Draft 2045 Comprehensive PlanCity of Atlantic Beach
2045 Comprehensive Plan
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Index of Tables and Maps 3
Background and Summary of the City's Comprehensive Planning Process 4
General Characteristics of the City of Atlantic Beach 5
Demographics & Existing Conditions of the City of Atlantic Beach 6 - 44
Ecosystem Analysis 45 - 57
Comprehensive Plan Elements
A. Future Land Use Element
B. Transportation Element
C. Infrastructure Element
D. Conservation and Coastal Management Element
E. Recreation and Open Space Element
F. Housing Element
G. Intergovernmental Coordination Element
H. Capital Improvements Element
I. Public Schools Facilities Element
J. Property Rights Element
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Al - A18
B1 - B-16
C-1 - C8
D-1 - D-13
E-1 - E-6
F-1 - F-5
G-1 - G-6
H-1 - H-12
1-1 - 1-24
J-1
of Atlantic Beach Commission City of Atlantic Beach Staff
Curtis Ford, Mayor
Bruce Bole, Commissioner
Michael Waters, Commissioner
Candace Kelly, Commissioner
Jessica Ring, Commissioner
Bill Killingsworth, City Manager
Kevin Hogencamp, Deputy City Manager
Amanda Askew, Director of Planning & Community
Development
Brian Broedell, Principal Planner & Environmental
Coordinator
Abrielle Genest, Planner
2
INDEX OF TABLES AND MAPS
The Future Land Use Map and all Maps included within the 2040 Comprehensive Plan Map Series are includ-
ed and adopted as part of this Comprehensive Plan amendment. In the event of anv conflict between anv
Maps and the text of the Plan, the text of the Plan shall control.
Map A-1: Generalized Land Use
Map A-2: Future Land Use Map
Map A-3: Vacant Parcels
Map A-4: Environmentally Sensitive Areas
Map A-5: Wetlands
Map A-6: Military Influence Zone
Map A-7: Energy Efficient and Conservation Zones
Map A-8: Soils
Map A-9: Contour Elevations
Map B-1: Roadway Functional Classification
Map B-2: Roadway Context Classification
Map B-3: Roadway Access Classification
Map B-4: Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities
Map C-1: Potable Water Wells
Map C-2: Utility Service Area
Map D-1: Coastal High Hazard Area
Map D-2: Evacuation Zones
Map D-3: Shallow Coastal Flooding Areas
Map D-4: FEMA Flood Zones
Map D -5a: Proiected Sea Levels
Map D -5b: Proiected Nuisance Flooding
Map D -5c: Proiected Flood Hazard Areas
Map E-1: Parks Map
Table A-1: Residential Land Use Classification and Permitted Density
Table A-2: Mixed Use Distribution Standards
Table B-1: FDOT Traffic Volumes
Table B-2: City Traffic Volumes
Table B-3: Collector Roadway LOS
Table B-4. Projected Annual Average Daily Trips (AADT)
Table B-5: City of Atlantic Beach Planning Area Minimum Levels of Service
Table B-6: Minimum Pedestrian Level of Traffic Stress (LTS)
Table B-7: Minimum Bicycle Level of Traffic Stress (LTS)
Table C-1: Atlantic Beach Service Area Water Projections
Table C-2: Daily Average Water Reuse
Table E-1: Recreation and Open Space Level of Service Standards
Table E-2: Existing Public Recreation and Open Space Facilities, 2009
Table H-1: Sanitary Sewer Level of Service Standards
Table H-2: Solid Waste and Potable Water Level of Service Standards
Table H-3: Drainage Level of Service Standards
Table H-4: Schedule of Capital Improvements
A-7
A-15
B-5
B-6
B-7
B-8
B-11
B-11
B-12
C-2
C-3
E-3
E-4
H-5
H-5
H-5
H-9
3
Background and Summary of the City's Comprehensive Planning Process
In 1975, Florida enacted the Local Government Comprehensive Planning Act which required all local govern-
ments to have comprehensive land use plans in order to manage growth and protect the natural environ-
ment. As a result of this legislation, the City of Atlantic Beach began working on its first comprehensive plan
in 1976 and officially adopted it in 1981 (Ordinance 95-81-21).
In 1985, in response to a rapidly growing population and associated development pressures, Florida passed
the "Growth Management Act" , which substantially amended the 1975 Act. Pursuant to the 1985 Act, all
local comprehensive plans must be consistent with State and Regional plans and be approved by the State.
Further, all comprehensive plans must include specific elements, a Future Land Use Map (FLUM), and associ-
ated land development regulations. In 1990, the City of Atlantic Beach adopted its second comprehensive
plan (Ordinance 95-90-48).
Pursuant to Section 163.3191 of the Florida Statutes, local governments are required to evaluate their com-
prehensive plans at least once every seven years to determine whether the plan needs to be amended to
reflect changes in state requirements since the last update. Prior to 2011, the state required the preparation
and adoption of an Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) at least once every seven years to determine if
amendments to the plan are needed due to changes in state requirements and/or local conditions. These
reports were adopted by the city via resolution and then submitted to the state. The City of Atlantic Beach
adopted EARs in 1997. 2003, 2008, and 2010.
The comprehensive plan has been amended several times since its original adoption, often as a response to
changes in state requirements. Notable amendments occurred in 2009 with the addition of the Public
Schools Facilities Element and in 2012 with the addition of policies addressing military compatibility and co-
ordination, both in response to new state legislation at the time. In 2015, the state enacted the "Peril of
Flood" statute which required the city to include a redevelopment component with principles to eliminate
inappropriate and unsafe development in coastal areas. The city amended the comprehensive plan in 2019
to comply with this requirement. Most recently, in 2021, the state passed legislation that requires local gov-
ernments to add a Property Rights Element to their comprehensive plan.
4
General Characteristics and Conditions of the City of Atlantic Beach
The City of Atlantic Beach is a small coastal community consisting of approximately four square miles of land
area and a population iust shy of 14,000. The City is located between two miles of Atlantic Ocean beachfront
on the east and the expansive marsh and estuarine environment of the San Pablo Creek / Intracoastal Water-
way on the west. The City is a near fully -developed municipality where the predominant land use is residen-
tial consisting of stable and well-established neighborhoods. The City possesses a unique character and
"personality" where a high quality of life, diverse recreational activities, preservation of community charac-
ter and protection of natural resources are day-to-day priorities to residents and elected officials as well.
The City contains two commercial corridors: the north side of Atlantic Boulevard (SR10) extending from the
ocean westerly to the Intracoastal Waterway, and Mavport Road (SR A1A), extending from Atlantic Boule-
vard northerly to the municipal limits. Both corridors continue to experience a solid level of market-driven
redevelopment. The appropriate redevelopment and aesthetic enhancements to the Mavport Road corridor
continue to be strategic planning priorities to the City. In 2018, a community driven Mavport Road Visioning
Implementation Plan (MRVIP) was completed to guide future development along the Mavport Road corridor.
The MRVIP includes recommendations for new design standards and activity programming.
The City contains a wealth of natural resources and parks including the beach, preserves, and a dense tree
canopy. Since adoption of the 1990 Comprehensive Plan, the City has annexed and acquired extensive marsh
areas extending westerly to the Intracoastal Waterway. The future land use of these areas is designated as
Conservation, and invaluable recreational resources have been established therein. Tide Views Preserve,
which opened to the public in 1996, consists of eight acres of passive park and offers scenic views of the In-
tracoastal Waterway, 2500 feet of trail and boardwalk, a scenic overlook, canoe launch and fishing area.
Dutton Island Preserve, which opened in 2003, is a 40 -acre passive park containing 9,000 feet of nature trails,
fishing and viewing piers, a canoe and kayak launch, pavilions and picnic areas and primitive camping areas.
The 2009 acquisition of the 350 -acre Buckman Pritchard Trust marsh tract, renamed the River Branch Pre-
serve, significantly increased the City's inventory of Environmentally Sensitive Lands and passive open space.
Additionally in 2018, the City purchased a 3.52 acre parcel adiacent to Sherman Creek, often referred to as
Selva Preserve. Preservation and protection of these natural coastal resources, particularly the City's dense
native tree canopy, are strongly held community values.
5
DEMOGRAPHIC ASSESSMENT
POPULATION
In 1926, Atlantic Beach was incorporated and
became the "Town of Atlantic Beach." At that
time, the population was about 164. Subse-
auently, the town became the "City of Atlantic
Beach" and currently has an estimated popula-
tion of 13,513. The table and chart on this page
illustrate the population by decade, showing rap-
id growth between the 1940s and 1970s. While
the rate of growth decreased after 1970, the to-
tal population has more than doubled since that
time. Between 2000 and 2010, the popuIation
declined by an estimated 5%; the only decade
experiencing a decline in population. As most of
the developable land within the city has been
developed within the last 20 years, the growth
rate has declined considerably. This trend is ex-
pected to continue.
16000
14000
12000
10000
8000
6000
4000
2000
Year Population Growth/Decline
1930 164
1940
468 185%
1950 1,604 243%
1960 3,063 91%
1970 6,132 100%
1980 7,847 28%
1990 11,636 48%
2000 13,368 15%
2010 12,655 -5%
2020 13,513 7%
Population
0
1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020
6
RACE
The table below illustrates the race of Atlantic Beach residents from 1980 to 2020 as reported by the U.S.
Census. The table shows the maioritv of the population reported their race as White (81.1%). followed by
Black or African American (7.3%). Historic data demonstrates an increase in population since 1980 re-
porting their race as White and as Two or more races and a decline in population reporting their race as
Black or African American. The Hispanic or Latino percentage of the population has decreased slightly
since 2010.
Year White Black or Asian Native Ha- American Two or
African waiian and Indian and more
American Other Pacific Alaska Na- races
nder lama
MIN
1980 75.1% 18.7% 5.3% 0.3% N/A 0.6%
1990 80.2% 15.4% 3.2% 0.1% 0.3% N/A 0.8%
2000 82.2% 12.7% 2.1% 0.03% 0.3% 1.6% 1.1%
2010 82.5% 10.8% 1.9% 0.1% 0.5% 2.8% 1.4%
2020 81.1% 7.3% 2.1% 0.1% 0.4% 7.5% 1.6%
8.0%
7.0%
6.0%
5.0%
4.0%
3.0%
2.0%
1.0%
0.0%
Percentage of Population that is Hispanic or Latino
2000 2010 2020
7
Hispanic or Latino Population
Percent of Total Population
0%
1% -o
° - 1O%
11%-1 %
City Boundary
1
timm.r1awl I_ iI1 rm.mI•+
i
1
.��a}t,•}
1
1
1
1
i
1
9
1
._M_��r��r
.0r�M��h�
Source: 2020 ACS 5 year estimates
0 0.25 0.5
1
1 Miles
8
1
Pla Median Ag 4
AGE
Overall, the population of Atlantic Beach has increased in age over the past three decades as shown in the
reported median age and age cohorts shown below. The median age has increased from 32.7 in 1990 to 48.6
in 2020, higher than the median age of Duval County and of Florida. Similarly, the percentage of the popula-
tion 65 years of age and older has increased from 9% to 23% in that time, while the percentage under 18
years of age has decreased from 33% to 18%.
Year
Under 18 18 and over 65 and older
1990 33% 67% 9%
2000 22% 78% 15%
2010 20% 80% 17%
2020
18%
82%
23%
Atlantic Beach 48.6
Duval County 36.3
Florida 42.2
9
Median Age
60.0
48.6
50.0
39.3
41.6
40.0
32.7
30.0
20.0
10.0
0.0
1990
2000
2010
2020
9
Below is a "population pyramid" for Atlantic Beach in 2020. Population pyramids are a tool used by demogra-
phers to visualize an area's age and sex at a given time. The population pyramid below shows the number of
Atlantic Beach residents by sex in different age cohorts. The pyramid shows a large portion of the population,
both female and male, are between 45 and 70 years of age.
The two maps on the following pages show the median age and the percent of the population 65 years and
over by census block group. The maps indicate that the age of the population generally decreases as you
move east to west.
Population Pyramid
Data from 2020
Census
85 and older 336 192
80 to 84 280 144
75 to 79 250 178
70 to 74 506 374
65 to 69 409 479
60 to 64 662 648
55 to 59 616 523
50 to 54 637 438
45 to 49 579 352
40 to 44 259 379 ■
35 to 39 548
30 to 34
25 to 29
20 to 24
15 to 19 224 406
10 to 14 497 457
5 to 9 287 282
Under 5 283
800 600 400 200 0
im Female — Male
398
346
282
376
331
324
268
200 400 600 800
10
Median Age by Census Block Group
Source: 2G2GACS 5 year :... ..
ID
11
Percentage of Population 65 Years and Over
iM
Percentage
- 10%
11% 20%
21% 0%
31% 0%
51% - %
1
N. y
9
Source: 2020 ACS 5 year estimates
0 015 0.5
-1
Miles
12
EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT
According to the 2020 ACS, 94.6% of the population aged 25 nears and over has at least a high school degree
(includes equivalency), which is higher than the rate reported for Duval County (90.1%) and the state
(88.5%). The percentage with at least a Bachelor's degree was roughly 53%., which has remained consistent
over the past five years.
Place
% with High
School Degree
Atlantic Beach
Duval County
Florida
94.6
90.1
88.5
The chart at the bottom of the page shows the percentage of the population 25 years and over broken down
by educational attainment. The maps on the following pages illustrate the percentage of the population 25
and over with at least a Bachelor's degree and with a Graduate, Professional, or Doctorate degree.
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
5.4
Percentage by Educational Attainment
20.7
Less than high High school
school graduate graduate
15.3
5.8
33.8
Sone college, no Associates degree Bachelor's degree
degree
19
Graduate or
professional
degree
13
Percentage of Population and
over with a Bachelor's Degree
Bachelors Degree
0% - '15%
16% - 5%
26% 5
36%-40%
(CityBoundary
`� 2
1
0 0.25 03
Source: 2x20 ACS 5 year estimates
1
Miles
Percentage of Population 25 and over with
Graduate, Professional or Doctorate Degree
0 0.25 03
'Source: 21:112U ACS 5 year :} :
1
Mi les
SCHOOL ENROLLMENT
According to the 2020 ACS, the population 3 years and over that are enrolled in school is 2,785. Of this popu-
lation, 7.6% are enrolled in nursery school/preschool, 69.4% are enrolled in Kindergarten to 12th grade, and
the remaining 23% are enrolled in college or professional school. The majority, 73.6%, are enrolled in a pub-
lic school while the remaining 26.4% are enrolled in a private school. In Duval County, 79.5% are enrolled
in public school. Of the 639 Atlantic Beach citizens en -rolled in college or graduate school, 65% are female
and 35% male.
26.4%
73.69
■ Percent in public school ■ Percent in private school
Population Enrolled in College or Graduate School
65%
35%
JIFF
• Male • Female
800
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
1
Nursery/Pre Kindergarten Grade lto4 Grade 5to8 Grade 9to12 CoIIege, Graduate,
school undergraduate professional
school
16
GRADUATION RATE
According to the Florida Department of Education, the 2019-2020 graduation rate for Duncan U. Fletcher
High School, which Atlantic Beach is zoned for, was 97.4%. This rate was higher than that of both Duval Coun-
ty and the state of Florida for that year.
Fletcher High Duval County FL Graduation
School's Graduation Graduation Rate Rate
Rate
97.4%
90.2% 90%
Fletcher High School's 2019-2020 graduation rate trended upward over the past 8 school years and contin-
ues to be higher than that of Duval County and the state as shown in the chart below.
100.0%
90.0%
80.0%
70.0%
60.0%
50.0%
40.0%
30.0%
20.0%
10.0%
0.0%
Graduation Rates
2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
2017-18 2018-19 2019-20
• Fletcher High School • Duval County • Florida
I
I
I
I
17
GRADUATION RATE
The 2019-2020 graduation rates by gender and race/ethnicity are shown
below. The graduation rate for White (97.5), Black or African Americans
(96.4), Hispanic/Latino (100), and Asian (100) graduates are all within 5
percentage points of one another. Similarly, the graduation rates for fe-
male (98.4) and male (96.4) cohorts, were also within 5 percentage
points of one another. Further, at Fletcher High School each race/
ethnicity reported by the FL Department of Education had a higher or
equal graduation rate when compared to the state average.
Female 98.4%
Male 96.4%
MIP Race/Ethnicity Fletcher HS Graduation Rate Florida HS Graduation Rate
American Indian or Alaska Native
L -
(fewer than 10 students) 84.1%
Asian 100% 98%
Black or African American
96.4% 86.6%
Hispanic/Latino 100% 89.5%
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific
Islander
White
Two or more races
(fewer than 10 students) 90.5%
Mi. El
97.5% 91.7%
90.5% 90.5%
18
MEDIAN INCOME
The median household income includes income of all persons 15 or older in a household. It is commonly
used to provide data about the wealth of a geographic area and is considered by many statisticians to be a
better indicator than the mean household income as it is not dramatically affected by unusually high or low
values (USDOH). According to the 2020 ACS, the median household income in Atlantic Beach was $84,830,
which was and has been consistently higher than that of Duval County and Florida. The median household
income for the city has grown at a rate similar to that of the county and state as shown below.
Atlantic Beach Duval County Florida
$84,830
$56,769 $57,703
Median n Household Income
$90,000
$80,000
$70'000 41
$60'000
$50,000
x'000
$30.000
$20,000
$10,000
5-
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Atlantic Beach —6—Duval County — F b rich
Households Fami it Married -couple Nonfamily
families households
Median Income
Mean Income
$84,830 $102,816
$123,038
$132,717 $57,500
$153,260 $74,996
19
Median Household In m
0 - 560,000
561,000 - 575,000
576,000 - 590,000
591,000 - 5110,000
5111,000 - $150.000
City Boundary:.
Source. 2020 ACS 5 Year s•. . s.
0 0.25 0.5
Miles
COST BURDEN
Households with an income of 80% or less than the area median income (AMI) are often considered low in-
come, those with an income of 50% or less of the AMI are often considered veru low income, and those 30%
or less are often considered extremely low income. In addition, households are often considered to be "cost
burdened" if housing costs equal or exceed 30% of the household income and severely cost burdened if they
exceed 50% of the household income. Below are cost burden estimates for Atlantic Beach by the University
of Florida Shimberg Center for Housing Studies. These estimates show the estimated number of low income,
very low income, and extremely low income households and the respective housing cost burden for those
households.
% of the Area Median Number of Households
Extremely low income 30 or less 530
Very low income 30.01 to 50 454
Low income 50.01 to 80 767
All Households, Cost Burden by Income, 2020 Estimate (Summary)
Geography
Atlantic Beach
Atlantic Beach
Atlantic Beach
Atlantic Beach
Atlantic Beach
Household Income
30% AMI or less
30.01-50% AMI
50.01-80% AM I
80.01-100% AM I
Greater than 100%
AMI
Housing Cost Burden
30% or less 30.1-50%
70 10
60 247
378
261
3396
More than 50%
450
147
221 168
121 14
465 71
Sources: Estimates and projections by Shimberg Center for Housing Studies. based on U.S. Department of Housing Development.
Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) dataset and population projections by the Bureau of Economic and Business
Research. University of Florida
21
Median rosy Rent as
Percentage of Household Income
Not reported
21% -%
26% 30%
31% - 0%
1...1
City Boundary
1
1
t
---
Source: 2020 ACS 5 year estimates
N
0 0_25 0.5
Miles
22
Median M nthI wn r Costs
as Percentage of Household Income
Monthly owner costs include payments for
mortgages including home equity loans and
other junior mortgages; real estate (US Census)
10% - 16%
17% - 23%
/ 1
24% - 30%
i !
L..._.J city Boundary
1
Source: 2020 ACS 5 year estimates
t:
0 0.25 0.5
1 Miles
23
POVERTY RATE
The poverty rate is the ratio of the number of people whose income falls below the poverty line. The 2020
reported poverty rate in Atlantic Beach was 4.3%, lower than the rate reported for the past 6 years. Similarly,
Atlantic Beach reported a much lower poverty rate than Duval County and Florida.
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
8.5
Poverty Rate
8.9
8.6
6.6
4.8
4.3
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Florida
Duval County
Atlantic Beach
2020 Poverty Rate
0
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
24
.1
Percent of Households with
Income Below Poverty Level
j City Boundary
pailLEm
■ ..m..,=1.•yrU.l
e
r
r;
1
i
:--i
Source: 2020 ACS 5 year estimates
0 0.25 0.5
1
1 Milts
25
OCCUPATION/EMPLOYMENT
According to the 2020 ACS , there were
5,204 full-time year-round employed
civilians 16 years and older in Atlantic
Beach. Of this population, over half
(51.4%) are employed in the
management, business, science, and
arts occupations as shown in the charts
below.
Management, business, science, 51.4
and arts occupations
Service occupations 12.9
Sales and office occupations 25.9
Natural Resources, construction, 5.1
and maintenance occupations
Production, transportation, and 4.7
material moving occupations
Occupations
51.4
12.9 01110,
di
• Management., business, science, and .a its occupations
■ Service occupations
• Sales d rid office occupations
- Natural Resources, coristruc do ri., and rna i ritenarice occupations
• Production, transportation, and material rr ovi rg occupations
26
OCCUPATION/EMPLOYMENT
The unemployment rate represents the number of unemployed people as a percentage of the civilian labor
force. The unemployment rate for the population 16 years and over in Atlantic Beach was 2.9% in 2020.
This rate was lower than that reported for Atlantic Beach in 1980, 1990, 2000, and 2010. Fur-ther, this rate
was lower than that reported for Duval
County and Florida in 2020, both of which were
above 5%. 2.9% 5.3% 5.4%
Atlantic Beach Duval County Florida
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
5.2
Unemployment Rate
s_2
3.2
2.9
2016 2017 201S 2019 2020
6.4
Unemployment Rate
4.4
6.7
2.9
1980 1990 2000 2010 2020
27
Unemployment Rate
(unemployed/Iabor force)
0 0.25 0.5
Source: 2a2U AGS 5 year
1
Mi les
HOUSING
The 2020 ACS reported an estimated 6,774 total housing units within the city of Atlantic Beach, which rep-
resents an increase in 595 units since 2010. The chart below shows an estimated 2,899 housing units,
roughly 43% of the existing stock, were constructed in Atlantic Beach between 1980 and 2000. The 1980's
experienced the highest increase in housing units of any decade with 1,784 additional units being con-
structed.
8,000
7,000
6,000
5,000
4,000
3,000
2,000
1,000
r
Kb. Total Housing IIIP Increase in 1
Units Housing Units
1970 2,434
1980 3,104 670
1990 4,888 1,784
2000 6,003 1,115
2010 6,179 176
2020 6,774 595
Housing Units
HOUSING
According to the 2020 ACS estimates, there were 6,110 occupied housing units within the city. Of these occu-
pied units, the majority (65.6%) were single-family detached units. The percentage of the housing units which
are single family detached has increased about 7% since 2010 while the percentage of two— and multi -family
units has decreased in this time period.
Year Housing Single-family Single-family Two or more Mobile home
units detached attached apartments or other type
2010 6,179 58.7% 19.1%
2015 6,533 60% 14.7%
2020 6,774 65.6% 15.6%
17.O%
15.5%
20.7%
23.9%
17%
65.6%
■ Single-farniIyrdetached • SiigIe-farniyrattached
• Two more apartments Mobile Horne or other
30
Percent of Housing Units that are
Detached Single-family Units
30% %
50% - 74%
75% - %0
100%
j City Boundary
ME
Source: 2020 ACS 5 year estimates
0 0.25 0.5
1
1 Mlles
31
HOUSING
The chart below shows when the housing units in Atlantic Beach were constructed. The chart shows the vast
majority of the homes (62.4%) were built between 1970 and 1999 with 1980's experiencing the highest num-
ber of housing units constructed.
Year Built
1939 of earlier 1
1940 to 1949 1
1950 to 1959 1
1950 to 1959 1
1970 to 1979 1
1980 to 1989 1
1990 to 1999 1
2000 to 2009 •
2010 to 2013
2014 or later 1
0 200 4 600 S00 1000 1200 1-00 1600 180a
Of the 6,110 occupied housing units in the city. the 2020 ACS estimates that lust over half (51%)of the
householders moved to Atlantic Beach between 2010 and 2018. It is estimated that roughly 14% of house-
holders moved to the city prior to 1990.
35%
30%
25%
20%
15%
10%
5% 3%
Moved in 2019
or later
30%
Moved in 2015
to 2018
21%
Moved n 2010
to 2014
19%
Moved II 2000
to 2009
13%
Moved li 1990
to 1999
14%
Moved in 1989
and earlier
32
Percent of Housing Units
Built prior to 1950
0%
1%
8%
13%
200/
J City Boundary
-is. \
1
4
1
1
i
---
Source: 2020 ACS 5 year estimates
0 0.25 0.5
Miles
33
Percent of Housing Units
Built since the year 2000
Source: 2x20 ACS 5 year estimales
0 0.25 0.5
1
Mi les
34
HOUSING
Of the 6,774 total housing units reported in Atlantic Beach, an estimated 6,110 (90.2%) were occupied and an
estimated 664 (99.8%) were vacant in 2020. Similar to the national trend, the average household size in At-
lantic Beach has decreased each decade from 3.18 in 1970 to 2.26 in 2020. When compared to the county
and state, Atlantic Beach has a smaller average household size.
Year Total Vacancy Average
Housing Rate Household
Units Ail
1970 2,434 8.3% 3.18
1980 3,104 9.9% 2.82
1990 4,888 7.1% 2.56
2000 6,003 6.3% 2.36
2010 6,179 10.5% 2.29
2020 6,774 9.8% 2.26
Place
ei
Average
Household
Size
Atlantic Beach
Duval County
Florida
2.26
2.51
2.62
Of the estimated 6,110 occupied housing units in the city, roughly 72% were owner occupied while the re-
maining 28% were renter occupied. The percentage of owner occupied units has increased about 6% since
2000 as shown below.
100.0%
9€k_0%
s _a%
7€k_0%
6F_0%
5€k_0%
4.0_0%
3011%
2a_ii%
10._0%
o.
33.9%
66.196
Tenure
30.3%
69.7%
h —1
28.1%
719%
2000 2010 2020
• Owner Occupied • Renter Occupied
35
---
Percent of Housing Units
that are Vacant
0% I
1% - °o
10% - 14%
15% - 1 %
20o/0 - 21%
0
L......i City Boundary
f
Source: 2020 ACS 5 year estimates
0 0.25 0.5
1
1
Miles
36
Renter Occupied Homes
(as percentage of total occupied homes)
Source: 2020 ACS 5 year
0 0.25 0.5
1
Miles
HOUSING
In 2020, the median home value of owner occupied homes
was estimated to be $397,200 in Atlantic Beach, much high-
er than that of Duval County and the state of Florida. The
map below shows the median home value by census block
group.
Place Median Home Val-
ue (owner occu-
pied)
Atlantic Beach $397,200
Duval County $195,600
Florida $232,000
Median Home Value
1,mm.0..11
i
i
t
SO - 5200, 000
52001001 - 5350,000
5350,001 - 5500,000
$500,001 5650,000
$050,001 - 5750,000
City Boundary
•
ti
1
-w.1-•,
Source: 2020 ACS 5 year estimates
0 0.25 0-5
1
Miles
38
TRANSPORTATION
Of the 7,055 estimated workers 16 years and over in Atlantic Beach, 2.1% do not have a vehicle available for
transportation. The remaining 97.9% have one or more vehicles available. The majority of this population
(80.6%) drive alone to work in a car, truck or van, while 3.2% walk to work and 2.7% bicycle to work. Further,
9.8% worked from home, which is double the rate reported in 2010.
Means of Transportation to Work
Worked from horse
Taxicab, motorcie or other means 0.2%
Bicycle • 2.7%
Walked • 3.2%
Puhlictransportatian 0.0%
Carpooled 3.6%
Driwealorre
12
10
s
6
4
2
6
4.9
9.8%
Percent Working from Horne
8.2
9.8
2010 2015 2020
B0.5%
39
TRANSPORTATION
The 2020 ACS estimates 21.9% of workers 16 and over work in
Atlantic Beach, while 91.8% of workers 16 and over work in
Duval County. The average travel time to work was 25.4
minutes in 2020, similar to that for Duval County and Florida.
The time of departure for work varies, however as expected,
Targe portions of workers depart between 7:OOam and 8:30am
as well as between 9:OOam and 11:59pm.
Time of Departure
lace Mean travel
time to work
(minutes)
Atlantic Beach
Duval County
Florida
25.4
24.9
27.9
9:00 a.m. to 11:59 p.m. ■
8:50a_m_to3:59a_m_
3:00 a _m_ to 3:29 a _m
7:30 a_m_ to 7:59 a_m_
7:00 a.m. to 7:29 a.m.
6:30 a_m_ to 6:53 a_m_
6:00 a _m_ to 6:29 a _m
5:30a_m_to5:59am_
5:00 a.m. to 5:29 a.m.
120 a.m. to 4:59 am_
f.D% 5.22% SO.C% 15.0% 20.0% 25.05 .30.05 35.0%
12a_o%
100.0%
80.0%
60.0%
40.0%
20.06
0.0%
21.9%
Place of Work
90.5%
98.696
1.4%
Work in Atlantic Beach Work in Duval County Work in Florida Work outsideof Florida
40
Percent of Workers over 16
that Bike or Walk to Work
0%
4c - %
1Oo-14
City Boundary
1
1
1
1
1
■
1
1
L.i
■
1
1
Source: 2020 ACS 5 year :
0 0.25 0.5
1
Miles
41
Percent of Workers over 16
that Drive Alone to Work
7%-7%
77% - 86%
87%- o -
City Boundary
1
1
1
Source: 2020 ACS 5 year estimates
0 0.25 0.5
1
1 Milts
42
Work in Atlantic Beach
(Percentage of Workers 16+)
° -1 %
20% - 25%
26% - 35%
City Boundary
r
1
t
ti�
Source: 2Cl2G KCS 5 year :..:• . : �..
0 0.255 0.5 'I
Miles
43
Percent f Workers over 16
that Work from Home
0% - 2 0
i
1O -1 U
..1 City Boundary
L.,
,
1
.,I=.1
N
Source: 2020 ACS 5 year i...' ..
0 D_25 Q_
1
Miles
Ecosystem Analysis
Topography & Flooding
Atlantic Beach is a relatively flat and low-lying coastal community that borders the Atlantic Ocean on the east
and the Intracoastal Waterway on the West. The highest elevations in the city, ranging from about 10 to over
30 feet above mean sea level, are located along the ocean side where sand dunes have developed over time
and the lowest elevations, at or just above sea level, are generally located along the Intracoastal Waterway
on the west side of the city. Additional low-lying areas of the city are located along Sherman Creek and Hop-
kins Creek, two of the city's primary drainage basins.
As a low-lying coastal community, Atlantic Beach is especially vulnerable to flood risks as experienced during
Hurricane Irma, Hurricane Mathew, and the November 2015 Nor'easter. Unsurprisingly, flooding impacts
have been most notable in the lowest areas of the city, notably along the Intracoastal Waterway, near Hop-
kins Creek, and along Sherman Creek. In addition, most of the city was developed prior to modern storm -
water regulations for flood protection which has further contributed to these flooding issues. In recent years,
the city has also experienced the development of lots on the west side of the city that have been historically
untouched/ignored due to low-lying topography, wetlands, and flooding concerns. This development trend is
expected to continue as remaining undeveloped lots are scarce and the demand for housing in the area con-
tinues to increase. As a result, the city has taken several initiatives to address an increasing threat of urban
flooding. In 2018, the city updated the Stormwater Master Plan which led to recommended capital improve-
ment projects that have since either been implemented or incorporated into the city's Capital Improvement
Plan (CIP). In 2019, the city completed a Coastal Vulnerability Assessment which included highly detailed
modeling of projected changes in sea levels, rainfall, soil storage, wave sizes and impacts, and increases in
impervious surfaces which was then utilized to create projected special flood hazard areas (flood zones) for
25, 50, and 100 year timeframes. In addition to modeling projected flood zones, sea levels, storm surges, nui-
sance flooding, and rainfall flooding, the report assessed potential impacts to critical infrastructure and facili-
ties as well as private property and has been used to inform the recently approved Capital Improvement Plan
(CIP), proposed code changes, and the completion of the city's Adaptation Plan in 2021. The Adaptation Plan
identifies focus areas within the city and prioritizes critical infrastructure and facilities that are vulnerable to
flooding impacts and then recommends strategies to adapt to these projected impacts.
Geology
The University of Florida identifies the geologic unit for Atlantic Beach as undifferentiated Pleistocene and
Holocene coastal deposits. These sediments exist along the present day coast of Duval County and the asso-
ciated lagoons and coastal rivers and streams. They are composed of sands, silts and days that sometimes
contain varying percentage of organic matter. The sands may contain mica and heavy minerals. The sands
are poorly to well sorted depending on the depositional environment. These include beach, marsh and la-
goonal sediments which lie on older undifferentiated Quaternary sediments or Nashua Formation. Sand
dunes are also present in Atlantic Beach but are not the predominant landform. The quartz sands comprising
the dunes may contain shell fragments and often contain 5-10 percent heavy minerals and lies on undifferen-
tiated Pleistocene and Holocene coastal deposits.
45
Soils
The majority of Atlantic Beach has been
developed with either residential or com-
mercial development except for the beach
and generally undevelopable areas of salt-
water marshes. As such, the majority of
Atlantic Beach has been identified as Ur-
ban Land with the remainder largely iden-
tified as a type of fine sand due to the
city's proximity to the coast. The drainage
class for nearly all soils range from some-
what poorly to very poorly.
Map Unit Svm-
Map Unit Name
bol
Acres in AO1
7 Arents, nearly level 16.07
10 Beaches. veru freauently flooded 7_7
14 Boulogne fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes 279.1
Evergreen-Wesconnett complex. depressional, 0 to
22 19.76
2 percent slopes
Hurricane and Ridgewood soils. 0 to 5 percent
24 22.76
slopes
29 Kureb fine sand. 2 to 8 percent slopes 37.08
32 Leon fine sand. 0 to 2 percent slopes 512.62
Leon fine sand. 0 to 2 percent slopes. veru frequent -
33 1.65
Iv flooded
35 Lynn Haven fine sand, 0 to 2 percent slopes 135.99
36 Mandarin fine sand. 0 to 2 percent slopes 82.3
Newhan-corolla. rarely flooded, complex. gently
42 4.13
undulating to hilly. 2 to 20 percent slopes
Percent AOI Prime Farmland
0.63% No
0.30% No
11.03% No
0.78% No
0.90% No
1.47% No
20.25% No
0.07% No
5.37% No
3.25% No
0.16% No
49 Pamlico muck. depressional, 0 to 1 percent slopes 21.27 0.84% No
58 Pottsburg fine sand. 0 to 3 percent slopes 26.22 1.04% No
Rutlege mucky fine sand. 0 to 2 percent slopes, fre-
62 23.28 0.92% No
auently flooded
Tisonia mucky peat. 0 to 1 percent slopes. veru fre-
68 423.65 16.74% No
auently flooded
69 Urban land 75.05 2.97% No
Urban land -Leon -Boulogne complex, 0 to 2 percent
71 755.96 29.87% No
slopes
99 Water 86.4 3.41% No
46
Soil data from National Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). 2021. Parcel data from 2020 property appraiser layer.
MAP A-8:
Soils
City of Atlantic Beach
2040 Comprehensive Plan
Amendment Map Series
Soil Type
ARENTS
BEACHES
BOL'LOGNE
EVERGREEN
HURRICANE
KUREB
LEON
LYNN HAVEN
MANDARIN
NEWHAN
PAMLICO
POTTSBURG
RUTLEGE
TISONIA
URBAN LAND
WATER
4 0.25 0.5
1
Miles
Vegetation & Habitat
Tree Canopy. A designated Tree City USA since 1992, Atlantic Beach boasts a tree canopy recognized as one
of its most valuable assets by City leadership and citizenry, alike. The canopy largely consists of live oak, slash
pine, and cabbage palms. In 2014, the city conducted an urban tree canopy assessment which analyzed digi-
tal images of the city's tree canopy taken in both December, 2003 and January, 2014 in order to estimate
changes to the canopy during that time period and to quantify long term impacts from the three hurricanes
that passed through the city in 2004. The final report noted that there did not appear to be widespread dis-
turbances in the canopy, either natural or human -caused, indicated that property owners appeared to be
conscientious in conserving trees on private lands, and spoke positively of the city's measures to protect its
canopy. The assessment estimated that the citv's tree canopy percentage was at 32% in 2003 and 30% in
2014. If the land areas occupied by marshes, open water, and dunes is deducted from that assessment, this
percentage increased to 39% for 2014. These figures compare favorably with the average Florida statewide
tree canopy coverage in developed areas of 26.7%, and 32.1% when unplantable areas are eliminated. A sec-
ond tree canopy assessment was completed in 2023 for the years 2021 and 2010 which estimated that the
citv's tree canopy to be 32% in 2021 and 33% in 2010. Further, in 2017 the City of Jacksonville conducted a
tree canopy assessment which estimated the city's canopy percentage to be 48% in 2015 (excluding open
water from the land area). This assessment also estimated the 2015 canopy coverage for the Jacksonville
Beaches as a whole to be 29%.
60%
40%
?4
20%
10%
0`%6
1
1
32%
Tree Canopy Coverage (%)
33%
30%
32%
48%
29%
Atlantic Beach Atlantic Beach Atlantic Beach Atlantic Beach Jacksonville Jacksonville
(2003) (2010) (2014) (2021) (2015) Beaches (2015)
48
Tree Canopy Coverage by Census Block Group (2021)
49
Vegetation & Habitat
Land Coveraae. Atlantic Beach is a built -out community consisting mostly of developed land. The highest in-
tensity of developed land is located along the city's two commercial corridors of Atlantic Boulevard and May -
port Road where suburban type shopping malls with large parking lots as well as wholesale and storage uses
occupy much of this land. Additional "medium intensity" developed land is located along the coast where
several multi -family developments and dense single family developments exist. The remaining residential
areas are generally classified as "low intensity" developed land due to lower residential densities, larger lots,
and more tree canopy. Woody wetlands are shown along Shermans Creek and the Intracoastal Waterway
(ICW) while the 350+ acre River Branch Preserve is shown as Emergent Herbaceous Wetlands. Lastly, many
of the city's parks and open spaces make up the pockets of Evergreen Forest shown on the USGS land cover-
age map. Forests and woody wetlands provide a host of ecosystem services including climate regulation, wa-
ter quality protection, biodiversity conservation, erosion control, air quality maintenance, and recreational,
cultural, and aesthetic values.
Within the 350+ acre River Branch Preserve, located between the ICW and the city's uplands, a 2018 current
conditions report found four natural communities; saltwater marsh, mixed hardwood -coniferous, mixed
scrub -shrub wetland, and estuarine.
Saltwater marsh is an estuarine wetland on muck, sand, or limestone substrate, inundated by saltwater daily
tides. No trees are present and vegetation includes a dense herb laver with few shrubs, and common species
of saltmarsh cordgrass, needle rush, saltgrass, saltwort, perennial glasswort, and seaside oxeye.
Mixed hardwood -coniferous ecosystems have a canopy dominated by sand live oak, live oak, water oak,
slash pine, loblolly pin, red cedar, red bay, sabal palm, and southern magnolia. The understory consists of
species such as wax myrtle, vaupon holly, gallberrv, saw palmetto, wiregrass, and brackenfern.
Mixed scrub -shrub wetlands are dominated by vegetation less than 20 feet in height. Soil is often saturated
and mucky, occasionally shallowly inundated. Vegetation consists of dense stands of shrubs, with trees often
absent or sparse. Common species include sphagnum moss, titi, black titi, fetterbush, large gallberrv, laurel
greenbier, pond pine, and slash pine.
Estuarine habitats include deepwater tidal habitats and adiacent tidal wetlands that are usually semi -
enclosed by land but have open, partIy obstructed, or sporadic access to the ocean, with ocean derived wa-
ter at least occasionally diluted by freshwater runoff from the land.
50
Impervious Surface Coverage by Census Block Group (2021)
OAK HARBOR
22%
51
Hydrology & Aquatic Ecosystems
Atlantic Beach is located within the Lower St. Johns Watershed, which covers the portion of the St. Johns Riv-
er and its tributaries from Lake George to the mouth of the river at the Atlantic Ocean. The Lower St. Johns
River is an elongated estuary that extends about 101 miles from its union with the Ocklawaha River to the
Atlantic Ocean, and is joined near its mouth by the Intracoastal Waterway (ICW). The hydrology of the Lower
St. Johns River is highly varied and influenced mainly by the interaction of tide, wind, freshwater flows, and
the confines of the river banks and bottom. The Lower St. Johns contains both freshwater and saltwater wet-
lands. Salt marshes are common along the ICW in the northern end of the watershed and provide important
nursery areas of saltwater commercial fisheries. In Atlantic Beach, tidal salt marsh creeks drain west in the
ICW, which then drains to the north in the St. Johns River which ultimately drains into the Atlantic Ocean.
Drainage Basins. Stormwater in Atlantic Beach flows to four primary drainage basins; Sherman Creek, Hop-
kins Creek, Puckett Creek, and the Intracoastal Waterway. Sherman Creek begins within Howell Park and
flows north to the Intracoastal Waterway (ICW) and is where the majority of water in the city drains. Hopkins
Creek drains the Royal Palms and Donner subdivisions in the central part of the city and runs south through
Neptune Beach into the ICW. Hopkins Creek and Shermans Creek watersheds both originate within the city
however only a small portion of the northern end of the Hopkins Creek watershed, approximately 340 acres,
is located within the city. The Shermans Creek watershed within the city limits is partially ditched and pri-
marily wooded. It originates within Howell Park and flows north through a drainage ditch flowing across the
Atlantic Beach Country Club through heavily developed areas until its confluence with Puckett Creek at SR
A1A. Areas west of Mavport Road flow into the Intracoastal Waterway or into Puckett Creek. The Puckett
Creek headwaters are located near Dutton Island Road on the city's northern boundary and flows through
the residential and commercially developed areas until its confluence with the Shermans Creek canal at SR
A1A where it then flows through salt marsh to Shermans Creek. The City primarily drains through storm -
water pipe collection systems that route water to larger ditch/creek systems. The City's stormwater discharg-
es to the Intracoastal Waterway via direct discharge from ditches, by way of Hopkins Creek or Sherman -
Puckett Creek. A majority of the City drains through Hopkins Creek or Sherman -Puckett Creek, which flows
through a combination of ditches and large culver crossings owned and maintained by other entities before
discharging to the Intracoastal Waterway.
52
Legend
City Limits
Hopkins Creek Basin
fit Intracoastal Waterway Basin
Puckett Creek Basin
Sherman Creek Basin
53
Hydrology & Aquatic Ecosystems
Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHA). Atlantic Beach has approximately 1,085 acres of SFHA area within the city
limits, mostly "AE" zones. Generally, the SFHA is shown along the Intracoastal Waterway (ICW) on the west
side of the city, in the Aquatic Gardens area near the Hopkins Creek ditch and pond, along Sherman Creek
and canal, and on the beach. These areas correspond to reported flooding issues as well as proiected flood-
ing issues and priority areas as identified in the city's stormwater master plan, coastal vulnerability assess-
ment, and adaptation plan. The city has a number of regulations and policies related to flood protection.
This includes a minimum finished floor elevation of 8.5 feet NAVD and at least 2.5 feet above the base flood
elevation. This requirement is meant to ensure that habitable living area is elevated above potential flood
waters. Also, the city requires on-site water retention for all development within the city, including single
family, which is extremely rare in the state. New development is required to retain water equal to a 25 -near
and 24-hour rainfall (9.3 inches) over the site. Development within a special flood hazard area (SFHA) is also
is required to retain water onsite to mitigate for any filling in order to ensure a no net loss of floodplain stor-
age. In addition, the city has managed to acquire land within the SFHA for preservation and flood protection
purposes.
Atlantic Beach City Limits
Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA)
0.25 J r•
54
#8 and #12
Zoomed In
#13 Zoomed In
Tri'G 7 I
#13
#11 Zoomed In
#9
ue—p4
roje =AZ
-
uu.nm
i.iu gnu_
amiNvAl
.wn n -
Open Space Preservation
Impact Adjustment Map
for Activity 420
I-1 Atlantic Beach City Boundary
SFHA (total 2118.18 acres)
® A
AE
VE
#1 River Branch Preserve {259.09 acres
#2 River Branch Addition 1 (11.84 acres)
#3 River Branch Addition 2 (7.73 acres)
#4 Tide Views Preserve (931 acres)
#5 Dutton Island Preserve (3127 acres)
#6 Selva Preserve (3.52 acres)
#7 Howell_Park (7.04 acres)
#8 Atlantic Beach Dog Park (03 acres)
#9 The Beach (303 acres)
—I #10 Golf Course (40.7 acres)
1 #11 Paradise Preserve 0.47 acres)
' #12 Aquatic Drainage Tract (1.88 acres)
11. #13 Fleet Landing (1.8 acres)
Total Open Space: 677.95 acres
Natural Functions
Open Space (NFOS) Map
I-7 Atlantic Beach City Boundary
SFHA (total 2118.18 acres)
�A
rfliV
AE
VE
NFOS1 Credit:
#1 River Branch Preserve (259.09 acres]
#2 River Branch Addition 1 (11.84 acres)
#3 River Branch Addition 2 (7.73 acres)
#4 Tide Views Preserve (9.31 acres)
#5 Dutton Island Preserve (31.27 acres)
#6 Selva Preserve (3.52 acres)
#7 Howell Park (7D4 acres)
Total NFOSI: 329.8 acres
Hydrology & Aquatic Ecosystems
Wetlands. A majority of the wetlands in Atlantic Beach are located along the western coast where the salt-
marsh and uplands meet. As undevelopable land in the city becomes scarce, many wetlands areas are seeing
increased interest from developers. Wetlands provide flood protection, water quality improvements, erosion
control, and habitat for aquatic and terrestrial plants and animals. Recognizing the importance of preserving
this environmentally sensitive land, the city has purchased over 350 acres of environmentally sensitive land
along the Intracoastal Waterway compromising of three preserves collectively referred to as the "Marsh Pre-
serves". The Marsh Preserves offer the public enjoyment of the saltwater marsh, pine flatwood forests, live
oak, magnolia, and water oak forests, and resource-based recreational facilities. The creation of the pre-
serves has protected a large land area of undeveloped wilderness within the urban landscape along the In-
tracoastal Waterway (ICW) including saltwater marshes, which are the most productive ecosystems on earth.
The City's Comprehensive Plan, the Marsh Master Plan, respective Management Plans, and a recorded ease-
ment all serve to ensure that these preserves will remain passive and natural in function. In addition to salt-
water marshes, there are "mixed scrub -shrub" and "mixed forested" wetlands along the ICW and "mixed
wetland hardwoods" along Shermans Creek toward the center of the city.
Beaches. The City of Atlantic Beach contains about two miles of public beaches along the Atlantic Ocean that
residents and visitors enjoy year round. There are 21 public beach access points along the beach with most
located at a street terminus while a few are narrow easements over private property. The majority of the
beach is adjacent to single-family homes, with the exception of several multi -family developments and the
One Ocean Resort and Spa. Sand dunes lie between ocean front development and the beach and provide the
city's first line of protection against storm surge. A primary concern of Atlantic Beach, and other Florida
coastal communities, is beach erosion caused by wave action. As a response to major erosion experienced in
Northeast Florida between the 1950s and 1970s, the Duval County Shore Protection Project was implement-
ed in 1978 and since then, six principal renourishments have occurred (1985-87, 1991, 1995, 2005, 2011 and
2016-17) in addition to periodic placement of maintenance -dredged sand. The beach renourishment occurs
about every five to six years to maintain beaches at their original design as part of the project. The renourish-
ment is funded in partnership with the City of Jacksonville, Florida Department of Environmental Protection,
and Duval County. The goal of engineered shore projects is to reduce risk and promote coastal resilience.
Shore projects help to reduce the damages — economic, environmental, infrastructure, human health and
safety — of tropical storms and hurricanes. Along with providing economic stability and opportunities, beach
nourishment projects also have inherent benefits in restoring critical habitat. It provides more sand for en-
dangered sea turtles, which normally nest on the same beach where they hatch, to find sufficient areas for
nesting. Several species of shorebirds also nest along the beach. And, of course, the beach is essential to the
area's economic driver, tourism. The 2016-17 Project Description: The Duval County shore protection project
nourished eroded beaches and rebuilt dunes devastated by Hurricane Matthew's passing in October 2016.
The City of Jacksonville funded the additional dune work that included building dunes in Jacksonville, Nep-
tune and a portion of Atlantic Beach. More than a million cubic yards of sand — equivalent to more than 2.7
billion pounds — was dredged, piped and tilled across about ten miles of county shoreline. Roughly 860,000
cubic yards went to building the beach and another 200,000 cubic yards went to rebuilding dunes. Construc-
tion started in mid-September 2016 to widen the beach berm between 20 to 60 feet, and raise the elevation
of the beach by about 3 to 5 feet. In addition to beach renourishment, the coastal dunes are protected by
the Florida Department of Environmental Protection's (FDEP) Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) Pro-
gram which regulates structures and activities which can cause beach erosion, destabilize dunes, damage
upland properties, or interfere with public access as well as regulations to protect sea turtles and dune
plants.
57
zan Comprehensive Plan
2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
lnecit cf Taane Maw
Background an4 G►:mmary of the City's Comprehensive PIanning Procc.x.
General Charactoric icr�and Conditiorc of the City of Atlantic Beas\h
Demographics of the City of Atlantic Beadi
A.
C,
F.4tcrc !lane Elcmcnt
Tnrcror tion Elc\vont
Infs raet ra Ele\vont
E. Roc\ motion and C' on Spaso Ek sent
F. ko►!ung Elcvont
G. Intergovernmental Coordination Elemdnt
H. Capital ImitrcvemonA Elcmcnt
I. Pbtlis School Elomtant
ACKNOW EDGIM ENTS
City of Atlantic Beach Commission
Ellen Glasser, Mayer
Cindy L. Anderson, Ccmmisci&cr
l�C:rtir� "Blythe" Waters, Commixxisor
Candace Kelly, Commkxisor
Brittany Norris, Ccmmiioncr
2
V
AA17
1—B-9
C , --G-6
n 1 n 11
E 1 —E--3
F 1 --F-S
G1 G6
I-1 1 I-1 11
I'-133
City of Atlantic Beach Staff
Joseph Gerrity, City Manager
'Yovin Hogencamp, Deputy City Manager
Shiano Corbin, Community Development Director
Porek W. Reeves, A4GP, Prin' al Plcnn+
Brian Brocdell, Planne
2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
INDEX OF TABLES AND MAPS
Future 1 and I lee Map Series
The Future Land Usc Map and all Maps included within the 2030 Comprehensive Plan Map Series are
included and adopted QC art of this CompmharcJro Plan cmyanth',ant. In thia ovent of any conflict
between any Maps and thc tcxt of thc PIcn, tha 3i(t of th,a Plcn Oall control.
Map A 1: Fataro Land Usc Map
Map A 2: Jurisdictional Wetlands
Map A 3a: Ccxtal High Hazard Ar a
Map A 3b: Evacuation Zones
Map A 3c: Shallow Coastal Flooding Ar as Map
A 3d: S a Level Rise Scenarios
Map A 4: Environmentally Sensitive Ar as
Map A 5: Energy Efficient and Conservation Zones
Map A 6: Military Influence Zone
Map E 1: Trarwortation Facilities
Map C 1: Potable Water Wells
fie.
T±Io A 1: Residential and Usc Classification and Permitted Density
Tizblo "—, Non Ftv �lcntial Intcrcity Eta nem rc'✓i A 7
Tela E 1: Projoacd T cffic \'olumxc 1
Tiablo B 2: City of Atlantic Beach Planning Ar Minimum ! ovels of Scrvicc B-7
Tablo E 1: Rccr ation and Opcn Spacc Level of Scrvicc Standards E
Tale -E-2: Emitting P►,r lic Recr ation and Open Space Facilities, 2009 E
2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Tabs !-! 1: R2crcotion and Qr;n Er:.ce Level of Service Standarii
Tabs !-! 3: C•anitary Sewer Level of Service Standari
Table. H 3: Solid Wastc and Potablc Watcr Lcvcl of Scrvicc Standards
mob1e-1=4-'I: Prairxgc Lcvcl of Scrvicc Standards
Taps !-! E: Tran1 portation Level of Scrvicc Standard'
-Sable H 6: Schedule of Capi l Improvements, 20 ' 9 through 29211 25
u 5
kei:-/Jcnt to thc requirements of Chaptcr 163, FUrt 11, Flar+da 9za ,`os (F.S.) and Chapter 9J 5, Flar+4a
Admin'ctrative Code (F.A.C.), the City of Atlantic Bach adopted its original Comprehensive Plan in
F,\ rcquirvA that the Plan be updated periodically through the
App cxi Report (EAR). The City's most previous EAR was
.. e
2010. EAR based amendments av required by Statutory or Rule ahangstis have net Istsn made since 2010
such that the effective plan not current.
Thc 2008 EAR evaluated thc 2003-2005 planning period, and ' rsrnarizcd tho clzat.K. of thc various
clemon , ct the timc of adoption of thc 2004 EAR based amendment conditiorc at the timc of
preparation of thc EAR (2003)-analyzcd thc changes since adoption of thc Plan; identified thc successes
or failuroc in implen}nnt ig tho policics and recommendation in the Plan and thc reasons therefore;
analyzed thc impact of any unforeseen problems or opportunities presented and identified the
mandatory Statutory and Adminic''atve Rule changes since thc adoption of tho Plan.
analysis, the Evaluation and Appraisal Pirport included recommendations for revisirni tr update the
adopted Comprehensive Plan.
Thc 2010 EAR based amendments reflected all changes recommended within thc 2008 EAR. Tcxt that
have been implcmcntcd through thc course of tho planning horizon, wcrc deleted. Othcr policics that
required continued implementation or that hove ---bean pretittlly implcmcntcd, were appropriately
modified to addrcss thc revised planning horizon. New goals, objectives and policics wcrc added to
addrcss thc issues raised within thc EAR and oc 'mandated by changes to Florida S-\ tos and thc Florida
Adminirtrrat vc Codc. In addition to thc policy changes, thc associated data and analysis as required for
ach Element was revised to support thk; EAR Based Amendment to thc Goals, Objectives and Policies.
On March 28, 2018 the City received notification of prohibition of fan amendments for failure to suhrxit
proposed Evaluation and Appr;A al Amendments by March 20, 2Q1/E. Th'A update resolves the notification
of prohibition frr fan ameeiresntt lay providing new goals, objectives and policitt that address Peril of
Floc./ e mandated by changes to Flori k Ctctcti cid the Florida A&minwtx tivc Codc. In addition, text
1
2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
that was no longer rcicvant hoc been deleted or updated. Demographic dai +.lit was not previously
included has been added to further describe comr init' character and conditionc. Firxdly) rrapc in the.
existing map series have been updated and scvsri).. hzrc been added to the map series with new
content.
2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
The City of Atlantic B ach is a crriall coastal cemmnity=xncicting of approximately three square miles of
land ar a and a population locc than 11,000. Thc City is located between two milca of Atlantic Ocean
b achfront on thc ast and the expansive me s i cnd estuarine environment of the Can Pablo Creck /
Intracoastal Waterway on thc west. The City is a near fully developed municipality where thc predominant
land use is residential consisting of stable and well ccti±liched neighborhoods. Thc City possesses a
unique character and "p ,•sx\ ..lity" where a high quality of life, diverse rec eationa'activitics, preservation
of corrmcnity character and protection of r atu_x.l resources arc day to day priorities to residents and
elected offi€aIc-ac well.
The City ccntairi: two commercial corridors: the north side of Atlantic Boulevard (SR10) extending from
• .
Boulevard northerly to the municipal limits of the City at Dvttan Island Road. Both corridors continue to
experience a solid level of market driven redevelopment. The appropriate redevelopment and aesthetic
enhancements to the Mayport Road corridor continue to be strategic planning priorities to the City. In
'oning Implementation Plan (MRVIP) was completed to guide
future development along thc Mayport Road corridor. The MRVIP includes recommendations for new
4 c gn andards and activity prognmming
- -- ---
•
Q Plan, the City 1-vx. annexed and acquired extensive march ar as
extending westerly to the Intracoastal Waterway. The future land use of these ar as is designated as
... _ - - _ - _ . - _ - •!i hcd therein. Tideviews Preserve,
which opened to the public in 1996, consists of eight acres of passive p ' ri�and offers scenic views of the
.. --
Dutton Island Preserve, which opened in 2003, is a X10 acre passive park containing o 000 feet of nater„
trails, fishing anor as. Preservation and protection of these ro.t►:rol coastal resources, particularly the City's dense native
cmm►:nity values.
Thc 2009 acquisition of thc 350 acro Rv:Arxn Pritchard Trot math tact, renamed tha River Branch
Preserve, significantly increased thc City's inventory of Environmentally Sensitive Lands and passive open
space. In 2018, the City purchased 3.52 acres of -a lerl' cd residential development adjacent to Sherman
Creek known as Salva Preserve. The long range use of the 3.52 acres was not determined at the time
these EAR based amendments were swrmitted for consideration.
T#n primary objective of this Plan amendment is to restate or update existing goals, objectives and
policies, and provide new onoc, cam. ap*� apriate, and as needed to reflect changes required by law. Since
the City'c low E, •_ - _ . • - - . - _ - _ •, _ _ _ "da S c 'tcs was
created that requires comprehensive plarx; include a redevelopmiant component referred to as Peril of
€ieed th/t outlinec prir��lec that meat bo cod to eliminate inappropriate and unsafe developmiant in
thc Thc state required Peril of Flood camper/ant, new -community demographics, and an
updated map series have been included in thio EAR based amendment.
2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Demographic
Thc demographics section con .,ire information about thc City's populcian and housing characteristics.
-d in thic taction is derived from thc Unitcd States
Gorr✓w�. Tx_au's 2012 2016 American Corsmu+niV, Survey (ACS) 5 Year Et rrx tes
Reputation
Thc 2017 estimated population for Atlantic B ach was 13,608 whioh is up naarly 1,000 from thc 2010
reported population of 12,655. Thc population pyramid bclow depict: t cg— ibwvon by gender of
Atlantic Bcach residents.
Population Pyramid
800 600 400 200 0 200
85+ 226 106
80-84 181 119
75-79 27
70-74 336
65-69 388
60-64 465
55-59 537
50-54 685
45-49 465
40-44 362
35-39 356
30-34 323
25-29 304
20-24 407
15-19 401
10-14
5-9
0-4
AGE CATEGORIES
259
226
233
400
232
238
464
600 800
417
503
391
378
391
291
629
• Female — Male
291
238
397
450
404
682
The reported median age of Atlantic B ach residents was 46.2 in 2016, higher than the reported median
age of both Duval County (36) and Florida (41.6). Thc map bclow depicts thc median agc by Ccnsus Block
and shows thc median agc dccr ascs as you move ast to west within thc City.
VII
2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Median Age
by Census Block
i
7
i
I
I
i
El 1.100101'
Median Age
BeI•::.., 30
30-40
40.1 -50
Above 50
0 0.25 0.5
1
Miles
Data taken from US Census 2012-2016
American Community 5 -year Estimates
2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
The pie chart below represents th>, rcicorted race of Atlantic Bach residents. large majority (87.9%3
of resiz!cnts zre White, with 8% Black or African American.
American Indian or
Alaska Native
1%
Black or African
American
8%
Asian
3%
Native Hawaiian and
Othre Pacific Islander
0%
Race
2012-2016 ACS Estimates
• White
• Black or African American
• American Indian or Alaska Native
• Asian
• Native Hawaiian and Othre Pacific
Islander
• Some other race
Thcrc arc 5,502 households and an average household size in Atlantic Beach is 2.37\ Thic-3 3wor thin the
average household sizcs of 2.58 rcportcd for Duval County and 2.64 rcportcd for Florida.
Educational Attainment
According to thc 2012 2016 ACS Ctirnato, 94.2% of thc population Yx -at louxt a high cchool degree. This
is a greater rate tkxan that of both Duval County (S .9%J, and Florida (87.2%).
35.0%
30.0%
25.0%
20.0%
15.0%
10.0%
5.0%
0.0%
5.8%
1
Educational Attainment
Population 25 years old and over
21.1%
i
16.6%
8.9%
1
28.7%
18.9%
Less than high High school Some college, no Associates Bachelor's Graduate or
school graduate graduate degree degree degree professional
degree
VIII
i
2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
$160,000
$140,000
$120,000
$100,000
$80,000
$60,000
$40,000
$20,000
$0
• Atlantic Beach
• Duval County
• Florida
Income
Household & Family Income
I11 IIS III
Median HH Income
$70,921
$49,196
$48,900
Mean HH Income
Median Family
Income
$115,725
$67,800
$69,936
$86,375
$60,669
$59,139
• Atlantic Beach • Duval County • Florida
Mean Family
Income
$143,422
$79,989
$81,708
The chart above shows the City's reported household and family incomes compared to those of Duval
County and of Florida. The chart shows Atlantic B oah I-Kx:N.c higher household and family income the
of Duval County and Florida.
The chart below shows the median ornings of Atlantic B och resideenc:, bccod on cducatioru - ainme-Fit,
$90,000
$80,000
$70,000
$60,000
$50,000
$40,000
$30,000
$20,000
$10,000
$0
Median Income by Educational Attainment
(Population 25 years and older with earnings)
$18,250
1
$26,114
1
$31,003
1
$50,783
$85,688
Less than high High school Some college or Bachelor's degree Graduate or
school graduate graduate associate's degree professional degree
IX
x
2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Transportation
Means of Transportation
(Workers 16 years old and over commuting to work)
90% 85%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Car, Truck, or Van
1%
Public
Transportation
3.5%
1.9%
8.8%
Walk/Bicycle Taxicab, Motorcycle, Worked at Home
or Other Means
The vast majority (85%) of the working population drive personal vehicles to work, with 75A% driving
alcor The ser.Ca+.wL with 411.4% of the working population working outside of Atlantic B ach city limits
and a reported mean travel time to work of 26.7 minutes.
Occupation/Employment
Of the 11,32' residents 16 y ars old and over in "t_lanti2 9 ach, 7,329 reported to be in the labor force.
Of these 7,329 residsn*�, 2R1 reported being unemployed and 4e rcpertod being in the Armed Forces.
The chart hlaw br aks down the occupation for the rsmaining 5,902 residtntr that ars vrxpI yed in the
civilian labor force.
2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Occupation
(Civilian employees 16 years old and over)
5.7% 4.8%
• Management, business, science, and arts
• Service
• Sales and Office
Natural resources, construction, and maintenance
• Production, transportation, and material moving
g
In 2016, there wcrc 6,554 housing knitc in the city, which is from thc 6,1711-mixi.ng units rcportcd in
2010 and thc 6,003 hou:c ng u:nitc reported in 2000. The chart below showrthat 53.9% of thc h•ot.:r✓ng gni
wcrc occupied, while 16.1% wcrc valiant, Thi; 15.1% vacancy rate c higher than those rcportcd in 2010
{40.5%Jfund 2000 (6.3%).
XI
XII
2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
25.00%
20.00%
15.00%
10.00%
5.00%
0.00%
Housing Units (6,554)
Year Built
■ Occupied
■ Vacant
1 • I
L°y°ot �°°° °�° y0) '• '•
y°°° (7) y(75 0)
1,
05N,
T#a thcrt okovc shows thc 6,554 hawing unit@ c'kx oificd by thc time period they were builtt. Nearly 50%
of the howcing snit, were built between 1970 and 1989.
Thc reported median value of thc 3,609 owncr occupied hosring snit, in the City is $330,400. Thc chart
below shows the hc►v.ing tock broken down by value.
2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
$1 Million or more
$500-$999.9
$300-$499.9
$200-$299.9
$150-$199.9
$100-$149.9
$50-$99.9
Less than $50
Home Values
(Measured in $1,000s)
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900
XIII
XIV
2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Median Home Value
by Census Block
Median Home Value
Belov,, 5100,000
5100,001 - 5200:000
3200,001 - 3400.000
Above $400,000
C 0.25 D_5
Miles
Data taken from US Census 2012-2015
American Community Survey 5 -year Estimates
20 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT
A-1
20 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN — FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT
According to the U.S. Census the estimated 2020 population of Atlantic Beach was 13,513. This represents
an increase of about 7% from the 2010 census reported population of 12,655. The population increase
during the 1990s was a result of several new residential developments within the city such as the Fleet
Landing retirement community and the Sevilla Gardens and Selva Linkside neighborhoods. After these
developments, the city became mostly "built -out" with limited available land for development. In fact,
the city's population actually decreased between 2000 and 2010 by an estimated 713 people. The increase
in population from 2010 to 2020 can largely be attributed to the annexation and development of the
Atlantic Beach Country Club which added about 150 single-family homes to the city.
Year Population Source
2020 13,513 U.S. Census
2010 12,655 U.S. Census
2000 13,368 U.S. Census
1990 11,636 U.S. Census
The city's population is expected to remain stable with little to no growth anticipated. The city is largely
"built -out" with an estimated 49 acres of vacant land, most of which is difficult to develop due to
environmental and flooding concerns. Further, the city is experiencing an aging population with the
median age and percentage of the population 65 years and over both continuing to increase. Also, single-
family homes are accounting for an increasing share of the total residential units in the city, thus lowering
residential density, and the average household size within the city continues to decrease. Finally, high
vacancy rates within the higher property value areas of the city demonstrate that an increasing share of
homes may be vacation or "second" homes. All of these factors indicate a low population growth rate,
however, as land continues to increase in value and scarcity, remaining vacant lots will likely be developed
resulting in additional population. As such, a 10 -year population growth rate of 1% has been applied to
proiect population for the years 2030, 2040, and 2050.
Year Proiected Population Growth Rate
2030 13,649 1%
2040 13,786 1%
2050 13,924 1%
The following inventory of existing land uses is based on the 2023 Duval County Property Appraiser GIS
parcel data and real estate tax roll. The total acreage does not include open water, rights-of-way, and
beaches within the city limits as these are not parcels included in the GIS data set. Also note that the
percentage of total acreage does not equal 100% due to rounding the percentages to the nearest whole
number.
Land Use Acreage Percent of Total Acreage
Residential 1,041 52%
Conservation & Parks 509 25%
Commercial & Industrial 290 14%
Government 69 3
Institutional 51 3%
20 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN — FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT
Vacant
49
2%
There are an estimated 163 vacant parcels totaling roughly 49 acres within the City. This number does not
include city owned parcels or parcels classified as "waste land" by the property appraiser as these areas
are unsuitable for development. Additionally, this number does not include those parcels which were
classified as vacant but now have active construction occurring on the site. These vacant parcels are largely
scattered throughout the City, with the largest concentration of vacant lots on the western edge of the
Marsh Oaks neighborhood (see Map A-8). Much of this area is low in elevation, contains wetlands, and
experiences flooding resulting in challenging building conditions.
A. Future Land Use Element Goals, Objectives, and Policies
Future land use, new development and redevelopment within the City of Atlantic Beach shall be in
accordance with the following Goals, Objectives, and Policies and as further controlled by the Land
Development Regulations, as may be amended to implement the Goals, Objectives, and Policies of this
Comprehensive Plan. Development areas shall be defined by the land use categories described within the
Future Land Use Element and as depicted on the Future Land Use Map, included in this Plan amendment
as Map A-1 of the Future Land Use Map Series.
Pursuant to Section 163.3194(1), Florida Statutes, as may be amended, all Development undertaken, and
all actions taken in regard to Development, shall be consistent with this Comprehensive Plan. Further, all
Land Development Regulations enacted or amended shall be consistent with the adopted Comprehensive
Plan, and in the event of inconsistency between the requirements of any zoning or Land Development
Regulations and the Comprehensive Plan, the regulatory provisions of this Comprehensive Plan shall
prevail.
Goal A.1
The City shall manage growth and redevelopment in a manner, which results in a pattern of land uses
that: 1) encourages, creates and maintains a healthy and aesthetically pleasing built environment, 2)
avoids blighting influences, 3) preserves and enhances coastal, environmental, natural, historic and
cultural resources, 4) maintains the City's distinct residential community character, 5) provides for
reasonable public safety and security from hazardous conditions associated with coastal locations, 6)
that provides public services and facilities in a timely and cost effective manner, and 7) that encourages
energy efficiency and the use of renewable energy resources.
Objective A.1.1
Environmental Resources
Land development activities and project review procedures shall include requirements intended to protect
natural environmental features and improve the physical characteristics of the City so as to ensure the
conservation and protection of Environmentally Sensitive Areas, as defined by Policy D.3.2.8 of the Coastal
Conservation Element and any other natural resources including wetlands, wildlife habitats, estuarine
systems, and surface and groundwater resources.
1 P. .
\ 1/
Policy A.1.1.1 Land development within the City shall be permitted only where such development is
compatible with environmental limitations of the site and only when submitted plans
demonstrate appropriate recognition of topography, soil conditions, flooding conditions,
trees, vegetation and other Environmentally Sensitive Areas, including wetlands and
coastal resources, and habitat protection of rare, endangered or threatened species and
areas of unique natural beauty.
Policy A.1.1.2 The City shall maintain an inventory of lands, which possess significant environmental
features, habitats, and areas of unique interest or beauty. The potential for development
proposals to adversely impact such areas shall be considered prior to the issuance of
development permits.
Policy A.1.1.3 The City shall protect potable water well fields and surface waters from the adverse impacts
of development and shall prohibit the establishment of incompatible land uses adjacent
to potable water wells. Such incompatible land uses shall include all Industrial and
manufacturing uses, but shall also include uses, which have the potential to contaminate
surface water or groundwater resources.
Objective A.1.2
Wetlands, Environmentally Sensitive Areas and Estuarine Environments
The City shall protect, conserve and enhance the natural functions of existing wetlands, marsh and
estuarine systems, and other Environmentally Sensitive Areas in order to maintain the quality and function
of natural systems and wildlife habitats.
Note: The terms "wetlands" or interchangeably "natural wetlands" as used within this Plan shall mean
those wetland areas which have been created through natural means or through restoration or wetland
creation projects of government agencies having authority over these resources, and shall not be
construed to include stormwater ponds, or other manmade drainage facilities, which may be designated
as jurisdictional for the purpose of stormwater management, but which are not natural Wetlands.
Policy A.1.2.1 The City shall protect natural wetlands and other Environmentally Sensitive Areas, as may
be identified by Map A-52 and Map A-4 of the Future Land Use Map Series or as may be
identified by other accepted environmental survey methodologies, and their functions
from the adverse impacts of development by maintaining thc following required upland
buffers between wetlands and adjacent development as set forth herein and as also
implemented through the Land Development Regulations.
(a)
After thc effective date of J;ic plan amendment, a minimuyn rc.��ral vegetative
upland buffer of fifty (50) foo call be required and mein .ined between developed
a.c and thc Intracoastal Waterway (ICW) rc_ardlcss of any other regulatory agency
requirer:e. t sf a lesser distance. This requirement shall aIo apply to thc portions of
trrbutarrw, er other water bodies connected to the Intracrxtal Waterway:
St►ah imtie\i of the ICW and thc.,t trilcvte\ ies, str ams, or other water bodies subject
tc th .. buffer requirtmsnt shall be-sctahkhcd by the presence of a Man High Water
Linc—ef the odj-aunt tributary, str am or other water body as imtabliched in
accordance with Section 177.26, Flori& Ctut►t - -
A-4
20 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN — FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT
shall hs dcpicten all Cas,Plans, svc coscd devclopmsnt ansa and othcr documents
surrnitts _ _ -• -- e -ct uplcnd buffer shill b4
m asured from the Ct. Jchns Pii'er Water Management C'Y'trrct or Florida Dapari-nent
of Environmontc R-ctoction Wetland jurisdictional line.
Determinations of vested right:, which may supersede thc requirement for thic 59
foot buffx rhall bo made on a case by caro bcu� in accordance with thc Land
Devs'cs\-es`nt Regulations and applicable Florida law.
{Is) In t1-4 case of other retcrsl wetland ar as, which may not bc directly connected to
lest o part of the
eoas�� r,�sh end estuarine systuNsvz r�.tcr� vegetative upland buffer of twenty five
{25) feot,.hall be required and mcin .incd between development and adjacent
wetlands. Whcrc required, such buffer shall bo measured from thc jurisdictional
wetland line as catz,Nh`hed by the appropriate regulatory agency.
(c) With thc exception of facilities to provide public access for thc recreational use of
Intracoastal related rc z—al resources, any bufferc oc may bc required by preceding
•pa;sa cph,c (,-a) o-r(b) shall bo m:in wined in a &'ato with thc exception of the
clearing of Undcrstory Vegetation as defined by Chapter 23 of thc City's Code of
Ordinances, and any such clearing mall bo approved by the City and if required, the
a-p-la-te State or cdcral agency prior to any form of clecring, alteration or
d'ictxzbancc of a required buffer.
(d)(a) Whcrc romcining nam sal wetlands have been damaged or degraded over time
through previous development, storm evcxn :., improper drainage runoff or othcr
adverse activities, but where wetland vegetation and Nabi its t II aro p;sadomirrant in
quantity on a proposed development sito,all plarx-i✓Ami-tod for review or permitting
shall demonstrate a plan for mitigation, restoration, onhrwno xrant or recovery of
jurisdictional wctlan& It is thrc eniv asz intent of thc City that rc rect Icy a#
jurisdictional wetlands ocs r thresbh any devslcimsxnt vection within the City. Any
impacted wetlands on a dcveei nt sits th II ks rsck.ccd elsewhere on tlNz :\\Na
sits cr sl►ewherc within the City of Atlantic B ach. The City c`-x;.II incorporate
app:csviaticn provisions within this Lond Develos\nt flastkk.ticxis tc further
impIcm nt this
Policy A.1.2.2 The City shall protect wetlands and estuarine environments from the adverse impacts of
development and shall prohibit the establishment of incompatible land uses adjacent to
wetlands. Such incompatible land uses shall include all Industrial uses, but shall also
include uses, which have the potential to disturb, contaminate or degrade wetland
functions or natural systems associated with wetlands and estuaries.
Policy A.1.2.3 The City shall require that, as a condition of development approval, new construction
projects provide effective stormwater management, which avoids the contamination of
Environmentally Sensitive Areas, wetlands, marsh and estuarine environments in
accordance with applicable water quality standards of the St. Johns River Water
Management District, the City's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Systems
(NPDES) permit and Stormwater Management Plan and the Land Development
Regulations, as may be amended.
Policy A.1.2.4 The City shall not issue development permits that would significantly alter wetland
communities and functions.
Policy A.1.2.5 New development shall be subject to the stormwater regulations as set forth within the
Land Development Regulations, and post development conditions shall not discharge any
increased level of stormwater run-off into the City's stormwater system.
Policy A.1.2.6 The City shall enforce all applicable wetland regulations, including those as set forth within
the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of this Plan, and shall continue to
develop and implement comprehensive strategies to provide for the effective
protection of wetlands, marsh and estuarine systems, and other Environmentally
Sensitive Areas within and adjacent to the City.
Policy A.1.2.7 The City shall encourage shorelines lacking wetland vegetation to be planted with native
vegetation in order to minimize potential flood damage, stabilize the shoreline and trap
sediments and other non -point source pollutants, and provide additional habitat for fish
and wildlife.
Policy A.1.2.8 The City shall support and encourage the development of a strict flood plain management
program by state and local governments to preserve hydrologically significant wetlands
and other natural flood plain features.
Objective A.1.3
Maintaining Residential Character
The City shall encourage future development and redevelopment, which 1) retains the exceptionally high
quality of life and the predominantly residential character of the City of Atlantic Beach, 2) provides for the
preservation and protection of the dense tree canopy, and 3) which provides for varied and diverse
recreational opportunities, including the preservation, acquisition and development of public access to
the beach, Intracoastal Waterway and other water -related resources, and which provides for and
maintains energy efficient land use patterns.
Policy A.1.3.1 Additional commercial or industrial development shall be permitted only on those lands
that are zoned to permit such development as of the adoption date of this Plan
amendment, or following adoption of an amendment to the Future Land Use Map (FLUM).
In considering any such application for a FLUM amendment, the City shall find that each
of the following conditions are demonstrated by the applicant seeking said amendment.
(a) There are adequate public facilities available to serve the proposed development.
(b) The proposed commercial or industrial development shall not have adverse impacts
to surrounding neighborhoods, other properties, the natural environment, the
aesthetic qualities of the City and shall not impair or degrade scenic natural views.
4530
(c) There is a demonstrated deficiency of commercial or industrial lands within the City
to serve the needs of residents of the City for such uses.
Policy A.1.3.2 The City shall continue to rigorously enforce its tree protection, landscaping and buffering
regulations, as well as the City's "Adopt -a -Tree" and right-of-way tree planting program.
Policy A.1.3.3 The City shall continue to manage, preserve and construct facilities that provide diverse
opportunities to all residents for both passive and active recreation, including parks,
nature preserves, trails and bikeways, skateboard parks and ball fields, dune crossovers,
waterway accesses and associated amenities.
Policy A.1.3.4 The City shall not permit, either through public or private action, public access ways to the
beach, the Intracoastal Waterway, or other waterways, which are open to the public as
of the date of adoption of this Plan amendment, to be closed, vacated or restricted from
public use in any manner.
Policy A.1.3.5 The City shall continue to expand opportunities and facilities for public access to the beach,
the Intracoastal Waterway, and associated creeks and marshes for passive and natural
resource based recreation activities, such as hiking and biking, canoeing and kayaking,
birding, fishing and other similar activities that have limited impact on these resources.
Objective A.1.4
Old Atlantic Beach
Sites, structures, and neighborhoods, which have been identified as having historic, architectural,
archaeological, civic or cultural importance, shall be protected from damage or destruction, and the
preservation of such valuable resources shall be encouraged by the City.
Policy A.1.4.1 Sites and structures within the City, which are determined to have historic or archeological
significance, and which are found to be worthy of preservation in accordance with
standards established by the Florida Division of Historical Resources, shall be protected
to the extent possible.
Policy A.1.4.2 The City shall encourage the preservation of significant historic and archaeological sites
through public information programs, incentives and recognition of the preservation
efforts of individuals and organizations.
Policy A.1.4.3 The City shall maintain within its Land Development Regulations provisions intended to
retain the unique community identity, the architectural character, and the residential
scale of that area of the City known as Old Atlantic Beach.
Objective A.1.5
Sound Development Patterns
The City shall maintain development patterns, which 1) prevent blighting influences and eliminate
nonconforming uses; 2) foster diverse and stable neighborhoods; 3) protect coastal and environmental
4543
resources; 4) provide proper locations for public facilities and utilities and energy-efficient land use
patterns, and 5) which encourage healthy and aesthetically pleasing living conditions.
Policy A.1.5.1 The City shall review all applications for development permits to determine compliance
with the Land Development Regulations, particularly with regard to provision of open
space, required parking, on- site traffic flow, appropriate signage, impervious surface area
limits, landscaping and tree protection so as to avoid traffic congestion, hazardous public
safety conditions and inefficient land use, which may also result in harmful environmental
or aesthetic effects.
Policy A.1.5.2 The City shall consider, in conjunction with the issuance of all development permits within
its boundaries, the impacts of development upon adjacent jurisdictions, regional service
entities, regional planning policies, and hurricane evacuation plans. Further, the City shall
cooperate with such entities to ensure equitable, timely, and coordinated urban
development activities.
Policy A.1.5.3 The City shall not permit expansion or replacement of land uses in a manner that is
inconsistent with this Comprehensive Plan, as amended.
Policy A.1.5.4 The City shall continue to enforce provisions for landscaping and other buffering methods
as set forth within the Land Development Regulations, in order to prevent and minimize
incompatible land use relationships, excessive noise transmission, and to provide
screening of unattractive views and to enhance the aesthetic qualities of streets,
neighborhoods, and public areas of the City.
Policy A.1.5.5 Flexible regulatory methods shall be utilized to provide incentives for achieving
environmental enhancement, economical land development and energy efficient
patterns of land use that provide for an appropriate mix of uses within the City.
Policy A.1.5.6 Commercial and light industrial development shall be located and designed so as to
minimize adverse effects on residential areas, traffic facilities and the aesthetic character
of the City.
Policy A.1.5.7 Public facilities and utilities shall be located and designed to provide the most cost effective
service and to minimize public inconvenience
Policy A.1.5.8 The City shall permit residential development only in compliance with the residential
density limitations as set forth within the Land Development Regulations, and as
designated on the Future Land Use Map in accordance with the following table.
Table A-1. Residential Land Use Classification and Permitted Density
Residential Land Use Classification
Residential — Low Density (RL)
Residential — Medium Density (RM)
Maximum Density Permitted per Acre
Up to six (6) Dwelling Units
UpScvcn (7) to fourteen (14) Dwelling
Units
20 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN — FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT
Residential — High Density (RH)
j. Fiftccn (15} to twenty (20) Dwelling
Units
•
non residential intensity standards for commercial and indklroricl Icnd use classifications
as designated on thc Future Land Use Map and in accordance with thc following table.
Classification
Commercial
Qcn*rr.:l LZ„ianocc C ri
Industrial
Public and Scrni Fb blip
Floor Area Ratio* Impervious Surface Area 1 imit
.50 .70 Floor Ar c P is 7-Q% rraiumvm
.50 .70 Floor Arca Ratio 7Q nxmim:.rn
.25 .70 Floor Ara Ratio 70% mraicim:zn
.50 .70 Floor Arca Ratio 70% rrranima n
* The Floor Arca Ratio is determined by dividing thc gross floor a;sa of a building by thc size of the
property upon which thc building will be constructed.
Objective A.1.6
Preservation of Older Neighborhoods
The City shall preserve the sound structural condition and the diverse character of the built environment
of the City and shall encourage development programs and activities that are directed at infill
development as well as the conservation, redevelopment and re -use of existing structures and the
preservation of and re- investment in older neighborhoods.
Policy A.1.6.1 The City shall continue to implement code enforcement procedures in order to prevent
physical deterioration and blight throughout the City.
Policy A.1.6.2 The City shall encourage and assist in the revitalization of older neighborhoods that provide
housing for very low, low and moderate- income residents, particularly neighborhoods
containing sound, but aging housing stock, where adequate public services and facilities
re existing.
Policy A.1.6.3 The City shall discourage redevelopment practices that displace very low, low and
moderate -income residents.
Objective A.1.7
Coordination with Other Agencies and Adjacent Cities
The City shall coordinate its planning and development activities with the resource management plans of
the St. Johns River Water Management District, the Department of Environmental Protection, the City of
Jacksonville and the City of Neptune Beach, as well as with other private entities and public agencies, as
may be appropriate.
4543
Policy A.1.7.1 The City shall develop and adopt regulations and policies, which are consistent with
resource management plans of other government agencies and any special districts
within which the City is located.
Policy A.1.7.2 The City shall not issue local development permits prior to the issuance of any other
required permit from County, State or Federal agencies having jurisdiction and permitting
authority over the proposed development. Issuance of a required permit from County,
State or Federal agencies shall not be a presumption of any entitlement to a local
Development Permit.
Objective A.1.8
Post -Disaster Redevelopment
The City shall encourage innovative land development approaches and concepts in the event of post
disaster redevelopment, which will have the effect of reducing dependence upon automobile travel,
conserving valuable natural resources and Environmentally Sensitive Areas, and preventing property
damage as well as threats to human safety and security.
Policy A.1.8.1 Opportunities for encouraging the use of innovative land development practices shall be
provided within the Land Development Regulations.
Policy A.1.8.2 The City shall continue to be a participating agency in the Duval County Local Mitigation
Strategy (LMS) and shall continue to implement the goals and objectives of the LMS.
Policy A.1.8.3 The City shall identify the Coastal High Hazard Area as the area below the Category 1 storm
surge line as established by the Sea, Lake and Overland Surges from Hurricane (SLOSH)
computerized storm surge model pursuant to Chapter 163, Florida Statutes.
Policy A.1.8.4 Within residential development areas, that are within the Coastal High Hazard Area, as
depicted by the Coastal High Hazard Area map, adopted as Map DA -13 of the Future Land
Use Map Series and made part of this Plan, the City shall not approve Plan or Map
amendments that increase residential densities.
Policy A.1.8.5 The City shall not approve changes to Zoning District classifications or amendments to the
Future Land Use Map that would have the effect of increasing populations with special
hurricane evacuation needs, as described within Section 252.355, Florida Statutes.
Objective A.1.9
Public Services and Facilities
The City shall coordinate future land development and redevelopment with the availability of public
services and facilities so as to avoid deficient levels of service as established within this Plan.
Policy A.1.9.1 Development permits issued by the City shall be conditioned upon the availability of
facilities and services necessary to serve the proposed development, and facilities and
services shall be authorized at same time said development is approved. Facilities and
services shall meet the established levels of service as adopted in this Comprehensive Plan
and shall be available concurrent with the impacts of development, or an alternative
means of meeting concurrency requirements shall be provided.
Policy A.1.9.2 The City shall amend its Land Development Regulations as appropriate to effectively
implement the land use classifications as adopted on the Future Land Use Map and as
required to meet the Objectives and Policies set forth within this Plan.
Objective A.1.10
Surrounding Land Uses
The City shall continue to maintain a development character, which is compact in form, orderly in its land
use pattern, and diversified in its makeup so as to ensure employment opportunities, affordable housing,
a pleasant living environment, and cost-effective and energy efficient public services.
Policy A.1.10.1 The City shall undertake land annexation only when it can demonstrate an ability to
provide services and facilities in a manner that maintains the level of service standards as
set forth within this Plan and only when such annexation contributes to the orderly
growth and development of the region within which the City is situated.
Policy A.1.10.2 Those areas of the City, which are designated as Development Areas, are substantially
developed as of the adoption date of this Plan with no opportunity for sprawl
development. The City shall not, however, approve amendments to the Future Land Use
Map that would convert areas designated as Conservation to Development Areas where
adverse impacts to wetland and estuarine systems would result from development
activities. Adverse impacts shall be presumed to result from activities, which contaminate,
diminish the quantity or degrade wetlands and Environmentally Sensitive Areas, or
natural functions and systems associated with such areas.
Policy A.1.10.3 The City shall encourage the clustering of uses in locations where infrastructure facilities
are available or where extensions and enlargements can be achieved efficiently,
particularly with respect to commercial infill development along the Mayport Road
corridor.
Policy A.1.10.4 The City shall actively support the appropriate redevelopment and infill development of
the Mayport Road corridor. Retail and service uses that sustain neighborhoods, and
4530
encourage a more aesthetically pleasing and pedestrian friendly environment shall be
encouraged. New development along Mayport Road shall be in compliance with the
Commercial Corridor Development Standards as set forth within the Land Development
Regulations.
Policy A.1.10.5 Along the Mayport Road corridor, the continuation and proliferation of light industrial
uses, automotive sales and repair businesses and other more intensive commercial
business activities shall be discouraged in favor of those businesses and uses that provide
neighborhood serving retail products and services that generate daily activity and
interaction between residents of the surrounding neighborhoods such as banks,
drugstores, restaurants, churches, child care centers, grocery stores and similar
businesses and uses.
Objective A.1.11
Appropriate Land Use Patterns
The City shall provide for land use, development and redevelopment in an efficient manner, which
supports the land use designations as set forth within the 2030 Future Land Use Map; which enforces the
residential densities and the limitations upon the type and intensity of uses, and which results in
development appropriate to the sensitive coastal location of the City, particularly with respect to the
predominantly residential character and small-town scale of the City.
Policy A.1.11.1 The lands use categories, as depicted upon the 2030 Future Land Use Map (FLUM), which
is Map A-24 of the Future Land Use Map Series, shall permit the following uses and
activities.
(a) Conservation — Conservation lands shall include those lands so designated on the
FLUM. These areas are generally composed of open land, water, marsh and wetlands
and Environmentally Sensitive Areas. Conservation lands may be either publicly or
privately owned. It is intended that the natural and open character of these areas be
retained and that adverse impacts, which may result from development, shall be
prohibited or minimized. Adverse impacts shall be presumed to result from activities,
which contaminate or degrade wetlands and Environmentally Sensitive Areas, or
natural functions and systems associated with such areas.
Permitted uses within the Conservation category shall be limited to the following and
shall be further controlled by the Land Development Regulations.
• Activities intended for the conservation, re-establishment and re -nourishment,
or protection of natural resources.
• Recreation uses and facilities that are customarily described as passive in nature
including, but not limited to, fishing, hiking and biking, canoeing, kayaking, and
the use of other similar small, quiet low -speed watercraft.
• Very low intensity outdoor or water -dependent recreational related uses
(excluding commercial marinas) that are determined not to be in conflict with the
0 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN — FUTURE LAND USE ELEM
intent of the Conservation category, subject to applicable Federal, State and local
policies and permitting requirements.
(b) Commercial —The Commercial land use category is intended to provide appropriate
locations for neighborhood and community businesses providing services and retail
sales for the City and the closely surrounding communities. Government, civic,
religious, cultural and institutional uses, may also be located within this category.
Permitted uses within the Commercial category, along with uses that may be allowed
by special exception, shall be limited to the following and as more specifically
described within the Land Development Regulations and when located within the
respective Zoning District classifications, which are intended to provide a decreasing
level of use intensity due to proximity to residential uses. Residential uses, not
exceeding the Medium Density category shall also be permitted, provided that such
residential development shall not be permitted within the Coastal High Hazard Area.
• General Commercial. These areas shall include those businesses that provide
retail goods and services, which serve the routine and daily needs of residents,
including banks and professional services, grocery and convenience stores,
restaurants, accredited public and private schools and child care, but not
including manufacturing, warehousing, storage, mini -warehouses, mini -storage:
personal storage, or high intensity commercial activities of a regional nature, or
uses that have the potential for negative impact to surrounding properties due to
excessive noise, light or extremely late hours of operation. Residsntial vices, not
• shall aho be permitted, when in
rxxvnt and redcvticmtnt,
provides; that ivch residential devclopmint aha» not be permitted within the
GEN7i4tal High Hazard Ar a.
• Limited Commercial. These areas shall include low intensity office, service and
retail businesses that are compatible when located in close proximity to
neighborhoods. These uses are intended primarily to serve the needs of the
closely surrounding neighborhood. Large-scale discount super -centers or
"BigBox" retailers or similar intense commercial uses intended to serve a regional
market are not permitted within the Limited Commercial category.
• Professional and Office. These areas shall be limited to small neighborhood scale
businesses and professional offices that are compatible with, and have no
measurable or noticeable adverse impacts, upon surrounding residential uses.
Such uses include offices for doctors and dentists (but not clinics or hospitals),
accountants, architects, attorneys, engineers, land surveyors, real estate brokers,
financial planners, insurance and real estate agents and the like.
(c) Central Business District—This area contains a well-established pattern and character
of development, and permitted uses include retail, office, restaurant, and certain
entertainment uses, which contribute to the commercial, civic and cultural vitality of
the City as illustrated within the Atlantic Beach Town Center area. The Central
Business District is an economic, cultural, historic and architectural anchor of the City.
20 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN — FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT
In order to sustain these qualities, new development and redevelopment within the
Central Business District shall be reflective of the architectural styles and fabric of the
area. Consistency and compatibility with the existing built environment shall be
considered in the review and issuance of Development Permits within the Central
Business District. Residential uses, not exceeding the Medium Density category shall
also be permitted, when in conjunction with, or adjacent to commercial development
and redevelopment, provided that such residential development shall not be
permitted within the Coastal High Hazard Area.
(d) Saltair Business District - This general area was originally developed by the Saltair
Development Corporation in 1925. Today this area reflects a mixed development
pattern that transitions between the historic Town Center and suburban retail to the
west along Atlantic Boulevard with Sturdivant Avenue to the north. The land use
category was created to allow the Town Center to expand incrementally towards
Sailfish Drive without creating conflicts with properties zoned Commercial General.
Residential uses, not exceeding the Medium Density category shall also be permitted,
when in conjunction with, or adjacent to commercial development and
redevelopment, provided that such residential development shall not be permitted
within the Coastal High Hazard Area. The following zoning districts are consistent with
the Saltair Business District land use category and the uses within this category shall
be limited to the following and as more specifically described within the Land
Development Regulations and when located within the respective zoning district:
• Central Business District — This area contains a well-established pattern and
character of development, and permitted uses include retail, office, restaurant,
and certain entertainment uses, which contribute to the commercial, civic and
cultural vitality of the City as illustrated within the Atlantic Beach Town Center
area. The Central Business District is an economic, cultural, historic and
architectural anchor of the City. In order to sustain these qualities, new
development and redevelopment within the Central Business District shall be
reflective of the architectural styles and fabric of the area. Consistency and
compatibility with the existing built environment shall be considered in the
review and issuance of Development Permits within the Central Business District.
• General Commercial. These areas shall include those businesses that provide
retail goods and services, which serve the routine and daily needs of residents,
including banks and professional services, grocery and convenience stores,
restaurants, accredited public and private schools and child care, but not
including manufacturing, warehousing, storage, mini -warehouses, mini -storage.,
personal storage, or high intensity commercial activities of a regional nature, or
uses that have the potential for negative impact to surrounding properties due to
excessive noise, light or extremely late hours of operation.
(e) Marsh Oaks Business District - This area was identified during the 2018 Mayport Road
Visioning Implementation Plan for pedestrian friendly redevelopment. The land use
category was created to allow properties to redevelop with a Traditional Marketplace
zoning district without creating conflicts with properties zoned General Commercial
and Limited Commercial. Residential uses, not exceeding the High Density category
shall also be permitted, when in conjunction with, or adjacent to commercial
development and redevelopment, provided that such residential development shall
not be permitted within the Coastal High Hazard Area. The City in its Land
Development Code, shall provide density bonuses or special design considerations to
provide affordable housing. The following zoning districts are consistent with the
Marsh Oaks Business District land use category and the uses within this land use
category shall be limited to the following and as more specifically described within
the Land Development Regulations and when located within the respective zoning
district.
• General Commercial. These areas shall include those businesses that provide
retail goods and services, which serve the routine and daily needs of residents,
including banks and professional services, grocery and convenience stores,
restaurants, accredited public and private schools and child care, but not
including manufacturing, warehousing, storage, mini -warehouses, mini -storage,
or personal storage, or high intensity commercial activities of a regional nature,
or uses that have the potential for negative impact to surrounding properties due
to excessive noise, light or extremely late hours of operation.
• Limited Commercial. These areas shall include low intensity office, service and retail
businesses that are compatible when located in close proximity to
neighborhoods. These uses are intended primarily to serve the needs of the
closely surrounding neighborhood. Large-scale discount super -centers or
"BigBox" retailers or similar intense commercial uses intended to serve a regional
market are not permitted within the Limited Commercial category.
❑ Traditional Marketplace — This area contains development standards similar to the
Central Business District with an expanded range of permitted uses more
consistent with General Commercial. The permitted uses include a mixture of
residential, retail, office, restaurant, and certain entertainment uses, which
contribute to the commercial, civic and cultural vitality of the City. New
development, including without limitation redevelopment, within this area shall
reflect urban design principles that promote bicycle and pedestrian activity such
as minimal building setbacks which allow buildings to be closer to streets and
adjacent property lines.
Light Industrial —The Light Industrial category shall be limited to light manufacturing
and production, storage, warehousing and distribution uses as further controlled by
the Land Development Regulations. Light industrial uses may have outdoor storage
and business related activity, but such uses shall not include processes that create
negative effects to surrounding properties due to noise, heat, fumes, debris,
chemicals or hazardous materials.
(g) Public and Semi -Public — These areas include uses such as accredited public and
private schools, government uses, buildings, structures, utilities and public services
and infrastructure, including police, fire and emergency services.
(h) Recreation and Open Space — These areas include public and private parks, open
space, passive and active recreation areas. Note: Some park and open space lands
may be more appropriately designated as Conservation, such as the public lands on
the western marsh front. All beach areas that are seaward of private property lines
shall be considered as Recreation. Permitted uses shall include active and passive
recreation activities including bikeways and pedestrian trails, skateboard parks, ball
fields, tennis courts and the like. Public safety uses, including lifeguards, fire, and
police services may be located in Recreation areas. The use and development of
Recreation areas shall be further controlled by the Code of Ordinances for the City of
Atlantic Beach and the Land Development Regulations.
(i) Residential — Residential uses shall be permitted in those areas so designated in
accordance with the applicable permitted density and as further controlled by the
Land Development Regulations and the Florida Building Code.
(j) Electric Distribution Substations — New electric distribution substations shall be a
permitted use in all land use categories within a utility's service territory except those
designated as preservation, conservation, or historic preservation on the Future Land
Use Map or by duly adopted ordinance. The standards as set forth in Section
163.3208, Florida Statutes, shall apply.
(k) Public Schools — Public schools shall be a permitted use in all land use categories
except for lands designated as Conservation and lands located within the Coastal High
Hazard Area.
Policy A.1.11.2 The Future Land Use Map and all Maps included within the 2030 Comprehensive Plan
Map Series are adopted herewith as part of this Plan. In the event of any conflict between
any Maps and the text of the Plan, the text of the Plan shall control.
Policy A.1.11.3 The City's Zoning, Subdivision and Land Development Regulations, zoning or other maps,
and any regulations within the City's Code of Ordinances related to the use and
development of land shall be subordinate to the Comprehensive Plan and the Future Land
Use Map, which is part thereof.
Policy A.1.11.4 Where interpretation is required to determine exact boundaries as depicted upon the
Future Land Use Map, boundaries shall be determined by the nearest property line, the
right-of-way line of Streets, municipal boundaries, section, township and range lines, or
environmental or geographic features which serve as natural boundaries, as may be
appropriate.
20 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN — FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT
Policy A.1.11.5 Tho Commcrc&I C . -ict, Central Busing Griot, SaI air Zusincss District and Marsh Oaks
Business District dcnsitics and intensities will be governed by tables A.1 and A.2.
Policy A.1.11.65 The Commercial District, Central Business District, Saltair Business District and Marsh
Oaks Business District use distributions will be governed by tables A.23.
Table A-23. Mixed -Use Distribution Standards
Uses
Residential
Commercial
Light Industrial
Public and Semi -Public
Recreation and Open Space
Electric Distribution
Public Schools
Maximum Percent
70%
70%
5%
10%
25%
5%
5%
Objective A.1.12
Public Schools and School Planning
Any new public schools within the City shall be located in accordance the Comprehensive Plan and with
the procedures set forth within the Interlocal Agreement for Public School Facility Planning, adopted
pursuant to Section 163.3177, Florida Statutes, between the Duval County School Board, the City of
Atlantic Beach, the City of Jacksonville, the City of Neptune Beach, the City of Jacksonville Beach and the
Town of Baldwin and in accordance with Public School Facilities Element of this Plan.
Policy A.1.12.1 The City shall maintain its shared use agreements with the single public school within the
City (Atlantic Beach Elementary) and shall continue to encourage the shared use of public
facilities.
Policy A.1.12.2 The City shall coordinate with the Duval County School Board and the Navy to advocate
for the retention of elementary and middle schools which serve this community,
particularly Navy personnel and their families where these schools serve the particular
and special needs of the military community.
Objective A.1.13
Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan and Provisions for Public Participation in the Planning
Process
The City shall have the authority to amend the adopted Comprehensive Plan in accordance with the
process established within Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes, and shall, establish procedures to provide
for the review and amendment of the Comprehensive Plan.
20 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN — FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT
Policy A.1.13.1 As required by Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, the City shall evaluate its comprehensive
plan once every seven years to determine if plan amendments are necessary to reflect
changes in state requirements and notify the state land planning aeencv as to its
determination. prepare and adop4 cn EvcI ation cnd—Ap'j x c,al f oport (EAR) in
accordance with thc schedules and procedures as crta4.-\k icd by thc State land planning
agency.
Policy A.1.13.2 The City shall provide for the public notification, review and the public participation in all
amendments to the Comprehensive Plan and also in the preparation and adoption of
the Evaluation and Appraisal Report.
Policy A.1.13.3 The City shall not support amendments to the Future Land Use Map or the Plan, which
would authorize development within Conservation and Environmentally Sensitive Areas
that may be reasonably foreseen to have adverse impacts to such areas unless such
impacts are mitigated with equal resource replacement within the City.
Policy A.1.13.4 Applications to amend the Comprehensive Plan shall be reviewed and evaluated based
upon the following factors:
(a) Consistency with the Goals, Objectives and Policies of this Plan;
(b) Consistency with the State Comprehensive Plan and the Northeast Florida Strategic
Regional Policy Plan;
(c) Consistency with other adopted policies and plans of the City, the County, the State
or other agencies having regulatory authority over the City;
(d) The potential for adverse impacts to Environmentally Sensitive Areas, the natural
environment or the aesthetic quality of the City, andef
(e) The potential to cause deficiencies in adopted levels of service or to adversely impact
available water supplies, public facilities, infrastructure and services.
Objective A.1.14
Energy Efficiency and Energy Conservation
The City shall encourage the development and use of renewable energy resources in order to conserve
and protect the value of land, buildings, and resources, and to promote the good health of the City's
residents.
Policy A.1.14.1 The City shall maintain an energy efficient land use pattern and shall continue to
promote the use of transit and alternative methods of transportation that decrease
reliance on the automobile.
Policy A.1.14.2 The City shall continue to encourage and develop the "walk -ability and bike -ability" of the
City as a means to promote the physical health of the City's residents, access to
recreational and natural resources, and as a means to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
Policy A.1.14.3 The City shall develop and implement an energy management plan to minimize electric,
fuel and water resources in City buildings, fleet vehicles and on public properties.
4530
Policy A.1.14.4 No action of the City shall prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting solar collectors, or
other energy devices based on renewable resources from being installed on a building
and as further set forth within Section 163.04, Florida Statutes.
Policy A.1.14.5 Public buildings and facilities shall be constructed, and adapted where reasonably feasible
to incorporate energy efficient designs and appropriate "green" building standards. Green
building standards that should be observed are contained in the Florida Green
Commercial Building Designation Standard, Version 2.0, published by the Florida Green
Building Coalition, Inc.
Policy A.1.14.6 The City shall continue to promote and enforce energy efficient design and construction
standards as these become adopted as part of the Florida Building Code. The City shall
also promote commercial and residential standards that are promulgated from time to
time by the Florida Green Building Coalition, Inc.
Objective A.1.15
Military Compatibility and Coordination with Naval Station Mayport
The Florida Legislature finds that incompatible development of land close to military installations can
adversely affect the ability of such an installation to carry out its mission; that such development also
threatens the public safety because of possibility of accidents occurring within the areas surrounding the
military installation; that the economic vitality of a community is affected when military operations and
missions must relocate because of incompatible urban encroachment; and that it is desirable for local
governments to cooperate with military installations to encourage compatible land use, help prevent
incompatible encroachment, and facilitate the continued presence of major military installations. The City
of Atlantic Beach, as a municipality in close proximity and with strong cultural and economic ties to Naval
Station Mayport, shall cooperate with the military installation, shall coordinate on land use decisions that
may affect the mission of the military installation, and shall support development practices that are
compatible with the land uses of the military installation.
Policy A.1.15.1 The City of Atlantic Beach shall transmit to the Commanding Officer, Naval Station
Mayport, or his or her designee, information relating to proposed changes to the
Comprehensive Plan, and proposed changes to the Land Development Regulations,
which, if approved, would affect the intensity, density, or use of land in close proximity to
the military installation. At the request of the Commanding Officer, the City of Atlantic
Beach shall also transmit copies of applications for development orders requesting a
variance or waiver from height or lighting restrictions or noise attenuation reduction
requirements within areas defined as being in a zone of influence of the military
installation, as defined in Map A-6, Military Influence Zone, of the 2030 Comprehensive
Plan Map Series. The Commanding Officer shall be afforded adequate opportunity to
review and comment on the proposed changes prior to final action.
Policy A.1.15.2 The Commanding Officer, Naval Station Mayport, or his or her designee, may provide
advisory comments to the City of Atlantic Beach on the impact of such proposed changes
4543
may have on the mission of the military installation. Such advisory comments shall be
based on appropriate data and analysis provided with the comments and may include:
(a) Whether such proposed changes will be compatible with the safety and noise
standards contained in the Air Installation Compatible Use Zone (AICUZ) adopted by
Naval Station Mayport for the on -premise airfield; and
(b) Whether the military installation's mission will be adversely affected by the proposed
actions of the City of Atlantic Beach.
The Commanding Officer's comments, underlying studies, and reports shall be considered
by the City of Atlantic Beach in the same manner as the comments received from other
reviewing agencies pursuant to Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes.
Policy A.1.15.3 The City of Atlantic Beach shall take into consideration any comments and accompanying
data and analysis provided by the Commanding Officer or his or her designee, as they
relate to the strategic mission of the base, public safety, and the economic vitality
associated with the base's operations, while also respecting private property rights and
not being unduly restrictive on those rights. To this end, the City shall promote
development strategies that discourage incompatibility and provide alternative means to
preserve development rights, including the following:
(a) In instances where these policies result in limitations on the ability of the landowner
to utilize their land pursuant to its current land use and zoning designation, the City
shall support land use map amendments and rezoning to compatible uses.
(b) In instances where nonresidential uses that are consistent with current land use and
zoning designation, but incompatible with military influence zones, are discontinued
for a period of twelve consecutive months or more, the City shall not allow those
nonresidential uses to be restarted under the Land Development Regulations.
(c) In instances where land within the Military Influence Zone is proposed for
development, the City shall require techniques such as Planned Unit Development or
Special Planned Area zoning to cluster development away from accident potential
zones.
The City shall forward a copy of any comments regarding Comprehensive Plan
amendments to the state planning agency.
Policy A.1.15.4 The City of Atlantic Beach, in order to facilitate the exchange of information and foster
close coordination and communication, shall maintain a representative appointed by the
Commanding Officer, Naval Station Mayport, as an ex officio, nonvoting member of the
City's local planning agency. The designated military representative shall be notified of all
meetings and provided copies of all agenda packets.
4530
Policy A.1.15.5 The City of Atlantic Beach shall coordinate grant writing and management efforts with
Naval Station Mayport, and the Commanding Officer is encouraged to provide
information about any community planning assistance grants that may be available to the
City through programs such as those of the Federal Office of Economic Adjustment as
incentive to participate in a joint planning process that would further facilitate the
compatibility of community planning and the activities and mission of Naval Station
Mayport.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN -TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
Ci
N
20 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN —TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
B. Transportation Element
Introduction
This Transportation Element has been prepared to meet the requirements of Chapter 163, Florida
Statutes. Thc 1990 Pim contained only a Traffic Circulation Slomcnt; however, Section 163.3177(6)(j),
Florid\: S ite.tos was amended in 1994 to require each unit of local government vb•*rrn cn gar k rred or o
to adopt a Tcrcrortation Element in liar: of thc moN1 limited Traffic Circulation Element. The
Transportation Element "shall provide for a safe, convenient multimodal transportation system,
coordinated with the future land use map or map series and designed to support all elements of the
comprehensive plan." (Section 163.3177(6)(b), Florida Statutes). In addition, the element addresses traffic
circulation; alternative modes of travel; parking; hurricane evacuation capacity; land use densities to
support public transportation and energy efficient strategies for reducing greenhouse gases. Existing and
planned Transportation Facilities are identified within Maps B-1. B-2, B-3. and B-4 of the Future Land Use
Map Series.
This Transportation Element provides an analysis of transportation and mobility issues within the City of
Atlantic Beach. A planning timeframe of twenty years is incorporated into the analysis of future conditions.
Traffic data from the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), Jacksonville Trcetoportation Authority
{JCA} and the City's Department of Pbblic Work:, has been compiled into this element.
Quality/Level of Service (Q/LOS) Standards and Criteria
According to the 2023 FDOT Multimodal Q/LOS Handbook, quality of service (QOS) is a traveler -based
perception of how well a transportation service or facility operates. Level of Service (LOS) is essentially a
measure of the quality of the operating characteristics of a street or highway for each travel mode. There
are four maior travel modes: automobile. pedestrian, bicycle. and transit. Factors involved in determining
the LOS include speed and safety, as well as travel time; traffic conflicts and interruptions; freedom to
maneuver; convenience and comfort; and operating costs. Motorized vehicle LOS quantifies quality of
service into six letter grades: Icvcl of Scrvicc (LQ) is a method of describing thc operating conditions of
a roadway for various traffic volumoo. It c qualitative macuivem of thc effect of a number of factors
including speed and travel time, traffic intorrWions, freedom to rrcr/ae:vcr safely, driving comfort,
convenience, and operating costs. M asurement criteria to ;61Alclich t;i,:`fic circulation efficiency goals arc
m asuring actual average speeds, traffic flow or Level of Service (LOS) comparison is used to show a
m asurc of efficiency along thc roadway. Levels of service represc\nk; a oxo of operational conditions,
not a precise number or volume. Thc following arc general descriptions of the Lcvcls of Scrvicc a:,
crftliaiod by the Tmrx .ortatic\n Ree rch Board, 1997.
LOS A — This is a condition of free flow, accompanied by low volumes and high speeds. Traffic
density is low, with uninterrupted flow speeds controlled by driver desires, speed limits, and
physical roadway conditions. Little or no restriction in maneuverability due to the presence of
other vehicles enables drivers to maintain their desired speeds and arrive at their destinations
with little or no delay.
LOS B — This is a condition of stable flow, with operating speeds somewhat restricted by traffic
conditions. Drivers still have reasonable freedom to select their speed and lane of operation.
Reductions in speed are not unreasonable, with a low probability of traffic flow being restricted.
20 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN —TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
The lower limit (lowest speed, highest volume) of this Level of Service has been used in the design
of highways.
LOS C — This is still a stable flow, but speeds and maneuverability are more closely controlled by
the higher volumes. Most drivers are restricted in their freedom to select their own speed,
change lanes or pass. A relatively satisfactory operating speed is still obtained, with service
volumes suitable for urban design practice.
LOS D — This Level of Service approaches unstable flow, with tolerable operating speeds being
maintained, though considerably affected by changes in operating conditions. Fluctuations in
volume and temporary restrictions to flow may cause substantial drops in operating speeds.
Drivers have little freedom to maneuver, and comfort and convenience are low. These conditions
can be tolerated, however, for short periods of time.
LOS E — This Level of Service cannot be described by speed alone, but represents operations at
low operating speeds, typically, but not always, in the neighborhood of 30 miles per hour, with
volumes at or near the capacity of the highway. Flow is unstable, and there may be stoppages of
momentary duration. This Level of Service is associated with operation of a roadway at capacity
flow.
LOS F — This describes a forced -flow operation at low speeds, where volumes are well above
capacity. In the extreme, traffic comes to a standstill. These conditions usually result from vehicles
backing up from a restriction. The section under study will be serving as a storage area during
parts or all of the peak hour. Speeds are reduced substantially, and standstills may occur for short
or long periods of time because of the downstream congestion.
The most recent edition of thc FDOT Level of Service Standards Handbook was uscd to estimate the
standards for determining acceptable and unacceptable operating conditions for roadways within the City
of Atlantic B ach. The FDOT Handbook incorporates standardized service volumes for ach of the LOS
designations listed above. The Handbock iv a tool to provide for a general overview of the operating
conditions of thc roadway segments. More refined methods �.n bo uscd during concurrency review for
those segments where a more detailed traffic engineering analysis is critical for detormining whether
there exists adequate roadway capacity.
- - _ _ - •• - - - _ on a nvmlcor of standardized factcra These
fca�a t imtisde; 1) arca type; 2) roadway functional classification; 3) nwmisor of lanes; 4) median type; and
5) nvn*cr of sigri± por mils.
II II
The FDOT's LOS Policy Handbook sets the minimsm motorized vehicle Level of Service targets standards
for roadways on the State Highway System. The LOS target standards for an urbanized area of over
500,000 people apply to roadways within Atlantic Beach, in that tha since the City of Atlantic Beach is part
of the Jacksonville Urbanized Area. The FDOT motorized vehicle LOS target for state roadways during peak
travel hours in urbanized areas is LOS D. standard for all roadway: in ,an wrbenizcd area is LOS D.
Hewevsr, p►:_,cwent to S. 163.3180(10), Flori:rea iteSiwtcs, a local government may adopt alternative LOS
standards for any State roadway that is rpt on the Florid;. Intmc0-4A-c Highway Systcm (FINS). Nonc of the
roadways within thc City of Atlantic Beach arc on tho FRN'; thorcforc, LOS standards lowor than those
adopted by FDOT may be adopted.
20 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN —TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
The 2023 handbook uses level of traffic stress (LTS) as a performance measure to evaluate bicycle and
pedestrian quality of service. LTS only addresses comfort traveling along a facility as it relates to facility
type, width, and continuity; vehicular posted speeds; vehicular volumes; and separation from traffic. It
does not address the impacts of intersection design or delay, crossing frequency, or number of driveways.
Bicycle level of stress BLTS is a performance measure that quantifies the amount of discomfort that people
feel when they bicycle close to traffic. BLTS considers bicycle facility type, facility width, posted speed„
separation from traffic, and traffic volume to assess the roadway environment. BLTS designates quality of
service in to four categories:
BLTS 1: The level that most children can use confidently.
BLTS 2: The level that will be tolerated by most adults.
BLTS 3: The level tolerated by confident cyclists who still prefer having their own dedicated space for
riding.
BLTS 4: The level tolerated only by those with limited route or mode choice or cycling enthusiasts
that choose to ride under stressful conditions.
Pedestrian level of stress (PLTS) quantifies the amount of discomfort that people feel when they walk
along a road within the right of way. PLTS considers existence of sidewalks, sidewalk continuity, sidewalk
width, posted speed, separation from traffic, and vertical separation to assess the roadway environment.
PLTS designates the quality of service into four categories:
PLTS 1: The level suitable for all users including teenagers traveling along, the elderly, and people
using a wheeled mobility device. People feel safe and comfortable on the pedestrian facility and all
users are willing to use the pedestrian facility.
PLTS 2: The level where all users are able to use the facility and most users are willing to use the
facility.
PLTS 3: The level where some users are willing to use the facility, but others may only use the facility
when there are limited route and mode choices available.
PLTS 4: The facility is difficult or impassible by a wheeled mobility device or users with other
limitations in their movement and most likely used by users with limited route and mode choice.
Roadway Classifications
The FDOT utilizes two roadway classification systems, the traditional functional classification of roadways
and the newer context classification of roadways. Functional and context classification should be
considered together when determining the role and function of a roadway. Functional classification
defines the role that a particular roadway plays in servicing the flow of vehicular traffic through the
transportation network. Roadways are assigned to one of several possible functional classifications within
a hierarchy described below and in accordance with the FDOT 2020 Functional Classification Handbook.
See Map B-1 for functional classification of roadways within the city.
• Principal Arterial: Serves a large percentage of travel between cities and other activity centers,
especially when minimizing travel time and distance is important.
• Minor Arterial: Provides service for trips of moderate length, serves geographic areas that are
smaller than their higher arterial counterparts, and offers connectivity to the higher arterial
system.
• Collector: Collects traffic from local streets and connects them to arterials: more access to
adiacent properties compared to arterials.
• Local: Any road not defined as an arterial or collector; primarily provides access to land with little
or no through movement.
B-4
B-5
20 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN —TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
More significant than FDOT's functional classification of roadways, is the newer system of context
classifications. This new system is used to plan and design roadways in greater harmony with the
surrounding land use characteristics. The context classification assigned to a roadway helps identify
anticipated users of a roadway and is used to inform key design elements such as design speeds, lane
widths, and types of pedestrian and bicycle facilities. The classification system includes:
• C1 — Natural
• C2 — Rural
• C2T— Rural Town
• C3R — Suburban Residential
• C3C—Suburban Commercial
• C4 — Urban General
• C5 — Urban Center
• C6 — Urban Core
Existing Operating Conditions
Roadways — An inventory of the existing transportation network within the City of Atlantic Beach was
undertaken to determine the type of transportation systems available, functional classification of
roadways, and context classification of state roadways number of through lanes, corresponding capacities
and daily volumes. Within the city, there are two arterial roadways - Atlantic Boulevard (SR 10) and
Mavport Road (SR 101). Both roadways are state operated and designated hurricane evacuation routes
(Map A -3b). The FDOT's current context classification, as shown in Map B-2, assigns Atlantic Boulevard
west of Seminole Road and Mavport Road north of Dutton Island Road as C3C. It assigns Atlantic Boulevard
east of Seminole Road and Mavport Road south of Dutton Island Road as C4.
Atlantic Boulevard (State Road 10) is one of three major roadway corridors from 1-95 to the County's
beaches. It is also thc most h avily traveled of the three corridcr , primarily because it is the most direct
route from the ccmm►nitics of Jacksonville to the Mayport Naval Station. The Navy base is one of the
largest employers within thc County. Within thc City, Atlantic Boulevard is a divided six lane arterial
roadway with several signalized intersections. A construction project was completed in 2002 that widened
Atlantic Boulevard to six -lanes over the Intracoastal Waterway. Commercial establishments are located
on both the north and south sides of Atlantic Boulevard, and much of the existing traffic results from
motorists entering and exiting driveways that serve these establishments.
Mayport Road extends from the southern limits of the City at Atlantic Boulevard to the northern limits of
the City near Assisi Lane. Mayport Road continues within the City of Jacksonville providing access to the
Mayport Naval Station and on to the north as State Road A1A. Numerous local public streets and
driveways intersect with Mayport Road on both sides of the roadway. These streets and driveways serve
mostly low to moderate density residential and strip -type commercial developments. In March 2002, the
Mayport Flyover was completed and opened to traffic. The Mayport Flyover provides an interchange at
the intersection of the two most traveled roadways within the City of Atlantic Beach. Construction of the
Flyover alleviated a traffic problem identified in the 1990 Traffic Circulation Element. The intersection of
Atlantic Boulevard and Mayport Road was identified as operating at LOS F prior to completion of the
Mayport Flyover. The Wonderwood Connector, which was completed and open to traffic in 2007 provides
an alternative east -west connection between the City of Atlantic Beach, Mavport Village, Naval Station
Mavport and 1-295.
All other streets within the city are designated as collector or local roadways, see Map B-1. Seminole Road,
Ocean Boulevard, Plaza, and Sherry Drive are urban collectors, which primarily serve the residential areas
north of Atlantic Boulevard, and east of Mayport Road. Similarly, Levy Road and Dutton Island West are
collectors that primarily serve the residential and commercial areas west of Mayport Road. Local roads
predominately serve single- and two-family residential developments. These are all two-way, two-lane
roadways and experience relatively low traffic volumes with low accident rates. Due to the built -out status
of the city, no significant changes in traffic volumes are expected on these roadways.
The Wondcrwood Conncctor, which was completed and opcn to traffic in 2007 providst en Vternative
cast west connection between the City of Atlantic Beach, Mayport Village, Naval Station Mayport and
1295.
Table B-1. FDOT Traffic Volumes
Street Link 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Atlantic San Pablo Rd to
49,000 48,000 51,500 42,500 41,500 51,500
Boulevard Florida Blvd exit
Atlantic Florida Blvd exit to
Boulevard Penman Rd 34,500 37,000 38,500 31,000 40,500 36,500
Atlantic Penman Rd to 3rd St 23,000 24,500 25,000 21,000 26,000 24,500
Boulevard
Atlantic Mayport Rd to 12,000 12,000 12,500 11,000 11,000 11,000
Boulevard Westbound on-ramp
Atlantic Westbound exit to
Boulevard Mayport Rd 5,800 5,800 5,600 5,300 7,400 5,900
Mayport Atlantic Blvd to
29,000 26,700 28,200 23,800 26,400 22,500
Road Forrestal Circle S
Mavport Forrestal Circle S to
Road Donner Rd 36,000 35,500 38,000 29,500 34,500 34,500
Mayport
Donner Rd to SR-A1A 27,400 27,500 30,500 25,500 29,500 27,000
Road
Mayport Atlantic Blvd to W 6th
Flyover St 8.900 8,700 9,500 8,300 8,600 8,900
Seminole Atlantic Blvd to 17th St 6,800 6,900 7,000 6,800 6,800 6.800
Road
Sherry Atlantic Blvd to
Drive Seminole Rd
5,400 5,500 5,600 5,400 5,400 5,400
B-6
20 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN —TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
Source: Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT)
Table B-2. Citv Traffic Volumes
Average Daily Traffic (ADT)
Street Block Classification Year ADT
Donner Road 200 Collector 2023 1,368
Dutton Island Rd W 200 Collector 2019 2,351
East Coast Drive 500 Collector 2023 1,782
Levy Road 200 Collector 2020 2,740
Ocean Boulevard 300 Collector 2023 1,465
Plaza 800 Collector 2023 7,814
Royal Palms Drive 300 Collector 2020 2,874
Sailfish Drive 500 Collector 2023 2.087
Source: City of Atlantic Beach
Traffic counts for each location were conducted over one week. Where more than one count was
completed for the same street, the most recent data was used.
Table B-3 below shows the assessed vehicle level of service (LOS) and level of traffic stress (LTS) for arterial
and collector roadways within the city. Context classifications were assigned for collector roadways based
on their surrounding land uses and development patterns in accordance with the 2022 FDOT Context
Classification Guide. The LOS and LTS ratings for Atlantic Boulevard and Mavport Road were derived using
2021 traffic volume data and the 2023 FDOT QLOS Handbook generalized service volume tables. The
vehicle LOS for collector roadways is based on the QLOS Handbook criteria for non -state roadways. The
bicycle and pedestrian LTS ratings for collector roadways were completed in accordance with the criteria
below which was influenced by the 2023 FDOT QLOS Handbook. Note that all collector roads are two-lane
and 25 MPH.
Bicycle LTS:
Arterials: follow flow charts within the QLOS Handbook.
Collectors:
- 8'+ Shared use path on both sides of the road = LTS 1
- Separated (physical barrier) bicycle lanes = LTS 1
- 8'+ Shared use path on one side of the road = LTS 2
- Bicycle lanes or paved shoulders = LTS 2
- No facilities = LTS 3
Local roads:
- Shared use path, bicycle lanes, or paved shoulders = LTS 1
- No facilities with residential land use = LTS 2
- No facilities with commercial land use = LTS 3
Pedestrian LTS:
Arterials: follow flow charts within the QLOS Handbook.
Collector and Local roads:
- Continuous sidewalk on both sides of the road = LTS 1
- Continuous sidewalk on one side of the road = LTS 2
- No sidewalk and ADT = or < 1,000 ADT = LTS 3
B-7
20 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN —TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
- No sidewalk and over 1.000 ADT = LTS 4
Table B-3. Roadway LOS & LTS
Street
Atlantic Boulevard
West of Flyover Ramp
Ramp to A1A to W A1A
Junction
East of Mavport Rd
Donner Road
Dutton Island Road W
East Coast Drive
Levy Road
Mavport Road
South of Dutton Island Rd
North of Dutton Island Rd
Ocean Boulevard
Plaza
Royal Palms Drive
Sailfish Drive
Seminole Road
Sherry Drive
Functional Context Vehicle Bicycle LTS Pedestrian LTS
Classification Classification LOS (BLTS) (PLTS)
Principal
Arterial
C3C C 4 3
C3C F 4 4
C3C & C4
Collector C3R
Collector C3R
Collector C3R
Collector C4
Minor
Arterial
C4 C 4 3
C3C C 4 3
Collector C3R C 3 1
Collector C3R C 2 1
Collector C3R C 3 2
Collector C3R C 3 2
Collector C3R C 1 1
Collector C3R C 2 2
4
2
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
Table B-3 shows that all roadways, except for a 0.4 mile stretch of Atlantic Boulevard, meet or exceed
their respective minimum vehicle LOS. Collector roadways are operating well under the LOS D service
volume (ranging from roughly 5% to 40% of the service volume).
Needs Assessment and Future Traffic Projections
There have been a number of traffic improvements within and surrounding the City of Atlantic Beach that
have addressed capacity issues on major roadways. The Mayport Flyover addressed the capacity problems
experienced at the intersection of Mayport Road and Atlantic Boulevard. The widening of Atlantic
Boulevard to six- lanes over the Intracoastal Waterway significantly increased capacity for the improved
segments of Atlantic Boulevard. Completion of the Wonderwood Connector has improved traffic patterns
within the northeast section of the County._ Most recently, construction of raised landscaped medians
and improvements to acccoc r cr omcnt conditiorc Fxc improved tc quality and safety of
Mayport Road. The City is close to build out and the maioritv of future development will be infill
redevelopment. As a result, the citv's permanent population is stabilizing and local and collector roadways
are not expected to experience significant increases in traffic volume. Therefore, the city is focused on
enhancing multi -modal transportation options with a focus on pedestrians and bicyclists and will continue
to coordinate with the FDOT. North Florida TPO, and Duval County in doing so. Further, access
management is a priority, notably on the citv's two arterial roadways, for improved safety for all roadway
users.
B-8
B-9
20 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN -TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
In 2018, the Mavport Road Vision Implementation Plan was completed. As part of this study, an initial
analysis of roadway capacity and level of service (LOS) was performed on the section of Mavport Road
south of Dutton Island Road. The analysis demonstrated that Mavport Road currently operates well below
its capacity, suggesting that the roadway, in its current state, is wider than needed which encourages
speeding and pass-through trips. The Mavport Road Vision Implementation Plan recommends the
following transportation improvements to the roadway:
• Reduce the posted speed of Mavport Road from 45 MPH to 35 MPH to improve safety for all users„
including pedestrians and cyclists.
• Provide intersection improvements at Plaza and Donner streets, such as bricked crosswalks„
gateway signage, bulb -outs and better pedestrian lighting to improve safety.
• Providing enhanced landscaping in the form of street trees within the right-of-way to provide a
sense of enclosure and calm traffic.
• Provide pedestrian refuges within existing medians.
• Reduce building setbacks along Mavport Road to define the street edge and enhance the
Pedestrian experience.
• Initiate a Complete Streets Plan or a Lane Reduction Plan.
Street 0 2015 2420
S.R. AIA 0.1 mile North of SR 101 17,417 18,467 19,517
S.R. 101 0.1 mile North of SR A1A 35,667 38,167 '10,667
S.R. AIA 200 foot North of Church Strcct 54,417 57,167 59,917
S.R. AIA North of 2nd Strcct /13,'117 /15,167 '16,917
S.R. AIA South of llth Strom 57,333 59,833 62,333
SR 10 175 feet West of Third Strcct 35,250 37,000 38,750
SR 10 East of SR AIA (East of ficmpc /15,333 /18,333 51,333
A lin ar regression analysis was performed to calculate the projected traffic volumes. For th6levr��.,c a#
thc Comprehensive Plan EAR based updatec it i . -2stod that tho above dcscriptions replace the current
traffic dcscriptions provided in the Plan. (NEFRC used thc TTMA and PTMS sites to c3 rmira th,a borf
suited sites to rop- t in tho T'ar portatian Slomont}
Table B-4. Projected Annual Average Daily Trips (AADT1
Street Link 2027 2030 2035 2040
Atlantic San Pablo Rd to Mavport
Boulevard Flyover
Atlantic Mavport Flyover to
Boulevard Mavport Rd
Atlantic
Mavport Rd to 3rd St.
Boulevard
Mavport Atlantic Blvd to Dutton
Road Island Rd
56,931 58,968 62,363 65,757
50,697 52,348 55,100 57,851
34,414 35,479 37,254 39,029
34,725 35,745 37,445 39,144
B - 10
20 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN —TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
Mavport
Road
Dutton Island Rd to
Wonderwood Dr
25.286
Source: Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT)
25.988
27.159
28.330
Mass Transit
Transit service within the City of Atlantic Beach is provided by the Jacksonville Transportation Authority
(JTA). The JTA operates three two routes through the City including two local routes with service 7 days a
week and one community shuttle with a fixed route and curbside service 6 days a week. Route 10 is a local
route operating along Atlantic Boulevard, connecting the South Beach area of Jacksonville Beach to
downtown Jacksonville. Route 24 is the other local route providing a loop between Mayport Village to the
north of the City and the Atlantic Village shopping center on Atlantic Boulevard. Routc 3O is the
Boulevard, with the Mayo Clinic via Penmen Road and South B i e kway. The JTA is currently
constructing a Bus Rapid Transit route ae p rt of their First Coast Flyer systom tIwt will connect B ach
Boulevard in Jacksonvillc B ach with Downtown Jacksonvillc. There is also the Mavport express route 202
operating rush hour service six days a week north of the City between Naval Station Mayport and the
Regency area of Jacksonville. The transit routes, which serve the City of Atlantic Beach, are part of a larger
system of transit routes that were redesigned as a result of JTA's efforts to enhance service within eastern
Duval County. These routes have been successful in meeting the transit needs for the City of Atlantic
Beach.
Following the discontinuation of the Beaches Trolley. the JTA partnered with Beach Buggy to provide
transportation to residents and visitors of Atlantic Beach. Beach Buggy provides free rides and operates
zero -emission, long range, electric carts and passenger vans.
Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities
In 2021, Tthe City completed a bicycle and pedestrian connectivity plan to serve as a long-range planning
tool to shape the direction, development and delivery of on and off-street facilities that help create safe
and comfortable connections to neighborhoods, recreation amenities, commercial districts, schools„
community centers and the beach, and as a guide to assist with decision-making on matters pertaining to
budgeting on and off street amenities. This document analyzed existing conditions, identified
opportunities, and provided cost estimates and implementation tools. Previous studies and plans were
used to inform this plan including a pathway planning and public participation study in collaboration with
the City of Neptune Beach and the City of Jacksonville Beach in 2002. This collaboration produced a
general and conceptual plan for a system of bike and pedestrian routes to connect each of the three beach
Cities, and also provides for a better system of east -west bikeway connections within each City and to
other existing or planned facilities. Based on the findings of the study a priority list of desired routes was
developed and the City of Atlantic Beach has adopted a phased development approach to implement the
interconnected multi -use path system. The first phase of the City's bikeway plan was in completed in 2004.
The plan was updated in early 2009, and development of future phases will continue as budget resources
permit with consideration to community desires. In addition, the North Florida TPO completed the 2019
Regional Multi -Use Trail Plan which included recommendations for bicycle facilities including bike lanes„
sharrows, and wavfinding on local roadways. These recommendations were incorporated into the citv's
connectivity plan.
4548
Bike and pedestrian facilities continue to be a high priority to this community in order to provide for a high
level of recreational activity, energy efficiency and conservation and decreased reliance on vehicular
transportation. In 20204$, construction was completed bean on a Safe Routes to School project along
Sherry Drive and Seminole Road that identified in the bikeway plan. Once completed, the project will links
approximately 1.4 miles of residential neighborhoods to the Atlantic Beach Elementary School with an
eight foot multiuse path. In 2021, an eight foot multiuse path was completed along a one-half mile stretch
of Seminole Road, south of City Hall, which connects residential areas with two parks, city hall, and to
commercial businesses. In 2023, an eight foot multiuse path was also constructed on the north side of
Donner Road from Mavport Road to Sandpiper Lane. According to the Florida Pedestrian and Bicycle
Strategic Safety Plan, corridors with C3C or C4 context have the highest likelihood of bicycle and
pedestrian crashes based on the exposure and risk in these areas. Mavport Road and Atlantic Boulevard,
the city's two arterial roadways, are designated as C3C and C4 roadways. To improve bicycle and
pedestrian safety on Mavport Road, a lane re -purposing project that will include a shared use path along
the east side of Mavport Road is included in the North Florida TPO's 2023-2027 Transportation
Improvement Program (TIP). See Map B-4 for existing and planned bicycle and pedestrian facilities.
B. Transportation Element Goals, Objectives, and Policies
All transportation related activities within the City of Atlantic Beach shall be in accordance with the
following Goals, Objectives, and Policies.
Goal B.1
The City shall provide a safe, reliable and efficient roadway system with reasonable operational and
maintenance characteristics.
Objective B.1.1
Safe Roadway Conditions
The City shall develop and maintain a roadway system that provides the safest possible environment for
motorists, bicyclists and pedestrians.
Policy B.1.1.1 The City shall maintain a program to promote the safety of all activities occurring on streets
and within right-of-ways under the City's jurisdiction.
20 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN—TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
Policy B.1.1.2 The City's Department of Public Works shall be responsible for the planning, review,
supervision and coordination of all activities that impact the safety characteristics of the
roadway system.
Policy B.1.1.3 The City shall develop and maintain its roadway system in accordance with the minimum
criteria as set forth within the FDOT's Manual of Uniform Minimum Standards for Design,
Construction and Maintenance for Streets and Highways.
Policy B.1.1.4 The City shall require warrants for installation of new traffic control devices and coordinate
their efforts with FDOT.
Policy B.1.1.5 The City shall coordinate traffic signal systems with FDOT. +:intain coordinated or traffic
actuated traffic signal systems.
Objective B.1.2
Construction and Maintenance Standards
The City shall maintain procedures for construction, reconstruction, and maintenance of all city roads, as
well as and also for utility and emergency services functions, which provide for safe roadway operating
conditions during these activities.
Policy B.1.2.1 The City shall continue to implement the Manual of Uniform Minimum Standards for
Design, Construction and Maintenance for Streets and Highways prepared by the FDOT
for minimum requirements of work site safety.
Policy B.1.2.2 The City shall maintain its program of work site safety, and all roadway plan reviews and
permit applications shall be reviewed for compliance with established Maintenance of
Traffic and Safety Practices.
Policy B.1.2.3 The City shall coordinate construction scheduling within the public right-of-ways and shall
minimize whenever possible, any adverse impacts to normal traffic flow resulting from
such construction.
Objective B.1.3
Operating Conditions
The City shall provide streets with operating characteristics that conform to established and accepted
standards so as to ensure safe conditions for vehicles, motorists, cyclists, and pedestrians.
Policy B.1.3.1 The City shall accept the most recent2010 Highway Capacity Manual definitions for Levels
of Service, which utilize qualitative measures for establishing the operational
characteristics of the various roadways.
Policy B.1.3.2 The City shall manage land development regulation changes and prioritize transportation
infrastructure improvements to meet or exceed the target The -minimum Level of Service
(LOS) and Level of Traffic Stress (LTS) standards, a-s-ca��±Iid by FDOT, and as shown by
4RIIil [SIE110:11/11ff_1►a10110.11ila/_liNh1411ul1►fl
the following tablet, c\'icll clalelicablo to cll local streets and State highway system
fcs-jlitiac within tho City of Atlantic B ach.
Table B-52. City of Atlantic Beach Planning Area Minimum Vehicle Levels of Service (LOS)
Freeways Level of Service D
Principal Arterials Level of Service D
Minor Arterials Level of Service E
Collector Streets Level of Service E
Local Streets Level of Service E
Table B-6. Minimum Pedestrian Level of Traffic Stress (LTS)
Roadway Classification Minimum LTS Minimum Facilities
Arterial (40 MPH or greater) 2 Continuous 6'+ sidewalk on both sides with
vertical and horizontal separation.
Arterial (< 40 MPH) 2 Continuous 6'+ sidewalk on both sides with
horizontal separation.
Collector (commercial) 1 Continuous sidewalk on both sides of the road.
Collector (residential) 2 Continuous sidewalk on one side the road.
Local (commercial) 1 Continuous sidewalk on both sides of the road.
Local (residential)
ADT < 1.000 3 No facilities.
ADT = or > 1,000 2 Continuous sidewalk on one side of the road.
Table B-7. Minimum Bicycle Level of Traffic Stress (LTS)
Roadway Classification Minimum LTS
Minimum Facilities
Arterial 1 10'+ shared use path or separated bicycle lane on
both sides of the road.
Collector 2 Shared use path (8'+) on one side of the road or
buffered bicycle lanes on both sides of the road.
Local (commercial) 1 Shared use path, bicycle lane, or paved shoulder.
Local (residential) 2 No facilities.
Policy B.1.3.3 The City shall make vehicle LOS determinations on an as needed basis by utilizing Average
Daily Traffic (ADT) and/or peak hour data with the methods established in the most
recent2010 Highway Capacity Manual.
Policy B.1.3.4 The City shall maintain provisions for landscaping and other buffering methods within the
Land Development Regulations so as to prevent inappropriate land use relationships;
prevent noise transmission; provide screening of unattractive views; and enhance the
aesthetic qualities of streets, neighborhoods, and public areas of the City.
Policy B.1.3.5 The City shall support the incorporation of bike paths and pedestrian way systems in the
design of new roadway facilities and the upgrading of existing facilities in accordance with
accepted design standards and in response to the demonstrated need for such facilities
based on applicable survey data or information r,rin+Ained by the City and the North
Florida TPO.
Goal B.2
The City shall provide an integrated system of streets that encourage and facilitate coordinated and
compatible land use patterns, including the integration of private development with public
transportation facilities.
Objective B.2.1
Operating Standards
The City shall meet all accepted design and operating standards in the design and construction of all
streets within its jurisdiction.
Policy B.2.1.1 The City shall coordinate with FDOT for the incorporation of minimum standards for
roadway construction, reconstruction and maintenance for City streets as presented in
FDOT Manual of Uniform Minimum Standards for Design, Construction and Maintenance
for Streets and Highways and the FDOT Access Management Manual.
Policy B.2.1.2 Minimum design standards for the construction of new streets or the reconstruction of
existing streets shall be in accordance with FDOT roadway and traffic design standards.
Policy B.2.1.3 Traffic control devices on private property shall conform to the Manual on Uniform Traffic
Control Devices for Streets and Highways, as published by the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Federal Highway Administration.
Objective B.2.2
Private Driveways and Access Management
The City shall, to the extent feasible, provide for the satisfactory resolution of conflicts between the public
roadway system and private driveways and parking areas in order to enhance public safety as well as
existing and future neighborhood environmental conditions.
Policy B.2.2.1 The City shall ensure proper management of the connections and access points of
driveways and private roads to State roadways by coordination of development
permitting with FDOT to achieve applicable design standards.
Policy B.2.2.2 The City shall protect existing and future right-of-ways from building encroachment by on-
going coordination with the North Florida TPO and FDOT to establish right-of-way
requirements for future widening projects prior to issuance of development permits.
4538
Policy B.2.2.3 New development sites and redevelopment sites shall be required, where possible, to
provide for interconnectivity and the sharing of existing access points to major arterials.
Public streets shall not be used as an integral part of the internal circulation pattern of a
commercial development.
Policy B.2.2.4 The City shall coordinate traffic planning and development permitting with State and
Federal agencies so as to assist in implementing air quality improvement programs. As
part of the North Florida TPO, air quality status and future projection levels are monitored.
FDOT uses the Northeast Florida Regional Planning Model (NFRPM) to monitor air quality.
The future projections come from estimated building permit, housing and traffic
projections provided by each entity in North Florida area.
Policy B.2.2.5 The City shall continue to enforce land use and subdivision regulations to provide for the
safe and convenient on-site traffic flow, considering motorized and non -motorized traffic
movements and parking requirements.
Policy B.2.2.6 The spacing and location of access points shall be predicated upon reducing conflicts
between and among motor vehicles, pedestrians, and bicyclists.
Objective B.2.3
Provision of Sidewalks, Bikeways and Multi -use Facilities
All new right-of-ways established within the City shall be of adequate width to provide for bikeways,
sidewalks or similar facilities as required to encourage safe and increased pedestrian and bicycle activity.
Where possible, existing right-of-ways should provide for bikeways, sidewalks, or similar facilities to
encourage safe and increased pedestrian and bicycle activity.
Policy B.2.3.1 All new streets, including unimproved existing right-of-ways, shall be constructed to provide
for safe use by bicycles, and where sufficient right-of-way exists, separated bicycle paths
shall be provided.
Policy B.2.3.2 All new residential developments containing five or more dwelling units shall provide for
internal sidewalks, bike paths, or multi -use paths, and it shall be the responsibility of the
developer to construct such facilities and to provide connections to any other such public
facilities existing on adjoining lands.
Policy B.2.3.3 All existing rights-of-wav shall be reviewed when resurfaced, redesigned or modified to
provide for bikeways, sidewalks, multi -use paths, or similar facilities throughout the city
to provide linkages to schools, parks, and other destination points.
Policy B.2.3.4 The City shall seek opportunities to repurpose or add new rights of wav to enhance
connectivity for pedestrians and bicyclists.
B - 15
4538
Objective B.2.4
Coordination with Transportation Agencies
The City shall coordinate its transportation related activities with the plans and programs of all
transportation facility providers including the North Florida Transportation Planning Organization (TPO1,
the Jacksonville Transportation Authority (JTA), and the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT).
Policy B.2.4.1 Coordination of transportation activities should include the following:
• Supervision and/or coordination of all activities to promote safe and efficient operation.
• Coordination of all activities to provide consistency within a given iurisdiction.
• Coordination with adiacent iurisdictions to develop a compatible transportation system.
• Coordination with others transportation modes to promote overall transportation
efficiencv.The City shall continuc to cnforcc land use and subdivision regulations to provide for
the safe and convenient on site traffic flow, considering motorized and non motorized traffic
movements ar4 puking requirements.
Objective B.2.54
Energy Efficient Strategies
The City shall maintain its existing street patterns, which have developed to provide a network of
connected neighborhoods and an ability to walk, bike and travel throughout the City with minimum
vehicular travel miles and minimal traffic congestion.
Policy B.2.54.1 New retail and commercial services development and redevelopment shall be designed
to provide maximum opportunity for accessibility to transit, for pedestrians and bicycles
and where possible, shall connect to adjacent commercial uses.
Policy B.2.54.2 Strategies to promote mixed-use development and redevelopment in appropriate
locations, which shall be those locations that currently have Commercial land use
designations or High Density Residential land use designations, and where adjacent to
other commercial development or adjoining commercial corridors, shall be used to
provide opportunities for living in proximity to the workplace as an alternative housing
and transportation choice.
Policy 6.2.54.3 Mixed-use development and redevelopment as described in the preceding Policy shall not
be construed to permit industrial or intense commercial activities in combination with or
close proximity to new or existing residential uses, but rather to provide for an
appropriate mix of residential and neighborhoods serving retail, services and office types
of uses where the need for vehicular miles travelled can be minimized.
Policy B.2.5.4 The City may require new development and redevelopment to support alternative modes
of transportation through such measures including. but not limited to. the provision of
sidewalks. bikeways. transit stops or other facilities that support alternative modes of
transportation.
Goal B.3
B-16
20 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN —TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
The City shall work towards developing an integrated and connected multimodal transportation
system of Complete Streets that serves all neighborhoods.
Objective B.3.1
Complete Streets
Transportation proiects shall strive to create a network of continuous bicycle- and pedestrian -friendly
routes, including routes that connect with transit and allow for convenient access to work, home,
commercial areas, and schools.
Policy 6.3.1.1 All new construction and reconstruction of roadways shall be planned, designed,
constructed, and maintained to benefit all users, with consideration given to land use
context, right-of-way availability and costs.
Policy B.3.1.2 The City shall consider all elements of the right-of-way and utilize all applicable Complete
Streets policies as part of roadway repaving and resurfacing proiects.
Policy B.3.1.3 The City shall work to ensure the gradual implementation of Complete Streets policies on
existing streets, and incorporate these policies into applicable proiects included in the
Capital Improvements Program.
Policy B.3.1.4 Street trees, landscaping and amenities that provide shade and promote aesthetically
pleasing and comfortable environments for walking and cycling shall be incorporated into
Complete Streets proiects.
Policy B.3.1.5 Promote infrastructure that facilitates crossing of the right of way, such as accessible curb
ramps, crosswalks, refuge islands and pedestrian signals, where applicable.
Policy B.3.1.6 Promote complete streets that contribute to the slowing down of traffic, reduce pollution
and emissions, improve environmental quality and provides for local economic
opportunities, where applicable.
Policy 6.3.1.7 The City shall request that Complete Streets policies are incorporated into proiects
funded by outside agencies such as FDOT.
B-17
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - INFASTRUCTURE ELEMENT
Li
20 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN — INFASTRUCTURE ELEMENT
Introduction
The Infrastructure Element is "correlated to principles and guidelines for future land use, indicating ways
to provide for future potable water, drainage, sanitary sewer, solid waste, and aquifer recharge protection
requirements for the area", as specified in Section 163.3177(6)(c), Florida Statutes.
Potable Water
The City provides potable water to customers within the city limits (Atlantic Beach Service Area) as well
as the Buccaneer Service Area which is located in the City of Jacksonville north of city limits. The system
consists of nine Floridan aquifer supply wells, four water treatment plants with ground storage tanks, two
elevated storage tanks, and an interconnected distribution system. The City's potable water supply is fresh
groundwater pumped from the Florida aquifer. Florida Statutes require the St. Johns River Water
Management District (SJRWMD) to prepare a water supply plan for a 20 -year planning period in order to
ensure that existing water sources are adequate to meet proiected water demand. As a result of this
requirement, the SJRWMD developed the North Florida Regional Water Supply Plan (NFRWSP). This plan
contains specific activities and projects that regulated entities must undertake to reduce water
consumption. Concurrently, local governments within the regional water supply planning area are
required to develop a water supply facilities work plan (WSFWP) to ensure that adequate water supply is
available to meet future demands over a minimum 10 -year planning period. In 2019, the City of Atlantic
Beach completed the 2020-2040 Water Supply Facilities Work Plan (WSFWP). According to the city's
WSFWP, the nine Floridan aquifer supply wells that serve the City of Atlantic Beach's public water supply
system have an operating capacity of 8.52 million gallons of water per day (MGD), which is adequate to
meet the water demands for the next 20 -year planning horizon. Also, the NFRWSP did not identify the city
as an area with water shortages through the 2035 planning horizon and the findings of this plan indicate
that the city may continue utilizing the Floridan aquifer as its source of potable water. No alternative water
supply sources were identified. Table C-1 shows the projected water demands and the city's water
capacity through 2040.
Table C-1. Atlantic Beach Service Area Water Projections
2020 2025 2030 2035 2040
25.670 27.474 29.055 30.509 31.857
Proiected Population*
Proiected Water Demand
(MGD)
Consumptive Use Permit
Allocation (MGD)
WTP Combined Capacity
(MGD)
*UF BEBR & U.S. Census
3.07 3.26 3.44 3.60 3.75
3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75
8.52 8.52 8.52 8.52 8.52
Sanitary Sewer
The City of Atlantic Beach provides sanitary sewer service within the city limits and to a small area of
Jacksonville. There are currently an estimated 46 septic tanks within the city, representing about 3% of
the city's total buildings. The remaining buildings within the city are connected to the city's central sewer
system. The city operates the Atlantic Beach Wastewater Treatment Facility (WWTF) which has a
treatment capacity of 3.5 million gallons per day (MGD) annual average daily flow (AADF). Under the
current Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) permit, the Atlantic Beach WWTF is also
c-2
20 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN — INFASTRUCTURE ELEMENT
authorized to discharge 4.9 MGD AADF to the St. Johns River at Outfall D-001 and 3.0 MGD AADF to the
Intracoastal Waterway at D-002 during extreme wet weather. It also authorizes the reuse of 0.5 MGD
AADF via a slow rate public system.
Water Reuse
The City of Atlantic Beach operates a reuse treatment and distribution program. This effort included
upgrading the Wastewater Treatment Facility (WWTF) to meet reuse standards and offset up to 0.5 MGD
of ground water withdrawal through irrigation at the Atlantic Beach Country Club. The WWTF has
consistently provided reuse for on-site use at the facility as well as for irrigation for the golf course„
common areas, and residential homes within the Atlantic Beach Country Club. As the reuse system is
expanded in the future it is expected that reuse water will be used for irrigation on city right-of-ways
adiacent to the country club in addition to other areas throughout the city. The city continues to look for
funding opportunities in accordance with the City's Reuse Feasibility Study, as authorized by the
Comprehensive Plan. As a requirement of the recently passed Florida Senate Bill 64, the city will initiate a
study to eliminate all surface water discharge of treated effluent from the WWTF. This study will identify
the means to expand the reuse water system, protect the existing groundwater sources and reduce water
consumption. Table C-2 shows the water reuse rates from 2014 to 2021.
Table C-2. Daily Average Water Reuse
Year Reuse (MGD)
2014 0.384
2015 0.179
2016 0.236
2017 0.278
2018 0.254
2019 0.238
2020 0.201
2021 0.201
Stormwater Management
The City of Atlantic Beach is approximately 4 square miles in area and primarily drains through stormwater
pipe collection systems that route water to larger ditch/creek systems. The City's stormwater discharges
to the Intracoastal Waterway (ICW) via direct discharge from ditches, by way of Hopkins Creek or
Sherman -Puckett Creek. A majority of the City drains through Hopkins Creek or Sherman -Puckett Creek,
which flow through a combination of ditches and large culvert crossings owned and maintained by other
entities before discharging to the ICW. Most of the city was developed prior to modern stormwater
regulations requiring on-site retention/detention systems for flood protection. This, coupled with the flat
and low Tying topography of the city, has resulted in flooding issues. As a response, the City updated its
Stormwater Master Plan (SWMP) in 2018, conducted a Coastal Vulnerability Assessment in 2019 and
completed an Adaptation Plan in 2021.
C-3
20 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN — INFASTRUCTURE ELEMENT
C. Infrastructure Element Goals, Objectives, and Policies
The provision of public facilities and public infrastructure within the City of Atlantic Beach shall be in
accordance with the following Goals, Objectives, and Policies.
Goal C.1
The City shall provide needed public facilities and infrastructure in a manner, which protects investment
in the existing facilities and promotes efficient and appropriate use by existing and future development.
Objective C.1.1
Adequate Public Facilities and Infrastructure
The City of Atlantic Beach shall maintain procedures to ensure that adequate facility capacity is available
at the time a development permit is issued or will be available when needed to serve the development.
Policy C.1.1.1 In order to ensure that Level of Service standards are maintained, methodologies for
determining available capacity and demand shall incorporate appropriate peak demand
coefficients for each facility and for the type of development proposed.
Policy C.1.1.2 All improvements for the replacement, expansion or increase in the capacity of public
facilities shall be compatible with the adopted Level of Service standards for such facilities.
Policy C.1.1.3 Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the City will ensure that adequate water supplies,
wastewater treatment capacity, sewer collection infrastructure, and water infrastructure
facilities will be in place and available to serve no later than issuance of a certificate of
occupancy or its functional equivalent.
Policy C.1.1.4 The City's Director of Public Utilities shall provide written certification verifying that
adequate water supplies to serve new development will be available no later than the
anticipated date of issuance by the local government of a certificate of occupancy or its
functional equivalent.
Objective C.1.2
Public Facilities Planning
The City of Atlantic Beach shall incorporate capital improvement needs for public facilities within the five:
year Capital Improvements Schedule to be updated annually in conformance with the review process for
the Capital Improvement Element of the Comprehensive Plan.
Policy C.1.2.1 The City shall incorporate the proposed capital improvement projects, as identified within
the Water and Sewer Master plans, to create the five-year Capital Improvements Plan and
a five-year financial plan for water and sewer improvements. Both plans shall be
prioritized and updated annually, as appropriate.
th,a SJRWMP'c NIgional w for a4 ly plan cnd chall p ovide
�r maintain its identified water st,wly facilities, pvrcwant to Scction 163.3177(6)(c),
Fleic'ra Ctat►t�
C-4
20 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN — INFASTRUCTURE ELEMENT
Policy C.1.2.2 The City shall maintain a Water Supply Facilities Work Plan (WSFWP) that is coordinated
with the SJRWMD's regional water supply plan. The WSFWP and appropriate
Comprehensive Plan policies will be updated every 5 years, and within 18 months of any
update to the NFRWSP that affects the City, pursuant to Section 163.3177(6)(c), Florida
Statutes.
Policy C.1.2.3 The City's Water Supply Facilities Work Plan 2025-2045 is adopted by reference as part of
this comprehensive plan.
Objective C.1.3
Elimination of Septic Tanks
It is the intent of the City to eliminate all septic tanks within the City. The City shall limit such on-site
wastewater treatment systems to areas currently using septic tanks and shall install central sewer service
in accordance with Capital Improvements budgeting and planning in order to reduce the number of septic
tanks within the City.
Policy C.1.3.1 Pursuant to the City of Atlantic Beach Land Development Regulations, use of on-site
wastewater treatment systems (septic tanks) shall be limited to the following conditions.
(a) Existing septic tanks, which are properly functioning, may remain in service until such
time as centralized service is available within distances as set forth within the City's
utility regulations.
(b) All new subdivisions and new development shall be required to provide central sewer
service as set forth within the Land Development Regulations.
(c) The use of new septic tanks on any single lot of record, existing as of the date of this
Plan shall be permitted only in accordance with the Land Development Regulations.
More than one adjoining, but previously undeveloped lot of record that is developed
concurrently with multiple dwellings or as part of any unified development project
shall provide central sewer and water services.
Policy C.1.3.2 The City of Atlantic Beach shall continue to coordinate with the Florida Department of
Health in Duval County Duval County H alth Department to promote the inspection,
efficient operation and maintenance of existing septic tanks.
Policy C.1.3.3 Issuance of building permits shall be conditioned upon demonstration of compliance with
applicable Federal, State and local permit requirements for on-site wastewater treatment
systems where applicable.
Policy C.1.3.4 The City of Atlantic Beach shall coordinate with appropriate local, federal and state agencies
to require that issuance of permits for replacement or expansion of existing onsite waste-
water treatment systems is conditioned upon compliance with current regulatory
requirements and water quality standards.
20 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN — INFASTRUCTURE ELEMENT
Objective C.1.4
Capital Improvements and Infrastructure Facilities
The City of Atlantic Beach shall provide sanitary sewer, solid waste, drainage and potable water facilities
and services to meet the existing and projected demands as identified within this Plan.
Policy C.1.4.1 Capital Improvements and infrastructure projects shall be undertaken in accordance with
the schedule provided within the Capital Improvements Element of this Comprehensive
Plan.
Policy C.1.4.2 Projects and improvements needed to correct existing deficiencies shall be given priority
in the formulation and implementation of the annual budget of the City.
Policy C.1.4.3 The construction and expansion of capital improvements shall be scheduled so as to
minimize disruption of services and duplication of labor and to maintain acceptable
service levels for all facilities.
Policy C.1.4.4 All required Federal and State permits shall be obtained before the City undertakes or
authorizes contractors to begin construction and/or operation of infrastructure facilities.
Objective C.1.5
Conservation of Potable Water Resources
The City of Atlantic Beach shall conserve its potable water resources through regulations, policies and
coordination activities, which shall reduce consumption and provide encouragement for water reuse,
where feasible.
Policy C.1.5.1 The City agrees to comply with the water conservation rules issued by the St. Johns River
Water Management District (SJRWMD). The City shall also promote the SJRWMD
irrigation restrictions and implement other conservations measures to reduce potable
water use by its citizens and shall coordinate with the Water Management District's
regional water supply plan.
Policy C.1.5.2 The City shall maintain its adopted water conserving rate structure in order to reduce
potable water consumption.
Policy C.1.5.3 The Department of Public Utilities shall continue to monitor all facility meters and quantify
water loss within the potable water infrastructure. Any deficiencies shall be remedied
through the City's ongoing maintenance and repair program.
Policy C.1.5.4 The City shall continue to consider, where appropriate, reuse water for non -potable water
needs in accordance with the Reuse Feasibility Study completed as part of the Florida
Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) Permit renewal and the City's
Consumptive Use Permit renewal.
20 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN — INFASTRUCTURE ELEMENT
Goal C.2
Adequate stormwater management and provisions for drainage shall be provided to afford reasonable
protection from flooding and to prevent degradation in the quality of receiving surface water and
ground water.
Objective C.2.1
Protection of Natural Drainage Features
The City shall maintain provisions, in accordance with the Stormwater Master Plan, within the Land
Development Regulations that establish a basis for orderly provision of drainage facilities so as to protect
natural drainage features and to ensure that future development utilizes drainage facilities consistent with
the City's Level of Service standards and the Stormwater Master Plan.
Policy C.2.1.1 The City shall maintain provisions within the Land Development Regulations, which require
development to minimize stormwater runoff and eliminate erosion of areas adjacent to
natural drainage features.
Policy C.2.1.2 The City shall maintain Land Development Regulations that require land development
projects to submit plans, which demonstrate that drainage design and stormwater
management will be in compliance with the City's LOS standards and that additional
stormwater generated shall be retained on-site and will not adversely impact existing
drainage and stormwater systems.
Objective C.2.2
Stormwater Management and Drainage Facilities
The City shall continue to identify existing stormwater and drainage facility deficiencies and correct these
through the provision and maintenance of an efficient drainage system, which shall protect life, property,
water quality and the natural environment.
Policy C.2.2.1 The City shall work with the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) to coordinate
maintenance and improvement to the drainage and stormwater facilities owned by the
FDOT.
Policy C.2.2.2 The City shall continue to implement the updated Master Stormwater Plan, completed in
November of 2018, to address the identified drainage and stormwater problems areas.
Policy C.2.2.3 The City of Atlantic Beach shall update the capital improvement schedule to include
improvements to the drainage systems identified in the Stormwater Master Plan in
accordance with the priorities as recommended within the Plan, and subject to availability
of funding.
20 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN — INFASTRUCTURE ELEMENT
Goal C.3
The functions of natural groundwater aquifer recharge areas within the City shall be protected and
maintained.
Objective C.3.1
Protection of Aquifer Recharge Areas
The City of Atlantic Beach, in coordination with the SJRWMD, shall maintain a map of natural groundwater
aquifer recharge areas within the City.
Policy C.3.1.1 Existing potable water wells are depicted within Map C-1 of the Future Land Use Map Series.
Areas that may be identified as potential recharge areas shall be designated as
Conservation areas on the City's Future Land Use Map.
20 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
D. CONSERVATION AND COASTAL
MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
20 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN — CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Introduction
The Conservation Element focuses on the "conservation, use, and protection of natural resources" within
the city alone with "factors that affect energy conservation". as specified in Section 163.3177(6)(d). Florida
Statutes. Due to its coastal location. the City of Atlantic Beach is also required to include a Coastal
Management Element within its comprehensive plan. The intent of the Coastal Management Element, per
Section 163.3178(1). Florida Statutes. is to restrict development activities where such activities would
damage or destroy coastal resources.
D. Conservation and Coastal Management Element Goals,
Objectives and Policies
All conservation related activities and the management of coastal resources within the City of Atlantic
Beach shall be in accordance with the following Goals, Objectives, and Policies.
Goal D.1
The City shall protect, enhance and preserve coastal wetlands and beach and dune systems, as well as
other coastal resources of environmental value, through proper maintenance and management
practices, the avoidance of inappropriate use and development, including publicly -financed
improvements within the Coastal High Hazard Area, and shall continue an ongoing program of re -
vegetation and installation of properly designed public access -ways in areas that are subject to erosion
such as the dune system.
Objective D.1.1
Coastal High Hazard Area
The City shall limit public expenditures that subsidize development within the Coastal High Hazard Area
except for the maintenance, restoration, or enhancement of natural resources, and the provision for
appropriate public access to and use of natural resources.
Policy 11.1.11 Tho Stormwatcr Mastu Planyzc roviscd and adopted in 20Llhll bo implemented based
upon priority of need and in accordance with annmv� aapitul irsi cvema\nt ic,lanning and
budget review and adoption. Thu leico reviewed and updated by 2028.
Policy D.1.1.1 The City establishes, for regulatory purposes, the Coastal High Hazard Area as the area
below the Category 1 storm surge line as established by the Sea, Lake and Overland Surges
from Hurricane (SLOSH) computerized storm surge model pursuant to Chapter 163,
Florida Statutes.
Policy D.1.1.2 The City shall limit new public construction in the Coastal High Hazard Area to
improvements that do not increase residential density and to that which customarily
supports recreation and open -space use of the beach and waterway related resources,
and which achieves dune stabilization and prevention of erosion through environmentally
sound practices.
20 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN — CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Objective D.1.2
Storm and Flood Hazards
The City shall continuc bye. r:sar cmcnt practicer that/aro intended to reduce damage to and crosion of
dune systems and dunc vegetation and ecfrurino environments that result from pedecfricn trwf-fi The
City encourages the use of best practices for development and redevelopment, including principles,
strategies, and engineering solutions that will result in the removal of coastal real property from flood
zone designations established by the Federal Emergency Management Agency.
Policy D.1.2.1 The City shall rigorously enforce its floodplain management regulations to conform with or
exceed the requirements of the Federal Emergency Management Agency.
Policy D.1.2.2 The City shall continue to partner in the Duval County Local Mitigation Strategy and
participate in the Duval County emergency preparedness operations. The City shall review
new Land Development Regulations for consistency with the Local Mitigation Strategy
prior to adoption.
Policy D.1.2.3 The Stormwater Master Plan, as revised and adopted in 2018, shall be implemented based
upon priority of need and in accordance with annual capital improvement planning and
budget review and adoption. The plan shall be reviewed and updated by 2028.
Objective D.1.3
Protection of Dune Systems and Dune Vegetation
The City shall prevent damage and destruction of dunes and dune vegetation.
Policy D.1.3.1 The City shall rigorously enforce coastal construction code, and the Florida Building Code
as these regulate construction within Coastal Areas.
Policy D.1.3.2 The City shall continue best management practices that are intended to reduce damage
and erosion of dune systems and dune vegetation, which may result from construction
activities and inappropriate pedestrian traffic.
Objective D.1.4
Public Beach and Waterways Access
The City shall ensure adequate and convenient public access to the beach and other public waterways
through maintenance of all public waterway and beach access -ways at the twenty-one street end locations
existing as of the adoption date of this Plan.
Policy D.1.4.1 The City shall maintain all existing accesses including barrier -free ramps and shall join with
other beach communities, the North Florida Transportation Planning Organization (TPO),
the City of Jacksonville and others in seeking means of accommodating beach visitors as
a preferred alternative to the construction of parking facilities at beach access -ways.
45
! COMPREHENSIVE PLAN — CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Policy D.1.4.2 The City shall maintain all beach parking existing as of the date of this Plan, and reduction
in the number of public parking spaces available at beach accesses shall not be
permitted unless such eliminated spaces are replaced in equal numbers and within
similar proximity to the beach.
Policy D.1.4.3 The City shall not permit, either through public or private action, public access ways to the
beach, the Intracoastal Waterway, or other waterways, which are open to the public as
of the date of adoption of this Plan, to be closed, vacated or restricted from public use in
any manner.
Policy D.1.4.4 The City has determined that there are no appropriate locations for marinas within the City
of Atlantic Beach.
Policy D.1.4.5 The City will cooperate and coordinate with the City of Jacksonville to provide information
as necessary related to any County marina development or applicable plans.
Objective D.1.5
Environmental Conditions
The City shall limit new development of shoreline sites so as to conform to the objective of reducing
environmental degradation, as well as to encourage visual and physical accessibility, open space
conservation, wildlife preservation and compatibility between adjacent uses.
Policy D.1.5.1 In accordance with Section 163.3202, Florida Statutes, the City shall maintain within its
Land Development Regulations establish the following:
(a) Percentage of native vegetation to be protected, preserved or replaced within
Environmentally Sensitive Areas during and following site development or
construction activities.
(b) A buffer zone of natural vegetation around wetland and deepwater habitats.
(c) Stormwater retention and detention standards, which maintain rates and amounts
equal to conditions existing prior to development.
Objective D.1.6
Marshes, Wetlands and Natural Flood Plain Features
The City shall conserve or improve marshes, wetlands, and aquatic resources and natural flood plain
features to maintain their environmental and recreational value.
Policy D.1.6.1 The City shall require new development to preserve native vegetation on site when
applicable. This should not be interpreted to allow development in wetlands or protected
areas.
Policy D.1.6.2 The City shall take every effort to protect these resources as follows:
D-4
20 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN — CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
(a) Development and redevelopment shall be compatible with the surrounding
environment;
(b) The clearing of trees and wetland vegetation shall be prohibited, unless a mitigation
plan is submitted and approved by the Citv, the obiective being no net loss of
wetlands and trees; and
(c) All applications for site development approval shall be subject to site plan review in
accordance with the land development regulations.
Goal D.2
The City shall maximize, to the extent feasible, provisions and opportunities for the protection of life
and property from the effects of hurricanes and other natural disasters.
Objective D.2.1
Hurricane Evacuation
The City shall maintain a comprehensive hurricane evacuation management plan and shall incorporate
into that plan measures deemed necessary to maintain or reduce the City's evacuation clearance times.
Policy D.2.1.1 The City shall cooperate with and assist other communities in identifying adequate public
upland shelter spaces and shall not approve new development that creates undue
burdens on the number of spaces available for threatened populations.
Policy D.2.1.2 The City hereby adopts and shall maintain a Level of Service standard of a 12 -hour
evacuation time for a Category 5 storm for out -of -county hurricane evacuation.
Policy D.2.1.3 The City shall not approve Plan amendments that increase residential density within Coastal
High Hazard Areas in that such increases to existing densities have the effect of
concentrating populations in hazard prone areas and may result in an increase of
hurricane evacuation times for the City and the County.
Policy D.2.1.4 The City shall coordinate hurricane preparedness activities with other local governments
and affected agencies within the region; review its emergency preparedness plan each
year; maintain a broad program of activities to increase public awareness; meet the
evacuation needs of special populations, and through coordination with other local
governments, strive to achieve an evacuation time within the "quick" response time
frame for each storm category.
Policy D. 2.1.5 The City's evacuation plan shall be consistent with the Duval County Hurricane Evacuation
Traffic Management Plan as amended and shall maximize efficiencies in traffic movement
so as to reduce or maintain evacuation clearance times within the City of Atlantic Beach.
Objective D.2.2
Redevelopment after a Natural Eventwithin the GeastaI High Hazard Arca
Redevelopment activities within the Cca.—AV I-ligh Ha:,ard Ara shall be guided by the redevelopment
provisions as set forth within the Land Development Regulations, which shall serve the purpose of
reducing the vulnerability of people, property and natural resources to damage from coastal storms.
0 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN — CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Policy D.2.2.1 The City shall coordinate with Duval County in reviewing and revising the City's Hurricane
Plan and pertinent portions or regulatory codes as necessary to achieve the following
policies.
Policy D.2.2.2 Implement a temporary moratorium on construction immediately following a hurricane
occurrence until damage assessments and redevelopment policies have been
determined.
Policy D.2.2.3 Prior to re-entry of the population into evacuated areas, complete all critical cleanup and
repair activities required to assure public health and safety.
Policy D.2.2.4 Structures that are storm damaged over 50% of their most recent appraised value may be
reconstructed only when the entire structure will then conform to all applicable
regulations, including all Land Development Regulations, and Florida Building and coastal
construction codes. Repairs made to structures damaged to a lesser degree shall comply
with all applicable Land Development Regulations and Florida Building and coastal
construction codes in effect at the time of such work.
Policy D.2.2.5 The City tab. -.)-.10s, for regulatory purposes, the Coxizal High Hazard Aroo c tho ar a
below the Category 1 storm v rgo line as crtablic'hod by the Sea, Lake and Overland Surges
from I-Izricane (SLOSH) computerized storrs arbo modol oc rnappod in tho Smarm Tide
Atlas prepared by the North ast Florida Regional Council c\art of the current Regional
Evacuation Study n i iznt to Chapter 163, Floridz Ctztutc�,
Objective D.2.3
Hazard Mitigation
The City shall seek appropriate means of reducing the potential for loss of life and property through
provisions within the Land Development Regulations, including implementation of hazard mitigation
policies from the Local Mitigation Strategy.
Policy D.2.3.1 The City shall maintain provisions within its Land Development Regulations, which require
that all new residential development within the Coastal High Hazard Area assess impacts
to hurricane evacuation times and shelter provision.
Policy D.2.3.2 The City shall not approve Plan amendments, which increase residential density within the
Coastal High Hazard Area, or where demands upon existing shelter space shall be
increased.
Goal D.3
The City shall protect, preserve and maintain natural environmental resources so as to maintain or
enhance air quality, water quality, vegetative communities, wildlife habitats and the natural functions
of soils, fisheries, wetlands and estuarine marshes.
20 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN — CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Objective D.3.1
Air Quality
The City shall cooperate with adjacent communities in regional air quality management programs so as to
provide a high standard of air quality.
Policy D.3.1.1 The City shall implement policies of the Local Mitigation Strategy appropriate to protect air
quality and shall require mitigation prior to permitting of projects that may adversely
affect air quality.
Objective D.3.2
Conservation and Protection of Natural Coastal Resources
The City shall maintain or adopt provisions within its Land Development Regulations for private and public
development, which conserve and enhance soils, native vegetation, living marine and water resources and
wildlife habitats to the maximum extent possible.
Policy D.3.2.1 The City shall require applicants for development permits to submit appropriate
environmental surveys and reports prior to the issuance of development permits. All
applications for development permits and applications to rezone to Planned Unit
Development and other zoning related applications shall be required to identify
environmental features, including any wetlands, CCCL, natural water bodies, open space,
buffers and vegetation preservation areas, and to sufficiently address any adverse
impacts to Environmentally Sensitive Areas.
Policy D.3.2.2 The City shall cooperate with the St. John's River Water Management District (SJRWMD) in
implementation of water conservation measures as set forth within the management
plans and rules of the SJRWMD and the City's Consumptive Use Permit issued by the
SJRWMD.
Policy D.3.2.3 The City shall protect potable water well cones of influence, ashall maintain maps of
such cones of influence and shall continue to implement the well -field protection
regulations, as set forth within the Land Development Regulations so as to prohibit
incompatible land uses. Such incompatible uses shall include all industrial uses, but shall
also include uses, which have the potential to contaminate or degrade potable water
supply wells, wetland functions or natural systems associated with Environmentally
Sensitive Areas.
Policy D.3.2.4 The City shall appropriately restrict land use activities, which may threaten water sources
from stormwater runoff into recharge areas by maintaining the Stormwater, Drainage,
Storage and Treatment Requirements as set forth within the Land Development
Regulations. Development permits shall be issued only in accordance with the City's
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Systems (NPDES) permit, in addition to the
requirements of the Water Management District and the Florida Department of
Environmental Protection. NPDES requirements shall include use of Best Management
Practices (BMPs) prior to discharge into natural or artificial drainage systems. All
construction projects of one acre or more shall require a NPDES permit.
45
! COMPREHENSIVE PLAN — CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Policy D.3.2.5 In accordance with Section 163.3202, Florida Statutes, the City shall establish and maintain
within its Land Development Regulations, all necessary requirements and restrictions to
ensure that land development, land disturbing activities, and land uses are managed in a
manner which protects and conserves the natural functions of soils, fisheries, wildlife
habitats, rivers, flood plains, wetlands (including estuarine marshes) and marine habitats
including hatchling turtles.
Policy D.3.2.6 The City shall cooperate with adjacent local governments and regulatory agencies to
conserve and protect, as may be appropriate, unique vegetative communities located
within the City and within adjacent jurisdictions.
Policy D.3.2.7 The City shall designate Environmentally Sensitive Areas requiring protection as a means
of implementing the Comprehensive Plan and shall include in its Land Development
Regulations, prepared in accordance with Section 163.3202, Florida Statutes, means of
ensuring protection of such lands from degradation.
Policy D.3.2.8 Environmentally Sensitive Areas shall include lands, waters or areas within the City of
Atlantic Beach which meet any of the following criteria:
(a) All wetlands, including those determined to be jurisdictional, and which are regulated
by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) and the St. Johns River
Water Management District (SJRWMD);
(b) Estuaries, or estuarine systems;
(c) Outstanding Florida Waters and natural water bodies;
(d) Areas designated pursuant to the Federal Coastal Barrier Resource Act (PL97-348),
and those beach and dune areas seaward of the Coastal Construction Control Line;
(e) Areas designated as Conservation by the Future Land Use Map;
(f) Essential Habitat to Listed Species as determined by approved methodologies of the
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, the Florida Department of
Agriculture and Consumer Services, and the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service.
Policy D.3.2.9 The City shall ensure environmentally sound management of hazardous wastes and
reduction of potential problems resulting there from, through a multi -faceted program
incorporating public information, enforcement of regulations and monitoring of waste
handling activities. The following components shall be included within the City's program:
(a) Support the enforcement of current State and Federal regulations aimed at
prohibiting discharge of wastewater containing hazardous and industrial waste into
septic tanks or through stormwater runoff into aquifer recharge areas or surface
water bodies.
20 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN — CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
(b) Public education programs encouraging residents and business owners to avoid the
dumping of used petroleum products, paint, hazardous materials and pesticides onto
the ground or water bodies.
(c) City coordination and monitoring of hazardous wastes by collection and
transportation entities to ensure safe and responsible handling practices.
Policy D.3.2.10 The City shall seek to increase its conservation areas, through land acquisition, when
Possible, incentives for protective easements, and other appropriate protective
mechanisms to ensure the preservation of natural resources and listed animal species
habitat.
Policy D.3.2.11 The fragmentation of large wetland communities shall be avoided by encouraging density
transfers, conservation easements, clustering of development, and other land
development tools to enhance conservation.
Objective D.3.3
Regulatory Authority
The City shall continue to cooperate with other permitting and regulatory agencies to improve estuarine
environmental quality to achieve the estuarine water quality standards established by FDEP.
Policy D.3.3.1 The City shall maintain, and amend as necessary, provisions within its Land Development
Regulations to achieve consistency with the rules and regulatory authority of the
SiRWMD.
Policy D.3.3.2 The City shall coordinate with other governmental agencies during the review, permitting
and development of sites which, if improperly developed, could have adverse impacts
upon estuarine water quality and related resources, and through such coordination, the
City shall ensure adequate sites within the drainage basin for water -dependent uses;
prevent estuarine pollution which could adversely affect another governmental
jurisdiction and ensure public access and reduce exposure to flood hazards.
Policy D.3.3.3 The City shall coordinate its permitting activities with existing resource protection plans by
notifying the administrators of such plans of any pending development activity or public
improvement in a timely manner in order to ensure that such projects and activities can
be reviewed and comments returned to the City prior to permitting.
Objective D.3.4
Shoreline Development
The City shall give priority consideration to shoreline land uses and site development improvements,
which meet the following criteria:
(a) Prevent adverse environmental effects;
20 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN — CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
(b) Maintain or exceed the standards within this Plan for public access;
(c) Avoid shoreline hardening structures; and
(d) Enhance estuarine water quality.
Objective D.3.5
Natural Resource Based Recreation and Public Access
The City shall provide opportunities for appropriate recreational uses and access to public waterways, the
beach and natural areas and shall restrict activities that harm or diminish the public's right to use such
publicly owned natural resources.
Policy D.3.5.1 The City shall prohibit the closure or abandonment of public right-of-ways or public lands
that would restrict access to any public water bodies.
Policy D.3.5.2 The City shall enforce the requirements for public access to beach areas as set forth in the
Coastal Protection Act of 1985 in all permitting activities and through the course of coastal
redevelopment programs.
Policy D.3.5.3 The City shall prohibit the closure of existing beach and waterway accesses and any
presently unopened easements, except in the case of risk to public safety as determined
by the City's public safety officials, or in the case of adverse environmental impact.
Policy D.3.5.4 The City shall adopt within its Land Development Regulations provisions to provide for the
appropriate recreational use of surface waters within the City that under public control
or City ownership including dock construction, mooring and anchoring and resource
protection regulations to the extent that the City has regulatory control over such
resources.
Policy D.3.5.5 The beach, River Branch Preserve, Dutton Island Preserve and Tide Wiews Preserve are the
most significant natural resources within the City, and provision for the public's use,
enjoyment and access to these natural resources shall be a priority of the City through
the provision of activities and facilities that are appropriate to character and environment
of each location.
Goal D.4
The City shall promote and encourage energy conservation and efficiency in an effort to reduce
greenhouse gas emissions and protect the environment.
D - 10
20 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN — CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Objective D.4.1
Energy Efficiency and Energy Conservation
The City shall encourage the development and use of renewable energy resources in order to conserve
and protect the value of land, buildings, and resources, and to promote the good health of the City's
residents.
Policy D.4.1.1 The City shall maintain an energy efficient land use pattern and shall continue to promote
the use of transit and alternative methods of transportation that decrease reliance on
the automobile.
Policy D.4.1.2 The City shall continue to encourage and develop the "walk -ability and bike -ability" of the
City as a means to promote the physical health of the City's residents, increase access to
recreational and natural resources, and as a means to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
Policy D.4.1.3 No action of the City shall prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting solar collectors, or other
energy devices based on renewable resources from being installed on a building and as
further set forth within Section 163.04, Florida Statutes.
Policy D.4.1.4 The City shall continue to promote and enforce energy efficient design and construction
standards as these become adopted as part of the Florida Building Code. The City shall
also promote commercial and residential standards that are promulgated from time to
time by the Florida Green Building Coalition, Inc.
Objective D.4.2
Citv Buildings and Equipment
The City shall improve energy conservation and efficiency in City buildings, facilities and equipment.
Policy D.4.2.1 The City shall develop and implement an energy management plan to minimize electric,
fuel and water resources in City buildings, fleet vehicles and on public properties.
Policy D.4.2.2 The City shall conduct periodic energy audits of public buildings and facilities to identify
methods to reduce energy consumption and improve energy efficiency.
Policy D.4.2.3 Public buildings and facilities shall be constructed, and adapted where reasonably feasible
to incorporate energy efficient designs and appropriate "green" building standards. Green
building standards that should be observed are contained in the Green Commercial
Building Designation Standard, Version 2.0, published by the Florida Green Building
Coalition, Inc.
Policy D.4.2.4 The City shall continue to replace light-duty vehicles in need of replacement with hybrids,
alternative fuel vehicles, or the most fuel- efficient and least -polluting vehicles available
for specific functions whenever cost and reliability are similar to traditional vehicles.
Goal D.5
The City shall ensure the development and redevelopment of property requires principles, strategies,
and engineering solutions that reduce flood risks which result from high -tide events, storm surge, flash
floods, stormwater runoff, and the related impacts of sea -level rise.
Objective D.5.1
Development and Redevelopment
The City shall implement development and redevelopment principles, strategies and engineering solutions
to reduce or eliminate flood risk.
Policy D.5.1.1
Policy D.5.1.2
Policy D.5.1.3
Policy D.5.1.4
The City shall protect and restore floodplain areas when possible through land acquisition
or conservation easement acquisition; regulation, including setbacks, buffer zones,
designated wildlife corridors, low density zoning, performance standards and open space
requirements.
The City shall designate a Floodplain Administrator whom, when possible will be Certified
Floodplain Manager, to enforce the provisions of Chapter 8 of the Code of Ordinances
and other applicable regulations.
No development or redevelopment, including but not limited to site improvements, and
land disturbing activity involving fill or regrading, shall be authorized in the regulatory
floodway, as amended from time to time by the Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) to accommodate for changing external conditions, unless the floodway
encroachment analysis required in the Floodplain Management Ordinance demonstrates
that the proposed development or land disturbing activity will not result in any increase
in the base flood elevation.
Development or redevelopment within flood hazard areas shall be constructed with a
minimum finished floor elevation of eight and one-half (8.5) feet above mean sea level or
with two and one-half (2.5) feet freeboard, whichever is greater, in order to reduce flood
losses.
Policy D.5.1.5 The City shall manage its planning, regulatory and utility services to steer future
population concentrations away from the Coastal High Hazard Areas (CHHA) by
prohibiting utility expansions that would allow greater populations in the CHHA and
increasing utility availability outside of the CHHA to encourage development in those
areas.
Policy D.5.1.6
The City shall continue to upgrade its stormwater infrastructure through drainage
improvements, while utilizing sustainable flood management actions such as the
installation of bioswales, the use of pervious pavement and the maintenance of natural
preserve areas.
2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN — CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Policy D.5.1.7 The City shall continue to work with the State of Florida Division of Emergency
Management (DEM), the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the
National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) to mitigate flooding hazards through the
acquisition, elevation or relocation of repetitive loss properties miti_ation alternatives by
utilizing such programs as the Flood Mitigation Assistance Program (FMAP), Repetitive
Flood Claims (RFC).
Objective D.5.2
Flood Regulations
The City shall continue to require development and redevelopment to abide by the requirements of the
Florida Building Code and State Statutes in encourage the development and use of renewable energy
resources in regards to flooding.
Policy D.5.2.1 The City shall continue to require development and redevelopment be consistent with the
flood resistant construction requirements in the Florida Building Code and applicable
flood plain management regulations set forth in 44 C.F.R part 60.
Policy D.5.2.2 The City shall continue to require development and redevelopment seaward of the Coastal
Construction Control Line (CCCL) established pursuant to F.S 161.053 be consistent with
Chapter 161 of the Florida Statutes.
Objective D.5.3
National Flood Insurance Program
The City shall continue to implement ways to reduce flood insurance premiums for their residents.
Policy D.5.3.1 The City shall meet the requirements of the National Flood Insurance Program for
community participation as set forth in the Title 44 Code of Federally Regulations, Section
59.22 in order to reduce flood losses and achieve flood insurance premium discounts for
residents.
Policy D.5.3.2 The City shall continue to participate in the National Flood Insurance Program's
Community Rating System (CRS) administered by the Federal Emergency Management
Agency to reduce flood losses and achieve flood insurance premium discounts for their
residents.
20 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT
20 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN — RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT
The City of Atlantic Beach has 18 parks and preserves, each with a unique identity and function. The Citv's
parks and preserves range in size from the 350 acre River Branch Preserve to small pocket parks such as
Marvin's Garden and Fairway Villas Park. Similarly, some function as active parks with playgrounds and
ball fields while others are passive and largely remain in their natural state.
City of Atlantic Beach Parks and Preserves Inventors►
Park/Preserve Park Classification Acreage
Atlantic Beach Dog Park Active 2.15
Bull Memorial Park Active 1.44
Donner Park Active 5
Dutton Island Preserve Passive 31.86
Fairway Villas Park Passive 0.18
Frazier Park Passive 0.6
Howell Park Passive 9.64
Jack Russell Park Active 12.79
Johansen Park Passive 13.83
Jordan Park Active 2.22
Marvin's Garden Passive 0.12
River Branch Preserve Passive 350
Rose Park Active 0.98
Rose Doe Park Active 0.18
Selva Preserve Passive 3.52
Tide Views Preserve Passive 10.5
Veterans Park Active 1.5
Waters Park Passive 0.25
Total 446.76
E. Recreation and Open Space Element Goals, Objectives, and Policies
All provision for management of lands for Recreation and Open Space within the City of Atlantic Beach
shall be in accordance with the following Goals, Objectives, and Policies.
Goal E.1
The City shall maintain sufficient parks, recreation facilities and open space so as to provide the citizens
with a wide variety of leisure time activities in order that the City continues to be a healthy, desirable
and attractive community in which to live.
Objective E.1.1
Adequate Recreation Facilities
The City shall inventory at least once every five years, public and private recreation resources to identify
service inadequacies and opportunities for sharing of facilities and programs so as to provide safe,
convenient access for all residents to beaches, parks and other recreation facilities in accordance with
Level of Service standards set forth within this Plan amendment.
4530
Policy E.1.1.1 If determined to be necessary to maintain the adopted Level of Service standards as set
forth herein, the City may utilize a system of user fees to support the development
recreation programs and the maintenance of facilities.
Policy E.1.1.2 The City shall continue to encourage volunteerism and participant involvement in planning
and operating of recreation programs so as to supplement available City resources.
Policy E.1.1.3 The City shall continue to encourage equitable inter -community sharing of recreation and
open space facilities.
Policy E.1.1.4 The City shall continue to support efforts of other government agencies and shall offer
cooperation to achieve level of service standards for regional recreation and open space
facilities as set forth within this Plan amendment.
Policy E.1.1.5 The City shall maintain the existing recreation facilities, as identified within Table E-2, or
similar facilities so as to continue to meet or exceed the Level of Service standards as set
forth within this Plan.
Policy E.1.1.6 The City shall maintain all existing beach access ways as described within the Conservation
and Coastal Management Element and shall continue to make improvements to prevent
erosion caused by pedestrian traffic.
Policy E.1.1.7 The City shall maintain all existing accessible beach accesses, and shall seek opportunities,
where feasible, to provide additional access to all natural and constructed recreation and
park facilities. New facilities shall be developed and constructed in compliance with
applicable provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines for
Buildings and Facilities (ADAAG).
Policy E.1.1.8 The City shall continue to allow parking along public rights-of-way for the purpose of
providing parking for beach access, provided such parking does not interfere with
pedestrian or vehicular safety and does not excessively result in damage to public or
private property.
Policy E.1.1.9 The City shall not permit parks and designated open space to be diverted to any other use
unless mitigated by equal replacement in size and quality of the resource.
Policy E.1.1.10 As of the date of this Plan amendment, the City has exceeded the adopted Level of Service
standards for recreation facilities and open space areas. The adopted Level of Service
standards, as set forth within Table E-1, shall be maintained as minimum standards.
Table E-1. Recreation and Open Space Level of Service Standards City of Atlantic Beach, 204530
TYPE OF FACILITY
Playground (with equipment)
Baseball or Softball Field
Soccer or Football Field
Basketball Court
LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARD
1 playground per 2,500 population
1 field per 23,500 population
1 field per 5,000 population
1 court per 2,500 population
20 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN — RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT
Tennis or Pickleball Court
Running/Hiking Trail
Community Center
Beach Accesses
Passive Park/Scenic Open Space
Golf Course* (public or private)
1 court per 2,500 population
1 trail per 10,000 population
1 center per 10,000 population
1 access per 2,500 population
5 acres per 1,000 population
1 18 -hole course per 25,000 population
Regional Park/Open Space* 5 acres per 1,000 population
*Regional facilities are defined as those, which may not be located within the City of Atlantic Beach, but
are in such close proximity so as to directly serve the daily recreational needs of the residents of the City
of Atlantic Beach, such as Kathryn Abby Hanna Park and area golf courses.
Table E-2. Existing Public Recreation and Open Space Facilities, 202435
FACILITY LOS Minimum 202418 Inventory
Playground 6 7
Baseball or Softball Field 4 4
Soccer or Football Field 3 4
Basketball Court 6 45. full courts & 3 half courts
Racquetball/Handball Court N/A 2
Tennis Court 6 71
Pickleball Court 8
Trails 2 5 plus 2.3 miles of 8 -foot
multi -use paths
3
21
Passive Park and Open 412+/- acres
Community Center
Beach Access
2
6
70
Space
Golf Course (public or 1 1
private)
Regional Park and Open 70 450 acres- Kathryn Abbey
Space Hanna Park
Skate Park N/A 1
Objective E.1.2
Diversity of Recreation Facilities and Activities
The City shall continue to provide varied and diverse recreation activities to the community, and shall
coordinate with public agencies, private organizations and individuals, as well as adjacent local
governments to supplement efforts and resources of the City.
20 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN — RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT
Policy E.1.2.1 The City shall seek participation from appropriate private recreation program providers
in order to enhance the quality and diversity of recreational services and to improve the
cost effectiveness of such services.
Policy E.1.2.2 The City shall maintain, within its Land Development Regulations, provisions that require
open space and recreation within new development.
Policy E.1.2.3 The City shall continue to implement and construct its bicycle and pedestrian pathway
system, with priority given to locations that provide links between neighborhoods,
schools, parks and the beach and adjacent beach communities. Where sufficient right -of-
way or land area exists, wider six (6) or eight (8) foot widths shall be the recommended
standard to accommodate for the safety of multi -modal activities. The City shall also
advocate the addition of pedestrian and bike facilities lanes to State and County Roads.
Policy E.1.2.4 The City shall support the development of skateboard facilities so as to provide safe
locations for skateboarding and to discourage this activity in locations that are dangerous
or where damage to public property may result.
Policy E.1.2.5 The City shall maintain Tide Vviews Preserve, Dutton Island Preserve and River Branch
Preserve as passive and natural recreation areas. Facilities shall be limited to those that
support fishing, canoeing and kayaking, biking, hiking and exercise trails, picnicking and
camping areas and other similar activities. Other public spaces and designated parks, may
be reserved as passive areas, or may be developed as active parks as determined
necessary to maintain Level of Service standards and as appropriate to the location and
size of the area.
Policy E.1.2.6 l blip per`;, othor than thoco citcd within the preceding Policy) d,�all be considered as
aActive parks are to be used for athletics or specialized recreation activities, as
appropriate to the location of each park. Typical facilities include baseball fields, softball
fields, football fields, soccer fields, rest rooms, parking, recreation building, basketball
courts, skateboard facilities, tennis courts and walking trails.
Policy E.1.2.7 The City shall continue to provide funding for maintenance, staffing and development of
programs, particularly those programs that serve low and moderate -income populations
and the elderly, at the Gail Baker Community Center at Donner Park and the Jordan
Community Center.
Policy E.1.2.8 The City shall protect its beach as a recreational resource and shall rigorously seek funding
for future beach renourishment projects.
Objective E.1.3
Provision of Recreation and Open Space by Private Development
The City shall ensure that recreation facilities and open space areas are provided in conjunction with
development review and permitting so as to maintain or exceed the level of service standards set forth
within this Plan and prior to the impacts of such development.
453-0
Policy E.1.3.1 The City shall maintain requirements for the provision of recreation and open space as a
condition of development approval and shall also limit impervious surface area and land
coverage by structures and shall enforce building setbacks in accordance with the Land
Development Regulations.
Policy E.1.3.2 The City shall require all new residential developments containing five (5) dwelling units or
more to provide internal sidewalks or multi -use paths, and such sidewalks or pathways
shall link to other facilities and public spaces where possible. Where sufficient right -of-
way exists or can be designed, sidewalks and pathways shall be constructed at a minimum
width of six (6) feet.
Policy E.1.3.3 The adopted Level of Service standards shall be maintained as a minimum standard and
funding for continued management of these facilities shall be considered during the
annual budget review process.
Policy E.1.3.4 Acquisition of recreation sites and open space areas by the City shall be prioritized in
accordance with expressed desires of the community and in response to availability of
grant funds and other incentive programs.
Policy E.1.3.5 Private development shall not, by any means, restrict or prohibit access or use by the public
of any public recreational resource including the beach, the Intracoastal Waterway,
creeks, streams, marsh and wetland areas.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - HOUSING ELEMENT
0
N
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN — HOUSING ELEMENT
F. Housing Element Goals, Objectives and Policies
The City of Atlantic Beach shall encourage and support the provision of housing for all residents of the City
in accordance with the following Goals, Objectives and Policies.
Goal F.1
The City of Atlantic Beach shall provide opportunities for decent, safe and sanitary housing in suitable
neighborhoods at affordable costs to meet the needs of the present and future residents of the City as
well as ensure the stability and integrity of sound residential neighborhoods.
Objective F.1.1
Housing for Very Low, Low and Moderate Income Residents
Equal opportunity shall be provided to meet the housing needs of all existing and future residents of the
City of Atlantic Beach, including housing for very low, low and moderate -income families.
Policy F.1.1.1 The City shall support the efforts of the City of Jacksonville Housing Commission and assist
with efforts to determine needs and develop sites and programs on a region -wide basis
for housing for very low, low and moderate -income persons.
Policy F.1.1.2 The City shall pursue Federal, state and local sources and joint public- private partnerships
to provide funding sources targeted for very low, low and moderate -income housing.
Policy F.1.1.3 The City shall promote the use of alternative zoning techniques and mechanisms to
provide a mix of housing types within residential neighborhoods. which can include
reducing minimum lot sizes, exploring a Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) program,
and encouraging accessory dwelling units.
Policy F.1.1.4 The City may enter into an interlocal agreement with the City of Jacksonville (Duval
County) for the provision of affordable housing for very low, low and moderate -income
residents and special needs households to prevent the need to increase residential
densities within the Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA) in order to provide affordable
housing to serve the City.
Policy F.1.1.5 The City shall continue to provide assistance and incentives where possible to encourage
new affordable housing and preservation of existing housing stock through the CDBG
funded housing rehabilitation program and through assistance to organizations such as
Beaches Habitat and Builders Care.
Policy F.1.1.6 The City shall consider private and public partnerships, particularly as may be necessary
and appropriate, to address the City's affordable housing needs in response to:
(a) Market driven limitations, where meeting the needs for affordable housing is not
economically feasible due to exceptionally high property values related to the City's
coastal location.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN — HOUSING ELEMENT
(b) Meeting the needs for affordable housing is not feasible due to limitations of
residential density within the Coastal High Hazard Area.
Objective F.1.2
Navy Housing Needs
The City shall assist developers in responding to the special housing needs of Navy personnel.
Policy F.1.2.1 The City shall coordinate with the Navy Planning Officer to assess potential future impacts
resulting from growth of Naval Station Mayport that may increase housing needs of the
City.
Objective F.1.3
Group Homes and Foster Care Facilities
Sites for group homes and foster care facilities shall be available at suitable locations to ensure that the
needs of persons requiring such housing are met.
Policy F.1.3.1 The City shall allow the location of group homes and foster care facilities in multi -family
residential zoning districts in a manner, which is consistent with the intent of such districts
so as to ensure harmonious development patterns and, at the same time, assure
healthful, convenient, and pleasant environments for residents of such housing.
Policy F.1.3.2 The City shall allow the placement of group homes in Planned Unit Developments.
Objective F.1.4
Displacement of Housing and Businesses
Uniform and equitable treatment shall be provided by the City to persons and businesses displaced by City
activities and programs in accordance with Florida Statutes and Federal law, and comparable relocation
housing shall be provided as required to comply with such laws and to meet demonstrated needs.
Policy F.1.4.1 The City shall discourage redevelopment and demolition practices that significantly reduce
existing housing stock in older neighborhoods and that result in the displacement of very
low, low and moderate -income residents or special needs households.
Policy F.1.4.2 The City shall monitor all redevelopment and demolition activity to ensure that comparable
relocation housing is available in accordance with federal regulations, regardless of
whether federal monies are involved in the activity.
Goal F.2
The City shall encourage the preservation and protection of housing of historic significance as well as
other components of the existing housing inventory.
20 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN — HOUSING ELEMENT
Objective F.2.1
Historically Significant Housing
The City shall encourage the preservation and protection of historically significant housing, which has been
identified within The Historic, Architectural Resources Survey of the Beaches Area and shall promote the
use of such housing for continued residential use.
Policy F.2.1.1 The City shall discourage development actions that have the potential to destroy or
irretrievably damage the City's historic and architectural resources.
Policy F.2.1.2 The City shall coordinate with the Florida Department of State's Division of Historical
Resources to further the identification and preservation of historically significant sites or
structures, and if appropriate, nominate such sites or structures to the National Register
of Historic Places.
Policy F.2.1.3 The City shall encourage the rehabilitation and adaptive reuse of historically significant
housing.
Objective F.2.2
Existing Housing Stock
The City shall undertake housing conservation and rehabilitation of existing housing stock, but shall also
require demolition when rehabilitation is not possible or economically feasible, particularly within areas
of the City where there exists a significant concentration of substandard housing that contributes to
negative neighborhood or environmental conditions.
Policy F.2.2.1 The City shall continue to enforce Florida Building Codes, the International Property
Maintenance Code, and other local ordinances and State laws to ensure adequate
maintenance of residential properties and neighborhood environments.
Policy F.2.2.2 The City shall schedule and concentrate capital improvements to coincide with housing
improvement and financial incentive programs as needed to maintain and upgrade the
quality of existing neighborhoods.
Policy F.2.2.3 The City shall encourage individual homeowners and private developers to increase
private reinvestment, which shall upgrade and enhance the structural quality and
aesthetic conditions of existing housing and existing neighborhoods.
Policy F.2.2.4 The City shall continue to rigorously enforce its Land Development Regulations, Florida
Building Codes and other applicable laws as a means of deterring the deterioration of
existing housing stock.
Policy F.2.2.5 The City shall continue to encourage redevelopment and new development of housing
units within the Section H (Marsh Oaks) area.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN — HOUSING ELEMENT
Policy F.2.2.6 The City shall continue to encourage redevelopment and new development of single:
family housing units within Seaspray and Royal Palms and shall implement strategies to
maintain stable levels of home ownership.
Policy F.2.2.7 The City shall continue to pursue available funding sources, such as the Community
Development Block Grant Program (CDBG) funds, to upgrade housing conditions and
infrastructure within the City's designated CDBG target area.
Policy F.2.2.8 The City shall support the efforts of community based organizations and neighborhood
improvement initiatives, which will contribute to the stabilization, conservation,
enhancement and improvement of existing housing, structures and other physical
facilities within neighborhoods.
Objective F.2.3
Energy Efficient Housing
The City shall encourage building and construction strategies, methods and practices that promote energy
efficiency and the use of renewable energy resources in the construction of new homes and rehabilitation
of existing housing structures.
Policy F.2.3.1 The City shall encourage individual homeowners and private developers to use currently
acceptable green housing specifications for rehabilitation of existing housing structures
and will provide a resource for best green building practices.
Policy F.2.3.2 The City shall encourage individual homeowners and private developers to use currently
acceptable green housing specifications for construction of new homes as made available
from U.S. Green Building Council.
Policy F.2.3.3 The City shall promote opportunities to integrate housing, including affordable and
workforce housing, with infill development to create mixed-use neighborhoods to
increase energy efficiency through efficient land use patterns.
Policy F.2.3.4 The City shall continue to promote and enforce energy efficient design and construction
standards as these become adopted as part of the Florida Building Code. The City shall
also promote commercial and residential standards that are promulgated from time to
time by the Florida Green Building Coalition, Inc.
20 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT
G. INTERGOVERNMENTAL
OORNATION ELEMENT
20 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN — INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT
G. Intergovernmental Coordination Element Goals,
Objectives and Policies
Goal G.1
The City shall coordinate and cooperate with adjacent jurisdictions, other public and governmental
agencies to ensure: 1) the equitable and reasonable sharing of authority, responsibility and resources
in the provision of services, education and housing, 2) the provision for effective development review
and permitting, and 3) the effective representation on behalf of the City in decisions related to future
growth management, planning and funding resources.
Objective G.1.1
Maintaining Consistency with Comprehensive Plans and Interlocal Agreements
As a means of achieving effective intergovernmental coordination and consistency in planning for the
future of the City and the surrounding region, copies of proposed amendments to the adopted
Comprehensive Plan shall be provided to adjacent local governments and government agencies, which
provide services within the City, but which may not have regulatory authority within the City.
Policy G.1.1.1 The City shall forward copies of proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments to adjacent
local governments, the Duval County School Board, the Northeast Florida Regional
Council, the St. Johns River Water Management District, the Florida Department of
Environmental Protection, the Florida Department of Transportation and the Florida
Department of Economic Opportunity, any special service districts as required in Section
163.3187, Florida Statutes, for comment prior to legislative adoption in order that the
impacts of development as proposed in the Plan amendment are coordinated with
development throughout the region and the State.
Policy G.1.1.2 The City shall continue to coordinate with the City of Neptune Beach, the City of Jacksonville
Beach and the City of Jacksonville related to utility and infrastructure issues.
Policy G.1.1.3 The City shall continue to monitor and ensure consistency with the provisions as set forth
in the Interlocal Coordination Agreement between the City of Atlantic Beach and the City
of Jacksonville related to shared infrastructure and utility services and annexation in
accordance with the detailed and specific provisions as set forth within the restated 1995
Interlocal Agreement and anv subsequent amendments.
Policy G.1.1.4 The City shall continue to coordinate with the Cities of Jacksonville, Neptune Beach and
Jacksonville Beach for the purpose of developing coordinated land use planning and
unified development policies.
Policy G.1.1.5 The City shall enter into and maintain Interlocal Agreements as necessary to provide
efficient and effective services.
0 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN — INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT
Policy G.1.1.6 The City shall continue coordination with the following entities and agencies for the
purposes as indicated:
(a) Other local governments and agencies within the Duval County Evacuation Network,
including the Emergency Preparedness Division of the Duval County Fire and Rescue
Department and the Florida Department of Transportation for the purpose of
improving hurricane evacuation routes and reducing evacuation time.
(b) The State of Florida, Duval County, other local governments and the Naval Station
Mayport for the purpose of post -disaster redevelopment planning, land use and
transportation planning, resource conservation (including potable water), provision
of shared recreation facilities, and coastal and beach access facility development.
(c) The North Florida Transportation Planning Organization related to transportation
improvements needed to maintain or exceed adopted Level of Service standards.
(d) The St. Johns River Water Management District and the Florida Department of
Environmental Protection related to coordination of land use and water supply
planning, verification of adequate water supply to meet demands through the
planning period and development review and permitting responsibilities and
procedures.
(e) The Duval County Health Department related to the coordination of proper education
and procedures to improve and maintain a healthy environment within the City.
(f) The law enforcement agencies of surrounding local governments, as well as State and
Federal law enforcement agencies to achieve compatibility of communication
equipment and coordination of services.
(g) The Jacksonville Transportation Authority to support the development of
transportation routes to serve Naval Station Mayport and surrounding beach
communities.
(h) The City of Jacksonville Environmental Quality Division to ensure provision for timely
planning and development of solid waste and storm debris disposal facilities to
effectively serve the needs of all communities within the County.
(i) The DCPS and the Duval County School Board to ensure that population projections
and proposed educational facility site plans and off-site impacts are consistent with
the 20430 Comprehensive Plan, as set forth in the Public Schools Facilities Element of
this Plan, the Land Development Regulations and in support of following Policy
G.1.4.4.
Policy G.1.1.7 The City shall continue its involvement in the North Florida Transportation Planning
Organization and shall maintain representation on the Technical Coordinating Committee
as appropriate and necessary.
0 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN — INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT
Policy G.1.1.8 The City shall in coordination with the Northeast Florida Regional Council utilize the dispute
resolution process established by Section 186.509, Florida Statutes, to reconcile
differences on planning and growth management issues between local governments,
regional agencies, and private interests.
Policy G.1.1.9 The City shall coordinate with thc City of Jacksonville for thc provision of services of the
portion of the Atlantic B ach Country Club Spec .I Pk nnsd Ar (REZ 13 00100057) that
is located in the City of Jacksonville and is the subject of an Interlocal Service Boundary
Agreement between thc City of Atlantic Bach and thc City of Jacksonville, which was
signed by both partos on May 11, 2015. The subject property is to be annexed ink the
City of Atlantic B ach as cc\scIO int with all aic)7.icable FlorisiE Etzei.tes,
Objective G.1.2
Coordination of the Management and Protection of Natural Resources
The City shall continue to coordinate with all adjacent local governments and relevant agencies in
implementing protection of the beach and shoreline and in protecting the potable water supply from
saltwater intrusion.
Policy G.1.2.1 The City shall coordinate with all jurisdictional agencies and adjacent local governments in
developing and implementing programs aimed at effective management of the beaches
and shorelines as well as other cross- jurisdictional water bodies.
Policy G.1.2.2 The City shall coordinate with Duval County and the Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) to
strongly advocate a continuing program of beach re- nourishment.
Policy G.1.2.3 The City shall coordinate with the St. Johns River Water Management District to identify
potential areas where saltwater intrusion may degrade potable water resources.
Objective G.1.3
Coordination of Levels of Service for Public Facilities
The City shall coordinate planning and land development activities with adjacent local governments so as
to ensure that the impacts of new development shall not preclude the attainment of adopted Level of
Service standards; impair sound environmental management practices; create land use conflicts, or in any
respect contribute to inconsistent and incompatible urban development patterns.
Policy G.1.3.1 The City shall advise adjacent local governments of proposed development and
redevelopment activities, which might reasonably be foreseen to reduce facility service
standards and shall review such projects from the standpoint of conformity with the
Comprehensive Plan of adjacent local governments, particularly near jurisdictional
boundary lines.
Policy G.1.3.2 The City shall coordinate with affected jurisdictions and agencies, including FDOT, regarding
mitigation to impacted transportation facilities not under the jurisdiction of the City.
Interlocal Agreements with other jurisdictions may be utilized for this purpose.
0 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN — INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT
Policy G.1.3.3 In order to reflect the shared responsibilities for managing development and concurrency,
the City may enter into agreement with one or more adjacent local governments in order
to address cross -jurisdictional impacts of development on regional transportation
facilities.
Objective G.1.4
Coordination with the Duval County School Board
In accordance with the adopted Interlocal Agreement for, Public School Facilities Planning, as may be
amended pursuant to Section 163.31777, Florida Statutes, the City shall consult with the Duval County
School Board and Duval County Public Schools (DCPS) prior to implementing projects or plans that might
impact the use of school facilities related to shared facilities, access, surrounding environment, housing
patterns, alteration of public services and general development policies of the City.
Policy G.1.4.1 The City shall notify the Duval County Public Schools of projects or plans under
consideration, which might affect the operation of school facilities at least thirty (30) days
prior to taking formal action thereon.
Policy G.1.4.2 The City shall request that the Duval County Public Schools advise the City of proposed
alteration, construction, or other plans under consideration so that the City may be
advised and provided an opportunity to discuss the potential effects of such action upon
the City.
Policy G.1.4.3 The City shall maintain, as a non-voting representative to be appointed by the Duval County
School Board, a seat on its Local Planning Agency (LPA), who shall be noticed, provided an
agenda, and invited to attend LPA meetings and provide comments related to land use
amendments and rezoning proposals that may affect student enrollment projections or
school facilities.
Policy G.1.4.4 The City shall participate in joint planning processes and procedures for the coordination
of public education facilities intended to facilitate coordination of DCPS plans with the
plans of the City. On an ongoing basis, the City in cooperation with the DCPS and the other
Duval County local governments, shall review existing mechanisms, each City's
comprehensive plan, the Interlocal Agreement for Public School Facilities Planning and
other City and DCPS programs and their effects on the plans developed for providing
public schools.
Objective G.1.5
Affordable Housing
The City may enter into Interlocal Agreements with adjacent municipalities in order to facilitate
coordination in addressing affordable housing needs.
Policy G.1.5.1 The City shall enter into Interlocal Agreements with adjacent governments, as determined
to be necessary and appropriate, to address the City's very low, low and moderate:income
affordable housing needs in response to:
20 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN — INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT
(a) Market driven limitations, where meeting the needs for very low, low and moderate
income affordable housing is not economically feasible due to exceptionally high
property values related to the City's coastal location, or
(b) Where meeting affordable housing needs for very low, low and moderate income
residents is not feasible due to limitations of residential density restrictions within the
Coastal High Hazard Area.
(c) The City shall continue to coordinate with the Navy and the City of Jacksonville to
implement strategies that support reinvestment and revitalization of older
neighborhoods along the Mayport Road Corridor that provide low and moderate
income housing and which serve to assist housing needs of Naval Station Mayport
personnel.
20 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
20 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN — CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
Based on Section 163.177(3)(a), Florida Statutes, the Capital Improvements Element should be "designed
to consider the need for and the location of public facilities in order to encourage the efficient use of such
facilities." For a five-year period, this element also must identify the investments needed to maintain and
upgrade existing public facilities and needed new facilities; set priorities; and identify the revenue sources
to pay for these investments. The City of Atlantic Beach adopts a Five -Year Schedule of Capital
Improvements as part of the City's annual budgeting process. Section 163.177(3)(b), Florida Statutes,
allows modifications to the Five -Year Schedule of Capital Improvements to be accomplished by ordinance
and not considered an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan.
H. Capital Improvements Element
Goals, Objectives and Policies
Terms used within this element shall be as set forth within Section 163.3164, Florida Statutes or as defined
by applicable City of Atlantic Beach ordinances.
Goal H.1
The City shall provide public facilities, which are sufficient to enable the City to: 1) accommodate the
needs of present and future populations in a timely and cost- effective manner; 2) maximize the use of
existing facilities; and 3) maintain or enhance the City's services, physical environment and fiscal
integrity.
Objective H.1.1
Capital Improvements Planning
Capital projects needed to support development shall be evaluated annually, and when financially
feasible, shall become part of the five (5) year Schedule of Capital Improvements of the Capital
Improvement Program (CIP) as set forth within Table H-6 and consistent with the annual adopted budget
for the City. Such updates to the CIP shall be completed in accordance with Section 163.177(3)(b), Florida
Statutes. included in the City's adopted Comprchensivs Plan ai part of tlIs ann,ial review and amendment
to this Gapi 11 Improvements Element.
Policy H.1.1.1 Capital improvements, which are determined to be necessary to implement the Goals,
Objectives and Policies of this Comprehensive Plan shall be given priority by the City. All
capital improvements having a cost of $250,000 or more shall be included in the City's
annual capital improvements budget along with an identified funding source.
Policy H.1.1.2 The City Manager, or designee, shall have the responsibility of preparing for consideration
by the City Commission a capital improvements budget and Capital Improvements
Element update (when required) after evaluating the population growth within the City,
the condition of City facilities, and the provisions of this Comprehensive Plan.
Policy H.1.1.3 The City shall be guided by the following criteria in identifying and prioritizing capital
improvements both in the provision of new facilities and replacement or renewal of
existing facilities:
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN — CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
(a) Improvements needed for the protection of public health and safety;
(b) Improvements that increase the utilization of existing City facilities, multiple use of
facilities or improved efficiency of facility operation;
(c) Improvements that address existing Level of Service deficiencies;
(d) Improvements necessary to meet the requirements of future development;
(e) Improvements that enhance and improve the City's built environment and aesthetic
character, economic stability, or environmental quality.
Policy H.1.1.4 The City supports coordination of capital improvement planning by all levels of government
as a means of providing services in an orderly, economical, and efficient manner.
Policy H.1.1.5 This Capital Improvements Element shall be reviewed annually and updated as necessary
to reflect revisions to the Capital Improvements Program in accordance with the annual
adopted budget, including any proportionate fair -share contributions.
Policy H.1.1.6 The City shall ensure the financial feasibility of all capital improvements included within
the adopted Capital Improvements Element.
Objective H.1.2
Concurrency and Level of Service Standards
The City shall coordinate land use decisions and the issuance of development permits with the
implementation of the Capital Improvement Program so as to ensure that the Level of Service (LOS)
standards, as set forth within this Plan element, are fully met in accordance with Florida Statutes, and
other applicable rules and regulations. A Concurrency Management System (CMS) shall be maintained
that is consistent with and supports the Capital Improvements Program, and which is financially feasible
to provide necessary facilities to maintain adopted Level of Service standards and to serve new
development during the five-year Capital Improvement Program planning period. The Concurrency
Management System shall ensure that public facilities and services are available concurrent with the
impacts of new development.
Policy H.1.2.1 The City through its Concurrency Management System shall ensure that Level of Service
(LOS) Standards for sanitary sewer, solid waste, drainage, potable water, parks and
recreation, and schools d t;sancpor atian facilitioc, it ding me tsarist whcro
atwlic&tle7 are maintained.
Policy H.1.2.2 Development permits, including permits issued for single-family and two-family residential
development upon existing Lots of Record, and those issued solely for alteration,
remodeling, reconstruction, or restoration of residential units provided that such permits
do not authorize an increase in the number of dwelling units; and for nonresidential uses,
those permits that do not authorize an increase in the square feet of the development
shall be deemed no impact projects and shall not require a Concurrency Certificate. It
shall be the Applicant's responsibility to demonstrate and certify this provision in
accordance with concurrency review procedures.
Policy H.1.2.3 Applications for development permits for projects, which are deemed to have no impact
upon public facilities and services, as defined by preceding Policy H.1.2.2, or to have a de
Minims irsimct as defined by Ctac\v, or which have acquired statutory or common law
vested rights, shall not require a Concurrency Certificate. It shall be the Applicant's
responsibility to demonstrate and certify this provision in accordance with concurrency
review procedures.
Policy H.1.2.45 Development permits issued by the City, other than those as addressed by Policies H.1.2.2
and H.1.2.3, shall be accompanied by an approved Concurrency Certificate for that
specific project, certifying that the proposed project has passed mandated concurrency
tests. Capacity for all local development permits holding approved Concurrency
Certificates shall be reserved in the effected public facilities for the life of the approved
development permit but shall be released upon expiration of such development permit.
Policy H.1.2.56 The City shall implement a concurrency tracking and monitoring system, which shall:
(a) Analyze the impacts of a proposed development in relation to the available capacity
and Level of Service requirements contained within this Capital Improvements
Element; and
(b) Create an annual report that summarizes the available capacity of public facilities and
forecasts the future available capacity based upon best available data.
Note: Terms and abbreviations used within following policies H.1.2.7 through H.1.2.12 rJxall h(zxc thc same
m ening as defined within thc Public Schools Facilities Element of this Plan.
Policy H.1.2.67 The City shall ensure that future needs are addressed consistent with the adopted level
of service standards for public schools in accordance with the Public School Facilities
Element of this Plan.to cnsuro that thc capacity of schools is sufficient to support
residential development order approvolat to adopted level of service (LOS) V2ondards.
Policy H.1.2.8 The LOS standard; chall bo applied consistently by the City and by DCPS district wide to all
schools of tI'a ino type.
Policy H.1.2.9 The uniform LOS standards fel- all public schools including magnets an all instruatiofal
facility ty 4 shaV.. !cc 105% of the permanent Florida Inventory of Scheel I -`:tri (FISH)
capacity, pIic portables, based on tho rate as rfsablicihod by thc State
Requirements for Educational Facilities (SREF).
{a) The designated middle schools within CSA 6 shall bit identified as backlogged facilities
and an interim Icvcl of standard within CSA 5 amll bo 1L5% it%I lanwNary 1, 2018,
after which thc uniform LOS standard & ell apply -
H -4
20 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN — CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
{b) Thc implementation of long tcrm concurrency managcmont shall bo monitored to
evaluate thc effectiveness of thc implemented improvcmcnts and strategics toward
period.
{e)—City shall adopt thc DCPS Long Range Ccpi cI Improvements Plan uc, tho 10 year
long +Arra cahcdule of improvements for the purpose of correcting existing
The long crrx sahcdule includes 21,0 72 irW - - -
meet thc anticipated demands for backloggcd facilitics within thc 10 y or period.
Thc long tcrm schcdulc improves interim level of scrvicc standards for backloggcd
faailiti s an -- _ - _ -- as svitahUh�e - - -
achieved by 2018. The long term schedule will be updated by December 1st of ach
y ar, in conjunction with the misdate to the DCPS Five Y ar Calsito. Facilities
Plan and thc City's sp I Improvements Elcmcnt.
(d) The City's strategy in coordination with DCPS for correcting si isting deficiencies and
addressing future needs includes:
1) ImlArncntation of a financially f asible Five Y ar Capital Facilities Plan to ensure
level of service standards arc achieved an rxaintain4
2) ImlAmcntation of intcrirx level of servix standards within designated
concurrency service ar as with identified backlogged facilities in conjunction with
a long-term (10-y ar) schedule of improvements to correct deficiencies and
improve level of scrvicc standards to the district wide standards;
3) Identification of adecps+,f sites for funded an banned schools; and
4) Thc expansion of revenues for school construction.
Policy H.1.2.10 The City hereby adopts by referenx as part of this Element the 2018 2019 Fivc Y ar
District Facilities Work Progrzr:n and the Long Range Cap 1). Imp, evemcnti Plan 1 the
10 year long tcrm schcdulc of improvcmcnts progranxvwdopted by Duval County Public
Schools, which sets forth a financially feasible public school capital facilitics prcgrarx that
demonstrates thc adopted level of service standards will be achieved and main ain4
a-ne r�;.intcini _ - . . e iskxining periods.
Policy H.1.2.11 By December of ach year, the City, shall adopt thc updated DCPS Fivc Yw,r F,stri2t
Facilities Work Pragr x s ux d the Long Range Calcital Imv ovemtntc Man w tho 10 y ar
long tcrm schcdulc of improvcmcnts program to thc extant that it rolates to school
capacity to ensure maintenance of a financially feasible ou�i .l impmvern-uits program
and to ensure level of service standards will continue to be achieved ani n^,�ntcinsd
pursbxInt to Policy H.1.2.10 of this Ela\s2-nt,
H-5
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN — CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
Policy H.1.2.12 If there is a consensus to amend thc L1Q it chill be accomplished by thc execution of an
amendment to thic Interlocal Agreement by all Citioc and DCPS and thc adoption of
amendments to ach local government's Comprehensive Plan, fallowing an advisory
review by the ILA T am and the Joint Planning Committee. The amended WC shall not -be
effective until all plan amondments arc effective and the amended Interlocal Agreement
is fully executed. P.h level of service rJ►all be amended without showing thct the LOS is
financially feasible.
Policy H.1.2.12 In addition to thc LOS for school concurrency oVabliatccl by thr Duval County School
Board, the following Level of Service standards arc adopted as the basis for the City's
issuance of development permits.
H-6
AD
Table H
TYPE OF FACILITY
Playground (with equipment}
Baseball or Softball Field
Soccer or Football Field
Basketball Court
Volleyball Court
Tcnnis Court
Running/ I4iking Tail
Community Ccntcr
B ech Accesses
Passive Park/Scenic Opcn Space
Golf Coursc* (public or private)
Regiorrl Park/Open Space*
LEVELOF SERVICE STANDARD
1 playground per 2,500 population
1 field per 2,500 population
1 field per 5,000 population
1 court per 2,500 population
1 court per 5,000 population
1 court per 2,500 population
1 trail per 10,000 population
1 center per 10,000 population
1 access per 2,500 population
5 acrcs per 1,000 population
1 18 hole course per 25,000 population
5 acrcs per 1,000 population
*Regional facilities arc defined as those, which may not be located within the City of Atlantic Bach, but
are in such close proximity so as to directly serve the daily recr ational needs of the residents of the City
ef,Aticntic each, c4`�h ac VV�hryn Abby Hama Park and ama golf courses.
Policy H.1.2.734 The City shall manage development approvals, land development regulations, and
infrastructure improvements not issue a development permit enless provision to
maintain or exceed the above standards for Park, Recreation and Open Space Levels of
Service is mct or committed as set forth in the Recreation and Open Space
Elementfollowing Policy H.1.2.9.
Policy H.1.2.15 A development permit may be issued, if d1:cr lined to be appropriate by the City, subject
to thc condition throt the time of issuance of a Ccrtificatc of Occupancy or its functional
equivalent, thc acr age for thc necessary park, recreation or open space facilities arc
dedicated or acquired by the local government, or funds in thc amount of thc developer's
fair share arc committed in accordance with the following and:
{a) The perk, recreation or Olson &race facilities arc in place or under actual construction
not more than one year after ii &' nce of a Ccrtificatc of Occupancy or its functional
equivalent as: provided in thc adopted local government 5 y or Schedule of Capital
Improvements; or
{b) At the time the development permit is r eed, the necessary park, recr ction or open
space facilities arc mandated thre:bh a binding executed agreement which requires
the necessary facilities to be in pI or under actual construction not more than one
y or after iooaancc of a Certificate of Occupancy or its functional equivalent; or
H-7
20 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN — CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
Table H
(c) At the time the development permit is ilc►:cd, the necessary park, recr ation or
open space facilities arc gweiruntaed in an
iearci-x nt to Scction 163.3220, Florid: Satstoc, or an agreement or devoloprr,nt
porrsit perc cant Chapter 380, Florida Satb'cs, to be in place or under actual
construction not more than one y ar after i-wvarice of a Certificate of Occupancy or
its functional equivalent. [Section 163.3180(2)(b), Floriea Ctatcte.s}
Table H-16. Sanitary Sewer Level of Service (LOS) Standards City of Atlantic Beach, 20430
Type of Service LOS Standard
Average sewage 94105 gallons per capita per day (gpcd} for
COAB system
105 gpcd for COAB system (outside City limits)
Peak flow design capacity 120.5231 gallons per capita per day fgpcd)_ fer
COAB system
164 gpcd for COAB system (outside City limits}
Policy H.1.2.816 At the time of issuance of a development permit, there shall be in place an enforceable
development agreement that ensures, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy
or its functional equivalent, the necessary facilities and services for sanitary sewer will be
available in accordance with Table H-1.
Table H-23. Solid Waste and Potable Water Level of Service Standards City of Atlantic Beach, 20460
Type of Service LOS Standard
Solid Waste 7.3 pounds pcpd
Potable Water 94105 gpcd for COAB system
Policy H.1.2.917 At the time of issuance of a development permit, there shall be in place an enforceable
development agreement that ensures, prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or
its functional equivalent, the necessary facilities and services for solid waste and potable
water will be available in accordance with Table H-2. The use of onsite sewage treatment
and disposal systems approved by the Department of Health may be used to meet this
requirement.
Table H-34. Drainage Level of Service (LOS) Standards City of Atlantic Beach, 20430
Surface Water Quality Applicable local and State regulations shall pertain to maintaining
water quality, natural hydroperiods and flows. Ambient water
quality standards shall be maintained. Minimum criteria for surface
water quality shall meet the standards of F.A.C. 62-302.
H-8
Table H
Wetland Stormwater Discharge Permits for Wetland stormwater discharge shall meet F.A.C. 40C-
42.0265.
Stormwater Discharge Facilities Permits for construction of new stormwater discharge facilities shall
meet F.A.C. 40C-42.022.
Closed conduits 5 -year frequency, 24-hour duration; IDF curve Zone 5, FDOT
Drainage Manual, 2003.
Open channels 10 -year frequency, 24 hour duration; IDF curve Zone 5, for
Roadside, Median, and Interceptor ditches or swales and 25 -year
storm for Outfall ditches, FDOT Drainage Manual, 2003.
Level of Service Shall meet FDEP Stormwater Drainage Rule 40C-42.025 and
40C42.026 regarding retention of stormwater runoff.
Policy H.1.2.108 At the time of issuance of a development permit, there shall be in place an enforceable
development agreement that ensures, prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or
its functional equivalent, that the necessary facilities and services for drainage and
stormwater treatment, the protection of natural hydrologic functions, particularly tidal
marsh systems will be in place.
Roadway Classification
Freeways
Principal Arterial
Minor Arterial
Collector Strcct
Local Strcct
LOS "D"
LOS "D"
LOS "E"
LOS "E"
LOS "E"
Freeways
Principal Arterial
Minor Arterial
Collector Street
Local Strcct
4 .ain+lain existing LOS and travel speed
lkiuirizir. existing LOS and travel speed
k41,2irteir existing LOS and travel speed
Mtirheir. existing LOS and travel speed
M,a%rza%r. existing LOS and travel speed
Freeways
Principal Arterial
Minor Arterial
ICainin and improve existing LOS and travel speed
ICainin and improve existing LOS and travel speed
Main+lair.-ind improve existing LOS and travel speed
H-9
20 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN — CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
Table H
Collector Street
Local Street
-Maintaairand improve s►Iicting LOS and travel speed
-Maintaairand improve evicting LOS and travel speed
Policy H.1.2.19 A development permit may be issued if determined to be appropriate by the City, subject
to the conditicn that the necessary transportation facilities arc scheduled to be in place
or under e' al cor i.-5:Mion rpt ma -o thin three (3) years after is ance of a Certificate
e -f C' cncy or its functional equivalent ec provided in the adopted local government
f car Schell '^ of ap;`ol Imp evomtant:.. Tha Schedule of Capital Improvomyan c may
recognize and includo trerwortation projects included in the first three y ars of the
applicable, adopted Florida Department of Transportation five y ar work program.
Policy H.1.2.20 An estimated date of commencement of actual construction and the estimated date of
project completion for tnr.cportation imrravements necessary to satisfy concurrency
shall be included in the sapitcl I;npovements Program for thc City.
Policy H.1.2.21 A Comprehensive Plarremcndment is required to eliminate, defer, or delay construction
of transportation improvements which are needed tc mainizain the adopted
Transportation Level of Service standard, and whirl--a;a Wted in the five (5) year
Schedule ofCc i cI Impravomiantc [Section 163.3177.3.(b)1, Florida S c tcs], unless:
{a) At the time a development permit is iccwcd, the necessary transportation facilitior��
contained within a kin ' - • - - . - cnt tl-NA mandates the necessary
transportation facilities will be in place or under actual construction within three -(3)
y ars after the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or its functional equivalent; or
{b) At the time a development permit is i ►cd, thc necessary transportation facilities arc
guaranteed in an enforc able development agreement) pvnivant to Section
H-10
20 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN — CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
1
163.3220, Florila Ctatutvs, yr an -4;rcement or develvprxint'rrxit p.rfant
to Chapter 380, Florian it-vtos, to be in place or under actual construction within
three (3) years aftor cc' once of a certificate of occupancy or its functional equivalent.
[Section 163.3180(2)(c), Florida
Policy H.1.2.22 The City c.hall incorporate into it:!end Development Regulation a P;aportionate
FairShare Program few tre yrrpertation concurrcncy.
Policy H.1.2.23 The City a"x- I r x-.intcin rscords on dt rsinirsk irspC c' tmrtip'c tDtian concurrcncy to
cnsuro twat traffic volume rom circ under thc 110% critu is pu7/:raant to requirements of
thc Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO), and this doo��•nan on ck>aII be
provided to thc DEO annually -
policy H.1.2.24 The City & I s,stplOich and -imp xscint a IVO cess for assuscing, rsc^ ^^ and oppl ^^ o
fO r share of the cost of provia'i'ng transportation facilities necessary to serve a proposed
new development. Tronci:ortation facilities or improvt\vwitc nscessary to r x:intcin
adopted LOS standardc c. II be included in a financially feasible five (5) y ar Schedule of
Capital Improvements. Any fair ck'iarc assessmont :-)xall have a r asonablc relationship to
t#o trarcportation impcot that c projected to be generated by thc proposed new
development.
Objective H.1.3
Public Expenditures within the Coastal High Hazard Area
The City shall not make public expenditures that subsidize land development within the Coastal High
Hazard Area other than improvements as required to implement the Objectives and Policies identified
within the Coastal Management Element and the Infrastructure Element.
Policy H.1.3.1 The City shall coordinate with the appropriate agencies to ensure improvements as
appropriate and necessary to protect and re -nourish dunes and beach areas, and to
maintain or replace public facilities and provide improved recreational opportunities.
Objective H.1.4
Funding for Capital Improvements
The City shall manage its fiscal resources and establish through revisions to its Land Development
Regulations, as required by Section 163.3202, Florida Statutes, equitable facility cost allocation and
concurrency requirements in a manner that ensures the City's capability to meet future capital
improvement needs, which are associated with continued development and redevelopment of the City.
Policy H.1.4.1 The City's annual adopted budget, which identifies General Fund and other revenue sources
and all fund expenditures, and all governmental debt obligations, (as set forth within the
Debt Service Fund) is hereby identified as supporting data and analysis for this Capital
Improvements Element. The annual budget shall continue to contain a Capital
Improvement Program with a Schedule of Capital Improvements, adequate to, at a
minimum, maintain the adopted Levels of Service as set forth within this Plan element.
H - 11
20 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN — CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
Policy H.1.4.2 The City's annual budgeting process shall reflect immediate as well as long-term
implications of capital project expenditures in terms of trends and projections in the City's
fiscal condition, expressed public attitudes, Comprehensive Plan provisions, and
consistency with the plans of regional service agencies, the St. Johns River Water
Management District, and other entities with whom coordination of facility planning is
appropriate. Criteria for evaluating capital project expenditures shall include:
(a) The urgency of need based upon health, safety and welfare considerations of the
general public;
(b) The orderly scheduling to maximize funding availability; and
(c) Opportunities for coordinating expenditures so as to improve efficiency and
effectiveness of public services.
Policy H.1.4.3 The annual budget process shall include a review of two years of actual history, an estimate
for the current year, the proposed year, then the final approved budget for the following
fiscal year. The adopted capital expenditures budget shall be segregated both by program
area and by revenue fund type and shall identify existing and projected revenue sources
and funding mechanisms.
Policy H.1.4.4 The annual adopted budget shall continue to include a yearly Schedule of Capital Outlay
and also a Long Term Financial Plan, which shall be evaluated, reviewed and adjusted
during the budgeting process, as may be necessary, to correct existing deficiencies, or to
address emergency needs.
Policy H.1.4.5 The City shall review the Capital Improvements Element not less than once annually, and
funding for capital improvements shall be given priority as set forth with Table H-46,
Schedule of Capital Improvements, or as priorities may be established during the annual
budget review process.
20 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
H - 13
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
Table H-46. Schedule of Capital Improvements, 202418 19 through
203324 25
SCHEDULE OF CAPTIAL IMPROVEMENTS: 2019 through 2025
Project Description 2018 19 2019 20 2020 21
2021 22 2022 23 2023 24
2021 25 TOTAL
SOURCE
1. Parks and Roads
a. B ach walkover 120,000 120,000 120,000 360,000 1/2 Ccnt
b. Russel Park Iuiliotball court
80,000 80,000 1/2 Cent
improvements
Park leailiotball court
80,000 807000 1/2 Ccnt
improvements
d. Bull I':m l: ter..: i.s court �nn0 25,000 1/2 Ccnt
improvements
e-b1►isrl Psck plovground 90,000 90,000 1/2 Ccnt
f. Rev�lI P;ek tennis court
100,000 100,000 1/2 Cent
lighting
g. Howell Park bridges 100,000 100,000 1/2 Cent
h. Russell Park baseball field 65,000 6-57000 6-57000 195,000 1/2 Ccnt
lighting
1. Skateboard park 120,000 120,000 1/2 Cent
improvements
j. Ragcttmball court
improvements 300,000 300,000 1/2 Ccnt
k. Bull Park tennis court lighting 607000 60,000 1/2 Ccnt
1. Rosa Park skyground sct 60,000 60,000 1/2 Ccnt
m. Dutton Island canal bridge 700,000 700,000 1/2 Cent
n. Jasmine Road pond 200,000 200,000 1/2 Ccnt
restoration
o. Tidcvicw Park walkways 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 1/2 Ccnt
restoration
.1
1
MIFil201111ZIMIMIZIEDIAlglifilEIMI2:1•BUI4Z111414MIVII
Q
ri
III III 1 11
Ii HI 1 00
1;
1
0
0
0
0
0
N
1!
1
20 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
g. Construct 2,500 LF of 6 inch
WM in Marsh Oaks
h. Construct 100 LF of 6 inch PVC
WM to connect Kestner Road
and Paradise Court
i. Coating wastewater tanks
j. Mayport Road watcr services
and valves
k. WTP tt2 500,000 storage and
aeration
1. Atlantic Blvd. watcr services
and valves
rn. Construct 250 LF of 8 inch
PVC WM to connect Cornell to
Oc an Gate
200,000 200,000 /100,000 101T
39,000 39,000 11
480,000 480,000 11
381,000 381,000 1-1-T
550,000 550,000 101T
512,000 512,000 101T
1087000 1087000 kfT
n. Sclva Marina drive water
;crvices and valves on what? 610,000 610,000 -UT
o. Replace 2,100 LF of l'inch AW
WM with 8'inch PVC WM on 387,000 387,000 101T
P:rk Trriee
p. WTP tt4 Decommission and
total rocsnervetit c north of the 100,000 100,000 1-1-T
existing WTP tth
q. WTP tt1 Include costs for
reconstruction costs 3,500,000 3,500,000 1-1-F
r. Rcplacc Services and valves 259,000 259,000 1
L. Rcplacc 1,300 LF of 8 inch AC
WM with 12 inch PVC WM on
East Plaza from Seminole Road 688,000 688,000 1.1-T
to Mayport Road
t. Construct 1,200 LF of 12 inch
PVC WM on Mayport Road from 288,000 2-887000 U
SR A1A to Courtyards Lane
6101M101:11►1:1W11 1►Qi11UIQ1 IMI2 ii111M14►101 4114M11►11
0
N
O
0
0
O
N
O
O
O
0
0
O
O
O
0
0
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
I.) •
1
O
O
O
O
O
•1
•1
•
0
0
0
0
(n
1 I
1
O
O
O
O
O
N
O
O
O
O
In
1
•
•
•1
1
0 0 0
o o 0
ooo 0
o o o
O O O
0 0 O
c
20 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
r. Replace ;ro-;�-otors valves
and manifold piping at existing 50,000 507000
Yard Pump Station
s. Influent LS need a new deeper
wctwcll or an additional-
chamber
dditionalchamber next to the existing
wctw it
t. Improve aeration tank include
a structural integrity study, new 250,000 250,000
drains and sand blasting
I:9tcll socond centrifuge 200,000 200,000
v. Pre tr atment: replace
existing eccentric plug valves 40 880 40 080
w. Chlorination: add motor
operators to the chlorine contact 90,008 90,008
chamber sluice gatcs (7 total}
x. Blowcr Buildings: improve
130,000 130,000
ventilation at blower buildings
y. Construct new operations
8007000 800,000 1
building
z. Construct new equipment
7-00 7194;19 788 000 1
vehicle building
TOTALS 620,000 2,,035,009 873667080 575817000 879457000 447079003,960,000 2473877000
400,000
400,008
Funding Source
Cu Toil Cos 2-57008 2-57008 25,000 2-57008 25,888 25,000
Half Cn/:. ['aim. icy: 1/2 Cent 811,229 1,387,900 1,379,684 2,126,199 2,199,013 3,118,701 3,760,680
Sanitation Fund SF 522,011 375,101 430,031 185,871 512,902 601,082 665,380
Water Sewer Utility Fund UT 5,827,243 4,931,945 /1,866,910 5,095,399 6,009,121 7,118,589 8,227,733
$ 197,100
W
$ 15,000
W
$ 200,000
W
$ 9,500
W
$ 100,000
W
Public Utilities Department - 10 Year Schedule of Capital Improvements - 2024 through 2033
Adopted by Commission - 09-25-23
Includes Projects Identified in the 2018 Stantec CIP, 2014 Potable Water MP, 2016 & 2021 Potable Water Model and 2021 Adaptation Plan
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Project #
2024
I 2025
2026
I 2027
I
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
TOTAL
FUNDING SOURCE
POTABLE WATER -PRODUCTION
WTP #1 - Modernization - Construction (Carryover)
PU2110
$ 992,000
W
$ 992,000
WTP #2 - Modernization - Design & Eng (Carryover)
AR2201
$ 75,000
W
$ 75,000
WTP #2 - Modernization - Additional Design Services as required
$ 40,000
W
$ 40,000
WTP #2 - Modernization - Construction
$ 1,300,000
W
$ 1,300,000
WTP #2 - Chlorine Gas Conversion
$ 40,000
W
$ 40,000
WTP #1 - Hydropneumatic Tank (Carryover)
$ 100,000
W
$ 100,000
WTP #1 - 1,500 Gallon Diesel Tank for Generator
$ 80,000
W
$ 80,000
WTP #1 - GST Clean & Paint - Inside & Out
$ 250,000
W
$ 250,000
WTP #2 - Eng Evaluation & Repair - Building Foundation
$ 100,000
W
$ 100,000
WTP #2 - Demo Elevated Storage Tank
$ 200,000
W
$ 200,000
WTP #2 - New GST
$ 950,000
W
$ 950,000
WTP #2 - Video Log & Insepct Well No. 3 & Well No. 5
$ 150,000
W
$ 150,000
WTP #3 - Modernization - Dsn, Eng & Construction
$ 150,000
W $ 900,000
W
$ 1,050,000
WTP #3 - New Well and Pump Construction
$ 850,000
W
$ 850,000
POTABLE WATER - DISTRIBUTION
5 Ton Dump Trailer - 6X12
Service Line & Valve Replacements (various)
Tie in JEA 20" WM to existing @Renault & Sherry Dr
Large Water Meter Replacement Program
Construct 110 LF of 12" PVC WM along Mayport Rd (Carryover)
Cavalla - Install New Long Side Service Connections east end of Cavalla
Replace Water Services on Seminole Rd from Atlantic BIlvd to 5 -Way
Replace Poly Water Services on Garden Lane & 300 Block of 20th St
Construct 250 LF of 12" PVC WM - Mayport Rd @ A1A (Carryover)
Construct 1,800 LF of 12" PVC WM - Sherry Dr Phase II - Pioneer to NS Mayport (75% Reimb. DCIP)
Construct 55 LF of 12" PVC WM - Navy CDC West to Navy CDC East, Install 2 new hydrants
Construct 280 LF of 12" PVC WM - 1089 Atlantic Blvd to 1075 Atlantic Blvd
Construct 470 LF of 12" PVC WM - Atlantic Ct to Aquatic Dr
Construct 160 LF of 12" PVC WM - Atlantic Blvd @ Aquatic Dr to Fire Hydrant @ Wells Fargo
Construct 1,080 LF of 12" PVC WM - Atlantic Blvd @ Aquatic Dr to Pizza Hut, NE to existing WM
Construct 2,700 LF of 6" WM in Marsh Oaks plus services
Replace 6" AC WM with 12" PVC WM on Sailfish from Cavalla Rd, tie in to Atlantic Blvd (750 LF)
Replace 4,200 LF of 6" PVC WM with 12" PVC WM on Dutton Island Rd - Mayport Rd to Paradise Cir
Replace 3,200 LF of 8" WM with 12" PVC WM Loop on Mayport Rd/A1A from Assisi A1A to Quad Ct
Replace 5,000 LF of 8" AC with 12" PVC - SR A1A from Mayport Rd to Wonderwood Dr
Replace 4,000 LF of 8" CI/AC with 12" PVC - Seminole Rd from Selva Marina Dr to Saturiba
Replace 3,500 LF of 8" PVC with 12" PVC - Seminole Rd from Saturiba to Oceanwalk
Replace 3,500 LF of 6" AC with 8" PVC - Oak Harbor - Year 1
Replace 3,500 LF of 6" AC with 8" PVC - Oak Harbor - Year 2
Replace 1,000 LF 10" CI (1955) with 12" PVC - Seminole Rd - Selva Marina Dr to 5 -Way
Replace 4,000 LF of 6" AC WM with 12" PVC WM - Selva Marina Dr from Saturiba to Seminole
Replace 2,400 LF of 4" AC WM with 8" PVC WM - Park Terrace E
Replace 4,300 LF of 8" AC WM with 12" PVC WM - Plaza from Seminole to Mayport Rd
Replace 2,200 LF of 4" AC WM with 8" PVC - Seat Oats Drive and services
Replace 3,300 LF of 8" CI with 12" PVC - Seminole Rd from 5 -Way to Atlantic Blvd
PU2101
PU2101
PU Staff
PU Staff
PU Staff
PU Staff
PU Staff
PU Staff
PU Staff
PU Staff
PU Staff
PU Staff
PU Staff
PU Staff
PU Staff
PU Staff
$ 9,500 PU Staff
$ 100,000 W $ 100,000 W $ 100,000 W $ 100,000 W $ 100,000 W $ 100,000 W $ 100,000 W $ 100,000 W $ 100,000 W $ 1,000,000 PU Staff
$ 120,000 W $ 120,000 2021 PW Model Update
$ 15,000 W $ 15,000 W $ 15,000 W $ 15,000 W $ 15,000 W $ 15,000 W $ 15,000 W $ 15,000 W $ 15,000 W $ 150,000 PU Staff
$ 200,000 2021 PW Model Update
$ 270,000 W $ 270,000 PU Staff
$ 120,000 W $ 120,000 2021 PW Model Update
$ 275,000 W $ 275,000 2021 PW Model Update
$ 197,100 2021 PW Model Update
$ 1,400,000 W $ 1,400,000 PU Staff
$ 135,000 W $ 135,000 2021 PW Model Update
$ 80,000 W $ 80,000 2021 PW Model Update
$ 144,000 W $ 144,000 2021 PW Model Update
$ 45,000 W $ 45,000 2021 PW Model Update
$ 1,100,000 W $ 1,100,000 2021 PW Model Update
$ 220,000 W $ 240,000 W $ 460,000 Septic to Sewer Program
$ 170,000 I W $ 170,000 2016 PW Model
$ 840,000 2016 PW Model
850,000 W $ 850,000 2016 PW Model
$ 800,000 W $ 800,000 2014 PW MP
$ 750,000 I W $ 750,000 2014 PW MP
$ 700,000 I W $ 700,000 2014 PW MP
$ 525,000 W $ 525,000 2014 PW MP
$ 525,000 W $ 525,000 2018 Stantec CIP
$ 288,000 W $ 288,000 2014 PW MP
$ 800,000 W $ 800,000 2014 PW MP
$ 420,000 $ 420,000 2014 PW MP
$ 850,000 W $ 850,000 2018 Stantec CIP
$ 600,000 W $ 600,000 2014 PW MP
$ 750,000 W $ 750,000 2014 PW MP
$ 840,000 W
Page 1 of 2
$ 95,000
5
$ 250,000
S
$ 50,000
S
$ 200,000 S
$ 500,000
5
$ 394,600
S
$ 400,000
5
$ 300,000
S
$ 40,000
5
$ 50,000
S
$ 85,000
5
$ 40,000 S
$ 30,000
5
$ 100,000
S
$ 185,030
S
$ 436,400
S
Adopted by Commission - 09-25-23
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Public Utilities Department - 10 Year Schedule of Capital Improvements - 2024 through 2033
Includes Projects Identified in the 2018 Stantec CIP, 2014 Potable Water MP, 2016 & 2021 Potable Water Model and 2021 Adaptation Plan
Project # 2024 I 2025 I 2026 I 2027 I 2028 I 2029 I 2030 I 2031 I 2032 I 2033 TOTAL
WASTEWATER - TREATMENT
Replace Digester Catwalk (Carryover)
Hydraulic Improvements (Carryover)
Construct new headworks (includes design, eng & permitting)
Improve aeration tank include a structural integrity study, new drains and sand blasting
Install second centrifuge
Pre-treatment: replace existing eccentric plug valves
Influent wetwell replacement/expansion
Chlorination: add motor operators to the chlorine contact chamber sluice gates (7 total)
Inspect & Repaint Hydro Tanks
Replace Decant Drive on Davco Tank
Repurpose Polymer Building - Locker room and office area
Rehab Operations Building
Construct Hypochlorite Bldg
Odor Control Assessment and Implementation
Philadephia Mixer Replacement - Anoxic Tank
WWTF Yard Task Lighting
Kubota Tractor Replacement
WASTEWATER - COLLECTION ■ -
Replacement of Clay Service lines for Selva Marina, Oak Harbor and Park Terrace and services
Infiltration & Inflow Control - Assessment & Implementation
Retrofit High Priority LS Vulnerable to Flooding (AR2207 Carryover) - Buccaneer LS
Retrofit High Priority LS Vulnerable to Flooding - Cavalla LS
Retrofit High Priority LS Vulnerable to Flooding - TBD
Retrofit 18 Medium Priority LS Vulnerable to Flooding
LS Wetwell and Suction Pipes Repair
Replace 2,400 LF of 8" effluent FM from Selva Marina LS (LS D)
Replace 4,330 LF of 8" effluent FM from Cavalla LS (LS F)
Replace 5,490 LF of 8" effluent FM from Mayport Landing LS
Replace 2,270 LF of 6" effluent FM from Mimosa Cove LS
Septic to Sewer 14 homes in Marsh Oaks (Begonia, Tulip)
Septic to Sewer Remainder of Marsh Oaks (W Plaza, Carnation, Gladiola & Lilly)
Install screens/comminutor and pump replacements at Buccaneer LS
Sewer Collection System Master Plan Update
20 St Lift Station - New Generator (HMGP - 75% Reimbursement)
20 St Lift Station - Bulkhead & Access Road Reconstruction
SB 64 Compliance - Design & Construction of Alternate Effluent Disposal*
56 64 Compliance - Design & Construction of Reclaimed Water Sytem Expansion*
* BPJ, assumes no changes in regluatory requirements
- Linked to PW CIP Project
Water Utility Fund - W
Sewer Utility Fund = 5
PU2210
AR2208
AR2207
$ 185,030
$ 436,400
$ 1,500,000 S $ 1,500,000
$ 300,000 5 $ 300,000
$ 350,000 S $ 350,000
$ 65,000 5 $ 65,000
$ 700,000 S $ 700,000
$ 100,000 S $ 100,000
$ 40,000
$ 30,000
$ 100,000
$ 600,000 S $ 600,000
$ 300,000
$ 200,000 S $ 240,000
$ 50,000
$ 85,000
$ 35,000 S $ 35,000
$ 200,000 S $ 400,000
$ 250,000 5 $ 250,000 S $ 250,000 S $ 250,000 S $ 250,000 S $ 250,000 S $ 250,000 S $ 2,250,000
$ 394,600
$ 400,000
$ 500,000 5 $ 700,000 5 $ 1,200,000
$ 300,000 S $ 300,000
$ 50,000
$ 480,000 S $ 480,000
$ 850,000 S $ 850,000
$ 1,200,000 S $ 1,200,000
$ 500,000 S $ 500,000
$ 375,000 5 $ 375,000
$ 375,000 5 $ 375,000
$ 750,000 5 $ 750,000
$ 175,000 5 $ 175,000
$ 95,000
$ 250,000
$ 1,000,000 5 $ 18,000,000 S $ 12,000,000 5 $ 5,000,000 5 $ 36,000,000
$ 750,000 $ 7,500,000 S $ 7,500,000 S $ 15,750,000
$ 5,699,000 $ 11,430,000 $ 27,465,000 $ 14,803,000 $ 6,215,000 $ 1,815,000 $ 365,000 $ 87,661,630
$ 7,504,630 $ 7,235,000 $ 5,130,000
$ 4,348,600 $ 4,400,000 $ 1,655,000
$ 3,156,030 $ 2,835,000 $ 3,475,000
$ 3,884,000 $ 1,480,000 $ 815,000 $ 1,953,000 $ 965,000 $ 715,000 $ 115,000 $ 20,330,600
$ 1,065,000 $ 9,950,000 $ 26,230,000 $ 12,850,000 $ 5,250,000 $ 1,100,000 $ 250,000 $ 66,161,030
Page 2 of 2
FUNDING SOURCE
PU Staff
PU Staff
2018 Stantec CIP
2018 Stantec CIP
2018 Stantec CIP
2018 Stantec CIP
PU Staff
2018 Stantec CIP
PU Staff
PU Staff
PU Staff
PU Staff
PU Staff
PU Staff
PU Staff
PU Staff
PU Staff
2018 Stantec CIP
PU Staff
Adaptation Plan
Adaptation Plan
Adaptation Plan
Adaptation Plan
PU Staff
2018 Stantec CIP
2018 Stantec CIP
2018 Stantec CIP
2018 Stantec CIP
2018 Stantec CIP
2018 Stantec CIP
2018 Stantec CIP
PU Staff
PU Staff
PU Staff
PU Staff
PU Staff
Draft - 09-14-23 Public Works Department - 10 Year Schedule of Capital Improvements - 2024 through 2033
Includes Projects Identified in the 2018 SWMP, 2030 Parks MP, 2021 Connectivity Plan & 2021 Adaptation Plan
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Project 8
I 2024
2025
I 2026
2027
2028
2029
I 2030
I 2031
2032
2033
TOTAL
PARKS & BEACH ACCESSES
Park Maintenance & Miscellaneous
Landscaping - Beach Accesses $ 10,000 GF
$ 10,000
Landscaping -General $ 6,000 GF $ 6,000
Landscaping - Parks $ 7,000 GF $ 7,000
Garage Shed w/ Concrete Floor at PW Yard $ 20,000 GF $ 20,000
4X4 Landscape Truck - Replaces 2003 F-450 $ 40,000 GF $ 40,000
Kubota Tractor (25% from PU Sewer Fund) $ 46,000 GF $ 46,000
Beach Accesses $ -I
Reconstruct 16th St Walkover $ 600,000 CPF $ 600,000
Dune Walkover Maintenance & Repair (various) $ 222,180 CPF $ 222,180
New Walkovers, Locations TBD $ 140,000 BJP $ 140,000 BJP $ 140,000 BJP $ 140,000 BJP $ 560,000
Landscaping Improvements (Various) $ 25,000 BJP $ 25,000 BJP $ 50,000
Remove Landscaping that Hides Public Property $ 10,000 GF
$ 10,000
Aquatic Dog Park
Littoral Planting
$ 5,000 GF
$ 5,000
Bulkhead in Pond $ 50,000 BJP $ 50,000
Fountain Replacement (carryover) $ 5,200 GF $ 5,200
Mural on western edge of park $ 10,000 BIP $ 10,000
Walking Trail & Obstacle Course
$ -
Bull P
-
$ -I
East Coast, Ocean & 7th Safety Improvements $ 25,000 BJP $ 25,000
7th - Relocate Curb for On -Street Parking Improvements $ 100,000 BIP $ 100,000
Remove Berms, bike racks, etc. $ 5,000 GF $ 5,000
Tennis Court Rehab $ 100,000 BJP $ 100,000
Donner Park $ - I
LED Lighting @ Baseball Field $ 25,000 BJP $ 25,000
Splash Pad (carryover) $ 607,500 CPF $ 607,500
Bike Safety Course $ 85,000 BJP $ 85,000
Path Along Perimeter $ 100,000 BJP $ 100,000
Improve Dudley St Entrance $ 15,000 BJP $ 15,000
Bike Repair Station $ 3,500 GF $ 3,500
8X10 Shed for Baker Center $ 15,000 GF $ 15,000
Pickleball Court Expansion $ 90,000 GF $ 90,000
Misc. - Bottle Station, Murals, Landscaping
$ 10,000 BJP
$ 10,000
Dutton Island
$ -
N Fishing Pier Rehab - Deck & Rail Replacement
$ 200,000 CPF
$ 200,000
Dutton Island Rd Drainage Improvements (FY23 Carryover) AR2212 $ 70,000 SW $ 70,000
Bat Boxes $ 3,000 GF $ 3,000
Overlook Seating & Shade $ 5,000 BJP $ 5,000
Replace/Rehab Causeway Bridge $ 700,000 BJP $ 700,000
Dead Tree Removal $ 20,000 GF $ 20,000 GF $ 20,000 GF $ 60,000
Trailhead Wayfinding $ 15,000 BJP $ 15,000
Improve/Add Interpretive Signage along Trails $ 20,000 BJP $ 20,000
Bike Racks @ Entrance & Fishing Piers $ 2,000 BJP $ 2,000
Recycle Bins, Butt & Fishing Line Receptacles $ 1,500 GF $ 1,500
Dog Friendly Amenities - waste bags, fountain, etc. $ 3,500 BIP $ 3,500
Trash Bins @ Trail Entrances $ 2,500 BJP $ 2,500
Install Trail/Surface Edging $ 20,000 BJP $ 20,000
Stabilize Trail Surface in Wet Areas $ 15,000 BJP $ 15,000
Restroom Skylights $ 4,000 BJP $ 4,000
Fairways Villa Park $ -
Sign & Entrance Feature
$ 3,000
BJP
$ 3,000
Xeriscaping
$ 10,000
BJP
$ 10,000
Howell Park
-
Page 1 of 4
PW Staff
PW Staff
PW Staff
PW Staff
PW Staff
PW Staff
PW Staff
2030 Parks MP
PW Staff
2030 Parks MP
2030 Parks MP
2030 Parks MP
2030 Parks MP
2030 Parks MP
2030 Parks MP
2030 Parks MP
2030 Parks MP
2030 Parks MP
2030 Parks MP
PW Staff
PW Staff
2030 Parks MP
2030 Parks MP
2030 Parks MP
2030 Parks MP
PW Staff
2030 Parks MP
Commission Priority
2030 Parks MP
PW Staff
PW Staff
2030 Parks MP
2030 Parks MP
PW Staff
PW Staff
2030 Parks MP
2030 Parks MP
2030 Parks MP
2030 Parks MP
2030 Parks MP
2030 Parks MP
2030 Parks MP
2030 Parks MP
2030 Parks MP
2030 Parks MP
2030 Parks MP
Draft - 09-14-23
Public Works Department - 10 Year Schedule of Capital Improvements - 2024 through 2033
Includes Projects Identified in the 2018 SWMP, 2030 Parks MP, 2021 Connectivity Plan & 2021 Adaptation Plan
PROJECT DESCRIPTION Project fJ 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029
2030
2031 2032 2033 TOTAL
Turtle Pond Bridge Replacement
Lift Station Landscaping $ 1,000 GF
ADA Parking Space @ Palm Ave $ 5,000 GF
Creek Restoration Pilot Project (FY23 Carryover) AR2211 $ 50,000 SW
Update Educational Signage
Install Gazebo for Special Events
Wayfinding Signage
Pervious Pavement - Russell Park to Bull Park
$ 30,000 BJP
Johansen Park
$ 2,500 BJP
$ 3,000 BJP
$ 10,000 BJP
15,000 BJP
30,000 PW Staff
1,000 2030 Parks MP
5,000 2030 Parks MP
50,000 PW Staff
2,500 2030 Parks MP
15,000 2030 Parks MP
3,000 2030 Parks MP
10,000 2030 Parks MP
Refurbish Memorial Planter
Public Art @ South End
Entrance Sign - Saturiba Dr
Signage & Path Park Terrace East Entrance
3,000' Pervious Trail along Drainage Swale
New Bridges
Wayfinding & Educational Signage
Dog Waste Bag Stations
Picnic Tables/Benches, Trash Cans
Butterfly Garden
Native Plant Planting
Educational Signage for Trees/Plants
Bat Boxes
Bike Racks - Seminole Rd
Jordan Park
$ 4,000 BJP
$ 20,000 BJP
$ 2,000 BJP
$ 5,000 BJP
$ 10,000 BJP
$ 2,000 BJP
$ 7,000 BJP
$ 7,500 BJP $ 7,500 BJP
$ 8,000 BJP
$ 1,000 BJP
$ 1,800 GF
$ 120,000 BJP
$ 12,000 BJP
$ 30,000 BJP
Angled parking on N. Side of Park
Parallel Parking along Jordan St
Install/Improve Lighting
Walking Path along Perimeter
Stage for Events
Multiuse Path through Park
Exercise Equipment
Bike Racks
Jordan St Entrance Enhancements
$ 60,000 BJP
$ 15,000 BJP
$ 30,000 BJP
$ 100,000 BJP
$ 150,000 BJP
$ 50,000 BJP
$ 30,000 BJP
$ 50,000 BJP
$ 3,000 BJP
$ 4,000 2030 Parks MP
$ 20,000 2030 Parks MP
$ 2,000 2030 Parks MP
$ 5,000 2030 Parks MP
$ 120,000 2030 Parks MP
$ 12,000 PW Staff
$ 10,000 2030 Parks MP
$ 2,000 2030 Parks MP
$ 7,000 2030 Parks MP
$ 30,000 2030 Parks MP
$ 15,000 2030 Parks MP
$ 8,000 2030 Parks MP
$ 1,000 2030 Parks MP
$ 1,800 2030 Parks MP
$ 30,000 2030 Parks MP
$ 60,000 2030 Parks MP
$ 100,000 2030 Parks MP
$ 150,000 2030 Parks MP
$ 50,000 Commission Priority
$ 50,000 2030 Parks MP
$ 30,000 2030 Parks MP
$ 3,000 2030 Parks MP
$ 15,000 2030 Parks MP
Marvin Gardens -
Signage, Fencing, etc.
Upgrade Play Equipment
$ 30,000
BJP
$ 5,000 BJP
$ 5,000
$ 30,000
Riverbranch Preserve $ -
Educational Signage @ W. 6th St
Update Kayak Route Signage
$ 6,000
$ 5,000
BJP
BJP
$ 6,000
$ 5,000
Rose Park $ -
Benches
Playground Equipment
Field Lighting (If neighbors not opposed)
Bat Boxes
Dog Washing Station
Public Art
Russell Park
Refurbish Skateboard Park (Minor followed by Major)
Repurpose One Raquetball Court & Exercise Equipment (Carryover)
New Baseball Field Lighting (3 fields)
Install Community Garden
New Play Set
Rain Gardens & Bioswale along Ditch
Widen Sidewalks along Plaza to 8'
Bike Repair Station $ 3,500 GF
$ 2,000 GF
$ 1,000 GF
$ 60,000 BJP
$ 120,000 BJP
$ 70,000 BJP
$ 20,000 BJP
$ 65,000 BJP
$ 15,000 BJP
$ 180,000 BJP
$ 50,000 BJP
1,000 BJP
100,000 BJP
65,000 BJP
45,000 BJP
Page 2 of 4
2030 Parks MP
2030 Parks MP
2030 Parks MP
2030 Parks MP
2,000 PW Staff
60,000 PW Staff
70,000 PW Staff
1,000 2030 Parks MP
1,000 2030 Parks MP
20,000 2030 Parks MP
$ 120,000 PW Staff
$ 100,000 2030 Parks MP
$ 130,000 PW Staff
$ 15,000 2030 Parks MP
$ 180,000 PW Staff
$ 45,000 2030 Parks MP
$ 50,000 2030 Parks MP
$ 3,500 2030 Parks MP
Draft - 09-14-23 Public Works Department - 10 Year Schedule of Capital Improvements - 2024 through 2033
Includes Projects Identified in the 2018 SWMP, 2030 Parks MP, 2021 Connectivity Plan & 2021 Adaptation Plan
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Project 9
I 2024
2025
I 2026
2027
2028
2029
I 2030
2031
2032
2033
TOTAL
Low -Light, Low -Level Lighting along Paths
$ 90,000
BJP
$ 90,000
geviews Park
$ -
New Decking & Handrail Sunset Pier
$ 200,000
CPF
$ 200,000
Bat Boxes
$ 3,000
BJP
$ 3,000
Walkway Restoration
$ 10,000
CPF
$ 10,000
BJP
$ 10,000
BJP
$ 10,000
BJP
$ 10,000
BJP $ 10,000
BJP $ 200,000
BJP
$ 260,000
Kayak Launch Replacement
$ 40,000
BJP
$ 40,000
Signage at Kayak Launches Showing Trails
$ 10,000
BJP
$ 10,000
Connection to Atlantic Blvd
$ 15,000
BJP
$ 15,000
Bike Racks
$ 3,000
GF
$ 3,000
Seating/Shade at Each Entrance
$ 30,000
BJP
$ 30,000
Pervious Walking Path around Pond
$ 50,000
BJP
$ 50,000
Wayfinding Signage @ Trailheads
$ 10,000
BJP
$ 10,000
Add/Maintain Interpretive Signage
$ 5,000
BJP
$ 5,000
Fishing Line Recycling Bin
$ 1,500
BJP
$ 1,500
Entrance Sign on Camelia St
$ 2,000
BJP
$ 2,000
ADA Access to Sunset Pier
$ 15,000
BJP
$ 15,000
Path from Camelia to Drainage Pond Path
$ 30,000
BJP
$ 30,000
Veteran's Park
$ -
Wrap Electrical Box w/ US Flag or Similar
Shade Trees for Visitors
Grade Lawn to Slope - Emulate Stadium
Bushes/Fencing around Substation
Signage for Parking Areas
Pavillion & Grill
Interpretive Signage about Park
Bike Racks @ Entrance
Park Signs @ Mayport Rd Entrance
$ 3,000 GF
$ 5,000 TF
$ 3,000 GF
$ 30,000 BJP
$ 3,000 BJP
$ 5,000 BJP
$ 5,000 BJP
$ 2,000 BJP
$ 50,000 BJP
3,000
5,000
50,000
3,000
5,000
30,000
5,000
3,000
2,000
Waters Park
Turf Block Parking
ROADS & STREETS
$ 50,000
GF
$ 50,000
GF
$ 100,000
Street Maintenance - Milling and Paving
Sidewalks - Throughout City as needed
Levy Road - Multiuse Path ($609,000 carryover)
Two New Beach Showers
ROW Parking Pads w/ Turfblock
Thermoplastic Crosswalks - Throughout City
Landscape Replacement -Atlantic Blvd & Mayport Rd
Landscape Replacement - Police Department
Landscape Replacement -Atlantic Blvd Median
Landscaping - General
Royal Palms - Replace broken curbs and gutters throughout
$ 550,000 CPF $ 550,000 CPF $ 550,000 CPF $ 550,000 CPF $ 550,000 CPF $ 550,000 CPF $ 550,000 CPF $ 550,000 CPF $ 550,000 CPF $ 550,000 CPF
$ 125,000 CPF $ 125,000 BJP $ 125,000 BJP $ 125,000 BJP $ 125,000 BJP $ 125,000 BJP $ 125,000 BJP $ 125,000 GF $ 125,000 GF $ 125,000 GF
PW2308 $ 609,000 CPF
$ 10,000 GF
$ 50,000 GF
$ 15,000
$ 5,000
$ 17,000
$ 7,000
GF
GF
GF
GF
$ 50,000 GF
$ 500,000 BJP $ 500,000 BJP
5,500,000
1,250,000
609,000
10,000
50,000
50,000
15,000
5,000
17,000
7,000
1,000,000
CONNECTIVITY PLAN
Sturdivant - Seminole to East Coast - 8' Multiuse Path + Bike
Sandpiper - 5' Path
Dutton Island Rd - Francis to Mayport - 8' Multiuse Path
Dutton Island Rd - Mayport to George - 8' Multiuse Path + 5' Sidewalk (CO1 Side)
Dutton Island Rd - George St to Main St - 8' Multiuse Path
Sailfish Dr - 8' Multiuse Path
W Plaza - North Side - 8' Multiuse Path
1st St W - Tide Views to Veterans Park - Sharrow
Orchid St - Rose to Tide View - 6' Path
Seminole Rd - Missing Link 8' Multiuse Path - Saturiba to Garden Ln (1,900 LF)
Seminole Rd - Missing Link 8' Multiuse Path - 17th St to Saturiba (1,100 LF)
Seaspray - Sailfish to AB Elementary - 8' Multiuse Path
$ 550,000 CPF
$ 90,000 BJP
90,000 BJP
216,000
272,000
330,000
CPF
BJ P
CPF
$ 32,000 BJP
$ 400 BJP
$ 250,000 I CPF
Page 3 of 4
$ 216,000 CPF
$ 430,000 I CPF
$ 330,000 CPF
$ 550,000
$ 90,000
$ 90,000
$ 216,000
$ 272,000
$ 330,000
$ 32,000
$ 400
$ 216,000
$ 430,000
$ 250,000
$ 330,000
2030 Parks MP
PW Staff
2030 Parks MP
PW Staff
PW Staff
2030 Parks MP
2030 Parks MP
2030 Parks MP
2030 Parks MP
2030 Parks MP
2030 Parks MP
2030 Parks MP
2030 Parks MP
2030 Parks MP
2030 Parks MP
2030 Parks MP
2030 Parks MP
2030 Parks MP
2030 Parks MP
2030 Parks MP
2030 Parks MP
2030 Parks MP
2030 Parks MP
2030 Parks MP
2030 Parks MP
2030 Parks MP
PW Staff
PW Staff
PW Staff
PW Staff
PW Staff
PW Staff
PW Staff
PW Staff
PW Staff
PW Staff
PW Staff
2021 Connectivity Plan
2021 Connectivity Plan
2021 Connectivity Plan
2021 Connectivity Plan
2021 Connectivity Plan
2021 Connectivity Plan
2021 Connectivity Plan
2021 Connectivity Plan
2021 Connectivity Plan
2021 Connectivity Plan
2021 Connectivity Plan
2021 Connectivity Plan
Draft - 09-14-23
Public Works Department - 10 Year Schedule of Capital Improvements - 2024 through 2033
Includes Projects Identified in the 2018 SWMP, 2030 Parks MP, 2021 Connectivity Plan & 2021 Adaptation Plan
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Project 6
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
TOTAL
BUILDING MAINTENANCE & PW ADMINISTRATION
New A/C Units - Locations TBD
'Public Works Building Rehabilitation - (carryover + $550K from Water & Sewer)
'PW Building - Replace all 8 Bay Doors (100% HLMP Grant Funded)
'City Hall - Solar Panels
'Adele Grage - Outside Rehab
Gail Baker Center - Expansion
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
$ 15,000 GF
$ 1,500,000 CPF
$ 194,000 GF
$ 10,000 BJP
$ 250,000 CPF
$ 75,000 GF
15,000 PW Staff
1,500,000 PW Staff
194,000 PW Staff
75,000 PW Staff
10,000 PW Staff
250,000 PW Staff
Aquatic Gardens - Phase 1 (carryover + new $500,000 state appropriation) $ 2,600,000 SW $
Easements $ 5,000 SW $ 5,000 SW $ 5,000 SW $ 5,000 SW $ 5,000 SW $ 5,000 SW $ 5,000 SW $ 5,000 SW $
Aquatic Gardens - Cutlass Box Culvert/ Ditch Imp. Design (90% HMGP) $ 82,000 SW SW $
Aquatic Gardens - Cutlass Box Culvert/ Ditch Imp. Construction (90% HMGP + $1.0M Leg. Approp.) SW $ 2,500,000 SW $
Aquatic Gardens - Phase III - Ditch Widening Design & Construction $ 1,500,000 CPF $ 1,500,000 CPF $ 2,500,000 BJP $ 2,500,000 BJP $
Sherman Creek Culvert Replacement - Seminole, Plaza, & 11th St $ 1,200,000 SW $
Howell Park & Sherman Creek - Dredging for Flow Restoration $ 1,000,000 CPF $ 1,000,000 CPF $
9th/10th/11th/12th Streets - Phase I $ 1,100,000 SW $
1st, 2nd & 3rd St - Drainage System & Roadway Rehab $ 2,000,000 CPF $
Ahern St - Drainage System & Roadway Rehab $500,000 CPF $
PW Yard - 4 Door Bay Garage Building $ 240,000 BJP $
Royal Palm CIP Storm Sewer Lining (carryover) $ 40,000 SW $
Baffle Boxes on Levy & Saturiba $ 125,000 SW $
Dutton Island Drainage Improvements (carryover) $ 70,000 SW $
New Fountain at w. 4th St Pond $ 6,200 SW $
West Side Ditch Cleaning $ 75,000 SW $
Annual Drainage Ditch Maintenance Bid $ 200,000 SW $ 200,000 SW $ 200,000 SW $ 200,000 SW $ 200,000 SW $ 200,000 SW $ 200,000 SW $ 200,000 SW $ 200,000 SW $ 200,000 SW $
Sherman Creek Drainage Ditch Maintenance Bid $ 200,000 SW $
4th & 5th St - Drainage System & Roadway Rehab $ 1,000,000 SW $
6th, 7th & 8th St - Drainage System & Roadway Rehab $ 1,000,000 SW $ 500,000 BJP $
Plaza East Coast to 5 -Way) - Drainage System, Curb & Roadway Rehab $ 1,000,000 BJP $
9th/10th/11th/12th Streets - Phase!! $ 1,200,000 SW $
Johansen Park - Culvert Replacement $ 450,000 BJP $
Stanley Rd Area - Enlarge Existing Storm Sewer (90% HMGP Funded) $ 103,000 SW $ 650,000 BJP $
Mary St & Stewart St - Improvements (75% HMGP Funded) $ 371,400 SW $
2,600,000 SWMP - 2018
40,000 SWMP - 2018
82,000 SWMP - 2018
2,500,000 SWMP - 2018
8,000,000 SWMP - 2018
1,200,000 SWMP - 2018
2,000,000 SWMP - 2018
1,100,000 SWMP - 2018
2,000,000 PW Staff
500,000 PW Staff
240,000 PW Staff
40,000 PW Staff
125,000 PW Staff
70,000 PW Staff
6,200 PW Staff
75,000 PW Staff
2,000,000 PW Staff
200,000 PW Staff
1,000,000 PW Staff
1,500,000 PW Staff
1,000,000 PW Staff
1,200,000 SWMP - 2018
450,000 SWMP - 2018
753,000 SWMP - 2018
371,400 SWMP - 2018
ADAPTATION & RESILIENCY
Critical Public Facilities - High Exposure Evaluation & Improvements
Critical Public Facilities - Medium Exposure Evaluation
Critical Public Facilities - Medium Exposure Improvements
50 -Year Drainage Plan - Evaluate Major Drainageways & Projects
25 -Yr Plan for SLR Protection - West of Mayport Rd
Vulnerable Roadway Segments - Protect from SLR
- Linked to PU CIP Project
General Fund - GF
Half Cent Sales tax - BJP
Capital Project Fund - CPF
Sanitation Fund - SF
Tree Fund - TF
Stormwater Utility Fund - SW
$ 80,000 CPF $ 50,000 GF $ 50,000 GF
$ 25,000 GF
$ 20,000 GF $ 20,000 GF $ 20,000 GF $ 20,000 GF
$ 100,000 GF
$ 100,000 GF
$ 8,781,780 $ 7,692,000 $ 8,060,500
$ 1,000,000 GF $ 1,000,000 GF $ 1,500,000 SW $ 1,500,000 BJP $ 2,000,000 SW
$ 180,000 Adapation Plan - 2021
$ 25,000 Adapation Plan - 2021
$ 80,000 Adapation Plan - 2021
$ 100,000 Adapation Plan - 2021
$ 100,000 Adapation Plan - 2021
$ 7,000,000 Adapation Plan - 2021
$ 7,371,400 $ 6,478,500 $ 6,460,000 $ 5,270,000 $ 4,460,000 $ 1,065,000 $ 875,000 $ 56,514,180
$ 620,500 $ 278,000 $ 165,000 $ 1,070,000 $ 1,020,000 $ 40,000 $ $ 175,000 $ 175,000 $ 125,000 $ 3,668,500
$ 260,000 $ 2,179,000 $ 2,769,500 $ 1,696,400 $ 1,487,500 $ 2,735,000 $ 4,515,000 $ $ 140,000 $ - $ 15,782,400
$ 4,023,680 $ 2,530,000 $ 2,596,000 $ 2,300,000 $ 3,766,000 $ 1,980,000 $ 550,000 $ 880,000 $ 550,000 $ 550,000 $ 19,725,680
$ - $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
$ 5,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 5,000
$ 3,872,600 $ 2,705,000 $ 2,530,000 $ 2,305,000 $ 205,000 $ 1,705,000 $ 205,000 $ 3,405,000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 17,332,600
Page 4 of 4
ATLAPiii TIC
CEACI-1
CHIDOIL
r
I. PUBLIC SCHOOL
FACILITIES ELEMENT
CITY OF JACKSONVILLE & MUNICIPALITIES SCHOOL CONCURRENCY PROGRAM
(Where appropriate to the context, references herein to "the City" shall mean the City of Atlantic Beach,
whereas references to the Cities shall mean all Duval County local governments or the City of
Jacksonville as expressed by the specific responsibility or reference.)
I. PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS
GOAL 1.1: COORDINATE AND MAINTAIN HIGH QUAILITY EDUCUATION 1- 3
OBJECTIVE 1.1.1 COORDINATION AND CONSISTENCY 1- 3
GOAL 1.2: PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITY SITING AND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION I- 4
OBJECTIVE 1.2.1 PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES AND AVIALABILITY
OBJECTIVE 1.2.2 ENHANCE COMMUNITY/SCHOOL DESIGN
OBJECTIVE 1.2.3 COORDINATE LAND USE AND SCHOOL CAPACITY
I-4
1-7
1-8
GOAL 1.3: IMPLEMENT SCHOOL CONCURRENCY 1- 8
OBJECTIVE 1.3.1 AMENDING ADOPTED LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS
OBJECTIVE 1.3.2 SCHOOL CONCURRENCY SERVICE AREAS
OBJECTIVE 1.3.3 PROCESS FOR SCHOOL CONCURRENCY IMPEMENTATION
OBJECTIVE 1.3.4 PROPORTIONATE SHARE MITIGATIONS
OBJECTIVE 1.3.5 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLANNING
1-9
I-10
I-13
1-14
DEFINITIONS 1- 15
MAPS
EXISTING LOCATIONS OF DCPS PUBLIC ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS
EXISTING LOCATIONS OF DCPS PUBLIC MIDDLE SCHOOLS
EXISTING LOCATIONS OF DCPS PUBLIC HIGH SCHOOLS
EXISTING LOCATIONS OF DCPS ANCILLARY AND ADMINISTRATIVE FACILITIES
PLANNED LOCATIONS OF DCPS PUBLIC SCHOOLS
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
1. Public Schools Facilities Element Goals, Objectives and Policies
Goal 1.1
COORDINATE AND MAINTAIN HIGH QUALITY EDUCATION
The City shall collaborate and coordinate with the Duval County Public Schools (DCPS), the City of
Jacksonville and the other Duval County municipalities to ensure that the public school system offers a
high quality educational environment, provides accessibility for all its students, and ensures adequate
school capacity to accommodate existing and future population.
Objective I. 1.1
Coordination and Consistency
The City shall establish coordination review procedures to ensure consistency of its Comprehensive Plan
with the plans of the DCPS, the City of Jacksonville and the other municipalities.
Policy 1.1.1.1 It is the intent of this element that the policies included herein shall be applied to the City,
unless specifically noted or where clearly not applicable to the City of Atlantic Beach.
Policy 1.1.1.2 Staff shall meet in joint workshop sessions with staff from DCPS, the City of Jacksonville
and the other municipalities on an as needed basis, but at a minimum of twice per year,
to provide opportunities to discuss issues of mutual concern.
Policy 1.1.1.3
The City shall meet with the DCPS and the legislative bodies of the City of Jacksonville and
the other municipalities on an annual basis in a joint workshop or meeting session to
discuss issues regarding coordination of land use and school facilities planning, including
population and student growth, development trends, school sitings, school needs, school
concurrency, co -location and joint- use opportunities, and ancillary infrastructure
improvements needed to support and ensure safe student access.
Policy 1.1.1.4 The City shall coordinate and base its plans upon consistent projections of the amount,
type, and distribution of population growth and student enrollment which are consistent
with those of the DCPS, the City of Jacksonville and the other municipalities. The Interlocal
Agreement shall establish the methodology to be used to determine school enrollment
projections to be used in preparing the DCPS Five -Year Capital Plan, and the methodology
to be used to determine school enrollment and capacity to be used in concurrency testing.
At a minimum, the methodology shall include consideration of both students anticipated
from projected new housing stock and enrollment projected to occur from existing
housing stock, and that each of these components of projected student enrollment be set
out for each Concurrency Service Area by type of school, or a functional equivalent. To
ensure that the City's Capital Improvement Plan and the Concurrency Management
System are financially feasible, the City of Jacksonville shall confirm that the student
enrollment projections from new housing stock in each Concurrency Service Area are
consistent with the population projections for that Concurrency Service Area. The City will
annually revise its Five-year population projections and update information and provide
those revised projections and information to the DCPS, the City of Jacksonville and the
other municipalities in order that DCPS annually update its school enrollment projections.
Policy 1.1.1.5 At the time of adoption of the Public School Facilities Element (PSFE), the City shall
coordinate and share data with DCPS including an inventory of reserved capacity that
existed prior to the effective date of the City' School Concurrency Ordinance, approval
and a projection of the number of these residential units that are anticipated to receive
certification of occupancy approval in the next five years, and the identification of any
development orders issued which contained a requirement for the provision of a school
site as a condition of the development approval.
Policy 1.1.1.6 On an ongoing basis, the City will provide the DCPS with data, including information
regarding the type, number, and location of residential units which have received zoning
approval, site plan approval, a building permit, or a Certificate of Occupancy and a draft
Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) with the final version of the CIP to be submitted by the
City to the DCPS after official adoption. Information regarding the conversion or
redevelopment of housing or other structures into residential units that are likely to
generate new students shall be provided.
Policy 1.1.1.7
By December of each year, the City shall consider for adoption the DCPS Five -Year Capital
Facilities Plan to the extent that it relates to school capacity to ensure maintenance of a
financially feasible capital improvements program and to ensure level of service
standards will be achieved and maintained by the end of the 5 -year planning period. If
the City determines that the DCPS Five Year Capital Facilities Plan is not financially
feasible, then the City shall notify the DCPS that the Five Year Capital Facilities Plan is not
financially feasible, and request that DCPS modify the Five Year Capital Facilities Plan to
make it financially feasible.
20 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN — PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
Goal 1.2
PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITY SITING AND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION
It is the goal of the City to maintain and enhance joint planning processes and procedures for
coordination with the DCPS, the City of Jacksonville and the other municipalities of public education
facilities for planning and decision-making regarding population projections, public school siting, and
the development of public education facilities concurrent with the residential development and other
services.
Objective 1.2.1
Public School Facility and Availability
The City shall coordinate with DCPS, the City of Jacksonville and the other municipalities to establish a
process of coordination and collaboration between the Cities and the DCPS in the planning, siting and
construction of educational facilities, so that timing is proper and the site location is compatible with the
surrounding area, concurrent with necessary service and infrastructure, and consistent with the City's
Comprehensive Plan.
Policy 1.2.1.1
Policy 1.2.1.2
The City will coordinate with the DCPS to assure that proposed public school facility sites
in the County are consistent with the applicable land use categories and policies of the
applicable Comprehensive Plan. Pursuant to Florida Statutes, each City will consider each
site, within its boundaries, as it relates to environmental, health, safety, and welfare
concerns, as well as the effects on adjacent property.
The City will coordinate with the DCPS for the selection of future school sites within the
County as to aspects related to:
(a) Acquisition of school sites which: (i) allow for future expansions to accommodate
future enrollment, in accordance with the adopted level of service (LOS) standards
and other facility needs; (ii) coordinate with the City's development and
redevelopment objectives; and (iii) are deemed beneficial for joint uses, as identified
by the DCPS and the City, to the extent feasible; and
(b) Coordination of the location, phasing, and development of future school sites to
ensure that site development occurs in conjunction with the provision of required
infrastructure to serve the school facility.
Policy 1.2.1.3 The City shall coordinate with the DCPS in the school site selection process to encourage
the location of new schools within areas designated for development on the Future Land
Use Map.
Policy 1.2.1.4 At the request of the DCPS, the City will assist the DCPS and the JPC in reviewing and
recommending potential sites for new schools, proposed school closures, and significant
school expansion projects, and making recommendations to the Superintendent.
Policy 1.2.1.5 The City shall coordinate with the DCPS to establish a procedure for timely review of
development for new public school facilities.
Policy 1.2.1.6 Public schools shall be located so as to provide direct access to collector or arterial
roadway system, where feasible.
Policy 1.2.1.7 The City shall coordinate with the DCPS to evaluate and seek to locate potential sites
where the co -location of public facilities, such as parks, libraries, and community centers,
with schools can be accomplished.
Policy 1.2.1.8 Schools are an allowable land use in all future land use categories, except for heavy
industrial and conservation, subject to the following criteria:
1) Whether the area contains or will contain a student population density sufficient
to support the school;
2) Whether the school in that location would be consistent with sound facility
planning, including consideration of overall cost and design;
3) Whether the school site is of sufficient size to accommodate the required parking
and circulation of vehicles;
4) Whether anticipated unacceptable impacts to the environment and significant
environmental constraints would preclude a school on the site;
5) Whether development of the school would result in unacceptable impacts on
archeological or historic sites listed in the National Register of Historic Places or
designated by the City as locally significant;
6) Whether the location of site is located within the area of velocity flood zone or
floodway, as delineated on pertinent maps identified or referenced in the City's
Comprehensive Plan or Land Development Regulations;
7) Whether or not the proposed location lies within an area regulated by Section
333.03(3), Florida Statutes, regarding the construction of public facilities in the
vicinity of an airport;
8) As to elementary school sites, whether the site is proximate to and within walking
distance of the residential neighborhoods it is intended to serve, thereby
encouraging the use of elementary schools as focal points for neighborhoods.
9) As to middle and high school sites, whether the site is conveniently located to the
residential neighborhoods it is intended to serve, and has access to major roads;
10) Whether the new schools site, significant renovation, expansion or potential
closure will support community redevelopment and revitalization;
11) Whether the new school site, significant renovation, expansion or potential
closure will increase or diminish the current and projected level of service within
the concurrency service area, and contiguous concurrency service areas.
(b) The facility shall be of a design, intensity, and scale to serve the surrounding
neighborhood and be compatible with the surrounding land uses and zoning.
4530
Policy 1.2.1.9 The City shall protect schools from the intrusion of incompatible land uses as determined
by the City's Land Development Regulations, by providing the DCPS the opportunity to
participate in the review process for all proposed developments adjacent to schools.
Policy 1.2.1.10 The City shall coordinate with the DCPS to ensure that the future school facilities are
located outside areas susceptible to hurricane and/or storm damage, and/or areas prone
to flooding, or as consistent with Chapter 1013, Florida Statutes, regarding flood plain and
school building requirements.
Policy 1.2.1.11 The emergency management officials of the City shall coordinate with the DCPS facilities
staff to identify schools, both existing and proposed, which can serve as emergency
shelter sites, as well as identify and make available to the DCPS any grants or other monies
for use in preparing a structure as an emergency shelter site.
Policy 1.2.1.12 The DCPS and the Cities will jointly determine the need, responsibility for providing, and
timing of any on or off-site infrastructure improvements necessary to support a new
school located in the City. To the extent that the proposed renovation or expansion of an
existing school located in the City effects on or off- site infrastructure improvements, the
same determination shall be made for the proposed renovation or expansion.
Objective 1.2.2
Enhance Community/School Design
The City shall coordinate with DCPS to enhance community and neighborhood design though establishing
effective school facility design and siting standards thereby encouraging the siting of school facilities to
serve as community focal points and to be compatible with surrounding land uses.
Policy 1.2.2.1 The City shall coordinate with the DCPS in order to provide consistency with the City's
Comprehensive Plan and public school facilities program, and to provide for the following
desirable outcomes:
(a) Greater efficiency by the placement of schools to take advantage of the existing and
planned roads, water, sewer, parks, and drainage systems;
(b) Improved student access and safety by coordinating the construction of new and
expanded schools with roads and sidewalk construction programs;
(c) The location and design of schools with parks, ball fields, libraries, and other
community facilities to take advantage of shared use opportunities; and
(d) The expansion and rehabilitation of existing schools to support neighborhoods and
redevelopment.
(e) The City shall coordinate any updates to its future land use map with the DCPS and
the DCPS shall coordinate any updates to the long range public school facilities map
with the City.
Policy 1.2.2.2
The City shall coordinate with DCPS to seek to provide for the shared -use and co -location
of school sites and local government facilities with similar facility needs, such as libraries,
parks, and recreation facilities, and health care facilities. The City will look for
opportunities to co -locate and share local government facilities when preparing updates
to the Comprehensive Plan's schedule of capital improvements and when planning and
designing new or renovating existing, community facilities.
Policy 1.2.2.3 Where continued use of an existing school which is considered a locally significant
building is not feasible, the City shall seek to coordinate with DCPS to provide for the
adaptive reuse of that locally significant building.
Policy 1.2.2.4 New residential developments adjacent to schools which do not prohibit school aged
residents shall be required to provide a direct access that is safe for pedestrian travel to
existing and planned school sites, and shall connect to the neighborhood's existing
pedestrian network.
Policy 1.2.2.5
The City shall coordinate with the DCPS to ensure that pedestrian and bicycle facilities are
provided adjacent to school sites located in the City to allow for the safety of pedestrians
and bicyclists.
Policy 1.2.2.6 The City shall coordinate with the DCPS to find opportunities to collaborate on public
transit and public school bus routes to better serve citizens and students.
Policy 1.2.2.7 The City shall encourage the DCPS to use sustainable design and performance standards,
such as using energy efficient and recycled materials, to reduce lifetime costs, where
feasible.
Objective 1.2.3
Coordinate Land Use with School Capacity
The City will coordinate proposed changes to future land use, rezoning, and developments of regional
impact for residential development with adequate school capacity. This objective will be accomplished
recognizing the DCPS statutory and constitutional responsibility to provide a uniform system of free and
adequate schools.
Policy 1.2.3.1
Policy 1.2.3.2
The City will provide an electronic copy, or otherwise make available electronically, to
the DCPS, copies of all land use applications and development and redevelopment
proposals pending before them that may affect student enrollment, enrollment
projections, or school facilities, as provided in the amended Interlocal Agreement.
The City will coordinate with DCPS to establish plan review procedures to manage the
timing of Future Land Use Map amendments and other land use decisions so that these
decisions coordinate with adequate school capacity.
Policy 1.2.3.3 The City will take into consideration the DCPS comments and findings on the availability
of adequate school capacity in the evaluation of comprehensive plan amendments, and
4530
other land use decisions as provided in Section 163.3177(6)(a), Florida Statutes, and
development of regional impacts as provided in 1380.06, Florida Statutes.
GOAL 1.3
IMPLEMENT PUBLIC SCHOOL CONCURRENCY
The City shall ensure the future availability of public school facilities to serve development consistent
with the adopted level of service standards. This goal will be accomplished recognizing the DCPS
statutory and constitutional responsibility to provide uniform system of free and adequate public
schools, and the Cities' authority for land use control and management, and their joint responsibility to
maintain the adopted level of service standards.
Objective 1.3.1
Adopted Level of Service (LOS) Standards
Through the implementation of its concurrency management systems and in coordination with the DCPS,
the City shall ensure that the capacity of schools is sufficient to support new residential developments at
the adopted level of service (LOS) standards within the period covered in the five-year schedule of capital
improvements and the long range planning period. These standards shall be consistent with the Interlocal
Agreement agreed upon by the DCPS, the City of Jacksonville and the other municipalities. Minor
deviations to the LOS standards may occur, so long as they are limited, temporary and with scheduled
capacity improvements, school capacity is maximized to the greatest extent feasible.
Policy 1.3.1.1
Policy 1.3.1.2
The LOS standards set forth herein shall be applied consistently for the purpose of
implementing school concurrency, including determining whether sufficient school
capacity exists to accommodate a particular development application, and determining
the financial feasibility of DCPS Five -Year Capital Facilities Plan and the City's Capital
Improvement Plan.
The uniform LOS standards for all public schools including magnets and instructional
facility types, shall be 105% of the permanent Florida Inventory of School House (FISH)
capacity, plus portables, based on the utilization rate as established by the State
Requirements for Educational Facilities (SREF).
(a) The designated middle schools in CSA 5 shall be identified as backlogged facilities
and an interim level of standard within CSA 5 shall be 115% until January 1, 2018,
after which the uniform LOS standard shall apply.
(b) The implementation of long term concurrency management shall be monitored to
evaluate the effectiveness of the implemented improvements and strategies toward
improving the level of service standards for middle schools in CSA 5 over the 10 -year
period.
(c) The City shall adopt DCPS Long Range Capital Improvements Plan as the 10 -year
longterm schedule of improvements for the purpose of correcting existing
deficiencies and setting priorities for addressing backlogged facilities within CSA 5.
Policy 1.3.1.3
The long-term schedule includes capital improvements and revenues sufficient to
meet the anticipated demands for backlogged facilities within the 10 -year period.
The longterm schedule improves interim level of service standards for backlogged
facilities and ensures uniform LOS, as established in policy above, is achieved by
2018. The long-term schedule will be updated by December 1st of each year, in
conjunction with the annual update to the DCPS Five -Year Capital Facilities Plan and
the Cities' Capital Improvements Elements.
(d) The City's strategy, in coordination with DCPS, for correcting existing deficiencies
and addressing future needs includes:
1) Implementation of a financially feasible Five Year Capital Facilities Plan to ensure
level of service standards are achieved and maintained;
2) Implementation of interim level of service standards within designated
concurrency service areas with identified backlogged facilities in conjunction with
a long-term (10 -year) schedule of improvements to correct deficiencies and
improve level of service standards to the district -wide standards;
3) Identification of adequate sites for funded and planned schools; and
4) The expansion of revenues for school construction.
The uniform LOS standards may only be amended by agreement of the City of
Jacksonville, the DCPS and all other municipalities. Such agreement must be reflected in
amendment of the Interlocal Agreement relating to schools. The revised LOS standard
shall not become final until the Interlocal Agreement has been amended. No level of
service shall be amended without a showing that the proposed LOS is financially
feasible. The LOS will be achieved and maintained by the end of the five-year planning
period.
Objective 1.3.2
School Concurrency Service Areas (CSAs)
The City' shall coordinate with DCPS to establish Concurrency Service Areas (CSAs), as the areas within
which an evaluation is made of whether adequate school capacity is available based on the adopted level
of service standards.
Policy 1.3.2.1
The City shall enter into an Interlocal Agreement with the DCPS, the City of Jacksonville
and other municipalities in Duval County to establish CSAs to be used as the basis of
school concurrency determinations. The CSAs shall be delineated so as to maximize
available school capacity and make efficient use of new and existing public school facilities
in accordance with the adopted LOS standards, taking into consideration the following
criteria:
(a) Maximization of school facilities,
Policy 1.3.2.2
4530
(b) Minimize transportation costs,
(c) Limiting student travel time,
(d) Requirements of court -approved desegregation plans.
(e) Achieving socioeconomic, racial, and cultural diversity objectives,
(f) Recognizing capacity commitments resulting from local governments' development
approvals for the CSA and contiguous CSAs.
The CSA designations may only be amended by agreement of the City of Jacksonville, the
DCPS and all other municipalities, after receiving comments from the Joint Planning
Committee and the ILA Team. Such agreement must be reflected in an amendment to the
Interlocal Agreement relating to schools. The revised CSA designations shall not become
final until the Interlocal Agreement has been amended.
Policy 1.3.2.3 There shall be Concurrency Service Areas established for Duval County for elementary
and high schools, and Concurrency Service Areas for middle schools as depicted on the
CSA maps attached to the adopted Interlocal Agreement.
Objective 1.3.3
Process for School Concurrency Implementation
In coordination with the DCPS, the Cities will establish a process for implementation of school concurrency
which includes applicability and capacity determination and availability standards, and school capacity
methods. The City shall manage the timing of new residential development approvals to ensure adequate
school capacity is available consistent with adopted level of service standards for public school
concurrency.
Except as provided in policies below, school concurrency applies only to residential uses that generate
demands for public school facilities and are proposed or established after the effective date of the School
Concurrency Ordinances.
Policy 1.3.3.1 The City of Atlantic Beach in consultation with DCPS and the other municipalities shall
establish a uniform methodology for determining capacity. Capacity will be defined as: a)
the number of student stations as established in the permanent FISH, plus portables; and
b) Proposed changes to permanent FISH capacity as a result of construction,
rehabilitation, or other changes in school capacity which will commence in the first three
(3) years of the Five -Year Capital Facilities Plan.
Policy 1.3.3.2 The DCPS will be responsible for "concurrency testing" of any new residential
development projects. This process will involve applying the adopted student generation
rate to the development project to determine the number of students in each school type
and then evaluating whether or not the schools in the appropriate Concurrency Service
Area (CSA) or the adjacent concurrency areas have sufficient excess capacity to absorb
the new students.
Policy 1.3.3.3 The following residential uses shall be considered exempt from the requirements of
school concurrency due to the lack of impact on the school facilities or the
accommodations made for schools.
(a) Age restricted communities.
(b) Any development with a de minimus impact as defined as any residential
development of 20 units or less, subject to land development regulation aggregation
criteria.
Policy 1.3.3.4 In evaluating a proposed residential development for concurrency, any relevant
improvements which are committed or planned in the Five -Year Capital Facilities Plan and
the Capital Improvement Plan, shall be considered available capacity for the project and
factored into the level of service analysis. Any relevant improvements which will
commence construction after the 3rd year of the Five -Year Capital Facilities Plan shall not
be considered available capacity for the project unless either: (i) funding and a schedule
to accelerate the improvement into the first three years is assured through DCPS; (ii)
funding for the improvements which are scheduled to commence in years four or five is
provided through proportionate share mitigation; (iii) the developer and the DCPS agrees
to accelerate the construction and funding of the facility to be moved into first three
years; or (iv) some other means. Also, any projected reduction in the number of students
enrolled in the CSA or adjacent CSA will be considered as additional available capacity.
The City shall not deny an application for site plan, final subdivision approval, or the
functional equivalent for a development or phase of a development authorizing
residential development for exceeding the adopted level of service, where adequate
school facilities will be in place or under construction within three years after the issuance
of final subdivision or site plan approval, or the functional equivalent. If the adopted LOS
standard cannot be met in the particular CSA as applied to an application for a
development permit, and if the needed capacity for the particular service area is available
in one or more contiguous CSAs, as adopted by the City, then the City may not deny an
application for site plan or final subdivision approval, or the functional equivalent for a
development or phase of a development on the basis of school concurrency, and, if
issued, development impacts shall be shifted to contiguous CSAs with schools having
available capacity.
Policy 1.3.3.5 The City will approve final development orders for residential projects, only after the
applicant has complied with the terms of the School Concurrency Ordinance.
Policy 1.3.3.6 In any instance where the DCPS, in consultation with the City, has determined that a
proposed development will cause level of service standards for schools to be exceeded
within the testing period in both the affected School Concurrency Service Area and the
adjacent School Concurrency Service areas, then the City shall coordinate with the
applicant for the proposed development and the DCPS to determine whether
improvements will be in place or under actual construction within three years after
issuance of final subdivision or site plan approval, or the functional equivalent, sufficient
to provide adequate capacity to meet the adopted level of service. If adequate capacity
does not exist, then the City will coordinate with the applicant for the development and
4530
the DCPS to determine whether improvements are planned in the Capital Improvement
Plan with adequate capacity after the 3rd year of the Capital Facilities Plan. The City will
also request that the DCPS determine whether it has the capacity to further maximize
school usage in the system to accommodate the anticipated impact without requiring the
construction of new school facilities.
After all alternatives to providing sufficient capacity to provide for the adopted level of
service are considered and determined not to be feasible, the City, the applicant and the
DCPS may: (i) enter into a mitigation agreement whereby the applicant will pay for his
proportionate share of the impacts; or (ii) some other form of acceptable mitigation will
be provided, and upon payment of the proportionate share mitigation, the developer will
be allowed to proceed with development. If no mitigation agreement can be reached that
is acceptable to all parties, and proportionate share mitigation is not feasible, then the
school capacity deficiency shall be a basis for denial of the application.
Policy 1.3.3.7 The City will issue a School Concurrency Determination only upon:
(a) Determination that adequate school capacity to serve the development (or
anticipated phase of the development which will be constructed in the first three
years) will be in place or under actual construction within 3 years after the issuance
of the final subdivision or site plan approval, or the functional equivalent; or
(b) The execution of a legally binding mitigation agreement between the applicant, the
DCPS and the City.
Policy 1.3.3.8 Where a proportionate share agreement is required, capacity shall be reserved as
specifically defined by an approved mitigation agreement between DCPS, the developer
and the City that includes a performance schedule and phased payments.
Policy 1.3.3.9
The school concurrency system shall provide that concurrency application may be applied
for and a concurrency determination made at any time prior to the issuance of a
development order.
Objective 1.3.4
Proportionate Share Mitigation
The City shall establish a procedure for coordinating with the DCPS and applicants to provide for
proportionate share mitigation in appropriate circumstances.
Policy 1.3.4.1 The City shall establish standards, procedures, and methodologies for the application of
proportionate share mitigation.
Policy 1.3.4.2 The City shall establish a procedure and methodology to assure that in the event that
there is not sufficient capacity in the affected or adjacent CSA to address the impacts of a
proposed residential development and acceptable mitigation is agreed to, the mitigation
found acceptable shall be incorporated into the final development order.
Policy 1.3.4.3 The City and DCPS shall develop a procedure and methodology to determine the
proportionate share within the CSAs.
Policy 1.3.4.4
Policy 1.3.4.5
Mitigation shall be allowed where feasible, for those developments that cannot meet the
adopted level of service standards set forth in Policy 3.1.2. The applicant shall initiate in
writing a mitigation negotiation period with the DCPS in order to establish an acceptable
form of mitigation, pursuant to Scction 163.3180(13) (c), Florida Statutes, the Cities'
School Concurrency Ordinances, and this agreement. Mitigation shall be negotiated and
agreed to by the DCPS and shall be sufficient to offset the demand for public school
facilities projected to be required by the development.
Acceptable forms of mitigation shall include but not be limited to:
(a) The donation, construction, or funding of school facilities sufficient to offset the
demand for public schools created by the proposed development such as: a developer
signs a development agreement and builds a new or improves an existing school or
schools to specifications and under a business arrangement satisfactory to the DCPS
and the city. Improvements to existing schools will only be acceptable if they add
permanent student station and associated core space capacity, if needed.
(b) Land acquisition or contribution such as: a developer signs a development agreement
or is subject to a conditional zoning requiring donation of land satisfactory to the
DCPS and the city. Land must be demonstrated to contain the minimum number of
buildable acres determined by the DCPS and the city as required for a particular
school type, as Evidenced by a report by a licensed environmental consultant
acceptable to the DCPS.
(c) Expansion of existing permanent school facilities subject to the expansion being
consistent with DCPS standards for a school of the same category;
(d) Establishment of a Charter School with facilities constructed in accordance with the
State Requirements for Educational Facilities (SREF);
(e) Mitigation banking within designated areas based on the construction of a public
school facility in exchange for the right to sell capacity credits. Capacity credits shall
be sold to developments within the same CSA or adjacent CSA;
(f) Proportionate Share mitigation as set forth in Section 163.3180(13)(c), Florida
Statutes.
By December 1st of each year, the City in coordination with DCPS, shall update its Capital
Improvement Plan to incorporate those changes made by the DCPS in its Capital Facilities
Plan and committed improvements required by development orders or other approved
mitigation plans. DCPS may accelerate the provision of one or more schools that serve the
development's capacity needs. The DCPS will update the Five-year Capital Facilities Plan
by October of each year in advance of the annual December update.
D COMPREHENSIVE PLAN — PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
Policy 1.3.4.6 Proposed mitigation must be directed toward permanent school capacity improvement
identified in or amended into the DCPS financially feasible Five -Year Capital Facilities Plan,
which satisfies the demands created by the proposed development. Relocatable
classrooms will not be accepted as or used as mitigation.
Objective 1.3.5
School Capital Facilities Planning
The City shall cooperate with the DCPS to ensure existing deficiencies and future needs are addressed with
the adopted level of service standards for public schools.
Policy 1.3.5.1 The City shall implement its school concurrency management system established pursuant
to Policies contained in Objective 1.3.2 through 1.3.4.
Policy 1.3.5.2 Consistcnt with Scction 163.3177 (12)(h), Florid: SMtdt s-tThe PSFE shall include future
condition maps showing existing and anticipated schools over the five-year or long term
planning period. The maps of necessity may be general over the long-term planning
period and do not prescribe a land use on a particular parcel of land.
4540
DEFINITIONS
Ancillary Plant — A building or facility necessary to provide district wide support services, such as energy
plant, bus garage, warehouse, maintenance building, or administrative building.
Auxiliary Facility—The spaces located at educational plants which are not designated for student occupant
stations.
Available Capacity — A factor to be used to determine school concurrency that is determined by current
permanent FISH capacity plus portables plus planned additional permanent seats plus portables over the
applicable testing period according to the CIE less current student enrollment (for testing in the current
year) or projected enrollment (for testing in year 3) based on State COFTE, adjusted to remove students
generated by projected new housing stock (see Policy 1.1.4 in the PSFE).
Capacity — The number of students that may be housed in a facility for the testing period based upon the
permanent FISH capacity calculations plus portables.
Capital Improvements — Physical assets constructed or purchased to provide, improve or replace a public
facility and which are large scale and high in cost. The cost of capital improvement is generally
nonrecurring and may require multi-year financing.
Class Size Reduction — A provision to ensure that by July 1, 2010, there are sufficient number of classrooms
in a public school so that:
(a) The maximum number of students who are assigned to each teacher in the public
classrooms for pre -kindergarten through 3rd grade does not exceed 18 students;
(b) The maximum number of students who are assigned to each teacher in the public
classrooms for 4th grade through 8th grade does not exceed 22 students; and
(c) The maximum number of students who assigned to each teacher in the public classrooms
for 9th grade through 12th grade does not exceed 25 students.
Core Facility — The cafeteria, media center, gymnasium, toilet facilities and circulation space of an
educational facility.
Concurrency — With regard to the provision of facilities and services, the assurance that the necessary
public facilities and services to maintain the City's adopted level of service standards are available when
the impacts of development occur.
Concurrency Management System — The procedures and/or process the City will use to assure that
development orders and permits when issued will not result in a reduction of the adopted level of service
standards at the time the impact of the development occurs. Applied to schools, such a process is called
a school concurrency management system. Applied to streets and highways, such a system is called a
transportation concurrency management system.
4540
Concurrency Service Areas (CSAs) — The designation of an area within which the level of service will be
measured when an application for a residential development order is reviewed.
Concurrency Requirement — A growth management tool for ensuring the availability of adequate public
facilities and services to maintain adopted levels of service necessary to accommodate the impacts of
development.
Cost per Student Station — Cost per Student Station includes all costs of providing instructional and core
capacity facilities as published in the Educational Specifications, State Requirements for Educational
Facilities (SREF), Florida Building Code and designed using the standards listed in the Facilities Services
Design Guidelines developed by the School District, including school facility construction cost, hurricane
hardening of structures, required on and off-site infrastructure costs, including land, professional fees for
architects, engineers, construction managers, design, DCPS athletic costs, buildings, equipment, furniture,
and site improvements.
Developer — Any person, including governmental agency undertaking any development.
Development Order - Means an order granting, or granting with conditions an application for a building
permit.
Development Permit — Means any building permit, zoning permit, subdivision approval, rezoning,
certification, special exception, variance, or any other official action of local government having the effect
of permitting the development of land.
Duval County Public Schools (DCPS) —The Duval County Public Schools District Educational Facilities —The
public buildings and equipment, structures, and special educational use areas that are built, installed or
established to serve educational purposes only.
Educational Facilities Work Plan — The listing of capital outlay projects for a five-year period that is
adopted by the DCPS as part of the educational facilities plan. The work plan must include a schedule of
major repair and renovation projects necessary to maintain the educational and ancillary facilities and a
schedule of capital outlay projects necessary to ensure the availability of satisfactory student stations for
the projected student enrollment in K-12 programs.
Education Plant Survey — A systematic study of educational and ancillary facilities conducted every five
years, to evaluate existing facilities, and to plan for future facilities to meet proposed program needs.
Financial Feasibility — An assurance that sufficient revenues are currently available or will be available
from committed or planned funding sources for the 5 -year capital improvements schedule.
Five -Year Capital Facilities Plan — The adopted DCPS Five -Year Work Plan and Capital Improvements
Budget as authorized by Section 1013.35, Florida Statutes.
Florida Inventory of School Houses (FISH) Capacity — The report of the permanent capacity of existing
public school facilities. The FISH capacity is the number of students that may be housed in a facility (school)
4540
at any given time based on a percentage of the total number of existing student stations and a designated
size for each school type, based on the Department of Education (DOE) formulas.
Grade Level — Pre -Kindergarten — 5th grade, 6th — 8th grade, and 9th — 12th grade.
Infrastructure — Those man-made structures which serve the common needs of the population, such as:
sewage disposal systems; potable water systems; potable water well serving a system; solid waste disposal
sites or retention areas; Stormwater systems; utilities; piers; docks; wharves; breakwaters; bulkheads'
seawalls; bulwarks; revetments; causeways; marinas; navigation channels; bridges and roadways.
Interlocal Agreement — an Agreement among the DCPS, the City, the City of Jacksonville and the other
municipalities containing the specific details of the school concurrency management system for all of
Duval County, including the establishment of a process and uniform methodology for determining
proportionate share mitigation. A school concurrency management system cannot be created by a single
local government body acting alone.
ILA Team — A committee of members representing the DCPS, the City, the Office of General Counsel, and
the Cities of Atlantic, Neptune and Jacksonville Beaches and the Town of Baldwin.
Joint Planning Committee — A committee of elected and citizen members which provides advice to the
DCPS, the Jacksonville City Council, and the other municipalities.
Level of Service (LOS) Standards — A standard established to measure utilization or capacity of a facility,
expressed as the percentage or ratio of student enrollment to the capacity of the school.
Maximized Utilization - the use of student capacity at each school to the greatest extent possible, based
on the adopted LOS and the total number of permanent student stations according to FISH inventory,
taking into considerations such as, core capacity, special programs, transportation costs, geographic
impediments, court ordered desegregation, and class size reduction requirements to prevent disparate
enrollment levels between schools of the same type and provide equitable distribution of student
enrollment district -wide.
Mitigation Banking — The means by which a residential developer or a group of developers may front the
cost of contributing land or constructing school facilities and be reimbursed by future residential
development.
Other Municipalities — The City of Atlantic Beach, City of Jacksonville Beach, City of Neptune Beach, and
the Town of Baldwin.
Permanent FISH Capacity — Permanent FISH capacity, plus portables, for each school type, based on the
utilization rate as established by the State Requirements for Educational Facilities (SREF).
Permanent Student Station — An area within a school that provides instructional space for a student, as
specified by the FISH inventory.
4540
Proportionate Share Mitigation —A developer funded improvement or contribution identified in a binding
and enforceable agreement between the developer, DCPS, and the City to provide compensation for the
additional demand on deficient public school facilities created through residential development.
Public Facilities — Major capital improvements including but not limited to, transportation, sanitary sewer,
solid waste, drainage, potable water, education, parks and recreation, health systems and facilities, and
spoil disposal sites for maintenance dredging located in the intracoastal waterways, except for spoil
disposal sites owned or used by ports listed in Section 403.021 (9)(b).
Public School Facilities Element (PSFE) — The specific details contained in the interlocal agreement must
become part of each local government's comprehensive plan. This element must be based on data and
analysis and contain goals, objectives and policies as set forth in Section 163.3177 (c) -(h), Florida Statutes.
Among other things, The Element must establish the options for proportionate share mitigation of impacts
on school facilities.
Residential Development — Any development that is comprised of dwelling units, in whole or in part, for
permanent human habitation.
School Concurrency Determination — DCPS identifying if school capacity is available to serve a residential
development project.
School Concurrency Ordinance — The legislation adopted by the City implementing its concurrency
management system.
School Type — Elementary, Middle, and High School
State Requirements for Educational Facilities (SREF) — The Florida Department of Education's standards
regulating the construction of educational facilities.
Student Generation Rate — Student Generation Rate shall be calculated for each school type by dividing
the total number public school students actually enrolled in that school type in Duval County by the
number of total housing units for the same year.
20 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN — PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
EXISTING LOCATIONS OF DCPS PUBLIC ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS
1
}
9 ❑
Miles
4 3 6 12 18 CC.ii ,.u; ii y Mai rayei iEiitAreas ■
G5
20 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN — PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
EXISTING LOCATIONS OF DCPS PUBLIC MIDDLE SCHOOLS
0 3 6
12
Miles
18
Concurency IVInagemefitAreas A
aC°
I-21
20 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN — PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
EXISTING LOCATIONS OF DCPS PUBLIC HIGH SCHOOLS
0
3
6
12
Miles
18
Concurency Management Areas *
20 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN — PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
EXIS i INV LOCATIONS OF DCPS ANCILLARY AND ADMINISTRATIVE FACILITIES
Bulls Ba
9
Regional Superintendent
Regional Superintendent V
226
(Regional Superintendent ll
regional Superintendent 1 AL
,a
(Technical HS "67' i 51Jacksonville
105
#1 J1J'iAL
Terry Parke Irf
Maintenance Station
T
13
Regional Superintendent 1
School Police
��[Maintenancetape
ndsca. Leased]
Administration Buildininsg Regional Superintendent
Shultz Cente
Maintenance Station #2 % Southside Administration]
T
i1
f
262
T
0 2 4
8
Miles • Administrative Facility
12
I-23
20 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES ELEMENT
PLANNED LOCATIONS OF DCPS PUBLIC SCHOOLS FACILITIES
Duval County Publ"hoofs
KC SABA
KS WATERLE
AAA HIGH SCHOOL
•
KS BARTRAM SPRING S
I-24
2045 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - PROPERTY RIGHTS ELEMENT
�._
No... --
J. Property Rights Element Goals, Objectives, and Policies
Goal J.1
The City will recognize and respect judicially acknowledged and constitutionally protected private
property rights in accordance with the Community Planning Act established in Chapter 163, Florida
Statutes.
Objective J.1.1
Local decision making shall be implemented and applied with sensitivity for private property rights
and shall not be unduly restrictive.
Policy J.1.1.1 The City will ensure that private property rights are considered in local decision making.
Policy J.1.1.2 The following right shall be considered in local decision making:
1. The right of a property owner to physically possess and control his or her interests in
the property, including easements, leases, or mineral rights.
2. The right of a property owner to use, maintain, develop, and improve his or her
property for personal use or for the use of any other person, subject to state law
and local ordinances.
3. The right of a property owner to privacy and to exclude others from the property to
protect the owner's possessions and property.
4. The right of a property owner to dispose of his or her property through sale or gift.
J-2
C
1
.1
litsoosis•..-..-..-..-..-..-..-..-..-..-�-..-..-..-..-..-.�� ...-..-..-..-..-..-..-..-..-..-..-..-..-..-..-...-..-..-..-■.-■.-..-.■-..- Q�
0
MAP A-1: Generalized
Land Use
City of Atlantic Beach
2040 Comprehensive Plan
Amendment Map Series
Generalized Land Use
Industrial
Institutional
Other
Parcels with no value
Public/Semi-Public
Recreation
Residential
Retail/Office
Right -of -Way
Vacant Non -Residential
Vacant Residential
City Limit
N
0.5
Updated 2023 Data Sources: FDOT (2022)
1
Miles
1 1111111 1
ME
■i
MN
1!
P-11
1
1
■
UM
M.
NI
1.1
Rix
ft
an
in
as
aw
as
i -
!1■
la.■■
..ip
i
III 1111(IIIIIIIII
1 1111111 1
1IIIIIIII
111)111
IIIIIIII
■ MEI ■■
UN Um II
■■l. e
■
h ao\v1%1141,1.1!11311I1:al
VIM
7
,1L
gum
1 .
00 00 01 MI MIMI
imam
MOM
■11►�
uuI
M l J
_I
MI6=
11111E
1111111
111/
-
-
1
1
1
1111101a a
NIP° 2
mnr�
'+ - —
1M►I Ell
:I L+
ipoVp141D 1■1■11
01■111
11111■
IBM
NE Hi
♦,�� `� �■ iiiiiiiiiiiiNE 111 ":
111!,
4� _�—IIIIMINNIMION
■....■.111■
i^r ///SII/��
►/civ
44/401/11 ii
PI D `,I��IIj�� it1
41414 4.6 i
■cif* ff.
I1•
:e
1111
X11'
1■1111
■Intl
111
1
1
TM VP AV,uIIIwanal
uIuUpMUN7
Mum mim
11►�
i1Lfr7s
1:..4....
�
olarmaialimurme;78111.11:allairalitill7:ir=ICA
:1�11111 X11111 �
lb. -mar,` •�111
::�ENmov /11
g••••■,um mm ms x_1111
ow Ela EEL ■I■■I'- .n11
i4I
1----■br■
OA 1■ ■..■ ■■■ ■u ■.■
i.
.§*
1111.
is - Ir
■■ . —
J;.low. iris 1.14Valwr
I` 1
"v
=1111y�11111 w�
1p
� ti ti•
ti 5r
=
IH
1�
11
1.1.1 .t . 1 . 1.1.1.1. 1 . 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1. 1
I 144
p'
-1. 1. 1 . t.1
I
11.11..■.■.■■
111.1■.■..
. 1 . 1 .t •1 - 1.1.1.1.1 .
!111L
Of/
Updated May 2024; Data
0
OUT
01101
111/4
■■■►
■■■■w
N.
11:
EEP
EEP
_-on
eft
moo
■.-
•
11*
1111
•
1..
tui %rim
410
11.
srA
11=
111111
nni
1110
NNW1
te
1011110101
20111010
IIIIIIIIIIII11111
0101111111110.
X IWI
x11111
NOUN
44444 4.11. ,A
I.
*IS41144
�� m..4*
yrir
4.
�� . 0$0%
��....
'JI►lic ....�...
p. 144
111
■11
..
1111111111111111111•
phIpllll
1111111111
1101111111111111111 01
111111111111111111111
1111:111111111111101_
1��%�II�� 1111 � �1
�ji1111���1111 a •
x1111111111111111: �_
��I111111111110
� 1111111111111111 ■
�� 11111II111I111h1
.,=10111111001 –
1111111111111111111 ■-
��' `IIIIIIIIIIIIIII 1•
:.,IIIIIIII111 .
oshI11�1
tIIiIUIII•
■
ow
p1
i
ma
NG
J
t.1
-
Se
1
GS
n.
�I
try -
11. ��
.
Ilia
-i 1 1 1 1 111L7
I - !"
Sources: ABGIS(20 ); C•JPA (20221; SJRWMD; USFWS; FNA,; FDEP
111
Depicting Amendments Through Ordinance Number 31-24-17
MAP A-2:
FUTURE LAND USE
MAP (FLUM)
City of Atlantic Beach
2045 Comprehensive Plan
Map Series
In the event of any conflict between any maps
and the text of the Comprehensive Plan, the text
of the Comprehensive Plan shall control.
Future Land Use Designations
Residential Low Density (RL)
Up to six (6) dwelling units per acre
Residential Medium Density (RM)
Up to fourteen (14) dwelling units per acre
Residential High Density (RH)
Up to twenty (20) dwelling units per acre
Conservation (CON)
Recreation/Open Space (R/0)
Public/Semi-Public (P/SP)
Central Business District (CBD)
Marsh Oaks Business District
Saltair Business District
Commercial (CM)
Light Industrial (L/I)
Coastal Construction Control Line
Areas designated as Conservation are approximate;
Exact boundaries to be determined by environmental survey
E 0 0.25
0.5
Miles
1
1
o
MAP A-3:
Vacant Parcels
City of Atlantic Beach
2040 Comprehensive Plan
Amendment Map Series
0
Vacant Parcels
Does not include parcels classified as "waste land"
by the property appraiser or land classified as vacant
but now has active construction on the site.
0.5 1
Updated 2023 Data Sources: ABGIS, COJPAO(2023),
AB Building Department Permit Data
Miles
N.NN - INNI.
pp1pp11 i .. 111
I[ 1
iiiim'
.iii =ll :ia1
11 1111 11 Li
' iI
s'1
MOWER 1
ri II: II hid r/64: 11:1111111111 1111 1,111 1111111: ftI I 1:11 IF A
lig-,vg Mae
=M1 I =
-eft sew -_=
itjjf.
a.
NNN
10.
_M SSE
_sr 4111111WaI1
N.. N En NE
�%t 1111111111111
<11114
111110.' 6116 alr 4.4 WM
•
tumuli= ra
b, �w•••••,•��••••� mom
LILY•
sp A
:ign_
S
aL.:ip.
INI
Si
_' 6
iffirt
Anima
=r
4 IlirmintuadISM
402_44118881111.1Th
.8.1.11: Mr* *
num 4
i••ummerviamifinamt
leatemiti
14144.4 MU gamma A
4.44 r 4%76
1j1111111:11:101:11.1
mg
44111114 ittfirtpard 411 S
tairiero
N
0111111111110
11110111111111111
51111111111111111116
insumustima
tonsussifinten
tinsummust
saustentesse
1011111111111111111111
1111011111111111115
stonsussigs
samossissas
0111111111111111112
11011111111111
1111111111111111
11101111101
11111110110
2111111111111
0116112
INNIS
100110151
Tossosse
rossestes
001111111116
Sffiginesi
14 11 IN
H
MAP A-4:
Environmentally
Sensitive Areas
City of Atlantic Beach
2040 Comprehensive Plan
Amendment Map Series
Habitat Areas
Estuarine and Marine Wetland
Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland
Estuarine and Marine Deepwater
Coastal Construction Control Line
Habitat areas identified by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation
Commission include those for Loggerhead Sea Turtle, Atlantic Sturgeon,
Shortnose Sturgeon, Stone Crab, Caribbean Spiny Lobster, Brown Shrimp, Blue
Crab, Pink Shrimp, and White Shrimp.
Wetland and habitat areas identified in this map should be used
for general reference, not for legal purposes or detailed analysis.
Local determinations always require field inspection.
N
0 0.25 0.5 1
Map updated February, 2023. Wetland data from the US FWS (2022). Habitat data from FWC (2022). CCCL data from FDEP. Parcel data from 2020 COJ PAO layer. Miles
V 11111 11
1111111111/
1(11ti1111111;
Opt
•
•
1111
atv
maul
4 mann,140"li
111:11
sra
�II��IIIIIIIIINslum xi:'AA* jra. WNW %ArsWIMP
nnl11111111L eni 11014' moue
0
0
1
1
1
1
n
0
CDn
Wetland data is from SJRWMD 2014 Land Use Land Cover data. Parcel data from 2020 COJ PAO layer.
MAP A-5:
Wetlands
(SJRWMD)
City of Atlantic Beach
2040 Comprehensive Plan
Amendment Map Series
Land Classification
��A Wetlands
Water
Wetland Classification
Mixed Wetland Hardwoods
Wetland Forested Mixed
Freshwater Marshes
Saltwater Marshes
Mixed Scrub -Shrub Wetland
Wetlands identified in this mpa should be used for general
reference, not for legal purposes or detailed analysis.
Local determinations always require field inspection.
N
0 0.25 0.5
1
Miles
•
1
i
i
Stff
. =...1..
MI= 1311;.;
11111121114
Nig to
sow
316
Updated 2018 Data Sources: ABGIS, COJPAO, US Navy
MAP A-6: MILITARY
INFLUENCE ZONE
City of Atlantic Beach
2040 Comprehensive Plan
Amendment Map Series
Mayport Naval Station
Air Field
Military Flight Tracks
Accident Potential Zone
/7/ Noise Zone
Military Installation Area
Military Influence Zone
City of Atlantic Beach Boundary
0 0.5 1
2
Miles
I I
►
m\e„,
�o r�
1
1
i
••
Ipw
1 a--
•
MEM
■i ;
pCEANW ALQb�
•
O
.m
.:r== I
.,
_ _ o
i�pd�'u n -u -n `�
GI 0
\
1
1 I
0
a
EE
!;
j'a
o
1,1%11-11 i•
Emommoommemomm•iaiNamliiiiaaiL; Emma
STWART ST
MEMORIAL JR
LEVY RD
_ a
� . z
SE=J
- FJ I
a...
ANTI
•
u
IASMINE Sl
:AMELIA S-
0)
DUDLEY ST
LEWIS ST
ROBERT ST
EDGAR ST
LEVY RD
11/
0,37- Wesr /3TH
wesTpL
�A
MMCRSL'L•r
AMBERJACK LN
BONITA RD
NM
ME
ME
REDFIN DR
O
v z .p segs
O Z X p\l
A 7 r O
A z
0
p VECUNA RD
z
N
0
m
0
A
PLAZA
I/ih/Nes
`� e
0 5
11TH ST
10TH ST
4TH ST
8TH ST
7TH ST
6TH ST
Q.
5TH ST
4TH ST
3RD ST
2ND ST
1ST ST
STURDIVANTAV AHERN
1
1
1
MAP A-7:
ENERGY EFFICIENT &
CONSERVATION ZONES
City of Atlantic Beach
2040 Comprehensive Plan
Amendment Map Series
Associated Land Uses
Residential High Density
Central Business District
Conservation
Recreation/Open Space
Community Connectivity
Regional Transit Routes
El Bus Stops
Accessibility
1/4 Mile Buffer
1/2 Mile Buffer
0 0.25 0.5
Updated August, 2018 Data Sources: ABGIS, COJPAO, JTA
Miles
Soil data from National Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), 2021. Parcel data from 2020 property appraiser layer.
aTi
t'► ▪ ' _ Intercoastal Waterway
•
C
C
C
_i IMP
0
0
N
01
O
01
• 1 .IIIA
1 111.1
4001- 0,
• /f
r`II
(7))
�� '_
.,INNNe
4 NV1 NV8H fl
"Jim mm 11_
maw =
1111111. ■•=
A�1ri•
/11
"4 1111111'
r
11,11/1
1
C
O H
D G)
m
OHl8SllOd
z
r =
O z
..I
0*0*
11
111
111111
I L L_
VIM
imairingeok
MIR
Oa V
mar ■_',
Ir/ �I��III�IIII� mIl�irl�inl111111"°�IIIIIIII�IIIII IIII�'llllll■+
�IIIIIIlIIIIIIIIIII Illi�lnlllllll�lllll
1111111 .._.._.._.._.._..
NIHV4NVW
N8AVH NNA-1
0
z
C
m
co
ueeo j 3l.JUelJd
8NVOI2:12:1f1H
BNOO1f1O8
SBHOV88
F',
2
o
3:J o0 �?
m CD r�1.
Q O O
:::!1
CD
CT)
cl)
(Ip (1)
Data from FL Department of Emergency Management (FDEM).
Parcel data from 2020 property appraiser data.
0)
MAP A-9:
Contour Elevations
City of Atlantic Beach
2040 Comprehensive Plan
Amendment Map Series
Contour Elevations
p 30 ft
CD 22 ft
v
z 14 ft
6 ft
0 0.25 0.5
1
Miles
Q)
MAP B-1:
Roadway
Functional
Classification
City of Atlantic Beach
2040 Comprehensive Plan
Amendment Map Series
Functional Classification
o
Principal Arterial
q)
z Minor Arterial
Major Collector
Minor Collector
Local
-••-••-••-••-••• City Boundary
0
0.5 1
Updated November, 2023 Data Sources: ABGIS, FDOT
Miles
i
1
i
4
4
Q)
0
CDn
MAP B-2:
Roadway
Context
Classification
City of Atlantic Beach
2040 Comprehensive Plan
Amendment Map Series
FDOT Context Classification
Urban General (C4)
Suburban Commercial (C3C)
FDOT's context classification of roadways is used to plan and
design roadways in greater harmony with the surroundnig land use
characteristics. The context classification assigned to a roadway
helps identify anticipated users of a roadway and is used to inform
key design elements such as design speeds, lane widths, and
pedestrian and bicycle facilities. The classification system includes:
C1 -Natural
C2 -Rural
C2T-Rural Town
C3R-Suburban Residential
C3C-Suburban Commercial
C4 -Urban General
C5 -Urban Center
C6 -Urban Core
0
0.5 1
Updated February, 2023 Data Sources: ABGIS, FDOT
Miles
City of Jacksonville
City of Atlantic Beach
City of Neptune Beach
sJ Access Control
Classification for
MAP B-3:
State Roads
Data from the FL Department of Transportation
The FDOT Access Control Classification
relects the desired access management
standards to be followed in each classification.
These are standards for restrictive medians,
median opening separations, and driveway
separation. The ranges are from 00 to 07, with
01 being the highest amount of access
management control (freeways) and 07 usually
found on suburban built -out corridors.
�._.._.i City Boundary
Access Control Classification
03
04
05
06
0 0.25 0.5
Miles
N
Updated 2023 Data Sources: ABGIS, FDOT
z
0
0
(D
MAP B-4:
PEDESTRIAN
AND BICYCLE
FACILITIES
City of Atlantic Beach
2040 Comprehensive Plan
Amendment Map Series
Pedestrian & Bicycle Facilities
0
Shared Use Path
Sidewalk
Paddling Trails
Programmed Improvements
Park/Preserve
0.5 1
Updated 2023 Data Sources: ABGIS, COJPAO, FDOT
Miles
.
•
Groundwater Recharge Priority (FNAI)
Priority 1- HIGHEST
Priority 2
Priority 3
Priority 4
Priority 5
Priority 6
8
i
i
i
i
i
i
i•
oa)
o •
O
MAP C-1:
Potable
Water Wells
City of Atlantic Beach
2040 Comprehensive Plan
Amendment Map Series
Public Water Well
/// Wellhead Protection Area
0 Private Wells within Wellhead Protection Area
FDEP
WACS Solid Waste Facilities
O Storage Tank Contamination Monitoring Site
o Petroleum Contamination Monitoring Sites
• Large Generator of Hazardous Waste
• Hazardous Waste Facilities
0 Environmental Restoration Cleanup Site Activities
Brownfield Areas
0 0.25 0.5 1
Updated February, 203. Data from ABGIS; COJPAO (2020); Public and private well data from FDEP, FDOH, and AB Utility. Environmental hazard site data from FDEP. Miles
Recharge Priority data from FL Natural Areas Inventory (FNAI)
Sewer treatment
only in Mayport Village
Legend
Sewer Plant
Water Plant
Roads
City Limit
Mayport Village
Service Area
g Atlantic Beach
Outside City Limits
�I
Int
,;11
rpt li
annwarlossi
117
nin ` 1111 w a�
1•4, � I� is
4A TIC �'''• _:r
Atlantic Beach, Florida
Geographical Information System
Public Works Department
-ter
zoo Sandpiper Ln
Atlantic Beach, FL 32233
www.coab.us Ph: 904.247.5834
AT
0 0.25 0.5
l i i i l
Miles
Atlantic Beach Utility
Service Area
Data from FDEM, published August, 2021. Parcel data from 2020 property appraiser data.
MAP D-1:
Coastal High
Hazard Area
City of Atlantic Beach
2040 Comprehensive Plan
Amendment Map Series
The Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA) is the area below the elevation
of the category 1 storm surge line as established by a Sea, Lake, and
Overland Surges from Hurricanes (SLOSH) computerized storm surge
model. [163.3178(2)(h), F.S.]
I w
Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA)
Evacuation Routes
Storm Surge Zone
lb Mil
HURRICANE CATEGORY 1 STORM SURGE ZONE
HURRICANE CATEGORY 2 STORM SURGE ZONE
HURRICANE CATEGORY 3 STORM SURGE ZONE
HURRICANE CATEGORY 4 STORM SURGE ZONE
HURRICANE CATEGORY 5 STORM SURGE ZONE
This map depicts storm surge zones created using a Surge Modeling
application created for the Florida Statewide Regional Evacuation Update
Study. The data was derived from National Hurricane Center SLOSH
model runs on all the NOAA SLOSH basins throughout Florida.
0 0.25 0.5 1
Miles
Q)
0
0
0
•
Updated October, 2022; Data Sources: ABGIS; COJPAO; FDEM
MAP D-2:
Evacuation Zones
City of Atlantic Beach
2040 Comprehensive Plan
Amendment Map Series
Evacuation zones are based on factors including wave action,
precipitation, and areas known to flood and are classified on a
lettering system, with A, B, C, D, E, and F zones. The areas located
in Evacuation Zone A are the most vulnerable to the factors listed
above and will be the first to be evacuated.
0 0.25
Evacuation Zone A
Evacuation Zone B
Evacuation Routes
0.5 1
Miles
4104,14
9d
LI" ral °ft
::
II
we wil
.10
.1 loi 44
:.�
• .74 11 Imiti:ilittelaStriEJVAIras
- Yll
:till 4:611141/
.i' ' Tia hilibnallat Ms
4,40420,44;*w
ti eI
R
-,-i,ifilairalliii171111:11-111111111111111:1
won
iftissisuil
Min
$HU""
mum
7 ....filt: lillit y
ow Ma go inn
d
1:14:::::::7losiii: steltiri t stri 4 irpli1 i i 4 ;17 y Art +;•1 \1\i el,
iliiiiili
11111000111
'rpt ii,... it*4
is** ivar i xi :11011101.
6141,. 4 weal.., 4
n
0
Lir& Mit Ns: pa All
‘........
/IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
( IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII \
111111111111'
IIIIIIIIIII 1
Ai
mommojUi
Updated August, 2018; Data Sources: ABGIS; COJPAO; NOAA
MAP D-3:
Shallow Coastal
Flooding Areas
City of Atlantic Beach
2040 Comprehensive Plan
Amendment Map Series
Low -Lying Areas
0 Feet
1 Foot
2 Feet
3 Feet
4 Feet
5 Feet
6 Feet
0
Shallow Coastal Flooding Areas
This layer of the map shows areas identified by the National
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) as shallow
coastal areas prone to frequent flooding.
0.25 0.5 1
Miles
—6\
66
......._......._....._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.a
6
4'
8
13
Parcel data from 2020 property appraiser data. Flood Information is from FEMA. Based on FEMA FIRM effective November, 2018.
MAP D-4:
FEMA Flood Zones
City of Atlantic Beach
2040 Comprehensive Plan
Amendment Map Series
Flood Zone
A
AE
VE
X
1
Floodway
0.2 PCT Annual Chance Flood Hazard
Base Flood Elevation (BFE)
Limited Wave Action (LIMWA)
City Boundary
0 0.25 0.5
1
Miles
Intercoastal Waterway
E(115111I 11
ii•111ii1111111 niiiiii
111111
[111111
11.\n.■
1 I
I 1
::
::
:E 1111111111111
WWIMO
I 1
:'
Wow
Sem
-rr■■■.
•
i
[
•
•
111
MN
EN
..
■ MIEN
•
(7)■
slur
.u1�
a
mir
yam::
T.. in ,l
■
ie
WWI
nun►_ a=
gunman r•
1111111111
I I
en osmom
s� t
Erbil
nuigL
NEM _
NAM
ilft't' 1111
1Ci�.: mn e
murrt
r.a
111 111111
111111111
11
1 -
1�
1=
�.
11
Ina
ill
Hot ii'
��►�717
1.�m
�• j��..��
.410.1 mi
111,1414.1.4%;74
sew N.L. Nary
aims,7:.., ""
:.
.,,„, ow,.
��_ my -romerp„.
X•
n�■IIII� ��i
..■MImim•mp �,
L
�"•.gym■•■i m�■111►•i.ss en asin am jam asE
•
•
1111
111
4.4 :i
irtikas
111111
VIIIA$
•
.. 11111111114"
!MP
=gums
hfflddiui �pnm
moil= _►1 H■Intl \1r 7 �.
�►11i -- ILS
■►►IM
i1`I�i/
P.
•
....::::••
•
•••
•
iiWM
gm WM sig
Ac
J,1Nam
■\.
0111
•�
■
VW
jIMP
NEIL
111111
•
■-
11-M
111
.1n,
•
:n\
1
ni
EIEP
EEP
li®
1•
Eatu
mos
woo
11111 no
1►g.
'till
►m
7i15
Am_
mut
11111
SS
orE
1
111
1111111
►n9
1111•1
SOU $$
Vol
0121
1
now a.
us
Gn
O1=
silt;Es
i-� �■; 1/I��Ij7/`I U f
I— 0du 4141141,11
/41/ —_
;■ ■111 -�11's 41411,4,11-WilorIr ! .114111
1� ���11�.1►111
•rrrr�
J
m
J1�
E' -
1
IMO
1u1
mum
1im
►IS
0
■
OE
i►
n
Uri
■
11
Uti
►►C
Q)
0
0
Q)
Projected
Sea Levels
City of Atlantic Beach
2040 Comprehensive Plan
Amendment Map Series
Projected Sea Level
Current Mean Higher High Water
Sea Level 2044
Sea Level 2069
City Boundary
Projections utilized the NOAA 201 7 Intermediate High Sea Level Rise
projection curve for the NOAA tide gauge station at Mayport, FL.
Projections from the COAB Coastal Vulnerability Assessment, updated 2021. Parcel data from 2020 property appraiser data. Current MHHW is from NOAA. Miles
o °e
ep
R•
4
It7
a va
\III r1I
111111r r11ti1111'1 1111
•
1
1I
111111
(111111_111J
/ '\mini ..
• U•UUUI= nnum 1111111
1.......
1
111
b
•
aye o
•
•y.
P,
P'
■ ■■ 1111•
■
a;
)Ir
\IIIIIIIIIIIr)
1mega
■
'ni�_ L
1 7'♦ • bQ\\11I11I_I11 \Ra�Iptie'
`;,40041 ;► . Ii I I. 1111
la. 014
1111
0
_.._.��.Y�.._
1
1
1
1
1
0
ro
a'
O
,
a
aL
1(3
i40
i
ii
.1111.
111111
.1111
\1111
�-
11111
vL
t1,Egaviig
■
•
al
✓ O
V IF
Co
4111:11:1411111:411111111 E9d ��4141
jy*s i
ip• :Xi p::
r1'''ii& o
‘,..44.-4 - i Minn
v111 4 5+
\ir i . 1111
�7�,,, ._ 1MIMISM p. -n II II 0
rte! k OE Het %11111
0.' 1 :. ■i■ ■111 ■■1 JA ■
WI
Yrs
i a ...
1
•
1
\1/
11/4
- .-q11111141
•
1t►�
■
mlpaa• 19
mIIIIIIII
II II 111111111
111111-
1111111
111.111
Fr
1111
i
T.
rviers-Mt 1
t 1 =r UNN f�j.wing
ILL A1i
Rl noet
r
Ili A IMO!, 'ViM
140
-'x1M1111-rtle 0.15!�.
ri fa
UMnil .411 W 1
J ==l-- ,s,
'i t N lei E:
J11_ii is
i_.-d_GEALMr
__1■1�
"1I�
4110'
S
Q111r
m1 ■ .r
■
{ �la
. ▪ ▪ i
i♦ Yi
V.
st
la
ik 41 s 411 MI
�4
111 r
�
•r A i
inte; 4114e 04
B 4
•'•
40
.1, �c t I1
i
1 NE J1� •.
fri
Y '.., l:/
+Jsi
,.
� nn■r,' IIS' =;=
411/
ip 1111►► 1"
Dam.
11
visaumumna
rni
:T'.1:f4f411;141;
::":7111"
�i; I1MEM
® a Iii
iiiiiiMUNI*
IIII{IIiI_ _._. anlp ■.{lll{II■I{Illll{
-is 4a■.i
1
MAP D -5c:
Projected Flood
Hazard Areas
City of Atlantic Beach
2040 Comprehensive Plan
Amendment Map Series
Projected Special Flood
Hazard Area (SENA)
Current (FEMA)
2044
2069
City Boundary
Projections utilized the 2018 FEMA Flood Insurance Study for
Duval County, NOAA 2017 SLR projections, and site-specific
modeling using FEMA's CHAMP V2 model suite, including the
FEMA Wave Height Analysis for Flood Insurance Studies
(WHAFIS) overland wave propagation model. See the COAB
Coastal Vulnerability Assessment for more info.
N
0 0.25 0.5
1
Projections prodouced by ATM Engineering, updated 2021. Parcel data from 2020 property appraiser data. Current SFHA layer is from 2018 FEMA FIRM. Miles
SEBAGO AV S
h - BOCA GRANDE AV
y
GREEN CAYAV
MONTREAL ST
SPOKANE AV E
TRENTON CT
CYPRESS LANDING DR
COVE LANDING DR
Dutton Island
Preserve
i
/
/
/
1
/
i 1
f jpi
� �y O
! � !_
1 1ST ST W
.•M.,�►,R•• _.._..,max►Ian,—.._.._..'U._.''75'tr25.._..,�t.,«���.._.._.._.. �.75_.._.._.._..1.._.._.._
10.••O'grt - - Miles
BEGONIA ST
1-
N
z
2
WINDRIFT LA
MEMORIAL DR
W PLAZA
JASMINE ST
CAMELIA ST
ASSISI LA
RUDDER RD
1
11 m
VEGA CR
•
7Zo
20
JOHN'S CREEK t
BUCCANEER TR' Q
• Q
iQ
Ce
BLUE AV i
J >J DILLARD RD
N
Q -
J
HARVEL L
14TH ST W
STOCKS ST
MEALY ST S
LEVY RD
cn
O
Ur
0 9jysTll
DUDLEY ST
LEWIS ST
ROBERT ST
EDGAR ST
FRANCIS AV
JACKSON RD
DONNth'h'U
ABCC
Golf Course
SAILFISH DR N
BONITA RD
lamas, MN Wimillaim°61M10.1•1811.061
SARAT OG0 CR N
0
A
0
Di
m
2
0
r
z
N
0
m
0
D
T
fA
2
O
m
CAVAL LA RD
3
aC
73.0
Kathryn Abbey
Hannah Park
OCEANWALK DR S
COLINA CT
2IG A I I3HS H1HON
HICKORY LA
19TH ST
PALMW 00D
l
SELVA GRANDE DR
FIDDLERS LA
20TH ST
SEA OATS DR
•
1
•
SEMINOLE RD
SATURIBA DR
I.A
77 73
x
it
m A A
m
SEA OATS DR
co
D
n
•
'17TH SS
4LL �'jb
COUNTRY CLUB LA
15TH S7
12TH ST
117H ST
10TH ST
9THST�
PLAZA ��+J
6TH S7
LMAV
1
1\m
4TH S7
3RD ST
A
7TH S7
z
O
n
cb
z
•
•
•
CLUB DR
6TH ST
STURDIVANT AV
ei
5TH S
ro
D
co 0 1
0
o
- I
A
2ND
1ST ST 1ST ST
AHERN S7
City of Atlantic Beach
Parks and rails
1. Atlantic Beach Dog Park MI
2. Bull Memorial Park
3. Donner Park
4. Dutton Island
IDIeI
04§
Preserve e ra�
5. Fairway Villas Park
6. Frazier Park
7. Howell Park
8. Jack Russell Park
9. Johansen Park
10. Jordan Park
11. Marvin's Garden
110,
s
v
12. River Branch Preserve 121
EZ
OD CI
13. Rose Park
14. Rose Dog Park
15. Selva Preserve
16. Tide Views Preserve
17. Veterans Park
18. Waters Park
• Ampitheatre
® Baseball
Basketball
Grills
Multi -use Field
121 Picnic Shelter
ElConcession fPlayground
O Fishing ra Kayak Launch
Multi -use Path
10 ME
Racquetball
2
Restrooms
Eli Skate Park
111 Tennis/Pickleball
Beach Access