Resolution No. 09-06 vRESOLUTION NO. 09-06
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH ADOPTING THE
WATER FACILITIES PLAN UPDATE -WELL 2R REQUIRED BY THE
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION FOR THE
DRINKING WATER STATE REVOLVING FUND PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the City of Atlantic Beach completed the Water Master Plan in 2001,
which included a recommendation to replace Well #2 for Water Plant No. 1, and
WHEREAS, the City has completed design plans and specifications for the replacement
We112R, and
WHEREAS, the City has approved the Capital Improvement Plan and necessary water
rates during the annual budget process to pay for the financing of the We112R Project, and
WHEREAS, the City wishes to use the Department of Environmental Protection State
Revolving Funds for construction of the We112R Project because they are at a lower interest cost
than conventional financing,
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Commission of the City of Atlantic
Beach, that the Water Facilities Plan Update - We112R be approved and adopted, and staff is
authorized to make application to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection to finance
the project through the State Revolving Fund.
This is to certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of a resolution duly and
legally adopted by the Atlantic Beach City Commission at a legal meeting held on this 2~'~
of 2009.
Appro a as to form and correcfiess:
A N . JENSEN, ESQUIRE
i orney
ATTES
Q'~?iYLQ~ ~1~~~~~Z~IX~
DONNA L. BARTLE, CMC
City Clerk
day
WATER FACILITIES PLAN UPDATE- WELL 2R
City of Atlantic Beach, Florida
April, 2009
~1. COLLINS ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, LLC
Foreward
This is a summary update to the Water Master Plan prepared in September 2001 by Camp, Dresser &
Mckee, Inc. The Water Master Plan was a comprehensive document that addressed water supply; water
demand; water treatment storage and water distribution. The purpose of this report, "WATER FACILITIES
PLAN UPDATE- WELL 2R", is to address or update the water supply portion of the previous Water Master
Plan. Those items are:
- Facility planning per the Water Master Plan has been implemented per the document beginning
with water distribution upgrades, pump upgrades over the years. While there are pressing issues to
improve the water sys#em through annual updated Capital Improvement Program, Well 2R is a
required replacement of an older modified supply well (11Vell 2). It is now a critical item in the Water
System to install a new water supply well to ensure that the City has a stable water supply
- Previous attempts to fund the replacement well have been delayed to lack of adequate funding.
The project is also a "shovel ready" since the design of the Well 2R is complete and an FDEP
permit is in preparation.
-The project has no environmental constraints.
- This report, Water Facilities Plan Update -Well 2R, is consistent with the adopted Comprehensive
Plan for the City of Atlantic Beach.
- Water supply or demand is not an issue since this is replacement or backup to the existing system
-This document, "Water Facilities Plan Update -Well 2R", along with the existing Water Master
Plan, is anticipated to meet or exceed the requirements of a comprehensive water plan. The original
document is a very detail evaluation of the water system that has been implemented for many years
through the Capitat Improvement Program at the city. The city of Atlantic Beach is faced with a
complex need to immediately replace a Raw Water Supply Well and this document provides the
detail needed to meet the requirements for funding.
John E. Collins, Jr. PE
J. Collins Engineering Associates, LLC
11516-3 San Jose Blvd..
Jacksonville, FL 32223
Water Facilities Plan Update 2 J. Collins Engineering Associates, LLC
TABLE OF CONTENTS
FOREWARD ................................................................................................................... 2
CHAPTER 1.0 -SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ..................... 4
CHAPTER 2.0 -BACKGROUND OF WATER FACILITIES PLAN .................................. 4
CHAPTER 3.0 -ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS .............................................................. 4
CHAPTER 4.0 -WATER SYSTEM .............. ................................................................... 4
CHAPTER 5.0 -WATER SUPPLY WELL 2R ................................................................ 7
CHAPTER 6.0 -IMPLEMENTATION AND COMPLIANCE ............................................. 7
WELL 2R PLANS .............................................................................APPENDIX A
WATER MASTER EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..........................................APPENDIX B
Water Facilities Plan Update 3 J. Collins Engineering Associates, LLC
CHAPTER 1.0 -SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
1.1 Purpose
This update report was prepared by J. Collins Engineering Associates, LLC for the City of Atlantic Beach
(COAB) to comply with the requirements for the city to have a Comprehensive Water Facilities Plan for
possible funding of new Well 2R through the Florida State Revolving Loan Program (SRF) funded by the
Federal Stimulus Program of 2009.
The City of Atlantic Beach has a 'shovel ready" project in a new well for the Water Treatment Plant #1. This
well was originally planned under the Water Master Plan of 2001 and is already designed by CH2MHill in
2004. The ongoing work is the preparation of FDEP permit applications for the construction permit and
obtaining funding through the SRF stimulus funding program. Upon receipt of funding, the project will be
publically advertised and construction could immediately begin.
CHAPTER 2.0 -INTRODUCTION
2.1 General
City of Atlantic Beach has a current Water Facilities Plan that was prepared as a comprehensive evaluation
of the Water System Needs for at least a 10 Year Planning Period. The Water Master Plan was prepared in
Year 2001 by .Camp, Dresser 8~ Mdcee, Inc. An executive summary is attached below:
CHAPTER 3.0 -ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
The scope of work associated with the construction of the City of Atlantic Beach's NEW WELL 2R is not
anticipated to have any environmental impacts.
CHAPTER 4.0 -WATER SYSTEM
The City of Atlantic Beach Water System is comprised of two service areas -the Atlantic Beach and
Buccaneer Water Service Area. The two areas contain two water treatment plants each. The service areas
and wells are shgwn in the following exhibit from the recent Consumptive Use Permit Renewal permitting
process.
The first system is the Atlantic Beach system. This system serves primarily customers within the City limits
of Atlantic Beach. The Atlantic Beach water service area is serviced by Water Treatment Plants No. 1 and
No. 2 (WTP No. 1 and No. 2). WTP No. 1 is centrally located within the City, close to the Public Works
office and Wastewater Treatment Plant No. 1 (V1tWTP No. 1). Well #2R is a replacement well for the
existing Well #2 at WTP #1.
Water Facilities Plan Update 4 J. Collins Engineering Associates, LLC
The second plant, WTP No. 2, is located just north of the Selva Marina Golf Course. The second water
system is the Buccaneer water service area. This system serves customers north of the City's limits
excluding the customers served by the Mayport Water System (JF-A) and those on the Mayport Naval Base.
The Buccaneer system is provided its water by WTP's No. 3 and No. 4. Water Treatment Plant No. 3
provides the bulk of the system's water and is located off Assisi Road in close proximity to WTP No. 2.
Water Treatment Plant No. 4 is located in the northern portion of the Buccaneer system and is primarily
used as a re-chlorinatioNre-pump station due to limited well and treatment capacity.
4.1 Atlantic Beach Service Area Facili#ies -Water Treatment Plant No. 1
The water supply system consists of two Upper Floridan Aquifer wells. Treatment consists of a tray aerator
followed by disinfection in two identical 200,000-gallon storage tanks. From the ground storage tanks, water
is pumped by a combination of four identical high service pumps. The water is pumped into a 100,000-
gallon elevated storage tank or to the distribution system, based on distribution system pressure. The wells
for the City of Atlantic Beach Water System is shown in the following exhibit. Well #2R will serve WTP#1.
Water Facilities Plan Update S J. Collins En~ineerinQ Associates, LLC
Attach>nant 5
1 _ _ , , , _,. ~, ~ e ~.
~,y _ -
1 1• L1 Ii '1 ~ - _ rl 4 tiT'_..Y,..t -_...._, ti-'.I~ ! .1. 1, •1 .~ _. ~, ._.~ [ - ____.
f.` . _ A.~` ~ , , ,
' -. T_- au~ :Ee I c. irv'~~I~ 'rte o: ~s~ , ,
N~~ Y
~r , ~' i
1 1~ 4 ,µ +~ _ ~Irri I ~ r'~~:eU7•:3'lEEf LtiCr,r~.5
r .,,, ~B..t; 'Y4'e!I ICI `•VT _ I
-• ~ EIJL c,_~I I~: 3.: _ I.:.g L'k'e! ID:' .. i
-__._ ~ ~ 1
1:.
sl ~ ~ "" ~ . 1 :~.
~ I. - ~ - y
r. i c..
~ [ ~ 4~, a tlf~~ .y r
~ w•+~ ~` ~.-,. r•a :yell i.1 Prc~~ead ' ."t'v-l~
;, ', - `:~ ~; 1 _ ~B',Yiell ID 1 '1:11 `,
, t` 4; - t i ,'i ell Id '' -~~ ~ _.' ` ° I
. ~ _S 7
N '~ i 1. ~, . .- r I
C. a•Itl...l ~ ti ti
- ~ _ r - ~ ~1 ~ ~.
• ~ ~ y,~ -~s~a~,J ~
~ ~ i J 1 '• ,~ ~I.
.. i : j ~ i C1 ~ * .1
E -- +i. .. Y',~.
,n t
.. _
;mt.y,} wit '- ~`r ---- -~. ~ [ +.la 1 .-.. ~• c,.~~ e? •" e!~ ''T]
44 1 II I• ~.~I• ~ lR ." '' :1
^ j
pity of Atlantic BeacF~
Consumptive Use Permit Application
Ulrell Locations ~ Service Areas
CHAPTER 5.0 -WATER SUPPLY WELL 2R
Water Facilities Plan Update 6 J. Collins Engineering Associates, LLC
During the preparation of Water Master Plan and the St Johns River Water Management District
(SJRWMD) Consumptive Use Permit (CUP) Renewal in late 1990s and early 2000s, the SJRWMD
determined that a further analysis of the water supply wells would be required as part of the renewal
process. Therefore a well inspection and rehabilitation work was implemented to determine the need for
City of Atlantic Beach water system improvements to increase redundancy and reliability.
Recommendations for improvements at WTP No. 1 (served by proposed Well 2R)' consisted of projects to
enhance facilities operation and maintenance. The SJRWMD required that the existing Wetl# 2 which was
an artesian well (Wells that are artesian have characteristics of higher transmissivity and yield which
translates into higher pressure when the zone is "punctured" by a well) be modified by backfilling which
would reduce the well yield. Welt #2 has now been backfilled and no longer is artesian flow which reduces
the well yield. During the CUP renewal, the SJRWMD permitted the new "Well 2R".
Currently the City of Atlantic Beach is renewing their SJRWMD CUP again and this well is on the permit for
installation Therefore the installation of the New WELL 2R is driven by regulatory requirements and
the need to ensure the city has a sufficient water supply. The WTP#1 has always been served by two
wells. Well #2 was modified and a new backup well is an immediate need.
The plans for the new Well #2R are complete and the project is ready for implementation and will meet the
"shovel ready" requirement of the SFR Stimulus Funding. Key sheets of the Well 2R plans are attached in
Appendix A.
CHAPTER 6.0 - IMPLEMENTATION e~ COMPLIANCE
The City is ready to implement this project immediately and this report represents a completed Water
Facilities Plan. In addition, the city has prepared under separate documents:
- Facilities Plan Public Participation/Dedicated Revenue Public Meeting Documentation
(Resolution No.09-06)
- Florida Environmental Information Document
- Business Plan
Water Facilities Plan Update ~ J. Collins Engineering Associates, LLC
APPENDIX A -WELL PLANS
Water Facilities Plan Update J. Collins Enfineerin~ Associates, LLC
irrdwnooa aie
~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~~~i ~
d ~
aaaaa aaaaaaa *a3 sa aas z
W
'A
I-oZ~ ~
0
o ~ m ~ gg
W ~ o V =~~
2 Q Z ~ ~
~ N
~o~J ~_~~
J Jv
U ~ VW ooh ~ ~ ~
O~Z
~o ~
a~
FON ~~s
W= 3~
a3 ~~~
~ ~
#~
~ ~
~ -~
~~ ~~
~~~ ~~
~wnooa ale
ti-~'1HS 33S 3NIlH~l`dW ; ~
~
s ~ ' Z
~ ~
>•+T1 ~
'
~
~~
.r i '.
Q
'
~ ' -~7p;-/,
ldiY !4
NC.tCS
~rw~nr
l
N
m ~
f ^
~
4 f
R
{ VS
Z
Sd
~
j
~
~~`,~ +.¢r`~
1
rv
a
bmy'~
4..
O 1
J F'
°I~~ I
~~
1 ~ I
e.Yfa`SA m
f I
O
a o I V
~
`
~
Si
*
~
I
I
zH:w~
.m <w~.,.~,,.:~.~w~
~
F
~ I
5
'. ~F ~~~G
1N3Wf1000 019
~~ O ~~
X~ ~~
X J ~ p'
Wu~~ .p{ ~_
5 "J~ ~ ~z ~ O ~ ~ 3 W ~u
6 ~< ~'~ 1
~~~ d o ~< ~
W 3 ~ N
aSs3 W F ~ ~ ~, U
O R ~ ~~ g ~~
I ~
~ I z~~ ~~ a aa"
6o a '~ ~ % ~~ ~ a ~.
3
~~ ~~~ ~ ~ I s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~
N< g
~~~~. ~$~ w ~ I ~ `~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~
~{:~~~ ~ 1 I .- el d d d d n d E
3 <~.s ~ T III ~ R
~ ~ e 1 ~ ;<~ ~~ a ~
s e
F ~ ~~
w ~ 3
_ m ~ ~~ $ ~ ~~ Z ~
S
~~ S ~~~a
k~ ~~ a a a ~
~ !
~, i
~~ ~ ~~ J
~ _
®aa~~ I e ~
8~~~b I ~ N
3 ~ ~ ~ ~~
~~ O ~'~g~
' i~I~l~
~ ~ ~~ '<I
~ k,.
p~
~~
~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~
~ a
~^.~ -- Z 4
U g
~ '---- -- -- w Lj
~ ~
s ~ ~ ~- ~ m~ ~~ ~
~~ ~~~ = ~ ~ ' ~ ~~~ b ~ ~
i
b tl
Ao~ a
~~~ ~,
ns~ C
aoe ;€
APPENDIX B -EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
2001 WATER FACILITIES MASTER PLAN
Water Facilities Plan Update J. Collins Engineering Associates, LLC
Executive Summary
C:DM was retained by the City of Atlantic Beach to update the Cites Water Master
Plan as well as establish an initial City Geographic Information System (GIS) and
update the Utility Department hydraulic model. The results of these activities aze
f-rovided herein. The primary scope of services for the Water Master Plan update are
a.s follows:
^ Review existing conditions including monthly operating reports; water quality
data; water demand data; water supply, treatment, and distribution facility
capacities; population data; and land use data.
^ Develop future population projections and water demands.
^ Evaluate current water supply, water treatment and water distribution systems.
~ Evaluate impacts to water quality resulting from interconnection between Atlantic
Beach and Buccaneer Service areas.
~ Determine need and timing for new raw water supply and water treatment
facilities including capacity expansions at the existing facilities.
^ Update existing hydraulic models; perform water transmission and distribution
system modeling; and identify necessary storage, pumping and distribution system
improvements.
^ Present findings in draft and final reports.
1'roj ect Background
In 2000, the City provided potable water to a total water service area population of
approximately 24,508. Average daily flow (ADF) to this population was
approximately 2.877 million gallons per day (mgd). The water service areas include
areas within the corporate limits of the City (Atlantic Beach Service Area) as well as
the populated areas north of the City corporate limits (Buccaneer Service Area).
Atlantic Beach Service Area
The City of Atlantic Beach encompasses 3.03 square miles. The City of Atlantic Beach
is primarily a residential community with single and multi-family residextces
accounting for more than 70 percent of the total area. Additional land uses in the
service azea include commercial, institutional, light industrial, parks and opens space.
It should be noted that approximately 90-percent of the service area has already been
developed and the area is approaching build-out conditions. Land use by type is
summazized in Table ES-1.
CDM Camp Dresser & McKee Inc.
ES-1
UOASVfllmst2~207761'11769YtptWMP~T76~E~mdAM Swniwydoc
Executive Summary
BiiCCallee>C Se>CV1CE' ~'ea
The Buccaneer Service Area encompasses 2.6 square miles. The Buccaneer service
urea is primarily a residential community with single and multi-family residences
accounting for more than 50-percent of the area that can be developed (excluding
pazks and wetlands). It should be noted that approximately 95-percent of the service
~~rea has already been developed and the area is approaching build-out conditions.
Land use by type for the Buccaneer service area is summarized in Table ES-1.
Table ES-1
land Use by "1"ype
Description Atlantic Beach Buccaneer
Service Area Service Area
(Acres) (Acres)
:J
Residential
Single Family 624.2 311.3
Duplex 39.0 --
Multi-family 42.4 89.9
Mobile Homes 5.3 198.0
Vacant 124.7 39.3
Commercial
Office/Professional 3.3 3.4
Hotels 7.3 ---
General 125.7 42.4
Vacant 18.8 48.9
Institutional
Government 66.4 238.2
Educational 10.3 43.0
Religious 15.9 27.1
Gemetery 35.6 1.2
Vacant 6.7 11.1
Industrial
Light Industrial 34.9 2.3
Utilities 21.6 12.3
Vacant 5.2 ----
Open Space
Golf Course 19.9 177.1
Agriculture 14.8 146.32
Parks 15.3 14.2
Submerged Lands 55.8 ---
Miscellaneous~ 643.8 274.7
Total Undeveloped 155.4 99.3
Total Developed 1936.9 1680.7
Total Area 2092.3 1780.0
~ InrJudes. roads_ wasteland. homeowners assoa oroneriv. err..
' Nof zoned- Agricultural: Based on location, this land will most likely be zoned single family.
CDM Camp Dresser ~ McKee Inc.
ES-2
\10AsvflNbld\20a7a1"i179oYtpLW1A%TidKxeaAM Sumnory.doe
Execufive Summary
Population Data
T Historical population data for the City of Atlantic Beach and Buccaneer service area
are shown in Table ES-2. The data was provided by the City of Atlantic Beach
Department of Community Development. The average growth rate during the period
].994 through 2000 is 1.8-percent for the entire service. area. The Atlantic Beach and
Buccaneer service areas growth rates during this period were 1.6 and 2.1-percent,
respectively. The population data confirms that the service areas are approaching
guild-out conditions.
7"able ES-2
Historical Population llatal _
Year Population
Atlantic
Beach Buccaneer Totaf Increase
1994 12,561 9,445 22,006 --
1995 12,802 9,457 22,259 1.1
1996 13,202 9,655 22,857 2.7%
1997 13,650 9,795 23,445 2.6%
1998 13,562 10,204 23,766 1.4%
1999 13,619 10,247 23,866 0.4%
2000 13,836 10,672 24,508 2.7%
i r; a. „F a i7.,« c;,. Re....l. ne.,,,.F,,,e„ F .,F r,,,,.,,,,.«; F„ na.,at,,,,.,.e„ F i~nrni
Water Demand (mgd)
Atlantic Buccaneer
Beach
2.12 1.07
2.00 1.15
2.08 1.11
2.11 1.17
2.12 1.19
a r ---------------- - -r-------- v / - ----r------ •---•
Service Area Facilities
7'he first service area is referred to as the Atlantic Beach system. This system serves
customers within the City limits of Atlantic Beach. The Atlantic Beach water service
area is serviced by Water Treatment Plants No.1 and No. 2 (WTP No.1 and No. 2).
ti'VT`P No.1 is centrally Located within the City, close to the Public Works office and
ti'Vastewater Treatment Plant No.1(WWTP No. 1). The second plant, WTP No. 2, is
located just north of the Selva Marina Golf Course. The Atlantic Beach facilities are
s77m~rized in Table ES-3.
CDM Camp Dresser & McKee Ina
ES-3
\YJrgvftYl~k2120~76V 170iYtpLWMPITzPF~ceWlve 6umnwydoe
Executive Summary
'Table ES-3
of Atlantic Beach Service Area Facilities
Location Item
WTP No. 1 Production Wells*
High Service Pumps
Ground Storage Tanks
Elevated Storage Tank
WTP No. 2 Production Wells*
Quantity Description
2 Well No. 1:12-inch casing; 950 gpm capacity;
450 ft casing depth; 1020 ft total depth
Well No.2: 16-inch casing; 750 gpm capacity
(artesian well); 450 ft casing depth; 1040 ft total
depth
4 Model No. 6AE14 (Peerless); 50 Hp motor rated
at 1,000 gpm @ 120 TDH, 11-inch impeller
2 Two identical, baffled 200,000 gallon concrete
tanks (dimensions 50' x 50'). Average water
depth is 10 ft
1 100,000 steel tank
2 Well No. 3:16-inch casing; 1650 gpm capacity;
450 ft casing depth; 1080 ft total depth
Well No.5: 16-inch casing; 1850 gpm capacity;
450 ft casing depth; 1000 ft total depth
3 Model No. 6AE14 {Peeriess); 50 Hp motor rated
at 1,000 gpm @ 140 TDH,12-inch impeller
2 Model No. 5AE12 (Peerless); 30 Hp motor rated
at 500 gpm @ 140 TDH,12-inch impeller
1 500,000 gallon baffled concrete tanks
(dimensions 75' x 75'). Average water depth is
12ft
Nigh Service Pumps
Ground Storage Tanks
on
'The second water system is referred to as the Buccaneer water service area. This
system serves customers north of the City's limits excluding the customers served by
the Mayport Water System (jEA) and those on the Mayport Naval Base. The
Buccaneer system is provided its water by WTP's No. 3 and No. 4. Water Treatment
:Plant No. 3 provides the bulls of the system's water and is located off Assisi Road in
=lose proximity to WTP No. 2. Water Treatment Plant No. 4 is located in the northern
:portion of the Buccaneer system and is primarily used as a re-chlorination/re-pump
station due to limited well and treatment capacity. The Buccaneer facilities are
:summarized in Table ES-4.
CDM Camp Dresses & McKee lna
ES-4
no~esva~e~stz~2aa~r3~ta~vevllvMp~r~a~wuus sam~.rr.aoc
Executive Summary
Table ES-4
iummarv of Buccaneer Service Area J{acilities
Location Item Quantity Description
WTP No. 3 Production Wells Z Well No. 3W: 12 x 8-inch casing; 1,400 gpm
design capacity; 100 ft casing depth (12-inch);
300 ft casing depth (8-inch); 720 ft total depth
Well No. 5N: 12 x 8-inch casing; 1,400 gpm
design capacity; 100 ft casing depth (12-inch);
300 ft casing depth (8-inch); 720 ft total depth
High Service Pumps 4 Model No. 4015-6 (Paco); 30 Hp motor rated at
750 gpm @ 116' TDH, 11-inch impeller. (Pump
4 has 15-inch impeller; design capacity of 1,000
gpm)
Ground Storage Tanks 2 Two identical 150,000 gallon concrete tanks
(dimension: 30' outside diameter). Average
water depth is 34 ft
Hydro-pneumatic Tanks 2 10,000 gallon, horizontal, steel tanks
WTP No. 4 Production Wells 2 Well No. 1 N: 6-inch casing; 350 gpm design
capacity; 400 ft casing depth; 600 ft total depth
Well No. 2S: 6-inch casing; 350 gpm design
capacity; 400 ft casing depth; 600 ft total depth
High Service Pumps 2 Model No. 820A (Peerless); 15 Hp motor rated
at 250 gpm @ 150 ft TDH
Ground Storage Tanks 1 Capacity of the vertical steel tank is
approximately 80,500 gallons. Diameter is 16 ft
from elevation 0' to 40'. Diameter is 8 ft from
elevation 40' to 64'
Hydro-pneumatic Tank 1 10,000 gallon, horizontal, steel tank
Distribution System
'f'able ES-5 provides a summary of distribution system pipe diameters, lengths of
~tipe currently shown in the system distribution model, and typical, materials of
construction. Due to the relative age of the system, a significant amount of cast iron
(:larger diameters) and galvanized steel (2-inch diameter) pipe is present in the
system. There is also some transite pipe (asbestos concrete) still used in the
c[istribution system. The City prefers to utilize polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and ductile
iron (DI) pipe materials in new distribution system installations. Pipe material that
could not be identified during the G1S data design for the City's distribution system
were classified as "unknown".
CDM c~-,, ~~ s~ Maces i~
ES-5
~uon.Mzaat~zosre~t~emprrwuwna~we swrwn.y.eoe
Executive Summary
'Cable ES-5
Water Distribution System Summary
Diameter (inches) Length (feet) Materials of ConstructionZ
1 1,140 PVC, Unknown
1.5 5,200 PVC
2 29,055 PVC, Transite, Unknown
3 2,418 PVC, Unknown
4 51,788 PVC, DI, Transite, Unknown
6 167,725 PVC, DI, Transite, Unknown
8 159,515 PVC, Dl, Transite, Unknown
10 17,768 PVC, DI, Unknown
12 15,975 PVC, DI, Unknown
16 5,157 PVC, Unknown
18 75 PVC, Unknown
24 2,740 PVC, Unknown
' Lengths are approximate and do not represent aif existing (in-ground) pipe lengths, especially in the
Zower diameters. ; ;, .-~ L ~S$ S~
PVC =Polyvinyl chloride, DI =Ductile Iron or Cast Iron f
Future Land Use
Che City of Atlantic Beach and Buccaneer service areas are approaching build-out
conditions. It is expected that the current mix of residential, commercial, and multi-
family water demand classes will prevail, with minor percentage changes throughout
the planning period. Because more than 90 percent of the available Land has been
developed within the service areas, typical population projections are not valid
t~eyond build-out.
A11 vacant parcels and corresponding land use categories were identified to determine
the number of potential unit connections in the service areas. Five categories were
used to identify the key land uses within the service area: residential, commercial,
institutional, industrial, and open space. The vacant parcels are summarized in Table
)~S-ti.
'Cable ES-6
Summary of Vacant Parcels
Description Atlantic Beach Buccaneer
Service Area Service Area
(Acres) (Acres)
Residential 124.6 185.6
Commercial 18.8 48.9
Institutional 6.7 11.1
Industrial 5.2 ---
Total 155.3 245.6
. r Includes 146.3 acres not zoned -agricultural.
CDM Camp Dresser & McICce Inc.
ES-6
IYDM1svt2ltlLStZ120370C11769YipLWAATiM~EUwIM 3urtr~wy.Caa
Executive Summary
• .atlantic Beach Service Area Residential Classifications
:Residential classifications for the City of Atlantic Beach were further subdivided into
:jingle family and multi-family land use categories using the December 2000 Zoning
:Vlap (City of Atlantic Beach Depaztment of Community Development). Table ES-7
J~rovides the assumptions for population densities.
'Table ES-7
Build-out Proiections for the Atlantic Beach Service Area
Description ~
Acres
Density Potential No.
of Unit population
z
Connections projection
Single Family
RS-1 30.0 1 unit per 7500 sf 140 298
RS-2 52.4 1 unit per 5000 sf 366 778
PUD 1.0 1 unit per 5000 sf 5 11
Single Family/ Two-family
RG-1 13.4 2 units per 5000 sf 188 400
RG-1A 16.4 2 units per 7500 sf 154 328
Single Family/Two-family/Multi-family
RG-2 9.7 3 units per 5000 sf 204 434
RG-3 1.7 3 units per 5000 sf 36 77
Commer~cial3 18.8 NA NA NA
lndustrial3 5.2 NA NA NA
lnstitutional3 6.7 NA NA NA
Total 155.3 1093 2326
Assumed 20% of the available vacant property is designated forstormwafermanagemenfnnd infrastructure
needs (utility right-of-ways, roads, etc.).
'' 2. i24 persons per unit connecfion (City of Aflantic Beach, Summary of Wafer Usage 1994-2000).
'' Commercial, industrial and institutional land wilt not contribufe fo increased population within the service area.
~uccaneerServiceArea Residential Classifications
~[~esidential classifications for the Buccaneer service area were further subdivided into
J:ow, medium and high density land use designations using the City of Jacksonville
land use categories. Low and medium density classifications were identified within
the Buccaneer service area and aze defined by the City of Jacksonville as follows:
^ Low-Density Residential (LDR): developments in a gross density range of up to
seven dwelling units per acre when full urban services are available.
^ Medium Density Residential (MDR): developments in a gross density range of up
to 20 dwelling units per acre when full urban services are available.
Table ES-8 provides build-out projections for this service area.
CDM Cacrp Dresser & McKee Inc
ES-7
~ionc~rt~a~t~2~xoa~s3neswp~vu~ne~eanwa sumnayaoe
Ezecufive Summary
Table ES-8
Fiuild-out Protections for the Buccaneer Service Area
Description
Acres
Population Potential No. of
Unit
Population
bensity Connections2 Projection
Residential
Low Density 164.1 7 units per acre 920 2149
Medium Density 21.5 20 units per acre 345 806
Commercials 48.9 NA NA NA
Institutional s 11.1 NA NA NA
Tota- 245.6 9 265 2955
' Assumed 20ib of the available vacant property !s designated for stormwater management and Infrastructure
needs (utilityright-0f-ways, roads, eta).
s 2.124 persons per unit connection (City of Atlantic Beach, Summary of Wafer Usage 1994-2000).
' Commercial, industrial and institutional land will not contribute to Increased population within fhe service area.
Projections
Based on utility summaries provided by the City of Atlantic Beach, the current
number of water customers per unit connection is approxunately 2.12 and 2.33 for the
Atlantic Beach and Buccaneer service areas, respectively. Using these ratios,
F~opulation projections at build-out were determined for vacant residential parcels.
These projections were added to Year 2000 populations for a combined service area
l:~uild-out population of 29,789.
Atlantic Beach Service Area Population Projections
7'he population projections fox the City of Atlantic Beach based on unit connection
projections are summarized in Table ES-9
Buccaneer Service Area Population Projections
1'he population projections for the Buccaneer service area are summarized in Table
F,S-10.
I'o#able Water Demand Projec#ions
7'he demand values were based upon the following criteria and are provided in Table
ES-11:
^ Per capita level of service of 153 gallons per capita per day (gpcd) for the Atlantic
Beach service area
^ Per capita level of service of 111 gpcd for the Buccaneer service area
^ Maxirnum day flow to average daily flow ratio of 1.48 for the Atlantic Beach service
area
CDM Camp Dresses & McKee Inc.
ES-8
~lOrtsvftWbk2120 7 7915 7 7 9 9Ytpl WM%Td`ExeaAiw Sumnerydoe
Executive Summary
^ Maximum day flow to average daily flow ratio of 1.47 for the Buccaneer service
area, and
^ Population projections as provided in Table ES-9 and Table ES-10.
Table ES-9
City of Atlantic Beach Population Proiectionsi
Year Unit Connections Population Projections
Single Unit Multi-Unit Single Unit Multi-Unit Total
1994 4,300 1,281 -- -- 12,561
1995 4,345 1,287 -- '' - 12,802
1996 4,504 1,491 - - 13,202
1997 4,709 1,506 -- -- 13,650
1998 4,750 1,516 -- - 13,562
1999 4,829 1,516 - - 13,619
2000 4;956 1,560 - -- 13,836
2001 5,062 1,583 10,749 3,361 14,110
2002 5,171 1,606 10,980 3,410 14,390
2003 5,282 1,629 11,216 3,459 14,675
2004 5,395 1,653 11,456 3,510 14,966
2005 5,467 1,677 11,610 3,561 15,172
2006 5,467 1,701 11,610 3,612 15,222
2007 5,467 1,726 17,610 3,665 15,276
2008 5,467 1,751 11,610 3,718 15,329
2009 5,467 1,776 11,610 3,771 15,382
2010 5,467 1,802 11,610 3,826 15,437
2011 5,467 1,828 11,610 3,882 15,492
2012 5,467 1,855 11,610 3,939 15,549
2013 5,467 1,882 11,610 3,996 15,607
2014 5,467 1,909 11,610 4,054 15,664
2015 5,467 1,937 11,610 4,113 ~ 15,724
2016 5,467 1,965 11,610 4,172 15,783
2017 5,467 1,994 11,610 4,234 15,845
2018 5,467 2,023 11,610 4,296 15,906
2019 5,467 2,052 11,610 4,357 15,968
2020 5,467 2,082 11,610 4,421 16,031
2021 5,467 2,112 11,610 4,485 16,095
2022 5,467 2,142 11,610 4,552 16,162
2023 5,467 2,173 11,610 4,552 16,162
2024 5,467 2,205 11,610 4,552 16,162
2025 5,467 2,237 11,610 4,552 16,162
' Note: Population projections are based on potential unit connections to the water distribution system.
CDM camp ~3resser st McKee Inc. ES-9
~~.~rna~~zos~evt~eowp~wMa~ns~+~nNa s~.y.aoo
Executive Summary
•
'table ES-10
Buccaneer Service Area Population Proiections~
Year Unit Connections Population Projections
Single Unit Multi-Unit Single Unit Multi-Unit Total
1994 2,063 1,287 - -- 9,445
1995 2,079 1,283 -- - 9,457
1996 2,167 ~ 2,184 ~ - -- 9,655
1997 2,267 2,184 - - 9,795
1998 2,280 2,184 - - 10,204
1999 2,270 2,184 - -- 10,247
2000 2,361 2,211 - - 10,672
2001 .2,403 2,225 5,609 5,194 10,803
2002 2,446 2,239 5,710 5,226 10,936
2003 2,490 2,253 5,812 5,259 11,071
2004 2,534 2,267 5,915 5,292 11,207
2005 2,579 2,281 6,020 5,324 11,344
2006 2,625 2,295 6,127 5,357 11,485
2007 2,672 2,309 6,237 5,390_ 11,627
2008
• 2,720 2,323 6,349 5,422 11,772
2009 2,769 2,337 6,464 5,455 11,919
2010 2,818 2,351 6,578 5,488 12,066
2011 2,868 2,366 6,695 5,523 12,217
2012 2,919 2,381 6,814 5,558 12,372
2013 2;971 2,396 6,935 5,593 12,528
2014 3,024 2,411 7,059 5,628 12,687
2015 3,078 2,426 7,185 5,663 12,848
2016 3,133 2,441 7,313 5,698 13,011
2017 3,189 2,456 7,444 5,733 13,177
2018 3,246 2,471 7,577 5,768 13,345
2019 3,281 2,486 7,660 5,803 13,463
2020 3,281 2,501 7,660 5,838 13,498
2021 3,281 2,516 7,660 5,873 13,533
2022 3,281 2,532 7,660 5,910 13,570
2023 3,281 2,548 7,660 5,948 13,608
2024 3,281 2,556 7,660 5,967 13,627
2025 3,281 2,556 7,660 5,967 13,627
' Note: Population projections are based on potentfat unit connections to the wafer distribution system.
CDM c.~ i~ & Maces inG
ES-10
lYDtlsvft~dlsIQ1M3T0~'~170BVtpLVNAR7M1Ewewlive Sumurydoc
Executive Summary
'Table ES-11
Potable Water Demand Projectionsi
Year Atlantic Beach Service Area Buccaneer Service Area Total Service Area
Population ADF MDF Population ADF MDF Population ADF MDF
(mgd) (mgd) (mgd) (mgd) (mgd} (mgd)
1996 13,202 2.118 3.132 9,655 1.065 1.567 22,857 3.184 4.700
1997 13,650 2.004 2.963 9,795 1.147 1.687 23,445 3.151 4.651
1998 13,562 2.084 3.082 10,204 1.112 1.637 23,766 3.196 4.718
1999 13,619 2.113 3.125 10,247 1.173 1.726 23,866 3.286 4.851
2000 13,836 2.120 3.135 10,672 1.191 1.753 24,508 3.312 4.888
2001 14,110 2.157 3.190 10,803 1.203 1.770 24,913 3.360 4.960
2002 14,390 2.200 3.253 10,936 1.218 1.792 25,326 3.418 5.045
2003 14,675 2.244 3.318 11,071 1.233 1.814 25,746 3.476 5.131
2004 14,966 2.288 3.383 11,207 1.248 1.836 26,172 3.536 5.219
2005 15,172 2.320 3.430 11,344 1.263 1.859 26,516 3.583 5.288
2006 15,222 2.327 3.441 11,485 1.279 1.882 26,707 3.606 5.323
2007 15,276 2.336 3.453 11,627 1.295 1.905 26,902 3.630 5.358
2008 15,329 2.344 3.465 11,772 1.311 1.929 27,100 3.654 5.394
2009 15,382 2.352 3.477 11,919 1.327 1.953 27,300 3.679 5.430
2010 15,437 2.360 3.490 12,066 1.344 1.977 27,503 3.704 5.467
2011 15,492 2.369 3.502 12,217 1.360 2.002 27,710 3.729 5.504
2012 15,549 2.377 3.515 12,372 1.378 2.027 27,921 3.755 5.542
2013 15,607 2.386 3.528 12,528 1.395 2.052 28,135 3.781 5.581
2014 15,664 2.395 3.541 12,6$7 1.413 2.078 28,351 3.808 5.620
2015 15,724 2.404 3.555 12,848 1.431 2.105 28,571 3.835 5.660
2016 15,783 2.413 3.568 13,011 1.449 2.132 28,794 3.862 5.700
2017 15,845 2.423 3.582 13,177 1.467 2.159 29,021 3.890 5.741
2018 15,906 2.432 3.596 13,345 1.486 2.186 29,251 3.918 5.782
2019 15,968 2.441 3.610 13,463 1.499 2.206 29,431 3.940 5.816
2020 16,031 2.451 3.624 13,498 1.503 2.211 29,530 3.954 5.836
2021 16,095 2.461 3.639 13,533 1.507 2.217 29,628 3.968 5.856
2022 16,162 2.471 3.654 13,570 1.511 2.223 29,733 3.982 5.877
2023 16,162 2.471 3.654 13,608 1.515 2.229 29,770 3.986 5.883
2024 16,162 2.471 3.654 13,627 1.517 2.233 29,789 3.988 5.886
2025 16,162 2.471 3.654 13,627 1.517 2.233 29,789 3.988 5.886
' Note: Population projections are based on potential unit connections to the water distribution system.
CDM Cazr~p Dresser & McKee Inc.
ES-11
~w~~ewrrzo3~sans~wrn~na+~m~ summsyaoc
~/Vater Transmission/Distribution System
Hydraulic Model
Executive Summary
Summary of Modeled Scenarios
l7emand Scenarios
'Cwo sets of demand scenarios were developed to analyze the City's potable water
network. Since the service area is currently close to buildout, the two scenarios or
:study years selected for analysis were current (2000) demands and projected {2020)
demands.
]?uture projected flows indicated an additional 1.2 MGD average daily flow in the
'Year 2020. Peaking factors were then applied to obtain the MDD and PHD. Table
ES-12 provides a summary of the potable water demands used in the hydraulic
;analysis of the existing and future potable water systems.
'Table ES-12
.Summary of Hydraulic Scenarios
~;+~7 of Atlantic Beach Water Master Plan
Scenario Conditions Atlantic Beach
Demands Buccaneer
Demands Total Demand
1 Existing Max Day + Fire Flow 2,210 gpm 1,230 gpm 3,440 gpm + Fire Flow*
2 Existing Peak Hour 2,940 gpm 1,640 gpm 4,580 gpm
3 Future Max Day + Fire Flow 2,790 gpm 1,860 gpm 4,650 gpm + Fire Flow*
4 Future Peak Hour 3,800 gpm 2,400 gpm 6,200 gpm
'` Fire Flows are equal to 500 gpm for single-tamny Homes, ~,5uu gpm ror muin Tamny ana ~,uuu gpm ror
commercial properties.
$efore modeling the hydraulic scenarios described in Table ES-12, it was assumed
that all of the existing 8-inch diameter piping on Sherry Drive (from Seminole Drive
to Atlantic Boulevard) was replaced with 12 inch diameter pipe. This modification
was made based on, the City's current construction of this pipe replacement.
Model Results
Year 2000 Demands -Atlantic Beach Water System
Maximum Day Demand and Peak Hour Demand. The MDD and PHD steady-state
flow scenario was simulated in the model by setting the elevation in the elevated
storage tank to 116 ft (corresponding to a 50 psi discharge pressure at WTP No. 1),
operating the No. 4high-service pump at W'TI' No.1, and utilizing pump controls
based on system pressure to start and stop high-service pump No.1 at WTP No. 2, if
necessary. Similar to the actual current system operation, no major areas of concern
were evident for the MDD or PHD scenarios. The system contained satisfactory
reserve pumping and storage capacity for each of these scenarios. System pressures
ranged from 43 to 55 psi for both the MDD and PHF flow conditions.
•
CDM Camp Dresser & McKce Inc.
ES-12
1XklsvfMlsk2~20371I1117691iip(.YVMPITIG~ExeurtNa SvnYtWY•UOC
Executive Summary
Maximum Day Demand Plus Fire Flow. All fire flow scenarios were run concurrently
with the MDD. Atlantic Beach Water System is currently largely residential in nature.
Fire flows associated with residential dwellings are 500 gpm. Fire flows of 1,500 and
2,000 gpm were also included to reflect demands of multi family and commercial
:properties. Residential, multi-family and commercial fire flows were assigned based
~~n meter size. Two areas of low pressure (less than 20 psi) were discovered for this
.scenario. The areas of low pressure are located on 2, 3 and 4 inch pipe diameters in
the south east corner of the Atlantic Beach Water System. These low pressure areas
'were solved by increasing the pipe diameters to 6 and 8 inch lines.
'Year 2000 Demands -Buccaneer Water System
Maximum DaX and Peak Hour Demands. The MDD and PHD steady-state flow
;scenario was simulated in the model by setting the hydropnuematic tank pressures to
46 psi, for both WTP No. 3 and 4, and operating one high-service pump at each of the
'WTPs based on system pressure. No major areas of concern were evident for the
:MDD or PHD scenarios, although the PHD scenario produced a few nodes with
:pressures of 39 psi. These pressures were increased to greater than 40 by increasing
'the pressure at the hydropneumatic tanks to 52 psi. Because the Buccaneer pumps
:have sufficient capacity to meet MDD and PHD and fill the existing hydropneumatic
'tanks, instances of pressures below 40 psi would expect to be infrequent and of short
duration. The system contained satisfactory reserve pumping and storage capacity
:Eor each of these scenarios. System pressures ranged from 40 to 52 psi for both the
:MDD and PHD flow conditions.
Maximum Day Demand Plus Fire Flow. All fire flow scenarios were run concurrently
'with the MDD. The Buccaneer Water System is currently largely residential in nature.
:Fire flows associated with residential dwellings are 500 gpm. The Buccaneer Water
System showed several areas of low pressure (less than 20 psi) when the MDD plus
:Eire flow scenario was operated. These areas of low pressure are almost exclusively
,associated with nodes on 2-inch lines or nodes serving multi-family or commercial
:properties. As noted previously the fire flow assigned to multi-family and
commercial property is 1,500 and 2,000 gpm, respectively. Commercial sites were
:located by the meter size assigned to the node, as previously discussed in Section
7.2.2.4. This database does not subdivide commercial sites according to actual fire
.flow requirements based on the structures served. Therefore, the assignment of fire
.flows may not match the actual fire flow requirements. It is probable that the results
of the fire flow requirements have identified potential system deficiencies where a
site-specific calculation of fire flow needs would show lower flows and no need for
improvements.
The low pressure areas associated with nodes on 2-inch lines were solved by
increasing the pipe diameter to b inch lines. The majority of the remaining low
pressure areas were solved by opening the south interconnect between the Buccaneer
Water System and the Atlantic Beach Water System. Any improvements identified in
the 2000 scenarios were included in the future (2020) scenarios discussed below.
~i~M Camp Dresser & McKee Inc
ES-13
aonevrre~e~2oaTe•Jt7eclRp~•uVMP~rn~E,mcuwe sumnsadoe
Executive Summary
`dear 2020 Demands -Atlantic Beach Water System
lylaximum Day and Peak Hour Demands. MDD and PHF scenarios were simulated
the same as the Year 2000 scenarios, except future demands of undeveloped parcels
were included and additional controls were added to start additional pumps at WTP
Nos.1 and 2, if necessary. No major areas of concern were evident for the MDD or
I'HD scenarios. The system contained satisfactory reserve pumping and storage
capacity for each of these scenarios. System pressures ranged from 43 to 55 psi for the
MDD and the PHF flow conclitions.
P~Iaximum Day Demand Plus Fire Flow. All fire flow scenarios were run concurrently
with the future predicted MDD. After the 2, 3 and 4-inch lines were increased based
the 2000 MDD plus Fire Flow scenario, all residual pressures were greater than 20 psi
in the 2020 scenario.
Year 2020 Demands -Buccaneer Water System
r/Iaximum Day and Peak Hour Demands. The MDD and PHD steady-state flow
scenario was simulated in the model by including expected future demands and
setting the hydropnuematic tank pressures to 52 psi, for both WTP No. 3 and 4, and
operating all high-service pumps at each of the WTPs. No major areas of concern
were evident for the MDD or PHD scenarios, although the PHD scenario produced a
f ew nodes with pressures of 39 psi. System pressures ranged from 39 to 52 psi for
both the MDD and PHD flow conditions.
D~Iaximum Day Demand Plus Fire Flow. All fire flow scenarios were run concurrently
with the MDD. The Buccaneer Water System showed several areas of low pressure
([ess than 20 psi) when the MDD plus fire flow scenario was operated. After the 2- '
inch lines were increased based the 2000 MDD plus Fire Flow scenario, all residual
I~ressures associated with these pipes were greater than 20 psi. The majority of the
remaining low pressure areas were solved by opening the south interconnect between
the Buccaneer Water System and the Atlantic Beach Water System.
Interconnection to Neptune Beach
7'he City has expressed an interest in providing potable water to Neptune Beach.
Existing connections between the Atlantic Beach and Neptune Beach system exist at
the intersection of Sherry Drive and Atlantic Boulevard and at the intersection of
~~eminole Road and Atlantic Boulevard. Both of these connections are 6-inch diameter
and there are questions regarding if the valuing is operational. Consideration of the
capacity of these interconnections was included in the hydraulic modeling. A fixst
step to this process was to calculate how much water a combined Atlantic
Beach/Buccaneer water system might have available for use in Neptune Beach. This
volume was determined by subtracting the current (firm} max day water production
capacity of the combined Atlantic Beach/Buccaneer water system (5,829 gpm) from
the expected 2020 max day demand of these systems (4,650 gpm) resulting in a
potential flow of 1,179 gpm (1.7 mgd) to Neptune Beach. It should be noted, this
CDM Camp Dresser & McKee Inc
ES-14
110ikvftldkY2~2037813176WRpl WMRT~ExacutM Sunvnory.QOe
Executive Summary
. represents the maximum volume available and not necessarily the water required by
rdeptune Beach.
For the purposes of hydraulic modeling, the maximum potential flow to Neptune
Beach was divided between the two existing points of connection based on the
relative delivery capacities at each point. Based on the cross sectional areas of
Atlantic Beach pipes at the points of connection, 57 percent of the demand was
assigned to the Sherry Drive location and 43 percent to the Seminole Road location.
The 2020 fire flow scenario (as described above) was then run with the Neptune Beach
demands. The results indicate that a combined Atlantic Beach/Buccaneer water
system could provide up to 1,179 gpm to Neptune Beach.
I~ecommendafi.ons
The following recommendations are provided to identify the actions necessary to
proceed with a timely implementation of the findings of the Water Master Plan:
1. This Water Master Plan be accepted by the City and adopted by the City
Commission.
2. The water system improvements identified in Section 8.1 be implemented by the
City in a programmed and systematic plan of capital improvements.
3. The City establish renewal and replacement (R&R) funds for water valve, fire
hydrant, and pipe replacement programs.
4. Population growth, flow demands, raw water quality, and finished wafer quality
be reviewed on a yearly basis to determine necessary schedule or cost estimate
modifications for the CIP and Long-Term Improvements projects.
5. The GIS database should be continuously updated as new data from construction
projects, point repairs, customer complaints, and operator input become available.
6. The water distribution system hydraulic model should be continually updated to
reflect new construction and development.
7. The City should establish standard criteria for the location and spacing of water
valves and fire hydrants as the City implements projects to replace older sections of
the water distribution system.
8. Open valves interconnecting the Atlantic Beach and Buccaneer water distribution
systems and develop plant operating protocol for the interconnected grid.
9. For aesthetic enhancement of potable water quality (i.e. taste, odors) consider
additional specific investigation or pilot testing of treatment technologies for
effectiveness and cost-benefit.
CDM camF~ ~~ & tvtclcee ~~.
ES-15
\\disvTdisld120370\3'178WNp~WMP~T~d~E,reaAM Summarydoc
Executive Summary
. :Recognizing the magnitude of the comprehensive list of capital improvement projects
for the City of Atlantic Beach, and the limitations of financial resources to fund this
~axtensive CIP, the recommended projects have been prioritized in a 10 year CIP. This
'LO year plan integrates recommended projects with other needed projects previously
identified and listed by the City in the CIP budget.
The 10 year capital outlay for water production facilities is provided in Table ES-23.
'Che water distribution facilities 10 year capital outlay is provided in Table ES-14. The
~~ctual implementation schedule maybe adjusted depending on the City's approach to
iiznding the recommended capital improvements.
C,
CDM came ~~~M~c« im~
ES-16
\Wttsvr2~GL5k2120~78171769Yip(„INMRTM1EZeNliva S~rtnmsry.dx
• t
Table ES-13
WaterPmducNon 400.5502-533
Schedule of Capital Chrtlay -30 Year Financial Plan
-- -
C° , ltd OuNa " D$seH' Nan
•
Flt-02' :"
FY~03
FY-04'. , ; ' , •;
FY,eOSa'
FY-0B:: . ' ':.:
F3(-0T'"?- : `.`
ESf-QB%:. ' '.: '~
FY-09
Well data eollectlonlane sis 570,000
Well Cseni 560,000 580,000 SBO.D00
Weil Rshab or Re lacemenl at WP 3 S100,000
WeN Rehabilitetion/Re iscement et WP 1
Re it aM Coali of Elevated Tank at WP 1 5100 000
S50 000 S100 000
Telam /Scads for water stem S25 006 525,000 S25 000 S25 000
Add afore a tank at WP 2 S1 000 000
Add elevated eto a tank at WP 2
Genset re lacements at water lants S70 000 570000
Elevatedtankre aidmeintenance $760D0
H ro eumatlc teak air/maintenance 550,000 S50 000 550000
Weil rehab or re acement at WP 2 gt00 000
Plant rades or rehabilitation 5100 000
New wall et WP 2 5350 000
Decammisaton WP 4 $450,000
>+«,.. : ,
E .F' pant •.:. ~ .: -';
., .:
~ s
Poet Chlorinator at Bus Water
Lab ui H Chlorine meters-WP #1 $2 000
S1 500
Co utsrafSoftwaro
Cam x R lecementa
..
.
.
'
.
.:,. i
,
'
;
.~
~ ~
Tnrdt ro lecement S30 000 330 000 .
530,000
TofallNaNrProdueNon Sl28,ti00 5508,500 5235,000 578,000 5100,000 S~T$000 Sl,030,000 5170,000
CDM ampfkwereM~l:eetn~
•
Table ES34
Water D$fribudon -4005504533
Setredale of Gvital Oatlar- 30 Yeu Financial Plan
•
Litpihl0utle i'€' On_ r;:, _a; :. ':. ~.. - .. r` ~. ... . '; "':':'
Fy-02.:., ..
F,Y-OJ
1~'~4 ..:. .
FY-o3`
~"(-09.: ' . ..
.-~T.
FY-0d'...
SeivaSfnesbWatxLlneRelocetlona City) S755,000
R see 2" -4" water main on Beach Ave. and 4" on Ahem with 8' FF and improvements 5350,000
R aoe 8' Water Msin on Ocean Blvd from Ahem to 8th Street FF and im rovements) 5500,000 '
R see 4" AC main with e" on Sea Oeta Drive AC 5175,000
IMerooruraetlon belrveen AB b BuC at Church 6 Metn (Ci ) 520,000
R ace 2" water rrlein wink B" on Mealy S; Dudley S; Park St end extend Church St (undersizetl) 5182,000
R ace 2' 8 4" AC rtf~n with 5" main on PaQc Tertece East AC) 525,000 5250,000
R ace 4'AC msMwilh 8' main on Park Terrace West AC E154,000
R a water main on Ma Rd, north of Wondenvood FF and improvements 5140,000
R acs water main from M Landin to Sh Le Ci 5'150.000
R see 2" and 8" water mein wlth 12" on Esst Coast Drive FF and im rovements . 5324,000
R see 2" water main with 8" on Ribualt Road F 532,000
R as 2" water meln with 8" on Renault Road F 539,000
Install 8' water main tram bird Dr. aaoss SR A1A and 8" water main from Nantucket to Meyport Landin (FF) 582,000
Re acs 2" water main with 6" on Pine St end ad scent area undereiz 533,000
R ace 8' AC mdn on Sehra Marina Dr, between Seturibe end Seminole Roads AC Pi a
N Beach IntercormedsatS Drive end Seminole Road 5150,OOD '
R acs 8" AC mein on Piaza behveen M rt and Sailfish Roed AC) '
R aosment of 2' water melns with 8' mains undeniz S215,000 5215,000 5275,000 5215,000
t ii l.+J. (e. T.. ~ i:.t ~, ~..-F ~; `~~' 1r?"~. ~ )
tryt .. 1'~ . .Y',1 ..~7{t I ~ 7. .~3% ~' .6G Fsi Y`4. i.
Rs sae s asaemblles 510,000
u era too S~s,two
Baddas 550,000
. ~-=:.
n .,'i. ~
Sri
GIS Handheld Unih IPAQ~870 Pocket PCa 4 each 52,500
GP3 M 330 ties ~ above 51,200
Printer far Servla Orders at 902 Aaalsl 35,000
Aratew 8.1 Ucsnaa for GIS Technkian 51,200
torGlS Teaurlaan 53,500
,. ~ ,,
,
_
,
3
.
Fz
Trudr IaeemeM P3 520,000
Trtsdt ecerrlenl P5 f20.000
Tr++~ ~~ 530,000
TohiWalerDisMbWon ;977,100 51,008,000 SBJ9,000 S5$2,OOb S2J5,000 St1S,000 5245,000
CDM c„~a.,~a,t~1M.
APPENDIX C -FULL COPY OF 2001 WATER FACILITIES MASTER PLAN
(FOR REGULATORY AGENCY SUBMITTAL ONLY)
Water Facilities Plan Update J. Collins Enf2ineering Associates, LLC