The URL can be used to link to this page

12-01-96 BID N0. 9697-1 - ABOVE-GROUND TWO-POST AUTOMOTIVE LIFT Specifications: Lifting Capacity: 9,000 lbs. Lifting Height: 75" Min. Overall Height: 150" Max. Overall Width: 144" Max. Width Between Columns: 100" Min. Pad Heigh[: 4" Min. Arm Ad3ustment: Front 32" - 48" Rear 38" - 54" Motor: 2 HP Single Phase with truck and van adapters Include installation of lift no electrical ACCEPTABLE MODELS- AMMCO MODEL B2900 BAYHASTER MODEL B-9000A, or Approved Equivalent, or better ~~ ~a-o9-9~ CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH C'ITF COti]iISSIO\ riEE"I'L\G STAFF REPORT :~GF.\DA ITF.tI: SUBMITTED BY: DA'PE: BACKGROL; \D: Above Ground Two-Post Automotive LiR Robert S. KosopDirec[or of Public Works ~ Phil h'odineiSVeets & Maintenance Division Director December 5, 1996 "the automotive lift at the Public Works Fleet Maintenance Facility- became unsafe to lifr the tnrcks for repair and maintenance. Karl Gntnewald, City Safety Officer, dxlared the equipment unsafe and discontinued its use. A bid opening was held on Thursday, 12; 0~, 96; at 1:00 P.M. w replace this item of equipment. The following vendors submitted bids to meet or exceed the existing specifications for the two post above ground automotive lift: Southeastern Automotive Ben Pearson Model B-9000A 53,595.00 NAPA Automotive Parts AMMCO Model B-2900F 53;656.67 "I'he follotcine bidder did ~ meet all the specifications: Atlantic Auto Suppliers Mohawk System I 55,300.00 Atlantic Auto Suppliers Grand TP09A S3,495.00 RECO~I~iF.~DATIO\: Award the bid to Southeastern Automotive to purchase the Ben Pearson Model B-9000A in [he amount of 53,595.00. The budge[ contained an allotment for a new brake lathe in the amount of 55.000. We recommend use of these monies to replace the auto lift and tn• to make the old brake lathe last one more year. .~l fACH11E~TS: Bid Information and Specifications KI•:~'1}:~~'ED Bt' CITY tiA\AGER:~~ AGE~iDA 1TEtl 7D Iz-oq-9~ CITY COMMISSION MEETING DECEMBER 9. 1996 BOARD APPOINTMENTS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD - 4-year terms (Current terms expire December 31): Patricia Pillmorc -Was appointed to the Community Development Board in December 1991 to fill an unexpired term. Has also served an additional full 4-yearterm Mary Walker -Has served one fu114-year term PENSION BOARD OF TRUSTEES - 2-year terms (Currerrt terms expire December 31): Chip Tousey -Has served one full 2-year term John Fletcher -Was appointed to the Pension Board in January 1993 to fill an unexpired term. Has served an additional full 2-year term. RESIGNATIONS: CULTURAL ARTS BOARD: Darieae Glasel Term will expire on April 30, 1998. CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD: Kathleen Russell Term will expire on September 30, 1998 ~~ 2020 SW 31st P (305) 962-2700 INDUSTRIES, INC. BETTER THAN WOO D RECYCLED PLASTIC PRODUCTS venue ~ Pembroke Park, FL 33009 FAX (305) 963-4778 GETTER TNAN WOOD RECTCIEO /LASTN: PRODUCTS 2020 SW 31st Avenue Pembroke Park, FL 33009 (305) 962-2100 FAX (305) 963-4778 Sh Y S GULK RATE U.S. Pp$TAGE PAID FT. LAUDERDALE, FL PERMIT /i If Its Better Than Wood... _~= fJ e!IOn.N Mark Clinf, .rn,! Sakti CCII!PI 1800) 9R7 a7'>o j SUiI 987 49ny tr,~ I30SI 987 rr7 /, ~, r.q,Im OIhU", an11 1'I,un j30S1 9G7 1100 rn>: I305I9G3 a77r; ...;111::.".1 1 I..r lc!,1 1'i.l i,i Why BTW Products? ^ MJm Um.uu , .,~ , ^ Non-abti Or!,..il• - , • TCr mIU• .inC :: , , .. ,.. O Can bC wol :.~ ..... ..... ,..... ^ SO-yCar Onv[rr! ac'r'.:. ^ NO Sp 6n[ennf;. t: ,u :. ~.'~~ C.• <nr);,'.1:~ C ColOrfdSf ., ..i i. . ..... . ^ NCVCr rOt•, ^ Skid reslstan! We Care For The Environment c hemkally Inert no cr~o<u!/~ or drSCnlc Uosed~loop n..-.., ..,..,.,: Call now for a free sample! (800) X387-4750 Our product line includes recycled plastic lumber for construction of: a e 6 ... and these finishec products. o o This... Instead of this... _~ B w INDUSTFIES, INC. ..~uon n I r r r u . .nt , ~ {1111'1 :1'~1 Over Hatf A Century of Experience '. iul-tr-gib wtl: ~:.I, , ... _~ r( American Earth ~J~- ~/57ip1~(f j~~ '~ Friendly, Inc. ueluxe Ylcmc Tables All Recycled Plastic 6 Ft. Picnic Table 60" x 71" x 72' 29S Lbs f449.00 4 Ft. Childs Picnic Table 3)" x 22" x 48" 123 Lbs. f179 00 i (Optional Stainless Steel hardware T25.00 per table) The " J " [.eg Table Walk •Thru Picnic Table SS" x 30" x 72" 225 Lbs. 5399.00 r Galvanized Steel Frame (6 Ft.) (Optional Stainless Steel hardware: 535.00 per table) ~Jy U U Handicap Accessible Tables / A.D.A. 7 IR Ft. Picnic Table 60" x 31" x 90" 345 Lbs. 5549.00 All Rtxycled Plastic 7 1/2 Ft. Walk-thru Table SS" x 70" x 90" 260 Lbs. 5499.00 t! Galvanized Steel Frame Ftaagon Picnic: Table Walk-in Design 30' x 72' 275 Lbs. 5549.00 Deluxe Hextgon Picnic Table Scats I2 People 28" x 90" 4S0 Lbs 5799.00 t Standard cokxs Gray, Tan, Cedar Custom wlors available in quantity Starderd harOwarc: galvttntzed (Stuppea and Haedliaa as iacWdsd ie plea) 5h~ 3 I ~Sn 5 W Irne Strcu. 12 • IT=4ay tkrh. Fl. 3JN< • Ph' pn7) ,76-~ I3Y • Fat (ati/)116.3965 i..w s. w !an s~.•<~. a2 • Dciray BurA, Fl, )3r/< • Ph. (101) 216.4 (~]~ ~tl`•~ntt ~~-`~ 112rFer d [ V 7I1 -- ~__ -~rn~,,.. ,.~_ .. Recycled Plastic Products Price List - ~' American Earth Friendly, Inc, PO LYTI M B RE tm RECYCLED PLASTIC LUIUgER PRICE LIST rnrTna,l r~.cnvs: ~Pxn,/1~ 5h~ z I"ROUND ' " t" DIA .25 LB S .55 12 FT 3 LBS S 6 60 I X 2 " " 5/8" X 1 1/2" .50 LB S .60 12 Fi' 6 LBS . S 7 20 I X 2 " " 1" X 2 I/8" .75 LB 51 00 - 12 FT 9 LBS . S12 00 l X 4 ' " 3/4" X 3 1/2" 1.00 LB 5135 12 FT 12 LBS . S 1610 1 X 6 5/8 X 5 1/2" 1.50 LBS 51.61 12 FT 18 LBS 519.32 2" X 4" " " 1 1/2" X 3 3/4" 2.00 LBS 51.86 8 FT 16 LBS S14 88 2 X G " " 1112" X 5 1/2" 3.00 LBS 52.92 8 FT 24 LBS . 523 3¢ 2 X 10 1 1/2" X 9 1/2' 5.00 LBS S5.26 8 FI' 40 LBS . . Sd2.08 2" }( 6" (FULL) ` 2" X 5 1/2" 3.50 LBS 53.28 8 FT 28 LBS 526 24 FULL 2 THICK . PROFILI: DESIGNED TO SURFACE DECKING/DOCKS USE WfITi 24" , ON-CENTER EXISTING STRINGERS WITHOUT ADDITIONAL SUPPORT STRINGERS 4" X 4" 3 1/2' X 3 I/2` 4.50 LBS S4.73 8 FT 36 L8S S37.84 6" X 6" 5 t/2" X 5 1/2• 13.00 LBS 511.12 8 FT ]04 LBS 588.96 STANDARD COLORS; GRAY, BROWN, TAN, CEDAR, BLACK CUSTOM COLORS: GREEN, REDWOOD. BLUE YELLOW, WI{17'E (ADD 10% PER FT) NOTE: OTHER COLORS AVAII,gBLfi iN LG. QUANTITIES VOLUME DISCOUNTS ON LUMBER IN 22,000 LB, LOTS (12 TRUCKLOAD) LUMBER IS SOLD BY THE FOOT/ STANDARD (FACTOR' ) LENGTA IS d / 12 I'7: DEPENDING ON PROFILE /CUSTOM LENGTRS ARE AVAILABLE IIV QUANTITIES CUSTOM PROFILES (SIZES) NOT LISTED ABOVE ARE AVAII.ABLE, WE CAN BUILD A DIE (MOLD) TO YOi1R SPECII7CATIONS FOR LARGE VOLUME ORDERS ASK ABOUT OUR CURRENT SELECTION OF DdHOUSE DIES FOR A SIZE NOT LISTED SRIPPING/fiA1V>>L[NG CHARGIrS: FOB, DELRAY BEACH, FLORIDA 14S11$.~Y. 1(hh Strcq. ~2 • Dclr~y Ilcach. fl. ~}CGi • Ph' (~7127G-/ (S2 • fa: (GQ1) Z76-3%5 •Ywr Okmc Jrlrit wN m e inr." d n:..".. shy ~~ iu. .~.. .,.. .., .,., .,,,...., .._ October 31, 1995 Bob Kosoy, P.E. Public Works Director City of Atlantic Beach 800 Seminole Road Atlantic Beach, Florida 32233 Dear Mr. Kosoy; This will provide our quote to collect used automobile tires and pick up truck tires at curbside once per week in Atlantic Beach. Our proposed rate is $0.093 per month per residential customer. This price will be subje<:t to increase at the same rate and schedule currently provided f:or in our contract. This is the same rate we are paid for similar services to the City of Jacksonville. Tires mint be derimed and limited to four tires. four times per year. These ca res must be waste tires generated by each residence in the course of normal occupancy and not by result of any commercial enterpriyc. ~* Thank you for the opportunity to quote you this rate and if accepted we will prepare necessary contract amendments and begin service on your schedule. Sincerely, !~(~ Jj ,CGS. OujJ~A'N~ ~ ~ `~.3~ viz i+rou~" al"4 3q~.~e P~ re+. rv~~~ DeWayne Igou k ~ ~ Division President and Gcncrnl Manager ~ ~-~ 2/7 ,f~, Y6i!'f. roT~, Page 2 Recycling Grant Monies December 5, 1996 Alternative C For Expenditure of Budgeted Funds• Half Ton Pickup to be used for pickup of tires 13,458 Truck would be painted to promote recycling with logo reading "Please Recycle." Have Contract Hauler (Waste Management) Pick ttp Tires 5,218 Recycling Bins @ 5.00/each 1,956 14 6' Ficnic Tables ~ 144/each 6,286 13,460 Purchase materials to build handicap ramp to the beach from recycled plastic 13,458 Please Note: We must submit our written request to the City of Jacksonville by December 31, 1996 to be eligible for the State of Florida Recycling Grant Fund. Attachments: Data Sheets on design and pricing REVIEWED BY CITY MANAGER: AGENDA ITEM ~c December 5, 1996 AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: DATE: Recycling Grant Monies ~z-oq-q(~ Robert S. Kosoy/Director of Public Works Phil Nodine/Streets & Maintenance Division Director December 4, 1996 BACKGROUND: The City Commission approved $15,000 for the 1996/97 Budget for Recycling Grant Monies which are appropriated for Duval County by the City of Jacksonville Recycling Division. The actual appropriation for FY 1996-1997 is $13,458, and reimbursement will be processed upon submittal of purchase receipts. Alternative 500 A. For Excenditure of Budget F Recycling Bins unds• 5/each 2,500 l5 6' High Back Benches 191/each 2,865 19 32 Gallon Trash Receptacles 142/each 2,698 12 6' Picnic Tables 449/each 5,388 13,451 With Tresca Park and Dutton Park coming on-line it would be advantageous for the City to purchase these items. Alternative B. For Expenditure of Budgeted Funds: 500 Recycling Binds 5/each 2500 111 Composting Bins 44/each 4,884 Lot Advertising Material 3,000 1 Hire Consultant to provide seminaz(s) and state-of--the-art information for recycling, composting/gardening 3,000 13,384 The advertising material would include a contest for all elementary school children in the City and the best recycling poster would receive a $100 Savings Bond. IV. Application for Variance tiled by Peter Coalson on behalf of Bob Blohm to construct an addition that ~s~ll encroach the setback requirements of property located at 1057 Beach Avenue. Peter Coalson introduced himself to the board and explained that Mr. Blohm purchased the property ~+~th the hope of constructing a second storo garage and covered front stoop. He read several letters from neighbors expressing their support of the improvements. Fie stated the 60-foot frontage under the present plan would allow for a 5'4" setback on the north side, a 5-foot setback on the south side and an open breezeway of 5'6" for an aggregate of 16 feet. Mr. Worley explained that the property consists of t~vo 30-foot tots and the proposed addition will be attached to the original structure by a 5.5 foot long breezeway. He stated that under "Definitions" the code addresses the issue of combining two 30-foot Tots. After discussion, Mr. Wolfson moved to approve the variance with the following conditions: L That the building be used only for a garage; 2. That no second floor be constructed on the building. Mr. Grunthal seconded the motion and the variance was granted by a vote of 3 - 2 with Mr. Frohwein and Mrs. Walker dissenting. The board agreed to hold a special meeting on December 17, 1996 to discuss proposed amendments to the Zoning Code, The board will hold election of officers at the next regularly scheduled meeting. Iltere being no further business to come before the board on motion duly made the meeting vas adjourned. SIGNED: ATTEST: 1-he Chaimtan requested the application be placed on the agenda for the next regularly scheduled meeting. 11. Application for Use-by-Exception filed by Bill_v loe Witt to operate a jeep specialty shop at propene kno++at as 20 Donner Road. Billy Witt introduced himself and explained that he desired to open a jeep specialty shop in the CL. Commercial Limited district. He stated that no more than two vehicles ++~II be parked outside overnight and no more than four vehicles during business hours. After discussion, Mr. Frohwein moved to recommend approval of the Use-by-Exception +vith the following conditions: 1. The hours of operation between 8:00 AM to 8:00 PM; 2. Not more than t+vo vehicles parked outside overnight; 3. No noise producing equipment operate outside the building; 4. No auto body work performed. The Chairman requested that the use-bv-exception be granted solely to the applicant. Mr. Grunthal seconded the motion and the use-bv-exception +vas unanimously approved. i~ III. Application for Use-by-Exception filed by Adele Grage Community Center to operate anon-profit theater at 716 Ocean Boulevard. Martha Reid, President of the Atlantic Beach Experimental Theater which operates under an agreement «~th the City of Atlantic Beach and operates a community based theater in a portion of the Conununity Center +vhich is located at 716 Ocean Boulevard. ). P. Marchioli, Peter Coalson, Joan Carver and Pete Dowling introduced themselves and expressed their approval of the request. Bob Weiss introduced himself and explained that he was not in favor of granting the use- bv-exception due to the fact that alcohol is served at the premises. After discussion, Mr. Frohwein moved to recommend approval of the use-bv-exception. At the Chairman's request, Mr. Frohwein withdrew his motion. The Chairman asked if anyone present had any problems regarding parking at the location. There being no response, Mr. Frohwein restated his motion. Mr. Grunthal seconded the motion and the board voted unanimously to recommend approval of the use-bv-except ion, After discussion, the Chairman moved to grant the variance as presented provided: I . "1"he irrigation plan be implemented in compliance +vith city ordinance; "L. "I~he parking requirement be reduced to 193 spaces; 3. "fhe applicant be held to eight trees on the L shape location and clustered in such a way as to be protected in the future and maintained indefinitely by the contractor as well as the o++nrer. Mr. Frohwein seconded the motion. After discussion, Mr. bVolfson amended his motion to exclude the requirement of landscaping at the rear of the property on the north side. Mr. Frohwein seconded the amended motion and the variance +vas granted by a unanimous vote. NEW BUSINESS: 1. Application for Variance filed by Dorothy Papazian to remodel a nonconforming structure located at 537 Beach Avenue. Michael Leinenweber, contractor for the applicant, introduced himself and explained that Mts. Papazian had asked him to appear on her behalf. He stated that the applicant desires to construct an addition on the rear of an existing garage to be used as a secondary dwelling. The addition will be attached to the east side of the building and continue along the south line. The original stnrdure was a garage larger than its current size. Half of the structure was demolished and the remaining structure used for storage. After discussion, the Chairman moved to approve the variance and Pat Pillmore seconded the motion. Mr. Frohwein expressed concern about the proximity of the structures and felt that the request was not a minimum request by the applicant. The Chairman indicated that his motion for approval was based on the wrong survey and withdre+v the motion. After disctusion, Mr Frohwein moved to deny the variance and Mr. Grunthal seconded the motion. "Ihe Chairman explained that if a vote was taken and the variance denied the applicant +vould have to +vait a year before reapplying. It appearing that the consensus was denial, Mr. Leinen+veber asked that the application be withdrawn to allow the applicant to present a revised application that the board may be more inclined to approve. MINUTES OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD OF THE CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH, FLORIDA November 19, 1996 7:00 P.M. CITY HALL PRESENT Don Wolfson Robert Froh+vein Pat Pillmore Mary Walker Buzzy Grunthal AND Alan Jensen, City Attorney George Worley, II, CD Director Pat Hams, Recording Secretary ABSENT Sharette Simpkins Mark McGowan Chairman Don Wolfson called the meeting to order and asked for approval of the minutes from the meeting of October I5, 1996. Upon motion made and seconded the minutes were approved. OLD BUS/NESS: 1. Application for Variance Filed by Kent Enterprises, Inc., to reduce parking requirements and waive island requirement in parking lot for property located at 751 Atlantic Boulevard. John Kent of Kent Theaters introduced himself to the board and presented a revised landscape and parking plan prepared by Ron Slade of Powers & Merritt Architects and drawn pursuant to the landscape code but providing 193 parking spaces which includes the south part of the adjacent property in the overall theater plan. Mr. Kent indicated that the irrigation system is not shown on the plan but would be installed completely according to code. On Mr. Worley's suggestion, the applicant has included a 5-foot grass strip around the south and east side of the north part of the adjacent property where the edge of the theater property consists of a driveway but requested that only eight trees be planted. }J~1 I~ , ,..,,., Please Type or Print in Ink `I}~~J(cation Fee ~~tu.~~U A1)11 J ~~~ --IIIIVVVIIIiii APPLICATION FOR -~dlakingEaadP~eA#11g Date Filed~_L~~y" _i rl~'Lc1 ~____-- Nawe and Addre•a of Orner or Tenant Sn Possession of Prewlees: _A~Err1_AA.E''--G_pR[~G~-~Qrsr1~n,11~ Phone ---~L1Yr~.~----°-----°------- Mork: ___ Howe: ------------------------- Street address and legal description vi the prewlaee ae to rhich the •Uae Dy 6xception• i^ requeated~ - -Q~~AA1_ ~~L~t~? ~------------------------------ -- -------------- _~~-A_~r_t.c__L~F.~c_. --~__~s~_ 3.~z~3_____________ ----------------- A description of the •Ua by 6xception• desired, rhich shall specifically and particularly deaoribe the type, charaoter ^nd extent of the proposed •Uae by 6xception•t ---- ~-1+E--1~.L1.9L~Z1~ _S~~q~fl _~~~~RJI~~ NT.pll~___-Z-+_~_4T~ R---- -~ s --~_l~eN -Q~.4F1L_ 4t?~3S~QK~~D1~1__ ~~9_I~E~t~ Q _ T~ __~~Ns-~n.~~. hIC1~! w... Cn~_.. r~~~ ..~_ _ 1------------ Specific reasons rhy the applicant ieel^ the request should be granted: ------1r~UTy___C~1l~--SM~1.1._IH~~T~R_~Et~~ N~ T ~,.~ _~ ~ ---- ~I 1l GI , ~ n~ ~r, n ,... , .r ~B STAFF REPORT ~ z ~ ~ 9 _9 AGENDA ITEM. i_is._ny_FyrenPpn fnr Atl2nhr Beare Theater SUBMITTEC BY George LNcrley il. Community Development Director/,, -~ DATE ~ecembcr ; 1SSE BACKGROUND. The applicant is Atlantic Beach Experimental Theater which operates under a contractual ayreemerrt with the City. leasing space at the Adele Grage Community Center at 716 Ocean Boulevard. The theater has been in operation at this location for several years. With ttie recent approval by the Commission to undertake the substantial renovation of the front portion of the buildng the question of ttre use has again been addressed. The applicants theater use approximates the "Public and private recreation facilities" use permitted by exception in Section 24-105 (c} (2) The Community Center has insufficient parking on-site to accornrnodate the demands imposed by some of the theaters productions. however the on street parking availability has offset this somewhat. RECOMMENDATION: Following review of the application and public input. the Community Development Board recommended granting the Use-by-Exception to the applicarrt for this location. ATTACHMENTS: 1) Application for Use-by-Exception. 2) Minutes of the Community Develcpment Board Meeting. REVIEWED BY CITY MANAGER: ~~, AGENDA ITEM NO IV. Application for Variance filed by Peter Coalson on behalf of Bob Blohm to construct an addition that ~~~II encroach the setback requirements of property located at 1057 Beach Avenue. Peter Coalson introduced himself to the board a~td explained that Mr. Blohm purchased the property :with the hope of constructing a second story garage and covered front stoop. He read several letters from neighbors expressing their support of the improvements. He stated the 60-foot frontage under the present plan would allow for a 5'4" setback on the north side, a ~-foot setback on the south side and an open breezeway of 5'6" for an aggregate of 16 feet. Mr. Worley explained that the propene consists of two 30-foot lots and the proposed addition will be attached to the original structure by a 5.5 foot long breezeway. He stated that under "Definitions" the code addresses the issue of combining two 30-foot lots. After discussion, Mr. Wolfson moved to approve the variance with the following conditions: L That the buildi~;g be used only for a garage; 2. That no second floor be construtted on the building. Mr. Grunthal seconded the motion and the variance was granted by a vote of 3 - 2 with Mr. Frohwein and Mrs. Walker dissenting. The board agreed to hold a special meeting on December l7, 1996 to discuss proposed amendments to the Zoning Code, The board will hold elettiort of officers at the next regularly scheduled meeting. There being no further business to come before the board on motion duly made the meeting was adjourned. SIGNED: ATTEST: t The Chairman requested the application be placed on the agenda for the next regularly scheduled meeting. ll. Application (or Use-by-Exception filed by Billy Joe Witt to operate a jeep specialty shop at property known as 20 Donner Road. Billy Witt introduced himself and explained that he desired to open a jeep specialty shop in the CL, Conunercial Limited district. He stated that no more than two vehicles will be parked outside ovemight and no more than four vehicles during business hours. Aber discussion, Mr. Frohwein moved to recommend approval of the Use-by-Exception with the following conditions: 1. The hours of operation between 8:00 AM to 8:00 PM; 2. Not more than two vehicles parked outside ovemight; 3. No noise producing equipment operate outside the building; 4. No auto body work performed. The Chairman requested that the use-by-exception be granted solely to the applicant. Mr. Grunthal seconded the motion and the use-by-exception was unanimously approved. [11. Application for Use-by-Exception filed by Adele Grage Community Center to operate anon-profit theater at 716 Ocean Boulevard. Martha Reid, President of the Atlantic Beach Experimental Theater which operates under an agreement with the City of Atlantic Beach and operates a community based theater in a portion of the Community Center which is located at 716 Ocean Boulevard. J. P. Marchioli, Peter Coalson, Joan Carver and Pete Dowling introduced themselves and expressed their approval of the request. Bob Weiss introduced himself and explained that he was not in favor of granting the use- by-exception due to the fact that alcohol is served at the premises. Aher discussion, Mr. Frohwein moved to recommend approval of the use-by-exception. At the Chairman's request, Mr. Frohwein withdrew his motion. The Chairman asked if anyone present had any problems regarding parking at the location. There being no response, Mr. Frohwein restated his motion. Mr. Grunthal seconded the motion and the board voted unanimously_ to recommend approval of the use-bv-exception, After discussion, the Chairman moved to grant the variance as presented provided: . 'the irrigation plan be implemented in compliance ~+~th city ordinance; 2. The parking requirement be reduced to 193 spaces; 3. The applicant be held w eigiu trees on ii~c L si~ape location and clustered in such a way as to be protected in the future and maintained indefinitely b_v the contractor as well as the owner. Mr. Frohwein seconded the motion. After discussion, Mr. Wolfson amended his motion to exclude the requirement of landscaping at the rear of the property on the north side. Mr. Frohwein seconded the amended motion and the variance .vas granted by a unanimous vote. NEW BUSINESS: 1. Application for Variance filed by Dorothy Papazian to remodel a nonconforming stnitture located at 587 Beach Avenue. Michael Leinenweber, contrattor for the applicant, introduced himself and explained that Mrs. Papazian had asked him to appear on her behalf. He stated that the applicant desires to construct an addition on the rear of an existing garage to be used as a secondary dwelling. The addition will be attached to the east side of the building and continue along the south line. The original structure was a garage larger than its current siu. Half of the structure vas demolished and the remaining structure used for storage. After discussion, the Chairman moved to approve the variance and Pat Pillmore seconded the motion. Mr. Frohwein expressed concern about the proximity of the structures and felt that the request was not a minimum request by the applicant. The Chairman indicated that his motion for approval was based on the wrong survt_v and withdrew the motion. After discussion, Mr Frohwein moved to deny the variance and Mr. Grunthal seconded the motion. The Chairman explained that if a vote was taken and the variance denied the applicant would have to wait a year before reapplying. It appearing that the consensus was denial, Mr. Leinenweber asked that the application be withdrawn to allow the applicant to present a revised application that the board may be more inclined to approve. MINUTES OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD OF THE CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH, FLORIDA November 19, 1996 7:00 I'.M. CITY HALL PRESENT Don Wolfson Robert Frohwein Pat Pilhnore Marv Walker Buzzv Grunthal AND Alan Jensen, City Attorney George Worley, II, CD Director Pat Harris, Recording Secretary ABSENT Sharette Simpkins Mark McGowan Chairman Don Wolfson called the meeting to order and asked for approval of the minutes from the meeting of October I S, 1996. Upon motion made and seconded the minutes were approved. OLD BUSINESS: I. Application for Variance filed by Kent Enterprises, Inc., to reduce parking requirements and waive island requirement in parking lot for property located at 751 Atlantic Boulevard. John Kent of Kent Theaters introduced himself to the board and presented a revised landscape and parking plan prepared by Ron Slade of Powers & Merritt Architects and drawn pursuant to the landscape code but providing 193 parking spaces which includes the south part of the adjacent property in the overall theater plan. Mr. Kent indicated that the irrigation system is not shown on the plan but would be installed completely according to code. On Mr. Worley's suggestion, the applicant has included a S-foot grass strip around the south and east side of the north part of the adjacent property where the edge of the theater property consists of a driveway but requested that only eight trees be planted. Pleeee Type or Print Sn Ink APPLICATION FOR 'USE BY Det• Filed: Application Fer ?IUU. uU E%CEPT ri7~-~~~' I~I ~. ~J`~ `~C~ ``UPI ,.,, ,~ ~ 1996 Ness ^nd Address of Orner or Tenant in PoseeselonUOf~pn Q a ed Zoning --fix :SP~_shaaTr--------------- _ ~e~cY,~rz.~~44.~y.f_~oeiAq_.3a~ay---- Phone Mork: _ ~O J_ ~J 3'1 - ISoZC~ Street address end lapel description OS the premises ee to rhich ih~ •U Dy Exception' Ss requestedi -. ------------------------ A description of the •Uss by Exception' desired, rhich shell epecifical] end pertioulerly desaribs the type, character and extent of the propose 'Use by Exception: A_,2~p~-~~e~Cd~jd~~~}(2~d_.£rDm_~~~aacLTv ~5_COp~n.~[~inz.t'i~t~tL~ccs-_rp~a ~s'izari $:.4QaaiTc_(t~~.49prt?_J~eol~wv}_~Li~~vSi~.ti9'Lva! oFAu ~, n1E~A9nAfnL r+~JL~J1fL____ _-~~..~~.R.----_ Y~'s.~+e~'u~JL~21G.~cm?cs.Lg' !~.-~ rnl~....v Om..,e ~ v /.. .~.. ~ . _ .ae1 SE ~~ Ci.rr ~ CwaS!~.4fd_~JtJS~d4~MBS_NJ~kltyuzl9[IOnttc~L`.~1L4kiaf.!fSJ~Side-~eA.r~s3~i5.~ es``'°t-S MHCa.:.~ A~Q Too~S To be..u5ty~ ~rJ "(~~~• oaf S-,cQ ~ "w^-t F.cm NNC•hbc.-tic a SDeCi11n remmnwe ..w.. •w_ ___.. _ 7A STi,FF KGPVK I AGENDA ITEM. ~Se-^y-ExCe~hon `rr Je~^ IP!lair ann aCC6ccnriFc SUEMIT, TED BY: George 1l1,b^ey II Communit`: Development Director _ DATE. uc'CemG2r ; i 99E BACKGROUND The applicant desires to operate a repair and accessory installation business specializing in "Jeeps". The applicant proposes to park no more than two vehicles outside in the parking lot overnight and to have no more than four vehicles parked outside during business hours. The proposed use can be classified as an Automotive/truck service garage, which is item number (9i under Uses-by-Exception in Section 24-110. RECOMMENDATION: The Community Development Board considered this request and recommends approval to the applicant at this location with the following conditions: 1) Hours of operation from 8:00 AN to 8:C0 PM 2j Not more than two vehicles sha!! be parked outside overnight. 3) Noise producing equipment shall not be operated outside of the building. 4) No auto body work pertormed. ATTACHMENTS: 1) Application for Use-by-Exception 2) Minutes of the Community Development Board Meeting RELr!E~lVED BY CITY MP.NAGER: ~~~ AGENDA ITEM NO. that will encroach the rear setback line of property known as Lot 307, Saltair Section 3. Mr. Rausch introduced himself to the board •nd explained that he is currently building a home on the property and stated he desired to add a screened room addition that will encroach 10 feet into the rear yard setback. After discussion, Mr. Frohwein moved to deny the variance. Mrs. Walker seconded the motion and the variance was denied by a unanimous vote. 111. Request to Amend the Comprehensive Plan submitted by Marcus Prom. Attorney Mark Pennington, representing the applicant, introduced himself to the board and stated that his client desired to change the designation of property from Residential Higlt Density to Commercial to allow for commercial rnnstruttion. He presented a site plan from the Future Land Use Map showing the location of the property as well as surrounding properties and their zoning designations. He stated that Mr. Prom proposes to landscape property along Cornell Lane and dedicate it to such use preserving the buffer zone intent of the Comprehensive Plan. Alicr discussion, Mr. Grunthal moved to rernmmend to the City Commission that the request as presented be denied. Mrs. Walker seconded the motion and the motion passed unanimously. After discussion, Mr. Frohwein moved to recommend to the City Commission that the land use designation in the Comprehensive Plan remain unchanged. Mrs. Walker seconded the motion. After discussion b_v the board the motion was passed by a vote of 4 - 1 with Mrs. Simpkins voting nay.. I\'. DISCUSSION ITEM The board discussed the operation of motorized vehicles (jet skis) in close proximity to the beach. Mr. Jensen pointed out that City of Atlantic Beach Ordinance Chapter 5, Settion >-7 addresses the unlawful operation of an_y motorized boat or other motorized apparatus within 200 feet of the beach. The board decided to request. the Public Safety Director pursue enforcement of the ordinance. MINUTES OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD OF THE CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH, FLORIDA September I f3, 1996 7:00 P.M. CITY HALL PRESENT Don Wolfson Robert Frohwein Marv Walker Sharette Simpkins Buzzv Grunthal AND Alan Jensen, City Attorney George Worley, [l, CD Director Pat Hams, Recording Secretary ABSENT Pat Pillmore Mark McGowan Chairman Don Wolfson called the meeting to order and asked for approval of the minutes from the meeting of August 20, 1496. Upon motion made and sernnded the minutes were approved. NEW BUSINESS: 1. Application fer Variance filed by Preston and Susan Jackson to construct a new home that will encroach setback requirements at property known as Lot 21, Tiffany by the Sea. Architect Jim McCue, representing Mr. and Mrs. Jackson, introduced himself to the board and apologized for missing last months meeting. He explained that the applicants are requesting a variance for a I -foot side yard, 2-foot rear yard and 2-foot front yard setback. He presented a design of the proposed construction to the board. After discussion and with no apparent hardship being found by the board, Mr. Frohwein moved to deny the variance. Mr. Grunthal seconded the motion and the variance request was unanimously denied. 1I. Application for Variance filed by Steve W. Bausch to construct a se2eened porch i.il IU! dr m •ns' ce rh fall 'c ed gas mi or m. Ion to as ;pa line f ion T IS rice flan ,s rx e wlin the flan npli- nph offs the hdd the effected lord luusdichon and 5irbnnt a leconnnentled order to the state land plannlny agency ThC slate land planning agency shall allow lU days for the tiLng of rrxception5 to Ihe, recommended ceder and shat! issue a final order wdhm 3U days cellar receipt of the recom mended order d the slate land planning agency deter mines That the plan a plan amendment is in compliance. If VtC stale land planning agency determines that the plan or plan amendmenl rs not in compliance, the agency shall subnnt wdhm 30 Cays cellar receipt, the recommended order to the Administratan Commission for final agency action. (t0) PROCESS IF LOCAL PLAN OR AMENDMENT IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE- (a) If the slate land planning agency Issues a notice of Intent to imd the comprehensive plan a plan amend- ment not in canphance wdh this act, the notice of intent shall be forwarded to Ina Division of Adminislrahve Hearings of the Departmem of Management Services. which shall conduct a proceeding under s. 120.57 in the county of and convernent to the affecle0 beef lunsdic- hon. The parties to the proceeding shall be the slate land planning agency. the atlected local government, and any affected person who intervenes. No new Issue may be alleged as a reason to lind a plan w plan amend merit not in compliance in an administrative pleading Lied more Than 21 days alter pubkcation of nol5ce unless the party seeklnG that issue estabhshe5 good cause for not alleg!ny the Issue wdhm ihal brne pared. Goof cause shall not include excusable neglect In the pro- ceeding. the local governmenPS deternnation That the comprehensive plan or plan amendment is in complF ante is presumed to be cwrecl. The local government's determination shall be sustained unless it is shown by a preponderance of the evidence that the compeheo- srve plan a pier. amendment i5 not in compliance. The local governntent'S determination that elements of ds plans are related to and consistent with each other shall be suslaired if the determination is fairly debatable. (b} The (tearing officer assigned by the division slice!( submit a recommended order to the Administration Commission for final agency actan. (c) Prior to the hearing, the state land planning agency shall afford an oppalundy to mediate w other wise resolve the dispute. If a party to the proceednp requests rtedia lion or other alternative dlspule resdu- Ilon, Ihf (tearing may not be held until ine slate land planning agency advises the hearing officer in wnhng of the results of the mediation or other alternative dispute resolution. However, the hearing may not be delayed for longer than 9J days for mediation w other altemative dispute resolution unless a longer delay is agreed to by the parties to the proceeding The costs o1 the media- tion anther alternative dispute resoution shall be borne equally by all of the parries to the proceeding (11) ADIdINISTRATIONCOMMISSION- (a) It the Admirnstrahon Comrtussan, upon a hearing pursuant to subsecton (9) w subsectan (t0). hods !hat tite comprehensive plan a plan amendmenl Is not In compliance wdh Ihis act. the commisson Shall speCdy remedial actions which would txing the comprehensive plan Or plan 2mendmeni inld Cortiphance. ThR COmmlfr sion may darer state agenaes rat to pr(•~de funds to :ncrrase the Capaaty of roads, bridges. a water ono ~~ewcr systems wdhm the IxXlraariCS of those IOrJa~ yor i~rnmental entdles which have corrtprehertsive plans or plan elements foal are delermirad tat 10 be in cpnpo ante. The commissar order may also speaty that ine Inca) government shall not be ehgifale Iw grants admnis fared under Ina Idbwnrg programs. t. The Florida Small Gttes Community Develop- ment Block Grant Program, as authonzeo by ss 290.p40t-290.049. 2. Tne Florida Reweatan lkvetopnxnt Assistance Program, as autnaized Dy chapter 375. 3 Revenue sharing pursuant to ss. 206.60.210.20. and 218.61 and part I d chapter 212, to ttte extent rat pledged to pay back bwlos. (b) I1 the beef government is one vrfxCh is requned b include a coastal marlagemenl element n its congre~ pensive plan pursuant to s. 163.3177(6x9). the cwrxrvs- sion order may also specify that the local goverrment is not eogibte for funding pwsirant to s. 161.091. The com- missan order may also specify that the last that the coastal management element has been deterrttinbd to tx not m compliance shall be a Consideration when ilia department considers permits under s. 161.053 and when the Board of Trustees of ttie Inlerrel4rfprovement Trust Fund considers whether to set. convey any xtter- esl m. w lease any sovereignty lands w submerged lands until the etemeN is bfarght NttO Oofrlphafloe. (c) Any funds from a state prooram vritfiheb from a local government pursuant to paragraphs (a) and (b) as a sancton for nwlcorrpliartce shall be de-0ositetl into the Growth Management Trust Flxto created b'y rs. 186.91 t. (d) Tne sanctions provided by paragraphs (a) and (b) shall not apply to a lor.al goverrnfenl regarding any pier, amendment, except for plan amendments that amend plans that have not been fira~y determined to be in compliance with (his part, and except as provltleo in s t63.3t89(2) w s. 163.3t91(l t). (12) GOOD FAITH FILING.-The signature of an attorney a party constitutes a cendicate that he w she has read the pleading, rtatan, w other paper ono that. b the best of his a Der knowledge, information. and belief formed alter reasonable irtquwy. d a rat inter- posed for any improper purpose, such as to harass w to cause unnecessary delay, w Iw econwrrc advantage. competitive reasons, w frivolous prrposes w needless increase in the cost of klgalan. a a pleading. motion, a other paper is sgned in vglation d these requremems. the hearing officer, upon frldiorl w his w tier Own rcxlia~ rive, shalt impose upon the person who srgrxrd d, a rep resented party, or both, an appropriate sanction, whx;h may include an ceder to pay to ItM other party a parties the amount of reasonable expenses neared because of Ina iding of the pleadxg, naton. w dher paper. including a reasonable attorney's lee. (t 3) E xCLUSNE PROCEEDINGS.-The txocurdlrgs under Ihis sedan shall be the sofa proceeding w actxxt for a determiretan of whether a local government's plan, element. or arneMment is n caripiarge with this act. (t4) AREAS OF (3=1RICAL STATE CONCERN-No proposed local government Conlpehansive plan w pWn amendment which is appFCable to a designated area o1 1237 95 F.S._T995 INTERGOVERNMENTAL PROGRAMS ___ Ch_163 aauuns. min conm!nnts reganfinq the pnrpuse!t plan anicndrnent A regional plannuua tourist «alfecled per sun icqucstury a review shall du so by 5ubmdnny a wnl- [;vi Icquest to the ayency wdh a notice of ilia rrquesl !o the I«;al government and any other person vd io has reque=.led notice. (b) ilia state land plamm~y aynncy may review any proposed plan amendment regardless of whether a request for review has been made, it the agency grves ounce to ilia local government, and any other person who has requested ranre, of ds Intention to corxluct such a review wilhur 30 days of Vansmdtal of the pro posrd plan amendment pursuant to subsection (3). (c) The slate land plamm~g agency, upon receipt of comments Irom the various government agencies pur suanl to subsecton (4), shall hava 30 days tc review comments Irom the various governmem agences along wdh a local government's comprehensive plan a plan amendment During Thal period. the state land plannmg agency shall tiansmd in writing rts comments to the beat government along wdh any ob;echons and any recom~ mendations for moddicahons. when a federal, state, or regional agency has implememed a permdling program. the slate land planning agency shall not regwre a local government to duplicate or exceed that permitting pro- gram m rts comprehensive plan or to implement such a permitting program m its land development regulations. Nothing contained herein shall prohibit the stale land plamm~g agency m conducting ds review of local plans cr plan amendments from making oblectans, recom~ mendatans, and comments or making compliance determmafions regarding densmes and mtensdles consistent with ilia provisions of this part. (7) LOCAL GOVERNMENT REVIEW OF COM~ MEMS; ADOPTION OF PLAN OR AMENDMENTS AND TRANSMITTAL.-The local government shall review the written comments submitted to It by the state land plan ping agency, and any other person. agency, a govern- ment. Any comments, recommendations. or ob(eclions and any reply to them shall be public documents, a part of the permanent recall in the matter, and admi55iWe m any proceeding m which the comprehensive plan a plan amendment may t>e at 65ue. The local government. upon receipt of written comments Irom Ine state land plamm~g agency, shall nave 120 days to adopt or adopt with changes the proposed comprehensive plan a s. !63.3191 plan amendments. In the case of comprehem slue plan amendments other than those proposed pun suant to s. 163.3191, the local government shall have 60 days to adopt the amendment. adopt the amendment wdh chanyes. a determine That it wdl not adopt the amendment. The adoption of the proposed plan a plan amendment or the determinatan rat to adopt a plan amendment, other Than a plan amendment proposed pursuant to s. 163 3191. snail be made m the course of a public hearing pursuant to subsection (15). The local government shall transmit the adcpted comprehensive plan or adopted plan amendment to the stale land plain Wing agency as specdied in the agency's procedural rules vnthm 10 working days after atlo0tion_ The local gavermng body shall also transmit a Copy of the adopted comprehensive plan or plan amendment to the regional planning agency and to any other and of local yuvernrnent « governmental agency in the slate IDa1 has Lled a written request with the gwermny Iatly fa a copy u! the plan or plan amerament. (8) NOTICE OF INTENT.- (a) E.cepl as provided m s. 163.3187(3). the state land planning agency. upon receipt of a local govern merit's adopted comprehensive plan Or plan amera- menl. shall have 45 days for review and to deternwte d the plan or plan amendment i5 to compliance with tMs aCl, unless the anleOdmeOl IS the /ewlt Of a Corrip10r1Ce agreement entered into under wbseclan (16), in WtliCh case the time period for review and determinaton shall be 30 days. II review was rat corducied under wbsec- tan (6). the agencys determination must be based upon the plan amendment as adopted. II review was conducted urger subsection (6). the agency's deterrrn~ nation of compliance must be based orny upon one a both of Ine fdlowing 1. The state land plamm~g agency's written corn merits to the beat government pursuant to wbsectan (6), or 2. Any changes made by the IpCel goverrxnent to the comprehensive plan or plan amendment as adopted. (b) Outing the time period W^v'bed for in tins wb- section, the state land planrwng agency shall issue. Through a senior admiNStrata a the seaelary, as spew Led m the agency's procedural rules, a notice d intent l0 hod Thal the plan or plan amendment is o corTtPLartce a not m compliance A notice d intent stiatl be issued by publication m the manner provded by tins paragraph and by madirg a copy to the local gwerrmenl and to persons vita request notice. The required advertrsn merit shall be ra less than 2 colixms wide by 10 ndres bog, and the headline b the advertisement shat be in a type no smaller than 12 point. The advertiserriant shay not be placed n that portion d the newspaper wfwxe legal notices and classified its appear. The advertisement shall be published in a newspaper vAnch rt1e015 the 512e and ClrWlallOn requirerttenl5 sal forth MI paragraph (15Kc) and which has been Oesigrtatrad m writing by the affected local goverrtrrtent at the time d transmittal of the amendment. Publication fyy the stale land planning agency of a ratite d intent n the newspa~ per designated by the local gpverrvrient shay be prima facie evidence of compliance wiU the putNicabon requirements of this sectbn. (9) PROCESS IF LOCAL PLAN OR gMEPD1oEM IS IN COMPLIAIVCE.- (a) a the slate lard plarriirq ager~.y issues a notice of intent to find that Ilia oanpreltertsrve pfan ar Pia" amendment transmitted pwswnt to a. 163.3167, s. tC>,3.3t87, s. 163.3189, a s. 163.3191 a in oomph wdh this act, any affected person may fete a petition with the agency pursuant to s. 120.67 within 21 daYS aHer the pudicatlon of notice. In tMS Proceeding, the local pan a pWn amendment shah be determined to be n corrpM~ ance d Ine local goverrsnent's determination d cdrtgli ance is tarry debatable. (b) The hearing snail lx conducte0 by a hearing oHi~ ter of the Divisan of Adrrnrnstrative Mearngs d the Department of Management Services, vino St1aN tab the hearing m the county of and convernent to Ine 1236 rc I~ C t~ r. pi Cn. 163 INTERGOVERNMENTAL PROGRAMS F.S. 1995 - 1995 tin or or 6 y OVIdL Ierna army, coin f Con ring a r elect for the cision lbsec feet is +r con- ich is a ilea roles, • of its procr yas pros eerie in es not mless, person same public I. HOw arising ype, or motion Yer the -0y aria ;tralive file the King a hlorma- is aloe. looting re. Fd rig, the ys after 1hC po new set agency 1t of rile all mob led pun fegilesl wTah i5 govern a tofu SdUhdn. dispute govero ciliation. until Inc F.S. 1995 _INTERGOVERNMENTAL PROGRAMS Ch. 163 ci,;ipb•hon cl Ih+~ rnedratnai ur 7~ days, whichever 6 rarLer omen e X. e P~ : • d, n rt. iy5 > i .n O W a 3 m /1.11 e ., .,. a m. iF. ~ n 5i ~; H, a .n Y~ rei, s 10. cr. 9S LO 163.3164 Process for adoption of comprehensive plan or plan amentlment.~- (t) OFFINITICNS.---AS used ui This section (a) 'Affected person' includes the affected local yavcrr!ment, fxrsons owning properly, residing, or owm trig or opnrabnq a business wdon the boundaries of the local yovemment whose plan is the sub)ecl of the revmw, and ad)ouuny local governments That can dem- onstrate that the plan or plan amendment wJl produce substantial impacts on Inc increased need fa publicly funded infrastructure or substantial impacts on areas designated for protection a special treatment within Iheu lunsdiaion Each person, other than an adloininq local government, m order to qualify under this dehni tan, shall also have 5ubmilled sal or written COnlments. recommerWaians. or oblechons to the local government during the period of ;line beginning with the Iransmibal heating fa the plan or plan amendment and ending with the adophcn of the plan or plan amendment. (b) "In compliance" means consistent with the requrreinents of ss. 163.3177, lfi3.3178, and 163.3191, wdh the state comprehensive plan, with the approprate strategic reyanal policy plan, and with 'chapter 9J-5. F A.C., where Such into is noI nconsistenl with Chapter 163, part II (2) COORDINATION.-Each comprehensive plan or plan amendment proposed to be adopted pursuant to this part shall t1C transmitted, adopted, and reviewed in the manner prescribed in this section. The state land planning agency shall have responsibility for plan review, coadinatan, and the preparation and transmis son of comments, pwsuant to Ihrs 5eclion, to Ifte IoCal yoverning body responsible for the comprehensive plan. (3) LOCAL GOVERNMENT TRANSMITTAL OF PRO- POSED PLAN OR AMENDMENT - (a) Each local governing body shall transmit Inc complete proposed comprehensive plan or plan amend moot to the slate land planning agency. the appropriate reganal planning council and water management dis- trict. IM• deparlrnenl, and the Deparlmenl Of Transpor lotion immediately following a public heanrig pursuant to subsection (15) as speohed in the slate land planning agency's procedual rules The local governvig body shall alw IransmA a copy of Ifte complete proposes compehensive plan or plan amendment to any other unit of local government a government agency in the stale Ihat has hied a written request wdh lf>e gwerrnng tidily for the Plan or plan amendment. (b) A local governing body shall rat Iransmd poi lions of a plan or plan amer~dment unless d has peeve wsry provided to all state agencies designated by Inc slate land planmr~q agency a complete copy of its adopted comprehensive plan pursuant to subsectiai (7) end as speuhed in the agency's procedural rules. In the case of wmprehensrve plan amendments. the local gov~ emmg tYJdy shall Iransmd to the state land planning agency, the appropriate regional planning ecuncd and water n~anagernnnt district. the deparlmen!, and the Deparlmi'nt ul TranSpOllaiiOn the materials Specdied in the state rand planning agency's procedural rules and. in Cases ui which IhC+ plod amendrtlenl iS 8 Iesult 01 an evaluation and appraisal report adopted pursuant to 5 1ti;1 3191, a cor1Y of the evaluatan and appraisal repot Local governing bodies shalt consolidate a9 proposed plan amendments into a single subscction fa each o1 the two plan amendment adoptim dates during trio cat endar year pursuant to s. 163.3187. (c) A local government may adopt a proposed plan amendment prevausly transmitted pixsuant to Ihrs sub- section, unless review is requested a otherwise initi- ated pwsuant to subsecton (6). (a) INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVEW.-H review of a proposed comprehensive plan amendment is requested or otherwise rotated pwwant to subsection (6). the state lard plarnirg agency wihin S working days of delermming that such a review witl be coin ducted shall transmit a Copy of the proposed pWn amendment to various goverrxnent agencies, as appo poste, for response a corttrttent, irxkxfinp, brit not lim~ iced to. the department, the Department d Transpdna~ lion, the water management district, and the regonal planning council. and. ir. the case of municipal plans, to the county land planrung agency. These goverrvnental agencies shall provide corrunents to the state land plan- ting agency within 30 days after receipt d the proposed plan amendment. The appropriate regional plaraing council shall also provide its written COrMienls to the state land planning agency within 30 days offer receipt of the proposed plan amendment and St1aE Specify any objections. recommendations fa mod"Aica[ions, and comments of any other regidrlal agencies to vrftich the regional planning council may have refereed Hte pro posed plan amendment. (5) REGIONAL AND COUNTY REVIEW.-The review of the regonal planning council pursuant to sub section (4) shall be limited to effects On regional resources or laCihlie5 identdied m the sVetegic regiOrlal policy plan and eztrajwisdictanal MTlpaats which would be inconsistent with the Comprehensive plan of the affected Ideal government. However, arty iriconsistertcy between a local plan or plan amendrtient and a strategic reganaj policy plan must rat De the sole basis to a ratite of inlCnl to find a local plan a plan amendment not in Compliance with This act. A reglOnal pWnrung council shall not review and ca*irtrenl on a poposed comprehenswe plan it prepared ASeH rxlless the plan has been changed by the local government subsequent to the preparalan of the plan by the regional plarriirg agency. Tree review of the county lardd planriirg agency pursuant to subsection (e) shall be prirttarily n the cdn- lezt o1 Ne relatan5hip and effect Ot the proposed plan amendment on any county cOmpreflenslve plan ele- ment. (6) STATE LAND PLANNNG AGENCY REVIEW.- (a) Tne state rand pWnnvg agency shah review a proposed plan amendment upon request OI a regional planning ca,ncd. affected person. a local government !ransmillmg the plan amendment if Ifte request s received within 30 days after transmittal d the proposed plan amendmem pursuant to subsection (3). The agency shalt issue a repot o) 115 obteclrons, feddfrinlen~ 1235 sIa IP ~ChCn uvern mrnts nually dtnuiy u Omit e per N the ehem mrttal .sub vung plan t the tined ssed vern ,n to ttne 'r an ;mail the fern the resr ~. 6 to <4~! rw ~,ti. rk+ vo •[aC tm- eC •en ed ve ay s vc icr t0 ,¢ 3r (b) CV;•;!`dnnni.,va!e.u Cummissiun. u{xmaheanny pursuam t4 5 16331134, finds That the adopted plan ;unendmeM is nut in cump6ance, the commission shall speedy actions drat v:ou!d bung the plan amendment into congtl~anu•. and may sper.Ay the Sanctions pr0- vWed m s 1fj33184(11) to which the local government will be sut:jeCl it d elects !o make the amendment efleC bve notwn hslandrny the determm.auon of noncomplr ante. However, otter the final order of the commrssion, the local guvernmenl, by resolution at a public meeting alter public notice, may elect to make the amendment elleGwe and be subject to sanctions pursuant to s. 16331734(71) If Ore, heal government enacts the reme~ dial actions speahcd in the canm~ssion's final order, the local government shall no longer be subject to sang lions (3Ha) At any lime alter the department has issued its nonce of mtrnt and the matter has been forwarded to the DiwsiOn of Administrative Hearings. the local gov~ ernment proposing the amendment may demand formal mediation or the local government proposing the amendment or an aaected person who is a party to the proceeding may demand informal mediation or expeditious resolution of the amendment proceedings by serving written notice m the stale land planning agency, all other panes to the prceeeding, and flit hearing officer (b) Upon receipt of a notice pursuant to paragraph (a), the hearing officer shall set the matter for final hear ing rto more than 30 days after receipt of the notice. (Mee a final hearing pursuant to this paragraph has been set, no continuance in the hearing, and no addi~ tional lime for post-hearing submittals, may be granted without the wnnen agreement of the parties absent a finding by the hearing officer of extraordinary cicum s!ances. Eztraordmary circumstances do not include matters relating to workload or need for atlditional time for preparation or neyohation. (c) Absent a showing o1 ezbaordmary chtum- stances, the Administration Commisson Shall issue a final order, m a case proceeding under this subsecfion, within 45 days after the issuance of the recommended order, unless the parties agree in wnhng to a bnger time. NNpy.-s 9 cn gJ rA s ~7 rn 9)-Afi 163.3191 Evaluation and appraisal of comprehen- sive p4n.- (1) Ttte planning program shall be a continuous and ongoing process. The local planning agency shall pre pare pertodtc repgts on the comprehensive plan, whrch shall be Sent to the governing body and to the State lard planning agency aI Ieasl once every 5 years after the adopton of the comprehensve plan. Reports may be transmdted al lesser intervals as may be requrred or upon request of the gcverning body It is the intent of this act that adopted comprehensive plans be perrodr tally updated as provided by this secucn Through the evaluation and appraisal report. The evaluation and appraisal report process shall be the pnnapal process for updating local comprehensive plans to reflect changes m state policy on planning antl growth moo- agement (2) The report shall present an a55essAtent and eval nation of the success IX failure Of the Comprehensive plan, a element or portion thereof, and shall contain appropriate statements (using words, maps, illusua~ lions, a other forms) related to: (a) The major problems of devebprt7ent. Physical deterioration, and the location of land uses and the social and ecptorriC effects of such uses in the area. (b) The corditiort of each element n the comprehem sive plan at the time of adoption and at date of repot. (c) The comprehensive plan objectives as coin pared with actual results at date of report. (d) The extent to which unanticipated and unlore~ seen problems and opportunities occurred between date of adoption and date of report. (e) The effect orl the comprehensive plan of changes to: the state cortl{xefterlsitre plan, the require- ments of this part the mirliMan Criteria contained m chapter 9J-5, E.A.C., and the appropriate strategic regional pdicy plan. (1) The idenldlCetidn of eny actions that are taken or steed f0 be IakBn to eddnB85 tfle plarrirlg fSSUes denti~ tied in the report. (g) Reposed or antidpaled plan arrtendrttertts nec- essary to address or kftplerrtertt the identified charges. (h) A description of the public j7aAiCipati«t process used by the local grnetmrttertt in preparing the report. (3) The report shall also suggest dlanges needed to update the comprehensive plarl, ar eknttertts a portions thereof, inCltding refornNdalee objectives, pdides, and standards. Local goverrrrrerlts are erlcauaged to use the report process to develop a local vision that could serve as one basis fa revision m the local contprehem sive pWn consistent with the requirements d this act. (4) The governing body shall adapt, a adopt with changes. the report or portions thereof within 90 days after receiving it horn ltte local plamrtg agency- The governing body shall amend its Comprehensive plan based on the recommendations contained in the adopted evaluation and appraisal report, pursuant to the procedures m ss. 163.3784, 763.3787, and 163.3169. Amendments to the plan and tfle adoption of the repot may be simultaneous. When artterdments to the plan do not occur srmultarteously with the adoption W the evalu~ atron and appraisal report, the report shah contain a schedule Ia adopton of proposed amendments wrtnm 1 year alter the report is adopted, except that Ifte state land planrirg agency may gam a 6-ngnth extensan for adopton of such plan amendments H the request is justified by good and sufficient cause as defemtirted by the agency. The report shall be Vartsrfitfed to the state land planning agency, vnth the seated amendments when ttte amendments are transmitted pursuant to s 163.3784. (6) The lust periodic report for each local govern merit shah be prepared not later than 7 years after the adoption o7 ttte corttpreftertsive plan. Every other peni odw report shah be prepared rtot more than an add~- tronal syears thereafter. (6}(a) The report shat irlckrde frxfirgs and recom meneatans with respect to the requiements of subset trans (2) one (3). 1241 :. 1995 F.S. 1995 ____ __ INTERGOVERNMENTAL PROGRAMS Ch. 163 Ch. 163 INTERGOVERNMENTAL PROGRAMS F.S. 1995 (d) Any eomprui u:nsivr~ i,'~_u, ~rn~~ndnleni u_quin:d by a complancc aymenu~nl pwSU,tr4 I0 S 1633184(18) may be eppruved without rr~q„ni In std nr iory limits on the Ireq uency UI .lJoldam of On;endrnenil lu the COnr prehenvve plan (e) Acornprchrnsr:e plan ainendrnenl for lw:ahOn of a stale correctmnal far.Jily Such en aniendmenl may be made at any hrne and Jas no! count toward the limita~ lion on the Irequency of plan amendments. (2) Cornprehensrve plan; may only be amended in such a way as to preserve the internal rons~stency of the plan pursuam to s IU3 3t 77p) Corrections, updates, or rnodihcations of torten costs which were set out as pad of the comprehensive plan shall not, Inr the purposes of this act, be deemed to be arnendmenls (3)(a) The state land planning agency shall not review w issue a notice of intent br small scale develop- ment amendments which satisfy the requhements o1 paragraph (1Xc). Any affected person may hie a petition with the Dlvisbn of Administralrve Hearings pursuant to s. 120.57 to request a hearing to challenge the compli- ance of a small scale development amendment wah this act within 30 days folbwmg the local government's 2dophon o! the amendment, shall serve a copy of the petdion on the local government, and shall furnish a copy to the slate land planning ayency. A hearing officer shall till a hearing in the affected lunsdiction not less than 30 days nor more than GO days fdlowmg the fling of a petition and the assignment of a hearing officer. The parties to a hearing held pursuant to this subsection shall be the petitioner, the local government, and any Intervene. In the proceeding, the local government's determination that the small scale deveopment amend merit is in compliance is presumed to be correct. The Ioral governmenPS determination shall be sustained unless it is shown by a preponderance of the evidence that the amendment is not in compliance with the regwrements of this act. In any proceedng indicted pur- suant to this subsection. the state land planning agency may intervene- (b)t. If the hearing officer recommends that the small scale development amendment be found not rn compliance. trio hearing ofLCer shall submit the recom- mended order to the Administratior. Commisson for final agency action. tl the heaung Olhcer recommends that the small scale development amendment be found In compliance, the heaung officer snail submd the recom- mended order to trio stale land Dlanning agency 2. II the slate land planning agency determines that the plan amendment ~s not in compliance, the agency shall submit, within 30 days following its receipt, the reo ommended order to the Administratron Commission for final agency action. If the state land plannng agency determines that the plan amendment is in compliance. the agency shall enter a final order within 30 days Idbw~ my ns receipt of the recwnmendetl etler. (c) Small scale development amendments shall not become effective until 31 days alter adoption. If chat longed wdhm 30 days after adoption, small scale deveb opment amendments shall not become effecive until the state land planning agency w the Admimstrahon Commission, rCSpechvely, issues a final order determim ing the adopted small scale development amendment is in compliance (4r F.rdi governuig [xxly shall Iransmd to the State land 1~4mniny agency a cuuent copy of ns cwnprehen sive plea nut later roan December I. 1995. Each govern- my b<xfy shall also transmd copies of any amendments d adopts to its comprehensive plan so as to continually update the plans on file wdh the Slate land plarxrxtg agency (51 Nothing m this part iS lntentletl b Ixohlbit a Imlit the authwny of beat governments to regwre shat a per- son requesting an amendment pay some a aN of the cost of public nObce. (6) tvo local government may amend ns comprehen~ save plan after the date e51abllshed by rule Ie Subntittal of 115 evaluation and appraisal report unless d has sub- mitted ds repot eaddendum to the state land pWxwg agency as prescribed by s. 163.3191, except tar plan amendments to implement recommendations in the report w addendum. When the agency has determirted that the report a addendum has suffidently addressed all pertinent provisions of s. t63.3t91, the local govern merit may proceed wdh plan amendments in additbn to those necessary to Implement recormtertdatiars n tfte report or addendum. (7) The state land pWnning agency shall consider an increase in the annual total acreage threshold for small scale amendments, particularly with regard to the unpue characteristics among the various local govern moots. and shall report its revlewr to the Governor, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, and ttte Presi- dent of the Senate on a belee January 15, 1996. Irby.-e ,0. en rs-nr, e t en. n-ve . s. m n~i.. 9. a. dies.. i0. a aF Iv,.. e. a ~ -tz9. • , I. a 1da16. a .. a 9p-Ztl. .. ors w 96-, u. s ,2, rn. 96-~10. s ]. dt. 9'r32. s. s. ar 95-86 Mbr- kananeegs 5. cn. 91861Mravisptlara rider HYs <.aeeeon a bpw,ne .a (w,laniei a me rb~ a alpewwrr t9t6 0 t195, ra Jpuria a M Srrr raa, o >al srsoeevepn IlNclr. r sr ameranf b/ a. 1. U 9S-~. sU Yiel NII, Ittlt I. ire aeppeea ww~O+lwi nruM1eteree0aee bd weagwsbw. ..in • ~+vr a IO~.ie per w w ier. rpseys naa.uwar ww sq'ena Wtl w uiepay ru b..owf t0 ar n ba. erU trio crnuune eMKi a me.o..p. Iu r .rw vr.e..ep.w w,e men. eaoMa q me nni (pwnwn sop M meaea m W or snsh o trio awoeee s,wemrn apes mi ei.ora ss bit os0~b •e. bin MfO. rfY c ire appeeM wwre+sniere rotnuwehr+s a++reVmrb ~` zoo Iri a Dinette a+^Iw . ergo ssw .. ao iz mars e ins w.weea eirwietwV floes rY.wan a wn orge w ti Wet W ew. ee agecMa a er io<a wr«ar~ml i arrrperrsw aw. m deer w pees . Wtl w uirge b me eriVe bM re nep b. e.e-pc4 wit d NHIMnM,I clrMy me appora w.ro..a s mi trim .r.n w ors a ore rr inn 163.3199 Process la amsittlrftsiM of aAOpMd code prahenaivs plaa- (1) The procedure for amertdment of an adopted comprehensive plan or plan elenlertl which fns been found to be m complnrrce shah be solely as presaged by Ihls Section. (2) A local goverrxnent wtndt has a compreirerise plan that has been found to be in contpiierre rrnY amend Its comprehensive plan as set forth In s. 163.3164, with the fdbwing exceptiorl5: (a) Plan amendments Shall rqt become eltectne until the state land pWnrtvg agency issues a tent order determining the adopted amendment Io be n conVl' ante rn accordance with s. 163.31&191. a Iota tM Admirnstratan Commission Issues a rural ale' dolor mining the adopletl amendment to be m cenWonce n accordance with s. t63.3t84(10). 1240 L: Er m ar Pr e. by ag he. (a), ing One Dec lion with. find star matt (e p (C start fmia! wdh^ rider torte More ib; Siva f (1) atgar Bret syh_a_N b I"w ~i adoph Iransrr uDan r [a*s ac _•) U, Nalua, aDDrar Ipr up, Jiang„ a9emnr n^Y ul y anti trabvc 1?0 57 )y the men! Nance Ist 10 I grn rdven Wend :cord The nenls Imem rnt to para- iar of nsmn ~y as shall rid to merit I with Went. admg ipt of Dance ntent rend sub coon isive menl nt m exy xt of shall ding, con :1Or15 :n of hnal rs to may tddr rely the tGve tiles rigs pro- h b ga (9) the fing Ida 2 II ai iy of Ihu 6'.Ur,, ,,,' :r=d by Bit stale IarW pia rimy agenry ,n ^ie ongnel sub;ection (10) proceed,. are not rnsolvcd by trio compliance agreement amen nlent S, any intervenor ,n Ihri onymal subsection (10) pr <'crdurg may rrvauue those suss to be addressed Ihu pondiny 5 120 57 con snhdaled reaLgnetl procee ing As to those unresolvprl issues, the burden 01 pr shall be governed by subsection (IO). i 3. 'Il the local government adopts a Canprr_hensiv plan amendment pursuanl to a corplance agreeme and a notice of ,ntent to find the plan amendment n ~ in compliance Is Issued, the state land planning agent I shall forward thr. notice o1 Intent to the Division i Atlministrahve Hearings, which shall consolidate th ~ proceeding wdh the pending proceeding and Immed ately set a date br hearing In the pending s. 720.57 pr i tootling. Affected persons who are not a party to th i underlying s. 120.57 proceeding may challenge the pia amendment adopted pursuanl to the compliance agree merit by Iding a petition pursuant to subsection (10). (g) II the local government fails to adopt a compre hensive plan amendment pursuant to a compliant agreement, the stale land planning agency shall noti`y the Division of Atlmirnsuahve Hearings, which shall set the hearing in the pending s 120.57 proceeding at the earliest convenient time. (h) This subsection does not prohibit a Ixal govern- ment Irom amending portions of its comprehenswe plan other Than those which are the subject o1 the compfi~ ante agreernenl. However, such amendments to the plan may not be inconsistent wdh the compliance agree merit. i (i) Nothing m this subsedlon is intended to limit the parties from entering into a comptiarrce agreement at any time before the final ceder in the proceeding is issued, provided that the provisions of paragraph (c) shall apply regardless of when the comptianCe agree- mentisreaChed. V) Nothing ur this subsealon is intended to force any party into settlement against ifs will or to preclude the use of other informal dispute resdulion methods, ~ such as the services offered by the Fbrida Growth Man agement Dispute Resdution Consortium, in the course ~ of a in addition to the method described in this subset lion. i 6 M~ .-s 9 cn 8 154 a ,. cr. n-ur s u m t>.Dr s 1. cn BJ-JlIB s YA.s B cn BS-SS s 9 '~ B6-i9r s r.rn 9?-,19 a )).m 91. gSSSa°rr911YM 9~7,09TTL a>z'n 9•-a56.s ir+5. cn ~-trl. BIl9. ~ mr~.-i~wa'manlr: ,,,s swsusn w me want' q rte eonan Io e~ COrKl i, a,br s,It b,nt ,eMMEQ I,IrIGIW •IOY.--IeOeYN W cn 9 - tS 163.3167 Amendment of adopted eomprleheneive folan.- (1) Amendments to comprehensive plans adopted pursuant to ihls part may be made not more than two limes during any calendar year, except. (a) In the case of an emergency, comprehensive plan amendments may be made more often than twice during the calendar year A Ine additional plan amend- ment receives the approval of all of the members of the ' governing body •E mergency' means any occurrence or l threat thereof whether acudemal or natural, caused by i humankind. In war a peace. which results or may result n in 5ubstanhal uyury or harm to t1w populahai a svb- ny stantial damage to or loss of property or publ,c funds d (b) Any local government comprehenswe plan o- amendments directly related to a proposed develop in went of regu~nal Impact, induding changes which have d- been determmetl to be substantial devialrons and col including Florltla Ouallly Developments 380.061, may be radiated b a local pursuant to s e considered by the local y ernin ~m°9 a9e~Y and nt tinre as the appLCalion for d~evebprr ~1 y at the same of the procedures provldetl for local approval using Y this section and applicable heal atlrnances~witntrout 01 regard to slatutay a local adinarrce flints m the fre- e quency of consideration of amendments to the local '- comprehensive pan. Nothing in this subsection snail be °- deernetl to require favorable consoeratbn of a plan e amendment sdely because it is reared to a develop n merit of regional impact. (c) Any local government comprehensive plan amendments directly rented tc proposed tunas scale development activities may be approved without regard e to statutory limits on the frequency of calsideratbn of amendments to the bowl cdnprehensive pan. A small scale deveiopntent amendment may be adopted any under the fdbwing conditions: '1. The proposed arni'ndmertt invdves a use of 10 acres a fewer and: a. The cumuative effect d the aaeage far as smart scale development amendments adopted by the local government shall not exceed (>b total saes amualty- b. The Proposed arrtertdmertt does rid irtvvlve the same property more than once a year. c. The proposed amendment does not involve the same owner's property within 200 feet of got7eny granted a change within the prior 12 months d. The Proposal amendment does not invove a text change to the goals, pdi°ie5, ano dbjeCines of trio local government's corrtpreFlertsive plan, put orgy pro poses a and use charge to the future and use map for a site-specific small scale development activit e. The proposed arrrertdntent 5 not IOOated within an area of crllical state carcern. 1. If the proposed arrtendment invdves a residential land use, the residential and use has a density o1 10 untls a less per acre- 2. A local gwerrvnent a riot requtel to comply write me requvements of s. 163.3184(i5xc), la pan amendments pursuant to iMS paragraph p pie local gdv ernment cdmplles with the provisions n s. t25.66(Oxa) for a county a In s. 166.041(3xc) fa a nxrrtiapalrty. p inn tinted by otfrer than the local government Public notice is requued. The local gwerrtment ytall serW copies of the nonce aril amendment to Itte state and laannirg agency, the regional pamirtg rbtxtcJl, and arty other person a entity requesting a copy. 3 Small scale levelopntenl amendments adopted pursuant to paragraph (ixc) require only one pubMc hearing before the governing board whiat yell be an adoption hearing as lesaibed n s. 163.3780(7), and are not sublect to itre regtarements of s. 163.3184{3}{6) unless the IOCaI goverrxrrenl elects to have them sublect m those requnemenis 1239 7995 F.S. 1995 ___ _ INTERGOVERNMENTAL PROGRAMS --- -~ -- -- Ch 163 Objective 1.8 The City will continue to maintain a development character which is compact in form, orderly in its land use pattern, and diver- sified in its makeup so as to ensure employment, a!lordable housing, a pleasant living environment, and cost-effective public services. Policy 1.8.1 The City will undertake land annexation only when it can demon- strate an ability to provide services and facilities in a manner which maintains level of service standards set lorth in this Comprehensive Plan and; only when such annexation contributes to the orderly and harmonious urbanization of the region within which the City is situated. Polio The City will encourage clustering of urban uses in locations where infrastructure facilities are available or where extensions and enlargements can be achieved efficiently. Policy 1.8.3 Density bonuses and other incentives shall be considered for inclusion with the City's land development regulations to foster patterns of growth which reduce vehicle trips, conserve scarce resources, and provide other benefits for the community. 9(la 5n I-19 Objective 1.6 The City will encourage innovative land development approaches and concepts in the event of post-disaster redevelopment which will have the effect of reducing dependence on automobile travel, conserving valuable natural resources, and preventing property damage as well as threats to human safety and security. Policy 1.6.1 Opportu,~ities for encouraging the use of innovative land development regulations will be considered in conjunction with the preparation of revised land development regulations as required by Section 163.3202 F.S. Objective 1.7 The City shall coordinate its future land development with the availability of public services and facilities so as to avoid substandard level of services as established in this Comprehen- sive Plan. Policy 1.7.1 The City shall adopt land development regulations in accordance with S.163.3202 F.S. prior to April 1, 1991 as necessary to provide that either (1) development orders and permits issued by the City are specifically conditioned on the availability of facilities and services necessary to serve the proposed develop- ment and that the facilities and services are authorized at the same time the land uses are authorized; (2) that the facilities and services meet the established level of services adopted in this Comprehensive Plan and that they will be available con- current with the impact of development; or (3) that alternative means of meeting concurrency requirements are provided in accordance with standards set forth in Chapter 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code. Policy 1.7.2 The City will review its land development regulations in conjunc- tion with the preparation of revised regulations in accordance with 5.163.3202 F.S. so as to effectively implement land use classifications contained in the Future Land Use 2iap and regula- tions for the subdivision of lan3 so as to meet the objectives and regulations for the subdivision of land and other development processes in order to meet the objectives and policies set forth ir. this Comprehensive Plan. 90450 I-18 Policy 1.3.9 The City adopts residential density standards for each residen- tial land use classification designated on the Future Land Use Map as follows: Residential Land Use Classification Density Standard Residential (Low) 0 thru 6 Dwelling Units Per Acre Residential (Medium) 7 thru 14 Duelling IInits Per Acre Residential (High) 15 thru 20 Dwelling IInits Per Acre Policy 1.3.10 The City adopts the following non-residential density standards for commercial and industrial land use classifications indicated on the Future Land Use Map as follows: Classification intensity s tandard Commercial .5 - 1.0 Floor Area Ratio Industrial .25 - .5 Floor Area Ratio Objective 1.4 The City shall achieve improvement of the physical character of the City and elimination of substandard development programs directed at conservation and through redevelopment of structures. Policy 1.4.1 The City shall undertake by January 1, 1993 a study of all areas of the City to identify substandard structures and site condi- tions and develop a program for correcting such conditions including such activities as implementing necessary improvements in code provisions and more affective code enforcement procedures to deter physical obsolescence and blight throughout the City. Objective 1.5 The City will coordinate its planning and development permitting activities with resource management plans prepared by the St. John's Water Management District, Department of Natural Resources, City of Jacksonville, and other entities and agencies. Policy 1.5.1 The City will develop and adopt regulations and policies which are consistent with resource management plans oP other levels of government and special districts. 90450 I-17 Policy 1.3.2 The City will consider, in conjunction with issuance of all development orders within its boundaries, the impacts of develop- ment on adjacent jurisdictions, regional service entities, regional planning policies, and the hurricane evacuation plan. Furthermore, the City will cooperate with such entities to assure equitable. timely, and coordinated urban development activities. Policy 1.3.3 The City shall not permit expansion or replacement of land uses in a manner which is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Policy 1.3.4 Provisions for landscaping and other buffering methods shall be established on the City's land development regulations so as to prevent inappropriate land uses relationships, prevent noise transmission, provide screening of unattractive views and enhance the aesthetic qualities of streets, neighborhoods, and public areas of the City. Policy 1.3.5 Planned Unit Development regulations and other flexible regula- tory methods shall be utilized to provide incentives for achiev- ing environmental enhancement, economical land development and efficient patterns of land use. Policy 1.3.6 Commercial and light industrial development projects shall be located and designed so as to minimize adverse effects on residential areas, traffic facilities and the aesthetic character of the City. Policy 1.3.7 Public facilities and utilities shall be located and designed to provide the most cost effective service; minimize public incon- venience and hazardous conditions; and, assure the lowest practicable operating cost. Policy 1.3.8 The City will request, by January 1, 1992, that all utility providers advise the City of current needs and future needs as determined by those providers in order that an appropriate procedure and notification process can be mutually agreed upon whereby reservation, dedication, or acquisition of sites can be utilized as appropriate. 9n45~ T-1F Policv 1.1.4 Potable water well fields shall be protected from adverse impacts of development by inclusion of appropriate provisions within the City's land development regulations prior to April 1, 1991. Such provisions shall address limits on activities which have the potential for contaminating soil as well as ground and surface waters. Objective 1.2 Sites and structures identified and documented as having historic or archaeological importance shall be protected from damage or destruction and their preservation shall be encouraged by the City. Policv 1.2.1 Sites and structures within the City which are determined to have historic or archeological significance and worthy of preservation in accordance with standards established by the Florida Division of Historical Resources shall be protected by performance standards and other provisions included in the City's land development regula- tions as amended in accordance with requirements of S 163.3202 F.S. Policv 1.2.2 The City shall encourage preservation of significant historic and archaeological sites through public information programs, incentives and recognition of preservation efforts of individuals and organizations. Objective 1.3 The City shall ensure development patterns which prevent blight- ing influences, eliminate non-conforming uses having a deleter- ious effect on surrounding areas, foster stable neighborhoods, provide proper locations for public facilities and utilities and encourage healthful living conditions. Policv 1.3.1 The City will review all development permit applications in accordance with provisions to be included within its land development regulations adopted in accordance with 5.163.3202 F.S. on or before April 1, 1991, to determine compliance with standards and requirements set forth therein regarding provision of open space, signage, on-site traffic flow, and required parking so as to avoid traffic congestion, hazardous public safety conditions, and efficient land use, while at the same time, avoiding use of excessive impervious areas with resulting adverse environmental effects. 90450 I-15 Goals, Objectives and Policies for the Future nd IIse P~ ment Future land development within the City of Atlantic Beach shall be in accordance with the following Goals, Objectives, and Policies: Goal 1 A city-wide pattern of land uses that fosters a healthy and attractive physical environment, avoids blighting influences, preserves and enhances historic and natural resources, provides reasonable public safety and security from hazardous conditions associated with coastal locations-and has the potential for being served with public services and facilities in a timely and cost effective manner. Objective 1.1 Land development activities and project review procedures shall include requirements aimed at protecting natural environmental features and improving the physical characteristics of the City so as to assure the conservation of natural resources including wetlands, wildlife habitats, and other natural resources; and, improve estuarine water quality. olcv 1.1.1 Through development and adoption of land development regulations by April 1, 1991, land development within the City will be permitted only when such development is compatible with environ- mental limitations of the site and when submitted plans demon- strate appropriate recognition of topography, soil conditions, flooding conditions, habitat protection of rare, endangered or threatened species and areas of unique natural beauty. Policy 1.1.2 The City shall inventory by April 1, 1991 natural environmental features, habitats, and areas of unique interest or beauty to be considered when reviewing development proposals prior to penait- ting activities which can be expected to adversely alfect such areas. Policy 1.1.3 The City shall amend its land development regulations prior to April 1, 1991 so as to require as a condition of development that new construction projects provide effective stormwater management which avoids estuarine pollution conditions consistent with applicable water quality standards of the St. Johns River Water Management District. 9~45Q T-ia Legend RL Residential, Low Density (1-6 DU/AC) RM Residential, Medium Density (7-14 DU/AC) RH Residential, High Density (15-20 DU/AC) RMH Residential, Mobil Home CL Commercial, Limited CG Commercial, General IL Industrial, Light P/SP Public/Semi-Public R/O Recreation/Open Space CON Wetlands/Conservation SW Wetlands/Surface Water V Vacant O Historic Structure w~ Water Dependent Use wR Water Related Use Potable Water Well Vii-inilrr Mnn 1f ` ~i~~ 1 i III _ ~y~l I'~ twj ~ F'~ ~ ~_~~~~I ~i ~. ~ 433tl0 SNINdOH O M\M 1~ a~ a A~~,f o~i o~ ~ '~ 4 7 _J to ~:~ I a ,_ U N Q~ V .~ AGENDA ITEM: # 4 c. A request to amend the Comprehensive Plan Ftritue Land Use Map to change the appGcarrts land~se designatlon hom RH, Residential Migh Density, to CG, Commercial General. The applicant owns the property designated on the attached copy of the Futue Land Use Map. He proposes to change the designation from RH, Residerdfal High Density, to CG, Commercial General, to permit commercial development. The property adjoins property currently designated CG as well as property designated RH and RL, Residential Low Density Changes to the Comprehensive Plan must be accomplished by ordinance. The process for adopting such an ordinance is provided by Chapter 163.3187. Florida Statutes (attached for your iMarmation). To facilitate compliance with Florida Statutes as well as city policies, I have outlined Me process below. 1) Request for Comprehensive Plan Amendment submitted by applicant. 2) Hearing by Community Development Board for recommendation to City Commission. 3) Recommendation and drart ordinance submitted to City Commission for first reading. 4) Public Hearing and final reading of ordinance. The effective date of the ordinance must be set 30 Oays following the date of adoption. 5) If adopted, the ordinance must be submitted to Florida Department of Community Affairs for review and approval. Twerrty-one (21) days folbwing DCA approval the amendment takes effect. 6) An ordinance amending tite zoning map must be initiated and approved prior to development of the property. The Community Development Board should consider positive and negative impacts of the proposed amendmenrt and base its recommendation on the concepts of advancing the goals, objectives and policies of the Future Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan, protecting the public health and welfare, and preserving the Rrtegrity of the Zoning Codes. The Board should make a motion to recommend to the City Commission approval or denial of the proposed amendment. MAP SHOWING SURVEY OF A vA In u r IfxNEY tutor. slcnoN n. TwpsNlr > souTU. 4NCC :f In}i. U'. v'n LIfC Vr~`'iM ft(`M IUA, b[IN4 M]NC II.Xi1t U11.PL1 pCSCNIfLD AS IOLYM$/ [Of A YO'. rIT VI Y II P[r.~f CuXwI NCC AT Tllt' PoINT Of INTCMSlCT 10Y O!' TIIL 4STEYLT X11;11} 1.C N i1LIU[ t. MA YI OIrT RVNU ISTATC N0111 A-1-A. AS INY ESTIILLISYLO A$ 1Y 1)0 IIXIT NIl:11T uP VtTI LND TIIL NOIITII[MLY PILIIT OE VtY LINE q AT4YTIC 60U LLVAYU ISiniL 4'1AU t-1-A, /.5 MOY LSTAOLI SUtU AS Nx 100 IWT YIQT q YPY11 TXt eh l: X. Y9. 14'11'[., nLON: TIIC MUPTIIf 4LY LINL Of SAID ATIJiVTIC YWILVAW f UI~TnVCL rl I1t4.40 ILLT TO TIIC' $OVTIrK51 (OXPC[ OC TIIC IAYp 1f OCSCt11 KD IY L1'.lV VV:/ IGL/, Pn!:[ I)) 01' YVC CVPNI.Vf vUULIC Y[COP(If d DwnL COYNi[, I LOPI UA, TV1rNt u.41'OS'10'M., A!pNG TfIC VtST LIMC q SA10 IJYD R OISTNYC[ P ))1.11 IIfT TO n ILON IIIC SLT NT TIIC IOI Y} 0I CLOI YNIYOI TIICYC[ IIIOY 5110 YUIMT OC YCCIYx IxC M. (f•)1'l5 •M. A DISTAMfL Of ))t, )0 ([fT TO /u IYOY IIIC SC11 Tu Cr,Ct x.0 ]•0)VO'Y. A D6TANCC q 100.00 f[fT TO tw IYVw IIIC LLT IY TfIL T IIN[ u A STNII 0I LANU OCO:CN~f.D f0 T11[ PCMLCtY/.L VSC q TNL IYYLI< 14xiV5[Ln x!iAU. Sl.lu STPIP W' LINp Ol:r. 50 I YI VIX AS YtfCNIY(D IY Of CIC 11L YICUP VS vOLVMf )TO. PAGf )C{I )N[11CL 5.(1 rlIMlY •C., fl.°IIL TMC $OVTUCPLi yVL OI StIU POAD L DISTANCE d ))1.10 C[[T TO TIIC PoINT OC INTt NS[C11 UN C( TVL $UVTXLNLT LIXC U( SAID NOAH tNU TII[ YE$T LIML q }NL yC10 A$ OCSCPI bCO In uCLU LORI lOC3, Y11L[ ))): }NENC[ 5.0)•05'10•[.. I4,d1( Ty[ KST LIMC OL $A 10 LAIIU A UIStANCC Of {00.00 CECT TO 1110 10)Y1 VI L[OIYYINOC COXTA IXI K. 1-!) ACPC$ NOMC ON LLS$. 'P +SC "r M CrIYt1K1ElY>•lllYrwCYYKx ., ~T` 0 ti ~1 ~ ' ~ o ?yam 3 °d o- (~ , ~Y'•T....YN) ~. o y ~0 8 e (, o r/ '\ I .. f-...n.. n I{ ~ 1 C ~TI? ~4~{ _roiG ^i ~\ 1( 10~~ -C T~ _ q•~orC pOUC v ~ ...,'~.. ~... L E/.o,Lpp sui.....~, ... ~ ~... i~uo ...., .n ~.,,..~ o-~ ..^,1., ... J F , ~, ....,...~ ~ ° i...~:;il ~., \ IPMIlY O11L[CW MY [unLC WYY 1111NPwNX ICYtJ YLIWLIOL M M b1Y A W C4MI MYL LI LM ~/Yll~\ LNLI~PL N. A. DURDEN NS1LYen."mlrN.s1....L b ASSDCIATESYN: -~~ ~~ -~~ _ _.I,w_ .Y....M. „M„ ,)C,.ICI.R 7 )L~s .._.__.._.N. r... ~-~.[~ TNN CVN VCi NT vnl" VMLIL TNN IYNIi N LuLONLO MTN TM LlLL M TNL ILOYL YyMLO i7l.l o- i ~: mil S LAW ! IR'~1 7U77 Bunneval Road. Sufic 1'0 latksonvBle, IL 3?216 904 281-2 2 5 5 • Fax 904-281-2266 Fank R- Kessler, Ir. Mark G. I'crvrinKton . August 5, 1996 VIA HAND DELIVERY City of Atlantic Beach, Florida Community Development Board, Chairman Don Wolfson 800 Seminole Road Atlantic Beach, Florida 32233 ATTN: ylr George Worley Citv Planner Re: Request to Initiate Comprehensive Plan Amendment Dear Mr. Worley and/cr Board Members Please be advised that we represent Mr. Marcus J. Prom as the owner of that certain tract of land located within the Castro Y Ferrer Grant, Section 38, Township 2 South, Range 29 East, as more particularly described in the enGosed survey (the'Property'). AS I discussed with Mr. George Worley, the Property abuts the southern side of Comell Lane and the rwrtliem side of the narrow strip of commercial properties which abut Mayport Road. The Property is currently designated multi-family (apartment) on the City's Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Prom requests that the Board consider a plan amendment to redesignate the property to a general commercial use. The intent of the current Comprehensive Plan designation is to provide a buffer zone between the commercial use along Mayport Road and the residential use north of Comell Lane. However, the highest market demand for the Property is for commercial -not mufti-family. In order to develop the property to its highest and best use and at the same time preserve the "buffer zone `intent of the Comprehensive Plan, Mr. Prom proposes to landscape a corridor along Cornet Lane and dedicate it to this use permanently. This :.oukt accomplished e~J•,er through a stipulation to a permit or a conservation easement. Please let us know what further steps we need to take in order to have the City consider Mr. Prom's proposal and request for an amendment. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. ~Sin~cer/ely, // v V Mark G. Pennin MGP/mlh Enclosure ORDfNANCE NO 9~-96-1E3 AN OP,DINANCE OF THE CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACr. AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP OF THE ADOPTED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. CHANGING THE HEP.EIN DESCRIBED PARCEL FROM RH. RESiDENTIA~ HIGH DENSITY TO CG. COMMERCIAL GENERAL. PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DA T E cc iT vRDAiNcu oy ine Gty Commission of fire Ciiy of i~,iiantic peach. ~b~iida Section 1, The Future Land Use Map of the adopted Comprehensive Plan is hereay amended to reflect the change of land use designation of mat parcel of land ovmed by Mr. Marcus Prom and described in me attached survey and legal description, from RH. residential high density to CG. commercial general. The attached survey and legal description is made a part hereof. The effected parcel is depicted en the attachea portion of me Future Land Use Map. Following adoption of mis ordinance a copy shall be submitted tc it~e Flenda ;.eparrre!~t of CommuNy Af'airs fct fBViEW anC comment In co;np!ia~Ce Wittl Jar;ir_,n ',S? ?? $S Of me Flonda Statutes. ~~tion 2. This ordinance shall become effective rive, ~. ~-one days foliow~ng su:,rriss,cn to me Florida Departmerrt of Community Affairs, unless an objection in writing is returned by said agency wimin me preschbe time period. PASSED b HiP C,;ity ~nmmiccinn of tha Ci_ of Atlanfir Raarh Flnnria nn Firgt rFariin~ mis day of , 1996. PASSED by me City Commission of me City of Atlantic Beach. Florida on Second and Final reading mis day of , 1996. ATTEST: Maureen King City Clerk Lyman T Fletcher Mayor ApprcveG as to form and ccntern Alan Jensen, Esquire City Attorney ~B iz -09-9 STAFF REPORT :,GEN~:;A :'E:~! ~' ,r;useC amendment tc ttie Comprehensive Plan CUBMIT'ED 6Y. G_crge VJcrley !!. Cornrnunity Development Cirector , ~ /i CrTE ~e:e"rber 4 t99n EACKGuCI;NC Marcus Protn is the owner of a : ~ acre parcel located on the south side of Cornell Lane. The property is zoned RG-3. resideniia{ general and is designated Rti, residential high density by the Comprehensive Fian. Mr Prom proposed to the City to amentl the Future Land Use desiyna[ion of this property to CG. commercial general. The request was sut;mitted to the Community Gevelopment Board at the September meeting. After discussion as to the existing and potential uses of this property the Board unanimously recormnended venial e` the reccest Mr Prom requested time to consult with his attorney pncr .o subnssion of hie re4u65t to tt,e City Commission for further action. ~i:r Prom has r•:ow roquestec the rroposed arnandment be submitted to ttte Ciiy Con:.r. sson RECOMMENDATION: As descnben in tt;e Staff repot fo the Community Development Board. this process requures adoonon. of an ordmanee amend~na the Future Land Use Map of ttie Comprehensive Plan. followed by submission of the change to the state for approval. and then adoption of an crdmance amending the offida, Zoning Map of the City. Attached is an ordinance amending the Future Land Use Map. in order to complete the process, the ordinance should be passed or+. first reading and a public hearing set. If it is the desue of the City Commission to change fie Future Land Use Map as requested by Mr Prom. it could Dien be adopted on final reading. If the City Commission desires to deny the requested amendment the ordinance should be defeated upon final reading. ATTr" CHM,ENTS 1 j Letter requesting amendment from Mr. Proms Attorney 2j Staff Report to the Community Development Board ~; R4irutes of the Ccmmurity Develepment Board REVIE'J',tED BY CITY MANAGER. A~GEN~DA ITEM NO. ~~nn!ng. excepting from ttie teritory hereinabeve described that Hart thereof lying !~ c,7,d ~,ecDOns c and 9 ocal,r.•ied and used by Selva ",Hanna Country Club as descnt~?^. ;.r. a .?,: •?CSrdeC :n Vc eme o5[. page a54 Offnaai Records of Duva! County. and .:,rsd chop cf the eaters c` the At'antlc Ocean two rmles from the iow water mart ::et~.tieen the nGrth ai?C SCUt1; P^ESUf Sard :ity as abOVc UeSC(jbed protected easter~y ^~1c rniies ar.d poiice;cnsaiclur, for traffic ccntrc! purposes over Atlantic Boulevar.^.'re;:: cue Atiantic Ocear. to ^te v:es:eriy ;units of sard crty as hereinbefore described. over sa,r. "Jaynort Road `rom ".e City limits as anove desc! ibed. norther?y tc the norttterr. G- ~UnClB rY Ilne vt Sald ' raC?I i:nc i v@°t!On 5. provided. however Y~iat the CITY Councl: i~' t" Cl;y' C.. JaCkSCnV;ae, Fi(;Ii(7a. a:a:ng ir' itS Capacity aS ~:6 .jCVP.r.^,ing h,cdy of Duva! ^ '• ~: li tinl• '!Cr~da !S i'?reby' aU^~~f.Z?C ~. CG ^StrUCt and maintain any and all streets. f03d5. C ~g!Iways that have a`. any U ne heretofore beer adopted as county roads by fie 6ca~:: o. County Ccmmissicners of Duval County Florida. ?s it may deem necessary and groper for rte benefit ct the pUhljr Szctrorl.3 Thrs ordinance shall become effective Immediately upon final passage ?ASS~D by the City Commission of the City er Atiantic 3each. Florida on First reading *.r'!s day of 1996 SASSED by me City Comm~ss,on Or"'e C!t'y 01 Atlantic Eeacn. ~lor:da cn Sernn,^ a~.^ F~na~ reading this _ dxy of 1996 ~T SST. w,~ure?r, KInQ City Clerk V i.ynian ` ~ietche! Manor Approved as tc form anc con`ent ~.:an Jensen. Esquire C~tv A±;ornev r".:.0!-•`;r~C- H REti ;~E~ .';-:. _^.~P~:O\ OF THE -+,uiv,C~~AL CORPO!?h1T= 50i~r\DAR'~.C. o~, .n. ~ n F. „v~~..tiG :,N E~`==CTii~ ., ^TE `_'= ,- OP,DH!tVEL cy *•~e Clty :.•r;res ,.,~. o° tn~ C y of Ht!ar... 8eacn Fionda ;>eCtror i _ By referendum eiecUor held tVevemr~er 4 1996 a aornon of me Clty of Jacicsonvife descr,hed as tite area hounded on the south try a line 16 feet north of me center tine of Arant:c Beutevar. measured at ng!~t angles from said center line. on me west by m< center .ice of the :ntrcoastai 11Vaterv+ay or, me norm by me north tines of Sect!ons 18 and 40. and on me east by me previously established corporate limit lines of the City of Atlantic Beach was annexed rnto tr:e Gry of Atiant:c Beach S Cl i;~a: J Ti1C l.liy 1. ii'~r11I'IJJUfI V? IiIC 1.i1= Vf /iilc'lil C. '~JCA CiI l:C~l(C$ tV Eli: Ul atelV ref~ect me c~:rrent ;nu^.ICloai corporate bounCarn_s !n Ii5 Charter. Tc mat end me 'a; r•~~r!~'~. h~•_ir!r~re~ a5 Ct25l, r:bed n $•: ~~~:~:~ ~ ';i? ~I'81iEr O"~?e CiiY Cf H.tiant;c c d%'.:'?. ~..'!da 2r° ne(9UV amer.cec t~ .'edC aS tOvCVlS Eeg~nring at a point cn the bead; of ±t;e Atlan±~; Ocean which is the intersec"on of 'ie I~w waxer mark line of said Ariantic Ocean acd an easterly prolonaafion of me souti~e~;y bcandary Ilne of Katrryn Ah`y Hanna Fark 'Unnlnr mence westerly alone the sc:;;t:er!y bounoary hie of Bard Kamryn Ahby Hama Park to me easteny rght-of-way line of Old S!ter ry Dnve (County Roao Nc 55 . ): running mence soumerly along said easterly rig^;-of-way ne of Oid Sherry Drive ;County P.oad fVc 551! to me norm boundary line of frachona! Section 5 Township 2 Soum. Range 29 East: runrmg mence westerly along me northeny boundary tine cf sard Fract;onai Section 5 rn Bard Township and Range. to me easterr, nght-of-way line of Mayport Road (State Road A-1-A): running thence soumerly along me easterly right-of-way line of said Mayport Road to me norm boundary ire of Government Lot 15 of Section 8 running mence easterly along me north boundary line of sard Government Lot 15 tc me northwest comer cf tfie east one-half of said Government Lot 15 running mence southerly along me west boundary line of me east o^e-half of said Government Lot 15 to me north 4oundary nne of Sec?ions 17 and 18 in salt. Township and Range: n~nning mence westzr!y along said north_I~ounilaryJine ~rrd ti-e rcr*t•_ t:ou~pary lirf<4_f Sectron_40_ to a pclnt_at the center- Irne gf the IntraG4astal 4l!a:erway running th~11CQ southerly,~lopg 5ald_4~ntEfllt7e of the 11h~9~gt81 yU~tefway ;:, the In;a;:ect!on of 5ald center line wrm a line six;eQn !' 6) f~ets9rtngriy-9f_ meast~ied as r,gn aryies from. anp fjargll~I to ttie ce~t~rGnz ot_ATanti~ 6culQyard: running mence easreny along Bald parallel line and a prolcr.gatran of same to a point of intersecfion of sa!d plo~onga~or: wrm me low water mark of me Htfantlc Ccean, and running mence nc~^,iieriy aloha said low water mark of me A?lantic Ocean to me point or place of ~A rz-o9-9~ STAFF r<ErOR? A"E'V~A'.'E'':r ib n.~~^(.G el"~ ^(•.^J ~ir~ ~(,._ 1 ^a.^.u< .C..:.iRM1~ITTC~RV Vcn.r.o x!11 J..~`r: '~I /~nmrr gym,. f'~o„ol,~nrnnn}vlr°.ni'vr i,./ -_ LATE DeCS:r,oer ~ ioc BACKGROUND: As a result of the approval of ttte annexation referendum on the November general eiecficn ballot. an amendment to the Charter is necessary to correctly define the corporate boundahes of the City of Atlantic beach. The attached ordinance amends only that portion of the Charter which defines the corporate boundaries. Approval of this ordnance wiL allow staff to proceed with amendments to the various official maps of the City and to prepare ttie appropriate documentafion to amend the Comprehensive Plan to refzc; 9.e ntv: addiTOn to ttte City. P.ECOMrNEN~ATION Approve Ordinance No. on nrst reading. r".'TACHPAE~TS. i l Ordinance No. 28-96-4 -~1/ ~/ REVIEWED 6Y CITY MANAGER: ~ i AGENDA ITEM NO `.Y.Fi~= i„~~ o )~l)j~ ~4i•e•0,c~(; s Mepdf ; 59.Rk~.o~9rt~wca-Jcy~s the rroFe~ d~Al~ J~~ i. . ~:J f r _- - . c.rv.or L~ (s G ~1_C3..4 C ~~~~ p } C .i _ ~nP lime Dale _- i r~ L ~.Q_-- Company: _ lw>.~ L f'rern: -- Message: ' ~~~ -- '1_G5 t Sl. Johns E31u11 Rd. Jacksonville, t"lurida 3221G Phone (904) 6d1-f1564 I=ax (904) 646-3709 y ~ ~~ r~ ~ ~ G~ Number of sheets including this transmittal ~" ~ g04 641-(3584 It all sheets are not received, please immediately notify us by phone at ( ) !TY OF ~aKtc'e tieae.k - ~fn~.tda till) a.vl~ln r: Itu.{u .___ _ _ ___._ •IL%. •.l H-ah:N'H, tL//Rm{R23 ~.<1.1: _ It_L P.IYHI]F ~WIL ]J~-<&NI tAT IYM1 2i]-SMAK _.- -_ _. __ __ ..' ~ 19Y~... December 3, 1996 To: Jim Jarboe, City Manager //-,,-I From: Timmy Johnson, Parks & Recreation Director,~~%/, Re: Park Signs After reviewing the Parks & Recreation Board resolution on signage and speaking with Todd Lake, owner of Ace Signs and Design, 1 came up with the following information. Below is a list of Parks and City buildings that the resolution would affect, along with an estimated cost (Per Todd Lake, see attached). The sign is three feet high and six feet long. Donner Park (2) Donner Park Community Center (1) Jordan Park (1) Johansen Park (2) Bull Park (2) Adele Grage Community Center (I ) Howell Park (1) Russell Park (2) Tresca Property (1) TOTAL NUMBER OF SIGNS 14 COST PER SIGN: $1260 (Sign only) S1975 (Sign and Post) Cost for fourteen signs: $17,640 (Sign only) 527,650 (Sign and Post) 5A 12 - 09- 9~ RESOLUTION NO. 96-54 WHEREAS, the beautification of the City of Atlantic Beach is best served by attractive and complementary signage which "catches the eye" and thereby informs, directs, or instructs quickly and accurately; and WHEREAS, the regulation of the city is best achieved by signage which is standardized, predictable and legible; and WHEREAS, the signage for parks and public buildings, unlike traffic and parking signage, has never been carefully regulated and standardized. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT KESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the city adopt the signage specifications developed by the Recreation Advisory Board, which are based on the pioneering efforts of the Beautification Committee. SECTION 2. That, exclusive of all Legal parking and traffic signage, all other official signage for pazks and public buildings which is larger than two feet by two feet, shall complement and conform with the existing WELCOME TO ATLANTIC BEACH signs in color, composition, material, sandblasted surface, and lettering. SECTION 3. That all signs, whether designating (naming) public buildings and parks or welcoming citizens or visitors, shall have all the elements of the city's logo: palm tree, sailboat, surf and shoreline with rocks. SECTION 4. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its fmal passage and adoption. Passed by the City Commission this 12th day of December, 1996. Lyman T. Fletcher Mayor/Presiding Officer ATTEST: Approved as to form and correctness: Alan C. Jensen, Esquire City Attorney ~ ~~pxps~~yy(~~~yy~~yy~pp~~~ xO~p~1(~~x~ S AO Y hNOfV ~ Om~IfV ON~~ ~~s ~RRRogoonR4R44Rm ~ r 5 W = ~ p d ~.-tn Y)ryNm00f'lhm' M ~ O O W « 2 L t0 O1 ~io oin~ooooN~.-moo.- ~ ~"~ Q C W W ~ ~~~~Rt~)m NP10Nh"'m O G ~" W O ~ s _~ O y J ~ H ~ ~ s ~y w W ~ ~ y a~z=wm° z W W ~W ~~a~F~~m.w~LL~y(J~ ~ ~ N } ~ ~ W y~ ~ rr.(~.~~ ~ innV "" ¢ W ~2y ~ ~Sy Sy~yS 4j ~ 1' O '~ f K u LL S Z N~~~ W~ W 0 7 0 V ~ o Q J ~ W Q ~ m ~ g ~ ~~~~~~~p1~~~:R~~m~ o ~' ~ 3 ~o $o vii rion~n~"~oo~o~c~i Q z • U Q ~~ ~~gt7~OfN~t~lm~Y1~~ m Q o ~ IV o ~ O O N t0 O ~ O O N O ~ N O ~ m 0 O O ~'N N f'1~0)~n 01~11nON N1A 5 LL N y Q ~ r ~ y y ~Zy y O W O Q g1 O ~i ar Z j K W U y y ~ Za J J'y~ ~p~F ~~ ~J1 ~` J'y~'~ M1' 3 7 2 p u 3 f y~ 3 J W~ 2~ 0 ~ ~ 0 > V f ~ W e~ Y W ~ s W yW~ LL m m~ ~ OO~~NO~m ~ S W f ~~p p Nt~l~l OOD~ ~-Nh ~~IN y~j O e 0~0 K ~ tONm000.~ OOOf~c? ~ Q ~ C ~' O ' F N n W 2 ~ > ~ = U U ~ p ~N W OO ~D~ ~O~ O N~ ~ Li H a _ D aD O~ ~OOC7 .- ~O NYf O 1~ O a7~ r OON~~ ~O ~ tQ n d x W n W m~~OON~~ ~OCD {~ O OD ~y li W ~ J W ° ° W ~ Z O Z yy O LL O J w Z Q w y ¢ w o 2 ~ 2 Q U _ K a 0 (O LL K Y J Z ~ F p LL ~ ~ z a ~ J w uyQ~~w~~N~caio O ~ O O W W H~ W S J N y~ ~ ~ ~ ~ LL ~ ~ ~ 3 . > m ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~~ m N awp z a~a O ~ N i ~ Z F ~ ~~ m0~ O 3e 3E deo 2~0 oe ~'e1e~sR~ ¢ ~an0~r LL N ~ NO~O~DO~OOD ~~ O > O N~noo~oo~orod a m ~ N m O ~ N O ~ N ~ m 0 m t0 C W r W m J W U W ? ~ J G O dJ M 2 li ~ b y w z~ w w ~ ~ Z O W O= W S d'F"U AIL O Q ¢ O m LL~ y z 0.' U 4 2~ g J x U a ~ a g~ ~ o~ w LL a a 3 J <? G O o O ~ h ~ y a u x ~ v O F U O } W S J N y~ R ~ R K~ j O ~ 0 F 7 a U c C ~ > > ~ LL LL x~ 3~ 1 m (~ ~ J F a m Y! a U M CITY OF >4tQa.ctic beaels - i~Ce~cida # ~. .f_'~-_._---- December 4, 1996 TO: Jim Jarboe, City Manager VIA: David Thompson, Public S ety rector FROM: John Ruley, Fire Chief e~ ~ REF: Monthly Report for Nov r, 1996 iILA\llf KE,\('H rlKl-.RtSCI~I~. ~~~~ Sf_.NIA~ULI: KOAD m asnr nr;~rri. ft oK!a~ ;__;: TI:LhPHO\'f: i W}l i _!'-5854 Attached is a wpy of the data from the run nports for the month of November, 1996, and a comparison oC runs for November, 1995, In addition, you will sec a report showing the curtcnt year 1996 as it compared to the totals for the same time last year. 1995. As indicated for the month of November 1996, the Fue Rescue Department responded to 106 calls for service. This figure is about up 20.8% Gom the same time last year (November 1995). The average response time for the month is about 3 minutes and is well within the normal response time to calls within the cih. Comparing our total year to date figures with last years totals, you will sce that our call volume is up 83% This month our calls for malical related service is about 57.55% of our total call volume. This figure is some wfiat lower than the 73.81 % last year same month. The fire related call percentage for this month is about 11.32% which is about 5.37% higher then the same month last year. The fire departnxnt responded to throe (3) swcture fires and one (1) outside of structure fire .All throe of the tyre were in the City of Jacksonville Beach, however the outside of structure fire was in Atlantic Beach. The outside of structure fees caused about S5,000 worth of damage. tAtt the good side the fuc was on a connecting wood porch and was stopped before it could advance into the house. Property values saved $500.000. 4A az -09-9~ City of Adarnic Beach City Commission Meeting Stall' Report AGENDA ITEM: FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT FOR NOVEMBER 1996 SUBMITTED BY: John Ruley, Fire Chief DATE: December 4, 1996 BACKGROUND Attached is a copy of the Mottthly report and fire report data. RECOMMENDATIONS: To have this report part of the consent agenda for the December 9, 1996 commission meeting. ATTACHMENTS: Copy of Fire Department monthly report and fire report data. ~_~ RECEIVED BY CITY MANAGER: ~ /~~' ~~ ~' ~i AGENDA ITEM NO. 4A , ~z-o9-~~ CITY OF rQt.Cacttc - ~lcrida ,~ _~-_ _-__ F~+.- _ ___.. _ _. _ _ _ 2, 1 *.v. To: 1im Jarboe, City Manager From :Timmy Johnson, Parks and Recreation Director! Re: Usage Report, Community Center, November, `96 WN1 1t_lll\Ill.t. NI IAII 111 ~\11l' REi/'f1, h1A IH III-\ ~:2}l.:yyc TFf.EI'HfKh: iYflii 117-:xdi F1X 1'N13i _~7-511(15 Jim, here is a recap of activity at the Adele Grage Community Center for the month of November, 1996. Group/Event # Migs/ # People % Total Use Events THEATER (Room A) ABET Performances 9 434 51 ABET Rehearsal 25 300 35 ABET Workshops 2 22 3 Exercise Group 8 80 9 Leleche Group Mtg. I 15 2 TOTALS 851 100•/. MEET ING ROOM (Room B) AA Meeting 9 108 36 Arts & Crafts 2 14 5 Boazd Meetings 6 105 35 CribbagelScrabble 5 42 14 State Atty's Mtg. 1 g 3 Travel Group 2 20 7 TOTALS 297 100% GRAND TOTALS Theater-851 7q•/. Meeting Room-297 ~•/. 1148 100% CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH Code En/orcement ActiWty RepoK October 1, 1996 - November 30, 1996 OTHER ACTMTIES: Coda Enforcement Board January 7, 1997 at 7: JO p.m. Pn9pal~ed By: Kart W. Orunewa/d Tog! Raactlve and Proactlw Complaints {1993~4j 724 {19945} 780 {19!6.98} 852 AGENDA ITEM N0: ¢~ Meeting Dale: 11-9-1996 AGENDA ITEM SUBMITTED BY: ~7 DATE: BACKGROUND: RECOMMENDATION: C/TY OF ATLANT/C BEACH C/TY COMM/SSION MEETING STAFF REPORT NOVEMBER 1996 CODE ENFORCEMENT REPORT Krrl W. Granewnid, Code Eotorcemeot Officer December 4, 1946 ATTACHMENTS: November 1996 Code Enjorceneenl Report RF,VIF.WF,D RY CITY MANAGER: CITY OF fltfa.rtle " w,e(c - ~latida ,1 ».w sr:ws~ ~i.t: au:w ATL:1NTIt' BF:A~'I1. PI trta UA :._"_'aa-Sta". Tha.ta'H~~SF: ~.xH~ 2-0~-:.~~~U FAX ~9u-I "-05-55Uf ~.~ ,_ D U M ,~ ~, „~~ ~,.,_ .,n~H, November 7, 1996 TO: Jim Jarboe, Cily Manager FROM: Don C. Ford, Building Offlclal RE: Building Pertnks Rsport ' Phase be advised that the follovMng permits were issued in the month of November 1998: TYPE PERMR NO. PERMRS I~ERMtT COST CONST. VALUATION New Single Famiy 3 10,557.48 418.739 New Duplexes New Townhouses 8 17.867.84 480,271 AddRionslRemodels 12 740.00 71,011 Swimming Pods Commercial GaragelCarport 1 87.50 8,800 Demolitlona (Irderior) 4 200.00 Decks 1 25.00 3,000 Fences 1 10.00 300 Gazebo 1 52.50 4.000 Signs 1 21.00 UdNtles 8 7,275.00 Wells 1 10.00 Reroof 10 250.00 28,501 Sheds 2 50.00 1,000 TOTALS 49 37,128.32 9!1,422 Misceilarbous permits issued in connection wkh new optstrtrctlon, additior-s, rerrmodelirg, etc: Number of PermBs Per mits Costs EkdAcal 30 1,012.40 Plumbing 36 1.ti05.50 Mechanical 24 971.00 Mspectlona Performed bet martln: Building Concrete Electrical Plumbing Mechanical Misc. Oxup. Lic. 48 31 39 41 30 2 8 INFORlIATION COMPILED BY PAT HARIeS - BLM.DNYO OEPAR7~IfENT Agenda kem No. c~. A 12-09-96 CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH CITY COMMISSION STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM: Building Permits Report November 1996 SUBMITTED BY: Don C. Ford, Building Official DATE: December b, 1996 The following is a comparison report of Building Permits for New Single Family, Duplexes, Townhomes, Remodeling/Additions and New Commercial for years to date for November 1996 and November 1996: Year to Date November 1996 TYPE PERMIT NO. PERMITS CONSTRUCTION VALUATION New Single Family Duplexes Townhomes Remodeling/Additions New Commercial Total New Single Family Duplexes Townhomes Remodeling/Additions New Commercial Total 69 56,347,820 7 668,836 6 373,818 128 3,049,961 6 426,791 204 510,767,216 Year to Date November 1996 21 52,971,360 19 1,248,379 27 2,016,6b3 143 2,066,372 9 834,123 219 i9,23b,887 RECOMMENDATION: ATTACHMENTS: Building Permit Report for November 1996 REVIEWED BY CITY~(~~ MANAGER: 1~~ ~~fa../ii+lu+t (sn f ~~z) MEMORANDUM December 3, 1996 Page No. 2 include a contingency of I S% or 520,000 to this price for budget purposes, giving a total anticipated cost of 5150,000 for the drainage improvements. I indicated that Gee & Jenson Engineers have the revisions to their preliminary plans as modified in the field by myself, Emie Beadle and Peter Kirby of Callaway, and that final plans and quantity takeoffs for new project unit prices should be forth coming in two weeks. A formal change order will be prepared and should be completed by January 6, 1997. Afta~hM~~r a ~sh~. ~~z) Memorandum CI"fY OP A'I~LAN"1'IC Bf:ACF1 "fo: Robert Kosoy, Public Works Director CC: Ham McNally, Collection%Distribution Division Director Ernie Beadle, Public Works Inspector Harry Skahn, Gee & Jenson Engineers From: James G. Jacques, Assistant to the Public Works Director Date: December 2, 1996 Subject: Beach Avenue Drainage Improvements Conversation with Peter Kirby, Callaway Contracting City Project No. AW9603 1 called Yeter Kirby to discuss the letter from Callaway Contracting dated November 25, 1996. in which they stated an approximate cost for the drainage improvements on Beach Avenue between 17ih Street and 20'6 Street. 'fhe price quoted in their letter was for $ 110,000 for the work, but it did not include several items- 1. Water main relocations should be increased from the 2 shown on the preliminary plans sent to them on November 22, 1996, to 4, to anticipate conflict with 2 additional storm inlets on the west side of Beach Avenue toward 20`" Street. This will add approximately 52,000 to the cost. 2. Landscape restoration already has a bid allowance item, which has not yet been used. "there should be sufficient monies in the allowance to cover any increased work, if required. 3. The cost of the bond for this increased project work will be approximately $2,000, 4. The work will require replacement of pavement and driveways along 17'" Street, 20'" Street and Seminole Road, which +vas not included in the total quantity in the contract. Based on the estimated quantities involved, the cost for pavement, driveway and sod restoration will be approximately $16,000. "fhe revised price from Callaway Contracting is now $13Q000. We should Callaway Contracting, Inc. General Contractors Underground Utility Contractors November 25, 1946 Mr. James G. Jacques, Ass[. to the Public N'orks Director Ciry of Atlantic Beach 1200 Sandpiper Lane Atlantic Beach, Fl. 32233-0381 Re: Memorandum of Nov. 25, 1996 City Project No. AW9603 Dear Mr. Jacques: ~/ ~w9G received the preliminary plans for 17'" Ave. and Beach Ave. drainage dated Nov. 22, 1996. Using these two sheets as modified in red by Public Works, I have developed preliminary cosu that can be used at your discretion as budget costs. 1 have included the following items as indicated on the plans: I S" RCP, 18" RCP, type "C" structures, conflict manhole, 6" W.M. offsets, pavement removaVreplacement, driveway and sidewalk removaUreplacement, sod replacement, lower manhole top, connections to existing pipelswcmres, maintenance of tra(Jic, general site restoration. No costs are included (or water utility relocation or restoration other than the two offsets noted on the plans. No special landscape or structural restorations are included. 1 have changed the type "C" structure at station 3 + 26 (20m St J to a type "E" due to the number of pipes in the sirucmre. It appears the cost for the work as noted above will total about b 110,000.00, bond not included. 1 have some concern about the work along existing asphalt paving that is not included N the sewer project for removaUreplacement. 71te storm drainage is very close to the paving and it will be just about impossible not to lose the edge of the roadway. Pleax le[ us'A~ow if we can be of further help to you. Patrick S. Callaw~y P.E. President PSC:awe' ~1~/~ ~Ov 2 7 1996 CG0009273 CUC050627 PO. liox I Id35 Jacksonville, Florida 32239 • Phone (904) 727-6765 FAX (904) 724-6443 STAFF REPORT ON BEACH AVENUE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS December 3, 1996 RECOMMENDATION: Approve allocation of funds to include the proposed drainage improvements on Beach Avenue between 1 T° Street and 20'h street for the additional cost of $ 150,000. The work wil I be performed under the current construction contract with Callaway Contracting, Inc., to be included with the current water and sewer improvemenu. A formal change order to the construction contract will be developed when final plans are developed and will be presented to the Commission at the next scheduled meeting in January 1997. ATTACHMENTS: Letter from Callaway Contracting, dated November 25, 1996, and a memo from James Jacques, Public Works, relating a conversation with Peter Kirby of Callaway Contracting, Curther defining the scope of proposed work and associated costs. c- ~. REVIEWED BY CITY MANAGER: AGENDA ITEM ~D ~z-og-9c~ CI'1'ti' OF A"1'LANTIC' BEACH CI"1'1' ('O!11MISSION MEETING S"J'AP'E FtF:PORT AGENDA 1'1'EiV1: RecommendaUOn of Urainage Improvements for Beach Avenue SUBMITTED BY` Robert S_ Kosoy, P.I:., Pubhc Works Direetor`~`s~~ DATE: Uecembe:r 3, 1996 BACKGROUND: As directed at the City Commission meeting of August 12, 1996, the City Staff has contracted with the engineering firm of Gee & Jenson Engineers, Inc., to design and prepare engineering plans for drainage improvements on Beach Avenue at 17"' Street, I8'" Street and 20'" Street. A survey was performed and plans have been prepared delineating new storm drainage inlets and pipes at the following locations: I 17°i Street from Beach Avenue to Seminole Road. A series of 8 inlets will drain the low areas and transmit the runoff through storm pipes to the ditch west of Seminole Road. This will intercept runofTat the south end of Ocean Grove drive and at a low spot just east of Seminole Road- The pipe construction across Seminole Road will require traffic control and careful construction techniques. 2. 18"' Street at Beach Road. 3 Inlets will improve drainage at the intersection and connect to an existing storm piping system leading to Saturiba Drive. 3. Beach Avenue from 19"' Street to 20"' Street. Anew drainage system consisting of9 inlets on Beach Avenue will replace an ineffective inleVdry pit system approximately half way between 19'" and 2G' Streets, and connect through storm piping to 20ih Street, leading to an existing inlet on the west side of Seminole Road. The pipe construction across Seminole Road will require traffic control and careful constnution techniques. Plans are being submitted to the St. Johns River Water Management District. No permit is anticipated by the engineers. Preliminary plans have also been sent to the contractor for Beach Avenue Water and Sewer Extensions, and a preliminary price has been developed of $150,000, which includes a I S°~o contingency. The funding for this recommended increase of $15Q000 in the contract will come from the existing contingency in the project of $ti8,107, plus remaining funds in the current Capital Improvement Plan budget for Beach Avenue of $I 16,772. This still leaves a total of project contingenc}• and remaining budget funds of $34,879 for additional work within the water and sewer portion of the contract. City of Atlantic Beach Employees Retirement System GENERAL-POLICE-FIRE MEMBERS PROPOSALS UNDER CONSIDERATION Submitted To: The Board of Trustees Date: June 27, 1996 Submitted By: Brad L. Armstrong and Mark K. Johnson Gabriel, Roeder, Smith & Company As requested, we have determined the increase in the City's computed annual contribution rate due to the proposed benefit changes for General, Police and Fire members. VALUATION RESULTS Proposal 2A - Provide a 3 % ad hoc COLA for current retired members and beneficiaries. For example, a $100/month pension would become a $103/month pension. Adoption of this proposal would require an additional ~i y contribution of: Percent of Payroll FY 96/97 Dollars General Police Fire eneral Police Fire Normal Cost 0.00 0.00 0.00% $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 UAAL 0.09 0.08 0.12 1~ 721 604 Total 0.09% 0.08 0.12% $1,714 $721 $604 CITY OF ~tfadfe b~eacli - ~lmuda r _--___ ___. F~ -_--._ ___._ _ _. -__.-_ MEMORANDUM December 4, 1996 To: Jim Jarboe, City Manager From: Don C. Ford v Re: 3°~ Cola for Retirees aW SEMI\ULF ROAll ATLANTIC' REACH. FI,OHIDA aY133-5445 TELF:PHUNE ~s04i 2a;~5Ra! FAX ~ 904 i 24 i -SROS SUNCOM R52-5R(I(1 I am submitting a copy of the actuarial study by Gabriel, Roeder, Smith and Company showing the cost to the City for a cost of living increase for the retired employees. This is a one-time increase of 3%. The total cost to the City is $3,039.00 for general, police and fire retirees. With your approval, I would like to have this placed on the agenda for the December 9, 1996 meeting of the City Commission. The last cost of living increase for the retirees was over seven years ago. DCFlph Enclosure AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: .3 G MEETING DATE - 11-09-96 CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH CITY COMMISSION M~E'~IG AGENDA ITEM: 3% Cola jor Retirees SUBMITTED BY: Don C. Ford, Pension Board Representative ~~ DATE: BACKGROUND: December, /996 Proposals Under Consideration for the City of Atlantic Beach Empbyees Retirement System to provide a 3% ad hoc COLA for current retved members and beneficiaries. RECOMMENDATION: ATTACHMENTS: Memorandum and Actuarial Study by Gabriel, Roeder, Smith & Company RF,VIEWED BY CITY ` \~' 1" \` MANAGER: ~~`~ -l The absence of a responsible person to handle these duties may well result in the development of an attractive nuisance. People will know that they can do into the park virtually hidden from public view, and they can engage in improper conduct with little chance of being caught. It only takes a few incidents to injure the reputation of the park and deter people from coming to it. If people visiting the park know that a city staff person will be there to Beet them, answer their questions, and assure that everyone is abiding by the rules, then the park may maintain a positive reputation. Dames and Moore made some good choices in the design of the park, including the location of the parking lot outside of the main pazk area. However, the very nature of the park will require staffing to prevent problems and assure an acceptable level of safety. RECOMMENDATIONS: We recommend that the City consider the staffing of the park in its long-teen plans for the development of the Tresca Property. ATTACHMENTS: NONE ~('~„~. ~' \~.J,. REVIEWED BY C[TY AGENDA ITEM: 3A ~z -09-9~ C1TY OF ATLANTIC BEACH CITY COMMISSION MEETING STAFF REPORT' AGENDA ITEM: Public Safety Perspective on Tresca Park Design ~,~ SUBMITTED BY David E. Thompson, Director of Public Safety DATE: November 26, 1996 BACKGROUND: The design prepared by Dames and Moore for the Tresca property was presented to the City Commission on November 25, 1996_ At that time, the plan had not been reviewed by the Department of Public Safety. The morning of November 26, 1996, the Director of Public Safety met with Mr. Cryscon from Dames and Moore, along with City Manager Jim Jarboe, Tim Johnson, George Worley, and Bob Kosoy. The same afiemoon, Police and Public Works members walked the Tresca site to gain a better feel for the property size and character. T'he possible public safety problems with the park design are common for this type of project. The same features that make a park attractive in its natural state are the same qualities that make it difficult to police. The foliage, tree cover, and natural habitat are the factors that will give the park its personality and beauty. The docks, ramps, water access, animals, and plants are intended to preserve the natural state of the environment. [t is these same factors that create specific hazards in the park. They will prevent the police from being able to see who is in the park and what activities are taking place in the park. They will prevent fire/rescue people from being able to respond quickly to injured or ill individuals, and they will certainly delay the transport of people to medical facilities. The extensive access to water creates concems for water safety, especially at canoe launch areas. By its very nature, this type of park creates pubhc safety concerns. To address the major concerns for public safety in such an environment, it is recommended that the City assure staffing of the park while it is open to the public. After sundown, the park should be closed to the public. A Parks and Recreation position, similar to a park ranger, would be adequate to provide the necessary supervision. This position should be expected to handle general maintenance duties, identify hazards, welcome visitors, provide basic first aid and perhaps lifeguard services, and act as a resource for information on the habitat and the park. This position should be on-site most (if not all) of the time that the park is open, and they should contact police or fire/rescue staff as needed for services. [f the park is open seven (7) days a week from sunrise to sundown, then the it may require hiring several people to assure the necessary coverage. Minutes Page 9 November 25, 1996 Mayor Fletcher inquired concerning the city's franchise agreement with Ferrellgas and was informed the agreement was renewed about two years ago. There being no further discussion or business to come before the Commission, the meeting adjourns at 9:20 PM. Lyman Fletcher MayodPresiding Officer ATTEST: Maureen King, CMC City Clerk NAME OF COMMAS. M S V Y V N Minutes Page 8 November 25, 1996 to provide professional services in the completion of the 800 MHZ communications system Motion: Authorize staff to negotiate for s professional communications firm to provide professional services in the completion of the 800 MHZ communications system. There was no discussion and the motion carried unanimously. S. City Manager Reports and/or Correspondence A. Status report on Capital Improvement Projects Each Commissioner was given a Capital Improvement Plan Progress Report No. 6. Jim ]acques, Assistant to the Public Works Director, presented a brief update on the projects occumng in the city. It was pointed out that all projects were on schedule. B. Recycling Grant City Manager Jarboe reported that he would provide options for the expenditure of recycling grant funds at the next meeting. 9. Reports and/or requests from City Commissioners, Ciry Attorney and City Clerk Mayor Fletcher thanked Commissioner Meserve for his diligent work on the contracts for use of city owned facilities. Commissioner Shaughnessy referenced the Florida League of Cities Newsletter each member received and stated that she would like as many Commission Members as possible to attend the December 5, 1996 dinner meeting. Commissioner Shaughnessy then stated she had attended a recent wnference of the Florida Shore and Beach Preservation Association and arranged for a representative from the Army Corps. of Engineers to speak to the Commission concerning beach renourishment and related matters. She then asked the Commission if the meeting should be scheduled as a sepazate meeting or as part of a regular meeting. ARer a brief discussion, it was the consensus of the Commission to schedule the meeting on the third Monday of January or February at Z 15 PM NAME OF COMMRS. M S V Y V N MESERVE X REED X ROSENBLOOM X X SHAUGHNESSY X X FLETCHER __ _ X 1 , Minutes Page 7 November 25, 1996 5. Action on Resolutions: A. RESOLUTION NO. 96-52 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH, FLORIDA, RESCHEDULING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON A PROPOSAL TO LEVY A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT FOR A SEWER LINE TO SERVE THE PROPERTY OWNERS BETWEEN 16TH AND 20TH STREETS ON BEACH AVENUE, AND ON SECTIONS OF DEWEES AVENUE, SHELL STREET, COQUIN4 PLACE, OCEAN BOULEVARD AND SEMINOLE ROAD, AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE Motion: Adopt Resolution No. 96-52. Mayor Fletcher read the Resolution by title only. City Clerk King explained the public hearing was being rescheduled from Monday, January 20, 1997 at 7:15 PM to Tuesday, January 21, 1997 at 7:15 PM due to the Martin Luther King holiday falling on Monday. There was no discussion and the motion carried unanimously. B. RESOLUTION NO.96-53 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH TRANSFERRING FUNDS Motion: Adopt Resolution No. 96-53. It was explained that the transfer of funds would allow for the purchase of a new mid-sized vehicle from State Contract for the Public Safety Departrnent. There was no discussion and the motion carried unanimously. 6. Action on Ordinances: None. New Business: A. Authorize staff to negotiate for a profesaional communications firm NAME OF COMMAS. M ~ S V Y V N NESERVE X REED X X ROSENBLOOM X X SHAUGHNESSY X FLETCHER X' MESERVE X I REED X X ROSENBLOOM X X SHAUGHNESSY X FLETCHER X Minutes Page 6 November 25, 1996 Considerable discussion ensued concerning use of keys, paying staff to open and close facilities, and who should pay for cleaning and plumbing repairs. Dezmond Waters gave a brief history of ABET's use of the Community Center and of the contracts presently used. He urged the Commission to consider all of the citizens who wished to use the building and set policy accordingly. Some further discussion occurred concerning whether cribbage players using the building should be considered "long term users" and charged the $200.00 per year fee. It was the consensus of the Commission that a definition of "long term users" was needed and individual card players would not be charged the $200.00 per year long term use fee. Amendment No. 2 to the motion: Amend short term contract to allow Atlantic Beach Residents use of Atlantic Beach Public Facilities at no charge, and to include a deposit and cleaning fee to be determined by the City Manager. After some further discussion concerning cleaning of public facilities a third amendment was made. Amendment No. 3 to the motion: Add condition 3. (k.) to the list of conditions in both the long and short terra rental contnets which rwds as follows: "The renter shall inherit the facility in a clean and safe condition". City Manager Jarboe stated that this could add to costs for cleaning city facilities, and due to the small staff, a contract employee may need to be hired to meet the additional requirements. He also stated he would allow no commercial use of the public facilities unless approved by the City Commission. There being no further discussion, the question was called on the original motion to adopt the long and short term agreements, as amended. The motion was approved unanimously. 4. Consent Agenda: A. Acknowledge receipt of monthly reports from Building, Fire and Public Works Departments The consent agenda items were received and acknowledged as presented. NAME OF COMMRS. M S -- r ,. Y N ESERVE X ED X X OSENBLOOM X SHAUGHNESSY X X~ LETCHER XI SERVE X i EED x x OSENBLOOM X! HAUGHNESSY X XI LETCHER XI Minutes Page 5 November 25, 1996 NAME OF COMMAS. M S V Y V N Attorney, and authortize the City Manager to renegotiate individual contracts with long term users. City Manager Jarboe pointed out that under the terms of the proposed contracts, all users would be charged a fee of $5.00 per day for use of City facilities. Commissioner Reed requested clarification as to the previous long term contract holders. City Manager Jarboe stated that ABET, the YMCA, Little League and Habitat held long term contracts with the city. Conunissioner Rosenbloom inquired if the Little League, ABET and other long term users would pay the $5.00 per day fee and was told they would. He then asked if the Little League currently pays a fee and was told it did not. What definition of long and short term use was diswssed. Commissioner Meserve stated that short term use could be considered one day use of a city facility. i Discussion ensued regarding fair and equitable charges for long term users of the facilities, charging no fees for not-for-profit organizations, and charging or not charging deposits and clean up fees. Commissioner Shaughnessy expressed concern for charging Little League the $5.00 per day fee considering they contribute to the maintenance of the fields and have other expenses. Commissioner Shaughnessy also suggested the I wording to condition 3. (G) of the contracts be changed to read "Shall not have exclusive use of the facilities outside of the dates and times agreed to in the contract". MESERVE X Amendment No. 1 to the Motion: Amend fee to 5200.00 per year Reen X for long term users of City of AWntic Beach Public Facilities. ROSENaLOOM X SAAUGHNESSY X X Mayor Fletcher and Commissioner Shaughnessy stated that ifthere were no FLETCAER X Xt objections, they would like to have rental fees paid for a particular facility remain with the facility, and handling of building keys would be left to the discretion of the City Manager. There were no objections. Martha Reed, President of ABET, (620 Ocean Boulevard) stated that in the past as part of its contract, the group had paid a $100.00 per month fee for use of the Adele Grage Community Building. She also stated the group experienced problems with having use of only one key and with the plumbing and cleaning of the building. Minutes Page 4 November 25, 1996 NAME OF COMMRS. _ M - S ~ Y N used at low tide, whereas, the Dutton Island property would allow for canoe launching at either high or low tide Some further discussion ensued and concern was expressed regarding whether approval of the proposed M1lanagement Plan for Tresca Park would lock the Commission into the design plan being presented. City Manager Jarboe suggested consideration be given to a base plan for the park with alternate items added at a later date. Mayor Fletcher stated that if there were no Conunission objections, he would tike the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board and Public Safety Department to review the conceptual plan for the park. Due to the increased costs brought about by the requested changes to the plan, the Mayor stated he would like a reduction in the scope of the park plan to meet the minimum requirements previously presented to the state and have the management plan amended to reflect those changes. There were no objections. MESERVE X Motion: Defer action on proposed design of Tresca Park and final REED x Management Plan for Tresca Park until the ne:t regular scheduled ROSENBLOOM X meeting. SHAL'GHNESS X X FLETCHER X X Mr. Cryscon was directed to get with Mr. Waters to discuss and implement the proposed changes to the plan. Mr. Cryscon was advised the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board would meet the following night. B. Approval of final Management Plan for Tresca Park Action on this item was also deferred to the next regular scheduled meeting by the motion in item 3 A. C. Adoption of long and short-term contracts for use of city facilities Commissioner Meserve indicated the proposed contracts had nothing to due with the current renters of city owned facilities. He reported the contracts set needed standards and addressed fees to be charged, building security, key usage, building cleanup, and gave the City Manager the right to make decisions concerning the use of the buildings. Commissioner Meserve continued by stating that the language used needed some adjustments and the City Attorney would be making those changes. Copies of the proposed long MESERVE x I x and short term contracts were given each Commission Member. REEO x ROSENBLOOM X i X Motion: Adopt the draft long and short term standard contracts SHAUGHNF.ss x as presented, subject to language modi5cations by the City ~ FLETCHER R Minutes Page 3 November 25, 1996 NAME OF COMMRS. M S ~~ Y V N stated that she had launched a canoe at the retention pond site and canoed to the canal bordering Atlantic Boulevard. She expressed concern that this canal was very dirty and asked if any of the canals would be deepened or cleaned out. Mr Czyscon indicated this work was not part of the plan and he did not believe the Department of Environmental Protection would permit it. Doug Speed of 1207 Seminole Road expressed concern for destruction of trails and the surrounding area if mountain biking was allowed in the park and inquired concerning trash pick up. It was explained that no biking would be allowed and trash would be hand carried from the site because there would be no vehicular traffic. It was pointed out there was one utility road in the park which provided access for the Jacksonville Electric Authority (JEA), and it would be gated to prevent driving in the pazk. Since no one wished to speak further, the public discussion was closed. Commissioner Meserve commented that he thought it was a good plan but inquired concerning launching canoes at the retention pond located outside of the park. Jim Jacques stated that in his dealings with the Department of Environmental Protection, the mazshy retention pond area could be considered endangered wetlands and vehicles should be kept from the area. . Commissioner Shaughnessy inquired what grade of wood was being used to construct the boazdwalk at a cost of $100,000 and was told it was pressure treated yellow pine. Commissioner Shaughnessy also inquired as to security for the park. Public Safety Director Thompson stated that he had not seen the plan before tonight, and he would like to have time to evaluate the design from the safety/security standpoint. Commissioner Reed inquired if the canoe launch sites were low tide accessible and Mr. Cryscon stated they were not. Project costs were also questioned. City Manager Jarboe explained the city could still eliminate some items from the proposed plan or phase in some features at a later date. In reviewing funds for the pazk development, it was reported approximately $291,000 was available from grants and Convention Development funds. Commissioner Rosenbloom related originally it was thought the park would cost $100,000 and now the cost has increased to $540,000. He then questioned if the Commission wished to spend that kind of money on Tresca Park considering Dutton Island is wming along in the near future. He further questioned the feasibility of building canoe launches at Tresca that could not be Minutes Page 2 November 25, 1996 NAM£ OF COMMAS. M - S -i v Y - v N Mr. Marchioli read a letter to the City Commission proposing the following Charter revisions: (I) addition of two Commissioners, (2) establishment of six voting districts within the city, and (3) the at large election of the Mayor. The letter is attached and made part of this official record. (Attachment A). Unfinished Business: A. Dames and Moore presentation regarding proposed design of Tresca Park Edward G. Cryscon, Associate Director of Landscape Architecture with the firm of Dames and Moore, presented a conceptual master plan for the nine acre passive park, incorporating the following changes requested by the Conunission during the Special Called Meeting held Monday, October 21, 1996: two (2) canoe launching areas, picnic areas, an elevated viewing area, interpretive sinage which would include tidal information, a senses garden and separate playground away from the water. Mr. Cryscon pointed out the location of the canoe launch 90' from the parking lot, and indicated that the playgound, restroom and picnic areas were designed to be in close proximity to each other. The restrooms and parking lot would comply with the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Ad. The overall design included seven (7) individual picnic areas and one (1) group picnic area, security lighting, a 16 car parking area, pull-off and viewing areas and 3,000 linear feet of trail and boardwalk. The cost estimate for the park, including consultant fees and contingency was reported at $540,000. Mayor Fletcher then invited public discussion of the proposed park. Dezmond Waters, Chairman of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board, stated that the Board had presented a draft resolution recommending a design for uniform signage for all city parks to be adopted by the city at a future date. He further stated this recommendation should be incorporated into the Tresca Park signage when the resolution is adopted. Barbara Hopson, a member of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board, inquired about tree removal, width of the trails, and the materials to be used on the trails. Mr. Cryscon stated that the trees would be saved by utilizing meandering trails and only underbrush would be cleared. The trails are between six and eight feet wide to accommodate carrying a canoe and will be constructed of clay and crushed shell. Patricia (ioelz, another Member of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board, MIND BEAC ROA The m Shaug J.. The m The m ~. A. Deputy Brian introdu On beh welcom B. TES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE ATLANTIC H CITY COMMISSION HELD IN CITY HALL, 800 SEMINOLE , AT 7:15 PM ON MONDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 1996 PRESENT: Lyman Fletcher, Mayor John bteserve Tim Reed Steve Rosenbloom Suzanne Shaughnessy, Commissioners ME OF COMMAS. M O T I O N - S E C O N D - V O T E D Y E S ~- C 7 E C N O AND: lames Jarboe, City Manager Alan G Jensen, City Attorney Maureen King, City Clerk eting was called to order. The invocation was offered by Commissioner nessy, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. MESERVE X X Approval of the minutes of the Special Called Meeting Geld REED X November 7. 1996. RosENBL00M X SHAUGHNESS X X Motion: Approve minutes of the Special Called Meeting held FLETCHER X November 7, 1996. tion carried unanimously. Approval of the minutes of the ReeuLr Meeting held MESERVE x November 11. 1996. REED X X ROSENBLOOM X X SHAUGHNESS X Motion: Approve minutes of the Regular Meeting held FLETCHER X November 11, 1996. tion carried unanimously. Reco¢nition of Visitors: Introduction of new Public Safety employees Chief John Campbell introduced the following new Police Officers: aldrep, Jason Lewis, and Steven Hicks. Fire Chieflohn Ruley ced Firefighter David Marti. lf of the Commission and citizens of Atlantic Beach, Mayor Fletcher ed the new Public Safety employees to the city. J.P. Marchioli of 414 Sherry Drive D e h o o W a i .~ AGENDA December 9, 1996 Page "I ..o New Business: ,q Public Hearing and action on an application for Use-by-Exception filed by Billy Joe Witt to operate a Jeep specialty shop at 20 Donner Road on property zoned CL (Commercial Limited) B Public Hearing and action on an application for Use-by-Exception filed by the Atlantic Beach Experimental Theater to operate a theater at 716 Ocean Boulevard on property zoned RS-2 (Residential Single Family) C. Action on options for expenditure of recycling grant funds D Board Appointments. (I) Community Development Board - 2 (ii) Pension Board of Trustees - 2 (iii) Code Enforcement Board - I (iv) Cultural Arts Board - 1 E. Authorize purchase of a Ben Pearson Model B-9000A above-ground automotive lift from Southern .Automotive at a cost of $3,595.00 (Bid No- 9697-1) F Discussion and related action nn financial options other than assessments for curb and gutter in core city area 8. City Manager Reports and/or Correspondence: Reports and/or requests from City Commissioners, City Attorney and City Cleric Adjournment If any person decides to appeal any decision made by the City Commission with respect to any matter considered at any meeting, such person may steed a record of the proceedings, and, for such purpose, may need to ensure that a veri>atim record of the proceedings is made, which record shall include the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Any person wishing to speak to the City Commission on any matter at this meeting should submit a request to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. For your convenience, forms for this purpose aze available at the entrance to the Commission Chambers. In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and Section 286 26, Florida Statutes, persons with disabilities needing speaal acr-ommodaz'on to participate in this meeting should contact the City Clerk CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH COMMISSION MEETING -December 9, 1996 AGENDA Call to order Invocation and pledge to the flag Approval of the minutes of the Regular Commission meeting of November 25, 1996 2. Recognition of Visitors: 3. Unfinished Busieess: A. Adoption of final design for Tresca Park B. Approval of final management plan for Tresca Park C. Action on 3% cost of living increase for retirees D. Authorize allocation of funds to include drainage improvements on Beach Avenue between 17th Street and 20th Street in current water and sewer improvement project 4. Consent Agenda: A Acknowledge receipt of monthly reports from Building, Code Enforcement, Fire, and Recreation Departments 5. Action on Resolutions: A. Resolution No. 96-54 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH ADOPTING SIGNAGE SPECIFICATIONS FOR PARKS AND PUBLIC BUILDINGS 6. Action on Ordinances: A Ordinance No. 28-96-4 -Introduction and First Reading AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH AMENDING SECTION 2 OF THE CITY CHARTER BY ADOPTING A REVISED DESCRIPTION OF THE MUMCB'AL CORPORATE BOUNDARIES; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE B Ordinance No. 90-96-163 -Introduction and First Reading AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP OF THE ADOPTED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, CHANGING THE HEREIN DESCRIBED PARCEL FROM RH, RESIDENTIAL HIGH DENSITY, TO CG, COMMERCIAL GENERAL; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE ~cCR~~er