524 Vikings Ln Arborist Letter 4.28.25 AW—Jim
Joe Musgrove
ISA Certified Arborist®
FL-9674A
Joe.lucastreera)amail.com
(904)887-1492
January 24, 2025
Agnes Sharkey
524 Vikings Ln.
Atlantic Beach,F132233
In Re: Certified Arborist letter
To Whom it May Concern:
Upon inspection of the property,I found two Maple trees that should be removed.The trees
pose an unnecessary risk to person or property. Both trees are completely dead. They are full of
dead rotted branches. The trees are growing next to the road and branches are starting to fall and
land in the street.The trees are very hazardous to the surrounding property and should be removed,
If you have any questions or concerns,please feel free to contact me.
Best regards,
zj!�Toel&lu ove'
Joe Musgrove
ISA. Bask Tree Risk Assessment Form
Client &&t_5 3 �kt 9 Date t,4L ag 'Z t ' Time
Address/Tree location 572 t( Vi k- 2f 44 _ Tree no. Sheet of
Tree species d-AAAl q dbh S,�^'A Height 30 AF Crown spread dia. d��✓
Assessor(s)_ '744 NIKTime frame Tools used il�Sum,
Target Assessment
Target zone
Occupancy
srate
E $a 3 = 1-rare °
i Target description •ay [- 2-occasional
1 3—frequent a 4
N
N 4-constantF
a` £ a
2
3
4
Site Factors
History of failures Topography Flat[] Slope❑ % Aspect
Site changes None❑ Grade change❑ Site clvariig anged soil hydrology Root cuts❑ Describe
Soil conditions Limited volume❑ Saturated , I Compacted❑ Pavement over roots[] % Describe
Prevailing wind direction Common weather Strong winds 1:1 Ice Snow❑ Heavy rain 11 Describe
'free Health and Species Profile
Vigor Low❑ Normal ❑ High❑ Foliage None(seasonal)❑ None(dead Normal % Chlorotic % Necrotic %
Pests Abiotic
Species failure profile Branches❑ Trunk[] Roots[] Describe e 5 Cl.,
Load Factors
Wind exposure Protected❑ Partial❑ Full❑ Wind funneling❑ Relative crown size Small❑ Medium❑ Large❑
Crown density Sparse❑ Normal❑ Dense❑ Interior branches Few❑ Normal❑ Dense❑ Vines/Mistletoe/Moss❑
Recent or planned change in load factors
Tree Deflects and Conditions Affecting the Lllzel hcaod of Failure
—Crown and Branches —
Unbalanced crow LCR % Cracks❑ Lightning damage❑
Dead twigs/branches�'6 /overall Max.dia. Codominant❑ Included bark❑
Broken/Hangers Number Max.dia.
Weak attachments ❑ Cavity/Nest hole o�circ.
Over-extended branches ❑
Previous branch failures ❑ Similar branches present❑
Pruning history
Crown cleaned ❑ Thinned ❑ Raised ❑ Dead/Missing bark ❑ Cankers/Galls/Burls ❑ Sapwood damage/decay El
Reduced ❑ Topped ❑ Lion-tailed ❑ Conks ❑ Heartwood decay ❑
Flush cuts ❑ Other Response growth
Main concern(s) _rA4 T) (40A W_ _
Load on defect N/A❑ Minor ❑ Moderate❑ Significant❑
Likelihood of failure Improbable ❑ Possible❑ Probable ❑ Imminent ❑
—Trunk— —Roots and Root Collar—
Dead/Missing bark ❑ Abnormal bark texture/color❑ Collar buried/Not visible❑ Depth Stem girdling❑
Codominant stems ❑ included bark❑ Cracks❑ Dead ❑ Decay❑ Conks/Mushrooms❑
Sapwood damage/decay❑ Cankers/Galls/Burls❑ Sap ooze ❑ Ooze ❑ Cavity❑ %circ.
Lightning damage❑ Hea ood decay❑ Conks/Mushrooms❑ Cracks❑ Cut/Damaged ro is ance from trunk
Cavity/Nest hole ° Depth Poor taper❑ Root plate lifting❑ wea Hess❑
Lean ect d.
Response gro th Response owth
Main concer (s) Main co ern(s)
i
Load on defect N/A❑ Minor❑ Moderate❑ Significant❑ Load on defect N/A❑ Minor❑ Moderate❑ Significant❑
Likelihood of failure Likelihood of failure
Improbable 0 Possible❑ Probable 0 Imminent❑ Improbable❑ Possible 11 Probable 0 Imminent 13
SBasic Tree Risk Assessment Form 30
Client Amus Sll� Date LSM N WS Time
Address/Tree location Shy �r�� c_ L,�'1 Tree no. Sheet of
Tree species (?-u/1 dbh Height 3GAt e Crown spread dia.
Assessor(s) lVl"J.:�/•-� Time frame Tools used iJ�3�ti
Target Assessment
Target zone
Occupancy +
a ° t x
F'� c m •— H,� ;p rate
*0 E °"mm
: 1—rare
x 2—occasionalTarget description c c
m
'n 3—frequent
'4 4—constant 0. E aW ELT
1 r4
z Of
3
4
Site Factors
History of failures Topography Flat❑ Slope❑ % Aspect
Site changes None❑ Grade change❑ Site clearing❑ Can d soil hydrology❑ Root cuts❑ Describe
Soil conditions Limited volume❑ Saturated❑ SI w o npacted❑ Pavement over roots❑ % Describe
i direction Common we t5 her Strong winds ice Snow Heavy rain Describe
Prevailing wind tt g y
Tree stealth and Species Profile
Vigor Low❑ Normal ❑ High❑ Foliage None(seasonal)❑ None(dead)❑ Normal % Chlorotic % Necrotic %
Pests _F1
Abiotic
Species failure profile Branches❑ Trunk❑ Roots❑ Describe " '-q `r5
Load Factors
Wind exposure Protected❑ Partial❑ Full❑ Wind funneling❑ Relative crown size Small❑ Medium❑ Large❑
Crown density Sparse❑ Normal❑ Dense❑ Interior branches Few❑ Normal❑ Dense❑ Vines/Mistletoe/Moss❑
Recent or planned change in load factors
Tree Defects and CorKlitions Affecting the Likelihood of Failure
—Crown and Branches—
FDeadtwigs/branchesK
ed crown[� LCR % Cracks ❑ _ Lightning damage❑
—%overall Max,dia. Codominant❑ Included bark❑
ngers Number Max.dia. a
Weak attachments ❑ Cavity/Nest hole %circ.
Over-extended branches ❑
Previous branch failures ❑ Similar branches present❑
Pruning history
Crown cleaned ❑ Thinned ❑ Raised ❑ Dead/Missing bark❑ Cankers/Galls/Burls 11Sapwood damage/decay❑
Reduced ❑ Topped ❑ Lion-tailed ❑ Conks ❑ Heartwood decay ❑
Flush cuts ❑ Other !, Response growth
Main concern(s) Tif-.q 4 d"A-d
Load on defect N/A❑ Minor ❑ Moderate❑ Significant❑
Likelihood of failure Improbable❑ Possible 13 Probable ❑ Imminent 1:1
—Trunk— — Roots and Root Collar—
Dead/Missing bark ❑ Abnormal bark texture/color❑ Collar buried/Not visible❑ Depth Stem girdling❑
Codominant stems ❑ Included bark❑ Cracks❑ Dead ❑ Decay❑ Conks/Mushrooms❑
Sapwood damage/decay❑ CVnkerG /Burls❑ Sap ooze ❑ Ooze ❑ Cavity %circ.
Lightning damage❑ Heartwoy onks/Mushrooms❑ Cracks❑ Cut/Da age ro s Distance from trunk
Cavity/Nest hole % c. Poor taper❑ Root plate lift' ❑ nets❑
Lean ° Corrected?
Response growth Response g owth
Main concern(s) Main concern(s)
L�LZelrihood
d n defect N/A❑ Minor❑ Moderat ❑ Significant❑ Load on defect N/A❑ Minor❑ Moderate❑ Significant❑
of failure Likelihood of failure
able❑ Possible❑ Proba�03
Imminent❑
Improbable Possible❑ Probable❑ Imminent❑