Loading...
71- Paul Eakin letter re. appeal (00652388xBA9D6)PAUL M.EAKIN,P.A. JEFFREY J.SNEED,P.A.* BANDA DELANE NADEAU EAKIN &SNEED ABOARD CERTIFIED CIVIL TRIAL LAWYER ATTORNEYS AT LAW TELEPHONE:904-247-6565 TELECOPY:904-247-6535 599 ATLANTIC BOULEVARD,SUITE 6 ATLANTIC BEACH,FL 32233 April 15,2016 Brenna M.Burden,Esquire 245 Riverside Ave.,Suite 150 Jacksonville,FL 32202 bdurden@llw-law.com City of Atlantic Beach,Gate Appeal Paul M.Eakin Re: My Client: Dear Ms.Durden: I am writing you today in response to your request for my client to identify the errors which are the bases for our appeal of the City's issuance of the Preliminary Site Development Permit to Gate Petroleum Company.The assignments of error are as follows : 1.The City's permit was issued by officials 'without authority to do so. The City misclassif ied Gate's project under the City's Zoning Code,thus allowing a more intensive use than permitted under the Code . 2. The City did not follow its own Code in reviewing and issuing the preliminary development permit at issue. 3. The City failed to properly interpret the relevant portions of its own Code relative to the review and approval of the application of the applicant. 4. 5.Any error alleged by any other appellant. The City failed in its due diligence in accepting and relying on the information supplied by the applicant in response to the City's inquiries regarding "minor automotive service". 6. Brenna M.Durden,Esquire April 15,2016 Page 2 7.The City unlawfully delegated its authority and responsibility to a third party contractor. 8.The City failed to apply its own Zoning Code in the same fashion to the facts in this case as it had done in similar cases in the past. Since you were unable to cite to me any basis under statute or ordinance for having to list assignments of errors as I have just done,I also reserve the right to raise any other error I believe committed by the City in regards to the Gate project that I discover prior to the hearing before the City Commission of Atlantic Beach. On that point,I still object to you setting the hearing for May 12,2016 beginning at 9:00 a.m.without all parties agreeing to same and without a site having been agreed upon or even selected . Lastly,Section 24-49 (a)mandates that the "Community Development Director shall,upon notification of the filing of the appeal transmit to the City Commission,all the documents, plans,or other materials constituting the record upon which the action being appealed was derived".(Emphasis supplied).The record submitted to me contained a letter from Derek W.Reeves to Jeremy Hubsch dated March 29,2016.The permit was issued on February 9,2016.I find it hard to believe that this letter of March 29,2016 from Mr.Reeves to Mr.Hubsch would have entered into anyone's consideration of the permit now being appealed. What is most disturbing to me is the fact that when I inquired of the City Clerk as to who prepared the record,I was informed that Mr.Hubsch had "done it with the assistance of the new City attorney".Of course,I had assumed that you reviewed the record prior to its release anyway. Brenna M.Durden,Esquire April 15,2016 Page 3 This document must be removed from the record immediately and all copies previously distributed recalled.Likewise,the Commission should be advised that the facts and opinions expressed therein were not considered by the City in making its decision. Sincerely, Paul/M.Eakin,Esq. Jane West Law,6277 A1A South,Suite 101,St.Augustine,FL 32080 (i aneOi anewestlaw .com) cc : Theodore R.Mainline,Jr.,Esq.,1301 Riverplace Blvd., Suite 1500,Jacksonville,FL 32207 f tha inline @rt law .com)