The URL can be used to link to this page

Agenda Item 8EAGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: DATE: AGENDA ITEM# 8E JANUARY 13, 2014 AGENDA ITEM NO. ___ _ CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH CITY COMMISSION MEETING STAFF REPORT Rezoning for SPA -13-001000715 201 Mayport Road DATE: ________________ __ Michael Griffin, CBO, CFM M/ Building and Zoning Director v lp Jeremy Hubsch Redevelopment and Zoning Coordinator December 6, 2013 STRATEGIC PLAN LINK: Goal Number 7, Mayport Corridor. This goal is to build, encourage, and support a vibrant commercial corridor and strong residential neighborhoods along Mayport Road and adjoining neighborhoods. BACKGROUND: The applicants are requesting to rezone a 7.2 acre property that is currently zoned Commercial Limited (CL) and Residential General Multi-Family (RG-M) to a Special Planned Area (SPA) for up to 80 residential units. The property is located on the eastern side of the Mayport Road flyover, near Atlantic Boulevard. As proposed, the project will consist of a variety of multi-family dwelling types that include duplex, triplex, and quadplex units. The property is in a Residential High Density Future Land Use District, which allows a maximum of 20 units per acre. The proposed project has a density of 11.2 units per acre. The applicants are seeking to create a unique development that would not ordinarily be allowed in a traditional zoning district. The Community Development Board staff rep01t details the specifics of the development, waivers requested, and sections of the Comprehensive Plan that relate to the project. The Community Development Board considered this request along with comments from staff, the public and the applicants at the November 19 111 meeting, and the Board recommended approval by a vote of 6-0. The board found the request consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and Future Land Use Map, as well as Division 6 of the Land Development Regulations, which relates to Special Planned Area Districts (SPA) BUDGET: RECOMMENDATION: None. Review recommendation of Community Development Board for consideration to draft ordinance amending zoning to a Special Planned Area. ATTACHMENTS: Draft minutes of the November 19, 2013 Community Development Board meeting; copy of Community Development Board staff report; copy ofSPA-13-00100075 application. REVIEWED BY CITY MANA~-----7 • AGENDA ITEM CASE NO CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD STAFF REPORT 4A SPA-13-00100075 AGENDA ITEM II 8E JANUA RY 13,20 14 Req uest for Special Planned Area {SPA) rezon ing as permitted by Sectio ns 24-116 through 24-126 to allow a maximum of80 residential units. The property is curre ntly zoned Commercial Limited (CL} and Residentia l Genera l-Mul ti-Family (RG-M). The Future Land Use Designation is Resi dentia l High Density (RH}. LOCATION 201 MAYPORT ROAD APPLICANT HABITAT FOR HUMANITY BEACHES DATE NOVEMBER 12, 2013 STAFF JEREMY HUBSCH, REDEVELOPMENT AND ZONING COORDINATOR Staff Comments Baclcground The s ubje ct properly contains approxim a te ly 7.2 aaes a nd is located on th e east s ide of Maypo rt Road, just no1·th of Atl antic Boul ev ar d . The prope rty is cu•·•·e ntly zoned Comme t·cia l Limite d (C L) a nd Resi d entia l Ge n e ral Multi -Fam il y (RG-M). The appli cants are seekin g to r ezone the property to a Special Planne d Area (S PA) for t h e construction of up to 80 •·es idential uni ts. Th e s ite is cuJTc nt ly vacant and p 1•evious ly contai n e d a 98 unit multi -family co mplex, which was torn down a few years ago. The constructio n of the Mayport fl yover and subsequen t lack of access to Mayport Road s outh m ak es the s ite less s u itable for commercial d evelopme nt a nd more s uita ble for r esid e ntial. The applicants are requesting to build a m ax imum of80 r esid ential uni ts. As proposed, t h e project will have a d ensity of 11.2 units p er acr e, which is be low the m ax imum of 2 0 uni ts p er acr e in t h e Resid e ntia l High Density Future Land Use Distri ct. I 1 I . I Project Description AGENDA ITEM# 8E JANUARY 13, 2014 Habitat for Humanity is seeking to use the Special Planned Area District (SPA) to create a unique development that otherwise would not be allowed by a conventional zoning district in Atlantic Beach. Planned developments generally enable flexibility for building setbacks, lot widths, and lot coverage; in exchange for the creation of park space, open space, and landscaped buffers. Per Section 24-116 of the Atlantic Beach Land Development Regulations, "The purpose of the special planned area district is to create a mechanism to establish a plan of development or redevelopment for a site where the property owner and the community's interests cannot be best served by the provisions of the conventional zoning distdcts, and where assurances and commitments are necessary to protect the interests of both the property owner and the public, and also the unique qualities of the City of Atlantic Beach." The proposed project has smaller lot widths and building setbacks, and higher lot coverage than allowed in a standard development in Atlantic Beach. However, this is a unique development for Atlantic Beach. The applicants have described the design of the development as a Traditional Neighborhood Development (TND). While staff does not believe the development to be a fully fledged TND, it does display some elements from a design standpoint such as a centrally located park space, alleys, front porches, and walkability. The scale of the project and location along a stretch of Mayport Road that has no left turn lanes is a deterrent to the mixed use ( commercialjretail) component of a Traditional Neighborhood Development. Additionally, the development is lacking connectivity to adjacent neighborhoods, which often occurs in a TND, The SPA is providing a centrally located park space, though not required to per Atlantic Beach Code. Only developments over 10 acres must provide recreation per 24-257. However, this project can hypothetically have a higher population than a 10 acre development in a Residential Low Density Future Land Use, which has a maximum density of 6 units per acre. The applicants are providing 5 feet of landscaped buffers along the entire northern, eastern, and southern property boundaries, though not required to by code. There will be a 10' landscaped buffer along the entire Mayport Road facing corridor, which is required by the Atlantic Beach Commercial Corridor development standards outlined in 24-171. It is anticipated that the proposed 80 units will be mostly duplex, triplex, and quadplex buildings. The applicants do not yet know what customer demand will be like, and thus would like the flexibility to alter the unit type shown on the site plan, while maintaining the same general layout. The SPA text clearly states that any modifications that change the use, building height, density, buffers and open space, and access points/driveways will need to come back before the Community Development Board and Commission as required per Section 24-124. The units will be sold fee simple to Habitat for Humanity participants. The SPA proposes 2 parking spaces per dwelling unit as required by code, as well as an additional minimum 20 visitor spaces. Habitat for Humanity plans to create an HOA to maintain the project in perpetuity, but at this time the HOA documents have not yet been created. Per the SPA text, membership in the HOA will be mandatory for all homeowners, and all open space, retention areas, park, and landscaping will be maintained by the HOA. The commercial corridor development standards outlined in Section 24-171. which pertain to all structures within 100 feet of Mayport Road, state that all new buildings shall be made of brick, wood, stucco, decorative masonry, exterior insulation and finish systems (EIFS), architectural or split-faced type block, or other finish materials with similar appearance and texture. It also states that metal clad, corrugated metaL plywood or oriented strand board (OSB), and exposed plain concrete are not permitted. The applicants have submitted architectural renderings for the project that are consistent with this requirement (attached). Given the location of the site at the entrance to Mayport Road and its visibility from Atlantic Boulevard, staff believes it is important to ensure that this project will be aesthetically pleasing. At this time the city's Public Works Director has a few outstanding construction level comments that need to be worked out with the applicants prior to this item going to the City Commission. Additionally the City of Jacksonville Fire Department is still in the process of reviewing the project for any public safety issues. It is anticipated that these will be cleared up shortly. Page 2 of 8 AGENDA ITEM# SE JANUARY 13, 2014 Compatibility The proposed project is generally compatible with adjacent properties. To the east is another multi-family project, to the north is a small fast food restaurant, and to the south is a mini-storage facility, which faces the opposite direction. According to section 24-177 (e), the applicants are not required to provide any buffers between adjacent parcels. If they were required to provide a buffer, it would need to be ten feet wide where bordering an incompatible use. The applicants have chosen to provide a 5 foot wide landscaped buffer along the east, north, and south property lines. As previously mentioned, they are also providing a 10 foot wide landscaped buffer along Mayport Road. Below is a table of the Future Land Use and Zoning of adjacent parcels: Direction Future Land Use Category Zoning District East Residential-High Density (RH) Residential General, Multi- Family (RG-M) West Commercial (CM) Commercial General (CG) North Residential-Low Density (RL) Commercial Limited (CL) and Residential, General, Multi- Family (RG-M) South Commercial (CM) Commercial General (CG) D s d d eve opment tan ar s Lot and Building Maximum allowed density per land 20 units/acre use Proposed density 11.2 units/acre Maximum number of units 80 Maximum Lot coverage by Parcel Parcel Type 1 (Single Family): 65% Parcel Type 2 (Duplex): 65%. Parcel Type 3 (Triplex): 65% Parcel Type 4 (Quadplex): 65% Minimum lot width (rectangular Parcel Type 1 (S.F.): Min. Width-32 feet; Min. Area-2,900 s.f. shaped lots only) and Minimum Lot Parcel Type 2 (Duplex): Min. Width-50 feet; Min. Area-4,600 s.f. Area by Parcel Parcel Type 3 (Triplex): Min. Width -68 feet; Min. Area-6,250 s.f. Parcel Type 4 (Quadplex): Min. Width-84 feet; Min. Area -7,725 s.f. Average Lot coverage by Individual End Unit: 60% units within a Duplex, Triplex or Inside Unit: 75% Quadplex Parcel Minimum lot width (rectangular End Unit: Min. Width-26 feet; Min. Area-2,300 s.f. shaped lots only) and Minimum Lot Inside Unit: Min. Width -16 feet; Min. Area -1,450 s.f. Area by individual units within a Duplex, Triplex or Quadplex Parcel Minimum Lot Frontage for Any For irregular shaped lot, the minimum frontage can be no less than 10'1ess Irregular Shaped Lot than minimum lot width Minimum floor area (per unit) 1,000 SF (enclosed air conditioned living area) Maximum building height 35 feet, principle dwelling; 15 feet, accessory structure-Per COAB LDC Minimum Primary building separation 10 feet Minimum front setback (rectangular Parcel Types 1-4: 8 feet open air porches, shaped lots only) 12 feet exterior building wall Page 3 of 8 Minimum front setback (irregular shaped lots) Minimum side setback (all structures) Minimum rear setback (principal dwelling) Minimum Driveway I Parking area Setback Accessory Structure Setback Comprehensive Plan Parcel Types 1-4: 4 feet for open air porches AGENDA ITEM# 8E JANUARY 13, 2014 8 feet for exterior building wall (for a maximum one unit per building) most closely located to the irregular portion of the lot front boundary. All Parcel Types: 5 feet All Corner Lots: To maintain a clear sight triangle at intersections, no obstructions to vision exceeding 4feet in height shall be allowed within the straight line connection of a 10 foot offset from the intersecting right-of- way lines of two streets. Parcel Type 1-4: 15 feet 3 feet from side property line I Parking space dimension begins 2 feet from property line. 3 feet from side or rear lot lines; not allowed in front of unit Per Section 24-62.c.2, the Community Development Board shall "Indicate the relationship of the proposed rezoning to the comprehensive plan for the city and provide a finding that the requested change in zoning is consistent with the comprehensive plan." Below are a few goals, objectives, and policies of the comprehensive plan that are relevant to this project. Consistency with the comprehensive plan is one of the findings of fact necessary for approval of the SPA. Goal A.1 The City shall manage growth and redevelopment in a manner which results in a pattern of land uses that: 1) encourages, creates and maintains a healthy and aesthetically pleasing built environment, 2) avoids blighting influences, 4) maintains the City's distinct residential community character Objective A.1.3-Maintaining Residential Character The City shall encourage future development and redevelopment, which 1) retains the exceptionally high quality of life and the predominantly residential character of the City of Atlantic Beach ... and, 3) provides for varied and diverse recreational opportunities ... and which provides for and maintains energy efficient land use patterns. Objective A.1.5-Sound Development Patterns The City shall maintain development patterns which 1) prevent blighting influences 2) foster diverse and stable neighborhoods ... 4) provide proper locations for ... energy efficient land use patterns, and 5) encourage healthy and aesthetically pleasing living conditions. Policy A.1.5.5 Flexible regulatory methods shall be utilized to provide incentives for achieving environmental enhancement, economical land development and energy efficient patters of land use that provide for an appropriate mix of uses within the City. Policy 1.5.8 The City shall permit residential development only in compliance with the residential density limitations as set forth within the Land Development Regulations, and as designated on the Future Land Use Map in accordance with the following table. Objective A.1.6 The City shall preserve the sound structural condition and the diverse character of the built environment of the City and shall encourage development programs and activities that are directed at infill development as well as the conservation, redevelopment and re-use of existing structures and the preservation of and re-investment in older neighborhoods. Page 4 of8 Policy A.1.6.3 AGENDA ITEM# 8E JANUARY 13, 2014 The City shall discourage redevelopment practices that displace very low, low and moderate-income residents. Objective A.1.10 The City shall continue to maintain a development character which is compact in form, orderly in its land use patter, and diversified in its makeup so as to ensure employment opportunities, affordable housing. a pleasant living environment, and cost effective and energy efficient public services. PolicyA.1.10.4 The City shall actively support the appropriate redevelopment and infill development of the Mayport Road corridor. Retail and service uses that sustain neighborhoods and encourage a more aesthetically pleasing and pedestrian friendly environment shall be encouraged. New development along Mayport Road shall be in compliance with the Commercial Corridor Development Standards as set forth within the Land Development Regulations. Objective A.1.11 The City shall provide for land use, development and redevelopment in an efficient manner, which supports the land use designations as set forth within the 2010-2020 Future Land Use Map; which enforces the residential densities and the limitations upon the type and intensity of uses, and which results in development appropriate to the sensitive coastal location of the City, particularly with respect to the predominantly residential character and small-town scale of the City. PolicyA.1.14.1 The City shall continue to maintain an energy efficient land use pattern and shall continue to promote the use of transit and alternative methods of transportation that decrease reliance on the automobile. Policy A.1.14.2 The City shall continue to encourage and develop the "walk-ability and bike-ability" of the City as a means to promote the physical health of the City's residents Waivers The applicants are requesting thirteen waivers. Section 24-121 states "The special planned area district should not be construed as a mechanism to diminish the requirements set forth elsewhere within this chapter or other chapters of the City Code. Waivers to existing development standards shall be approved by the city commission and only upon demonstration that an alternative standard will provide a better development outcome with respect to the quality of design and development form." The waivers requested by the applicants are essentially areas where certain aspects of the SPA differ from the standard requirements of the code. It should be noted that the practical purpose of planned developments is to seek relief from standard setbacks, lots sizes, and lot widths. These types of items are typically not listed as waivers in a PUD/SPA. For instance, in the Atlantic Beach Country Club SPA, there are several lot types and building setbacks that are smaller than allowed by Atlantic Beach's zoning districts, but there were no waivers listed in the staff report or SPA text. In this case, the applicants have chosen to provide all areas where the development varies from what is allowed by code. Waivers 4-10 are all examples of items that are often times not considered a traditional waiver in a planned development These items generally relate to requests for lesser setbacks, lot sizes and widths; and greater Impervious Surface Ratio (ISR). As pointed out earlier, increased landscaping, open space, and park space is often a tradeoff for allowing these types of requests in a planned development Waivers 1-3 relate to requests for limited relief from landscaping requirements. Waiver 11 requests a reduction in setbacks for accessory structures. Waivers 12 and 13 are requests for relief for roadway standards. The City Commission has the power to grant. deny, or alter any of these waivers. The Community Development Board shall take them into consideration when making a recommendation. Page 5 of8 AGENDA ITEM# 8E JANUARY 13, 2014 1. Per section 24-171, Commercial Corridor, it references Div. 8 Landscaping which requires 50% of the required trees along the Mayport frontage road be shade trees. Due to the adjacent overhead power, shade trees are not permitted to be located in this proximity to the power lines: therefore, this buffer will only include understory trees and palm trees. 2. Per Section 23-30, Minimum Tree requirements under Division 4 General provision, which is later referenced by Division 8, For triplex parcels, we are requesting to 33% shade tree versus the required 50% shade tree requirement. Overall, there will be 40% shade trees on the development parcels. This reduction of shade trees is off-set from the additional planting that has been provided elsewhere on the property that is not required by code. 3. Per Section 23-30, Minimum Tree requirements under Division 4 General provision, we are requesting to plant 3" caliper trees versus the required 4" caliper trees. This reduction in size is requested due to availability of non- shade plant material along with costs, and is off-set from the additional planting that has been provided elsewhere on the property that is not required by code. Please note, that only required trees on-site are located on the individual residential parcels and the Landscape Enhancement area to Mayport 4. Per Sec. 24-88 which requires for "high density residential development, a minimum lot area of two-thousand one hundred seventy-five (2,175) square feet for each dwelling unit." We request for duplex units through quaplex units, that the outside unit have a minimum lot size of 2,300 SF, and inside units have a minimum lot size of 1,450 SF. 5. Per Section 24-108 (d) (1) minimum lot area requirement for "Single-family dwellings" requires seven thousand five hundred (7,500) square feet". Our single-family lot is 2,900 sf. 6, Per Section 24·1 08, minimum yard requirements, requires "Front Yard setback: Twenty (20) feet." Our request is 8 foot from open porches (12 foot from building) for rectangular lots. On irregular lots we request a minimum 4 foot for open air porches, 8 feet for exterior building wall (for a maximum one unit per building) most closely located to the irregular portion of the lot front boundary. 7. Per Section 24-108, minimum yard requirements which requires "Rear Yard setback: Twenty (20) feet." We request 15 feet. 8. Per section 24-108, minimum side requirements require: a. Single-family dwellings: Combined fifteen (15) total feet and five (5) minimum feet either side. b. Two-family (duplex) dwellings and townhouse: Seven and one-half(7.5) each side." We request side setbacks of 5 feet. On corner lots: To maintain a clear sight triangle at intersections, no obstructions to vision exceeding 4 feet in height shall be allowed within the straight line connection of a 10 foot offset from the intersecting right-of-way lines of two streets. 9. Per section 24-108, minimum lot width requirements of ten (75) feet. We request 32 feet for a single family lot, 50 feet for a duplex parcel and 68 feet for a triplex parcel type. 10. Per section 24-108, Building Restrictions which requires "The building restrictions for the RG-M zoning district shall be a 50% Maximum impervious surface. For Parcel Types 1 through 4 we request a 65% maximum impervious surface. Furthermore, on the individual units we request an average 60% impervious on exterior units and 75% impervious on internal units. 11. Per Section 24-151, Accessory Structures, Detached carports have a 5 foot side and rear yard setback requirements, and private garages have a 10 foot rear and side yard setback. We request all accessory structures have a minimum 3 foot side and rear yard setback. Page 6 of8 AGENDA ITEM# 8E JANUARY 13, 2014 12. Per section 24-252 (i) cul-de-sac's require a minimum 50 foot right-of-way. We request a 44 foot right-of-way for an approximate 200 feet in length. 13. Per section, 24-252 (c)(l) which states "Any subdivision of land, which creates more than ten (10) residential lots shall provide two (2) separate access points, unless other provisions, such as permanent easements, are made for emergency ingress, and provided that such entrances will not adversely affect the street system." We are providing two access points however, only one will be for ingress. REQUIRED ACTION The Community Development Board may consider a motion to recommend approval of the Habitat for Humanity SPA (Application SPA-13-00100075) to the City Commission, a rezoning to Special Planned Area for lands described within said application, approving the site development plan and adopting the application and supporting documents, and all terms and conditions as set forth therein, subject to conditions enumerated, and provided the following, or similar, findings of fact: (1) The request for rezoning has been fully considered after public hearing with legal notice duly published as required by law. (2) The rezoning to Special Planned Area is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the Future Land Use Designation of Residential, High Density. (3) The rezoning is consistent with the Land Development Regulations, specifically Division 6, establishing standards for Special Planned Areas. (4) The rezoning and the site development plan are consistent with the stated definition, intent and purpose of Special Planned Areas. (5) The zoning district classification of Special Planned Area, and the specific uses and special conditions as set forth herein, are consistent and compatible with surrounding development. The Community Development Board may consider a motion to recommend denial of the Habitat for Humanity SPA (Application SPA-13-00100075) to the City Commission, a rezoning to Special Planned Area for lands described within said application, provided the following, or similar, findings offact: (1) The rezoning to Special Planned Area is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the Future Land Use Designation of Residential Low Density because (2) The rezoning is not consistent with the Land Development Regulations, specifically Division 6, establishing standards for Special Planned Areas because (3) The zoning district classification of Special Planned Area and the specific uses and special conditions as set forth herein are not consistent or compatible with surrounding development because Page 7 of8 AGENDA ITEM# 8E JANUARY 13, 2014 APPLICATION FOR ZONING MAP AMENDMENT for SPECIAL PLANNED AREA -or-PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT City of Atlantic Bench · 800 Seminole Road • Atlantic Beach, Florida 32233-5445 Phone: (904) 247-5800 • FAX (904) 247-5805 • http://www.coab.us Date October 16,2013 File No. October 16, 2013 Application No. October 16, 2013 t. Applicant's Name Joseph P. Loretta, PLA, LEED AP BD+C 2. Applicant's Address 9822 Tapestry Park Circle Suite 201 Jacksonville, FL 32246 3. Pl'Operty Location 201 Mayport Road Atlantic Beach, FL 32233 4. Property Appraise•·'s Real Estate Number _1_7_7_6_4_9_-o_o_o_o ___________________ _ 5. Current Zoning Classification CL and RG-M 6. Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Designation _R_H __ _ 1. Requested Action Rezone property to Special Planned District (SPA) 8. Size of Parcel_7_.2_a_c_re_s _________ _ 9. Utility Provider The City of Atlantic Beach 10. Provide a textual narrative and a composite site plan, which demonstrates compliance with A•·ticle Ill, Division 6 of the City of Atlantic Beach Zoning, Subdivision and Land Development Regulations. The narrative, and any required attachments, should concisely address each of the provisions and requh·ements of Section 24•+20 and should be p1•ovided in an order and format consistent with this Section. Please provide a coVel' page and a table of contents identifying each attachment to the application. ~01'\ '1-Lf.-lltO-/ZIP 11. The following items must be submitted with the application: n. List ef tUij11eent flFOfle~ners nithin 366 feet of the jiiope•'t)' including nome, mailing address and Property At•l" iilser's ltenl Esr:ne uumbe• 11om most 1 enmtly-ttttified tax 1 oils. Addt es~ lwe (2) legal slu: cnveloJJes to each property owner on tbe lis,, De Rot iiiGiudc ·• return address, Eeeh envelepe RUISt eentain jltoper postnge. I lie utder of the cnv!!lopcs must •nald• tbe tlt dt1 in "hieh the tutmu l!!!ne!lruli the list. b. Proof of ownership (copy of deed or certificate by lawyer or abstract company or title company that verifies record owner ns above), If the appllcanHs not the owner, a letter of authorization from the owner(s) for applicant to represent the owner foa· all purposes related to this npplicalion must be provided. OV\e c. Required number of copies: ~ Please submit~) copiu of any plnns or nllachments that are l1.1rger than II x ~v.AilP.-rc..t. 17ioches In size, or any other items that cannot be easily reproduced. f) eop1e5 cf 0\fei./'&IZec;( on~ '"T-d. Application Fee. ($500.01)) Of>Pl'C,cJW I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ALL INFORMATION PROVIDED WITH THIS APPLICATION IS CORRECT: Signature of owncr(s) or authorized person If owner's authorization form is attached: ADDRESS APPLICATI Joseph P. Loretta 822 Tapestry Park Circle Suite 201 Jacksonville, FL 32246 Phone: 904-730-9360 FAX: 904-730-7165 E-mail: jloretta@GeneslsGroup.com AGENDA ITEM# 8E JANUARY 13, 2014 OWNER'S AUTHORIZATION FOR AGENT ..:.Jo::..:s:..:;ap~h:..:.P..:... ==Lo::..:re::::tt:=!a,..:::G:.::e::..:ne=sl:.:..s..=G.:.:ro~upc:.__ ______________ is hereby authorized to act on behalf of _B_aa_c_he_s_H_ab-'-lt-'-at_fo-'-r_H_um-'-a_n__,lty _________________ , the owner(s) of those lands described within the attached application, and as described in the attached deed or other such proof of ownership as may be required, in applying to the City of Atlantic Beach, Florida, for an application related to a Development Permit or other action pursuant to: Zoning Variance Use-by-Exception Building Permit Sign Permit ® D Comprehensive Plan Amendment Zoning Map Amendment Plat, Replat or Lot Division Tree Permit D D D D D Other ___________________ _ BY: ~--------------------------------------------Signature of Owner 904-241-1222 Extension 222 Telephone Number State of_hwh=------ County of !J u V<>~ l Signed and sworn before me on this IS~ day of, 20 .!l.· By~ Identification verified: Ocrl..ociS {..,~VIS(. Oath sworn: _ _._)( ___ Yes ---~-No Notary Signature My Commission expires: KYLE MURRAY ~[.hrnn""OMMISSION i# EE18S723 EXPIRES April 02, 2016 FlOOd• s.mo. cam AGENDA ITEM# BE JANUARY 13, 2014 ~Beaches ii'f Habitat for Humanity® Ownership and Commitment: Beaches Habitat for Humanity has unified control of the subject property and is committed to proceed with the proposed development in accordance with the ordinance creating the special planned area. Beaches Habitat for Humanity is committed to proceed with the proposed development according to the plans and schedule approved by the ordinance, and will continue operation and maintenance of all privately owned areas, functions and facilities, which will not be operated or maintained by the City pursuant to written agreement. Beaches Habitat for Humanity is committed to bind all successors and assigns in title to any commitments included within the ordinance creating the special planned area which shall also include by reference the application for rezoning and the approved plan of development, and which shall be recorded with the Clerk of Courts of Duval County. Beaches Habitat for Humanity will form the 201 Mayport Road Neighborhood Association, Inc., a Florida non-profit corporation, for the continued ownership and maintenance of the right-of-ways, common open space, retention areas, park and landscaping. Membership in the association shall be mandatory for cyl property owners within the SPA development plan. Beaches Habitat reserves the right to deed the ~~ht-of-way and alley back to the City while still maintaining the landscape . . , BY: Signature of oW.rier Debbie Jones Print Name October 15, 2013 Date 797 Mayport Road, Atlantic Beach, FL 32233 • Office: (904) 241-1222 • Fax: (904) 241-4310 www .beacheshabitat.org I • Prepared by and return to: Lawrence V. Ansbacher, Esq. Ansbacher & Schneider, P.A. 5150 Belfort Road, Building 100 Jacksonville, FL 32256 Doc #20132411 13, OR BK 16531 p Number Pages: 3 age 2248, Reco~ded 09/18/2013 at 02:17 PM Ronme Fussell CLERK CIRCUIT COURT DUVAL COUNTY RECORDING $27.00 DEED DOC ST $7700.00 SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED 1. Grantor's name and address is: CENTERSTATE BANK OF FLORIDA, N.A., A National Banking Corporation 1234 King Street Jacksonville, FL 32204 2. Grantee's name and address is: BEACHES HABITAT FOR HUMANITY, INC., a Florida non-profit corporation 797 Mayport Road Atlantic Beach, FL 32233 Grantee's tax identification number is: -------- AGENDA ITEM# 8E JANUARY 13, 2014 The terms Grantor and Grantee shall be non-gender specific, singular or plural, as the context permits or requires, and include heirs, personal representatives, successors or assigns where applicable and permitted. 3. The real property ("Property") conveyed hereby is described as follows: A tract of land lying in the Castro Y. Ferrer Grant, Section 38, Township 2 South, Range 29 East, Atlantic Beach, Duval County, and more particularly described as follows: For a point of reference commence at the intersection of the Northerly line of Atlantic Boulevard and the Easterly line of Mayport Road; thence run North 20 degrees 28' 35" East along said Easterly line of Mayport Road, a distance of 360 feet to a point of beginning; thence run North 89 degrees 19' 35" East parallel to said Northerly line of Atlantic Boulevard, a distance of 612.38 feet; thence run North 7 degrees 04' 25" West, a distance of 691.90 feet; thence run North 69 degrees 31' 25" West a distance of 251.01 feet to the Easterly right of way line of said Mayport Road; thence run South 20 degrees 28' 35" West along said Easterly right of line of Mayport Road, a distance of 834.36 feet to said point of beginning, together with all tenements, hereditaments, easements and appurtenances belonging to or benefiting such property. The Property Appraiser's Parcel Identification Number is 177649-0000 4. Grantor for good and valuable consideration plus the sum of $10.00 the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, hereby grants, bargains, sells and conveys to Grantee the Property to have and to hold in fee simple forever. 5. Grantor fully warrants title to the Property and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever claiming by, thro1~gh or under Grantor, but not otherwise, except for those certain "Permitted Exceptions" more particularly described on such Exhibit attached hereto and, by this reference, made a part hereof. EXCEPT AS EXPRESSLY SET FORTH IN THIS DEED, GRANTOR HAS MADE NO, AND EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ALL, REPRESENTATIONS, WARRANTIES, COVENANTS AND CONTRACTS OF EVERY KIND AND CHARACTER, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED OR ARISING BY 130172.03 Special Warranty Deed Last Saved: 13.9.10 12:26 PM AGENDA ITEM# 8E JANUARY 13, 2014 OPERATION OF LAW, WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPERTY, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES AS TO MATTERS OF TITLE (OTHER THAN AS SPECIFICALLY SET FORTH ABOVE), ZONING, TAX CONSEQUENCES, PHYSICAL OR ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS, AVAILABILITY OF ACCESS, INGRESS OR EGRESS, OPERATING HISTORY OR PROJECTIONS, VALUATION, GOVERNMENTAL APPROVALS, GOVERNMENTAL REGULATIONS OR ANY OTHER MATTER OR THING RELATING TO OR AFFECTING THE PROPERTY, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION: (i) THE VALUE, CONDITION, MERCHANTABILITY, MARKETABILITY, PROFITABILITY, HABITABILITY, SUITABILITY OR FITNESS OF THE PROPERTY FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE; (ii) THE MANNER OR QUALITY OF THE CONSTRUCTION OR MATERIALS INCORPORATED INTO ANY OF THE PROPERTY; (iii) THE AVAILABILITY OR EXISTENCE OF ANY WATER, SEWER OR UTILITIES (PUBLIC OR PRIVATE); (iv) THE MANNER, QUALITY, STATE OF REPAIR OR LACK OF REPAIR OF THE PROPERTY; OR (v) THE EXISTENCE OF ANY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE AT, IN, ON, UNDER OR ABOUT THE PROPERTY. THE TERMS OF THIS DISCLAIMER SHALL SURVIVE DI;LIVERY OF THIS DEED. ~~L---Executed on ~__hL. 2013. State of Flo 'da County of Du al CENTERSTATE BANK OF FLORIDA, N. A A National Banking Cor oration The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this \5-h-. day of ~162\.c. 10'-bL , 2013 by Matthew T. Maynor, Vice President of CepterState Bank of Florida, N. A, a national banking corporation, on behalf of the corporation ( Vf who is personally known to me or ( ) who has nuc~d _ Florida Driver's License) as identification. ~~~3=~~~~~~~~-~~d Notary Public, Sta of Florida My Commission Expires: PERMITTED EXCEPTIONS AGENDA ITEM# 8E JANUARY 13, 2014 1. General or special taxes and assessments required to be paid in the year 2013 and subsequent years which are not yet due and payable. 2. Downguy Easement to Jacksonville Electric Authority filed September 24, 1985 in Official Records Book 6018, page 1256, of the current public records of Duval County, Florida. 3. Grant of Easement to Mediaone of Greater Florida, Inc. as filed May 19, 2000 in Official Records Book 9629, page 901, of the current public records of Duval County, Florida. 4. Easement to Southern Bell Telephone and Telegraph Company filed January 31, 1961 in Official Records Book 1196, page 308, of the current public records of Duval County, Florida. 4. Facts, matters and things disclosed on a current survey of the Property. I. Overview WRflTB'J NARRA 11\IE fPA REZ.ON I NG Affi.JCA 110\J FOR 201 MA YFDRT ROAD November 11, 20 13 1\GEND/\ ITEM II 8E JI\N UI\RY 13,2014 The subject site oontal ns approximate ly 7.2 aa-es, and is located In the sou th central portion of the a ty of Atlantic Bead1 (COAB) on the east side of Mayport R>ad (ffiA1A), sou th of Cbrnell Lane. The applicant , Beaches Habitat, is seeki ng to rezone the propert y from Cbmmerdai- Umit ed (Q) and Fesidential, General , Multi-Family (R3-M) to the ~edal Aanned Area (~A) zoning district in order to create a Traditio nal Neighborh ood Cbmmuni t y. 201 Mayport R>ad will be a maximum 80 unit residential development, providing a mix of housing opportunit ies to indude single-family uni ts, duplex, triplex and quadplex buildings in w hich units wi ll be sold fee simple . Amen it y areas, ind uding sce nic oorridor landscaping , a oommun ity park and oommon open space, will be provided. Th e homes will be arranged in a Traditional Neighborhood Design wi th rear lane/all ey access and buildings fronting on the scenic co rrid or or the main loop road wi th the oommun ity park. All homes wi ll feature front porches and sidewalks that lead one t hrough the neighborhood and Mayport R>ad , crea tin g a wa lkable oommu nity. A-lo r Development Use: The prio r use oo nsi sted of a multi-family oommunity with a total 98 units, w ithin 25 buildings. The par king fadlity oonsisted of a total of 154 spaces w hich did not meet oode and the landscaping on t he site was very sparse. Th e prior development, und er separat e ownership, went into oo nd emnation In the middle 20 00's. The buildings located on the property were later torn down at the req uest of the aty by a separate lan d owner. II. Future land Use Designa tion s and ZDni ng Dist ri cts Land Use: The si t e has a future land use designation of Fesldentlal -High Densi ty (R-l) which allows a density of 15 DU/ ACto 20 DU/ AC, for a total144 dwe lling units. The propo sed ~A development repr esents a 45% red uction of potential developable un its on the subject property. ZDn ing: Th e western portion of the property, to a depth of approximate ly 150 feet , is f':"l"'31•n~:""'7Q'::t::'f"777\'!"::'l'TTI currently zoned O:>mmerdal Umited (Q). Thiszoning district is for low Intensity business and oomme rdal uses generally intended to serve neighboring residential development. The remainder of the property is currently zo ned Fesidential, Gene ral, Mu lti-Family (FGM) and is intended for med ium to high density multi-family development. The proposed s:'A zoning will provide the developer with fl exib ility and development alte rnative s not possibl e un der the sta ndard R3-M zo ning district, and wi ll all ow unifi ed design eleme nt s, w hile harmo nizing wi th the surrounding area . Th e land use designations and zoning districts for parcels adjacent to the subject site are shown below. The proposed residential development is compatible with surro undi ng land uses. 201 MAYR:>RTROAD AGENDA ITEM# SE JANUARY 13,2014 Future Laud Usc Designations and Zoning Districts for Adjacent Parcds Drection Future land Use Category Zoning Dstrict East R3sidential -High Density (R1) R3sidential General, Multi- Family (R3-M) West G:>mmerdal (OV1) G:>mmerdal General (03) North R3sidentiai-LDw Density (R..) G:>mmerdal Umited (Q) and R3sidential, General, Multi- SJuth G:>mmerdal (OV1) Family (R3-M) Commerdal General (03) ~- S::lurce: CDAB Future Land Use and Zoning Maps Ill. Permitted and A"ohibited Uses The following section lists the permitted uses for the 201 Mayport R:lad s:'A n A mixture of single-family dwelling units; duplex, triplex and quadplex buildings sold as fee simple units; in total, not to exceed 80 units n A"ivately maintained Neighborhood Park with andllary amenity building or structures n A"ivately maintained oommon open space whidl may indude CJ 8:ormwater enhancements n G:>mmunity Gardens o G:>mmunity Amenity Facility n Mail Kiosk I Gazebo I Rre Rt I Qher oommunity amenities D lvx;essory Sructures on individual lots (rear yard only) u Detadled garages I carports n S:orage Sled o R3sidential scaled fendng less than 42" in height within internal portions and western frontage of the development n 6' in height screen fendng I wall for the north, south and east perimeters LJ Temporary ~les and G:>nstruction Trailers IV. Development Density The s:'A rezoning requests a maximum of 80 dwelling units representing a density of 11.2 units per acre. This represents a 44% reduction below the maximum density of 20 dwelling units per acre allowed by the R3sidential High Density land use designation; and a 20%reduction from the prior residential development. V. Development 8:andards Development standards have been created to ensure oontextual design elements. This section describes the various types of development standards proposed for 201 Mayport R:lad. The rurrent s:'Asite plan reflects a site plan version with 78 dwelling units, whidl indudes a mixture of single-family units, duplex, triplex and quadplex buildings in which units will be sold fee simple. The intent of this s:'Ais to allow Beachesl-labitat the flexibility to alter the unit type based upon rustomer demand, while maintaining a maximum density of 80 total units. The developer is required to meet all portionsoftheCDABL.and Development Code(LDC), unlessstatedwithinthe following development standards text and waiver section of the s:'A requirements. Page2of 9 201 MA YRJRr ROAD AGENDA ITEM# 8E JANUARY 13, 2014 A Buildings and Lots: The following table lists the proposed lot and building requirements for the development. Lot and Building R3quirements Maximum allowed density per land 20 units' acre use A"oposed density 11.2 units' acre Maximum number of units 80 Maximum Lot coverage by Parcel* Parcel Type 1 (Sngle Family): 65% Parcel Type 2 (D.Jplex): 65% Parcel Type 3 (Triplex): 65% Parcel Type 4 (Quadplex): 65% Minimum lot width (rectangular Parcel Type 1 (SF.): Min. Width -32feet; Min. Area-2,900 s.f. shaped lots only) and Minimum Lot Parcel Type 2 (D.Jplex): Min. Width-50 feet; Min. Area-4,600 s.f. Area by Parcel* Parcel Type 3 (Triplex): Min. Width-68 feet; Min. Area-6,250 s.f. Parcel Type 4 (Quadplex): Min. Width-84 feet; Min. Area-7,725 s.f. Average Lot coverage by Individual End Unit: 60% units within a D.Jplex, Triplex or Inside Unit: 75% Quad pi ex Parcel* (Note: In total, the Parcel Type allows for a Maximum Lot Coverage Of 65%) Minimum lot width (rectangular End Unit: Min. Width-26 feet; Min. Area-2,300 s.f. shaped lots only) and Minimum Lot Inside Unit: Min. Width -16feet; Min. Area-1,450 s.f. Area by individual units within a D.Jplex, Triplex or Quadplex Parcel* Minimum Lot R"ontage for Any For irregular shaped lot, the minimum frontage can be no less than 10' less Irregular Slaped Lot than minimum lot width Minimum floor area (per unit) 1,000 S:(endosed air conditioned living area) Maximum building height 35 feet, prindple dwelling; 15 feet, accessory structure-Fer CDAB LOC Minimum A"imarybuildingseparation 10 feet Minimum front setback (rectangular Parcel Types 1-4: 8 feet open air porches, shaped lots only)* 12 feet exterior building wall Minimum front setback (irregular Parcel Types 1-4: 4 feet for open air porches shaped lots)* 8 feet for exterior building wall (for a maximum one unit per building) most dosely located to the irregular portion of the lot front boundary. Minimum side setback (all All Parcel Types: 5 feet structures)* All Corner Lots: To maintain a dear sight triangle at intersections, no obstructions to vision exceeding4feet in height shall be allowed within the straight line connection of a 10 foot offset from the intersecting right-of- way lines of two streets. Minimum rear setback (prindpal Parcel Type 1-4: 15 feet dwelling)* Minimum D"iveway I Parking area 3 feet from side property line/ Parking space dimension begins2feet from ~tback property line. Aet;t;ssory Sructure ~tback 3 feet from side or rear lot lines; not allowed in front of unit .. * These relate to speafrc areas where we are requesting waivers. ~page 8. Page3of9 201 MAYRJRfROAD B. A"ojections into FEquired Yards: AGENDA ITEM# 8E JANUARY 13, 2014 Soops, balconies, awnings, bay windows, and roof overhangs may encroach into the required front yards, not to exceed 3 feet. Sde and rear yards shall be measured from the property line to the outside wall of the prindpal structure. A"ojections may occur within the required side and rear yards, such as roof overhangs and bay windows, but shall not exceed two feet. In addition, chimneys may project up to one foot into the side or rear yard. G SNimming FOols and l-lot Tubs: In-ground swimming pools and hot tubs are permitted. FOol endosuresshould be located only at the rear of the property and shall be no wider than the width of the prindpal structure. The minimum side yard setbacks for pools, decks, and pool endosures shall be equal to the side yard requirements of each residential lot, as noted in the l..Dt and B...lilding Qiteria section of this s=>A FOols that do not contain a screen endosure shall have a minimum of a five foot setback, induding deck, from the rear property line. Move ground hot tubs are permitted with architectural review approval of the site and landscaping. No above ground swimming pools are permitted. All pools shall meet rurrent CDAB L..OCstandards. Although not rurrently planned for, the community is permitted to construct an HQA. managed community swimming fadlity within the common opens space area at a future date. D. B...lffering, Landscaping and Vegetation: There are many sections where this s=>A es:HDSthe required landscape requirements by the CDAB LOC This has been done through additional landscaping and buffering to the surrounding commerdal and residential properties to the north, south and east. Furthermore, the community will have enhanced landscaping within the internal loop road of the development. All landscaping within the rights-of-ways, alley ways, and common open space will be commonly maintained and replaced by the HOA.. All landscaping commonly maintained by the HOA requires irrigation. FEsidents within the community will not be allowed to remove any installed landscaping within the commonly maintained areas managed by the HOA.. It is a..trrently envisioned that Individual lot landscaping will be maintained by the individual property owner. The residential buildings indude a small storage area on the rear side of each unit to house lawn equipment. The applicant will indude the landscape plans as a part of the A"eliminary ste Ran submittal to CDAB. 0.1: Mayport Rlad Landscape Blhancement: A ten foot wide landscape enhancement shall be provided along Mayport Rlad (ffiA1A) per the Cbmmerdal COrridor Cbde under !Jvision 7, ~ion 24-171. This landscape enhancement area may indude walls and/or fendng not to exceed 42 inches in height, and community sidewalks. The intent of this landscape enhancement is to indude a residentially scaled landscape buffer to Mayport Rlad to indude a rurvilinear row of shrubs, and a mixture of understory trees, and palm trees. Slrubs I native grasses within this enhancement area will be planted with a 7 gallon container at time of installation to provide an instant landscape screen. Slade trees will not be planted within this enhancement area due to the proximity of the power lines along Mayport Rlad. Understory trees and palm trees will be planted no less than one tree for every 50 linear feet within this enhancement area. Trees may be dustered but shall be no more than 75 feet apart. For the purpose of this enhancement area, understory trees will be planted with a minimum caliper 3 inch; or if multi-stem, a minimum of 3 stems that total3 inches in caliper size; or palm treeswith a minimum 10 foot dear trunk. 0.2: Northern and S:Juthern Ferimeter Landscape buffer: Although not required by code, a five foot wide landscape buffer has been located adjacent to the northern and southern property boundaries that abuts the commerdal developments. This Landscape B...lffer has been considered and incorporated into the side yards of individual lots and alley widths. This will indude a continuous landscape area with shrubs, ground covers, tree coverage, mulch and grass. No less than one tree for every 50 linear feet shall be planted within this buffer. Trees may be dustered but shall be no more than 75 feet apart. Page4of9 201 MAYFORTROAD AGENDA ITEM# 8E JANUARY 13, 2014 These Perimeter Buffers may also indude a visual screen where existing fendnglwallsare acceptable, which maybe a six foot tall wood, or masonry wall, or landscaping. Ranted trees within these buffers will be planted with a minimum 2" caliper trunk and/or palm trees with a minimum 8 foot dear trunk. 0.3: Eastern Perimeter Buffer: Although not required by code, a five foot wide landscape buffer has been located between the alley pavement and the abutting property to the east. The adjoining property indudes a six foot black aluminum picket fence. This buffer will indude a continuous landscape area with shrubs, ground covers, tree coverage, mulch and grass. No less than one tree for every 50 linear feet shall be planted within this buffer. Trees may be dustered but shall be no more than 75 feet apart. These Perimeter Buffers may also indude a visual screen where existing fendnglwalls are acceptable, which may be a six foot tall wood, or masonry wall, or landscaping. Ranted treeswithin these buffers will be planted with a minimum 2" caliper trunk and/or palm trees with a minimum 8 foot dear trunk. 0.4: Interior Central LDop Rlad ~ght-of-Way Landscaping: The Central LDop Rlad and ~ght-of-Way indudesa boulevard entryvvay, which merges into a2-lane roadway, then to a one-way loop road around a central community park. Although not required by code, the boulevard portion of the road shall indude for a mixture of shade, understory and palm trees, along with shrubs, ground covers, mulch and grass, within the internal median and outside the edge of pavement within this segment of the right-of-way. Although not required by code, the two-way portion of the Central Loop shall allow for a mixture of shade, understory and palm trees, along with shrubs, ground covers, mulch and grass. Although not required by code, the one-way loop road centered on a community park shall allow a similar mixture of planting on the residential frontage portion of the right-of-way. As designed, the interior portion of the right-of- way has been designed to allow use with emergency vehides. No vegetation other than sod shall be allowed within the first 3 feet of the back of pavement on the interior portion of this right-of-way to allow for an open 20 foot width for emergency vehides. 0.5: Interior O:>mmon Area landscaping: O:>mmon areas within the s:'Ashall allow landscaping at the developer's discretion. 0.6: Interior Individual Parcel landscaping: For the purposes of this submittal, other than single family units that will meet the interior lot requirements by code, other required trees will be considered on a per parcel basis (building type). The minimum tree planting requirements proposed will comply with the matrix below. Parcel Type Typical s= R::quired Trees R"ovided Trees Duplex Parcel 4,600S: 1 U/1 S 1 U/1 S Triplex Parcel 6,250S: 1 U/2S 2U/1S Quadplex Parcel 7,725 s= 2U/2S 2U/2S The above matrix when evaluated over all of the duplex, triplex and quadplex parcels, equates to 40%shade trees and GO% understory (U) trees, which is less than the required 50% shade (S) threes. It will be typical that where lots abut each other, many of the larger shade trees will be placed in the rear of each parcel and on the property line between two parcels, to allow for the greatest amount of room for the root ball to grow. This reduction of shade tree planting on an individual parcel is off-set with the additional non-required planting that has been provided across the entire development. Page5of9 201 MAYFORTROAD E Bltry Sgnage and Ughting: AGENDA ITEM# SE JANUARY 13,2014 h5 permitted in Saction 17-28 of the CD6S ~identification signage bearing the development name may be placed at the residential main entrance. "201 Mayport R:>ad" signagewill indude one ground mounted sign at the entry located on Mayport R:>ad within the landscaped median; or a combination of signage and columns that incorporates two signs on the sidesoftheentrydrive and a column with plaque within the median. Ughtingofthe sign(s) will also be provided. Neighborhood Identification signage and illumination shall comply with the maximum sign area, sign height, and minimum setbacks of Saction 17-28. Slould neighborhood identification signage be incorporated into two signs on either side of the entry drive, the combination of sign area shall be consistent with the maximum 32 square feet as code requires. Any additional street signage will comply with the current <::X)AS L.OC. Sreet lighting will comply with the current CD6S L.OCand in accordance with .EAservice agreements. F. Vehicular Orrulation, R"oject Af:l:ess and Parking: h5 shown on the S<etch Ran, the development will have two vehirular access points to Mayport R:>ad. The main entry road will consist of two-way traffic with 20 feet of pavement, measured from edge of asphalt to edge of asphalt within a minimum 44 foot right-of-way. The boulevard portion of this main entry R:>adwill indude one way drive aisles consisting of 15feet of pavement measured from edge of asphalt to edge of asphalt. lhismain road will transition to a one way loop road which consists of 15 feet of pavement measured from edge of asphalt to edge of asphalt. In keeping with the traditional neighborhood design, all of the homes will have parking in the rear off a 20 foot alley-way. The alley will indude a minimum of 14 foot of pavement, but will be maintained dear of vertical obstructions for the entire width of the alley, otherthanwherethealley is widened or abuts a perimeter property boundary. A one-way exit drive to Mayport R:>ad has been located dose to the southern portion of the property and is accessed within the internal alleyway system. Upon completion Beaches Habitat reserves the right to deed the pavement areas that meet Oty OJde within the right-of-way and alleybacktotheOty. lheOJmmunityHOAwill maintain alllandscapingwithintherights-of-way. Parallel parking has been planned for along the main loop road and measures8' x22'in size to the edge of asphalt. Each dwelling unit shall provide a minimum of two off-street parking spaces. at street parking is sized at 9 feet wide by 18 feet long. Parking has been designed to have a two foot setback from the rear or side property lines, adjacent to the alleyways. This two foot off -set from the rear property line allows the alleyway pavement area to be expanded to 24 feet in width, which meets typical code, when parking is located on either side of the alley. In certain situations, double tandem parking has been provided on irregular lots, but still accommodates two cars. AJthough the site plan rurrentlyshows32 additional visitor spaces, forthepurposeofthis~A at project build-out, the development will require 1 visitor space for every 4 units or a maximum of 20 visitor spaces. Visitor parking should be spread throughout the development. G Fedestrian Orculation and ~eation/ Q:>en ::pace Amenities: 201 Mayport R:>ad will feature a minimum four foot wide sidewalk within the right-of-way of the main loop road. Additional sidewalk enhancements are located within the development. Where sidewalks abut the parking areas, the sidewalk width may be a minimum of six foot wide when adjacent to either a grade transition, curb stop or pavement transition. OJmmon open space may indude landscaping, surface and/ or subsurface stormwater enhancements, benches and/or shade structures (such as gazebos' mail kiosk). The area designated for the community park, while rurrently planned for passive recreational use, could be used for a more active recreational community amenity, such as a playground, community fadlity or swimming fadlity. Page6of9 201 MAYR:>RfROAD H. Fencing: AGENDA ITEM# 8E JANUARY 13, 2014 Fesidential fencing on individual units are limited to 42" height in both the front, side and rear property, unless adjacent to the overall fPA perimeter boundary. Fencing will not be allowed in the front yards of individual parcels fronting Mayport Rlad. Fencing material and appearance will be limited by the oovenants and restrictions oft he HOA, but at minimum materials and style must be oonsistent with one adjoining lot. All fencing much beoonsistent with the CDl\8 LOC. I. ~ssory S:ructure: Acr:essory structures shall oomply with CDl\8 LOCother than setbacks as described on page 3, Lot Table. J Utilities: All Utilities will be located underground. Water and wastewater will be provided by the COABand are available within the vicinity. Existing overhead electric that runs along Mayport road will be retained. K S:ormwater: S:ormwater retention and treatment will meet the requirements oft he S: . ...bhnsRver Water Management Dstrict (SR/1/MD), FOOT and CDl\8. Maintenance of the drainage facilities will be the responsibility of the 201 Mayport Rlad Neighborhood Association, Inc. L Model Homes: Beaches Habitat reserves the right to obtain a building permit for one model building per building type, prior to the full site work, utilityoonnection and stormwater enhancement being fully permitted. The certificate of oCOJpancy for such building cannot be attained until infrastructure for that designated phase is oomplete. M. Home O::cupations: Any requested home oCOJpations shall oomply with CDl\8 LOC. N. Variances/ Modifications: Any variances to the site design criteria as specified in this fPA shall be processed in the same manner as specified in Sec. 24-124oftheCOABLOC. VI. Neighborhood Association The oommon open space, retention areas, park and landscaping described in this text will be owned and maintained by the neighborhood Home ONnersAssociation, Inc., a Rorida non-profit oorporation, to be formed. Membership in the association shall be mandatory for all property owners within the s:>A development plan. fos disrussed previously, Beaches Habitat reserves the right to deed the pavement areas within the right-of-way and alley back to the Oty while still maintaining the oommon area landscaping. VII. Deed Restrictions and Architectural Review Board R"ior to the sale of any lots, a "Declaration of Covenants, Conditions, and Festridions for 201 Mayport Rlad" (Dedaration) will be prepared for this project. Architectural standards and use restrictions will be provided for in the Dedaration. An additional document oontaining design guidelines may be prepared which may outline the specific design guidelines for the various lots, and the architectural and landscaping requirements for the project. An Architectural Feview Board may be established to review and approve or deny plans for each lot, based upon the design guidelines document. Formulation of this Board and how it will be run will be provided in the Declaration. VIII. Rlasing 201 Mayport Rlad will be oonstruded in phases to be determined based upon engineering criteria and market oonditions. Fer COAB, ~any phase must indude a vehicular accessible route for trash and emergency vehides, along with oomplying with that phase's stormwater enhancements. Page 7 of 9 201 MaYPort R>ad SJAApplication Waivers The following are the waivers requested: 201 MAYPORT ROAD AGENDA ITEM# 8E JANUARY 13, 2014 1. Per section 24-171, Commerdal Corridor, it references Div. 8 Landscaping which requires 50% of the required trees along the Mayport frontage road be shade trees. Due to the adjacent overhead power, shade trees are not permitted to be located in this proximity to the power lines; therefore, this buffer will only indude understory trees and palm trees. 2. Per S3ction 23-30, Minimum Tree requirements under Division 4 General provision, which is later referenced by Division 8, For triplex parcels, we are requesting to 33% shade tree versus the required 50% shade tree requirement. CNerall, there will be 40% shade trees on the development parcels. This reduction of shade trees is off-set from the additional planting that has been provided elsewhere on the property that is not required by code. 3. Per S3ction 23-30, Minimum Tree requirements under Division 4 General provision, we are requesting to plant 3" caliper trees versus the required 4" caliper trees. This reduction in size is requested due to availability of non-shade plant material along with costs, and is off-set from the additional planting that has been provided elsewhere on the property that is not required by code. Rease note, that only required trees on-site are located on the individual residential parcels and the Landscape Elhancement area to Mayport. 4. Per S3c. 24-88 which requires for" high density residential development, a minimum lot area of two- thousand one hundred seventy-five (2, 175) square feet for each dwelling unit." We request for duplex units through quaplex units, that the outside unit have a minimum lot size of 2,300 s=, and inside units have a minimum lot size of 1 ,450 ::F. 5. Per S3ction 24-108 (d)(1) minimum lot area requirement for" Sngle-family dwellings" requires seven thousand five hundred (7,500) square feet". OJr single-family lot is 2,900 sf. 6. Per S3ction 24-108, minimum yard requirements, requires" Front Yard setback: Twenty (20) feet." OJr request is 8 foot from open porches (12 foot from building) for rectangular lots. 01 irregular lots we request a minimum 4 foot for open air porches, 8 feet for exterior building wall (for a maximum one unit per building) most dosely located to the irregular portion of the lot front boundary. 7. Per S3ction 24-108, minimum yard requirements which requires"~ar Yard setback: Twenty (20) feet." We request 15 feet. 8. Per section 24-108, minimum side requirements require: a.Sngle-family dwellings: Combined fifteen (15) total feet and five (5) minimum feet either side. b. Two-family (duplex) dwellings and townhouse: ~ven and one-half (7.5) each side." We request side setbacks of 5 feet. 01 corner lots: To maintain a dear sight triangle at intersections, no obstructions to vision exceeding4 feet in height shall be allowed within the straight line connection of a 10 foot offset from the intersecting right-of-way lines of two streets. 9. Per section 24-108, minimum lot width requirements of ten (10) feet. We request 32 feet for a single family lot, 50 feet for a duplex parcel and 68 feet for a triplex parcel type. 10. Per section 24-108, Building ~strict ions which requires "The building restrictions for the R3-M zoning district shall be a 50% Maximum impervious surface. For Parcel Types 1 through 4 we request a 65% maximum impervious surface. Furthermore, on the individual units we request an average 60% impervious on exterior units and 75% impervious on internal units. 11. Per S3ction 24-151, ~ry S:ructures, Detached carports have a 5 foot side and rear yard setback requirements, and private garages have a 10 foot rear and side yard setback. We request all aa:essory structures have a minimum 3 foot side and rear yard setback. Page8of9 201 MA'YR)RfROAD AGENDA ITEM# 8E JANUARY 13, 2014 12. Per section 24-252 (i) cul-de-sac's require a minimum 50 foot right-of-way. We request a 44 foot right- of-way for an approximate 200 feet in length. 13. Per section, 24-252 (c)(1) which states" My subdivision of land, which creates more than ten (1 0) residential lots shall provide two (2) separate access points, unless other provisions, such as permanent easements, are made for emergency ingress, and provided that such entrances will not adversely affect the street system." We are providing two access points however, only one will be for ingress. Page 9 of 9 I -.. I w I .. I z ~ ' := •I ~.-.J ii •• J. IN FEET) 1 In • 30' FMt Q T (/) D SF 3d I LEGEND QUADPLEX-24/6 BLDG. TRIPLEX-33/11 BLDG. DUPLEX-20/10 BLDG. SINGLE FAMILY-1 EA. 78 TOTAL DU AGENDA ITEM# BE JANUARY 13, 2014 ?"06'55" W(P..CT) N 0 -·· -·· ... _.. .. SECOND FLOOR GROUND FLOOR loA .l fM I 'Itt t«• '~ ·H"'.t '''-•I 'K ,.,., ·N~« rvn.&w • • ,. "1 1• 'f IIFC'..U t AGENDA ITE M II Sf:. JAN UARY 13,20 14 DUPLEX FRONT ELEVATION 2 01 MAY PORT ROA D BE ACIIC S HAB ITA T r On IIUM/\N il Y AlL ANliC BtA CII , f·LOH IDA TWO 3-BE OROOM II OME S AGRNDA ITEM fl 8E JANUARY 13,20 14 Dmfl Minutes of t!t e Octobe r /5, 2013 regular fll eelilfg of th e Co nullltll ily Del•elopll!ell l Board MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD November 19, 2013 1. CALL TO ORDER. -6:06 pm AGENDA ITE M II 8E JANUA RY 13,20 14 Chair Brea Paul verified the prese nce of a quorum with the attendan ce of1 l<e lly Elmore, Harl ey Parke s, Patri ck Stratton and Sy lvi a Si mmons. The m ee ting was ca ll ed to ord er at 6:06pm . Al so prese nt wa s the Building an d Zon ing Director, Micha e l Griffin, Redevelopment and Zon ing Coordinator, Jer emy Hubsc h and Rec ording Sec reta ry Je nny Walke r. l<irk Han son arrived at 7:00pm, Jason Burg ess was ab se nt. 2. ADOPTION OF MEETING MINUTES -October 15, 2013. Brea Paul ca ll ed for a motion to approve th e m i nutes of th e Octob er 15, 20 13 regu lar me eting. l<e ll y Elmore moved that minutes b e approved as writte n. Patrick Stratton seco nd ed the motion and it carri ed by a vote of 7-0. 3. OLD BUSINESS. Non e. 4. REPORTS. A. Boats and Trailers. Brea Paul asl<ed for a vote by show of hands to take the Agenda out of order and discuss Boats and Trailers ahead of New Business b ased on the number of citizens in attendance to speal< on this topic. Brea Pau1 stated the Boats and Trailers Ordinance was discussed at the October 151h m eeting and the Board had asked staff for some additional details to include the actual numbe r of violations that were actually prese nt. Michael Griffin s pol<e sta ting the Board asl<ed for some site boundary information, Code Enforceme nt information and staff did a survey of 80% of Atlantic Beach and found that th e re were 21 boat violations, 13 of the violations the boats could be relocated on the property and be found in compliance. 28 boats were found in compliance. Five trailers and campers were found in violation and 9 n·ailers and campers wet·e found in complia nce. On the Code Enforcement issu es we average 10 complaints per month for boats a nd trailers or recreational vehicles in the front ya rd. Mr. Griffin refreshed the boards memory that jacksonville, St. Augustine, Neptune Beach and St. Johns County has the same r egulations of no boa ts or trailers in th e front 20ft fr·ont yar·d setback. Jacl<sonville Beach allows one 20 ft boat in the front yard setbaclc. Atlantic Beach is less restrictive than Ja cl<sonvH ie, Neptune Beach, St. Augustine and St. johns County by allowing the boat to be 15ft fr om the front property line. T he Board also aslced for some boundary information. Mr. Griffin showed a plat of the Pari< Terrace subdivision stated that when plats are set up houses are set up on the lot with g e n e rally a 20ft setback, anything Pagelof5 Dmfl Mi nutes of the October/5, 2013 regular m eetlllg of/he Connmtnlty De t•elopmen t Board AGE NDA IT EM II 8 E JA NU AR Y 13,20,14 beyond that 20ft setbaclc is in the right of way. He then showed several examples of compliant lots and noncompliant Jots boats, trailers and campers. I<eUy Elmore questioned how long time wise can a boat or recreational vehicle be in the right of way before Code Enforcement will tidcet it. Mr. Griffin responded stating Code Enforcement will leave a courtesy notice first giving a reasonable time. Mr. Elmore aslced and if the homeowner states that it is a visitor and it will be removed in a few days 7 Mr. Griffin stated the City will work with them before taking any code enforcement action. The firstspeaker was Mr. Paul Gunsaulis, 780 Begonia Sb·eet. Mr. Gunsaulis stated that because everyone in Atlantic Beach has different lot lines, he feels the only way the City can uniformly enforce the Boats and Trailers Ordinance is to change the wording on b (2) from stating "15 ft setbacl{ from the lot line" to read "15ft setback from stt·eet pavement." He states that would put him in compliance. The second spealcer was Michael Hampton, 651 Begonia Stt·eet. He stated someone from tlte City came out to his property yesterday and told him he coukl talce down 2 n·ees on the Jot and move his boat bade and be in compliance. He said it is absurd for him to remove trees and that too many trees have been removed in Atlantic Beach akeady. He states again that "he will not remove his boat, the City can fine him all they want, he will not move his boat". The thh·d spealcer was Linda Spencer, 282 Magnolia Street. She agrees with homeowners having home rights but her neighbors have their boat parl{ed right underneath her bedroom window. She is in favor of the Ordinance the way it is. Final speaker is Chris Lamber·tson, 357 12Lh St. Believes the issues with Boats and Trailers started because of the lade of Code Enforcement on this ordinance in the past. Mr. Lambertson believes that our codes are too lax for boats aesthetically and the noise factor and that the City should increase the setbad< for boats, n·ailers and recreational vehicles. I<elly Ebnore stated that this ordinance is in place for a reason and we do have the most lax ordinance compared to surrounding municipalities. He feels the ordinance should be left just as it is. The ordinance withholds the standard aesthetic throughout the City. Harley Parlces stated that he agrees with Mr. Elmore. Sylvia Simmons stated that she drove all over the City and was sltl·prised at how few violations she saw. Ms. Simmons stated reducing the requirement may result in creating more boats and trailers. She doesn't thinlc the Ordinance should be changed at all Brea Paul says she concurs with all the other board members, we have the most lax code already. l{eJiy Ehnore made a motion to l<eep the Boats and Trailers Ordinance as written in place, unaltered. Harley Parl<es seconded the motion and it carried by a vote of 6·0. 5. NEW BUSINESS . A. SPA-13-00100075 (PUBLIC IIEARING)-201 Mayport Road Staff Report Rct]uest for S J>cc ial Plnnned Area (SPA) rezonin g as permitted by Section s 24-116 throu g h 24-126, to nllow a max imum of 80 residential unit s. The property is cutTently zoned Comme rcial Limited (CL) and R eside ntial Gen eral-M ulti-Fa mily (R G-M). The Future Land Usc Dcsig n:ttion lligh Density (lUI). Jeremy Hubsch, Red evelopm e nt and Zoning Coord ina t or gav e a Page 2 o f 5 Draft Minutes of the October 15, 2013 regular meeting of the Community Development Board AGENDA ITEM# 8E JANUARY 13, 2014 Applicant Comment presentation about SPA-13-00100075. Mr. Hubsch showed an aerial of the site and described the neighboring sites. Stated that the site was formerly a development of 96 units that had been previously torn down roughly 10 years ago. He then showed a Future Land Use Map and discussed density of surrounding properties and the zoning. Subject property is 7.2 acres and the applicants are proposing a maximum of 80 residential units. Maximum allowable density is 20 units in a Residential High Density Land Use, and the applicants are proposing a development with 11.2 units per acre, so it is below the maximum density. The applicants are proposing 4 unit types, Single family, duplex, triplex and quadplex. As it is currently designed, there will be only one single family home. They will be providing 2 parking spaces per unit and 20 visitor parking spaces. There will be a lOft landscape buffer along Mayport Road, which is required per our Mayport Corridor Standards. There will be a Sft landscape buffer along the entire Northern, Southern and Eastern property boundary, which is not required by our code. The Commercial Corridor standards for construction materials along Mayport Road will be met. It is anticipated that the proposed 80 units will be mostly duplex, triplex, and quadplex buildings. The applicants do not yet know what customer demand will be like, and thus would like the flexibility to alter the unit type shown on the site plan, while maintaining the same general layout. The SPA clearly states that any modifications that change the use, building height, density, buffers and open space, and access points/driveways will need to come back before the Community Development Board and Commission as required per Section 24-124. Habitat for Humanity plans to create an HOA to maintain the project in perpetuity, but at this time the HOA documents have not yet been created. Mr. Hubsch states that Per Section 24-62.c.2, the Community Development Board shall "Indicate the relationship of the proposed rezoning to the comprehensive plan for the city and provide a finding that the requested change in zoning is consistent with the comprehensive." He then discussed some of the goals, objectives, and policies of the comprehensive plan that are relevant to this project. Mr. Hubsch gave an overview of the thirteen waivers that the applicants are requesting. He also gave an overview of the boards required actions. He also stated that staff does not have any recommendations at this time and will be leaving the decision up to the board. The applicant, Jay McGarvey, Chairman of Beaches Habitat stated that they are very excited to present this model community for the Page 3 of5 Draft Minutes of the October 15, 2013 regular meeting of the Community Development Board AGENDA ITEM# 8E JANUARY 13,2014 Public Comment Board Discussion Motion residents of Atlantic Beach. He states that this development will dress up Mayport Road. He then introduced the President of Beaches Habitat, Mr. Brian Wheeler. Mr. Wheeler presented several examples of other neighborhoods that have developed using the same traditional neighborhood design that Habitat is proposing. He showed computer images of the before and after of the site. He also showed example floor plans of the units. He discussed parking, sidewalks, front and rear yards, landscaping and drainage on the project. Kelly Elmore stated he is concerned given the location and the density request, will crime and home values become an issue. Mr. Wheeler stated that he feels there is a difference in behavior of renters of high density apartments and homeowners. He then discussed all of the requirements the prospective homeowners must comply with before being given the privilege of home ownership with Beaches Habitat. Mr. Elmore then asked how the development is handling stormwater. Mr. Wheeler pointed out that most of it will drain under the park to a underground system created with the existing concrete that is on- site and the rest is already currently flowing to Mayport Road. Habitat will work with FOOT concerning the drainage issues. The first public speaker was Matthew Chimumento, 632 Main Street, stated he is very glad to see something going into the "bombed out" shelter. His concerns were regarding how many more of these type homes or developments are going to be coming up in Atlantic Beach? Is Atlantic Beach going to become totally focused on Beaches Habitat homes? He was also concerned about the lack of storage with no garages and having the front and rear porches start serving as garages with outside storage. The second public speaker was Mike Whalen, business owner on Mayport Road. Mr. Whalen stated he thinks this is the wrong location for this project. Is Atlantic Beach going to become the "poster boy" for Beaches Habitat. He thinks this is too many low income people in one project and that this will turn back into what the Palms turned into and that it will close businesses on Mayport Road. Kirk Hanson had questions regarding if they grant the variances for this SPA do they have to do the same for all future SPA's. The board decided they are decided on a case by case basis. Brea Paul was concerned about the park being turned into a retention pond for drainage. Mr. Hubsch stated that then that change would have to come before the board again. Sylvia Simmons made motion to approve SPA-13-00100075 and it Page4 of5 Draft Minutes of the October 15, 2013 regular meeting of the Community Development Board AGENDA ITEM# 8E JANUARY 13, 2014 was seconded by Harley Parkes. It was unanimously approved 6-0. 6. REPORTS. A. Through Lots. Michael Griffin stated that this item is to request a recommendation from the Community Development Board to the City Commission to repeal Section 24-84. (c) The Land Development Code which relates to double frontage lots which requires new structures built in between Beach Avenue and Ocean Blvd. to actually front onto Ocean Blvd. Currently there are only 4 lots with Ocean Blvd addresses and 10 lots addressed on Beach Avenue, and 3 vacant lots with no address. Sylvia Simmons is concerned about letting homeowners place 6ft tall fences right along Ocean Blvd. Mr. Parkes stated that the economic value of having a Beach Ave. address is not arguable. Kelly Elmore made a motion to amend the code to allow through lots between Beach Ave. to Ocean Blvd. to front on Beach Ave. Mr. Stratton seconded the motion. The motion was unanimously approved 6-0. B. Tree Ordinance. Michael Griffin stated that the Tree Ordinance is not up for discussion for this evening. Mr. Griffin stated this is just a heads up that this will be coming up in the December meeting. Mr. Elmore stated he will be missing the December 17th meeting. Brea Paul stated that Jason Burgess will not be staying on the board and the new board member will be Linda Lanier. 7. ADJOURNMENT-8:31 PM Brea Paul, Chair Attest Page5of5