Loading...
655 Sailfish Drive - Arborist Letter 11.05.2025 _ ISA, Basic Tree Risk Assessment Form Client C rt l tS Date Time j l LrO 4'�"� Address/Tree location ZZ Tree no. i Sheet of Tree species 'w VVk dbh. ;, � Height . 1-2,' Crown spread dia, 19, Assessor(s) V71 V144 366x5 -b Tools used ateAW"+!3 rtW,Phr!"ifs Time frame Target Assessment Target zone Oaupancir ate Target description Target protection �'. -91 y, x 2—a=kw l ,�G 'L eY $�fieque(R QQ rm i 4—cont E K 1 A( 2 3 4 Site factors History of failures done, Topography Flat011lope❑ % Aspect Site changes NoneO Grade change❑Site clearing❑ Changed soil hydrology❑ Root cutsO Describe_ Soil conditions Limited volume Saturated 0 Shallow❑ Compacted❑ Pavement over roots 13 % Describe f4nek Prevailing wind direction a Common weather Strong winds Ince 0 Snow 13 Heavy rain❑ Describe Tree Health and Species Profile Vigor Low Normal ❑ High❑ Foliage None(seasonal) None(dead)0Normal % Chlorotic % Necrotic % Pests/Biotic -Yid Abiotic Afyi4G Species failure profile Branches❑ Trunk[3 Roots Describe _ _ Load Factors Wind exposure Protected Partial I3 Full© Wind funneling❑ Relative crown size Small Medium❑ Large[] Crowndensity Sparse❑ NormalelDense© Interior branches Few❑ Normal Dense❑ Vines/Mistletoe/Moss❑ Albl`e- Recent or expected change in load factors Tree b�efects and Conclitlo;TAffectlng the Likelihood d of Failure —Crown and Branches-- Unbalanced crown❑ LCR % Cracks❑ Lightning damage O Dead twigs/branches 0 %overall Max.dia. Codominant❑ included bark❑ I Broken/Hangers Number ____. _ Max.dia. Weak attachments❑ Cavity/Nesthole_%circ. ` Over-extended branches ❑ Previous branch failures❑ Similar branches present❑ Pruning history Crown cleaned E3 Thinned 13 Raised 13Dead/Missing bark ElCankers/Galls/Burls❑ Sapwood damage/decay 0 { Reduced ❑ Topped ❑ Lion-tailed ❑ Conks 0 Heartwood decay❑ Flush cuts 0 Other ,t _ Response growth a 11A A►r A n dlU6 Condition(s)of concern Part Size Fall Distance Part Size Fall Distance Load on defect N/A❑ Minor ❑-Moderate II Significant❑ Load on defect N/A❑ Minor ❑ Moderate❑ Significant Likelihood of failure Improbable❑ Possible Probable ❑ Imminent❑ 4kelihoodoffailure ImprobableO Possible❑ Probable [3 Imminent❑ —Trunk— --Roots and Root Collar-- Dead/Missing bark ❑ Abnormal bark texture/color❑ Collar buried/Not visible ar" Depth __ Stem girdling Codominant stems ❑ Included bark❑ Cracks❑ Dead Decay❑ Conks/Mushrooms U Sapwood damage/decay❑ Cankers/Galls/Burls❑ Sap ooze❑ Ooze. ❑ Cavity❑ . %circ. Lightning damage❑ Heartwood decay 13 Conks/Mushrooms❑ cracks.❑ Cut/Damaged roots O Distance from trunk Cavity/Nest hole %circ. Depth Poor taper❑ Root plate lifting❑ soil-weakness❑ Lean . ° Corrected? — Response growth Response growths t5 Condition(s)of concern IVrc n E'%'—T-rgeAs bi>eL Condition(s)of concern Part Size Fall Distance Part Size Fail Distance Load on defect N/A❑ Minor ❑ Moderate0 Significant II Load on defect N/A Cl Minor 0 Moderates Significant❑ Likelihood of failure improbabtes Possible 13 Probable 0 Imminent❑ LikelihoodoffaituCe improbable❑ PossibleProbable ❑ lmminerrt❑ Pave I of 2 Risk Categorization Likelihood Failure impact Faoure.&impart :Consequences Targetrona9artrit" �" Goadition(s) (Target number Tree part m ordextiptfon) of concern = i' l: Risk Q s s d W t j m rating 12 6 WSu `TJ�2�l� Matrix I.Likelihood matrix. p .. Liklihood Likelihood of impact i of Failure :Very low Law Medium_ High { Imminent Unlikely :Somewhat likely Likely Very likely —�— s Probable Unlikely Unlikely Somewhat likely Ukel i i ii Possible- LTnlikely n i - Unlikely SoM-CwWat like{ — Improbable I Unlikely Unlikely Unlikely Unlikely Marrix2 Risk rating matrix. Likelihood of Consequences of Failure Failure&im Pam Negligible Minor Significant Severe Very likely Low Moderate High Extreme --�--�--�---•-•�-----{------1--- r.--_.!`.-._,l , Likely tow Moderate High High Somewhat likely CLow 3 Low Moderate Moderate North Unlikely Low Low Low Low Notes,explanations,descriptions 4u T f Mitigation options 1., .WiD\! Residual risk 2. Residual risk s. Residual risk a. Residual risk Overall tree risk rating Low Moderate 13 High❑ Extreme❑ Overall residual risk None❑ Low❑ Moderate 17 High❑ Extreme❑ Recommended Inspection Interval- (Joy) Data ❑Final ❑Preliminary Advanced assessment needed❑No❑Yes-Type/Reason Inspection limitations Mone ❑Visibility ❑Access Mines ❑Root collar buried Describe this detasheet was produced by the International Sudetyof"Atbaziculture(TSA)—2017 Page 2 of 2