Loading...
Complete Streets Implementation PlanC O M P L E T E S T R E E T S I M P L E M E N T A T I O N P L A N MAIN STREET CORRIDOR JANUARY 2022 Prepared for: City of Atlantic Beach Address: 800 Seminole Road, Atlantic Beach, FL 32233 T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S TITLE PAGE NUMBER PROJECT TEAM 3 COMPLETE STREETS VISION 4 COMPLETE STREETS POLICY 5 PROJECT APPROACH 7 TRAFFIC CALMING 8 SHORT-TERM RECOMMENDATIONS 19 LONG-TERM RECOMMENDATIONS 27 FUNDING STRATEGIES 30 NEXT STEPS 31 APPENDIX 32 TEAM INFORMATION: Mayor of the City of Atlantic Beach Mayor Ellen Glasser Commissioner Of Atlantic Beach Commissioner Brittany Norris Seat 5 Mayor Pro Tem City of Atlantic Beach City Manager Shane Corbin AICP City of Atlantic Beach Planning Director, Amanda Askew, AICP Chief of Police, Chief Vic Gualillo City of Atlantic Beach City Engineer, Steve Swan PE Public Works Director, Scott Williams I NF OR M A T IVEM O T I V A TIVED R I V E N B Y P U R P O S EDIVERSE R E L I A B L EENTHUSIASTICORGANIZ E DAE Engineering, Inc. Heather Neville, AICP DDEC, LLC Uyen Dang, PE The City of Atlantic Beach would like to improve Main Street utilizing the Complete Streets Policy from W. 1st Street to Dutton Island Road. The purpose of the Complete Streets Implementation Study is to revisit community concerns and desires, leverage the policy objectives and review existing facilities. The Implementation Plan that follows identifies scalable short- and long- term projects that align with the City's vision to provide for safer, efficient, and affordable modes of transportation. This project is expected to revitalize the area, encourage economic development, and promote multi- modal connections. This will support the vision of Marsh Oaks residents, businesses, and other other stakeholders. Main Street Corridor Improvements E X H I B I T 1 : L O C A T I O N M A P A COMPLETE STREETS VISION Dutton Island Road W. 1st Street Main Street Levy Road Per the accepted definition by the US Department of Transportation, Complete Streets are streets designed and operated to enable safe use and support mobility for all users. Those include people of all ages and abilities, regardless of whether they are travelling as drivers, pedestrians, bicyclists, or public transportation riders. The concept of Complete Streets encompasses many approaches to planning, designing, and operating roadways and rights of way with all users in mind to make the transportation network safer and more efficient. Complete Street policies are set at the state, regional, and local levels and are frequently supported by roadway design guidelines. WHAT IS COMPLETE STREETS? Complete Streets approaches vary based on community context. They may address a wide range of elements, such as sidewalks, bicycle lanes, bus lanes, public transportation stops, crossing opportunities, median islands, accessible pedestrian signals, curb extensions, modified vehicle travel lanes, streetscape, and landscape treatments. Complete Streets reduce motor vehicle-related crashes and pedestrian risk, as well as bicyclist risk when well-designed bicycle-specific infrastructure is included (Reynolds, 2009). They can promote walking and bicycling by providing safer places to achieve physical activity through transportation. One study found that 43% of people reporting a place to walk were significantly more likely to meet current recommendations for regular physical activity than were those reporting no place to walk (Powell, Martin, Chowdhury, 2003). While Complete Streets is a framework to construct roads, it is also a path to placemaking inclusive of all community members. The City adopted the local Complete Streets Policy October 25, 2021. This policy can be located in the appendix of this document. MODE HEIARCHYImage 1: Example of Complete Street Cross Section COMPLETE STREETS POLICY: The local policy that was recently adopted is an excellent steppingstone towards addressing community needs and desires. The implementation plan will address the needs of a local municipality will support projects that staff and leadership can plan to fund and execute. Placemaking, road design and neighborhood character can have expected outcomes when policy including zoning, code and budget objectives are align. We provide near-term updates to enhance and further the intent of the policy. The proposed Implementation Plan for the Main Street Complete Streets project includes various components such as leadership workshops and preliminary recommendations. Considering the newly adopted Complete Streets policy, the Team was tasked to elevate community awareness through communication within the Main Street Corridor and adjacent neighborhood roads. This allowed better understanding on how the community interacts with the City of Atlantic Beach leadership as well as local vision and technical understanding of public roads. The implementation plan providing scalable solutions for near, mid and long term programs and projects to support the policy. An Informative Approach To address the scope set forth by the City of Atlantic Beach, the project Team chose to approach the project area of Main Street Complete Streets through education to achieve maximum results. With the very recent adoption of the Complete Streets Policy by City leadership, it is important to introduce the project through communication of community awareness in order to provide design concepts that reflected both the policy as well as the local communities desires as it related to their local neighborhood road. Concurrently, the Team conducted a detailed traffic analysis, crash analysis along with utilities coordination to further understand the complexity of short-term and long-term implementation. PROJECT APPROACH: The following process resulted in initial concepts based on observations made through meetings, survey results, and in-person discussions regarding the goal of Main Street Improvements and desired outcomes. To approach this, a fundamental education campaign was utilized including visual components to help illustrate complex technical geometry and design components of safer roads by design. A TRAFFIC CALMING APPROACH WHAT IS TRAFFIC CALMING? 1. Reduce crashes 2. Enhance quality of life for residents and visitors 3. Enhance safety The Main Street Corridor serves as a primary north south collector road of the Marsh Oaks Neighborhood. Through data collection from COAB Police Department– 2/11/202 to 2/20/2020 and 1/24/2021 to 1/31/2021, the team found that most traffic volumes are cut through traffic to avoid heavy congestion on Mayport Road intersections and direct access to the Levy Road and Dutton Island signalized intersections. Traffic calming is a low impact solution to achieve complete streets within the local roadway network. As a strategy it can reduce the negative effect of drivers utilizing the roadway network. It is effective in many communities where traditional road design or land development uses of an area has resulted in unintended consequence of cut through traffic and speeding. Traffic calming can alter driver behavior for any street network. The goals of traffic calming are: To reduce cut through traffic, a series of traffic calming strategies are considered for Main Street. A balance of intersection treatment such as the existing mini roundabout are proposed to maintain residential access while reducing cut through traffic on Main Street from 2nd Avenue to Levy Road. This is where most of the residential access is being impacted. North of Levy Road are commercial use with no recommendations for traffic calming. For Traffic Calming Design Considerations: Target speed is 20MPH Most effective use for traffic calming devices is between 300’ to 500’. Devices should not be less than 150’ from intersection or bridge approach Through a series of internal and external engagement and coordination, the following traffic calming devices are preferred for the City of Atlantic Beach. Divided Median - create a pinch point for traffic in the center of the roadway. Narrow Road - restrict motorists from operating at high speeds and yield to pass this device. Mini Roundabout - reduce traffic speeds at intersections by requiring motorists to move with caution through conflict points. PROJECT APPROACH FDOT Florida Design Manual (FDM) Manual for Uniform Traffic Control Design (MUTCD) FHWA Small Town and Rural Multimodal Networks NACTO Urban Streets Design Guide NACTO Urban Bikeway Design Guide Quantitative data was collected through several avenues. The City of Atlantic Beach provided traffic counts, right of way maps, As-builts, and other useful technical data that is provided in the appendix of this report. The Team utilized Signal 4 Analytics to gather traffic data including crashes. The Team also performed site visits to observe the existing environment and cross section. This information was utilized to begin the process of developing conceptual designs for informational purposes to guide conversation with staff internally to prepare for public meetings. Referenced Manuals: SITE VISIT: The project Team performed many site visits such as drive throughs and on in person foot visits. The Team conducted a community walk with City planning staff to observe existing traffic patterns, adjacent land-use, modal usage, connectivity, access and other transportation elements that may be affected by change. Site visits were conducted in the evening as well as daytime. More detailed information is referenced in the exhibit section under memo/site visit memo/Main St. City walk. CORRIDOR CHARACTERISTICS: MAIN STREET L oc a t i on : Existing conditions are no sidewalks along the corridor lacking ADA accessibility from West 1st Street to Levy Road. North of Levy Road has a continuous sidewalk on the East side of Main Street. No dedicated bicycle facilities within the City’s bicycle network or signing/pavement markings to designate a bicycle route. Now parking utilization with 3 parked vehicles during daytime (12/1/2021) and 1 vehicle nighttime (6p.m. 11/30/2021). The neighborhood is lined with trees with low light visibility. Some traffic calming devices are present but the spacing is not consistent with best practices for target speed design. CHARACTERISTICS: EXISTING CONDTIONS: 25 CURRENT POSTED SPEED IS 25 MPH MPH THE EXISTING LANE CONFIGURATION HAS 2 LANES WITH SOME ON STREET PARKING LANES 2 IT CURRENTLY TAKES AN AVERAGE OF 5 MINUTES TO BIKE THE TOTAL LENGHTH OF THE STREET 5 MINUTES Main Street is classified as a local road classified in the City of Atlantic Beach roadway network. Sidewalks are nonexistent along the corridor, but curb and gutter are generally present, and lighting and utility poles are located along the west side of the roadway. There are no traffic signals along this corridor with primary intersections like Levy Road that provide access East/West of the Marsh Oaks Neighborhood District The current right of way (ROW) for the corridor is 50’ from West 1st Street to Levy Road and 60’ from Levy Road to Dutton Island Road. Two travel lanes are present, and on-street parking is generally not restricted. Table 1 summarizes the corridor characteristics. Main Street is identified on the City’s Bicycle Connectivity Plan as a neighborhood network connecting adjacent neighborhoods to the Dutton Island Preserve Trail network and East through Levy Road. Main Street's Function Classification is currently a Local Collector Road. TABLE 1. THE CURRENT LENGTH IS 1 MILE LONG 1 MILE IT CURRENTLY TAKES AN AVERAGE OF 20 MINUTES TO WALK THE TOTAL LENGHTH OF THE STREET 20 MINUTES EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY CRASH ANALYSIS EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES Existing traffic volume is relatively low with an ADT of 548 for 2021 and 2258 for 2020. Posted speed along the corridor is 25MPH. ~ 85% > 3% < 80% CRASH DATA Many crashes are in the afternoon during Monday through Friday Many crashes are on the State Highway system such as A1A and Mayport Rd. A community-based analysis was conducted within Marsh Oaks Neighborhood with three- year crash data obtained from University of Florida’s Signal Four Analytics, including both long-form and short-form crashes between November 5th, 2019, and November 11th, 2021. A total of 5 crashes were recorded on Main Street over the three-year period. No prevailing crash patterns were identified, and neither bicycle nor pedestrian related crashes were recorded. Most recorded crashes were property damage only crashes, and most crashes occurred during daylight conditions. Most of the crashes involved a parked vehicle. MAIN STREET L oc at io n : Almost 85% of crashes results in non-injury Less than 3% involved in alcohol More than 80% crashes occur during the daytime A three-year citywide crash analysis was reviewed for the City of Atlantic Beach. A total of 797 crashes were reported from 1/1/2019 to 12/26/2021. All data was acquired through University of Florida’s Signal Four Analytics. CRASH SUMMARY: CONNECTIVTY NETWORK: Bicycle connectivity is planned in the vicinity of the corridor, connecting Main Street, the Marsh Oaks Neighborhood, and the surrounding neighborhood. Main Street is designated as a bicycle route within the City’s Bicycle Connectivity Plan. Main Street connects to other planned bicycle corridors such as Levy Road and Dutton Island Road to the Mayport Commercial District. It also connects residents to the Dutton Island Preserve and the extensive trail network as a local amenity to the City of Atlantic Beach. A Bike Boulevard or a Neighborhood Bikeway is a low stress local streets network where vehicle traffic and speed are designed to be kept at low volumes to make it safer for pedestrians and bicyclists. Many communities have called it quiet streets, slow streets, or neighborhood bikeways. A Bike Boulevard design is a complete streets strategy to enhance safety on Main Street. WHAT IS A BIKE BOULEVARD OR A NEIGHBORHOOD BIKEWAY? Main Street is designated as a cycle route for low traffic volume, a bike boulevard, or a neighborhood bikeway. Slow Streets – safe mobility for all Prioritize pedestrian and bicyclist safety Lower vehicular speed design Adding shared lane pavement markings (“Sharrows”) to alert drivers to expect bicyclist in the streets and help people along the bicycle route Improving crossing on major streets Adding wayfinding signage to guide people to local and regional destinations Discourage cut throughs through means of traffic calming There are many ways to enhance the existing neighborhood bikeway on local streets through the following: 1. 2. 3. 4. Source: Rural Design Guide – Bike Boulevard Face-to-face meetings with internal stakeholders, One-on-one meetings with local elected officials, Site visits on our own as well as with city staff on two occasions, Online and printed survey, Social media posts, and two public meetings. This process is useful for when there is a new program or procedure locally that requires additional information for stakeholders to make decisions upon. This process was a success to get locals engaged and thinking about potential projects instead of deciding on a project that may or may not be supported locally either by residents, other stakeholders, or have an easily available solution considering the existing right of way and infrastructure. This allowed the task to remain focused on the corridor as well as the purpose of this scope which included near-, short- and long-term concepts to address local concerns. Complete Streets is intended to provide a toolbox of scalable solutions to address needs now and in the future. This comprehension by locals was deemed as valuable a task to the project as the concepts themselves. To better understand the qualitative aspects of the project area, the Team utilized several methodology, includes: City staff provided a stakeholder list inclusive of email addresses. The Team gathered stakeholder information from elected officials and survey response data. We coordinated with stakeholder via emails in three separate occasions to inform residents of upcoming surveys as well as public meetings. The Team utilized the City's mailing list to inform residents of the project. This information was then reviewed by staff to arrive at various values identified by residents and officials to drive which concepts would be provided to the community for this report. PROJECT COORDINATION: QUALITATIVE:INTERNAL STAKEHOLDERS MEETING PUBLIC MEETING: Two public meetings were held on December 16th at 1:30 and 5:00 pm for approximately 1.5 hours. A PowerPoint presentation which is provided in the appendix of this document was presented by team members Heather Neville from AE and Uyen Dang from DDEC. An interactive component included a type of puzzle where attendees were able to select puzzle pieces reflective of what they would like to see in the cross-section but only allow them to select enough options that would fit within the available right of way. The presentation focused on providing education about Complete Streets, community Placemaking, and how we utilize quantitative data with qualitative data to arrive at an outcome that satisfies the most needs. The public meeting was showcased on the cover of the local newspaper (see appendix), which supported additional attendees to the meeting. MAIN STREET PROJECT BOARDRESIDENTIAL ENGAGEMENT PUBLIC MEETING: Through preliminary survey results, more than 90% of the community was not aware of the City of Atlantic Beach Complete Streets Policy. Residents were expected to see final design and constructability concepts. The common theme and feedback received during the meeting was speeding and access. Many suggestions from local residents who attended the meeting was project specific to Main Street and show displeasure for a prior concept been initiated in past years. Specific concern relates to sidewalks, the mini roundabout, and other small improvements that have been executed by local staff were discussed. The most important key takeaway from the public meetings was the lack of awareness by the community and the need to educate the community more on public processes to arrive at a project. Also, there are varying opinions based on individuals’ relationship to the project itself and how it will impact their daily lives. This is expected however for any project to move forward there needs to be an understanding of trade-offs. The puzzle exercise utilized during the public meeting showcased this well and opened attendees’ eyes to how important it is to seek input but also to be willing to accept trade-offs. The project Team developed a Complete Streets Puzzle as educational for the adopted Complete Streets Policy. The Team presented attendees with a Complete Streets postcard for share the knowledge with loved ones during the holiday season. 31.9% 44% 100% 73% SURVEY RESULTS: 31.87% were residents of Main Street 43.96% were residents of Marsh Oaks 100% of responses support 20mph design speed objectives set forth by staff and supported by the Complete Streets Policy. Out of the 91 responses collected: An eye opening, 73% of respondents were unaware of the updated policy change indicating the need for more communication and education. 91 responses were collected. 31.87% were residents of Main Street, 43.96% were residents of Marsh Oaks, 100% were residents of Atlantic Beach and six owned a business in the neighborhood. Comments centered on a desire for safe roads with dedicated space for all modes. When posed with a trade-off question, responses were evenly distributed across the four options below: This indicates there is not a current agreement on which project to move forward with beyond improvement to connectivity for all modes. This does support a lower community impact project in the near-term while a larger construction project and its aspects need to be further understood and weighted against trade-offs to attain community support. 100% of responses support 20mph design speed objectives set forth by staff and supported by the Complete Streets Policy. 73% of respondents were unaware of the updated policy change indicating the need for more communication and education. The team utilized the SurveyMonkey tool to gather basic information and a basic understanding of local understanding of the Complete Streets policy and temperature on various trade-offs and types of construction opportunities available. By design, the survey was meant to be simple and easy to use and assist in the planning process in information gathering fees that this project is currently in. Parking Trees Easement on property for sidewalk Slower Streets 1. 2. 3. 4. RECOMMENDATIONS: The following recommendations are based on the qualitative and quantitative data collected throughout the project. They are broken down into short-, mid-, and, long- term solutions. There are quick and cost-effective options that can start to address residential concern of the Main Street Corridor and Marsh Oaks neighborhood. Some technical constraints includes existing right away, underground utilities infrastructure and existing drainage pattern. Other factors include lack of consensus on certain features such as a sidewalk. The Team have provided conceptual designs to illustrate the recommendations as it relates to future construction projects as well as programming the existing right of way as a methodology to address near- and short- term solutions. SHORT-TERM RECOMMENDATIONS: Short-term recommendations can be executed in a relatively short period of time with minimal planning and funding. Short-term concepts have the ability to secure future capital investments to ensure community vision of the Main Street corridor. The recommendations are community best practices and consistent with the Complete Streets policy. Developing additional components to the existing Complete Streets Policy is a way to support long-term capital improvements for the City. Throughout the process of this project, the Team coordinated with staff various to address other concerns and roads within the community. Some recommendations are not limited to only Main Street but can be translated to other roads within the Marsh Oaks Neighborhood. Much of the near and short-term recommendations is communication and education. They key messaging to leadership and the public about the Complete Street policy, what it means to have a Complete Street, and how to get the most out of your capital improvements to achieve the goals of the policy. To do this, the Team recommend the City take a multi-pronged approach so that there is consistency and continuum of design going forward that is supported by the community. More education and more communication about this will help also and longer-term projects as the community becomes more aware of public process and how projects come about. The City should consider adding second layer to the Complete Streets policy such as Vision Zero with additional initiatives that support the program. Vision Zero, reviewing existing code to ensure road design and inclusive features, as well as reviewing zoning to ensure it provides the most support to meet Complete Streets policy objectives. Parking minimums and maximums, utilization of curbs, design speed and signage, would all support how the policy is able to be utilized without conflicting with other guiding documents. This also makes the permitting process more straight forward for the general public with expected outcomes. Policy updates: SHORT-TERM RECOMMENDATIONS CON'T: Developing a City of Atlantic Beach Complete Streets website will allow localize resources for residents to have better understand of the City's new policy along with upcoming complete streets projects. Having a focused site for a complex new policy with such broad uses for so many different types of roads and Placemaking will support a more informed community. This will also help with future zoning and land development, diverse and new concepts and support long-term projects. Complete Streets Website: Communication is centralize to the success of Complete Streets implementation. The Team recommends the City engage in a public education campaign maximizing the website, social media and public meeting spaces to workshop the community. This will help begin with the fundamentals and move towards developing project concepts and designs that are more inclusive of available updated cross sections and what the community currently is aware of. This will expand the options staff has to use to solve community requests readily available, reducing costs over time. Public Education : Bicycle Education Campaign Sharrows : Implementing the City Connectivity Plan through the usage of sharrows on low speed roads. Sharrows is a shared-lane marking indicating where cyclists can ride. Cars have to give cyclists 3 feet of space when passing. Under Florida Law, bicycles have the same rights and responsibilities as a motor vehicle. SHORT-TERM RECOMMENDATIONS CON'T: City slow roll bicycle parade to highlight the City of St. Augustine new bicycle ordinance. Street Play, Cyclovia and other open street event play days are a concept currently used across many cities and counties in the State of Florida. The basis of the project teaches road users how to operate within the road while vehicles are moving about. Frequently, public comments regarding road safety and speed of vehicles address how the road makes them feel. This is not to disregard public comment about those issues because we know all too well that they do exist, however motor vehicles current iteration provides for a quiet comfort use while inside a vehicle. This has impacted road users, especially those outside of a vehicle, senses to perceive information. Street Play also typically helps with local initiatives where offenders are typically each other’s neighbors. This works well in many residential roads as well as main streets to educate the community all at one time and a fun and inviting way. The cost varies depending on how the municipality or other agency wants to execute this project. It can be as simple as an in street block party or as robust where we seen 5K is parades etc. SHORT-TERM RECOMMENDATIONS CON'T : Lighting: Coordinate with JEA through the existing City franchise agreement to add new luminaries to existing utility poles. There are currently 19 poles on the West side and 18 on the east side. With many poles at the intersections, this will allow added illumination and enhance safety for all users. Pavement Markings: Update and enhance all stop bars to meet minimum standards of 24” white per FDOT Design standards. Signage: Coordinate with Public Works to check reflectivity on all regulatory signs such as “Stop” signs. Measure the retroreflectivity in accordance with ASTM D4956. The goal for short- and mid- term improvement is to improve safety utilizing the latest standards and specifications to enhance the existing conditions. Short and Mid-Term Safety improvements for Main Street are the following: ADA Accessibility : The existing ADA accessibility is limited within the right of way. Utilize existing pavement width and implement complete streets within FHWA, MUTCD and FDM guidance to enhance pedestrian access and as interim solution while capital improvement projects may take many years to implement. With short-term and long-term vision, the recommended design and target speed is 20MPH. Due to the existing crash frequency and the crash type on Main Street, the recommendation is to remove existing parking to allow space for pedestrian and bicyclist access. Existing Mini Roundabout: The existing roundabout does not meet minimal signing and pavement markings. Utilize MUTCD for additional pavement markings and advance warning for traffic calming at the intersection. 4th Quarter A pedestrian lane is a short-term improvement on low and moderate speeds and volumes to designate space on the roadway for pedestrian usage. The implement this design, provide signing and pavement markings for a Pedestrian Lane as recommended from Chapter 5 of FHWA Small Town and Rural Multimodal Networks to be consistent with the City’s Complete Streets policy and the City’s bicycle network. The pedestrian lane limits are proposed on Main Street from West 1st Street to Levy Road. There is an existing sidewalk on the East side of Main Street north of Levy Road. Implementing “sharrows” north of Levy Road will alert drivers to acknowledge that there are bicyclists utilizing the right of way. 4th Quarter Option 1: Pedestrian Lane SHORT- TERM IMPROVEMENTS CON'T: *The complexity of the pedestrian lane is the offset of the centerline of the roadway and the existing roundabout at Main Street and 9th which will require a redesign of the intersection with minor drainage and utilities relocation. **Eliminate all parking along the corridor due to low parking utilization and most crashes are parked vehicles. C ate g ory Re c ommen d ation s Referen c e Design Speed Lane Width Sharrows 20MPH 9’ Shared Lane Marking should be placed immediately after an intersection and spaced at intervals not greater than 250 feet thereafter. *Pedestrian Lane **Parking 6’ with 2’ buffer on X side No on street parking FDOT Design Manual Section 233.3 Shared Lanes Markings 2009 MUTCD - Chapter 9C Shared Lane Markings. FDOT FDM Chapter 19 - Traditional Neighborhood Chapter 5 of FHWA Small Town and Rural Multimodal Networks FDOT FDM Chapter 19 - Traditional Neighborhood 4th Quarter An advisory shoulder is used to accommodate pedestrian and bicyclists on roadway segments that is too narrow. The “motorists may only enter the shoulder when there are no bicyclists” or pedestrian present. Typical application with low to moderate traffic volume. Volume criteria based on FHWA MUTCD guidance with vehicle traffic lower than 3000ADT. 4th Quarter Option 2: Advisory Shoulder **Eliminate all parking along the corridor due to low parking utilization and the majority of crashes are parked vehicles. SHORT-TERM IMPROVEMENTS CON'T: Categ o ry Re c o m men d ati o ns Ref e re n c e Design Speed Lane Width Sharrows 20MPH 16’ Shared Shared Lane Marking should be placed immediately after an intersection and spaced at intervals not greater than 250 feet thereafter. Advisory Shoulder **Parking 5’ each direction No on street parking FDOT Design Manual Section 233.3 Shared Lanes Markings 2009 MUTCD - Chapter 9C Shared Lane Markings. FDOT FDM Chapter 19 - Traditional Neighborhood Chapter 5 of FHWA Small Town and Rural Multimodal Networks FDOT FDM Chapter 19 - Traditional Neighborhood Intersection Treatment Mountable Roundabouts PLACEMAKING AND COMPLETE STREETS: Placemaking and Complete Streets are synonymous now as the movement towards safer mobility for all has evolved. The Marsh Oaks neighborhood is filled with natural beauty and plenty of public destinations for residents and visitors alike to enjoy. Creating equal access to all road users and residents can not be under estimated as a significant way to improve the quality of life and access by harnessing the public right of way. Equally, this will provide residents within the neighborhood access to other locations around Atlantic Beach including the ocean and commercial destinations. Leveraging Complete Streets, the City could consider public art installation, respite focused parklets including benches and added trees, as well as potential for a district approach capitalizing on the beautifully named floral streets. While working on this project, the Team began referring to Marsh Oaks as the Garden District. Concepts like these can drive long term objectives, create a sense of pride in a neighborhood and establish potential themes around which design decisions can be made. PAINTED ROUNDABOUTENHANCING BEAUTY IN THE COMMUNITY Long-term recommendations can encompass a lot more of the elements that the community desires however as a name suggest, they are longer term due to their costs and construction requirements. A complete redesign of Main Street to include additional features would also require utility as well as tree removal or relocation. These projects typically are within the capital improvement program year five and require additional design and engineering and potentially other added needs such as real estate easements. Long-term improvements for Main Street shall consist of revisiting all underground improvements and subsurface infrastructures as a major reconstruction project. The existing as-builts utilities provided by the City Engineering Staff are dated 1990 with Sanitary Sewer running along the centerline of the roadway. This placement of utilities may affect median planting that will not meet the City’s minimum utilities separation. The existing 8” watermain is on the West side of Main Street may need to be relocated for proposed sidewalk placement. MID - TO LONG-TERM RECOMMENDATIONS: Mid-term recommendations include more robust design, striping and other construction type projects that would not require extensive rearranging of the right of way or underground utilities. These recommendations were reviewed by the team as a reflection of what the community has said that they would like to see for the Main St. Corridor. With an emphasis on safety, speed management by design, the utilization of a 20-mph design speed accompanied by other vertical concepts including lighting and signage, these concepts can be done in relatively short amount of time depending on local budget and desire to complete these projects. MID-TERM RECOMMENDATIONS: LONG-TERM RECOMMENDATIONS: Option 1: Slow Street 4th QuarterSharrows Shared Lane Marking should be placed immediately after an intersection and spaced at intervals not greater than 250 feet thereafter. FDOT Design Manual Section 233.3 Shared Lanes Markings 2009 MUTCD - Chapter 9C Shared Lane Markings. 4th Quarter C ate gory Re comme nd atio n s Re f er en ce Design Speed Lane Width 20MPH 10' each FDOT FDM Chapter 19 - Traditional Neighborhood FDOT FDM Chapter 19 - Traditional Neighborhood Sidewalk Parking 5’ Street parking on the Intersection Treatment -Mountable Roundabouts -Tabled Intersection FDOT FDM Chapter 19 - Traditional Neighborhood Driveway Counts LONG-TERM IMPROVEMENTS: A slow street design will include a series of lateral shift/chicane for on street parking and new intersection improvements. Utilizing striping as a traffic calming technique is less disruptive to emergency service vehicles without no vertical or horizontal elements within the roadway surface. This concept will accommodate residential parking demand and allow adequate access for emergency service vehicles. Alternating dedicated parking space through each blocks will give the visual effect of a lateral shift or chicane within the corridor and is universally recognized as a traffic calming strategy. Traffic calming striping gives the visual impression that roadway width has been reduced, which has been shown to slow vehicles down while traveling along a roadway. This type of striping will not slow down emergency service vehicles utilizing the roadway or adversely affect traffic operations. Consistent with the advisory shoulder presented in a short-term option #2, the Advisory Bike Lane (ABL) will maintain the existing curb line without major reconstruction or a change in drainage pattern. This alternative will provide traditional sidewalk on both sides of the street to maintain Complete Streets. Option 2: Advisory Bike Lane A shared use path or wide sidewalk on one side is not recommended for Main Street due to the existing residential driveways and building setbacks. Creating a 10’ path will place adjacent property owners in noncompliant of residential parking and vehicle overhang of the existing right of way. Advisory Bike Lane is a shared space for bicyclists and motorists within narrow streets. Unlike a shared street, Advisory Bike Lanes accommodate two-way car traffic while dedicating safe space for bicyclists. Main Street is a low traffic volume (≤ 5,000 ADT) network with vehicular speed of less than 30MPH. These installations fall in line with the contextual guidance provided for the Advisory Shoulder treatment featured in the FHWA Small Town and Rural Multimodal Networks document. Advisory Bike Lane shall be installed from West 1st Street to Levy Road, North of Levy should be a traditional 5’ bike lane due to the the 60’ right of way will allow for a higher level of service. What is an Advisory Bike Lane? TYPES OF LONG-TERM IMPROVEMENTS: 4th Quarter 4th Quarter Categor y R e c o mmendations R e fer e nce Design Speed Lane Width Sharrows 20MPH 16’ Shared Shared Lane Marking should be placed immediately after an intersection and spaced at intervals not greater than 250 feet thereafter. Advisory Bike Lane Sidewalk 5’ each direction 6' FDOT Design Manual Section 233.3 Shared Lanes Markings 2009 MUTCD - Chapter 9C Shared Lane Markings. FDOT FDM Chapter 19 - Traditional Neighborhood Chapter 5 of FHWA Small Town and Rural Multimodal Networks FDOT FDM Chapter 19 - Traditional Neighborhood Intersection Treatment -Mountable Roundabouts -Tabled Intersection FDOT FDM Chapter 19 - Traditional Neighborhood ENGINEERS ESTIMATE 4th Quarter Short-Term Option 1 Short- Term Option 2 Internal Short-Term Option 2 External Long-Term Planning $53,020 $53,020 $53,020 $200,000 Design $63,870 $42,580 $42,580 $600,00 Construction $258,120 $43,020 $172,080 $3,817,480 Construction 20% Contingency $51,624 $8,604 $34,416 $190,874 CEI $0 $0 $0 $190,874 Total $426,634 $147,224 $302,096 $5,571,850 A detailed engineers estimate is provided in the appendix. *Long-term engineering estimate subject to change due to market conditions shovel ready projects i.e. having complete designs ready to go, projects that are fully supported by the community via public meeting and votes, potential concurrency projects across different groups including Parks and Recreation, Florida Inland Navigation, or others who might have a vested interest in creating better access to the river. Funding strategies directly correlate to which policies, procedures, and projects City leadership and residents desire. Funding mechanisms include the local general fund, potentially bonding for larger projects, as well as seeking grant funds from state and federal resources. Potential funds through the state include the FDOT LAP program, TAP program and Safe Routes to School. In order to attain those find these projects must be listed with the North Florida Transportation and Planning Organization(NFTPO) is a priority of Atlantic Beach and Duval county. This process is straightforward and requires a scope and fee estimate for the project to be submitted to the NFTPO board via the City's representative to the Technical Committee. There can be multiple projects listed with the TPO since there are various funding sources available as the TPO funnels all state funds to projects that are not direct grant receivership to the city. The Federal Administration has also released extensive funds available post Covid- era in order to stimulate various parts of our local economies, making it a good time to seek out those types of funds. Projects must be outlined with a scope to reflect the required bullet points within those guidelines depending on the fund source. Money currently can be used for every stage of projects including planning, design, construction, and purchase of property. The process is very straightforward however in order to receive funds there will be some steps in the City must execute depending on the funding strategy. These include things such as: There’s also an element of sustainability and resiliency as it relates to a full reconstruction project and those superlatives help attain more funding for local communities to stretch local dollars. Depending on the project or projects the City selects the Team will draft scope language and general fee estimates to support the next steps. FUNDING STRATEGIES : City Commission to adopt the Main Street Implementation Plan City Staff to develop a Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for short-term and long-term options City Staff to coordinate with the North Florida Transportation Planning Organization for projects to be on the Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP). This will allow project to receive future funds. City to allocate funding for planning and design of short-term option Develop constructability plan and with City Public Works Department Implementation of short-term recommendations Next steps include the city and residents deciding on a path. The Main Street Corridor is a very beautiful local neighborhood road with low traffic, amazing trees, several neighborhood amenities, and is in good condition on the surface. Enhancements to the road will only further enhance the March Oaks community as a destination as well as great place to live. The City should consider a more robust education and communication program to let residents know about the policy and how it can support their livability on their own roads as well as how it can help direct other areas including the commercial district. NEXT STEPS: A P P E N D I X JANUARY 2022 The scope of services for this contract includes providing Planning and Engineering staff to assist the City of Atlantic Beach on the following tasks Overview Project Deliverables Review existing conditions of existing planning documents Traffic analysis Comprehensive plan Bicycle network Parking policy and other functionality of the corridor. Provide alternative corridor analysis for complete streets Intersection improvements and connectivity nodes including public engagement and workshops. Provide preliminary planning document Task 2: Task 3: Existing conditions memo Initial design alternatives and workshop presentation materials Planning document, typical sections and rendering Prepare project website and communication strategy to engage stakeholders in Complete Streets Workshop findings Task 1: SCOPE: AE ENGINEERING INC. : DDEC: AE Engineering, Inc. (AE) has proudly based our headquarters in the City of Jacksonville since 2006. Our history in the area as a CEI firm means we have engineers on staff who know first hand how to manage design and cost aspects which help in the planning and design phases. AE has 16 Professional Engineers, 1 Professional Planner and now employs over 130 qualified professionals. AE is also a certified DBE and minority owned business. AE is proud of our new Planning Department with a 10-year history in Northeast Florida focused on Strategic Planning. AE acquired VRUM Planning (VRUM) in 2020, formerly owned and founded by Director and Senior Transportation Planner, Heather Neville, AICP. VRUM’s experience as a Transportation Planner, existing clients and regulatory relationships match AE’s expected quality and desire to create better places for people. VRUM’s support services include municipal and county level Transportation Planning and Traffic Review for bicycle, pedestrian, mobility, access, transit hub, safety, signage, sub area planning includes calculations, design and plan review as well as project management. Working with leadership on complex community concerns and defining a work plan, Heather assists in reaching successful outcomes that require policy maker approval, community support or projects defined objectives. This included working closely with the Transportation Planning Department, Parks & Recreation, GIS Systems and others. Results identified creative long-range concepts as well as practical and implementable measures including strategic funding, grant application and grant administration. DDEC is a boutique transportation engineering firm based in West Palm Beach, FL that is dedicated to reinventing the way the world moves through innovative planning, placemaking and engineering. DDEC is specialized in safety and mobility projects with special emphasis on community engagement and communications. DDEC’s professional engineers are experienced in federally funded grant projects that can handle a project from conception to implementation. Founded with the core values of safe and sustainable infrastructures, DDEC is dedicated to creating change within the built environment. DDEC is also minority and women owned. AB Main Street CS Task memo AE Engineering Inc. To: Amanda Askew, AICP Atlantic Beach, From: Heather Neville, AICP AE Engineering and Uyen Dang, PE DDEC CC: Shane Corbin, AICP City Manager Date: 12/15/2021 Re: Main Street Complete Street Task Public Engagement Outline AE and DDEC provide the following outline to promote the Public Engagement portion of the Main Street Complete Street Public Meeting. Meeting Info: • Date: 12/16/2021, Thursday • Time: 1:00PM – 2:30PM and 5:00 – 6:30PM • Location: Atlantic Beach City Commission Chamber • Materials: o Door to door flyer, 5.5”x8” o Flyer PNG Format o Survey including QR Code and Electronic Sharable Link Launch locations and dates: • Stakeholder email list 12/9 and 12/14 • Nextdoor Post 12/9 and 12/15 • City Facebook Post 12/9 and 12/15 • Door to door on Main Street 12/10 Email and Nextdoor Content: • Art: Flyer The City of Atlantic Beach has engaged one of our continuing service firms, AE Engineering Inc. and Traffic Specialist DDEC to support the City’s newly adopted Complete Streets Policy objectives. The first project will focus on Main Street and the Marsh Oaks neighborhood and businesses. Residents, businesses and others are invited to join the public outreach sessions. • What: Stakeholder Open House When: 12/16/2021 Where: Atlantic Beach Commission Chambers • Times: 1:00PM - 2:30PM and 5:00PM - 6:30PM • A Visioning Session for Main Street & Area From W 1st Street to Dutton Island Road • Focus - Traffic calming, place making 2 The program will be in an open house format with a 20-minute presentation at the beginning of each session. Our consultant team has also prepared a survey to gauge community understanding and interest in the policy. Please consider attending, participating in the survey or sending an email with thoughts. Survey link: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/ABMainStreetCS Next steps will include making near, short- and long-term recommendations for the Main Street and Marsh Oaks Neighborhood that will support the Policy and support community needs. Thank you and we look forward to continuing to serve our community. Social Media Narrative: Art: Use Flyer We value your input! Help support AB Complete Streets! Focus Area Main Street, Marsh Oaks December 26th. Take the Survey https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/ABMainStreetCS Flyer: Staff Contact: Amanda Askew, Director of Planning and Community Development P: (904) 247 5841 E: aaskew@coab.us Consultant Contact: Heather Neville, AICP AE Engineering Inc. P: (904) 509 6895 E:hneville@aeengineeringinc.com F OC U S ARE A : M A I N STRE E T What: Stakeholder Open House When: 2/15/2021 Where: The Urban Farm Times: 2:00PM - 3:30PM and 6:00PM - 7:30PM A Visioning Session for Main Street & Area From W 1st Street to Dutton Island Road Focus - Traffic calming, place making C I T Y O F A T L A N T I C B E A C H C O M P L E T E S T R E E T P R O G R A M Take the survey! Stay up to date. Follow the QR Code or Visit ww w.COAB.co m/CompleteS treet SAN PABLO ELEMENTARY SIIJdents learn about sea IIJrtle&I Page 2 CLEANUP seaches Go Green cleans up Beaches Town Center I Page 2 THE BEACHES LEADER Vol. 59 • No. 26 Serving the communities ot At11ntlc Beach , Jacksonvlllt e,,,ch, Neptune Beach, Mayport and Ponti Vodrl BelCh since 1963 Sl (From left) Maria Mark, Beaches Watch president; Dr. Randy Hayes, ~EAM volunteer; L~ri Richards , BEAM executive Director; and Mary Ellen Waugh, BEA~ d1re~or ot fo~ servrces, are shown during the presentation of the 2021 Beaches Watch Give sac Do.nation to BEAM . Beaches Emergency Assistance Ministry (BEAM) received the award for helping local famllles recovering from the pandemic. --------------------------- Pete's Bar changes owner§hip -by LIZA MITCHELL -planet that yo, :0wd still pl,Y pool -=it',--;;t: ;;f.';: to '°'!'ment ?0 , CONTRJBUTO~ . for a quarter. That pool table LS here ~bat 50 ' he said. Its last ca.11 for an iconic Nep-for the entertainment of the guests-E tune Beach landmark. The bar and They're the ones spending money at package store holds the first liquor thebarastheyunderstand,•be said. license issued in Duvnl County to "They don't intend on changing the Pete Jensen following the repeal of bar. They still plan on carrying on prohibition. Since 1933, Pete's Bar tht> Thanksgiving tradition . The only has bttn operated at 117 First Street thing different when you walk in the 'ttingslow said the newo\\nersarecommitted to main- taining th~ bar's original format, what they do above and beyond that ls uptothematthecity'sdiscretion. "What they do in addition is on them . They are going to have to do that on their own/ he said regard- ing possible expansion opportuni• ties including a rooftop deck. by generations of the Jensen family. door is that Tom won't be there: On Tuesday, that chap~r closed Whittingslow said there's no tn1th as the bar officially changed own· to the rumors that have been swirl· ership. Co-owner Tom Whitting· ing on social media fo r the last six slow confirmed the sale Monday to months. He said he's heard every- a retail holdings group "v.ith ties to thi ng from the site is being cleartd the Beaches." According to Whit-to make way for condos, it was pur- tingslow, the new owners intend chased by out-of-state -and some- to honor the legacy and the tradi · times international -developers tions that are unique to Pete's B&r. that wan t to build an Applebee's or They've even made notes on ctrtain other resta urant franchise. elementsreferredtoas"Pete-isnu." While he wouldn 't comment on "'Ibey understand the traditions theldentityofthenewowners, Whit- nod wba l makes Pete's Bar Pete's tingslow confirmed they own inter- Bar, like 25-cent pool. You Cl.D 't est in multi ple projects throughout change that. There's no place on the Jacksonville Beach and Riverside. "I'd Jove to have had the money to do a rooftop deck. They'll have to propose that [to the city]. rm not going to speak for them. It,all has to go through a review board, but the fact that there's a rooftop deck will make no dilference to what's here now. What exists now hasn't changed much ove r the last several decades. With it's faded wood paneling, walls PETE'S, sec page 6 Adventure Landing rezoning request deferred until 2022 dentlal buildinpwhich are all below 35 feet , rneedn& the city's height, parking and stormwater require- ments . A rezoning request to ace.om• modate a high-density residential project proposed for the Adventure Landing site wns deferred Monday by the Jackso nville Beach Planning Commission. Agents fo r the de,rel· oper notified city staff that th ey in- tended to wait until after the first of the year to resubmit the applica tion . Developers are seeking a land use amendment to the 2030 Compre- hensive Plan for approximately 22 acres located at 1944 Beach Blvd. They are also attempting to re- zone the 53.8-acre site, which has existed u a theme park since the mid-199os, to Planned Unit Devel· opment. The commission voted 4-1 in favor ofthcdefennent, with David Dahl lo oppo,ldon. Commission Cbalnnao Greg Sutton encouraged both the applicant and city planning staff to be "conservative on the date that we chose in the future out of respect for everybody's time that was here to- night so we make sure we don't have a deferraJ inthe future." Plarui include 427 residendal units in \our multi-family buildings; a 177-umt and a 90-unit structure each with its own amenity court~ yard; a 78-unit building; and an 82-unit building \\ith the ground· floor leasing, club and fitness cen- ter on the ground floor and an out· door pool. The Adventure Landing theme park is scheduled to close this month. The site would WO Include a to· ta] of 854 spaces in a four-level 400-space parking garage and 4s,; surface parklnl spots. The parking garage ia situated behind the resi- To obt ai n~tbe density fneoessary for the sso mlllion ,partn\ent com- plex , the _c1 t)Emust amend the zoning designa11on for •pproximately five acres from . ation/Open Space land"" to lJl&h Denlity Resldeo!W wupmtou,ty nol puking . par Prtor,to 1996, it was Jesigblted u Hi&Ji Density and 1.011 Deollty \Residendal, and was cha nged to ' hcreailon/Opeo space to nccommodate the aeuonal parking for tlie ~tin LIDd- ing thrJlll' put. Approximat ely L9 acres 1H1old rimairi desi,nated as Recrtat10~ Space. ~o,-:apages New program is designed for safe transportation in AB Atlantic kJich officials ~re see::::t:~~:~ puttoirnplem~ta newp ... A..id 1be City sali d cohesive traJllPOrtation ChJ"' e. Co~isslon recently adopted the Complete Streets p r designed to facilitate tn11vel for drivers, ~e;s. =: bicyclists, shared mobility and mass traMt op-- ::a::nirest in the Complete Strttts policy. Consultants with AE Engineering Inc. an~ ~c Spe-- 'alist oDEC will assist city staff In establishing short· :nd long-term recommenda?oos for the ~ro~Kt area. outing a recent presentation to coIDl]llSSlon mem· t,ers Planning and Community Development Director -da Askew said the Impetus for the program grew from dlscUSSions during the Parks Master. Piao pro- cess. City officials hosted a town hall mtttin8 on the topic to help refine the concept. "It's a mnsportation and design approach that re-quires streets to be planned, desi~ed. opented and maintained to enable safe, converuent and com!of!· able travel and access for users of all ages and abill· ties regardless of their mode of tranSJ)Ortation," she aaid. -i'bere's multiple examples of complete st:red elements throughout the city and there's more that we can do: I ~polnted_ ... _ .. tbepa>e-~~~=-~-=-= transportation needs of the specific area. A multi•use path could be installed in a school zone to ensure stu· dents can navigate safely to and from school. ·Some of the things include bike Janes, shared paths, arrows, maybe there's some street furniture that we can add along the street,-she said. "You could even potentially look at speed limits or stop signs so there arc multiple things in the wheelhouse we could use to implement some of these things. -According to Askew, the city has already installed \\ider paths and bike lanes as part of its approach to complete streets. •1t is a priority that the commission identified in a LEED roadmap as part of the top 10 recommenda- tions,~ she said. ·11 helps incorporate recommenda· tions from the Connectivity Plan and it provides a framework for staff to review projects. "Whenever there is a new transportation project, whether it's a street repaving or a new street going in, staff would look at it and it would be looked at by mul- tiple departments; the Planning Department, Public Works, Police and Engineering,· she said. -We have criteria that we would use so ifs not subjective to re- view each project on a project-by-projKt basis. We would coordinate with other jurisdictions and agen- cies as needed.~ Askew said projects are to be prioritized by the level of need of a particular neighborhood and implement· ed to reflect the character of the surrounding environ- ment. Citiz.ens without any transportation projects planned for their neighborhood may apply for a multi- departmental review to determine eligibility. A mini· mum of 55 perttnt of the residents in a specific block would have to agree before staff would consider an ap- plication. City staff' also considers annually the avail· able budget, community benefit and other data when considering complete streets' projttts. ·u we look at this on a yearly basis, we could get an idea of where we are and where we need to go. We are going to look at the number of paths that we have cur· reotly and the amount of paths we're adding, the num· ber of curb ramps, the number of new treeS, signage, traffic conflicts between pedestrians and bicyclists, the number of children walking and biking to school and the vehicle miles tra,,eled,~ said Askew, adding that coofilct define areas with a high number of traffic ac• cidents or near accidents. Locations prone to •c1ose wls"aremoredifficultlotrack. "I kind of believe if you build ii, they will come. Maybe the.re's not [a path] the.re now and peopleo.ren't taking advantage of getting outside and biking and walking. But If you build a path or a bike lane, people will take advantage of it and it "ill be safer for them. Instead of getting in your car to go to the park, you might get on your bike or walk." SU1toc:~bl1nd INDEX 1111. Tholloochoo L-wlllbl dollvnd by moll P.O. Boz50129 Julkb.3:iuo One Yeor -$35 c.n924-:wMOJJ .. C op1-'-, alen_dar Poll 11taO , • ... ,. ...... 4 Classr~d 7 ~,u" Boat ... _ .: .... 3 6~~~l:"" rt ·:::;,. ::·:·:J CopplghtlOllb)isl••: ,Ilic, Ont1cc1ion l ~i . II ,BEACHE §a: :..EADE R Submit news and photos at 111111.1N11c11.-111d1r.cam ___ -/ ~\\\\Ull/4a/ II Jf/~ fhu,~~c.--~l t / c.i.;.,.CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH COMPLETE STREETS PROGRAM /I'/,,_ / MA1NSTREET PUBLIC MEETING SIGN IN .. ®: 0 What: Stakeholder Open House When: 12/16/2021 Where: Atlantic Beach Commission Chambers Times: 1:00PM -2:30PM and 5:00PM -6:30PM Name Email Address Resident/BusinessNisitor c Z4-I Dr .s . d<sdf k"DLY )Ce,} L:ade:~w)A(( ., ~,a ~IT"' \--a-..~M..~0 hl..Jl._~ ~-W,""5:3o/tW\,CU\-<-av,._ ~t ~c ~.--z-'(U-1 S ?Y ~al.\.ft-\i-. M$ ~-..i74---, ~d,,_~ /~ /7(.. s,- ~s.dir~ 7BI SI-. Keif)~mh \Jio\\~p\esy \ °i '5 ~·· lj :S{ Ho~~6W'1\if 1' ============== ••· ~f:fll/JIAlfJWl~IIH\\Y//4\\\ J::?:I\ \9 / -/ ~~?/ ~\\\\U////4// If Jtl'-1 ~l t CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH COMPLETE STREETS PROGRAM / fJ,-v / MAIN STREET PUBLIC MEETING SIGN IN ~ - C' What: Stakeholder Open House When: 12/16/2021 Where: Atlantic Beach Commission Chambers Times: 1:00PM -2:30PM and 5:00PM -6:30PM Name Email Address Resident/BusinessNisitor ~TE(\~ :S-a\..\""t :J'wS\E"~J' a ot;;";c.A;S 7-~ le~ 11oL s-v~ ~(NA-Ott, Rn-<-o e+t.:t 9F.ftl/J/AlfJIIJ~IIH\\V//4\" ):;;?;7'.. ¥ / ~?iiJi~ -/ ~\\\\U///h,(/ II Jtl'1 ~,t CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH COMPLETE STREETS PROGRAM / MAIN STREET PUBLIC MEETING SIGN IN .. 0 What: Stakeholder Open House When: 12/16/2021 Where: Atlantic Beach Commission Chambers Times: 1:00PM -2:30PM and 5:00PM -6:30PM Name Email Address Resident/BusinessNisitor 'i,M\i-'I"\¥.½\+ :L7 t' °f)O :\;,l/\\k-/)k\ !kf?~ \'\~ c:;-C!.H/tA'Qc.e. -:pa\ CAl'l.c\.\A s-;-ie->l°9c......rr i=; d K11rt..l,,.~a.rroc. lo (o 2 l'Y\M'f\ t-12.e..~ \Qb-=t: -{_ ™Yf\..-Y\ ~&Mi*'· c..r:::::: 1' ~F.f/1 I J/JlfJ Ill\\ \Y//4\\\_~ V / ~,:~;;,·~ AB M ain Street Survey - Complete Streets 1 / 7 25.25%25 74.75%74 Q1 Are you aware of the newly adopted Complete Street Policy? Answered: 99 Sk ipped: 0 TOTAL 99 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%1 00% Yes No ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Yes No AB M ain Street Survey - Complete Streets 2 / 7 Q2 If you could change one feature about Main Street what would it be? Answered: 83 Sk ipped: 16 AB M ain Street Survey - Complete Streets 3 / 7 Q3 What are you willing to give up to get it? Please rank. Answered: 85 Sk ipped: 14 44.00% 33 26.67% 20 21.33% 16 8.00% 6 75 3.07 6.67% 5 24.00% 18 20.00% 15 49.33% 37 75 1.88 20.78% 16 33.77% 26 28.57% 22 16.88% 13 77 2.58 34.15% 28 14.63% 12 25.61% 21 25.61% 21 82 2.57 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Parking Trees Easement on your propert... Sl ower str eets 1 2 3 4 TOTAL SCORE Parking Trees Easement on y our property for sidewalk Slower s treets AB M ain Street Survey - Complete Streets 4 / 7 31.31%31 68.69%68 Q4 Are you a resident on Main Street? Answered: 99 Sk ipped: 0 TOTAL 99 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%1 00% Yes No ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Yes No AB M ain Street Survey - Complete Streets 5 / 7 41.41%41 58.59%58 Q5 Are you a resident of Marsh Oaks? (The Neighborhood bounded by Mayport Road, The River, Dutton Island Road and W. 1st Street) Answered: 99 Sk ipped: 0 TOTAL 99 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%1 00% Yes No ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Yes No AB M ain Street Survey - Complete Streets 6 / 7 6.06%6 93.94%93 Q6 Do you own a business in Marsh Oaks? (The Neighborhood bounded by Mayport Road, The River, Dutton Island Road and W. 1st Street) Answered: 99 Sk ipped: 0 TOTAL 99 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%1 00% Yes No ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Yes No AB M ain Street Survey - Complete Streets 7 / 7 98.55%68 15.94%11 97.10%67 5.80%4 100.00%69 100.00%69 97.10%67 78.26%54 92.75%64 82.61%57 Q7 Please provide your contact information. Answered: 69 Sk ipped: 30 ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Name Company Address Address 2 City/Town St ate/Prov ince ZIP/Postal Code Country Email Address Phone Number Main Street Engineer's Estimate DATE:1/10/2022 20 PROJECT: Main Street Short Term Implementation 30 PROJECT NO.: N/A PREPARED BY: Uyen Dang CLIENT PROJECT MANAGER: Amanda Askew, AICP Item #Description Quantity Unit Bid Unit Price Bid Extension 4 FDOT PAY ITEM N/A: AUDIO-VISUAL PRE-CONSTRUCTION AND POST CONSTRUCTION RECORDS 1 LS $1,000.00 1,000.00$ 6 FDOT PAY ITEM 102-14: TRAFFIC CONTROL OFFICER 40 HR $100.00 4,000.00$ 7 FDOT PAY ITEM 102-60: WORK ZONE SIGNS, F & I 200 DY $1.00 200.00$ 19 FDOT PAY ITEM 102-74-1: CHANNELIZING DEVICE, TYPES I, II, DI, VP, DRUM, OR LCD, F & I 400 DY $8.00 3,200.00$ 23 FDOT PAY ITEM 102-74-9: TRAFFIC CONES, F & I 600 DY $8.00 4,800.00$ 29 FDOT PAY ITEM 102-76: ARROW BOARD / ADVANCE WARNING ARROW PANEL, F & I 40 DY $50.00 2,000.00$ 41 FDOT PAY ITEM N/A: FDOT CERTIFIED FLAG PERSON 40 DY $45.00 1,800.00$ 669 FDOT PAY ITEM 700-1-40: SINGLE POST SIGN, INSTALL 50 AA $300.00 15,000.00$ 670 FDOT PAY ITEM 700-1-50: SINGLE POST SIGN, RELOCATE 10 AA $500.00 5,000.00$ 671 FDOT PAY ITEM 700-1-60: SINGLE POST SIGN, REMOVE 50 AA $100.00 5,000.00$ 693 FDOT PAY ITEM 705-11-1: DELINEATOR, FLEXIBLE TUBULAR 210 EA $100.00 21,000.00$ 698 FDOT PAY ITEM 710-11-101, 710-11-201, OR 710-11-421: PAINTED PAVEMENT MARKINGS, STANDARD, WHITE, YELLOW, OR BLUE, SOLID, 6 IN 2200 LF $2.50 5,500.00$ 700 FDOT PAY ITEM 710-11-123 OR 710-11-223: PAINTED PAVEMENT MARKINGS, STANDARD, WHITE OR YELLOW, SOLID FOR CROSSWALK AND OUNDABOUT, 12 IN 2640 LF $3.00 7,920.00$ 702 FDOT PAY ITEM 710-11-125 OR 710-11-225: PAINTED PAVEMENT MARKINGS, STANDARD, WHITE OR YELLOW, SOLID FOR STOP LINE OR CROSSWALK, 24 IN 660 LF $4.00 2,640.00$ 703 FDOT PAY ITEM 710-11-131 OR 710-11-231: PAINTED PAVEMENT MARKINGS, STANDARD, WHITE OR YELLOW, SKIP, 10-30 OR 3-9 SKIP, 6 IN WIDE 10560 LF $3.00 31,680.00$ 704 FDOT PAY ITEM 710-11-160: PAINTED PAVEMENT MARKINGS, STANDARD, WHITE, MESSAGE OR SYMBOL 40 EA $300.00 12,000.00$ 705 FDOT PAY ITEM 710-11-170: PAINTED PAVEMENT MARKINGS, STANDARD, WHITE, ARROWS 14 EA $300.00 4,200.00$ 708 FDOT PAY ITEM 710-11-302: PAINTED PAVEMENT MARKINGS, STANDARD, BLACK, SOLID, 6 IN 10560 LF $0.50 5,280.00$ 711 FDOT PAY ITEM 711-16-101 OR 711-16-201: THERMOPLASTIC, STANDARD, WHITE OR YELLOW, SOLID, 6 IN 2200 LF $2.75 6,050.00$ 713 FDOT PAY ITEM 711-11-123: THERMOPLASTIC, STANDARD, WHITE, SOLID FOR CROSSWALK AND ROUNDABOUT, 12 IN 2640 LF $4.00 10,560.00$ 715 FDOT PAY ITEM 711-11-125: THERMOPLASTIC, STANDARD, WHITE, SOLID FOR STOP LINE OR CROSSWALK, 24 IN 660 LF $5.00 3,300.00$ 718 FDOT PAY ITEM 711-11-160: THERMOPLASTIC, STANDARD, WHITE, MESSAGE OR SYMBOL 40 EA $300.00 12,000.00$ 719 FDOT PAY ITEM 711-11-170: THERMOPLASTIC, STANDARD, WHITE, ARROW 14 EA $300.00 4,200.00$ 722 FDOT PAY ITEM N/A: REMOVE EXISTING PAVEMENT MARKINGS 250 SF $7.00 1,750.00$ 724 FDOT PAY ITEM N/A: MINIMUM CHARGE FOR STRIPING FOR EACH PROJECT 1 EA $2,000.00 2,000.00$ 172,080.00$ TOTAL: Estimated Work Days: Estimated Calendar Days: Main Street Engineer's Estimate DATE:1/10/2022 180 PROJECT: Main Street Long Term Implementation 30 PROJECT NO.: N/A PREPARED BY: Uyen Dang CLIENT PROJECT MANAGER: Amanda Askew, AICP Item #Description Quantity Unit Bid Unit Price Bid Extension 4 FDOT PAY ITEM N/A: AUDIO-VISUAL PRE-CONSTRUCTION AND POST CONSTRUCTION RECORDS 1 LS $1,000.00 1,000.00$ 6 FDOT PAY ITEM 102-14: TRAFFIC CONTROL OFFICER 240 HR $100.00 24,000.00$ 7 FDOT PAY ITEM 102-60: WORK ZONE SIGNS, F & I 1800 DY $1.00 1,800.00$ 19 FDOT PAY ITEM 102-74-1: CHANNELIZING DEVICE, TYPES I, II, DI, VP, DRUM, OR LCD, F & I 3,600 DY $8.00 28,800.00$ 21 FDOT PAY ITEM 102-74-2: CHANNELIZING DEVICE, TYPE III, 6 FT, F & I 900 DY $50.00 45,000.00$ 23 FDOT PAY ITEM 102-74-9: TRAFFIC CONES, F & I 5400 DY $8.00 43,200.00$ 29 FDOT PAY ITEM 102-76: ARROW BOARD / ADVANCE WARNING ARROW PANEL, F & I 360 DY $50.00 18,000.00$ 41 FDOT PAY ITEM N/A: FDOT CERTIFIED FLAG PERSON 360 DY $45.00 16,200.00$ 46 FDOT PAY ITEM 104-11: FLOATING TURBIDITY BARRIER 100 LF $40.00 4,000.00$ 49 FDOT PAY ITEM 104-18: INLET PROTECTION SYSTEM 40 EA $115.00 4,600.00$ 57 FDOT PAY ITEM 110-2-1: CLEARING AND GRUBBING 17600 SY $25.00 440,000.00$ 70 FDOT PAY ITEM 110-4-10F: REMOVAL OF EXISTING CONCRETE-CURB AND GUTTER 8500 LF $30.00 255,000.00$ 75 FDOT PAY ITEM 120-1: REGULAR EXCAVATION 10000 CY $35.00 350,000.00$ 82 FDOT PAY ITEM 121-70-2: FLOWABLE FILL 1000 CY $130.00 130,000.00$ 104 FDOT PAY ITEM 285-708: OPTIONAL BASE, BASE GROUP 08 17600 SY $14.00 246,400.00$ 128 FDOT PAY ITEM 334-1-11C, 334-1-12C, 334-1-13C, 334-1-14C, OR 334-1-15C: SUPERPAVE ASPHALTIC CONCRETE, TRAFFIC A, B, C, D, OR E, GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO 500 TON 3000 TN $130.00 390,000.00$ 185 FDOT PAY ITEM 425-1-211: INLETS, CURB, TYPE 10, <10 FT 40 EA $1,200.00 48,000.00$ 228 FDOT PAY ITEM 425-2-61: MANHOLES, P-8, <10 FT 10 EA $1,500.00 15,000.00$ 238 FDOT PAY ITEM 425-5: MANHOLE, ADJUST 10 EA $2,500.00 25,000.00$ 249 FDOT PAY ITEM 430-173-112B, 430-173-115B, 430-173-118B, OR 430-173-124B: PIPE CULVERT RCP MATERIAL ONLY, ROUND, 12 IN, 15 IN, 18 IN, 24 IN, GUTTER DRAIN 5280 LF $45.00 237,600.00$ 424 FDOT PAY ITEM 520-1-10: CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER, TYPE F 10560 LF $30.00 316,800.00$ 431 FDOT PAY ITEM 522-2A: CONCRETE SIDEWALK AND DRIVEWAYS, 6 IN THICK 4200 SY $60.00 252,000.00$ 432 FDOT PAY ITEM 522-2B: CONCRETE SIDEWALK, 8 IN THICK 1800 SY $70.00 126,000.00$ 440 FDOT PAY ITEM N/A: ADA COMPLIANT CURB RAMP, TWO-DIRECTION 28 EA $3,000.00 84,000.00$ 669 FDOT PAY ITEM 700-1-40: SINGLE POST SIGN, INSTALL 50 AA $300.00 15,000.00$ 670 FDOT PAY ITEM 700-1-50: SINGLE POST SIGN, RELOCATE 10 AA $500.00 5,000.00$ 671 FDOT PAY ITEM 700-1-60: SINGLE POST SIGN, REMOVE 50 AA $100.00 5,000.00$ 693 FDOT PAY ITEM 705-11-1: DELINEATOR, FLEXIBLE TUBULAR 210 EA $100.00 21,000.00$ Estimated Work Days: Estimated Calendar Days: Item #Description Quantity Unit Bid Unit Price Bid Extension 698 FDOT PAY ITEM 710-11-101, 710-11-201, OR 710-11-421: PAINTED PAVEMENT MARKINGS, STANDARD, WHITE, YELLOW, OR BLUE, SOLID, 6 IN 2200 LF $2.50 5,500.00$ 700 FDOT PAY ITEM 710-11-123 OR 710-11-223: PAINTED PAVEMENT MARKINGS, STANDARD, WHITE OR YELLOW, SOLID FOR CROSSWALK AND OUNDABOUT, 12 IN 2640 LF $3.00 7,920.00$ 702 FDOT PAY ITEM 710-11-125 OR 710-11-225: PAINTED PAVEMENT MARKINGS, STANDARD, WHITE OR YELLOW, SOLID FOR STOP LINE OR CROSSWALK, 24 IN 660 LF $4.00 2,640.00$ 703 FDOT PAY ITEM 710-11-131 OR 710-11-231: PAINTED PAVEMENT MARKINGS, STANDARD, WHITE OR YELLOW, SKIP, 10-30 OR 3-9 SKIP, 6 IN WIDE 10560 LF $3.00 31,680.00$ 704 FDOT PAY ITEM 710-11-160: PAINTED PAVEMENT MARKINGS, STANDARD, WHITE, MESSAGE OR SYMBOL 40 EA $300.00 12,000.00$ 705 FDOT PAY ITEM 710-11-170: PAINTED PAVEMENT MARKINGS, STANDARD, WHITE, ARROWS 14 EA $300.00 4,200.00$ 708 FDOT PAY ITEM 710-11-302: PAINTED PAVEMENT MARKINGS, STANDARD, BLACK, SOLID, 6 IN 10560 LF $0.50 5,280.00$ 711 FDOT PAY ITEM 711-16-101 OR 711-16-201: THERMOPLASTIC, STANDARD, WHITE OR YELLOW, SOLID, 6 IN 2200 LF $2.75 6,050.00$ 713 FDOT PAY ITEM 711-11-123: THERMOPLASTIC, STANDARD, WHITE, SOLID FOR CROSSWALK AND ROUNDABOUT, 12 IN 2640 LF $4.00 10,560.00$ 715 FDOT PAY ITEM 711-11-125: THERMOPLASTIC, STANDARD, WHITE, SOLID FOR STOP LINE OR CROSSWALK, 24 IN 660 LF $5.00 3,300.00$ 718 FDOT PAY ITEM 711-11-160: THERMOPLASTIC, STANDARD, WHITE, MESSAGE OR SYMBOL 40 EA $300.00 12,000.00$ 719 FDOT PAY ITEM 711-11-170: THERMOPLASTIC, STANDARD, WHITE, ARROW 14 EA $300.00 4,200.00$ 722 FDOT PAY ITEM N/A: REMOVE EXISTING PAVEMENT MARKINGS 250 SF $7.00 1,750.00$ 724 FDOT PAY ITEM N/A: MINIMUM CHARGE FOR STRIPING FOR EACH PROJECT 1 EA $2,000.00 2,000.00$ 757 FDOT PAY ITEM N/A: WATER METER BOX, INSTALL 90 EA $700.00 63,000.00$ 758 FDOT PAY ITEM 425-5-1: MANHOLE, ADJUST, UTILITIES 10 EA $2,000.00 20,000.00$ 818 ALLOWANCE: IRRIGATION SYSTEM 1 EA $50,000.00 50,000.00$ 819 ALLOWANCE: UTILITIES COORDINATION AND ADJUSTMENTS 1 EA $50,000.00 50,000.00$ 820 ALLOWANCE: LANDSCAPING 1 EA $300,000.00 300,000.00$ 822 ALLOWANCE: PERMIT FEES, NON-BROWARD COUNTY AGENCIES 1 EA $50,000.00 50,000.00$ 823 ALLOWANCE: MAILBOX RELOCATION OR NEW 90 EA $300.00 27,000.00$ 300 3,817,480.00$ TOTAL: