Town Center r Pap w Beaches / Pa ape Students team about e. { � +� sea WrUey Papa 2 December 16, 2021 RTHE BFACHES E since 1967 f1 Vol. 59, No. 26 Servinp the communities of Atlantic Beach, Jacksonville eeath, Nepluna Beach, Mgypod and P0014 Vadra Bh aac New program is designed for safe transportation in AB kill transp eammnnat), M Ajs tic Beach . roayndeelgnedl.Bceilat f j put to imps adon city+ide. Tnt CgtY raft and roheslwe -=' p1M the Complete Suits \� ! pomy, it. & rein fa 's a tfi, a for driven, peen \ t!� Pond. dcy bicyclists, ahrred mob end men truest d 5 I plaru, bkYel ustun ill ha held u r and 5 ^„ A stkch'ndet1 • open �� Comminioo Cham Iud+Y wits focus on "me nalming and 1 be .Ten °n the Hain Singer and the Marsh thka BEBCISBS - pa12 - busirusses. neialrbornood. and sorroundinR tCI1 1; n wits beg° wrath a xo-m note presrna ...w, w•,. w% . i -:a Poch cess ° r UI lir distributed to adeadas to !1 09 _ __ tiro and a survey wCom ey �[' NA 's1_at help rnemurel tAEF�rPoreringInlctandTraBuSpr- ►a►_ Li•1 001ConsatonicwDl��tci7suBinestablishingshon- . .I tar,'a( ;Wut DDECw 1- IVi f1Ul Ylrecl �!'d,.: -f — rid long-Itre remmmri for the Prolecs arr<L - Duren{ + tar°1 Presentation1)to comma t D recm- '�'� ben. plenrdna and Cornmunit7 DoveioDment Director us for the propam pr"' liivr Amand+Nkew sola rhe impel _ !"` from discussion., during the Pules blah , ?I. Pthe cess. Cry otfidal, hosted a town hall messing topic to help rrfipe the roncepe. that m .• y 'It's a transportation and design approach (From left) Maria Mark, Beaches Watch president; Dr. Randy Hayes• BEAM voWnteer; Loh q' Baan to , planned dnignM. opersled on - Richards, Richards, BEAM executive Director; and Mary Ellen Waugh. a C alta for of food services, ma(nt;ned to enable safe, conv f .11 i and evmfon- are Shown during the presentation of the 2021 Beaches Watch G,ve Back Donation to BEAM . able tn"I and acros for users of n puntaauon �bs e Beaches Emergency Assistance Ministry (BEAM) received Ins award for helping local familles tin regard,", of t6elr mode i tra°'aapD Wd. 9bele i -WdPkus"' aramples of complete dust recovering from the pandemic. - _ _ _ dernents mroughom tha etty and there's more tanl�t� pNnted draauood aim oa rise Payr ownership mrnt and manlliggs, "� • Cas b' I.aq.d m an Pete's Bar changes - h�°q-� •p's m 'r fpr me to romment on tnruportation needs of the specific aria. A multi -use by IJy k MPI'CHF11 planet that you could sWl play POLI what wrr ore chis owns,• he said. path roWd be instilled in a school cone ro saran stu- °°.vTuaV70A for a gainer. That pool able it here EvaeyanNs scared of change.' dela can navigue safely to and from stLool. Its last nd for an knot, Nep- for the enrenainmem of this p>.sr`t And w* yyhlmngslow said the -Some. things includebike lana, shoed pada• tune Beach laodmuk The bar and TWm the ores spending money rww owns ase mmmined to mer- I .mess, maybe there's some street furniture that we Package ion holds the first liquor the bar u they underantd; Isthe tuns°, thk bars original format, can add iloog Ins stmt; she said 'y'ou could ren It-,- Issued to Wva1 County n -yyey don't instead w changing what rhe, do sbo a and beyond that potntiaB> look at speed nrrou or trop sips an there Pet Jensen following the repeal of bar. They still Plan On mm�W °O I,up to them at the drys enacretion. ere mWtiple thi has in the wheelhouse we could use to pcohibipon. Sino ,933, Petri &+ rhe Thmksai,wStradino°.TheoWY .w,h,t they do in addition u on Implement some of thes<things.• has been opened at rr7 First Street ruing drdrrml when you walk in the term. Ihey are going to hays m do According to Nktw, the city has already instilled by generations of the Jensen f -0y' door u that Tom on t be then .• wider path and bike lanes i purl of ib approuh to on Tuesday, that chapter dosed witimsadow, sad them'. on truth ill �rpuvbler nyertuon o'pportwn- complete streets. u the bar oroclaby changed oo- to he rumors that hate been swirl' 0n Includin o rooftop •II u a priority that he rommission identiaed in . <nhip. Ca -owner Tom N'hittioa- urg on wcW mMl+ for the Bsl cis 'I'd lu.t ro Ane had Ins manly LEED roadmap as part of the top res taommenda- elpw confirmed the sale Noadsy m months. He old he's nerd eery'1. a retests holdiop group 'with tin to thins from the site u being r1= to do a r hat n o the ci Il m nest tions tram Ins Conn e�„iryn•%rfapno +rid it t prsrides a the Beach..' Acrordin9 to Whit- to make way lir condos. It wv put- Dr°o 'no ale far tbem III d has to hamework for cuts to renew Projects_ tinaslow, the sissy owners intrad duwd by outrof-nate -and some {oi g u ear to honor tilt ,egad and tit "'dthadi. rima international - developers g0 through a redew bard bot Ins 'Ss'hene,er then u new transportation proyaC tion that art unique to Prta Bu. thu want m build an Appleba'r or fact makehno ut lv.. oto wluYskhenl I also wouldtwitat it and it would be looked at byichnsetgo�mul- Thej ve tyro made notes an certain other rnra—.t franchise. - tiple drpu menu, the Planning Department, Public tlemenn relerrtd m u •Pet ams • N'Mle he ouIMY rommmt an ouA works, Police and Fryaneering: she said. 'We have 'They understand rhe padrnons the identity of the newuo<ra, it wTal r.ists now hasn't changed sit u multiple projects throughout W'Ith its tided wood pao<Wra, wits, w each project on a Projat-by-project buts. N't °rid whet make Pate's Bar Pete i theidew cooftheurn end own Inter- much o. rr the Iut ,neral diades. criteria that we would use so it's not s camas tap e Bu, like a5 -tem Diol. You -a t o p •B see pate 6 1 would coordinate with other jurisdictions and agen- change Zhu. ".., no alae on the Jacksomnlle inch and Rivenlde. __ _ - _..._ tan u needed.* _ - Askew said proyau tie to be priorivad by enc level �y of need of a parttWu neignbornood and unplemt°r- Adventure Landing rezoning I ed to teat the eharorterofthe aurm'mdmgrn,iron- anent. C1tiont without any transportation proyets pienned for their neighborhood may+pply for+mWti- request deferred until 2022 i departmental renew to determine eligibillry. A mint- . mum of M percent of the residents in a spmfic block A mantling leg unt to accom- applicant a ad dry planning stag to drnlfal huildislpwhith an dl Deluw w.oiddhisstoapeslKfonstaQwouldtonsidrranap- madau a hlghderairy residential be'conse—t1we op the date that we 35 feel ft the city” bright, pnntion. City stag also considrn annually the arail- pmjed proposed (or rill Adnnnam chore In the future out of respect for parking and rtormvmter require- I able budget. community benefit and other dao %ben lending site esu deferred Monday nerybudr s time that was hen to- menu. considering e"plte,trots' pmjrca by the Jacksondlk Beeth PknWna fight sn we make nue wee don't have To obta�n,tbe ekmiry pet>ea,y •If we look at thi on a yeuly basis, wr rode get an vt CommWbo. Aamu for Nr duel a defeml in the furors•.' for the SF,�Jttrsllo wend the t nom idea of when we art sad where we need 1. ao. We art oyer nod6ed tin wether they tea- Plans Ine"'i 177 midentiil pin.lh `` far epproslnueelyfi 'rtondyandthe amours i ng to look at the o(partnswof pereuldi°g.at Ks that we henum- tended to watt until neer the Bnr of units in four inulti-famity Int units, drmgns "M r of cub ramP3. the _ Imes. the year to mubmit the epplicalkn. a 177-unil and a 90 -unit rtiutrort, arca IrvT � •f=/opety ddratW Pam Betraffe tonPocts between pMestnansnand iryrdu the Devebpen ua seeking lard use each with 'Ia own amenity court- Wal cast l"I amendment to the 2030 Compre- yard. a 78 -unit building; and an Wd �iw' d.parcel was tarsriously °umber of thildrcn walking and biking to school and heruiw Plan for approdmettly 9a 8a -unit building with the pound- uvd +' unlra*d anconal paridng the vehicle tulles myelM: aid Askew, adding that acres looted at '9M auch Blvd door leasing. dub and ficosis cea- for the ihr �Be poi PdOr to t9g6, ronelt define arta with a nigh number or traffic ec- They are rho attempting to m. ter on the ground floor and in out- it was d'.t wed u Hlgb Denrfty cidenu or near stridents. Locations prone to •dots sone the 53 0 -um sit, width has door k. Purl The Adyenlurt Landing and �a d th �m®tial and p ' 11 find of beli'f:Krult 1. rve if yet. build It, they will come. raiated u a theme Park since the theme park u rtrtduled to dare this was chs"' oyer ""'anal Ma t mi not path l then now and people aren't cold -199m, to Planned Dolt lXvel- month. Spay F �,*Adventure lend- ukii advaoage o! gctttag outride and biking and opment The lit would +leo nuJude • to- par thr.nr Appl urraakly a-9 welkin{. But If you build a path or a Hike lane, people The mmmBelon voted qa Io Boor sal of B- apace In a four -leve, Ina d fed u will take advantage of it and It will be ufer far them. of the deferment, with Davey DOW In q0o-apse, puking ganga and 454 acres `"",'Id Bpae,el� Instead of netting N your sir to go to the park you opposition. Commission Chairman surface par" spot The Puking Brcrea'��raP�!•$Pa. a0/ red t ton aur in our a t t Greg 3uttnn enwu.•aatd both the gangs Is'Roared behind 'be rest- �e3 gra g+ > Subscribe and The Beach" Leader will be dethroned by null lao, Boa Sol 29 jai Bch. 32.240 t y One Year - 235 Cell 904-:149-9033 Car,Mar.. 5 'dv:a BlaL.. 3 Clesa�fied 7 ieh,yipn„ Leila Notices Cbauerba 6 Noaser.. S c,prlgbr url k, I',•� "a►rwwr. tat. o ew Yry aw BEACHESe.-TUADER Submit news and photos at wwwbeachesleadercem �-qqqtk\\xW A�mrk� sin 1 CV"'��CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH COMPLETE STREETS PROGRAM /MAIN STREET PUBLIC MEETING SIGN IN, What: Stakeholder Open House When: 12/16/2021 Where: Atlantic Beach Commission Chambers Times: 1:OOPM - 2:30PM and S:OOPM - 6:30PM Name Email -AA; a,, C,� 3 4 a C --E� _� as 0 SCA EM N 7a/ Address Resident/B usinessNisitor \-aazs S�- ovryizaw 4L1/U!/rfJNl''I 41 N �d C 0 i r r J,00�zzllllly lzo lk v /////1 I I CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH COMPLETE STREETS PROGRAM IPv JN 1 REET PUBLIC MEETING SIGN IN What: Stakeholder Open House When: 12/16/2021 Where: Atlantic Beach Commission Chambers Times:1:00PM - 2:30PM and 5:00PM - 6:30PM Name Email Address Res ident/B us inessNisitor -5 E-R,-`� C, kA awsTIE 2 (ZoL Se�.vA �Rcnt�oit, or-• cfas �. n Na Res -c o e+.X i - ft waft 1 CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH COMPLETE STREETS PROGRAM REET PUBLIC MEETING SIGN IN What: Stakeholder Open House When: 12/16/2021 Where: Atlantic Beach Commission Chambers Times:1:00PM - 2:30PM and 5:OOPM - 6:30PM Name Email Address Res ident/BusinessNisitor lll4rfJNG`'I L d & �] zv r\ ra Q w. �,; .1. to r-� (O 2 1'h c�.t` n - 1" Eck lll4rfJNG`'I Attachment A AB Main Street Survey - Complete Streets to 7-11-22 Minutes Q1 Are you aware of the newly adopted Complete Street Policy? Answered: 99 Skipped, 0 Yes No G"t, 1011/1, 20 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 800% 90% 100" ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Yes 25.25% No 74.75% TOTAL 1/7 25 74 99 Attachment A AB Main Street Survey - Complete Streets to 7-11-22 Minutes Q2 If you could change one feature about Main Street what would it be? Answered: 83 Skipped: 16 2/7 Attachment A AB Main Street Survey - Complete Streets to 7-11-22 Minutes Q3 What are you willing to give up to get it? Please rank. Answered: 85 Skipped: 14 Parking Trees Easement on your propert... Slower streets 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 3/7 1 2 3 4 TOTAL SCORE Parking 44.00% 26.67% 21.33% 8.00% 33 20 16 6 75 3.07 Trees 6.67% 24.00% 20.00% 49.33% 5 18 15 37 75 1.88 Easement on your property for sidewalk 20.78% 33.77% 28.57% 16.88% 16 26 22 13 77 2.58 Slower streets 34.15% 14.63% 25.61% 25.61% 28 12 21 21 82 2.57 3/7 Attachment A to 7-11-22 Minutes Yes M AB Main Street Survey - Complete Streets Q4 Are you a resident on Main Street? Answered: 99 Skipped.0 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Yes 31.31% No 68.69% TOTAL 4/7 31 68 99 Attachment A AB Main Street Survey - Complete Streets to 7-11-22 Minutes Q5 Are you a resident of Marsh Oaks? (The Neighborhood bounded by Mayport Road, The River, Dutton Island Road and W. 1st Street) Yes No Answered: 99 Skipped:0 0'', 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Yes 41.41% No 58.59% TOTAL 5/7 41 58 99 Attachment A AB Main Street Survey - Complete Streets to 7-11-22 Minutes Q6 Do you own a business in Marsh Oaks? (The Neighborhood bounded by Mayport Road, The River, Dutton Island Road and W. 1st Street) ve No Answered: 99 Skipped:0 0% 10% 20% 30", 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Yes 6.06% No 93.94% TOTAL 6/7 6 93 99 Attachment A AB Main Street Survey - Complete Streets to 7-11-22 Minutes Q7 Please provide your contact information. Answered: 69 Skipped: 30 ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Name 98.55% Company 15.94% Address 97.10% Address 2 5.80% City/Town 100.00% State/Province 100.00% ZIP/Postal Code 97.10% Country 78.26% Email Address 92.75% Phone Number 82.61% 7/7 68 11 67 4 69 69 67 54 64 57 Attachment A to 7-11-22 Minutes Main Street Engineer's Estimate DID1 E IC DATE: 1/10/2022 Estimated Work Days: 20 PROJECT: Main Street Short Term Implementation Estimated Calendar Days: 30 PROJECT NO.: N/A PREPARED BY: Uyen Dang CLIENT PROJECT MANAGER: Amanda Askew, AICP 4 FOOT PAY ITEM N/A: AUDIO-VISUAL PRE -CONSTRUCTION AND POST CONSTRUCTION RECORDS 1 LS $1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 6 FOOT PAY ITEM 102-14: TRAFFIC CONTROL OFFICER 40 HR $100.00 $ 4,000.00 7 FOOT PAY ITEM 102-60: WORK ZONE SIGNS, F & I 200 DY $1.00 $ 200.00 19 FOOT PAY ITEM 102-74-1: CHANNELIZING DEVICE, TYPES I, II, DI, VP, DRUM, OR LCD, F & I 400 DY $8.00 $ 3,200.00 23 FOOT PAY ITEM 102-74-9: TRAFFIC CONES, F & I 600 DY $8.00 $ 4,800.00 29 FOOT PAY ITEM 102-76: ARROW BOARD / ADVANCE WARNING ARROW PANEL, F & 1 40 DY $50.00 $ 2,000.00 41 FOOT PAY ITEM N/A: FOOT CERTIFIED FLAG PERSON 40 DY $45.00 $ 1,800.00 669 FOOT PAY ITEM 700-1-40: SINGLE POST SIGN, INSTALL 50 AA $300.00 $ 15,000.00 670 FOOT PAY ITEM 700-1-50: SINGLE POST SIGN, RELOCATE 10 AA $500.00 $ 5,000.00 671 FOOT PAY ITEM 700.1-60: SINGLE POST SIGN, REMOVE 50 AA $100.00 $ 5,000.00 693 FDOT PAY ITEM 705-11-1: DELINEATOR, FLEXIBLE TUBULAR 210 EA $100.00 $ 21,000.00 698 FOOT PAY ITEM 710-11-101, 710-11-201, OR 710.11-421: PAINTED PAVEMENT MARKINGS, STANDARD, WHITE, YELLOW, OR BLUE, SOLID, 61N 2200 LF $2.50 $ 5,500.00 700 FOOT PAY ITEM 710-11-123 OR 710-11-223: PAINTED PAVEMENT MARKINGS, STANDARD, WHITE OR YELLOW, SOLID FOR CROSSWALK AND OUNDABOUT, 12 IN 2640 LF $3.00 $ 7,920.00 702 FOOT PAY ITEM 710-11-125 OR 710-11-225: PAINTED PAVEMENT MARKINGS, STANDARD, WHITE OR YELLOW, SOLID FOR STOP LINE OR CROSSWALK, 24 IN 660 LF $4.00 $ 2,640.00 703 FDOT PAY ITEM 710-11-131 OR 710-11-231: PAINTED PAVEMENT MARKINGS, STANDARD, WHITE OR YELLOW, SKIP, 10-30 OR 3-9 SKIP, 61N WIDE 10560 LF $3.00 $ 31,680.00 704 FOOT PAY ITEM 710-11-160: PAINTED PAVEMENT MARKINGS, STANDARD, WHITE, MESSAGE OR SYMBOL 40 EA $300.00 $ 12,000.00 705 FOOT PAY ITEM 710-11-170: PAINTED PAVEMENT MARKINGS, STANDARD, WHITE, ARROWS 14 EA $300.00 $ 4,200.00 708 FOOT PAY ITEM 710-11-302: PAINTED PAVEMENT MARKINGS, STANDARD, BLACK, SOLID, 6 IN 10560 LF $0.50 $ 5,280.00 711 FOOT PAY ITEM 711-16-101 OR 711-16-201: THERMOPLASTIC, STANDARD, WHITE OR YELLOW, SOLID, 6 IN 2200 LF $2.75 $ 6,050.00 713 FOOT PAY ITEM 711-11-123: THERMOPLASTIC, STANDARD, WHITE, SOLID FOR CROSSWALK AND ROUNDABOUT, 121N 2640 LF $4.00 $ 10,560.00 715 FDOT PAY ITEM 711.11-125: THERMOPLASTIC, STANDARD, WHITE, SOLID FOR STOP LINE OR CROSSWALK, 241N 660 LF $5.00 $ 3,300.00 718 FOOT PAY ITEM 711-11-160: THERMOPLASTIC, STANDARD, WHITE, MESSAGE OR SYMBOL 40 EA $300.00 $ 12,000.00 719 FOOT PAY ITEM 711-11.170: THERMOPLASTIC, STANDARD, WHITE, ARROW 14 EA $300.00 $ 4,200.00 722 FOOT PAY ITEM N/A: REMOVE EXISTING PAVEMENT MARKINGS 250 SF $7.00 $ 1,750.00 724 FOOT PAY ITEM N/A: MINIMUM CHARGE FOR STRIPING FOR EACH PROJECT 1 EA $2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 TOTAL: $ 172,080.00 Attachment A to 7-11-22 Minutes Main Street Engineer's Estimate DID1 E 0 DATE: 1/10/2022 Estimated Work Days: 180 PROJECT: Main Street Long Term Implementation Estimated Calendar Days: 30 PROJECT NO.: N/A PREPARED BY: UyenDang CLIENT PROJECT MANAGER: Amanda Askew, AICP 4 FOOT PAY ITEM N/A: AUDIO-VISUAL PRE -CONSTRUCTION AND POST CONSTRUCTION RECORDS 1 LS $1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 6 FOOT PAY ITEM 102.14: TRAFFIC CONTROL OFFICER 240 HR $100.00 $ 24,000.00 7 FOOT PAY ITEM 102-60: WORK ZONE SIGNS, F & 1 1800 DY $1.00 $ 1,800.00 19 FOOT PAY ITEM 102-74-1: CHANNELIZING DEVICE, TYPES I, II, DI, VP, DRUM, OR LCD, F & 1 3,600 DY $8.00 $ 28,800.00 21 FOOT PAY ITEM 102-74-2: CHANNELIZING DEVICE, TYPE III, 6 FT, F & I 900 DY $50.00 $ 45,000.00 23 FOOT PAY ITEM 102.74-9: TRAFFIC CONES, F & 1 5400 DY $8.00 $ 43,200.00 29 1 PAY ITEM 102-76: ARROW BOARD / ADVANCE WARNING ARROW PANEL, F & 1 360 DY $50.00 $ 18,000.00 41 FOOT PAY ITEM N/A: FOOT CERTIFIED FLAG PERSON 360 DY $45.00 $ 16,200.00 46 FOOT PAY ITEM 104-11: FLOATING TURBIDITY BARRIER 100 LF $40.00 $ 4,000.00 49 FOOT PAY ITEM 104-18: INLET PROTECTION SYSTEM 40 EA $115.00 $ 4,600.00 S7 FOOT PAY ITEM 110-2-1: CLEARING AND GRUBBING 17600 SY $25.00 $ 440,000.00 70 FOOT PAY ITEM 110-4-10F: REMOVAL OF EXISTING CONCRETE -CURB AND GUTTER 8500 LF $30.00 $ 255,000.00 75 FOOT PAY ITEM 120.1: REGULAR EXCAVATION 10000 CY $35.00 $ 350,000.00 82 FOOT PAY ITEM 121-70-2: FLOWABLE FILL 1000 CY $130.00 $ 130,000.00 104 FOOT PAY ITEM 285-708: OPTIONAL BASE, BASE GROUP 08 17600 SY $14.00 $ 246,400.00 128 FOOT PAY ITEM 334 -1 -11C,334 -1-12C, 334-1-13C, 334-1-14C, OR 334-1-15C: SUPERPAVE ASPHALTIC CONCRETE, TRAFFIC A, B, C, D, OR E, GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO 500 TON 3000 TN $130.00 $ 390,000.00 185 FOOT PAY ITEM 425-1-211: INLETS, CURB, TYPE 10, <10 FT 40 EA $1,200.00 $ 48,000.00 228 FOOT PAY ITEM 425-2-61: MANHOLES, P-8, <10 FT 10 EA $1,500.00 $ 15,000.00 238 FOOT PAY ITEM 425-5: MANHOLE, ADJUST 10 EA $2,500.00 $ 25,000.00 249 FOOT PAY ITEM 430-173-1128,430-173-1158,430-173-1188, OR 430-173-1248: PIPE CULVERT RCP MATERIAL ONLY, ROUND, 12 IN, 15 IN, 181N, 24 IN, GUTTER DRAIN 5280 LF $45.00 $ 237,600.00 424 FOOT PAY ITEM 520-1-10: CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER, TYPE F 10560 LF $30.00 $ 316,800.00 431 FOOT PAY ITEM 522-2A: CONCRETE SIDEWALK AND DRIVEWAYS, 6 IN THICK 4200 SY $60.00 $ 252,000.00 432 FOOT PAY ITEM 522-2B: CONCRETE SIDEWALK, 81N THICK 1800 SY $70.00 $ 126,000.00 440 FOOT PAY ITEM N/A: ADA COMPLIANT CURB RAMP, TWO -DIRECTION 28 EA $3,000.00 $ 84,000.00 669 FOOT PAY ITEM 700-1-40: SINGLE POST SIGN, INSTALL 50 AA $300.00 $ 15,000.00 670 FOOT PAY ITEM 700-1-50: SINGLE POST SIGN, RELOCATE 10 AA $500.00 $ 5,000.00 671 FOOT PAY ITEM 700-1-60: SINGLE POST SIGN, REMOVE 50 AA $100.00 $ 5,000.00 693 FOOT PAY ITEM 705-11-1: DELINEATOR, FLEXIBLE TUBULAR 210 EA $100.00 $ 21,000.00 Attachment A to 7-11-22 Minutes Item # Description Quantity Unit Bid Unit Price Bid Extension 698 FOOT PAY ITEM 710-11-101, 710-11-201, OR 710-11-421: PAINTED PAVEMENT MARKINGS, STANDARD, WHITE, YELLOW, OR BLUE, SOLID, 6 I 2200 LF $2.50 $ 5,500.00 700 FDOT PAY ITEM 710.11-123 OR 710-11-223: PAINTED PAVEMENT MARKINGS, STANDARD, WHITE OR YELLOW, SOLID FOR CROSSWALK AND OUNDABOUT, 12 IN 2640 LF $3.00 $ 7,920.00 702 FDOT PAY ITEM 710-11-125 OR 710-11-225: PAINTED PAVEMENT MARKINGS, STANDARD, WHITE 660 LF $4.00 $ 2,640.00 OR YELLOW, SOLID FOR STOP LINE OR CROSSWALK, 24 IN 703 FDOT PAY ITEM 710-11-131 OR 710-11-231: PAINTED PAVEMENT MARKINGS, STANDARD, WHITE 10560 LF $3.00 $ 31,680.00 OR YELLOW, SKIP, 10-30 OR 3-9 SKIP, 6 I WIDE 704 FDOT PAY ITEM 710-11-160: PAINTED PAVEMENT MARKINGS, STANDARD, WHITE, MESSAGE OR 40 EA $300.00 $ 12,000.00 SYMBOL 705 FDOT PAY ITEM 710-11-170: PAINTED PAVEMENT MARKINGS, STANDARD, WHITE, ARROWS 14 EA $300.00 $ 4,200.00 708 FDOT PAY ITEM 710-11-302: PAINTED PAVEMENT MARKINGS, STANDARD, BLACK, SOLID, 6 I 10560 LF $0.50 $ 5,280.00 711 FDOT PAY ITEM 711-16-101 OR 711-16-201: THERMOPLASTIC, STANDARD, WHITE OR YELLOW, 2200 LF $2.75 $ 6,050.00 SOLID, 6 I 713 FDOT PAY ITEM 711-11-123: THERMOPLASTIC, STANDARD, WHITE, SOLID FOR CROSSWALK AND 2640 LF $4.00 $ 10,560.00 ROUNDABOUT, 12 IN 715 FDOT PAY ITEM 711-11-125: THERMOPLASTIC, STANDARD, WHITE, SOLID FOR STOP LINE OR 660 LF $5.00 $ 3,300.00 CROSSWALK, 24 IN 718 FDOT PAY ITEM 711-11-160: THERMOPLASTIC, STANDARD, WHITE, MESSAGE OR SYMBOL 40 EA $300.00 $ 12,000.00 719 FDOT PAY ITEM 711-11-170: THERMOPLASTIC, STANDARD, WHITE, ARROW 14 EA $300.00 $ 4,200.00 722 FDOT PAY ITEM N/A: REMOVE EXISTING PAVEMENT MARKINGS 250 SF $7.00 $ 1,750.00 724 FDOT PAY ITEM N/A: MINIMUM CHARGE FOR STRIPING FOR EACH PROJECT 1 EA $2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 757 FDOT PAY ITEM N/A: WATER METER BOX, INSTALL 90 EA $700.00 $ 63,000.00 758 FOOT PAY ITEM 425-5-1: MANHOLE, ADJUST, UTILITIES 10 EA $2,000.00 $ 20,000.00 818 ALLOWANCE: IRRIGATION SYSTEM 1 EA $50,000.00 $ 50,000.00 819 ALLOWANCE: UTILITIES COORDINATION AND ADJUSTMENTS 1 EA $50,000.00 $ 50,000.00 820 ALLOWANCE: LANDSCAPING 1 EA $300,000.00 $ 300,000.00 822 ALLOWANCE: PERMIT FEES, NON-BROWARD COUNTY AGENCIES 1 EA $50,000.00 $ 50,000.00 823 ALLOWANCE: MAILBOX RELOCATION OR NEW 90 EA $300.00 $ 27,000.00 300 TOTAL: $ 3,817,480.00