The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutEnvironmental Stewardship Committee (ESC) - 25 Feb 2026 - Agenda - Pdf City of Atlantic Beach Agenda Environmental Stewardship Committee (ESC) Meeting Wednesday, February 25, 2026 - 5:00 p.m. City Hall, Commission Chamber 800 Seminole Road, Atlantic Beach, FL 32233 Page(s) 1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL 2. COURTESY OF THE FLOOR - GUEST PRESENTATION 2.A. Steve Swann, City of Atlantic Beach Engineer - Marsh Pilot Project Saltmarsh Presentation by Hunter Matthews Saltmarsh Restoration Pilot Project - Potential Site 3 - 23 3. ONGOING - OLD BUSINESS 3.A. ESC Joint Workshop with Commission Draft ESC-Commission Workshop Agenda 3.2.2026 24 3.B. ESC Priorities ESC Priorities - for 2.25.2026 25 3.C. Chapter 23 and other tree related items  Any updates from committee and staff on Chapter 23  Trees in setbacks  Tree Resolution (see below)  Summary of comparative tree ordinance structure research Tree Protection Report 26 - 39 3.D. Public Input Session and Survey Results 3.E. Upcoming Events/Comms/Campaigns  Centennial Tree Planting Campaign - 100 Trees for 100 years  Howell Park Native Plantings  Earth Day/Mayor's Monarch Pledge (April)  Film Series (May) 4. REPORTS AND/OR REQUESTS FROM ESC MEMBERS AND STAFF 4.A. Monthly Tree Report Tree Data Summary Tree Fund Action and Spending Plan 11.24.2025 40 - 41 4.B. Chair Report 4.C. Member Reports ESC Member Report S Boren UPDATED 42 - 68 Page 1 of 68 Environmental Stewardship Committee (ESC) - 25 Feb 2026 5. NEW BUSINESS 6. ADJOURNMENT Any person wishing to speak to the Environmental Stewardship Committee on any matter at this meeting should submit a Comment Card located at the entrance to Commission Chamber prior to the start of the meeting. This meeting will be live-streamed and videotaped. The video recording will be posted within four business days on the City's website. To access live or recorded videos, visit www.coab.us/live. In accordance with the American with Disabilities Act and Section 286.26 of the Florida Statutes, persons with disabilities needing special accommodations to participate in this meeting should contact Deputy City Ladayija Nichols at 247-5821 or at City Hall, 800 Seminole Road, Atlantic Beach, Florida not less than three (3) days prior to the date of this meeting. Page 2 of 68 How to Protect AB’s Saltmarsh Wetlands: Possible Solutions Hunter Mathews, M.Sc. Certified Coastal Practitioner TM Environmental Scientist, ERS Founder, Jax Oyster Conservation, Inc.Agenda Item #2.A.25 Feb 2026Page 3 of 68 Benefits of saltmarshes ▪Provides nursery habitat ▪Helps cycle nutrients ▪Sequesters carbon ▪Protects the coast by absorbing boat wake energy and storm surge/flooding 2 Agenda Item #2.A.25 Feb 2026Page 4 of 68 Saltmarsh loss: A modern tragedy Global decline of oyster reefs 85% in 2011 (Beck et al 2011) Loss of protection, increasing pressure Beck et al 2011 3 Agenda Item #2.A.25 Feb 2026Page 5 of 68 Way too much wake Increased boating on our waterways Registered Recreational Vessels in the US 1980-2020 Statista.com Near Fort George sandbars 4 ~1 meter lost/year along ICWW (Silliman et al 2020)Agenda Item #2.A.25 Feb 2026Page 6 of 68 Nowhere to go Coastal hardening Florida Times Union Coastal squeeze Energy dispersion Less absorption 5 East Anglia Bylines Agenda Item #2.A.25 Feb 2026Page 7 of 68 March of the mangroves Northern expansion of distribution Reduced freezes and warmer temperatures Online Plant Guide NPS 6 Agenda Item #2.A.25 Feb 2026Page 8 of 68 Can’t build a house with just a hammer ▪Thin layer placement – Restore and prepare ▪Green Infrastructure – Facilitate survival ▪Living Shorelines – Restore and protect NOAA 7 Agenda Item #2.A.25 Feb 2026Page 9 of 68 Thin Layer Placement Raposa et al 2023 SC Sea Grant Spray thin layer of sediment over marsh, let plant community respond, repeat 8 Agenda Item #2.A.25 Feb 2026Page 10 of 68 Green infrastructure MB Rising Above Design Museum Living Seawalls ▪Doesn’t sacrifice strength or safety ▪Captures wave energy ▪Creates habitat High elevation living shoreline along bay ▪Captures energy ▪Creates habitat ▪Better prepared for storms/floods 9 Agenda Item #2.A.25 Feb 2026Page 11 of 68 Living shorelines Bio-genic shoreline stabilization ▪Strengthened by plants and bivalves (oysters/mussels) that grow on shoreline ▪More effective/sustainable ▪Create habitat for fish, crustaceans, birds, mammals ▪Greater cost and effort Virginia SWCD10 Agenda Item #2.A.25 Feb 2026Page 12 of 68 Oyster reef restoration Florida Living Shorelines UF IFAS Out with the old!Plastic mesh aquaculture bags ▪Use oyster shell, cheap, easy to make ▪Breakdown, releasing microplastics ▪Can’t handle the energy, limiting recruitment and lifetime 11 Agenda Item #2.A.25 Feb 2026Page 13 of 68 Biodegradable materials Coconut coir/jute fiber Bese Products BESE (potato starch biopolymer) Florida’s Living Shorelines 12 Agenda Item #2.A.25 Feb 2026Page 14 of 68 Cement of course! UF IFAS FWS Oyster Castles Reef Balls Reef Innovations Reef Prisms 13 Agenda Item #2.A.25 Feb 2026Page 15 of 68 Pervious Oyster Shell Habitat (POSH) Structural complexity Less cement No plastic Uses oyster shell Cheap Relatively easy to make Recruit oysters Used by crabs and fish Pre-deployment 2-yrs Post-deployment Stone Crab Mud Crab 14 Agenda Item #2.A.25 Feb 2026Page 16 of 68 Planning for success Safak et al. 2020 ANERR May need to combine tools One size doesn’t fit all! Protect vulnerable areas Regional cooperation 15 Agenda Item #2.A.25 Feb 2026Page 17 of 68 Action in AB 1.Vulnerability assessment 2.Identify vulnerable community assets and prioritize 3.Identify strategies and projects From City Vulnerability Assessment 100-yr Rain/Storm Surge Projection Marsh Vegetation Mapping 16 Agenda Item #2.A.25 Feb 2026Page 18 of 68 It takes a village •Volunteer! •Support federal and state resiliency funding (resilient Florida grant) •Invest in our descendants’ future •Build green infrastructure •Watch your wake •Recycle oyster shell and stabilize shorelines 17 Agenda Item #2.A.25 Feb 2026Page 19 of 68 Thank you! Hunter Mathews hunter@jaxoysterconservation.org 18 Agenda Item #2.A.25 Feb 2026Page 20 of 68 2025 INTRACOASTAL WATERWAYAgenda Item #2.A.25 Feb 2026Page 21 of 68 2016 Agenda Item #2.A.25 Feb 2026Page 22 of 68 2004 Agenda Item #2.A.25 Feb 2026Page 23 of 68 Draft agenda for the March 2 workshop is as follows: Part One: Priorities -Review of 2026 Priorities -Presentation of 2027 Priorities -Summary of Public Input -Discussion on Priorities Alignment Part Two: Chapter 23 and Other Tree-related Items -ESC Resolution to preserve priceless trees -Overview of other tree-related items slated to come before commission -High level overview of ESC’s recommended revisions to Chapter 23 Agenda Item #3.A. 25 Feb 2026 Page 24 of 68 CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP COMMITTEE (ESC) PRIORITIES FY2026 & FY2027 1. To study and make recommendations to and respond to requests from city commission and city staff with respect to the city’s maritime forest, parks and open spaces, beautification of public and private spaces, and environmental stewardship , including: a. MARITIME FOREST i. Support passage and implementation of submitted and ongoing revisions to Chapter 23 and other tree-related recommendations – especially those focused on preservation of largest trees b. PARKS & OPEN SPACES i. Study and recommend nature-based solutions for pilot program to combat marsh erosion ii. Support Parks Master Plan Update c. BEAUTIFICATION OF PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SPACES i. Improve public spaces through “Florida-friendly” landscape design while conserving water and reducing use of chemical fertilizers and pesticides. d. ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP i. Provide input for Master Stormwater Management Plan and related water conservation campaign 2. Act as a motivating and coordinating body to encourage joint public and private participation in promoting these purposes through an integrated communications, education and outreach plan aligned to the above priorities, which includes: a. Events b. Reports c. Educational/Outreach Communications & Materials d. Partnerships & Volunteers Agenda Item #3.B. 25 Feb 2026 Page 25 of 68 Municipal Tree Protection: Comparative Analysis of Leading Programs Focus: Communities Protecting Centenarian Trees (100+ Years Old) Executive Summary This report analyzes tree protection ordinances in Florida municipalities with a specific focus on how communities protect mature, centenarian trees (100+ years old). Based on comprehensive research, the following municipalities demonstrate exemplary approaches to protecting irreplaceable tree resources: • Orange County leads with 5x replacement ratios for Heritage trees and $21,200+ removal costs for large Live Oaks • St. Petersburg's Grand Tree ordinance (30"+ DBH) protects trees 100 -120+ years old with penalties up to $6,855 • Coral Gables uses sophisticated canopy-based replacement calculations, ensuring trees are replaced by equivalent ecosystem value rather than simple tree counts • For Live Oak trees (growth factor 4.0), a 30" DBH threshold captures trees approximately 120 years old The analysis reveals that the most effective ordinances share three critical elements: (1) multi-tiered protection thresholds starting at 8" DBH with enhanced protection at 18 -20" and maximum protection at 30"+, (2) exponential replacement requirements tha t make removing large trees economically prohibitive, and (3) robust enforcement with dedicated arborist staff and substantial penalties. Agenda Item #3.C. 25 Feb 2026 Page 26 of 68 Section 1: Understanding the Comparison Framework To create meaningful comparisons between municipal tree codes, this analysis evaluates eight critical categories. Each category reflects a key aspect of how communities protect their urban forest, with particular attention to provisions that preserve centenarian trees. The Eight Evaluation Categories 1. Scope & Coverage (15 points) Examines which properties and land uses are regulated. Strong ordinances apply to all properties including single-family residential, while weaker codes exempt large portions of the urban forest. Florida Statute 163.045 (2019) limits local regulation of si ngle-family residential trees when a certified arborist deems them hazardous, forcing municipalities to be creative in maintaining protections. 2. Protected Tree Thresholds (30 points) ★ CRITICAL The most important category for protecting older trees. Measures the diameter at breast height (DBH) thresholds that trigger permit requirements and enhanced protections. Exemplary programs use 3-4 tiers: • Basic protection: 8" DBH (captures trees 30 -40 years old) • Enhanced protection: 18-20" DBH (captures trees 70-80 years old) • Specimen protection: 24" DBH (captures trees 90-100 years old) • Grand/Heritage: 30-34" DBH (captures trees 100-130+ years old) 3. Replacement Requirements (30 points) ★ CRITICAL Determines what must be planted when trees are removed. Leading programs don't simply require planting one new tree for each removed—they use escalating replacement ratios that reflect the ecological and community value of mature trees. A 100-year-old tree cannot be replaced within a human lifetime, so strong codes require 3x-5x mitigation for large specimens. 4. Financial Mechanisms (20 points) Evaluates Tree Trust Funds and payment-in-lieu options. Strong programs maintain dedicated funds with mandatory spending requirements (e.g., 80% must be spent on tree planting annually) and allow applicants to pay for off-site mitigation when on-site planting isn't feasible. 5. Enforcement & Penalties (35 points) ★ CRITICAL Without meaningful penalties, tree protection is merely advisory. Leading programs impose substantial fines, often calculated per inch of diameter, making illegal removal of centenarian trees economically devastating. St. Petersburg's $6,855 penalty for a 30" Agenda Item #3.C. 25 Feb 2026 Page 27 of 68 Grand Tree and Orange County's $21,200 removal cost for Heritage Live Oaks exemplify effective deterrents. 6. Administrative Process (25 points) Assesses permit review procedures, arborist involvement, and appeal mechanisms. Programs with dedicated Tree Boards or Tree Advisory Commissions provide specialized expertise and community accountability, particularly for controversial removals of heritage trees. 7. Development Standards (20 points) Examines protections during construction and development. Strong codes require tree surveys, protective fencing around root zones, certified arborist monitoring, and may offer density bonuses or reduced requirements as incentives to preserve significant trees. 8. Program Quality Indicators (25 points) Considers broader programmatic elements: Tree City USA designation, Urban Forest Master Plans, stated canopy goals, public planting programs, and educational resources. These indicate long-term commitment to urban forestry beyond just regulation. Agenda Item #3.C. 25 Feb 2026 Page 28 of 68 Section 2: Leading Municipalities—Detailed Analysis This section profiles the municipalities with the strongest tree protection programs in Florida, organized by overall program strength. Each profile examines how the community protects centenarian trees and implements best practices across all eight evaluation categories. Tier 1: Exemplary Programs (★★★★★) Orange County, Florida Overall Rating: ★★★★★ Exemplary (Estimated 290/330 points) Why It's Exemplary for Centenarian Trees: Orange County adopted comprehensive revisions in 2023 after extensive community engagement, creating one of Florida's most sophisticated tree protection programs. The ordinance explicitly recognizes that Heritage and Specimen trees "have been growing for decades—sometimes even centuries—they're not easily replaced." Protected Tree Thresholds: • Protected trees: Not explicitly stated for all species • Specimen trees: Winged Elm, Turkey Oak, Longleaf Pine, Sweetgum, Bald Cypress (size-based) • Heritage trees: Live Oak, Southern Magnolia (size-based) • 3-tier protection system 100-Year Tree Protection: • Heritage Live Oak designation specifically protects centenarian trees • Removal cost begins at $21,200 for Heritage Live Oak • Based on Live Oak growth factor of 4.0, these are 100+ year trees Replacement Requirements: • Specimen trees: 3x replacement ratio (caliper inches) • Heritage trees: 5x replacement ratio (caliper inches) • Example: 30" Heritage tree requires 150" of replacement trees • Among highest replacement requirements in Florida Enforcement: • Dedicated arborist staff doubled from 3 to 6 (2023) • Substantial penalties for violations • Active monitoring and enforcement program Key Strengths: • Clear distinction between Specimen (3x) and Heritage (5x) categories Agenda Item #3.C. 25 Feb 2026 Page 29 of 68 • Economic disincentives make large tree removal prohibitive • Recent update shows ongoing commitment to improvement Agenda Item #3.C. 25 Feb 2026 Page 30 of 68 St. Petersburg, Florida Overall Rating: ★★★★★ Exemplary (Estimated 285/330 points) Why It's Exemplary for Centenarian Trees: St. Petersburg has maintained Tree City USA designation for 35+ consecutive years and established a 30% tree canopy goal by 2030. The Grand Tree ordinance creates exceptional protections for the city's oldest specimens. Protected Tree Thresholds: • Protected trees: 4"+ DBH (shade trees), 8"+ DBH (understory) • Grand Trees: 30"+ DBH (except Laurel Oaks) • Signature Trees: Special recognition for non-natives (Banyan, Kapok 30"+; Jacaranda, Royal Poinciana 8"+) • 4-tier system including unique Signature category 100-Year Tree Protection: • 30" Grand Tree threshold = approximately 120 years for Live Oak (growth factor 4.0) • Grand Trees "must be preserved" - strongest language • Total penalty for 30" Grand Tree: $6,855 Replacement Requirements: • Payment in lieu for on-site planting: calculated per tree • After-the-fact permit: $1,000 • Payment in lieu: $5,355 for 30" tree • Fine: $500 • Comprehensive cost calculation deters violations Program Quality: • Tree City USA: 35+ consecutive years • 30% tree canopy goal by 2030 • 2022 city-wide tree canopy analysis completed • Community Canopy Initiative: 1,000 trees by 2025 • On-staff ISA Certified Arborist available to residents Key Strengths: • "Signature Trees" recognize culturally important non-natives • Long-term commitment demonstrated by 35+ years Tree City USA • Clear preservation mandate for Grand Trees • Comprehensive penalty structure Agenda Item #3.C. 25 Feb 2026 Page 31 of 68 Coral Gables, Florida Overall Rating: ★★★★★ Exemplary (Estimated 280/330 points) Why It's Exemplary for Centenarian Trees: Coral Gables is frequently cited as having one of Florida's strongest tree ordinances. The city employs a full-time city forester and uses sophisticated canopy-area calculations rather than simple tree counts, ensuring ecological equivalency in replacement. Protected Tree Thresholds: • Protected trees: 4.5"+ DBH or 12'+ height • Specimen trees: 18"+ DBH • Enhanced specimen: 24"+ DBH (double mitigation) • Lowest basic threshold (4.5") provides broadest coverage 100-Year Tree Protection: • 18" specimen = ~72 years (Live Oak, growth factor 4.0) • 24" specimen = ~96 years (Live Oak, growth factor 4.0) • Double mitigation at 24" recognizes near-centenarian status • Certified arborist report required for 18"+ trees Replacement Requirements: • Canopy-based replacement calculation (not simple tree count) • Replacement based on canopy loss area • Double mitigation for 24"+ DBH trees • If site cannot accommodate replacement: Tree Trust Fund contribution • Most sophisticated replacement methodology reviewed Administrative Process: • Full-time city forester on staff • Tree Preservation Agency reviews all applications • Comprehensive tree survey requirements • 10-day application review timeline • Tree Trust Fund for off-site mitigation Key Strengths: • Canopy area replacement > tree count ensures ecological equivalency • Very low 4.5" threshold protects young trees • Professional staff resources (full-time forester) • Requires permits for virtually all tree work Agenda Item #3.C. 25 Feb 2026 Page 32 of 68 Tier 2: Strong Programs (★★★★) Alachua County, Florida Overall Rating: ★★★★ Strong (Estimated 265/330 points) Protected Tree Thresholds: • Protected trees: 8"+ DBH (all land uses) • Heritage trees: Native trees 20"+ DBH (30"+ for laurel/water oak) • Champion trees: Largest specimens of species • Strong emphasis on native species protection 100-Year Tree Protection: • 20" Heritage native tree = 80-100 years (most species) • 30" Heritage oak = 120 years (Live Oak, growth factor 4.0) • Champion trees require Tree Advisory Board approval • Complete prohibition on removal without prior approval Replacement Requirements: • Mitigation required for all regulated trees removed • High-quality shade species required • Preference for on-site mitigation • Tree mitigation fund for off-site when demonstrated infeasible • $90 permit fee (covers multiple trees on same permit) Administrative Process: • Tree Advisory Board reviews champion tree removals • Only Tree Advisory Board may approve champion tree removal • Development Review Staff processes applications • Natural emergencies: permits may be waived temporarily Key Strengths: • Strong native tree focus (20" Heritage threshold) • Champion tree designation with Board oversight • Applies to all land uses and zoning districts • Tree Advisory Board adds accountability for significant removals Agenda Item #3.C. 25 Feb 2026 Page 33 of 68 Gainesville, Florida Overall Rating: ★★★★ Strong (Estimated 260/330 points) Protected Tree Thresholds: • Regulated trees vary by size and species • Champion trees: special designation • Heritage trees: protected designation • Single-family exemption except champion/heritage trees 100-Year Tree Protection: • Champion and heritage tree categories protect oldest specimens • Only Tree Advisory Board may approve champion tree removal • Single-family homes still require permits for champion/heritage Replacement Requirements: • Mitigation trees required for tree removal • High-quality shade species from Gainesville tree list • Installation of new trees may count toward mitigation except for high -quality species removed • Tree mitigation fund for off-site planting when no space available Key Strengths: • Champion tree protections survive single-family exemption • Tree Advisory Board provides specialized review • Tree mitigation fund allows flexibility • Complements Alachua County ordinance in unincorporated areas Agenda Item #3.C. 25 Feb 2026 Page 34 of 68 Section 3: Category-by-Category Implementation This section examines how leading municipalities implement each of the eight evaluation categories, highlighting innovative approaches and best practices. How Communities Set Protection Thresholds The size threshold at which trees receive protection is the single most important factor in determining which trees are covered by an ordinance. Leading municipalities recognize that tiered systems provide flexibility while ensuring comprehensive coverage. Municipality Basic Enhanced Specimen Heritage/Grand Coral Gables 4.5" — 18" / 24" — St. Petersburg 4" / 8" — — 30" Orange County — — Varies Varies Alachua County 8" 20" / 30" — Champion Gainesville Varies — — Champion/Heritage Agenda Item #3.C. 25 Feb 2026 Page 35 of 68 Section 4: Best Practices for 100+ Year Old Trees Based on analysis of leading programs, the following practices most effectively protect centenarian trees: 1. Use Science-Based Size Thresholds For Atlantic Beach and Northeast Florida communities, protecting Live Oak trees (growth factor 4.0) at specific thresholds: • 30" DBH = ~120 years old (centenarian status confirmed) • 24" DBH = ~96 years old (approaching centenarian) • 20" DBH = ~80 years old (mature adult phase) Recommendation: Adopt a 30"+ DBH threshold for "Grand" or "Heritage" designation with preservation preference and 5x replacement requirements. 2. Implement Exponential Replacement Ratios Linear replacement (1:1 regardless of size) fails to account for the irreplaceable nature of centenarian trees. Leading programs use escalating ratios: • Basic trees: 1:1 caliper inch replacement • Specimen trees (18-24"): 2-3x replacement • Heritage trees (24-30"): 3-4x replacement • Grand trees (30"+): 5x replacement (Orange County model) Example: A 30" Heritage Live Oak requiring 5x replacement would mandate 150" of replacement trees. Using 2" caliper replacements, this equals 75 new trees —a powerful deterrent that reflects true community loss. 3. Create Economic Disincentives Without meaningful financial penalties, tree protection becomes optional. Leading programs make illegal removal economically devastating: • St. Petersburg: $6,855 total for 30" Grand Tree • Orange County: $21,200+ for Heritage Live Oak removal • Per-inch penalties that scale with tree size Recommendation: Use formula-based penalties ($150-200 per inch of DBH) plus replacement costs, ensuring minimum $5,000 penalty for Heritage/Grand trees. 4. Require Specialized Review for Heritage Trees Centenarian trees warrant elevated review beyond standard administrative approval: • Tree Advisory Board or Commission review • Public notice and hearing opportunity Agenda Item #3.C. 25 Feb 2026 Page 36 of 68 • Certified arborist assessment required • Presumption of denial unless clear justification provided 5. Maintain Dedicated Staff Resources Effective tree protection requires professional expertise: • Full-time city forester or urban forestry staff (Coral Gables model) • Multiple arborists on staff (Orange County doubled from 3 to 6) • Regular site inspections and monitoring • Active enforcement program with dedicated resources Agenda Item #3.C. 25 Feb 2026 Page 37 of 68 Section 5: Recommendations for Atlantic Beach Based on comprehensive analysis of leading Florida programs and consideration of Atlantic Beach's coastal environment and native tree species, the following recommendations would create an exemplary tree protection program: Recommended Tiered Protection System Category Threshold Approx. Age Replacement Key Species Protected 8" DBH 32+ years 1:1 All natives Specimen 20" DBH 80+ years 3:1 Live Oak, Magnolia Heritage 30" DBH 120+ years 5:1 Live Oak, Magnolia, Sweetgum Agenda Item #3.C. 25 Feb 2026 Page 38 of 68 Implementation Priorities Priority 1: Establish Heritage Tree Program (Years 1-2) • Adopt 30"+ DBH Heritage Tree threshold for Live Oak, Southern Magnolia, Sweetgum • Implement 5x replacement requirement • Create Tree Trust Fund with 80% spending mandate • Establish formula-based penalties ($150+ per inch DBH) • Hire or designate urban forestry coordinator Priority 2: Broaden Protection Coverage (Years 2-3) • Add Specimen Tree category (20-24" DBH) with 3x replacement • Extend basic protection to 8" DBH trees • Develop tree survey requirements for development • Create Tree Advisory Board or Commission Priority 3: Program Enhancement (Years 3-5) • Pursue Tree City USA designation • Complete urban tree canopy analysis • Adopt 30% canopy goal by 2040 • Launch public tree planting program • Develop educational materials and tree identification guide Conclusion Protecting centenarian trees requires deliberate policy choices that recognize these irreplaceable community assets. The leading Florida programs demonstrate that effective tree protection combines science -based thresholds, exponential replacement requirements, meaningful penalties, and dedicated professional resources. Atlantic Beach has the opportunity to join communities like Orange County, St. Petersburg, and Coral Gables in establishing exemplary protections for its 100+ year old Live Oaks, Southern Magnolias, and other native species that define the community's character. The 30" DBH threshold recommended for Heritage Tree status captures trees approximately 120 years old—specimens that have survived multiple generations of development, countless storms, and represent living links to the community's past. These trees cannot be replaced within a human lifetime, making their protection not just an environmental imperative but a responsibility to future generations. Agenda Item #3.C. 25 Feb 2026 Page 39 of 68 Month Permit Applications Total Trees Removed with Permits Total Inches Removed with Permits Total Trees Planted Total Inches Planted Total Mitigation Payments Arborist Letters Received Total Trees Removed by Arborist Letters ADOPT A TREES PLANTED Jan-26 2 28 358 0 0 114,211.00$ 11 16 SPRING 25 Feb-26 FALL 25 Mar-26 Apr-26 May-26 Jun-26 Jul-26 Aug-26 Sep-26 Oct-26 Nov-26 Dec-26 YTD 2 28 358 0 0 $114,211 11 16 0 Tree fund balance, I'm waiting on system update 0 44 Prepared by COAB staff TREE DATA SUMMARY YTD TREES PLANTED YTD TREES REMOVED Agenda Item #4.A.25 Feb 2026Page 40 of 68 PROPOSED 2025-2026 Tree Fund Action & Spending Plan Color KeyPurpose: Be more strategic and proactive in how we add canopy back to the city.In progressFund Balance as of 6/9/2025 340,704$ Completed25% Reserve85,176$ ChangedProposed spending plan amount255,528$ UnsureDIRECTION OF FUNDSCATEGORY% OF FUND BUDGETED% IN ACTUAL DOLLARSACTUAL EXPENDITURENOTESESC LEADCity street plantings in public right of ways17% 57,920$ Estimated goal of 30 trees at $1,000 each; considering 4 locations (1 - Club Drive, Beach Ave, and 8th Street; 2 - Upper Seminole between 18th & 19th; 3 - Tideviews; 4 - Sailfish East); also asked each ESC member to walk their nearby blocks, check Google Earth and COJ GIS, and identify potential ROW planting locations that could take 5-10 trees planted at once and bring findings to next discussion meeting. PWs has been helping with watering challengeD. Giovannucci / All ESCCity park replacement plantings8% 27,256$ Replace dead/dangerous trees that may have been untended for years Staff / PWsUnplanned city-directed plantings4% 13,628$ StaffCity entrance Atlantic Blvd & Seminole ($15k approved)4% 15,000$ 18,000$ B. AndrewsCity entrance for Mayport Road (by Arby's) - $7k approved2% 7,000$ 7,000$ StaffMayport Road Greenway set-aside0%Mayport Road TBD 2025-2026 with FDOT construction; Low maintenance landscaping (no trees due to line of sight issues therefore maybe not include in this Action & Spending Plan at all -- should really be under beautification)S. BorenDutton Island assessment and pilot to replant losses0% -$ Seek $70k from COJ or another grant; There are serious concerns about using COAB Tree Fund for a task as big as Dutton and as "distant" from the neighborhoods that generated the loss. It could easily wipe out a large chunk of the fund and may be questionable as a direct benefit to residents. S. BorenEdible Orchard4% 13,628$ As of 7/1/25 Marsh Oaks Community Center if off the table due to someone willing to fund design and build of community garden. Need to research other possible locations such as Tides View, ABE, Johansen, Jack Russell and create a comparison matrix that assesses water/irrigation, safety (no fruit dropping on roads or pathways), maintenance and aesthetically pleasing, possible partnerships, what edible trees can grow in each location, etc.) and make recommendation to City Manager. Must know that city will not offer anything besides water -- no maintenance or public works labor/time.J. GracyCity Free Front Yard Plantings (Spring/March)3% 10,000$ 9,400$ 20 trees in Spring (March)ESC promotesStaff executesCity Free Front Yard Planting (Fall/November) 5% 17,035$ 20 trees each in Fall (November)ESC promotesStaff executesJanuary Arbor Day Tree Giveaways1% 2,500$ 2,625$ Spent 150 trees at $17.50 each for Jan 2025; Spent $3k in Jan 2024 & $5300 in April 2024; Giveaways moving forward will be in January & October for best planting time.S. BorenTricks & Trees October Tree Giveaway2% 5,111$ T. MinerSUBTOTAL: 50% 169,078$ 37,025$ Heritage Tree Preservation3% 10,000$ 2025 Idea: Start with the 4-5 public Heritage trees most in need of care2024 Idea: Pilot grant; Designated trees only; No match required as it adds too much administrative burden; Citizens have to apply, agree, sign waiver, etc. DanElders Campaign5% 17,035$ AnastasiaQuarterly Master Arborist Day4% 12,000$ One day each quarter, COAB will offer a sign-up sheet for residents to choose a slot during the day they would like their mature tree assessed for free. A. Askew is going to call Danni/Chuck Lippi to see if they are interested and what it would cost.A. AskewCanopy Health Data & State of the Trees 4% 13,628$ 2025 Idea: Consolidate data with input from ESC, CoJ, and staff and formulate (with expert) recommendations for Commission2024 Ideas: Tree inventory of parks; piggyback on COJ; seed money for statistical sampling and framework; tree inventory grant; IFAS Master Arborist/Gardener train the trainer; Amy PSUBTOTAL: 15% 52,663$ -$ Demonstration / Learning Gardens 6% 20,442$ Planning staff really wants to do a "No Mow" Demonstration Wildflower Patch (like FDOT does on highways) as well as a Raingarden Demonstration project in Jack Russell. Maybe next year a Marshside Erosion Pilot ProjectESC & StaffEducation & Outreach 4% 13,628$ Improve community understanding of regulations, tree care, and sustainable landscapes with information and expert speakersESC createsStaff reviews & distributesSUBTOTAL: 10% 34,070$ -$ Reserve 25% 85,176$ On 7/1/25 City Manager Killingsworth suggested ESC always leave 25% in reserve and propose a thoughtful plan to spend the rest.SUBTOTAL: 25% 85,176$ -$ TOTAL: 100% 340,988$ 37,025$ RESERVE (25%)DIRECT TREE REPLACEMENT (50%) MATURE TREE PROTECTION & CANOPY HEALTH DATA (15%) COMMUNITY LEARNING GARDENS & EDUCATION (10%)Agenda Item #4.A.25 Feb 2026 Page 41 of 68 ESC Member Report | Sarah Boren (as of 2/19/26) Cliff Notes • Marsh Pilot – Movement forward; some cool opportunities; Steve Swann will be speaking to ESC on 2/25/26 • Film Series – Send suggestions and contact for panelists for No Sleep Til (e.g., hurricane/SW) • Potential Tree Removals – 350 4th St and 812 East Coast Drive • Meeting with CM Grant – Re: ESC priorities alignment with CC he would like to see ESC focus on stormwater, trees, and marsh. Re: Ch23 proposed changes, he still needs to dig into the details and will send questions if he has them before the 3/2/26 workshop • Realtor Workshop – Need direction from ESC on whether to pursue and which approach to take • Edible Orchard -- Need direction from ESC whether to move forward, pause, or scrap. • Awards – Need status update from staff on whether this event is happening and if nominations have been promoted • Commercial Partnership Planting Program – No update • FYI Resources • Priority memos for the record – Added these to this member report since I mentioned them during the last meeting Marsh Pilot Priority Met with Steve Swann, City Engineer; Dr. Steve Jones, UNF Professor; Tom Frick, CRO SJRWMD; Ron Brockmeyer, Environmental Scientist SJRWMD; Loraé T. Simpson, PhD, Supervising Environmental Scientist SJRWMD, and Cori Hermle, Strategic Planning Basin Coordinator - Lower St. Johns River Basin SJRWMD COAB is considering two possible marsh projects: 1. Potential Saltmarsh Restoration Pilot near Dutton Island 2. Repair mosquito lane(s) near Atlantic Blvd in front of Tides View Preserve 1) Potential Saltmarsh Restoration Pilot near Dutton Island Restore eroded habitat/vegetation in the two potential areas shown below. The COAB City Manager likes these sites because they are relatively accessible by boat and kayak launch, can see them at low tide, and they are farther up the creeks with a good chance for successful restoration with land on either side of eroded area. COAB would partner with Dr. Jones, UNF and his students for monitoring progress. Dr. Jones is already monitoring mangroves north of Johnston Island. Cost TBD. Agenda Item #4.C. 25 Feb 2026 Page 42 of 68 Agenda Item #4.C. 25 Feb 2026 Page 43 of 68 2) Potential Repair/Seeding/Thin Layering of Mosquito Lanes Next steps: • Steve Swann, City Engineer will speak to ESC on 2/25/26 about potential pilot projects • COAB will present to Northeast Florida Estuarine Restoration Team (NERT) gathering of experts in New Smyrna Beach sometime between 3/24/26-3/26/26 and seek feedback on potential projects Agenda Item #4.C. 25 Feb 2026 Page 44 of 68 • ESC to discuss and make formal pilot recommendations to staff and Commission in April for consideration in the 2026-2027 budget Background Resources • How to Protect AB’s Saltmarsh Wetlands: Possible Solutions (March 2025 Program) -- Watch the March video / Passcode: 91.Sc1xx • SJRWMD o Bringing Back our Coastal Wetlands https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/e4d0f606c20240999f92fa76fe9e6e86 o Florida Specifier. Beneath the surface, tracking aquatic vegetation in the Lower St. Johns River, November 6, 2025, By CORINNE HERMLE https://floridaspecifier.com/nov-dec-2025/beneath- the-surface-tracking-aquatic-vegetation-in-the-lower-st-johns-river/ • SASMI o SASMI Overview Film Marsh Forward -- https://youtu.be/b_1oHvp9PuY o Marsh Migration: Restoring Habitat Connectivity -- https://youtu.be/3yPsXQ8B8E4 o Marsh Migration: Primer - https://youtu.be/XzmyNQYrjdo o Adaptation in Local Communities: https://youtu.be/CAyIdu5wyb4 Film Series Update The Lorax – Saturday, February 21, 2026 4-6pm • Need to continue to promote heavily • Need an ESC table with free yard applications and volunteer sign-up sheet • Hoping to share a few slides from ARCC, ESC & BGG at beginning of program No Sleep Til – Thursday, May 25, 2026 6-8:30pm • Alexandra Simpson, Director, is checking her availability • Anne Marie Moquin, Beaches Go Green, is concerned the film is too slow and people won’t come or stay through end of film • I am working on lining up a panel of experts to answer questions and foster discussion after the film such as: insurance expert, emergency prep/recovery expert, resilience expert. Please send your suggestions with contact information if possible. • Need to create a promotion graphic Kiss the Ground – Thursday, August 27, 2026 6-8:30pm • Have not started on lining up panel or promotion yet • It is my understanding that Parks & Recreation staff is in charge of securing license to screen Isles of Dogs • Staff can’t find license to screen so ARCC looking into it Agenda Item #4.C. 25 Feb 2026 Page 45 of 68 Meeting with Commissioner Grant • CM Grant met with me for 1.5 hours on 2/19/26 and we discussed his big bucket areas of concern, Ch23 proposed changes, trees in general, ESC ’s 2025 performance, insurance, heat island effect, and LEED for Cities recertification. o Three areas of concern are: Stormwater, Trees, and Marsh Erosion o For ESC priorities, he would like to see action/focus in he of his concern areas. o He has not had time to dig into the Ch23 proposed changes yet. I promised to resend Amanda’s powerpoint to him and Dan’s info on CRZ. o Trees – we discussed possible solutions for some of the challenges facing our tree canopy. He seems interested in a mature tree inventory and finding a solution for trees and parking on Plaza. o ESC ’s Performance – He was happy ESC was willing to hear his thoughts regarding trying to retain canopy supporters and said we did good work. o LEED for Cities Recertification – Fine with it as long as it does not cause any major staff burden. Possible Tree Removals • 350 4th Street – I received a call from a resident on 4th St about this property that was just sold to a developer. The property has at least three large live oaks. The resident said she spoke to the realtor who shared that the developer may save one of the trees. See photos of property at end of this report. • 812 East Coast Drive – I received these photos from a local resident about a large palm (or two?) cut down recently saying they never saw a permit sign posted. Agenda Item #4.C. 25 Feb 2026 Page 46 of 68 Realtor Workshop • Spoke with a Keller Williams contact who suggested meeting with their realtors first to test the waters and then approach NEFAR about hosting a larger event. A lunch and learn will not get realtors to attend. They want CEUs and something of value that will help them do their job better. We could also try having the City invite/host workshop for realtors and see if that peaks some curiosity and levels the playing field. • Need direction from ESC on whether to pursue and which approach to take Edible Orchard • I have two experts lined up to help COAB site, design, and choose appropriate species. I need direction from ESC whether to move forward, pause, or scrap. Awards • Despite repeated requests for an update from staff, none has been received. • Need status update on whether this event is happening and if nominations have been promoted FYI Resources • Community-Led Resilience o The Environmental Collaboratory at Drexel University Report / Press Release /  Severe weather emergency preparedness article • Data Dashboard - Explore Progress | Systems Change Lab • In the last issue of this newslist an article foresaw a drop in the use of commercial methane. A study covered in the Global Energy Monitor foresees the opposite, with an enormous increase in the use of Agenda Item #4.C. 25 Feb 2026 Page 47 of 68 AI largely responsible. The US is expected to lead the increase, followed by China. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2026/jan/29/gas-power-ai-climate • Yale Climate Connections takes a global look at energy development and concludes that the growing momentum of renewables is driven by an insuperable cost advantage. https://yaleclimateconnections.org/2026/01/despite-trump-renewable-energy-keeps-surging/ • The Ecology Department at the U of Washington has initiated an admirable program to support adaptation of coastal areas to sea level rise. Help is offered in dealing with coastal flooding, beach and bluff erosion saltwater intrusion, and increased storm severity. https://ecology.wa.gov/blog/february- 2026/building-coastal-climate-change-resilience • A study published in Nature Communications found that the regular succession of species in a wide range of habitats is being interrupted by environmental degradation and loss of species, with the danger that the system itself is threatened. Thanks to Cherrill Heaton for the lead. https://phys.org/news/2026-02-nature-halt-climate-gains-pace.html#google_vignette Agenda Item #4.C. 25 Feb 2026 Page 48 of 68 Picture of 350 & 354 4th Street Duplex just sold. It did not even go on the market. Agenda Item #4.C. 25 Feb 2026 Page 49 of 68 Close up picture of front yard tree. Agenda Item #4.C. 25 Feb 2026 Page 50 of 68 Attempt to get picture of breadth of canopy of tree in back yard. Agenda Item #4.C. 25 Feb 2026 Page 51 of 68 Picture of tree on west side of lot. Agenda Item #4.C. 25 Feb 2026 Page 52 of 68 The shade three in front of 350 4th Street is one of three shade trees left on 4th Street Agenda Item #4.C. 25 Feb 2026 Page 53 of 68 Picture of ROW Live Oak on left side of street across from 350 4th Street. It will take a long time before that ROW tree will become a shade tree for the street. Agenda Item #4.C. 25 Feb 2026 Page 54 of 68 Lots of construction parking on street. Agenda Item #4.C. 25 Feb 2026 Page 55 of 68 z Protection around tree Agenda Item #4.C. 25 Feb 2026 Page 56 of 68 CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP COMMITTEE (ESC) 2025-2026 FOCUSED WORK By September 2026, ESC will complete the following: 1) To study and make recommendations to and respond to requests from city commission and city staff with respect to the city’s maritime forest, parks, preserves and open spaces, beautification of public spaces, and environmental stewardship, including: a) Support passage and implementation of revisions to Chapter 23 and other tree-related recommendations – especially those focused on preservation b) Make a recommendation for a Marsh Pilot Program for Commission to fund in 2026-2027 budget c) Improve Public Spaces with Florida Friendly Design vs Seek Bee City USA designation to focus attention and efforts on native landscaping and related reduction in biocide, fertilizer, and water usage d) Provide input for Master Stormwater Management Plan and campaign towards water conservation with goal of 15% residential water reduction (given current drought) vs Research models and cost for pilot residential composting program 2) Act as a motivating and coordinating body to encourage joint public and private participation in promoting these purposes by leading environmental communications initiatives and outreach activities, including: a) Reports b) Events c) Educational/Outreach Communications & Materials d) Volunteers & Partnerships 3) Continue to improve ESC’s organizational excellence and processes so it can fulfill its two above purposes to the best of its ability a) Increase number of volunteers, subject matter experts, and partnerships b) Increase effectiveness, productivity, and satisfaction of ESC meetings c) Improve ESC processes including communication with staff, Commission, & community, EOY evaluation process, and priority setting d) Improve upon one takeaway from EOY self-evaluation and shift EOY survey timing to EOFY timing (aka Sept) Agenda Item #4.C. 25 Feb 2026 Page 57 of 68 MEMO To: ESC From: Sarah Boren, ESC Member CC: Amanda Askew Date: February 4, 2026 Re: ESC’s 2025-2026 Focused Work Reframed for Discussion With the ESC consensus to focus more and do fewer actions well, I am submitting this reframing of Amy Palmer’s 2025-2026 priorities document submitted in January for discussion during February meetings. My goals with this memo and discussion are to: 1. Improve upon ESC’s overall priority/goal setting and workplan process moving forward 2. Make sure each ESC member has a voice and understands current status of work General Comments: • FYI ESC priorities timeframe switched to fiscal year from calendar year two years ago per direction of City Manager and to be more aligned with the timing of the city budget. Therefore, ESC is already in Q2 of its 2025-2026 priorities and workplan that ESC voted on/approved in August 2025. Here is a quick review of our process last year: o 12/24 ESC EOY survey for ESC member priorities o 1/18/25 Community Input Workshop (facilitated by T. Miner) o 2/12/25 ESC approves proposed 2025-2026 priorities to send to Commission o 3/13/25 March Joint Workshop with Commission o 4/9/25 ESC approves top five priorities o 4/14/25 ESC presents top five priorities to Commission o 5/12/25 Commission chooses one priority for ESC – incentives for protection of mature trees o 7/1/25 Former City Manager Killingsworth requests a 2025-2026 ESC workplan for a resolution for Commission to approve o 8/13/25 ESC approved 2025-2026 workplan to send first to City Manager who said would put on Commission agenda but never did • These 2025-2026 priorities do not need to be presented to Commission at the 3/2 Joint Priorities Workshop. The 3/2 Joint Priorities Workshop is to discuss October 2026 – September 2027 priorities BEFORE Commission deliberates its priorities and the 2026-2027 budget. • I submit it is not the priorities we have trouble with but rather staying on track with a workplan that achieves our set priorities. When a project gets stalled due to staff or Commission or some other urgent issue comes up, there is little clarity on how ESC should adjust its workplan. • Whatever ESC decides as its focused work for the year, it needs a workplan that has regular milestones and delineated action steps (including education and outreach) for each priority/program/effort so we can make sure each commitment gets across the finish line. Each effort should have an estimated completion date and an ESC member in charge/as lead who reports out monthly via member reports on the effort’s progress. Agenda Item #4.C. 25 Feb 2026 Page 58 of 68 Agenda Item #4.C. 25 Feb 2026 Page 59 of 68 CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP COMMITTEE (ESC) 2025-2026 FOCUSED WORK By September 2026, ESC will complete the following: 1) To study and make recommendations to and respond to requests from city commission and city staff with respect to the city’s maritime forest, parks, preserves and open spaces, beautification of public spaces, and environmental stewardship, including: e) Support passage and implementation of revisions to Chapter 23 and other tree-related recommendations from 2024-2025 – especially those focused on preservation Approved 2025-2026 Canopy Priorities (as of 8/25) • Approve & Implement 2025-2026 Tree Fund Action & Spending Plan (orange = in progress) • Continue to improve Chapter 23 *** • Create Tree Reports & Improve Data Collection • Long-Term Tree Replacement Draft Plan (red = not started/on hold) • Dutton Island Tree Loss Investigation • Tree Inventory of Parks • Partner with COJ TreePlotter Program • Edible Orchard (carry over from 2024-2025 priorities) QUESTIONS: • Where does the work of the Tree Trust Fund Action & Spending Plan fit in? • Does this mean ESC stops working on other voted upon canopy priorities? • What are the SMART goals for this priority and sub-bullets? Implementation & timeframe for each sub-bullet? • Are there any general fund budget implications with this priority? • What exactly do we need staff support on for this priority? If approved will staff implement Heritage Tree grant program with support needed from ESC? • Workplan with monthly milestones needed and who will lead which strategy over finish line • Historic Corridors (LEAD: A. Palmer) • Heritage Tree maintenance grant program (LEAD?) • Developer/Builder/Realtor input on incentives to preserve trees (LEADS: Developer/Builder – C. Kelcourse; Realtor/Title – S. Boren) • “Elder Tree” mapping (LEAD: A. Houston) • Extra protection of “really large/old” majestic trees (LEAD?) • Quarterly/Semi-annual Master Arborist Free Consulting Days f) Study and recommend nature-based solutions to combat marsh erosion Approved 2025-2026 Parks, Preserves & Open Spaces Priorities (as of 8/25) • Create Friends/Stewards of the Parks Working Group • Propose a Marsh Pilot program for 2026-2027 support *** • Update Parks Master Plan • Rain Gardens in flooded areas of Jack Russell Park COMMENTS: • ESC should be done with this priority by May 2026 • If Commission funds pilot in 2026-2027, it is unclear if ESC will have any role in its implementation except maybe community education and outreach • ESC is assuming implementation will involve staff and contractors g) Seek Bee City USA designation to focus attention and efforts on native landscaping and related reduction in biocide, fertilizer, and water usage Approved 2025-2026 Beautification Priorities (as of 8/25) • FDOT Mayport Road Beautification • Improve Public Spaces with Florida Friendly Design • Bee City Designation Agenda Item #4.C. 25 Feb 2026 Page 60 of 68 QUESTIONS: • Does this mean ESC stops working on other voted upon beautification priorities (e.g., wildflowers in public ROW)? • Are there any budget implications with this priority (e.g., is there a cost for designation) and if yes, do we have money in 2025-2026 budget or does this need to be a request for 2026-2027 (by this April) or 2027-2028 budget? • Will designation require significant staff time? • Who is going to be in charge/lead this priority and what is timeframe to complete (e.g., by Sep 2026 or does it need to become part of ESC’s 2026-2027 priorities as well)? h) Research models and cost for pilot residential composting program Approved 2025-2026 Environmental Stewardship Priorities (as of 8/25) • Work Toward 2050 Goals & Better Performance and Measurement • Support 15% Residential Water Reduction • Voluntary Resilient & Green Building Ordinance Proposal • Flooding & Stormwater Management Plan Input • Floating Solar Research COMMENTS: • This is a brand-new priority for 2025-2026 not on voted upon list by ESC • If ESC compost recommendation has budget implications, do we have money in 2025-2026 budget or does this need to be a request for 2026-2027 (by this April) or 2027-2028 budget? QUESTIONS: • Does this mean ESC stops working on the other voted upon env stew priorities already started? • What is SMART goal for this priority? • Who is going to be in charge/lead this priority and what is timeframe to complete? 2) Act as a motivating and coordinating body to encourage joint public and private participation in promoting these purposes by leading environmental communications initiatives and outreach activities, including: e) Reports f) Events g) Educational/Outreach Communications & Materials h) Volunteers & Partnerships Approved 2025-2026 Education & Outreach Priorities (as of 8/25) • Increase number of volunteers and SMEs by 20 people • Education & Outreach (E&O) about tree ordinance/trees and resilience/stormwater • Expand outreach via website • State of the Canopy report delivered by Jan 2027 (added on by former City Manager) COMMENT: • For simplicity and conciseness, I recommend we only list reports, events, materials, and volunteer/partnerships – not specifics • Examples of each activity include: i. Reports (e.g., Monthly tree report, Semi-annual permit process report, Biennial comprehensive report on the canopy) ii. Events (e.g., Centennial, Minecraft, Arbor/Earth Days, Tree Giveaways, Speaker & Film series, Awards, Service Days, Topical Workshops/Meetings/Lunch & Learns) iii. Educational/Outreach Communications & Materials (e.g., Door hangars & postcards/letters, Welcome kit, Community surveys, City bill insert, enewsletter, website, yard signs & social media content (e.g., how to conserve water, call before you cut, tree ordinance 101, make your property more resilient) iv. Volunteers & Partnerships (e.g., Build a committed group of SMEs and volunteers to help ESC; Work with other entities such as nonprofits, universities, TPO, JTA, etc. to leverage additional expertise, resources, and community cohesion) 3) Continue to improve ESC’s organizational excellence and processes so it can fulfill its two above purposes to the best of its ability Agenda Item #4.C. 25 Feb 2026 Page 61 of 68 e) Increase number of volunteers, subject matter experts, and partnerships f) Increase effectiveness, productivity, and satisfaction of ESC meetings g) Improve ESC processes including communication with staff, Commission, & community, EOY evaluation process, and priority setting h) Improve upon one takeaway from EOY self-evaluation Approved 2025-2026 Education & Outreach Priorities (as of 8/25) • Increase effectiveness, productivity, and satisfaction of ESC mtgs • Improve ESC processes including communication with staff, Commission, & community, EOY evaluation process, and priority setting • Improve upon one takeaway from self-evaluation Agenda Item #4.C. 25 Feb 2026 Page 62 of 68 CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP COMMITTEE (ESC) 2026-2027 FOCUSED WORK & PRIORITIES FOR COMMISSION Per the City Manager, what are ESC’s “most essential and urgent work that the commission can do" and how do they connect to the city's mission, vision, and values.” 1) To study and make recommendations to and respond to requests from city commission and city staff with respect to the city’s maritime forest, parks, preserves and open spaces, beautification of public spaces, and environmental stewardship, the ESC will complete the following by September 30, 2027: i) Maritime Forest objective -- XXX j) Parks, Preserves & Open Spaces objective -- XXX k) Beautification objective -- XXX l) Environmental Stewardship objective -- XXX 2) To a ct as a motivating and coordinating body to encourage joint public and private participation in promoting the above focus areas, the ESC will implement an integrated communications and education and outreach plan aligned to the above objectives, through the following strategies: i) Reports j) Events k) Educational/Outreach Communications & Materials l) Volunteers & Partnerships 3) Continue to improve ESC’s effectiveness, impact, and processes to fulfill its two above purposes to the best of its ability by implementing the following: i) XXX j) XXX k) XXX l) XXX Agenda Item #4.C. 25 Feb 2026 Page 63 of 68 MEMO To: ESC Members From: Sarah Boren, ESC Member CC: Amanda Askew Date: February 3, 2026 Re: ESC’s 2026-2027 Focused Work Framework My goal with this memo is to build upon what Amy Palmer, ESC Chair, challenged all of us to do at the last meeting – to think about her proposed priorities framework so she can present something clean and simple at the 3/2 Joint Priorities Workshop with Commission. I am hoping the enclosed will get us started by using ESC members shared priorities in the EOY survey and achieve consensus by 8pm on 2/25/26. I reread the updated Chapter 23, Article III, Division 7, Sec.23-56. regarding ESC’s duties and responsibilities and noted the following expectations of ESC’s annual joint workshop with Commission: “The city commission will have an annual joint commission and ESC workshop to discuss the committee's priorities, suggested projects, and annual workplan.” Since this workshop is for Oct 2026- Sep 2027, my recommendation is to not present a proposed workplan on 3/2/26 but rather seek confirmation whether the City Manager/Commission wants/needs to see a workplan from ESC after Commission has decided on their priorities and budget for as full alignment as possible. General Comments: • Commission likes SMART goals • Commission’s use of dots to choose priorities does not do ESC any favors. For instance, when ARCC presented three priorities using this enclosed format and ESC presented its five top priorities last year, Commission only chose one priority for each committee. Even the former City Manager acknowledged that ESC could work on more than one objective for the whole year. o My recommendation is that the ESC Chair ask the City Manager if we can try something different this year. To ask if ESC can present its proposed focused work for 2026-2027 including projects and proposed calendar, see if Commission has any alignment suggestions, and then have specific asks ready for funding and staff support that ESC would like Commission to prioritize when it comes to the budget. Essentially ESC would ask for Commission’s “blessing” of its SMART objectives for the year rather than having them choose one of the three priorities. The workshop focus and discussion would then be more about what resources (budget/staff support) ESC needs to achieve proposed objectives (e.g., if they agree with us seeking Bee City USA certification, we need $200 and sanctioned support from staff) • Whatever ESC decides as its focused work for the 2026-2027 fiscal year, it needs a workplan that has regular milestones and delineated action steps (including education and outreach) for each priority/program/effort so we can make sure each commitment gets across the finish line. Each effort should have an estimated completion date and an ESC member in charge/as lead who reports out monthly via member reports on the effort’s progress. • There still seems to be confusion between what ESC submits to Commission to consider as objectives for the year and ESC’s ongoing year-to-year work. Agenda Item #4.C. 25 Feb 2026 Page 64 of 68 CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP COMMITTEE (ESC) 2026-2027 FOCUSED WORK TEMPLATE 1) To study and make recommendations to and respond to requests from city commission and city staff with respect to the city’s maritime forest, parks, preserves and open spaces, beautification of public spaces, and environmental stewardship, the ESC will complete the following by September 30, 2027: m) Maritime Forest objective: XXX n) Parks, Preserves & Open Spaces objective: XXX o) Beautification objective: XXX p) Environmental Stewardship objective: XXX 2) To a ct as a motivating and coordinating body to encourage joint public and private participation in promoting the above focus areas, the ESC will implement an integrated communications and education and outreach plan aligned to the above objectives, through the following strategies: m) Reports n) Events o) Educational/Outreach Communications & Materials p) Volunteers & Partnerships 3) Continue to improve ESC’s effectiveness, impact, and processes to fulfill its two above purposes to the best of its ability by implementing the following: m) XXX n) XXX o) XXX p) XXX Agenda Item #4.C. 25 Feb 2026 Page 65 of 68 EXAMPLE using ESC EOY survey responses on priorities for 2026-2027 NOTE: This example does not include Commission, staff, or community responses/input CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP COMMITTEE (ESC) 2026-2027 FOCUSED WORK 1) To study and make recommendations to and respond to requests from city commission and city staff with respect to the city’s maritime forest, parks, preserves and open spaces, beautification of public spaces, and environmental stewardship, the ESC will complete the following by September 30, 2027: q) Maritime Forest Example #1 (one main objective for all focus areas): ESC will help protect the large mature majestic trees by securing Commission adoption and financial support of at least one Chapter 23 amendment or formal policy that increases protection for such trees (e.g., setting a higher DBH threshold for removal, adding extra review, or strengthening mitigation), and by doubling the number of designated Heritage Trees on the city’s official list (e.g., from roughly 16 to at least 32) through targeted outreach and assistance with the Heritage Tree designation process. Example #2 (one objective for each focus area): ESC will deliver to the City Commission a completed “State of the Canopy” report and secure at least one formal Commission action on Chapter 23 updates or related tree-protection measures. Example #3 (one objective for each focus area plus a bit of how and E&O) : ESC will strengthen Atlantic Beach’s maritime forest by: (1) supporting Commission adoption of at least one set of Chapter 23 tree-protection updates focused on preserving the large mature majestic trees and heritage trees informed by at least one work session with developers/builders and one with realtors/title companies, and (2) facilitating the planting of at least XXX new front-yard or right-of-way trees through existing city programs (e.g., free tree planting / giveaways), with basic tracking of plantings by location and species to feed into the 2027 “State of the Canopy” report. r) Parks, Preserves & Open Spaces Example #1: ESC will increase public planting of mature trees by coordinating with City staff to plant at least XXX new canopy-forming trees (minimum 15-gallon size or equivalent “mature” nursery stock) on public property and eligible front-yard/right-of-way sites through municipal free tree and giveaway programs, ensuring plantings are distributed across all four city districts and tracking species, location, and survival annually until well established. Example #2: ESC will design and launch a “Friends/Stewards of the Park” pilot for at least two parks with at least a few volunteer workdays completed including a large/mature tree inventory, trash cleanup, invasive removal, and/or native plantings, and a brief evaluation with staff recommending whether and how to scale to additional parks. Agenda Item #4.C. 25 Feb 2026 Page 66 of 68 Example #3: ESC will enhance Atlantic Beach parks, preserves, and open spaces by: (1) designing and delivering a park-health assessment that includes a simple connectivity and ecological-health assessment for at least five parks, preserves, or open spaces to include in the Parks Master Plan, and (2) launching a “Friends/Stewards of the Park” pilot in at least two parks with at least a few volunteer workdays focused on large, mature tree inventory, trash cleanup, invasive removal, and native plantings, with participation and outcomes documented for potential expansion to additional parks. s) Beautification Example #1: ESC will enhance beautification through public planting of mature trees by coordinating with City staff to install at least XXX new canopy-forming, 15-gallon-or-larger trees along highly visible corridors and civic spaces, ensuring that plantings occur across all four city districts with locations, species, and one-year survival documented in a simple beautification planting log. Example #2: ESC will develop and recommend to Commission a native-planting and beautification plan for at least one key corridor or civic site (e.g., Marsh Oaks Community Center landscaping, a main entry road, or beach/park accesses), including a target of at least 90% native plants and research potential grant funding opportunities (e.g., Viva Florida or similar grants), and support implementation of at least one visible pilot project. Example #3: ESC will improve beautification of public spaces by: (1) achieving Bee City USA certification and incorporating pollinator-conscious practices into city policies and plans; and (2) designing and implementing a native-plant and Florida-Friendly landscaping visible pilot project (e.g., re-landscaping a main entry road segment, beach access, or park entrance with native plantings and educational signage). t) Environmental Stewardship Example #1: ESC will implement a focused education and outreach campaign on protecting and planting mature trees by: (1) delivering at least four tree-focused outreach events or workshops (e.g., Treats & Trees, “how to plant and care for mature trees,” or similar) that collectively reach at least 200 participants; (2) publishing a simple, visually friendly “Mature Trees 101” package (one web page, one handout, and at least three social media posts) explaining why large trees matter, when permits are required, and how to plant and care for new canopy trees; and (3) tracking engagement by collecting at least 100 resident sign-ups or commitments to plant or preserve a mature tree, documented through event sign-in sheets, online forms, or follow-up photo submissions. Example #2: ESC will support the City in completing all ESC-related tasks needed for LEED for Cities 2027 recertification (including at least one resilience and stormwater-management recommendation and one “lead by example” landscape or lighting change), and present a short summary of these actions to Commission and the community. Example #3: ESC will advance environmental stewardship in Atlantic Beach by (1) supporting the City’s 2027 LEED for Cities recertification by contributing at least two documented recommendations and Agenda Item #4.C. 25 Feb 2026 Page 67 of 68 data inputs on resilience or stormwater management that are reflected in the recertification submittal, and (2) securing Commission approval and implementation of at least two highly visible “lead by example” practices—such as a Lights Out proclamation with defined nighttime lighting reductions and one native-landscape/no-biocide pilot (e.g., City Hall or a park/ROW site with ≥90% native plants and educational signage)—and promoting these efforts through at least three targeted outreach pieces to the community. 2) To a ct as a motivating and coordinating body to encourage joint public and private participation in promoting the above focus areas, the ESC will implement an integrated communications and education and outreach plan aligned to the above objectives, through the following strategies: q) Reports r) Events s) Educational/Outreach Communications & Materials t) Volunteers & Partnerships 3) Continue to improve ESC’s effectiveness, impact, and processes to fulfill its two above purposes to the best of its ability by implementing the following: q) Example: Adopt an annual work plan that outlines the timeframe, milestones, strategies and action steps needed to complete each priority with a named ESC lead and backup for major projects by September of each year. r) Example: Achieve at least 90% on-time completion of ESC action items assigned in meeting minutes (measured at year-end) and at least 80% of members submitting any required written updates by the agenda-packet deadline. s) Example: Maintain at least a 90% attendance and good agenda packet preparation rate at regularly scheduled ESC meetings t) Example: Establish and implement a simple volunteer & ESC member recruitment and onboarding process to support overall work, visibility, continuity and bench strength. Agenda Item #4.C. 25 Feb 2026 Page 68 of 68