Loading...
590 Jasmine Street REZN19-0005 Packet (JWB Real Estate Capital)Aerial of Site Residential Cluster Development What is Cluster Development? •Cluster Development, also known as conservation development, is a site planning approach that is an alternative to conventional subdivision development. It is a practice of Low Impact Development that groups residential properties in a proposed subdivision closer together in order to utilize the rest of the land for open space, recreation or agriculture.Cluster development differs from a planned unit development (PUD) due to the fact that a PUD contains a mix of residential, commercial, industrial, or other uses, whereas the cluster development primarily focuses on residential area.[1] Purpose •promote integrated site design that is considerate to the natural features and topography •protect environmentally sensitive areas of the development site, as well as permanently preserve important natural features, prime agricultural land, and open space •minimize non-point source pollution through reducing the area of impervious surfaces on site •encourage saving costs on infrastructure and maintenance through practices such as decreasing the area that needs to be paved and the decreasing distance that utilities need to be run •the primary purpose is to create more area for open space, recreation and more social interaction [2] Benefits •Thanks to there being more porous ground coverings and fewer impervious surfaces such as asphalt and concrete, the risk of fl ooding and erosion from stormwater is reduced. Economical benefits of cluster development can include there being less infrastructure to build—fewer roads, sewers, and utility lines. The higher density of the clusters of housing also tends to mean more efficiency for services such as public transit, and can also promote increased bicycle usage and the encouragement of pedestrians. The extra open space made available by this type of development leaves room for parks, trails, and community-supported agriculture. 23’x70’ house 27x45’ house 27’x 58’ house 34x320 lot 34x320 lot 34x320 lot Record a conservation easement over original lots 4, 5, and 6 –the rear part of the three new lots. •Take the six lots and combine them, and then split them into 3 lots facing West 6th Street •Homes will have 6’-11’ of their own property between them and their neighbor Zero Lot Line Layout –OPITION A 23’x70’ house 27x45’ house 27’x 58’ house Tree Survey –OPITION A 23’x70’ house 27x45’ house 27’x 58’ house 1.24’’ twin unknown 2.17’’ oak 3.12’’ oak 4.13’’ oak 5.22’’ twin oak 6.16’’ oak 7.14’’ unknown 8.13’’ unknown 9.22’’ twin unknown 10.14’’ pine •16’’ pine •10-12’’ oak (this is an $6,000-$8,000 tree) •Additional trees according to tree requirements Trees Saved Trees AddedTrees Lost 1 2 4 3 5 6 7 8 10 9 Proposed Lot Coverage –OPITION A Impervious Surface •House #1 = 1610+200+9 = 1,819 •House #2 = 1215+320+9 = 1,424 •House #3 = 1556+320+9 = 1,895 TOTAL = 5,138 Lot Coverage •Total Area = 34,680 •Impervious = 6,936 •Lot Coverage = 20% Site Coverage •Total Area = 50,680 •Impervious = 6,936 •Lot Coverage = 13.6% Site Coverage •Total Area = 50,680 •Impervious = 22,806 •Lot Coverage = 45% Proposed Developed as 6 lots Example of 27’ and 20’ wide houses Agreed to Conditions •House sqft limited to 1900 sqft, heated and cooled •Impervious lot coverage limited to 20% •AC’s placed in the rear, behind the buildings, not in side setback •No fences allowed in front of the rear corner of the buildings •Saving 10/11 trees, and all hardwoods •Planting a new 10-12’’ oak (6K-8K tree) in addition to requirements •A conservation easement will be placed on the rear 150’ of each lot– can’t cut trees, etc •All lots will still have to comply with 100% of COAB drainage req’s 15’x75’ semi-detach28x320 lot 23x320 lotRecord a conservation easement over original lots 4, 5, and 6 –the rear part of the four new lots. •Take the six lots and combine them, and then split them into 4 “semi-detached” townhomes lots facing West 6th Street •Homes will have at least a 5’ sideyard between neighbors. Interior walls will have 3’ between them and neighbor. Semi-detached Layout –OPITION B 23x320 lot 28x320 lot 15’x75’ semi-detach 15’x75’ semi-detach 15’x75’ semi-detach 5’ setbacks 3’ setbacks 10’ setbacks Lot 1 Lot 2 Lot 3 Lot 4 Example of semi-detached homes in Atlantic Beach -15’ wide homes, 6’ in between -These are ~1700 sqft Semi-detached Layout –116, 120, 124, 128 Jackson Road Tree Survey -OPITION B 1.24’’ twin unknown 2.17’’ oak 3.12’’ oak 4.13’’ oak 5.22’’ twin oak 6.16’’ oak 7.14’’ unknown 8.13’’ unknown 9.14’’ pine •16’’ pine •22’’ twin unknown •10-12’’ oak (this is an $6,000-$8,000 tree) •Additional trees according to tree requirements Trees Saved Trees AddedTrees Lost 1 2 4 3 5 6 7 8 9 15’x75’ semi-detach28x320 lot 23x320 lot 23x320 lot 28x320 lot 15’x75’ semi-detach 15’x75’ semi-detach 15’x75’ semi-detach 10’ setbacks Proposed Lot Coverage -OPITION B Impervious Surface •Houses = 1125+200+9 = 1334 •X 4 TOTAL = 5,336 Lot Coverage •Total Area = 34,680 •Impervious = 6,936 •Lot Coverage = 20% Site Coverage •Total Area = 50,680 •Impervious = 6,936 •Lot Coverage = 13.6% Site Coverage •Total Area = 50,680 •Impervious = 22,806 •Lot Coverage = 45% Proposed Developed as 6 lots Lot 1 Lot 2 Lot 3 Lot 4 6TH m ox zD D =' r 1 l A1 A18 Wetland Flagging MapSessa Properties - Jasmine StRE#: 170891-0000 Project: 15009Date: January 2015Base map provided by ESRI. Propertyboundary provided by FDOR 2012. Habitatsbased on a wetland delienation performedon 1/26/2015 and located by GPS.Atlantic Beach, Duval County, Florida §120 0 12060 Feet1 inch = 100 feet1:1,200 Legend Appr oximate property boundary (0.71 ac) Filled uplands (0.66 ac) Other sur fac e water - ditch (0.05 ac) Note:This map is intended to assist yoursurveyor in locating our flags. All surfacewaters are marked in the field with pinkand blue flagging tape. All surface watersshown hereon are upland cut ditches andare jointly regulated by the FloridaDepartment of Environmental Protection(FDEP) and the US Army Corps ofEngineers (USACE). This map does notrepresent surveyed information. Allacreages and locations are approximate. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT O F Environmental Protection Northeast District 8800 Baymeadows Way West, Suite 100 Jacksonville, FL 32256 Ron DeSantis Governor Jeanette Nuñez Lt. Governor Noah Valenstein Secretary October 20, 2020 Mr. Alex Sifakis Jacksonville Wealth Builders (JWB) Real Estate Capital 7563 Phillips Hwy. Suite 109 Jacksonville, Florida 32256 alexs@jacksonvillewealthbuilders.com Re: Review of Excavation and Disposal Plan Atlantic Bch Old Dump (A/K/A 9th & Tulip St Dump) Solid Waste Facility ID No. 101266 Duval County Solid Waste Dear Mr. Sifakis: The Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) received your document dated September 8, 2020 and entitled “Proposal for Site Development – Old Dump Guidance”, received on September 19, 2020. The document in conjunction with the supporting documents received have been reviewed for consistency with the DEP’s Old Dump Guidance entitled “GUIDANCE FOR DISTRUBANCE AND USE OF OLD CLOSED LANDFILLS OR WASTE DISPOSAL AREAS IN FLORIDA”, v. 2.3, April 2, 2019. The Proposal of Site Development, herein after referred to as the Excavation and Disposal Plan (EDP), is specific to development and post closure use of only a portion of the old dump and is not a comprehensive plan to address the entire currently identified area of the old dump. The following comments are offered: 1. The DEP strongly discourages the placement of any structures on top of or immediately adjacent to any buried solid waste and further discourages the use of old dumps and landfills for any type of residential development. 2. DEP agrees that this site is best classified as an old disposal site, such as dumps, open dumps and promiscuous dumps, that were operated and closed without permits and which may have had few or no records available for their operations. 3. DEP staff does not agree that the Phase II indicates no gas production at this sit e as the Phase II was specifically looking for VOC’s from contaminated soil. DEP staff recommend a gas study be proposed and implemented at this site to understand the potential for gas production through a time duration study which would be more indicative of exposure to residential use. 4. DEP agrees with the recommendation noted in the phase II assessment report. “With regards to the buried solid waste identified at the property, further action that most likely would involve the removal and off-site disposal of the waste material, and replacement with clean soil should be considered to assure there is a ground surface suitable for building construction.” Atlantic Bch Old Dump (A/K/A 9th & Tulip St Dump) October 20, 2020 Page 2 of 2 5. The Phase II does not appear to adequately delineate the boundaries of the old dump which should be delineated at least to the edge of the property. Additional soil borings and landfill delineation is recommended. 6. The installation of a single well does not appear to be an adequate assessment of the ground water in the area of the old dump. Additional ground water samples should be proposed, or the developer may consider placing a deed restriction against installing any wells on the entire property. 7. Additional plan details are needed regarding the use of the, EDP report recommended, steel helical piles, as well as, additional details related to the water and sewer connections excavation depths and backfilling criteria. Additionally, the site plan shows three unidentified structures south of the proposed foundations and north of the conservation area that should be identified. I look forward to receiving your supplemental report for this site. If you have any comments concerning this correspondence please contact Brian Durden at the letterhead address or by email at Brian.Durden@FloridaDEP.gov, or by phone at (904) 256-1575. Sincerely, Thomas G. Kallemeyn, Permitting Program Administrator cc: Jim Maher Brian Durden Brian Dugan, bdugan@onsiteec.com September 8, 2020 Mr. Alex Sifakis Jacksonville Wealth Builders (JWB) Real Estate Capital 7563 Phillips Hwy. Suite 109 Jacksonville, FL 32256 CC: James Maher Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) Northeast District Assistant Director 8800 Baymeadows Way West Suite 100 Jacksonville, FL. 32256 Re: Proposal for Site Development – Old Dump Guidance Proj: JWB – Jasmine Street (J20115) 590 Jasmine Street Atlantic Beach, Duval County, FL (approx. 0.71 ac) Via e-mail to alexs@jacksonvillewealthbuilders.com Dear Mr. Sifakis, The following is a proposal for the development of the property located at 590 Jasmine Street Atlantic Beach, Duval County, Florida is based upon a professional review of FDEP’s Guidance for Disturbance and Use of Old Closed Landfills or Waste Disposal Areas in Florida, Version 2.3, dated April 2, 2019 by Onsite Environmental Consulting, LLC (OEC). The proposal is based upon both the aforementioned Old Waste Disposal Area Guidance by FDEP, the proposed Site Development Plan provided by JWB for the Subject Property, and prior environmental reports on the Subject Property. In order to meet the regulatory compliance of informing FDEP on the intent to disturb the old disposal facility as stated in Rule 62- 701.610(1), F.A.C. OEC is providing this letter to outline the plans to disturb the old disposal site without posing a potential hazard to public health, groundwater and the environment. Methods: Our findings are based on our professional experience, review of relevant FDEP guidance, and review of past environmental reports: • Review of Florida Department of Environmental Protection Guidance for Disturbance and Use of Old Closed Landfills or Waste Disposal Areas in Florida, Version 2.3, dated April 2, 2019; • OEC reviewed Pfahler Environmental Services (PES) Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated February 2015; JWB – Jasmine Street (J20115) September 8, 2020 Page 2 of 4 J20115 Proposed Site Mitigation JWB Jasmine Street.docx • Review of PES Phase II ESA dated March 2015. OEC reviewed the Phase I ESA prepared by PES in February 2015 to provide background on site conditions and review the site history in regards to a historic dump located on the Subject Property. The review of the Phase I ESA also included the conclusions of Phase I which recommended the completion of a Phase II ESA to determine if the underlying solid waste was hazardous and posed an immediate threat to human health and the environment. OEC reviewed the results of the Phase II ESA in order to determine if the Phase II had been properly conducted and the results of the soil and groundwater assessment. A review of the revised Guidance for Disturbance and Use of Old Closed Landfills or Waste Disposal Areas in Florida (Old Dump Guidance) was completed to determine the appropriate course of action based upon the proposed development of the Subject Property by JWB. Findings: The Subject Property is located at 590 Jasmine Street, Atlantic Beach, Duval County, Florida on Parcel RE#170891-0000 on the southwest corner of Jasmine Street and West 6th Street. The Phase I ESA conducted by PES found the presence of one (1) recognized environmental condition (REC) and one (1) business environmental risk (BER). The REC identified by PES was identified from historical aerial photos particularly the 1970 aerial which showed that the ground surface of the Subject Property had been reworked and partially filled with what appeared to be solid waste. The solid waste may have been placed on the Subject Property as part of a historic dump operated by the City of Atlantic Beach in the 1960s and 1970s at the south and west adjoining properties. Wetlands and low-lying areas appear to have been filled in with the solid waste during the historic dump’s operation. During the site reconnaissance of the Subject Property PES observed the presence of used tires and solid waste dumped on the ground surface of the Subject Property along with evidence of buried waste throughout the Subject Property. The presence of the solid waste and old tires was listed as a BER which could impact the ability to properly develop the Subject Property. The Phase II ESA conducted by PES included the installation of five (5) soil borings and one (1) groundwater sample collected through the tooling of the direct push technology (DPT) drill rig. Soil samples were screened throughout each of the borings to a maximum depth of 10 feet below grade surface (bgs) using a photo ionization detector (PID) to assess the presence of volatile organic vapors. During the screening of soils at each of the borehole locations no evidence of the presence of volatile organic vapors was noted and a sample was collected from one boring location at a depth of 2.0 – 3.0 feet bgs and submitted to a laboratory for analysis. The laboratory analysis included Priority Pollutant Volatile Organics (PPOV) by EPA Method 8260B, Priority Pollutant Semi-Volatile Organics (PPSVO) by EPA Method 8270-SIM, and Priority Pollutant Metals by EPA Method 6010. The single groundwater sample was collected from the same borehole and was analyzed for the same constituents as the soil samples. Soil analytical results indicated that several constituents of concern (COC) concentrations were above the laboratory method detection limit (MDL) no constituents were above their respective FDEP Soil Cleanup Target Levels (SCTLs). Groundwater analytical data was similar to that of the soil data in that several COCs, PPSVOs and metals, were found in concentrations above the MDL but below the SCTLs. Based on the JWB – Jasmine Street (J20115) September 8, 2020 Page 3 of 4 J20115 Proposed Site Mitigation JWB Jasmine Street.docx laboratory data PES concluded that there were no impacts requiring additional investigation at the Subject Property. OEC reviewed the FDEP Old Disposal Guidance to determine the proper course of action for the proposed development of the Subject Property on the former Old City of Atlantic Beach Dump located on the Subject Property and surrounding area. As stated in in Section 1.0 potential risks of developing on or near and old disposal site stem from the types of waste disposed at the property, potential generation of biodegradable waste over, leachate from the old disposal facility impacting groundwater due the lack of proper lining, proximity of wastes at or near the surface. If the waste was biodegradable, which appears to be the most likely case at the Subject Property, the waste “may have stabilized to the point that gas generation is no longer of concern” as stated in Section 1.0. According to Section 2.0 Applicability for the use of this guidance the disposal sites must no longer be receiving wastes and would fall into one of three possible categories. Based on the categories listed in Sections 2.0 of the guidance OEC feels that this site would fall under the category as listed in Section 2.0 (2) old disposal site, such as dumps, open dumps and promiscuous dumps, that were operated and closed without permits and which may have had few or no records available for their operations. Dumps, open dumps, and promiscuous dumps were defined by Rule 17-7.02(7) in the Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.) in 1974 as a “land disposal site at which solid waste is disposed of in a manner which does not protect the environment and is exposed to the elements, vectors and scavengers”. In the case of the old disposal site on the Subject Property the 1979 definition of an “open dump” found in Rule 17-7.02(33) and old dump is defined as a site for the disposal of solid waste which does not comply with the criteria of Chapter 17-7. The guidance allows for the development of an old disposal site so long as the waste is not disturbed and there is ample evidence showing that the waste is stable and no groundwater impacts are evident as a result of the waste (Section 4.2, Old Disposal Guidance). Stabilization of the waste is defined in Rule 62-701.200(120), F.A.C. as when the biological and chemical decomposition of the wastes has ceased or diminished to a level so that such decomposition no longer poses a pollution, health, or safety hazard. Conclusion: Upon review of the prior Phase I and Phase II ESA’s conducted by PES and review of both the Old Disposal Guidance and Chapter 62-701, F.A.C. OEC feels that the site should be considered an old disposal site which operated without permits. A review of the soil boring logs from Phase II ESA indicated that while solid waste from the former dumping activities remained onsite the average depth of the waste in the five (5) soil boring installed was not noted until approximately 4.5 to 5.0 feet below grade surface. Soils screened in the zone of the trash using a photo ionization detector (PID) did not indicate the presence of organic vapors with readings at each of the locations below detection limits (BDL) on the PID. This would be expected given the amount of time elapsed since the last of the solid waste had been placed at the Subject Property. As previously stated soil samples collected for laboratory analysis while finding several COCs above their respective MDLs were all below their SCTLs. During the course of the Phase II ESA a single groundwater sample was collected from one of the boreholes and found that there were no COCs which exceeded their JWB – Jasmine Street (J20115) September 8, 2020 Page 4 of 4 J20115 Proposed Site Mitigation JWB Jasmine Street.docx respective GCTLs. Given that the evidence from the Phase II would indicate that there is no longer any methane formation ongoing in the soils, and there is no laboratory evidence of soil or groundwater impacts OEC feels that the solid waste is stable and does no pose a threat to human health, groundwater or the environment. Based on the evidence and above statement that the solid waste is stable and poses no threat OEC would argue that the waste does not need to be removed prior to the development of the site should it not be disturbed and that a sufficient cap remain over the solid waste to remove the possibility of exposure pathways being present upon the completion of construction efforts. In order to meet this requirement OEC has recommended to our Client, Jacksonville Wealth Builders (JWB), that and future residences constructed on the property should be done on steel helical piles to minimize impacts to the former disposal site and that a vapor barrier be placed underneath any proposed ground structures to limit the potential of ground vapors posing a threat to human health and the environment. In addition, OEC has recommended that should any overburden soils be removed from the site to allow for the stable construction of the residences that those soils be replaced with clean fill materials to maintain and effective cap on the remaining waste. A copy of the proposed construction and site development plans have been attached to this report for your review and approval and to provide you with a conceptual model of the proposed footprint of the residences on the Subject Property. Feel free to contact me if you have further questions regarding this parcel. I can be reached in the office at (904) 384-7020. Sincerely Yours, Brian Dugan Senior Environmental Scientist Aerial of Site Residential Cluster Development What is Cluster Development? •Cluster Development, also known as conservation development, is a site planning approach that is an alternative to conventional subdivision development. It is a practice of Low Impact Development that groups residential properties in a proposed subdivision closer together in order to utilize the rest of the land for open space, recreation or agriculture.Cluster development differs from a planned unit development (PUD) due to the fact that a PUD contains a mix of residential, commercial, industrial, or other uses, whereas the cluster development primarily focuses on residential area.[1] Purpose •promote integrated site design that is considerate to the natural features and topography •protect environmentally sensitive areas of the development site, as well as permanently preserve important natural features, prime agricultural land, and open space •minimize non-point source pollution through reducing the area of impervious surfaces on site •encourage saving costs on infrastructure and maintenance through practices such as decreasing the area that needs to be paved and the decreasing distance that utilities need to be run •the primary purpose is to create more area for open space, recreation and more social interaction [2] Benefits •Thanks to there being more porous ground coverings and fewer impervious surfaces such as asphalt and concrete, the risk of fl ooding and erosion from stormwater is reduced. Economical benefits of cluster development can include there being less infrastructure to build—fewer roads, sewers, and utility lines. The higher density of the clusters of housing also tends to mean more efficiency for services such as public transit, and can also promote increased bicycle usage and the encouragement of pedestrians. The extra open space made available by this type of development leaves room for parks, trails, and community-supported agriculture. 23’x70’ house 27x45’ house 27’x 58’ house 34x320 lot 34x320 lot 34x320 lot Record a conservation easement over original lots 4, 5, and 6 –the rear part of the three new lots. •Take the six lots and combine them, and then split them into 3 lots facing West 6th Street •Homes will have 6’-11’ of their own property between them and their neighbor Zero Lot Line Layout –OPITION A 23’x70’ house 27x45’ house 27’x 58’ house Tree Survey –OPITION A 23’x70’ house 27x45’ house 27’x 58’ house 1.24’’ twin unknown 2.17’’ oak 3.12’’ oak 4.13’’ oak 5.22’’ twin oak 6.16’’ oak 7.14’’ unknown 8.13’’ unknown 9.22’’ twin unknown 10.14’’ pine •16’’ pine •10-12’’ oak (this is an $6,000-$8,000 tree) •Additional trees according to tree requirements Trees Saved Trees AddedTrees Lost 1 2 4 3 5 6 7 8 10 9 Proposed Lot Coverage –OPITION A Impervious Surface •House #1 = 1610+200+9 = 1,819 •House #2 = 1215+320+9 = 1,424 •House #3 = 1556+320+9 = 1,895 TOTAL = 5,138 Lot Coverage •Total Area = 34,680 •Impervious = 6,936 •Lot Coverage = 20% Site Coverage •Total Area = 50,680 •Impervious = 6,936 •Lot Coverage = 13.6% Site Coverage •Total Area = 50,680 •Impervious = 22,806 •Lot Coverage = 45% Proposed Developed as 6 lots Example of 27’ and 20’ wide houses Agreed to Conditions •House sqft limited to 1900 sqft, heated and cooled •Impervious lot coverage limited to 20% •AC’s placed in the rear, behind the buildings, not in side setback •No fences allowed in front of the rear corner of the buildings •Saving 10/11 trees, and all hardwoods •Planting a new 10-12’’ oak (6K-8K tree) in addition to requirements •A conservation easement will be placed on the rear 150’ of each lot– can’t cut trees, etc •All lots will still have to comply with 100% of COAB drainage req’s 15’x75’ semi-detach28x320 lot 23x320 lotRecord a conservation easement over original lots 4, 5, and 6 –the rear part of the four new lots. •Take the six lots and combine them, and then split them into 4 “semi-detached” townhomes lots facing West 6th Street •Homes will have at least a 5’ sideyard between neighbors. Interior walls will have 3’ between them and neighbor. Semi-detached Layout –OPITION B 23x320 lot 28x320 lot 15’x75’ semi-detach 15’x75’ semi-detach 15’x75’ semi-detach 5’ setbacks 3’ setbacks 10’ setbacks Lot 1 Lot 2 Lot 3 Lot 4 Example of semi-detached homes in Atlantic Beach -15’ wide homes, 6’ in between -These are ~1700 sqft Semi-detached Layout –116, 120, 124, 128 Jackson Road Tree Survey -OPITION B 1.24’’ twin unknown 2.17’’ oak 3.12’’ oak 4.13’’ oak 5.22’’ twin oak 6.16’’ oak 7.14’’ unknown 8.13’’ unknown 9.14’’ pine •16’’ pine •22’’ twin unknown •10-12’’ oak (this is an $6,000-$8,000 tree) •Additional trees according to tree requirements Trees Saved Trees AddedTrees Lost 1 2 4 3 5 6 7 8 9 15’x75’ semi-detach28x320 lot 23x320 lot 23x320 lot 28x320 lot 15’x75’ semi-detach 15’x75’ semi-detach 15’x75’ semi-detach 10’ setbacks Proposed Lot Coverage -OPITION B Impervious Surface •Houses = 1125+200+9 = 1334 •X 4 TOTAL = 5,336 Lot Coverage •Total Area = 34,680 •Impervious = 6,936 •Lot Coverage = 20% Site Coverage •Total Area = 50,680 •Impervious = 6,936 •Lot Coverage = 13.6% Site Coverage •Total Area = 50,680 •Impervious = 22,806 •Lot Coverage = 45% Proposed Developed as 6 lots Lot 1 Lot 2 Lot 3 Lot 4 ZONING NOTICE TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN Notice is hereby given to all property owners within 300' of 590 Jasmine St. (RE# 170891-0010), 0 Jasmine St. (RE# 170891-0030), & 0 Jasmine St. (RE# 170891-0040) A public hearing regarding the following items will be held by the COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD at 6:00pm on August 20, 2019 and by the CITY COMMISSION at 6:30pm on September 9, 2019 and at 6:30pm on September 23, 2019 in Commission Chambers located at 800 Seminole Road. CASE NUMBER REZN19-0005 Request for a rezoning of Lots 1-6 Block 120 “Section H” (590 Jasmine Street, 0 Jasmine Street, and 0 Jasmine Street) from Residential, Single-Family (RS-2) to Special Planned Area (SPA). Concept Site Plan: Location Map: For additional information regarding the above item, please contact City of Atlantic Beach Community Development Department at 800 Seminole Road, Atlantic Beach, Florida 32233, or (904) 247-5826. Notice to persons needing special accommodations and to all hearing impaired persons: In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, persons needing special accommodations to participate in this proceeding should contact the City of Atlantic Beach, 800 Seminole Road, Atlantic Beach, Florida 32233, or (904)247-5800, not less than three (3) days prior to the date of this meeting. NOTICE OF ZONING MAP CHANGE The City of Atlantic Beach proposes to adopt: ORDINANCE NO. 90-19-244 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH, COUNTY OF DUVAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, REZONING THOSE LANDS DESCRIBED IN ATTACHED EXHIBIT A FROM RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY (RS-2) TO SPECIAL PLANNED AREA (SPA); PROVIDING FINDINGS OF FACT; REQUIRING RECORDATION; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Public Hearings on the proposed ordinances will be held in Commission Chambers at 800 Seminole Road, Atlantic Beach, Florida by the:  Community Development Board on Tue, August 20, 2019 at 6:00 PM  City Commission on Mon, September 9, 2019 at 6:30 PM  City Commission on Mon, September 23, 2019 at 6:30 PM Pursuant to Section 286.0105, Florida Statutes, a person deciding to appeal any decision made by the Commission with respect to any matter considered at the meeting or at any subsequent meeting to which the Commission has continued its deliberations is advised that such person will need to insure that a verbatim record of all proceedings is made, which must include the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. All information related to the item(s) above is available for review at the City of Atlantic Beach Community Development Department at 800 Seminole Road, Atlantic Beach, Florida 32233, between the hours of 8:00 am and 5:00 pm, Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays, and may be obtained at this office or by calling (904) 247-5826. Interested parties may appear at the public hearing and be heard regarding the item(s), or written comment s may be emailed to scorbin@coab.us prior to the hearing. In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and Section 286.26 of the Florida Statutes, persons with disabilities needing special accommodations to participate in this meeting should contact the City Clerk’s Office at City Hall or by calling (904) 247-5800 not less than three days prior to the public hearing. ORDINANCE NO. 90-19-244 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH, COUNTY OF DUVAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, REZONING THOSE LANDS DESCRIBED IN ATTACHED EXHIBIT A FROM RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY (RS -2) TO SPECIAL PLANNED AREA (SPA); PROVIDING FINDINGS OF FACT; REQUIRING RECORDATION; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Atlantic Beach, Florida hereby fmds that the change in zoning classification enacted by this Ordinance shall provide for orderly growth; encourage the appropriate use of land; protect and conserve the value of property; prevent the overcrowding of land; promote, protect and improve the health, safety, comfort, good order, appearance, convenience, and general welfare of the public; and implement the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the lands subject to this change in zoning classification are vacant; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Board held a duly noticed public hearing on September 17, 2019 to consider this Ordinance, found it to be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and voted to recommend that the City Commission approve this Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the City Commission considered this Ordinance after proper public notice and comments from staff and the public. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ENACTED BY THE CITY COMMISSION ON BEHALF OF THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH, FLORIDA: SECTION 1. Findings of Fact. The above recitals are hereby incorporated as Findings of Fact in support of this Ordinance, and the City Commission finds as follows: a. This change in zoning district classification has been fully considered after public hearings with legal notice duly published as required by law and has met the procedural requirements as set forth in Sections 24-51, 24-62 and the Land Development Regulations. b. The proposed rezoning to Special Planned Area (SPA) is consistent with the Residential Low Density (RL) Future Land Use Map designation and the goals, policies and objectives of the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan. c. All development within lands subject to this rezoning to Special Planned Area (SPA) and any future development shall be consistent with the provisions of Exhibit B & C, attached hereto and made a part hereof, written descriptions, subdivision, Land Development Regulations and other applicable provisions of the Atlantic Beach Code of Ordinances that are not inconsistent with Exhibit B & C prior to issuance of local permits authorizing construction or site alteration. d. The zoning district classification of Special Planned Area (SPA) is consistent and compatible with the surrounding development and zoning districts in that the adjoining 1 properties to the north, east and south are designated Residential, Single -Family (R-2) and could be developed with single-family homes up to 6 units per acre. The property to the west is zoned Special Purpose (SP) and used as a salvage yard. This district is intended for a limited single use that does not fit within the conventional zoning district. SECTION 2. Affected Properties. Pursuant to this change in zoning district designation procedure, the zoning district classification of those certain lands within the City of Atlantic Beach, as more particularly described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby reclassified from Residential, Single -Family (RS -2) to Special Planned Area (SPA). This reclassification grants authority for only three single-family homes and limited conservation uses on three lots. Any proposed use on said lands shall be reviewed and approved in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 24, Land Development Regulations and this Ordinance. SECTION 3. Zoning Map Revised and Subdivision Required. The Director of Planning and Community Development is hereby directed to revise the official Zoning Map of the City of Atlantic Beach to reflect the change in zoning classification for those properties described in Exhibit A from Residential Single -Family (RS -2) to Special Planned Area (SPA). The owner of said lands shall be required to obtain a replat of the lands from the City of Atlantic Beach prior to any development permits for the subject properties. SECTION 4. Conflict. All ordinances, resolutions, official determinations or parts thereof previously adopted or entered by the City or any of its officials and in conflict with this Ordinance are repealed to the extent inconsistent herewith. SECTION 5. Severability. If a Court of competent jurisdiction at any time finds any provision of this Ordinance to be unlawful, illegal, or unenforceable, the offending provision shall be deemed severable and removed from the remaining provisions of this Ordinance which shall remain in full force and intact. SECTION 6. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect upon final reading and approval. PASSED by the City Commission on first reading this 214-4 day of Ocko her 2019. PASSED by the City Commission on second and final reading this 121* day of N Ov.wr b' (, 2019. Attest: Ofe0M1A- il/.6111Lti& Donna L. Bartle, City Clerk Approved as to form and correctness: en CityAttorneyY CITY •,' • TLANTIC BEACH len Glasser, Mayor 2 Exhibit A The lands subject to this Ordinance No. 90-19-244 changing their zoning district designation from Residential, Single Family (RG -2) to Special Planned Area (SPA) shall be those described below. All Book and Page information can be found in the current public records of Duval County, Florida. Address RE Number Legal Description 590 Jasmine St. 170891-0010 Lots 1 and 2, Block 120, Section "H", Atlantic Beach, Plat Book 18, Page 34 0 Jasmine St. 170891-0030 Lot 3, Block 120, Section "H", Atlantic Beach, Plat Book 18, Page 34 0 Jasmine St. 170891-0040 Lots 4, 5, and 6, Section "H", Atlantic Beach, Plat Book 18, Page 34 3 tiD N Il•75•. 1`,s8°'m•rn•1 Exhibit B Zero Lot Line Layout Take the six Tots and combine them, and then split them into 3 lots facing West 6th Street Homes will have 6'-11' of their own property between them and their neighbor 1500:11506 -,1-\ r row >a-"-_ i 0 1Platy u••u1e 1/6 a6r4'ri:LJw'— s4,5&6may 9y as conservation uses 1 5.5•15'14.1 5,54 SPA Written Description yw I Dal 6'-Sa 5 •5. 5.5 --.--... -- 50.00•rC/r. 4x3201ot LANTI C CA65 1. C- 50 A `A ` 307c320 lot 34320 lot 5*.W+C1V1 27x45' house 27'x 58' house 5 00431,5 5 06'l5'10• 5 5 00.11.16• 0510,56h 112pn 6S- ... %2_601_ .._ -So ow rah wo L 2E Jl:4.. .;i( I:.6r §•Y= s JASMINE. S MEET _ --.44L'-^-1%-g10.3 ."" LAI --- - - - ri1-1n6._. ib' (S0' RA BY PLM) Sdn -•- ___,:t., --_ Exhibit C A. The following shall be permitted on the property in the locations shown on the Exhibit B, the zero lot layout plan, attached hereto and made a part hereof. 1. Lots 1, 2 and 3 each developed as 34' x 320' single-family lots with frontage on 6th Street West. 2. Former lots 4, 5, and 6 may only be used for conservation purposes. Defined as nature preserves, public natural resource-based parks, and passive recreational uses and facilities as need to support such uses. 13.No lots shall be further subdivided. B. Development Standards: 1. Combine the existing six (6) lots into three (3) single-family lots fronting on 6th Street West 2. 34' x 320' lot size (10,880 square feet per lot) 3. No side yard setback on eastern side of structures (zero lot line) 4. 6' 11" side yard setback on western side of structures 4 5. Minimum 20' front yards 6. Maximum 20% lot coverage 7. Develop as single-family 8. Maximum 1,900 square feet of heated and cooled area 9. Mechanical equipment (AC) placed in rear yard, behind buildings 10. Saves all but one (1) of the existing trees 11. Former lots 4, 5, and 6 may only be used for conservation purposes. Defined as nature preserves, public natural resource-based parks, and passive recreational uses and facilities as need to support such uses. 12. All lots will comply with drainage requirements C. Infrastructure Electric and telecommunication lines shall be installed underground in accordance with the policies of the utility provider. The Developer is responsible for the provision, construction and maintenance of any required potable water and sanitary sewer facilities in accordance with the terms and requirements of the City of Atlantic Beach Utility Department and other applicable governmental agencies. Sanitary sewer, facilities to be constructed by the Developer shall be connected to the City's central wastewater system. The development shall conform to the requirements of both the St. Johns River Water Management District and the City of Atlantic Beach for storm water storage and disposal. Drainage plans for the development shall be submitted to the City's Building and Public Works Departments for approval as part of an application for a development permit pursuant to the Code of Ordinances. D. Access Access will be provided to this SPA development by utilizing the existing 6th Street West city roadway. E. Phases Development pursuant to this SPA shall be in a single phase. 5