08-01-95pc
•~V~\~
~V ~
~i
U
h
7
W
Y
(."'
r
^
z W4
U F
q 0
m a W ~
^ ~ F a 't ~ O q
y 4 4 !aA 4 aW x Z ,Wj ~
m £ 3 n .. UU F X 2 S+ C . H ¢ hyj
~ SZOU41 F (A? 41 W E.
s Z.. .~qW m a~a O
a m ai qq tiff¢ £ F E O Z G M rZi cOl y W Cy V n F
U W "~ U 6 Y = ~ " O^ F O ~ ~/ ~
v, z o w q m a u o ~ .N. 7L~
£ FO Y ~' ~Oi m• 4^1 s 0 F X m a
O 4 aj x O m '~ O R F F F O ~ 4¢7 C
a ~ a ~ z F
u "~ rd ~ a• m 3NmFM m ^ a .. a
¢ X 4 £ w E., O 4 M
O ¢ N m ''~ .] O ¢¢ m t7 F 4 W N ii
O
W ~ ¢ a O 2 S F .7 .] q ~a. Y ~ K
~ O Y ¢ O d t w r w 47 Z '-; S
4 9 3 3 m 47 7 V F ~G
i
~iiii..
V
c:,a,d
ABET PRESENTS: "KRAZY KAMP"
BOOK BY TIM KELLY
MUSIC & LYRICS BY BILL FRANCOEUR
DIRECTOR:
TECH. DIRECTOR:
MUSICAL DIRECTOR:
ASSISTANTS:
DF CHARACTERS (IN
EVE HUNNICUTT:
ALVA DORIGHT:
ADAM APPLE:
WILLARD:
TMEODORA:
VIVIAN:
KATE MILLFLOSS:
HILDEGARD:
OFFICER DUMM:
ME. TERWILITER:
SMUDGE:
LINDA BIDDLE:
CINDY:
SYLVIA:
JENNY-THE COOK:
JOE:
LARRY:
IVAN/TARZAN:
ELMER CRUME:
CLEOPATRA:
CLAMS MARINARA:
DIXIE:
DOYLE:
MRS THISLEMIST:
GLORIA:
BETH ROBERTSON
MEGAN PHZFER
LAURA PEDEN
ERIN THOMAS
VANESSA HARPER
ELAINE BREAULT
JAMIE PHIFER
ORDER OF APPEARANCE)
MEGGZE ISAACS
KATIE KILLEY
MATT BURKE
MATT MCKENZIE
JANNA HOWARD
KATE MCMANUS
AMANDA HOLLOWAY
WHITNEY ELLIS
LAUREN SCHOONOVER
BILLY SMITH
DAVIS GREENE
STEVAN SCHWARTZ£NBERGER
DANIELLE THOMPSON
MEGHAN PAPKE
BETSY GRAVER
CAROLYN CARITHERS
BRITTANY KAROL
JOHNNY WALSH
JEREMY DUNK
JOHN MERRITT
LANCE HENRY
HOLLY WILLIAMS
DEZMOND WATERS
MERRITT MONTANYE
COURTNEY DENNIS
CAITLIN PARRISH
ANGELIQUE KIRBY
BROADWAY BABY DANCERS: SUZANNE JARECKI, CAMILLE DAME, MEGNAN
PIERSON, COURTNEY DENNIS, LAUREN FERBER, KELLI KI£FER.
GIRL CAMPERS
JULIANNE CURRY
MIA MONTANYE
J.ANINE GRANT
SARA CANTER
CHELSEA KAROL
LAUREN MCCAIN
SUSANNE PODZAMSKY
EMIE WHITMAN-ALLEN
MEREDITH COREY-DISCH
BOY CAMPERS
JOSH COLEMAN
MICHAEL BELL
PATRICK LUCEY
-..' :.r~.L~'a&irr~:,~s...cs3~ti.-55i#f~+
CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACN
IF YOU NISH TO ADDRESS THE CITY COl4SISSION ON ANY HATTER, PLEASE
COHPLETE AND GIVE THIS FORM TO THE CITY CLERR PRIOR TO THE HEFTING
DATE OF COHHISSION HEFTING ~'~ w6 >~S
AGENDA ITT]f NUMBER OR SUBJECT TO BE DISCUSSED
~h.4t~s ~ ~~a7 , ~ 7
-{ Pc ' -Sf'p~~~~ i°oi ~!~ ~
~~~~~
TELEPHONE ~7G-~z~
CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH
IF YOU NISH TO ADDRESS THE CITY COl4fISSION ON ANY MATTER, PLEASE
COMPLETE AND GIVE THIS IURM TO THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE MEETING
DATE OF CONMi SS ION lfEETING ~~ ; ~v3 j S
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER OR SUBJECT TOE~ BE DISCUSSED
TELEPHONE_ -~7G^Z Zc~7/~
CITY OP ATLANTIC BEACH
IP YOU WISH TO ADDRESS THE CITY COl41ISSION ON ANY MATTER, PLEASE
COMPUTE AND GIVE THIS FORM TO THE CITY CLEAR PRIOR TO THE !ffiETING
DATE OF COMMISSION MEETING l ! ~~, r l \ `7 L~~!, -
~-
AGENDA ITEM KUMBER OA SUBJECT TO BE DISCUSSED
/. i 1
1 i; ~ ~'y
NANE ~ / ~Y / 1 i-~' / / ~ ~ r ~~ ~;~
~-i _ ~ -~
ADDRESSle1 l print clearly) ~ f -" < C ~'- a~= ~
. , ,; /,, r Y,- r
TELEPHONE L !/ /_ ~ _ _, ~. !/
--T-
20TH CENTURY ---
-- _J
THE AINSU`ORTH
~~
~~'1 ~
MODEL=C_Al'-iK-C '~
I ~
L~ItGE BO\Tl SILADE FLCIl"RE
_
~-- ~ yrhr,S,cu for!arger d'.r.;^_¢vn l:nng;oc'^~ e'.dI
ilc::,v
~
S
'un
d
:
^
~!
~
~ ~
u:
g i
's.ucam
>.~
V
P
K
t`
~ / v:il+R'.~,N shade rOtKe.n:h :.+r s. a \ I f
i
.\
' u:ab Icrg~,h 33' a
Ij
NOUEL K\l )Ltisnurr. krg'h. 1~ 11
$hanu,,h shade ~lSCE. Caing rarrq',: 17
U!y:<er li" Igl4tmer6nsirclWe shalel
IC'iF. 1i _ ~'Ulb~l :Q"hullrY~iV+ _ e
F;ner
o" S1ee~i arui4 trnq.giag rn,;^apa:u' __ _____
.
iJJ
u]S bil15
~ T'Itlt<rh.. L15 S.i'I:IE 6 L"St11]'J~t if: wae' 2NIS.1F
~
.
.~'
:. .. a^IYqu.~lpaiuhd brm
'
'
`~
THE T-~
JACKSON PARK ABERNETHY
MODEL=QLIIJ MODEL =C)+l'4K
SL\GLE PE\DA'~T IARGE BOU'L
SHADE FA'flJRE
?M (uvsrt's slDSSauI
miw:.am noe9 sww'fa MPw^~1or i"{°d10i"B
xia
a
.
mam: m_~nhvx.'~:sa. udimngmum
,
~.
JV
ZYf Itle llkf. ~'V frid ~K
Shan nih s,'uh i015~ d~°B WPIKLwrs.
{Ll y...n,...tr xn'0(alY Ansllbie a;lh study lGLC~
~lobe•tthafi-E:r.. WT (oNeseVvaet; 1.
TuaeKr iS AY~'-3~
,M.IrJm'N.CgC ry ~~. \I:NrILL'fl lQlyuv. ~j '~ .
`~
" ~
.. . r q..
_
Com3asvry 10' - rdsngossoP.' 10
Wl yrtnn:,,m s!aY sVdd Wl Grtar+u's M1.lude shilu _
cl••~ ` to~Kloo-..vwro~
YaVS arse uC:.Y: Y~ib I -~
"l can t plnnd a na@rd IrgGl 6ulG.ar~~ more Ibart
!ran slmrd n rude rrn: ark or a vulgar action."
-irnnr>see u%lilamc.
~IBrlrar 1Gr»ed Desire
THE X10\TAVILLA
MODEL=Cwl"IS
ffOU'L SIL\DE FI\ R~RE
i E..<mKr! z /i ss41
THE
PET71'GRObE
?fODEL=CAXIS
gp~Cl SIiADE
FI\?l'HE
,.... ~d ltrt~.. ~z
~.~-.::;
ecr, ti .,-..,..
~< ~.,,_n
4~ t'..~ :CS
lu.7t'~: E~AI log 1.a>tr s rrt 1 cw'.l.u.
_._. t _~: LIhbV
20TH CENTURY
I
t ~ i
~
~
_ J
r
THE ROSE CITY
naoDEL =c?:1t1J
-SCHOOLHOLSE'
PE'~DA.~T
Mr b~-srL'ing Fmue. The
(more has maw arq:~dxtt.
Iwth prtmtenial and raidetdal.
Snh gkba rziging us sit fmm
7"b I$, it B quips¢rvlile.
Sill a¢eptam'
6' 1mc
MODa aa7ilJ
Shan vitF: shade tiri.OP-1;.
irame;er 1;
)IinLmum letgth `0"
CeiL.^.q caMip~'. S
liner 6'
1fLYy5 j0}4an bulb.
Moues iOBIP
Sewn aiihshah a3010P-10.
Diameter: 10'
SuMard 4ng1h. 3E'
lfirtirnum !engih' li'
Cdlingr~s'>'
Fnen 4'
THEJEWELL
MODEL =lC7Nt E
aICIRIC WAll. BRALC-I~~T
fins WrnlOG pop{dar Gall IYWR
Shorn ailh shade e151tE.
1'rojmian' i
Sill cassopr 4'a6' :a
WI dimesiau hdude shah)
fan lx inAilkd up cr dart.
Diurxlen ti'
5tardard Ienglh-. 3b'
llinimum length. IB- ^
feilingwnrsl~.S =z
WI dircemiu~ irclmle shade)
krepts ore 300-uan bulb
THE FRENCHGLEN
MODEL xWXV2E
iWOARN WALL B0.{CKEF
Shorn Gish shade tl??CE.
Pmjatior.:6-
xagnc 10-, a-dlh:lo-
Sa11 w:opr 4's 6'
WI dlmassirns ircluh shades)
Can be irtWled up or dart.
- THE LOMBARD
AfODELKICIF
5IIGLESHADE FA'TLRE / ,\ '
Shwa xilh shz,'z :31050. Shc
_ _ _ a~y~30D~senes shades (5'fi:r.).
_~_~ lamer g- NODa+rCCCIE ffODa •QCIF Moos ~xelJ
LetgaY. 1:' Shorn anh xhad!L:iiOP. Sho+^v,3;shah SM+naish shah a0010P-1.
^.~j~ IAUnesa 6" =iiIUP-Y Uancf¢i"
. Ceih ¢cawf.a Im~~3 rra-ter 5' (math: li
~,_--se%- lU'C~rnsio1 ~t'.de shade) ~Wgry.~,.s .r. 10' GeiliAmpp!-,'
s Asat abh v th des P Iu~dun lalal Fitter' li;' G "g r{:. i Fver 6'
( V..'n inva:a~rnss fse¢page ail. ,. k'ms¢I.Guv^bib.
.. incase ccu rerz wondering. the E:;:u;es and lamps in cur catalogue are named zither for vxgon Ions or for Portland
:?eghbo;i~:oeds and stzzs. \R~. I;ke mm: O:zgOr.ian s. lend to be insui:`e: ably provincial.
o,,.ee:..:...-se.,:r.l-r-h cull:; rr l~,:!;..g isa[iren -emL'ri our Portland rods. lc Jacd --,timing in l.`e earls
'_r:;h r.:.r,: r.-- aed ~::e ha~.e a ~•vo.^.dzrfci farce sack of fwr<quar°s, buc!;zlow~s, colca:al<. ar.d o:he: ;.: -i[ne;al houses
'.r- hse I1 e:r c:-• - < arz :~~catrd :^. a heauY cl a..rt oI .he world. \\e ~aould ~~t!c.r.~ ; o ~ ..:, to c ~ :;il ~;;,re.
>zz our .n:-es up eh:<e. a ;c - .. :~..:r !trough tier h:;ge showroom o( -r::,~n. ~~.: ...e ..c.~. sc -zs :nd house
~.; <
c~,~z:i '.lanEa~, ::.:ouch S:rurdap. 4.u 6: S~nda-r. .AOOn ,o ~ 1;OJ.-.. G:.u:d -s znue- t • ...and. t 1 _:
I i - ~ '~ RLJ I'l'7 '~.II IOV i.{\ t & iiSTCRI°, IX). --~ 0~-----
(Continuation of ADELE GRAGE COMM. CT[t- RENOV.)
• AMODNTB
DESCRIPTION
g, Bathroom Addition ~ ;oo
3-2339
~1. Plumbing-
Labor and materials to install 1-white
Rrigqs 4728 Handicap Conserver toilet,
1-white Briggs 6604 Wee Bairn wall hung
lavatory, and 1-Delta 520 chrome handicap
law. faucet
125--
2. Electrical-
Labor and materials to relocate ceiling
light and snitch
875
3. CarPentrY-
Labor and materials to frame a doorvall and
install door along with associated trig
225
4. Staining-
Labor and materials to stain all new wood to
match the existing
490
5. Flooring-
Vinyl the for the new bathroom and replaceme
nt
carpet for the disturbed bath hall area
500
6. Miscellaneous
Total Bathroom Addition i 4,445
'~3~
3 ! `~
Prepared by
Heyxood A. Dowling
ADELE CRAGS COlO7ONITY CENTER
RENOVATIONS
RECOlMENDED BDDGET
August 10,1995
ANODNTS
DESCRIPTION
A. Ceiling and Nall Restoration ~,~~
$~-
,;rl. Electrical-
Re-routing of all existing exposed conduit
and junction boxes to create a concealed _ _
10 of which r _ _
wiring system serving 14 lights,
are solid brass "Rose Hill" Schoolhouse ~ V
Pendant fixtures
~0+
iV...TOs a
8
n~s'c
`
/
and re-use of
3liere~atgTl=MOd if ication
existing flourescent fixt~re~ /r
O
instead of 10 pendants. //
~ _
at ems..-t= ie Aoairod, D$~ 9
Alternate !~-Add 6 Sconce(wall) Lights. If thie/
0 ~~/
alternate is desired, ADD X95
1,190
~/2. Air Conditionina-
Restoration of all existing ductwork and
grilles to the original ceiling height(12'4")
600
J =~ 3. Attic Insulation- i
lSafe III fire
T~ Installation of R-30 Insu
, l~
attic
tin
i
'
~L
g
s
resistant attic insulation(Assumes ex
ersonnel)
AB
it
'
p
y
~ debris to be cleaned oat by C
i~
850
„/4. Carpentry-
~S Labor and materials to restore all damaged
ceiling and wall tongue and groove board
1,500
5. Stalnina-
Labor and materials to finish all new wood and
to strip and refinish various old discolored
areas
290
6. Flooring- i
( (~ Labor and materials to restore water damaged
~i~' floor(air conditioner leak)
`
,~
7. Miscellaneous X00 `1 ft~
D ~+ 6oD;
Total Ceiling and Nall Restoration
- ~{~~
,~,~ ~ y9o
~ ,
~~ ~~~% r: -
/ 0~ ~ S' Tl„(~~IL
Heywood A. Dowling
Stale Ccrt[fied Contractor
CBC R~633A
July 10,1995
Kim Leinbach, City Manager
City of Atlantic Beach
800 Seminole Rd.
Atlantic Beach, Florida 32233
RE: Adele Grage Co®unitp Center-Renovations
Dear Hr. Leinbach:
At the request Mayor Fletcher, I have conducted a
study to determine the cost of-
A. Restoring the original pine tongue and groove
ceiling along with restored air conditioning
ductwork, attic insulation, and a general
lighting system
-and-
B. Installation of a new unisex bathrooms next to the
existing handicap bathroom.
The attached data should not be considered a "bid"
from my company and does not include compensation in
any way for me. It may be relied on, however, as accurate
enough, based on known conditions, to serve as a
Recommended Budget to fund the above described work.
As ABET's volunteer Renovation Project Manager, Z am
offering to manage construction of these two important
improvements to the community center as a coepleeent to
the final phase of ABET's originally planned theater
renovation project to be completed by the end of this year.
Si
i 7:~_, .e., 1.!..:,d: i'. ,d., ii. }]]:3 • Ph..: .e h,.. 1''.':r:+'~ IF 73
c
0
~ a~
Y ~O
~ a!
f0 °~
d ~
(~
\/
A~
MW
W ''
V
= U
~ a
d
a>
~ a
U ~
CD ~
O ~.
a~
u_ Y
i
Q.
O ~
_U a)
L
T
V
a~
d
.~
3
a°
;°ia ~,
N ~ _
. .
(6
w
r :' ~
a
0
i
w w
N
j a
0
m
1_
U
a
N
O
^~
._
~~
~~
V
~
~
O
~ ~
H
c ~
a~
~
a
~
p
W
Q '^
i
^
i O Y
U
. ~
z
~ ~ ~
~ ~ Q
c c
~
U
U _
~
. .
O
~
_
U
a
~
~
a~ ~
0
U
o
~ ~
W O
~Y1 t~
~ ~
U ~ N
U
Q . .
~ ~ o
O ~ cn
C
U U
O ~
0
W
O
U
~ra0
LL
Q
a
v
0
e
C
A
^~
L
(~
V /
a
~~
A
Q
i
~ ~
'
.t.. i
~
~
~ ~
~ ~
~
~
~ i
~
~ ~ O
_
~
~
L ~
~ O ~x ~
~ ~ ~
~ '
"' N
'i ! N
~ ~, = U
p ~ ~ ~ J
O ~ +r ~
x N
c
O ~ C N
~ O O ~ W
C~ ~ U i i
. ^ ^
O
O
O
U
.~
(~
.~
Q
c ~
•~
O Q
~ ~
i i
\\
.~
U
0
cd
0
(~
C
00
~~
W
.~
U
ctS
C
O
a
N
a
0
w~~
w
a
m
h
V
G
O
O
!~ V /~'/
~; r ~~/);I ~. ~ i
~ i
^~
~~
c~
a
O
T
-1--+
a
i"~
IIII~~II
1116gt
~~~~~~~~
II~~~~II
W
a
N
a
0
1
CITY OF
~antce b"iat~C _'~~Q
:160CEA\ &A IET V:L
P O BG\i5
ATUXTIC BE 1CN. iIARIDA iJ. S
TELEPN06E X506 2:'r_ itr'
TO: Kim Leinbach, City Manager(
FROM. John Rutty, Fire Chief ~~1"
REF: R.F.P. Response for Renovation of the Public Safety Building
On July 10, 1995 the Commission allowed Staff to prepare RFP's for a Conwhant Service that
will prepare plans and specifications for the renovation and addition to the Public Safety
Building.
The RFP's were published accordmg to Florida Statutes Chapter 287.055, the" Conwltan[s
Competitive Negotiation Act" and the response from those companies imerested had to be
wbmitted to the City tto later then August 10, 1995 at 2:00 P.M.
.As of 2.00 P.M. August 10, 1995 there were twee (J) companies that had submitted documents
for consideration: Fleet & Associates, Gee & Jenson and Michsd Dunlap.
I request that the Commission scheduk time needed to cotduc[ negotiations according to Stale
SlaWtes
Plcax allow this request to be heard before the Commission meeting xhedule August 14, 1995
Respectfully wbmiued
August 10, 1995
City of Atlantic Beach
City Commission Melling
Staff Report
AGENDA ITEM: Request a time be scheduled for commission to selection a
Architects from those that answered the R.F.P. for the renovation
and addition to the Public Safety Building.
SUBMITTED BY: lobo Rulty, Fire Chief
DATE: August 10, 1995
BACKGROUND: Attached is a memo to the City Manager dated August 10, 1995,
that idrntifies the three (3) wmpames that answered our R.F. P.
RECOMMENDATIONS: To advise staff as to the Commission's availability for this selection
process.
ATTACHMENTS: Memo to City Manager
REC'EI VEU BY CITY MANAGER:
AGENDA ITEM NO. ~p E
CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH
CITY COMMISSION MEETING
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA ITEM: Replacement of i2 pump at "E" Station
(Sewage Pumping Station)
SUBMITTED BY: Tim Townsend/Plant Division Director
Robert S. Rosoy/Director of Public Works ,~.; ;~~
DATE: August 10, 1995
BACRGROUND: Recent problems with the operation of the i2
pump at the "E" Lift Station located at 799 Mayport Road
revealed the inside of the volute casing to be badly scoured.
This problem is caused by excessive hydraulic back pressure.
The excessive hydraulic pressure is caused by the discharge
force main being to small for the amount of pumpage from the
station. Over time, this back pressure causes excessive wear
on the pump casing. Three years ago, the it pump had similar
problems and was replaced.
Of the vendors contacted for the emergency repair of
replacing the pump and two existing 4" check valves, only two
replied with pricing. Gruhn-May Construction bid 55,638 and
.'acksonville Utilities Construction bid 56,130.60
RECOMMENDATION: Award bid to Gruhn-May Construction for
replacement of one (1) T-4 Gorman-Rupp pump
and two (2) 4" check valves at "E" Sewage
Lift Station located at 799 Mayport Road
ATTACHMENTS: Quotes from Two Vendors
i~
REVIEWED BY CITY MANAGER' ~<~
i T
AGENDA ITEM' NO._ !0 I ,
~.'.s~. sa - `a
_ ,~ - _~~~
<ya ~' a 3,F, >o
- Mkt ~.Y4 ~'-€` r;~aE~ ~~ ,~ ~/ZI:
o Tb' m NetE ~•~a G r 2 s
~ ~ s3 L'.- Z '~5 ~ ~ Y~ iii 4 3 o j~[ a
W v _
Z ~ . L . _ . _ _ 3 i vi ~ L '~ J ~ ~ t i [
Y ~[i
.. u.~„ sue'- c- S:c~ s +[~ ~ ~ ~
~ W ~ 71 i < f" c~ b fr~ E yob yr~.i ~~
+ .: ~ ~~-5 3~u {<.;,~ <:o EeAy S~'~cu ~. ~ ~~' ~-~-t ter?
'. Y: ~ 10r f 6 ~ O r~ Z ~ ~ c u Y ~ v E /-~1L ~'l -t / z > _ Y ` ~ !1 ~
V li A2 -nX OCY~1 (SSMLaY G ~,EsY ~ V~~ ~ N'v~~
F y
~ .
~y Z~~(. ~ `3 Z~ zC2E`~n Y4C t'_ :..
< ~ < = ~
Z -- ~ ~- [~ a.j _ P[__
= Z _ _
[ c L j '. J Z 5 9 C 1
. -: +' S _
J 7 - c
_ a _
`~
~• O`er - ~_ ~3'R?~ 3 a..~~ a ~ 9° a '`o=a s5' -~ t °_3 C
+-. _:, U,:S ~.=;s =~d.$ a as < " _'' --- 3's~ 'I
a.:O ~~.y ~_ sr o5C9' -a3°g a3 ~?__ .'__e _g ~?-.9 O
f/lN 5°_..~oC.Y 3== c'_amC Sy°e~ iw_ .-o.,:_ -: °;U e~
F ^-I ~ mv~ j~ °9a .2 5y ~< o °.n~ ° S ~ S ~ yaS ` "_ °O-~s, aOn ~'$
O C C f a o~"` •+: L `aS G 9 k~ _~ 9 C~ i` : n C~ > a_ 9" 9_~ a i. $ c$ ~~
1`a x'41 _ ~ ° _ n° 3 °- i
'Ta u~=~ ag°oi 57Z9~Ua S~ey~ uDfl $~2am.. _Y Ana 9..92
L"~ cZ-93`a °mS.om~ 3 mUi-~_ a'.. ~ 9a?7 ~°'~
(j °P~g e~~a `e~r~'a f°`a~vm F..-79~C9. G'-'r psp7"'°595 ~:2e~t ~' a~ ,
~O m ~~~ ~<2~ e a o g 8.? ~~y; ey:[.3 ° ~:SZi ~`~~-_52 w ~:,oA ., '
J „~, .ire ~`Stm yE,eE rv1"'-~e...°,7~°> X905-a.2.-YJ;~cgYe? ~°'~e
' y a'Y; ,9a2~~= yttGo5.p5,~7~ms.~tle~~ 9e eyO~ggx.E~°'~~3s~
~ S~ 5 a3 S L aM= O C PGC 0 ° ; °G'- .
3 F ~~ gleam°a; ~ 3~ ;3z33~:
~ z°°>c9'~~~E ::°c z`s5 :a$~-~i~a Eo~5~5B85 : ~
I i
rAYu ~ 5°O ~ `o a°~st L`o a °^E~'. •°-6`0 °°° °.cv.->_'Gfi3o '
° F ,D .°i p ~ ~ C 5 ._ 7 O m L "~ •~ ~° 9 ~ c ~~ C j a i °e '~°. ~°+ ° b
.e C
I ~'1s v°°-°° _~ ~ o~ c'.s9~ m O~ E~ `o m~~ o~tis ° > ° e `~~e'c 9 a
i $'-g6Otlu >o6°t~°c s~°~'t'e-^•••=W°° aqm°oCs.~a?
a,°~os ~°. 'o '~L- °a,E.,~fim >•u.. ... .>.m"~L.. aU~a8m•~w
W o m E' ° C ~ G~ o ~ m=v ~ ~u ~ w ° E.a~ &v.°° e°'= o~G k ° G
Ev -o o m c 7 3 3 gt'• o° m?c u ~,°>..a~"' m
c S.°..u tli ° ce~m$oc~ o•~EaC o6i°,>tla ~°Eo;°~~mZ'
6 >~ mG c mn °~.-
~ oo ~.° a~mo ~w~1 b°'~ °d^'OQ~e C]O ~~C...3~d
,PaS m°o °.. d~c°Y-'.c_ ~utl ~y'°u.~e°'a` ^03 °6°
I e° o$ cow 5yy 'e °3iY~ ~'°r°d a Ca o~= ~~ eon mo"6°
m $ e F i
' ~~+64ooua° .,~tl $om .e~cc°pme>°3c EFj~=.°. ~'oveY
YQOO~>~~ .-w ~O 6F Tti Cly~. °''V°G6~°m5° ymLe~~~On
°° °'9 C i L 7 CO i° m tl ~ J O m m r' V m O° O''~ ° C° s O
~ A ~>'uo°~ o.°. tn.°!_°- v~ o&°O~iF.,~aa ~a:oE-°cas
mEevs ~~ mo tl°~-°e y'g ° ~ 4., 3°e$6$°m=
' W-y o!y p,otl 4~~50~o~c n"~'O33u amy 3ao`~=ou•a I
' ~a5 nn°~85'c ~'o0~`m3 tlco~ F°~arnBEs°3.5 .°, y°vie~Va QS
_~ _
~_. ___ ..
J
L~
V
.J
h
l ~
U
W
D ~ v 'C
~ .?
~
V] .
~'. ~
`N ~ y
~
J
<
~ ~
~ ~..~
z ~
~
; ~
~ ~
U
_ `~
•
- ~ J .~ C
+.+
J 1 c~~i
1 ±.
.... ~
J y ^v
o
..r
Ai
I
~ J
J
~ v~
ti ~
~~
V
:,c,~:
T±
,: -.-.:
Y?__r.
4 ~-
:..
Vii':.
P'i~
.~'=
%_~'.
5"~q=:
a :.7
'4'it ca 1:: J) "~
Jo)
COST BREAADOWN
BASIC SYSTEM:
Fire Data hfanagement System (FDhfS) S 8,500
PRICING INCLUDES:
-- - Software, Multi-Usu Licensing (2-5 Stations )
- Full Relational Database Engine
- Sours Files (allows customintion)
- On-siu frstallation and Trining (5 days )
- One year Utilimiud Telephcre Support
- Complete Security System (user changeable)
- FWI Featured Repot Geaeramr (user changeable)
OP'IYONS:
Laas!ay (each 5 Additional Sntioas) S 894
- Yeuly Service Coatrau (2nd yr) 5 450
- Importing Existing data Files (per day) 3 <50
Importing es!sting data files and making adjustments in the rysums to aecommodau that data can be
accomplishai. However, the conversion of your original don !ntn an aceeptabk forma[ is your departmeaas
responSbiGry. We Hill QY m asset in curry way possible we just un mt guaraah2 the ouccom-, when rMrig
m work wirb semeox else's software sad hardware. Modifying the existing system and uploading that data
u norma8y charged at a daily ae of 5450 plus direu expeaus for the time required m complete the process.
A auld-p:,o,-, braaclung, user-cnznga6le HELP utility is alsp included ultb the ryst: m, with Feld sea5itive
help x.-+~.bi whoa zppropria~,. Feld help and/or lookup tables ue available at every data entry field that
is io any uav tomertd m NFIRS.
Tne prig of all software, inclutling iastalladon, raining and support for one year is indicated on the Lts[ page.
Evcryttigq u covered by one price, [here are no hidden or future avnual charge;. Experience has taught us
not to br exk up the systtm and iasell only parts of it. a department youz size will want b be 2ble to make
changes and [reap new applications. Once snrrPd with FDMS, users typimlly find many othu ways ro use
the system to the deparmunrs benefit. Its a powerful toot thar YOU wnrol, and that is what makes FDMS
diKerent from all outer rystems.
We look forward to working widt you ut anyway possible to mzke the _rys[em s reality for your deparanrnL We
ue willing m make adjttstments in the rysrem m males it address your specific t>adt. I wpdd also be glad to
help you with any hardware related quesdons you might have.
I will forward as original of this fu along with a brochure and a couple sample screens by mail
l will be in Jax continuously for dte rtext two woks if 1 ran be of any ocher assisrznee.
Sinrerety,
Thomas Muxhamp
Director, CMI
~~at
. ~ -,-- Sul ~~i ' ~ 1 ~13
lsi-~,~~
~~R
VWch2%, iSrS
Chief loon Ruizy
A4enGC Beach Fire Department
850 Seminaiz Rd.
Atlantic Ae<th. FL 32233
Subject: Proposz! for Fire Data Management Syr_m (EONS)
Dear Chief Ruley:
Thank you again fcr your interest in FDMS.
Tx Firc Dztx Mzregermnt System (1'DMS ), as you Imnw, R a full feanued rysxm thzt is generally linked
via modem to rtnore fire stauoas. It ran fully automate me records keeping rrtds for mon fire deparnttents.
The rtladonzl database eogix used is very powerfid znd ~n handle virtually zny number of records or
appliwdon files. Tne system can be installed is a single or m~>!d-user envuonment. .
Speda! tads rltit your department may have dot zre mt covered by the system wi116e addressed. We will
zdjust or add fexmres to arty pan of the rystem where possible at >ro addidonal charge. Every depanmem has
mess retizJ rr,~s, we try m identity them and use this u an opporttuury a reach you how eary it is [o tnzke
ctal¢es, once you have the passwrd. After inrallstion is complete, You will be zble m m+k. eLanges to nay
scrcen or report. The ryrr:m is wmplettly uxr~hangeaL!e. Your depzrmxnt will hzve all source files.
Pembroke Fires and Lauderhill Fie Departments would be very good rtferenx contacts if you have any
spedac quesdors as to our long term P-dorman:e and the relztionship we esrzhlish with depar~eo*s ueliring
a>r FDMS sys~Gm. They both Lave several remoe stations logging inm their main system via modem. They
IiVx m talk abou[ tie rysmm and mold provide you with a wealth of information on all aspects of the system
intluding hardazre. I strongly encourage you to call them.
During a S~day irstallation Process wx provide special training in all zspects of the ryst-m and the dztabxse
G~~ix. V:e show you how w make the changes 7taicing will consist of much more tLaa just Iexming Low
:o o~rztt tht .n~r~m. 1'ou will be given the source files and then wall be able to xdjust your rysrtm at zrry
im: m the ruturt at \O COST. K'e .:ill trio zny Dumber of p^_rscncel. Nowtver, it usually works out best
r "-e i-0rr~nez2 of zttDru on ace or two key person.
Da;~ cr..j a.~:; s~sing upeatcns are common thraughaut all data firs. Dzt3 en7y is accomplished by jtyR
;:,:-.:~ i-. ire d_~:: ea zrez5 vd the:. pressing a Sngle 5_-cEon key. Fall .'ezwed s°dret::ng capabili5es are
F %~"; ;-d.:.d s_~rc;.:ag is zao^-^;irh°d t:::c_-
# 1 FIRE REPORTING SOFTWARE
& _
COMPUTER EQUIPMENT
SINCE FEBRUARY 1995 WHEN WE FIRST IDENTIPIED THE
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT GOAL THE FIRE DEPARTMENT RECORDS
MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (SOPTWARE) DEVELOPED A MAJOR PROBLEM.
__ DUE TO THIS PROBLEM WE HAVE LOST SEVERAL MONTHS OP
DATA, WE HAVE BEEN UNABLE TO REPORT TO THE STATE,
INCIDENT DATA, AND FOR THE MOST PART THE SYSTEM IS
REQUIRING HAND ENTRIES.
THE CURRENT PIRG MANAGEMENT SYSTEM "FIRE SOFT" IS
GIVING POOR SERVICE AND THERE PROGRAM IS NOT ABLE TO
HANDLH THE TASKS WE REQUIRE OP IT. IF WE WERE TO UP
GRADE THE CURRENT PROGRAM, WHICH I DON'T RECOMMEND, IT
WOULD COST ABOUT $6,000.00.
AFTER RESEARCH AROUND THE STATE WE HAVE FOUND THAT
THERE AR6 ABOUT 13 VENDORS THAT HAY6 APPROVHD PLORIDA
PIRE REPORT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS. ONE THAT IS LOCATED IN
JACKSONVILLE HAS A PROGRAM THAT MEETS MOST OP THE
DEPARTMENT NEEDS AND IS HIGHLY RECOMMENDED BY THE
CITIES OF PEMBROKE PINES AND LP.UDERHILL.
OUR BEST ESTIMATE IS THAT THE SOPTWARE WILL COST ABOUT
§9,000.00
THERE IS ALSO THE NEED TO PURCHAS2 A WORKSTATION FOR
THE PIRE MARSHALS OFFICE. THE COST OP THAT PURCHASE IS
ABOUT $1,500.00.
THE TOTAL COST FOR COMPUTER & SOFTWARE NEEDS IS
$ 10,500.00
I~ElViO
To: Kim Leinbach, Cit_v .lanaeer - -
From: John Ruley
Subject: Fire Reporting stem --- ~ -
Date: luly 11, 1995
As you know we have been having major problems with the Computer program , FIRESOFT,
which is used as our Fire Reporting System .For several months we have been trying to get the
system repa'ved with rw results. At the present time the rystem is out of service, and we have been
unable to send the data to the state as required.
Because of the problem we have been having with FiRESOFT we would not recommrnd
replacing our arrrent program with a new FIItESOFT program. We would recommend that we
replace the program with one that will meet the needs of the fire service today.
ARer many hours of research and cortsuharion with Fire Departtnenu that are wing the system , I
would recommend that we purchase a program from Custom Micro Inc., Jacksonville FL. The
program is entitled "Fire Data Management Systems".
The total cost of the program installed with trairtirtg is Sg,800.00. There is money iv the budget
and was identified dtuirtg mid-year revision and was approved by conunission.
Your approval is needed as soon as possible as the Computer Compatry is scheduled well in
advance for new insW Cations. There could be even a rnomh before they could install the program.
Attached is a copy of a letter from Fve Data Management, with cost breakdown. In addaion there
is some information about the Fire Data Management System and what the basic system can do.
If you have arty questions I will be glade to try to answer them for you.
Cit}' of Atlantic Beach
City Cununission Meeting
Staff Repon
AGE\D.A ITEM: The approval to purchase a fire reporting softwaze program ,that
will replace the one that we currently have that is not operational .
SL,BMITTED BY-. John Ruley, Fve Chief
DATE- August 9, 1995
BACKGROIJND~ "' Attached is a mettw to the City Manager dated July 11,1995, that
detailed the need for this purchase.
This memo indicated that the computer program was a budgtted
during the mid Year revision and the price is under the budgeted
amount.
This computer program was picked as the one that best to meet our
needs from several diffttem companies. There was no other vendor
of this program ,therefore it is a sole source vendor.
RECOMMENDATIONS: To approve this purchase as soon as Possible.
ATTACH2.7EhTS: Merno to the City Manager. COPY of mid year budget request for
the wmputer program. Copy of letter from Fue Data Management
System with cost breakdown, Copy of informarion sheet provided
by F"ve Data Management Systems.
;~
RECEIVED BY CITY MANAGER: '% `~~~ it
AGENDA ITEM NO.
~ " `~ ~ ri/'S :~~~i
1 i'_ . -~,
.. i CCU?; . T L; .~ ~/i: ~ _ ~ l ~, m : o? j 5. ~ •,,.
~~, .~1':'J is ii ~,.~ ~- -%
CORRECTION
THIS DOCUMENT
HAS BEEN
REMICROFILMED
TO ASSURE LEGIBILITY
~~';~
~N wI~yI~M(
MT Y~11~
~ ~~T~~.v .~:LV.~ai~f8u'A:.,:.w
~~-~aew_~a.
'~ r
-:
-i'~
~~__ x_141-..,
`~ ~~° ~.
1 _~~~~
~ y„__
men ~T ~ ~~
/ n. ~.,
4 i.j f' ' ~
~ I. i ~ t L
~' % ~ '~ ,
~a+4 . - \~ i. s
~~~~~
~~~J~
a
i
Y
V
.~ i
~~
:Q
~,
z
a
6
!. ~ i 3
r~
'~ ~ N ~ ~ '
:~ J
W ~ V
V
~ o
EY
u
\~
V
W
" H
x
" o_; J
V
r/ s ~
.. ~ , ,
u
t
~+
~ .N
1 e
T
<C
_ ~ a
---~_' --- ~Q
..I
•' ~
t~
_~ IAN
~~~ Ia i
~r I 1 t
~I-J h
N q: Y
4~ ~ ~~
r,
~~ ._ ;:
Y t
O ~ d.
~ ~ iy €° ~
I~ `
~~ .~ ~~-:
~° ,~,:
~~ o ~:o
f a
t -r-__--- - .~~c 1'
i t V ,1 ~ ~ ~
Or `~ ~" F V
t ~
N
~ ~ ~~
y
WI
W y
V ''
~,
NOTICE
OF
ILLEGIBILITY
ILLEGIBILITY OF SOME OF
THESE DOCUMENTS IS DUE
TO THE POOR QUALITY OF
THE ORIGINAL. THE FAULT
DOES NOT LIE WITH THE
CAMERA OR ITS OPERATOR.
.~~.
iii ~
~~~~
wyA w~~
~V Wl~~ 1~
~F ~~
Memo
lu. Ann Mcuse, Cny nr gtlamic Owch
Fain. Merle Szynuruki, ILrvis, Gn)' h Company ~j!
kc A.ti'4(q and nc[work upgrade
Date quguxt Itt, ISMS
I hale teVICH'e.J [hc later from Mr. Frank AdanY dattd August 7 151515 arq the al[ached IBM
wnGguntion reports. The suggestcJ wnfiguruiot[a ate taatnistGmt with the City's plaru to expand its data
prncrs.ing capzMliues and previous recottunenduion we love nude [o the City. The plain for
networking tIR: u•atcr plant, public wnrkx, sewer, fire, police arb parks IOCU1Op6 appar [o be well
wrutnwteJ. liithcr the xti'otal ur thin! uptiat should tutfice, ar10 while rrore capetaive. provide the City
x nh a Ingh degree nl pm[ecrion againa disk failure a[d increased growth potential.
O P" :' 39?'...h w E ' ~r cr,...r . 'C,~+ir~r' olds 7~S(nJ~. r"fal J'A 7 ar , . .
ara• J'~
tl::-IJ-55 19.41 FROM PDRVIS CRAY AND COMPANY ID.
PAGE 2
Ms. Mn Meuse
August 7, 1994
Pape 3
2210-72E Router (Pub6c Works) 51
596
5765-366 Software ,
2210-12E
Router (City Halp 216
5765-368
SoRware 1.796
6224-001
Ethemel HUB 240
_~2Z
u.47s
The City would provide the dipilal tekiptane line. CSU/DSUS (2) arN personal computers with
EMernet Adagers.
Finally, we dswssetl the r~~~vemerM ro dal-in to the netwpk arq AS/400. I ctlMgured a 8235
networkatg tlevice with 3 rtbdeme (ean hands up ro B). This device makes your rengle personal
corngder IOOk like you are attached to the Iocal neMak. It the tlry insuas this machine. then the 6
dial-in pills on the AS/400 woutl be renbved (57.277) and the need for a new 5394 remote coniro6er
at Public Works would be eliminated
8235-032 Ethemel Unit with 3 Modems ~ 687
To implertrerd the above upgrades. I estknate the tolbwirp professional services stbuW be irtck/de0 in
the projeq:
Install new software on AS/400
Install CGeM Access SoMware on personal carputers
(2o pttrsomal cortputers)
Install and confgure Routers (2210)
Iratall and configure d"al-in rtelMrorkirg device (62'.15)
(br 5 personal corrgtders)
I( you have additional Quesibrts. please bo nut hesitate b ca9 ma at 73&1779
Sincerey,
-~ _ r
Frank Adams
Authorized Agent
Enzrvvst
3
Ms. Ann Meuse
August 7, 1994
Page 2
Q88gDRLQ11
9404 Processor Upgrade py~p~
S 43.943.00
9910 UPS whh extra battery pads 1,635.00
5763 Software upgrades 2.316.00
s n~4m
36 Month Term (4.22°/) f 1418 71 ~
48 Month Term (4.47 %) 1,091.60
6G Month Term (4.61 %) 896.29
4PIlQIi$ - AS/400 Upgrade wish RAID Disk
Same lectures as Option 2 with the blowing exceptbns
- Increased disk capaciy (2.6 to 7.8468)
• Combination Mirrored 6 RAID Disk approx. 32%util¢ed
R89gfIR11Qt1 g~p~
9404 Processor Upgrade S 45,497.00
9910 UPS with extra Badery Pack 1,635.00
5763 Software upgrades 2.376.00
S 49-448m
36 Momh Term (4.22°/,) ~Ql1th1Y.~OW
f 1,464.75
48 Momh Term (4.47°/,) 1,126.92
60 Momh Term (4.61%) 924.34
After further discussion with Chief John Ruley. Carotyn Ttx„na5 ant Mice Austin, i was rewmmended
to oonnea the existing personal conguter netwodc in the Police Fve Buioirg using fber to the clerks
network in Crty Hall. The AS/400 would attach tc this network through the new Ethernet Adapter. Tne
AS/400 Client Access Program, which is part of the upgrade, wouo be installed on any personal
computer that wouo need AS/400 connectivity.
In addition, we discussed the replacement of the Old 5294 Remote CoMrdler at the Public Works
Department with a personal cortyuler Ethernet Network. By usirq this method of communicatgn the
Ciy would ba implememing the beginnirp of a Wide~lvea Network (WAN) where anybody would be
able to "talk" to anybody incWdng the Internet.
The IBM HardwarerSotlware costs to inpomeM the Wide-Area-Netw0dc are:
E~z+~sr
n^.~~rmcr~ai Business Ma<nines GorOOrauon
August 7, 1995
Ms. Ann Meuse
Finance Director
City of Atlantic Beach
City Nall
Atlantic Beach, FL 32250
Dear Ann:
IBM Umletl Stites
P O 90. '.92M
Jacksonvme. Florma J22a5~92CA
901:929-1500
This letter will coMirm the costs to upgrade your installed AS/400 and Data rtetwrork. In addition. I
have inGuded IBM's Installment Payment Agreement as a payment option br your purchase.
9~714H1- AS/400 Upgrade with Mirrored Disk
• Inueased processor perbmwrlce (2.2 to 6.2)
• Increased disk caPacilY (2.SG8 b 4.0 GB)
• Mirrored main nterlgry -approx. 62% utiize0
• AddAional main memory (from 32M8 to 64M8)
• 2.SG81/4 tape cartridge
• Eiherrtel Adapter
• Unimerruptible Power System (UPS)
• 6 dail-in ports
~[IOIi9
9404 II
Processor Upgrade
9910 UPS with extra Badery Pack
5763 Sohware upgrades
36 Month Term (4.22°x)
48 Month Tenn (4.47%)
60 Mor11h Term (4.61°/,)
OPTION 2 ~ AS/400 Upgrade with RAID Dlsk
Same features as Option 1 with the blowing ezceptbrh
• Increased disk capacuy (2.5 to 6.91G8)
• Combination Mirrored 8 RAID Disk - approx. 36°r, utilized
f 32.880.00
1.270.00
X1600
I~~G
119ntG1Y.~rmm1
f 1.080.19
831.06
681.66
t nzt99s~
Memo Page 2.
installation which does not leave much room for growth. Mark Szymanski has reviewed
Option 2 and Option 3 and found them acceptable. Attached is a letter from Mark with his
recommendation. Iwould like to suggest Option 3 in that it providos increased disk
capacity at a minimal cost as compared to Option 2. IBM has a very aggressive (ease
purchase Dtogram with a 36 month lease at 4.22%. The lease purchase of the AS-400 has
been included in the 1995/1996 budget. According to discussions with IBM, the City could
enter into a lease purchase agreement now and bring the equipment on line by mid
September, which would enable the opening of tha new fiscal year October 1. The first
lease payment would not be due until October, so there would be no financial impact this
fiscal year.
Due to the urgency of the situation, I am requesting authorization from the City
Commission to purchase tha DDLIOn 3 upgrade of the AS-400 by a 36 month lease
purchase with IBM at the Stated 4.22% interest.
The IBM representative, Frank Adams, will be available at the Commission meeting
monday night to answer any questions regarding the upgrade.
CITY OF
y~tla«k'e
-~-- -
b'eaek - ~louifa
X00 SE\II\OLF NIHU
-- ATLASTI('BEK'H.I WNWA A:)1$N5
TELERI0\E ~90•ri 2Ir_XX00
~~ EAx 1911X13h5Xp$
MEMORANDUM
Date: August 10, 1995
70: Kim Leinbach, City Manager
I
From: Ann Meuse, Finance Director
Subject: Upgrade AS-400
As you are aware, the City has known for some time that the AS-400 would need to be
upgraded to handle the volume of City transactions. The system was initially purchased to
handle quarterly billing of 24,000 bills a year. When the City converted to monthly billing
it increased the number of utility bills to 84,000, an increase of 250%. In addition to the
demands placed on the system by [he utiiity conversion, the city has added several new
users; such as the Deputy City Manager, Buccaneer Plant, City Clerks network system.
Assistant Director of Public Works, Building Department Secretary as well as three
additional users in the Finance Department. The system presently supports 60 users which
also includes printers. Fire, Police and Atlantic Beach Sewer Plant are scheduled to come
on-line next year. Attached is a rough diagram of the system and users.
Mark Szymanski of Purvis Gary & Company, the City's auditors, has provided ongoing
consulting advice on the City's computer system. Based on his recommendation last year,
the City postponed the upgrade of the AS-400 to take advantage or price reductions in the
computer industry. In order to manage the City's available disk space, any program which
could be removed from the system was removed as well as all source code antl even
something called "journalizing" which is an internal data check. As Mark stated last year,
"as long as the City could remain at less than 90 % disk space, the system could operate
without affecting performance." Unfortunately, on July 22, 1995 the City loaded a
necessary update to its software which pushed the disk space to 94 % and the system
shut down. ey signing off users and removing programs, the City was able to bring the
disk space down to 90% and get the system running. But I have been informed by HTE
that the Ci[y will not be able to open [he next fiscal year, which must be opened bV
October 1'st ,because there is not availalle disk space.
Attached are three proposals from IBM to upgrade the AS-400, all at state contract prices.
Option 7 is not under consideration because the disk space will be at 62% on the date of
/.
t, The PRG cautloni that specific results of the wave tank tu4 should noI be ezuapolated
to prototype scale slnrc the watt' level in the wave tank probably far exceeds the
oomparablo i04-yeal sWrm surge level, The still water Iced uuod in the wave tank teats
was Scaled to reflect the 100-year storm surge from Palm Beach County, which included
the efkcts of saris and dynamic wave setup, fn rho tank, howevu, wave setup would
have been gcaeratod by the Creaking waves w that, In effxt, wave-setup would have
born •doubk counted' in the laboratory tests, As a result, water levels toted in the
physitel model tats may correspond to a storm far exceeding rho 100-year return period
and trJt reauln should not 6e wed to Infer Nc behavior of the profile undo the 100-year
atoms in Palm Beach County.
n -
~- insufficient treat elevation or return waG length to meet these standards. O.` :he rtmainirg ..-ei's
that mat these geometrical standards, the rcquircment fur structural in lcgrl:y and adequate
maintenance will further reduce [he number of walls qualifying.
. It is the opinion of the PRG, however, that those walls that do mcet these stringent
requiremenU shoed be wnsidered positively in resetting the CL. The DFP shoulA therefore
commence a study W define spaific criteria related to seawall survlvebtllty and seawall
effectiveness In reducing erosion/wave impact of upland praxrty during. the 100-year storm.
In thole rases when suwalls ue not of sufficient height, do not have adequate ntum
walls, and are rase darned swcturally sound to withstand ore 100-year stortn,lto'credi[' should
tw given for reducing [he landward extent of erosionlwave impact. Fo(.thcsc walls, laboratory
tests wnducted in this study have demonstrated that beach response will be usentielly the same
as that which woald occur if no seawal: wuc pres:•rt. Por si:ch ;.aces, Nc Yr:G bciln~es that Ne
present method of applying numeical erosion models under the assumption that the sand behind
the seawall Js fret to code Is reasonable. This approach should be utiliuA only alter revisions
m U:e erosion model have ban wmpleted, such tha[ ar,y od hoe multipliu is removed and the
model is re"ullbnted so that send conxrvation is ensured.
Publkstlon and D(ssetnination o(Study Results
Because some of the conclusions of the PRG may conflict with some conclusions drawn
in the various deft rcporu produced in the study, it is strongly rtxommended that all previous
rcporU be considered es "interim" or 'daft' repons. These reporu should Do compiled loco one
or two summary documrnu with test appropriately edited so that commcnu and alternative
conclusions of the PRG are included. 'This is considered important berauae projat reports aze
to be made available to other rescarchtra, consulting enginan, sate and local government
of6clals, and manben of the public.
Summary Commen4
This study has provided a useful forum to evaluate the CCCL model against additional
Cara end against attanative numerical models. 1Ypile the PRO believe that the basic mechanics
of the CCCL model are scienfifically sound, the ux of the. 2.5 m•dtiniirr to adjust computed
bc~h tceession diuuiJ be Jisuuntlnued. LfYewise, ¢I:rougn eras procedures used to esubliah fire
CL location on most armored profJes is generally appropriate, some beneficial effects of loge
and well-mninWnod uawalls should De ruognirtd. 'iltese change will require some
modifiudon of the CL mapping program. In the opinion of the PRG, it is not appropriate ro
wndnue the current procedure in the remaining three counties, orates othu criteria (such as
eras 3-foot wave Impact rune) are Ne dominant facmrs used to uabGsh the revised CL location.
Alt comments and conclusions in [his re, on are the ur:animous findingt of the five PRG
mcmbvs. We believe it signi (leant that these arc consensus opinions end that no minorty or
duac~ting ttports are necessary.
In the opinion of the PRG mambas, Nc CCCL model, with the 2.3 multipau, is
• futx4unattally flawed and use of the CC~L model with this or any othu mWtlpllu chouid Dc
discontlnued. My numerical model adoptrd for the Cl. program should avoid ux of ad ha, or
blartkU multiplies, applied to any spoClfic eleratlon contour, to achieve model vibration. As
an lntuim wlution, IDs DEP should consider two options:
(1) using othu ezisdng numerical models that arc vibrated w•the sane uosion event
(hurricane 8loix) and which cdnserve sand volume without ux of multipliers, o:
(2) undortaking a well-0ocumented re-calibration of the CCCL model with use of multipliers
Cor beach mceccion discontinued.
Once any vibrated erosion model is ustzl W compute the erosion limit of a 100•ycar
storm, D8P may, as an admtnlsra{ive decisiod; cohsidu application of an addiconal factor of
safety based on demonstrated longshorc variability el erosion. Variations in wave parametuc and
. beach profile charactuistics car cause wbstandal varlabllity in uosion from monument to
monument, prodtrUng a rune in which erosion predictions ate uncertain. DEP should thcreforc
determine n more appropriate method oCaccounGng for this ua:ertainty tha[ cart be well jusrficd
and easily interpreted for application to any existing ur future erosion model.
P1ntLLogs ou SuNtsll Issue
The tR0 utwtimously believes that ruuln seawalls, if properly designed and
rrtaintainod, can provide substantial protxtion m upland property during the llyp-year storm as
dellned for the purpox of xtting the CL.
A seawall with sufficient uut rlevalion, adequate rUum walls, and structural integrity
to withstand the loadings associated with a Itk)•yeu storm, will reduce if not prevent erosion
and wave impact damage landwud of the wall in i ]00•ycar storm. In those cases whve stuh
a seawall iFtsasonably expected to protect upland.yropcrty, the DEP should take ore err moss
of the Collowing actions:
(1) aisest the beneficial effect of the seawall and account for the trduccd limit of
erosion/wave impact in xtpng the CL, .'
(2) modify existing mapping procedures a idtrtify a zone of reduced impau between the CL
and the seawall with relaxed or mole flexible pumitung standards, or
(3) achieve a lcglslativc modification to appliraDle daWtes to adminicwtivtily diiferenuate
the nature o! rcgulxtion in anus of redtu:M uosion vulnerability behind mrjor seawalls.
It is «pocted that relatively few seawalls in the State of Plorida will qualify for tech
"credi[' in reducing the impact of Ne 100-yw storm. Urce the DEP develops spaific criteria
regarding seawall overtopping and flanking, it is expected Chet most walls in the sate will Dave
F1\AL RECO.~g.,1"DATIOtiS OF PRG
Ftndlnea on Nssmer7r~I Eroalon hf oilers
Based oe extensive comparisors o(!re CCCL model w both she EDUh'E and SBEACI3
models, [he PRG believes that basing the CL posiuoa on t.^.c results of dosed-ioop numcriw]
models u5liru[g oGuuibhum beach profile censxpts is scicntifica!ly sound "and tochnlcally
appmpriak for the purpow of she CL program.
FuMermore, the assumption of a vmylc cxpor.cntiai Umc respor.x as used ir. the CCCL
model, as opposeC w the solution o` more detailed govcmmg eyuatiors for sedimrst trarspor.
ra[ea as used in [he EDUh'E and SBEAC;I mudcis, also appears to be rmsonable. In
comparisons of numerical results for which [he 2.5 muicplier was not mcd i:, the CCCL mWd,
she CCCL model seems to product esoced p.ofilu thu are s:m:iar w tnose proC:tt;: by o! c
numerical models and w measured post-storm Leach proflles.
Daplk [hex attribuks, however, the PRG fords serious shortwmings in she calibration
and application of the CCCL model, a,-sing principzlly from the use of the 2.5 multiplier.
The radibration of [he CCCL model, and the methods used to 4errJmine boor the uosion
Iak paramekr (k) and the 2.5 multiplier, arc numcr adequakly nor wnslstutUy described. h'o
quantlntive (graphical or tabular) caa was presented w support the xia¢on of these paramekrs
based on comparisons between measured and predic[t~ torsion. As a result, the brief
explanations ofhxd for mesa factors do rot instill either scientific or public confidence in rho
accuracy of model prcdicuons.
Mote imporanUy, applicaton oC the 2.5 facor produszs revue fnconsls[encles between
eroded pcofilw prcd[ctul by the model and those obxrvw in natutt. Ir. paticular, eroded
profiles following applintion of the 2.5 mulupGer viottk the most basic requirement for any
Iwo•Clmensional erosion model, namely that sand volume must be wnscrvcd so mat eroded and
deposited sand volumes balance.
Prior w application of uhe 2.5 factor, the CCCL mWe: sarisfiu this ccquirement for sand
conservztion and products croCcC nruf~ie; ••~`ose's'.~^^ s :^ gc:~c:a; eg:»mc.: ~::;5 t':.x.
observe4 afkr severe stones. Atkr app;;cauon of me 2.5 mul!ipliu, howevv, me shape of the
eroded profile above mra: sra level is altued in a socmingly arbitrary way. As a resull, (!)the
«oded sand volume is sncreased signlScanUy, usuahy more than 2.5 times That originally
predicted, (1) the profile often exhibiu'kinis' or C!scontinuitits that e:e not physically realistic,
and (3) U,e the cf Uic cane erwio:: scarrr is often mcd[fied so that is no longer coincides with
t"c pray storm surge level but is at w.:m a;bi:fary cicvation either above or below :his elevation.
Ir. many cases, the CCCL mudci prWUCCS unrtalistiully :a: ge y:txlided erosion, with CAnwur
rteessior. hundreds of fu[ !anAwarC o1 what mlEht be reasonably exyxted and with erodrA
vOin:nea far in excess of ;hc 5;0 R'!ft sogges;W by FFMn as typical of 106-year storms.
COM.11E1TS
OF
PEER kEVIEW GROUP
"EVALUATTON STUDY AVll COMPARISON OF EROSION MOULTS
A.VD EFFECT OF SEAWALL 1 FOR COASTAL CONSTRUCTIO'i CONTROL I.L'v'E"
Jaeuary 3•S, 1995
T61rd MeetWg
INTRODUCTION
The Peer Review Oroup (PxGJ held itsahiM and final mee[inq on 3•S January 1955 in
7b!tahassee and Wak-ul;a Spires, Flordz. Ti:c meetings consisted of opening commu:ts by
officials from Ne Florida Department of Fwironmenta'. Protection (DP3), briefings by Professor
Robert Dcen regarding projtxa activities undertaken by Ne Univertiry of Florida (UP), and e
bricfmg by Dr. T.Y. Chiu of Nc Beaches and Shotcs Resource (:enter regarding methods used
to map Ne Centro) lint (CL) position. These briefing were accompanirA by open discussion
among participants and were Nen fo:lowed by doseC dixustion by Ne PRG members. Members
of the PRO presuu at Ne macng included Dr. Billy Bdge, Mr. Tom Jarrett, nr. David Kriend,
and Mr. E[ik Olsen, Dr Robcn Wicgcl was unable W attend for medical teasens.
TA6R:ING OF PRG
M stated in Task 6 of Ne UP project proposal, Ne PRO was atablishcd Sn order w
provide an Indcpenden[ and impartial poet review, and to pzovlde rxommmdations, regarding:
(1) ~ the consistency of, end scientific Danis foe, numerical models used to predict erosion
auocietc4 wiN Nc 100-yr:ar hurricane for use in establishing Ne CL, and
(2) Ne eatrnt to wNth suwalls and other similar umoring swcrures should be accounted
for in Ne esublishment of the CL. ,
A further function of [hc PRG, as presented by Ih: DEY, ws a prdv:de gcida:.ce tc Nc Dr'r
on how to proceed wiN retsublishing Ne CL in Ne remaining three counties for which Ne CL
has not yU been reset.
PREVIOUS FL\'DINGS OF THF. PRG
In previout reporu, Nc PRO devdopcC druilod comments and ree:ommu:daCons rclatr4
to speufic technical issues. Many o1 Ne comments and observations contained in these reports
remain valid and a:^.ould be aodruicd Dy Ne DtJ' in fusure devdopmenl and application of
numerical models (or use in Nc CL program. The Appendix curtains a rcvized list of decilcd
technical contxmt that remain at the conclusion of the study.
Davte 1.. Hrlrbel, Ph.D., P.E.
Ctuatnl and Oculn Eogloearing
74S Buckeye Court
;vlWersv8le, tvrD 21108
January 25, Ith"'S
Dr. Robert Dean
CcwW and Ocrdtugraphic kngineering
336 Weil Hall
University of Florida
Gainesville, FL 32611-2083
Dray Bob:
-,..
p i i:sa,. ~~4... -
As sea rctary of Ne Par Rcvicw Group, i have bwl directed to transmit our final report
to you. Under aorma] clrcumstanres, Professdr Wicgd would have sent Ne report to you.
Profnsot Wiegel aid review Ne report, however, and his comments have been fully
incorporated.
T'he PRO members have reached unanimous agreement on dte major issues discussed ir.
the three PRG meedngs. We agrud that a short repon that OWs d(roctly wiN two major lssucs
is preferable to a lengthy report that attempts ro diwuss a!1 aspecU of your study in gees[ detail.
As a result, this Final report t4vers what we believe ate the two critical iasua: (l) Ne sWtability
of Ne uisting CCCL model and Q) the extent to wNch srxwalb should be Llcluded In the
convol line program.
On behalf of the PRG members, I would like~to Nani you far Ne opporturdty to sm~e
m this review group. Plraa call any PRO member if you have questions regarding our final
report. We sincerely hope Nat our comments will help to svvlgNin Ne wntrol line program.
SirrxreJy']
Davi" d L, Kra .D., P.E. .
cc: H. Been
R. Wiege:
8. I:Age
T. )artett
E. Olsen
Post-IC'Grentl lax lran5mnlel mem07611 •oi e+q.a.
wog. enen..
r
i ~
CY-.~~ r~ (ice
ra..
-
Larson, M., and Kraus, N„ "SBEACH: Numerical Model for Storm-Induced Beach
Change.' U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Coastal Engineering Research Center,
T.R. CERC-89-9; July, 7989.
USACE, "Duval County Beaches; General Design Memorandum.' U. S. Army Corps of
Engineers, Jacksonville District, Jacksonville, FL; August, 1975.
Steetzel, H.J., "Cross-Shore Transport During Storm Surges.' Proc., 22nd Int. Conf. on
Coastal Engineering; ASCE, 1922-1934; 1990.
Vellinga, P., "Predictive Computational Model for Beach and Dune Erosion During Storm
Surges." Proc., Coastal Struqures '83, ASCE, 806-19; April, 1983.
.8
REFERENCES
Birkemeier, W.A., E.W. Bichner, B.L. Scarborough, M.A. McConathy, and W.C. Eiser,
"Nearshore Profile Response Caused by Hurricane Hugo " J. Coastal Research,
Special Issue No. 8. 113-727; Spring, 799 i.
Birkemeier, W.A., R.J. Savage, and M.W. Leffler, "A Collection of Storm Erosion
Field Data.' U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station, M.P.
CERC-88-9; July, 1988.
Brennan, J.W., 'Meteorological Summary of Hurricane Hugo.' J. Coastal Research,
Special Issue No. 8, 1-12; Spring, 1991.
Cech, N.K. and M. P. Wolff, "Effects of Hurricane Hugo Storm Surge in Coastal South
Carolina.' J. Coastal Research, Special Issue No. 8, 201-226; Spring, 1997.
FDNR, "Methodology Workshop: Coastal Construction Control Line Establishment.' Fla
Dept. of Natural Resources, Div. of Beaches and Shores, Talahassee, Florida;127
PP: July 11-12. 7984.
FDNR, 'Escambia County: Coastal Construction Control Line Study; Florida Dept. of
Natural Resources, Div. of Beaches and Shores, Tallahassee, Florida; January,
7 986.
FEMA, "Flood Insurance Study; Charleston County, South Carolina.' Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA), Washington DC; April 17, 1987.
FEMA, "National Flood Insurance Program; Flood Plain Management Standards; Fnal
Rule.' Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), in: Federal Register,
Vol. 53, pp. 16269-16280; 1988.
Hallermeier, R.J. and P.E. Rhodes, "Generic Treatment of Dune Erosion for 100-Year
Event.' Proc., 21st Int. Conf. on Coastal Engineering, ASCE, 1797-7211; 1988.
Katuna, M.P., "Changes in Sediment Budget along the Isle of Palms, S.C. caused by
Hurricane Hugo." South Carolina Geology, 33(2), 11-16; 1990.
Kriebel, D.L. and Dean, R.G., "Numerical Simulation of Time-Dependent Beach and Dune
Erosion.' J. Coasta! Engineering, Vol 9., 221-245; 7985.
Kriebel, D.L. and Dean, R.G.. "Beach and Uune Response to Severe Storms.' Proc., 19th
Int. Conf. on Coastal Engineering, ASCE; 1984.
zr
CONCLUSIONS
DNR's predictions of the 100-year storm dune erosion along Atlantic and Neptune
Beach greatly exceeds that of proven physically-based models and measured field data
of dune erosion. -
Specifically, the DNR model consistently predicts an eroded volume which is
greater by a factor of 2 to 3.6 (above the surge level and mean sea level, respectively)
relative to the EDUNE model of Kriebel. At about the +6 ft and +10 ft NGVD contours,
the DNR model consistently predicts 120 to 150 feet greater recession than the EDUNE
model. The tlune crest is predicted by DNR to recede 50 to 105 feet greater than the
EDUNE model.
The median DNR prediction of volumetric erosion above the still water flood level
is at least 75q° greater than the median value suggested by the dune erosion database,
and is i 5°k greater than the largest 100-yr storm erosion value in the database. One-
quarter of the profiles' predictions exceed the 300-year erosion measured at the North
Sea coast by 10% to 43%.
The DNR volumetric erasion rates exceed the measured dune erosion caused by
Hurricane Hugo near Myrtle and Debidue Beaches by a factor of over 7.3 above the still
water flood level, and by a factor of 5.2 above the 0.0 tt NGVD cortour. The horizontal
recession is greater than the Hugo data by a factor of 5 to 6.
Perhaps most importantly, the DNR models (nor the EDUNE model) da not
account for the UenefiCial effects of the seawalls which exist along about 12,000 feet of
the study area.
26
25
7
J r
6 '^ ~
E 181 m ~
-° t 'o
S i ~ ~
'v
"5
E dune
` Hsig ____ ____
V _ _______ -- L
> -~
o A C
o i SCOU E
u
u m
u ~
s ~% a,
3 i deP~ ~ ~ ---- 0. 0
~~ i 9. 5
i
----12. 5
distance from wove board (m)
Figure 6
Example of profile development and transport in a large
scale model with revetment ([es[ T3I4); Heasu red trans-
port at t - 11.25 hr: S(net) - 0.40 m'/m/hr
24
The effects of partial shoreline armor on dune erosion are presented by Steetzel
(1990) among others. An example case is illustrated in Figure 6. Further investigation,
beyond the present paper, is necessary to quantify the degree to which. the armor
decreases the upland erosion.
23
erosion for Station 9; however, this eiiecl may be partially due to uncertainties in the
choice of the model parameters onginal!y used by DNH. Importantly, however, it is noted
that the EDUNE model reasonably duplicates the DNR erosion -- but through the use of
a robust, physically-based model which does not rely on ad-hoc multipliers.
Effects of Seawalls.
Perhaps most importantly, neither the DNR nor EDUNE erosion predictions
account for the presence of a seawall along much of Neptune and Atlantic Beach.' In
many places, the seawall is within the present dune and is only exposed during
particularly severe storms at which time it has been observed to act as a "last line of
defense".
Neither the DNR nor EDUNE (nor other) models are presently conditioned to
account for the effects of a sawall on a beach profile in regard to:
a) the erosion landward of the structure due to overtopping, and/or
b) a seawall buffed within a dune.
In the case of Atlantic and Neptune Beach, for which the seawall is substantial, it
is more likely that upland erosion will be due to overtopping rather than significant failure.
It is likewise obvious that the presence of the seawall will reduce the extent of upland
erosion. The DNR methodology gives no allowance for such structures' effects.
,t The Atlantic Beach seawall begins at the north corporate limit and extends south about
r, ' 6,G00 feet to Atlantic Boulevard. It was originally built by the town of Atlantic Beach and
the Public Works Administration in 1934 and 1335. It is a reinformed concrete
superstructure of the roll-away orwave-return type resting on a substructure of supporting
piles, supplemented by a longitudinal wncrete cutoff wall under the toe, extending about
4 feet below mean low water. The cap of the seawall is at about elevation 13 feet above
mean low water. The Neptune Beach seawall was orginally constn;cted by Neptune
Beach and the Works Progress Administration in 7936. Ii is about 6,200 feet long and
is of precast reinforced concrete sheet piles. The wall is vertical and the cap is at about
elevation 13 feet above mean low water. (From ASACE 1975.) -
zz
I __ _-_ ~ v
i ~- ~„~ Cl
Sr
G
L
w
.ti
7
O
F J ~ m
m [V G
W .. O
ti
..~~ N
HvV I Y
W W w
J J H 4
~WW ~ w
J d ~ 8 v N
W ~~S ^ z o
(/~ I W i+
U
W ~ W W I ~ ~ 'O
4
~ ~ Ili ~ ~
W E C
O
m ~ ~ O U
W ~ f~ -'+
Z ~ ~ V wro
O IY Z Z ~
L `--. ~ O 4
m ~ TS S
q
~ 'C U
.ti
W N
2 H
~ 7
S
w
O 4
O
G w
~ N
J w m
~ m ti
ao
I ~ ~a
~, ~
m
~ N B 1. ID N m N ID _. f.
canJN '1.~ 7 NOIlV~3~3
21
IJ
IS
10
~ 5
0
-9
20
IS
` 1C
5
0
-9
:; r:rr 1 f,
~ :,,
- -- - - -
~~i ~ April, 1 979 (before FrederiQ
7
{ z~
/
/ ~ \
--~ / ~
~~ Campu [e d erosion
\
(Tito 2.9 factor;
Oct. , 1979 ( after Fre tlerlc) \
~
`~~ _ -_ .
-300 -250 -200 -I90 -100 -90 0 50 100 150 200
Volume eroded above 0.0 ft NGVD: 30.3 cy/ft
13.0 ft NGVD: 0.2 cy/ft
STAT ON 10
GULF SHORE A1.A
it
~
~ l
i
i
April, 1
1979 (hef
ore Frede
ric)
t
`~ l
_` ' I
~ ~ t
_i 1
~~ t Com puted erosion
_ l
(wi
th 2.5 factor)
\
O 1979
ct. (after Fr ederic) ~
` "
~
, • .
_
~~ ~
_
_~ _~'
Volum erode abov 0.0 f NGVD: 46 cy ft
13.0 f NGVD: 2.2 y/ft
-100 -90 U 50 100 150 200 260 700 3iU
Eizta ncs (fi.) __
F'i gure 4: F.zample of dune erosion predicted by DNR model
fa aer Chiu end l;ea n) .
20
o
~
i
I J
I C7 S o
QQI
I a~U
~ Q I _-t~ _°~¢ I Cl
I
C
I I ~m II II mLj'
LL eI _II I-WtYJW _
Jm
U I"
I
I~ I Qp III l if W N I I -. I I Z
o
II i I III ¢FrLLI c
__
I w~- ---1 _
I ~ i N
, I
,
iI
II a< I ~I
a I
.
I~ 1
11 I '¢ ~ m_
,
I
I
~ l 1
I
I
z`Q il
i2
I
II ~-
I~litl' i ~,yi~ I
'I IiI I
'
~ ~
I
L
~
,
'.. III I• l
I
I
.;I °
,,
z '. L~ _l o
~
1 1 ~} x
¢ ¢ ~ ¢¢¢ ¢ rd f~_ ~
'i i `
I _
~ ~-- x i- I
I '
i~
__~
~
I ~ I ' ~ I I
_
_
_
I
'¢tI ~
I
I
~I
I ~ I_ I ~.I
I
¢
W~L I C
It I ~~'_ I I_ ~ JN
~ w
~
4~~a Ir
I{ I
I . I I I I I--I
III I
I
1
¢a
x I J
~~
~ 'I \. al 0 1p
I
W
.
~ I
I t - ~ I ~
I I I _ 1 1 I ti ._._I
i W
H
l
~
~ I I '
II s
I
~I
'
.I
I
I I i
I 1 1 i~i- '
I
o
I
I
' N
U
I I
I ~ I
\\' I11iI
I ~
I
I x Id~ W
r I Q\ d O W
\ 4
0
O
. t
I
!
I i I I
I ~ I__ _I
''~'-i `
I 1 I ~ X I LL.
_ _
_
_ I1
'
:. ~
I
.
I I
'. I \
I
... In
~ _ x
I I 1
`
~ x
I
x
1
r
N ~ `
x
x `x n
p y Q I I) ' I l I
I V
O
I
I
~ ,.
I IiI l i I,- I I I=1 rI -i' :-I
I
I ~
Il 1
I
i
1
1 I
II
II
' U p
I
U
I
I !
' N
'
1'
III
'1
1
1
1
f U I
Z
I ~
1 I
III
1 I' 1'
~
I
r
' a LL C) I I I I I
r 1
I
I m
F' J A I I
4 U^ I
. I
I
I
' v
I ' x
r I I
' '
J
x '1 •
Iliil!i,'1
I' IILIj
I
_
I !
1_j_l~f ilil` I'~Iij_i~j~'_.-'_r_
0 a
_
_. __
O
O n
7 o 0
N
N
rl j/~O) '~'3'M'S 3n09V NOISOtl3 3Nf10 03tlf1SV3W
19
Figure 3 replicates the Hallermeier and Rhodes dune erosion database presented
earlier -- and includes these Hurricane Hugo results and DNR's erosion predictions for
Atlantic and Neptune Beach.
Katuna (7 990) reported maximum volumetric erosion rates above 0.0 h NGVD of
40.9 cy/ft at Isle of Palms, S. Carolina. This barrer beach was subject to maximum surge
elevations of about +14.5 ft NGVD (Brennan, 1997) which approaches the 500-year return
period far this area. The profiles described by Katuna may likely have been subject to
overwash. In any case, this erosion value is significantly large. Nonetheless, DNR's
prediction of erosion along AtlantidNeptune Beach (above 0.0 ft NGVD) is 22.6 to 38.7
cy/lt larger than this measured value.
Hurricane Frederic.
Chiu and Dean (1986) offer examples of the DNR model's ability to reasonably
predict dune erosion by way of pre- and post-storm profiles measured at Gulf Shores,
Alabama, in association with Hurricane Frederic, September, 7979. Storm surge
measurements of 10 to 75 feet near the beach profiles suggest that the surge was on the
order of a 700-yr event (FDNR 1986).
The profiles, reproduced in Figure 4, indeed suggest that the DNR model -with
2.5 multiplier-- conservatively reproducesthe post-storm profile. However, it is noted that
[he measured erosion volumes for this demonstration example are less than half of the
average 700-yr erosion volumes predicted at Atlantic and Neptune Beach. That is, above
the 0.0 ft contour, the Hurricane Frederic profiles exhibit gross erosion of 30 to 46 cY/ft.
DNR's estimates of erosion at Atlantic and Neptune Beach range from 55 to 99 ry/ft.
While it is recognized that beach and stonm conddions vary from coast to coast in Florida,
this discrepancy in erosion volumes seems inordinately large.
Figure 5 demonstrates that the EDUNE model is more-or-less equally capable of
predicting the shoreline erosion at these pwfdes. The EDUNE model yields slightly less
to
Coch and Wolff (1991) also offer pre- and post-Hugo profiles at an unspecified
location in North Myrtle Beach. The primary dune was completely removed and
subsequent overwash ensued. (Because this dune was breached, this type of profile data
would not be included in the Hallermeier 8 Rhodes dataset presented above.) Volumetric
erosion above the +9.8 ft and 0.0 ft NGVD contours, respectively, totalled 9.2 cy/tt and
28.7 cy/tt (neglecting overwash effects).
In summary of these data, Hurricane Hugo resulted in median and maximum
volumetric erosion of the Mynle and Debidue Beach profiles of 4.8 cf'/ft and 15.9 cyttt,
respectively, above +g.8 fl NGVD. The values imputed for AtlantidNeptune Beach by
DNR -- above the +11 tt SWFL -range from 23 cy/tt to 59 cY/ft. Likewise, the median
and maximum volumetric erosion along Myrtle Beach above 0.0 h NGVD were 14.3 cyNt
and 23.1 cy/ft, respectively. The corresponding values computed for Atlantic Beach by
DNR range from 63 cYnt to 99 cy/tt. Overall, the average DNR volumetric erosion rates
computed /or AtlantidNeptune Beach exceed the measured dune erosion caused by
Hurricane Hugo near Myrtle and Debidue Beaches by a factor of over 7.3 above the Still
Water Flood Level, and by a factor of 5.2 above the O.O ft NGVD contour.
Median and maximum recession of the +9.6 tt NGVD contour along Myrtle Beach
was measured as 29 ft and 700 ft, respectively, with mean recession of 35 ft. Recession
of the +9.8 tt contours at AtlantiGNeptune Beach, as predicted by DNR, ranges from 185
to 270 ft, with a mean value of 204 feet.
Likewise, the median and maximum recession of the +6.6 tt contour along Myrtle
Beach was 26 f[ and 53 ft, respectively, with mean recession of 27 feet. Recession of
the same contour elevation at AtlantiGNeptune Beach, as predicted by DNR, ranges from
82 to 185 feet, with a mean value of 133 feet.
On average, then, the DNR prediction of hodzonta/ recession at AtlantiGNeptune
Beach for the 100-year storm exceed the measured recession associated with Hurricane
Hugo at Myrtle and Debidue Beaches by a factor o/ 5 to 8.
n
Table 4 : Recession and Volume
Changes Mcasurcd aloay Myrtle and Deb>_d ue
Beaches after Hurricane Hugo (1989)
Horizontal Contour Volume Change
Change (FT) (CY/FT) above
PROF .2 +6.5 ft +9.8 ft +0.0 ft +9.8 ft
60 -26.2 -39.4 ~ -12.75 -5.58
62 -99.2 -75.9 -23.11 -1.99
82 -49.2 -13.1 -19.34 -C.90
90 -92.6 -19.7 -8.77 -1.20
122 -26.2 -29.5 -11.56 -0.90
13G -39.4 -39.9 -18.73 -5.58
132 -36.1 -42.6 -18.33 -9.36
190 -32.8 -45.9 -14.79 -9.78
142 -52.5 -39.9 -15.99 -2.39
202 -32.8 -59.0 -23.11 -7.57
203 -36.1 -72.2 -19.92 -5.18
219 -26.2 -36.1 -19.52 -6.77
220 -9.8 -6.6 -6.38 0.00
233 -i9.7 -29.5 -19.79 -3.98
252 -29.5 -23.0 -15.99 -5.96
253 -16.4 -23.0 -7.57 -5.18
259 -16.9 -36.1 -9.56 -6.77
273 -9.6 -39.9 -13.55 -5.58
279 -19.7 -23.0 -5.98 -3.19
282 0.0 -9.6 0.00 -0.40
290 -13.1 -23.0 -7.17 -3.59
300 -13.1 -23.0 -6.37 -4.78
302 -19.7 -19.7 -8.77 -3.59
310 -36.1 -29.5 -20.72 -10.36
DEB -33.0 -100.0 -22.70 -15
90
HO'°'} - -- -28.69 .
-9.20
MBY.. -52.5 -100.0 -28.69 -15.90
MEDIA.ta -26.2 -29.5 -14.79 -9.78
!rAN -27.2 -35.2 -i9.27 -4.80
S.Dc'7 13.9 17.9 6.74 3.50
t_
.rrne ... r. _... ut _, at. f1992)
1 xLiGUC Bea ct.; 'row Birkrocier e; al. (2591)
~ 2apor: eG S~ C«B and ^ol `.! (1991); Forth Myrtls Beach
. ~
76
erosion above the SWFL exceeds by 10% to 40°b the dune erosion measured fora 300-
yv s;orm event in the Netherlands.
Dune Erosion during Hurricane Hugo.
Hurricane Hugo impacted the South Carolina coastline in September of 1989 with
maximum storm surge levels of +20 ft NGVD measured 25 miles north of Charleston
(Cock & Wolff, 1991), As such, Hurricane Hugo exceeded the 500-vear still water flood
level (SWFL) predicted for this area (FEMA 1987), North of the Charleston area,
measured storm surge level; averaged about +13.4 tt NGVD along Myrtle Beach and
Debidue, and therefore correspond to a 100- or 200-year event for those beaches.
Birkemeier et al. (1997) measured volume change and shoreline retreat attributed
to Humcane Hugo along 35 beach profiles at Myrtle Beach and 4 profiles at Debidue
Beach. Table 4 presents the Myrtle Beach data for only those profiles though to be
mostly uninfluenced by seawalls or sign cant wave overtopping. The median and
maximum volumetric erosion above 0.0 ft NGVD and above 9.8 ft NGVD are indicated
for these data in the table. The latter value is intended to approximate the volumetric
erosion above SWFL because erosion computations above the actual SWFL of+13.4 ft
were not offered in the literature. Since the actual SWFL is 3.7 feet higher than the +9.8
tt contour considered here, the vclumetdc erosion rates in the table very conservatively
represent erosion above SWFL (as per FEMA guidelines). The horizontal retreat of the
+6.6 ft and +9.8 ft NGVD contours are also listed in the table as a point of interest.
Only one of the four beach profiles at Debidue Beach was not armored and not
overtopped by the storm. (The dune crest elevation of this profile was about +21 ft
NGVD) Volumetric erosion above the +9.8 ft contour was 15.9 cy/tt -- a conservative
representation of the erosion above the SWFL. Total erosion above 0.0 ft NGVD was
about 22.7 cy;tt. The +6.6 ft and +9.8 ft contours retreated 33 ft and 100 ft, respeMively.
is
w
J
~ O
- ~
- •
:._~ t0
_
a
.. _-_ .._ ._ ~-_. ::-
_
~
- ~, _...
~ _. _. _. i.. _
- - , o
__
_'- __ _ o
___.-
is
__ i
- __..
__ __
-
__ __ __
~
__ __~_ I
_ _1 i-- ~
I )
_. i - I ~
~ i _._ - ._ _
I_ _.
-
i o
o
-
'_
_
y
x1=
-_~ ~ • -
t ~
-~ 1_-_ i ._a Q
__
- I
~ -J
- O W
.
. _ _
_ _i
¢a
-= I __1 ._
1 . ~
t I
. __ _
_ - ~ ~
~ _ _
.
- ` - - -
- - ~
----- 1. - - - -- - - c w
-- t ` - -i- \ _ _ -_~ U
.._._ _ _ _ - _-_ W
_ 1 Q
I ~
- ~ t j ~
` Q ' O W
__ _
- _ __ _ O
_
--
. ~-. _ _
~ t _
_- . _ _ -rt t- ~.-_
.. _~ -_____._ _
-
J
--
_._-
.-
..-- _
- ____.__
r--~- _
_ _._-._. _-._
----~ -'-- -- --
-_,
LL
__
-
• --- --'--
_- -
,-- ---' v~
-
- i
_
__ _- ~'%~~ x
Q ~ - t t - ~
-~>~ ~, in
}
1
< O --
- _ _
' _
S~
o 3
_ _
-
- _'
~ -- ~
x i __ }
-
~ ,_ ,-
;Ii I11 ' ~1-i - I - ~~ ii -ilil it-i
O O O O O O
n + o+ r
(13/A3) 'l'3'M'S 3~09tl NOISOki3 3N(10 03df1Stl3 W
7a
These 38 median mezsurements of dune erosion are plotted in Figure 2.
Hallermeier and Rhodes (1988) suggested that the data are described by the relationship:
Erosion above SWFL (cy/tt) = 3.19 (Return Period (vrsJ)°~~
with an empirical error of ± 29%. This relationship implies that a 100-yr event will result
in erosion of about 20 ± 5.8 cubic yards per ft alongshore above the SWFL -- or 540 ±
156 cubic feet per ft. This value has been adopted by the Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA, 1988) as the minimum volume which the primary dune must
feature above the 100-yr SWFL and seaward of the dune crest so as not to be subject
to breaching or inundation during that storm. The 100-yr storm erosion value of '540
ft'/ft' gives this policy the common name of "the 540 Rule.'
The Hallermeier relationship from which FEMA formulates its dune erosion policy
indicates that dune erosion rates of 20 cY/ft are expected median values for the 100-yr
event (measured above SWFL). Likewise, erosion of up to about 26 cy/ft is the expected
upper limft for the 100-yr event. In the Hallermeier & Rhodes database, the largest dune
erosion value measured for the 100-year event is 30.5 cy/it. The largest value of all is
42.5 cylft, as measured fora 300-vear event along the Dutch coast.
One can condude from the database, then, that dune erosion above the 100-year
SWFL may be typically about 20 cy/ft; may be reasonably expected to total up to about
26 cy/ft; may in extreme cases reach up to 31 cy/ft; and are unlikely to approach 43 cy/ft.
The DNR projedions of dune erosion above the 100-yr SWFL at AtlantidNeptune
Beach, using the FEMA flood level of +11 ft, range from 21 cf'/ft to 59 cy/ft (see Table
1). The DNR median value, 35 cy/ft, is 75% greater than the median value suggested
by the dune erosion database; and is 15% greater than the largest 100-yr storm erosion
value in the database. For one-quarter of the profiles, the DNR prediction of dune
.~
13
fable "[. Cu..~.ya ri sor. of Erosion Volumes Computed at Atlantic/
[:e ptur,e i4each by DNR and EDUNE (Kriebel) !42lhodologies.
PROE-* LE
R-4S
k-46
R-48
R-51
R-53
R-56
NAX
MEDIAN
MEAN
S. DEV
Cnm_n uteri Net Erosion
(CY/FT)
above NVGD = 0.0 Ft
DN P. EDULJE
-66.9 -18.2
-79.6 -22.2
-75.3 -22.0
-72.2 -20.2
-63.5 -18.2
-75.0 -2U.1
-79.6 -22.2
-73.6 -20.2
-72.1 -20.2
5.9 1.7
Computed !riot Erosion
(CY/r'i)
above SWFI. _ +11 ft
DNR EDUNE
-33.1 -17.3
-46.3 -23.1
-45.9 -22.2
-33.1 -19.8
-27.8 -15.2
-27.0 -15.9
-96.3 -23.1
-33.1 -16.6
-35.5 -18.1
8.5 3.6
Table 3: Comparison of Horizontal kecession Predictions Computed
at Atlanti c/Neptune Beach (Valu es in FEET.)
EDGE OF
+6.6 F T CONTOUR +9.8 FT CONTOU R SCARP'
PAOFiLE DNR EDUNE DNR EDUNE DNR EGUNE
R-44 -122 -16 -196 -52 -49 +8
R-46 -98 +15 -187 -96 -105 -13
k-48 -110 0 -195 -90 -112 -11
R-51 -132 -19 -195 -45 -73 +32
R-53 -125 -12 -215 -60 -36 +22
f<-55 -183 -12 -229 -69 -37 +16
!9ean -128 -7 -203 -51 -69 +9
S. Dev 29 13 16 9 34 18
alive to estimate developed by the FEN~F. "550 Rule"
12
I
(~
W Z L
~ ~ C
w ~.
o -
~ J
in w Q
w >_
Z LL Y C
~-
a
~..
8rWWJ
L W .
~~~ -.
W ...
J .
4~4W
H W
H
O44
~O ~
~ J~ d
~~ WpWp
O
~W
III W
'
i
i
,'
i ~
L
B n
[V --
m
-a
-m
m
_~
lD
H
m
O Z
P W
F
Z
O
F
m L
n ~
W
V
Z
O Q
H
N ~
H
0
W
J
T
N
m
lD N- .~ n ID N m N ID
cUn~JN '1~) NOIIVA3"13
n
r
~.~.
1
r
F-
J Z
> > O
~ U
i w
o --
c ~ J
i° w Q
a w ~
z w Y O
O LL
I
~ ,
WmJ
oQ
1W~
'
I
hN
.. d'
W ....
J
~
+W W
i
I
J
J
i.
-.
(J.
~~~
J~
~
~
6
~ i
~~
ww
II, ,
_ __
m ID B ID
N ID N "
(OA~JN
m
-m
m
m
Q
B
_~
C1
F
F
_~ Z
N ~
Z
-m U
~~
W
U
Z
m ~'
y
O
m
m
m
N
u
u
v.
C
w
m
~ M
m iu m w m -w m '
. ~ n ID N m N ID
'l~ l NOIlbA3"13
io
~(.
1
}
Z
J W C
p Z
Q ~
i p
o w
v 4
~ J
W ~
a m
~ w ~
Z w
p u' Y
~,
~ -~
s
~~
1- JJJ
L W..
N~~
W. ..
I
~J
J
_
4
~~ ,
O
~
¢~
~~
~
I ~
Ili I '
i
i
,
I
I
I i
~
1 ~
i
~____
m ID m lD m
p n lD N ~ .0
N
(pAON 'l~ l
ID m ID m lU
n ID N O N
NOI1V~3~3
m
m
9
B
Nl
O ~
O Z
N W
F
Z
E
m O
W
W
v
z
a
~ H
N
0
.B
m
.B
N
i ti
H
m ~
B ~
tD
s
Q
1
(}'
W J Z
Z ~ ~
~¢ O
w o U
~- a
J 'n J
w Q
Z ¢ w ~
w Y LL p
~~\
W0W
i .-.
~J
8m
L W..
N~+
..c
w..
J
LLLL~WW
~Hw
J~~
4
w0
gww
~~'
~ . ~'
to m W
n lD N
f (C~JN
n
m to m in m ' in m '
O ~ ~ N m N ID
'1 a l NOIlV~3~3
a
m
-m
in
.m
P
_m
F
.~ Z
N ~
Z
0
F
d ~
'm O
~~
W
W
Z
m H
~.
0
m
m
m
N
u
a
o w
V
i
(k
F
W L
Z ~ C
0 K L
W ~
- o _
J N <
~ W ~ ~
Z Y
-. ,
~..
--
~
--~ r --
--
~ o
mow..
N
Z
K
w ....
~
ww
4JJ
l
~ a~°
a
Jaa
a
i
o~w
&
~w
w
II1
i
)
)
i
i
~.
I ~ I
m ~ O w
m n ~ _N
N ~ (C~`JN
m l0 O tD
B n lD N
'1~) NOI1`JA3~3
m LD
B N
9
h
H
F
sZ
NW
E
Z
O
F
O O
W
U
Z
Q
m
N
O
m
.B
N
M
B ~
ID
a
c~
H
L
V
V
I
F
Z
w C
J ? (.-
I W Q
O
O J
~ W
" [D
Q W
~ ~ Q
Z W Y
~ W ~-
~ ~ -
I Sr. ,
rJ
OW
m
~~~
..2'
~
~ J~~
~
+WW
{
y
pww
a~~
~~~.
II ~,
i
l
r I
1
I
B Ifl B L W m lD m lD
l9 n W C. ~ T W N B N
N ~ ~ ~ ~
(O~~Jty 1~) NOIlV~3~3
d
m
m
P
m
B
f'1
F-
CL
~~
mZ
N LJ
Z
O
L
m O
CL
W
U
Q
'0 ~
(n
H
_~
i
B
N
m
M
m ~
IO
ti
u
w
7
c
w
6
Figures to through 1f illustrate the pre- and post-storm beach profiles predicted
at six arbitrarily-selected locations along the study area. The figures include the results
developed by the DNR and EDUNE models and by FEMA me!hodology (described
below).
For these six profiles, Tables 2 and 3 respectively compare the volumetric erosion
and horizontal recession predicted by the DNR and EDUNE models.` From Tabla 2, the
DNR eroded volume prediction is consistently 3.6 times greater than the EDUNE result
above 0.0 h NGVD, and 2.0 times greater above the +11 h still water flood level. From
Table 3, the DNR prediction o/ the horizontal recession is 120 feet greater than the
EDUNE result at the +6.li K contour, and 150 feet greater at the +9.8 h countour. DNR's
erosion prediction of the dune crest (i.e., the edge o/ scarp) is 50 h to 105 R greater
than the EDUNE results.
FEMA Values of Dune Erosion for the 100-Year Storm.
Hallermeier and Rhodes (1988) described 38 separate cases of duneface retreat
as a function of storm intensity. The retreat data represent the volumetric erosion per unit
dune-width measured above the still water flood level (SWFL). The storm intensities
represem the recunence interval, or return period, for each measured SWFL. These 38
cases indude hunicane and extratropical storm impacts in 11 Atlantic- and Gulf-coast
states with 'particularly good representation of sites in Florida, North Carolina, New
Jersey, and New York'. Five of the cases indude data from particularly extreme
extratropical storms collected along the Dutch North Sea coast. About halt of the 38
reported data points represent the median erosion computed for multiple profiles subject
to the same storm. In each case, and for each profile, the dune was not breached by the
storm of interest.
Input parameters for each model were purposefully identical: A=0.143 ft"'; H, = 10 ft;
DNR 36-hr hydrograph with Sm,, = 13.2 ft; slopes = 0.018 to 0.020. .-
s
'Fable 1: DNR Prediction of Dune Recession. and
Volumetric F.r onion; Atlantic and
Nept un^ 3caches , k'lorida
Itorizoutal Contour Vo_u;ne C hanya
Change (ET) (CY!ET) a`uuve
PROF.
` t6.6 ft +9.8 it +0.0 ft +11 it
39 -172.0 -2"10.0 -98.80 -47.10
90 -170.0 -238.0 -90.80 -39.60
41 -185.0 -210.0 -70"80 -20.80
42 -150.0 -155.0 -55.70 -27.00
43 -198.0 -180.0 -85.20 -41.60
_
q.: -122.0 -196.0 -66.90 -33.10
0 95 -102.0 -185.0 -91.30 -59.30
45 -98.0 -187.0 -79.60 -46.30
47 -82.C -185.0 -85.80 -53.20
F 48 -110.0 -195.0 -75.30 -45.40
< 49 -92.0 -18E.0 -66.80 -37.80
SG -103.0 -175.0 -70.70 -35.10
51 -132.0 -196.0 -72.20 -33.10
52 -126.0 -198.0 -76.G0 -35.00
MAX. -185.0 -270.0 -98.80 -59.30
MEDIAN -126.0 -195.0 -76.00 -39.60
MEAN -128.0 -197.0 -76.28 -39.60
S.DEV 32.6 28.0 10.52 10.20
Horizontal Contour Volume Change
Change (FT) (CY/FT) above
PROF. +6.6 ft +9.6 ft +0.0 ft +11 ft
s 53 -125.0 -215.0 -63.50 -27.80
59 -139.0 -200.0 -66.40 -28.00
m 55 -88.0 -185.0 -59.90 -25.80
56 -183.0 -229.0 -75.00 -27.00
57 -158.0 -238.0 -E9.00 -22.90
58 -159.0 -236.0 -68.20 -23.60
59 -155.0 -232.0 -75.90 -26.30
t9AX. -183.0 -238.0 -75.90 -28.00
t9EDIAN -155.0 -232.0 -69.00 -27.00
MEAt+ -193.1 -219.3 -67.56 -25.89
S.CEV 30.2 20.2 7.14 2.12
ATLANTIC AND NE^TUNE BEACH (Combined)
MAiC. -185. 0 -270 .0 -58.80 -59.30
MED; 747 -139 .0 -198 .0 -75.00 -35.G0_
MEAN -133 .0 ~-204 .4 -74.?0 -35.01
S.i;EV 31 .9 27 .4 10.68 10.69
4
In short, the EDUNE model successfully predicU volumetric and horzonta! dune
retreat based on internal calibration rather than by the use of ad hoc multipliers. The
EDUNE model calibrated solely upon the Hurricane Eloise data has been subseeuently
demonstrated to successfully predict dune erosion at other locations in the United Slates
and Europe for both extreme and high-frequency storm events. The ability of-the DNR
model to predict the erosion in these other cases is not known.
This author has found that the DNR model consistently predicts much greater
volumetric and horizontal recession of the dune in Florida relative to the EDUNE model.
It is speculated that the root of this overprediction is DNR's use of the 2.5 multiplier.
While it is recognized that it is in Florida's interest to conservatively estimate dune erosion
due to storms; it is suggested that Florida's interest would be better served if the basis
for such predictions was a model which provides more physically consistent results.
The following pages describe the extent to which the DNR model overpredicts
dune erosion in Atlantic and Neptune Beaches relative to the EDUNE model, and relative
to measurements of dune erosion due to high frequency stones and severe storms such
as Hurricane Hugo in South Carolina.
Comparison of DNR and EDUNE Erosion Results.
DNR bases it's 100-year prediction of dune erosion in Atlantic and Neptune Beach
upon a storm surge elevation of +13.2 ft NGVD. The DNR results, expressed in terms
of both volumetric antl horizontal dune recession, are listed in Table 1. The volumetric
erosion is described both above 0.0 h NGVD (approximately mean sea level) and above
+17 ft NGVD. The latter elevation corresponds to the Federal Emergency Management
Agency's (FEMA) estimate of the 100-year flood level for Atlantic and Neptune Beach.
The horizontal profile recession is described ai the +2 m (+6.6 ft) and +3 m (+9.8 h)
NGVD contours.
(1984), which has been subsequently revised and unproved to yield the most recent dune
erosion model, EDUNE (Kriebel, 7989). It is noted that other recent models have also
been deyeloped which yield results similar to those of EDUNE (Vellinga, 7983; Larson
and Kraus, 7989); however, this paper will limit discussion to the Kriebel/Dean type
energy dissipation models.
The current DNR model is not physically based but relies upon an overall erosion
response feature characteristic of the Kriebel model (FDNR, 1984). The model was
calibrated upon measurement of dune erosion caused by Hurricane Eloise in Walton
County. Florida in September 7975. After initial calibration, it was found that the model
underpredicted the horizontal dune recession of the most severe cases by a factor of 2
to 3. Accordingly, the erosion predictions developed by the DNR model are multiplied by
a fador of 2.5. The point at which this mult~olier is presently applied is not dear. That
is, it is not certain to this author whether it is applied to the eroded volume, to the
maximum predicted horizontal recession, orto some other geometric aspect of the eroded
profile. (K is noted that ad-hoc multiplication of the eroded volume violates the models'
prindple of conservation of mass; that is, a greater volume of sand will be eroded from
the dune than is deposited on the lower beach profile. While DNR admits that its model
is not physically based; this nonetheless undermines the level o'. reality of the model
which is successfully retained in other more current models.)
On the other hand, the EDUNE model was calibrated upon the same dataset but
used a different set of calibration parameters integral to the model's mechanics. The
extreme outliers in the dune erosion dataset were discarded and twenty profiles --
weightedtowards the more severe erosion cases -- were selected for spedfic calibration.
Calibration was conducted on the basis of the sectional volume which was eroded, not
upon the extent of horizontal retreat. After calibration the model was found to reasonably
predict the erosion profiles and volumes witnin about ± 25%, at worst (Kriebel -- personal
communication.
2
THE STATE OF FLORIDA'S PREDICTION OF DUNE EROSION ALONG
ATLANTIC AND NEPTUNE BEACH
A Coastal Engineering Analysis
Prepared by
Kevin R. Bodge, Ph.D.
Olsen Associates,lnc.
February 20, 7992
Introduction
In accordance with Florida Statute 761.053 the State of Florida Department of
Natural Resources (DNR) is obliged to establish and periodically update the Coastal
Construction Control Line along Florida's coastal counties. Central to this effort is the
prediction of the storm surge elevation and dune erosion associated with the 100-year
storm event. The 100-year storm surge elevation is developed through aprobabilistic-
based bathystrophic computer model. The dune erosion associated with this stone event
is then predicted through aphysically-based computer model. The dune erosion
prediction provides estimates of both the volume of sand eroded from the dune and the
horizontal retreat of the dune face. The latter is the primary basis for the establishmerrt
of the coastal construction control line (CCCL). The present paper addresses the
methodology employed by DNR to predict the dune erosion through consideration of the
results recently developed for Atlantic Beach and Neptune Beach, Duval County, Florida.
It is this author's understanding that DNR utilizes a simplified algorithm developed
from the well-known dune erosion model of Kriebel and Dean (1984, 1985) which is
based upon principles of equilibrium energy dissipation. Models of such nature have
been shown to produce reliable estimates of dune erosion due to severe storms within
the limrations of the current state-of-the-an in coos;al engineering (Birkemeir et al., 1987).
However, it can be argued that the DNR dune erosion model does not represent state-of-
the-er,. This is because the model is a simplification of the complete Kriebel/Dean model
a 'technical ohiections were raised to the setting of the 1992 Control Line,
which reasons still exist, and are documented in the report by Olsen Associates (report
attached hereto).
b. Substantially the same model and procedures used to re~stabhsh the Duval
County Coastal Construttion Control Line have been found erroneous enough to
commission an expensive revision of the Coastal Construction Control Line model.
c. The newest Coastal Construction Comrol Line model has been found
seventy flawed in a Peer Review Group report commissioned by the State of Florida
(report attached hereto).
d. The Coastal Construction Control Line set in 1976 adequately and
reasonably refleAed over half a cemury of storm, erosion, and construction location data
for Duval County.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT:
a. The Coastal Construction Comrol Line az re-established m 1992 be
revoked for the coastline of Duval County immediately.
b The trtore restrictive of; the Duval County Coastal Conswction Comrol
Line of 1976, or a Coastal Construction Control Line as delineated by Duval County
municipalities, be established for the Duval County coasthrte immed%ately.
This Resolution shall take effect irtttrxdiately upon passage.
PASSED by the City Commission of Atkuttic Beach, Florida,
this day of 1995.
Attest
MAUREEN KING
City Clerk
Approved az to form and Cortectttess-.
.ALAN C. JENSEN
City Attorney
LYMAN T. FLETCHER
Mayor
\5'HFRE:15 at the time of establishing the new Coastal Construction Control Linc
certain objections to it, occasioned by consideration of mathematical, historical, coastal
seawall and coastal rock armoring, 100 year storm Gequency and reach of impact
correctness, were raised by Cuval County citizens, and
WHEREAS the Coastal Constmction Comrol Line re-established in Duval County
in 1992 did not account for the active beach profile as required by State rule at the time of
re-establishment, and
WHEREAS the mathematical model used for the establishment of the Duval
County Coastal Construction Control Line was subsequently and substantially revised at
great cost to the State of Florida through considerations of complaints of citizens, and
WHEREAS the State of Florida commissioned a Peer Review Group to study the
newest model to be used to set subsequent Coastal Construction Control Lines, and
WHEREAS the Peer Review Group in their final report of lantrary 3-5, 1995,
formally expressed in writing in detail serious objections to the new Coastal Construction
Control Line model, specifically, concern with consistency oC, and scientific basis for,
numerical models used for the Line, and the extent to which coastal t7rtnoring should be
accoumed f or in the establishment of the Line, and in partiwlar, called for rejection of the
ad hoc 2.5 multiplier used in model calibration, and
WHEREAS application of the new model used without the ad hoc 2.5 multiplier
will frequently place the Coastal Construction Control Line well to semumd of the original
/97G CoasW Construction Control Line (emphasis added), and
WHEREAS now neither the previous rtor the newest mathematical model will
serve to precisely determine the proper location for a Coastal Construction Control Line
on the heavily armored, Duval County wastline, and
WHEREAS considerable hardship has already occurred on the Duval wunty
coastline by residents wishing to preserve, protect, and enjoy property well landward of a
reasonably set 1976 Control Line, said hardship being directly attributable to placemem of
the 1992 Control Line, and
WHEREAS the best protection of fragile wastal resources may be by those
stewards closest and most directly benefited and affected by the natural forces on our
COdti15
THEREFORE. BF IT RESOLVED BY 7HE CITY COMMISSION OF
ATLANTIC BEACH. FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS:
"fhe Honorable Virb~nia B Wetherell. Secretary of the Florida Department of
F.mironmemal Protection, be requested to<ettsider at the executive level, certain points
that would inFluence placemem of a new Coastal Construction Comrol Line in Duval
County, Florida, namely
!`ormdssiom~r Weiss
FiF.SOI.U'I'I0Y
95-23
A RFSOI.i'TIOk OP TI IP. CITY OP :\TL~\1'TIC
ItP ACI1, FLORIU,~ REQUES"ITNG THIi
SECRETARY OF THC: FLORIDA DGPARTAIENT
OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTEC7TON TO
R[VIF:W CERTAIN ASPECTS OP THE COASTAI.
CONSTRUCTION CONTROL LINE AS RE-
ESTABLISHED FOR DUVAI, COUNTY,
FLORIDA, IN JULY, 1992, AND TO ESTABLISH
A NEW COASTAL CONSTRUCTION CONTROL
LINE FOR MUNICIPALITIES IN DUVAL
COUNTY IMMEDIATELY.
WHEREAS cooperation among State, county, and local govemmrnts is desirable
and beneficial to all citiums, and
\4'HEREAS State, county, and local govemments are increasingly aware of the
need for environmental protection and enhancement, and
WHEREAS those governments closest to a problem frequemly suffer most, and
yet provide the best remedies, and
WHEREAS most of the ten miles of Duval County coastline have been settled,
occupied, and reasonably developed and preserved by local citizens for well over sevrnry
years, and
WHEREAS massive concrete seawalls and granite armoring along the Duval
County coastline constructed at various times since the 1920s have functioned as planned
in reducing norm damage to beach and upland imereris, and
WHEREAS wch seawalls and granite armoring, having successfully resisted
equivalent to ] 110 year storm action is now buried beneath vegetated sand dunes resulting
from the ongoing beach re-nourishment project of the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, and
is now only partially exposed to erosion forces, and
WHEREAS in March of 1976 the State of Florida establisFkd in Duval Couny a
Coastal Construction Control Line that was both empirically cortex, and seaward of the
majority of sevemy year old riructures on the seacoast and
WHEREAS there have been no appreciable costs to the State noted by
implementation of the 1976 Coastal Construction Comrol Line, nor has rt noticeably
affected a homeowner's ability to preserve and prrnecl his residence, and
WHEREAS a new Coarial Conriruction Comrol Line was established for Duval
County in 1992 that was landward of the 1976 Coastal Construction Comrol Line, and
well landward of a line of coastal residences, the majority being of great age. and
NAME OF
COMMflS. ~--
M -
S ~
v
Y -~i
v
NJ
Minutes. Page 6
July L9, 1995 i
...referred [o a letter trom Senator Craham relative to -
renourishment of the beaches and suggested sending
letters, etc., in an efTOrt to keep rer.ourishment Trom
being stopped.
Commissioner Meiss:
...advised a meeting of the Restoration Advisory Board
would be held August 17, 1995 at 6:30 p. m.
...inquired whether there should be a stop sign at 10th
Street and Beach Avenue.
..advised he had received a complaint from a Neptune
Beach resident concerning an Atlantic Beach police
ofticer, and offered to meet with Chief Thompson and the
complainant.
Mayor Fletcher:
..indicated he vas pleased to have a reduction of .6
mills for the upcoming year.
...reported he had met with Mayor Delaney on several
occasions and vas working toward a settlement of the
dispute with Jacksonville.
There being no further business the Mayor adjourned the
meeting at 8:55 p. m.
Lyman T. Fletcher
Mayor/Presiding Officer
A T T E S T:
Maureen Ring
City Clerk
NAME OF
COMMflS.
~ -r _~~
~, ,,
~ ~~
Minutes, Page 5
July 29, 1995
lessons were being offered, summer camp at Donner Park -
haA begun, as yell as other activities. The Commission
commended Mr. Johnson for his accomplishments.
7. _ Reports and/or requests troy City_Cguissioners City
Attorn~ and_City Clerk.
Commissioner Weiss felt the renovations to the auditorium
in the Adele Grage Community Center needed to be
completed.
A discussicn ensued concerning the city's waste water
Treatment Plant at Buccaneer. Bob Kosoy reminded the
Commission that at their request on every purchase over
$100,000 the city prequalified contractors. He reported
the city received only three prequaiif ication Dackages,
but only two prequalified. Thus, there would be only two
bids to open on Thursday, July 27, 1995. He indicated
references were checked on the two prequalified
contractors and each received gloving references.
Following discussion, it vas decided to proceed with the
job.
Commissioner Waters:
..referred to recent discussion concerning naming the
park bounded by Sixteenth Street, Ocean Boulevard, and .
Seminole Road. He suggested the name of Mandalay
Memorial Park, and the placing of a memorial in
recognition of Atlantic Beach citizens who had served the ~
community, as well as the names oL all city
Commissioners.
...inquired regarding the problem of untethered
surtboards, to which Chief Ruley replied that lifeguards i
were stopping individuals from having untethered boards. ~
and on occasion were asking people to leave the beach if
their boards were untethered. He added staff was
preparing language to be placed in the city ordinance.
...inquired regarding the 16th Street Crossover and was
advised that work should be completed by [he end of
August.
Commissi~iner Shaughnessy:
..-commended the Mayor regarding the successful work
regard~nq Dutton Island. _
...:.uyyested that the name of Glover G. Weiss Memorial
Perk be added Lo the list of proposed names for the park
bounded by Sixteenth Street, Ocean Boulevard, and
NAME OF
~
COMMAS.
~
M~
S
°~
Y
~
N
Minutes, Page 4
July 29, 1995
Jason Kerr, Firefighter, requested authorization to trade
an Atlantic Beach Fire R S-1 Im ini pumper) for a Ponta
Vedra S-lU Iwalk in rescue). It was explained the
Atlantic Beach Fire Department and the Jacksonville Beach
Fire Department came up with an agreement wherein
Jacksonville Beach would take on confined =_pace rescue
and Atlantic Beach would take on dive rescue. It was
further explained Atlantic Beach did not have a vehicle
to serve its needs for the implementation of the
agreement, but that Ponta Vedra had such a vehicle.
After a series of talks a trade agreement had been
reached, and commission approval was recommended at this
time to approve the trade of the trucks.
HAUGHNESS X X
Motion: Authorize the trade of an Atlantic Beach ATERS X X
Pire R S-1 (mini VusPerl for a Ponta Vedra 5-10 EISS x
(walk in rescue) LF.TCHER X
Following a brief discussion the question was called and ~
the motion carried unanimously.
D. Authorize completion of Additive Bid "F" for the
Atlantic Beach Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion
Project
Rob kosoy, Public Works Director, explained on April 24,
1995 the City Commission awarded the contract for the
Atlantic Reach Waste Water Treatment Plant Expansion
Project to Indian River Industrial Contractors, Inc. The
Commission decided to delay Additive Bid "F"
(construction of the new aeration system in the DAVCO
Plan[ - $66,'/001 until a later date. He indicated over
$50,000 had been expended in recent years in repairs, and
he recommended mod itications be made now, since the price
of steel would increase August 1, 1995. He felt locking
in prices now would be in the city's best interest. He
indicated no major change orders were anticipated at this
time. S IAUGHNESSY ~X X
W S
Motion: Authorize completion of Additive Rid "P" ISS %
Yor Atlantic Beach Waste Water Treatment P1antF ETCHER X
Expansion Project
Followiny discussion, the question was called and the
vote resulted in 3-1 with Mayor Fletcher voting nay. The .
motion care ed.
6. City Manager Reports and/or Cories~ondence_
trim Leinbach, City Manager, asked Timmy Johnson,
Recreatlou Director, to yive a report on recent
~o~~,~
af'1, VltleS. mC. aunnnuu Teti va ie~ .,ua~ ~~.•.~•~•
__
NAME OF
COMMHS. i
M !~
S Y yl
1 NJ
Minutes, Paqe 3
~ - j-
July 29, 1995
tee-sF~irts and race programs on the beach. -
Mayor Fletcher explained that application to hold the
event antl permission for related activities should be
matle to the City Manager.
Kim Leinbach, City Manager, explained several meetings
had been held between Mr. Davie, the Fire Chief, Police
Chiet, and himself, and that it was agreed Motor Sport
Holdings would pay for anc expenditures the city would
incur over its normal quota of expenditures.
Following discussion, Mr. Davie was asked to meet with
staff.
5. New Business:
A. Appointment to the Code Enforcement Board to fill
the seat vacated by John Venn
Mayor Fletcher asked the Commission for suggestions for
appointment to the Code Enforcement Board. Suzanne
Shaughnessy suggested Mark Beckenbach, and Commissioner
waters suggested Rick Mann. Mayor Fletcher asked that
the matter be placed on the next agenda.
B. Set tentative millage rate for PY 1995/96 and
approve budget calendar
It uas explained as required by the TRIM section of
Florida Statute 200.065, the City must set the proposed
millage and tha date for the public hearing on the
tentative budget. Mayor Fletcher suggested that the City
Commission set the proposed millage at 3.1721, with
tentative budget hearing on September 11, 1995, and final
budget hearing on September 25, 1995.
HAUGHNESS X X
Motion: Set the proposed millage at 3.1721, with ATERS X ~ X
tentative budget hearing on September I1, 1995, and EISS i X
final budget hearing on September 25, 1995 LETCHER ~ X
Under discussion, it was explained that the tentative
1995-96 tax rate was lower by 60 cents per $1,000 of
assessed property value than last year's rate. Kim
Leinbach, City Manager, asked for one additional week to
submit the budget, and the Commission concurred.
The question was called and the motion carried
unanimouslc.
C. Approve exchange of vehicles between Atlantic Beach
and Ponte Vedra ReaM F'i ra Dana rt~ents
NAME OF ' I I J I y
COMMRS. IM!. S'~~Y~N
Minutes, Page 2
July 24, 1995
No discussion before the vote. The motion carried
unanimously.
S. Action on Resolutions:
A. Resolution No. 91-22 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF
ATLANTIC BEACH, PLORIDA SHOWING SUPPORT FOR A
PARTNERSHIP WITH THE CITY OF JACKSONVILLE IN THE ~
DEVELOPMENT OF DUTTON ISLAND AS AN INTItACOASTAL
WATERWAY PARK
Mayor Fletcher presented in fu12, in writing, Resolution
No. 95-22. HAUGHNESS X
X
ATERS I
X
Motion: Approve passage of Resolution 95-22 EISS X X
LETCHER X
Thomas Dumas, Real Estate Agent, indicated he represented
I
Walter E. Dutton, owner of Dutton Island. Mr. Dumas
Jacksonville Land Trust Board,
th
e
explained he served on
rd had designated Dutton Island as its number
B ~
oa
and the
one priority for purchase. He explained he had been
asked to assist Atlantic Beach in their application
lso
process for the Preservation 2000 grant, and that he a
Jacksonville Planning
had been working with the
He explained the City of Jacksonville had
Department.
agreed to provide 100 percent of the f.undsd to acquire
the property.
or Fletcher explained that he envisioned the property
Ma
y
to be handicap-accessible with passive recreational uses.
Mc. Dumas asked that signs prohibiting dumping be placed
on the property.
The question was called and the motion carried
unanimously.
At this time Steven Davie joined the meeting and Mayor
Fletcher invited him to address the Commission.
A. Report by Steven Davie relative to Jacksonville
International Offshore Grand Priz to be held August
10-13, 1995
i
Steven Davie, Acting Director for Motorsport Holdings,
Inc., explained this year's boat race would begin at -
Hanna Park and would end 300 teet north of the
Jacksonville Beach Pier. He indicated there would be 103
race teams. He asked permission to block otf Atlantic
Boulevard, from 1st to 2nd Street, the same as normally
blocked oft for Town Center events. He asked Dermission
to sell beer and refreshments, and to sell promotional
INU'1'ES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF ATLANTIC BEACH CITY
'OMMISSION HELD IN CITY HALL, 800 SEMINOLE ROAD, AT 7:15
'M ON MONDAY, JULY "l9, 1995
PRESENT: Lyman T. Fletcher, Mayor
J. Dezmond Waters, III,
Suzanne Shaughnessy
Robert G. Weiss, Jr. Commissioners
AND: Kim D. Leinbach, City Manager
~
~
AME OF
COMMRS.
M
I
T'
I
O
N I
I~
~
S
E
C
O
N
D
~~
0
T
E
D
Y
£
S ~
~~
0
T
E
D
N
O
Maureen King, City Clerk
ABSENT: Steve Rosenbloom (Excusedi
Che meeting was called to order by Mayor Fletcher. The
invocation was followed by the pledge to the flag. i
1. Approval of the minutes of the regular meeting
1995
of July 10 HAUGHNESS X
, ATERS X
Notion: Approve minutes of the regular EIS
CHER X X
X
meeting of July 10, 1995 LET
So discussion before the vote. The motion carried
unanimously.
2. Recognition of yis itors:
A. Report by Steven Davie relative to Jacksonville
International Offshore Grand Prix to be held August
10 - 13, 1995 (It was decided to address this
matter later in the agenda when Mr. Davie would be
in attendance)
Richard Johnson, B57 Bonita Road, complimented the Code
Enforcement Department of the City relative to resolving
problems on Bonita Road.
Consent Agenda:
3
.
Acknowledge receipt of Recreation Oepartmegt report
A
.
relative to summer programs and other recreational
activities
ft. Acknowledge receipt of Public Works projects status
report
C. Authorize execution of Mutual Aid Agreement with
Duval County Sheriff's Office and the City of
Neptune Beach and Jacksonville Beach HAtJGHN_ESS X
ATERS X
Motion: Approve Dassage of Consent Agenda X ~
LETCHER X
Page Two
Agenda
August 14, 1995
B. Authorize purchase of computer software for Fire Department (Chief Ruley)
C. Discussion and related anion relative to completion of the renovations at Adele
Grage Community Center (Mayor Fletcher)
D. Authorize Gruhn-May Construction Company to undertake emergenty
replacement of b2 pump and check valves at "E" sewage lift station at a cost of
55,638.00 (Bob Kosoy)
E. Schedule imerviews with architects for the proposed addition to the Public Safety
Building (Chief Rutty)
7. City Manager Reports and/or Correspondentt
8. Reports and/or requests irom City Commissioner, City Attorney and City Clerk_
Adjournment
IFarry person decides to appeal any decision made by the City Commission with respect to any
matter considered az arty meeting, such person may need a record of the proccedings, and, for
such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim rewrd of the proceedings is made, which
rewrd shall include the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based.
Any person who wishes to spcak to the City Commission on any matter at this meeting should
submit a request to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. Fortes for this purpose are available at
the entrance to the Commission Chambers.
CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH
August 14, 1995
AGENDA
Call to order
Invocation and pledge to [he Bag
1. Approval of the minutes of the Regular Commission Meeting of July 24, 1995
2 Recognition of Viaitots
A. Recognition of Mdrew R. Lindeen
3. Unfinished Business
A. Appointment to the Code Enforcement Board to fill the seat vacated by Jnhn Venn
ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED TO BE
ROUTINE BY THE CITY COMMISSION AND WB.L BE ENACTED BY ONE MOTION IN
THE FORM LISTED BELOW. THERE WII.I. BE NO SEPARATE DISCUSSION OF THESE
ITEMS. ff DISCUSSION !S DESBtED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE
CONSENT AGENDA AND WB.L BE CONSIDERED SEPARATELY. SUPPORTING
DOCUMENTATION AND STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS HAVE BEEN PREVIOUSLY
SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COMMISSION ON THESE ITEMS.
Consent Agenda
A. Acknowledge receipt of Recreation Department Facilities Usage Report for July
1995 (Timmy Johnson)
B. Acknowledge receipt of Code Enforcement report for July 1995 (Don Ford)
C. Acknowledge receipt of Building Department report for July 1995 (Don Ford)
D. Acknowledge receipt of Fire Department report for June and July 1995 (Chief
Rulcy)
5. Action on Resolutions:
A. Adoption of Resolution No. 95- 23 requesting the Florida Department of
Environmental Protection to review certain aspects of the Coastal Construction
Line as reestablished for Duval County in July 1992. (Commissioner Weiss)
New Business:
A. Approve financing for emergenry upgrade o(IBM AS-400 computer (Ann
Mcuse)
tflS O/r S. 2M 6/rrM
t _ fMtlr Y. lafi mat i11 tab d!w! i~~ YwwiM • I .. .
i
7
I!
Z•
_ ~
2w
2f
2i
27
b
Z!
i~
D1
00071i~ IIt~ ~~ s~ iMtlw; wi ~» n ~liitfwr.
.. tfti tyislslaes (9/p E. ~ Ogeap~i
a:llar it~tM sa-~aet d tM eaaaawisstip +i tis taast[tD K
tM saasp, saw. ae ptitr nest +s.. tit.....d..ta.. lass
/~seae is aipl.pa V eW s pat K tae traseet Mass Hari
'aatip as !Le satlae.~ .
t\) l laesl ssalis altloisl wr ssaa . tsrlttw
aaanasiessip !ap ps sattsas. /pwae, ~ sittp
asa.asiastip fast ttslatse to lttri-}ti4dal astip la~+s
Mtacs • lsea0. palls sttlaisl attall sst.~ ~
la.jaiesl.s t. tb petp .s/ seas .dtta• .wpeotip savl
w 11Ms • s.at K tae s+aw~a Mtaes Lttrl clip p taa
..tt.e.
sel weal p-lia - attiaisL '4 .as+tet laaaaeisstla..
a.t sits •idts ass sq esastas ss~t gisiao npaa8as
ppi-yahsisl asllas swaty salsas tip. s3aea ast3Ntlss
ill pt e. pssa.al srsjseisisl W tas .slip St tM
aa~iatssts K Ys iswtiptip, sit. vlslt, se~sa~ert aptdp
is arcs a pas d W acaa salsas lipi astias w tae
pttae. I
1! ta> olasiste. asaa psa.pt ti. pastea/a, ts), tal,
2a w tc3 are it Baia l+sters r aaai.s !aa palls sastly at
Zl said a wb is taus as ssak sattaas, w tact peeps sM
22 >,srs osisips awtraey t. tMas assesarN L ter s-)sets
23 wstariptSw ass /cuss s zpsapals q/aaepitf t. tstYtts K
24 asgas'i is !V eowsiaatir. 7ttis watlr sass pt aaajsst
2S+ laol D•131. attlaLls t. pat III st rigtp 712 tae alt
u ~Yiel ells tai, saasastio.
n ui el~ecs.--tell. saeteas ear as cseteiat tae
u aataaritD at aq Maea oe ....ipia. t. asta~lfsa aslp ae
tt sraaaasea paaraly pills Rsaeigs se oatApb dta lease
Sa plla atlislass.
COSllfit Msr'A a4-iaaaw w •bttami rseM ~jstq~ w aiYlliwr.
Kc~~~
F21~tltii8 ~ V
ties IK/aLtrsa a.ss s: 2.+
1 I iw 2t tawtad w ~• ~tay~taeasr 'at L. s*at..! n«i..:
z
3 laatiw 3. iaatiaa 2/i.rl/S. Fioei4 ft.tatw. L
• eawtai to rwi+ .
6~ tii.ytls iaww is laeal rablia dtiaiab: -
~ tl) Wt•O[t2tl.-t aaiaab oe wia;r.iity M dot r
7 raiiaaaa w saartrtlw ewaviat tM Roaaartiw d renja~lar-
• laos aa'Reta wrrriatiwa rill lwl rv~• r!llrLla w
! aatallialfaf a reswaa t. ~iaalwr os-rnet. ao~ieatior
It rlq cant dlisiala ruraraat to tiL aartiw Q w do-''M +•
11 altaeaatiw pwa toe sal alslrw•- faaws, O!a
12 aaatiw irra cat sa~riea a awaty w ~-- =: ~~ty N dart wr
IS nediweo re tawlrtis art.lli~iq a tlaalaarea rareoa•.
14 ill 0!F»>ZrtM.-b riai is tlia awtlw. !ia tan
15 ~I.aal ~N •!!~~ •aae aq rlaatai nc arrriatat r+lia
la rtliaial rl+l.r • arelr ne nwialral door rM twwoda
17 re laa. ~wd-jdiaial active as a .actor d a traa! rr
U awaladu- Ila lass ~w wt Sanlydr • wine d tta twee
ll R wadwias n! ap stab Mo~7 er wtireity.
2t t!) iR'di rFaall2E0.--4y r+ewa ant ottaeriw
21 reaviita~ w •~•, otw*ae rswiatw, e< .di.wn. wr
22 iiaawa rift aN lwl rilin dtiafal tta areib d asy
23 arttae w atLl active say M tatty tr arY irad R nnaai,arir
2• a rlfet tic loerl rilia dliaial is a andar. 2! sMrtd ill
2! aaraty ae aaaiairal ae~faaara K evrlatioa+ dMeaaao tr tM
2t lallariar rrreaieeaa ata11 eraao. tic Rawrtiw d Rr~vdia
27 aeiaiar .fen ra-rarta waawla.tiwa d!i loeal ro-lia
2f dtisiW.
27 (a) fir aatalaaea n! >a1l os-raetr nwraadw{iw dtl +
3• Leal rritia rltiaial slid sorlataa is paai- jdiaial aatloa
31 raa~ier~tdur tic dtiolai y art Raved Isa~ial N tt+
2
L~IIIO: Ilee~a ertrlad++ an raLtiwaf oaeb y~iW aea aJllllraa
tM3 l,o~iaLia~
C8/iti S, bt b~raraoi
y. wt s.t.tiM ~ +~ t. 7.ea1 filler .
.Kiai~iri o+KiM s. YN.01Sr £.f.{
atNrisih c.~tLs ui as.isipiitia ;•
d.FL .aet~ area r taslt3.r rslat.r
ts.arfaet. aa,a~ia~iar dt~ ~.
altiiaLi fe..iiiN . i.li~ttiai l.'..~3M
!at s.ean t. 1d~ dllaiaLi .dMri~iq
ti.o d rawiK d idaastlos/
~~ ~Siaiaa~ d a }.eta °~
~iaiN lawl zdr a Kai
f~diy r diatiro iota.
mss, ~.wrasa~t is Fleciia Sa oMRt~ i• LD.
aaeaLia. sat ~ ~~ 7ti. Floriir r ~
f@itr tM 1~~ ~~ N ~~ ~ ~° its '.
piai.e~a t. l.aal ~i.at.i Nili~ dtisisl~r ~ .
~Y..latoi ad !+~ dlf.i~ie ar. lrowa.i t.
prt.es hair trtis ;a . lwlsl aar Ie~r ~a• M
1'~f. la~'~afsi ioaideeeeLiM vt 1. iaaai a
aaR.tai, wMtatisl ..i/.sia d e.aet, eai
1~f~1Nr load si.etai ltllie dli.i~is ipaa Mw
aMts+r•bi ae ~i Szw ti. laic ari dt.etir. aiaN.rp d
aw.ir s.ar. f.tW asi soaf.aiW~tia is t. a~aaiw
S,tuFrN.hi~. d ~...i.n v• eei. Caatf, a ieeieda
~ ra.i.rai H q. Nisi fiatriat cart .c~ ige~lr eai
r ff~f. ii.etio s. ~~ I d tM ltat. C.atitvtias
sip SM 1M3s !r. ri.~t f..oa~lf L. as~.r t• i.etra.t
! tLdr saRaa~~wr a~ to 1'Ki~a !s e.i<wa .!
1 ~iwaaaa, ~• ~'
1
Ct~ili~ 1lorste eMdtan aro iai.ils.ei ~'~ lOf~tll~d ero e~Ytiawe.
JENSEN $C HOULD
Armxnns wr Lww
X00 NOR'1}1'M1-D SRtEET
1'O6'r OFFlCE BOX SD{67
JACKSONVIIIE -EMH. I.ORiDA 3290-095]
A6n C. Jenao~
S4phrn A HouW
TdeMone Isom 2962500
Fu (90412969960
August 27, 1995
ME?f0 TO: Atlantic Beach City Commission:
Mayor Lyman 1'. Fletcher
Commissioner J. Dezmond Waters
Commissioner Robert G. Weiss, Jr.
Commissioner Steven Rosenbloom
Commissioner Suzanne Shaughnessy
PROM: Alan C. Jensen, Esq.//
City Attorney ~/',/V
RE: Ex Parte Communications W /h Public Officials
Enclosed is a copy of the 1995 Legislative Act creating §286.0115,
Florida Statutes, for adopting rules regarding ex parte communica-
tions with public officials when a decision must be made in a
quasi-judicial status.
I would suggest that you adopt a resolution pursuant to this newly
created statute, and I will be glad to prepare one for your
consideration at the next scheduled meeting if you instruct me to
do so.
sY,y
PORIIt d PLpIPS, 1 ~\C. ,
]Ni'ERC1iAI3GE GIINE /DODGE
vVh~ ~~'an rONO pfld bM<
(.'~~:~ xk,d Falk Ow~rM dada moo!
egidglan ilwrn M the ir110rdienpa loble. h 17. oJrripMirha
a+il Y ~+eded, K*dP Br Folk aelaa6on in Iallafin 771.170.
iw airpl0 radudlen unib raselM +iilh eamplefe apdtaolion
dwlk
STV Z .. OOdIPARE i1MU~ b~Bei~nMesend
JR - C1rdt TA Toper ~"'a The IIe rod end+e~
b ntaeelad.
1F - $aa Falk 8ulladrt 711.110 b camPwa dMdY.
75C . FaNi aarew aomtil'w drive :ra daHpnnd b CF1.IA
Olordardt V~dv sF~ ww. diamaw, ben. ad
MDUph end afw 17pe~
• N IM fIS. aM8 damatar fa dillermt, d+m0e d+e Aeon or
fMeaa b+alie0 b saN.
• d a mMar moanl o na ord d+e mdw may nod b a
rebadld. CAad~ drronaiWr•
• 0 p+e~ uM f•oc o aoaGi0 /on, odd err fe the
FoK • ar dwck MxrmoM N Ou11eYn 3J t-110.
p111H1810g8L {ARIIMBKOM
tlrk ar.dll+! 18p81U71t
/rp• W ww ~
lya 7W 6113 Ilt to S10 Kp 11
/.• ^.
~~ la•.
nu Sib Fro +.n xss un
n
.... »,, ar 1776 u 1.n" {Sl tt71
~ IIS
t-+ 1775
® ISp 350 IlV UI 1n110
l~M1I qn U13 u IV1 171 IW 711
y~„ m l5a LSf ITI7 7l1 lul >n
_. .... ••r •. nr In IW 611
11a 110 1{71 U! OA i/1 nl1
59+ 1101 U>f 7M 0.11 nl{ f1.4
PA UO 1.19 117 >17l IU7 1W
Ippy8~~8mYCFIO M •:1-16A•78A•
F~ ~ / ~~
pppp~/pt; 8lSIf C
1107 1 1
7113 2 T
6203 7 3
1207 ~ <
6110 s 5
6707 6 6
uls 7 7
uo7 e e
Nis 9 9
6807 10 10
4608 1T iT
• 077rrm w pM ee70 re++aa mat Dave .~...T ~•-- -
d~aga diytdr.
17edre t7R/BC%7
~
~ ..... -~
r
~
+ eY r
r
r
M • n
I 1731 171 7l1 W Ill
j tnf IA I]I 636 frf
t IEO Lo In 3671 wi
~ tm Ill Fn 1111 I1R
s 1.10 W tan OO n/1
/ 7.10 s.a Iw q71 IktS
1 7711 s's lu1 S+u 36u
1 1.671 W 1171 It13 1111
t t07 111 IlM I{57 7677
p l.10 lr IW 11ri till
n rm aJf N,0 n 1{ i/al
M
o.da foirrc
r rr InM v Y 4J y
I Q73t 7A Ill W t1{ >f
t I.Iri i67 7J1 /Si IY O
r I7b >a N 1671 1611 M
/ im UI t7f na 1171 M
f I fp 6r tab OAI 111f i31
1 LW S17 Orl t>n 117{ 7af
7 7.W iN t711 NO ltlf >D
1 im 671 LLtl KY 411 m
•wr •r ur LLr f_!Fl A
p 7.b UI 1071
n 7m 1!{ W
Ire 7
OB- 7 - i8lit7 COMW (~8
au
l
6wJAkob/ Roma ~
O
i
llr
fbr slp7l
5ka8 Moaned
p p°rp' Mbureed
p a ~, ~,,,~„
^ _
.,a
p
~ 7~
UnR/IOlie I7W1
B
:
1
L Bosia lMh/Reto (FM uaaNM~.i Relefrn vMSro
> -
1. Buda lk6VFab lPM
7.7sup6+p gze/Bore c
a
.
fWiinp dk.78are
p~o 2 5.e1 Sloop 0'171
3. t)d+e ]I+rN Dio. IPM ~ ~ ~w , pn wdNaadarp
CooRlp
B
d IPM
3 ~ yd ~ ~ 6~rd &eoi+x - OroV~~-S. SMB Uv
kv
a
.
sirr M8711rar NM
D JR Bldl IdowNad
O Or .. ~ Nlow6ed
l]1X Skr.w Con•a3er
OrYe . u07 Onb s
a Own Ot+l
Tyb~rud IIoM la - Daaad/le^ lP<+I
^~A-A
f
O
d
i
i
Orin
(N`7)
i. UriNPtAie t . Unh/Rd~ 1. ~U pIPM a
-
w
P
(*+r
WBa
U ~,o Tool - Uaw+g6e^ MM
,
.
1'n Rod nd+d^° d Ca6od Folk (or aperid daa~ oP6ana~
i`;.y j 2. ~ SiaAon ~~ u ~ °f° G Y~(171 M~ ~ - 1"T
• kdoded
POY.ER & PLfl~S, INC.' 2971309.: 3!
U
New "Torque Assist" TA toper Bushing
^ Unique tpque Ostia design (Patent Pending) provides the
@ayle5l fCr11aVOL ECSI IrlswNallall, tOOI
• Elimirgras binding wmmon w hvin-taper ondsingle-ROrged
Mnhingt.
^ Concentric operolion minimiTes wobbk avan on worn sfwhs
^ t7uill cover keeps out conwmissanH Ord protects outboard
shoflsml. ,
^ Minimal shah engagement required for reholil5.
• Inboard bushing KKotipn anvr.. high spttd beorkgs by
minimising ahnnw nvarhong.
Contents
Bask lnlormotbn ....... ... ............ . .. 6J
How To Select .......... ........'........ ...... B
Huw TS Ordar ... .. .................... . ......9
Load Chssi&otions ... .... ........... ..... 10
Gan l-Selection Tabk ......... ..... ... ... ..... 11
Cbss II . Sektlbn Talsk .......... .... .... 7 2
Cbss 111 SNetlwn Toblc ... .... ..... ... .... ..... 73
Erpinpering Dow ......................... ..14.17
410718, IF d JX Dimensions 6 Port Nvmhed ..... . 18-19
a 11518, Jf 61X Dimeniwns 8 Port Numbers ..... ..2021
420318, Jf d 1X Dimensons @ Port Number ..... . . 2223
a20)JR, JF d 1X Dimensions 6 Port Numbers ..... ..2425
421 SJN, JF 61SC Dimensions 8 Pod Numhen ..... .. 26-27
430718, 1F 615C Dimersions b Mrt Number ..... .. 28-29
431518, 1F d JX D'"ssereions 6 Pod Numbers ..... ..30.31
4t071R, IF 61X Dimemwns 6 Pon Number ... 7235
t41]1N 6 Jt Uimernions 8 Port Number .... .. 7tr37
450718 8 JF Dimensions b Pon Numbers - - - - ~ - - . .. 3R-39
4]0818 d 1F Dimeneians6 Port Number ........ .. 4aa]
Trough End Diriserssiwn d Pad Numbers ......... . .. a3
Stdnku Steil Ddve Shofts6 PortNUmhers .. .... .....43
Nrminnl $hwnve RniksaR V-NIIa .............. ..... 44
V-sell Guofd SCkchMS ............... ... dS
nterdwigaabiNy ... ... . .......
Quaddv
e ... 4G
/1
..
DeYgn..yhOr15 .... .. .... ... .... ..... .... .. . a7
Jfalk Fodory warrosdy - talk produtls generally cony o
kmhed, ary-ypr worrony agoirdt dClecss in moteriols nr
wwkmonship; but for on actual swtement of the Falk Fodory
Worrpnty, ask your lorol Reprnenwtive or Fob Distr:buwr wr
our Sbndord Conddions d Sok. Form 100~h03.
c iM~ M Www4ua K/1 M1V2 Y Egle tgw.vr ~nM ~ LLi w
rr.V. tWMaeE45TEEaLLII iOAVSatl •o poC+wv in VM~Ve'menynn.N
Eoslest On .. .
7o install, simply pbce the TA blser bushing oswmby onto
the driven slsaN. sl"de the seducer capered hero over the
bushing unJ Ighlen the Ihrcoded nut asM uturew. Folk's TA
Toper design puwidm u vedorm drove orb the super cash
kss d~Hlwhy Ikon IwM-toper or sMglrNanged bushings.
...And Easiest Off!
To remove, loosen the bushirp selxrew, insert talk's cydusive
TA removal Tool and Turn the high speed shah using the gear
sets mechanisol odvamoge bfree the unN off she hushing
taper. Then remove the trot and unit. It's that easy. -.only
wbh Folk!
aW..eneVOMMwdM be (pptlerM1 Y~ntleJ wiflW~lw layer
eerwenwsawr.+r w.vsv EV nyywae s.l..s.
iM. e.wrT or rsrer."..Ew"n ewv ~V1o.r New eby+n+
eal.~w:n ewu r....:~ rwa s" v.4...u e.sw. r+wra was,
ti~ arwaaso~rlut, rl. z-Jl-as :IU zI,
1 ~ balk Quadrive 40pp~
Ouodrive B a fourth genewtron shall mounted drive from
folG. BuiM fq exceptiotgl value, the Ouoddve lseri>1n~ r..._
the WtesT in nxmuloctudng and design mc/ttrok
The Ewnomic AdTgntage_feUular monufon
re9u1 om b reEUq in kuv un» wri. ala
moon o simple, cqh f fl~ve insto
HonnT Wome
service and ~-!ou gY°ronlees imrned'pte
simple worronh, procedures.
Slondard
num ~onrtgf and fools vr'dh publKhe
hers om ovoilabk I d ^"
downtime. °wllY b minimiee repL
M~evoner ~ lea ~fepN PurBod soak on high speed
rier tra ~ and subsfyuent unB kilure. A g
tho+hoh obro omomhgrds before they mn
w entry the geor drive.
udssn
COMlly1NA\llpr
afE,gE WR~f aUAI-llP SeAl3
LfE~ TN[ qt W
Tmditionol lortp life gwdrg-~•s h'
finished, heGwldcsign kalwesb gh hordngy,
ibr maximum kwd caoying copo~ kah and wide
LLC
Jitefs
1M~.~ 2i 71~W :: 2/
Shaft Mounted Dri esv
7-31-Si :10~20AM PORIX & PlA1ffS. INC.
/f~13ZG ~(f
-- --~iT/f ~ /YfA,¢G ---
247I304:x L
'7 3~ 4s
Ctl5i3M~ Lt5 % USING FMK ~xiv~.ex S__
~. ----3L~~LLN~ ~ - -- Gtwow ~C.~ .-
i_. - - ~F.t~_~.4,~,y..n2o.P.E SMw„~-» (~L-~,cc~-S_
_- -!~(~.~w G+k. .~ .~~,, h.a„g ,r~.y fie: ii~rs
Wi~~~ -- -- - _t'~'iAttx, - _-
-- --- FA~!`_ 79g-~ --- foUt~e PMPs ~,~c_3356- S$~
~ - ~,:- -
P
Ta: Marc Chris
Company: City Of AOantic
Phone: 247,5835
Fax: 247-5843
From: Ben Moore
Phone: 904-772-1685
Fax: 904-772-8608
Date: 7/26/905
Pages Including this cover 1
Page:
COMMENTS:
1. Fumy 8 Install (?) podye TDT 915 gear reducer as a
nuccaneer Plant #7:511,043.00. Delivery date 8/30/95.
2 Fumiah & Mstell (1) Faulk Model4415-JR?4 8~r red
the Dodge TDT 915:310,764.00. Delivery : 2 to 5 days.
equal or tester to
..__ _._......._a~~.
CITY OF ATLABTIC BEACH
CITY CONNISSION MEETING
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA ITEM: EOne~9 eTankR apl BuccaneerfWastewater Treatment
Plant ~1I./ m
SOBMITTED BY: Harry E. McNally/Plant Division Director 1'`
DATE: August 24, 1995
BACAGRODND: The West gear reducer on the No. 1. Tank
located at the Buccaneer Wastewater Treatment Plant is out of
service. This gear reducer which turns the paddlewheel for
aeration has been in service since 1982. The oil has been
changed, as recommended, every 6 months. It is important to
note that this gear reducer operates continuously, 24-hours a
day and it is time to replace the gear reducer. Lead Plant
Operator, Marc Christensen, contacted Mr. Ben Moore of PBM
andsthecassociated paddlewheelspand gavehus twoequotesratioa
2. Fau~k replacement - 510,764.00 including installation
Mr. Christensen spoke with several customecswith theiPaulk
gear reducers and found they are very happy
service.
RECOMMENDATION: Replace Dodge Gear Reducer with Paulk Gear
Reducer ASAP for 510,764.00 to Maintain
Propec Aeration b to Comply with DEP
Requirements
ATTACHMENTS: Quotes, References, Catalog Cut
REVIEWED HY CITY MANAG
GENDA ITEM NO. ~ n
E~t Gzozra: 8equirzm_ns 241
ring a lazge amount of span per
u use. Examples of rhae typical
g the use of nblez and ehaia, as
mce rooms. Gymrtasiutns arc an
requira space for the occupana
n (.e., ezertising or sport gamrs)-
Ind similar bench-type seating one
45.7 linear cm).
e occupant bad of an area having
tuned by the number Ot toed SeztS
space serving the n.ed sea's shall
the occupant lose
rson per 1 W cross sg h (g.3 gross
fies the method of calculating the
restaurants anA cafeterias where
ng is used as a k:etcn, wherhe:
r divided from rho dining arts by
c [hat this occupant load is color
q ft (sq m)."This takes into corn
ill be stoves, s!nks, cutting boards,
~raq~ machiner: necesvn' to oper-
areas. one Derscr. per tC0 c:ci; s;
acing rooms. cnc~ res>n D~~ bG rte!
'I'nu mkcs mru .~nvdcrauuu Coe ecurcnce of book-
shcis'<s and pertnancnt aisle- Rcadmg rooms p'pically
hose large magazine racks chairs, couches, and orher fur-
nishings char are arranged w make me area comfortable
for the user.
A-8.1.7.7 Seagested «cupan; bad factors for componertts
of large ai!por, terminzl bmlcings are given, However, Cte
aw'Arity Having jurisdiction may elect to use drfterent ocw-
pan; bad lactors provAed exit requirements are satisfied.
Nrport $q FI SV Y
Terminal (Gross) (Grua)
Catc.M:ru tD0 Ig.31
war rg lveas is It.41
Baggage Gtaan 20 It.gl
Ba9ria9e ManC4ng 300 12]91
pher ISw utla rotouaq A-3~3.r11
To assist in preventing serious o-reruawdag irtcidena kl
sports arenas. sWdiuns, and Sirtalar oaupartCies, sPeualor
standing room should rtU be Permitted Detsveen the strafing
areas and Ne pWy:ng areas. except in rarse race and dog
track loaf ies.
Where a rapacity w near capariry autlienoe is anticipated,
all seating should be assigneC unto t~rxea stwwug Me sec-
Ibn, rpW, anC Seal number.
Where sLarCing room ¢ Pe'm'Ce"-. Lie =apaaty of the startl-
ing dfea ShOUIC
(a) ee detemmed on the bzss of 5 sa tt (46 sa m) per
person.
(b) Ha+¢ M15 Gapde:ry adCeC Io Ue 52aeng Capzaty:n detH-
m:Nng E^yreSS r¢y~'E^:ena.
(c) ee boated to Ne rear of the sealing area, ono
(d, BE given "starA:ne roGm ony udets acco'C~ng to me
area de5:gna;eC tp the purpoSF
The number o) (iri:ea SWC W OmerwSe OiStrbu2E0 stbukt
ro; exceeC me aggregate rumrxr of Seas plus approved
s:a~+C~ng morn numbers. (See also A~B~231)
The occupam load favors cf F~1.7,1 reflca the data
der<loped from sunevs of typical occupancies.
LIFE 6PFETV GODE HAND800K
ng ar a Rack Music Concert Held :n
2a0 Chapter 8: New A55emDly Occupancies
fur the fifth floor and all (1..ors below the fifth floor,
including any baumcm 1<a els (sre rotes to ehan).
My asumbly «cupancies locaad blow the Icvel of
exit diuharge require auroma[ic sprinkler promctioq as
do all levels below the assembly «cupancy and all Iev-
ds inarv<ning between the asxmbly krd and [he level
of exit diuhuge (i.e., parts (a), ro), and (c) of [he (oot-
no[e aPP1Y)~
The corrstmcDon types shown in the chart following
8-1.6 arc baud on 1.'FPA 220, Smndard on Tyyez oJBuild-
ing Construction.' (See 6-2.7 and related appendrs note.)
8•x.7 Occupant Loatl.
8-1.7.1 ~ 11te otx:uparn batl Drxmilted in arty assert:bly btnW-
ing, abuc7ura, a< portion Otereol shall De determined on me
basis d 1M b6orritg ocapant batl foao(s:
For eau of using this Handbook, A-8-1.7.1 appears
following all discussion on 8-1.7.1.
(a)' An asaembty area of fnncertVared use wilttgn faed
seats such as an auditorium, place of twprsh~p, dance fkxx,
045cdtseque, or bilge tall: one person per 7 neI sq f[ (0.65
cwt sq m).
In the 1988 Cadq nc~ rcrminology "7 sq @ (0.65 tic[
sq m) per person" wu changed to rnd "one person per
7 ntt sq ft (0.65 ntt sq m)." The inten[ of the Commit-
tee was to chtrily the meaning of the Code. Th< inten[
is that one person is assumed (or nch i sq ft (0.65 59
m) that is available w be uud by «cupanrs after dedutt-
ing space xcvpied by xrmanently fixed counters, fur-
nishings, etc.
The 7-sq ft (0.65-sq m) «cupant load factor is baud
on open floor space with people standing m comfortable
surroundings. This (actor also can he uud to enimate
xcupan[ load in a multipurpou room where portable
chairs arc placed in rows for meaings, tlm s'ieu':ng. or
lectu rc<
I-,'L'I.i.i\iI TCS :GJLTE55PCE~ied :EE:::aI SEL:..'.^.
F rs:nal sc~: n:g rs dlus:raad m F;gurc F-'_. Th:s com-
tc: e. i.ir. !:nr elev.;;.: ar:ar.,5cmev: of F F!c, ~::h:ci:;:u-
rides :item u'rti~ :hc ab:i:r. to m: directly un the ground
or Our:r and to more relaua it easily through and oe
of the area, hkdy <rols'ed from fes[ivals held m opq
areas Ths concept has been abused where applied ro
indoor or omdoor a'enrs where the asumbkd spectatoq
arc no[ connollzblc in terms of their numbers, Iota' '
or behavior. R«k musi: concerts arc examples of ev~~
where (he "fatical scaring" concept might become drdd+'
edly unfestive due ro unmanageable crowds of z
(nor oared) peopl a in front of the sage area and a
plete loss o(any maintained circulation routs for
the asumbled crowd. Injuries due to bodies
against bodies or portions of structure are likely
this «curs. A deuription of a typical enssh situatite_
found in a report titled, "Oburvatiorss o(Gowd
ditions a[ R«k Concert in Fvh'bition Stadium, T
16 July 1980;' by J. L Pauls. Becauu the oumb¢
amngemrnt of peopk N this ittsarsG was trot
throughout the evenq there were eventually some
to forty thousand people distributed unevraly is a
o(abouc 125,000 sq h (10,600 zq m), ratdmrg m a
age density of about 1 person per 33 W ft (33
However, due to loalizcd Gawding at the stage
cral thouvnd people were at Gushing densities of
1 person per 2 sq h (.19 sq m). Both normal
emergency access into [his congested uea caste
impossible, and mamgement efforts to iasauct
move back wward less denuly occupied eras .
futile. Incidents such as this one have kd ro the are
intions shown in 8-1.7.2, which provides for
of «cupant load m some simationz.
ro) M 255emDly area et less toncemraled r6R
a mrnerence room. dr~vg room. dmkeg esiabls'rt'd
room. myrnnas~um. cr lornGe'. one person Der 15 nR ~,
net sq r..,.
In the ]988 Code, the rcrminology "li W
m) per person" uas changed ro read "one , -saes
tic; sq k (l.a tie sq r.,)."'ihe inane of thr C
arcs :o ca(:p~ : he mcan;ng of :he Ccdr. Thr :'"'s ~~.
eve person is assn T:ed for each l j sq h I ~ -
is a': z;lzbie rot use by xcc, z,^.n. 1~
7h( 1. ~sG f; iL-.•y m) Dees Far.; Inad : "'-~..
pl: :l ::~('.a ,^f:<a l'::]::1 ]ma~l:."r G: aF i:f :v •~•~
tel:
~:~
NOTICE
OF
ILLEGIBILITY
ILLEGIBILITY OF SOME OF
THESE DOCUMENTS IS DUE
TO THE POOR QUALITY OF
THE ORIGINAL. THE FAULT
DOES NOT LIE WITH THE
CAMERA OR ITS OPERATOR.
..^.
it--~-
ii~ii
~~~~
Ty yyawyP w/
M~Ip WYy'~
i1lIG1.' ~
CITY OF
~tEa.etic b~eaclc - ~loaula
/y ._ -_ -- - __- - _._- _-
MEMORAA'DUM
Tp: Building end toning
FROM: John Raley
Fire Chief
RE: D Load
DATE: August 15, 1995
tl005E\IISOLF: R(MD
ATI.A~TIC NF_ACN. FI.ORa1\ )321J .415
TELFPNO.\E l9WI Tl1-~
FA%19W1 r~-5905
Asper our mooting of August 15,1995 you will find attached the Life Befell' Code es it rehdes W
occupaotloed
As steed in our meeting. these are several secnioa4 that will aPP15wlud yourw~~
be difficult for us to give yw an occupml Wad denial of requested variance.
Without this information, we are rxommeminB
I hope 16st the attached information will assist yw wiW Your layout Plain. tf yw have aaY
edditiot,~/a",!/Ky/yua~nws, please fat flee to oodad me et 247-5870.
~Ruley
Fire Chief
~-
CITY OF
rQllartc'e b~eaek - ~letida
uw sJnvnrEa unE
Ai1.JNnC BEKN. flt)RmA JE2JNJf1
TPLEMIOYE ItOII N1-JW
EAr 1%11 2fld/U
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: Auquat 8, 1995
TO: Oeorge Worley/Zoning Department
PROM: Robert S. Roaoy/Director of PJJblic Norka Z~
StlBJECT: Dourer CoarmJnity Residences on Francis Avenue
We bare reviewed the preliminary submittal for the proposed
residential construction on Praacis Avenue. Our concerns are
as follows:
1. .Water and Sewer - Please submit final plans for water
and newer for our review.
2. Parking - Materiel should be specified for driveway
construction.
3. Accea• - It is uaciear how the North side of the
development will be accessed.
RSR/cat
cc: Rim D. Leiabach/City Manager
PILE: Donner/Francis Residential Community
.. .-,~.. .a._..
As fee ae how vuay people cen be seated in the rrstauranl or how mwrv pw kute ~puce.:u _'
available fa its operation as a reatatrmt, Wr police drparanrnt fry nu yo~mou. "ILA opnnou:.:w.l
projadions above are baed on observations nrtlatrd tc cili.^.rn complumt... cnmutal ureidew. :w.l
concerns for public safety.
I hope Wal Wis irtformatioo is helpful to you iu considering Wr proposed u:,r tar Wr husnrc+>
previously krrowa n We North Shire Grille. If you need addinonal s,•tvu:.•s hom our dop:uhu:•ut.
please do not hesitme to aek.
Sincerely, O
/ `-„
Davtd E. Tbompsrm
i'hief of Police
ec: Mc Kim LeirWaeb, City Marrager
r~laatie aenek
\tf. ~irOfge WOlley
is onanlsrity Development Director
800 Seminole Rd
Atlantic Beach, FT.32233
Dear hie. Worley,
ran sECtr~rne sluu
A7ln~'TiC !1F 1Cn. twxm+ lzz))-sus
lFa.tAlO\f 19011 Zit-5800
tnx 19u12rrsBOs
loin _ ". I'n~
l have been asked to cortanem relative to the business previously kmownr as the North Shorn r frdlr.
and the proposed changes to the state alcohol li«nsing nt Ihat IOCntlnll
As 1 understand it, Mt : ed Johnson is considering hunigg the lacdih' nno n re~4aw :un and Ju. to
seating mrd parking requirements in our code, Me Johnson wdl need to obr:nn for rgrprnval of the
Comnnity Development Bond to do co. Nr is proposing a change in Wr Main alcohol bcru~r
from one Wat would allow the bueitrees to operate as a bar, to one that enquire Wr r rst:uuarn m do
:u least S1He of their business in food. In mY experience, this ppe of request rs tannic r:nr
'the North Shore Caille originally represented themselves pnmanly ax a rrntmu:ud Alihmrsh drcu
state licevse allowed them to operate as a bar, they appeared to do a lot ofLluiue» :u a
restaurant. However, there was a change of er hmr.
"Rlr crowds at North Shore becarro large, and the customers wrre packed m uelnl~- runnsh to
cause concern to fhe fire deparmtent. 'Ifiere wrre numrrmu:, well docwurrnrd cuurplanns li mu
residents of Atlantic Beach and Nepnvte Beach due to loud music '1lrrrr wrrY cnauual wndrrd.
in the parking lots and adjacent buildiggs that were related to the clientele ti-om "Ilrc r in II:• ILr
crowds created problems including littering, illa¢al conetarrption of alcohol. and tratlic 'Ihrs,• m:
problems that one would generally associate with a bar.
'il:r proposed restaurant is not going to make these problems am• worse for the surtolmdins
cormmmrty, and will probably improve the area We gassers tlrnt a quahtc r. stain ~ml w J: out ion :•
laud rock music playing loud enough to disturb citizens livirgt nearby. Srnnut alcolr,l with a
meal rc less Gkele to haw individtzalsjud looking for a place to "drink".:uul the nowd..:ur nlnl --
racily cararolled nt a place where tables and space nee comrniaed to servins loud
Parkulq has been a problem due to the nearb} loancentrv devrlopmrul. acrd rl uill {uob:d~h.
continue to be one to come deeee. Moei of thv businesses m the shapers nt Narih :thorn :u ••
closed in the early evening, end the restaurant business will probable not brut tbrln m omen ut
parkins. Ae fa as the bury evenings in towncenter. it i6 doubttbl dr:a ibr ope:uum nt rc+tam :un
well increase parking problertts to die In•el of ns prrviotrs operation
WE THE UNDERSIGNED, WHO ARE MERCHANTS IN THE SHOPPES OF
NORTHSHORE, 363 ATLANTIC BLVD., ATLANTIC BEACH, WOULD LIKE TO MAKE
KNOWN OUR SUPPORT FOR THE APPLICATION BY MR. TED JOIp~SON FOR AN
EXCEPTKMI TO THE CURRENT ZONING OF THE NORTHSHORE GRILL IN ORDER TO
INCREASE THE SEATING CAPACffY.
HAVING SEEN THE PROPERTY USED AS A BAR/NK;HTCLUB, WE FEEL
STRONGLY THAT SUCH USE IS NOT IN THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE
COMMUNRY AT LARGE AND IS DETRIMENTAL TO OUR OWN BUSINESSES. WE
SUPPORT THE USE OF THE PROPERTY AS A QUALITY FAMILY RESTAURANT
AhU URGE THE COMApS,S10N TO DO LIKEWISE. '
H(E~~AVEN ON EA/RUTH I~~
K'lA~ f'~"~V-~~ 6 w _
MISE EN PLAC
BEA M ~.I^-~l~
~~~~
E%RIBIT B (continued)
Presently the location Ss not open for business. The Owners have
several prospects vlshing co lease the property and operate it
as a bar. It is [he owera' preference to have us operate as a
restaurant. To that end, they have given us until September 1
to have [h1a exception granted, alluring us to acquire a Special
Restaurant Liquor LSceose from the State. Otherwise they will
have co lease [he property to another operator in order to
eliainace the tontinued loss of revenue.
It Se our feeling [hat Atlantic Beach rill benefit more from a quality
restaurant than from another bar. It is our further hope [hat you
will agree with us and grant this request.
Thank you for your consideration.
E%t1IBIT B
It is the desire of the applicant to ee[nbllsh a quality
restaurant and lounge on the site of the North Shore Gr111
st 367 Atlan[Sc Boulevard which hoe moat recently been operating
as a bar with an unreatric[ed 4 COP liquor license which allws
an oecupancy of over 550 patrons (4000 s.f. of service area at
7 s.f. per person - 571 persona, per the Plre Marshall.) The
location fa presently reetrlcted to a seating capacity of 116
person for dfaing, and it is the purpose mf this request to
remove this reatric[ion for the follwing reasons and rationale:
The increased sealing capacity ie necessary for the
economic viability of a quality restaurant. IC is the
object lye of the applicant Co receive a Special
Aeatsurant Liquor License from the State which
aeceealta[ee the follwing:
1. You wat Mve no lees Chan 2500 s.f.
2. You suet have no lees than l50 seats
3. Your income from liquor sales cannot ezceed
SOS of your gross sales
The result of Chia type of license fa to alloy
sore seating for dining.
The reason for the present formula of parking co seating per
Nr. Otorge Yorley is "ca prevent the doalno effect of excess
parking frw one location to the next." 1ih11e ve are very
cognizant of this situation, ve feel that restricting the
nusber of restaurant customers (1. e. diners) to this
facility dose not alleviate the parking probles for Atlantic
Beach. In fact, ve feel it exacerbates the problem by
allwing in exeeea of S50 cuatwera under the current
occupancy regulations. The removal of the seating
ree[rlctlon of 116 will result in more re s[aurant customers
versus fever bar customers.
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
SHOPPES OF NORTHSHORE
363 ATLANTIC BOULEVARD
ATLANTIC BEACH, FLORIDA
Lots 7, 8, 9, i0, 11, 12, 13, 14, 1°i, 16, 17, 18, Block oue (1),
according to Plat No. 1 of Section "A" ATLANTIC BEACH, recorde3
in Plat Book 5, Paqe 69 of the current ?ublic Records of Duval
Cowtty, Florida together with that portion of Lot SS, Block 1 of
said subdivision more particularly described as follows:
starting at a point on Ahearn Street at the Northeast corner of
Lot 19, run thence South along the Easterly lot line cf said Lot
19 for a distance of 82.6 feet to a point; thence at right angle
Westerly on a line parallel to Ahearn Street run for a distance
of 14 feet; thence run at a right angle Northerly on a line
parallel to the Easterly line of Lot 19, a distance of 82.6 feet
to the South line of Ahearn Street; thence at right angle
Easterly along said Southerly line of Ahearn Street run a
distance of ,4 feet to the Point of Beginning. Subject to the
Restrictions, Covenants and Easements of record.
and
Lot u, Hlock 1, according to Plat No. 1 of Section "A", ATLANTIC
BEACH recorded in Plat Hook 5, Page 69, of the currant public
records of ~>uval County, Florida. Subject to covenants,
restrictions and easements of record, if any, this reference to
wh ict~ shall not operate to reimpose the same, and taxes accruing
subsequent to Gecember 31, 1989.
-IYDIY// 0I r1C}
•LruntuMr•• 11 M1~1wt•. /vtl~ler r~tvP•nN Yw YD
••d• t• •uto•otlr• W Mdstrl•n wt•tr •N
conr•nl•wM. tr•ffla S1N •ed eewtrol •M •oN11
!n oN• of NtYtrlwk•~
3. Oft-1tr••t Nrkly •N leN1N i1 -__ ---
/•relaul•r •tt•wtiN 11 Nid to eN lt~fww~l.
•Nr• Wi M •o•we11e. ealN, /1•r• W oNr
•tt•ets M M1.1.1
wrew•rtly yy r N•-t1w N Ntoiwly _,
dr.trl,tl ~ e/wrt1N, /1e•r•111 le tN
]. 1lowtiaN N r•t•N W e•wlN wryl wr• __ ___
••o•:pt1k11 •itk eurr•W/y NMrt1N wed Ne
7 ••NNlkl•.
t. iowtta•w: wr111eYllltr W wNw•tikilllr of y _--~
utalltiN v •N~r•t1,
3. T7Nr dtw•N1oN W •w•r•ot•r N wWw1y ~ ___
•rW Nlt•rly wr• N1~ewt•.
i• /1/w1 W NM•••d Niplwr 1 y, rltw ___
»t•r•eN b /1W W tr•flie Nt}r W le
k•r•owr •N v1 e•1w•tlktl rltk •tMr N•wrrti•w
in tN dietrl,t.
}. /NutrN rvN eN wtW oNw e/w•1e er• ~_ ___
•d•wwt•.
•. TM uN 11 /•w•rwli} •.y.tiwl. rt4 Nl•ewet _ -__
proNralN W etklr N•Mrtl le tN dletrMt.
CAY/uYITT 0/rtt.w/p} /Ok// /00/} 1/D ~Tt011/.
I
ac TIDM/ /i }Yi CiTT GVYiMiD/~ .
PL. u. TYVe ar Prl nt 1n Ink ApVlf c.tion Fee SIOU.Ou
APPLiCAT10X f'OX •fISE BY EXCEPTION• V ~~~~ ~+
:~~~2 1995
Da. Ftl.dt 8/1;95
---------------------- Bwlding and Zoning
M.N .nd AtldrN. of O.Nr ar T.n.nt Sn Poowvion of P».S.N~
__161 Assbclatt• Ltd. --------------- PnoN
__1A) ulanttc Blvd. 8u1ce 3 904+2414814
_____________________________ Xorkt
__A[la _[ta leach, FL 72 D3----------- NONt 904+285-]160
--_____-__ _________________________
St»a .a1tlr.N .ntl lpd d.urlptlon o1 tM pr.. L.. N to .Alen tM •u..
br C.Nptlea• i. rapNa.dt
Exn161[ A
A tl.wrlptlaa el tb. •ON OY iXwptioo• W.ir.tl, rbiab .b.ll .p.of lie.lty
.ntl p.rt lool.rlr tl..oe1W tn. tFP.e ab.r.oUr .ntl .XNnt of th. prapowd
•UN by [Xa.ptiaa•c
___1521°_? to~utfn~ cap.<SCy 1L1[atlon in ru C.unot <a ubl Anad
a[ [i.e of Nor[6 Snore ShopDlvg Cevicer or1g1m1 approval
Sp.olZia e...on..bY tM .pplio.ot 1NL th. rpuat .houltl tnr pr.ntetl~
See a[[acbed Erhlblt B
2onlnp Cl...illwtgonc_~-~ ~ 0
I, I~i~Y(l ,~ ~ -~
..[nora..a .p.nt or atorNY. tl Applloaion a.nnot W prow v.d
.a.nt or atorNY, loot atl. l.te.r .unoat o.Nr..lpn.ear..
rro..pµlNnt eo tna a:.at.
A pplte. ntc Do not-l111-1n WYaM tnL palm. Nor...r, t. pr.p.r.tl to
r..pond to tM lollNl.p gt.Ml
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH
Notice is hereby given the City Commission of Atlantic Beech,
Florida, will hold a PUBLIC HEARING or. Monday, July 10, 1995, at
7:15 PM at City Hall, 800 Seminole Road, for the purpose of heariny
and considering the views of the public concerning the following
request for a Use by Exception:
AN APPLICATION FOR A USE BY EXCEPTION FILED BY
363 ASSOCIATES LTD., FOR AN EXCEPTION TO TAE
SEATING CAPACITY LIMITATION IN THE RESTAURANT
FORMERLY KNOWN AS NORTHSHORE GRILL IN THE
SHOPPES OF NORTHSHORE.
All persons interested are notified to be present at said time and
place and they shall be heard. If a person decides to appeal any
decision at any meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the
proceedings, and for such purpose he may need to ensure that a
verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record shall
include the testimony and evidence upon which appeal is to be
based.
In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, persons
needing a special accommodation to participate in this proceeding
shouid contact Maureen Kinq, City Clerk, at 297-5809, or at City
Hall, 800 Semi ro le Road.
___________________________________________________________________
Posted: City Hall
Public Wcr4a
Published: Beaches Leader, Wednesday, August 23, 1995.
Micle N of Chapter 24 provide We process and standards for subdivision plats.
7Le enclosed submittal is a preliminary plat drawing showing the Proposed layom of lore.
7Lr final plat will contain legal descriptions and dedication of easements. 7Le lot sizes
are smaller than required by Section 24-255 bu[ are aorriparable to most lots wuhw the
cdy. StatTwill reeonunend War the City Coinmivsion
as shown. Setback Par',:ing and height requirements ar~n conformance witliitWe codeizes
We preli ~ arv and fn ia~nlet h-_me~R Comm ~~
~hrvrt a. In addnwu, die visual nupact of a sfrudurr, especially one which is two stones
high, will elect dtr overall appearutce of the neighborfiood 'Ilia proposed sWCture could
be IocatrJ in Wr rear yard ad~acrut to We child playhouse, and while occupying useable
e:ud space, i; woW A comple wnh the setbacks.
Lt addiGou to the setback Variance, the sWdure, as proposed, will regwre a
Variance to the height linritazwn established in Sediov 24-151 (b) (3) fwtuch limits
accessory structrrres to not more than one story. Based upon the determination thaz
altemazives exist and that no undue hardships exist,~laff recormnevds~e~tal.
Y AGb'NUA ifFld: p 4 c. Apphcazion for Use-by-Exception to seating capacity of
'^`' restaarant as established az the lime afthe original approval
of the Shoppes of North Shore, 363 Atlantic Boulevard.
77te applicant desires to operate a restaurant in the location of the former North
Shore Grille. Al the lime of dte original approval of Ure shopping carder an exception was
proofed to the required number of parking spaces. 77te sealing capacity o(the restaurant
was determined to be 116 seats. lhaing its lifetime the business evolved into more oCa
nightclub than a restaurant. Because of the standing room feature ofnighlclubs an increase
in occupanry rate occurred ben not an increase in seating capacity. 1Le sErplicmrt proposes
to obtain a liquor license which applies to only a restaurart etttablishrcertt, but which
requires a minimum of I50 seats.
'ltte expected occupancy level of a restamartt generally does not exmed the seating
capacity. 7Lis is not true of bars and nightclubs where patrons typically stand '1}te
expected impact on parking of a 150 seat restarnard is less than the impact of a 116 seaz
nightclub where two or three patrons may be standing for every patron seated. Section 24-
161 establishes parking regwrements for restmaams based upon sestina caoaciN. The
applicants position that a restaurant with a larger seating capacity will have a lesser tmpacr
on parking than a nightclub is accepted by Staff 'I3e covicetn is that his exception must
limit futrtre use of the locazmn m a similar mariner. A precedent should not be set which
would allow a fuhne evolution ota restaurant into a nightclub as happened with the
pervious occupant St--R~r co meva= coutpliance withl~gsL~tir,,,d oa~i^a l4lWlall9nE.
A(iENUA fI11N: x 4 d. Appltcazion (or approval of subdivision pled for the eTeation
of ] 1 :;mgle-family home lots an Francis Avenue.
'llte Donner Conununtty Development Corporation has recently purchased several
contiguous tracts of lend in dte Donner neighborhood with the intemion of constructing
Sutgle-famly homes for sale 10 low to moderate income level families. 71re tracts are
pruposed to be combined and planed into lots. Prv owner association is to be established
artd covenants are to be adopted. "Ifie proposed plat conlarns several utturual feanves
which will tee addressed by stall below
CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH
CO.MMU!\7iY DEVELOPMEN7 BOARD
STAFF REPORT
A1GI'll\G UA~II: Aujeust I5, 1995
:\GL7vUA Itli\] # 4 a Application for Variance to reduce reyuued from setbacks
from nvrnty (20) feet to sixteen (I ti) feet to permit the
consWetion of an addition to aSingle-family residence on
property at 322 Mag,,rtolia Street.
Pte Applicatn desires to eonshvM an addition onto aSingle-family residence
which will rnnoach into tfie front yard setback by approximately fats feet The addition is
proposed to increace the ground floor living space.
The existing residence is in compliance with the setbacks and due to the design of
Ote struchue the location of the proposed addition is approxitoa2ely 30 feet from the front
property line. The addition will extend 14 feet forward, thus rnnoaching the setback If
We addition were reduced in siu or constructed onto We rear of the sYruchrre a Variance
may not be necessary. Based on the information presented by the applicant, StaH'believes
tbat alternatives exiri which would not require a Variance or which may require a smaller
Variance. Finding that no hardship exists,
AUhNUA ITEMS # 4 b. Application for Variance to construct an accessory struchae
with a setback of f ve feet from dte Bide property line where
that line is a secondary street frontage requiring IS feet of
setback on propetry at 394 Eighth Street.
The Applicard desires to cortstrud a storage building on the west side of their
property. 71wt side line is a ucondary street frontage because of the location of the lot on
a comer. Seaton 24-I51 establishes a side yard utback requirement for accessory
strvtlures offive feel "lift definition of"Lo1 corner' establishes that the longer sweet
Homage is a side yard and requires a setback of 15 feet. The applicant elates that no oMer
reasonabb~ location exists (or this sWchae.
'Ihe regulations in Section 24-l51 address accessory buildings and setbacks in
general. The definition of "Lot, corner" addresses only comer lots, but appears to
rsWblislt specific requirements for side yard cetbacks. It is common practice to accept the
spenfic regrlation over the general regulation whrn the two differ.
"Ihe Goner lot setback requirement ie, at leas) in part, related to traffic safety.
:6ucnurs :uGacem to nglns-o:-way !rnd to obstruct or distract the visimt of vehicle
Sec. 3-5. Locations where on-premises sales prohibited.
No vendor of slrnholic beverages containing alcohol of rot more than fourteen (141 percent
by weight and wines, regardless oC alcoholic mn[ent, (or consumption on premises, shall be
permitted to conduct his place of busineu in the CC zone east of a line two hundred 12QD~ feet
east and parallel to the center line of a street designated ea Sylvan Drive, unless such place
cfbusiness is a restaurant or delintessen and the sale of beer and wine is incidental to the sale
of food.
Code 1970, § 3.4; Ord. Nc. 10-80-13, § 3S, 4-28-SOj
State law reference-Authority to regulate location of alcoholic beverage establish-
ments, F.S. § 562.45121.
Sec. &8. Restrictions on location of establishments.
la) Notwithstanding the provisions of this chapter, no location shall be approved (or an
alcoholic beverage license, whether for on or olf-premises consumption, unless the location is
not less than:
Il) One thousand five hundred 11,5001 feet from any other location where there exists a
current alcoholic beverage license; or
(2) One thousand Cive hundred 11,5001 Ceet Crom any established school or church.
ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES § 3-8
Ib) The (oregoing provisions ofthis section shall not apply to any restaurant 1"restaurant"
is defined for purpose of this section as being an enterprise involved solely in the preparation,
and serving of Cood within the physical confines of that establishment) which derives not less
than filly 1501 percent oC gross inceme Crom the sale oC food prepared, and served on the
premises, provided that such a restaurant with a beverage license permitting consumption on
[he premises of alcoholic beverages including liquor (hard liquor) shall have a seating capadty
of not less than one hundred filly (1601 seats end overall Moor area of not less than three
thousand (3,0001 square (set: nor shall the foregoing provisions of this section apply to grocery
stores or drugstores licensed to sell alcoholic beverages for ot6premises consumption only.
lord. No. 90.82-73, § 1, 7-2&82; Ord. No. 10.82-14, $ 1, 1-24-831
State law reference-Authority to regulate location of alcoholic beverage establish-
ments, F.S. § 562.45'21.
Sec. 3.7. !Keasurement of distances.
All distances provided in this chapter shall be measured as follows
~L V.'ith respect to the distance between a IocaHon for which an alcoholic beverage
license is proposed and a location where such a license exists, the distance shall be
measured by following a straight line from the nearest point of the building or portion
of a building which is the proposed license premises to the nearest point of the
building or portion o(a building which is the existing licensed premises.
~~21 W'ith respect to the distance between a location for which an alcoholic beverage
license is proposed and en eatabluhed church or school, the diatnnce shell be mee-
sured by (ollowing a svaight line from the nearest point o(the building or portion of
a huilding to be used as a part of the proposed (oration to the nearest point of the
After discussion, Mrs. Fiilmore moved to recommend to the Ci[y
Comrt~i scion [hat the subdivision plat be approved subject to the
approval and review of the preliminary and final plats by the City
Commission. Mrs. Walker seconded the motion and it passed
unanimously.
Scott Fletcher advised the board he had sold his home in Atlantic
Beach and would no loneer be qualified to serve as a member.
The board decided to hold the next workshop meeting on September
12, 1995 at 7:00 p.m.
There being no further business to come before the board on motion
made and seconded it vas adjourned.
SIGNED
ATTEST:
II. Application for Variance filed by Cynthia Corey to construct
a storage building that uil] encroach the side yard setback of
property located at 399 8th Street.
Mrs. Corey introduced herself to the board and explarned that she
desired to build an storage shed on the west side of her proFErty
with an attached car overhang. She stated that the storage
building would have a ]oft '_or additional storage and that the car
overhang would allow them to move their cars off the street.
She stated that hardships exist due to considerable time and
expense being incurred for the architectural drawings and also the
unusual shape of the iot.
After discussion, Mrs. Walker moved to deny the application. Mrs.
Pillmoce seconded the motion and the variance was denied by a vote
of 3 - 2.
III. Application for Use-by-Exception to seating capacity
limitation filed by 363 Associates Ltd., for property located at
363 Atlantic Boulevard.
Ted Johnson introduced himself to the board and explained that the
applicant desired to operate a restaurant in the location of the
former North Shore Grille and obtain a liquor license which applies
to only a restaurant business which requires a minimum of 150
seats. He stated that the previous restaurant turned into more of
a nightclub than a restaurant and an increase in occupancy occurred
but not an increase in seating capacity. Ne said the objective
was to maximize the food service capability in the space, and that
the porch area would be completely enclosed.
Mr. Worley stated that a use-by-exception was previously granted
to the required number of parking spaces and a variance as to
setback requirements.
After discussion, Mrs. Pillmore moved to recommend to the City
Commission that the use-by-exception be granted subject to approved
calculations from the Building and Fire Departments. N,rs. walker
seconded the motion and the motion was unanimously passed.
IV. Request for subdivision plat filed by William Morgan
Architects on behalf of Donner Community Development Corporation.
William Morgan introduced himself and explained that Donner
Comrt~unity Development purchased several tracts of land in the
Donner Subdivision with the intent of constructing single family
residences for sale to low to moderate income level families. He
stated that a homeowners' association will be established and
covenants and restricn ons adopted. He answered questions
regarding setbacks, parking and height requirements.
~~Y ~~~~
MINUTES OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOAFi-
OF THE CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH, FLORIP,F.
AUGUST 15, 1955
7:00 P.M.
CITY HALL
PRESENT Robert Frohwein
Pat Pillmore
Mary Walker
Sharette Simpkins
Scott Fletcher
AND Alan Jensen, City Attorney
George Worley, II, CD Director
Pat Harris, Recording Secretary
ABSENT Mark McGowan
Don Wolfson
Acting chairman, Robert Frohwein, called the meeting to order
and asked for approval of the minutes from the meeting of July 18,
1995. Upon motion duly made and seconded the minutes were
approved.
NEW BUSINESS
I. Application for variance filed by Haftco, Inc. on behalf of
Jennifer Chalot to construct an addition that will encroach the
front yard setback of property located at 322 Hagnolia Street.
Bill Haft introduced himself to the board and stated the applicant
contracted him to build a 10-foot by 14-foot bedroom addition on
the first floor of her residence for use by her mother. He stated
the addition could encroach 4-feet into the front yard setback
line. He stated that the problem with constructing the addition
in the rear was an existing second floor screened pcrch.
Bruce Robbins, Mrs. chalot's next door neighbor, introduced himself
to the board, and expressed his approval of the proposed addition.
Hrs. Chalot introduced herself to the board and presented pictures
of the front and rear of the residence. she stated she originally
desired to build the addition below the rear porch but was informed
by two contractors that the idea was impractical.
After discussion, Mrs. walker moved to deny the variance. Mrs.
Pillmore seconded the motion and the variance was unanimously
denied.
AUL\U.}l F:\' ... :r d`'.:: p',io^toi iucrra:,.d test:LU:mt ar:uiq¢r~: id.~.w
SLBDIITTF.ll B}-: ii_.,i c: 1l'orlc}, Couwwril} Drvrlopmeut Dir~ctor / ,i.~
U.4TE: :luensr '_, 194?
BACKGHOP?ill:
The applicant desires to oparate a restaurant in the location of the former North Shore Grille. At
fhe time of We original approval of the shopping tamer ~ eueplioa was granted to the required
number of paritirtg spaces. The original seating capacity of the restaurant was determined to be
116 sears. During its lifetime the business evolved imo more of a nightclub than a restaurant.
Because of the standing room nanae of nightclubs an increace in occupanry rate occurred but not
>m increase is seating capacity. Tfie applicant proposes to obtain a liquor license which applies to
only a restaurant establishment, brn ut,ich requires a tnivimtxn of 150 seats.
Section 24-161 establishes parking requirements for restaurams based upon t~atiug
tap3tipt. The applicams position is that a restaurant with a larger seating capacity will have a
lesser impact oo parking than a nightclub. The concern is that this exception mast limit future use
of the location in a similar mmmer. Section 3-6 limits the plecemem ofbaeirresaes with alcoholic
beverage licenses by requiring a separation of 1,500 feet between (hose establishmems. '[fie only
exception to this requirement is for rrstaarauts wiW 150 seats or more.
1tECONA7EM1T)ATK)K:
Tfie Cotttm:miry Developmem Board considered this request and reco®nends drat an exception be
premed to permit the applicant to operwe a restetemn with a rnininnan of I50 seats without an
iucrease w the number of parking spaces. The rnaximmn occupaory of 16e building is to be
determined by the Fire and Building occupanry calculations. The calculations are heavily
dependent upon the tloor plan o(the proposed resaurant which has not yet been provided to Staff
ATTACTL'NF.~TS:
1) Minutes of the ~ ommuntty Development Board
2) Stafl?sport to the l;omrnunity Development Board
3) Application for IIse-bc-Lxcepton
REVIF;WF,D BY r'1"I'Y MAM1.4GE6: '~
~~~
___
I I ~_ _ ~ ._ I I.-_~ 1 _-I-I_ l _-_i I__._T=- m
i ~ I ~ m
__i__ ,T .
I U
II L
~.-. i. ~ ~ I -.-.~
I
.II .-.- l I ~ ---;~ ~ W
'' I I I i I ~ I II
' .1-. ~ ~I' _~ II m
-~----•-II ! ~-- ~-- I'- ~ -~ ~ E
I II ~ ter. _
I II ~ !,; I: II
-~-- I `' ~ - - -~- - 3
- li ---• I-r-~ -•-- -----II -r".- ~
-~-~---~--~~-- •-~ --•---II~--r; ---- ,I - ,,
I II I:. I, I _
--•--- f -• ---~ ~ --- I
II I! I I 'li i~ I E
I-.-. E
Ii !I I ! - . II ii U
! -r- - • - ~ I -n-- -• -
I--~~ --~-+~~ •-El-•-~ -•--fit-~
I I. _ I I ___ l i _
'I ( ' I I I II o
' I ~ I I ~ \ ~i1- m
~ m
_ I
~`- ~ Roof Framing ?Ian
3f - ~
- ' At
7:6~~
'F' F' Ro
(oS*1V•~ f ~
TILE
L
R16 Nr Cu B ~i
SIDE
BAtN 1
Transverse Section
'~ " 4x10"Wv.pM
co Ilt
NL
It =VAN
FAUA '
~T-I-II-? .
~~
ao6o?I
<.oPC 2"
E - ~'~
r K ~r~ t Po ~~c ~!
Longitudinal Section
GL. GL.`
~G.w.8.1
///
\~ t
.o. \
L.NiF3~ - t21NIN C7
' GWBa
?i.$''C2v"T /cLG.
2-? ~3"cnrrt.
~ ~
/GWB~
i ~«
! I'vik.>-C1N8.IV
2"z8~~X1.4~o•LENG?H
C: „ ~-I/2' COX ON 2,X6,.
J VENTED '~ ~"O,C-(1YR)W~d"
t3LOGK1tiiC7 INiuL. pATrS
~/ CL4. ~ A.F.F. 2~8' '~ ~ :~;'
'
°
' I CP;P.)~ `~ MIA. J2-2
x8
`A , l.r
i ~ ; ;
~ .
l
I
` " + i l
V
~ Sia
~
w s.
~ I - LEFT .
asrar~ CL%,
SIDE 2"xq^@16" FURRII.1(a
BArH 2
A~
'
'
1 '/z
= 1
- l7
-FIxEU ~.--~A~ri~
wo~:;:i t ~rarH
tLE:•a?tpN~
~
Alc ,
V ~~ ~ 'i;
~
GWB ~ / ~ VEiaL"cU
~ . . . ~ ~ ~
~
'
`
~ .:rK."X7
~ ~~
~s
j
~,,
/
~
'
r
' 3.4i
~ ~
.
~
~ i
e
~- Nooo. \ ~ \ i
~ ~. ~
~
••
Z 2'•x3
_
~ tai. BKxi4LASH 4038 i
~ NgALt~
~ - :I~~V.tU
RPNG_ ~ I ~
,~ ~~,
~,Qa_ .
~
AtJM. ,
FRP>nE
/ ----
Ki~
EN Detail
.e
•
'
'
Cy
FIEAR 17/2
=1
_0
~:
a
N
U
d
t
a
c
m
0
E
m
3
T
E
E
0
U
m
c
0
O
c
m
U
m
a
7
~,
m
N
U
0
L
U
Q
C
A
O
E
m
3
T
C
E
E
0
U
m
c
c
0
c
Q
U
C
0
N
Q
4
6
•-- - -- -- - - -- - -- -- - - -- - - - - ---- - ---- - - - - -4
Rear Elevation
rJ--_--_-___--__-- -----__----__h.
L __- _ ----_____..._--.__ __ _ _-__-- ___ _____~
Left Side Elevation
GL. G,~~\
~~ \~
F. G, S*4h~1GL+~,1
~T-I-Il-a
296
40/ao ~
~~
~~
4060
2460
rT1-~1 2
r~------- --- --------- ~
---- -----------------r
L--------- -----
Frorrt Elevation _ - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - -
y+' = 1'- 0'
' x $' TAGS
(rc P.)
m
a
5
Right Side Elevation -~
- a _ __ - - -
~,
I ---- - --24roo . -- - -FF ~ ~ --- -~2q ~ - -- - ~
I ~~ ~r.~r~ c~~' .tea`=~~ - - - -- ._ ---- - ;r-~«= . J~:.~ - ~
i
I f'~ -
I I B~.p~<M1 PGR;.H U P_~LRIn2 ,
~ I I ~ .^~~ 108 ~ 11a 12°- o~ 10$ 10~ i m
I I ! y v+ `! = I o
I 1 c~+,
' ~ ~ _-- --
~ r r s t ~, .p a
I ~„ 4orao a • 4a&o r _` IPaT->_~ ~ i o
~- ~--~-
I :. ~. G~OS ~~~ ~ ` ~ '~ S' I E
I ; c~ --- SERA LIVING-DMINC~ CL. ~ ,~ ,-~
I ~ ~ ~c SHV. sH ~ 12°_ 184 / _ - i ao' I n~j m j m
I i OI / ~-'- N-~ I
~;' ~._ y c I _ / .~~' SCI-ill,xi j ~i
Q~ Cn;~ G I f~ ~I BA~rl2 ~ r I
! m ,
- C '° ]4 76j ' c
I ~ N CL's I i I ~ I U
I i ~ - _ ..
~ I
i O S°-/# GI FdID m9 J A.. ReE i\ ~Y PN, ~ ' ~ I c
I ~:.I EEl~i?M 3 ~ C f 1... I.\m.J ; N ~ BEl7RM~ I'.T ~ I c
' o
I ~: r-.!I IG H 10. ~' I t~ I ~ 10 = I Oo ~r U
, ~
i I~ IG •~ U7111'.Y Z K1TCM.J~p ~-~ ~ ~ I c
I ~~ 5°_ ~O8 n 6sI081~r,I,J!, ~ - _ ~~ ~i I o
I _- _ PANES ~ y"s 10'1 JI ~ _! I ~
I~ j I ~
,; v - 29 6`'- ~' 111
I ,~ ~~, ~ ~ ~ I ~
I ~ ~ ' , , ~-' - e ' ~ ~ I ~ ~_ I Floor Pian ~
2460 ~n / ~~ 4033 296
' ~ .9 I
- ~, I-:c~_/,:.. ILA. I 4
~~ -
i
ii~.1~S~TY~ I 4~WIOE CONC.
SIDE WALK -
-------- I - ---
.
„\O
CAK TnL-L-
r/c lnl . 4 " ~,B.H,
~A~?
(TYQ)
PAR~(ING /
PAvE M°/.IT
~TYP.~
-.~._.
rg .
~l
MULCa-1 o~r~~
M 1N . (D~ 70~
gO1L Fob
PLgnt7-S BY
I~C~1DcNTS~
3 \o I
¢~~~~_,
~;~0 j
Ir
oAK T~'ec
MI>,1, 9"D E. N,
a
t`
M
I
-P~.-
WL-ST L-j~E pF _~
PI<ANCih AYE. TNICKcN CCh1C.EtiGE
TO 10" Wjl4 T~~
roN~, ~-~-~-~~
Entry Garden Plan
t" = 1II' - 0' NOr~Tµ
- • -~-W- -
~~ - -
MuLCN ALL q RAISES ~ ~ „~.
R-Ai`1TINCl QL- Vj . j0 j ' ~~ \ \~ - -+ V:'i~,c. ; 11;1(.
RECEtvE PLA~~`I~ly / ~ {\' c CtuEwntK
-- ~:
RY RESIO~,.,-~~ ~ ~ ~ -~~ ~ !~Y~~%
/ \
~ SHAVE ?KEGS
_-~/ .fir '~,
r- '~ Anw 4"D.B.N~
`.~ ~ ~ F,Y caNT ftACTol2 ,-~- ~ -
' (TY P f~i1 '1-QEt'^S ~ EACMS~
LOT S
LoT 6
I PLAYcou><T.
~ ; 3o'x30'x 4"
~
~~ o ~s~.-~ neA~,~
i
~
P M1, ~
' I
.o ~B'O~~ ~ j ~ \
1'S'~ + 15;0.. ~
PA~i~~ i ;
~lY
- - ~.
~~
Tot Lot Plan
--
~ 1NSTALI ~"x 8" ylrD,j~
cRflo~T~q CU1:95 ARa.av
RAIX-D P~AN~c--,^~ -~
(TYP,~ _
;,,~ MIU 4"IIg,N.
~- ~~~'
v%.I ;~
._
-- - -- - ~G ~ _},,I ~
.~
~,
._Lj cJ
,o I
I
NI
a
~ ~ toTg
P~ I li~~-
B~O' 40
~~~I i o
\\tiIl I N
~~L-_
/~/ )
.~r~---
~; ~
- ~:
:(
C
c
G~',ASS ~ ~ '
i
u,~
~I
I
i
I~'y\7'\'`~ ~~
1'~~C~-I AR V SOn~ L /\NC-
!w
Z
;n
I~
W
Z
Z
0
a
NO7ES~
1) PRaVIDC- TWO 10'x20' fAVEV PAR) .GNU sP,c4:E5
oN EACW LOT WHE~~'E P•1 Q P-2_ ARC SHOWr.I,
Z) PAYL- ~A12KING ~ DANES }N~MA~ERI/a~
ACCE VTA_R,LE Tb Ty1L GTE( O r ATLAnYnC QACZI,
3) MInNMVM CoNCRETS S~Y>`WALK WIOTJi Ig 9~0;
~--- ' _- .
LOT Z ~ LOT 2
I
N~ •-1----. _~.
N i ~ LOS" 3
~ j ~ 1
I M
~' 1
I ~~~~&~
ro
M I
34' 8" 5' 2"
j :~"s~
r GARDcr7
L . P-' ~-? ~~'- -
I
I~
SlHB~= i
~~~ Y P.) ~ j
m:
Ak'OELLA
j~l ' p.2 c-~~
T;
M j
~ °48" 20-2' 20=2'i 395" ;
LOT 10 5.2 LOT II
-. _~
P: PT;
27=2^ 398
r- -
2.-~"
-I j~'Z
LoT 4
-i
-'k- LOTS j LoT 9 -~,-,
d i `.~ ~,
_~;
•f %
ml ' ' ~ k-i '-2
,j ~ i - ~ ~ 2
ToT' L.. ~ -I
- 7 8"-. ~ 7_F~"
8''~' ~ B' -L20~~z~"~t
~ ~ •1
' ~; P~1 IP-Z
LDT 6 ~ ~ ~ LOT 7 ~ -\-j
!--~g~Z, ''S'2"--~J LOT 5 I
j ~! I .ryY~i
PI I ~~e}' I e
i Mj I ,M
39~ 5' 20'2 ~ ?0'2''' 3 _ j e i I- _
Community Plan rvoRYH
1'=30'-0'
17.e°I
3q'B•
N
a
N
U
m
r
U
a
c
A
m
0
E
m
3
Y
7
E
E
0
m
C
C
0
0
c
m
U
^-C -
m
D
N
d
2
~. -
I
I
I ~
I W
Q'
i i
/ ~-ARDELtA
tZICHAR175Ut.~ tAN E~ ~. -. - .
io'I ioo' ~oo• Igo.
- -~ - ^~i ~ __ ; ___ I
1 - - - Lo7 10 I ~I I L07 11 - -- I ~ '
{ I I 1 ~ I I
2 0' I ;~ . 20 12 0• j ~~ 2 0
i ~ '- r ^ ^---1 +- - - - - - ~ J
-j-~- - - -~-~
~--~-------~ I r------~--~ I
I ~ LOTS I I t0i 9 r I
I ~ ~I I ' ~
_ I I I
~ I I
48-18~ 70' _ . ~ - So' -~ 20 I- -~~----- J 20' ~ 20•~--- ---^ - ~ ?o - _O
I I I r-------~ - +-- ----r ~ r--~--------I ~------_F--r
.~
Iz
~O
D
I
I
L~
~-
I L07 1 ~ I LOT 2 I I LOT 3 ~
I, I I I I ~ I ~
I I! I I II len.
.pr- I j l I ~ ~ (pI
I I I I I ~ I I
I I I I. I I
I I I i
I I
Ilo ~-----~ I L75 ----- 7S-~ ~~5----llo•I
I I
52.72 ~ r
Lot 8, Setback Plan
t' = 30' 0'
I n LOT (o I ~ I L0T7 ~ ~ '
I I OI I I
i - I ~ I ~ `-
~ I ~ I ~ I `
20 L- {,------~ Zo ~ 20 L------~-J2o` .
0 p 120'
r I' ,
- 70 - ~ 50 r .~L~~--
r`" LoTq.~
I I
I I
I i
I ~
,
1- -------~ 20
o!
NI
FRAraC15 A~/E>`1L1~. (55• RIGHT Or wAYj
I Lo75 "' I I !
I I
I I
20' ~-•__--- i 20'
- ioo'_°-- -i1O~
NoR7 H~
m
m
a
T
E
E
c
U
m
c
0
0
C
m
U
C-
m
N
O
a
--~_
'~ ~~
CITY OF
~Ifa.rtie bneael - ~lauda
M E M O RAN D U M
uao s~wnvFn LAnE
ATLA\TIC BEACN. FIAa1DA 312JJ~JtI
TELEPNO\E i90a1 W1-SBJa
FU ~90.112h5BU
DATE: August 8, 1995
TC: George Worley/Zoning Department - ~/
FROM: Robert S. Rosoy/Director of Public Works ~~g
SUBJECT: Donaer Community Residences on Francis Avenue
1 We have reviewed the preliminary submittal for the proposed
! residential construction on Francis Avenue. Our concerns are
as follows:
1. Water and Sewer - Please submit final plans for water
and sewer for our review.
~ 2. Parking - Material should be specified for driveway
construction.
i
i
3. Access - It is unclear how the North side of the
development will be accessed.
RSR/cst
1
~ ec: Rim D. Leinbach/City Manager
FILE: Donner/Francis Residential Community
Miele N of Chapter 24 provide We process and atmrdards for subdiviswn plate.
I7te enclosed submittal is a preliminary plat drawing showing the proposed layout of lots.
'Ilre final plat will contain legal descrip[ioos and dedication ofeasemeats. 7Le lot sizes
are smaller Wan required by Section 24-255 but are comparable to most lots wuhin We
city. SlaH will recommend Wat We City Cortaaiasioa grad a waiver to permit We lot sizes
as shown SeWack parking and height requiremeras are in conformance wiW We code.
C Rr commeti~ approval ofLlm pier ~ tat ~ect to We review and anoroy8j.pr
Wg nrelim'narv ipL rMats by rhejity C-ommiscien
drivers. N addition, the visual impact of a structure, especially one which is two stories
high, will e$ect the overall appearance of the neighborhood The proposed sttveture could
be located in the rear yard adjacent to the child playlwuse, and while occupyirul useable
yard space, it would comply with the setbacks.
la addition to dte setback Variance, the structure, as proposed, will require a
Variance [o the height limitation established in Sediov 24-I51 (b) (3) twhich limits
accessory strudures to not more than one story. Based upon the determination that
alternarives exist and that no undue hardships exist,~la!t'recommends dents-
AGENDA fTEM: # 4 c. Application for Use-by-Exception to seaming capacity of
restauram as established at the time of the original approvnl
of We Shoppes ofNor[h Shore, 363 Atlantic Boulevard.
1be applicant desires to operate arestauraM in the location of the former North
Shore Grille. At the time of the original approval of the ahopputg order an exception was
µr~oted to the required number ofpaking spaces. The seating capacity o(tbe realaaant
was determined to be 116 seats. Durigg its lifetime the business evolved into more of a
nighlelub than a reslauranL Because ofthe standing room nature ofnightclubs an increase
in occupavry rate occurred but not an increase in seating capacity. The applied proposes
to obtain a liquor license which applies to only a restaaam esfablidsvent, but which
requires a minimum of I50 seaLS.
- 1Le expeded occupancy level of a reatataant generally does not exceed fie seating
capacity. This is not true of bas and nightclubs where patrons typically stand. The
expeded impact on parking of a I50 seat restaaant is less than the impact of a 116 seat
nightclub where two or three patrons may be standing for every patron seated. Section 24-
161 establishes perking requirements for restaursrts based upon aesdinc capacity. The
applicada position that a restaurant with a lager seating eapaciry will Gave a lesser impact
on parking than a nightclub is accepted by Staff the covicem is drat this exception ®ut
limit future use of the location m a similar rrtarvter. A precedent should not be set which
would allow a future evolmion of a realaaad torn a nigldclub as happened with the
previous oectrpanL St frrecommen`° comnl~snce with Lhe e~liahed pa~kino reguja(tgtlF,
./~ A(i1;TIDA fIT:IN: # 4 d. Application for approval ofaubdivision plat for the ereatton
of 11 Single-family home loll on Francis Avenue.
The Dotner Community Development Corporation has recently purchased several
contiguous trade o(Isnd in the Dormer neighborhood with the intemion of conxlructirg
Single-family homes for sale to low to moderate income level families. The trade ere
proposed to be combined and planed into Ins. Av owner association is to be established
and covenatts are to be adopted. Tire proposed plat cordains several tamsual features
vvhidt will be addressed by stallbelow.
CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH
COMMU]YITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD
STAFF REPORT
b1EEI71vG DA"Il: August 15, 1995
AGENDA ITEM: # 4 a Application for Variance to reduce requved front setbacks
from lwrnty (20) feet to sixteen (16) feet to permit the
conswetion of ao addition to aSingle-family residrnce on
property at 322 Magnolia Street.
The Applicant desires to constrtrct atr addition onto aSingle-family residence
which wi II encroach into the front yard setback by approximately fottr feet. The addition is
proposed to increase the Around floor living space.
The existing residence is in compliance with the setbacks and due to the design of
the swchrre the location of the proposed addition is approximately 30 feet from the Gom
property line. The addition will extend 14 feM forward, data encroaching the setback if
We addition were reduced in sin or coastrvcted onto the rear of the ehrttctrae a Variaace
may not be necessary. Based ve the informative presented by the applicant, Staff believes
War alternatives exist which would not require a Variance or which may require a smaller
Variance. Finding that no hardship exists, SrsN"recammea~= i t of this r R'•°t
AGENDA ITEM: # 4 b. Application for Variance to construct an aeeesaory strvcnce
with a setback of five feet from the side property I ine where
that line ie a eecvedary street frotYSge requiriryt IS feet of
setback ve property ar 394 Eighth Street
The Applicam desires to corewd a Gorage building ve the west tide of their
property. That side lure is a secondary etreM frontage because of the locative of We lot ve
a comer. Section 24-151 establisMa a side yard setback requirement for accessory
structures of five leer. The de5nitive of"I-ol, corner' establishes that the longer street
Gontage is a tide yard and requirec a setback of 15 feet The applicant slWes tltW no other
reasonable locariot. exists for this sweture.
The regulations in Section 24-151 address eccescory buildir~ and setbacks in
general. "Ihe definition of "Lot, comer' adheeaee only corner Iota, but appears to
rslablish specific requirements for tide yard setbacks. It is commve practice to accept the
specific regulation over the general regulation when the two differ.
The comer lot setback requiremeN is, at least in part, relattd to traffic safety.
3wctures adjacrnl to ri{dds-of--way lend to obstruct or distract fhe vieive of vehicle
After discussion, H[s. Pillmore moved to recommend to the City
Commission that the subdivision plat be approved subject to the
approval and review of the preliminary and final plats by the City
Coneni ssion. Hrs. Walker seconded the motion and it passed
unanimously.
Scott Fletcher advised the board he had sold his home in Atlantic
Beach and would no longer be auatified to serve as a member.
The board decided to hold the next workshop meeting on September
12, 1995 at 7:00 p.m.
There being no further business to come before the board on motion
made and seconded it was adjourned.
SIGNED
ATTEST
II. Application for Variance filed by Cynthia Corey to construct
a storage building that will encroach the side yard setback of
property located at 399 8th Street.
Mrs. Corey introduced herself to the board and explained that she
desired to build an storage shed on the west side cf her property
with an attached car overhane. She stated that the storage
building would have a loft for additional st oraae and that the car
overhang would allow them to move their cars off the street.
She stated that hardships exist due to considerable time and
expense being incurred for the architectural drawings and also the
unusual shape of the lot.
After discussion, Mrs. walker moved to deny the application. Mrs.
Pillmore seconded the motion and the variance was denied by a vote
of 3 - 2.
III. Application for Use-by-Exception to seating capacity
limitation filed by 363 Associates Ltd., for property located at
363 Atlantic Boulevard.
Ted Johnson introduced himself to the board and explained that the
applicant desired to operate a restaurant in the location of the
former North Shore Grille and obtain a liquor license which applies
to only a restaurant business which requires a minimum of 150
seats. He stated that the previous restaurant turned into more of
a nightclub than a restaurant and an increase in occupancy occurred
but not an increase in seating capacity. He said the objective
was to maximize the food service capability in the space, and that
the porch area would be completely enclosed.
Mr. Worley stated that a use-by-exception was previously granted
to the required number of packing spaces and a variance as to
setback requirements.
After discussion, Mrs. Pillmore moved to reco~renend to the City
Commission that the use-by-exception be granted subject to approved
calculations from the Building and Fire Departments. Mrs. Walker
seconded the motion and the motion was unanimously passed.
IV. Request for subdivision plat filed by William Morgan
Architects on behalf cf Donner Community Development corporation.
William Horgan introduced himself and explained that Donner
Community Development purchased several tracts of land in the
Donner Subdivision with the intent of constructing single family
residences for sale to low to moderate income Ieve] families. He
stated that a homeowners' association will be established and
covenants and restrictions adopted. He answered questions
regarding setbacks, oarY.ine and height requirements.
n1~1~~' Ca~~'
MINUTES OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 80ARD
OF THE CITY OF ATLANTIC REACH, FLORIDA
AUGUST 15, 1995
7:00 P.M.
CITY HALL
PRESENT Robert Frohvein
Pat Pillmore
Nary walker
Sharette Simpkins
Scott Fletcher
AND Alan Jensen, City Attorney
George Worley, II, CD Director
Pat Harris, Recording Secretary
ABSENT Mark McGowan
Don Wolfson
Acting chairman, Robert Frohvein, called the meeting to order
and asked for approval of the minutes from the meeting of July 18,
1995. Upon motion duly made and seconded the minutes were
approved.
NEW BUSINESS
I. Application for variance filed by Haftco, Inc. on behalf of
Jennifer Chalot to construct an addition that will encroach the
front yard setback of property located at 322 Magnolia Street.
Bill Haft introduced himself to the board and stated the applicant
contracted him to build a 10-foot by 14-foot bedroom addition on
the first floor of her residence for use by her mother. He stated
the addition would encroach 4-feet into the front yard setback
line. He stated that the problem with constructing the addition
in the rear vas an existing second floor screened porch.
Bruce Robbins, Mrs. Chalot's next door neighbor, introduced himself
to the board, and expressed his approval of the proposed addition.
Mrs. Chalot introduced herself to the board and presented pictures
of the front and rear of the residence. She stated she originally
desired to build the addition below the rear porch but vas informed
by two contractors that the idea vas impractical.
After discussion, Mrs. Walker moved to deny the variance. Mrs.
Pillmore seconded the motion and the variance vas unanimously
denied.
William Morgan Architects
•rcn~IKN(a 6 Fluminp • Ylp Eaal Faayl~ SUMI • JacYaMMW. FIOrNa u1p3J33p • TNapnwr 90a•SM~alpS • Fu pWS56ap!
Juty 28, 1995
Mr. Donald Wolfson
Chairman
Community Development Board
Atlantic Beach City Hall
800 Seminole Road
Atlantic Beach, Fbrida 32233
Re: Proposed plan for a residential subdivision in Donner Canurwrity
Gear Mr. Wofson:
On the behalf of the Dorxter Cortwxuvty Daveloprrtertt Corporation, I request to
be placed on the agenda of the Corrrrtuniry Developrnertt Boats for the review of our
proposed plan for a group of eleven eirtgle fanu7tr detached residences in Oorxrer
Community. 1 have provided Mr. Ceaoe Worley d the City of Atlantic Beach wph
several drawings dearly ind'~catng the proposed plan which would require a
subdivision replat and approval by the Gty Corrxrdeaion.
1 Wan to appear before the Conrnunity Developrttent board during Rs meeting
at 7:00 pm Tuesday August 15th at the Atlantic Beach City Hap. please advise me of
arty additbnal information which you may require at your earpeu convartiertce.
Yours very truty,
Wil FAIR
rx:: a Simpkins, P.O. Box 828. Atlantic Beach
Ms' _ Worby,'(;omnt+Yly'pavelopRpnt'DkaaSor
~'rAe'F' RF'YUB'.L
,':'1'. .Tta IT1_"11 Pt•itmitiu}~PL•tlmD<am:r Jutalr: isiou
41:~5)1I114'Ir k1_ fJC 1 t, ,.~ ~-
o:ge N'or ° , enun:min~ llevaopmem DireMor ~'~~
D:U~E: :1ggrrst 2'',199
BACIiGROIJND:
The Dormer Comnnarity Developmem Corporation hav recemly prtrchased several corrtiguon
4acts of land in the Dourer oeiphborhood with the intemion ofcomm~reting Single-family homes
for sale to low [o moderate income level families. The tracts are proposed to be combined and
platted imo IMs. An owner association ie to be established and Stalfrecommends That covenants
be adopted to protect the camrnon property. Tire proposed plat cotdaine several rrnrtsra! feeaars
which will be addressed by staffbelow~.
Article N of Cater 24 provide the process and standards for subdivision plats. 'lhe
enclosed submittal is a prelimimay plat drawing atmwing the proposed Iayort of lots. 'the furs!
plat will codaio legal description and dedication of easements. The lot cues are enraller t6ao
required by Section 24-255 but are comparable to most lots within the city. Staff reco®e~s that
the City Cormviesion grant a waiver to permit the lot sizes as shown. Setback, parking and height
requirements are in cordormance with code.
IION:
Co~umity Develrnmtent Roard recd®emds ~Rroval of the Orel- 'nary Rlat s~ j ~ to
review d armroval of the R_~r_y •_a~f I RAY ~ ~v~' ~ Cily~omm~~o.
Stag' Note -The Pref imirrraryy Plat will be submitted to all S~r$'Deparaneras for thorough review
end n Final Ylet will be preaemed to the City Commission for review and approval.
ATT.4Cf~fENTS:
1) CotKephral Plat proposal and drscript-ve cover letl ~ !
REVIEVYED BY CITY M.4.'gAGER:
AGENDA ITEM NO. ~~
-~
CITY OF
~tfa.etle ~ - ~lazisfit
~p~RlltftAlt
~.~~ »_za
,\ KESOLl17lON OF F.STEF:M1f
WHEREAS. Sharettr Simpkins has sm cd as President of the Donner Commumh~ Uccclopment
Corporation, and
WHEREAS. Ute Ik~nncr Conunumh~ Ucrelopmrnt Corporation undo the duauon of Sharelte
Simpkins, has grcatb~ :mprmcd the quahn~ of Gfe for the restdenls o(the fkmncr area. and
WHEREAS, Uu Crtc Commuston recognvts that successful govemmrnt requires dtirrn incolvemrnt
and pantapauon
NO\1', THEREFORE. BG IT RESOLVED. the Cih~ Comrmssion of Atlantic Beach. Florida. hereby
nxggmzcs the sttoars(ul efforts o(Sharette Simpkins to improve the qualin~ of Itfc for others, and torruncnds
her for hn dW.enship and voiumecnsm
BF; IT FURTHER KESOI,\'EU. that a cope of this Resolution o! e5hxm be spread upon the official
minutes of the Gn~ o(Alianuc Beach. and a eertiGed cope hereof be furnished to Ms. Simpkins.
Adopted be Uk Cue Commason o(the Cth~ of AUanOC Beach, Florda, this 2%Ih dac of August. 19Y5.
T. ~F~lc~t~c/h,~~~
{{{G ' LMUWk1N'~ _
Ste cn M. Rosenbloom. Commtssoncr
~~~
RIU N0. 9495-19 - RESURFACE FIVE EXISTING ASPF'.ALT TENNIS COURTS
lta fling Lis[:
Court Surfaces, Inc.
P. O. Box 57059
Jacksonville. FL 32241
Premier Tennis Courts
3435 Phillips Highway
Jacksonville, FL 32207
Varsity Courts
1970A Corporate Square
Longwood, Florida 32750
Nelth Tennis Courts
Attn: Carl Peterson
201 Travelers Nay
St. Petersburg, FL 33710
Nhalen d Goodrich
6299-9 Powers Avenue
Jacksonville, FL 32217
Asphalt Haintenante
4149 St. Augustine Road
Jacksonville, FL 32207
D 3 B Tennis Courts
3003 Nate mood Drive
Sebring, FL 338?2
Len [ral Coast Construction
P. 0. eor. 1565
Palm Coast, FL 32164
= tl n~ I I I ~ I I
O
o '
F
¢
I
~
o O ~ ~ I
~~ I
I
I
I I 1 I
l I
I I I I I
~ I I i i I V I
a I I I I !
I
Q `^ ~ I
O
LL = W'
c UI. i ~
I
LL
_ ' n', I I I
~
U ~'
Y W ~I I
f I
m
f 6~ ~
Z ~ N
}
r
N ~j
~
I
Q x~ ~
) ~
J W'. I I I
_ I
a i
~
~
I i
r, j'. I I
O o
_ Y, o I
R Q
w
n I I rl ~
11 ~ r
1 r~
~
v I I I I I
a I
- o I I
~ ~ I i I I
i I I 1
i O I
~
p
6 _ M
N
~ o
O _ W.
O 0
O .~
~
J -
C y i
a
Y ~
2
y
y
t
1
Q 7 ~ _
l I I (
I I I l I I
l I I i
YI
u
a
__
O E
- c
~ p + - -
_ =
3=
~u
a
6
Z'
J
- U
a
`x
W
U
C.
n >'
U
Q a
~ %
-- w.
O
LL w.
~
LL =
O U a'.
.I
T w
~ "' ~
a0
U
U u.
f a
a
w
J
Q 5
U
o Q;
Ey dl
F
~
- i Z',
J'.
_ x I
T' I I Y' l1 ml I x. al
I I YI lI YI YI „I
I
I
J
I
I
I
i
i i
~ I
I I
I
~ I
~.
~
- i
~ ~ `o.
-~
_' ..!
~Il~'-~ ~ ~I
+
,
J
a - -
~
a
_
N I ~-
~
0
- o
LL _ _ Y
o
¢
m I
z
O
n
¢
s
?
_
-.
I
I
l
<
~
~ ~:
~
~ ¢
o
m
m ~ ' ~
I + + + + + + ! + I + + + + I I +
F
W
f
Y
F .
CITY OF
o'f~lartle 6tae! - ~ldeu~fa
Tao TfMa
ATLANTIC BFACtI, Fl.Oa~ r321YS~lS
IFI.FPiTOTd?dMT IeFSiB6
Fi~1C OMI ].[FINS
DATE• / J
i0: Joan LaVake, Ynrchasing Agent
FRDM: J
/i,ecµy a„-
n I~~
Puading for this project .la Sdentiffed ae follow:
with as approved budgeted swan[ of ;~DOC'7
PUl /IDIAG APP~ROV~A"L":
-~J'A..~ ~•...-K.~~
-Director of Pinance
10,
Porvxrded to you 6erevith are apecificatlona and other pertinent infor,.e-
tfov necessary for you to call for hide on project to be entitled:
c. No oil base line of any kind will be accepted.
d. No machine sprayed lines will be accepted
e. All playing lines are [o be carefully measured and laid out [o within
1/g" of regulation dimensions as prescribed by the Nni[ed States Tennis
Association.
5. Net Posts:
a. Clean and pain[ ezistinR net posts using a rust inhibitive pain[.
6. Nea[her Limitations:
a. No parts of Che construction involving these surfacing systems shall
be conducted during rainfall or when railfall is imminent. The air
temperature must be a[ least 50 degrees and rising.
7. Guarantee:
a. All work is guaranteed against defects in material and vorkmanshlp
for one year from date of completion, subject [m proper main[enarte by
the City.
marked for patching. All depressions along the original paving joints
shall be brought level with the surrounding surface in this same
pa [thing procedure even if not holding eater.
e. Depressions shall be patched (filled) with Court Pa [ch Binder mixed
vi[h sand according to manufacturer's specifications. Any patches deeper
than 5/g" may be filled vi[h ho[ mix asphalt or mul[ip Le lifts of tennis
court grade acrylic deep patch compounds as per manufa~ Corer's
instructions.
f. After patches are properly cured, then pa [c hes and areas surrounding
each patch shall be flooded again and alloyed to drain for 60 minutes.
A[ [ha[ time, Che surface shall be checked for depressions and any areas
holding eater more Chan 1/8" deep shall be marked for patching and then
patched after [he area has been dried. This procedure will be repeated
until any lov areas have been brought vithin Che 1/g" tolerance and
inspected and approved by City's represen [alive.
g. The edges of all patches will he scraped or ground smooth so that
patches are no[ visible through the finished surface.
2. Finished Course Preo [1
a. In order [o provide a smooth, dense underlayment for Che California
Products finish cola: courses apply one Coat of sand - acryi is resurfaces
mix to [he entire surface of the courts vith a broad squeegee according
[o manufac corer's recommended coverage rates.
3. Texture and Finish Courses (Color)•
A. Apply [vo successive coats of colored, fortified California Products
fortified Plexipave filler coat (sand-filled acrylic) [o [he entire
prepared area of [he courts. Total application rate will be not less
than .13 gallons per square yard of surface area based on the material
prior [o dilution. No applScations shall be covered by succeeding
application until thoroughly cured.
b, the mixed ma [erial shall be homogenous. Segregation before or during
application will no[ be permitted.
c. Color selection of any [vo from manufacturer's standard color char[
to be determined by [he City.
d. The finished surface shall have uniform appearance and be free from
ridges and tool marks.
4. PlayinK ~.ines:
a. After completion of [he resurfacing, tvo inch vide vhi[e playSng lines
shall 6e accurately located, marked and hand-painted with Detoralt Line
Pain[ or approved equal.
b. 7vo coats of line paint to be applied to be solid white throughout,
vi[h nn dark spots due [u lack of paln[.
SPECIFICA'1'IO`:S
RHSORPAC F. '1'F:YN 15 COOkTS
BID N0. 9455-19
The FollovinR are spec if icatiuns to resurface sir (b) existing, asphalt
tennis courts in Atlantic Heath, four at Russell Park and Cwo a[ Hull
Park.
Ma cer ial shall be Plexipave, a product of Cal if ornis Products, or
approved equal.
Approved equals are:
Southern Sport surfaces.
Decorah Surfacing System as manufactured by Koch Asphalt Co.
If a bidder proposes to use materials other than those approved, detailed
technical specifications from [he manufacturer [o be used must be submitted
at leas[ two weeks prior to bid opening for evaluation by [ha City. If
alternate material is acceptable to the City, an addendum will be sent co
all regisfe red bidders indicating the material approved as equal. If
alternate ma [etia is are not approved prior to bid opening, specified
materials only are [o be used.
1. Surface Preparat ion
a. Entire courts' surface to be cleaned ro remove all loose dirt, debris.
vegetation and foreign matter. Any mildew algae, etc., must be removed
by either manual or power scrubbing using Trf-Sodium Phosphate or
pressure washing (minimum 2000 PSI pressure washer) with five percent (SS)
chlorine solution. All vegetation growing through the court will receive
at least 2 applications of non-selec Cive herbicide before finishing new
surface.
b. All existing "rust spots" or ocher items of debris visible within the
asphalt surh as pieces of wood are to be individually routed out to a
depth of a[ least 114" or as necessary [o remove any objectionable
material. Apply tennis court grade patching ma terlals [o all touted areas
[o brSng each one flush with surrounding asphalt.
c. Clean out all cracks [o remove dirt, debris, etc., and Cill all cracks
[hat are at least 1/16" vide or a[ least 6" in length with California
Products Corporation's crack filler or approved equal. Apply a section of
fiberglass membrane at least one foot vide over each crack in court's
surface. The membrane layer will be held in place using acrylic coating
eater ials and will extend a[ least six inches (6") on either side of each
crack and one font (I') beyond the end of each crack.
d. Prior to application of surf ac inR materiais, [he entire court's
surface shall be water-flooded and alloyed to drain for 60 minutes. A[
[ha[ time, [he surface shall he checked for depressions and any areac
holding eater more than ]/H" deep (the thickness o[ a nickel) shall be
preference shall be giver. [o businesses vi[h a drug-free vo rkplace
program in place. A form for this cer[if is anon is included vi[h [he
bid forms, but is nn[ a requirement to bid.
Joan LaVake
Purchasing Agent
Y Y fi * * fi * * * * * * fi * # * # * fi # * fi * * * * * # Y Y fi * # Y #
FLORIDA TIMES-UNION: Please publish one time on Mednesday, July 19,
1995. Submitted by Joan LaVake - 247-5518
CITY OF
July 19, 1995
rQtla«tci b'eael - ~loacda
~ a00 tiFMM'OLE RIHn
_- ~4 -- --- ATI 11TIC BFX'H, FLOHHM RDl4ic
TELFAIfI\E 19W1 llA5A0a
~` , FAC 190112lFSBOS
CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH
INVITATION TO SID
t+OT ICE is hereby given that the City of Atlantic Beach, Florida, will
receive sealed bids in [he Office of the Purchasing Agent, City Hall,
800 Semino Le Road, Atlantic Beach, Florida 32233, until 2:00 PN.
Thursday, August 17, 1995, after which time the bids will be publicly
opened and read aloud to RESURFACE FIVE (5) EXISTING ASPHALT TENNIS
COURTS IN ATLA.NT IC BEACN (FOUR (4) AT JACK RUSSELL PARK; ONE (1) AT
BULL PARK).
Bids shall be enclosed in an envelope endorsed "BID N0. 9495-19 -
RESL'RFACE EXISTING ASPHALT TENNIS COURTS IN ATLANTIC BEACH, TO BE
O: EKED AFTER 2:00 PM, THURSDAY, AUGUST 17, 1995."
Bid Forms and information regarding the bid may be obtained from [he
Office of the Purchasing Agent, 800 Seminole Road, Atlantic Beach.
Florida, telephone (904) 247-5818.
DOCUMENTS REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED IN BID PACKAGE AT BID OPENING ARE:
1. Bid Bond in [he amount of SI of the bid.
2. Form PUR 7068, SWORN STATEMENT UNDER SECTION 287.133(3)(A),
FLORIDA STATUTES, ON PUBLIC EN'iITY CRIMES.
3. ORIGINAL Insurance Certificates (copies or Xeroxes are
UNACCEPTABLE), naming the City of Atlantic Reath as Certificate
Holder, showing [hey have obtained and will continue to carry
Mor ke rs' Compensation, public and private liability, and
property damage insurance during the life of the contract.
4. References [estif ying to the quality of work.
5. Proof of contractor's licensing (copies are acceptable).
6. Signed copy of Doc omen[ Requireme n[s Chec kl isL.
Bid prices must remain valid for sixty (6U) days after the public opening
of the bids. Goods and services proposed shall meet all re quiremen[s of
the Ordinances of the City of Atlantic Beach.
The City of Atlantic Beach reserves [he right [o :eject any or all bids
or parts of bids, waive informalities and technicalities, make ava rd
in whole or par[ with or without cause, and [o make the ava rd in what
is deemed to be in [he best intere s[ of the City of Atlantic Beach.
IUF,`:TICAL TIE BIDS - In accordance with Section 287.087, FLORIDA
STATUTES, effective Janus r} 1, 1991, in a "TIED BIDS" situation,
CITY OF
i Y~lla«tie beat! - ~l°a~da
AeARDS COlLM ITTEE M.I NUTES
THURSDAY, AUGUST l7, 1995
600 SF NI\/ILF IaMll
ATLA!1'flt' aFi1CN. FU)RIIN )22J}µFc
TFlEYNOSF. f\0/1 2h58m
FA\ ~9W12iz58p5
The Awards Committee met on Thursday, August 17, 1995, at 2:00 PM, to
receive bid advertised as Hid No. 9495-19 - RESURFACE FIVE (5) E%ISTINC
ASPHALT TENNIS COURTS IN ATLANTIC BEACH (FOUR (4) AT JACK RUSSELL PARK;
ONE (1) AT BULL PARK).
Present a[ the bid opening were Commissioner Robert G. Neiss, Chairman,
Recreation Director Timmy ]ohnson, Building Official Don Ford, and
Purchasing Agent Joan LaVake.
Invitations [o Bid vere mailed to eight (8) prospective bidders, and
the project vas advertised 1n [he Florida Times-Union. Three (3) bids
vere received as follows:
TOTAL PRICE BID
D S B Tennis Courts S 8,975.00
Sebring, FL
Court Surfaces, Inc. 9,460.00
Jacksonville, FL
Central Coast Conscruction 36,000.00
Palm Cnast, FL
D 8 B Tennis Courts, [he low bidder at 58,975.00, failed to provide
proof of bidder's licensing which vas required [o have been enclosed
with all bids. I[ Ss, therefore, [he consensus of [he committee [hat i[
recommend [o [he City Commission [ha[ it accept [Se bid from Court
Surfaces, Inc., as [he loves[ responsive bid mee[Ing bid requirements,
in [he amounc of $9,460.00, and make the award accordingly.
Respec [f ul l_v,
Joan LaVake, Purchasing Agent
/ "v
August 22, 1995
a
~-
:~~`~ 3 ~ ~ tl
P . i Ci a~
K Y
g g €
z~ ~
~ ~~ t~ ~ i
.i~;~
~ ~g
_ ? ^~. R of !i ~ _ ?
t3 C3 L
~ ~ ~i` ~ i i pp
~7:g X~ C
~ < i53 _
J. :X L .X i
C C E~ 5 ~ ~~4 $
S C ~. i 3~ i 5
o Y ~~
't tl~ ~~
i
L C~ ~~ ~~ 6
6
,
2 j
- p
4€ g
S° C$o
g
E7
~~~
€S
tl
t $ € ~_ ~2 ~~ ..~.
~a~
e
?
- ,. - ~°
-c 43 g5 ~a~ ? 8? a
$ ~ r ~ €
~ ~ a~
e °-
' a
x
Y
E
~
~
~k:~ BE
o
i~ ~~
~
'?
s
~
~°
`
A~:e ~4
~
i~
a' 7
~~
~'
5 ' E~ Q
3 c x E
~
€ 6'
b C
g~
~9
e
--
€ - -
.< .
€ s
- _ e~ ~i L s ~
¢ 5€ P €
~co~ `~~ $ B a ~
$ E $ Cy ~ s
y~3£e $
L$ y 9 ~ g :~
~ ~ ~ 9t ~t $
a
€i~':~ 5E ~ F ~'~ ~ tl
~ , 3
~ ~ $8 a
g ~ ~ ~~ €
~a
oa 6
~~
~
~ ~ -.
-
~ ~~ s~ L ~
t a a a i=
i= ~ $ p_
_
~ '¢
e c 5s ° ~ ~- ~ a
e ' E~ a
e ,~
F. a
e
Q :
g
~ c
0 3e ~ j R ~~ ~ e ~ Eg
e ~ ~ ~
5 1 ~: ~ 5 ; $~
- _
~ i _
~.. ,a;, ...,
>:9+
q ` ..~y '
_~~ _,.
=r---"
Ju'Y-" L~
~1.., ,
14.:
~r+.u s.r ~::c t oc ~F.n..
~~D uni ~ c . s""..t y
Fs
r ~
r+ Roo ~bv-x~ I
1
0 O O ^ n ~~,~.1
_ U `J ~~T"
~ ~:1 L% J7
-_ I
y 44 ~
1 L
~~... .,-9S 19 21 FROM PUHVIS GRgY qNU COMPgNV ID. PpLr ~
'J
Mena
1++. Ann Meuse, Coy of Atlantic Oeach
Fluor. Merk Szymanski, 1'urvia. Grey Qr Company ~j~
kc AS!4fq and network upgrade
Dat< August 10, 1995
I hose reviewed tht Inter from Mr. Frank Aflame dtled August 7, 1995. aM the uuched IBM
eunGguration spurn. The suggestul toufiguratimst ue COIU61COt with the City's plain to expand in data
prxessing capahVlines and previous rttotnmerdatioru ve love nude to the City. The plena for
networking tlx water plant, public works, xewer. foe, police std parka locuiom appnr lu De well
corutmttal. t:ilher the sannd ur Utinl option should WKtu, an0 while trwre expensive, provide [he Ciry
orth a high degree nt protection agaitrst desk failure std increased growth poteNial.
C~IMN t+yWcAeewMarb
Ms. Ann Meuse
August 7.1994
Page 3
2270-12E Router (Public Wanks) fi.5%
5765-368 SoMrare 276
221072E Rarer (City Hall) 7.796
5765368 Sollware 240
8224-001 Ettzrnet HUB sa2Z
(4,475
The Giry would provide Me Oipilal teleWtone line, CSU/DSUS (2) and personal computers with
EMemet Adapers.
Frtally, we diswssed the re~remerk b dial-in to the network and AS/400. I tonl"gured a 8235
nelw«kinp device with 3 rtgdems (can ttartde up b 8). This device makes yax rornde personal
computer lock Eke you are anaehed to the bcal netwok. H Me dry imAals this n1ad1'trle, then the 6
Oialin pons on the ASl400 would t>e rerrbved (f1,277) and the need for a new 5394 ronbte contrdler
at Public Works wwd be elimirwted .
8235-032 EMernel Urit wid13 Modems (4.667
To knPlertterll the above upgrades. I est:nate the folbwirt9 prolessicnal services sFrwd be klckrde0 in
Me project:
Install new soHware on ASl400
Install GFem Access SoMrare a1 personal cartputers
(20 persarW oorttgners)
Ir151aY and configure Routers (2210)
IrWaY and cadqure dial-in rknworkirg device (8235)
Ibr 5 Personal conputas)
H you have additional Que51ip1s, please d0 rbl tlesRale b Caf r11B at'341779
Sincerely.
Frank Adams
Aulh«i:ed Agem
EN219951
Ms. Ann Meuse
August 7, 1994
Page 2
Descrjption
9404 Processor Upgrade Pumlrase Price
E 43.943.00
9910 UPS with extra banery pack 1,635.00
5763 Sonware upgrades 2.316 00
S 47A94 00
Installment PavmeM Agreement
36 Momh Term (422°/,) Monthly Payment
E 1 418.71
48 Momh Term (4A7°%) 1,09750
60 Momh Term (a.67 %) 898.29
OPTION 3 - AS/400 Upgrade with RAID Disk
Same features as Qptan'[ with the folbwing exceptions
• Increased tlisk wpainy (2.5 to 7.84G8)
• Combination Mnrored 8 RAID Disk approx. 32°/, tAilized
Description PurClMae Prk:e
9404 Processor Upgrade f 45,497.00
9910 UPS with extra Banery Pack 1,635.00
5763 Software upgrades 2 316.00
S 49A48 00
Installment Pa7rrneM Ad m nt
36 Momh Term (4.22°/,) lAotlihly Payment
E 1.464.75
48 Momh Term (4.47%) 1.126.92
60 Morph Term (4.67°/,) gpq.3q
Aner further Discussion with Chief ,bhp Riney. Carolyn Ttwmas and Mike Austin, a was recommeMed
to mooed the existing personal mnputer network in the Police Foe Building usirg fiber to the clerks
network in City Hall_ The AS/400 woub attach to this network through the new Ethemel Adapter. The
ASl400 Client Access Program, which rs pars of the upgrade, woub be instatletl on any personal
computer that would need AS/400 connectivity.
In add4an, we Oacusse0 the replacemem of the old 5294 Remote Comroller at the Public Works
Departmern with a personal mnputer Ethernet Network. By using Ihis method of communication the
City woub t>a implememirg the beginning of a Wide-Area Network (WAN) where anybody wmid be
able to •talk'to anybody including the Imernel.
The IBM Hardware/Software costs to implement the Wide-Area-Network are:
E»zis9s~
. .,_o: iai bavr+•ss ~~.-~,_o.., s CulPm91r0
August 7, 1995
Ms Ann Meuse
Finance Director
City of Atlantic Beath
Cey Hall
Atlantic Beach, FL 32250
Dear Ann'
taM UnpeU Suers
P O na. 19200
Jacxsonve~e. Fmnaa 322+5~92W
90a; 928~~500
This letter will wniirm the costs to upgrade ywr installed AS/400 and Data network. In addition, I
have induded IBM's Irlstallrnent Payment Agreement as a payment opan br your purchase.
OPTION 7 - AS/400 Upgrade w4h Mirrored Disk
• Increased processor perbrmance (2.2 to 6.2)
• Increased dsk capacity (2.SGB b a.0 GB)
• Mirrored main memory -approx. 62% utilzed
• Additional main mertgry (hom 32MB to 64M8)
• 2-5G6 va tape cartridge
• Ethernet Adapter
• Urtirtterruptible Power System (UPS)
• 6 dail-in ports
~IIp1IQ
9404 II
Processor Upgrade
9910 UPS with extra Battery Padc
5763 Software upgrades
36 Month Term (4.22°/ )
48 Month Term (4.47 % )
60 Mmtth Term (4.61 % )
QQjjQ~ - AS/400 Upgrade with RAID Dlsk
Same features as Option 1 with the blowing exce{%brts
bcreased disk tapatity (2.5 to 6.91 GBJ
CaMlirlation Mirrored 8 RAID Disk -approx. 36 % utilized
BucLexPlkA
S 32.660.00
1.270.00
2.316.00
1l~Ot011LP~t
S 1,060.19
831.06
881.66
'_H(i9951
Memo Page 2.
installation which does not leave much room for growth. Mark Szymanski has reviewed
Option 2 and Option 3 and found them acceptable. Attached is a letter from Mark with his
recommendation. Iwould like to suggest Option 3 in that it Drovides increased disk
capacity at a minimal cost as compared to Option 2. IBM has a very aggressive lease
purchase program with a 36 month lease at 4.22%. The lease purchase of the AS-400 has
been included in the 1995/1996 budget. According [o discussions with IBM, the City could
enter into a lease purchase agreement now and bring the equipment on line by mid
September, which would enable the opening of the new fiscal year October t. The first
lease payment would not be due until October, so there would be no financial impact this
fiscal year.
Due to the urgency of the situation, I am requesting authorization from the City
Commission to purchase the Option 3 upgrade of the AS-400 by a 36 month lease
purchase with IBM at the stated 4.22% interest.
The IBM representative, Frank Adams, will be available at the Commission meeting
monday night to answer any questions regarding the upgrade.
.., =t:... ._..
F t i7 U: f 6
CITY OF
--- - --
MEMORANDUM
Date: August 10. 1995
To: Kim Leinbach, City Manager
From: Ann Meuse, Finance Director
Subject: Upgrade AS-400
wu,t,li,nl.e Nuta
AI1_UTIC atX'H. F l:)R W~ ):.)). W p
it.LlPN(r\! ~9pri 2LJ.Sbpr
tax i,rori znseos
As you are aware, the City has known (or some time that the AS-400 would need to be
upgraded to handle [he volume of City transactions. The system was initially purchased to
handle quarterly billing of 24,000 bills a year. When the City converted to monthly billing
it increased the number of utility bills to 84,000, an increase of 250%. In addition to the
demands placed on [he system by the utility conversion, the city has added several new
users; such as the Deputy City Manager, Buccaneer Plant, City Clerks network system,
Assistant Director of Public Works, Building Department Secretary as well as three
additional users in the Finance Department. The system presently supports 60 users which
also includes printers. Fire, Police and Atlantic Beach Sewer Plant are scheduled to come
on-line next year. Attached is a rough diagram of the system and users.
Mark Szymanski of Purvis Gary & Company, the City's auditors, has prcvided ongoing
consulting advice on the City's computer system. Based on his recommendation last year,
the City postponed the upgrade of the AS-400 to take advantage of price reductions in the
computer industry. In order to manage the City's available disk space, any program which
could be removed from the system was removed as well as all source code and even
something called "journalizing' which is an internal data check. As Mark stated last year,
"as long as the City could remain at less than 90% disk space, the system could operate
without affecting performance.' Unfortunately, on July 22, 7995 [he City loaded a
necessary update to its software which pushed the disk space to 94°b and the system
shut down. By signing off users and removing programs, the City was able [0 bring the
disk space down to 90% and get the system running. But 1 have been informed by HTE
that the City wili not be able to open the next fiscal year, which must be opened by
October 1'st ,because there is not available disk space.
Attached are three proposals from 19M to upgrade the AS-400, all at state contract prices.
Option 1 is not under consideration because the disk space will be at 62°h on the date of
:;~
I'Hfi AISS\\ Ukll l
~r--~~ ~fuuF1 < ~c,r; r
I ~
L{RGE BUU L SH aU H 1' S FI 9_
iF=TYIR ~$
MODEL ?QIIJ >:a.'dzrd krgth 33-
AFnxn'.;%ihvl~~!oC= Uimmum lenP,.hl~
Ula-,r;e! li- frlmg no:wp.-10'
Leng,f.9? lUl durcn4am irc4dz aharil ^i
(r,Lngc'Igr: i:- \xtx four l0~"man bulbs. --
FtYrS" a.-eJ ax Tia tn~~:-gaegedcn up:'•.n;
.~9$0 'ry^gas I c'o:e. shK e_a:rt uuna_•Bbkm~.rrae-r:: a:e
r
.^.IYP~P.R~1 ?~~:5'rC S'LL
"l can'I strn:;l.r t.:.:; ::,; ~~~ r,;,rbnnr more 1Gan
1 Cart stcn:':: r:~c~ r, n:,:• r r n cdgar z; dion-'
.,-. .,,nrr 1nn:ed Der,n~e
THE
ABERNETHY
MODEL =C~-Y';1:
LARGE BOWL
SHADE FL\'NRE
ABaopfzle fu Inge bm,:g
aM Irving mar¢, as cell as
mmmvaal and~c
dtil6ng a~glinuara
Aailable alfh shade K09fi
OIJy (OIA`f ffpYL~ 1
Dii~ l?"
Glmg mm~~ 10' 1 r
WI dunmusu I:el'..<V:ael
mp¢bzr l0:'-': a': iV1:5
TIIF \IO\'G1\71.1_,
zo
.r. I
!:I !f -: i.A:J II )f: l '...,1 ;, i U; l l'I': t 1 ~ ~~.__
V
J: --- - -
I
f r
I I
~
_
g10DFl aL1N iJ
Shawn with shade;•JO;+tP!;
Diamner !
Surdard length 3G'
UilingcarwpF S
Finn. 6'
kxxpts d04vzv bu'.b.
Ir
\`-
MODD :CtB If
Shorn u~,h sha~ct010P~ 10
Dia:,e:er !0"
Sur:L:c k:.;.h iL'
Afinimv,n z:,,c: !;'
Celing n~.;;,
Fit4 1"
THE JEVi'ELL
MODEL =Nal+1 E
FIFCFRIC WJLLL BRACFLT
/JUTS our rno9 mpWuval! Luiur_
Shorn vith shale ai:(I
Projatiare T
Hnghc 8'. a'dm: a' mil;
flail arwp}-i':E' :~
W; dnnmsiazs inciufe shale)
tan be irmalkd up ordwn.
'lift: R/)SF. CI'Il'
THE FRENCHGLEN
MODEL =W'JCVZE
T1'O~ARM WAil BRACI:kT
Shawn uiih shade EI??CE
Pmjasior,:6"
Finght IO', Y idlh: 10'
Sa17 rvsop;•- 4' > 6'
(A!I dirriassime irclude studs)
Can be irWailed tip or dmn
THE 1.0~1[3.1RD
MuurL=c~clr
9SGLF~oILiDE FIS7l'tiF.
//
~
~-~
Sixtii.'+iti: Stu %=d~50 G1II aci-Yr \
\
am i:Kisene shin ~--.`.:_:1
~;~
Panes:..i" NODFl x(.lClS MODFl-(.lClf MODt1 fC1iC1
)
I[i:g:h t,.
J 4sc nusV. shade it ijOP i'vi'•n unh s'u'e SY+m with stude WJlOP~I?
_
Ceding a~egr j - _I .pa;r~.r.. 6"
' °i~IOR.°. Iia;eer lI
_
Cti!CL.M:}iO.Z ::rti:%Jf SY:aCRI IC'y..i5 Itu;erer3 Ies:M9a'
Fy k.-zJL.le'x;Ih La:;P!.lixra :itl F:rr. 2., :L:..-g2'n(sf fiY 6'
fo: l2sci: r.<ts:it:ins lw. page;i? i:rx+ .:.7a iiC~cs. nr3
.n rzse cou acre Monderiag. ILe i::•. u:: es z::d ism, s m our catalogue .+rc nzmed either ;or irr;or. w:.n_ or (o; r'vrland
:~~.elglibcrhoods z::d srzes. A'e. 1.4. ^iminrcgunrrs.IC;;SwI'x :n;u(.`e~.:bl~, jrtortncial.
OU!C" ..-IS fu e: :-iD iI CP .: ~ 3f e-:'FSU;I : (.:I ....'.GUIs FpPI -~~ ...^.<;r:ptll'I_ .1 eRt:'•
'0;!: r.-D n. e.td zp h. c .. c...,'.r ' .I L. , c :u t < k- aaasss St . calasz colt •ualr- :.0 :hs; }t.n : ! I:mse~
'..: L>~~..c. _i~. c;. :;u ~:; _a~: c::.. ~t.: he i i:.(:eu,.i,iP.r :could :~.riccrr .c... :.ii t~c ~:I sr:%
., n: i,;, ~r ,; cs u~ do~v i r - .:... _ _: Sutr .Lt ra sin : r :..._ ~ ....: a. : ...d hol e
.. sad. i; ~ ..
:: ,. ". tl. .:uu;h ...'d.r: : ~~:r•. Ao:',: ::~: rCJ, 4.: ;Iu.-.'P~ ~:r.d. t;:r_uu i-'..
(Continuation of ADF.LE GRAGE CORM. GTR. RENOV.)
DESCRIPTION AMOUNTS
B. Bathroom Addition
/, ~ 00
1. Plumbina~-
$ -2; 2~
Labor and materials to install 1-white
Briggs 4728 Handicap Conserver toilet,
1-white Briggs 6604 Wee Bairn xall hung
lavatory, and 1-Delta 520 chrome handicap
law. faucet
2. Electrical- 125
Labor and materials to relocate ceiling
light and switch
3. Carpentry- 875
Labor and materials to frame a doorwall and
install door along with associated trim
4. Stainino- 225
Labor and materials to stain all new wood to
match t.*.e existing
5. Floorino- 490
Vinyl the for the new bathroom and replacement
carpet for the disturbed bath hall area
6. Miscellaneous 500
Total Bathroos 1ddition 4 445
?30
3 '7' s
Prepared by
Heywood A. Dowling
u:
ADELE GRAGE COMMUNITY CENTER
RENOVATIONS
RECOTfNF.NDED BUDGET
August 10,1995
DESCRZPTION AMOUNTS
A. Ceiling and Nall Restoration
~~1. Electrical- /~~~
S -~,~-
Re-routing of ail existing exposed conduit
and junction boxes to create a concealed
wiring system serving 19 lights, 30 of which ~~ -
are solid brass "Rose Hill" Schoolhouse
Pendant fixtures ~ V
- s ~j ~-1y,i{p.
23ie-teetir#1=Modification and to-use of 8 / ~ n~0~7~
existing flourescent fixtures
instead of 10 pendants. Tf~h'
a,.e.., a ~ d, D a gSt7 -
Alternate #~-Add 6 Sconce(wall) Lights. If this"
alternate is desired, ADD j950
~/2. Air Conditionino- 1,190
_%~ Restoration of all existing ductwork and
grilles to the original ceiling height(12'4•')
may. 3. Attic Insulation- 600
~1 //` Installation of R-30 InsulSafe III fire ~
'7 !~ resistant attic insulation(ASSUmes existing attic
i'~~ debris to be cleaned out by City AB personnel)
,I4. Caroentrv- ~ 850
~~ Labor and materials to restore all damaged
ceiling and wall tongue and groove board
5. Staining- 1,500
Labor and materials to finish all new wood and
to strip and refinish various old discolored
areas
~; 6. Flooring- 290
,.~~. Labor and materials to restore water damaged ~
~~-~ floor(air conditioner leak)
~. `".i scelianeous
Total Ceiling and Nall Restoration
'~/~ ~{, ~ yqv
/J// ,"~ 7 ~/~j
500 / ~~
D~fbup
Cf 290
/ 0 ~j S" T~7~G
He~~ivood A. Dowling
State Certified Contractor
CEiC QFS3a
July 10,1995
Kim Leinbach, City Manager
City of Atlantic Beach
H00 Seminole Rd.
Atlantic Heach, Florida 32233
RE: Adele Grage Community Center-Renovations
Dear Mr. Leinbach:
At the request Mayor Fletcher, I have conducted a
study to determine the cost of-
A• Restoring the original pine tongue and groove
ceiling along with restored air conditioning
ductwork, attic insulation, and a general
lighting system
-and-
8. Installation of a new anises bathroom next to the
existing handicap bathroom.
The attached data should not be considered a "bid"
from my company and does not include compensation in
any way for me. It may be relied on, however, as accurate
enough, based on knovr. conditions, to serve as a
Recommended Budget to fund the above described work.
As ABET's volunteer Renovation Project Manager, I am
offering to manage construction of these two important
improvements to the community center as a complecent to
the final phase of ABET's originally planned theater
renovation project to be completed by the end of this year.
Si
i~. cq3 J--:. Co,li r.g
It: ::!~~...... +. ~!.,: ~:~ it_~. 6. iI. S"_3'.•:'6.,. ~.,; f:,~l!'. :; ::•. ISi3
NAME OF
COMMRS.
August 14, 1995
public had tentatively been scheduled for August 22nd at Fleet landing,
August 23rd at City Flall, and August 24th at Selva Marina.
and Citr ('1..4•
Commoaioaer Shaaghaeary
...requested that legislation rcgardutg ex pane communications with city
boards be placed on the next agenda.
..commended Chief Thompson for his involvement in teaching children to
swim.
Commiaeiooer Waters expressed cottam regarding the issuance of liquor
licenus in the city. The City Manager and City Attorney agreed to check
into this end report to Commissioner Waters.
Mayor Fletcher
.. reported the Teen Council was putting their fall program together.
...indicated set out rate for recycling was 98 percent for June.
There being no further business the Mayor adjourned the meeting at 9:45 p.
m.
Lyman T. Fletcher
Mayodpresiding Officer
ATTEST:
Maureen King
City Clerk
NAME OF
COMMRS.
-_
M
l._
S
- ~~
Y;
L-1
N
Minutes, Page 6
August I4, 1995
xwage lik atatiop at a coat of 55,638.00
Bob Kosoy, Public Works Director, explained that it was necessary to
replace #2 pump az "E" Sutiort He distributed three puce quotes that had
been received std it was recommended that tlx bid be awarded to Gruhn-
May Construction az a price of 55,638. He explained the work entailed
replacemem of one T-4 Gorman-Rupp p[rmp and two 4" check valves at "E"
Sewage Lift Station located at 799 Maypon Road.
Rfotaa: Award bid to Grohs-May Construction Company SENELOOM
eAUGRNess X x
!x
for replacement of one T-4 Gorman-Rupp pump and hvo
"
°
"
' TERS
ELSS x
~ x
x
4
check vatvea at
E
Sewage Lik Station located at
799 i
Mayport Road at • price of S5,(aS ETCHER x
Following discussion the question was called and the motion carried
unanimously.
E. Scheduk iekrviewa with architects far the proposed addition to
the Pablte Safety Building
John Ruley, Fire Chief, requested that a time be scheduled for the
Commission to select an architect from those that responded to the Request
for Proposal for tlec renovation and addition to the Public Safety Building. It
was irtdirated Ihrce proposals had been received: Fleet & Associates, Gce &
Jenson, and Michael Dunlap. The Ciry Manager was asked to coordinate the
scheduling of interviews.
z, ('itv Rr.nager 2.a2rCa aeator Corrnpondence
Kim Lriebach
...indicated it was time to schedule workshops to discuss the 1995/96
budget. He indicated staff would like to use overhead projections. The Ciry
Clerk was asked to artange workshops between 6:00 p.m. and 8:00 p.m.
...reported the city was working in concert with the Teen Council of
Neptune Beach and that on August 19, 1995 both teen councils would have a
joint activity.
...reporteA the U. S. Attorney would presem the city with the deed iq
properh~ on Francis Sueet.
John Ruky, Fire Chief, reported htuucane preparedness meetings with the
J
~
NAME OF
COMMRS.
M
S ~
Y ~
N
Minutes, Page 5
August 14, 1995
During discussion, Commissioner Weiss expressed concern relative to the
secutip~ of the computer room, to which Kim Leinbach, City Manager,
indicated the glass exposure would Ix addressed.
The question was called and the vole resulted in 4-1 with Commissioner
Shaughnessy voting nay- The motion carried.
At this time (8:45 p. m.) a 15 minme recess was called.
Following the recess the Commission addressed Item 6B.
B. Authorize purchase of computer software for Fire Department
John Ruley, Fire Chief, asked for approval to purchase a fire reporting
software program that would replace the one that the Fire Departaten[ had
which was not operational. Chief Riney irdicated the Fire Department had
been having major problems with they computer program and, after many
bores of research end consdtation with Fire Deparmrents that used the
system, recommended that a program be pruchased from Custom Micro Inc.,
Jacksonville, Florida entitled "Fire Data Marragemem Systems." It was
explained total tort of the system with tral^~^9 would be 58,600.00 and tire[
there was money in the budget which was iderrtified and approved by the
Commission.
OSENBLOOM X'
Motion: Approve purchax of program from Custom Micro NAUGHNESS x x i
-ac., Jacksonville, Florida totitlcd "Fire Data Managemeet ATexs I x
Systems^, for a total cost Of 56,800.00 LETCHER x I X
Followingabrief discussion the question was called andthe vote result a
in 4-1 with Commissioner Waters voting nay. The
motion carried.
C. Discussion and related action relative to completion of the
renovations at Adele Grage Community Center
At this time the question was called on the motion to appropriate fords not to
exceed 511,000.00 to complete audi[orirrm renovations in Adele Grage
Community Center, which would include new lights, ceiling repairs, and a
new unisex bathroom near the front of the auditorium, and the vote resdted
in all ayes. The motion carried.
D. Authorize Gruhn :'Nay Cooatruction Company to undertake
emergency replacement of N2 pomp and cheek valves at ^E^
NAME OF I ~
COMMBS MSS Y
August 14, 1995
A discussion ensued concerning the air conditionine of the building and it
was felt that i(a glass enclosure was placed over the air conditioning box that I
this would prevent people from constantly changing the temperature.
It was decided to vote on the matter after s recess which would be called later
in the meeting.
A. Approve fieavcivg for emergency upgrade of IBM AS~400
computer
Ann Meuse, Finance Director, requested an upgrade for the city's computer
system, IBM AS-000, as outlined in a memorandum dated August 10, 1995
(copy attached hereto and made a part hereof - Exhibi[ B). She explained
without the upgrade the city would tat fz able to begin its new fiscal year in
Ocaber. She explained the upgrade was ten emergency because the bigger
hard drive would not be ready by October 1, 1995 if it wasn't purchased at
the present time.
It wa explaired three options were under consideration: Option 1 - a simple
hard drive upgrade would cost 536,446 and would relieve the problem for
approximately 12 m 18 months; Opuon 2 -which was a more
comprehensive option -refurbish the city's computer and upgrade its
processing power in addition to its hard disk which would last the city at least
five years at a wst of 549, 448.00; Option 3 -same as Option 2 with betur
networking abilities through Ethernet included at a cost of 54,475.00.
Ann Meuse invoduced Ftank Adams, 03M Representative, who answered
questions regarding the upgrade. It was explained Mark Srymanski of Purvis
Gray & Company, the City's auditors, had provided ongoing consulting
advise regarding the maser.
A discussion ensued concerning whether to address the problem over the
short urm and address a long term solution during the 1995-96 budget, or to
more thoroughly upgrade the system which would solve problems over the
long-terra immediately. During discussion it was felt by some commissioners'.
that a thorough upgrade via Option 2 or 3 would ultimately lead a better
service for citizens. RpSENBLOOM
Motion: Accept teeommevdaliov of staff avd approve
Option 3, which ivclvded installatiov of Etheroe[ at a
total cast of 554.000 pvrsvavt to the memonvdvm dated
August 10, 1995 (attached hertrto avd made ^ -Exhibit B)
NAME OF
COMMRS.
M
S V
Y V
N~
Minmes, Page 3 I ~- -
August 14, 1995
ASPECTS OF THE COASTAL CONSTRUCTION CONTROL
L[,'VE AS REESTABLISHED FOR DL'VAL COUNTY,
FLORH/A, IN JULY, 1992, AND TO ESTABLISH A NEW
COASTAL CONSTRUCTION CONTROL LINE FOR
MUNICH'ALITIES IN DUVAL COUNTY IMMEDIATELY.
Mayor Fletcher presented in full in writing Resolution No. 95-23.
OSENBLOOM X
Motion: Approve paa+age of Rwolutioo No. HAVCeeess x
9523 ATERS
P'EISS
x X
X
~
LETCHER X ~
Following a brief discussion the question was called and the motion carried
unanimously.
6
New Baaiees
•
.
s
Item GC w>, taken out of sequence sad anted upon.
C. Discaaiou and related action relative to compk:tao of the
rcuovatioss at Adele Gnge Community Center
Motion: Appropriate foods not to esceed 511
000 to OSENBLOOM ~ i x
~
,
complete auditorium reuovatiosa in Adele Gnge HAUGHNESS~
ATERS X
Community Center, which would include new lights, t~
EISS
x X
x
ceiling repairs, and a new aoixz bathroom oar the trout F LeTCFtER I x ~ x
of the auditorium
Heywood Dowling passed out data outlining the work to be performed
(attached hereto and made a pert hereof -Exhibit A). Mr. Dowling reported
Atlantic Beach Experimental Theater (ABET) had thus far donated 515,000
cash and 510,-000 in volunteer help and services toward the renovation of
the Communih~ Centel.
Commissioner Shaughnessy (elt the Commission should have had
information relative to the renovations included in their packet so that they
would have had time to study the matter. Mayor Fletcher indicated the
matter could be deferred until the next meeting, but Commission
Shaughnessy indicated it was not her intent to delay tM project but that she
would like to have a few moments to study the information. It was decided a
10 minute recess would be called to give the Commission time to study the
data which they had just received from Mr. Dowling.
IY Y
NAME OF
COMMAS. I M S ~ Y N
unutes, Page 2
August 14, 1995
city cede with reference to the definition of weight limits of trucks.
Dorothy Kerber suggested palm trees at the intersection of Atlantic
Boulevard sod Seminole and Sherty Drive should be trimmed, as well as
palm trees in the Royal Palm area
Cards M. Sanders, 2320 Barefoot Trace, inqured as to the status of the
16th Street overpass, to which Bob Kosoy explained the Project would be
completed by the end of August When asked what 1M total cosy of the
project would be Mr. Kosoy replied the total cost would be approximately
525,000.00.
Mr. Sanders also inquired cottceroing she stapes of the Donner Park
Community Building, to which Timmy Johnson, Recreanon Director,
explained prequalification information bad bceo submitted by wntractors an
was being reviewed by staff. The bid opening was scheduled for August 24,
1995.
p~the Code Eotoramtot Board to tilt the seat
vuated by John Veno
Mayor Fletcher asked that the ePPomtme°t t01hC Code F.ofOrcemwt Bonrd
be deferted utt[il the neM meeting, and the Commission contorted..
4 ComrntA4euda:
A. Aelmowledge receipt of Reereatioo Departmwt Facilities Usage
Report fur July 1995
B. Ackoorrbd8e tYaipt of Code Eaforeement report for Jaly 1995
C. AcJtaorrkdge receipt of Banding peptrtment report for Jdy
1995
p Aelmmrkdge receipt of Firc Department report for Jane and
Jaly, I99s
Motion: Approve pamage of the Covent Agenda ATek
EISS
No discussion before the vote. The tnobon tamed unamutously. t.ETc
~ ARTdLANT1C BEAC6. FLORIDA, REQl7ESTUVG TB.E OF
SECRETARY OF 7HE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION TO REVIEW CERTAIN
COMMHS. IMISIYIN
CITY COMMISSION HELD IN CITY .~~., yr n ~ t.nrtl IC BEACH
AT 7:15 PM ON MONDAY, AUGUST 1~4, II99 ~ SEMINOLE ROAD,
PRESENT: L_vmatt T. Fletcher, Mayor
Steven Rosenbloom
Suzanne Shaughnessy
J. Dezmond Waters, ID, and
Robert G. Weiss, Jr., Commissioners
AND: Kim D. Leinbach, City Manager
Alan C. Jease4 City Attorney
Maureen King, City Clerk
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Flemher. The invocation was
followed by the Pledge to the Flag.
~ .Appi2ral of the miantns of rh ~ r
Jnly Zd
loot
. ~tOSENBLOOM X
Motioo:Approveminataofthe
1993 tegalar meeting ofJoly
24 HAUGHNESS X X
ATERS X
, X
EISS X
No discussion before the vote. The
rnMlOn tamed ttnamrrlouslY. LETCHER X
lia B~o¢aition of Visit
A. Recogaitioo ofAodrew R Lindeeo
David Thompeoq Chief of Police, introduced Andrew R Lindeea Chief
Thompson explained Mr
Lindx
.
n rescued s 10 year old child from drowning
in a pool u Sea hats q~nt Complex Mr. Lindeen administe
d CPR
d
re
an
saved the child's life. A plaque from the City was presented to Mr.
rc~ntative f
rom Rrbeutt 1'°dge Ixeseated a Cotnmtmity
Service Award.
Joha Raley, Chief of Police, imroduced Claude Mayo tl~e ~ Fire
hsspector.
Roth Gregg, 905 Sailfish Drive, suggested that the Ci seod om notices
advising citizens of the ty
garbage collection scheduk.
Ms. Gregg also complained of a truck locoed on the west eM of Selfish i
Drive and Plaza Street i
th
n
e Royal Pums nei
violation of the Ci Bhborhood ~ she felt was in
ty code. She indicated the truck blocked th
i
i
e v
s
on of
motorists. Following discussion concerning the legality of trucks parking on
the city rightof--way. Kim Leinbach
Ci
M I I
,
ty
anger. was asked b review the ~
AGENDA -August 28, 1995
Page Two
New Business:
A. Select architect and authorize staff to negotiate a contract with same for design
services in wnnection with the proposed addition to the Public Safety Building
B. Approve preliminary plat for Donner subdivision (George Worley)
C. Action on an application for a Use by Exception filed by 363 Associates Ud_ for
exception to the seating capacity limitation without additional parking, in a
restaurant established at the time of Shopper of North Shore Shopping Center
original approval (George Worley)
D. Award contract to PBM Constructors, Inc. for emergency replacement of West
Gear Reducer on No. 1 tank at Buccaneer Wastewater Treatment Plant (Bob
Kosoy)
City Manager Reports sod/or Correspondence
Reports and/pr requests from City Commisaiooers, City Attorney and City Clerk.
A. City Attorney with reports relative to ex pane wmmunications and the issuance of
liquor licenses
B. Authorization to retain Tim Dumas to represent the City of Atlamic Beach in
preparation and follow through of the Preservation 2000 grant application (Mayor
Fletcher)
Adjcurnmem
If any person decides to appeal any decision made by the City Comntission with respect to any
matter considered st any meeting, such person may need a record of the proceedings, and, for
such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is [trade, which
record shall include the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based.
Any person who wishes to speak to the City Commission on any matter at this rrrat6rg should
submit a request to the City Clerk prior to the meeting Forms for this purpose are available at
the entrance to the Commission Chambers.
('I'll' OF A"FLANTIC BEAC11
August ?8, 19)5
.AGENDA
Call to order
Invocation and pledge to thr flag
Approval o(the minutes of the Regular Commission Meeting of August 14, 1995
Recognition of Visitors:
A Interviews with .Architects proposing to provide archituYUral services in
connection with the proposed addition to the Public Safety building
1.IS Pht - Fleet & Associates
7.30 PM - Gee & Jenson
7 45 PM - Michael Dunlap
Unfinished Business
A. Appoimment to the Code Enforcement Board to fill the seat vacated by John Venn
B. Discussion and related action relative to existing restroom building in Dormer Park
(Commissioner Shaughnessy)
ALL MATTERS LISTED UNDER THE CONSENT AGENDA ARE CONSIDERED TO BE
ROUTINE BY THE CITY COMMISSION AND WU.L BE ENACTED BY ONE MOTION IN
THE FORM LISTED BELOW THERE WILL BE NO SEPARATE DISCUSSION OF THESE
ITEMS. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED, THAT ITEM WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE
CONSENT AGENDA AND WILL BE CONSTDERED SEPARATELY. SUPPORTING
DOCUMENTATION AND STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS HAVE BEEN PREVIOUSLY
SUBMITTED TO THE CITY COb1MISS1ON ON THESE ITEMS
4. Consent Agenda
A Acknowledge receipt o(Public Works Projects Status Report (Bob Kosoy)
B. Award contract to Court Surfaces, Inc., for rewrfacing of tennis courts at Bull
Memorial Park and Jack Russell Park, pursuant to the specifications o(Bid No
9495-19 (Timmy Johnson)
Action on Resolutions:
Adoption of Resolution No 95-24 Rewgnving Sharette Simpkins (Commissioner
Shaughnessy)
av'.aVLMR wnnlS5loN
AUGUST 1995
.awe... -_ _.: ua~.iaisa..