Loading...
95-23 v Commissioner Weiss RESOLUTION 95-23 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH, FLORIDA, REQUESTING THE SECRETARY OF THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION TO REVIEW CERTAIN ASPECTS OF THE COASTAL CONSTRUCTION CONTROL LINE AS RE- ESTABLISHED FOR DUVAL COUNTY, FLORIDA, IN JULY, 1992, AND TO ESTABLISH A NEW COASTAL CONSTRUCTION CONTROL LINE FOR MUNICIPALITIES IN DUVAL COUNTY IMMEDIATELY. WHEREAS cooperation among State, county, and local governments is desirable and beneficial to all citizens, and WHEREAS State, county, and local governments are increasingly aware of the need for environmental protection and enhancement, and WHEREAS those governments closest to a problem frequently suffer most, and yet provide the best remedies, and WHEREAS most of the ten miles of Duval County coastline have been settled, occupied, and reasonably developed and preserved by local citizens for well over seventy years, and WHEREAS massive concrete seawalls and granite armoring along the Duval County coastline constructed at various times since the 1920s have functioned as planned in reducing storm damage to beach and upland interests, and WHEREAS such seawalls and granite armoring, having successfully resisted equivalent to 100 year storm action is now buried beneath vegetated sand dunes resulting from the ongoing beach re-nourishment project of the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, and is now only partially exposed to erosion forces, and WHEREAS in March of 1976 the State of Florida established in Duval County a Coastal Construction Control Line that was both empirically correct, and seaward of the majority of seventy year old structures on the seacoast, and WHEREAS there have been no appreciable costs to the State noted by implementation of the 1976 Coastal Construction Control Line, nor has it noticeably affected a homeowner's ability to preserve and protect his residence, and WHEREAS a new Coastal Construction Control Line was established for Duval County in 1992 that was landward of the 1976 Coastal Construction Control Line, and well landward of a line of coastal residences, the majority being of great age, and WHEREAS at the time of establishing the new Coastal Construction Control Line certain objections to it, occasioned by consideration of mathematical, historical, coastal seawall and coastal rock armoring, 100 year storm frequency and reach of impact correctness, were raised by Duval County citizens, and WHEREAS the Coastal Construction Control Line re-established in Duval County in 1992 did not account for the active beach profile as required by State rule at the time of re-establishment, and WHEREAS the mathematical model used for the establishment of the Duval County Coastal Construction Control Line was subsequently and substantially revised at great cost to the State of Florida through considerations of complaints of citizens, and WHEREAS the State of Florida commissioned a Peer Review Group to study the newest model to be used to set subsequent Coastal Construction Control Lines, and WHEREAS the Peer Review Group in their final report of January 3-5, 1995, formally expressed in writing in detail serious objections to the new Coastal Construction Control Line model, specifically, concern with consistency of, and scientific basis for, numerical models used for the Line, and the extent to which coastal armoring should be accounted for in the establishment of the Line, and in particular, called for rejection of the ad hoc 2.5 multiplier used in model calibration, and WHEREAS application of the new model used without the ad hoc 2.5 multiplier will frequently place the Coastal Construction Control Line well to seaward of the original 1976 Coastal Construction Control Line(emphasis added), and WHEREAS now neither the previous nor the newest mathematical model will serve to precisely determine the proper location for a Coastal Construction Control Line on the heavily armored, Duval County coastline, and WHEREAS considerable hardship has already occurred on the Duval county coastline by residents wishing to preserve, protect, and enjoy property well landward of a reasonably set 1976 Control Line, said hardship being directly attributable to placement of the 1992 Control Line, and WHEREAS the best protection of fragile coastal resources may be by those stewards closest and most directly benefited and affected by the natural forces on our coasts. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF ATLANTIC BEACH, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS: The Honorable Virginia B. Wetherell, Secretary of the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, be requested to consider at the executive level, certain points that would influence placement of a new Coastal Construction Control Line in Duval County, Florida, namely: 2 a. Technical objections were raised to the setting of the 1992 Control Line, which reasons still exist, and are documented in the report by Olsen Associates (report attached hereto). b. Substantially the same model and procedures used to re-establish the Duval County Coastal Construction Control Line have been found erroneous enough to commission an expensive revision of the Coastal Construction Control Line model. c. The newest Coastal Construction Control Line model has been found severely flawed in a Peer Review Group report commissioned by the State of Florida (report attached hereto). d. The Coastal Construction Control Line set in 1976 adequately and reasonably reflected over half a century of storm, erosion, and construction location data for Duval County. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT: a. The Coastal Construction Control Line as re-established in 1992 be revoked for the coastline of Duval County immediately. b. The more restrictive of; the Duval County Coastal Construction Control Line of 1976, or a Coastal Construction Control Line as delineated by Duval County municipalities, be established for the Duval County coastline immediately. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon passage. PASSED by the City Commission of Atlantic Beach, Florida, this 14th day of Aug•, 1995. Attest: . 1127t '' a tC� MA EN KING U L T. FLETCHER City Clerk Mayor AA roved as to form and Correctness: NC. SEN Atto y 3