3-2-26 Commission Workshop Adopted MinutesMINUTES
Commission Workshop Meeting
Monday, March 2, 2026 - 7:00 PM
City Hall, Commission Chamber
800 Seminole Road, Atlantic Beach, FL 32233
ATTENDANCE:
Present: Curtis Ford, Mayor - Seat 1 (At Large)
Bruce Bole, Commissioner - Mayor Pro Tem Seat 2 (District 1308)
Thomas Grant, Commissioner - Seat 3 (District 1307)
Candace Kelly, Commissioner - Seat 4 (District 1306)
Jessica Ring, Commissioner - Seat 5 (District 1312)
Also Present:
CALL TO ORDER
Kevin Hogencamp, Interim City Manager (CM)
Donna Bartle, City Clerk (CC)
Amanda Askew, Neighborhoods Department Dir. (NDD)
Chris Delk, City Arborist
Bruce Andrews, ESC Member
Amy Franqui, ESC Member
Christina Kelcourse, ESC Member
Todd Miner, ESC Member
Amy Palmer, ESC Chair
Mayor Ford called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM. He clarified that the Environmental
Stewardship Committee (ESC) members are invited to stay for potential questions and dialogue
during the workshop.
1. TOPIC: TREE PROTECTION CODE (CHAPTER 23)
B. Staff Overview
AB Code Chapter 23 (Link)
CM Hogencamp acknowledged subject matter experts, NDDAskew and City Arborist
Delk. He reported that since presenting the initial red -line Chapter 23 draft in November,
staff has been in active listening mode, incorporating feedback from the Commission,
ESC, and community. The feedback will be synthesized for an April town hall meeting
where we plan to provide a dedicated forum for broader community input on tree canopy
goals.
CM Hogencamp announced that within the next few months, staff will return to the
commission with a second red -line version reflecting all collaborative feedback. He
emphasized the goal of ensuring decisions are data -based, mentioning that staff has
applied for a grant to fund a professional tree inventory, with results expected by June
Commission Workshop
March 2, 2026
30th. As an alternative, the commission may be asked to fund the inventory directly if
they want to expedite the process.
Staff has reinitiated their request to the City of Jacksonville to utilize their tree plotter
software, expecting a favorable response that would enable precise mapping and
monitoring of the city's most significant oaks. CM Hogencamp stated the goal is to bring
a code recommendation that not only manages growth but preserves community
character.
A. Overview of Workshop Purpose - Mayor Ford
Mayor Ford explained that the recent cutting of a 200 -plus year old oak on West First
Street brought tree protection issues to the forefront. He emphasized that any changes to
Chapter 23 needed to be thoughtful and data -driven, requiring a comprehensive tree
inventory to understand the volume of trees and whether they are located in the public
right-of-way or on private property.
Mayor Ford posed questions about the city's priorities, asking whether Atlantic Beach
would be willing to trade stormwater requirements for tree preservation when both
cannot coexist. He suggested considering exceptions to stormwater retention
requirements and setback variances to save significant trees and noted that trees naturally
absorb stormwater. He questioned whether city staff could be granted authority to make
reasonable exceptions for tree preservation without someone crying graft and corruption.
He asked everyone to think about what could be done differently to get where they want
to go, noting his support for saving trees.
Commissioner Bole referenced a previous city manager's right-of-way chart showing
how tree roots intersect with streets.
C. Commission Discussion
Commissioner Bole
Emphasized the need for better enforcement and education regarding tree
protection.
Expressed concern about the current double mitigation requirements for tree
removal, noting that when dealing with multi-million dollar properties, even
substantial mitigation fees become a small percentage of the overall project cost.
Commissioner Kelly
• Supported the concept of case-by-case flexibility to save trees by adjusting house
placement.
• Acknowledged the enthusiasm of new residents wanting to build their ideal
homes but favored dealing with existing lot constraints.
• Liked the idea that properties with more trees should require less stormwater
retention since trees provide natural retention benefits.
• Raised concerns about root zone protection, specifically mentioning the beautiful
oak trees on Plaza that are at risk from parking and the need for city action to
prevent root damage.
Commission Workshop
March 2, 2026
• Noted that tree preservation efforts on roads like Sailfish between Seaspray and
Atlantic are paying off.
• Emphasized the need to address challenges on small lots and the balance between
preserving trees and allowing reasonable homeowner development.
Commissioner Ring
• Questioned the higher mitigation rates for new development versus other types
of development. NDD Askew explained the current code categorizes projects as
vacant property, new development, redevelopment, and heritage trees in
environmentally sensitive areas. The Environmental Stewardship Committee
was particularly concerned about targeting tear -downs and new development
rather than penalizing homeowners adding pools or additions. The higher
mitigation ratio for new development serves as a deterrent to clear -cutting and
encourages creative design to save trees.
• Raised concerns about subdividing properties, citing the West First Street
example where subdividing one lot into two led to the loss of the 250 -year-old
oak. Askew acknowledged this as difficult since the subdivision met minimum
code requirements, noting that developers often aren't deterred by high mitigation
fees, with some simply paying $80,000 without concern.
Commissioner Grant
• Echoed concerns about higher mitigation rates and the need for developer
outreach.
• Advocated for a developer town hall to gather input.
• Suggested more flexibility on setbacks might be appealing to developers.
• Emphasized that with rising land costs, even substantial mitigation fees represent
only 1-2% of project costs.
• Proposed incentives for tree preservation and discussed mitigation location
flexibility.
• Suggested developing a program to match people wanting trees with those
needing to mitigate, particularly in areas with fewer trees away from the shore.
• Stressed the importance of addressing root zone protection.
• Noted the inconsistency of asking homeowners to protect trees while the city
struggles to protect its own trees on Plaza.
ESC Member Bruce Andrews explained that current code allows payment into the
mitigation fund instead of on-site planting, once minimum on -property requirements are
met. This fund supports the Adopt -a -Tree program, which aims for 100 trees in 2026 for
the city's centennial and is nearly at 50 trees already.
Mr. Andrews noted that Chapter 24 requires new construction to include shade trees in
front yards, with successful examples visible throughout the city. He suggested
increasing requirements for expensive new homes, noting that some multi-million dollar
houses have minimal landscaping despite the negligible cost impact.
Mayor Ford
Commission Workshop
March 2, 2026
• Expressed concern about unintended consequences from proposed changes to
root protection zones, particularly on narrow 50 -foot lots where construction
logistics are already challenging.
• Concerned that overly restrictive requirements might encourage builders to
simply pay fees and remove trees rather than work around them.
• Emphasized the need for data on whether protected trees are actually being
damaged during construction, noting that while citizens would typically report
deaths of 200 -year-old oaks, staff doesn't currently track such incidents.
• Referenced examples of old oaks surviving with exposed roots in Jacksonville
parks, suggesting the need for balanced, thoughtful regulations.
• Addressed confusion about tree terminology. NDD Askew clarified the terms.
• Emphasized that live oaks should receive special consideration due to their
longevity, stating that a 250 -year-old live oak cannot be replaced in one, two, or
even three lifetimes.
• Noted the current code requirement to replace oaks with oaks, but pointed out the
illogic of replacing a water oak (80 -year lifespan) with another oak when a
longer -lived species might be preferable.
Commissioner Kelly
• Asked about the possibility of freezing all tree permits until the ordinance
revision is complete. Mayor Ford indicated this would likely be problematic
legally, noting that permit moratoria are typically used for health and safety
issues rather than policy development.
Commissioner Ring
• Suggested looking to Savannah, Georgia's tree management model, noting their
forward -thinking approach to green spaces and protection of centuries-old trees.
CM Hogencamp noted that Florida legislature presents impediments to
implementing Savannah -style ordinances.
• Suggested partnering with nonprofits for tree preservation, similar to how the city
acquired Selva Marina and River Branch Preserve.
The discussion included acknowledgment that while some property owners exploit the
diseased/dangerous tree exemption through questionable arborist reports, most residents
appear to comply with the tree ordinance requirements. NDD Askew noted concerns
about arborists who charge $150 to write removal letters for any tree without proper
professional standards.
Commissioner Grant
• Mentioned that the tree inventory would cost approximately $100,000.
• Suggested focusing initially on larger trees while potentially incentivizing self -
reporting.
• Emphasized the need for proactive identification of at -risk significant trees to
enable preservation efforts.
Commissioner Bole
Commission Workshop
March 2, 2026
• Noted emerging drone technology that could provide advanced tree surveying
capabilities, offering detailed analysis of tree patterns and root systems.
ESC Chair Amy Palmer expressed appreciation for the creative suggestions, particularly
regarding variances to save trees. She noted that Chapter 24 is largely silent on tree
preservation priorities and suggested that explicit language prioritizing tree protection,
similar to Fernandina Beach's requirement that "every effort shall be made to save the
tree," could provide clear direction for staff and the Community Development Board.
The workshop concluded with plans for the next town hall meeting to gather broader
community input on tree canopy protection goals.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 7:52 p.m.
Attest:
wol(,M4 a4a*-
Donna L. Bartle, City Clerk
Date Approved:
�q
Curtis Ford, Mayor
Commission Workshop
March 2, 2026
MW