Budget Workshop Minutes of 8-3-10 vMINUTES OF THE BUDGET WORKSHOP OF ATLANTIC BEACH CITY COMMISSION
HELD IN COMMISSION CHAMBER, ON AUGUST 3, 2010 AT 5:00 PM.
City Commission Members present:
Mike Borno, Mayor
John Fletcher, Mayor Pro Tem
Jonathan Daugherty, Commissioner
Paul Parsons, Commissioner
Carolyn Woods, Commissioner
Staff present:
Jim Hanson, City Manager
David Thompson, Assistant City Manager
Nelson VanLiere, Finance Director
Donna Kaluzniak, Public Utilities Director
Rick Carper, Public Works Director
Keith Randich, IT Manager
Donna L. Bartle, City Clerk
The meeting, which was held for the purpose of discussing the following items, was called to
order at 5:01 p.m. by Mayor Borno. Mayor Borno explained the agenda items to discuss and the
process.
Budget Overview (Handouts: Budget Workshop (Attachment A) and List of Items that
Have Been Reduced or Excluded from FY 10 Proposed Budget (Attachement B)
City Manager Hanson gave an overview of the budget and explained the budget was cut
dramatically last year and to some extent this year so this is really something the Commission
needs to look at as a multi-year basis to really understand the situation that we are in.
He explained the "Global Economy" indicating that property taxes, sales taxes, interest rates, and
other revenues are down. Hundreds of thousands of public employees have been laid off across
this country and are being laid off right now. Service levels are cut in quite a number of cities.
Atlantic Beach is in quite a bit better shape than the other cities and counties for a lot of reasons
and we will try to explain those reasons as we go through. One of them is that we budget very
conservatively. We have multi-year plans for water, sewer and storm water systems. We have
some long-term plans for park systems; and we pretty well follow them. We move some of the
items out. We will show you those, but generally they provide a road map for improving the
systems. There has been dramatic improvements in the water, sewer and storm water systems
conditions in the last several years which leaves us in good shape. The funds we've had
available when economic times were much better, property taxes were up, sales taxes were up, a
lot of good times were happening budget wise. We invested that money into the projects that we
had showing in the Master Plans. So we stuck to the plans rather than reduced the tax rate. The
maintenance work has been done. Many of our systems were not all that well maintained a
number of years ago. Since we've done a lot of these projects the cost of running them is less.
Mr. Hanson gave examples of maintenance projects and explained that they have been paid for
with cash and that there has been no new borrowing in this city since 1996. We have issued
bonds, but those were refunding bonds, basically bonds for trying to reduce the interest rates.
The city's utility and storm water systems are overall in very good shape. We do need to
continue maintaining them, not just drop things entirely, but we have a plan to do that. It is
certainly easier to cut back on capital projects now that we have spent this much money in recent
Minutes — City Commission Workshop August 3, 2010
Page 2
years. When the recession hits it is a lot easier not to put cash into new projects and also we're
left with a capacity to borrow money.
Mr. Hanson distributed a handout titled List of Items that have been reduced or excluded from
FY 10 proposed budget for reference as he explained that the same items plus even more are cut
from this proposed budget.
He gave a general overview of the following items from the list: Sidewalk and manhole repairs,
police motorcycle, overtime and training, employee raises, employee bonus program, document
imaging, street light upgrades, fence replacements, city hall parking lot lights, and ball field
lighting. He added that during last years' budget we cut the lifeguard hours. He reported that in
total there was better than $1.6 million that was taken out of the budget last year. This year, we
are continuing those and are not adding them back, but there are some other projects that are not
on the list that will be discussed later.
He reported that expenses are rising and explained that these are ones that are essentially out of
our control. Fleet Maintenance contract $7,438 (3%), Fire Contract $27,601 (3%), Power costs
$89,331 (11%), Pension costs $184,646 (16%) and Group Health Insurance $221,659 (32%).
He reported that revenues are declining over 3 years and explained the amounts of decline for
each. Property taxes $298,000 (from 3 years ago), State Revenue Sharing $49,000 (from 2 years
ago), Half Cent Sales Tax $123,000 (from 3 years ago), Local Option Gas Tax $11,000 (from 2
years ago), Better Jacksonville Sales Tax $29,000 (from 2 years ago), and Interest earnings
$475,000 (from 4 years).
He explained that what you have in the draft is a "Bare Bones" budget. He explained that most
of the service levels are maintained; only the necessary capital projects are included; the only
revenue increase is a 6% water/sewer rate increase; no employee pay raises combined with
reduced health benefits equate to employees getting a pay cut.
Water and Sewer System (Handout: Public Utilities Budget FY2011 (Attachment C)
Ms. Kaluzniak reported on the current FY project status for Ocean Blvd. Water Main- complete,
Well 2R- construction underway, Tank Rehab WP 1 & 4- construction underway, Salt Air Sewer
Rehab- construction underway, Improvements at Various Lift Stations- construction underway,
Donner Subdivision Sewer Rehab- Awaiting finalization of grant paperwork for City of
Jacksonville, TMDL Force Main- design complete, DEP permit received, prequalifying
contractors, and TMDL WWTP Upgrade Design- 60% design, constructability review complete.
Ms. Kaluzniak explained the last Water Master Plan was done in 2001 and that some
recommended projects have been delayed due to reduced funding, but progress is still being
made. Since the 2001 Plan we have interconnected the Buccaneer & Atlantic Beach Water
Systems, added a 300,000 gallon elevated storage tank at Water Plant #2, replaced old cast iron
water mains with new PVC mains in several areas of the City, and updated the Water
Distribution System Model in 2007.
She explained that for FY11, we are proposing the replacement of old water mains on 11th from
East Coast to Beach Ave. - $120,000, rehabilitation of Well #1 at Water Plant #1 - $50,000, and
Water Plant Tank Rehabilitation - $55,000.
Minutes — City Commission Workshop August 3, 2010
Page 3
She reported that water loss is one of the issues we've talked about at some of the commission
meetings. She explained that water loss is the difference between the gallons of water produced
and the gallons of water billed. There are two types of water loss. Real Loss is when you are
actually losing water that's from a water line break, leaks in the joints or fittings, background
leakage, treatment plant operation/maintenance, and authorized unmetered water use from fire
fighting, hydrant flushing, water main disinfection, etc. Apparent Losses is when there are meter
inaccuracies, billing data errors or unauthorized water uses from theft.
She reported that the average water loss declined from a high of 20% in 1999 to a low of about
10% in 2006 but has been climbing since then. She explained some of the action steps to reduce
water loss are 1) replacement of aging water mains that are leaking, 2) professional leak
detection on a portion of the system annually, 3) annual testing and repair of all large meters (3"
and up), and 4) replacement of old residential meters. She explained that meters slow down and
read low as they get older. She explained the meter replacement program and explained that
they are increasing the amount of meters to replace in 2011 and have added another $32,000 to
the budget to get an additional 340 meters (562 total). Discussion ensued regarding water sales
and water loss.
Ms. Kaluzniak reported on the status of the Sewer Master Plan. She explained that we have a
Sewer Rehabilitation program that was recommended in the Master Plan. The funding is once
again less than recommended, but we have still accomplished Royal Palms and Seaspray
Subdivisions and the grant funding is allowing us to do Salt Air area which is currently
underway and the Donner Subdivision. We do plan to resume sewer rehabilitation in FY12. She
showed the 2006 Sewer Master Plan Map and explained the progress.
She explained the TMDL — WWTP Improvements which includes phasing out Buccaneer and
upgrading WWTP #1. She reported that the force main design is complete, the WWTP #1
upgrade is at 60% design and the constructability review is complete, the equipment pre-
selection is complete and the energy study is underway as well as the odor control study and the
sludge study. She explained the sludge processing study. Treated sludge is the byproduct of the
wastewater treatment process. Our current treatment consists of stabilization (aeration),
dewatering on drying beds, disposal at Trail Ridge Landfill, hauling performed by City staff and
no tipping fees per Interlocal Agreement with COJ. She showed photos of the sludge drying
beds at WWTP #1.
She explained the Preliminary Sludge Study Results so far. She reported that modifications to
the City's sludge handling process are recommended. She explained some issues: the current
system is antiquated, labor intensive, weather dependent and odor producing; the new process for
nitrogen removal will increase sludge production, putting the current system at maximum
capacity; if COJ enacts tipping fees, additional costs will be - $131,000 (more with increased
sludge volume); mechanical dewatering will reduce tonnage and tipping costs; consolidation of
aeration blowers could lower electrical costs. Mr. Hanson elaborated on the issues.
Commissioner Woods distributed a handout on TMDL titled Alternative Comparison
(Attachment D). She reported there are four issues as follows:
1. Capitol Cost Decommissioning WWTP#2 does not include $2.6m impairment loss for closing
plant in year 3 instead of anticipated 15 years of use; 2. Cost savings and life cycle analysis cost
Minutes — City Commission Workshop August 3, 2010
Page 4
estimates assume operating at full capacity, when in reality this will probably never be realized;
a. Need to justify need to design so far beyond need; b. Final TMDL report of March 2009
details in table 3.2 WW flow not to reach 2002 levels until well after 2027, section 3.5 attributes
declining WW rates to sewer rehabilitation which continues and is expected to reduce flows by
approximately 30-40%, (this figure is not even included in the already reduced flow projections).
c. Maximum capacity design standard was derived from the Comp Plan which is in strict
contradiction to all empirical data given in all of the reports; 3. Revenue projections used in this
report were based on which flow assumptions?; and 4. $1 m reduction for sale of property in
Alternative 1 is not valid, same $ amount should be shown for Alternative 3 because the asset is
maintained by the city so the value is still present. This results in the actual dollar Capitol Cost
for Alternative 1 at $13,550,000 and for Alternative 3 $8,950,000. This is a $5m savings. The
additional operating cost of $115,848 per year would take 43 years to add up to $5 million.
Mr. Fletcher asked Commissioner Woods a question but Mayor Borno explained we are getting
off on a side issue and that it has no bearing on what we are here to do tonight and that we need
to concentrate on the purpose we are here for so that we can get it done. He offered for it to be
addressed at another time. Commissioner Woods disagreed by saying this is what we are
discussing.
Mr. Hanson suggested that we get the engineers to address Commissioner Woods' questions and
could discuss it during a future workshop or commission meeting. Commissioner Woods agreed
with Mr. Hanson's suggestion. Commissioner Daugherty indicated he would be satisfied with a
written report. Mr. Hanson said he would work with the engineers.
Mr. Hanson referred to his handout and explained the following: Water/Sewer Sales adding that
the blue bar = water sales and the red bar = sewer sales, Water Sales Vol 99-00 to 09-10, and
Sewer Sales Volume FY 2000 -FY 2010. He further explained the Water and Wastewater
Financing, the Transfers to General Fund vs Surcharge adding the blue bar = the dollars
transferred to the General Fund and the green bar = how much the surcharge is, Public Utilities
which indicates the amounts for Personal Services, Debt Services, Operating Expenses,
Transfers, Capital Outlay and Revenue. The Commission asked questions and Mr. Hanson and
Mr. VanLiere responded to the questions. Discussion ensued and they referred to pages 115 and
103 of the proposed budget for some of the answers.
General Fund Revenues and Expenses (Handout: Revenue and Tax Information
(Attachment E)
Mr. VanLiere referred to his handout while he explained and answered questions on the Total
2011 General Fund Revenues broken down by Taxes, Licenses and Permits, Intergovernmental,
Interfund Transfers, Fines and Forfeitures, Charges for Services, Miscellaneous, and Ad
Valorem Taxes. Mr. VanLiere explained and answered questions on the General Fund Total
Revenues by Type and Total Expenses, State Shared Revenues, Ad Valorem Assessment Rolls,
Atlantic Beach Taxable Property Values, Total Value and Taxable Value, Property Tax by Value,
2% Sample Analysis (AB GIS July 2010; Change in Assessed Value (09/10), Ten Year Millage
Comparison with 2010 Proposed Operating Millages, and 2010 Proposed Millage. Mr. Hanson
explained some of the options available such as take rolled up tax rate, transfer more money
from utilities to the general fund, and/or rate increases and explained the impact. Mr. VanLiere
Minutes — City Commission Workshop August 3, 2010
Page 5
gave an overview of the General Fund as he referred to the proposed budget pages 4 and 5,
Summary of General Fund Revenues.
General Fund 10- year Plan
Mr. Hanson referred to the Total Revenues and Expenditures (page 106) and the General Fund
Long Term Financial Plan Projection Summary (page 105) as he explained Personal Services,
Operating Expenses, Capital Outlay, Transfers Out and Revenues. Discussion ensued.
Convention Development Tax Fund
Mr. Hanson explained how the Convention Development Tax Fund can be used and referred to
page 30 of the proposed budget as he explained the Revenues and Expenditures. He answered
questions from the Commission. Commissioner Parsons commented that the Public Art is
misleading explaining that it is actually a three year budget that was taken out of 07, 08 & 09,
but was put in 03, 04 and 05.
Agency Funding Requests for FY 1
(Attachment F�
Handout: A.wencFun( in.,_ Reuests for FY11
Mr. Hanson distributed a list titled Agency Funding Requests for FY11. He explained that in
past budget years we invited the various agencies to come in and make a presentation, but since
it takes a lot of time and there is little monies involved, he has summarized what is currently in
the budget, what the request is for next year and what is in the draft budget. He explained that if
needed, we could invite the agencies to a later budget meeting. Mr. Hanson went through each
item on the list. He asked the Commission if they wanted any changes made to the amounts
listed.
It was the Consensus of the Commission to Add $2,000 back in for the Teen Council.
Rick Carper explained the Services provided by the Beaches Resource Center.
It was the Consensus of the Commission to Change Beaches Resource Center to $2,000
instead of $1,000.
There being no further discussion by the City Commission, the Mayor declared the meeting
adjourned at 8:38 p.m.
Donna L. Bartle, CMC
City Clerk
LI
•
i.
EA
Attachment A
Budget Workshop 8-3-11
Global Economy
▪ Property taxes, sales taxes, interest nahya,
other revenues down
▪ Public employees laid off
▪ Service Ievels cut
Expenses Rising
• Fleet Maintenance contrac$7,438 (3%)
^ Fire Contrac$27.001 (3%)
• Power costs $D8,351(11%)
Pension costs $184,646 (16%)
^ Group Health Insurance $221.O59(32%)
"Bare Bones" Budget
▪ Service evels (mostly) maintained
▪ Necessary capitaprojects only
▪ Ortly rate inerease 6% water/sewer
▪ Employees get no raises, lower health
benefits
Attachrnent A
Budget Workshop 8-341
Conservative Budgeting/Long
Term Planning
• 10 -year plans forwater, sewer, storm watersystems
• Funds investewhen available into capital projects
• Paid in cash; no new flnancing since 1996
• Maintenance work done
• Utilities, storm water system and parks in good conditon
Ready to withstand recession
Revenues Declining over 3 years
.Proporty taxes $298,000
• State Revenue Sharing $49,000
` Half Cent Sales Tax $123.000
^ Local Option Gas Tax $11.oOO
• Better Jacksonville Sales Tax $29,000
^ Interest earnings $475.0Oo(xyears)
~~
' Warirj Sewer Sales
011 11.1 Fr 0^~'1.01 .1~`.01~~`1,01.'z,s,' 10
Water Sales Vol 99-09 to 09.10
Sewer Sales Volume FY 2000 -FY 2010
Attachment A
Budget Workshop 8-341
90,000
80,000
70,000
8. 60,000
50,000
40,000
30,000
20,000
10,000
40 000
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Water and Wastewater Financing
Engineering Buccaneer Phase out
Main Plant
Construction Services
Construction of Buccaneer line, other misc.
Construction of main plant upgrades
Water main; Ocean
Lift Station upgrades
Replace Well#1
Total Cost
$326,435
$566,125
$460,000
$3,500,000
$6,169,000
$150,331
$342,000
$752,456
$12,266,347
,tenths of FY; October =1
Water and Wastewater Financing Continued
Construction and Engineering Costs
Less SRF Loan
Less cash/SRF loan offset
Less WMD grant
Total bank financing
Yearly P81 Payments for new debt
Total P&I Payments including existing debt
Public Utilities
$12,266,347
-$902,787
-$102,787
-$1 000,000
810,260,773
$904,000
$2,300,000
Transfers to General Fund vs Surcharge
1,015
16
0 14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
it
,110, rarrr�iirirrilJli r %iia 111%D
CS
.0o -1 < 4 <
t t le J 1, -0 4)o ' 9 85 1' 1 4:1' 5
Q 4 Q 4 F Q F 4 Q Q Q Q F
nom Personal Services eu®Operating Expenses m® Capital Outlay
MU Debt Service =Transfers ...-Revenue
2
Attachment B
Budget Workshop 8-3-11
List of Items That Have Been Reduced or Excluded from FY 10 Proposed Budget
Updated List 7/13/10
Notes
3% merit would have equaled $201,000
Plan to take comp. time off instead of pay for
unavoidable overtime
Funding still available to maintain various
certifications necessary for jobs
Have issued 1 polo shirt/ year for non -uniformed
employees
Program eliminated
Clerk $ 12500; Public Works $5,200
Transfer smaller budget to IT Division to only replace
those that stop and cannot be repaired
Position eliminated
Eliminated
Budget reduced
Eliminates city contribution to program
Eliminates motorcycle
Budget cut in half; do work in-house
Cut in half
Budget cut in half.
Budget to 1/2; lower cost expected with Royal Palms
rehab.
Done by contractors; flowers eliminated
a.)
Ca
CC
E
w
a.)
Ca
.E
w
Matching funds for projects; budget reduced
New project; would have added 2 new cameras for
police surveillance at park
Eliminated; old SS cabinet rusted
4-,
0
0
E
Q
varies by dept.
varies by dept.
varies by dept.
0
0
O
NNi
N
t/}
0
0
N
N
r -i
VI
00E'0Z$
0
0
tO
m
4A-
$5,237
0
0
N
r-1
in.
005'Z$
0
0
CD
T -i'
tA}
0
0
m
m
tA}
0
0
0
rr
i/}
0
0
0
Lr
N
if}
0
0
0
tri
tA}
0
0
0
iri
N
tA}
0
0
0
d'
in-
0
0
0
ui
tAl•
0
0
co
(-,
tr).
008`Z$
0
0
0
N
t/?
0
0
u)
cri
tA)-
E
Employee Raises
Overtime reduced; most departments
Training funds reduced; most depts.
Shirts; non-uniform personnel
Bonus program; City-wide
Document imaging program
PC/ Laptop Replacements
10% Pay Cut
Liaison PT position
Employee Picnic
Supervisor Training
Explorers
Motorcycle lease
Bathroom Repair
Sidewalk Repairs
Manhole Repairs
Stormwater point repairs
Flowers for Town Center
Solid Waste transfer station study
Fence for Aquatic Gardens
'Beach Access Improvements
Cameras for Tideviews Park
Replace cabinet in Town Center
Department
Various Departments
Commission
1Planning &Zoning
Human Resources
V
O
Public Works
Attachment B
Budget Workshop 8-3-11
r
Project eliminated
phase 2 of project to upgrade ball field lights
Will keep old equipment another year
Old Gate crashed several times
Cut each year for last several
City Hall parking lot; some no longer operational; fell
from pole during TS Fay
Eliminated project
Eliminated project
Next link would have been on Seminole Rd.
Project eliminated
Related to elimination of WWTP#2; hold 1 -year
Would have replaced chain link w/ decorative
Would have replaced chain link w/ decorative
Budgets reduced; do work w/ existing employees
City share after grant from WMD
Eliminated
Will use tap water
Men's RR done last year $17,898
Note; 1) many projects not proposed because of anticipated budget shortfalls
2) Hard to track normal budget reductions from dept requests vs. special reductions
OOOOO
0
00000
0
r -I
t/?
0
0
N
t/}
0
0
N
t/?
0
0
co
t/)-
0
0
N
t/1-
$10,000
OOO
0
000
co
N
t/}
0
11
t/)-
0
l)
in -
$100,000
o
0
o
O
N
i/1-
000
0
000
o0
in
0
O
N
th
0
O
N
t/}
0
0.0
0
N
t.,1-
000`000`1$
o
o
t!)
VI
crO
N 0
in0
t!)
N
t/}
r+
r-+
(o
tf)
Ol
U1
c --i'
t/}
Street light upgrades Royal Palms
Diesel Generator Replacement
Russell Park Field Lighting
Bull Park; replace playground equip.
Replace Gate at Dutton Isle
Russell Park Drainage Improvements
Parking Lot Light Replacements
New Sidewalks
Pave parking; Jordan Park
Ped Path Extensions
Document laserfisch to Web
Radio relocation; WP#4
Fence replacement WP#2
Fence replacement WP#4
Lift Station roof repairs
Reclaimed water facilities
Subsidy to Jax Beach for fireworks
Bottled water for Commission meetings
Rehab of Women's Bath in City Hall
1—
1Water/ Sewer
1Other Divisions
Attachment B
Budget Workshop 8-3-11
r
a
FY20 I 1
August 3, 2010
ies dget
Attachment C
Budget Workshop 8-3-11
Current FY Project Status
fiar
OA
Ocean BIvd.Water Main
Well 2R
Tank Rehab WP 1 & 4
SaltAir Sewer Rehab
Improvements at Various
Lift Stations
Donner Subdivision
Sewer Rehab
urn 111t''° "t
$150,331
$752,834
51 16,000
$400,000
$397,818
$178,000
T14DL Force Main $3.6M
TMDLWWTP Upgrade $566,125
Design
lly,
Complete
Construction Underway
Construction Underway
Construction Underway
Construction Underway
Awaiting finalization of
grant paperwork from
coJ
Design complete, DEP
Permit Received,
Prequalifying
Contractors
60% Design,
Constructability Review
Complete,
2.001 Water Master Plan Status
Some recommended projects have been
delayed due to reduced funding, but progress
still being made. Since the 2001 Plan we
have:
Interconnected the Buccaneer &Atlantic Beach
Water Systems
Added a 300,000 gallon elevated storage tank at
Water Plant #2
Replaced old cast iron water mains with new
PVC mains in several areas of the City
- Updated the Water Distribution System Model in
2007.
Water Capital Improvements for
FYII
o Replacement of old water mains on I I th
from East Coast to Beach Ave. - $120,000
Rehabilitation of Well #1 at Water Plant
#1 - $50,000
Water Plant Tank Rehabilitation - $55,000
Attachment C
Budget Workshop 8-341
Water Loss
Water loss is the difference between the
gallons of water produced and the gallons of
water billed.
Real Losses:
Water line breaks, leaks in joints or fittings (reported)
Background leakage
Water lost in treatment plant operation/maintenance
Authorized unmetered water use (fire fighting, hydrant
flushing, water main disinfection, etc.)
Apparent Losses:
Meter inaccuracies
Billing data errors
Unauthorized water use (theft, contractors)
Water Loss Action Steps
. Average water loss declined from a high of
20% in 1999 to a low of about 10% in 2006
but has been climbing since then. Action
steps taken to reduce water loss:
Replacement of aging water mains and services
Professional leak detection on a portion of the
system annually.
Annual testing and repair of all large meters (3"
and up)
Replacement of old residential meters
Small Meter Replacement
. Water meters slow down (read low) as
they get older
Meter replacement program was in place, but
will be enhanced beginning in FYI I —
Additional $32,000
Additional 340 meters (562 total)
Approximately 7% of all meters and 10% of meters
over 10 years old
Priority for replacement will be high use
neighborhoods
2006 Sewer Master Plan Status
* Sewer System Rehabilitation
Funding is less than recommended in Master
Plan, but much has still been accomplished.
Royal Palms and Seaspray Subdivisions
completed
Grant funding is allowing for completion of
Salt Air area (currently underway) and
Donner Subdivision
Additional sewer rehabilitation resumes in
FY 12
Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation — Status at 2006 Sewer Master Plan
Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation — Status FY 2010
Attachment C
Budget Workshop 8-3-11
TMDL. —WWTP Improvements
Phaseout of Buccaneer and Upgrade of WWTP
#1 — Current Status
Force main design complete, DEP permit
received, prequalifying contractors
WWTP#1 Upgrade
60% Design and Constructability Review Complete
Equipment Pre -selection Complete
Energy Study underway
Odor Control Study underway
Sludge Study underway
Sludge Processing Study
Treated sludge is the byproduct of the
wastewater treatment process. Our
current treatment consists of:
Stabilization (aeration)
Dewatering on drying beds
Disposal at Trail Ridge Landfill
Hauling performed by City staff
No tipping fees per Interlocal Agreement with COJ
yjoyof
2
Preliminary Sludge Study Results
Pob Modifications to the City's sludge handling
process are recommended.
Current system is antiquated, labor intensive,
weather dependent and odor producing.
The new process for nitrogen removal will
increase sludge production, putting the current
system at maximum capacity.
If CO) enacts tipping fees, additional costs will be
$131,000 (more with increased sludge volume).
Mechanical dewatering will reduce tonnage and
tipping costs.
Consolidation of aeration blowers could lower
electrical costs.
Attachment C
Budget Workshop 8-341
3
• g
4/4
•0
• 2 a,
g
<8
el et)
71 LI
0
tIo "
a44
..:71
"g,
A
44
44/44/40
4/'
4)
40
4*4
0
e
r;
r- •
4/41
CO}
40
4*4
11)
40
A
Process Improvement Combinations
18
18
14
18
84
4,4
4/4
4*4
140
4>
8'8
1.6
en"
4/4
40
8
14)4>
4/1
8
8
0
0
‘4,
.44
01
40
10)
4*4
0
'7D
(44
00
14)
4)
44
en
.4/
o oj
4/41
10
4)
P #2 does not include $2.6m impairment loss for closing plant in year 3 instead of
probably never be
ates assume operating at full capacity, when in reality th
0
a)
(/)
Attachment D
Budget Workshop 8-3-11
r -Fd
• 88
Fe -4
• re
Peel
-4--+ P..
g ,-+ co
cd (L)
7-t,-4
o o v.) ,--▪ (
,-,
cv (1)
cl)
,-t '4,
czs a) .c-)
2,
-I-, 0 "H 0 0 CC▪ S
4-' c "")
-ci •°) 4- 5 (1)
a) F c) •- ra,
(1)., .-, s
• CI) CID ,-• 0 7'71
(1) CKS 0
N cle) (i) 'in r—I • ,1
'-cri -(5 •;t1
0 • • 0 ,-g rci
C -S- • -e-,
co a) P-4 g 0 g CZi E-4
- - '' ' 1
-.. ".." ct
O 0 1=1 b.0
• c.) '
0 •--1 =1 Q)
• CCJ CD
'11
0 ...:), cni.-e o
7:3
o a) o rg .. ?_,
N • re, rti 7.-e
c,,,:) -Ed g '481 • e-1) '-C-id Hi Lc)
4-, •—• no ,-g 4_7
a) •,-, c•-)
-8 0 ocs c)i
C'CLA Cr)
a) as ct g r-, •.--, ct
0
rzl E (1) ri:i 7-.1
,_., • F -I CD C/) a) ,-1
H
kA(t 4-'0
. 0
r--, o •-, 0 .--,
p-, -0 u) • ct a) Fn. a) 6 E
.,:,)
o 0
o
cA 4-, E4_-_, . • o
u)
(1) b.0 4 F -I .Cr) 0 t Q) • '-' 4 "C'e
• e --e
u) u) sa u) o cL)
G) ccs G) a) •,-4 a) Cip 7:1
..5 ccig
04 . CO -1 -5 • e—, 0 -P ,. .r_q ;-' . C../ 0 0
7:3 ._e 0 71- *c_I ,_,.., P", c • D ; - I + - )
. 4.-C2e ,_,C16)
• e - - , t • i - i , . N
CO
;-,., Q) ' V <--,_ c...) ' ced .- r-1 8.s' • a)
o -
41) 1-0
10ct•,°0a) •t0,0
).,4c,7,$,-7,°.g-
cco,'
u)c,c•a7o)1-
1-8 up
8-J
(4 7:i b•O 'Si '-c-d al l-' a 1 ;-1 tj . Ed 0 .-cj
o CO g Z 11")
A c..•P 6 E
.
4.,,,, • r.4 c./) NI 0 r--, *r" 1-c)
•-, C.) 4...) • re...i d r„,6 ci a) + 0
-I 1-
• (,)
CI) r1
a4 ,se- m cn
ea C.) S--4
cr)
a) •
e -i
C/)
C/)
cf.) 4
Attachment E
Budget Workshop 8-3-11
Attachment E
Budget Workshop 80-3-11.
'11111111111011111010111111111111001111 11111111111111111111111 11111 110 1111:111111111111'1111111111111111111 'III'
000
.0.10000.0p0110000000000000.10000000010.0000000000.00000.00001000000000000000000011000000000 111111111111
,1011.1.10.10.1110(0.000.0.00.10101111111100000000010000000
\ • \LI'II. fIIIIIIIIIIII°°°°°°°°"°4°°°°°•IIIIIIIIIIIII•"•°:°°";I•
IIIIIIII001.1011.11.1111011,101000Ji0000 000000000:..0...
iffir 10100000000001000:00001
••,I700:0,056.P.,404',0000:00°00'000.0.0•00000000000.0.0.0
„,111111,1,11'111•"1:
1110011illv011..-110001011111111110000011101111110111
111111110ils
1111111111111
ohoophooloo00 0000000
1.40%
4.62%
0.80%
Taxes Licenses and Permits r Intergovernmental
Interfund Transfers is Fines and Forfeitures Charges for Services
Miscellaneous Ad Valorem Taxes
14,000,000
10,000,000
8,000,000
General Fund Total Revenues by Type
and Total Expenses
•'.. ••.•
•.000I0 'If
"".•••000000°0I1001,01
..,...,
00000000000011.11.111111111110
0010111111010001040000000000111101010101111111110
111111111.1.1.111.11.1.10001
1111'
? "
111111111111111111111111111111101111111111411
111111111111111111111V11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 6000(00.000
1111111101011111111001111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111010411111oull
1111111 1111 .. • ,.. 11 1 II 1 '''•••••••••••
1010110
ti
1111111
,,,,1111111.11111011111.1.11111),
:000. •••••• 0..• • 0 111110.0111111000000001100011110000111111110011110 00111111111111111 1111111 0111111111110111"
0000000000001
11111111110111111111111111111001 0000011111111100101111101011100
4,000,000
!PUI;:.. •-•(• 1111 4411111111111' op IP
00000 01111111111100,110
';'f• •:••• Vow A0 VALOREM TAXES ...:.: • • • . TAX6.ARTTFRANCH)SE. FEES:. .. • VAMP, PERM TS FEERANDXSESS.
. . • • :• „,.: t. • , E. •
11:11111,11,111111111111111111,111111111111111.11.„
X ;0.00,000 1."
111 • ,11.1'.'n • .,,,•„•••• ••• ..••••••„1.:,,,,,,fx'11!..v...,:•111,:11•111T„1,!,1,111,1,1,11111,1,1,1,11111,1,11,111111,0,11,
;11. • .• • ••• • O. ""1,•••••••••,,......:,,.,,,111110010,11,1111,1,11.11101010 000AW voi,v,4100111111•Iti ,1101•1:•••.• 1111111 11,1000000111110111ON0010000100000 1111111111011111111111111111111111111111111111101000 '
• • Cn 111'11d1.111H.R1.11H1P1000111111111111101HH,I,!
• • .•••. • , • .
••.,• •••A,INP011,111111,1111100,1,1,,,,,,, 11111101101111 11
111110100 011011101
1.1:1•••.• • ....,.•:''..1.11011:14TXR04)/ERPITTINTRE REVERI)Ex.imAR.ERAR0ES PPR RERiAcES... ..• .• .: ROM F114EXAN4 EpRFTITTIITIES"
11( 0 HT
• ., • • I
'•'' • • • • . .
t • •
• • • •••
111111000000001
00*
MISCELLANEOUS REVENUES Is" INTE8FUND TRANS EX5 — EXPENSES
.1 .1
1' .1
• • . „ „ .„,
,•••••••.„ •
" I
1
Attachment E
Budget Workshop 8-3-11
City of At an#i Beach
State Shared Revenues
000,090
800.000
,$2ll
III 11v1111 I 111 1 Ill 111,11,1 V 11111111,1 .
II I iuIIII
l
v1111 III 11111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIVIIIII.11V111,11111111111,11,11111111111111111111
Nall
^ 11 1111,
0011 1111. 111 1 II
Il 1 1 11111 1 11 11111III 11111111111111111 11
.$1,000,000. mum
ill U111111111111" ' '
f1 uluu
$soo,aoa I
$600,000 j0 i VVIIII ' 11111 1 111 11 1I ' I ILII
Iu
406,990 11 0 mo um 11 III
1111 11111111111 , ,,iq�111111111111111111111111IIIIIil u III
ullll
Illll IIIIIII III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII I III r II mluuurlllmr VIII 1.11
I II II I
$200,000
sc State Shared. Revenues
ocal Govt Half -Cent Sa es Tax
State Revenue Sharing Proceeds
2,500
2,000
NIM h`iagIV
696
oolooloolool
xemptions
levet Ho
mlmvuuuo Ho
1,500
1,000
50
stead Exemption
ead Exemption
Homestead Exemption
for Elderly
NE Save Our Homes Cap
Value
Taxable Value
Just Value
2009
2
Attachment E
Budget Workshop 8-3-11
1,600,000,000
1,400,000,000
1,200,000,000
1,000,000,000
800,000,040
000,000;000
400,000;000
200,000,000
■ New Construction
Personal Property,]-,
Real Property
999 2000 2001 2002 2003 -2004'; 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2
Fiscal Year
Total Value and Taxable Value
a00,000
$600,000
$400,000
$200,000
as
w Taxable Value ,° NIHomestead USOIi Cap
$12,000
$10,000
$8,000
$6,000
$4,001)
$2Awo
• i;.#t:i;:i.pot.tv..7rai:;'.'.4V••::••.,)/a.1(....:-.'.::.:.....• .....
..., ...,...,.. :...
.. . .
. . . . . ..... . ..
. . .. .... ..
. ....., . .
. . ..
.. .
. . . .... .
•
• • • ••• • • • •
• •
. .
.. . . . . .. .
. ..
...
. . . .
.. . .
. .
.. . .
.. .
• •• •.
. .
. .
. .
Attachment E
Budget Workshop 8-3-11
11111'11'1'11111111111111111111111111111
111111111m111110111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
-0"," cOs cf' P cip
a =7 ,
t211' ta tr tl 0' 0" 4'1' 0'
a? a/044one Seael
2% SAMPLE ANALYSIS (AB GIS July 2010)
CHANGE IN ASSESSED VALUE (09/10)
DECREASE
NO CHANGE
iIIIINCREASE
4
Attachment E
Budget Workshop 8-341
CHANGE IN ASSESSED VALUE (09/10)
-$49,999.99 to -$40,000.00 1 property (L49% of .satnple)
-$39,999.99 to $30,000.00 4 properties (5.97% ofsample)
-$29,999.99 to $20,000.00 1 property (L49% of sample)
-$19,999.99 to -$10,000.00 5 properties (Z46% of saniple)
$9;999:.99.t0•S0M0'. • 2 properties (298% of Sample)
0.01 to $10,000.O0 47properties.(70..15% ofsample)
10A00.01,.0.,..s20o00.00v.. 5 properties176%.'ofsample) •
$20,000.01 to .00 1 property (L49% 0fsetiopie)...: • •
0,000.01 to $40,000,00 0 properties • • • •••: • • • •
• •••:••• ••••••••::•• ••• • • • • • • • •
40,000,01 to $5000000 1 property (1.49% ofsarnple)
1000
11111111111111111111111111,1,1,11,1,11,111111111,11,11,111100,01,011,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,100000000004000l0000000
0,41.1.111,1,11"•
•
,
11,r111i1111
111l11,111111111011111111110111111111111'11'01,11'11111ij
„,110111,,1,1,p,11,V11111,11,111;1;
..•••••••••.••,,,,•-••••••••,--
••••••• ,,• •• A111111,111111,
11,11111•1'1,11111111111"0""'
"'"111,1"4111:11:111:11:1.),'
,'1111111111111111111111111,1,1''
Florida Inland
Navigation
0.19%
5
Attachment E
Budget Workshop 8-3-11
Ten Year Iage Court
4:500
4.000
Vain
3,500 a70
�YPI
3,000 .,�➢f
2.500
111111111
2.000
n w th 2010 Proposed Operati
0.500
0,000 I °
i
,111111111111111
BSI
.11111111
Qd
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
ptune,
ksonville Be
CITY OF ATLANT C BEACH
2010 Proposed Mileages
ksonvitle
6
Agency Funding Requests for FY 11
Item
Acoustic/ Songwriters
Holiday Sign -A -Long
Discretionary
Teen Council
Working Warier
Arts in the Park
Artisan Faire
Fine Arts Series
Lagniappe
AB Elementary After School
AB Elementary Grass
Mayport Middle After School
Beaches Resource Center
Dial -A -Ride
Chamber of Commerce
Total
FY 10 Budget
$5,800
$750
$1,000
$2,000
$2,000
$5,000
$1,000
$3,000
$0
$16,500
$5,820
$14,000
$1,000
$1,500
$15,000
$74,370
FY 11 Request
$5,800
$750
$1,000
$0
$2,000
$7,000
$1,500
$3,000
$750
$16,500
$5,820
$14,000
$2,000
$1,500
$0
$61,620
FY 11 Draft Budget
$5,800
$750
$250
$0
$2,000
$7,000
$1,500
$3,000
$750
$16,500
$5,820
$14,000
$1,000
$1,500
$0
$59,870
Attachment F
Budget Workshop 8-3-11