59-27r4~~r'c ~3eaehrF¢a~ida
I~soL~TIO23 ~~59~-27
W"rIEREAS, The'Courts have rendered a verdict 3n favor
of 2•Tr: ~c Pits.' halter t,. 2lurphy entitlir.~ -then to
Hor~e3tead Exemption for the yearn 1957 and 1958; whi7.e
he was in' overseas aerv~.cQ; on the W 2gft t~f E. 50 ft.
of Lot 25; • B1.o~k 2 ~C Part of tznzauabercd ~ tract ly3.n~ c~rQSt
of Bloek 2, Atlr-antic ~ieach+ and
k'HE~iEA5 the 2•Iurphys hrxvo Wade re7ttect far refund on t}~e~.r
tares ~ for the years ~.y57 and l95$ ~.n line ti~ith crz~.d Court
Order,
IdOt•I TrIEfiEFOR~•a IlE IT R~SOLVF.D BY THE CITY COI"li•:ISSIOIi OF
~iE C I T 1' OF ATL ATITIC BEACIi, DWAL C OUI7TY, FLORIDA, that
The City Trea3urer be authorized to refund to the 2•Ittrphya
the eReeus tax po.id by thou :nor 'the years 1957 cnd ~.95g
due to the failure to alloz~r then the x;5000.00 Homestead
Exemption.
Pasaod by the City Co.~niesion on Deeeuber 1~th, 1859.
(SEI~,)
h~~~~ -
Adele 5. Gra.~e, City C r}~
The cot,~rt suit " t~raa ~ brought by the I•Iurphyr~ ~ainst the
County, and I•ir. T}~ompson advised thot cineQ the Court had
given a verdict in theft Savox,a~ainst tho.County, that.~re
~chould reconize the verdict . tend rake necessary rofund, also.