FINAL Complete Streets Implementation PlanCOMPLETE STREETS
IMPLEMENTATION
PLAN
i'1 FREET CORRIDOR
TABLE OF CONTENTS 'I
• • • i • • i • • i i i / i i • i / • ■ i • • ! • i • • i • • • i �
TITLE PAGE NUMBER
PROJECT TEAM 3
COMPLETE STREETS VISION 4
COMPLETE STREETS POLICY 5
PROJECT APPROACH 7
TRAFFIC CALMING 8
SHORT-TERM
19
RECOMMENDATIONS
LONG-TERM
27
RECOMMENDATIONS
FUNDING STRATEGIES 30
NEXT STEPS 31
APPENDIX 32
TEAM INFORMATION:
• Mayor of the City of Atlantic Beach
o Mayor Ellen Glasser
• Commissioner Of Atlantic Beach
o Commissioner Brittany Norris Seat 5 Mayor Pro Tem
• City of Atlantic Beach City Manager
o Shane Corbin AICP
• City of Atlantic Beach Planning Director, Amanda Askew, AICP
• Chief of Police, Chief Vic Gualillo
• City of Atlantic Beach City Engineer, Steve Swan PE
• Public Works Director, Scott Williams
Wum AE Engineering, Inc. DED
Heather Neville, AICP [113
DDEC, LLC
Uyen Dang, PE
The City of Atlantic Beach would
like to improve Main Street utilizing
the Complete Streets Policy from W.
1st Street to Dutton Island Road.
The purpose of the Complete
Streets Implementation Study is to
revisit community concerns and
desires, leverage the policy
objectives and review existing
facilities. The Implementation Plan
that follows identifies scalable
short- and long-term projects that
align with the City's vision to
provide for safer, efficient, and
affordable modes of transportation.
This project is expected to revitalize
the area, encourage economic
development, and promote multi-
modal connections. This will
support the vision of Marsh Oaks
residents, businesses, and other
other stakeholders.
A COMPLETE
STREETS VISION
Main Street Corrido
Improvemen
EXHIBIT 1: LOCATION MA
WHAT IS COMPLETE STREETS?
.y
lot� ._
pow L
Per the accepted definition by the US Department of
Transportation, Complete Streets are streets designed and
operated to enable safe use and support mobility for all
users. Those include people of all ages and abilities,
regardless of whether they are travelling as drivers,
pedestrians, bicyclists, or public transportation riders. The
concept of Complete Streets encompasses many approaches
to planning, designing, and operating roadways and rights of
way with all users in mind to make the transportation
network safer and more efficient. Complete Street policies
are set at the state, regional, and 'local levels and are
frequently supported by roadway design guidelines.
Complete Streets approaches vary based on community context. They may address a wide
range of elements, such as sidewalks, bicycle lanes, bus lanes, public transportation stops,
crossing opportunities, median islands, accessible pedestrian signals, curb extensions, modified
vehicle travel lanes, streetscape, and landscape treatments. Complete Streets reduce motor
vehicle -related crashes and pedestrian risk, as well as bicyclist risk when dvell-designed bicycle -
specific infrastructure is included (Reynolds, 2009). They can promote walking and bicycling by
providing safer places -to achieve physical activity through transportation. One study found that
43% of people reporting a place to walk were significantly more likely to meet current
recommendations for regular physical activity than were those reporting no place to walk (Powell,
Martin, Chowdhury, 2003).
While Complete Streets is a framework to construct roads, it is also a path to placemaking
inclusive of all community members. The City adopted the local Complete Streets Policy October
25, 2021. This policy can be located in the appendix of this document.
WHAT IS A COMPLETE STREET? p p E G
A Complete Streets approach integrates people and place in the
planning, design, construction, operation, and maintenance
of our transportation network. i
i 1w0fiW�_ W' '..„, ,
Image 1: Example of Complete Street Cross Section
COMPLETE STREETS POLICY.-
The
OLICY:
The proposed Implementation Plan for the Main Street Complete Streets project includes
various components such as leadership workshops and preliminary recommendations.
Considering the newly adopted Complete Streets policy, the Team was tasked to elevate
community awareness through communication within the Main Street Corridor and adjacent
neighborhood roads. This allowed better understanding on how the community interacts with the
City of Atlantic Beach leadership as well as local vision and technical understanding of public
roads. The implementation plan providing scalable solutions for near, mid and long term
programs and projects to support the policy.
Pk.n gm mhtlnYi. M. phye L
.p—1 hmaMronk.-
.�apaoa. Wt .
aa9gn ro aawe, m. wxaeanc&uaa
1*116 Final Engineering Design
4 , F.,a.ngm.eangae.g�pnoa.rm
Ona hmding aafldaKto wnatruci me
OEMR
r.w�gePanaedmmwre.anm.a m.mu,.oe -� D 010
aemem�dae.g^eye lmpen�emea conemvo•w nnwmue
.+�,Iai�+xVRVO
The local policy that was recently adopted is an excellent steppingstone towards addressing
community needs and desires. The implementation plan will address the needs of a local
municipality will support projects that staff and leadership can plan to fund and execute.
Placemaking, road design and neighborhood character can have expected outcomes when policy
including zoning, code and budget objectives are align. We provide near-term updates to
enhance and further the intent of the policy.
CIP Project Timeline
01-2years
• Duration of Project
Capital lmprovementPlan
" •1-zyears
Local Budget to Build Projects
tat-2years
t 1-2 years
2
Identify Prioritize
Stakeholder Engagement fY and
10
asr
news. In orgen�a t%am wM m
folm
d
Hoare
wmmunl[yNaon [s W met
33
OM
W
Pk.n gm mhtlnYi. M. phye L
.p—1 hmaMronk.-
.�apaoa. Wt .
aa9gn ro aawe, m. wxaeanc&uaa
1*116 Final Engineering Design
4 , F.,a.ngm.eangae.g�pnoa.rm
Ona hmding aafldaKto wnatruci me
OEMR
r.w�gePanaedmmwre.anm.a m.mu,.oe -� D 010
aemem�dae.g^eye lmpen�emea conemvo•w nnwmue
.+�,Iai�+xVRVO
The local policy that was recently adopted is an excellent steppingstone towards addressing
community needs and desires. The implementation plan will address the needs of a local
municipality will support projects that staff and leadership can plan to fund and execute.
Placemaking, road design and neighborhood character can have expected outcomes when policy
including zoning, code and budget objectives are align. We provide near-term updates to
enhance and further the intent of the policy.
i PROJECT APPROACH:
An Informative Approach
To address the scope set forth by the City of Atlantic Beach, the project Team chose to
approach the project area of Main Street Complete Streets through education to achieve
maximum results. With the very recent adoption of the Complete Streets Policy by City leadership,
it is important to introduce the project through communication of community awareness in order
to provide design concepts that reflected both the policy as well as the local communities desires
as it related to their local neighborhood road.
Concurrently, the Team conducted a detailed traffic analysis, crash analysis along with utilities
coordination to further understand the complexity of short-term and long-term implementation.
The following F
through meetings,
Main Street Improv
education campaig
complex technical �
A TRAFFIC CALMING APPROACH
WHAT IS TRAFFIC CALMING?
. 0 000000 a 0*90 0 e e a***so 0000000* a •
Traffic calming is a low impact solution to achieve complete streets within the local roadway
network. As a strategy it can reduce the negative effect of drivers utilizing the roadway network. It
is effective in many communities where traditional road design or land development uses of an
area has resulted in unintended consequence of cut through traffic and speeding. Traffic calming
can alter driver behavior for any street network. The goals of traffic calming are.-
1.
re:
1. Reduce crashes
2. Enhance quality of life for residents and visitors
3. Enhance safety
The Main Street Corridor serves as a primary north south collector road of the Marsh Oaks
Neighborhood. Through data collection from COAB Police Department— 2/11/202 to 2/20/2020
and 1/24/2021 to 1/31/2021, the team found that most traffic volumes are cut through traffic to
avoid heavy congestion on Mayport Road intersections and direct access to the Levy Road and
Dutton Island signalized intersections.
To reduce cut through traffic, a series of traffic calming strategies are considered for Main
Street. A balance of intersection treatment such as the existing mini roundabout are proposed to
maintain residential access while reducing cut through traffic on Main Street from 2nd Avenue to
Levy Road. This is where most of the residential access is being impacted. North of Levy Road are
commercial use with no recommendations for traffic calming.
For Traffic Calming Design Considerations:
• Target speed is 20MPH
• Most effective use for traffic calming devices is between 300' to 500'.
• Devices should not be less than 150' from intersection or bridge approach
Through a series of internal and external engagement and coordination, the following
traffic calming devices are preferred for the City of Atlantic Beach.
• Divided Median - create a pinch point for traffic in the center of the roadway.
• Narrow Road - restrict motorists from operating at high speeds and yield to pass this device.
• Mini Roundabout - reduce traffic speeds at intersections by requiring motorists to move with
caution through conflict points.
lisle 1010
,-- PROJECT APPROACH
1 • ■ ■ i ■ • ■ i i • ! ■ k 'P • i • ■ ■ ! / • • ■ • •
k
Quantitative data was collected through several avenues. The City of Atlantic Beach
provided traffic counts, right of way maps, As -bunts, and other useful technical data that
is provided in the appendix of this report. The Team utilized Signal 4 Analytics to gather
traffic data including crashes. The Team also performed site visits to observe the existing
environment and cross section.
This information was utilized to begin the process of developing conceptual designs
for informational purposes to guide conversation with staff internally to prepare for
public meetings.
Referenced Manuals:
• FDOT Florida Design Manua[ (FDM)
• Manual for Uniform Traffic Control Design (MUTCD)
• FHWA Small Town and Rural Multimodal Networks
• NACTO Urban Streets Design Guide
• NACTO Urban Bikeway Design Guide
SITE VISIT:
The project Team performed many site visits such as drive throughs and on in person
foot visits. The Team conducted a community wa'1k with City planning staff to observe
existing traffic patterns, adjacent land -use, modal usage, connectivity, access and other
transportation elements that may be affected by change. Site visits were conducted in
the evening as well as daytime. More detailed information is referenced in the exhibit
section under memo/site visit memo/Main St. City walk.
Location:
MAIN STREET
THE CURRENT LENGTH IS 1
MILE LONG
THE EXISTING LANE
:ONFIGURATION HAS 2 LANES
WITH SOME ON STREET
PARKING
IT CURRENTLY TAKES AN
AVERAGE OF 5 MINUTES TO
BIKE THE TOTAL LENGHTH
OF THE STREET
IT CURRENTLY TAKES AN
AVERAGE OF 20 MINUTES TO
WALK THE TOTAL LENGHTH
OF THE STREET
CURRENT POSTED SPEED IS
25 MPH
TABLE 1.
CORRIDOR CHARACTERISTICS:
• • i • ! • ■ • • • & • • i • • i i • f • 0 0 • 0 / i ■
EXISTING RIGHT OF AWAY
EXIST N6 CONDITIONS:
�J:J ) 11 D J 10 _ _ i _ 10
Existing conditions are no sidewalks
along the corridor lacking ADA
accessibility from West 1st Street to
Levy Road. North of Levy Road has a
continuous sidewalk on the East side
of Main Street. No dedicated bicycle
facilities within the City's bicycle
network or signing/ pavement
markings to designate a bicycle route.
Noliv parking utilization with 3 parked
vehicles during daytime (12/1/2021)
and 1 vehicle nighttime (6p.m.
11/30/2021). The neighborhood is
lined with trees with low light
visibility. Some traffic calming
devices are present but the spacing is
not consistent with ibest practices for
target speed design.
CHARACTERIST:CC:
------------
Main
---------- Main Street is classified as a .local
road classified in the City of Atlantic
Beach roadway network. Sidewalks
are nonexistent along the corridor,
but curb and gutter are generally
present, and lighting and utility poles
are located along the west side of the
roadway. There are no traffic signals
along this corridor with primary
intersections like Levy Road that
provide access East/West of the
Marsh Oaks Neighborhood District
CRASH SUMMARY:
F CRASH Ark'ALYSIS Main Street Crash Statistics
.............. 0 0 0 0 0 0 ....
A community-based
_;, crash data
analysis was conducted within
from"/19-11/21
Marsh Oaks Neighborhood
bicyclist crash
with three-year crash data
obtained from University of
+
Florida's Signal Four Analytics,
Total of crashes
including both lmrg-form and
short -form crashes between
Oxa'_. ip, 11'^.G191c P1V]02'
November 5th, 2019, and
November 11th, 2021. A total of
5 crashes were recorded on
Main Street over the three-
reviewed
year period. No prevailing
o f 797 cr;
crash patterns were identified,
Universi
and neither bicycle nor
pedestrian related crashes
were recorded_ Most recorded
crashes involved
crashes during
pedestrian and
bicyclist crash
SS
vehicle
Oxa'_. ip, 11'^.G191c P1V]02'
crashes were property damag,_ Main Street Crash Statistics
only crashes, and most
crashes occurred during crash data crashes involved crashes during pedestrian and
from 1111/11S.-.1111/211 55 + bicyclist crash
daylight conditions. Most of
the crashes involved a parked
_
vehicle.
.�
CRASH DATA
......................
• Many crashes are in the
afternoon during Monday
through Friday
• Many crashes are on the
State Highway system
such as A1A and Mayport
Rd.
VOLUMES
Existing traffic volume is
relatively low with an ADT
of 548 for 2021 and 2258
for 2020. Posted speed
along the corridor is
25MPH.
Total of ,' crashes "' . 'I vehicle
L'a him S�o.0 ^w W.alyur it�l'1f 19 ro llitr2o11
Location:
MAIN STREET
85%
Almost 85% of
crashes results in
non -injury
80%
More than 80%
crashes occur
during the daytime
] 3%
Less than 3%
involved in alcohol
CON N ECTIVTY NETWORK:
Bicycle connectivity is planned in the
'-- vicinity of the corridor, connecting Main
Street, the Marsh Oaks Neighborhood, and
the surrounding neighborhood. Main Street
is designated as a bicycle route within the
City's Bicycle Connectivity 'Plan. Main Street
connects to other planned bicycle corridors
such as Levy Road and Dutton Island Road
to the Mayport Commercial District. It also
connects residents to the Dutton Island
Preserve and the extensive trail network as
a local amenity to the City of Atlantic Beach.
Main Street is designated as a cycle route f
low traffic volume, a bike boulevard, or a
neighborhood bikeway.
WHAT IS A BIKE BOULEVARD OR A NEIGHBORHOOD BIKEWAY?
................................... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 6 0 0* 0* ..0.00.0.. • ...... 0 0 a 0 a# 0 0 0 0 0* 0* 0 0* 0 ..... ••
A Bike Boulevard or a Neigfhborhood Bikeway is a low stress local streets network where vehicle
traffic and speed are designed to be kept at low volumes to make it safer for pedestrians and
bicyclists. Many communities have called it quiet streets, slow streets, or neighborhood bikeways.
A Bike Boulevard design is a complete streets strategy to enhance safety on Main Street.
• Slow Streets — safe mobility for all
• Prioritize pedestrian and bicyclist safety
• Lower vehicular speed design
There are many ways to enhance the existing neighborhood
bikeway on local streets through the following:
1.Adding shared lane pavement markings ("Sharrows") to
alert drivers to expect bicyclist in the streets and help
people along the bicycle route
2. Improving crossing on major streets
3.Adding wayfinding signage to guide people to local and
regional destinations
4. Discourage cut throughs through means of traffic
calming
y
Source: Rural Design Guide - Bike Boulevard
1W
PROJECT COORDINATION:
! • • • a 0 ! ■ *!�
QUALITATIVE:
008000 00*0000000000090000
To better understand the qualitative aspects of the project area, the Team utilized several
methodology, includes:
• Face-to-face meetings with internal stakeholders,
• One-on-one meetings with local elected officials,
• Site visits on our own as well as with city staff on two occasions,
• Online and printed survey,
• Social media posts,
• and two public meetings.
M
City staff provided a stakeholder list inclusive of email addresses. The Team gathered
stakeholder information from elected officials and survey response data. We coordinated with
stakeholder via emails in three separate occasions to inform residents of upcoming surveys as
well as public meetings. The Team utilized the City's mailing list to inform residents of the project.
This information was then reviewed by staff to arrive at various values identified by residents and
officials to drive which concepts would be provided to the community for this report.
This process is useful for when there is a new program or procedure locally that requires
.additional information for stakeholders to make decisions upon. This process was a success to
get locals engaged and thinking about potential projects instead of deciding on a project that may
or may not be supported locally either by residents, other stakeholders, or have an easily
available solution considering the existing right of way and infrastructure. This allowed the task to
remain focused on the corridor as well as the purpose of this scope which included near-, short -
and long-term concepts to address local concerns. Complete Streets is intended to provide a
toolbox of scalable solutions to address needs now and in the future. This comprehension by
locals was deemed as valuable a task to the project as the concepts themselves.
r--
'� PUBLIC MEETING:
Two pub-lic meetings were held on December 16th at 1:30 and 5:00 pm for approximately 1.5
hours. A PowerPoint presentation which is provided in the appendix of this document was
presented by team members Heather Neville from AE and Uyen Dang from DDEC. An interactive
component included a type of puzzle where attendees were able to select puzzle pieces reflective
of what they would like to see in the cross-section but only allow them to select enough options
that would fit within the available right of way.
The presentation focused on providing education about Complete Streets, community
Placemaking, and how we utilize quantitative data with qualitative data to arrive at an outcome
that satisfies the most needs. The public meeting was showcased on the cover of the local
newspaper (see appendix), which supported additional attendees to the meeting.
r
MAIN STREET = D
lzcr'i O= Complete Streets Implementation 4 ,
z
µpyyf pArS-A
�.� Where doyou wanicogo? Y,-_
TnMCUlming O
------------- n
O
_--------------- -- - �
,
------ W -J
----------------
■ M
0
m
• z
`� D
� rn
Fitl, �
PUBLIC MEETING:
Through preliminary survey results, more than 90% of the community was not aware of the
City of Atlantic Beach Complete Streets Policy. Residents were expected to see final design and
constructability concepts. The common theme and feedback received during the meeting was
speeding and access. Many suggestions from local residents who attended the meeting was
project specific to Main Street and show displeasure for a prior concept been initiated in past
_ years. Specific concern relates to sidewalks, the mini roundabout, and other small improvements
that have been executed by local staff were discussed.
The most important key takeaway from the public meetings was the lack of awareness by the
community and the need to educate the community more on public processes to arrive at a
project. Also, there are varying opinions based on individuals' relationship to the project itself
and how it will impact their daily lives. This is expected however for any project to move forward
there needs to be an understanding of trade-offs. The puzzle exercise utilized during the public
meeting showcased this well and opened attendees' eyes to how important it is to seek input but
also to be willing to accept trade-offs.
4
r �
r .
The project Team developed a
Complete Streets Puzzle as educational
J bt for the adopted Complete Streets Policy.
The Team presented attendees with a
Complete Streets postcard for share the
knowledge with loved ones during the
�. holiday season.
i,
SURVEY RESULTS:
The team utilized the SurveyMonkey tool to gather basic information and a basic
understanding of local understanding of the Complete Streets policy and temperature on various
trade-offs and types of construction opportunities available. By design, the survey was meant to
be simple and easy to use and assist in the planning process in information gathering fees that
this project is currently in.
• 91 responses were collected. 31.87% were residents of Main Street, 43.96% were residents of
Marsh Oaks, 100% were residents of Atlantic Beach and six owned a business in the
neighborhood. Comments centered on a desire for safe roads with dedicated space for all
modes. When posed with a trade-off question, responses were evenly distributed across the
four options below:
1. Parking
2. Trees
3. Easement on property for sidewalk
4. Slower Streets
• This indicates there is not a current agreement on which project to move forward with beyond
improvement to connectivity for all modes. This does support o lower community impact
project in the near-term while a larger construction ;project and its aspects need to be further
understood and weighted against trade-offs to attain community support.
• 100% of responses support 20mph design speed objectives set forth by staff and supported by
the Complete Streets Policy.
• 73% of respondents were unaware of the updated policy change indicating the need for more
communication and education.
31.9% 31.87% were residents of Main Street
.. _ 44% 43.96% were residents of Marsh Oaks
100% 100% of responses support 20mph design speed
objectives set forth by staff and supported by the
Complete Streets Policy.
Isd
New program
designed for s
transportation
Atlantic Beach officials are seeking community in-
put to implement a new program designed to facilitate
safe and cohesive transportation eityiMe, The City
Commission recently adopted the Complete Streets
Polis}•, designed to facilitate travel for drivers, pedes-
trians, bicyclists, shared mobility and mass transit op-
erators.
A stakeholder's open house will be held at r and 5
p.m. today in the Atlantic Beach Commission Cham-
bers. The meeting will focus on traffic calming and
placemaking for the Main Street and the Marsh Oaks
neighborhood, and surrounding businesses.
Each session will begin with a zo-minute presenta-
tion and a survey will be distributed to attendees to
help measure interest in the Complete Streets polio.
Consultants i,%ith AE' Engineering Inc. and Traffic Spe-
cialist DDEC will assist city staff in establishing short -
and long-term recommendatioms for the project area.
�lJ
RECOMMENDATIONS:
*•■ 0 i•• 0 W 4W W t
-• P_ i • 0
The following recommendations are based on the qualitative and quantitative data collected
throughout the project. They are broken down into short-, mid-, and, long-term solutions.
There are quick and cost-effective options that can start to address residential concern of the
Main Street Corridor and Marsh Oaks neighborhood. Some technical constraints includes existing
right away, underground utilities infrastructure and existing drainage pattern. Other factors
include lack of consensus on certain features such as a sidewalk. The Team have provided
conceptual designs to illustrate the recommendations as it relates to future construction projects
as well as programming the existing right of way as a methodology to address near- and short-
term solutions.
IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES
The following implementation options support the strategies that follow. This provides the City
with a tool kit to move this study and plan for next steps.
Do nothing: Main Street and the Marsh Oaks neighborhood is a comfortable with acceptable
street. Some improvements are warranted such as: signing and pavement markings, lighting,
minor landscaping and etc. The following short-term and long-term recommendations would
require trade offs to accomplish. Those trade offs are:
• On street parking
• Right of way
• Tree Removal, etc.
Through the study and community feedback, it appears that the community desires Complete
Streets features such as bicycle and pedestrian accommodations, therefore doing nothing is not
the recommendation.
PolicyChanges & Updates: The recent adoption of the Complete Streets policy is a initial step
towards providing staff with more options to address residents concerns. Adding national/state
level policy and design to expand the Complete Streets program will assist the community further
and open opportunities for funding. These near-term options are low cost solutions to develop
other minor and major infrastructure rebuild.
New or additional Programs: Short-term program recommendations focus on education to
address local behavior and improve overall the road user experience. They also provide concepts
that will support communication efforts and centralize information. These can be conducted
locally by staff or/and utilize outside support.
Short -Term Scalable Projects: These projects are scalable and can be executed in the near term.
They are less costly and less impact to the community for installation. All short-term projects
require tradeoffs such as the removal of on -street parking. On street parking utilization is low
or nonexistence. While on street parking is a speed management strategy, there is not enough
parked vehicles to be effective and the direct residential impact to removing on street parking is
minor. There are other ways to offset on street parking such as shared parking or encourage the
usage of residential driveways.
Short-term implementation projects are the consultant recommendations based on technical
data, community survey and city policy. Short-term projects will need additional neighborhood
outreach, workshop and design prior to implementation.
Long -Terra Rebuild: These are large scale projects including underground utility structures,
drainage improvements, and pedestrian facilities. While reconstruction address complete streets
concern, it does not meet community needs due to its tradeoffs. An example, length of
residential driveways will be negatively impacted due to the installation of sidewalks.
Long-term concepts require additional feasibility study such as a corridor study with additional
neighborhood outreach and workshop.
r
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
SHORT-TERM RECOMMENDATIONS:
Short-term recommendations can be executed in a relatively short period of time with minimal
planning and funding. Short-term concepts have the ability to secure future capital investments
to ensure community vision of the Main Street corridor. The recommendations are community
best practices and consistent with the Complete Streets policy.
Developing additional components to the existing Complete Streets Policy is a way to support
long-term capital improvements for the City. Throughout the process of this project, the Team
coordinated with staff various to addressother concerns and roads within the community. Some
recommendations are not limited to only Main Street but can be translated to other roads within
the Marsh Oaks Neighborhood.
Much of the near and short-term recommendations is communication and education. They key
messaging to leadership and the public about the Complete Street policy, what it means to have a
Complete Street, and how to get the most out of your capital improvements to achieve the goals of
the policy. To do this, the Team recommend the City take a multi -pronged approach so that there
is consistency and continuum of design going forward that is supported by the community. More
education and more communication about this will help also and longer-term projects as the
community becomes more aware of public process and how projects come about.
Policy updates:
The City should consider adding second layer to
the Complete Streets policy such as Vision Zero
with additional initiatives that support the
program. Vision Zero, reviewing existing code to
ensure road design and inclusive features, as well
as reviewing zoning to ensure it provides the
most support to meet Complete Streets policy
objectives. Parking minimums and maximums,
utilization of curbs, design speed and signage,
would all support how the policy is able to be
utilized without conflicting with other guiding
documents. This also makes the permitting
process more straight forward for the general
public with expected outcomes.
SHORT-TERM RECOMMENDATIONS CONT:
A W ti 0 0 W� •
Complete Streets Website:
Developing a City of Atlantic Beach
Complete Streets website will allow localize
resources for residents to have better
understand of the City's new policy along
with upcoming complete streets projects.
Having a focused site for a complex new
policy with such broad uses for so many
different types of roads and Placemaking
will support a more informed community.
This will also help with future zoning and
land development, diverse and new
concepts and support long-term projects.
Sharrows :
implementing the City Connectivity Plan
through the usage of sparrows on low speed
roads. Sharrows is a shared -lane marking
indicating where cyclists can ride. Cars have
to give cyclists 3 feet of space when passing.
Under Florida Law, bicycles have the same
rights and responsibilities as a motor
vehicle.
Public Education :
Communication is centralize to the success
of Complete Streets implementation. The Team
recommends the City engage in a public
education campaign maximizing the website,
social media and public meeting spaces to
workshop the community. This will help begin
with the fundamentals and move towards
developing project concepts and designs that
are more inclusive of available updated cross
sections and what the community currently is
aware of. This will expand the options staff has
to use to solve community requests readily
available, reducing costs overtime.
Bicycle Education Campaign
SHORT-TERM RECOMMENDATIONS CONT:
•./* i•! i■■! V 6 6 t, 0 0 W 0 0 a 0 W! i! 0• 0& t!• 0••• i
Street Play, Cyclovia and other open street event play days are a concept currently used across
many cities and counties in the State of Florida. The basis of the project teaches road users how
to operate within the road while vehicles are moving about.
02
No
opt,
Frequently, public comments regarding road safety and speed of vehicles address how the road
makes them feel. This is not to disregard public comment about those issues because we know all
too well that they do exist, however motor vehicles current iteration provides for a quiet comfort
use while inside a vehicle. This has impacted road users, especially those outside of a vehicle,
senses to perceive information.
Street Play also typically helps with local initiatives where offenders are typically each other's
neighbors. This works welt in many residential roads as wet[ as main streets to educate the
community all at one time and a fun and inviting way. The cost varies depending on how the
municipality or other agency wants to execute this project. It can be as simple as an in street
block party or as robust where we seen 5K is parades etc.
SNORT -TERM RECOMMENDATIONS CON'T:
The goal for short- and mid- term improvement is to improve safety utilizing the latest standards
and specifications to enhance the existing conditions. Short and Mid -Term Safety improvements
for Main Street are the following:
Lighting_ Coordinate with )EA through the existing City franchise agreement to
add new luminaries to existing utility poles. There are currently 19 poles on
the West side and 18 on the east side. With many poles at the intersections,
this will allow added illumination and enhance safety for all users.
Pavement Markings: Update and enhance all stop bars to meet minimum
standards of 24" white per FDOT Design standards.
00
t
4 J1111L Signage: Coordinate with Public Works to check reflectivity on all
regulatory signs such as "Stop" signs. Measure "the retroreflectivity in
accordance with ASTM D4956.
ADA Accessibility_ The existing ADA accessibility is limited within the right of
way. Utilize existing pavement width and implement complete streets within
FHWA, MUTCD and FDM guidance to enhance pedestrian access and as interim
solution while capital improvement projects may take many years to
implement.
Parking: With short-term and long-term vision, the recommended design and
target speed is 20MPH. Due to the existing crash frequency and the crash type
PARKING on Main Street, the recommendation is to remove existing parking to allow
space for pedestrian and bicyclist access.
Existing Mini Roundabout:
The existing roundabout does not meet minimal signing and pavement
markings. Utilize MUTCD for additional pavement markings and advance
warning for traffic calming at the intersection.
SHORT- TERM IMPROVEMENTS CON'T:
Option 1: Pedestrian Lane
A pedestrian lane is a short-term improvement on low and moderate speeds and volumes to
designate space on the roadway for pedestrian usage. The implement this design, provide signing
and pavement markings for a Pedestrian Lane as recommended from Chapter 5 of FHWA Small
Town and Rural Multimodal Networks to be consistent with the City's Complete Streets policy and
the City's bicycle network. The pedestrian lane limits are proposed on Main Street from West 1st
Street to Levy Road. There is an existing sidewalk on the East side of Main Street north of Levy
Road. Implementing "sharrows" north of Levy Road will alert drivers to aci),cnowledge that there
are bicyclists utilizing the right of way.
D D E CI
What is a PEDESTRIAN LANE?
Pedestrian lanes should be designed to support
and promote side-by-side walking within the lane. -
,- Because of the lack of physical separatbn, additional
oj�. width beyond thls should be Included for added comfort: r
8 ft (2.4 m) width Is preferred.
PED ONLY legend maridng and/or
Pedestrian symbol marking to identify
the pedestrian lane to all users.
5 ft (1S m) width is the minimum
to allow for side-by-side walking
and maneuverability by users of
mobility devices.
Pedestrian Warning sign (1M7-2) pained
with an "ON ROADWAY^ legend plaque
may be used to indicate to drivers to
expect pedestrians within the paved
road surface.
Ra -1 W11.2
NO
PARKING
ON OX
PAVEMENT ON
ROADWAY
Recommendations
"Design
Reference
111M
II V� II
• r
Speed
20MP11A
FOOT FDM Chapter 19 -
Traditional Neighborhood
Lane Width
9'
FOOT FDM Chapter 19 -
Traditional Neighborhood
❑
❑
�J�
SIV.
rl
Sharrows
Shared Lane Marking should
be placed immediately after
an intersection and spaced at
FOOT Design Manual Section
233.3 Shared Lanes Markings
❑
may(
r—�(
intervals not greater than 250
feet thereafter.
2009 MUTCD - Chapter 9C
Shared Lane Markings.
*Pedestrian Lane
6' with 2' buffer on East
side
Chapter 5 of FHWA Small
Town and Rural Multimodal
^,(
❑
❑
Networks
**Parking
No on street parking
11:1
❑
❑
*The complexity of the pedestrian lane is the offset of the centerline of the roadway and the existing roundabout at Main Street and 9th
which will require a redesign of the intersection with minor drainage and utilities relocation.
**Eliminate all parking along the corridor due to low parking utilization and most crashes are parked vehicles.
SHORT-TERM IMPROVEMENTS CON'T:
Jption 2: Advisory Shoulder
. 1 .... * .. ■ ■ ■ 0 0 0 0 so 600. 000000 06 .
An advisory shoulder is used to accommodate pedestrian and bicyclists on roadway segments
that is too narrow. The "motorists may only enter the shoulder when there are no bicyclists" or
pedestrian present. Typical application with low to moderate traffic volume. Volume criteria
based on FHWA MUTCD guidance with vehicle traffic lower than 3000ADT.
**Eliminate all parking along the corridor due to low parking utilization and the majority of crashes are parked vehicles.
► -`. -Afth, L � l L � �. A� .Abb, -dighh" .dldhhl� Ad
L�-�
r ■
Recommendations
Design Speed
20MPH
FDOT FDM Chapter 19 -
Traditional Neighborhood
Lane Width
16' Shared
FDOT FDM Chapter 19 -
Traditional Neighborhood
❑
❑
E9_
Sharrows
Shared Lane Marking should
be placed immediately after
an intersection and spaced at
FDOT Design Manual Section
233.3 Shared Lanes Markings
❑
��/�
intervals not greater than
250 feet thereafter.
2009 MUTCD - Chapter 9C
1 1
Shared Lane Markings.
Advisory Shoulder
5' each direction
including gutter
Chapter 5 of FHWA Small
Town and Rural Multimodal
El
�--�'
;
`�
Networks
**Parking
No on street parking
❑
❑
Intersection Treatment
Mountable Roundabouts
❑E-11,
:E:I]
**Eliminate all parking along the corridor due to low parking utilization and the majority of crashes are parked vehicles.
► -`. -Afth, L � l L � �. A� .Abb, -dighh" .dldhhl� Ad
PLACEMAKI N G AND COMPLETE STREETS®
• i i!• +� i i i tid i i i i i i i i i i i i i i® ���� ��* �' = i
Placemaking and Complete Streets are synonymous now as the movement towards safer
mobility for all has evolved. The Marsh Oaks neighborhood is filled with natural beauty and plenty
of public destinations for residents and visitors alike to enjoy. Creating equal access to all road
users and residents can not be under estimated as a significant way to improve the quality of life
and access by harnessing the public right of way.
Equally, this will provide residents within the neighborhood access to other locations around
Atlantic Beach including the ocean and commercial destinations. Leveraging Complete Streets, the
City could consider public art installation, respite focused parklets including benches and added
trees, as well as potential for a district approach capitalizing on the beautifully named floral
streets. While working on this project, the Team began referring to Marsh Oaks as the Garden
District. Concepts like these can drive long term objectives, create a sense of pride in a
neighborhood and establish potential themes around which design decisions can be made.
ENHANCING BEAUTY
IN
THE COMMUNITY
OJT:
m
�O
'1-4m
ILVIEff-
MID - TO LONG-TERM RECOMMENDATIONS:
0 %� 1?, ! i ! • i ■ • • ■ 0 ■
MID-TERM RECOMMENDATIONS:
......................................
Mid-term recommendations include more robust design, striping and other construction type
projects that would not require extensive rearranging of the right of way or underground utilities.
These recommendations were reviewed by the team as a reflection of what the community has
said that they would like to see for the Main St. Corridor. With an emphasis on safety, speed
management by design, the utilization of a 20 -mph design speed accompanied by other vertical
concepts including lighting and signage, these concepts can be done in relatively short amount of
time depending on local budget and desire to complete these projects.
LONG-TERM RECOMMENDATIONS:
......................................
Long-term recommendations can encompass a lot more of the elements that the community
desires however as a name suggest, they are longer term due to their costs and construction
requirements. A complete redesign of Main Street to include additional features would also
require utility as well as tree removal or relocation. These projects typically are within the capital
improvement program year five and require additional design .and engineering and potentially
other added needs such as real estate easements.
Long-term improvements for Main Street shall consist of revisiting all underground
improvements and subsurface infrastructures as a major reconstruction project. The existing as-
builts utilities provided by the City Engineering Staff are dated 1990 with Sanitary Sewer running
along the centerline of the roadway. This placement of utilities may affect median planting that
will not meet the City's minimum utilities separation. The existing 8" watermain is on the West
side of Main Street may need to be relocated for proposed sidewalk placement.
LONG-TERM IMPROVEMENTS:
Option 1: Slow Street
.......................
A slow street design will include a series of lateral shift/chicane for on street parking and new
intersection, improvements.
Utilizing striping as a traffic calming
technique is less disruptive to emergency
service vehicles without no vertical or
horizontal elements within the roadway
surface. This concept will accommodate
residential parking demand and allow
adequate access for emergency service
vehicles. Alternating dedicated parking space
through each blocks wit[ give the visual effect
of a lateral shift or chicane within the
corridor and is universally recognized as a
traffic calming strategy. Traffic calming
striping gives the visual impression that
roadway width has been reduced, which has
been shown to slow vehicles down vihile
traveling along a roadway. This type of
striping will not slow down emergency service
vehicles utilizing the roadway or adversely
affect traffic operations.
=
FDOT FDM Chapter 19 - -i
Traditional Neighborhood
Rf
im
9
Design Speed20MPH
Lane width
10' each
FDOT FDM Chapter 19 -
Traditional Neighborhood
❑
Shared Lane Marking should
be placed immediately after
FDOT Design Manual Section
Sharrows
an intersection and spaced at
233.3 Shared Lanes Markings
❑
EJu
intervals not greater than 250
feet thereafter.
2009 AAUTCD - Chapter 9C
Shared Lane Markings.
Sidewalk
5'
FDOT FDM Chapter 19 -
Traditional Neighborhood
Parking
Street parking on the
Driveway Counts
❑
❑
Intersection Treatment
Mountable Roundabouts
Tabled Intersection
❑'
LONG-TERM IMPROVEMENTS:
D:kc- Lane
I............................
Consistent with the advisory shoulder presented in a short-term option #2, the Advisory Bike
Lane (ABL) will maintain the existing curb line without major reconstruction or a change in
drainage pattern. This alternative will provide traditional sidewalk on both sides of the street to
maintain Complete Streets.
A shared use path or wide sidewalk on one side is not recommended for Main Street due to the
existing residential driveways and building setbacks. Creating a 10' path will place adjacent
property owners in noncompliant of residential parking and vehicle overhang of the existing right
of way.
What is an Advisory (Bike Lane?
Advisory Bike Lane is a shared space for
bicyclists and motorists within narrow streets.
Unlike a shared street, Advisory Bike Lanes
accommodate two-way car traffic while dedicating
safe space for bicyclists. Main Street is a low traffic
volume (s 5,000 ADT) network with vehicular speed
of less than 30P>IPH. These installations fall in line
with the contextual guidance provided for the
Advisory Shoulder treatment featured in the FHWA
Small Town and Rural Multimodal Networks
document.
Advisory Bike Lane shall be installed from West
1st Street to Levy Road, 'North of Levy should be a
traditional 5' bike tane due to the the 60' right of
way will allow for a higher level of service.
FA
M -E=3
Category Recommendations
Design Speed
20MPH
FOOT FDM Chapter 19 -
Traditional Neighborhood
Rf
Ef
9
Lane width
16' Shared
FOOT FDM Chapter 19 -
Traditional Neighborhood
❑
L
Sharrows
Shared Lane Marking should
be placed coon ate after
an intersection and spaced aced
FDOT Design Manual Section
233.3 Shared Lanes Markings
at intervals not greater than
250 feet thereafter.
2009 MUTCD - Chapter 9L
Shared Lane Markings.
Advisory Bike Lane
5' each direction
Chapter 5 ofSmall
Town and Rurall Mulut timodal
Networks
1:1
E'
❑
Sidewalk
6'
FDOT FDM Chapter 19 -
Traditional Neighborhood
❑
El
Intersection Treatment
ountable Roundabouts
[TabledIntersection
❑
u
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE
! • * • i ■ • 0 i i ! • w V
A detailed engineers estimate is provided in the appendix.
*Long-term engineering estimate subject to change due to market conditions
•
Planning
$53,020
$53,020
$53,020
$200,000
Design
$63,870
$42,580
$42,580
$600,00
Construction
$258,120
$43,020
$172,080
$3,817,480
Construction
20%
$51,624
$8,604
$34,416
$190,874
Contingency
CEI
$0
$0
$0
$190,874
Total
$426,634
$147,224
$302,096
$5,571,850
A detailed engineers estimate is provided in the appendix.
*Long-term engineering estimate subject to change due to market conditions
r^
FUNDING STRATEGIES:
Funding strategies directly correlate to which policies, procedures, and projects City
leadership and residents desire. Funding mechanisms include the local general fund, potentially
bonding for larger projects, as well as seeking grant funds from state and federal resources.
Potential funds through the state include the FDOT LAP program, TAP program and Safe
Routes to School. In order to attain those find these projects must be listed with the North Florida
Transportation and Planning Organization(NFTPO) is a priority of Atlantic Beach and Duval county.
This process is straightforward and requires a scope and fee estimate for the project to be
submitted to the NFTPO board via the City's representative to the Technical Committee. There can
be multiple projects listed with the TPO since there are various funding sources available as the
TPO funnels all state funds to projects that are not direct grant receivership to the city.
The Federal Administration has also released extensive funds available post Covid-era in
order to stimulate various parts of our local economies, making it a good time to seek out those
types of funds. Projects must be outlined with a scope to reflect the required bullet :points within
those guidelines depending on the fund source. Money currently can be used for every stage of
projects including planning, design, construction, and purchase of property. The process is very
straightforward however in order to receive funds there will be some steps in the City imust execute
depending on the funding strategy. These include things such as:
• shovel ready projects i.e. having complete designs ready to go,
• :projects that are fully supported by the community via public meeting and votes,
• potential concurrency projects across different groups including Parks and Recreation, Florida
Inland Navigation, or others who might have a vested interest in creating better access to the
river.
There's also an element of sustainability and resiliency as it relates to a full reconstruction project
and those superlatives help attain more funding for local communities to stretch local dollars.
Depending on the project or projects the City selects the Team will draft scope language and
general fee estimates to support the next steps.
NEXT STEPS:
During the January 24th, 2022 City of Atlantic Beach Commission meeting, the proposed concept
for Option 2 short-term implementation for the Advisory Shoulder was the consensus majority by
discussion with an interim focus on planning elements. The Commission did not vote on project
that evening. The recommended path that will allow City staff to determine the next steps include:
• City Commission to adopt the Main Street Implementation Plan
• City Staff to develop a Capital Improvement Plan (OP) for short-term and long-term options
o Short-term Option 2: Advisory Shoulder limits 1st W Street to Levy Road.
• City Staff to coordinate with JEA to determine feasibility of lighting improvements
• City Staff to coordinate with the North Florida Transportation Planning Organization for
projects to be on the Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP)
• City to allocate funding for planning and design of short-term option with an engagement
strategy for successful implementation
• Develop constructability plan and with City Public Works Department
• Implementation of short-term recommendations
Enhancements to the road will only further enhance the .March Oaks community as a
destination as well as great place to live. The City should consider a more robust education and
communication program to iet residents know about the policy and how it can support their
livability on their own roads as well as how it can help direct other areas including the commercial
district.
ANUARY 2022
APPENDIX
SCOPE.
Overview
.....................................................
The scope of services for this contract includes providing Planning and
Engineering staff to assist the City of Atlantic Beach on the following tasks
Task 1:
• Review existing conditions of existing planning documents
• Traffic anatysis
• Comprehensive plan
• Bicycle network
• Parking policy and other functionality of the corridor.
Task 2:
.....................................................
• Provide alternative corridor analysis for complete streets
■ Intersection improvements and connectivity nodes
o including public engagement and workshops.
Task 3:
• , • .. , • .. , , , , • , • , , , , , , ,, , , , , , • , .. • . , , , • , . , , , • , • • . • , • .
• Provide preliminary planning document
Project Deliverables
....................................................
• Existing conditions memo
• Initial design alternatives and workshop presentation
materials
• Planning document, typical sections and rendering .
• Prepare project website and communication strategy to
engage stakeholders in Complete Streets
• Workshop findings
F
AE ENGINEERING INC.:
AE Engineering, Inc. (AE) has proudly based our headquarters in the City of Jacksonville since 2006.
Our history in the area as a CEI firm means we have engineers on staff who know first hand how to manage
design and cost aspects which help in the planning and design phases. AE has 16 Professional Engineers, 1
Professional Planner and now employs over 130 qualified professionals. AE is also a certified DBE and
minority owned business.
AE is proud of our new Planning Department with a 10 -year history in Northeast Florida focused on
Strategic Planning. AE acquired VRUM Planning (VRUM) in 2020, formerly owned and founded by Director
and Senior Transportation Planner, Heather Neville, AICP. VRUM's experience as a Transportation Planner,
existing clients and regulatory relationships match AE's expected quality and desire to create better places
for people. VRUM's support services include municipal and county level Transportation Planning and Traffic
Review for bicycle, pedestrian, mobility, access, transit hub, safety, signage, sub area planning includes
calculations, design and plan review as well as project management. Working with leadership on complex
community concerns and defining a work plan, Heather assists in reaching successful outcomes that
require policy maker approval, community support or projects defined objectives. This included working
closely with the Transportation Planning Department, Parks & Recreation, GIS Systems and others. Results
identified creative long-range concepts as well as practical and implementable measures including
strategic funding, grant application and grant administration.
IDDDEC:
DDEC is a boutique transportation engineering firm based in West Palm Beach, FL that is dedicated to
reinventing the way the world moves through innovative planning, placemaking and engineering. DDEC is
specialized in safety and mobility projects with special emphasis on community engagement and
communications. DD:EC's professional engineers are experienced in federally funded grant projects that
can handle a project from conception to implementation. Founded with the core values of safe and
sustainable infrastructures, DDEC is dedicated to creating change within the built environment. DDEC is
also minority and women owned.
z
7 rn m SO
2"
a,
�
3 o ��
(� _10
C
O�
v 3as
CP W
N Im
w0h
-0o r
D 3
0-
trDl1 � T
V1 O
0;
3a
a�
o�
0
r
0
3
T
0
3
h
CA
T
Q
D
m
0
0
Z
m
kA
D
3
CDn
CA
tA
0-
rD
tA
Z
un
LA0
T
\D
D
m
0
0
Z
m
C)
M
D
3
CDn
n
n
3
tA
0-
rD
tA
Z
un
LA0
Z
(A
z
ow
m
m
m
m
N
m
0
0
m
C)
M
D
3
Z
(A
z
ow
to z ?
a o
L� r
4
� n.
m '+
3 p0
C
N
a .. C
00
0 G
V=
�+ 3 -h
�N
N�
O N
0
30
Q-
0- N I CL d
�
N A
a 8130
3a
..
oW
O '0A
L/) T
Q rD O
� j 3
C.
v LA a 0
�.
t1
L o
Q.
L N
0
n
m O
m D
r
D
Z
con
Trl
�
0
3
r
m
VI
riM
N
-�
mrTl
Ln
0
iii
0
X
3
Z
C)
tA \
0
z
Z 9-.
NI
b%4b r
mom,
P
w.P-
i
z
ai
m
0
Q
(D
(A
70
Ln
Q
D
co
C:
Ln
D
Ln
l/1
Ln
r -t
O
1
3
m
m
Z
0N
Z
w
O
T
r
A
Z
n
ao
m
D
n
n
-30
r
m
m
N
m
m
LA
O
D
3
z
It—
sop- vlz
11 ; GaFtt
`, CLEANUP
SAN PABLO SwOes GoGfem
ELEMENTARY �CerflartPIP 2
s'orarJ�b.m+b�
Sea blMdPop 2 , ea
w
pecefr]be� i6, 2091
THE BFAcHIES LrADf
R
f
+Iw, 59. % 2e Serft fie wmlmfltlft or AWdk & IVA Jit* ' "to A+ft+t >y"Um srd p0"H vie i
tteeh
New program is
designed
for safe
transportation in A
B
�.
- Adautle BeKh oQidds ve aaldns rola ante
f � comm�isdon 0dy d° troth
polkY, designed bgltyandmmtrandtoP
+ Irivtw bieydag.
A sts},etplads open home ands
Cham -
Pk• tad&Y i0 boos on tn15r -I— sod
be&. Them sit ■nd the Manb Oaks
r�Beaches •• =' for b96
Watch
„x.,, a•,,,„x.•,•x••••x ywp sod ■ survey lap tr disvibund b aaeadas m
BEAM _ �pme trotb< a
a.. - - wlthAB.Bndn� ,�.
,,pp��• btu ts db he
tiom forthe wdect on.
.atY.Y- J �� b•' DD1iCw'Bl sasnd
Frye i 111y�rfL sod wa-+�t°
ping . ream via . newt Diremr
�w� tut the pmGamFeA'
y f wr Y n r J = d3s�oos durnf t ban m.Ming on the
t • • •• � � ens ab' oIDdda listed a town
refine the conaPs-
- t �m tion -=Mlin spprmch th+tund �
Dr. F+endY HaYag• SCAM vdurrtBer Lori 9 strap m br pgnned deagnad �m�as-
(� limen) EAM b'seoi,tixe Dtt�or and Mary V augrl, eEnM dporrrah�Givem m eEaM+ s°��S . d °n stet •od.6i11-
are ==dufing Assiatertee Will” MUM) reomved Me mss fol hegtng local fatrliflea �� Q�amples� that we
rticoverin8 irorn the partdert+k- t1°��sWOmidgrtimtbe lssvr
ownership�f�:�
Pete's Bar changes aedadthe aPedfics�Amu]tf�
=p•s �rf=:Locommeoton ne.W tatio°
th.t yno mold stBl pars qw1 age Deus; be said. path mold be rnsralkd in a school cone to ensure am -
by MUCHELL
�al . That Pnef table t. lose what m trued clause" tk cut uavigan Batey m sod 5th achoot-
it'c last all for an imow NeP br the eoteaaiomeo d the Pam ,lad xb� acid rhe 'Somedthe thmgixludebikehnes, shared WrLs,
tole Hevh gndmuk The b&r and 'They�n meows sPmdint mpOQp Slat oxnertian coarmiucd t mZ I arrows maybe third• some street fintinue that we
tgz
package. hdds the fust bgnof the Mr a dxy_&jssso4"bassld' format, m add Idol for street- be said. 'You mold even
Game Idsued n Dorsi Cotmty b My dont mind oo the x� .' =■ndbgrood- PMmban+ wok at speed blain a stop sus so them
Pen Jemeo ronowina the raped d ber. They still vaso 00.E 6° is up u them n the dys disaedoa aremaldPle thmasm rbc wheethoux wz conic ase to
prohibition. Sin a t939. PeteY Bar theTLenkagi.io: hadmn°'TLe;wi, ,fit ��, do In additlao goo imPlemmtsmm dtlwctbings.'
has been .pawed st rr7 Mrd Street Gdagdifthmt wMoyor walk k the m have ro uw Aamo>Gng to Askew, the rity has a1rV :' imwnd
by geaendons d meJeosen to*. doorg d-1 Tomwcot b< Wee" ftt on their uwn w be said regard- wider piths and bike Ism st pan d m aPpro■ab m
Oo 'Nesday, that chapter doxd Whhtdog sT,dthhe'aaotnab mmpksestreen-
as the bar eddaDy d mpd. u, m- m the rumors I hate betaswirl- lois partible espansion� T g a Pr9mitY met the comm;<axw toU'ed in s
whip. Co.m iter Tom Wb.tuog- wg m nodal aeedis for +lr Wt siv tics btdadi Ibswehop IJffiD rmdmsP n part d tM row m recommmd■-
slow mn8rmed neads-
the sale idondV m months He Bald he's Msrd evttY• '1'd krve m have Md the money
a retell boldine Pouf lvhh tin m Wing Ilam the ale g bring Mve m dam: site acid. 'lt helps incorporate rerom ddes,
the Beaches.' Acmrdtn8 to Whit- to ng fromY ler . a mproP°se art �0 001 �p°a hom the Oonne'edvlty Mk and it pcovldet s
rings- the oerw owners imeod mawdbyom-d�rau- kdsome- go[ag to speakfa Utem.lt aB basro eramexvrkbrsMfftoa now
review'WojCan-
to boor the feguy Tod the Inds- runes mlerustimal - dt+ewpers go thrwdh a review board low for was s ■ attar w there gteWulnb tion Project.
N or teat that there's ■ rooftop deck wnl
or a orw sleet Lwag m.
tlom that art umiga to pent Bar. met want to Mold ■o Apylebee' nuke co diBereaee ro whaYs here gaQwaddwdr at it and it wouldhe looted at by mvl-
76ey+weewes mads mto oa armfn odw n d ursTA hsomge. d* drprtmrmF the planning +><parlr°e0t' Publx
ekmeon refendd mss'Pete-Wm.• Wbtle fah wwldnt mmmmtZ 'Z., jr. Dow haaat Changed Wales. Poore and E*-erwb- she wid'Wa have
.•) . ondetstkd the tnditwm theidea lyof tbenervownen, siterii that wt would um ao it's Out wbjaawe ro re-
ad whit 0ulkn Pate's By Petcs ungslow confulned they own later- much mer the lav severd dendes. view orb project w ° Projeet-bY-Pmjset basis. We
Bar. Glee z5aent Pod. You not ea M muldple IaoJecn throushnut Nlth d itadedpZ a. e e pap 66 woWd coordinate with other )misdictions and agen-
ehaugethatTlureanopgakme Jadkoouifle Beach and ltivttalde_ Askew mid poju,-ts are to be priaitiad by the lewd
dosed d • oel�uborhood and ,mplemeat-
Adventure Landing rezoning edtoreiletthe�r,r�dt�aspor— M -
mem. CStla ns without any tnaspornn for
Projects
request deferred until 2022 1� ��ty`A�
M= d55 permrt d the resideun m a specific black
evail-
A rewnmg +aWat ro scram- &ppGnot and arty pg,mug veto dermal bwldgfpwhichotallbelow wookillmmatpee hdore s■Rxmdd cousiderk aP
.dPro tesiwwm-denlisl "Pplimbe'VORevadva the can that we 35 feet mmft the dtyh height, pnndm. sty snR also mnsiden &moanY the wben
modate.� eo the Adventure dmaein the future 0th d V IW br puking and stormwver equire• able budget. community bend it a� °abet can whm
fure time that was hem to- menu oonddedns complete suets' proje m
I.,&M site was deferred bloaday adaoavBg Bradt Mamhg nigsPed
h Duke surewe dont have To obnw,+he d.IW PKesmy f wt Q at lith m a yearly Mss. we could get k
by the tut the deed- . deferral w thefulure' for the ego 4+�on spaetmmt cool- ides of wherewt ve sod where we treed ro go, We ■re
Commission. Agents t we ban end,
GM Bodied city ruse that lbeY in- Mks Indode 427 residmthd ples.me°t+ ky 6te6�that �&W b� uto.Psthsxof pr��addln&tbenum-
rended ro wdtmill aflttthe fins of tWts M bur mdtl-Lolly bnikfiaga; utestg � her emb �M the her of new• Does, s P Se-.
mmubmiltheapplintion. ■17"ruilVA&g0-uoitslnnture, sum estriwaadbkydists
theytar w BeddMW tnmccodFkts hetxven Ped
the
Devtl•Ptts arc aakiag ■ land me each with its own ammky mora god use
amendment m the 2030 OomPtr yard: a 78-wdi burlditz and k land me. partd ruu Ma+foesb' number d children wakA' and bildng , d Mol and
22 89 -unit bundigg with the used m m L sen- pricing the vehide lanes sanded." acid Askew. aching that
steel l Mk for 1944 Be ■ley Pond' Ja prim b t define erns with a blah 0mrbe d trade ao
They sre s d 1941 &■nit Blvd. floor the gr dab led surdfitosun
an- for me Dsh 996. didentt ae to 'Close
They sn sga ■tt®pU� m rt, tee w the ground Boor led k out- it wss d r ++160 Density ddmn a lar ■ccidcots. Locations Pr'n
roue the 53J1-sctt du, which has done pool. The Advenmre Ianding uld law DuMty `Rad al. awns' &re lase didxtdt to Creek
eland u &theme Ptak since the theme pot Isseheduled todme ibis was cbsayed.m Recied)oo/Opk R kind of believe if you build It. theY will come.
m PgonPo Unit Deed• month SPW to o,,*Mo&te thk rteasoud Maybe there's not fa path] that now and people■rent
mid -19909, leu Ad+entb& Ia&d- nldug adrkuge of getting outside and biking and
opmest The due mJd ago ladude a to- lssrki� �t APP�teb, t•9 w■ndgE But if you build a path or a bike giro. People
TbeeoouaWbnvotsd4.1 L fiRw W d 854 sPses M s fi newel, Ing t wow nzsio demo wID take sdnaugc d h led it will be safe for them
dWeddumm6with Davld Dahl fo 400-910e Parsing ksnN sod 454 Pxerva .. lo! 4. Imusd of getting In your nr ro go to the RIX Sort
oPPssldco•Camminioa Cbdrmaa keLon ParWKapots•7he parkl0g tp.7e>dfIlt0.sre gysg might get o0yaur bnoe orrialk.'
Greg SutmO eacounged both the gauge g &guarani bahlnd the tesi-
subKfpxww
The Bomb"
Under VIM be Cagtdr..
P-069=501" 8 ma ONO
tea .._.....6 .S bEACHE5. ,'�.EADER
>Qarh,"M owuww ,4 Submit news and photos at
e r AneYter-$33 "Viwloll h'..t ,nr- R�LE�r
t C49 z01.7sd-f093 `
AB Main Street Survey - Complete Streets
Q1 Are you aware of the newly adopted Complete Street Policy?
Answered: 99 Skipped:0
Yes
No
ANSWER CHOICES
Yes
No
TOTAL
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
1/7
RESPONSES
25.25%
74.75%
25
74
99
AB Main Street Survey - Complete Streets
Q2 If you could change one feature about Main Street what would it be?
Answered: 83 Skipped: 16
2/7
AB Main Street Survey - Complete Streets
Q3 What are you willing to give up to get it? Please rank.
Answered: 85 Skipped: 14
Parking
Trees
Easerr
your pr
Slower
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
3/7
1
2
3
4
TOTAL
SCORE
Parking
44.00°/%
26.67%
21.33°/%
8.00%
33
20
16
6
75
3.07
Trees
6.67%
24.00%
20.00%
49.33%
5
18
15
37
75
1.88
Easement on your property for sidewalk
20.78%
33.77%
28.57%
16.88%
16
26
22
13
77
2.58
Slower streets
34.15%
14.63%
25.61%
25.61%
28
12
21
21
82
2.57
3/7
Yes
No
AB Main Street Survey - Complete Streets
Q4 Are you a resident on Main Street?
Answered: 99 Skipped:0
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Yes 31.31%
No 68.69%
TOTAL
4/7
31
68
99
AB Main Street Survey - Complete Streets
Q5 Are you a resident of Marsh Oaks? (The Neighborhood bounded by
Mayport Road, The River, Dutton Island Road and W. 1st Street)
Answered: 99 Skipped:0
Yes
No
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Yes 41.41%
No 58.59%
TOTAL
5/7
41
58
99
AB Main Street Survey - Complete Streets
Q6 Do you own a business in Marsh Oaks? (The Neighborhood bounded
by Mayport Road, The River, Dutton Island Road and W. 1st Street)
Yes
No
ANSWER CHOICES
Yes
No
TOTAL
Answered: 99 Skipped:0
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
6/7
RESPONSES
6.06%
93.94%
6
93
99
AB Main Street Survey - Complete Streets
Q7 Please provide your contact information.
Answered: 69 Skipped: 30
ANSWER CHOICES
RESPONSES
Name
98.55%
Company
15.94%
Address
97.10%
Address 2
5.80%
City/Town
100.00%
State/Province
100.00%
ZIP/Postal Code
97.10%
Country
78.26%
Email Address
92.75%
Phone Number
82.61%
7/7
68
11
67
4
69
69
67
54
64
57
1�
CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH COMPLETE STREET PROGRAM
US AREA0
:
N STREET
Wh400,00 at: Stakeholder Open House
4 When: 2/15/2021
NOWhere: The Urban Farm
7 -
Times: 2:OOPfi�i; 3:30PM and 6:OOPlN# - 7:30PIV1
A Visioning Session for Main Street & Area
From W 1st Street to Dutton Island Road
Focus - Traffic calming, place making
Take the survey! Stay up to date.
Follow the QR Code or
Visit www.COAB.com/CompleteStreet
Staff Contact:
Amanda Askew,
Director of Planning and Community Development
P: (904) 247 5841
E: aaskew@coab.us
Consultant Contact:
Heather Neville, AICP
AE Engineering Inc.
P: (904) 509 6895
E:hneville@aeengineeringinc.com
Jamal
i
I
>—
Main Street Engineer's Estimate
E30013
DATE: 1/10/2022 Estimated Work Days: 180
PROJECT: Main Street Long Term Implementation Estimated Calendar Days: 30
PROJECT NO.: N/A
PREPARED BY: Uyen Dang
CLIENT PROJECT MANAGER: Amanda Askew, AICP
Item N
Descriptlori
Quantity
Unit
Bid Unit Price
Bid Extension
4
FOOT PAY ITEM N/A: AUDIO-VISUAL PRE -CONSTRUCTION AND POST CONSTRUCTION RECORDS
1
LS
$1,000.00
$ 1,000.00
6
FDOT PAY ITEM 102-14: TRAFFIC CONTROL OFFICER
240
HR
$100.00
$ 24,000.00
7
FOOT PAY ITEM 102-60: WORK ZONE SIGNS, F & 1
1800
DY
$1.00
$ 1,800.00
19
FDOT PAY ITEM 102-74-1: CHANNELIZING DEVICE, TYPES I, II, DI, VP, DRUM, OR LCD, F & 1
3,600
DY
$8.00
$ 28,800.00
21
FOOT PAY ITEM 102-74-2: CHANNELIZING DEVICE, TYPE III, 6 FT, F & 1
900
DY
$50.00
$ 45,000.00
23
FDOT PAY ITEM 102-74-9: TRAFFIC CONES, F & 1
5400
DY
$8.00
$ 43,200.00
29
FDOT PAY ITEM 102-76: ARROW BOARD / ADVANCE WARNING ARROW PANEL, F & 1
360
DY
$50.00
$ 18,000.00
41
FDOT PAY ITEM N/A: FOOT CERTIFIED FLAG PERSON
360
DY
$45.00
$ 16,200.00
46
FDOT PAY ITEM 104-11: FLOATING TURBIDITY BARRIER
100
LF
$40.00
$ 4,000.00
49
FDOT PAY ITEM 104-18: INLET PROTECTION SYSTEM
40
EA
$115.01)
$ 4,600.00
57
FOOT PAY ITEM 110-2-1: CLEARING AND GRUBBING
17600
SY
$25.00
$ 440,000.00
70
FOOT PAY ITEM 110-4-10F: REMOVAL OF EXISTING CONCRETE -CURB AND GUTTER
8500
LF
$30.00
$ 255,000.00
75
FOOT PAY ITEM 120-1: REGULAR EXCAVATION
10000
CY
$35.00
$ 350,000.00
82
FDOT PAY ITEM 121-70.2: FLOWABLE FILL
1000
CY
$130.00
$ 130,000.00
104
FOOT PAY ITEM 285-708: OPTIONAL BASE, BASE GROUP 08
17600
SY
$14.00
$ 246,400.00
128
FOOT PAY ITEM 334-1-11C, 334-1-12C, 334-1-13C, 334-1-14C, OR 334-1-15C: SUPERPAVE
ASPHALTIC CONCRETE, TRAFFIC A, B, C, D, OR E, GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO 500 TON
3000
TN
$130.00
$ 390,000.00
185
FOOT PAY ITEM 425-1-211: INLETS, CURB, TYPE 10, <10 FT
40
EA
$1,200.00
$ 48,000.00
228
FOOT PAY ITEM 425-2-61: MANHOLES, P-8, <10 FT
30
EA
$1,500.00
$ 15,000.00
238
FOOT PAY ITEM 425-5: MANHOLE, ADJUST
30
EA
$2,500.00
$ 25,000.00
249
FDOT PAY ITEM 430-173-112B, 430-173-1158, 430-173-1188, OR 430-173-124B: PIPE CULVERT
RCP MATERIAL ONLY, ROUND, 12 IN, 15 IN, 181N, 241N, GUTTER DRAIN
5280
LF
$45.00
$ 237,600.00
424
FOOT PAY ITEM 520-1-10: CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER, TYPE F
10560
LF
$30.00
$ 316,800.00
431
FDOT PAY ITEM 522-2A: CONCRETE SIDEWALK AND DRIVEWAYS, 6 IN THICK
4200
SY
$60.00
$ 252,000.00
432
FDOT PAY ITEM 522-2B: CONCRETE SIDEWALK, 8 IN THICK
1800
SY
$70.00
$ 126,000.00
440
FOOT PAY ITEM N/A: ADA COMPLIANT CURB RAMP, TWO -DIRECTION
28
EA
$3,000.00
$ 84,000.00
669
FDOT PAY ITEM 700.1-40: SINGLE POST SIGN, INSTALL
50
AA
$300.00
$ 15,000.00
670
FDOT PAY ITEM 700-1-50: SINGLE POST SIGN, RELOCATE
10
AA
$500.00
$ 5,000.00
671
FOOT PAY ITEM 700-1-60: SINGLE POST SIGN, REMOVE
50
AA
$100.00
$ 5,000.00
693
FOOT PAY ITEM 705-11-1: DELINEATOR, FLEXIBLE TUBULAR
210
EA
$100.00
$ 21,000.00
Item #
Description
Quantity
Unit
Bid Unit Pr
81d Emension
698
FDOT PAY ITEM 710-11-101,710-11-201, OR 710-11-421: PAINTED PAVEMENT MARKINGS,
2200
LF
$2.50
$ 5,500.00
STANDARD, WHITE, YELLOW, OR BLUE, SOLID, 61N
700
FOOT PAY ITEM 710-11-123 OR 710-11-223: PAINTED PAVEMENT MARKINGS, STANDARD, WHITE
2640
LF
$3.00
$ 7,920.00
OR YELLOW, SOLID FOR CROSSWALK AND OUNDABOUT, 121N
702
FOOT PAY ITEM 710-11-125 OR 710-11-225: PAINTED PAVEMENT MARKINGS, STANDARD, WHITE
660
LF
$4.O1)
$ 2,640.00
OR YELLOW, SOLID FOR STOP LINE OR CROSSWALK, 241N
703
FDOT PAY ITEM 710-11-131 OR 710-11-231: PAINTED PAVEMENT MARKINGS, STANDARD, WHITE
10560
LF
$3.00
$ 31,680.00
OR YELLOW, SKIP, 30-30 OR 3-9 SKIP, 61N WIDE
704
FOOT PAY ITEM 710-11-160: PAINTED PAVEMENT MARKINGS, STANDARD, WHITE, MESSAGE OR
40
EA
$300.00
$ 12,ODO.00
SYMBOL
705
FOOT PAY ITEM 710-11-170: PAINTED PAVEMENT MARKINGS, STANDARD, WHITE, ARROWS
14
EA
$300.00
$ 4,200.00
708
FOOT PAY ITEM 710-11-302: PAINTED PAVEMENT MARKINGS, STANDARD, BLACK, SOLID, 61N
10560
LF
$0.50
$ 5,280.00
711
FDOT PAY ITEM 711-16-101 OR 711-16-201: THERMOPLASTIC, STANDARD, WHITE OR YELLOW,
2200
LF
$2.75
$ 6,050.00
SOLID, 61N
713
FDOT PAY ITEM 711-11-123: THERMOPLASTIC, STANDARD, WHITE, SOLID FOR CROSSWALK AND
2640
LF
$4.00
$ 10,560.00
ROUNDABOUT, 121N
715
FDOT PAY ITEM 711-11-125: THERMOPLASTIC, STANDARD, WHITE, SOLID FOR STOP LINE OR
660
LF
$5.00
$ 3,300.00
CROSSWALK, 241N
718
FOOT PAY ITEM 711-11-160: THERMOPLASTIC, STANDARD, WHITE, MESSAGE OR SYMBOL
40
EA
$300.00
$ 12,000.00
719
FOOT PAY ITEM 711-11-170: THERMOPLASTIC, STANDARD, WHITE, ARROW
14
EA
$300.00
$ 4,200.00
722
FDOT PAY ITEM N/A: REMOVE EXISTING PAVEMENT MARKINGS
250
SF
$7.00
$ 1,750.00
724
FOOT PAY ITEM N/A: MINIMUM CHARGE FOR STRIPING FOR EACH PROJECT
1
EA
$2,000.00
$ 2,000.00
757
FDOT PAY ITEM N/A: WATER METER BOX, INSTALL
90
EA
$700.00
$ 63,000.00
758
FDOT PAY ITEM 425-5-1: MANHOLE, ADJUST, UTILITIES
10
EA
$2,000.00
$ 20,000.00
818
ALLOWANCE: IRRIGATION SYSTEM
1
EA
$50,000.00
$ 50,000.00
819
ALLOWANCE: UTILITIES COORDINATION AND ADJUSTMENTS
1
EA
$50,000.00
$ 50,000.00
820
ALLOWANCE: LANDSCAPING
1
EA
$300,000.00
$ 300,000.00
822
ALLOWANCE: PERMIT FEES,NON-BROWARD COUNTY AGENCIES
1
EA
$50,000.00
$ 50,000.00
823
ALLOWANCE: MAILBOX RELOCATION OR NEW
90
EA
$300.00
$ 27,000.00
300 TOTAL: $ 3,817,480.00
AE Engineering Inc.
To:
Amanda Askew, AICP Atlantic Beach,
From:
Heather Neville, AICP AE Engineering and Uyen Dang, PE DDEC
CC:
Shane Corbin, AICP City Manager
Date:
12/15/2021
Re:
Main Street Complete Street Task Public Engagement Outline
AE and DDEC provide the following outline to promote the Public Engagement portion of the Main Street Complete
Street Public Meeting.
Meeting Info:
• Date: 12/16/2021, Thursday
• Time: 1:OOPM — 2:30PM and 5:00 — 6:30PM
• Location: Atlantic Beach City Commission Chamber
• Materials:
o Door to door flyer, 5.5"x8"
o Flyer PNG Format
o Survey including QR Code and Electronic Sharable Link
Launch locations and dates:
• Stakeholder email list 12/9 and 12/14
• Nextdoor Post 12/9 and 12/15
• City Facebook Post 12/9 and 12/15
• Door to door on Main Street 12/10
Email and Nextdoor Content:
• Art: Flyer
The City of Atlantic Beach has engaged one of our continuing service firms, AE Engineering Inc. and Traffic Specialist
DDEC to support the City's newly adopted Complete Streets Policy objectives. The first project will focus on Main
Street and the Marsh Oaks neighborhood and businesses. Residents, businesses and others are invited to join the
public outreach sessions.
• What: Stakeholder Open House When: 12/16/2021 Where: Atlantic Beach Commission Chambers
• Times: 1:OOPM - 2:30PM and S:OOPM - 6:30PM
• A Visioning Session for Main Street & Area From W 1st Street to Dutton Island Road
• Focus - Traffic calming, place making
AB Main Street CS Task
The program will be in an open house format with a 20 -minute presentation at the beginning of each session. Our
consultant team has also prepared a survey to gauge community understanding and interest in the policy. Please
consider attending, participating in the survey or sending an email with thoughts.
Survey link: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/ABMainStreetCS
Next steps will include making near, short- and long-term recommendations for the Main Street and Marsh Oaks
Neighborhood that will support the Policy and support community needs.
Thank you and we look forward to continuing to serve our community.
Social Media Narrative:
Art: Use Flyer
We value your input! Help support AB Complete Streets! Focus Area Main Street, Marsh Oaks December 26th. Take
the Survey httos://www.surveymonkey.comZrZABw...,.,,.cc-.
Flyer:
•
01Y Ot ATLAN71G BEACH COMPLETL VREIIS PROGRAM
FOCUS AREA:
NZ:
MAIN STREET
What: Stakeholder Open House
When: 12/16/2021
3�Where: Atlantic Beach Commission Chamliers
Mmes: t:"M - 2:30PM and 5:00PM - 6:30PM
A Visioning Session for Main Street & Area
From W 1st Street to Dutton Island Road
Focus - Traffic calming, plata making
ra the -'wve. A -Y up cc
r:mow the :p •: cue =:o
!attos,!/urrvip:.surveyrnorikey.corii+/ABMa lnStreetCS
Staff Contact:
Amanda Askew. AICP
Director of Planning and Community Development
P: (9a4) 247 5941
E: aaskew0coab.us
' Consultant Contact-
Heather
ontactHeather Neville. AICP
AE Engineering Inc.
P. (%A) 509 6,995
EshneviI60aeengineeringinc.com
2
Main Street Engineer's Estimate
D[D-[EC
DATE: 1/10/2022 Estimated Work Days: 20
PROJECT: Main Street Short Term Implementation Estimated Calendar Days: 30
PROJECT NO.: N/A
PREPARED BY: Uyen Dang
CLIENT PROJECT MANAGER: Amanda Askew, AICP
Item*
Description
Quantity
Unit
Bid Unit Price
Bid Extension
4
FDOT PAY ITEM N/A: AUDIO-VISUAL PRE -CONSTRUCTION AND POST CONSTRUCTION RECORDS
1
LS
$1,000.00
$ 1,000.00
6
IFDOT PAY ITEM 102-14: TRAFFIC CONTROL OFFICER
40
HR
$100.00
$ 4,000.00
7
FDOT PAY ITEM 102-60: WORK ZONE SIGNS, F & 1
200
DY
$1.00
$ 200.00
19
FOOT PAY ITEM 102-74-1: CHANNELIZING DEVICE, TYPES I, II, DI, VP, DRUM, OR LCD, F & 1
400
DY
$8.00
$ 3,200.00
23
FOOT PAY ITEM 102-74-9: TRAFFIC CONES, F & 1
600
DY
$8.00
$ 4,800.00
29
FOOT PAY ITEM 102-76: ARROW BOARD / ADVANCE WARNING ARROW PANEL, F & 1
40
DY
$50.00
$ 2,000.00
41
FOOT PAY ITEM N/A: FOOT CERTIFIED FLAG PERSON
40
DY
$45.00
$ 1,800.00
669
FOOT PAY ITEM 700-1-40: SINGLE POST SIGN, INSTALL
50
AA
$300.00
$ 15,000.00
670
FOOT PAY ITEM 700-1-50: SINGLE POST SIGN, RELOCATE
10
AA
$500.00
$ 5,000.00
671
FOOT PAY ITEM 700.1-60: SINGLE POST SIGN, REMOVE
50
AA
$100.00
$ 5,00D.00
693
FOOT PAY ITEM 705-11-1: DELINEATOR, FLEXIBLE TUBULAR
210
EA
$100.00
$ 21,000.00
698
FOOT PAY ITEM 710-11-101,710-11-201, OR 710.11-421: PAINTED PAVEMENT MARKINGS,
STANDARD, WHITE, YELLOW, OR BLUE, SOLID, 6 IN
2200
LF
$2.50
$ 5,500.00
700
FOOT PAY ITEM 710-11-123 OR 710.11-223: PAINTED PAVEMENT MARKINGS, STANDARD, WHITE
OR YELLOW, SOLID FOR CROSSWALK AND OUNDABOUT, 121N
2640
LF
$3.00
$ 7,920.00
702
FOOT PAY ITEM 710-11-125 OR 710-11-225: PAINTED PAVEMENT MARKINGS, STANDARD, WHITE
OR YELLOW, SOLID FOR STOP LINE OR CROSSWALK, 241N
660
LF
$4.00
$ 2,640.00
703
FOOT PAY ITEM 710-11-131 OR 710-11-231: PAINTED PAVEMENT MARKINGS, STANDARD, WHITE
OR YELLOW, SKIP, 10-30 OR 3-9 SKIP, 6 IN WIDE
10560
LF
$3.00
$ 31,680.00
704
FDOT PAY ITEM 710-11-160: PAINTED PAVEMENT MARKINGS, STANDARD, WHITE, MESSAGE OR
SYMBOL
40
EA
$300.00
$ 12,000.00
705
FDOT PAY ITEM 710-11-170: PAINTED PAVEMENT MARKINGS, STANDARD, WHITE, ARROWS
14
EA
$300.00
$ 4,200.00
708
FOOT PAY ITEM 710-11-302: PAINTED PAVEMENT MARKINGS, STANDARD, BLACK, SOLID, 6 I
10560
LF
$0.50
$ 5,280.00
711
FOOT PAY ITEM 711-16-101 OR 711-16-201: THERMOPLASTIC, STANDARD, WHITE OR YELLOW,
SOLID, 6 I
2200
LF
$2.75
$ 6,050.00
713
FOOT PAY ITEM 711-11-123: THERMOPLASTIC, STANDARD, WHITE, SOLID FOR CROSSWALK AND
ROUNDABOUT, 121N
2640
LF
$4.00
$ 10,560.00
715
FDOT PAY ITEM 711-11-125: THERMOPLASTIC, STANDARD, WHITE, SOLID FOR STOP LINE OR
CROSSWALK, 241N
660
LF
$5.00
$ 3,300.00
718
FDOT PAY ITEM 711-11-160: THERMOPLASTIC, STANDARD, WHITE, MESSAGE OR SYMBOL
40
EA
$300.00
$ 12,000.00
719
FDOT PAY ITEM 711-11-170: THERMOPLASTIC, STANDARD, WHITE, ARROW
14
EA
$3D0.00
$ 4,200.00
722
FDOT PAY ITEM N/A: REMOVE EXISTING PAVEMENT MARKINGS
250
5F
$7.01)
$ 1,750.00
724
FOOT PAY ITEM N/A: MINIMUM CHARGE FOR STRIPING FOR EACH PROJECT
1
EA
$2,000.00
$ 2,000.00
TOTAL: $ 172,080.00