11-07-94 v CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH
PLANNING WORKSHOP
MONDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1994
AGENDA
Call to order
1 . Discussion of pay plan for non-union general employees
2. Discussion regarding Parks & Recreation Department
( a) Reorganization of department
(b) Parks and park land acquisition for next 3 - 5 years
3. Review of Capital Improvements Plan
4. Review of contracts for use of city facilities and discussion
of the city' s relationship with ABET, YMCA, Little League,
and Habitat
5. Discussion regarding amending alcoholic beverage ordinance
6. Discussion of Monday workshops and Tuesday strategic planning
sessions
7. Discussion regarding when and how items may be added to
commission agendas, and by whom
MINUTES OF ATLANTIC BEACH CITY COMMISSION WORKSHOP MEETING HELD IN
CITY HALL AT 4:30 PM ON MONDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1994
Present: Lyman T. Fletcher, Mayor
Suzanne Shaughnessy, Commissioner
J. Dezmond Waters, III, Commissioner
Robert G. Weiss, Commissioner
Kim D. Leinbach, City Manager
James R. Jarboe, Deputy City Manager
Bob Kosoy, Public Works Director
Alan C. Jensen, City Attorney
Maureen King, City Clerk
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Fletcher who indicated
that Commissioner Rosenbloom was out of town. He asked the City
Manager to brief Commissioner Rosenbloom on the meeting.
1 . Discussion of pay plan for non-union general employees
The City Manager reported a committee of non-union employees had
been formed to study the pay plan for non-union general employees.
He indicated a step plan had been approved by the City Commission
for collective bargaining units and it was the recommendation of
the committee that a similar plan be approved for non-union
employees. Based on the work of the committee, the City Manager
presented a step plan for review by the City Commission. He also
recommended non-union employees receive a 2% cost of living
increase, effective October 1, and then be placed on the new pay
plan at a step most closely reflecting their current rate of pay.
Schedule of salaries and recommended pay plan are attached hereto
and made a part hereof.
In discussion of the plan the Mayor asked committee members present
to comment on the matter. Those who spoke urged the City
Commission to approve the plan. Police communications personnel
indicated their pay scale was still lower than comparable
departments but felt the new plan was a step in the right
direction.
Discussion ensued regarding implementation of the plan and opinions
differed regarding whether employees' anniversary dates for payroll
purposes should be the hire date, or whether a date mid-way through
the fiscal year should be selected as an anniversary date for all
employees.
The City Manager will provide Commissioner Waters with a public
works ' pay schedule for comparison purposes.
Page Two
Minutes - Commission Workshop Meeting
November 7, 1994
2. Discussion regarding Parks & Recreation Department
(a) Reorganization of department
ikZ Parks & park land acquisition for next 3 - 5 years
The City Manager indicated he was proposing to divide the parks and
recreation responsibilities into two separate divisions with the
Parks Department Division Chief being responsible for the
maintenance of all parks and assigned city rights-of-way. The
Recreation Director would report directly to the City Manager and
would be responsible for planning the parks and ensuring their
usage to the maximum. He felt this system would provide for more
efficient operation of the department. The City Manager' s
recommendations are attached hereto and made a part hereof.
3. Review of Capital Improvements Plan
Jim Jarboe presented a list of water, sewer and storm water capital
projects. He reviewed the list and explained, using maps and
drawings, the need for each project. He pointed out the projects
were listed in priority order. Ernie Beadel showed a video to
illustrate some of the problems which had been discovered during
televising of sewer lines. A copy of the list of capital projects
is attached hereto.
Following a complete review of the projects, the Mayor requested
that every effort should be made to coordinate all projects
including water, sewer, storm water, tree planting, laying of cable
television and power lines to eliminate duplicating labor and to
make sure that newly paved streets would not be dug up in future
projects. It was also felt that contractors should be required to
properly repair any pavement cuts for which they were responsible.
Mayor Fletcher also suggested that staff investigate the
possibility of using gray water where possible for irrigation
purposes.
4. Review of contracts for use of city facilities and discussion
of the city' s relationship with ABET, YMCA, Little League, and
Habitat
The City Manager indicated he would try to answer any questions
commissioners may have in regard to the proposed contracts.
Commissioner Shaughnessy requested clarification as to whether ABET
was an agency of the city. The City Attorney advised ABET was not
an agency of the city, but following further discussion, it was
pointed out that ABET was considered a city agency for insurance
purposes. It was pointed out the city' s insurance would cover
liability during the use of the building; however, the city would
Page Three
Minutes - Commission Workshop Meeting
November 7, 1994
not be liable for any claim against ABET for non-payment of
royalties, etc. The City Attorney agreed to confirm this in
writing within two weeks following approval of the agreement.
Discussion ensued regarding the requirement that the city reimburse
ABET for the cost of major improvements to the Adele Grage
Community Center, less 20% for each year that ABET has used the
facility. This provision was questioned since it had not been a
condition for undertaking the work.
Commissioner Weiss felt one contract should be drafted which could
be used by all entities using city facilities. He provided the
City Manager with notes to assist in drafting such a contract.
5. Discussion regarding amending alcoholic beverage ordinance
The City Attorney provided a draft of a proposed amendment to the
alcoholic beverage ordinance which will sunset at the end of this
year. Brief discussion ensued and it was pointed out the major
change in the ordinance was that permits would be granted by the
City Manager instead of the City Commission. In further
discussion, it was felt "special events" referred to in Section 3-
11(3 ) , would be difficult to define, it was felt the word
"festival" should be used instead. The ordinance will be presented
for first reading at the second meeting in November.
6. Discussion regarding Monday workshops and Tuesday strategic
planning sessions
The Mayor expressed a desire to continue the commission planning
sessions but indicated these meetings would not be held for the
purpose of planning the commission agendas.
7. Discussion regarding when and how items may be added to
commission agendas, and by whom
The Mayor distributed copies of Section 2-19 of the city code which
he felt should be utilized to govern the conduct of the City
Commission.
In other business, Cindy Corey, Chair of the Recreation Advisory
Board, reported the board was planning the Christmas Tree Lighting.
She also indicated the board had reviewed the plans for the
concession building in Jack Russell Park and had recommended
changes. She requested that the Recreation Advisory Board be
allowed to report to. the City Commission on a regular basis and it
was agreed the Recreation Advisory Board would present a report to
the City Commission at the first meeting of each month.
Page Four
Minutes - Commission Workshop Meeting
November 7, 1994
Commissioner Water inquired into the status of the purchase of the
Tresca property and the City Attorney reported a purchase agreement
had been signed.
There being no further discussion, the Mayor declared the meeting
adjourned at 6: 45 PM.
r� apt"
Maur en King C,
City Clerk
•
CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH POSITION
SCHEDULE OF SALARIES 09/21/93
FISCAL YEAR 1993/94 ot
)\''\"
NONUNION NEW PLAN PROPOSAL
FY 92/93 DOLLAR PERCENT
ANNUAL ANNUAL INCREASE INCREASE
DEPT. EMPLOYEE GRADE BASE HOURLY BASE OVER OVER
# NAME WAGES RATE WAGES FY 92/93 FY 92/93
519 Receptionist 2 15,744 8.00 16,640 896 5.69%
19/22 Fire Marshall/Safety 14 35,188 Salaried 35,700 512 1.46%
512 City Manager N/A 49,934 Salaried 57,500 7,566 15.15%
512 Admin.Assistant 7 26,083 Salaried 26,500 417 1.60%
513 Finance Director 16 46,681 Salaried 49,750 3,069 6.57%
513 Purchasing Agent 9 28,846 Salaried 29,250 404 1.40%
513 Accountant 11 26,890 13.55 28,184 1,294 4.81%
513 Fiscal Assistant 8 27,046 _ 14.00 29,120 2,074 7.67%
513 Accounting Clerk 7 24,395 12.25 25,480 1,085 4.45%
513 ' Utility Bill. Clerk 5 15,987 8.40 17,472 1,485 9.29%
513 ' Utility Bill. Supervisor 6 17,107 8.85 18,408 1,301 7.61%
513 ' Customer Service Rep. 3 14,096 7.50 15,600 1,504 10.67%
513 ' Customer Service Rep. 3 14,096 7.25 15,080 984 6.98%
515 City Planner 15 35,805 Salaried 37,750 1,945 5.43%
5,6,24 Typist/Permit Clerk 3 15,826 8.25 17,160 1,334 8.43%
16/24 Building/Code Enf. Off. 12 38,407 Salaried 39,750 1,343 3.50%
517 City Clerk NA 29,492 Salaried 32,000 2,508 8.50%
517 Secretary 5 15,630 8.25 17,160 1,530 9.79%
522 Fire Chief 15 36,856 Salaried 38,000 1,144 3.10%
541 Public Works Director 16 53,575 Salaried 55,000 1,425 2.66%
541 Sanitation & Maint. Dir 11 35,563 Salaried 36,700 1,137 3.20%
541 Admin Assistant 7 20,039 Salaried 21,500 1,461 7.29%
541 Assist. Pub. Works Dir 12 32,965 Salaried . 35,000 2,035 6.17%
41/35 Clerk 3 14,096 7.25 15,080 984 6.98%
•
572 Recreation Directpr 12 27,249 Salaried 29,189 1,940 7.12%
533 Water Plant Super. 110 33,306 Salaried 35,500 2,194 6.59%
533 Water Dist. Div. Chief 12 28,370 Salaried 30,000 1,630 5.75%
535 Utility Plant Div. Chief 12 38,407 Salaried 39,800 1,393 3.63%
33/35 Utility Plant Div. Chief 12 34,485 Salaried 36,600 2,115 6.13%
•
NEW PLAN PROPOSAL
FY 92/93 DOLLAR PERCENT
ANNUAL ANNUAL INCREASE INCREASE
DEPT. EMPLOYEE GRADE BASE HOURLY BASE OVER OVER
# NAME WAGES RATE WAGES FY 92/93 FY 92/93
521 Police Chief 16 52,252 Salaried 54,000 1,748 3.35%
521 Police Captain 14 41,032 Salaried 43,500 2,468 6.01%
521 Police Lieutenant 11 35,563 18.25 37,960 2,397 6.74%
521 Police Lieutenant 11 35,563 17.75 36,920 1,357 3.82%
5-24 Police Lieutenant 11 35,563 _ e.# .
521 Police Lieutenant 11 33,838 17.50 36,400 2,562 7.57%
521 Emergency Comm. Off 4 20,510 10.30 21,424 914 4.46%
521 Emergency Comm. Off 4 17,024 8.80 18,304 1,280 7.52%
521 Emergency Comm. Off 4 18,815 9.75 20,280 1,465 7.79%
521 Commun. Supervisor 5 22,352 11.25 23,400 1,048 4.69%
521 ' Emergency Comm. Off 4 14,577 7.58 15,766 1,190 8.16%
521 Admin. Assistant 7 19,952 10.25 21,320 1,368 6.86%
521 Records Specialist 4 14,577 7.58 15,766 1,190 8.16%
521 Animal Control Officer 3 16,658 8.50 17,680 1,022 6.14%
TOTAL NON UNION EMPLOYEES 1,210,439 1,281,554 71,115 5.88%
yd, 7 7W L
ADDED POSITIONS .
Deputy City Mgr. "' N/A Contract Salaried 55,000 N/A N/A
PART TIME EMPLOYEES
513 Customer Service Rep. PT 7,280 7.50 7,800 520 7.14%
x-516 " Code Enf. Officer PT 7,500 12.00 10,500 3,000 40.00% Hours up
517 " Secretary PT 5,000 8.25 11,369 6,369 127.37% Hours up
542 Beaut. Coordinator PT 7,873 8.35 8,262 389 4.94%
572 " Activity Director PT 6,000 7.75 7,500 1,500 25.00% Hours up
535 Plant Operator PT 15,990 13.31 15,990 '. 0 0.00%
•
49,643 61,420 11,777 23.72%
Pay Ranges
GRADE HOURLY ANNUALLY
1 to to
2 6.50 to 9.40 13,520 to 19,552
3 7.02 to 10.15 14,602 to 21,116
4 7.58 to 10.96 15,770 to 22,805
5 8.19 to 11.84 17,031 - to 24,630
6 8.84 to 12.79 18,394 to 26,600
7 9.55 to 13.81 19,865 to 28,728
8 10.31 to 14.92 21,455 to 31,027
9 11.14 to 16.11 23,171 to 33,509
10 12.03 to 17.40 25,025 to 36,189
11 12.99 to 18.79 27,027 to 39,085
12 14.03 to 20.29 29,189 to 42,211
13 15.16 to 21.92 31,524 to 45,588
14 16.37 to 23.67 34,046 to 49,235
15 17.68 to 25.56 36,769 to 53,174
16 19.09 to 27.61 39,711 to 57,428
•
4-
GENERAL EMPLOYEES 1994/1995 •
32 STEP PLAN
GRADE 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 8 9 11 11 12 13 14
1 NO ONE IN CLASSIFICATION
2 6.51 6.69 6.89 1.11 7.31 7.53 7.76 1.99 8.23 8.48 8.73 8.99 9.26 9.54
3 7.12 1.23 7.44 7.67 7.91 8.13 8.38 8.63 8.89 9.15 9.43 9.11 11.11 11.3
4 1.58 7.80 8.14 8.28 8.53 8.78 9.15 9.32 9.61 9.89 10.19 11.49 11.81 11.13
5 8.19 8.44 8.69 8.95 9.22 9.49 9.18 11.17 11.31 11.69 11.11 11.34 11.68 12.03
6 8.84 9.11 9.38 9.66 9.95 10.25 11.56 11.87 11.21 11.53 11.88 12.24 12.60 12.98
7 9.55 9.84 11.13 11.44 10.75 11.17 11.41 11.75 12.11 12.46 12.83 13.22 13.62 14.12
8 11.31 11.62 10.94 11.27 11.60 11.95 12.31 12.68 13.16 13.45 13.86 14.27 14.71 15.14
9 11.14 11.41 11.82 12.11 12.54 12.91 13.31 13.71 14.11 14.54 14.91 15.42 15.88 16.36
11 12.13 12.39 12.16 13.15 13.54 13.65 14.36 14.8 15.24 15.7 16.11 16.65 17.15 11.66
11 12.99 13.38 13.18 14.19 14.62 15.16 15.51 15.98 16.46 16.95 17.45 17.98 18.52 19.17
12 14.03 14.45 14.88 15.33 15.79 16.26 16.75 17.26 17.17 18.31 18.85 19.42 21.11 21.63
13 15.16 15.61 16.18 16.51 17.16 11.57 18.10 18.64 19.20 19.18 21.31 21.98 21.61 22.26
14 16.37 16.86 17.37 17.89 18.42 18.98 19.55 20.13 21.74 21.36 22.00 22.67 23.34 24.14
15 17.68 18.21 18.75 19.32 19.91 21.51 21.11 21.74 22.39 23.06 23.76 24.47 25.21 25.93
16 19.19 19.66 21.25 20.86 21.49 22.13 22.79 23.48 24.18 24.91 25.65 26.42 21.21 28.13
CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH
JOB CLASSIFICATION/GRADE
AS SPECIFIED THROUGH MSN PAY PLAN
EFFECTIVE OCTOBER 1, 1990
Grade 1 (Not Assigned)
Grade 2
Receptionist
Grade 3
Animal Control Officer
Customer Services Representative
Permits Clerk
Records Management Clerk
Clerk - PW, AB Sewer
Grade 4
Communications Tech.
Police Records Specialist
Grade 5
Communications Supervisor Data Entry Clerk
Secretary
Grade 7 Grade 6
Accounting Clerk Utility Billing Supervisor
Administrative Assistant
Administrative Assistant/Personnel Tech. •
Administrative Assistant/Police & Fire
Grade 8
Fiscal Assistant Computer Operator
Code Enforcement Officer
Grade 9
Purchasing Agent
Grade 10 (Not Assigned)
Grade 11 &A.4-44..... (�.
Maint. & Sanitation Division Director Water Plant Superindentent2)
Police Lieutenant
Accountant
Grade 12
Chief Building Inspector PW Inspector/Asst to Director
Distribution & Collection Division Director
Utility Plant Division Director
Parks & Recreation Program Director
Grade' 13
Grade 14
Police Captain
Fire Marshal-
Grade 15
City Planner Fire Chief
Grade 16
Finance Director
Police Chief -
•
Public Works Director/Engineer
The Merit Step Pay/Grade Chart is set forth in attached
Exhibit a .
Entrance Wage Determination/Demotion
a . Original appointment to any position
classification , or the appointment of a current
employee to a new and different position
classification , shall normally be made at the
entrance rate and advancement from the entrance
rate to maximum rate within the pay grade shall be
by successive steps . Upon recommendation of the
Department Head , the City Manager may approve
initial compensation At a higher rate in the range
for the position classification when the needs of
the City make such action necessary.
b . Except as provided in the second sentence of this
subsection , when an employee is demoted to a
different position classification , he shall receive
the pay rate in the lower pay range of the new
position which is deemed appropriate by the
Department Head . Provided that, should the
demotion be the result of non—disciplinary action
(e .g. , a reduction in force ) , the demoted employee
shall receive the rate in the lower position
classification pay range which provides the
smallest possible decrease in pay. Employees
demoted for non—disciplinary reasons shall if
possible be reassigned to other duties commensurate
with his qualifications for the position . The
Employer will make a reasonable effort to reassign
the employee in accord with the provisions of this
section .
c . When an employee is promoted to a classification
with a higher base rate ot pay, the pay rate of
that employee shall be the lowest step in the
higher range that will provide at least a five
percent (5%) increase over the rate received
immediately prior to promotion .
Advancement within merit step plan .
a . Except as set forth below, advancement within the
merit step plan shall occur no sooner than twelve
(12 ) months from the employee ' s date of hire or
date of last increase , provided the employee
receives a satisfactory or above rating from his
Department Head , and such advancement is approved
by the City Manager .
44
Thereafter , employees who have previously advance
to the top step of the pay plan shall be eligible
for an annual three percent (3%) bonus twelve (12 )
months from the date of their last increase . The
annual bonus shall replace step movement and shall
be contingent on continued satisfactory service .
The bonus shall not be paid in the employee ' s base
rate of pay, rather the bonus shall be paid in a
lump—sum payment on the employee ' s anniversary
date .
Employees who receive an overall above satisfactory
evaluation rating shall receive a two percent (2%)
one—time bonus in addition to their normal step
increase . Employees who have advance to the top
step of the pay plan, and who receive an overall
above satisfactory evaluation rating shall receive
a two percent (2%) one—time bonus in addition to
their satisfactory evaluation annual bonus
increase .
The advancement in the pay plan for Department
Heads shall be per anniversary date , and any bonus
shall be determined by the City Manager based on
funds available .
For the purposes of this plan , the date of last
increase shall be the most recent date upon which
any of the following actions occurred to an
employee :
1 . Date of promotion ;
2 . Date on which an employee received a step
increase .
3. Cost of living adjustments or general increases
shall not be considered as the date or last
increase .
b . For purposes of determining whether or not the employee
has satisfactorily performed services for the City for
advancement in the merit step plan , the Department Head
shall notify the City Manager of the Department Head ' s
evaluation, with his recommendation for any merit
increase action . If the Employee ' s performance has not
been graded as satisfactory during the applicable time
period , the employee ' advancement may be delayed at the
sole discretion of the city for an indefinite period of
time . The employee shall be advised in writing as to the
reason his merit step increase was not granted at the
45
usual time . The evaluation rating of an employee under
this Article is within the sole discretion of the City
and thereby is not subject to the grievance or
arbitration procedures
46
C I 5/ C6po,tSS/O, 5 - 777,6-
/2,y?
77,S'74yi Fr- foe A16)(7
ilI L7�T/4/ ("Vol /y) . % b1)/Z&
,p ,H1 0 6
O ciet p-i/e),v5 fro yv,'
`c U1 f ) /) ../2 a? 7/-KU v. 7
Honorable Mayor ,,/Y5/-(6,P
and City Commission Members
Atlantic Beach, Florida /4 41
Dear Mayor and City Commission Members:
I am herewith proposing a reorganization of our Parks and Recreation
Department. In that the Director's position is currently vacant, as well as
one Parks Maintenance Worker 1, it is an opportune time to make any
changes.
Specifically, 1 am recommending the dividing of responsibilities
concerning parks and recreation activities. Currently, under the Atlantic
Beach Code, the Parks and Recreation Director reports to the Public
Works Director and then City Manager. This position also supervises three
employees and one part time. An organization chart would depict this
structure as follows:
City
Manager
?ub.Wks
Director
Parka and
Rec.Dir.
Camp Mtce. Mtce. Mtce.
Counselor Worker I--Worker I—Worker 7
I am requesting your approval to restructure the department with the goal
in mind to assure equal consideration in both these important service
areas. My recommendation is to hire a Recreation Director responsible
directly to the City Manager. This individual would be charged v.th the
general mission to plan our parks layouts (ie. functional design) and
ensure their usage to the maximum. In the latter regard, I envision
coordination/cooperation with all city departments, other governmental
entities(eg. school system, county et al.) and private concerns as well (eg.
YMCA, leagues and the like). The organizational chart would look like
this:
City
Mans er
Retreat.
Director
In addition, I am recommending the upgrading of a current, vacant
position to one entitled Parks Department Division Chief. This individual
would be responsible for all parks and assigned city rights-of-way
maintenance. Duties include landscaping/lawn maintenance,
pesticide/fertilizer application, parks/playground upkeep, safety program
coordination for the Parks Department, etc. This chart of organization
reflects this configuration:
City
Mena I
Pub Wks
Director
ark9 Div.
Director
Mtce. Mtce.
Please note, this Worker I Worker I
is working
position in
addition to
assigned supervisory responsibilities. The individual will be expected to
participate in the mowing, plant care, playground and other equipment
repair, etc. along with supervising personnel, budgeting, planning, et al.
I am proposing to fund the Recreation Director as currently provided within
the established pay range. Regarding the Parks Department Division
Chief, I recommend, as previously noted, converting the current, vacant
Maintenance Worker I position to the new one as proposed. The pay
range recommended, grade 10, begins at $25,027 and ends at $36,189-I
am planning to hire an individual, if you concur with my proposal, at the
beginning step ($25,027). When compared to the original position, funded
at $14,196 per annum, the additional cost is $10,831. This difference may
be obtained from our city hall lawn maintenance account, totaling $14,000
for one year. I have discussed the possibility of having lawn maintenance
performed by the Parks Department as led by a new Division Chief with
experience in this area and feel we could do the job. If you agree with this
scenario, we would actually save $3,169 a year even with enactment of the
upgraded Parks Department position.
Your consideration of this proposal is appreciated. It is my intention to
recommend these changes for the better operation of our municipal
government and meet the priorities you have established for our
community. For your convenience, I have enclosed suggested
descriptions for the positions noted herein. I would be most happy to
answer any questions.
Sincerely,
Kim D. Leinbach
City Manager
Enclosure
WATER AND SEWER CAPITAL OUTLAY ESTIMATE
FIVE YEAR WATER AND SEWER CAPITAL OUTLAY ESTIMATE*
(All Revenue Comes from Utility Payments)
(No new increase will be proposed to fund these projects)
Additional Needed
Over New $2,000,000 Approved
In FY 94/95 Budget PRIORITY
A. WATER CAPITAL OUTLAY
Major Projects:
. Water Trunk& Loop $1,250,000 1
. Water Main Install. AB 700,000 1
. Distrib. Sys. Mayport Rd. BUC 200,000 2
. Water Mains Oak Harb. 500,000 2
. Land for Water Tower AB 150,000 3
. Water Tank AB 375,000 3
. City Meters AB 50,000 4
. Meter Replacements -AB & BUC 208,000 4
. Beach Ave. Water 337,293 5
. Corrosion Reduct. WTP1 AB 30,000 6
. Contingency (10%) 380,029
Subtotal 4,180,322
B. SEWER CAPITAL OUTLAY
Major Projects:
. Sewer Plant (add on)AB 600,000 1
. Wetwell (add on) !,: 100,000 1
. 0.75 MGD Expand. BUC 1,115,000 1
. Sewer Main Rehab. AB 2,604,500 2
. Sewer Main Rehab. BUC 600,000 2
. Buc. Lift Station 120,000 3
. Park St. Lift Station AB 15,000 4
. Stewart St. Lift Station AB 15,000 4
. Beach Ave. Sewer 456,815 5
. Force Mains at Plant AB 150,000 6
. Contingency (10%) 577,632
Subtotal 6,353,947
MAJOR WATER & SEWER PROJECTS Total $105341269
Other:
. Sludge Management (Reserve Cont.) $1,500,000
. Buc. Generator(WW P) (Operating) $110,000
. Standby Lift Sta. Gen. BUC (Operating) $40,000
* Estimate based on Staff and Water and Sewer Committee review.
STORM WATER CAPITAL OUTLAY
STORM WATER MASTER PLAN
RECOMMENDED CAPTIAL OUTLAY
(Ranked by Priority)
1. AHERN TO 2ND ST./SALTAIR------------------------- -----$ 284,227
(SM-A & SM-D)
2. THIRD TO 5TH ST. 773,951
(SM-B)
3. 6TH TO 8TH ST.----------- 547,007
(SM-C)
4. PLAZA TO 11TH ST. 1,071,423
(SM-E)
-5. 11TH. ST. TO CLUB DR. 193,980
(SM-F)
6. CLUB DR. TO SATURIBA ------------------------------------------------------- 250,000*
(SM-G) (1,111,324)
TOTAL $3,120,588
*Staff recommendation
Z7 ---
8
\.,,,__,
1 SC-D
.. . t ,1.1
------ —1-4--talS
- .... ._
..7-•pri. -.4t.
'i.. .11‘g igillS
f't . -.•..•••.t...:1:'•
•'''';'Ivi.e.4•414
"„.(•,.,_. .."'";-..21:.' '
•,:?'''.,;).*:' ";;;.;.
,.. I . ---1, SC-E
:4•1"::•.*:741',;
- i,....1.7:1".::•11;
. sc.a . 10 '• -..-:li,....4:*
- *.' .4:1*4;... 4,,' - • •,...VI, "
.''.•:•••- ',•
L ..
...., ':A7`;.'s•-•.,,Z.i.-3?- , ••:,:et.:•7 4•41
.. ,,,,,X:101•';.,
• '".:•73047
, • N../ 71 S 11 g _i........40
•,.. . .., .--._.
• '',-,1$4i.r.
Private -,., ...N...t. .11110 IN
•-,._ 4:,,,,,_ -..,,,_ it;,,,, . 1 ..,..,-;;..1.i...4.
.45\ A
.-._ „. ., .,,,. ..?:. - • ...,Ab;',tre.
..-I, G . . i)t,•.5:;;c•a.
e, . ,.f4 1.4
rg-grif-...!-. --Y al.' • -.....•....,4,
Local', ', \ .......i.•.v5
- - . 10-filtration
-.,.. ._ _. if
\ scl If ,r-,;......,..„:„..
...„A=
-.,..... - 0 -7.....%t!r.,.•,,,.
! 1E1=q4 17:1 I —11 017
'''
t,,,.....,..,
_::.,,, Mt1.441. 4, •,..;.: i at , - ' \ \ lief ' --0
',.•
iill 1 - •
t.1 I get • -
ME 2;-r*Td•-•":::::-,34,h. ,...„....,54,
-i..... --.._-__.„4..„----,- -, .i.- --,---4,-- A•••=1 1111 • --'40 .
'N
lila ma vim ne----:- APPILI.i...— . smJ
,.._,...... , •,....:,
. _.
, ,.,.. .„. .c., •,..., . ,
WV.
-.. •
I \ I ! 1 V-.4W \.11 -, I 1110•10111.111" ''. 1.4
1.4"--._
1.14T - Srl' IC -le% I
.. 11105%, ifti 4 U \-\ '1.\ SM-H ___,•,-----
,-.:
,...41116 i \\\\uicuivtweil, 14
.,.....„.
.
Valj' AP RI" , .4
111101111
------- dunk ,-.--3
1
1
-;:ill.' A
-Valli 4
413-
.
im-.).-thor—i•-'41.4-1--g ib... I ..... ---,m.o.... -,m,...- --..-- 4mm i—, .,
— I /A\--11-1 ni 1 nr1r1— 4
0,
co
r-1
c't
0
iL Figure 2-2. Delineation of Subbasins.
-
no