41-Code Change Workshop 10-29-01 (00651512xBA9D6)WORKSHOP AGENDA
CITY COMMISSION
CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH
MONDAY, OCTOBER 29, 2001, at 5:00 p.m.
This workshop session has been scheduled at the request of the City Commission in
order to discuss certain provisions of Chapter 17, Signs and Advertising Structures and
proposed amendments to Chapter 24 of the City Code, which sets forth the Zoning and
Subdivision Regulations for the City of Atlantic Beach. The Community Development
Board by unanimous vote recommended approval of the proposed amendments at their
regular meeting on September 18, 2001.
1. Call to order.
2. Discussion of options related to nonconforming signs and revisions to Chapter 17,
Signs and Advertising Structures.
3. Stasi summary of proposed amendments to Chapter 24, consistency with the
Comprehensive Plan and Chapter 163, Florida Statutes and suggested final
revisions.
a. Chapter 163 requirements
b. Definitions — Eaves and Cornice
c. Sec. 24-88. Garage Apartments
d. Sec. 24-89. Dependent Care Living Assistance
e. Sec. 24-113. Special Purpose District
f. Sec. 24-163. Storage and Parking of Vehicles and Equipment in Residential
Zoning Districts
4. Discussion.
5. Staff reminder of dates for public hearings to enact Chapter 24 amendments. (First
reading and public hearing on Monday, November 12, 2001 at 7:15 p.m. and second
reading and public hearing on Monday, November 26, 2001 at 7:15 p.m.)
6. Adjournment.
Notice to persons needing special accommodations and to all hearing impaired persons: In
accordance with the American with Disabilities Act persons needing any special
accommodation or an interpreter to participate in this proceeding should contact the City
of Atlantic Beach, 800 Seminole Roacly Atlantic Beach, Florida 32233 or by calling (904)
247-5800 not later than 5 days prior to the date of this meeting.
n
MINUTES OF THE WORKSHOP OF THE ATLANTIC BEACH CITY COMMISSION HELD
IN COMMISSION CHAMBERS AT 5:00 P.M. ON MONDAY, OCTOBER 29, 2001
City Commissioners Present:
John S. Meserve, Mayor
Mike Borno
Rick Beaver
Theo Mitchelson
Dezmond Waters, City Commissioners
Also Present:
Jim Hanson, City Manager
Sonya Doerr, Community Development Director
Maureen King, City Clerk
Alex Sheffer, Code Enforcement Officer
Alan Jensen, City Attorney
DonWolfson, Code Enforcement Board Chair
Mary Walker, Code enforcement Board Member
Craig Burkhart, Code Enforcement Board Member
Bob Frohwein, Code Enforcement Board Member
The meeting, which was held for the purpose of reviewing options relating to nonconforming
signs and revisions to Chapter 17, Signs and Advertising Structures, and for reviewing a
summary of amendments to Chapter 24, Zoning and Subdivision Regulations, was called to
order at 5:10 p.m. by Mayor Meserve.
The Mayor pointed out that this was a very important document and one with which the city
would live for a very long time and he felt that all commissioners should be comfortable with the
final document.
Sonya Doerr reported that with the adoption of Chapter 24 the City was addressing all the
aspects of the Comprehensive Plan, including land development regulations, density, and
conservation.
Ms. Doerr distributed a document entitled Workshop Topics, a copy of which is attached as
Attachment A, and each item listed in this document was discussed as follows:
Eaves and Cornices - Ms. Doerr explained the definition of Eaves and Cornices as presented,
and this matter was discussed in detail, specifically regarding the distance eaves and cornices
should be allowed to protrude into the required side yard setbacks.
Section 24-83 Required Yards and Permitted Projections into Required Yards was
discussed, with respect to decks and balconies and Commissioner Waters felt that decks and
balconies should be allowed to protrude four feet into front and rear setbacks, instead of two feet
as indicated in the ordinance, especially if the balconies were cantilevered.
(e0-\
Page Two
Minutes -- City Commission Workshop
October 29, 2001
Following further discussion it was agreed to amend section 24-83(b) to remove bay windows,
and chimneys and similar elements and to change the distance that balconies may protrude into
front and rear yards from 24 inches to 48 inches.
Garage Apartments, Section 24-88 - Sonya Doerr said she felt it was always the intent of the
city that the combination of the apartment and the garage should not exceed 75% of the heated
and cooled area of the principal residence. She felt the language in the original draft was not
very clear and she had added language to clarify this point.
Don Wolfson pointed out that two members of the Community Development Board were not
present at the previous meeting when garage apartments were discussed by their board. He felt
that by allowing garage apartments at 75% of the size of the original structure, the city was
increasing density which was not in keeping with the Comprehensive Plan. He also inquired
regarding the provision for renting such units and the City Manager reported that the previous
Community Development Director had researched this and it was his understanding that rental of
these units was permitted in the city code as early as 1940. Mr. Wolfson also pointed out that
Beach Avenue was a very narrow street and not adequate to handle increased traffic. Sonya
Doerr pointed out that rental units were historically allowed only in double frontage lots but they
could not be used as vacation rentals. It was felt that there were very few double frontage lots
remaining and this would not be a significant problem. Commissioner Waters felt that the area
between Beach Avenue and the ocean should be rezoned to allow two units to be built on the
double frontage lots. Don Wolfson felt in order to comply with the Comprehensive Plan the
existing garage apartments should be grandfathered in and no further units should be allowed.
Commissioner Beaver said he would like to know how many units currently existed and how
many units could still be developed. It was felt that the construction of garage apartments would
automatically be limited by existing regulations for parking, impervious surface and setback
requirements.
Dependent Care Living Assistance, Section 24-89— Ms. Doerr pointed out this section was
added to provide for the care of an ageing family member in an assisted living unit which would
be an attachment to the main residence but which would not be allowed to include a full kitchen.
Don Wolfson felt that this section was unnecessary as it could be addressed under the existing
provisions for single family units. Following further discussion, it was agreed to delete this
section.
Special Purpose District, Section 24113 Discussion ensued regarding the inclusion of
salvage yard in this section, following which it was felt that this section should not be changed.
Ms. Doerr reported that an ordinance addressing the zoning of the radio station property would
also be brought to the City Commission. Commissioner Boma noted that the language of the
draft provided that in the event the specific permitted use within a Special Purpose District (SP)
Page Three
Minutes — City Commission Workshop
October 29, 2001
ceased for a period of six months, the SP district would revert to a previous zoning designation
and suggested that language be included to provide that if the radio station lost its Federal license
the use would be forfeited. Commissioner Waters expressed concerns regarding the creation of a
Special Use District which he felt would create problems in the future. However, the City
Attorney felt this classification would give the City control over future development of areas
such as Johnston Island. Don Wolfson felt that salvage yards should be deleted from this
section. He felt that the language should be as specific as possible so that it would not be open to
interpretation by future City Commissions.
Steve Deibenow, representing the Radio Station, pointed out that the radio station was a non-
profit
onprofit organization and it would be difficult for them to raise funds within a six month period to
rebuild the station if it was destroyed. He requested that the language be changed to provide that
the radio station be allowed to rebuilt after a period of one year if it went out of business because
of some catastrophe.
Discussion ensued and concern was expressed regarding whether salvage yards could be
established in any conservation district and the City Attorney pointed out that the existing
ordinance specifically describes the salvage yard property by lot and block number. He felt that
Salvage Yard should continue to be included in the SP district and suggested adding the legal
description of the property on which a salvage yard would be allowed to operate. Following a
lengthy discussion, it was agreed to add the property description of the salvage yard and the
radio station to sections 24-113 (b) (1) and (2) the ordinance.
Storage and Parking of Vehicles and Equipment in Residential Zoning Districts, Sec. 24-
163 — Sonya Doerr explained she had added language to make it clear that vehicles larger than
12,500 pounds gross vehicle weight could not be parked or stored in residential districts.
Discussion ensued regarding the requirements for the parking of boats, etc. on residential
property and Commissioner Waters felt the 20 -foot front setback line should be retained and not
be changed to 15 feet. He felt the city should not encourage boat -owners to park their boats in
their front yards which, he felt, degraded neighborhoods. Commissioner Beaver felt that the 15 -
foot provision was included primarily to address the requests of residents west of Mayport Road.
Don Wolfson reported that the Community Development Board was unanimous in their desire to
retain the 20 foot setback. Alex Sherrer said that if the setback requirement was changed to 15
feet, this would allow most of the boat owners west of Mayport Road to legally park their boats
in their yards. He felt the simplest way to deal with this problem would be to require that boats
be parked behind the front line of the building.
Following further discussion, it was agreed to leave the requirement for parking boats at 20 feet
behind the front building setback line.
r"*.\
Page Four
Minutes — City Commission Workshop
October 29, 2001
Section 24-87 - Construction Standards for Two-family Dwellings and Townhouse Units —
In discussion regarding this section, Commissioner Waters inquired regardingthe requirement
for firewalls and was advised that this was a requirement of the Florida Building Code.
Definitions — Commissioner Waters pointed out that a previous draft of the ordinance contained
two drawings illustrating setback lines and Sonya Doerr agreed to locate the second drawing and
include it in the ordinance.
Section 24-159, Home Occupations - In discussion regarding home occupations, Sonya Doerr
explained that there were separate definitions for home office and home occupation. She said
that applications for home occupations would have to be approved by the City Commission but
home office could be approved by city star Commissioner Borno noted that introduction
service was prohibited as a home occupation but noted that the ordinance did not contain a
definition. Following discussion, it was agreed to delete introduction services from the
ordinance
Mary Walker felt that under the new ordinance more home occupation applications would have
to be brought to the Community Development Board and the City Commission for approval.
Zoning Map -- Commissioner Waters felt the City Commission needed to review the zoning
map and make corrections and it was agreed to do so after the zoning ordinance is adopted.
Section 24-85, Nonconforming Lots, Uses and Structures - Discussion ensued regarding non-
conforming structures and several examples of the types of variance requests that are brought
before the Community Development Board were discussed. Following discussion it was agreed
that the language in the ordinance should be clarified to require that the combined side yards
must total 15 feet. It was also felt that parking and impervious surface requirements would
prevent expansion of nonconforming structures.
Following discussion ofnonconforming lots and structures, the Mayor inquired whether the City
Commissioners felt the ordinance was ready to be included on their next agenda for the first of
two public hearings, and there was consensus that the City Commission should proceed with the
public hearing scheduled for November 12, 2001.
Signs and Advertising Structures - Discussion ensued and Sonya Doerr referred the
Commissioners to the options she had submitted with the agenda for the meeting of October 22,
2001 for addressing signs which are non -conforming with respect only to distance from the
property line or height limitations. The options she suggested were (1) require all signs to be
made to conform to city ordinances; (2) continue to allow nonconforming signs which are not in
the right of way but are within five feet of the right of way to stay until they need to be
(e -N
Page Five
Minutes — City Commission Workshop
October 29, 2001
s
replaced; (3) create a waiver or variance process; or (4) change the ordinance to amend the
height and setback requirements.
Alex Sherrer presented pictures of signs which were in good condition but which were in
violation of either height or square footage requirements. It was felt that if the signs were legal
when they were installed, they should be allowed to remain. It was agreed that businesses with
such signs should be notified that they are not in compliance with city ordinances and that they
will be required to comply with city ordinances when the signs are replaced.
Banners - The Mayor felt it would not be reasonable to prohibit banners completely but felt that
requests for banners should be brought to the City Commission for approval. Commissioner
Waters suggested limiting the number and/or size of banners.
There being no fiirther discussion, the Mayor declared the meeting adjourned at 8:30 p.m.
Maureen King
City Clerk
Attachment A
Workshop —10/29/01
WORKSHOP TOPICS
a. Chapter 163 requirements
• See attached excerpt from Florida Statutes
b. Definitions -- Eaves and Cornices, page 8
• The currently effective regulations (within Sec. 24-84. Yards; obstructions;
double frontage lots) are as follows:
(a) Obstructions. Every part of a required yard shall be open from its lowest point to
the sky, unobstructed, except for the ordinary projection of sills, belt courses,
cornices, buttresses, ornamental features, chimneys, flues and eaves. No such
projection shall be project more than forty (40) percent of the width of the
required yard over which they project.
The February 02, 2001 draft proposed the following:
a) Obstructions. Every part of a required yard shall be open from its lowest point to
the sky, unobstructed, except for the ordinary projection of window sills, belt
sources; cornices, buttresses; ornamental features, chimneys, flues and eaves.
No such projection shall be peejeet-mere-thaft forty (40) percent of the width of
the required yard or four (4) feet. whichever is less.
This provision would have allowed the eaves and projections to be as close a two
feet to each other on side property lines.
• The Community Development Board recommended the following "compromise"
provision reducing the allowable projection from four feet to a maximum of two
feet:
Eaves and Cornices shall.'mean typical projections from the roof Structure of a
Building. Eaves and Cornices shall not project beyond twenty four (24) inches into
Required Front and Rear Yards. Eaves and Cornices shall not project into Required
Side Yards beyond twenty-four (24) inches, or forty (40) percent of the established
Required Side Yard Setback, whichever distance is less.
c. Sec. 24-88. Garage Apartments
• page 37 - g total WQrArea of the Structure containJng the Private Garage
rid the Garage Apartment shall not exceed seventy-five (75) percent of the heated
and cooled area of the Principal Dwelling.
The additional language clarifies that the entire building (both garage and
apartment) is limited to 75% of the heated and cooled area of the main house.
r
d. Sec. 24-89. Dependent Care Living Assistance
• page 38
This provision is suggested as a possible method to allow, subject to certain
limitations, for the care of family members in a semi -dependent setting on the same
lot as single-family residential use.
e. Sec. 24-113. Special Purpose District
• page 54 - Language requiring consistency with the Comprehensive Plan has
been added. Also, any future SP district would require approval of the
Commission to change the use or any terms and conditions related to that use.
f. Sec. 24-163. Storage and Parking of Vehicles and Equipment in Residential
Zoning Districts
• page 73 — The additional language clarifies that vehicles larger than 12,500
pounds gross vehicle weight cannot be parked or stored in residential districts.