Loading...
165 Sherry Drive - Arborist Letter 10.13.2025 RIA ) 4 Basic Tree Rise Assessment Form Client "tE F :; ,, i' Date t CF , t Time - 4 Address/Tree location Tree no. Sheet of Trees ecies dbh �::•, Height= Hei ..� � Crown spread dia. a �. r Assessors) Tools used irrae frarn a T e w Target Assessment ITargetzone Occupancy „ v rate ! ,-rare et description target protection m °_=' r- 0 a x 2-occasional v U I -o .q�-t y��p 4 3-frequent v 2 b•" *^"a' 4-x "}t•; ; l 'S""F f fN�J FBF I i Site Factors History of failures1,_� --- _ Topography Flat Slope❑ __ % Aspect Site changes None 0"Grade change ElSite clearing❑ Changed soil hydrology ElRoot cuts El Describe________ Soil conditions Limited volume❑ Saturated❑ Shallow❑ Compacted q,-Pavement over roots❑ % Desr_ribe_� t,j`. ,, r � Prevailing wind direction t' ,- Common weather Strong winds ffvlce❑ Snow❑ Heavy rain❑ Describe Tree Health and Species Profile _ %ligor Low❑ Normal' E High❑ Foliage None(seasonal)Ef None(dead)❑ Normal % Chlorotic % Necrotic Bests/Biotic Abiotic Species failure profile Branches El'Trunk❑ Roots❑ Describe - Load Factors vVind exposure Protected❑ Partial❑ 170❑ Wind funneling❑ _ Relative crown size Small❑ Medium❑ Large❑ Crowndensity Sparse❑ Normal[] Dense[] Interior branches Few❑ Normal❑ Dense❑ Vines/Mistletoe/Mass❑ Recent or expected change in load factors J Tree Defects and Conditions Affecting the Likelihood of Failure —Crown and Branches .� rUnbalanced crown❑ LCR % Cracks ❑ _ Lightning damage ❑ Dead twigs/branches❑ %overall Max.dia. Codominant❑ included bark❑ Broken/Hangers Number i Max.dia. Over-extended branches ❑ Weak attachments El _ _ Cavity/Nest hole%circ. Pruning history Previous branch failures❑ Similar branches present❑ Crown cleaned ❑ Thinned ❑ Raised ❑ Dead/Missing baric❑ Cankers/Galls/Burls❑ Sapwood damage/decay❑ Reduced ❑ Topped ❑ Lion-tailed ❑ Conks ❑ Heartwood decay ❑ f Flush cuts ❑ Other Response growth Condition(s)of concern Part Size Fall'Distance Part Size Fall Distance Load on defect N/A❑ Minor ❑ Moderate❑ Significant❑ Load on defect: N/A❑ Minor ❑ Moderate❑ Significant❑ Likelihood of failure Improbable C] Possible El Probable ❑ Imminent ❑ Likelihood of failure Improbable❑ Possible 11 Probable ❑ Imminent❑ f —Trunk � Roots arses Root Collar— ;( Dead/Missing bark ❑ Abnorrnal bark texture/color❑ Collar buried/Not visible F Depth Stem girdling❑ Codominant stems ❑ included bark❑ Cracks❑ { Dead ❑ Decay❑ Conks/Mushrooms❑ Sapwood damage/decay❑ Can ❑ Sap ooze ❑ Ooze ❑ Cavity❑ %circ. Lightning damage❑ Heal wood decay Conks/Mushrooms❑ Cracks❑ Cut/Damaged roots❑ Distance from trunk Cavity/Nest hole %circ. Depth Poor taper❑ l Root plate lifting❑ Lean___' Corrected? _ r p g Soil weakness❑ Response growth Response growth Condition(s)of concern Condition(s)of concern Part Size Fall Distance Part Size Fall Distance Load on defect N/A❑ Minor ❑ Moderate❑ Significant❑ Load on defect N/A❑ Minor ❑ Moderate❑ Significant❑ Likelihood of failure Improbable❑ Possible Probable ❑ Imminent❑ J Likelihood of failure Improbable❑ Possible❑ Probable ❑ Imminent❑ Pavr I of 2 Risk Categorization " Likelihood FailureUmpact Consequences Failure impact (from MaIrix 1) or descripiot�� of concern o 2 Risk Matrix/,Likelihood matrix. Likelihood Likelihood of Impact Failure Very Low-- Medium High ^ —11--Mil.t Unlikely Somewhat likely Likely Very likely Probable Unlikely Unlikely Somewhat likely Likely Possible Unjjj�g]V Unlikely Unlikely Sornewhat likely Unlikely Unlikely ' / - _ rmmx2.Rim razing mairix. Likelihood of Consequences of Failure 1g,IficarT Failure St Impact Negligible Minor evere Very likely j Low Moderate Hioh Extreme --Likely Low Moderate High High Sornewhat likely Low Low Moderate Moderate Nmtes,explanations descriptions NAitigation options ^ Residual risk ~ Residual risk � Residual risk * Residual risk � Overall tree risk rating LOW IT Moderate O H/:|`O Extreme Overall,esiduai,is|' mune El ° Low-11 Moderate O H/ox O Extreme Recommended'inspection interval Data Op/na/ 11 Preliminary Advanced assessment needed 0-"�oOres-Type/nea,on � mspeouon|irnitadon, Qmone OvisibUny OAccess Ovine, []Root collar buried Describe o./^u"'va,rct.,,`p",a.,ua/,yo,,�",",,^o.""lx,u,,*.,]A*^m",x.=nS.,`-2o/, Pap 2o/z 'J 73 ID ry, tA In qw kV bDD > J N V^ I� V l� C lh P $ Owl 2 H' 'MY V/ l; u Z 'n Kzj s at: N§ vF� ' c Sp e tt CID U CL ui V) 0v r. ' L It > 0 0 m z im .i� UJ Lu i[! T _ - LIa c: <L � fir° `c a; � k } Li v "in r_ u cl 4 WR r O Y _ V Vi ii! W i %' f tA LU , rk f� r� {r; ��r r r � F ry IN Ln cr ua by iD S �, tY N G T] O ,hQ �fiJ1 Basici Client, yy 'w " _Date_l Time Address/Tree location G < . Tree no. Sheet -3-1.or Tree species_� r €w °; dbh Height l: Crown spread dia. •- Assessor(s) w-a L.'°$ i Tools useds 1 cue { Time frame Target Assessment Target zone _ Occupancy • V : t N rate o O c Target description Target protection y '3= i-rare ° r n v x v Ln 2-occ asionali u V-gyp L 3-frequent u O y N rro 4-constant a E cu a Site Factors History of failures fes,'Topography Flat Slope❑_ % Aspect Site changes None 51", Grade change❑ Site clearing❑ Changed soil hydrology❑ Root cuts❑ Describe __ Soil conditions Limited volume❑ Saturated❑ Shallow❑ Compacted 0 Pavement over roots❑ _% Describe Prevailing wind direction Common weather Strong winds❑?Ice❑ Snow❑ Heavy rain❑ Describe Tree Health and Species Profile Vigor Low 2 Normal ❑ High❑ Foliage None(seasonal)❑ None(dead)❑ Normal % Chlorotic % Necrotic Pests/Bio is Abiotic _ Species failure profile Branches in Trunk❑ Roots❑ Describe ( ( { Load Factors trt'ind exposure Protected❑ Partial L"1 Full❑ Wind funneling❑ Relative crown size Small'( Medium❑ Large❑ Crown density Sparse 12 Normal❑ Dense El interior branches Few FJ Normal F-1 Dense[I Vines/Mistletoe/Moss❑ t e r... Recent or expected change in load factors Tree Defects and Conditions Affecting the likelihood of Failure Crown and BranchesUnbalanced crown❑ LCR % Cracks ❑ Lightning damage 2f Dead twigs/branches Z %overall Max.cia. Codominant❑ Included bark❑ I Broken/Hangers Number Max.dia. Weak attachments ❑ Cavity/Nest hole%circ. Over-ex-lended branches ❑ ", Previous branch failures 9 Similar branches resent❑ { Pruning history p ( Crown cleaned ❑ Thinned ❑ Raised ❑ Dead/Missing barl<❑ Cankers/Galls/Burls❑ Sapwood damage/decay `r"�. Reduced ❑ Topped ❑ Lion-tailed ❑ Conks ❑ Heartwood decay ❑ Flush cuts, ❑ Other Response growth f0 ndi oon(s)or concern 1 Part Size Fall Distance Part Size Fall Distance ` Load on defect N/A❑ Nlinor ❑ Moderate❑ Significant❑ Load on defect N/A❑ Minor 9l,Moderate 13 Significant❑ \ Likelihood offailure Improbable❑ Possible 17-1ProbableED Imminent ❑ Likelihood of failure Improbable[] Possible❑ Probable 0'Imminent❑ —Trunk— � Roots and Root Collar-- i Dead/Missing bark ❑ Abnormal barktexture/color❑ Collar buried/Not visible❑ Depth Stem girdling❑ Codominant stems ❑ Included bark❑ Cracks❑ i Dead ❑ Decay❑ Conks/Mushrooms❑ Sapwood damage/decay❑ Cankers/Galls/Burls❑ Sap ooze ❑ Ooze ❑ Cavity❑ %circ. Lightning damage❑ Heartwood decay❑ Conics/Mushrooms❑ Cracks❑ Cut/Damaged roots❑ Distance from trunk Cavity/Nest hole %circ. Depth Poor taper❑ Root plate lifting❑ Soil weakness❑ Lean Corrected? Response growth Response growth Condition(s)of concern Condition(s)of concern Part Size Fall Distance Part Size Fall Distance Load on defect N/A❑ Minor ❑ Moderate❑ Significant❑ Load on defect N/A❑ Minor ❑ Moderate❑ Significant❑ Likelihood of failure Improbable❑ Possible❑ Probable ❑ Imminent❑ Likelihood of failure Improbable❑ Possible❑ Probable ❑ Imminent❑ P'lop. I of 9 02 Risk Categorization f € Likelihood p Consequences Failure Impact f=ailure&Im act Target Condition{s) (from Mai rix 1) (Target number Tree part ordescrip cn) ( of concern v w w a Risi; o Z ° v > w m cc a rating E o o o a m � o Y 'Nm s d Jrom in (n Matrix 2) t,is l ? moi_ -< .�: t i -1 _ p?' e41 9 I tj C i ( t 7 1 I . I (i Ii 3i+loit'ix d.Likelihood matrix. Likelihood Likelihood of Impact of Failure very Iow Low Medium High { Imminent Unlikely Somewhat likely Ver like) v v v Probable Unlikely Unlikely fSomewhat likely Likely Possible I Unlikely Unlikely Unlikely Somewhat likely Improbable IUnlikely Unlikely Unlikely Unlikely Motrix 2,Risk rating matrix. Likelihood of Consequences of Failure Failure u impact negligible Minor s Significant Severe s Very likely Low l�Moderate High Extreme € Likely Low Moderate High High Somewhat likely Low Low `IVioderate- Moderate Horde unlikeit) 5 Low Lots trrvRr Low I r (Votes,explanations,descriptions lvlitig8tion Options Residual risk Residual risk Residual risk Residual risk Overall tree res:.racing Low D Moderate 0 Higher� Extreme M Overall residuai risk None© Low"I Moderate❑ High r,� Extreme❑ Recommended inspection interval -ata ©Final El Preliminary Advanced assessment needed 0No❑Yes-Type/Reason inspection limitations ❑None ❑Visibility DAccess ❑Vines ❑Root collar buried Describe -ibis�1s4a'a�tcc4;cats pro(luced 1z1-ilic loternatiora;Su[Idr u!drbarJc;ilmre(1SA)—20J7 Page 2 Of 2 rsv++ td Basis gee Risk Assessment Form _ Client _, 4 Date Time Address/Tree location Tree n0. W Sheet or Tree species dbh ° Height , Crown spread dia �M Assessor(s) Tools used Time frame Target Assessment c`v Target zone Occupancy y o f V e c rate Target description Target protection = 3 i '3 = a-rare i a x N 2-occasional 'uu `L ru 3--frequent�-n d £4 constant u > y u O.a ll ._ Site Factors History of failures t � r't� � Topography Flag Slope❑ % Aspect Site changes None Cdl"Grade change❑ Site clearing❑ Changed soil hydrology❑ Root cuts❑ Describe Soil conditiors Limited volume❑ Saturated❑ Shallow❑ Compacted❑ Pavement over roots _% Describe Prevailing wind direction Fµ Common weather Strong winds Er Ice❑ Snow❑ Heavy rain❑ Describe Free Health and Species profile Vigor Low❑ Normal OR High❑ Foliage None(seasonal) None(dead)❑ Normal� % Chlorotic % Necrotic % Pests/Biotic c =r Abiotic --- Species failure profile Branches❑ Trunkl2l"Roots❑ Describe Load Factors Windexposure Protected❑ Partialis Full❑ Windfunn ❑elingRelative crown size Small❑ Medium Large Cl Crown density Sparse❑ Normall3' Dense 1771 Interior branches Few❑ Norrnallf Dense❑ Vines/Mistletoe/Moss❑ 0Xr..- Recent or expected change in load factors Tree Defects and Conditions Affecting the Likelihood of Failure F^czmsat and Srrartches— Unbalanced crown❑ LCR % Cracks ❑ _ Lightning damage ❑ Dead twigs/branches❑ %overall Max.dia. Codominant❑ Included bark❑ Broken/Hangers Number Max.dia. Weak attachments C1Over-extendedbranches l — Cavity/Nest hole%circ. :pruning history Previous branch failures El Similar branches present❑ Crown cleaned ❑ Thinned ❑ Raised 11Dead/Missing bark❑ Cankers/Galls/Burls❑ Sapwood damage/decay❑ Reduced ❑ Topped ❑ Lion-tailed ❑ Conks ❑ Heartwood decay ❑ Flush cuts ❑ Other Response growth Condition(s)ofconcern _ Part Size Fall Distance Part Size Fall Distance Load on defect N/A❑ Minor ❑ Moderate❑ Significant❑ Load on defect N/A❑ Minor ❑ Moderate❑ Significant❑ Likelihood offailure Improbable❑ Possible Probable ❑ Imminent ❑ Likelihood of failure Improbable❑ Possible❑ Probable ❑ Imminent❑ Roots and Root Collar Dead/Missing bark 01Abnormal bark texture/color❑ Collar buried/Not visible❑ Depth Stem girdling❑ Codominant stems ❑ Included bark❑ Cracks❑ Dead ❑ Decay❑ Conks/Mushrooms❑ Sapwood damage/decay❑ Cankers/Galls/Burls❑ Sap ooze ❑ OOZe ❑ Cavity❑ %circ. Lightning damage❑ Heartwood decay❑ Conks/Mushrooms❑ Cracks❑ Cut/Damaged roots❑ Distance from trunk { Cavity/Nest hole %circ. Depth Poor taper❑ Root plate lifting❑ Soil weakness❑ Leanrte" Corrected? Response growth Response growth Condition(s)of concern Condition(s)of concern 4 il "t "„I',.. Part Size Fall Distance Part Size Fall Distance Load on defect N/A❑ Minor Ci Moderate❑ Significant'� ( Load on defect N/A❑ Minor• ❑ Moderate❑ Significant❑ Likelihood of failure improbable❑ Possible❑ Probable,�M"Imminent❑ Likelihood of failure Improbable❑ Possible❑ Probable ❑ Imminent❑ Pape i of 2 Risk Categorization I ! Likelihood i Failure Impact Failure&Impact Consequences target ifit (from Matrix l) 4 (;'arr�er number Tree pari Condition(s) i! ordescriptionJ of concern n ° m > vRisk ? v v T z v rating z a a` > W E s to °c c (from ° 2 rn _+ > Z in PAatrfx 2) L---------------- tatrix 1.Likelihood matrix. i Likelihood Likelihood of Impact of Failure Very low tow Medium High Imminent Unlikely Somewhat likely Likely Ver fil:ely - Probable Unlikely Unlikely Somewhat likely Likely`; Possible Unlikely Unlikely Unlikely Someivliat likely - Improbable Unlil(eIy Unlikely Unlikely Unlikely _ iViatrix 2.Risk rating matrix. Likelihood of i Consequences of Failure Failure&impact p � Negligible Minor Significant Severe Very likely I Low Moderate High Extreme - Likely Low Moderate High`• High }Somewhat likely Love Low Mod'er,C Moderate t _ � Pdorcn Unlikely � Low Lov,� I Low Low Notes,explanations,descriptions Mi-dgation options Residual risk �" a -- Residual risk Residual risk Residual risk Overall tree risk rating Low i-1 Moderate D' High D'':Extreme❑ Overall residual risk None❑ Low❑ Moderate❑ High �Extremie❑ Recommended inspection interval Data ❑Final ❑Preliminary Advanced assessment needed ©No CIYes-Type/Reason _ Inspection limitations (]None OVisibility ❑Access ❑Vines ❑Root collar buried Describe tri da:uchcct xas prode}ad Lr lire Lrtcrnetional So:iehuf Arboriculture{ISA)—2bl7 Page 2 of 2