03-28-94 vATLANTIC BEACH CITY COMMISSION
March 28, 1994
AGENDA
Call to Order
Invocation and pledge to the flag
1. Approval of the minutes of the regular meeting of March 14,
1994
2. Recognition of Visitors
3. Appearances:
a. Presentation of Proclamation declaring April as
Parliamentary Emphasis month
b. Presentation of Proclamation recognizing National
Telecommunicators Week
4. Old Business:
a. Public Hearing on proposal to provide additional access
to the Donner neighborhood, and discussion relative to
funding sources for same
b. Appointment of three additional members of Equity Study
Commission
c. Selection of engineer to provide professional services
for the expansion of Buccaneer water plant No. 3
ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED TO BE
ROUTINE BY THE CITY COMMISSION AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE MOTION IN
THE FORM LISTED BELOW. THERE WILL BE NO SEPARATE DISCUSSION OF
THESE ITEMS. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED
FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION AND STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS HAVE BEEN
PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COMMISSION ON THESE ITEMS.
5. Consent Agenda:
Acknowledge receipt of Water and Sewer Committee Report #8
6. New Business:
a. Authorize funding for additional man-hours for Code
Enforcement Officer (Commissioner Shaughnessy)
b. Approve entering into contract with JGJ Design Services
for redesign of outlet structure for Jasmine Street
retention pond
c. Approve Final Change Order and Final Pay Request and
accept the Buccaneer chlorine contact chamber project as
complete
d. Approval of Change Order in the Ocean Grove Sewer Line
Extension project, increasing the contract by $40,611.50
4
Page Two
Agenda - March 14, 1994
7. City Manager Reports and/or Correspondence:
a. Report relative to acquisition and usage of property in
Section H
b. Report relative to computer system upgrade for Police
Department
8. Reports and/or requests from City Commissioners, City Attorney
and City Clerk:
a. Action on City Attorney's recommendation relative to EPA
action regarding pH monitoring
Adjournment
•
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF ATLANTIC BEACH
CITY COMMISSION HELD IN CITY HALL, 800 SEMINOLE
ROAD, AT 7:15 p. m. ON MONDAY, MARCH 28, 1994
PRESENT: Lyman T. Fletcher, Mayor
Steven Rosenbloom
Suzanne Shaughnessy
J. Dezmond Waters, III, and
Robert G. Weiss,Jr.,Commissioners
AO! Kim D. Leinbach, City Manager
Alan C. Jensen, City Attorney
Maureen King, City Clerk
The meeting was called to order by Mayor
Fletcher. The invocation offered by Commissioner
Shaughnessy was followed by the pledge to the flag.
1. Aooroval of the minutes of the regular
meeting of March 14. 1994
Motion: Approve minutes of the
regular meeting of March 14, 1994
No discussion before the vote. The motion carried
unanimously.
Aooroval of the minutes of the Strategic
Planning Session of March 15. 1994
Motion:
Strategic
15, 1994
Approve minutes of the
Planning Session of March
No discussion before the vote. The motion carried
unanimously.
Aooroval of the minutes of the Joint
meeting between the Commission and
Solid Waste Committee on March 16. 1994
Motion: Approve minutes of the
joint meeting between the Commission
and Solid Waste Committee of March
16, 1994
No discussion before the vote. The motion carried
unanimously.
2. Recognition of Visitors
William J. Ryszykow, 535 Royal Palm Drive,
referred to the return of hospital tax money and
NAME OF
COMMRS.
ROSENBLOOM
SHAUGHNESSY
WATERS
WEI S S
FLETCHER
ROSENBLOOM
SHAUGHNESSY
WATERS
WEISS
FLETCHER
ROSENBLOOM
SHAUGHNES SY
WATERS
WEISS
FLETCHER
M S
O E
T C
I O
O N
N D
✓ V
O O
T T
E E
D D
Y
E N
S O
Page 2
March 28, 1994
i ndi catPd h. felt the ci+i 7Qn_^
R mn,rh
should receive the money and that it should not be
used for any other purpose.
3. Appearances:
a. Presentation of Proclamation declaring April
as Parliamentary Emphasis month
Maureen King, City Clerk, presented in
writing, Proclamation declaring
Parliamentary Emphasis month.
full
April
Motion: Approve passage
Proclamation declaring April
Parliamentary Emphasis month
in
as
of
as
No discussion before the vote. The motion carried
unanimously.
Mayor Fletcher presented said Proclamation
Maureen Fitzpatrick, representative from Fi
Coast Parlimentarians.
b. Presentation of Proclamation recognizing
National Telecommunicator•s Week
to
rst
Maureen King, City Clerk, presented in ful 1 , in
writing, Proclamation recognizing National
Telecommunicators Week
Motion: Approve passage of
Proclamation recognizing National
Telecommunicators Week
No discussion before the vote. The motion carried
unanimously.
Mayor Fletcher presented said Proclamation to
David Thompson, Police Chief, who indicated he
would present the proclamation to the proper
people.
4. Old Business:
a. Public Hearing on proposal to provide
additional access to the Donner neighborhood,
and discussion relative to funding sources for
same
Mayor Fletcher explained there was an existing
right-of-way next to the City's Public Works
building but that ingress and egress to the Donner•
neighborhood was closed in 1985, and the
possibility of utilizing the right-of-way would be
V V
NAME OF
COMMRS. MS Y N
ROSENBLOOM
SHAUGHNESSY
WATERS
WEISS
FLETCHER
ROSENBLOOM
SHAUGHNESSY
WATERS
WEISS
FLETCHER
X
X
X X
X X
X
X
X
X X
X X
X
Page 3
March 28, 1994 V V
NAME OF
COMMRS. MS Y N
J ; tcu nC wciii t u IlC
citizens to understand the proposal of Dostie
Builders to build single family homes in the
Donner area was not the reason the matter was
under discussion. The reason to provide the
Donner community with an access was to protect and
promote the residential character of the city, he
added. He explained the city had grown very
quickly and he felt that as the city grew to be
more dense citizens needed to be able to get along
with one another.
Mayor Fletcher opened the floor for a public
hearing and invited comments from the audience.
Samuel Kimball, Member of the Board of Directors,
Selva Lakes Association, Inc. and June Morris
President of the Board, Selva Linkside
Association, Inc., presented the Commission with
petitions signed by 170 residents (copy of
petitions attached herewith and made a part
hereof). Mr. Kimball verbally outlined the points
contained in the petition, which indicated the
main concern residents had was the potential
increase in traffic through their neighborhoods.
Whereas many residents spoke against the proposed
right-of-way, there were many residents who felt
the right-of-way was needed and important.
It was suggested that signs indicating "no trucks"
and "no thoroughfare" would alleviate heavy
traffic conditions. It was determined the
right-of-way was closed many years ago to protect
the security of the city's sewer plant and it was
felt that security still needed to be provided.
After discussion, it was explained the city would
incur• minimal expense to move a fence which would
secure and provide protection to the sewer plant.
It was determined the proposed access would
decrease by several minutes the time required for
emergency vehicles to get to the Donner Community,
and would allow children and the elderly access to
parks and various facilities in Atlantic Beach.
Some residents felt the proposed road would become
a through street between Seminole and Mayport
Roads and create excess traffic. A potential
safety hazard was discussed because the stop signs
at intersections along Plaza Street were already
too close together, and it was felt more traffic
would increase the problem. The Commission agreed
to study the possibility of closing off the access
from Linkside Drive to Sandpiper Lane East to
Page 4
March 28, 1994
p+V , V,e11, mi -"C p+C155I fly uirouyll e I va
Lakes and Selva Linkside.
William Gulliford, representing the Donner
Community Development Corporation (DCDC) indicated
he resented comments contained in the petition
presented by Selva Linkside and Selva Lakes that
he was somehow affiliated with Dostie Builders.
He indicated that the DCDC would put up half the
funding for the Donner Road construction if the
city would match the other half, and that he
personally would offer the use of heavy equipment
necessary to roll out and spread the temporary
gravel surface.
Since no one wished to speak further the Mayor
closed the Public Hearing.
The Commission held an lengthy discussion and it
was decided to temporarily open the Donner Road
extension, which would pass through city property
where the sewer plant was located. It was decided
to place limerock on 600 feet of the access and
to allow only automobile traffic. It was decided
that traffic would be monitored which would give
an indication of the vehicular utilization the
access.
Motion: Open
extension on a
trial period of
which time a
conducted
V V
NAME OF
COMMRS. MS Y N
ZOSENBLOOM
the Donner RoadaATERS
SHAUGHNESSY
temporary basis for a aEISS
six months, during
traffic study will be FLETCHER
Following discussion, it was decided to appoint a
committee of volunteers to sit on an ad hoc
committee to study Donner Road over the six month
trial period and present its findings. The
following people were appointed: Oprah L. Jackson,
Elsie Thomas, Sam Kimball, Joyce Freeman, Charlie
Williams, Donna Miller, Willie Powell, Mary Jeter,
Mary H. Bowman, Mary Dove, Rev. George G.
Hartsfield, Barbara Bonner, June Morris, Jerry
Sternberg, Gary Row, Lucille Gillyard, Bill
Gulliford, Peter Fantagrossi, Sherette Simpkins,
and Mr. Terrell.
Volunteers were encouraged to serve on the
committee and were asked to call the City Clerk's
office.
unanimously.
b.
r ri kr,,,vi 1ti.J utid
Page 5
March 28, 1994 V V
NAME OF
COMMRS. MSYN
h_ motion cat u r vu
Appointment of three additional members of
Equity Study Commission
It was decided to appoint Mike Borno, Barbara
Galloway, and Larry Doren to the Equity Study
Commission.
Motion: Approve appointment of Mike ROSENBLOOM
Borno, Barbara Galloway, and Larry SHAUGHNESSY
Doren to the Equity Study Commission WATERS
WEISS
FLETCHER
No discussion before the vote. The motion carried
unanimously.
c. Selection of engineer to provide professional
services for the expansion of Buccaneer Water
Plant No. 3
Bob Kosoy, Public Works Director, explained oral
presentations were made by Post, Buckley, Schuh &
Jernigan, Inc. (PBS & J, Inc.), Pitman Hartenstein
& Assoc., Inc., and Sims Design Consultants, Inc.
at the last Commission meeting for engineering
design services for rehabilitation and expansion
of the Buccaneer Water Plant No. 3. The Commission
decided to defer the matter until tonight's
meeting so that they would have an opportunity to
study proposals and make a decision.
The Commission asked Mr. Kosoy which firm staff
recommended, to which Mr. Kosoy explained the
original recommendation of staff was Sims Design
Consultants, Inc. Although their oral
presentation was not strong, Mr. Kosoy added,
staff was still in favor of Sims Design
Consultants.
Motion: Accept recommendation of
staff to enter into negotiations
with Sims Design Consultants, Inc.,
as the first choice of the City, for
engineering design services for
rehabilitation and expansion of the
Buccaneer Water Plant No. 3.
Commissioner Rosenbloom questioned the need of
having oral presentations. It was explained oral
presentations provided the Commission with an
opportunity to question firms and thus make a
ROSENBLOOM
SHAUGHNESSY
WATERS
WEISS
FLETCHER
x
X
x x
X X
X
Page o
March 28, 1994 V V
NAME OF
COMMRS. MSYN
Atoll Jensen h:a
required by Florida Statutes, and the procedure
that should be followed was for the Commission,
after hearing oral presentations, to rank the
firms and ask staff to enter into negotiations.
If agreement could not be reached with the top
ranked firm, staff would then negotiate with the
second ranked firm.
The question was called and the vote resulted in
4-1 with Commissioner Rosenbloom voting nay. The
motion carried.
After discussion, it was decided that if
negotiations were not successful with Sims Design
Consultants, Inc., that Pitman Hartenstein &
Assoc., Inc. would be considered as the city's
second choice. Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan,
Inc. (PBS & J, Inc.) were considered as the city's
third choice.
Motion: Accept recommendation of
staff to enter into negotiations
with Pitman Hartenstein & Assoc.,
Inc., as the second choice of the
City, for engineering design
services for rehabilitation and
expansion of the Buccaneer Water
Plant No. 3.
No discussion before the vote. The motion carried
unanimously.
5. Consent Agenda:
a. Acknowledge receipt of Water & Sewer
Committee report #8
Water & Sewer Committee report #8 was received as
submitted.
6. New Business:
a. Authorize funding for additional man-hours for
Code Enforcement Officer
Commissioner Shaughnessy explained in the past
code enforcement was covered by the Building
Inspector. Currently the city employs a part-time
Code Enforcement Officer but Commissioner
Shaughnessy felt there was a need for more active
code enforcement. She indicated that from 1991
until 1994 the number of cases had increased from
fewer than 100 cases per year to an average of 500
ROSENBLOOM X
SHAUGHNESSY X X
WATERS X X
WEISS X
FLETCHER X
Page 7
March 28, 1994
=5.46 p:r M ■rT-�rr�—a* t� i err®r c P., �-�Pi f. F t
full time attention. Presently the Code
Enforcement Officer was working six hours per day
and she asked that a full time position be created
at Pay Grade #8 at $21,455 per year. It was
explained monies were available in the Code
Enforcement/Building Inspector budget.
Motion: Delete existing part-time
Code Enforcement Inspector position
and create full-time Code
Enforcement Inspector position
Commissioner Weiss indicated he was in favor of
the position because of the workload involved in
code enforcement, and he felt money would be made
for the city via fines and liens. Commissioner
Waters felt the position should be funded
permanently prior to its creation, and he asked
that the matter be deferred until Ann Meuse,
Finance Director, could explain how the position
would be permanently funded. He explained he was
not prepared to create a new position without
further study.
Commissioner Shaughnessy indicated presently the
part-time Code Enforcement Officer was being paid
$12.00 per hour, and the new rate for a full-time
position would be $10.31 per hour plus benefits.
Mayor Fletcher indicated it would be possible to
allow the part-time position to work two more
hours per day, until the permanent, full-time
position could be filled. Don Ford, Building
Inspector, explained in order to obtain a good
insurance rating and possibly save money, it was
necessary to have certified people in the Building
Department. Karl Grunewald was cerfieid as a
building inspector and the creation of the
full-time position would insure another certified
person would be on hand during absences of the
Building Inspector.
It was reported the present part-time Code
Enforcement Officer collected $7,000 in fines
during the past 18 months.
Following discussion, it was decided to defer
action on the matter until the meeting of April
11, 1994 at which time the Commission will be
provided with specific information regarding
funding for the proposed full-time Code
Enforcement Officer position.
V V
NAME OF
COMMRS. MS Y N
ROSENBLOOM
SHAUGHNESSY X
WATERS
WEISS
FLETCHER
X
Page u
March 28, 1994 V V
NAME OF
COMMRS. MSYN
Design Services for redesign of outlet
structure for Jasmine Street retention pond
Bob Kosoy reported that over a period of time
tidal action had eroded the embankments that
separated the retention pond on Jasmine Street
from the marshland area. The St. John's River
Water Management District (SJRWMD) was aware of
this problem at the retention pond, and, at their
last inspection they requested that a design or a
redesign be initiated to the existing structure.
Mr. Kosoy indicated this would reduce the tidal
action and restore the retention basin to its
intended purpose, which was to collect stormwater.
Three proposals had been received and staff
recommended accepting the proposal of JGJ Design
Services in the amount of $4,500.00. It was
explained a $700 permit modification fee would be
paid directly by the City to the SJRWMD.
ZOSENBLOOM X
Motion: Approve acceptance of 3HAUGHNESSY X X
proposal of JGJ Design Services i n'4ATERS X X
the amount of $4,500 to redesign the',IEISS X
outlet structure for Jasmine Street iLETCHER X
Retention Pond
A discussion ensued relative to the last paragraph
contained in the proposal of JGJ indicating they
might have a problem obtaining professional
liability insurance. Mr. Kosoy explained JGJ had
secured insurance and increased their price
accordingly, to $4,500.00. Mr. Kosoy added he
felt JGJ would do an excellent job.
The question was called and the vote resulted in
all ayes. The motion carried unanimously.
c. Approve Final Change Order and Final Pay
Request and accept the Buccaneer chlorine
contact chamber project as complete
Bob Kosoy reported the contractor completed all
punch list items and submitted a Final Pay Request
and Change Order #4. Previously the Commission
approved Change Order #1 on August 23, 1993,
Change Order #2 on October 11, 1993, and Change
Order #3 on November 8, 1993. He recommended
approving final pay request and final change order
for a total amount of $22,246.54.
Page 9
March 28, 1994
moL i cin: Approve final pay request
and final change order for a total
amount of $22,246.54, final
acceptance of the Buccaneer Chlorine
Contact Chamber Project
No discussion before the vote. The motion carried
unanimously.
d. Approval of Change Order in the Ocean Grove
Sewer Line Extension project, increasing the
contract by $40,611.50
Bob Kosoy reported a revised quotation was
received from John Woody, Inc. on February 3, 1994
for $40,611.50 to install the remaining section of
sewer line on Ocean Grove Drive. The price did
not include replacement of the trees at 1825 Ocean
Grove Drive, only their removal.
Mr. Kosoy indicated the Commission rejected a
previous change order which would have extended
the sewer line from the corner of Seminole Road
and 18th Street to the corner of Ocean Grove Drive
and 18th Street, where a new home was under
construction. Instead, the commission requested
that the sewer main be completed on Ocean Grove
Drive. The homeowners affected by this new sewer
main were part of the Special Assessment. Mr.
Kosoy recommended approval of change order for
$40,611.50 for sewer extension on Ocean Grove
Drive.
Motion: Approve change order in the
amount of $40,611.50 for sewer
extension on Ocean Grove Drive
No discussion before the vote. The motion carried
unanimously.
7. City Manager Reports and/or Correspondence:
a. Report relative to acquisition and usage of
property in Section H
Kim Leinbach, City Manager, provided the
Commission with a map indicating property owned by
the City and other property which may be available
along with assessed values of same. The
Commission asked the City Manager to pursue
acquiring property.
Commissioner Waters suggested selling a small,
passive park in North Atlantic Beach and using the
money to purchase Section H Property. Mayor
V V
NAME OF
COMMRS. MS Y N
ROSENBLOOM X
SHAUGHNESSY X X
WATERS X
WEISS X X
FLETCHER X
ROSENBLOOM X
SHAUGHNESSY X
WATERS X X
WEISS X X
FLETCHER X
green space.
Page 1u
March 28, 1994 v V
NAME OF
COMMRS. MSYN
-
savor O'
b. Report relative to computer system upgrade
for Police Department
David Thompson, Police Chief, reported the Police
Department was experiencing problems with the
computer terminal for the FCIC/NCIC systems. The
computer terminal at the Police Department allowed
officers to communicate with other departments,
receive critical information from State and/or
Federal authorities, and many other services. The
existing equipment was 14 years old and not
compatible with software in Tallahassee.
Commission approval was requested to spend $2,765
for replacement equipment.x X X
3HAUGHNESSY X
Motion: Approve Police Department.JATERS X
expenditure not to exceed $2, 764NEISS X
from Investigations money to acquirel,LETCHER X X
equipment to accommodate F.C.I.C.
upgrades
No discussion before the vote. The motion carried
unanimously.
8. Reports and/or requests from City
Commissioners. City Attorney and City Clerk
Alan Jensen advised that the EPA had fined the
City $17,000.00 due by May 10, 1994. He explained
since legal costs could approach the cost of the
fine that it would be in the city's best interest
not to pursue the matter legally, but to pay the
fine.
It was explained that in August 1992, the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) notified the
City that it was in violation of continuous
monitoring requirements for the Wastewater
Treatment Plant. Subsequently, EPA was advised by
the City that the problem was due to lightning
strikes, but after documentation provided by the
City and numerous efforts by the City Attorney to
settle the matter it appeared there was no hope of
settlement.
Commissioner Rosenbloom felt the matter should be
brought to court by the city.
ROSENBLOOM X X
Motion: Fight EPA fine legally and SHAUGHNESSY X X
politically IJATERS X
Jt tss X
FLETCHER X
Page 11
March 28, 1994
.',f+er el___,„:„ : t .,a. .=,, ued not. J1HUC f eyd 1
recourse would be long and costs would be
prohibitive that the fine should be paid by the
city.
The question was called and the vote resulted in
1-4 with Commissioners Shaughnessy, Waters, and
Weiss and Mayor Fletcher voting nay. The motion
failed.
V V
NAME OF
COMMRS. MSY N
After discussion, it was decided to approve
payment of fine to the EPA in the amount of
$17,000 subject to identifying the source of funds.
ROSENBLOOM X
Motion: Approve payment of fine to SHAUGHNESSY X X
EPA in the amount of $17,000 WATERS X
subject to identification of the WEISS X X
source of funds FLETCHER X
The question was called and the vote resulted in
4-1 with Commissioner Rosenbloom voting nay. The
motion carried.
Commissioner Shaughnessy inquired concerning a
report relative to Dutton Island, to which the
City Manager advised the matter was presently
under discussion and a report would be forthcoming
at a later time.
Commissioner Waters announced the American Legion
planned to have an employee appreciation dinner
May 13, 1994 and he urged everyone to attend.
Commissioner Waters suggested advertising in the
Beaches Leader for citizens to serve on the Arts
and Entertainment Board. Following discussion, it
was felt that perhaps this would not be the
appropriate avenue to follow.
Since there was no further business the Mayor
adjourned the meeting at 10:56 p. m.
A T T E S T:
7/ t0L,Cllvi
MAUR N KING, CIt CLE
an T. Fletcher
YOR/PRESIDING OFFICER
SELVA LINKSIDE NEIGHBORHOOD
SELVA LAKES NEIGHBORHOOD
28 March 1994
City Commissioners
City of Atlantic Beach
Dear Commissioners:
Three and a half years ago, on 10 September 1990, over thirty homeowners
representing the Selva Lakes and Selva Linkside Associations stood before you
to register our opposition to the proposal to cut Donner Road through the
south side of the water treatment plant to Sandpiper Lane.
At that time then -mayor Gulliford, without calling for a public hearing
on the matter, was going ahead with plans when residents of Selva Lakes and
Selva Linkside challenged him to justify the road. We made the following
points.
(1) Was there a demonstrated need for the cut -through road? No. No
demonstration was ever offered. Residents of the Donner area had
and still have foot and bicycle access to Sandpiper. Possible
benefits from a cut -through road were asserted, but it should go
without saying that benefit from is not the same as need for.
(2) Where were the plans to study the negative impact on traffic, the
negative environmental costs, or the negative quality -of -life
consequences for the Selva Lakes and Selva Linkside communities of
the road? No. There were no such plans.
(3)
(a) There were no plans to analyze the ways in which the cut -
through road would increase traffic, increase noise, and
decrease pedestrian safety along Sandpiper Lane and through
the residential streets of Selva Linkside Drive, Parkside
Drive, and llth street.
(b) By his own admission, the mayor was unaware of the fact that
city vehicles were using Selva Linkside Drive as a shortcut
access route to get to the Public Works yard.
(c) There were no plans for replacing the beautiful stand of
trees that would have to be cut down to make room for yet
another city road and its maintenance.
Would there be any benefits for the residents of Selva Linkside
and Selva Lakes? Not a single one was proposed, let alone
demonstrated.
(4) Was there any cost -benefit analysis offered or planned for the
expenditure of tax monies on the road? No.
(5) Was there any analysis of alternative proposals, such as upgrading
the walk-through from Donner Road to Sandpiper, or putting in a
second walk-through, or creating a bike -lane down Plaza that would
connect with the entire west side rather than with the Donner
subdivision alone? No.
(6) Was any public hearing scheduled to be held on the matter to
solicit the perspective of the residents who would be most
affected by the road? No. Residents of Selva Lakes and Selva
Linkside found out about the matter when we saw trees being tagged
for cutting down and then asked what was going on. We then raised
the issue at the next meeting of the commissioners. The issue was
conspicuously absent from the agenda for the meeting.
Three -and -a -half years later the questions we raised in 1990 have yet to
be answered. In fact, it looks like we almost weren't going to get a chance
even to raise them. And yet the issues are now even more urgent:
(1) There has still been no demonstrated need for the cut -through /
road. Benefits from are not need for.
(2) The negative consequences of the road are greater today than
three -and -a -half years ago.
(3)
(a) The volume of traffic along Sandpiper Lane, Selva Linkside
Drive, Parkside Drive, and llth street has increased
substantially.
(b) Although when he was Mayor Mr. Gulliford promised to direct
city workers not to use Linkside Drive, Parkside Drive, and
llth street as a shortcut to the Public Works yard, the
volume of truck traffic along those routes has increased.
(c) The negative traffic, noise, and safety consequences won't
show up on any official price tag, but they are real,
tangible, direct, and immediate costs of the road.
The proposed road would benefit someone, but it isn't going to be
the residents of Selva Lakes and Selva Linkside.
(a) According to The Beaches Leader, former mayor Gulliford is
now representing the Donner Community Development
Corporation, which "has proposed a new housing development
in the Donner area which will include both market priced
homes and affordable housing. He said Dostie Builders has
expressed interest in the development if Atlantic Beach will
show good faith and commitment to development by adding
another access from downtown Atlantic Beach to the Donner
community" (The Beaches Leader, 16 March 1994)."
(b) No one would expect a developer to be willing to go into the
Donner area and build apartments if he wasn't going to make
a profit. Why would anyone expect the residents of Selva
Lakes and Selva Linkside to accept the proposed road not
only when there is not a single benefit to our neighborhoods
but in fact substantial negative impacts?
(c) Should a developer's perspective be more important than the
perspective of the hundreds (there will be close to
units in Selva Linkside and Selva Lakes when the two
- ' 3
developments are completed) of people who will be negatively
impacted?
(4) There still has been no cost -benefit analysis offered or planned
for the expenditure of tax monies on the road.
(5)
There has been no public discussion or analysis of the
aforementioned or other alternative proposals for benefitting the
west side without disadvantaging other neighborhoods.
(6) What do we want in return? Nothing, except to be listened to and
treated justly. If Mr. Gulliford wants to talk about good faith
to a developer who stands to make a profit, then let's talk about
a city's responsibility to residents who aren't even asking for
anything in return except not to be told that they must pay for a
/ road which they don't want and which will be to the irreversible
1/ detriment of their neighborhoods. If Mr. Gulliford wants to talk
about fairness to one neighborhood, then let's talk about giving
other neighborhoods the same chance for presenting their views
that he has insisted the city give to his group and the developer
they are backing.
The residents of Selva Lakes and Selva Linkside cannot afford to hire a
lobbyist to make our case. We have to speak for ourselves. Some of us are
able to be physically present before you tonight. But there are many others
who are here in name and spirit, as their signatures on the attached petitions
testify.
We are the ones who will have to live with the consequences of a cut -
through road, and we are overwhelmingly opposed to the project. The increase
in traffic will have an immediate negative effect on the safety of our
neighborhoods and on the overall quality of life.
As you are very aware, on the recent straw ballot residents of Atlantic
Beach, Neptune Beach, and Jacksonville Beach voted overwhelmingly in favor of
creating a new county if Jacksonville did not start treating us fairly.
Why is Atlantic Beach engaged in a lawsuit with Jacksonville? Because,
as everyone knows, Jacksonville has turned a deaf ear to us and refused to
listen in good faith to our legitimate complaints.
The residents of Selva Lakes and Selva Linkside have legitimate concerns
about the cut -through road and legitimate complaints about not being listened
to in the past. That is why we are asking you to listen not just to us but to
how you would respond if our roles were reversed and you were in our shoes
because it was your neighborhood that was going to pay the consequences.
%�
Sincerely yours,
June Morris
President of the Board
Selva Linkside Association, Inc.
J-
S muel Kimball
Member of the Board of Directors,
Selva Lakes Association, Inc.
SELVA LAKES ASSOCIATION, INC
P.O. Box 331365, Atlantic Beach, FL 32233
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, OPPOSE THE CUTTING OF AN ACCESS ROAD INTO SANDPIPER
LANE. WE BELIEVE THE PROPOSED ACCESS ROAD WILL BE IRREVERSIBLY DETRIMENTAL TO
THE SELVA LAKES AND SELVA LINKSIDE NEIGHBORHOODS. THE INCREASE IN THROUGH
TRAFFIC AND CONSEQUENT INCREASE IN NOISE (AS WELL AS THE LOSS OF A BEAUTIFUL
STAND OF TREES IF DONNER ROAD IS EXTENDED) WILL HAVE AN IMMEDIATE NEGATIVE
EFFECT ON THE QUALITY OF OUR NEIGHBORHOODS. ALTHOUGH THE PROPOSED ACCESS ROAD
WILL BENEFIT THE DEVELOPER WHO WANTS TO PUT UP NEW UNITS IN THE DONNER AREA,
THERE ARE NO BENEFITS TO THE RESIDENTS OF SELVA LAKES AND SELVA LINKSIDE. TO
THE CONTRARY, THERE ARE COSTS. THEY WON'T SHOW UP IN THE OFFICIAL PRICE TAG
OF THE PROPOSED ROAD, BUT THEY ARE REAL COSTS NEVERTHELESS FOR THE ATLANTIC
BEACH RESIDENTS OF SELVA LAKES AND SELVA LINKSIDE, PEOPLE WHO ARE TRYING TO
CREATE GOOD HOMES AND ENVIRONMENTS FOR THEIR FAMILIES.
46 Sehd��SG� ��� 0��1�
4..G0' 5-37 .,4,61,e. 4,44, e 2 Y9 -Yr)/
z - (--2/".14 3 Jei,v4e
45i /1/. C.
107 51-
45- /
372.
3zL33
z-/7-.`/70
4/1 S 4- L1 % ! 9./�.-4 Zy> it y3
/0" 1 C - O KY -S C r 4-7/
AK aim,th , 3 3-//1 /& t/ 7,171/ ,sir ,y?,-YFd3
"r62 �.?.( 5e_,q, t ,t Ler kes c irk-cc4,-5'(-y�
s'&1-4)
5147(
1S S t -r(
61
4_ 2, I
20,/1 cit. £ . t14,\
-\ ,;(45(,(f
-5'_7i2/
`64;( Q, , Los S�/c1A l f9 C it( (6,
0 d
41-14111)*(
SELVA LAKES ASSOCIATION, INC
P.O. Box 331365, Atlantic Beach, FL 32233
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, OPPOSE THE CUTTING OF AN ACCESS ROAD INTO SANDPIPER
LANE. WE BELIEVE THE PROPOSED ACCESS ROAD WILL BE IRREVERSIBLY DETRIMENTAL TO
THE SELVA LAKES AND SELVA LINKSIDE NEIGHBORHOODS. THE INCREASE IN THROUGH
TRAFFIC AND CONSEQUENT INCREASE IN NOISE (AS WELL AS THE LOSS OF A BEAUTIFUL
STAND OF TREES IF DONNER ROAD IS EXTENDED) WILL HAVE AN IMMEDIATE NEGATIVE
EFFECT ON THE QUALITY OF OUR NEIGHBORHOODS. ALTHOUGH THE PROPOSED ACCESS ROAD
WILL BENEFIT THE DEVELOPER WHO WANTS TO PUT UP NEW UNITS IN THE DONNER AREA,
THERE ARE NO BENEFITS TO THE RESIDENTS OF SELVA LAKES AND SELVA LINKSIDE. TO
THE CONTRARY, THERE ARE COSTS. THEY WON'T SHOW UP IN THE OFFICIAL PRICE TAG
OF THE PROPOSED ROAD, BUT THEY ARE REAL COSTS NEVERTHELESS FOR THE ATLANTIC
BEACH RESIDENTS OF SELVA LAKES AND SELVA LINKSIDE, PEOPLE WHO ARE TRYING TO
CREATE GOOD HOMES AND ENVIRONMENTS FOR THEIR FAMILIES.
1
x',14,
Li V,/, 7 7(42 r (-((„- ')7
((
6I—f5
Uva � ��XA1�-- a��'�P� l ,f /1 1 �-� � �
1\icki--er 5-03 5-e l/a
L$C( 2703
tai �n adS P4A,451 D(4 ..(0 ? a tie, CtiL, - a 41?- d3S
0, 0,
vnlok,e_,,
1 � t
a-%
j(fAinins; L-/ 63/,, c7( 4‘ Co- ,J (/,‘ pb C(3 •
4?3 -1-4/1/F- JCL (ir /1
V7 Jar
4,1 (
j -vu 1 le.rte - ( Iva (, t -es £V . 211-1-064
s"� 2 d ec v A- (1-14(i Cor.
14 3 . l E' Lt -
2 -34.7 6
eA1/41-‘ 1s-0
)1c/ -- %/31
��1 OC,c)
SELVA LAKES ASSOCIATION, INC
P.O. Box 331365, Atlantic Beach, FL 32233
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, OPPOSE THE CUTTING OF AN ACCESS ROAD INTO SANDPIPER
LANE. WE BELIEVE THE PROPOSED ACCESS ROAD WILL BE IRREVERSIBLY DETRIMENTAL TO
THE SELVA LAKES AND SELVA LINKSIDE NEIGHBORHOODS. THE INCREASE IN THROUGH
TRAFFIC AND CONSEQUENT INCREASE IN NOISE (AS WELL AS THE LOSS OF A BEAUTIFUL
STAND OF TREES IF DONNER ROAD IS EXTENDED) WILL HAVE AN IMMEDIATE NEGATIVE
EFFECT ON THE QUALITY OF OUR NEIGHBORHOODS. ALTHOUGH THE PROPOSED ACCESS ROAD
WILL BENEFIT THE DEVELOPER WHO WANTS TO PUT UP NEW UNITS IN THE DONNER AREA,
THERE ARE NO BENEFITS TO THE RESIDENTS OF SELVA LAKES AND SELVA LINKSIDE. TO
THE CONTRARY, THERE ARE COSTS. THEY WON'T SHOW UP IN THE OFFICIAL PRICE TAG
OF THE PROPOSED ROAD, BUT THEY ARE REAL COSTS NEVERTHELESS FOR THE ATLANTIC
BEACH RESIDENTS OF SELVA LAKES AND SELVA LINKSIDE, PEOPLE WHO ARE TRYING TO
CREATE GOOD HOMES AND ENVIRONMENTS FOR THEIR FAMILIES.
PCcstivtsz0 c\.. K �m�1zt�G !_3,'fl
cc_eHLQ:c1\
aq
edel,
1?-3/it
ii
575
575
5,3 l ,9C�
/1
(774/-6 -/735
eq 'kr
0,-/1 -;667( (D4? 97q9
56-) Sery Zemkesar
.5,S7 S�/% Z_66-ergq-/
c27 SPc_vo LP, vc S Crz- . 2C15= go5-7
9.--k-os9
c(Ys 5'
�Lt),, tkiu-s c i Ec r , 0 5�
' - 2170z/z
S �/ L/`-� ks cj-rle 7 1-Y2-(/
(-4/ C� ; 3'' 7
��� 5_/( S -e (Li 4.
SELVA LAKES ASSOCIATION, INC
P.O. Box 331365, Atlantic Beach, FL 32233
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, OPPOSE THE CUTTING OF AN ACCESS ROAD INTO SANDPIPER
LANE. WE BELIEVE THE PROPOSED ACCESS ROAD WILL BE IRREVERSIBLY DETRIMENTAL TO
THE SELVA LAKES AND SELVA LINKSIDE NEIGHBORHOODS. THE INCREASE IN THROUGH
TRAFFIC AND CONSEQUENT INCREASE IN NOISE (AS WELL AS THE LOSS OF A BEAUTIFUL
STAND OF TREES IF DONNER ROAD IS EXTENDED) WILL HAVE AN IMMEDIATE NEGATIVE
EFFECT ON THE QUALITY OF OUR NEIGHBORHOODS. ALTHOUGH THE PROPOSED ACCESS ROAD
WILL BENEFIT THE DEVELOPER WHO WANTS TO PUT UP NEW UNITS IN THE DONNER AREA,
THERE ARE NO BENEFITS TO THE RESIDENTS OF SELVA LAKES AND SELVA LINKSIDE. TO
THE CONTRARY, THERE ARE COSTS. THEY WON'T SHOW UP IN THE OFFICIAL PRICE TAG
OF THE PROPOSED ROAD, BUT THEY ARE REAL COSTS NEVERTHELESS FOR THE ATLANTIC
BEACH RESIDENTS OF SELVA LAKES AND SELVA LINKSIDE, PEOPLE WHO ARE TRYING TO
CREATE GOOD HOMES AND ENVIRONMENTS FOR THEIR FAMILIES.
AtiR7/^/
Q\CVAI\kWOM CSO'&k
feA,s (,rc 27 -2777
5'; Fell Can 1Keki
e,
Aoc t �C(buia-41/-- 104-3 13, Oki 41 -g S¢
AE'.k ote ",c D 1:55 Sava c,? -10 -VI --
I( -V-/(
,. ��•CI Jkltrtf
lcS1 Si? (It)) 270 g�
(A) ( C4 C67 Se(L4[e5 44,c(E
- ( 561 Se L (
SELVA LAKES ASSOCIATION, INC
P.O. Box 331365, Atlantic Beach, FL 32233
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, OPPOSE THE CUTTING OF AN ACCESS ROAD INTO SANDPIPER
LANE. WE BELIEVE THE PROPOSED ACCESS ROAD WILL BE IRREVERSIBLY DETRIMENTAL TO
THE SELVA LAKES AND SELVA LINKSIDE NEIGHBORHOODS. THE INCREASE IN THROUGH
TRAFFIC AND CONSEQUENT INCREASE IN NOISE (AS WELL AS THE LOSS OF A BEAUTIFUL
STAND OF TREES IF DONNER ROAD IS EXTENDED) WILL HAVE AN IMMEDIATE NEGATIVE
EFFECT ON THE QUALITY OF OUR NEIGHBORHOODS. ALTHOUGH THE PROPOSED ACCESS ROAD
WILL BENEFIT THE DEVELOPER WHO WANTS TO PUT UP NEW UNITS IN THE DONNER AREA,
THERE ARE NO BENEFITS TO THE RESIDENTS OF SELVA LAKES AND SELVA LINKSIDE. TO
THE CONTRARY, THERE ARE COSTS. THEY WON'T SHOW UP IN THE OFFICIAL PRICE TAG
OF THE PROPOSED ROAD, BUT THEY ARE REAL COSTS NEVERTHELESS FOR THE ATLANTIC
BEACH RESIDENTS OF SELVA LAKES AND SELVA LINKSIDE, PEOPLE WHO ARE TRYING TO
CREATE GOOD HOMES AND ENVIRONMENTS FOR THEIR FAMILIES.
--3-1/10- 1)%2e'-' ,.._<-3 2dr:-6,'-1, 16z1/'
i
4-41 . 465/ '1--t-e-t-e_.--,),4y`- yys7
j2,e i /0002 4 427i -/.6-..2
O
_ (14 , $
-6° i Z 6 L A/6ear J1 j a'"-',5" 1-
1/11,az,/j/14/44, /72( 6 /6-v;.Q by
5 �
(276- 0035
ay P ---o6 a- [
(b693 - 4 ,
IDS( &(71,41_ teri-y TLmrTc ?r---4-1 2*S77/
' 0 r 1 d j vo.nt si 24-6-$7,
74/4--)c c7
1'3 5 Os,Dre l )f ate. )5
SELVA LAKES ASSOCIATION, INC
P.O. Box 331365, Atlantic Beach, FL 32233
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, OPPOSE THE CUTTING OF AN ACCESS ROAD INTO SANDPIPER
LANE. WE BELIEVE THE PROPOSED ACCESS ROAD WILL BE IRREVERSIBLY DETRIMENTAL TO
THE SELVA LAKES AND SELVA LINKSIDE NEIGHBORHOODS. THE INCREASE IN THROUGH
TRAFFIC AND CONSEQUENT INCREASE IN NOISE (AS WELL AS THE LOSS OF A BEAUTIFUL
STAND OF TREES IF DONNER ROAD IS EXTENDED) WILL HAVE AN IMMEDIATE NEGATIVE
EFFECT ON THE QUALITY OF OUR NEIGHBORHOODS. ALTHOUGH THE PROPOSED ACCESS ROAD
WILL BENEFIT THE DEVELOPER WHO WANTS TO PUT UP NEW UNITS IN THE DONNER AREA,
THERE ARE NO BENEFITS TO THE RESIDENTS OF SELVA LAKES AND SELVA LINKSIDE. TO
THE CONTRARY, THERE ARE COSTS. THEY WON'T SHOW UP IN THE OFFICIAL PRICE TAG
OF THE PROPOSED ROAD, BUT THEY ARE REAL COSTS NEVERTHELESS FOR THE ATLANTIC
BEACH RESIDENTS OF SELVA LAKES AND SELVA LINKSIDE, PEOPLE WHO ARE TRYING TO
CREATE GOOD HOMES AND ENVIRONMENTS FOR THEIR FAMILIES.
01\c_Q__
Z.1,471( (11,a,
‘\(3
'36)1544,
L6)ait-v4--14
\-)1-771)"c__
Arff X4474
„-t
S- -Pitl ca, 1(2f
5 7J
3 t)s Wet.' Ks/
1?0 10,1 K;4 0/
16-y
0
'74717 C
7
'131 t et.i./L
L�t(.0 cc., l�
SELVA LAKES ASSOCIATION, INC
P.O. Box 331365, Atlantic Beach, FL 32233
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, OPPOSE THE CUTTING OF AN ACCESS ROAD INTO SANDPIPER
LANE. WE BELIEVE THE PROPOSED ACCESS ROAD WILL BE IRREVERSIBLY DETRIMENTAL TO
THE SELVA LAKES AND SELVA LINKSIDE NEIGHBORHOODS. THE INCREASE IN THROUGH
TRAFFIC AND CONSEQUENT INCREASE IN NOISE (AS WELL AS THE LOSS OF A BEAUTIFUL
STAND OF TREES IF DONNER ROAD IS EXTENDED) WILL HAVE AN IMMEDIATE NEGATIVE
EFFECT ON THE QUALITY OF OUR NEIGHBORHOODS. ALTHOUGH THE PROPOSED ACCESS ROAD
WILL BENEFIT THE DEVELOPER WHO WANTS TO PUT UP NEW UNITS IN THE DONNER AREA,
THERE ARE NO BENEFITS TO THE RESIDENTS OF SELVA LAKES AND SELVA LINKSIDE. TO
THE CONTRARY, THERE ARE COSTS. THEY WON'T SHOW UP IN THE OFFICIAL PRICE TAG
OF THE PROPOSED ROAD, BUT THEY ARE REAL COSTS NEVERTHELESS FOR THE ATLANTIC
BEACH RESIDENTS OF SELVA LAKES AND SELVA LINKSIDE, PEOPLE WHO ARE TRYING TO
CREATE GOOD HOMES AND ENVIRONMENTS FOR THEIR FAMILIES.
04.4 W7 ef- /5 /3 c2 `' cog*
77ZeZr, -,&/(ft„
act eA4 002(1, ✓#/ 9 7d}" f
291- 1117.1
4 1(s17, '.� 3y6-fs5id
z47-757.5
Sp y 17. - , 2'gZ
,a-chZe_ /f02e4-1
4.5z
•
a
Gt.
6
SELVA LAKES ASSOCIATION, INC
P.O. Box 331365, Atlantic Beach, FL 32233
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, OPPOSE THE CUTTING OF AN ACCESS ROAD INTO SANDPIPER
LANE. WE BELIEVE THE PROPOSED ACCESS ROAD WILL BE IRREVERSIBLY DETRIMENTAL TO
THE SELVA LAKES AND SELVA LINKSIDE NEIGHBORHOODS. THE INCREASE IN THROUGH
TRAFFIC AND CONSEQUENT INCREASE IN NOISE (AS WELL AS THE LOSS OF A BEAUTIFUL
STAND OF TREES IF DONNER ROAD IS EXTENDED) WILL HAVE AN IMMEDIATE NEGATIVE
EFFECT ON THE QUALITY OF OUR NEIGHBORHOODS. ALTHOUGH THE PROPOSED ACCESS ROAD
WILL BENEFIT THE DEVELOPER WHO WANTS TO PUT UP NEW UNITS IN THE DONNER AREA,
THERE ARE NO BENEFITS TO THE RESIDENTS OF SELVA LAKES AND SELVA LINKSIDE. TO
THE CONTRARY, THERE ARE COSTS. THEY WON'T SHOW UP IN THE OFFICIAL PRICE TAG
OF THE PROPOSED ROAD, HUT THEY ARE REAL COSTS NEVERTHELESS FOR THE ATLANTIC
REACH RESIDENTS OF SELVA LAKES AND SELVA LINKSIDE, PEOPLE WHO ARE TRYING TO
CREATE GOOD HOMES AND ENVIRONMENTS FOR THEIR FAMILIES.
P4a//-er-e,3 c5e/
4-614A75,5 2/ e4 k /
/44. 1,71' /daL
iyAvo- 63a id/ (cam
PC,,e1Ati
SELVA LAKES ASSOCIATION, INC
P.O. fax 331365, Atlantic Beach, FL 32233
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, OPPOSE THE CUTTING OF AN ACCESS ROAD INTO SANDPIPER
LANE. WE BELIEVE THE PROPOSED ACCESS ROAD WILL BE IRREVERSIBLY DETRIMENTAL TO
THE SELVA LAKES AND SELVA LINKSIDE NEIGHBORHOODS. THE INCREASE IN THROUGH
TRAFFIC AND CONSEQUENT INCREASE IN NOISE (AS WELL AS THE LOSS OF A BEAUTIFUL
STAND OF TREES IF DONNER ROAD IS EXTENDED) WILL HAVE AN IMMEDIATE NEGATIVE
EFFECT ON THE QUALITY OF OUR NEIGHBORHOODS. ALTHOUGH THE PROPOSED ACCESS ROAD
WILL BENEFIT THE DEVELOPER WHO WANTS TO PUT UP NEW UNITS IN THE DONNER AREA,
THERE ARE NO BENEFITS TO THE RESIDENTS OF SELVA LAKES AND SELVA LINKSIDE. TO
THE CONTRARY, THERE ARE COSTS. THEY WON'T SHOW UP IN THE OFFICIAL PRICE TAG
OF THE PROPOSED ROAD, BUT THEY ARE REAL COSTS NEVERTHELESS FOR THE ATLANTIC
BEACH RESIDENTS OF SELVA LAKES AND SELVA LINKSIDE, PEOPLE WHO ARE TRYING TO
CREATE GOOD HOMES AND ENVIRONMENTS FOR THEIR FAMILIES.
L-0,4 (rr.( Ot‘tecle-
2 i- e& 'j
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, OPPOSE THE CUTTING OF AN ACCESS ROAD INTO
SANDPIPER LANE. WE FEEL IT WOULD BE DETRIMENTAL TO SELVA
LINKSIDE DUE TO EXCESS TRAFFIC THAT WOULD BE CREATED. IT WOULD
RESULT IN A CUT -THROUGH BETWEEN MAYPORT ROAD AND SEMINOLE ROAD
AND THIS ADDED TRAFFIC WOULD ,FFECT THE SAFETY OF OUR
SUBDIVISION.
filar;'
l/,0/_
A-cv,
-(I.-? I L('GaC4-
//ted, Lv
////�Lr:� Ci GU
% tie.C*,CA%.
it(� f ).
1 I2 1 (,inksi J Qf• (A 1.
�aPC.1Ue44
ti
117 Z LI4' )/P( CT
! ! d -L/ ti,l 1(...1 I C T . Li)
licS-L/L1445.1r( t7 (A
01-)
'=-J, '
'`h1P dpi
zAiv"
k.
7a5-62 i ,;(-4.1040,e4,
//83 /iveDJE
//X Ali Li'vt 54-e a IV
//c7.
H2 3 t;,. �. �:�a C:t-, 63.
/103i& X11
1 ' 13 ,SwN bt'I P6 z L4 J�
1113 Q i e e.
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, OPPOSE THE CUTTING OF AN ACCESS ROAD INTO
SANDPIPER LANE. WE FEEL IT WOULD BE DETRIMENTAL TO SELVA
LINKSIDE DUE TO EXCESS TRAFFIC THAT WOULD BE CREATED. IT_ WOULD
RESULT INA CUT -THROUGH BETWEEN MAYPORT ROAD AND SEMINOLE'-ROAD
AND THIS ADDED TRAFFIC WOULD EFFECT THE SAFETY OF OUR
SUBDIVISION.
7/33/1/a412&
&dc/AzAsj
C/E-
tinkgio
_ilotLiAtilila6r6
1457
!L 1
Z:i--Z
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, OPPOSE THE CUTTING OF AN ACCESS ROAD INTO
SANDPIPER LANE. WE FEEL IT WOULD BE DETRIMENTAL TO SELVA
LINKSIDE DUE TO EXCESS TRAFFIC THAT WOULD BE CREATED. IT WOULD
RESULT IN A CUT—THROUGH BETWEEN MAYPORT ROAD AND SEMINOLE ROAD
AND THIS ADDED TRAFFIC WOULD EFFECT THE SAFETY OF OUR
SUBDIVISION.
Narr.
Ziz
1 n.g, eiv. PYv\ a. �..
btA:447..,;
AAL-Nn
-J107es
// 93 1/a0/Pe' cr E.
l/ 3 0� e
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, OPPOSE THE CUTTING OF AN ACCESS ROAD INTO
SANDPIPER LANE. WE FEEL IT WOULD BE DETRIMENTAL TO SELVA
LINKSIDE DUE TO EXCESS TRAFFIC THAT WOULD BE CREATED. IT WOULD
RESULT IN A CUT -THROUGH BETWEEN MAYPORT ROAD AND SEMINOLE ROAD
AND THIS ADDED TRAFFIC WOULD EFFECT THE SAFETY OF OUR
SUBDIVISION.
Nri)F 724'dare;s
041(2.4u;LA- C&:01a- A)(Dis)
__&tedit
4.7ch
/oys�n_ r/
>eViti D
WAIT A4 MOIG1
9,.-. - IA^ kvt. •sem
L' . A�►.1-Pkv•-� /'
AAA .01
/00 V r '?
/f76 2
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, OPPOSE THE CUTTING OF AN ACCESS ROAD INTO
SANDPIPER LANE. WE FEEL IT WOULD BE DETRIMENTAL TO SELVA
LINKSIDE DUE TO EXCESS TRAFFIC THAT WOULD BE CREATED. IT WOULD
RESULT IN A CUT—THROUGH BETWEEN MAYPORT ROAD AND SEMINOLE ROAD
AND THIS ADDED TRAFFIC WOULD EFFECT THE SAFETY OF OUR
SUBDIVISION.
(0g/A)
1195 3
N7,/
) f,ar
i*Met /.,,," v
/'6i L/ NrOh crPr
Imo diedgeLfzdtl_E
/7"7/y7
�/
47711,71/77c -too
(S.CH- t=`.
v]
I -tai h(&rc.CG) F'l )3)
11 /1
Cd -92 .��
lin
z z 5;7"19,),6?-t_z"J C i._4../j/�G