Loading...
04-01-92CITY OF 1P~tla.rtie $raelr - ~losida April 22, 1992 Honorable Mayor City Commission Members Atlantic Beach, Florida Dear Hayor and Ci[y Commission Members: eas sew.vo~E anAo ATI.~\TIC BEACH. FIDRmA R[115i1T 7ELFAIOAE OOII XFSaW FA% IAaq 2lFSp5 I have been in the process of negotiating with Captain John Campbell of our Police Department for the purposes of asking him to represent our City in collective bargaining relations ulth all three of our unions. Please recall Captain Campbell turren[ly negotiates viCh the F.O.P. Accordingly. he has agreed [o represent staff and ve have derived a figure of 51,000 for [he F.O.P., ;1,000 for the Public Works and {1,000 for the Fire Department as a flat rate to compensate him for [he many hours of additional time required for this process beyond his normal working hours. In Cha[ Chis amount is within my jurisdiction to approve, I vented you to be nonetheless aware of this arrangement and the great benefit ve have derived from utilizing the talents of Captain Campbell. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have say questions or desire additional information. Sincerelyn ~vV ~~~~ im D. Leinbach City Hanager KDL.dst cc: City Attorney Finance Director REF: KDL. 93 ~_,., 9a-i~ --- ~r~e~l-i~..~ ~.u.~-~c.. C~rQ.a-.Z ~ ca~ca_~EJz~ _ .. J,,,,,.o-c_~ I~ea~l~ 0. ~ ct.ttf.~,c ~~cv~ ~e ~ ~cG' __ --- ~- ~-ec~-~!-~ _-__ . _ _ _. _ . __ ~~- - .-~ __ ~~~~~~ ~ Q w~ G~-e eQn~-e ~.ti ~ ~'c~.~ . I -G't2~. ..C' P a ~ ~ CvLea , . l __ __ ;e Two ~o Co lfayot and City Commission ril 7, 1992 i [izen of the Year could also receive other tangible benefits such as: Free parking decal Free Atlantic Beach auto Cag No charge for pet licenses, oz any other such concessions [he City Commissicn may wish to offer. Suggest first Citizen of the year be selected in the fall of [his year, with presentation being made next Christmas. xc: City Manager CITY OF ~t(,antie b"eaek - ~lMida April 7, 1992 To: The Honorable Mayor and C.iAty Como,mission From: Maureen King, City Clerk '',K'M J 800 SEMINOLE hOAD ATLAMIC BF.1CH, FT.ORD11 lIUJ-Sits TEIFAIOME (901) 2h5800 FA%1900 2(FgDS Zn response to your request for reco®endations regarding Che selection of a Citizen of the year, the following is presented for your consideration. Nomination: Suggest nominations be open to individuals who have donated time, tangible items or funds, or professional expertise, or who have made any other contribution deemed to be beneficial to the city. The City Commission may with to extend the nominations [o include groups to alloy hu aid and wife teams or organizations (such as Publix, Bank, or Continental Cablevision) whose firms or employees have made contributions which benefited the c icy, to qualify for nomination. N¢minations could be made by department heads, employees. board members or standing committee members. Nomi¢ations should be presented in writing outlining the contributions of the nominee. Selection: Appoint a committee to review the nominations and present a shore list to the Cicy Commission for final selection. Selection committee could be comprised o'_ those persons eligible [o make nominations; however, anyone who had submitted a nomination should not be eligible to serve on the se lettion committee. Presentac ion: Present Resolution to the Citizen of the Year at Christmas Tree lighting or other public event, and follow up with a report (with picture) in [he Beaches Leader and Courier. Duplicate resolution could be displayed in City Hall until [he Citizen of [he Year is chosen the following year. and restrict the time and location of such garage sale. There shall 6e no fee for the issuance of such permit, but no more Chan three (3) such permits may be issued to one residence and/or family, household, or organization during any calendar year. No permit shall be issued f.or more [ha¢ two (2) consecutive days. Such sales shall be held during daylight hours only. Each permit issued must be prominently displayed on the premises upon vhic6 said sale is held. All merchandise to be sold at such sale shall be displayed in an enclosed garage of torpor[ and at no time shall merchandise be displayed on a public right-of-way or Swale area, provided, however, if no enclosed garage or carport exists ac said location merchandise may be displayed on a private driveway. e. One (1) temporary sign, ao[ to exceed four (4) ~square~ fee[ (double,-faced is permissible) shall be permitted on the property where the sale is to be conducted. In addition, a nazimum of two (2) other such signs, not to exceed two (2) square feet each, shall be permitted to be placed on other private property with the permission of the owner or occupant. In no event s6a11 signs be' placed on public property nor shall the same be erected or displayed more than twenty-four (24) hours before the sale ie to begin and such signs shall be removed immediately upon the termination of the sale. f. Parking - all parking of vehicles shall be conducted in compliance with all applicable lays and ordinances. The Police Department may enforce such temporary controls which would alleviate say such hazards and/or congestion caused by any garage sale. g. Violations - These axe' the basic elements which would in my opinion regulate garage sales and hopefully preclude those who~have abused this method of personal property sale. It is a draft for your coaslderatian and we will be most happy to refine and amend the same sa you deem appropriate. L would recommend [hat if you wish to proceed, the Ci[y Attorney be instructed to convert the same into [be proper legal format. Sincere~l~~y}/,~/~ J~~//~/jj im D. Leinbach City Nanager RDL.dst tea- CITY OF ~4tla«tic book - ~fmtufa Harch 23, 1992 Honorable Hayor City Commission Hembers Atlantic Beach, Florida Dear Hayor and City Commission Hembers: BOU SEMn~OIE RMD AiLANRC BFACn, FlAR0a1 JT.UJ-SMS rII)PNON[ Nso NF58o0 FMr (gpw 2f1905 Please recall at tLe last regular City Commission meeting citizen concern was beard Sn regards to abuse of garage sales by an individual on Hogal Palms. Subsequently, this office vas asked to propose an ordinance in regards to regulating [Le same. Aeeord ingly, I have reviewed the matter and would recommend that Lhe City Attorney construct an ordinance based upon the following provisions: a. Definition - the term ^garage sale^ shall mean any sale or offering Sor sale of personal property by a person or persona of a~family or other household unit, said personal property having been acquired, possessed and used by the family oz household for personal as opposed to business or commercial use, Vhen such sale is to be or ie conducted at the present residence of such family or household. The term shall Saelude sales commonly . referred to patio sales, driveway sales, yard sales and other such sales. The term shall not include the sale or offering for sale any goods on consignment, nor shall it include the sale or offering for~sale of goods for more [Lan three (3) families ar households. b. Garage sales shallrulesoandcregulationslnotcinwco of lict laV6, ordinance 6., with this chapter. c. Ezemption - the provisions (regulating garages sales) shall not apply to sales of personal property made pursuant to a valid order of the court of competent jurisdiction. d. Permit - no garage sale shall be conducted within the City without a permit having been first issued for such sale by [he Ci[y Hanager. Such permit shall set forth ..,... _ _ 20NING AND SU6DIV ISION REGULA'fIC1Ng § 24-!59 Sre. 29-169. Home occupations. Intent To recognize the need for people to conduct small-scale home occupations, which are inridental to the primary use of the residence, while preserving the character o[ residen- tial neighborhoods end minimizing traiGc and nonresidential disturbances. (e) A home occupation that is solely used for the purpose of receiving phone calls and keeping business records is correction with any profession or ocoupation or any business eetivity of a sedentary nature, ea listed in (7) below, shall be permitted in all residential districts and shell require a "convenience license." Service occupations including, but not )united to beauty ealodbarber (limited m one operator), carpenters, minor contracmrs doing remodeling or home repaim, wall papering, 11cor covering or file work, cosmetic sales, pet grcoming, repairmen (household appliances), travel agents, painters, window cleaners, and maid m Lwn xrvice, shall oleo be permitted, Provided no more than one vehicle u used in the hasinese and the applicant can meet all other conditions provided herein. The following eoaryntiom shall not he permitted m home oecupatious: EarortlmtroduMion cervice, maneage therapist, welding, vehicle repair. manufacturing each ea cabinet making, on.upholetering. Home ooeupations shall not 6e permitted is areas which ere restricted by deed when such documents ere recorded in the public records of Duval County and on file with the city clerk of the City of Atlantic Beach. All other bueineae activities shall be restricted to the commercial disricta. The following regulatlone shall apply to home occupations: (I) The addrae of the home oceupatioa shall not appear is the telephone book, oa letterhead, checks ar any type of advertising. (2) No one other fLen immediate family members residing on the premises shall be involved in the oorupetion. There shall be a limit o[ one license per pereou, and uo more then two (2) !icemen Per household. The home oavpation shall be nontransferable. (g) All buai>reae activities conducted on the licensed premises ehail be conducted entvely within the dwelling. There sYsll be no outside storage or outside use aC equipment ar materials. (4) No more than one (1) mom of the dwelling shall be used to conduM the occupation, provided the aces of that room does sat exceed twentydive (25) percent o[ the total living area of the dwelling- (~ No erSernal sign or evidentt that the dwelling is being used for the home occupation shall be allowed. (g) There shell be no pedestrian ar vehicular traffic, noise, vibration, glare, fumes, odors or electrical interference as a result of the home oaupaticn. (7) The following are typicel occupations that are acceptable as home occupations: Ac- countant, architect, artist, attorney, bookkeeper, consultant, auctioneer, seamstress or tailor, insurance agent, music iwtructor, photographer, piano tuner, real estate agent, aecretnrial services, telephone answering service, hobby/crafts (not involving heavy equipment). Sapp. No.9 1457 ~:_,. CITY OF rQtla«ta b"eae(s - ~lmuda 800 BENINOLE ROAD ATL.iNTIC BE9C11, FIARmA )rl3l-S9L5 TELFPFIONE (909) 2915800 FA% (90612015105 April 8, 1992 To: The Honorable Mayor and City Commissioners From: Maureen King, City Clerk Subject: GARAGE SALES At the last Commission meeting this office vas directed to look into the subject of garage sales as they relate to occupationai licenses. I[ is the opinion of this office that it wculd not be appropriate to issue occupational licenses for garage sales for the follwing reasons: 1. O<cupational licenses are issued fora period of one year, from October 1 to September 30 of the follwing year. An occupational license would, therefore, alloy the holder to have as many garage sales as they wished during that time. 2. Allowing garage sales to operate on a year-round basis would, in essence, be approving flea markets to operate in residential districts. This type of activity would not be in compl fence with [he City Code, Section 24-159, Home Occupations. I felt the intent of the City Commission vas to provide a meatus to regulate and limit the number of garage sales a resident could have, and in Chia regard ve polled ten neighboring cities and submit the following: - 4 cities had no garage sale regulations and reported no problems - 5 cities required permit (2 had no charge for permi [, others ranged from ;£.00 to ;5.00) - - One city did not require a permit but allowed four garage sales per yesr - Cities with regulations alloyed 3 or 4 garage sales per year Most cities indicated [hey had experienced no problems and felt [he ordinance vas enforced only if a complaint vas received. If it is the desire of the City Commission to regulate garage sales I vwid suggest a permit system could be established indicating [he number of garage sales which would be alloyed per household per year. You may wish [o refer [o [he City Manager's recommendations in his memo of March 23, 1992. .. Nr. Bob Kosoy April 3, 1992 Page - 3 of the services, provided that any such claim, damage, loss or expense is caused in whole or in part by the negligent act, omission and/or strict liability of the Owner anyone directly or indirectly employed by Owner (except J. Lucas 6 Associates, Inc.), or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable. This shall not apply to negligent acts, omissions and/or strict liability for which J. Lucas & Associates, Inc. is not responsible. TFRNTNATION OF SERVICES This agreement mey be terminated either by Owner or J. Lucas S Associates, Inc., should the other fail to perform its obligations hereunder. In the event of termination, Owner shall pay J. Lucas & Associates, Inc. for all services rendered to the date of termination, all reimbursable expenses and reimbursable termination expenses. JLRPi Ti'AAT.F i.AWS Unless otherwise specified, this agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Florida. If this proposal meets with your approval, please execute both copies and return one copy for our files. We look forward to the opportunity of working with you on this project. n Sincerely, J, LUG'~A///$"//b ASSOCIATES, INC. JalM1efs M.P.E. / President Approved and Authorized for City of Atlantic Beach BY: DATE ~-, . _, a . . Mr. Bob Kosoy April 3, 1992 Page - 2 This proposal does not include: 1. Permit fees 2. Soil evaluations 3. Construction management and inspection phase services SCHEDULE OF WORK We will commence the work immediately upon being given notice to proceed, and we will work to meet any reasonable deadline. We propose to prepare the plans and specifications and permits for review and bidding for the lump sum price of $9,800.00. SCHEDULE FOR PAYMENT Invoices will be submitted monthly based upon the percentage of work completed at that time. Payment will be due upon receipt of invoices. if payment is not received within 30 days from the date of the invoice, interest will be charged at a rate of 1-1/2$ per month on the unpaid balance retroactive to the invoice date, and J. Lucas S Associates, Inc. may, without waiving any claim or right against Owner and without liability whatsoever to Owner, terminate the performance of the service. Retainers shall be credited on the final invoice. In the event any portion or all of an account remains unpaid 90 days after billing, Owner shall pay all costs of collection, including reasonable attorney s fees. LIABILITY It is understood and agreed between both parties to this Agreement that Owner agrees to limit J. Lucas & Associates, Znc.•s liability to Owner and/or any of its subsidiaries, and to all construction contractors and subcontractors on the projects for errors, negligent acts, or omissions resulting form these professional services to an aggregate amount not exceeding J. Lucas E Associates, inc.•s professional services fees or $25,000.00, whichever is greater. INDEMNIFICATION Owner shall indemnify and hold harmless J. Lucas a Associates, inc. and all of its personnel from and against any and all claims, damages, losses and expenses (including reasonable attorneys fees) arising out of or resulting from the performance ,~__..- J. lveaa t Aaaociates,l«e. Design 8 Consulting Engineers James M. Lucas, P.E. April 3, 1992 Wr. Bob Rosoy Director of Public Services City of Atlantic Beach 1200 sandpiper Lane Atlantic Beach, Florida 32233-4381 Re: Proposal for Chlorine Contact Facility Buccaneer Wastewater Treatment Plant Dear Mr. Kosoy: RanEaA s. wtlder. P.E. J. Lucas & Associates, Inc. is pleased to submit an engineering fee proposal for preparation of plans and specifications for the Buccaneer plant improvements as described in greater detail below under Scope of Work. This proposal will remain in effect for a period of 60 days from the date of this letter. Acceptance after that period is subject to a review of the conditions stated herein, and possible revision by J. Lucas a Associates, Inc. in response to changed conditions. SCOPE OF WORK The work will include: 1. Design of a chlorine contact and sulfur dioxide chamber ].orated at the existing sludge drying bed. 2. Design of automatic feed chlorine and sulfur dioxide systems. 3. Design of ton handling facility for both the chlorine and sulfur dioxide cylinders including the necessary load cells and indicators. 4. The conversion of the existing contact chamber to a digester for additional sludge capacity. 5. The interconnecting piping between the existing treatment units and the new chlorine contact tank along with the chlorine and sulfur dioxide solution piping. 6. The installation of the necessary instrumentation required to control the amount of chlorine and sulfur dioxide. 8417 Baymeadova Way, Su4e 1 • Jacksonville, FL 32256 904-6369844 Mr. Bob Kosoy April 3, 1992 Page - 3 of the services, provided that any such claim, damage, loss or expense is caused in whole or in part by the negligent act, omission and/or strict liability of the Owner anyone directly or indirectly employed by owner (except J. Lucas s Associates, Inc.), or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable. This shall not apply to negligent acts, omissions and/or strict liability for which J. Lucas s Associates, Inc. is not responsible. TERMINATION OF SERVICES This agreement may be terminated either by Owner or J. Lucas & Associates, Inc., should the other fail to perform its obligations hereunder. In the event of termination, Owner shall pay J. Lucas & Associates, Inc. for all services rendered to the date of termination, all reimbursable expenses and reimbursable termination expenses. APPLICABLE LAWS Unless otherwise specified, this agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Florida. If this proposal meets with your approval, please execute both copies and return one copy for our files. We look forward to the opportunity of working with you on this project. Sincerely, J. C 6 ASSOCIATES, INC. \ ~~ J s M. Lucas, P.E. President Approved and Authorized for City of Atlantic Beach DATE K_- _. t Mr. Bob Kosoy April 3, 1992 Page - z This proposal does not include: 1. Permit fees 2. soil evaluations 3. Construction management and inspection phase services SCHEDULE OF WORK We will commence the work immediately upon being given notice to proceed, and we will work to meet any reasonable deadline. COMPENSATION We propose to prepare the plans and specifications and permits for review and bidding for the lump sum price of $9,800.00. SCHEDULE POR PAYMENT Invoices will be submitted monthly based upon the percentage of work completed at that time. Payment will be due upon receipt of invoices. If payment is not received within 3o days from the date of the invoice, interest will be charged at a rate of 1-1/2$ per month on the unpaid balance retroactive to the invoice date, and J. Lucas 6 Associates, Inc. may, without waiving any claim or right against Owner and without liability whatsoever to Owner, terminate the performance of the service. Retainers shall be credited on the final invoice. In the event any portion or all of an account remains unpaid 90 days after billing, Owner shall pay all costs of collection, including reasonable attorney's fees. LIABILITY it is understood and agreed between both parties to this Agreement that Owner agrees to limit J. Lucas 6 Associates, Inc.'s liability to Owner and/or any of its subsidiaries, and to all construction contractors and subcontractors on the projects for errors, negligent acts, or omissions resulting form these professional services to an aggregate amount not exceeding J. Lucas fi Associates, Inc.'s professional services fees or $25,000.00, whichever is greater. INDEMNIFICATION Owner shall indemnify and hold harmless J. Lucas b Associates, Inc. and all of its personnel from and against any and all claims, damages, losses and expenses (including reasonable attorney's fees) arising out of or resulting from the performance ~.•~,~, . J. lveas t A44ocoa~cs, 1.-t. Design & Consulting Engineers James M. Lucas, P.E. April 3, 1992 RarMa115. WilEer, P.E. !~rl:.~ lir. Bob Kosoy F ,_,~ ., ,.„v.:, J Director oP Public Services City of Atlantic Beach 1200 Sandpiper Lane Atlantic Beach, Florida 32233-4381 Re: Proposal for Chlorine Contact Facility Buccaneer Wastewater Treatment Plant Dear Mr. Kosoy: J. Lucas S Associates, Inc. is pleased to submit an engineering fee proposal for preparation of plans and specifications for the Buccaneer plant improvements as described in greater detail below under Scope of Work. This proposal will remain in effect for a period of 60 days from the date of this letter. Acceptance after that period is subject to a review of the conditions stated herein, and possible revision by J. Incas 6 Associates, Inc. in response to changed conditions. SCOPE OP WORK The work will include: 1. Design of a chlorine contact and sulfur dioxide chamber located at the existing sludge drying bed. 2. Design of automatic feed chlorine and sulfur dioxide systems. 3. Design of ton handling facility for both the chlorine and sulfur dioxide cylinders including the necessary load cells and indicators. 4. The conversion of the existing contact chamber to a digester for additional sludge capacity. 5. The interconnecting piping between the existing treatment units and the new chlorine contact tank along with the chlorine and sulfur dioxide solution piping. 6. The installation of the necessary instrumentation required to control the amount of chlorine and sulfur dioxide. 8471 Baymeatlows Way, Suite 1 • JackSOmille, FL 32256 904-636-9844 J. (L ~ L Z'~ / /~~ / ( i, 'I CITY OP A17.ANTIC BEACH CITY COMMISSION NEETINC STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM: ACCEPTANCE OF 1, LUCAS b ASSOCIATES. INC. PROPOSAL FUR DESIDN OF iiEW ChLORINE CONTACT FACILITY AT BUCCANEER WWTP. SUBMITTED BY: Robert S. Kosov/Director of Public Works ~/ DATE: Aor it 9- 1992 HACRGROOND: Buccaneer Wastewater Treatment Plan[ requires Che following upgrading of [he facilf cy: i 1) New larger Chlorine Contact Chamber with Sulfur Dioxide Injection Point. 2) New Ton Handling Facility for Chlorine and Sulfur Dioxide. 3) To convert existing Con[ac[ Chamber [o Sludge Thickening Tank. 4) To modify existing controls and design, additional controls to meet all government agencies/regulations. e ` 5) These items were budgeted for in FY 91-92. ! Staff evaluated four Technical Proposals from: I 1) J. Lucas b Assoicates 2) Pit [man, Hartensce in A Associates 3) Vargas A Asaoclates 4) Flood Engineers - ~ Subsequently, staff requested and received cost proposals ', from three of [he firms: 1) J. Lucas A Associates submit red the loves[ cost proposal at $9,800.00 to prepare engineering plans and spec £f Stations. The monies are from account 440-4402-535.63-00 of vhFCh there are sufficient funds. REC0lDgNNDATION: To award to J. Lucas S Assoc ia[es, Inc. ATTACHMFNIS: J. Lucas b Assotia s, Inc. Pro sa REVIEWED 8Y CITY MANAGER: ~7~ _ D AGENDA ITETI NO. c+ Mr. Bnb Kosoy March 16, 1992 Page 4 '1~ agreemeot may be terminated either by Owner or Connelly & Wicker Inc. should the other Cail to perforto its obligations hereunder In the even[ of termination, Owner shall pay Connelly & Wicker Inc. [or all services rendered to the date of termination, all reimbursable expenses, and reimbursable termination expetues. APP[ICABI.E TAWS Unkss otherwise specified, this agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Fbrida. [f this proposal meeu with your approval, please execute both copies and return one copy for our fks. We bok forward to the opportunity of working with you on this project. Very truly yours, Brig%~~ ~ ~ ~ Project Manager BEK/mao Approved and Authorsed Cor City of Atlantic Beach By. Date Ap~ d a Authorised for Conne/lly & Wicker Inc. / 3 ~~~9Z By. / Date ~. ~- Mr. Bob Kosoy March 16, 1992 Page 3 USE OF DOCUMENTS It is further understood and agreed tha[ the mnstmc[ion documents and the ideaz and designs incorporated therein az an instrument of professional service are the progeny oC Connelly & Wicker Inc. and are not to be used in whole or part, for any other project without written authorization of Connclty & Wicker Inc. Owner is hereby advisedM•arned that such unauthorized use ran be very risky, and Owner does therefore agree and warrant to hold Connelly & Wicker Inc. harmless for any such unauthorized use and to diligently defend and/or indemnity Connelly & Wicker Inc. from all claims, damages and expenses against Connelly & Wicker Inc. resulting out of said unauthorized use. [.IABIII7Y It is understood and agreed between both parties to this Agreement that Owner agrees to limit Connelly & Wicker, Ine.'s liability to Owner and/or any oC its subsidiaries, and to all construction contractors and subcontractors on the projects Cor errors, negligent acts, or omissions resulting from these professional services to an aggregate amount not exceeding Connelly & Wicker Ine.'s professional services fees or 550,0(10.00 whichever u greater. In consideration of the unavailability oC professional liability insurance for services involving or relating to hazardous waste materials and since it iz not the intent of thu agreement for Connelly & Wicker Inc to provide services imrolving or relating to hazardous wazte materials nor is any such exposure anticipated by either party under this agreement, it is agreed that the Owner shall indemnify and hold harmless Connelly & Wicker Inc. and its consultants, agents and employees Crom and against all claims, damages, losses and expenses, direct and indirect, or consequential damages, including but not limited to fees and charges of attorneys and coon and arbitration costs, arising out of or resulting from the performance of the work by the Engincer, or claims against Connelly & Wicker Inc. related w hazardous wazte materials or activities. This indemnification provision extends to claims against Connely & Wicker Inc. which arise out ot, are related to, or based upon the dispersal, discharge, escape, release or saturation of smoke, vapors, soot, fumes, acids, alkalis, toxic chemicals, liquids, gases or arty other material, irritant, contaminant or pollutant in or into the atmosphere, or on, onto, upoq in or into the surface or subsurface (a}soil, (b) water, or waterwurse, (c) objects, or (d) any tangtbk or intangible matter, whether sudden or not. Owner shall indemnify and hold harmless CWl and all of iL permnnel from and against any and all claims, damages, kxcus and expenses (including reasonable attorney s fees) arising out of or resulting from the performance of the services, provided that any such claim, damage, loss or expense is caused in whole or in part by the negligent act, omission, and/or strict liability of the Owner anyone directly or indirectly empkryed by Owner (except Connely & Wicker Inc.), or anyone Cor whose acts any of them may be liable. This shall not apply to negligent acts, omissions and/or strict liability for which Connelly & Wicker Inc. is responsible. Mr. Bob Kosoy March 16, 1992 Page 2 We will commence the work immediately upon being given notice to proceed, and we will work with you to meet any reasonable deadline. It is proposed the payment for our service be on the bazis of our current hourly rates set forth beknv plus andy required reimbursable coats. Cate¢orv Hourly Billine Rata Principal Engineer S 80.00 Senior Engineer S 70.00 Design Engineer S 60.00 EngineedDesigner f 50.00 Technician f 35.00 Dra[ter f 30.00 Secretary S 25.00 Reimbursable coati include fees o[ Professional Associates (whose expertise is required to complete the project) and outvf-pocket expenses. Outof-pocket expenses shall include but not be limited to travel expeoses (lodging, meals, etc.), job-related mileage at 20 cents per mile, long distartce telephone rolls, printing and reproduction costs, and sperial supplies and materials. Based on our understanding of the work to be performed, we recommend that you budget the folbwing: 1. Topographic Survey 52,000.00 2 Design & Permitting Phase 55,400.00 3. Bid Phase and Conatrunion Phase Services 33,2110.00 Invoiw will be submitted monthly based upon the work complete at that time. Payment will be due upon receipt of invoices. I[ payment is not received within 30 days Crom the date of the invoice, interest will be charged at the a rate of 1-1R percent per month on the unpaid baWnce retroactive to the invoice date, and Connelly & Wicker Inc. may, without waiving arty claim or right agairtst Owrter and without liabihty whatsoever to Owner, terminate the performance of the service. Retainers shall be credited on the final invoice. In the event any portion or all of an account remairss unpaid 90 days after billing. Owner shall pay all costs of collection, including reasonable attorney's fees. r~ ~ ~ PRJFESSUMI~S noeEa~~ o cwraur. v E N P WNMID. P .iawx Ewrs.vE ILµY 02EtL M O, P.E P.crwmc wE.w vPE Y.RVwE wxxEn, e Connelly & Wicker Inc. Consulting Engineers March 16, 1992 Mc Bob Kosoy Director of Public Services City of Atlantk Heath 716 Ocean Blvd. Atlantk Beach, FL 32733 Re: Engineering Services Proposal Levy Road Improvements Project No. 8906-15 Dear Mr. Kosoy. Connelly & Wicker Inc. is pleased to submit an engineering fee proposal Cor preparation of plans and speciGcatioas for roadway improvements for Levy Road as descnbed in greater detail below under Scope of Work. 7Lis proposal will remain in effect (or a period of 60 days from the date of this ktter. Acceptance aster that period is subject to a review of the conditons stated herein, and pas3k revision by Connelly & Wicker Inc. in resporue to changed conditions. SCOPE OF WORK The work will include the design and preparation of plate and apecificatioru for improvemeots to Levy Road from Orchid Street to Levy Road. This portion of the project will be combined with a prevausly compkled project (some revisarts to be made under this work) sorting at Mayport Road, proceeding west abng Levy Road to Main Street. Tlu work w~l include preparation and submitol otarry required stormwater permits from the SL Johm River Wakr Management District, preparation o[detsil tau estimalea, aaz'tswue to the City during advertising and bidding phase, project inspection sod contract administration az necessary during the cortstruaion phase. Tltis proposal does not include: 1) Permit Fees 2) Soil Evaluations 3) Oftsite Drainage Work P. O. BOX 51303 • JACXSONVILLE BEACH, FLORIDA 322A01343 •904249]995 pESTIN, FLORIDA • CASHIERS. NORTH CAROLINA . ~ `e- ~./~ ' . CLTY OP AYLANTIC BFACH CIT4 COlDfISSION l4TTINC STAFP REPORT ~' AGENDA ITEM: LEVY ROAD IMPROVEMENTS SUBlfITTED BY: Robert S. Rosoy/Director of Public Works Y DATE: April 10, 1992 BACRGRODND: The work will include the Design and Preparation of Plans and Specifications for Roadway Improvements for Levy Road from Orchid Street [o !lain Street. This portion of the project will be combined with a previously completed project (some revision [o be made under [his work) starting a[ MayporG Road, preceeding west along Levy Road [o Main S[ree[. The work will include preparation and submittal of any required s[ozmwa ter permits from SJRWHD, preparation of detail cost esc imates, assistance to the City during adver- tising and bidding phase, project inspection and Contract Administration as necessary during the Construction Phase. The proposed schedule will be for surveying design and permitting in PY 91-92 for $7,400.00. Construction is planned for FY 92-93, after which Cime we may have a commit [went from FDOT to fund '~ of the construction costs. Ge tentatively plan co do inspection with Ci[y staff. ~'~ 7 ~1.7/r~. The funds for [his pzoj ect are comivg from account 00150025413100, which has Buff icievc funds co cover the cost of the above. Accept Proposal of Engineer ATTACBlD~NIS: Connelly d Wicker Engineering Pro osa REYIEVFJ) BY CITY MANAGER: ~y(~. AGENDA ITEM NO. U ~_ .~ F n betveen [he parties and that this agreement incorporates the complete and only terms of [hat relationship. 8. The provisions of [his Agreement are severable, and if any par[ of it is found [o be unenforceable, [he other paragraphs shall remain fully valid and enforceable. This agreement shall survive the termination of any agreements contained herein. 9. This Agreement sets forth the entire Agreement betveen the parties hereto, and fully supersedes any and all prior agreements and understandings betveen the parties hereto pertaining [o the subject matter hereof. Dated this day of 19 By NITNessED: James R. Jarboe 332 4th Street Atlantic Beach; FL 32233 In compliance vlth the Charter of the City, I do certify chat [here is an unexpended, unencumbered and unimpounded balance in [he appropriation sufficient co cover the foregoing contract and provision hae been made for the payment of the monies therein to be paid. Director of Finance APPROVED As TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: City Attorney t pay for any holiday during which the City is closed for business. 4. The temporary employee understands and expressly agrees that he is a temporary employee for all purposes, including a ' Federal or Stale S[a[u[e, and [ha[ he may not be deemed or construed to be a regular employee of the Cicy. The temporary employee further understands and expressly agrees that Che City shall no[ provide any retirement benefits, personal leave I benefits, and that he will be responsible for his own health, disability and life insurance coverage. The temporary employee i further understands and agrees chat his employment is not regulated by or subject to the personnel policies governing permanent employees of the Cicy contained in the Cicy Charter, Code of Ordinances, or elsewhere. The temporary employee further understands and agrees chat he will not be eligible for unemployment compensation benefits upon [he termination of [his Agreement under any cizcumstcnces. ~ 5. Thls contract may be terminated by either party hereto I with notice of (30) thirty days upon the giving of written notice. 6. The temporary employee's performance under this ~ agreement shall commence on the and continue until the unless extended by the mutual agreement of the parties, or unless this ~ Agreement Se terminated sooner in accordance with the prow islons 'i set forth in Paragraph 5 above. ~', 7. The CSCy expressly claims and the temporary employee agrees [hat only an employment a[ will relationship exists TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT This agreement is made and executed [his day of April 1992 by and between [he City of At lan[ic 8e ach, Florida, a Municipal Corporation (hereinafter referred to as City). and James R. Jarboe of Atlantic Beach, Florida. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED AS FOLLONS: 1. The Ci[y agrees to retain James R. Jarboe, hereinafter referred [o as temporary employee in the capacity of Special Project and Research Analyst For the City of Atlantic Beach. 2. The temporary employee agrees [o use his expertise and best efforts in performing the responsibilities of but no[ limited to research and study relating [o various projects assigned by the Mayor, City Commission or City Manager. Each project shall be defined in detail (scope of services) with a no[ [o exceed cost de[eTmined and to be enforced unless amended by ~ s the Mayor, Ci[y Commission or Cicy Manager. ~ 3. In consideration for the above services rendezed by the 1 temporary employee as set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2, the City i agrees to pay him the sum not to exceed 538.00 per hour, not to exceed an aggregate of 530,000, paid bi-weekly which shall 'i constitute full and complete compensation for all services rendered. The City shall deduct from the weekly gross wages due Federal Income Tax Nithholding and Social Security. By executing [his agreement Che temporary employee expressly acknowledges that he is no[ entitled to any of [he usual and customary benefits, terms and conditions of employment with the City. It is further agreed that the [empora ry employee will not receive eight hours `~_ `R 3 Fi- _._., * Conducted a randoe digit dialing survey of Jacksonville residents concerning crime for [he Mayor of Jacksoovi lle. PERSONNHL NAMAGENBNT • Managed the City of Jacksonville's Gran[ EsDloyee Personnel Plan (1000+ employees]. * Nas responsible for the personnel management of the City of Jacksonville's tluman Services Department [300 full time and 3000 Dari time employees]. • Have conducted on numerous occasions interviews for key staff positions. • Served as disciplinary hearing officer for all positions in [he Jacksonville City Government funded Dy state and federal grants. GRANT/FUND RAISING • Rave a txenty year history of successful grantsmanship, resulting in millions of dollars for my employers. Developed grants for human services, public works, health, transportation, redevelopment, criminal justice, public safety and job development projects. • Acted as a consultant to many private and public agencies for pzograa development. * Developed and managed numerous special fund raising events. These Gave included fisbinq tournaments, races, festivals, and golf tournaments. CONNONICATI011/PUBLIC RSWTIO#S * Served as guest host for a radio talk shox on a regular basis. • Appeared on a number of T.V. torn meeting p[ograms. • Mrote articles and edited special subject inserts for "Nations Cities Meekly" over a three year period. + Given speeches before local, regional, and national organizations. • Coordinated the program for the National League of Cities' 1980 annual conference. * Acted as liaison to civic and couunity groups for the Mayor of Jacksonville. • Set up and participated in many Dress conferences. PINANCB/BUDGETDIG: * tlave developed numerous grant and contract budgets. * Prepared city department and division level budgets. Actively involved for many years in the development of the Mayor of Jacksonville's Annual Budget. • Served as Vice Chairman of the Jacksonville City Council's Finance Couittee. + Bave used the Plan Program Budgeting System to develop numerous comprehensive plans and budgets. • Served on budget comaittee responsible for reviex of the Jacksonville Electric Authority's Budget. ~. } ~` F AcRlEVehBNrs NMAGSNHIT • Served as a Senior Aide [o the Mayor of Jacksonville [strong mayor] with management oversight of city departments. This position is equivalent to a DeDu[y City or Countp Namager. * Administered a city department [300+ employees]. + Nanaged a large division within a city department [90+ employees]. • Coordinated a major grogram segment of a national Public interest group [30+ employees]. • Setved as a member of the Jacksonville City Council Personnel Management Committee. • Managed a planning unit of forty employees. * Served on numerous management, public works, human service, and other problem solving task force committees GOgAtNI®RRL REPAIRS • Served as the State and Federal Lobbyist for the City of Jacksonville, Florida. Successfully lobbied numerous issues which resulted in Billions of dollars saved and gained for [be City. • Coordinated vith the President's Domestic Policy Staff and Congressional Couittees for the National League of Cities. Effected policy changes which benefited cities nationwide. • Provided liaison with the Federal Goverment for Puerto Rico's Criminal Justice Council. Gained the release of several million dollars of Federal funds for the Commonvealth. • Nave successfully coordinated numerous times with State and Federal Agencies' staffs on administrative rule changes, for the benefit of my employers. • ReDreseeted private and public sector clients before administrative and legislative governmental bodies. • Acted as the Mayor's liaison to CDe local Naval Base. Assisted with liaison to the City Council for the Nayor. RESEARCR/PLRl111I11G * Developed and administered over a ten year period local, state, and regional program plans- These plans provided management overnight of the expenditure of more than fifteen million dollars. • Served as the Director of the National League of Cities' Police Consultation Service. This service provided evaluations of police departments throughout the United Slates. Also, executive searches were conducted upon request. • Directed an evaluation of the City of Jacksonville's Correctional System. The study lead to major policy changes in the system. • Managed an evaluation and monitoring team which conducted a wide range of project improvement studies for the City of Jacksonville's Criminal Justice System. • Served as a member of a national review team which study alternatives to traditional city fire departments. The project xas funded by the U.S. Fire Administration. • Nas selected to serve on a national program to evaluate the effectiveness of 911. i:.- JAMas a. JARBOs 332 4th Street Atlantic Beach, Florida 32233 [904] 241-5326 ~DCATIOII Governaeatal Fellow Prodraa University of Morth Florida [1983] Master of Pnblie Adainistration University of Geotgia [1970] Bachelor of Arts University of Georgia (1966] Professional sesinars: Narvatd University, Nea York University, University of Georgia, Biscayne College, University of North Florida, University of Plorida, Florida State University. PROFBSSIDIIAL ~L0T89Ft HISTORY 1988 - present Manasing Director Beaches eospital Foundation 6overaaental Affairs Consultant Jacksonville, Plorida. 1982 - 1991 City Cooncilaan (1987-1991] Senior Aide to the Mayor [1983-1987] Bquivalen[ to Deputy City Manager Chief of Adainistration [1982-1963] Huaao Services Departaent, City of Jacksonville, Plorida. 1978 - 1981 Senior Associate National League of Cities, Nashington D.C. 1978 Director of Plamiao consultant, Governor's Coaaission on Criainal Justice, Couonvealth of Puerto Rico. 1971 - 1978 Bzecative Director Mayor's Metropolitan Criainal Justice Council, City of Jacksonville, Florida. 1969 - 1971 Plainer Central Savannah River Area Plannrnq and Developaent Cooaission, Augusta, Geozgia. ~--<~ . = decide to proceed with this proposal, the City Commission could utilize funds available in our general government derived from [he balan<e of our additional monies available from the J.E.A. as previously discussed. In this latter regard, a balance of 315,000 remains from the increased revenue from J.E.A. this current fiscal year (unexpended) with 326,000 for FY 1992-93. Mayor Gulliford will address this matter with you at the next regular City Commission meeting and should you have any questions or desire additional information from [his office, please do not hesitate to contact me. SSncer~e /l'y/~, J ~ /J(j ~vV• G~II~G~r'~~r!!/' /Kim D. Leinbach City Manager RDL.dst REP: KDL.94 `~~- :._, ~~/~ , ;,z CITY OF 1'~alrtia b~trtelc - ~laxCda 800 )ENL\OLE aLL1D .~__._--_-__ _---_._ ATIAhTIC BEACH, FIARID131D)-SHS iFJ.kPF10NE Hap 7A}5800 ~\ FAX 19011 NFSlD9 April 22, 1992 tlonczable Mayor CiCy Commission Members Atlantic Beach, Florida Dear Mayor and City Commission Members: Mayor Gulliford has asked that I research [he possibility of contracting with James R. Jarboe for the purposes of assisting our government in the completion of a number of special [asks. ~, These are representative matters we wish to address and accomplish but for one reason or another including the day-to-day workload, have fallen short in achieving [he same. . Those items we would like to work out with Mr. Jarboe include: 0 Working with the Certified Development Corporation in the Donner and related subdivision area ~ 0 Providing assistance in the negotiation or research relative to negotiations of the In[erlocal Agreement ~ between the cities of Atlantic Seach and Jacksonville ' 0 Review and recommendations in terms of our disaster preparedness plans 0 Complete review of our water billing and meter reading systems to facilitate the same 0 Completely review and recommend changes to our purchasing ' policy to enhance [he same 0 Park master planning and development (the latter could be a research project into land owned by the City near the IntezcoasCal Waterway and use of the same) Again, these are a few of the many areas we Could utilize the talents of Mr. Jarboe as a means to enhance our muni<ipal government. The Mayor has suggested utilizing a concract format arrangement between the CS[y and Jim Jarboe with a rate established at 438 per hour and a ceiling established at 530,000 (which would iranalate into no more than one-half year of service). If you SN 2 OF 2 The above proje^ts are nov underray or in study to start. Due to the overload of projects listed above, re are in a position rhere one wan cannot do all of these and maintain a full time position at the WTP •1 b t2. Me respectively request that re solicit Request for Proposals Eor Consultant Resident Observation in order that a Consultant Resident Observer De assigned to cover the MTP sl b t2 Project. RSK/tb cc: Ernie Beadle/Assistant Public Morks Director File - PN DIR 4.:.v ., ~.. flhY'L~h~tn 1 3- CITY OF ~tla.ellc S"eac(c - ~loucfu 1200 S~NUPIPER lAAE ~_..- __. ._.._ ___. __ •TLAATIC aFwCN, FIgRli1N J22)11M1 TFJ,FPIIOAT IMMI L'/-5&Y /r~ FA11ml12fl56El SR 1 OF 2 April 13, 1992 M E M O R A N D U M TO: Kim D. Leinbach/City Manager FROM: Robert 5. Kosoy/Director of Public Works RE: SUMMARY OF PROJECTS REQUIRING INSPECTION AND NEED FCR CONSULTANT INSPECTION PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION OR UNUERMAY TO BE CONSTRUCTED 1. Levy Road Drainage Project (starting) 2. Mayport Road Bore and Jack (to start) 3. Point repairs, manhole repairs, line replacement on 6th street, Russell Park and Howell Park. (to start) 4. Cleaning and Televising subdivision at Schooners Bay (Buccaneer area). Breakdarn and revise for point repairs, manhole repairs and possible line replacement. <to start) 5. Breakdorn on lines that require medium end heavy closing, point repairs, manhole repeire in Buccaneer area. (in study) 6. Hater lines that need replacement on 9th Street, 11th Street and Ahern Street. (to cover these replacement) (first 3 streets, more to come) (to start) 7. Oversize rip rap construction on extension of ring ralle (Section H7. (ta start) B. Cleaning and televising on Ahern Street, Jackson Street, and 9th Street £or breakdorn on point repairs and possible line replacement. (to start) 9. Mater and serer Coamittee rants Field Investigation of drainage lines running thru Park Terrace Neet, through Park terrace Eaet, to drainage canal backup in system. (to start) 10. Marking •ith Division Chiefs on eater and serer emergency problems in-house. 11. Mater treatwent Plante •1 d •2. (to start) 12. Oak Harbor Sever Renab Phase I completed in design. 13. Buccaneer Chlorine Contact Chamber 14. Nell for Howell Park, meter, vault, and tag. Continued 4. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Size of Leak Steady Drip 1/8• Flor 1/4• Flor 3/B• Flor 1/2• Flor 3/4• Flor_ 1• Flor SANITARY SEMER LEAK ESTINATES Gal/Dav 50 410 1, 040 3, 680 6, 566 14,443 26, 236 PRIORITY LIST REPAIRS ~'(1) J-2 (2) I-3 [31 D-2 * [4) F-1 (5> E-2/2-A !6> C-4 (7) A-1 <B) C-3 <9) B-4 (10) A-2 lll) B-1 (12) B-3 (13) I-2 (14) H-2 <15> C-1 (16) G-1 (17> H-1 (181 I-1 (19) J-1 Total Estimated Cost ESTIMATED COST 53,500.00 2, 210.00 1, 260.00 22,000.00 1,760.00 1,760.00 2. 960.00 1,760.00 1,760.00 1, 760.00 1,190.00 1, 190.00 1,510.00 1, 510.00 1, 760.00 250.00 250. 00 250.00 250.00 547,890.00 NOTE: Start at J-2 and work dorn List. Continued 2. Recommend Point Repair Station 015. Service Connection, Hammer Tap, Leaking 410 GPD. <I) Manhole •C• to Manhole "B•. Manhole in Russell Park going South under tennis courts. 1. Recommend invert vark, seal rith non-shrink concrete. Grout rhere pipe enters Manhole •C• and leaves Manhole •C•. 2. Recommend Point Repair at Service Connection at Station 0.25. Hemmer Tap cracked and leaking 910 GPD. 3. Recommend Point Repair on service at Station 1"13. Not leaking at Fitting at main line, Dut very heavy continuous {lot o{ clear rater coming through this service. Appears to De a very long run o{ service pipe and leak could he anyrhere in run. Estimated leakage 26,236 GPD. (J) Manhole •B• to Manhole •A• going Eaet through Russell Perk. 1. Recommend invert cork at Manhole •B•. Seal rich non-shrink grout rhere pipe enters and leaves Nanhole •B•. 2. Just out o{ Manhole •B• at Station 0.07 rubber has rolled at joint. Also at this point this B• PVC line goes through an existing storm drain structure rhich is a violation. The existing storm drainage lines appear to be either 38• or 92• RCP. Recommend that this section o{ line {tom Manhole •B• to other side o{ existing drainage structure be replaced immediately rith D.I.P. with no joint inside o{ drainage structure. Rest o1 Line in good shape. Depth f6'-8'). <K) Manhole •A• to Manhole 106 at Ru eaell Park going Eaet. 6 joints shot that they have Deen leaking due to stains at joint. No leaking tae observed during taping and {or thla reason requires no immediate action. In future, i{ conditions rare to rorsen, this run could be lined. 156' o{ 8•. No Services. Depth (6'-8'). '~: R= x.,a:..... .. ContinueC 3. Recommend Point Repair at Station 1.59 Leaking 1,040 GPD. 4. Recommend Point Repair at Station 1.80 Leaking 3,680 GPD. (D7 Manhole 50 to Manhole 97 on 6th. Street going West from Sherry Street Manhole 97 just out of Lift Station •A•. Average depth (7. 0' to 8.5'7. 1. Recommend Point Repair at Station 0.28 Not Leaking. 2. Recommend Point Repair at Station 2.07 Leaking 6,566 GPD. (E) Manhole 106 to Manhole 96 on Palm Street going east from Seminole Road to Horell Park. Depth c6' to e'7 1. Recommend Point Repair at Station 0.45 Not Leaking. 2. Recommend Paint Repair at Station 1.52 Leaking 1,040 GPD. 2A. Recommend Point Repair at Station 1.55 Leaking 3x680 GPD. 9,720 GPD TOTAL (F) Manhole 96 to Manhole 97 from Palm Street going Eaet through Horell Park under creek to Manhole 97 just out of Lift Station •A• Depth (B' to 10'I 1. Bad dip in line Erow Station 0.94 to Station 1.68. Recommend replacewent of 100' of 12• from Station 080 to Station 1.80. This line rune under Creek. (G) Manhole •E' to Manhole •D• Manhole at City Hall goes teat under parking area into Russell Park. 1. Recommend invert rork, eeal rith non-shrink concrete Grout there pipe enters b leaves Manhole •E•. (H> Manhole D to Manhole C. Manhole in Rueeell Park going rest. 1. Recommend invert work, seal rith non-shrink concrete. Grout where pipe enters Manhole •D• and leaves Manhole •D'. f `9.4 ~rr::Y _. ._ .. REPORT ON CONDITION OF EXISTING SANITARY SEVER LINES ' FROM EAST COAST DRIVE ALUNG 6TH STREET', TO LIFT STATION •A• PEST OF SHERRY STREET', THEN TO RUSSELL PARK AND SEMINOLE ROAD ' Submitted by: Ernie Beadle/Assistant Public Yorke Director Date: Hatch 17, 1992 i (A) Manhole 53 to Manhole 52 on 6th street going vest to Sherry street. Average depth of line <4.5 to 5. 0) 1. Recommend Point Repair from Station 1.26 to 1.34 to ~ atop 1,040 GPD leak coming through service line into main line. Also at Station 1.36 there ie a cracked and leaking joint, rhich is leaking 410 GPD. 2. Recommentl Point Repair at Station 1•B3 to take out ~ protruding hammer tap. Groun^ is settling in this i i area. i 3. Reverse set-up Manhole 52 to Manhole 53. Recommend ~ Point Repair at Station 1.01 to 1.19 (1.83• Hemmer Tep> cracked ]Dint and structural cracks. (Not leaking yet). 4. Recommend Point Repair et Station 1.73 cracked joint ` tNot leaking yet). , (B) Manhole 52 to Manhole 51 on 6th Street going vest to Sherry Street. Average depth of line f4.5 to 5. 0I 1. Recommend Point Repair at Stetson 0.96 Leaking 410 GPD. 2. Recommend Paint Repair at Station 1.67 Hot Leaking. 3. Recommend Point Repair at Station 1.92 Leaking 910 GPD. 4. Recommend Point Repair at Station 2.09 Service Connection 1,090 GPD. 5. Recommend Paint Repair a[ Station 2.32 Not Leaking. 6. Recommend Point Repair at Station 2.72 Not Leaking. 7. Recommend Point Repair at Station 2.77 Not Leaking. (C) Manhole 51 to Manhole 50 on 6th. Street going Yest to Sherry Street. Average depth <4. 5' to 5. 5'>. 1. Recommend Point Repair at Station 0.24 Leaking 50 GPD. 2. Recommend Point Repair at Station 0.76 Not Leaking. 6 i U V1 _L ~ 0 F F O Z H F S, v: R.. ... as w0 N K ,~ 0 a N z r ~ +~ z v E ¢~J NZ I 0 m n z S i s bl a fi to E .~~ a L ~ i e. yT v ? a ~Y ~ d ~ 2 F _ ry o `~ - y o 3 2 l~ \\ \\ •F a J :\`:,~ ° E Q d N b y N N 0 ~ Yy ~ 7 £ ~ M £ ~ S qd y m U J d ,{ C ~ a ~~ Lo t f N 1 ~ T -3Z~- --..... A;;:acnw.~,vi a. REPORT ON CONDITIONS OF EXISTING SANITARY SEVER LINES FROM EAST COAST DRIVE ALONG SIXTH STREET, TO LIFT STATION 'A' PEST OF SHERRY DRIVE, TNEN TO RUSSELL PARK AND SENINOLE ROAD SH 2 OF 2 `: ~: £; ~., In additicn, the analysis of the sever tapes produced by the firm televising and cleaning our sever lines has saved the City approximately 56,000.00 in consulting fees to date. In house analysis rill continue to save the City money. Ernie's coordination with the crers doing the televising and ~, cleaning has saved the City countless monies. He hoe a keen arerenese of the p:o per speed to run the televising and cleaning equipment, therefore, preventing crers from doing further damage to already damaged areas. The direct savings to the City have been: a> Inspection savings = 513,152.00 b> In-house revier of tapes/report 56.000.00 519,152.00 for 15 reeks The indirect savings to the City have been Ernie's assistance to the Director in all areas of the Department, e. g. Capital Improvement Plan, Mater Line Report, Solid Matte Report. He ie gaining experience in handling the Department for short timefranes in the Director's absence. RSiS/tb cc: Ernie Beadle/Assistant Public Works Director File t' . CITY OF ~l b beads - 7(ezier!a April 13, 1592 M E M O R A N D U M AI l•L~\KIV 1 1~ um slnvnrEa une ATIAnTIC BE~CN, MP¢N J21)JJJ81 TF1ERf0~'E 190II Jtl-J8W FA%19a11A5W SH 1 OF 2 TO: Kim D. Leinbach/City Nanager FROM: Robert S. Koeoy/Director of Public Morke ~j~_ RE: COST SAVINGS REALIZED MITH CITY INSPECTOR! ASSISTANT PUBLIC NORKS DIRECTOR At your request re have compiled Figures and analyzed the savings realized by the City by hiring a City Inspector/Assistant Public Norks Director. Ilr. Ernie Beadle began rorking with the City on November 18, 1991 antl beginning in December 1991, replaced the Coneultsnt'e Resident Observer on the Buccaneer Nasterater tr¢atm¢nt Expanaian (Surge Tenk) end Sea Gardena Lift Stetson Projects. To date, the cast savings realized in this capacity have been: a) Consultant's Resident Observer: 61600/rk X 15 reeks <to 4/3/92) = 624,000.00 b) City's Resident Observer: 613. 9072/hr X 40 hr reek % 1.3 Denef its factor X 15 veeke (to 4/3/92) = 610,847.63 c) Savings for 15 reeks lto 4/3/92 la) - <h1 = 613,152.39 Inspection ie still required on a very limited basis on both of these prajecta. Continued CIY'Y OP ATI.ANYIC BEA® CITY C0f4fISSION MEETING STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM: CONSULTANT RESIDENT OBSERVATION SUBMITTED BYc Robert S. KosoylDirector of Public Works ~jp~y DATE: April 16, 1992 9 BACRCROOND: We have realized a significant savings of $19,152.OU since hiring Hr. Ernie Beadle as Assistant Public Works Director/ City Inspector. See Attachments 1 b 2. However, we did advise [hat if too many projects become active ac one time, we would need co augment tlr. Beadle's resident observation duties with consul cant resident observation. This situation is approaching quickly as outlined in Attaclimen[ 3. In [he pas[ we mailed request for proposals (RFPS) co consultants for resident observation and received high weekly rates. I[ is out wish to obtain RFP'S from consultants with hourly rates in increments of 2,4,6 and 8 hours. Furthermore, we will request resumes of proposed Resident Observers. and advise that hours worked will he mutually agreed open by Che Director of Public Works and the consultant on a weekly basis. The primary inspection duties will be the WTP Prcjecc and the Resident Observer should have a strong background in eater and sever. RECOl4Q97DATION: Solicit RFP'S for Consul cant Res idenc Observa cion ATIACtlfO]]fIS: At tachmencs 1, 2, and1, 2, and 3~ REVIENFd) BY CITY MANAGER: AGENDA ITF21 NO. ,~C s G ~. ~. ~. _... lea. _ _,_ _ _ _. . /~ C-l d: ii[ o o>~` F A~ «r C!'h ~'; ~.~~1:~.1 ~~.~~` ~/ j . ~ ~_ f~ CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH CITY COMMISSION MEETING STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM: 17th Vear CDBG Contract with Jacksonville SUBMITTED BY: George Worley, City Planner ~!v''~ DATE: April 23, 7992 BACKGROUND: The City of Jacksonville, Mayors Budget Review Committee met April 13th, to review and approve the amount of 5175,200 for the Community Development Block Grant, 17th year contract for the City of Atlantic Beach. This amount represents an increase over last years E100,800. This money must be spent in the much the same manner as in past years - in Donner Subdivision and primarily for home rehabilitations but this year a portion has been set aside to be spent on younger home owners who fit the income category. A portion of this money can be made available to the recipient family of Beaches Habitats new house to off-set the costs of impact fees. This will be included in next years contract as a line item figure. The Donner Subdivision Community Development Corporation will assist us in determining other home owners eligible for rehab assistance. The Contract for this year is somewhat late because of auditing and budget work at the HUD offices. The next step in the process is for Lhe City of Atlantic Beach Commission to authorize the Mayor to sign the contract. Once that is done we will immediately begin the bid process for the next group of houses identified for rehabilitation work. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Commission authorize the Mayor to sign the contract with the City of Jacksonville for the Community Development Block Grant program in Donner Subdivision. ATTACHMENTS: Proposed Contract /'~ REVIEWED BY CITY MANAGERr~~~~/_ ~ Q~6~ AGENDA ITEM NO. x PASSED BY THE CITY COMMISSION ON : William I. Gulliford, Jr. Mayor 't Al :; ~.. v; ~; :-.... ATTEST: Maureen King, City Clerk Approved as to Form and Correctness: Alan C. Jensen, Esaui re City Attorney .~ , r r~,_~`~_ - ;;_e<_~~ RESOLUTION NO. 92-1C WHEREAS, A group of local Merchants and residents have formed an organization known as Town Center, and WHEREAS, Said organization is dedicated to the renovation and beautification of the eastern portions of Atlantic Boulevard and adjacent properties, and WHEREAS, The City of Atlantic Beach City Commission desires to encourage and support said efforts and to facilitate future implementation, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH, DUVAL COUNTY, FLORIDA, THAT: That permission is hereby granted to the Town Center organization to construct or install improvements as shown on the submitted plans within the Right-of-Way of Atlantic Boulevard between Third Street and its eastern terminus, and including also, the south 50 feet of the Right-of-Way of Ocean Boulevard and the south 50 feet of the Right-of-Way of East Coast Drive. Any and all such construction and installation within Lhe above cited Rights-of-Way shall be approved in advance by the City Commission of the City of Atlantic Beach and shall be coordinated closely with the various Departments of the City. The City retains the right to deny all or part of any proposed construction or installation where it deems such construction or installation or parts thereof to pose a hazard or detriment to Lhe public or to the future use of said Rights-of-Way by the City. Town Center accepts all liability for damages and injury during construction and installation, and agrees to provide continuing maintenance of all landscaping materials placed in conjunction with said construction and installation. Town Center further indemnifies the City of Atlantic Beach in the event that the City must remove any construction, installation or landscaping from within the above cited Rights-of-Way for the purpose of maintenance, repair, replacement, inspection or installation of utilities and other public improvements therein, end agrees to bear the costs of replacement of said removed construction, installation or landscaping. a _. Continued 7. HATER RATES Recowwend advertising in the nerapaper to explain the eater stew. B. LEAD/COPPER RULE Harry McNally and Bab Koeoy met rith Nelson McArthur from the City of Jacksonville and both rater utilities have ell forma to begin implementing program. AB Mater rill have to obtain building perwit information £row City Hall and Buccaneer Mater rill have to obtain information from the City of Jackeonville'e Building Department. cc: Cowwieeioner Fletcher Ernie Beadl¢/Assistant Pu61ic Morke Director Harry E. McNally/Utility Plant Divieian Director Tiw N. Torneend/Utility Plant Division Director Dr. Ray Salwan Alan Potter File - 92 NSC(j Continued 2. ATLANTIC BEACN YTP •1 i i2 IMPROVEMENTS Contractor, Meadora, signed contracts and pre- construction schedule to be scheduled next reek. Due to the diificultiea being encountered rith this bid arard it •ae recomwended that the City conduct mandatory pre-bid meetings for larger jobs. Bob Koeoy rill prepare a Stali Report to the City Commission outlining the need for consultant realdent observation. 3. NAYPORT ROAD BORE AND JACK Bid analysis to be Surniehed by Gee i Jensen and tentative recommendation to arard rill be at the April 27, 1992 Cownieaion Meeting. 4. NAVAL CNILD CARE FACILITY City Manager signed perwite on April 15, 1992. The Coawittee could like to revier permits rhich exceed a Slorrate of greater than 5,000 GPD or 80:C capacity of the plant. 5. CAPACITT ANALYSIS REPORTS These reparta are needed in the next tra wontha. Bob Koeoy rill provide iniorwation to Tim Tarnaend and Harry McNally so that preliwinary report can be reviered by this Coawittee in the first reek of June. 6. ASNCO - TIPFANT BT THE SEA Additional in£orwation wuat be obtained {row the Building Department to deterwine rhether n request for reiwbureewent is rarranted. c ~. i ¢~ E CITY OF ~4i'la~rtle beat! - ~fmuda Imo sAnonnx uvF ~_._.- -_ __ ____.___. __ ATLNTIC BEICH, FLORID1J221J11t1 lF1FAlOhE 1/~1 }.(FSOi ~\ FA% I9a13fG5lll April 22, 1992 n e n o R A x D u n TO: Kim D. L.e inbach/City Manager FROn: Robert S. Kosoy/Director of Puhlic Worke~ RE: MATER AND SEVER COMMITTEE NEETING t16 On April 16, 1992 Commissioner Lyman Fletcher, Dr. Ray Salmon, Ernie Beadle, Narry McNally, Tim Torneend, Alan Potter and Bob Koeay met to discuss rater and serer concerns and projects. A brief summary follore: 1. BUCCANEER rr7'P EXPANSION (SURGE TANK) On April 10, 1992 the conveyor manufacturer'e local representative stated that he does not make a conveyor suitable for our application. On April 14, 1992 a meeting roe held at the WWTP and at Assisi Lane rith the screen manufacturer rho agreed to submit information to modify the screens. On April 15, 1992 Alan Potter spoke rith the president of Hytrol, Leon Hanson, rho stated they do make outdoor conveyors and rill cork with the City to provide thee. Mith the April 21, 1992 date approaching it roe agreed that since re are nor receiving the cooperation of the Contractor, the extenuating circumstances could dictate a contract time extension of 30 days. A change order rill be submitted by the Contractor. Me are araiting information from the engineer on the design on the overf for pipe at plant f3 and an evaluation of an automatic dialing system. f I I CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH ' CITY COMMISSION MEETING STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM: Cavalla Road Fire Lane Status Report . i SUBMITTED 8Y: George Worley, City Planner Cz (!j /G DATE: April 23, 1992 BACKGROUND: Per the request of the Commission at the last regular meeting, I have coordinated with the Fire Department and the Public Works Department to have "Fire Lane' signs installed on the city owned Right-of-Way on Royal Palm Drive denoting the driveway behind the buildings es a "Fire Lane". j RECOMMENDATION: In addition to the initial posting, we request that the City Commission either authorize the installation of additional signs as directed by the Fire Department, by city forces or authorize the City Attorney to notify the property owners of their legal obligation to install such additional signs. The determination of how and where such signs are to be installed rests with the Fire Department. ATTACHMENTS: REVIEWED BY CITY MANAGER AGENDA ITEM NO. ~~~ j / / 1. _~ ., r. ~,:d l~ i/. /,~fl .S ~,~ ,~ i~.__ ~?~.: Y.,; ;i „ 1:;~ ~ ~ ~~ CITY OF r~lartle " k - `~lmuda BdISEMISOLE xu,n i__ _ __- _ - - _ _. _ ~ ATIA1'nC BF 1LH. FlANm1 JE21Y5615 TELEPHONE f90011i5lW ~~ FA% (wrl }(FSlOS March 10, 1992 M E M O R A N D U M TO: Kim Leinbach, City 1lanager FROM: Don C. Ford, Building Official ~~ RE: Part-time Code Enforcement Officer I could like approval to approach the Commission far a part- time code enforcement person. This pereen could rock as a contract employee to alleviate a back log of complaints re acquire during peak building department activity. The history of these peak periods usually starts in March and carries through to June and July. This person could handle code enforcement complaints and help in pursuing compliance in target areas such ae Royal Palms and the Donner Subdivision. I suggest a budget adjustment of 56,000 to pay for this help. This amount is based on 512 per hour, four hours a day for 25 reeks. This person would not receive any benefits and reuld be responsible for ifie orn taxes, insurance, etc. This woney could come from tro sources. One source could be the Commission's Contingency Fund. Another source could be the Contractural Services Account Number 516-3400. This account ras eat up to dewoliah condemned structures in target areas. Thus far this year, I have approached tro property ornere of structures to De condemned. Both owners have agreed to demolish at no coat to the City. The addresses are 10 Church Road end 1630 Francis Avenue. Me had allocated 53,000 per structure for demolition. The account at present shore a balance of 94,138.47. Horever, 56,730 and 9375 are monies that rare bitl out in FY 90 and 91 far demolition of structures on 54 Church Road and 85 Dora Street. These items rare contracted in August and ararded on August 26, 1991. There were several delays due to reacher and problems rith the contractor appearing on the site. I believe these monies should be credited to the account and taken out of monies remaining in that account from FY 90 91. This would require an adjustment from the finance department. The actual balance in this account should be 511,243.37. Enclosed ie a copy of the account activity listing Eor Account No. 516-3400. Thanks for your attention to this matter. DCF/pah Enc. r (' i 7 N t7' ^r^.f C! I .', to ' ..'i.1Ki ~. .. ,,, OR - _ ___ ._ __ _ ___.__-__. _ - _ ___ _.. n- rn ---- . ~ ev ~ ._en~ -- - -~ -' -- --- _ - --- _._- - . ----. _ ,,,.. ~._,,. -- _ --- .e., _... --- -- - - -- - ... _ -- -._ .cr._ -- ---~---.... - ---... _..... ~-----... _... { I i( _-_________ __-.- _.-- __- -._...-____.__ {j __ __ 1 _ 1 `^ ~ `!1'7"'F C, ~ c ~ r ~ r, ~Cill' ' FPGAf CL r ~ ;H'~ .'.tl O'Jkr eat.f HSC `MCNT -: 2 Cft -. -' Ull L 1: 4':!0 .%C .13F. 9,' ~ ::. r ~C.pr;, P. % \s- S-: i - TPA. • ___ _____ _ __ . __ ..n nMn..__. _np - _.~ afyn~. ___._ _. r 5 ~ I ---- -------- (S 91 ~ --- ---- -- -- -------- .._ ~. y~ ,., NOTICE OF ILLEGIBILITY ILLEGIBILITY OF SOME OF THESE DOCUMENTS IS DUE TO THE POOR QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL. THE FAULT DOES NOT LIE WITH THE CAMERA OR ITS OPERATOR. .... it--~- iiii \L__JI ~~~i .MN,~.,,~.d .,.,...,.o.. .~~~5, ~~ ~= ~- properties lessening [he need for monies so allocated and as planned for the balance of [his fiscal year. We anticipate the need to continue funding the program to remove condemned structures, but simply Feel the same could be considered in the next budgetary cycle. I thank you for your consideration and will be moat happy [o answer any questions if you so desire. Sin~ely, `(~~~~ D zmond Waters, III Cit Commissioner JDW.dst cc: City Hanager Ruth Gregg George Worley Don Ford REF: JDW.I r ~~`'" CITY OF JQllawtc'a " - ~lmu'da eao scw.vote anAD AM4TIC BFX'H. FIURmA J22J}J{l5 i EI.FAIOA'6190015l1-Sb0 FAX 1~1 ifF5105 April 2l, 1992 Honorable Mayor and City Commission Members Atlantic Beach, Florida Dear Mayor and City Commission Members: The committee appointed by the Hayor and Commission for turning around some of the negative [rends within the Royal Palms area has met on several occasions with staff members and others [o attempt to find solutions to such problems as junk, poor construction, littering and other nuisances. Accordingly, there is one area ve feel warrants serious consideration and hopefully action by the City Commission to enact the same. Our current Code Enforcement program consisCS of a random system of application of various lays and regulations on a city-vide balls. Frankly this is about all [ha[ tan be done under the existing staffing level, but is more reactive in nature. We believe a pro-active stance is needed as a means to turn around some of the problems existing in the Royal Palms area. Therefore, ve are recommending concurrence with the Building Official/Code Enforcement Officer's recommendation (copy enclosed) [hat the City reallocate funds within the demolition account of his budget in the amount of 56,000 so that these monies may be utilized co retain our contract employee on a sustained basis co concentrate in Royal Palms. This type of comprehensive program would be a great benefit [o cleaning up neighborhoods and reversing the trends evidenced by some properties. Ne look at this as a first phase attempt with other6 to follow such as in Donner Park or elsewhere within our community as warranted. On behalf of our committee I will bring up these considerations during budge[ discussions with the goal of funding the same at [ha[ time. In [hat the monies are available within the demolition account of [he Code Enforcement budget and ve are simply suggesting a reassignment of priorities in [his regard, your Concurrence with [he proposal is urged. You should be aware that taking monies from [he demolition account should not hurt our efforts in this regazds either, because after certain structures were removed by the Ci[y, ve have experienced voluntary cooperation by other E. -- , CITY OF ~Alartle Biatk - ~leslda ~XDiCYtIIiTM#iIIl't YOUTH WEEK WHEREAS, the Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks has designat rd the week beginning Nay 1st, as Youth Week [o honor America's junior citizens for their accomplishments, and to give fitting recognition of [heir services to community, state, and nation; and WHEREAS, Jacksonville Beach Lodge No. 1901 Will sponsor an observance during that Week in [ribu [e to [he junior citizens of this COmmanlCy; dnd WHEREAS, no even[ could be more deserving of our support and participation than one dedicated co these young people Who represent the nation's greases[ resource, and Who in [he years ahead Will assume the responsibility for the advancement of our free society; and WHEREAS, our youth need the guidance, inspiration and encouragement Wh?rh We alone can give in order co develop chose qualities of character essential for future leadership and service co America; and WHEREAS, to achieve this Worthy objective We should demonstrate our partnership With youth, our understanding of [heir hopes and aspirations and a sincere Willingness co help prepare then in every Way for the rexpons ibllities and opportunities of citizenship. NOW, THEREFORE, I, William I. Gulliford, Jr., Mayor of the CS[y of Atlantic Beach, do hereby proclaim the Week beginning MAY Ist AS "YOUTH WEEK" and urge all departments of government, civic, fraternal and patriotic groups, and our <it izens generally, to participate Wholeheartedly in its observance. William I. Gulliford, Jr., Mayor i Ee,m loo3 Ee. IzBo Rn z7 P7z9DOCu oFauurloxs NAMED INSURED MORTON H HANSOM 2919-1 ATLANTIC BLVD ~~))j~ eOli[YApnaNT~~ @16*~H,„~keo i1MF3Rf R1E AIXM1E 55 OF fME NAMED IMSMEO AS SLA xFO XEppEIM ~ 0551 INS AGCY INCPOLILY EFFECTIVE FROM JUNE 26, 1991 TO JUNE 26, 1992 F 6028 CHESTER AVE /206 PF-10229 t JACKSONVILLE FL 3221] ~'~~~~ PROGRESSIVE AMERICAN INSURANCE CO. I-800-J2J-7756 P.O. BO% 31260. TAMPA, FLORIDA 33631-3260 ..Mi.icii. rn. ~i~mn we~ enlr inn ,•sw[r ,o a,[n ... ~e e.r or m. ro uo.iea [ •, .q•, ,. a. :oe~[n•e ..im .e<wa le . cn eoa~eea RwIM [Uw•rm. rly,«o. engnr. IiM iliry pet u • c su[n <ar nq[ .MU ee •< a .a nn•in, [uniecl r .u 1 al m. wl;cr YR TRADE NAME - MODEL VI Ne SERIAL N0. TERR GRP CC DRI VERUNG 90 KANASAKI BAYOU LF2 JKBLF BAIIL852669] 36 2 215 bl M *** COVERAGE ANO LInlTS OF LIABILITY *** YOU HAVE A PACKAGE POLICY BODILY INJURY l1ABILITY INCLUDING ORI VE OTHER CYCLE FULL TERM PREMIUM CHARGES $10,000 EA[N PERSON, $20.000 EACH ACCIDENT PROPERTY DAMAGE l1AB IDLITY $10,000 EACN ACCIDENT $46 UNINSURED MOTORISTS **A REJECTED *** ATTACHNENTS110ENT~FIEDLBY10ORM NO 0 DEPR EMIUMEBY VEHICLE $284238 1310(0588) 1319(0588) TOTAL POLICY PREMIUM $284.00 COVERAGE FOR PHY5I LAL DAMAGE TO YOUR MOTORCYCLE EXTENDS ONLY TO THE BASIC nOTORCYCLE AS IT COMES fROM THE fA[TORY. IF YOU HAVE ANY ADDITIONAL EQUIPMENT OR ACCESSORIES, NOT PROVIDED A$ ORIGINAL EQUIPMENT BY THE MANUFACTURER, THEY ARE NOT COVERED FOR LOSS. IF YOU HAVE ACCESSORIES ANO MISX TO PURCHASE THI$ COVERAGE, CONTACT YOUR AGENT. +r le•e eee« v«r l 11+ careen n .m .., a 340402 ^••r ww« 1 ..mea ..< ,ee ..a eee.. I qey e,eq v.er~~ e•,ago AI +. e•ev. nl•e Ew wl.e,,. a c.<• ee ~ n;e0291 zq<m. u..e UNIT 46 601 91190 HAN$ 00 150 e. u uo~en InSVeEO COev el [ •^ue.• E~oo~w~u~ex.El nx s L. .~ .1 p~og~elrire companies InsLCed NORTON N IIAL150N ]99-1 RTLANTIC aLVO RTLMITlC BERM FL 333]3 Welcome to Progressive. We have enclosed the following information pertaining to your Progressive NOTORCTCLE IfISUfanCe pORCy. DECLARATIONS PAGE This specifies all drivers and coverages listed under this policy. POLICY CONTRACT Please review your policy contract Contact your insurance agent if you have any questions about your policy or coverages. POLICY ATTACHMENTS These forms pertain to any specific coverages or contract modifications you may have in addition to those covered under the policy contract BILLING INFORMATION You have selected the Ot pay plan If you have selected a payment plan other than paid in full, you will receive your first installment due within o0 days. It is important that these installments be paid on time to ensure continuous insurance coverage. For further billing information, please see reverse aide. If you wish to make any Changes to [his policy, please contact your InsV3lce egent listed below or call Progressive Customer Service a[ t-800-727-7756. Thank you for choosing Progressive as your insurance company. Agent OSSI IRS aacT INO 0021 QIESTER •VE 1308 J11q(SONVILLE FL 33317 90a-7]1-7933 LOta717-a8) VIFL07-31-Ba IOfil7 Beaches Sea Tuttle Patrol, Inc. Patrolling Neptune, A[lanfic and Jacksonville Beaches Mr. Kim Leinbach Apr11 19, 1992 Page Two Nests found in unsafe areas are moved via the ATV to the hatchery in Hanna Park. The Patrol suzve ys are done in the early moz ning hours from sunrise to about 10:00 a.m. These hours are the necessary ones to provide the best protection for the nests. At times, it may also be necessary to use the ATV after dark to aid a nesting sea turtle oz a hatchling release. If this occurs, the police dispatch will be notified by phone of the circumstances prior to the trip. The amount of time needed on the beach depends on the number of nests or stzandings found. The ATV is owned, insured and operated by the Patrol. A copy of our insurance form is enclosed. Ne appceciate your support for our Sea Turtle Conservation Program. As you know, the Patrol is a Florida non profit corporation and depends on tax-deductible contributions to continue its work. This is accomplished through donations and the sale of annual memberships. Another source of funding is through a sea turtle monitoring contract with a city following a beach renourishment protect. In accordance with the Sea Turtle Protection Plan ("STPP"), the city concerned needs DNR approved personnel to monitor the beach for two to three years following the xenour ishment to provide statistical information on nests, false crawls and hatchling success. Thank you for your consideration. If there are any questions or concerns, please contact the undersigned at 246-1634. Sincezel y, Norton N. Nanson, Director /Ng Enclosure 299-] Atlantic Blvd. • Atlantic Beach, FL 32233 • (904) 246-]634 Beaches Sea Turtle Patrol, lnc. Patrolling Neptune, Atlantic and Iacksonville Beaches April 19, 1992 Nr. Kim Leinbach City Manager City of Atlantic Beach P. G. Box 25 Atlantic Beach, FL 32233 Re: Beaches Sea Turtle Patrol, Inc., a Florida non profit corporation Tax Exempt I.D. Number 59-3100329 Dear Mr. Leinbach: Foz the past four years, the cities of Atlantic Beach, Neptune Beach and Jacksonville Beach have granted us permission fox the use of an All Terrain Vehicle ("ATV") on the beach for sea turtle nesting and stranding surveys. This letter is to request your permission for the continued use of our ATV on the beach for sea turtle surveys from Nay through November of each year. The Beaches Sea Turtle Patrol, Inc. (the "Patrol") is made up of approximately 95 volunteers operating under a permit issued by the Florida Department of Natural Resources ("DNR"). The Patrol works closely with conservation groups and assists the Florida Marine Patrol in documenting sea turtle stranding situations. This allows the Marine Patrol more time to concentrate on other problems. Sea turtle nesting normally begins In Nay and extends through August, and hatchlings emerge from their nests from July through November. Due to the problem with excessive beachfront lighting, it is presently necessary fox the Patrol to relocate mast of the nests to a protected hatchery. This necessitates early morning as well as after dark trips on the beach to ensure that the newly emerged hatchlings make it safely to the ocean. It is very important that we continue our year-round documentation of sea turtle stzandings (dead, injured or washed ashore) before they are disposed of. The Beaches Sea Turtle Patrol operates out of the rear of Bio Max Health Food and Groceries, Inc., at 299-1 Atlantic Blvd., Atlantic Beach, Florida 32233. As the primary operator of the ATV, the undersigned conducts a daily or "as needed" patrol, from Atlantic through Neptune and Jacksonville Beaches every morning. The other members of the Patrol cover assigned areas on foot/bicycle for complete coverage from Hanna Park to the Ponte Vedra line. 299-1 Aliantic Blvd. • Atlantic Beach, FL 32233 • (909) 296-1639 ~. r J ~ ~~ t o -_ -~ 3 ~' a `~ h `h, _r a d ~ ~ h n +~ ~ ~( 3 i s ~ c ~ O Y6 ~ ` ~ M N j 3 '~ ~ ' , ~ i ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ N ~ Yur.~WT"~ N1-sruF ~Y v ~ ~ m Q ~ V (~/ 1..L ~ r K V ~ Y Y 1 ,l ~ ~ ~ Z ~ \ • ~ l 1 C ` ~ ~Y ~ ~ 1, j Q ? o h ~. v ~. i °u ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ 1 ~ ~ `~ 7 ~' ~ o t ~ ~ ~ ~ s ~ A w M ~ K a u g ~ ~ ~ s J P ~ \ ~ < ` ~ J ~ `7 '~ '- h V S l 0 t 'w G ;, ~ . CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH CITY COMMISSION MEETING STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM: Beaches Habitat SUBMITTED 8Y: George Worley, City Planner ~/,.~~ GATE: APRIL 23, 1992 BACKGROUND: The City has been contacted by Beaches Habitat with a request Lhat the City swap certein property along Francis Avenue to them for property they have recently acquired adjacent Lo Lhe north end of the Public Works facility. Their intention is to rehabilitate these single-family homes. They will place a carefully screened family into this house and assist them in making their home ownership work. Beaches Habitat has already constructed one new home on Francis Avenue and has two more in Lhe planning stage. RECOMMENDATION: The City owns a number of houses on the east side of Francis Avenue, however these homes were acquired for expansion of the sewer or water plants. To avoid future expansion problems, we recommend that this possibility be forwarded to the Mater antl Sewer Committee Lhat they may determine if there exists a future need for the Francis Avenue lots/./// ATTACHMENTS: ~'~~~~ REVIEWED BY CITY MANAGER ~,~~%% AGENDA ITEM NO. r F r t. i;: 'e Y .4 PR n,; F.CTED THEATF:E AC°: ~; T'i II: A.B. CGN.MUIJiTY CEf+TEF TLr follow try Idra~ for iuCrta~c,l Cufturai posslblllt lea in A.6. with CYre pcYf.~r rt~a nces fox con~~munity members aze being offered by a 26-yr. Lesident and former teachez, cuzzestly a board member oftlie Played-by-tbc-Sea (and f~undinq membezl as veil as BAF, Carson Mecry Baillie: I. A playezs-by-the-Sea 6-week SUMHER DRAMA CAMP Eor children aged 8 to 12, runntny June 22 to July 31st, 5 weekdays from 9 a.m. to 1 p.m. A. A minin:urt~ of theca professional instLUCLors with va r :n]s expert.; ce vi :: Lt vitfl ibe studrn;:: at all limo. .AVI6111:_LCa 1.~YC diLCCLVt DtbGYail Fa1:I5dy $Ii11 L:1, Cuc nrnlly piayiuy in .;u~ Aih~mbta': Funn''Ch~ Hd P4~r ned un Lhc W~ to the FucUm, vhu viii -also teach musical theatre and direct the final pr a9ucti~n by the children. She iw:: a deyree in theatre from J.U. and has, in addition to playiuy many local theatres, appeared 25 Limes at tt:e Ai hambra. She will he bx inyiny her S- yr. cld son to Lhc class; husband Michael is an art professor at UNF; and they are currently Guiidiny un Ocean Hlvd. at Plaza. 2. There will :r an instructor tr,r dance and mover,:e nt, and one Cur mime end pezhap~ clwniny and ju9ylin9, in addition to acliny. E. °. ii e; Cirial vrei. viii cud w;:. it a prtfucmance at the PBTS theatre in the eveoi^o for friends and Family of the students, but the final FL ida y, Lhece will be a Lull performance Erma L. p.m. tc approxima Lely 'c pm, for Atlantic Beacii residents at the center, with nu chatye. Rec. committee cordially invited. II. Fi.AYHOUSE FiFTI' a dtdRa vorhshop Coz seniors 60 p/u>, beginning Wed. April 22 to run far 6 consecutive Wednesday afternoons from 2 to 9 pm. A. Instructor - Carson Merry Baillie, flyer attached. B. This will be the third senior workshop, launched in the winter at PBTS. Many signed up for the second session, and five from last session are attendiny this one. C. Final session, a production of monoioyues and scenes, many humorous, will be offered to the community at 3 p.m. at the community center. Rec committee uryed to attend. III. A group of recent drama workshop graduates under direction of Mrs. BaC llie would like to rehearse a play a few eveninys a week at the conuwnity center, and in E or 7 weeks, present the play on the stage at the center for tt:r ee vicekends. The AB Community would not only gain Erom a cultural addition, but would be given the opportunity to see the play FREE on Thursday eveninys. @ S5 per person on vicekends, the community would be given the equivalent of 5250 each veek...in free entertainment of a new, experimental nature, ncv plays, ne vet seen before. The weekend fee is necessary to pay for simple lights, sets, costumes, pr irlt lug of pruyrams, etc.(Very basic..the play's the thiny.l *** In summation, I feel as a citizen of A.E., these pcoyc a:as could enc is t: the lives of children, seniors end adults, and add a diversity to beach life that would enhar:ce our community. cmb ' _:::. :. ~ ;~-~' - APRIL 2I, 1992 Par iculars regarding meeting oC City Manager, Carson Nerry Ba illie and Rose Blanchard, regarding use of Community Center for Drama groups. CHILDREN'S NORK SHOP ~~~ DATES: ]ONE 22 -JULY 31 //„ AGES: B-12 yrs. old ~'~'` HOURS: 9 am - lpm 6 NEEKS '` 9 0` Paricipants 25 TOTAL (split into 3 classes, each one approx. 8 students) Would not need tab Les, on Ly cha irs.POSSible use of Rm. 46 or 11/12 ADULTS DATES: OPEN ~ AGES: 35 PLUS . ~~{tirv- HOURS: 7-9:30 pm 3 Times per week 6-7 weeks j' - - of Particiapan [s 8 ,(!4~?~ " 'y Performances: FREE to Citizens of Atlantic Beach every Thursday evening far 3 vk: EVERY FRI AND SAT. $5 per person, by reservation - no[ [o exceed 50 people each evening. (This equates [o a $250 inkind contribution to the City a[ each of the Thursday evening performances for a [oral of $750 equivalent contribution. The fees Charged for non-residents of Atlantic Beach are to be used for lighcs, sets, Costumes, printing of programs, etc. Will use Lobby PLAYHOUSE 50 DATES: Begin April 22 OR 29, 199s ACES: 50 PLUS HOURS: 2-4 pm 6 weeks g of Participants; 10 ~ ~... y. _~~`~'~r. They need [o plug in a total of approx. 1,000 Notts of light, se[ up seating / / for 50 viewers, sets.... They will supply [heir own lighting and people [o se[ up. Karen Garrett will fill in for Nrs. Baillie when necessary. The Ci[y will check to see if [he lighting needed is appropriate for the Lobby of [he Community Center. // ~-~ " ~ '- ' ~` c on l _~ ~,~ ~,~ rc>. - ~:~ ~ r~ ~f' ~ ~CiC ff ~, ,C~c C ~M /Z p~ tc~ 7 ,1 PAGE FIFTEEN MINUTES, APRIL 13, 1992 There being no further business the meeting adjourned at 11:30 p. m. William I. Gulliford Mayor/Presiding Officer A T T E S T: Maureen King, City Clerk NAME OF COMMNS. M S V Y V N '~`" s::.-=. PAGE FOURTEEN MINUTES, APRIL 13, 1992 from the Atlantic-Neptune FOP Lodge requesting assistance £rom the City to help pay the utility bills. He indicated last year the City gave S500.00 to cover the utility costs for this building. Motion- Give 5500.00 to the Atlantic-Neptune Lodge, F.O.P., to assist them in paying water, sewer and garbage fees for their Lodge Builaing Commissioner Waters felt the money should come from the Police budget. The question was called and the motion carried unanimously. Mayor Gulliford stated the Sea Oats are being trampled on at the beach. This was discussed and the City Manager stated he would instruct all city workers to try to enforce regulations, and he also indicated he would send out a letter to all residents concerning this problem. Mayor Gulliford stated he would like the drainage ditch in the Donner Subdivision cleaned out. Mayor Gulliford reported the Mayor's Meeting was held in the City of Atlantic Beach and it was a success. He reported the three Beach Communities and the Town of Baldwin will submit to the City of Jacksonville by June 1, 1992 their individual proposals regarding county services to be provided to each community. Mayor Gulliford referred to "Visions 2000" which he explained was an action report prepared by Plantac Corporation for the Jacksonville Chamber of Commerce, Beaches Development. The report recommended the consolidation of services in the Beaches Communities as a growth management tool. The Mayor indicated he was not in favor of consolidating, as recommended in the report. NAME OF COMMAS. M S V Y V N Edwards x Fletcher x Tucker x x waters x x Gullifor x i PAGE THIRTEEN MINUTES, APRIL 13, 1992 The City Clerk suggested including a definition of a flea market in the nuisance section of the code, and prohlblting flea markets in residential districts. The question was called and the motion carried with a 4-1 vote with Mayor Gulliford voting nay. Motion: Reconsider the motion No discussion before the vote and the motion carried unanimously. Regular Motion: Defer until the next meeting No discussion before the vote and the motion carried unanimously. City Clerk Maureen King referred to her recommendations regarding the selection of a Citizen of the year, and it was decided to defer this until the next meeting. Commissioner Ldwards referred to the Florida League of Cities Board of Directors who met last Saturday. He referred to a bill concerning voter control of city taxes. He urged everyone to write to their representat?.ves and ask them to vote concerning this. He indicated this bill regulated the way cities spend their money. It was decided to prepare letters for signature of the Commissioners. A letter in the form of a petition also will be made available for citizens to sign. Commissioner Waters referred to garage sales and he, CO®iHHioner TUCker, and Maureen King were appointed to a committee to study garage sales. Commissioner Tucker asked if there was a report concerning Fleet Landing. Bob Kosoy responded he had talked to Ken Sanders from Haskell Company and in addition to investigating the pipe on the right side of the culvert, they were looking at the cost of lowering one of the middle culverts again. They promised their design within a week, Mr. Kosoy added. Mayor Gulliford passed out comparative salary information from cities size 10,000 through 50,000, for the information and perusal of the Commission. Mayor Gulliford reported the City had received a letter NAME OF COMMHS. M S V Y V N Edwards x Fletcher x x Tucker x x waters x Gulliford x Edwards x Fletcher x x Tucker x waters x Gulliford x PAGE TWF.LVF. MINUTES, APRIL 13, 1992 NAME OF COMMAS. M S V Y V N 11. City Manager Reports and/or Correspondence: A. Discussion and related action regarding Fire Marshall position Mayor Gulliford referred to the City Manager's memorandum and indicated a funding source has been found to fund the position of Fire Marshall. Edwards x Notion: Authorize funding of the position of Fletcher Fire Marshall pursuant to the City Manager's Tucker memorandum of April 6, 1992 Waters Gulliford x Amended Motion: Authorize funding of the Edwards x position of Fire Marshall pursuant to the City I Fletcher x Manager's memorandum of April 6, 1992, at the TUCker x current rate of pay of the Fire Chief Waters x x Gulliford x Commissioner Fletcher suggested this matter be bound over to the regular budgetary cycle. Re indicated he did not understand the rush *.o establish the position at this time. The question was called and the motion passed by a 3-2 vote with Commissioners Fletcher and Tucker voting nay. The City Manager asked Chief Thompson to give a report concerning parking sticker Spaces. Chief Thompson suggested potential spaces located at the Community Center parking lot and the area around the Sea Turtle be lncluded in the parking study, rather than haphazardly assigning parking spaces without a proper study. ~ City Clerk Maureen Fing gave a report concerning garage sales as they relate to occupational licenses. She reported the Clerk's office polled 10 cities and did not find any that gave occupation licenses to garage sales. She felt it would not be appropriate to issue occupational licenses for garage sales. She reported some cities gave permits to those who wished to have garage sales. Edwards x Fletcher x Motion: Adopt the regulation allowing three Tucker x x garage sales per year, with a permit at no Wafers x Charge Gulliford x A discussion ensued and it was determined only one complaint had been received concerning yarage sales for many years. Commissioner Waters indicated he has a problem with too much traffic from garage sales. PAGE ELEVEN MINUTES, APRIL 13, 1992 NAME OF COMMAS. M S V Y V N City Attorney Alan Jensen recommended giving Suzanne Green, Code Enforcement Attorney, a written agreement, ennually renewable, and approving a fee of 5100 per hour' Edwards x x Motion: Approve the preparation of a written Fletcher x x contract, annually renewable, for Suzanne Tucker x Green, Code Enforcement Attorney for the City, Waters x and approve payment of 5100.00 per hour for Gulliford x her services The commission indicated their desire to have language incorporated into the contract that specifies the 5100 per hour salary begins when Ms. Green begins work, not while ahe is en route. The City Attorney indicated he would incorporate this language into the contract. The question was called and the motion passed unanimously. C. Approval and authorization for Mayor to sign CDBG contract with Jacksonville George Worley explained that he had just received the contract and has not had time to thoroughly examine it. He asked that this item be deferred until the next meeting. D. Discussion and related action requesting authorization for repairs and rehabilitation of sewer lines and manholes in Russell and Howell Parks and request to bid i BOb Kosoy asked for approval for a budget transfer for point repair and manhole rehabilitation of sewer lines and manholes Sn Russell and Howell Parks. Mr. Kosoy indicated this was urgent and he recommended a budget transfer from the Sewer Construction Plant Fund, Fund 41, Account 596, and he indicated equal amounts could be transferred from each of six funds. Edwards x x Fletcher x Motion: Proceed and solicit bids for repairs Tucker x and rehabilitation of sewer lines and manholes Waters I x x in Russell and Howell Parks Gulliford x Commissioner Fletcher indicated his desire to see an itemized detail concerning this matter. The question was called and the motion carried unanimously. PAGE TEN MINUTES, APRIL 13, 1992 6. Ordinance No. 57-92-18 - Public Hearing AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH, ESTABLISHING A ROTATING WRECKER CALL LIST, SETTING FORTH CERTAIN REQVIR6T76NTS FOR WRECKER SERVICES, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Mayor Gulliford presented in full, in writing, ordinance No. 57-92-18, said ordinance having been posted in accordance with Charter requirements. He opened the floor for a public hearing and invited comments from the audience. Since no one spoke for or against the matter the Mayor declared the Public Hearing closed. Motion: Approve passage of Ordinance No. 57- 92-18 on final reading No discussion before the vote. The motion passed unanimously. 10, New Business: A. Discussion and related action concerning hydraulic shares for Harry Warnock The City Attorney explained in May of 1987 the City eccepted water and sewer improvements the Warnocks had installed. An agreement was made, letters were written, but a fozmal utility agreement was never signed. There have been two more connections into this line and payments should be due-to the Warnocks. City Attorney Alan Jensen recommended two payments be made to Mr. fi Mre. Narry C. Warnock for S2,887 each, which represents two structures tapping into the water and sewer lines that were installed by the Warnocks. Motion: Authorize two payments in the amount of 52,887 each to be made to Nr, fi Mrs. Harry C. wazaock which represents two tap-in's into the water and sewer line installed by the Warnocks Bob Kosoy suggested copies of agreements of this nature be given to the Public Works and Finance Departments in the future. The question was called and the motion carried unanimously. B. Recommendation authorizing employment of attorney for Code Enforcement Board NAME OF COMMAS. M 5 V Y V N Edwards x X Fletcher x Tucker x Waters x x Gulliford x Edwards x x Fletcher x Tucker x x Waters x Gulliford x J PAGE NINE MINUTES, APRIL 13, 1992 NAME OF COMMRS. M I S V Y V N TO PROVIDE THAT FORMAL ciDS SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR PURCHASES OF SUPPLIES OR SERVICES FROM ENTERPRISE FUNDS IN EXCESS OF $5,000, AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE Mayor Gulliford presented in full, in writing Ordinance NO. 5-92-22, said ordinance having been posted in accordance with Charter requirements. He opened the floor for a public hearing and invited comments from the audience. Dorothy Herber asked why this figure was being changed to 000. The Mayor responded this refers only to $5 , Enterprise Fund purchases. He added prices had increased considerably since the previous figure of S2, 500 had been established and he felt the increase to S5, 000 was reasonable in view of current prices. There being no further comments from the audience the Mayor declared the Public Hearing closed. Edwards x Fletcher x x Motion: Approve passage of Ordinance 5-92-22 Tucker x on final reading Waters x x Gullifor x No discussion before the vote. The motion carried unanimously. D. Ordinance p45-92-10 - Public Hearing AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER 20, TAXATION, ARTICLE III, OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE.TAX, SECTION 20-59, SCHEDULE OF FEES, TO ABD A CLASSIFICATION AND SET A FEE FOR MICRO BREWERY, AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE Mayor Gulliford presented in full, in writing ordinance No. 45-92-10, said ordinance having been posted in accordance with Charter requirements. He opened the floor for a public hearing and invited comments from the audience. Since no one spoke for or against the matter the Mayor declared the Public Hearing closed. Edwards x x Motion: Approve passage of Ordinance 45-92-10 Fletcher Tucker x x x ~ on final reading waters x Commissioner Waters suggested discussing the amount of Gulliford x money charged for licensing at upcoming budget meetings. The Mayor responded it would be a good idea to review ~, this annually at budget hearings. The question was called and the motion carried unanimously. F .~.:-, , PAGE EIGHT MINUTES. APRIL 13. 1992 Solid waste collection: All garbage containers shall be emptied and the contents thereof shall be disposed of at least twice each week. Dumpsters in residential districts or in the business districts shall be collected as designated by tha City Manager. Section 16-6, Burial of Solid Waste, add "or disposal" to the last sentence. Motion: Approve passage of Ordinance No. 55- 92-26, as amended No discussion before the vote. The motion passed unanimously. Resolution 92-7 Mayor Gulliford presented in full, in writing, Resolution 92-7: A RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE NUMBER OF DAYS PER WEEK OF SOLID WASTE COLLECTION PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Motion: Approve passage of Resolution 92-7 Mayor Gulliford asked Bob Kosoy if the City is eliminating Saturday work. Mr. KOSOy indicated he planned to Cut out Saturdays. If the department nets behind, he added, they would still have Saturday, if needed for overtime work. Along discussion ensued concerning the amount of trash and garbage pick ups per week. The question was called and the motion passed with a vote of 4-1 with Mayor Gulliford voting nay. B. Continuation of Public Hearing on Cable Television Ordinance No. 40-92-17 Mayor Gulliford asked to have this Public Hearing continued until May 11, 1992. Motioa: Defer action on Ordinance No. 40-92-17 and continue public hearing at the City Commission meeting on May 11, 1992 No questions before the vote. The motion carried unanimously. C. Ordinance 5-92-22 - Public Hearing AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER 2, ADMINISTRATION, ARTICLE VII, FINANCE, DIVISION 2, PURCHASING, AMENDING SECTION 2-331, BIDS - WHEN REQUIRED, NAME OF COMMAS. M S V Y V N Edwards x Fletcher x x Tucker x Waters x Gulliford x Edwards x x Fletcher x Tucker x x Waters x Gulliford x Edwards x x Fletcher x Tucker x Waters x x Gullifor x PAGE SEVEN MINIUTES, APRIL 13, 1992 reject the one bid received based on errors in calculations contained in that bid. Because of the poor response to this invitation to bid, the committee recommended that the project be re-bid. Notion: Reject the one bid the city received and re-bid the job No discussion before the vote. The motion carried unanimously. D. Report and recommendation by Awards Committee Chairman Commissioner Edwards on Bid 119192-9 installation of railing and stairways at wastewater treatment plant Commissioner Edwards recommended the Commission accept the low bid from Chancey Metal Products, Inc. in the amount of S38,925.00. Motion: Accept the low bid from Chancey Metal Products, Inc. in the amount of S38,425.00 No discussion before the vote and the motion carried unanimously. 9. Ordinances ,A. Ordinance 1155-92-26 - Public Hearing AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF ATLANTIC'BEACH, REWRITING IN ITS ENTIRETY CHAPTER 16, REFUSE AND GARBAGE, AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE Mayor Gulliford presented in full, in writing, ordinance No. 55-92-26, said ordinance having been posted in accordance with Charter requirements. He opened the floor for a public hearing and announced it was continued from the meeting of March 23, 1992, and invited comments frao the audience. Following comments from the audience the Mayor declared the Public Hearing closed. A discussion ensued, and changes and additions were suggested. It was determined Atlantic Beach would have two days garbage pickup and two days trash pickup. Bob Kosoy, Public Works Director, explained that the City plans to pick up garbage during a five day work week and utilize Saturday, if needed for overtime. The following amendments were agreed upon: Section 16-2, NAME OF COMMAS. M S V Y V N Edwards x x Fletcher x Tucker x x Waters x Gullifor x Edwards x x Fletcher x Tucker x Waters x x Gullifor x PAGE SIX MINUTES, APRIL 13, 1992 NAME OF COMMAS. M S Y Y v N No discussion before the vote. Motion carried unanimously. 8. Committee Reoorts- A. Water E Sever Committee report Commissioner Fletcher briefly outlined the Water and Sewer Committee Report and indicated he would be happy to answer questions. Since there were no questions the report was accepted and a copy of the complete report is attached hereto and made a part hereof. B. Zoning Comittee report and proposal to purchase Code of Ordinance on computer disk Commissioner Fletcher referred to the review of the zoning code that his committee is conducting. He reported the committee meats at 4:00 p. m. every Wednesday in the Conference Room of the City Hall. The committee would like to have the code on computer in the City Hall so that they can make changes more easily. The committee is requesting to purchase from the Municipal Code Corporation the computer disks of the municipal code for S2,000. Edwards Motion: Purchase entire municipal code of the Fletcher x City of Atlantic Beach from the Municipal Code Tucker Corporation for S2,000 Waters x Gulliford A discussion ensued concerning whether this could be purchased from another source. The mayor suggested using a scanner to reduce the code to a disk or something of this sort, to save money. Edwards x Substitute Motion: Authorize the City Manager Fletcher x x to acquire the entire code on disk or to Tucker x x explore the means that would be more Waters x economical to do this, not to exceed S2,000 Gulliford x The City Manager advised he will get competitive quotes Sf they are available when purchasing this disk. The question was called and the motion carried unanimously. C. Report and reco®erdation by Awards Committee Chairman Commissioner Edwards on Hid N9192-B roll-on roll-off sludge containers Commissioner Edwards recommended that the Commission PAGE FIVE MINUTES, APRIL 13, 1992 George Worley reported Dr. and Mrs. Robert B. Van Cleve own a large ocean front lot immediately south of Ocean Breeze with dimensions of 75 feet wide by 624 feet deep. They desire to subdivide the large lot into two smaller lots. An ingress/egress and utility easement was proposed through the street lot to service the ocean front lot. Notion: Approve recommendation of the Community Development Board to approve application to subdivide a large oceanfront lot owned by Dr. and Nrs. Robert B. Van Cleve, and limit development to one single family residence on the oceanfront lot. During a discussion it was determined that by providing a perpetual easement the applicants would meet the City's access requirements as provided in the Subdivision Code. On the ocean lot, only a single family structure could be built. Commissioner Fletcher inquired if a limit could be put on the size of a building that could be built on the other parcel of land on Seminole Road. The City Attorney responded that the Community Development Board did not place a condition of this nature on the applicants. The question was called and the motion carried with a 4-1 vote, with Commissioner Fletcher voting nay. Agenda Item 9F vas taken out of sequence and the Mayor iadicatedthis item should have been listed under "old business.^ He renamed 9F as 6C and acted upon it at that time. 5C. Reconsideration of water treatment plant bid Motion: Reconsider water treatment plant bid No second. Motion died for lack of a second. 7. Consent: A. Report on usage of the Adele Crage Community Center for March B. Action by the City Commission to approve the recommendation of the City Clerk regarding clerical staff Motion: Approve consent Agenda NAME OF COMMRS. M S V Y V N Edwards x Fletcher x Tucker x x waters x x Gullifor x Edwards Fletcher Tucker x waters Gulliford ,Edwards x Fletcher x x Tucker ~ x waters r. Gulliford ~ x PAGE FOUR MINUTES, APRIL 13, 1992 with Rose Blanchard and Mrs. Baillie to try to work this out, and to investigate the fire code as to whether or not more than 50 people can use the Center at one time. Mayor Gulliford asked John Weldon, Chairman of the Adele Grage Community Center Committee to set up a meeting with his committee and discuss this matter. 5 Resolutions- A. Resolution #92-9 Mayor Gulliford introduced in full, in writing Resolution No. 92-9: REMOVING THE NAME OF HARRY ROYAL FROM CHECK SIGNING AND REPLACING IT WITH KIRK WENDLAND. Motion: Approve passage of Resolution #92-9 No discussion before the vote. The motion carried unanimously. 6. Old Business: A. Report on ownership of streets in the Selva Marina area Alan Jensen reported the streets in the Selva Marina area are owned by the development company. He suggested polliny the property owners to see if they are interested in having the city assume ownership and maintenance of the streets, and possibly projecting costs that would be assessed to the property owners to bring the streets up to standard. ~- A discussion ensued and it was suggested using gas tax money to fix the streets. The Mayor responded the city could not take public money and use it on private streets. !lotion: Instruct the City Manager to notify the residents of this area via letter of the problems regarding the streets and invite them to meet with the City Commission in a special meeting in an attempt to resolve the problems associated with ownership and maintenance of these streets. No discussion before the vote. The motion carried unanimously. B. Discussion and related action relating to the adoption of subdivision of Van Cleve property NAME OF COMMITS. M 5 y Y Y N Edwards x x Fletcher x Tucker x waters x Gulliford x Edwards x Fletcher x x Tucker x Waters x x Gulliford x PAGE THREE MINUTES, APRIL 13, 1992 Substitute Motion: Defer action until next meeting. Address the question of traffic and define more accurately where the right-of-way is. The question was called and the motion carried with a vote of 4-1, with Commissioner Waters voting nay. Mayor Gulliford referred to the pole that comes from the roof at Ruby Beach Cafe. xe indicated Bob Hill, Traffic Engineer for the City of Jacksonville, called him and voiced his concern about the potential liability regarding this and Mr. Hill indicated he had contacted Neptune Heath officials to discuss the matter. The Mayor reported they discussed the possibility of eliminating the traffic light at the intersection of Atlantic Boulevard and First Street. The discussion concerned either going with a four-way stop, or making Atlantic Boulevard without a stop, and 1st Street from Neptune Beach, and Ocean Boulevard from Atlantic Beach, having stop signs. This will be reviewed further. 4. Aooearances• A. Cason Merry Baillie spoke on behalf of Players By the Sea. She indicated Players would like to use the Co®unity Center building as follows: For children, ages 8 to 12, from June 22 until July 31 -from 9:00 am until 1:00 pm weekdays; for adult rehearsal, 3 nights per week °or four weeks from 9:00 pm until 9:30 pm, for a period of four weeks, and for senior adult rehearsal, every Wednesday, from 2:00 Pm until 4:00 pm, during spring and fall only. Mrs. Baillie indicated Players would like to put on their plays at the Community Center. She indicated Players was a won-profit organization, and she asked the Commission to waive the fees for night use of the Center. She indicated Players would provide a free performance for Atlantic Beach residents in appreciation for the use of the Community Center. Rose Blanchard stated the Communlty Center was scheduled to be used £or a summer camp for Atlantic Beach children from June 8 through July 21, with approximately 40 children attending the camp. She reported the City's fire code would only allow 50 people in the Community Center at one time. Commissioner Fletcher suggested the City Manager meet NAME OF COMMAS. M S V Y V N Edwards x Fletcher x x Tucker x Waters x x Gulliford x PAGE TWO MINUTES, APRIL 13, 1992 NAME OF COMMRS. M S V Y VI N value of the houses and how much the City paid for them. The Mayor indicated his desire to have this as an agenda item for the next regular Commission meeting, and he asked George Worley to identify ownership and any other specific infozmation concerning the Francis Avenue properties. Dave Siebert, 816 Cavalla, spoke concerning his desire to construct a fence behind his property. He explained he was not able to do this, however, because the property was a fire lane. He felt the fire lane had been ignored by the City. Gorge Worley explained that through codes enforcement the city was trying to keep this alley clear and that the City intended to place signs on each end of the fire lane. He explained the Fire Department needed the fire lane open so that they could get to the back of the building in the event of a fire. The Mayor asked George Worley to contact Chief Rew once again to make sure the fire lane was necessary, and to investigate if the property was designated to be a fire lane when it was sold to the owners. Chie£ Thompson indicated once signs are in place, the Police Department would be able to enforce the law by ticketing or towing cars illegally parked in the fire lane. 3. Fresentatio s• A. TOVn Center Commissioner Fletcher gave a presentation concerning the Town Center, and he indicated he would like the Commission to adopt a resolution to commit right-of-ways. He stated the City had approved the concept of the Town Center in prior actions. He presented a drawing of the project and explained the project starts at 3rd Street and ~Antinues all the way to the ocean. He explained the sidewalks will be made of bricks, some of which, as part of a fund raiser, will be engraved_ He indicated 400 bricks have already been sold. Motion: Draft resolution to commit use of Edwards Fletcher right-of-ways, as indicated on the lan, and p Tucker x as previously approved by the City Waters x John Weldon stated he is firmly in favor of this project Gullifor , but he felt the width of the sidewalks should be reviewed. It was agreed Chief Thompson would review the streets to make sure they are adequate for traffic . Commissioner Fletcher explained that this plan would not delete any parking that already exists. Its purpose he , explained, was to make the area safer for pedestrian traffic. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF ATLANTIC BEACH CITY 15 T 7 y y : COMMISSION HELD IN CITY HALL, 800 SEMZNULE ROAD, A O O PM ON MONDAY, APRIL 13, 1992 T E T E PRESENT: William I. Gulliford, Jr., Mayor D D Glenn A. Edwards Lyman T. Fletcher M 5 Adelaide R. Tucker, and J. Dezmond Waters, III, Commissioners O E T C AND: Kim D. Leinbach, City Manager I O Y N Alan C. Jensen, City Attorney NAME OF O N E Maureen King, City Clerk COMMAS. N D S O The meeting was called to order by Mayor Gulliford. The invocation, offered by Commissioner Fletcher, was followed by the pledge to the flag. ~ r val of the minutes o£ the regular meeting of 1 il . March 23 1992 and suecral called meeting of Aor 2. 1992. edwards x x Motion: 8pprove minutes of the regular meeting of Fletcher Tucker x x x March 23, 1992. Waters x No discussion before the vote. The motion carried Gulliford x unanimously. Edwards x Motion: Approve minutes of the special called Fletcher x ~ meeting of April 2, 199:. Tucker ' x Waters x x No discussion before the vote. The motion carried Gulliford Ix unanimously. ~ Recognition of visitors: City Manager Kim Leinbach introduced the City's new '~, Finance Director, Kirk Wendland. ~I Mayor Gulliford introduced Brandon and Phyllis Terrell ! who will occupy the first Beaches Habitat home in the City of Atlantic Beach. Peggy O'Neill, President of Beaches Habitat, thanked the Commission for their help. She invited the Commission to - a dedication of their first Habitat house on May 2, 1992, at 3:00 p. m. She reported Habitat has purchased two new pieces of property, and she indicated they hoped the city would construct roads to the property. She indicated Habitat would also be interested in swapping this property for city owned houses on Francis Avenue. George Worley indicated the homes on Francis Avenue could be renovated. The Mayor would like to know the assessed `` CI1Y OF' ATLANTIC BEACH REQJLAR MEETING OP TBE CITY C014QSSION, APRIL 27, 1992, 7:I5 P.M. AGENDA Call to Order Invocation and pledge to the flag 1. Approval of the minutes of the regular meeting of April 13, 1992 2. Recognition of VSSi[ors: 3. Appearances: A. Robert Neiss regarding U.S. Senate Bill 1650-Flood Insurance Erosion Act 1991 4. Old Business: A. Proposed requested usage of the Adele Grage Community Center (Carson Merry Baillie) B. Discussion and related action concerning passible land exchange with Beaches Habitat (City Planner George Norley) 5. Conaeat: A. Status report concerning installation of fire lanes on Cavalla Road B. Approval co use ATY on beach for sea turtle patrol May - November (Mort Hanson, Beach Sea Turtle Patrol, Inc.) C. Proclamation declaring week beginning May i, 1992 as Youth Peek 6. Coaaaittee eeports: A. Aoyal Pelm Committee report and recommendation to retain special code enforcement service (Commissioner Waters) B. Hater and Sewer Committee report (Commissioner Fletcher) 7. Besolutions: A. Resolution i92-10 authorizing use of City R-0-N for Tovn Center project 8. Sew Bns1¢esa: A. Report and related action regarding draft contract with Jaeksawille for CDBC funds (City Planner George Norley) B. Disnlesion a¢d related action regarding protection of Sea Oats on the beach (Mayor Gulliford) C. Request to solicit RPP for Consultant Resident Observation (PN Director Robert Kosoy) D. Proposal to hire James Jarbo ae contract employee Eor special projects (Mayor Gulliford) E. Report and related action concerning request to accept proposal of Connelly 6 Hickey regarding Levy Road Improvements (PN Dlrecior Robert Koscy) F. Request [o accept ]. Lucas b Associates, Inc. proposal for engineering design for new chlorine contact facility at Buccaneer NNfP (PW Dl rector RoberC Kosoy) 9. City Ilamger Reports and/or Correspondence: 10. Sayor [o call w City Coaadsaioaera, City Attorney and CSty Clerk: A. Garage sale report (City Clerk Maureen King) B. Citizen of [he Year report (City Clerk Maureen King) Adjournment i branC lax VanvnalN memo 767 .w,pe.. I U.oFf Av ~ni G ' ,s8oq ..~t- 8 w. E N0. 70-79-9 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 8, SECTION 17, Of THE ATLANTIC BEACH CITY CODE ENTITLED 'EXEMPTIONS FROM UTILITY TAX'; BT MDIMG THERETO FURTHER EXEMPT10N5; PROYIDIN6 AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE !T ENACTED BY THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH, FLORIDA, that Chapter 6, Section 17 of the Atlantic Beach C1ty Lode 1s hereby amended by adding thereto the following: 1. There shall be exenpted ail those Dersons or organizations tram the tmposttion of a utility tax as are now totally exempted under Chapter 196.192, Florida Statutes 7918. 2. This Ordinance shall Decone effective on January 1, 1980. Passed by the City Commission on First Reading Navmber 26,1979 ~ Passed b the Cit Commission on Second Reed in n am Y Y 9 Pr her tn,., 979 Passed by the City Commission on Third and Final Reeding Jnnuarty i~, 19a0 ATTEST: ~; - _ ADELAIDE R. TUCKER, CTTY CLERK. .~(SEA1 ~ ~ -- i i ~_ -rte ~_,F: _ aRDI NANCE No. 70-77-7 An Ordinance Amendl ng Sectl on 1 of Ordinance 6` 70-72-6, <Sectl on 8-14, Code of the Cf ty of Atlentie 8eaeh, Florl da.) Dei ng an Ordl nonce antitlod: ' AN ORDI NAME IMPOSi NG AND LEVYING A TAX W EACH AND EVER! FURCFYISE OI LSLOF LIdIIER GRADEStMETERED OR2BO7TLE0 GAS NA')URAL(LIQ(1II~FITED ', pETRIX.EU1 OAS OR I.(ANUFAC)UtED) NITHIN THE COI~ORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH, FLORIDA: PROYIDI NG FOR THE COLLECTION OF SUCH TAX: PROVIDING THAT IN EYERf CASE THE TAX SHALL 8E COLEECTED FROM 7HE pUFA?IASER AND PAID BY 7NE Pl1RC)iASER FOR THE USE OF SAID CITY TO THE SELLER OF SUCH UTILITY SERVICE AT TTE TIME OF PAYIKK) FOR CHARvE THEREFOR TO THE SELLEit: PImViDING PENALTIES FOR TIE YIOI.ATION OF THIS ORDINANCE: AIA REPEALING ALL ORDIWWCES A)O PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HERENI7H.~ BE IT ENACTED BY THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH, FLORIDA: SECTION 1. Saetl on 1 of Ordt nonce 8 70-72-6 (Sectl on 9-14, Code of the CifY of ATlentic Beech, Florl de) is hereby emended to road: There Is hereby Imposed end ievled by the City of Atimtic Beech, Flort da, on each and every purchase of electricity, t I (Kerosene), X 2, end 1 3 Fuel Oils (But not fueloils of lower grades.) Metered or bottled gas (natural, liquified petroleum gas or menufectund), In the corporate Itmiis of the City of Atlantic Beech, a tax equivalent to five per .cent (5F) of the anqunt of the payments reeelved by the seller of such utility service fran the purehasors. Said tax, in every ease shell be collected from the purchaser of such utility service, and paid by such purchaser for the use of the City of Atlantic Beech to the seller of such eleetrteity, A' 1 (kerosene), X 2, and p 3 Fue! Oils Ibut not fuel oils of tower grades.) or gas servi ee et the same fiime the purchaser pays to the seller the seller's eherge for such service. SECTION 11. Any ordinances or ports of Ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. This Ordi hence shell beeane effective on thlro and final reading. Passed by the City Camml ssl on on first reeding March 14, 1977 - Passed by the City Commission on second reeding March 14, 1977 Passed by the City Commission on thl rd and ti nal reading March 29.1977. ATTEST: (BEAU /7,Oi~i~ ~ ..~~s~ Adeiel de R. Tucker, City Clerk IvIr. Lez Hester January 29,1992 Page -3- In regard to investor owned public electric utilities, both Florida Power Corporation ("FPC'~ and Florida Power and Light ("FP&L)" make ezteasive use of purchased power from other utilities. Aa informal study, by the JEA staff of these other utilities, has indicated that there is no censistency is how the concept of purchased power is handled. Foz ezample, both the Tallahassee municipal utility and FPC include the entire amount of their purchased power costa in the fuel adjustment chnrge. On the other hand, FP&L euludes only that portion of iffi purchased power which represenffi fazed plant f or capacity costs in the fuel adjustment charge. JEA, with which you are cencenied, ~ I follows the practice of Fl'C and Tallahassee and includes the entire amount of purchased power costa within iffi fuel adjustment charge. This inconsistency in practice indicates the eztant confusion with respect to the law and iffi ezemptions, and also indicates that this taw has *"•^~;^ed static while the electrical utility ', industry has grown and developed with new concepts. A review of the above dted state sad local legislation, in conjunction with canons of statatory interpretation end jadidal conatrnction, indicates two things: First, from the state mandated ezemptioa, the term "fuel adjustment charge" ffi sperifically defined end relates only to increases which result from increased feel msffi after October 1,1973. Therefore, the state mandated exemption applies only to that specific increase in feel charges. It is well eecagaized that when a statute Jacksonville Electric Authority WTEROFFlCE GO;ViE5PON0ENCE February 21. ~e 9Z sue~ECr: Taxation of Purchased Power/Fuel Adiustment Charges rnon~ ____R__ovice lvles ro John Delaney General Counsel JEA, in conjunction with Mr. Neill McArthur of your staff, has developed the following adminis*_rative guidelines to apply the concepts of the City's Public Service Tax that are identified in your letters to Mr. Lex Hester regarding Purchased Power/Fuel Adjustment Charges. These guidelines are similar to those used by Florida Power & Light Company to apply Public Service Tax. Presently, JEA's suppliers of purchased power, including the St. Johns River Power Park and The Southern company, separately state energy charges and capacity-related charges on the invoices Por these purchases. The Office of General Counsel has opined that all fuel cost components of purchased power will be treated for tax purposes like the oil and natural gas fuel costs incurred with JEA's Electric System generating units. The fuel cost component of purchased power will be subject to the City's Public Service Tax to the extent that the fuel cost component of the purchased power does not exceed the cost of JEA's fuel on October 1, 1973. All other components of JEA's purchased power costs shall be subject to the City's Public Service Tax; these purchased power capacity-related costa are similar to the non- fuel costs of the JEA's Electric System's operations. JEA's purchased power capacity-related costs currently include debt servicefind related debt service coverage costs, renewal & replaicement fund costs, nonfuel operation and maintenance costa, transmission costs, and capacity costs. JEA shall apply the administrative guidelines documented in this memorandum for the City of Jacksonville Public Service Tax to all JEA customers who are subject to the City of Jacksonville Public Service Tax. Also, as you lrncw, some residents of the General- and Urban Services Districts, exclusive of the three beach cities and the Town of Baldwin, are served by other electric utilities. These utilities include the Clay Electric Cooperative, Florida Power i Light Company and Okefenoke Electric Cooperative. We would appreciate your review and comments regarding our proposed Public Service Tax administrative guidelines. RL/Jw/cr ~_ ~. F ~` ~; JOHN A DELANEY 6(NfRAI CWNHL March 3, 1992 :- ` `~ J' '~ . ''•r OFFICE OF ,. GENERAL COUNSEL CITY OF ,JI1CE$DNVILLE Mr. Royce Lyles Managing Director Jacksonville Electric Authority 21 West Church Sheet Jacksonville, Florida 32202 Re: Purchased Power/Fuel Adjustment Charge Dear Mr. Lyles: ~30~ J/~C WMNW m uw Fu ~Yd~ c At the request of Joha Delaney, I am writing you in response to your February 27, 1992 memorandam, copy attached. That memorandum contained proposed JEA administrative guidelines Ln order to co11eM the discretionary public service taz socotding to conclusions contained is Mr. Delaney's letters of January 29, and February 27, 1992. A review of that memorandum indicates that the guidelines su therein follow Mr. Delaney~s legal conclusions. Accordingly, I can offer no~her comments or suggestions. While reviewingg the two (2) opinions fmm Mr. Delaney, I noticed an error on page 3, line 8, of the January 'L9, 1992 letter. At that particular reference the word 'Secludes" should be "euludes". I have taken the liberty of preparing a corrected page for substitution. Very truly yours, Ner W. MrArfhur, dr. Assistant General ('aunsel NWMcAdrJpe attachment' x. Lez Hester, Chief Administrative Officer John A. Delaney, General Counsel Walter P. Baseells, AMD, Finance and Administration, JEA Thomas R. Welrh, Deputy General Counsel. Governmental Operations Mary Arditti, Director, Finance Dept., JEA John J. Wolfel, Director, Aaountieg De t., JEA Ann A. Beckwith, Chief, ElecVic Rates Div., JEA ,.. - Mr. Royce Lyles February 27, 1992 Page Two The collection of the tazable portion of the purchased power costs should commence with the March billing. Given the short period of time from the date of flue letter sad your billing cycle, perhaps adjuatmeata rnuld be made to have the March amount included as a part of the Apnl bill (or spread over the April and May bille). This, of course, would be cone-time event. I hope this further explanation will be of assistance Lo you in your fiscal and accounting rnmputatioas. As always, it is a pleasure to work witin the JEA and its fine staff. With kindest personal regards, I am Very truly gaura, ''~ J John A. De e Geaer unsel JAD/pc ce: Lez Ha Welter JEA .. JEA Agency Div. _ o~ E~~ UI~~ OFFICC OF GENERAL COUNSEL CITT OF JACKSONVILLE JOHN A DELANEY arHCA.~ Oauu.e~ February 27,1992 Mr. Royce Lyles :flsasgiag Director Jacksonville Electric Authority 21 West Church Street Jacksonville, Florida 32202 Re: Purchased Power -Fuel A~ustment Charge uoo c,n w~.a_ J~Oaol.v• • FLW,M auu Tp uon ow,ae F.. yeu awns Dear Mr. Lyles: Pursuant to yow request, I em pleased to offer a clarification of my January 29,1992 advisory letter to Mr. Hester and to memorialize conversations with yow staff ae to how to apply nip legal opinion to the JEA as a municipal utility. As stated pesviouelyy, I understand that the State's largest utility (Florida Power sad L{ght) essentially interprob the Iaw in the same manner that I do. The eatlre cost of uchsaed power should sot be included in the fuel acjjustment charge. Only that portion of the cost ofpurchased power which itself repreaeab a lhel adjustment charge would be included. More specifically, that part of the coat of purchased power which represents "pLnt" or "capacity" costa should be e:cluded from the fuel adjuat- msnt charge. That portion of the cost of purchased power which relates to fhel sad which rasalb in an inatue is the coats of service to cuatoE¢eta rmaltingg from increased fuel wets to the JF.A should be included. Parsnant to state and local law, the wet basis would be the wet of fuel to the JEA as of Oetober 1,1979. To the extent that the fuel portion of the pzaxrhaeed power web represeab as fac:eaae fn wale to the customer rqult{ag from ea increase in fuel coats to JEA exceeding the~Oc~tober 1,1879 basis, that ezcess should remain as part of the fuel arm don fmm tEe nublic~seivice tax. ue W a{joy the legislatively authorized [90.wt PUOUC SERVICE TAx-GENE[tAL 190.10? CHAPTER 790 PURLIC SERVICE TAX-GENERAL :90.101 Tax imposed; rate; exemption. "90.102 Collecion;IiabilityoCseller;discontinu- ante of service. '90.103 Records of purchases; inspection. i90.10A Statements and payments where city or independent agency is seller. :!10.105 Application of [axmlocal telephone ser- vice. :90.106 Exemptions. 90.107 Computation oCtax when paid monthly and quarter~annually. -!)0.108 Scope o(tax. :90.109 Deposit of moneys; use for designated purposes only. ;90.110 Penalty. -90.111 Impairment oC prior obligations. 790.101 Taz imposed: rate; ezemption. There is hereby imposed and levied by the city on each purchase of electricity, metered ar bottled gas inatural, liquefied petroleum gas or manu[ar turedl, water service and local telephone service in the corporate Rmits of the city a tax in the amount oC tan percent oC the paymenb received by the seller of tha service Crom the purchaser Cor [he purchase oC the service. The tar hereby im- posed shall not be applied against a Cuel adjust meat charge, if the charge is separately stated on each bill rendered by the seller m the purchaser for the purchase of a utility service; provided, that jaef adjustment charge shall mean all inveases in the cast a utility service to the purchaser resulting from an intxase in the cost of fuel to the seller subsequent to October 1, 1973. In every ®se the tax shall be collected from tbe purchaxr of the service and paid by the purchoxr Cor the use oC the city m the seller of the service at the time of the purchaser's paying the charge therefor to the seller, but not less often than monthly, except for water service which meY be 4uarter-annually. The tax shall be collected on all payments received by tF.e seller in payment of bills, statements or in• voices rendered by the seller to the purchaser on or after October 1, 1972. Hirtop.-Code 1%5. a. 3943.Ord. 6&10681. µ 1. 7; Ora 69~1•l. a. 1, 2; Od ]Ob6a526; Ord. 71.397-191; Ord 72-'166 3i3. a. l: Ord. 747f3~Z7B, s. 1: Ord 83591400. ~ 1; Ord. 51805421. 4 y Ord &~1089~588, 4 1. uol<.-Former a. 806.101.- - 790.102 Collection; liability of seller; discontinuance of service. lal It shall be the duty of every seller of electricity, metered or bottled gas (natural, lique~ tied petroleum gas or manuCacturedl, water sea vice or local telephone service, in acting as the taxtollttting agency (or the city, to collect from the purchaser, for the use of the city, [he L•r.< hereby imposed and levied at the time u( cul- lectingthe purchase price tharl;ed for each trans- action, and to report and pay over, on or before the twentieth day oC each calendar month, to the Tax Collector all the taxes imposed, levied and collected during the preceding calendar month. In the event the twentieth day Calls on a Saturday, Sunday or holiday, the time shag be extended ad- ditionally to the next business day .rollowing the Saturday, Sunday or holiday. The Director of Fi- nance isauthorized to prescribe the Corms on which the reports shall be made, which forms shall pro- vide for the reporting oCa fuel adjustment charge upon which no tax is levied. IC shall be unlawful Cor a seller of a utility service to collect the price of a sale oC electricity, gea, water service or local telephone service without, at the same time, col- lecting the tax hereby imposed and levied in re- spell to the purchase or purchases and Cor a seller o[ the utility service to fail to state a fuel adjust- ment charge upon which ao eax is levied sepa- rately from all other charges upon which the tax is levied at the time the seller collects the charges and tax from the purchaser. (b) A seller [ailing m collect the tax at the time oCrnLLecting the price oCa purchase shell be liable t0 the city Cor the amount of the tax in like manner as d it had actually been Daid to the seller, and a seller [ailing to show separately the amount of the fact adjustment charge upon which no tar is levied at the time of collecting the charge shall be liable to the city Cor the omount oC tae which would have been coUeeted on the charge iC the tax had been levied thertron. When a seller Calla [o make a report or feiL+to PaY the tar within the time required hereunder, a specific pemlty, N addition to all other penalties provided herein, shall be added to the ta: in the amount of five percent i[the failure ie Cor not more than ten days, with m additional five pemnt for each addi- tionalten days or Craction thereof during the time which the (allure continues, not to exceed o total 2867 ~- - y, 166.0x5 1990 SUPDLEMENT TO FLORIDA STATUTES 1989 a. 166.271 ~; 5' W v00 Or less trpm the regwr¢meN for an p d sai a',1 ~ ruolw~mslan0ug Ine C!owsuNlS of Iros section. 5^~'nu.^.iciWUly Ina! OC¢S n01 cnOOS¢ w+th respect Io 5^v sL¢GLC pu¢ndse IO uDllte the ¢zemption Ir«n S. ..07111 Orovged In W5 Sechon mdY 1011pW My PrPLO' ,.e 41.n CPnniCl •win me prwison5 of chapter 1191« ~e w*cnaze of real property wn¢n is auth«¢etl m us +r « es!dDllsned py «dlnance. ~-.GI <pming m Iros seCil«I shall be iMerpr¢letl as ^,p,.tlng an e.emption Iron. « M exceplan to. s. j J11 w,r.-, i :r Y.SR 5 3 f f1-3:5 r b G iJ-YU PANT III MUNICIDAL flNAfaCE AND TAIUTiON cc 231 lkmiclparNes: puGv: Servile tar 166.23fA Nunic~Ul ~ D~ a~~alne D«cnase i' Nal y e'eCInCRY, meteretl « bolped qas (natural lpuehatl ;elraeum gas «manulaclure0), 31M water service. The sa shall DB IeweO poly upon purCha489 wM1Nn the y:,c,WUry and mall roI exceed t0 paten! d the pay Tents received lty ire seller of lne Taxable item Iron me y~ d5N 1« m0 purcrasa of SUCH SeNICB. MurYCipali' ,es vnpOSing a tact «l Ira purChaSB of qbb IelewSan lernce as of aWy a, 7977. may r.OriMUe 10 levy such laz ;p ;ce ezlenl necessary to meet aU obagaupns to « I« Te cenelil d hdden OI D«3o5 « cemlicales wNCh szuetl Ixxx to May 6, 1977. (Dl the W imposed by Paragraph (a) Shag not be agamsi arty fuel a0ws1n1Mt rylarge. and such Sar9e shall ba aeWratery staled on eaui bd. Th9 term ^~e adpuucent charge' means tm mcreases m va cost y vlary services to the ultimate wnsiriier resulhng tram do unease m [M cost d hat to dte utiery subsequent a Capper 1, 1973. !21 Servrss compeatire wim plow eniarerated in woseclwn (t) a subser;lan (9). as oehried by «di- narca, stall be IaxEd Orl a c«rlParable base at the same vies. tgwever, h3M d shsl be tailed at a rata not t0 4ceed { ceM5 par galas. Nowevm. bx riauaCipariliBa e+riri9less roan pa niaxamari rate alowade n sinsee lm 116 the r118xulxm tai on hat d shat bear da same aoponon t0 9 CAMS whidi pia tax 2le bvied tinder LASKhprl (7) bears 10 Osa rraxalaan ratio alw.abb n taxi (1l. 31 a rntautipe9ly rliay exempt hom Ua tax anpceed >7 Sector arty artiotalt ilp lo. end xlatrdm9, the lust i704Spwait ll«tn d ebctrinty Dte~~ par month br 'esgenlW ufe. SUCH exerrlpliorl Snell apply IO eaCt seP' arpa resxfenbal tint, regardless d wheNer ntcfi tAal n In a separate meter « a central meter. arld shat ba ;asud On W eeUl mtlrvdual tenant. tq Tha purdtase of rghYar gas «tlal d Dy a ptrdc s arvale ulialy. MtMr I« resale «kr use as lud m [tb 9meratpn d slBCinary. «IM p«Uase d hxsl d a ken eserc br use as an araaN ergea fuel « prppelaM « la use m mlemal cOmbuSWn e«yMS 6 exempt from n,auon nereunoer. l5 Amun:cIWIAY r^dY erempl lr«n laxahOn h¢reum d¢ the purcna5e Of the larabm dams by the Umietl Slates Government. mss slate. a any other puDIK ootlv as tlehned ~n s. 1.01 aru] mall ezempl purchases Dy any recCgruted church m mis state I« use ezclu5nep 1« Cnurcn purposes. (61 Tne tar sum«IZea nereuntler snarl ce codecled by IM sever of the laxdbl¢ Item irOm the W/Chaser al the Dme OI Ih¢ pdyrtl¢pl 1« sUGn Service. The Seiler shill! remit Ih¢ Idzes cdleclM Io the munKlpolliy m In¢ man- ner presalceo by «oinMCe Qf A muniOpalily snail noldy N wniing dny knpwn seller cl Hems idxdple nereurufer 01 any change in lht balptlanes of lne munGparlly « m the rdie pl Idadlgn l6)la) A municlWlily may by «dmance evempl rot less than 50 percent 01 the laz imposep urger Iros seC~ tan M pmcnd5ers OI ¢leciritar energy whp are o¢ler~ mnetl lp be eLgibte I« the ¢zempliOn pwidetl by s 212.06(151 by Ine Oeparlment 01 Revenue. The ezemp~ Iron shill! De ddmnslared as «wioetl in loot SeCign. A COpy Of dny «dmarlCe adopted pursuant lp INS SubSeC~ tan Srldil DB WOVIde0l01n8 D¢WnmMl pt Revent¢ rwl leSS Ihdn la nays prvX to M1s epeCUVe tla10. (b) N pie even) M area Thal 4 aulh«Ked to be an M1erpI158 IMB pmSUanl 10 5. 290.0055 hd3 rql Yal been approved pursuant to s. 2900065. a munapalny may enact an «dmance I« such exemplar; however. me «tllnance SroW n01 DB BII¢cWe unid Such area i5 aPproveo pursuant 1o s. 290.OO6fi. (c) This subseclan snail expne and be vdd on Dec¢ril0er 31, 1990, ezrepl Wt any quiWlieo G3Yne55 whirl! has sabsire0 the requvertanls at pus subseaan poor to December 31, 199x, 5naa ce arwwea the luu Den Qhi d IhR ex¢mpUM arlmvetl pflder lNa SubalCWn ds if tM5 suDSeCtmn had not expuetl On DeC¢inber 31, 799x. (9) A munippahly rtWY levy a lax prl Vte Pluchase cl telecprrurxtniCahon semces as defvad m s. 203072 as louorvs: (all. Drily upon p«clases vnlron pie munpWlily of local lelepnane service as aeluad m s. 203.Ot2I31 al a rate rot to exoeetl 70 percent d the monthly rearnrg Cuslian& semce charges. excluding pudic telephwne Vargas cdlecled an pIB. access charges. dryd any cus. tor7ler access Imo charges Wd to a blot leaptmce coiriPariY: « 2. DrdY upon p«chages lwitun lta mxadpa6ry d tdecortuwrucatans service wludl «aya:es arl0 temr N10! n WS sW18 al a tale not t0 e11CBBd 7 pwwnt d. the total am«mt UNrgep Ip any leaCOraraaacaD«is service provided wNUn pie rrxaucipaary a. d Uia locahpn d the IeleCOrYrxaxCatKKls SBIVICB provided Cillld la d0lerrnxietl, the Iola! arnoirM brYeO t« S1mJ3 leleLrorrxixi~ nwD«a service b a laleWlorie a IeaPrlola rumber. a leleCpr«rurucaUma number «device. «a Mtprrl erf' billing address btatad SwWn the raatmupality, excludutg psitdic telephone dtarge9 Cplect00 on 918. dlarges for arty 1«agn exUarge service «eriy pm2a bra service except wtan Such services are used «sd0 a9 d SUbSbIUb t« arN IeWjtlpfa cmiparry sauldled Sat' vKe a dedmdte0lauety by wruCh a lebpfl«a coiripar^/ providts a corraipasr,anpn Win. access crarges. and arty arslorrpr access br1B dlargea paKl to a local lele- 269 NOTICE OF ILLEGIBILITY ILLEGIBILITY OF SOME OF THESE DOCUMENTS IS DUE TO THE POOR QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL. THE FAULT DOES NOT LIE WITH THE CAMERA OR ITS OPERATOR. .~~. ir_-~- iii ii \L_-JI ~~~~ ... TM Inbm.la W ~^4 ~T /.JGV:1 :fit Mr. Lez Hester January 29, 1992 Page-8- There presently exists no authority by general law, to exempt the entire cost of punhased power, Crom the public service tax. At least part oC that purchased power should be subject to the local public service tax. To the eztent that the cost of purchased power itself rnntains a fuel adjustment charge, stated sepazately as required by state and local law, that fuel adjustment charge should not be fazed. However, the remaining portion of the rnst of purchased power should be subject to the tax. Unless and until the Florida Legislature provides a further ezemption, is the form of a general law, JEA's discretion is including the entire amount of purchased power in the fuel adjustment charge is limited as stated herein. Very truly yours, John A. uey -1~ Gener Counsel JAD/pc attazhments tt: Royce Lyles, Managing DirecWr, Jacksonville Electric Authority Welter P. Busselln, AMD, Finance & Administrakion, Jacksonville EleetrieAuthortty ThomasR Welch, Deputy General Counsel, Governmental Operations Gerald A. Schneider, Chief, Finance Division Lee S. Cazlin, Chief, Agency Division Thomas C. O'Bannon, Assistant General Counsel - Mr. Lex Hester ~- January 29,1992 Page -7- a municipality, does not include the power to ezempt from taxation or the power to remit or compromise fazes. 16 McQuillin, Municipal Corporations, 444.65, p. 204. (3d rev. ed.1984) Section 166.231, Florida Statutes sets out, by general law, one (1) mandatory exemption from the public service tax (Section 166.231(1)(b), Florida Statutes) and four (4) permissive or discretionary exemptions (Sections 166.231(3), (4), (5) and (8), Florida Statutes. However, there is no specific exemption for purchased power, and those existing exemptions cannot be construed as encompassing purchased power, by implication or otherwise. As has been previously stated, it is a well settled rule of statutory construction that expression of one or several things in a statute implies the ezclusion of other things not ezpressed. Thayer u. State, supra. This is especially true, with respect to the striM construction given to fazing statutes. Applying the above cited law, Florida's AtWrney General has previously opined that municipalities are not authorized to establish a cap on the amount of the public service taz generated by its chosen percentage rate. The rationale for those opinions is that taz caps, oa the public service taz, have the efleM of ezempting from taxation, that portion of the tazable value of electric service generating revenues is ezcess of such exp. Such an exemption, other than the exemptions specifically recognized by and authorized in Section 166.231, Florida Statutes, are not allowed. Op. A try. Gen. Nos. 87-45 and 89-11. _- Mr. Lez Hester January 29,1992 Page•6- the levy of and exemptions From ad valorem and non-ad valorem taxes. A municipality's authority to levy taxes is not found in Article VIII, Section 2, Florida Constitution (1968) which authorizes municipal home rule powers, but is instead found in Article VII, Section 9, Florida Constitution (1968) which relates specifically to local taxation. As provided therein, all such ad valorem taxing powers must be expressly authorized'by law" while non-ad valorem taxing powers must be expressly authorized by "general law." Art. VII, Section 9(a), Florida Constitution (1968); City of Tampa u. Birdsong Motors, Inc., 261 Sa.2d 1 (Fla. 1972). In matters oC rnnstitutional construction, the term "law", as used is the Constitution, contemplates an enactment of the State Legislature. Grapeland Heights Ciuic Assn u. City o/ Miami, 267 So.2d 321, 322 (F1a.1972); accord, Bromard County u. Plantation Imports, Inc., 419 So.2d 1145 (Fla. 4 DCA 1982). Thus, the entire field of local taxation and exemptions is preempted to the State Legislature for authorization in the form of either general, special, or local laws relative to ad valorem taxes and general laws only, relative to other tares such as eacise fazes. Any doubts as to the fazing power sought to be exercised must be resolved against the municipality. City o(Tampa, supra. Those general laws which authorize a municipality to taz are to be strictly construed; are not to be eztended by implication; and are not to be enlarged so as to include any matter not specifically included, even though that particulaz matter may be closely analogous to the powers so authorized. Id. Stated somewhat differently, the delegation of the power to tan, to Mr. Lez Hester January 29, 1992 I'agc •5- Similarly, it has been held that the law creating the fuel adjustment charge exemption was without ambiguity and clearly expressed the legislature's intent that only the portion of the fuel adjustment charge, (as defined in the statute) which was imposed after October 1,1973, was exempt from the discretionary local public service tax. Jaeksonuille Electric Authority u.Rice, 391 So.2d 190 (Fla. l DCA,1975). Because the language is the local ordinance, which implements the State mandated exemption, is so similaz to the state statute, the same rules of rnnstruction would apply. The local exemption of the fuel adjustment chazge is not broad enough, nor does it contain any indicia of a local legislative intent to include all or part of purchased power within that exemption. Furthermore, such a local exemption, not expressly authorized by general law, would not be permitted. Ia other words, once a city opts to enact the tax, it must do so only in the manner provided by the legislature in its authorizing statute. For purposes of this opinion, the term "general law" means a law that operates universally throughout the state, uniformly upon subjects as they may exist throughout the state or uniformly within a permissible class. Department ofBusiness Regulation u. Classic Mile,lnc., 541 So.2d 1155,1157 (FIa.1989). The public service tan is an excise tax as opposed to an ad valorem ta:. State u. City o/' West Panama City Beack, 127 So.2d 665 (Fla. 1961). It is a fundamental principle of Florida law that a municipality has no home rule power with respect to Mr. I.ex Hester January 29,1992 Page -4- ~~s 5t .oa r ,O, \~~ Y~ ~ t~ d~ . ~ ~ expresses one of several things upon which it operates or to which it applies, the exclusion of other things implies the legislative intent that the statute will neither operate upon nor apply to those excluded things. Thayer o. State, 335 So.2d 815 (Fla. 1976). Stated somewhat differently, in rnnstruing a statute, legislative direction as to how a thing should be done is, in effect, a prohibition against doing that thing in a different manner. Alsop u. Pierce, 19 So.2d 799 (Fla. 1944). Thus, the statute, on its ~ Cace, was not intended to include purchased power as part of the fuel adjustment charge Second, the term "fuel" as used in the defined statutory term "fuel adjustment charge", pursuant to judicial definition, is not broad enough to cover purchased power. Ia that regard, the Florida Supreme Court, is construing Section 166.231, Florida Statutes. has provided an mstructrve definition of the term "fuel" as used in "fuel adjustment charge": "We fin3 the trornmon meaning of'fuel' supplied by the a fN~• l trial court to be adequate: 'An matter used to roduce heat or wer b burnin¢. as w coo eat etrolenm gas... ctionarycita4oaomttte )..." (es.) City ojTampa o. Thatcher Class Corp., 445 So.2d 578 at 580 (Fla. 1984). In the absence of a statutory definition, it is presumed that the use of the terms, by the legislature, is in accordance with the meaning as defined by the Courts. 49 Fla. Jur. 2d Statutes 4132. Mr. Lex Hester January 29,1992 Pagc -3- [n regard to investor owned public electric utilities, both Florida Power Corporation ("FPC") and Florida Power and Light ("FP&L)" make extensive use of purchased power from o•.her utilities. An informal study, by the JEA staffof these other utilities, has indicated that there is no rnnsistency in how the concept of purchased power is handled. For example, both the Tallahassee municipal utility and FPC include the entire amount of their purchased power costs in the fuel adjustment charge. On the other hand, a1dabs FP&L includes only that portion of its purchased power which represents fazed plant or capacity costs is the fuel adjustment charge. JEA, with which you are mnterned, follows the practice of FPC and Tallahassee and includes the entire amount of purchased power vests within its fuel adjustment charge. This inconsistency in practice indicates the eztant confusion with respect to the law and its ezemptions, and also indicates that this law has remained static while the electrical utility industry has grown and developed with new concepts. A review of the above cited state and local legislation, in conjunMion with canons oC statutory interpretation and judicial construction, indicates two things: First, from the state mandated ezemption, the term "fuel adjustment charge" is specifically defined and relates only to increases which result from increased fuel costs after October 1, 1973. Therefore, the state mandated ezemption applies only to that specific increase in fuel chazges. It is well recognized that when a statute Mr. Lex Hester January 29,1992 Page -2- services to the ultimate consumer resulting from an increase in the cost of fuel to the utility subsequent to October 1, 1973." The state statute was enacted in Chapter 74- 109, Laws of Florida, effective July 1, 1974, and is codified as Section 166.321(1)(b), Florida Statutes. A rnpy of Section 166.231, Florida Statutes (1990 Supp.) is attached for your ready reference. The City has exercised its discretion to levy the local public service tax for many years. In 1974, the City enacted Ordinance No. 74-686-277, which implemented the fuel adjustment charge exemption to the public service tax. Pursuant to the ordinance, the term "fuel adjustment charge" was defined substantially the same as the state statute as follows: "all increases in the cost of a utility service to the purchaser resulting from as increase in the cost of fuel to the seller subsequent to October 1,1973." This ordinance became effective eight (6) days after the authorizing state statute on July 9, 1974, upon signature by Mayor Tanxler and is currently codified in Section 790.101, Ordinance Code. A rnpy of Section 790.101, Ordinance Code, is attached for your ready reference. When the State and local laws were passed, the concept of "purchased power" by one utility from another, was almost nonexistent. However, over the years this concept has increased. While not too many municipal electric utilities purchase power to a great eatent, JEA finds it economical to do so as its needs require. The Tallahassee municipal electric utility also purchases power insubstantial amounts. I t l - i _ I, ~ '~~ ~ ~) ~5 ' OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL CITY Or JACKSONVILLE JOHN A DELANEY GCMCRµ COVNSCL January 29, 1992 Mr. Lex Hester Chief Administrative Officer City ofJacksonville 1400 City Halt Jacksonville, Florida 32202 Re: Purchased Power/Fuel AdjustmentCharge Dear Mr. Hester. nur;,r,.~ r,~., l s l .. ~ J.ti, -- .,.~ lr. ~_ I~•~ ~ , ft[la t,~+ noo cix Nwu J.~CwsonviuE i,Gw,ow azzoi i[L ~BH~NU+1<O Gw[ i9G~ 6]oiry You have requested legal advice as to what discretion, if any, JEA has with respect to including the cost of purchased power in its fuel adjustment charge. Pursuant to your legal request, my staff has been working closely with the JEA in order to develop relevant facts upon which to apply the state and local laws concerning the discretionary public service tax and its exemptions. From what has been developed, it appears that,ia the absence of a general law by the Florida Legislature, JEA has very little discretion with respect to purchased power and the fuel adjustment charge and there appears to be no authority W include the entire amount of purchased power in the fuel adjustment charge. An analysis follows: From an historical perspective, the Florida Legislature passed astate-wide mandate that the discretionary local public service tax would not apply to fuel adjustment charges stated sepazately on a utility bill. In the state statute, the term "fuel adjustment chazge" is defined as follovrs: "all increases in the cost of utility `` ~~ i 5 V'• 7 ~ ~ ,_f _._ JACKSONVILLE ELECTRIC AUTHORITY RESIDENTIAL RATE & PUBLIC SERVICE TAX CHANGE PER 1,000 KWH ATLANTIC BEACH CURRENT REVISED BASE RATE CHARGE $~~~' $~'9J TOTAL FUEL & PUR. POWER CHARGE $40.20 $40.20 SUB-TOTAL $69.75 $69.15 GROSS RECEIPTS TAX $1.70 ~ $1.70 SUB-TOTAL $70.85 $70.85 FRANCHISE FEE ~~~ ~'~ PUBLIC SERVICE TAX - BASE RATE CHARGE 5~•~' $~'~' TAXABLE FUEL AMOUNT $3.55 $24.14 GROSS RECEIPTS TAX 51.70 $1.70 FRANCHISE FEE ~~~ ~'~ TOTAL TAXABLE AMOUNT 538.83 559.42 TAXABLE RATE 5% 5% TOTAL PUBLIC SERVICE TAX 51.94 $297 TOTAL RESIDENTIAL CHARGE 577.42 578.45 bargaining system. Therefore, even more, assignme nt and weight of responsibilities ie placed upon [his single position within the entire structure - of the Fire Department. As a result, segregation of fire inspection, arson and safety direction tasks are more critical now [Lan ever in my opinion. I propose to compensate the Fire Mnrshall 327,549 per year and 54,586 for duties es safety director. Chief Rev would continue to receive his incentive pay of 51,200 per annum as well. Thus, [here would be no redo ccion in compensation for Chief Rev. I realize that this is being proposed to you at mid-budget and would understand if you prefer to defer the same to our budge[ vorkahope. However, I still feel the position is warranted and would allow me to maximize the qualitications of Chief Rev both [o [he advantage of the City of Atlantic Beach and to himself and would like to proceed as soon as possible. Thank you for your consideration and please do no[ hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or desire additional information. S i/,n c~ejr e!/l,~/y/n/ i~. LeinbacG~~h~ C i[y Hanager KDi.det ct: Molter P. Rev' REP: RDL.88 x. CITY OF ~tla«tle $eaek - ~lazcifa eao selmoLE actin L .___-_- - --_- -_ ~---_ ATLANTIC 9EACN, FLORIDA 13211-SSfS TELEAION'E I9W134'F59011 .rti"~ FAx 19W13f}SmK April 6, 1992 Bonorab le Mayor City Commission Hembers Atlantic Beach, Florida Dear Mayor and City Commission Members: At your last regclat City Commission meeting, I had provided a recommendation to you For the creation of the Fire Marshall position for the City of Atlantic Beach, Florida. The same vas authorized but no monies allocated pending research and identification of a funding source. Recea[ly, I have been concocted by the Jacksonville Electric Authority in regards to additional revenues the City will receive from its public service Cax. To make a very long story short, [his fee levied by [he City of Atlantic Beath will now be applied against power purchased by the JEA, heretofore oot included. I have enclosed a copy of applicable letters from the Office of General Counsel as yell as [he Jacksonville Electric Authority for yout perusal explaining [he new app licatlon of [he public service tax. Ours is separate and one-half leas than tha t~ levied by the City of Jacksonville, but the new ruling still applies to us. The net result is based upon a 1,000 kilowatt usage at Che residential rate, Atlantic Beach customers will pay about a dollar per month more. This will result in an increase of about 40 - 50 percent in our revenues from the Public Service tax or estimated 568,0000 per annum beginning Apr11 1992. Itis this additional revenue source I anticipate utilizing for funding of the Fire Narshall position if you so permit. I also wanted to clarify with you a few more details relating to the Pire Marshall's position. Said position is a department head level assignment and as a result, reports directly [o the City Hanager. I. believe Lla lter Rev Ss an outstanding candidate for [his position and 6y transferring him to the same reflects maximization of his skills in fire inspections, arson investigation liaison, and safety director for the City of Atlantic Beach. 1 also want to call out co your att en[ion, with the recent rulings by the Public Employment Relations Commission and judicial system, it is my opinion our Pi re Chief has less reliance upon his lieutenants for assistance in the management area by the fact IteutenanCS are a par[ of the Collective Page 'No Hemo to Hayor and Ci[y Commission April 7, 1992 Citizen of [he Year could also receive other tangible benefits such as: Free parking decal Free Atlantic Beach auto tag No charge for pet licenses, or any other such concessions the City Commission may wish to offer. Suggest first Citizen of the year be selected in the fall of this year, vi th presentation being made next Christmas. xt: City Manager .... CITY OF 11tlaestlc b~'eael - ~lauda BOO SEMLtiOLE ROAO ~--------~----- ATLMTIC BEACH, FLORf6A R3!}5615 Tif.FR10NE (901)16F5800 April 7, 1992 To: The Honorable Hayor and C.iAty ComOmission From: Maureen King, City Clerk M K'"' J In response to your request for recommendations regarding [he selection of a Citizen of the year, the following is presented for your consideration. Nomination: Suggest nominations be open to individuals who have donated time, tangible items or funds, or professional expertise, or who have made any other contribution deemed to be beneficial to the city. The City Commission may wish to ex tend the nominations co include groups to allow husband and wife Ceams or organizations (such as Publix, Cd5 Bank, or Continental Cablevision) vhos<_ firms or employees have made Contributions which benefited the city, to qualify for nomination. Nominations could be made by department heads, employees, board members or standing committee members. Nominations should be presented in writing outlining the Contributions of the nominee. Selection: Appoint a committee to review the nominations and present a shore list to [he City Commission for final selection. Selection committee could be comprised of those persons eligible to make nominations; however, anyone who had submitted a nomination should not be eligible [o serve on the selection committee. Presentation: Present Resolution co the Citizen of the Year at Christmas Tree lighting oz other public even[, and follow up with a report (with picture) in the Beaches Leader and Courier. Dupl ica[e resolution could be displayed in Ci[y Hall until thr Citizen of the Year is chosen [he following year. :- _ : - i ATLANTIGNEPTUNE LODGE Y107 P. O. Box 6i Nepwne Beach. Florida 3223]-6100 20 Harch 1992 Honorable HilLiam I. Gulliford Jr. Hayor of Atlantic Beach 800 Seminole Rd. Atlantic Beach, F1. 32233 Dear Nayor Gulliford, As you are aware, the Atlantic-Neptune Lodge, Fraternal Order o£ Police has been tasked with the additional burden of paying rater,sewer and garbage fees for oui Lodge Building. in order to meet this requirement, we must curtail our programs in the community. In the past, the City of Atlantic Beach has cone to our aid and with your support, our Lodge was able to offset this financial burden. Ne are once again seeking your assistance. The etlarges for these services in 1992 are estiaated to be in the area of 5500.00, xhich 1s a significant portion of our yearly operating budget, and to be quite honest, a tremendous financial outlay for an organization of our size. If you could present this request to the full Council for consideration it would be appreciated. As in the past, and regardless of the outcome of this request, the Atlantic-Neptune Lodge will continue to make the Lodge Building available for police training and other bona fide city functions. Ne shall look forward to your reply, and thank you for your time and attention in this matter. S ~cere~~~ David L. Archer Lodge President and restrict the eime and location of such garage ssle. There shall be no fee for [he issuance of such permit, but no more Chan three (3) such permits may be issued to one residence and/or family, household, or organization during any calendar year. No permit shall be issued For more than two (2) consecutive days. Such sales shall be 6e ld during daylight hours only. Each permit issued must be prominently displayed on [he premises upon which said sale is held. All merchandise [o be sold a[ such sale shall be displayed in an enclosed garage or carport and at no time shall merchandise be displayed on a public right-of-way or svale area, provided, however, if no enclosed garage or carport exists a[ said location merchandise may be displayed on a private driveway. One (1) temporary sign, not to exceed four (4) -s quare~ feet (double-faced is permissible) shall be permitted on the property where the sale is to be conducted. In addition, a maximum of two (2) other such signs, not to exceed two (2) square feet each, shall be permitted [o be placed on other private property vit6 the permission of the owner or occupant. In no event shall signs be' placed on public property nor shall the same be erected oz displayed more than twenty-four (24) hours before the sale ie to begin and such signs shall be removed immediately upon the termination of the sale. Parking - all parking of vehicles shall be conducted in compliance with all applicable lava and ordinances. The Police Department may enforce such temporary controls which would alleviate any such hazards and/or congestion caused by any garage sale. Violations - These are- the basic elements which would in my opinion regulate garage sales and hopefully preclude those who have abused this method of personal property Bale. It is a draft for your coaelderatlon and ve will be most happy to refine and amend the same as you deem appropriate. I would recommend that if you viah to proceed, the City Attorney be instructed to convert the same into the proper legal format. Sincerely/, n im D. Leinbach City Nanager RDL.d6[ S ~f_ {[pfp f ~. ~:.... . CITY OF r~.~tla G"eacls - ~lozidu Harch 23, 1992 Honorable Hayoz City Commission Hemb ers Atlantic Beach, Florida Dear Hayor and City Commission Hembers: eoo sFASmott aoAn ATIA2IDC BEAC71, FLORmA +~+a15015 TFLEr110NE (90q 2!15000 FA% 00012!15805 Please recall ar the last regular City Commission meeting citizen concern vas heard in regards to abuse of garage sales by an individual on Boyal -Palms. Subsequently, this office vas asked to propose an ordinance in regards to regulating the same. Accordingly, I have reviewed the matter and would recommend that the City Attorney construct as ordinance based upon the following pzovis ions: a. Definition - the term ^garage sale^ shall mean any sale or offering for sale of personal property by a person or persona of a 8amily or other household unit, said personal property having been acquired, possessed and used by the family or household for personal as opposed to business or commercial use, when such sale is to be or is conducted a[ the present residence of such family or household. The term shall include sales commonly referred to patio sales, driveway sales, yard sales and other such sales. The term shall not Snclude the sale or offering for sale any goods on consignment, nor shall St include the Bale or offering forsale o~ goods for more than three (3) families or households. b. Garage sales shall be conducted in compliance with all lays, ordinance s., rules and regulations not Sn conflict with this chapter. c. Exemption - the provisions (regulating garages sales) shall not apply to sales of personal property made pursuant to a valid order of the court of cumpetent jurisdiction. d. Permit - no garage sale shall be conducted vithi^ the City without a permit having been first issued for such sale by the City Nanager. Such permit shall se[ forth <~- 20NING AND SUBDIVISION REGULA'f10NS 4 24-159 Sec. 24-139. Home occupations. Intent To recognize the need for people to conduct small-scale home occupations, which ere incidental m the primary use of the residence, while preserving the character of residen- tial neighborhoods and minimizing Vaftie and nonresidential disturbances (a) A home occupation that is solely used for the purpose of receiving phone calls and keeping business records in connection with aaY Profession or occupation or any business activity of a sedentary nature, ae listed in (7) below, shall be permitted in all residential distrieta and shall require a "cenvenience licence." Service occupations including, but not limited to beauty salodbarber pimited to one operator), carpenters, minor contractors doing remodeling or home repairs, wall papering, floor covering or file work, cosmetic sales, pet grooming, repairmen (household appliances), travel agents, Painters, window cleaners, and mid w )awn service, shall also be permitted, provided as more than one vehicle is used in the bssine® and the applicant can meat all other ceaditions provided herein- The following oontpations shall not be Permuted as home occupations: EacortlntroduMion service, massage ttaxapist. welding, vehicle repair, manufacturing such ae rsbinet making, or-upholstering. game occupetiom shall not be permitted in areas which are restrcted by deed when such dacamenra are recorded in the public records of Duval County and on file with the city clerk of the City of Atlantic Beech. All other business activities shall be restricted to the commercial distriete. The following regulations shall aPPly to home oaupations: (1) The address of the home oteupetion shall not appear in the telephone book, oa letterhead, cheeks or any type of edvertiaiog. (2) No one other than immediate family members residing on the premises shall be involved in the occupation. There sball be a limit of one license per person, and no more then two (2) lioeneee Per household. The home oavpetioa shall be noatreaafereble. (S) All 6uaiaeae activities conducted w the liceaeed Premises shall be conducted en'.vely within the dwelling. Thera shall be no outside storage or outside use of equipment or materials. (4) No more than one (11 room of the dwelling shall be used to conduct the otxvpetion, provided the area of that room dose not exceed twenty~five (25) percent of the total living area of the dwelling. (5) No ezterml sign or evidence that the dwelling is being used for the home occupation shall be allowed. (6) There shall be no pedestrian or vehicular traffic, noise, vibration, glare, fumes, odors or electrical interference as a result of the home occupation. ('7) The following ere typical occupations Chet are acceptable as home occupations: Ac- countant, architect, artist. attorney, bookkeeper, consultant, auctioneer, seamstress or tailor, insurance agent, music inatruclo*, Photographer, piano tuner, real estate agent, secretarial serncee, telephone answering service, hobby/crafts (not involving heavy equipment). Supp. No.9 1457 CITY OF dltlartle " 4 - ~louda am semnou: awn ~--~ ---- - ATLANTIC BFAC H, FIARIw )i1J}5yt5 rFLFrHO~e ~Sa~ zassroo _ _ ~` , FAX ISaI 2f1-5805 April 8, 1992 To: The Honorable Mayor and City Co®issioners From: Maureen King, City Clerk Subject: GARAGE SALES A[ [he last Commission meeting [his office vas directed to look into [he subject of garage sales as they relate to occupational licenses. Ic is the opinion of this office [hat i[ yould not be appropriate to issue occupational licenses for garage sales for the following reasons: I. Occupational licenses are issued for a period of one year, from October 1 to September 30 of the following year. An occupational license would, therefore, alloy the holder to have as many garage sales as they wished during that time. 2. Alloying garage sales to operate on a year-round basis would, in essence, be approving flea markets to operate in residential districts. This type of activity would not be in compliance with the City Code, Section 24-159, Home Occupations. I felt the intent of the City Commission was to provide a means to regulate and limit the number of garage sales a resident could have, and in this regard ve polled ten neighboring cities and submit the following: - 4 cities had no garage sale regulations and reported no problems - 5 cities required permit (2 had no charge for permit, others ranged from ;2.00 to ;5.00) - - One city did not require a permit but allowed four garage sales per year - Cities with regulations allowed 3 or 4 garage sales per year Moat cities indicated they had experienced no problems and felt [he ordinance yas enforced only if a complain[ was received. If it is the desire of the City Commission to regulate garage sales I would suggest a permit system could be established indicating the number of garage sales which would be allowed per household per year. You may vieh to refer to the Ci[y Manager's reco®uendations in his memo of March 23, 1992. t c ENVIROQ SERVICES, INC. ATLANTIC BEACH, FLORIDA T.V. INSPECTION LOO DATE: gEBRDARY 24, 1992 UP NH: 53 DWN MH: 52 STREET NAME: 6TH STREET PIPE DATA LENGTH: 375' NOMINAL DIA: 8" ACTUAL DIA: UP MH 7.3f 4 DWN MFf 7 L 1I}I DEPTH: UP MH 4'-11". DWN MH 4'-10" JOINT LENGTH: 3' MATERIAL: VC PIPE FLOW: ~8 DISTANCE DESCRIPTION REMARKS REVERSE SET UP - MH 52 - 53 3 SAND 5 SAND 10 SERVICE CONNECTION AT 9 O'CLOCK 12 SAND 25 CRACKED JOINT 25 SAND 79 SERVICE CONNECTION AT 9 O'CLOCK 95 - SERVICE CONNECTION AT 3 O'CLOCK 101 CRACKED JOINT 119 STRUCTURAL CRACK 138 SERVICE CONNECTION AT 2 O'CLOCK 151 SERVICE CONNECTION AT 2 O'CLOCK 173 CRACKED JOINT 191 (APPROK) SERVICE CONNECTION AT 2 O'CLOCK, HAMMER TAP - CAMERA CANNOT PASS ENVIROO SERVICES, INC. ATLANTIC BEACN, FLORIDA T.V. INSPECTION LOC DATE: FEBRUARY 24. 1992 UP MH: 53 DWN HN: 52 STREET NAME: 6TH STREET PIPE DATA LENGTH: 375' NOMINAL DIA: 8" ACTUAL DIA: UP NH 7 _~4 D1iN FIII 7 314 MH DEPTH: UP IIEi 4'-11' OWN MH 4._10" JOINT LENGTH: 3'_ MATERIAL: CLAY PIPE FLOH: 118 r . dr,- t: ~_: F DISTANCE 27 68 73 100 109 115 126 132 163 176 183 (APPRO%) DESCRIPTION REMARKS OFFSET JOINT SERVICE CONNECTION AT 10 O'CLOCK SERVICE CONNECTION AT 3 O'CLOCK PIPE CHANGE TO PVC OPEN JOINT, PIPE CHANGE TO CLAY PIPE OFPSET JOINT SERVICE CONNECTION AT 9 O'CLOCK CRACKED, LEAAING JOINT OPEN JOINT SERVICE CONNECTION AT 2 O'CLOCK SERVICE CONNECTION AT 11 O'CLOCK, HAMMER TAP (3 1/2") CAMERA CANNOT PASS _ n...> ENVIROQ SERVICES, INC. ATLANTIC BEACH, FLORIDA T.V. INSPECTION LOG DATE: FEBRUARY 24. 1992 UP MH: 52 DWN MH: 51 STREET NAME: 6TN STREET PIPE DATA LENGTH: 350' NOMINAL DIA: 8" ACTUAL DIA: UP MH 7~4 DWN MIi 7 3/_4 MH DEPTH: UP MH 4'-30" DWN MH 4'-11" JOINT LENGTH: 3.'. MATERIAL: VC PIPE FLOW: 1 8 DISTANCE DESCRIPTION RENARRS 1 PVC PIPE 10 OFFSET JOINT, PIPE CHANGE TO PVC 27 OPEN JOINT 39 SERVICE CONNECTION AT 9 O'CLOCK 36 PIPE CHANCE TO CLAY PIPE 52 SERVICE CONNECTION AT 3 O'CLOCK 63 SERVICE CONNECTION AT 9 O'CLOCK 96 CRACKED, LEAKING JOINT 106 SERVICE CONNECTION AT 9 O'CLOCK 145 SERVICE CONNECTION AT 3 O'CLOCK 167 STRUCTURAL CRACK 180 SERVICE CONNECTION AT 9 O'CLOCK 192 CRACKED, LEAKING JOINT 207 SERVICE CONNECTION AT 3 O'CLOCK 209 SERVICE CONNECTION AT 9 O'CLOCK, LEAKING 232 CRACKED JOINT 272 CRACKED JOINT 277 CRACKED JOINT 285 SERVICE CONNECTION AT 2 O'CLOCK 296 OPEN, OPFSET JOINT, PIPE CHANGE TO PVC 297 SERVICE CONNECTION AT 9 O'CLOCK 303 PIPE CHANGE TO CLAY 350 END OP LINE ENVIROQ SERVICES, INC. ATLANTIC BEACH, FLORIDA T.V. INSPECTION LOG DATE: FEBROARY 25. 1992 UP MH: 51 DWN MH: 50 STREET NAME: 6TH STREET PIPE DATA LENGTH: 381' NOMINAL DIA: 8" ACTUAL DIA: UP HH 7_J 4 DWN MH 7_3f4 MH UEPTH: UP MH 4'-11" DWN MII 5'-4" JOINT LENGTH: 3' MATERIAL: VC PIPE FLOW: 118 DISTANCE _ DESCRIPTION REMARKS 24 SERVICE CONNECTION AT 2 O'CLOCK, CRACKED AND LEAKING 62 SERVICE CONNECTION AT 9 O'CLOCK 76 CRACKED JOINT 81 PIPE CHANGE TO PVC 82 SERVICE CONNECTION AT 9 O'CLOCK 159 SERVICE CONNECTION AT 2 O'CLOCK, LEAKING 180 SERVICE CONNECTION AT 10 O'CLOCR, HAMMER TAP, LEAKING 314 SERVICE CONNECTION AT 2 O'CLOCK 381 DROP SERVICE 382 CLAY PIPE 381 END OP LINE NOTE: FOOTAGE COUNTER OFP ~'. _ ENVIROQ SERVICES, INC. ATLANTIC BEACH, FLORIDA T.V. INSPECTION LOG DATE: FEBRUARY 25. 1992 UP NH: 50 DWN MH: 97 STREET NAME: 6TH_STREET PIPE DATA LENGTH: 213' NOMINAL DIA: 12" ACTUAL DIA: UP MH 11._3/4 DWN MR 11. 3f4 lIFI DEPTB: UP MR 8'-4°. DWN !S}i 7'_4" JOINT LENGTH: 3', MATERIAL: V_C PIPE FLOW: 1L DISTANCE 28 89 110 207 213 DESCRIPTION REMARAS STROCTURAL CRACK SERVICE CONNECTION AT 9 O'CLOCK SERVICE CONNECTION AT 2 O'CLOCK LEAAING JOINT END OP LINE ENVIROQ SERVICES, INC. ATLANTIC BEACH, FLORIDA T.V. INSPECTION LOG i DATE: FEBRUARY 25, 1992 :~ UP MH: 106 DWN MH: 96 STREET NAME: PALM _ST, ' PIPE DATA LENGTH: 226' NOMINAL DIA: 12' ACTUAL DIA: UP NIi 11. 3j4 DWN MH 11__314 i i NH DEPTH: UP MH DWN MH JOINT LENGTH: 3' MATERIAL: VC PIPE FLOW: 1L DISTANCE _ DESCRIPTION REMARKS 1 PVC PIPE 5 OFFSET JOINT, PIPE CHANGE TO CLAY ~5 STRUCTURAL CRACK 97 SERVICE CONNECTION AT 9 O'CLOCK 152 SERVICE CONNECTION AT 9 O'CLOCK, LEAKING 155 SERVICE CONNECTION AT 2 O'CLOCK, LEAKING 226 END OF LINE NOTE: WRONG STREET LISTED ON DATA VIEW - SHOULD BE PALM ST. INSTEAD OP 6TH ST. ENVIROQ SERVICES, INC. ATLANTIC BEACH, FLORIDA T.V. INSPECTION LOG DATE: FEBRUARY 25 1992 UP MH: 96 DWN NH: 97 STREET NAME: PALH_STREET PIPE DATA LENGTH: 214' NOMINAL DIA: 12" ACTUAL DIA: UP HH 11.3/4 DWN MH 11_3f4 MH DEPTH: UP HH DWN MH JOINT LENGTH: 3' MATERIAL: VC PIPE FLOW: 1 8 DISTANCE DESCRIPTION REMARKS 91 SERVICE CONNECTION AT 3 O'CLOCK 94 DIP - CAMERA DNDER WATER 168 END DIP 214 END OF LINE ENVIROQ SERVICES, INC. ATLANTIC BEACH, FLORIDA T.V. INSPECTION LOG DATE: FEBRUARY 251_1992 UP MH: E DWN MH: D STREET NAME: RUSSELL_PARK PIPE DATA LENGTH: 174' NOMINAL DIA: 8" ACTUAL DIA: UP MH 7_3(4 DWN MH 7_3j 4. M}I DEPTH: UP MH 2' DWN M}I 2'-1" JOINT LENGTH: 3' MATERIAL: PVC PLPE FLOM: 1 8 DISTANCE DESCRIPTION REMARRS NOTE: CHECK MANHOLE - ON TAPE 174 END OP LINE >.5..- ENVIROQ SERVICES, INC. ATLANTIC BEACN, FLORIDA T.V. INSPECTION LOG DATE: PEBRUARY 25. 1992 UP MH: D DWN MH: C STREET NAME: RUSSELL PART( PIPE DATA LENGTH: 51' NOMINAL DIA: 8" ACTUAL DIA: UP MH 7. 3(9 DWN Ifll 7_3L4 MH DEPTA: UP MH DWN MH JOINT LENGTH: 20' MATERIAL: PVC PIPE FLOW: 118 DISTANCE ~ DESCRIPTION REMARKS NOTE: CHECA MANHOLE - ON TAPE 15 SERVICE CONNECTION AT 3 O'CLOCK, HAMMER TAP, LEAKING 51 END OF LINE ENVIROQ SERVICES, INC. ATLANTIC BEACN, FLORIDA T.V. INSPECTION LOG DATE: FEBRUARY_25~_1932 UP HH: C DWN MH: B STREET NAME: RUSSEL_L_.PARK PIPE_DATA LENGTH: 315' NOMINAL DIA: 8" ACTUAL DIA: UP MN 7 314 DWN lIFS 7.3(4 MN DEPTA: UP MH DWN 1III JOINT LENGTH: 20' MATERIAL: PVC PIPE FLOW: 118 DISTANCE ~ DESCRIPTION RENARAS NOTE: CHECK MANHOLE - ON TAPE 25 SERVICE CONNECTION AT 9 O'CLOCK, HAMMER TAP CRACKED AND LEAKING 113 SERVICE CONNECTION AT 3 O'CLOCK, LEAKING Z9g OFFSET JOINT 315 EHD OF LINE r F ~. ~- F k" ENVIROQ SERVICES, INC. ATLANTIC BEACH, FLORIDA T.V. INSPECTION LOG DATE: FEBRUARY 25, 1992 UP HH: B DWN MH: A STREET NAME: RUSSELL PARR PIPE DATA LENGTH. 171'_ NOMINAL DIA: B" ACTUAL DIA: UP HH 7_3f4 DNN HH 7 3/4 HH DEPTH: UP 1lEI DWN MH 8' JOINT LENGTH: 20' MATERIAL: PVC PIPE FLOW: 1 8 DISTANCE DESCRIPTION REHARNS NOTE: CHECK HANHOLE - ON TAPE 7 RUBBER BAD 171 END OF LINE ~° ENVIROQ SERVICES, INC. ATLANTIC BEACH, FLORIDA T.V. INSPECTION LOG DATE: FEBRUARY 21 1992 UP MH: A DWN MH: 106 STREET NAME: RUSSELL _P_ARK PIPE_DATA LENGTH: 156' NOMINAL DIA: 8" ACTUAL DIA: UP HH 7_3/4 DWN HH 7_3/9 HII DEPTH: UP HH S' DWN HH JOINT LENGTH: 20'. MATERIAL: CLAY PIPE FLOW: IL8 DISTANCE ~ DESCRIPTION REMARKS q3 LEAKING JOINT 60 LEAKING JOINT gl LEAKING JOINT 119 LEAKING JOINT 136 LEAKING JOINT 147 LEAKING JOINT 156 END OF LINE DARE 03;02/91 IOB INIIE~ AILAIIIIC BEACH 106 RMBE0.~ 2029 ----~--~ ----~-~--~-~----~--~----------;OIA„LEA6IH;-----F IELO REPOR11116 ; 9Rq.R ; DANNOLE ;in. ;R. ; IV SUR'JEY/LLEAI: ; WJfAEP,6 LOCATION ;SLS ;!YDE; FEET ; DALE ;A - IC6 ;RlS5EL1 PAAI: 6 ; ISb ;L 1St ;02.25.52 ' --_--~~ ;B - A ;RUSSELL PARE 6 ; I71 ;L Ill 102.2->.S2 ' ;-- -,- _, [ - B ;AU>SELL PARK B ; 315 ;L ; 315 ;02_25.52 ; ,D C ;RBSSiII DAP.K ; 6 ; ;1 ;L 51 ;OL25.Y2 ; -_--__~ ;E - D ;RUSSELL PAP,1. ; e ; V/ ;L ; 171 ;02.15.92 ; , ~ , , ' , ;96 - 07 ;PAEn S1. i2 , 11J ;L ; 211 ;02.25.52 ; ;105 - 46 ;~i.LN 51. ; 12 ; 22b ;L 126 ;02.25.51 ; ;i0 - 57 ;EI!I ;I ; 12 ; 213 ;l 213 ;02.25.41 I _ -_-__, i_--_--__--__.-____ i___-_-~_-_.~-_._--~._-_ ;51 - 50 ;oIH S1 ; B ; 361 ;L ; 381 ;0225.52 ; _-_--i_-_~____~__-,_--_- -__---_ I-.-.._----_.-...--__-_--._-__ ;52 - SI ;ElH Sl. ~ 8 ; 350 ;L 350 ;02_2152 1 ;53 - S ;EiH i! ; B ; 375 $ ; 373 ;022l.S1 ' 16.6 y' 1 rr 1 G. ~~. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Size of Leak Steady Drip 1/8• Flor 1/4• Flor 3/8• Flov 1/2• Flor 3/4• Flor 1• Flor SANITARY SE4ER LEAK ESTIMATES Gal/Day 50 410 1,040 3,680 6, 566 14, 443 26, 236 PRIORITY LIST t> is c" ~:. ~.-.. REPAIRS ~(1) J-2 (2) I-3 (3) D-2 * (4> F-1 (Si E-2/2-A (6) C-4 (7) A-1 (3) C-3 (9) B-4 (10) A-2 (lll B-1 (12) B-3 (13) I-2 (14) H-2 <15) C-1 (16> G-1 (17) H-1 (18) I-1 (19) J-1 Total Eatimatetl Cost ESTIMATED COST 53,500.00 2,210.00 1, 260.00 22,000.00 1, 760.00 1, 760.00 2, 960.00 1, 760.00 1,760.00 1, 760.00 1,190.00 1, 190.00 1, 510.00 1, 510.00 1,760.00 250.00 250.00 250.00 250.00 547,890.00 ROTE= Start at J-2 and work dorn List. ~.- - ._ . Continued 2. Recommend Point Repair Station 015. Service Connection, Hemmer Tep, Leaking 410 GPD. (I) Manhole 'C• to Manhole "B". Manhole in Russell Park going South under tennis courts. 1. Recommend invert work, seal with non-shrink concrete. Grout. rhere pipe enters Nanhole 'C• and leaves Manhole 'C•. 2. Recommend Point Repair at Service Connection at Station 0.25. Hammer Tap cracked and leaking 410 GPD. 3. Recommend Point Repair on service at Station 1.13. Not leaking at fitting at main line, but very heavy continuous flor of clear rater coming through this service. Appears to be a very long run of service pipe and leak could De anyrhere 1n run. Estimated leakage 26,236 GPD. (S) Nanhole •B• tc Nanhole •A• going East through Russell Park. 1. Recommend invert cork at Nanhole '8•. Seal rith non-shrink grout rhere pipe enters and leaves Manhole •B'. 2. ]uet out of Manhole •B• at Station 0.07 rubber has rolled at joint. Also at this point this B• PVC line goes through an existing storm drain structure rhich is a violeticn. The existing storm drainage lines appear to be either 38• or 42• RLP. Recommend that this section of line from Nanhole •B" to other aide of existing drainage structure be replaced immediately rith D.I.P. rith no joint inside of drainage structure. Rest of Line in good shape. Depth (6'-B'). lK) Manhole •A• to Manhole 106 at Russell Park going Eeat. 6 joints ehor that they have Deen leaking due to stains et joint. No leaking vas observed during taping and for this reason requfras no immediate action. In future, if eontlitione rare to rorsen, this run could be lined. 156' of 8'. No Services. Depth f6'-B'). Continued 3. Recommend Point Repair at Station 1.59 Leaking 1,040 GPD. 4. Recommend Point Repair at Station 1+80 Leaking 3,680 GPD. (D) Nanhole 50 to Manhole 97 on 6th. Street going West from Sherry Street Nanhole 97 just out o£ Lift Station •A•. Average depth (7. 0' to B. 5'). 1. Recommend Point Repair at Station 0.28 Not Leaking. 2. Recommend Point Repair at Station 2+07 Leaking 6,566 GPD. (E) Manhole 106 to Nanhole 96 an Palm Street going east tram Seminole Road to Novell Park. Depth (6' to 8') 1. Recommend Point Repair at Station 0.45 Not Leaking. 2. Recommend Point Repair at Station 1+52 Leaking 1,040 GPD. 2A. Recommend Point Repair at Station 1+55 Leaking 3~ 680 GPD. 4,720 GPD TOTAL (F) Manhole 96 to Manhole 97 from Palm Street going Eaet through Horell Park under creek to Manhole 97 just out of Lift Station •A• Depth (8' to 10') 1. Bad dip in line £rom Station 0+94 to Station 1.68. Recommend replacement o£ 100' o£ 12• from Station 0+80 to Station 1+80. This line rune under Creek. (G) Manhole •E• to Manhole •D• Nanhole at City Nall goes rest under parking area into Russell Park. 1. Recommend invert rork, seal rith non-shrink concrete Grout where pipe enters b leaves Manhole •E•. (N) Manhole D to Manhole C. Manhole in Russell Park going rest. 1. Recommend invert rork, seal rith non-shrink concrete. Grout where pipe enters Manhole •D• and leaves Nanhole •D •. REPORT ON CONDITION OF EXISTING SANITARY SEVER LINES FROM EAST COAST DRIVE ALONG 6TH STREET, TO LIFT STATION •A• PEST OF SHERRY STREET, THEN TO RUSSELL PARK AND SEMINOLE ROAD Submitted by: Ernie Reedle/Assistant Public Norks Director Date: March 17, 1992 (A) ttenhole 53 to Manhole 52 on 6th street going vest to Sherry street. Average depth of line (4.5 to 5. 0) 1. Recommend Point Repair from Station 1+26 to 1.39 to atop 1,090 GPD leek coming through service line into main line- Also at Station 1+36 there Se a cracked and leaking joint, which is leaking 410 GPD. 2. Recommend Point Repair at Station 1+83 to take out protruding hammer tap. Ground 1s eettling in this area. 3. Reverse set-up Manhole 52 to Manhole 53. Recommend Point Repair at Station 1.01 to 1.19 <1-83• Hemmer Tep) cracked joint end structural cracks. (Not leaking yet). 4. Recommend Point Repair at Stetimn 1.73 cracked joint (Not leaking yet). (B) Manhole 52 to Manhole 51 an 6th Street going rest to Sherry Street. Average deptl, of line (4.5 to 5. 0) 1. Recommend Point Repair at Station 0+96 Leaking 410 GPD. 2. Recommend Point Repair at Station 1.67 Not Leaking. 3. Recommend Point Repair at Station 1.92 Leaking 410 GPD. 4. Recommend Point Repair at Station 2.09 Service Connection 1,040 GPD. 5. Recommend Point Repair at Station 2+32 Not Leaking. 6. Recommend Paint Repair at Station 2.72 Not Leaking. 7. Recommend Point Repair at Station 2.77 Not Leaking. (C) Manhole 51 to Manhole 50 on 6th. Street going Mest to Sherry Street. Average depth <9. 5' to 5. 5'). i. Recommend Point Repair at Station 0+29 Leaking 50 GPD. i 2. Recommend Foint Repair at Station 0.76 Not Leaking. ~(i: r F' c~E _ _ o _ _ iE uE¢. _ _ _ E _ _ __ Ei - _~ _ y c _ - ~ ~~_~- ~_ u ~ O 3 _ _ ~Ei'H _ E vgo T= _-QEe ~ tm in ___ -aE~~_ v~ E_ - Ee cn_ ~) _ _ _ Ec~ms L ~ Eo - :€~ __ a _°e _ ~~ _-_ i~E~ iii eB~ _ sE _V E~m$ Ei'__~~' ~°o0 nwi~ nee Ei °OT - ES ~_o - °m~~__ _ ___~.4_ °g~ ¢n __ etr _°TO _ iET ~ecc Ee~_~E~~~EeNT °u~9r°o a e OEn :E<~0 ~2 ~`t SILL .,. ~e em~z : i ewe u ._._ .°44 a` Ei - ~- T ~_-cam E e° ~ c _ Ea se E° ~E~ - S - E~'_ _ _ _ _e S_cEC __ St°eEq - ~ E° ~ E ~ SE Ee c __ V _~ E _ ~i'npii^-_ - - _ _ - r i E _ _ _ n E i~e° ': o eO -^ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ==e ~ TEEie ~ ~ 4 a . S Ta Ec - E -uc' nE_F OZ_u __~~~ ~F _ u E o8 E $~ ~rEE0 _ _ LOYC YEe OEe __ ~ - '-E __ci -~~ a S~ga ~E= E°.~ w ~i eec - __ - - ETO -_ :E.. .. - ~SwE oEn '- __ _ ~ ) + _ mac- •ic°- _ o~E~ e, _~ .,moo ~E~• =_ _ o, Eo-'E T ^$~ _uE ~< E zf N E $R E 5 E a os~ as ~_ ., u eEo ~)u a E4Eu E - ~F ¢E~'. _~E~ Ee .. 3u of of of E~ ~~ E~ E° _ ~Oe 3.e,_ ~E~_ eE~ __cE o~eE~ - io 2SS cE0 - $T' c __ ___- __- aF _ E_ e~> ~ESeOOrE - °'° ~ _ _~~° e~~eE _~e_eje __a E° ~~ ~Eo -~Ei eEo ~i~ ~~e __ - -~i MOUE io Sv°== ieE°e~c ea~o o_eee _ ^~S vE e° `c) __ i c~a ~~Q 2a~$c~u E > cE ~ ~EeEa_ $$°_ :tee - ?E~ Ec'9 oae ES.i ~~ie- ~_ -_ _ _ •O_ e ~E ~ - _ _ ee _ Ea_~ ~ ~ -iE~ _ _ao@ evEE - -__ _~ _ ~ of = j0 .'B eE__ ^Ee~_ -_ ss 'i: ~$$ :EY e° _ Eve:cE eEV c8 _ _ ______~.G :god sue - _ °'b ^' ~i c=~e~c _ _ uri weep-'c ~" ~- aE~ $ecF_ _V;u _ ~EoE T__E~ _ _ oFr $cOEEncn_~Eo~i_ _-_ LLEnE3 Ef. c~~-v. - __ __ ~ ___ __o~» .nEn°_.i o°ev _c u..°~e ~. v~.o ue_n ~z E __ °SOUE o~t _- -- ^~ E.-m S- e •1• ~ - - ~ _ 3v -- oEU - rE o) _ ~ ~aBw _-eau- E-°~~ g °S aEu -- - :s5` Eo:- =c 'OEo - _- - F~- ~- cE- _ ~EEeog ~ _ EOM- - - i$-=a -- -_ ~°°_° ~:~E~ '_ _ _~ o$ 0"°080 Bc~+S _~ '_E'-°o° =x'83 ~ C.°cE oE --eE~uSc ~n ~e ur.. ,Se~~ -- e- v:E ,c eon " c@ae i $~sE"5 - ~E~• - E° E> - eo ~E r °p> Edo - °~~ -~E E°ug~Eo OEo --°EC4 e~°Ea ~' oY _''°xiE -:~~8 E~~u• re c°. 2 o~~ - -°~''°O -_ - v'c_i~~n~ B _- a~ ° Vie ' -_. - _ _ F °__ -~~F' -Ev i E° _- _- --c ~OE_ - _ - :- - of g °e- V S - _ _ '- '_ „Fe`o~gg =_-°s: _ ~s=°~`:_ 074 ; ~>3~`E - - _~ os :° ::~~_ ~: -.ie _- -o g~ -~Icni.. e. of Deco eae~°s~ rin g i=^~ eT°_ ~$~__' ~'_ c3 - Ee __ o- -••xf'cEE~c t ~SE~°-°e)~~°e -_- o°se .s~o ~ Se EPo ~. g E oEo B r 8 S T Eo°=~_ -- E~ E~ _ _ ~_ a~~3c oED __~je_= - _~ ~°sc Ec - eT oEa ~ E `c_'__ _ cTiEs _ aE~ _ - E E c°- _ e;^' °cE '--~E z~' ° . rg- __ ' E ojo °Ei of cE s.- ego __ cEC-_ "°' ~ u vi_- :soi5 - si- - -- _ _~_ _G~ _ G~-o_ _~ °~~ :, E e _ _eEE= - °Eo u u - ° E~ ~ ; o _ - _ of i. -a ~ - ° '--'~° _ _ ° _ _ cE~ _ -eE:°-c~E = i°~° E __c __ - -_ ° e ~~ ° __ c°c _ -_ N -_ _ _ _ _-- c~ _ _ -e^ - _ '~i _ § o-i ~ = ° - _ -= nE_ _ __ _ _ __ v _' _- is Rio -__ _ - ' 5-'' _ '-- __ _ •`~~ u --°5 := ° _ ~ m Eg - __~E ~ Ee uE -° y ~~ - - o ~° of ~ _ __ - i - _ _ -= I vEc - uE~ E° c ~ _ _ _ _-sE`iuc_ __ u8? ___ _ CE°_ ES:ce _ c __ o .. ..MOC~° E.°. o.. °c nE ~.~ _ i u ~o °e_°oc°ie°» - >_°u a X ~= - - - ° E -- ° -°~o- - _ ' ~ oic a- _ ~~__° _ _ E e _ - cE ofi~ c e e __ s g ic ow- _- C ._ .. ~ ~~ - o. ¢ ~ ~ ° _ co _ ° u 'E __ - ET __ .~~e s _ a`ad ~ ° P oV : ~ ~g€c ew-~ ~= O$ eE uE o _ - .E i~ oa eE= - ~ o _ -~E. 3 ~, ' ~A c T~$' o Ea ' - E 8 eO c~ 5-E °E`•~~ °t a e o e LL ___ rL .. ° E .s ~ B.. o _ _ _ E ~ e~coe ooe 6c`i e wog L~G)° i ~e X c ty ) _ _ !s~_ _~ egr n a t ..- ~ sE2 E r u06C~• c -~~0~ _ _ a 6 ei~c~ ~Et-~YS S O '° _ E~c'~ _,E• so ~ ocE'etaL. o'E_c ' 'E ~a'e~ ° ~i .° a ~O~ ' cECCed ° , __ _ iEe°c E^ ~ -__•- y N _°°E ~~ ac - i:.~ E~ ELY `c~ _ _ _ E ~ CU~.S EN~Z Sw~ O~ ° oa t: ei. i'i u.~ ~- ' _: =g _~ _ _ ~iiE of - _ ~Eu E °Ff; ~E °+ c cTe° ~- - -9ECg5 - w~ 5~~+ Sc.~~_ e~~ZeEesL° c .. y-off °n~ e ~o~yoL _~ _ £cm.e~9 E eFCF c96ei •~C.I~E 2v E~ e s $rf`_e8~~'i~ °_~ - yttc U.~c~• __ YL _ e = ~EO__~ES _ °eui ~: ~ = ti -sw Dui E~.o c os c o- u.. eb -b :na ~..:_. _. n _ zEC -cEa _ _ _ _ _ - u oEc _ ~_ F>'e _ ~ aw _ < _~ _ - _ E' _ - _ -- _~ ~ e ° ~~ ° ° 'S^I o ~ i o~j o n =a= uaEU . ec o_ ea. 'i - we 1 _ _ o 3` c °y'~~ °EO uE LTA ~i o 'iSE q3~ -_ n _C' __ - -Ei -~ i~~ .n u °e °•~ n uEi _ i vE enL e eF u - -• _ __c __c~ ggoE ~ 3 °E' ° v~ :° ~ c'TC c 5'c a-_ °Eai, • i.`E o Eoc _ E _ tEs ~ _- E° __~_ ~ Eul=r ~I cE c oE •~ °E aEO Ec - ° EE ~EiE S ESE 0 0 °°- ~ ~=` ~ U roiE° os e _ -`'E E E ~ ~ ==;o< c~i _ ~_=0 -ui4Y - _ _~Eu _ _3 ~ ~ - o. °°oE - v. ~o ~e.z_ ... sue. - c T£._ v_ °i _ c a_ u °c- _ --- _ Eue~~- e c ode ~__ ~~ -~ ~__ o=close °~Sl.E eo ~° oE° _ TeE - - _~ c_-~_ _ ~_os°c_°)~~-"~ "i Eic ~cEEe- o?E ~ - ~)o iEw __ E ' EEO - °o~ • E E^ o °i _ °E° o °EjY _~ __ caw OcEce-__- " ~°cE° °E°~-eo ~E=s - _°i°~- EE`°la T°uSEo°-_ ~~'EE c_ eEO_ O~ ~ _ _u 9E: ~c'i3-c~c _ __ HiEc _ ~j~. ~e°_En;.°r_ _ _ oECic _° E~ M19~E^ iij - eo_ o= .~c oe v-~.-e.--°l~eoP _'eE iT .o ~. oa uE - '_'° i _io i ~ _A Yr e°i _ _ E~ r ~SU i ~ i o ~_ ~ -cis -_~ al~ .~ 4i eB~ O a _ _ ~E_~`o •-- _ - a _ _ __ u art oa~C i E _ c E~ ~ ft E °~ ° a • _ o ~E ._ .- <3a c e •i r-p g n _ __ ~ __ _ a ~° - _ oa _• _ e5 0 a8 ~ _ _ Bi° e'~ ':° _ ~~e~ '°~ -ems ~x _ E~ g _ _ -=~Eu°e~° _ a eEc ce~~ ~~~ g n=E g _ wo u o~ i E3 ° ~ ~~ ___ s g e~_ ~ =° g ~ ¢ rf _ _ _ ° e a ° 3° s ?s r °_ ~E` c°ic _ _ i c _ _ = Ew_ - ~ LDF3 c _~__„eS= Yii cEa _- - __ ~y C°°E8T °eecoie c _i~ 3 zz_ -~ _ 3~ '- ~uE _ - _~_~ _ s+y_ ~ _ c ...n ~~z sL i E~_ r ca ° cEi a E E~~_ ~_ E~ .E °a g~ ion s ~__ ~E8 SoV E _ - ~ E _~ GEie E~~ u __ F vE_ _ us -rq cE~ ~ELGe.-.: ~ . - - _' E ~i~O~°- E' _ce~E O_ ui~ So <iu;3o _ S _ - - Es _~ ~l~ ~-"$ ~$~ >ae°w~5 cEc~2g2 ~_ ~ ~E~_iE ~a==Eo.Ee _i EE eiE t __°i.._-__ _s°__ _ - _- __ ~. -__-~ _ --- - _ _ _ _ ~sEe~ui~ .°vs os ou.. u. °aum ~rz a ~._°.e. ouevl~ri S ZxS XT C T ~) go ~j~ a.NC)=O~=g 60-e ~O°~ E~ Ts E°• s~ - ~_ _~ eEO~E - - .i ~ - Es.. .c Eo _ -Em ~ _ -iu uE E =i; i..° . cc - 2i3 -g - E=_ E~c _ E~c • _ __ _ _ c__ Ecg •- r~ O 6 V ~ O V V 8°R°888°R89§8~ eSSe°e°m°an~nS d m m e m 1 ~ i~x O 4 n i c s ~~~ ~, £ ay i0 J h M Q 2 ~ { J Y L a V ° a ~Y D ~ a `w ., d ,y - P < ~ f 2 o (p ~ . N ° y o ' a S i \\ i ` ~ ,Y S V = (\ J •~ ~ Y ,V _0 .° ~ F a \ a i Q / 6, \ .J ~L ~ r ~ 6 £ d' a a ~ Jr d 6 N ? ~ N J ~ 7 4- ° 7 Y f V 3 ~ ~ //~~ qs y g ~ ~ J i ~c ~ ~ ~a ~ o i £ p ~- m T REPORT ON CONDITIONS OF EXISTING SANITARY SEVER LINES FROM EAST COAST DRIVE ALONG SIXTN STREET, TO LIFT STATION •A• PEST OF SHERRY DRIVE, THEN TO RUSSELL PARK AND SEMINOLE ROAD ~~ a~~. _ _. _. t. _,.- CITY OP ATLANTIC BPACH CITY W!Q(ISSION MEETING STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM: POINT REPAIRS AND NA:7HOLE REHABILITATION OF SEVER LINES ' , AND MANHOLES IN RUSSELL AND HOWELL PARKS i SUHMTI'ED BY: i Robert S. Kosay/Director of Public Works~5~ i i DATE: ifarch 25, 1992 BACKGBODIID: Due co heavy rain in the late Summer and Fall of 1991, ~' Lift Station "A" (located in Novell Park off of 6th S[.) flooded out causing several manholes [o overflow sewage. , Staff suspected certain locations of being the cause of ~ i this inflow problem. I t i .Recent cleaning, televising and inspection of these areas shoe the following discrepancies: Four manholes in P.ussell Park have no inverts and are not sealed ac [he point where sever pipes enter and leave the manholes. The one conf lift manhole in Russell Park has PVC pipe instead of ductile iron and is not sealed " where [he pipe enters and leaves the manhole. *The 12 I main line through Nowell Park has an extremely bad dip under She-man Creek. There are hammer taps, longitudinal and radical cracks, and leaking services. I While all listed point repairs are needed and should be done for economy of scale, the repairs needed co [he manholes in ~ Russell Park, particularly the conflict manhole, are of an ~ emergency nature. *TV tapes 6 years ago showed only % of pipe no[ submerged. TV work done on Harch 2, 1992 shoved completely submerged pipe. RECONNENDATION: Do Point Repairs as described in attached map and list. Bfd as soon as possible. ATiACH1gN'I'S: Area map of potential probl po [. Breakdown of priority listing l~~-~^ ~~ REVIEWED BY CITY lIANAGER: / l AGENDA ITET1 NO. `r CITY OF r4~la«tic S"cacls - ~lo7isla April 1, 1992 M E M O R A N D U M uoo sAAVnFFa swn~ ATLAM1'nC BFACi1, Figanq 132LYltw TFIFPHONE 111M1 ZRSiN FAX flNl 2at5lll TO: Ki^ D. Leinbach/City Manager Darlene Matthere/Fiscal Assistant FROMS Robert S. Kosoy/Director of Public Yorke ~~7~• RE: BUDGET TRANSFER FOR POINT REPAIR AND MANHOLE REHAB (STAFF REPORT 3/25/92) The subject cork would require a budget transfer frow the Serer Construction Plant Fund, Fund 41, Aceount 596. Equal awounte could De transferred frow each of the six itews. RSK/tb cc: File - AB SEVER DIST ORGAN22ATION: CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH PROJECT NAMB: ,pQyNgg SDHDIVISION REHABILITATION III. S ~P •m~NTARY rmpOap • I. Project generated Sncome (Please show source, amount, and baele of eatisate. 2: Matching Funds (Please show source, amount, and bnsis of estimate.) 3. In Rind Contributions. Nuisance mi[Sga[fon. ditch cleaning and atormra[er improvements using City Personnel estimated at 640 man hours at SB.7$ ~ 55,600 in klud contribution by the City of Atlanbic Beach. Page 5. of ¢. 4. r. &` ~:. CORRECTION THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REMICROFILMED TO ASSURE LEGIBILITY .... it--~i ii ii \L__JI ~~~~° '^~~Y W^Nw~ a ~.> '~ ORGANIZATION: f.ITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH PROJECT NAME: DONNER SItgDIVISION REHABILITATION III. S mP c'~"'TARY cttmnriort - l. PrO~ect generated income (please show source, amount, and belie of eatisete. 2: Matching Fllnda (Please show source, amount, end basis of estimate.) 3. In Kfnd Contributions. Nuisance mitigation, dicch cleaning and sformvater improvements using City Personnel estimated at 640 nan hours at SH.75 - 55,600 in kind contribution by the City of Atlanelc Heach. Page ¢ of ¢. ORGANIZATION: PROJECT NA!ffi: Line Item ~ rnm r nA w h~ n A In Find Description ~~, Line Item HUD Funds Met hinq Funds Zn Kind Description , LSne Ite6 HUD Funds Matching Funds In-KSnd Description ' Page ¢ Of ¢ FawFx~r FU1Fffi: Lira Ites RUD Funds Metchira FVnda In-Rind Description Lira Ita~ fiUD Flinch Matchira Funds In-KSnd_ Description r , Lira items HUD Funds Netchira Funds In-Kind Description . Page ~ Of ¢ 0RGANIZ7ITION: CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACN pROJgCT pig; DONNER SUBDIVISION REHABILITATION Line Itd III 3 In Rind Services - HIID Fatale Metchira Funda In-Kind Deacription~ ' Nuisance Abatement (Weed d Debris removal) 3 men at 18.75 x 4 hours x 20 days S 2,100.00 Dicth cleaning/atormwater Smprove- ments S 3,500.00 4 men at ;8.75 x 4 hours x 25 days Page 4 of ¢ r. Y [. E .. ._- __ ORGANIZATION: City of Atlantic Beach PROTaCT NAME: Donner Subdivision Revitalization Lino Item II s x i R h bili i to s tii g Fonda In-Kind Description , Rehabilitate 4~hames of elderly/handi- capped, providing minimw weatherproof- ing, safe electrical wiring and ade- quate plumbing. 4 houses at estimated 515.000 per home ~ 360,000.00 TOTALS ;60,000.00 Line Item II.56 Additional RehabilitatfoYfJD Funds Matching Funds In-Kind Description Rehab 2 to 3 homes of low income non- elderly/handicapped, providing minimum weatherproofing, electrical and plwb- ing standards. Non Profit Donner Sub- division Community Development Corpora- tion - 3 homes at approximately ;9,300 ;28,000.00 r ins Item II 5 P k I' verve t HUD FLLnAe Matchino Fonda In Kind Description Conatruc[ ree[room facilities, Snetall playground equipment, basketball tour[ and parking facil idea in Jordan Park (only part 'in neighborhood) - Restroom facilities at approximately 310,000.00 Basketball court and ; 3,000.00 Playg[ound equipment .. ~ S 2,000.00 ~. ~ TOTAL ;IS 000.00 Page ~ of ¢ ORGANZZJITION: City of AMan[ic Beach PROJECT N11M8: Donner Rehabilitation Line Item I.1. iiaeea a ..,t Description . i es+ fl~~-- n n Co®unlty Development Direc[or 24 hours/month at~;15.14/hour ;6,360.00 Ieine Item L2. Frinxe Benefits m we .. 6i ~- In Kind Description -.. Fringe Benefits ;4,360 x .40 ;1,744.00 T92ALS SL 744.00 Line Item 7. a_ rnn...l . F ~+~a Mat ling F~ ae In-Kind Descriptitm Consultant for eon[ract preparations reports. ;IS/hour e[ approx. 81 hours ;6,075.00 ' TOT11I8 Page ~ of Sl ~ yM.tr. - _ PROGRAM PROPOSAL BUDGET SUMM ARY SNEET ORGANIZATION: CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH PROJECT NAME: DONNER SUBDIVISION REHAB ILITATION I. Adm inistrative Coate -. 1. Nagea 6 Salaries $ 4.360 .oo . 2. Fringe Bene£Ste 1.744 .00 Total Personnel $ 6.104 DO Cost 3. Consultant/Contract S A.o75 .00 Services • d. Travel S 5. insurance 8 6. Space Coate fi Rental 6 7. Utilltlee fi Telephone 8 8. Transportation S 9. Other Coate (attach ezplanation) S Total Non-personnel Coat S 6,096 00 SUB-TOTAL $ 12.200 00 II. Activity Coate ^ 1. Materials S 2. Supplies 3. Equipment Purchase8 d. Equipmani Rental 5. Other sa + 56 + Sc - 103,000,00 Description " gUg_~pAI, S 103,000 00 Program Panda ~pli~ gpr g 115,200 00 III. Stu }y lesantarv c.:~rt 1. Program Generated income S 2. Metchl7R~ Funds 3. In-kind Contributions 5.600 .00 4. Audit SVB-TOTAL $ " V ~ TOTAL PROGRAM 5120,800 QO . - COST Page 1 0£ ¢ i CITY OF JACKSONVILLE Depas'tfent O! Noosing end Vrban Developeant COl4WNITY DSVBLOPlR~NT BLOCK GR/WT 1 ;_ ,- _ CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH CITY COMMISSION MEETING STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM: 17th Year COBG Contract with Jacksonville SUBMITTED BY: George Worley, City Planner ~'(a~ DATE: April 73, 1992 BACKGROUND: The City of Jacksonville, Mayors Budget Review Committee is scheduled April 13th, to review and approve the amount of :115,200 for the Community Development Block Grant, 17th year contract for Lhe City of Atlantic Beach. This amount represents an increase over last years 5100,800. This money must be spent in the much the same manner as in past years - in Donner Subdivision and primarily for home rehabilitations but this year a portion has been set asitle to be spent on younger home owners who fit the income category. The Donner Subdivision Community Development Corporation will assits us in determining eligible home owners. The Contract for this year is somewhat late because of auditing antl budget work at Lhe HUD offices. The neXt step in the process is for Lhe City of Atlantic Beach Commission to authorize Lhe Mayor to sign the contract. Once that is done we will immediately begin the bid process for the next group of houses identified for rehabilitation work. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Commission authorize the Mayor to sign Lhe contract with the City of Jacksonville for the Community Development Block Grant program in Donner Subdivision. ATTACHMENTS: Proposed Contract REVIEWED BY CITY MANAGER AGENDA ITEM NO. 1 h if ~? 1 6 ~, ~~' ~ n, ~ C < w ~ ~ in r, atg` ^ aQ o ~ ~ ~~` c 2 < i o ~ ~ k• 1 , 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ <<y ~ 1 7+ • ~~ O ~ >': N. tii g v g ~ o i ~ N ~~ ~ a C d . (~ ~~ N ~ ~ r y i Y ` -~ T ~ ~ _ - i^i - I~ r~ ^ O P ~ N O N > O = O ~:.,... ~,-- ~~ e ~ W ti z v `~ 1 i i~ ~I f c I O 0 r F W O mQs ~J O U~O ~ • ~' 1 I 25~ ~ 1 ~°2~ - v j CSY ~. - LL 1 Oe~ I _. I >'i ~ 1 V p C ~u N C N 2 ~ 6 + C ~ G ~, r c r P ur ~ 1 n r. ' i E: ~ G 1,1 ~~ M1 1 ~' N 1 _ w ~+ O O N N ` N - O O ~ ~ CITY MANAGER CITY OF ATLANTIC @EACH WARRANTY FROM: DAWSON LAND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY p,0, BOX 707 ATLANTIC BEACHr FL 32233 JOB: OCEAN GROVE SEWER INSTALLATION COMPLETED: 10/09/@6 LENGTH OF WARRANTYt (I) YEAR (10/09/87) /A.. , . _~~~~1~ (William B. Dawson, IV. Pras.) CITY OF Salle $uuk - ~(aalda t~eocenseouLevAAn P.O.80X Yb ATLANIiC BEACH. FIAR9A J4Y9Y TELEPHONE IaM1 T4FT9D5 April 30, 1987 Mr. S Mrs. Harry C. Aarnoe's 1752 Otean Grove Drive Atlantic Heath, Plorida 32233 Re: UTILITY EXTENSIONS NORTH OCEAN CROV6 DRIVE AND S¢VENTEENTH STREET Dear Nr. S Mrs, Narnock: This will acknowledge our meeting in the City offices on Thursday, April 30, 1987, when we discussed is detail the above subject. During the discuaeions, I outliaad for you the maMer in which hydraulic share vas developed for this pro3 act along with an ad3 scent one devel- oped by Pete Mabiy. Ne discussed the method utilized to select the number of units thei ve:e to participate in the hydraulfc share, which nuabere iventy-four possible conneetfona from all o£ she properties on both sidae of the street from Seminole Road east on Seventeenth Street to Ocean Crowe Drive, and north on Ocean Crowe Drive to [he north line cf lot 22 and 13. The coat Se 51,706.45 per unit, of which $262.95 Le to be rebated to devalopez Mabrq as his ehere of the coat of lnstall£cg and that balance eof rSl 443.00 to obe rrmittedt to tyou ttoo reimburse Ryouz hydraulic share Forrom Seminole Road ease to Ocean Grove and from Ocean Grove north to the north line of lots 13 and 22. Normally, in order for the Citq _to accepe eheae linos for ownership and 1~1 ~Ceording vcor plans and lepecifita[Sonse eertiflceelon Sbys [he aCi[y Director of Public bervieea chat the linen were iaepeet ed in accordance with Citq requiramenrs; receipt of as-built pleas for the line from the eaginaer, a one-year warranty from the utility contractor agreeing to mafntnln the lines for one year from Che dace of acceptance, end a bill of sale from the owner for the linen themselves. IC is my understanding we have received all of these except the one-year warranty which I underataod you have not been able to obtain from Dawsun Land Development because of a dleagreement between him and your contractor, Pelke, telatlve to certain charges for the repaving Of Seventeenth Street zaqufred by the CSCy of .Iecksonv111e. - continued - Wa will aCtsmpt to work out [he warraney problem with Dawsvn and Pelke, and in Cha neantima if yov v111 furnish me with a bill of eele, we will praamt the document wa Mve [o the City Commiseivn aC their meeting on Hey 11, 1957, and aek that the lines be nccepted. S rely, Richard C. Fallowe City Henager ACP22 ees Direeeoz of Publie Senleea Cmatm+alty Developmtnt DSrettor S ~.. s.. G;.:: ~, CITY OF 1~llawtie $taek - ~losidu ]160CEAN EOlI1.EVAM P. O. BOx 96 ATLANTIC BEACA. PIAan1A JfR79 TELEPHONE 19MI 2~Pi9e6 Mr. 6 Mrs. Hazry C. Warnock June 8, 1987 161 Sixteenth Street Atlantic Seach, Plozide 32233 Ae: Refundable Hydraulic Shares Deer Mr. 6 Mrs. Nemock: At your request you will find attached hereto a map outlining the areas covered under the existing Utility Service Agreement and vhich, in turn, pswidee for the payment of hydraulic shnree to you sad the Mabry Conetruetion Company eo easiae you Sa defraying she costs of the voter and never improvements installed by you. We have estimated there aze twenty-four unite, including your own, which could hook into and utilize the benef its of Che nyatem vhich qou in- acalled. The hydraulic share per unit has been calculated to be 51,706.45, of vhich $1,663.53 i• to be remitted to you, and $262,93 eo the Mabry Co¢stxuctfon Company for his share of the Smprovemene• in- atelled betvean Sea Oate Drive and Seminole Aond. In addiLlon to the twenty-four unica indicated oa the map, the City will make eVei}' effort to collect a hydraulic share from the developers of Lot 12 and Lot 23 lying north of your development, and the east half and west half of Lot 8 end the east half and vest half of Lac 9 lying to the east of your development, the tollactioa of vhich would result in the •liminacion of a hydraulic share from one of tY,e unite whin the colored-ia map presentation. You are also advised [he City Commienion in regular session eaeembled Nay 11, 1957, accepted your water and never improvements coat Sngent upon receiving the necessary warranty from Dawson Land Company, which ve are preaantly attempting to acquire. Please lac me know if you require soy additional information. n rely, /'1 Richard C. Yellows C i[y Manager ce: Co®unity Development Director Public Services Director 1L~9 FLORIDA COtiSTRECIIOV L{W ACU PA{m1CE to award the contract, the bidder should immediately request a written notice of award. 'A public entity may not, however, attempt to retreat once a contract is awarded. In Duboise Const. Co. v. City a(Soutk Miami, 108 Fla. 362, 146 So. 833 (1933), it was too late for the town to declare a Coul in bidding aRer it awarded the contract. The town attempted to defend a breach of contract action by the successful bidder who sued the fawn for abandoning the projeM after awarding the contract. The cit,~s defense was to point out that the bidder had not submitted the lowest bid. The court did not accept the defense after finding that there had been substantial compliance with the law and the public suRered no actual unfairness. B. (§7.50] Time OC Contract Formation ~•A contract between the public entity and the successful bidder is considered to exist at the time of a public entity's notice to the successful contractor even if the public entity later fails to execute a written contract. Schloesser u. Dill, 3B3 5o.2d 1129 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). This rule prevents a public entity from merely changing its mind and attempting to rescind its approval because of concerns over whether the bidder is the lowest responsible bidder or whether the invitation to bid contained~sutlicient specifications to allow a fair comparison. Dedmond u. Escambia County, 244 So.2d 758 (Fla. 1st DCA 1971). The potentially harsh result of Sch(cesser u. Dill, supra, would not apply when the public entity clearly evidences an intent in the request for proposal not to be bound to a contract until after negotiations. Unless the clear intent is for the parties not to be bound until after successful completion of a negotiated contract, however, the formation of the contract will be simultaneous with an effective notice of award. Housing Authority o(City ojFort Pierce v. Foster, 237 So.2d 569 (Fla. 4th DCA 1970). The same rule applies in private sector bidding. Citizens Bank of Perry u. Harlie Lynch Construction Ca., 426 So.2d 52 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). Public entities should consider, therefore, whether any condition may need to be fulfdled before the contraM is executed. Those conditions and any negotiation an 5na1 terms and conditions must be clearly enunciated in the bid documents. Equivocation by the public entity over whether negotiation is contemplated will not prevent contract formation at the time of notice of award. Housing Authority of City o/'FoK Pierce v. Foster, supra. 7-32 E Bas,Bm DISPUrr_4, Ada CONPEIirfYE NECOrtUl0\i t].~9 supra, the error was not made by an employee. The bidders own miscalculation resulted in a 55,000 mistake. Allowing unilateral errors to justify withdrawal of a bid in those circumstances would be an incentive for inattention, and in the hands of a dishonest bidder could be used to avoid competition. In a casejustifying rescission of the bid, damages against the bidder will not be assessed unless clearly established. State Board o/'Control u. Clntter, saps. C. [37.48] No Equitable Relief To Reform Bid Although a bid error may justify rescission or withdrawal of the bid in certain circumstances, reformation of the bid is never appropriate. Department ojTransportalion u. Ronlee, Inc., 518 So.2d 1326 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988), reu. den. 528 So.2d 1183. In Ronlee, the court refused to allow the bidder to modify the bid due to a $317,463 error in the computation of unit prices for concrete culverts. Moreover, although the governmental agency was aware of the error at the time it awarded the bid, the court held that the department's failure to call the mistake to the bidders attention did not constitute fraud or inequitable conduct since the bidder noticed the error a short time afterwards. XI. NOTICE OF AWARD AND RESCA'DING AWARD A. (37.491 In General Omasionally, after the public entity selects a successful bidder or proposer, some change of mind will occur or the public body will receive additional evidence that will rouse it to want to reverse its decision. A public body strengthens its ability to rescind the approval of an award Lry spe~cally stating in the purchasing rule, ordinance, and bid donements a statement that the award is not final until a notice of award is mailed to the suaessful bidder or proposer. Sekloesser u. Dill, 383 So.2d 1129 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). Correspondingly, bidders should be cautious in relying on ot5cial action by a public entity. A public entity's vote to rescind an award is generally proper. Provided the bidder does not receive formal notice theC the bid has been accepted, a change of mind by the public entity in the same session is proper. Berry u. Okafoosa County, 334 So.2d 349 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976). if the bidder is in the audience at a public meeting end hears the governing body vote 7-31 ~,-. BmS. Bal aiSFLTES,A\a C0>1PEFRNE \i.GOTLV105S fT]l 2. Financial ability 3. Honesty 4. Skill 5. Business judgment 6. Capability 7. Previous conduct 8. Quality of previous work 9. Current work load 10. hfaintenance costs. Eggart u. Westmark, 45 So.2d 505 (Fla. 1950); Cnlpepper v. Madre, 40 So.2d 366 (Fla. 1949); IVillis u. Kathau;ay, 95 Fla. 608, 117 So. 89 (1928); Coach Construction Co. u. Department o(Trartsportation, 361 So.2d 184 (Fla. Ist DCA 1978). Bidders anticipating an arbitrary decision by a local public board may benefit from having a wort reporter at the meeting to rewrd the diswssion. I(the board's discussion and the reasons for selecting a particular bidder range far afield from those related to responsiveness, areviewing wort may discredit a wnclusion not based on "material Cads reasonably tending to support" the award. City o(Pensacola u. Kirby, 47 So.2d 533 (Fla. 1950). An agency's failure [o institute disqualification proceedings against a bidder does not proteR the bidder or relieve the agency from determining responsiveness. Facts that might lead to disqualification but that have not yet been acted upon by the agency still remain viable issues under the responsiveness criteria. Couch Construction Co. v. Department o(Transportation, supra. C. [47.37] Time Of Determining Responsiveness Nonresponsiveness at either the time of the intended derision or the protest hearing is sufficient for rejection. Baxter's Asphalt & Concrete, Inc. u. Department of Transportation, 475 So.2d 1284 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985). Time only erodes the position of a rejected bidder. Apparently, if the bidder is, in fact, responsive a[ the time of the intended decision but bewmes nonresponsive by the time of hearing, the agency is still permitted to reject the bidder. On the chance that an agency has erroneously rejected a bidder, that bidder should take steps to maintain qualifications and 7-23 f>..u rtoamw co.sracrnou uw.t~o ranrnce a bidder. When a bureau chief, for example, told a prospective bidder to submit a bid despite the bidders lack of a necessary license from the Florida Construction Industry Licensing Board, the public entity was still permitted to reject the bid for noncompliance with the licensing statute. Creenhut Construction Co. u. Henry A. Knott, Inc, 247 So.2d 517 (Fla. 1st DCA 1971). G. (§7.34J Contlid Of Interest And Public Entity Crimes Bidders must be sensitive to possible conflicts of interest not only within their own firm but also with subcontractors. Bidders should be familiar with F.S. Chapter 112 and its restrictions on the business activities of public oRcials and employees. [n addition, in 1989 the legislature enacted F.S. 287.132 and 287.133, relating to public entity crimes, with which bidders must comply. This law prohibits those convicted of certain crimes (set out specifically in F.S. 287.133) Crom bidding and requires affidavits az a prerequisite to entering into the public contract. Under Chapter 90-33, Laws of Florida, atLdavits must be filed on an annual basis. VIII. RECEIPT; EVALLTATION, AND AWARD OF BIDS A [§7.351 Discretion In Awarding Contracts ~~AA three-part formulation of the discretion vested in governmental bodies can be developed from Culpepper o. Afoore, 40 So.2d 366 (Fla. 1949), and Liberty County u. Bazter's Asphalt & Concrete, Inc., 421 So.2d 505 (Fla. 1982). - ~~First, actions must be taken in good faith and vrithout fraud. Second, public bodies possess wide discretion in determining the best bid. Third, honest discretion rill not be reversed even if it appears erroneous, and reasonable people disagree. B. [§7.36] Definition Of 3esponsiceness ~'~Any Castor reasonably related to the scope of work and its successful performance is legitimate in determining bid responsiveness. The public entity is allowed considerable discretion in its interpretation of the term "responsive bid." Courts recognize the following az only some of the permissible considerations for responsiveness: 1. Time of performance 7-22 FLORIDA CONSTRUCTION LAW AND PRACTICE SECOND EDITION I j~ .• 1:r~ii•iritiY. OF ~~4si 2 ~; 1991 DUV:1L COUNTY, LAW LIBR4RY 7HE FLORIDA BAR CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION ~: ~:i.;. NOTICE OF ILLEGIBILITY ILLEGIBILITY OF SOME OF THESE DOCUMENTS IS DUE TO THE POOR QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL. THE FAULT DOES NOT LIE WITH THE CAMERA OR ITS OPERATOR. .... it--~- ~i~i~ ~L__J% ~~~~ rr Maawa.~. s •UGVSi "~9Y CORRECTION THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REMICROFILMED TO ASSURE LEGIBILITY .~";. ii ii ~~ii~ ~: w~, bij:. .. .. .. _. .. _. .._.._~ ~<J .a FLORIDA CONSTRUCTION LAW AND PRACTICE SECOND EDITION Y_i.::il titYY. OF ~~~~~ !? ~; 1991 DU~'~- COUNTY, LAW LIBIL4RY THE FLORIDA BAR CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION E. __~_. City of Atlantic Bmeh -Plorida Atlantic Bmeh, Plorida Pege 2 of 2 renponaivenem oC the 6ida received fpeBe 7-22 and ?-231. Them considerations are slenet identiesl to them contained in the Code of Ordinance section 2-355 which was the basis of the roview of the qualificetions oC the bidders by the City staff. It ie Devious free the statement by your Public Servicm director, Bob [osy, that the evaluation of the 6iddaro quelificetionn rm Daeed on objective criteria stated in the City ordnmce cede end incorporated in the bid documents. Raferrin6 again to O1 ^-"" ^^"~`'^^"'" `'r end Practice. Nr. Bakm states that once e public badY votes to sward a oontreet end that a written notice oC award is received Dy the oontrector, than that award may not 6e rescinded (page 7-3'I end 7-321. He further ststas (pegs 7-3'U Chet a contract between the puDlie entity end the sutt`amful bidder is oonaiderod to exist st the time of a puDlie entity's notice to the sutt~emful contractor. Ya consider the action of the City Cpmnimion of the City of Atlantic Bench to award ue the oontroct for the above referenced project to De lawful end proper. Broad on the mitten Notjce of (ward, we have ezecutM the Contract Agraenent and euhmitted the required bonds and cartifimte of insurance. Na request that the City a=acute the Contrset Agreement sad imua a Notice to Proceed in n timely fashion. Ne anclom s copy of the sppliceDle portions of the referenced text end the rnpim of the relevant sppellete court decisions cited in the text. Be believe that we are the beat quslified contractor to do this project and wa know that wa rill do quality work to the mtiafsetion of the City. Sincerely yours, MR-DORS CONSTRUCYION COMPANY, INC. Q a..c.~/ W. ~LrlMp Sly Jedc N. Mendota, III Yice President iNIQII/ jms 6nclosuro x Nr. A1Mrew R. MeY. P.B. Project Manager, Gee 6 Jenson [ngineers ~.: E.. Meadows Construction Co., Inc. ct:newiLCOnrtlAClolls {eS3 LCnOk Av[nU[ P.O. 60k 80039 JACaaOaVILLS, fL0111DA 32205 rnODG 180.) 38]3506 JACIISOnVLLL[. rLOe1DA 32236 rAk I9a13Be~]]08 April 70,'1992 CI1R OP ATLANTIC B¢ACN - FLORIDA Pmt Office Bo: 25 Atlantic Beech, Ploride 32233 R¢P¢R¢NC¢: Notice of Arerd Nater Treatment Plsnt Improvements Gae 6 Janson Project No. 97-323 Atlantic Beech, Ploride Gentlemen: On April 2,'1992, the City Commission of the City oC ltlentic Beech voted to award e oontrect for construction of the subject project to Meedoro Construction Company, Ins in the amount of ='1,22K,950.00. On Apri17. '1992, re received a written Notice of Award dated 1pei1 6,'1992 from Gee end Janson Bnginaera on behalf of the City of Atlantic Beech. Na also received from Ges end Janson that data, five copies of the Contrset Agraasmnt for our ssacution. On Apri18,'1992, re a:ecuted and returned the five copies of the Contract Igraement to Gas a Jenson ISngineere together frith a Per[ornlenm Bond, tabor snd Materiel Payment Bond end Cert3.fimte of Inaursnm es requested in the notim of arard. Ne understand from a telephone conversation with Maureen ¢ing on April 9,'1992 that a somber of the City Comwimion hea requested that this project be plnmd on the agenda for discussion at itb meeting scheduled for April 13.'1992. She Consnission rss advised by itb attorney during itb meeting on April 2, 1992 conmrning the eppliosble Ploride ler. Therefore, we did not consider it neceamry to offer legal an^w+. or opinion. Flovavar, einm another bidder did cite a Florida appellate sees during hie presentation st that smatfng, ve do wish to submit the following information to the city for ith considerstion. She mast complete snd up to dote analysis on the subject of public entity bidding in Florida is Contained in Ploride ~... r ~etion ~r De Drsetica. second edition, published DY the Ploride Bar. In Chapter 7, which deals with bide to public entities, the author (John R. Bekaa, Jr.) states throe principals, DAasd on Ploride Appellate Lew, deaeribing the discretion of a public body (page 7-22k 7. letiona moat De taken in good faith and without fraud. 2. Public bodies pomPSe wide discretion in determining the Deaf Did. 3. Honest discretion sill not De reversed even if it appears erroneous, and reesonebla people disagree. Also, he cites ten conaiderstiona which a public entity may consider in itb review of the -~__ 272 Ca1.Rptr. 458 PAGE 7 (Gila ass 222 Ca1.App.30 1362, •13 t9, 272 Ca1.Rptr. 45s, ••l62) law. [Citations.]" (Taylor Bus Sar+ice, Inc. v. San Diego ed. of Education, supra, 195 Ce1.App.3d at p. 1340, 261 Ca1.Rptr. 379.) Tha record of the prxeedings before appellant was not before thn trial court. However, appellant submitted a declaration to the trial court Eros its engineer/manager, Dennis 5cherzinger, in which ha stated: ^[At the meeting at which respondent presented his reconsideration request, appellant) indicated that this additional information [in the consultant's opinion letter] suggested that [zsepondent] may also be qualified to operate the ... property, but they also indicated that [Huston] seemed more qualified and stated that their counsel informed them that they had to rely only on the initial evaluation of all seven side and Statements, and the initial interviews of all seven bidding parties and their references. They therefore voted to reaffirm the bid award to [Huston].^ At the Rearing before the trial court, appellant refused to stipulate that it had made a specific finding that respondent vas qualified. [6] Relying on City of Inglewood the trial court concluded that the determination of a ^qualified" bidder vas not for the court but for appellant. •1370 Because the record vas not definitive that appellant had made such a determination, it issued the writ commanding it to determine whether respondent was qualified. It also concluded ••463 that in reviewing the award appellant was not limited to the information presented with the original bide but, pursuant to the due process guidelines of City of inglavood, should consider any additional information presented by respondent to rebut appellant's initial award and demonstrate his qualification. (7] Na conclude the trial court rvled correctly. An agency awarding a public contract must determine whether the low (or, in this case, high) bidder is qualified to perform the contract. (City of Inglewood, supra, 7 Ca1.3d at p. 870, 103 Ca1.Rptr. 689, 500 P.2d 601.) The only information before the trial court vac a statement that appellant suggested that respondent may Rave been qualified to operate the property. Such information is not equivalent to a conclusive finding that respondent vas qualified. purthermora, the finding of qualification sROUld be made only after the low (or high) bidder has an opportunity to rebut adverse evidence of qualification and present additional evidence of qualification. Refusing to consider information assembled subsequent to that accompanying the original bid deleata the requisite review process due the bidders. III [FN••] PN•• See footnote *, ante. The judgment is affirmed. DISPOSITION IAN, P.J., and RING, J., concur. END OP DOCDMENT COPR. (C) NEST 1992 NO CLAZN TO ORIG. U.S. GOVT. NORR£ 272 Ca1.Rptr. 458 PAGE 6 '(Cite Laf 222 Ca1.App.3d 1362, •1368, 272 Cal.Rptr. 4Sa, ••461) [2] It is undisputed that appellant is engaging a private party to perform a task that, but for the agreement, it would perform itself. The difference between this agreement and the more customary public work contract is that payment for the work comes not in the form of cash from appellant's treasury, but in the fors of use of appellant's land and reclaimed eater for the private party's own agricultural purposes. The fact that the lessee pays rant does not alter the fact that the agreement requires the leases to perform public work. The reasonable conclusion to be drawn from the agreement is that the rental value of the property and the fertilization/irrigation value of the reclaimed water together exceed the cost of the sewage by-product disposal, and the rent paid by the lessee ••402 represents the net difference. Under such circumstances appellant's duty to the taxpayers, pursuant to the policy of competitive bidding, is to obtain the highest rent, thereby reducing its expenditure for the public work. Appellant argues that section 20784 clarifies the legislative intent to regulate competitive bidding only when it involves actual payment in cash of public funds. Section 20784 (added by Stats.1989, ch. 1163, s 55) merely requires all bids to be presented under seal and accompanied by the bidder's security, and the sanitation district to return the security of unsuccessful bidders in a reasonable period of time after the award "to the lowest bidder." It does not support appellant's contention. II [3][4][5] The diapositive issue is whether appellant correctly Lollowed the "responsible bidder" requirements. In the context of "responsible bidder," •13f9 the term "responsible" refers not only to the attribute of trustworthiness, but also to the quality, fitness and capacity of the bidder to perform the proposed agreement satisfactorily. (City of Inglewood, supra, 7 Ca1.3d at p. 867, 103 Ca1.Rptr. 689, 500 P.2d 601; 10 NcQuillen, Municipal Corporations, s 29.73.05.) When a statute requires that an award be made to the lowest (or highest) responsible bidder, it must be awarded accordingly unless that bidder is found not responsible, i.a., not qualified to perform the particular work under consideration. Although public bodies Nava discretion to etermine vhlch bidders are responsible, they may not, if they determine more than one bidder is responsible, make the award on the basis of relative superiority. (City of Inglewood, supra, 7 Ca1.3d at p. 867, l03 Ca1.Rptr. 689, 500 P.2d 601.) Before a contract may ba awarded to one other than the lowest (or highest) bidder, the public body must (1) notify that bidder of any evidence reflecting upon the bidder's responsibility received from others or adduced as a result of independent investigation, (2) afford the bidder an opportunity to rebut such adverse evidence, and (3) permit the bidder to present evidence of qualification. (Id., at p. 871, 103 Ca1.Rptr. 689, 500 P.2d 601; sea also Taylor Bua Service, Inc. v. San Diego Bd. of Education (1987) 195 Ca1.App.3d 1331, 1341, 241 Ca1.Rptr. 379.) In reviewing the award of a public contract our function is the same as the trial court--to determine whether the public entity's decision is supported by substantial widance. "In a mandamus action arising under Code of Civil Procedure section 1085, judicial review is limited to an examination of the proceedings before the agency to determine whether its actions have been arbitrary or capricious, entirely lacking in evidentiary support, or whether it failed to follow proper procedures or failed to give notice as required by COPR. (C) WEST 1992 NO CLAIM TO ORZG. U.S. GOVT. WORKS 272 Ca1.Rptr. 458 PAGE 5 (Cite as; 222 Ca1.App.3d 1362, •1367, 272 Ca1.Aptr. 45e, ••460) requirements must be followed even if the expenditure for a public work is not made from the agency's treasury. in East Bay Garbage Co. a sanitary district ••4s1 solicited bids from private garbage collectors for an exclusive contract as the district's refuse collector, at collection rates set by the district but paid directly by the households to the collector. One bidder offered $22,500 and the other $15,000, and the contract vas awarded to the $15,000 bidder. Former Health and Safety Code section 6515.5 required contracts for works exceeding $2,500 to be awarded to the lowest responsible bidder pursuant to the competitive bidding scheme set forth in the Health and Safety Code. The sanitary district had not followed the statutory notice requirements. In an action between the two bidders to determine the proper entitlement to the contract, the higher bidder prevailed. On appeal, the $15,000 bidder continued its argument that adherence to the requirements vas unnecessary because no expenditures were being made directly from the district's treasury. The Supreme Court disagreed. It observed that the statute, in effect, authorized two methods for handling the work: the district could perform the work itself or it could contrast it out to a private party. If it chose the latter, as the district had done, it had to follow the statutory bidding process and award the contract to the lowest responsible bidder. "In such circumstances, the lowest responsible bidder would be the bidder who, on the basis of a uniform fee schedule, returned to the district the largest sum for the privilege granted by the district. [P] It is a cardinal rule of statutory construction that the language of a statute should be construed to effect, rather than defeat, its evident object and purpose. [The $15,000 bidder] concedes the applicability of the statute where the district itself undertakes to do the work, in the sense that it will pay the scavenger firm directly for the services performed, and the cost to [the $15,000 bidder] exceeds $2,500. It is no less applicable where, as here, the district contracts with one of [several] competitive bidding scavenger firms tc do the work required, and has the cost of removal of the garbage paid directly to the firm by the inhabitants of the district. The same reasoning prevails in protection of the public interest to insure the greatest possible value for the least expenditure. To hold otherwise would permit •1368 circumvention of the statute contrary to its purport and reasonable construction." (East Bay Garbage Co. v. Washington Township Sanitation Co., supra, 52 Ca1.2d at p. 713, 346 P.2d 289, citations omitted.) East Bay Garbage Co. reLlects the public policy behind all statutory competitive biddlnq requirements governing the letting of public contracts: benefit to and protection of the public. (Universal By-Products, Inc. v. City of Modesto (1974) 43 Ca1.App.3d 145, 152, 117 Ca1.Rptr. 525: 10 NcQuillen, xunicipal Corporations, s 29.29.) "[L)owast responsible bids" insure the greatest possible value for the least expenditure. (East Bay Garbage Co. v. Nashington Township Sanitation Co., supra, 52 Ca1.2d at p. 713, 344 P.2d 289.) "Highest responsible bids' secure the largest reasonable retuzr to the public. (Zbid; Brown v. city of Phoenix (1954) 77 Ariz. 368, 371 [272 P.2d 358, 361].) In either case the principal is the same--assurance that the taxpayers receive the most for their money and that awards are made without favoritism, fraud or corruption. (See City of Inglewood-L.A. County Civic Center Auth. v. Superior Court (1972) 7 Cal.]d 861, 866-867, 103 Ca1.Rptr. 689, 500 Y.2d 601 [hereafter City of Inglewood ].) COPR. (C) WEST 1992 NO CLAZN TO ORIG. U.S. GOVT. WORX: 272 Ca1.Rptr. 458 PAGE (Cite tat 222 Ca1.App.3d 1362, •1366, 272 Ca1.Rptr. 4Sa, •460) directors reaffirmed the award. FN2. Respondent's action was not an appeal in the customary legal sense in that he vas not seeking review from higher authority of an inferior body's decision. It is more accurately characterized a reconsideration, insofar as he wa^ making his request to the same body that made the original award. Respondent then filed the instant petition for writ of mandate, contending that appellant was required to award the lease to him pursuant to the statutory public contract scheme of section 20783. Appellant opposed the petition on the grounds tTat section 20783 was not applicable because the lease did not involve an expenditure of public funds, but vas merely an agricultural lease in exchange for the tenant's skill and experience in utilizing wastewater for irrigation. The trial court issued a peremptory writ of mandate commanding appellant to determine whether respondent was a qualified and/or responsible bidder for the ranch and, if so, to award Tim the lease and vacate its prior award to Huston. If it determined Te was not qualified, the agreement with Huston would remain in full force and effect. DISCUSSION I Appellant contends section 20783 is inapplicable because the agreement herein is a lease rather than a contract for public work involving an expenditure of public funds. Section 20783 provides, in pertinent part: "when work is done by the [sanitation) district itself by force account, the amount shall not exceed five thousand dollars ($5,000). when the expenditure required for the work exceeds twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000), it shall be contracted for and let to the lowest responsible bidder after notice...." A public work contract is defined as "an agreement for the erection, construction, alteration, repair, or improvement of any public structure, building, road, or other public improvement of any kind." (s 1101.) Sanitation districts may contract with private parties for the disposition or operation of any property or work which the districts themselves might dispose of, operate or undertake. (s 20782.) [1) The operation of appellant's sewer plant results in the accumulation of reclaimed water and sludge, of which appellant must dispose. Although the original advertisement invited bids for a pasture "lease," the subject agreement is entitled, "Agrnament for Reclaimed Water Vse" and recites that the subject property exieta specifically for the purpose of utilizing the reclaimed avatar and sludge as irrigation and fertilization Por farming and grazing. Its apeciiicationa for the farming, grazing and use of sludge and reclaimed •13 i7 water on the property are precise. The primary purpose of the agreement is to diapoae of the sludge and reclaimed water in a utilitarian fashion which, absent the agreement, appellant would otherwise perform itself. Consequently, the egreamant tits the statutory definition of a public work contract. in response to appellant's argument that the agreement does not involve an expenditure of public Lunde, respondent cites East Bay Garbage Co. v. Washington Township Sanitation Co. (1959) 52 Ca1.2d 708, 344 P.2d 289 for the proposition that in certain circumstances "lowest responsible bidder" COPR. (C) WEST 1992 NO CLAIM TO ORIG. U.S. GOVT. wORICS 272 Ca1.Rptr. 458 PAGE 3 (C1ta aa: 222 Ca1.App.3d 1362, 272 Ca1.Rptr. 436) bidder. U.S.C.A. Const.Amend. 14. Boydeton v. Napa sanitation Dist. 272 Ca1.Rptr. 458, 222 Ca1.App.3d 1362 (7] 316AR11 PUBLIC CONTRACTS K. Award to lowest bidder; bidders' qualifications. Ca1.App. 1 Dist. 1990. Agency awarding public contract must determine whether low (or high) bidder is qualified to perform contract. Boydston v. Napa Sanitation Dist. 272 Ca1.Rptr. 458, 222 Ca1.App.3d 1362 ••1 Sf •1365 June E. Noroney, C. Preston Shackelford, Coombs & Dunlap, Napa, for defendant and appellant. Hugh E. Comisky, Jr., Kilpatrick, Kays, Daniels 6 Comisky, Vallejo, for plaintiff and respondent. HANING, Associate Justice. The Napa Sanitation District appeals a peremptory writ of mandate commanding it to determine whether respondent Jack L. Boydston is a qualified bidder on a lease of appellant's property. Its principal contention is that the trial court erred in basing its ruling on the competitive bidding requirements of Public Contract Code section 20783, because the lease did not involve an expenditure of public funds. [FNi] We affirm. PN1. Unless otherwise noted, all further statutory references are to the Public contract code. FACTS Appellant publicly advertised for an annual tenant for 753 acres of pasture ti be irrigated with reclaimed municipal wastewater, and 157 acres of non- irrigated pasture. The site was commonly known as the Kirkland Ranch. All potential tenants ware required to have experience in cattle operations, rotation grazing practices, and irrigation with fixed sprinkler systems. interested persons were to submit statements and bids, after which appellant would "nagotiaia an agreement with the moat qualified bidder." Respondent bid $38,440, but appellant accepted the $33,144 bid of the Huston-Fifield fi H.R. Angus partnership (Huston) which, in appellant's evaluation, ranked higher in farming experience. Respondent informed Dennis M. Scherzinger, appellant's engineer-manager, that ••660 ha wanted to ^appeal" the award. [FN2] Scherzinger asked an agricultural consultant to review both bids. The consultant concluded that each bidder appeared able to operate the acreage successfully. However, he believed Huston had "the edge^ as the more experienced operator with a broader base of management experience, more recent experience in the operation of sprinkler systems, better equipment resources, and larger herds •1366 of cattle from which stocking rates could be quickly adjusted as required during the grazing season. Tha consultant's "one point of concern" with respondent vas his ability to manage a "two herd" grazing plan. Appellant's board of COPR. (C) WEST 1992 NO CLAIM TO ORIG. U.S. GOVT. WORK 272 =a1.Rptr. 458 PAGE 2 (Cite as: 222 Cal.app.3d 1362, 272 Ca1.Aptr. aSa) use of reclaimed water and sludge by lessee, even though lease did not involve actual expenditure in cash of public funds; difference between agreement and more customary public work contract vas that payment for work did not come in form of cash, but in form of use of land and reclaimed water for private party's ovn agricultural purposes. west's Ann.Cal.Pub.COn.COde ss 20783, 20784. Boydston v. Napa Sanitation Dist. 272 Ca1.Rptr. 458, 222 Ca1.App.3d 1362 (31 316AK11 PUBLIC CONTRACTS K. Award to lowest bidder; bidders' qualifications. Ca1.App. 1 Dist. 1990. In context of responsible bidder under public contract law, term "responsible" refers not only to attribute of trustworthiness, but also to quality, fitness and capacity of bidder to perform proposed agreement satisfactorily. Boydston v. Napa Sanitation Dist. 272 Ca1.Rptr. 458, 222 Cal.App.3d 1362 [a7 716AK11 PUBLIC CONTRACTS K. Award to lowest bidder; bidders' qualifications. Ca1.App. 1 Dist. 1990. AlthougR public bodies have discretion to determine which bidders are responsible under public contract law, they may not, if they determine more than one bidder as responsible, make award on basis of relative superiority. Boydston v. Napa Sanitation Dist. 272 Ca1.Rptr. 458, 222 Ca1.App.3d 1362 [5] 316AK11 PUBLIC CONTRACTS K. Award to lowest bidder; bidders' qualifications. Ca1.App. 1 Dist. 1990. Before contract may be awarded to one other than lowest (or highest) bidder, public body must notify bidder of any evidence reflecting upon bidder's responsibility received from others or adduced as result of independent investigation, afford that bidder opportunity to rebut such adverse evidence, and permit bidder to present evidence of qualification. Boydston v. Napa Sanitation Dist. 272 Ca1.Rptr. 458, 222 Ca1.App.3d 1362 [6] 268K241 MUNICIPAL CORpOR11TIONS K. Award to lowest bidder. Ca1.App. 1 Dist. 1990. Sanitation district was required to determine whether high bidder for lease of sanitation district of land was "qualified bidder"; in making such determination, district was not limited to information presented with original bids, but, pursuant to due process guidelines, was to consider additional information presented by bidder to rebut district's initial award to another COPR. (C) WEST 1992 NO CLAIM TO ORIG. U.S. GOVT. WORKS PAGE Citation Database Node 272 Ca1.Rptr. 458 FOUND DOCUMENT CA-CS P (Gila aa: 222 Ca1.App.3d 13 a2, 272 cal.aptr. 45a) Jack L. BOYDSTON, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. NAPA SANITATION DISTRICT, Defendant and Appellant. No. A046297. Court of Appeal, First District, Division 5. Aug. 17, 1990. Certified For Partial Publication. [FN*) FN• Pursuant to rules 976 and 976.1, California Rules of Court, this opinion is certified Lor publication except for part IZI. Rehearing Denied Sept. 11, 1990. See 273 Ca1.Rptr. 331. Review Denied Oct. 30, 1990. High bidder for lease of sanitation district's property and use of reclaimed water and sludge brought mandamus action, contending that district was required to award lease to it. The Superior Court, Napa County, No. 58023, Herbert W. Walker, J., issued peremptory writ of mandate commanding district to determine whether high bidder was qualified bidder for lease, and appeal was taken. The Court of Appeal, Haning, J., held that: (1) primary purpose of agreement for reclaimed eater use was to dispose of sludge and reclaimed eater in utilitarian fashion which, absent agreement, sanitation district would otherwise perform itselL, and thus, agreement fell within statutory definition of "public work contract," and (2) sanitation district was required to determine whether high bidder for lease sanitation district of land vas "qualified bidder" under competitive bidding law. Judgment affirmed. [1] 268R236 MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS K. Contracts to be submitted to competition. Ca1.App. 1 Diet. 1990. Primary purpose of agreement for reclaimed eater use vas to dispose of sludge end reclaimed water in utilitarian fashion wnicn, absent agreement, sanitation district would otherwise perLorm itself, and thus, agreement fell within statutory definition of "public work contract." West's Ann.Cal.pub.COn.COde ss 1101, 20782. eoydston v. Napa Sanitation Dist. 272 Ca1.Rptr. 458, 222 Ca1.App.3d 1362 See publication Words and Phrases for other judicial constructions and definitions. [2l 268K236 MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS K. Contracta to be submitted to competition. Ca1.App. 1 Dist. 1990. , Competitive bidding law aCOpRed(c) WESTe1992sNO1CLAINnTOiORIGCtUgSPrGOVT yWOnRRS Mr. xim Leinbach, City Manager Mr. Alan C. Jensen, City Attorney Mr. William I. Gulliford, Mayor April 3, 1992 Page 4 I believe it is reasonable and proper to request that the City and the Public Works Department defer any further action until the next scheduled meeting on Monday, April 13. I would appreciate the City Attorney, Mr. Jenson, calling me this afternoon or Monday so that we may discuss this matter further. z, ,_.- TEA:vm Enclosure (case referenced) cc: Orteqa Industrial Contractors Respectfully submitted, SMIYT~/H, CURRIE 3 HANCOCK ~'. Thomas E. Ahern hy, IV Mr. xim Leinbach, City Manager Mr. Alan C. Jensen, City Attorney Mr. William I. Gulliford, Mayor April 3, 1992 Page 3 The diapositive issue is whether appellant correctly followed the "responsible bidder" requirements. When a statute requires that an award be made to the lowest (or highest] responsible bidder, it must be awarded accordingly unless that bidder is found not responsible, i.e., not qualified to perform the particular work under consideration. Although public bodies have discretion to determine which bidders are responsible, they may not, if they determine more than one bidder is responsible, make the award on the basis of relative superiority. The law of the State of Florida also recognizes that: [T]he purpose of competitive bidding is to secure the lowest responsible offer. . Tropabest Foods, Inc. v. State of Florida, 493 So. 2d 50 (1986 CONCLUSION Ortega is understandably upset with the action which the City of Atlantic Beach proposed to take last night. I have advised Ortega that rather than precipitously filing a lawsuit which would inunediately cause both Ortega and the City to incur significant time and expense, that I would write and request that you consider the information which I have been asked to prepare and present to you. Accordingly, I request that you take no further action to implement the recommended award voted on at last night's City Commission meeting. I am faxing this letter and the enclosed case £or your consideration and in support of my request that any further action be deferred until this matter has been further reviewed next week. I will provide you with a full analysis as to the appropriateness and legality of the planned course of action. ~' Mr. Kim Leinbac h, City Manager Mr. Alan C. Jensen, City Attorney Mr. William I. Gulliford, Mayor April 3, 1992 Page 2 6. The responsibility evaluation of the three lowest bidders was on a scale of 1 to 10 (with 1 being the poorest and 10 being excellent) and the results were reflected on a "matrix evaluation chart." 7. The responsibility evaluation score for the low bidder, Ortega, was S.R, and for the second low bidder, Meadors, was 7.6. 8. The Mayor asked the Public Works Department representative, Mr. Kosoy, several questions to which he responded as follows: (a) Mr. Kosoy stated he considered Ortega a "good" contractor and stated that Ortega was otherwise qualified as a responsive bidder; (b) Mr. Kosoy stated that a contractor with a "good" rating could satisfactorily perform the required work; and (c) Mr. Kosoy stated that he did not give more weight to the references listed than to the price and other qualifications of each bidder. THE ISSUE Accordingly, the issue presented is whether the City may properly and lawfully award a contract to other than the low, responsive bidder when the low responsive bidder is deemed ' responsible but has a slightly lower responsibility score than a higher bidder. The issue could also be phrased as whether the City may properly and lawfully award a contract and spend additional public monies for a higher priced contractor deemed "more responsible" than a lower priced contractor who is also - deemed to be responsible and capable of performing the work. This question has been squarely faced by one court which held that an award should not be made to a higher priced contractor based on the fact that it was deemed to be a more responsible contractor. Bo dston v. NAPA Sanitation District, 222 Cal. App. 3d 1362, 21 Ca Rptr. See enclosed copy) Specifically, the Court stated as follows: r ~:. - .- •- - s 5 J x.R~~o. i° C+ n('Y°s 9(tl ; CURATE 6[ HAHCOCK SMITH _ e E 9<C. - ' ~"- (, E V p~f BOG . _, Gnn nB [~~ ~• n_']O.. E'S ^~ _aN i iO. ' ` ~.[ `d`[„~R O.(cS::MiO ..• av [ 9 ~ - ' - ]. . • p].. °..a f + 9 : . p eR 1 __• ~Ee. , ~~ E HER 26C] ^ R 5 ; C µ(fs (( G ; . ie `[ • e - 2JJ oEn.:+.REE E'aEC ~ nG i CO [ o' ali. ~ ~'( ` [ ~ K . ,~ Y'o: i R^~(y ~~°^ G[01lGIA OODOl40~0 ATLANTA [.',i[~ : . '":.~~~~. ' . . [ ~C .u _ e 5 [ .+ [+.0. ~E_E]Ja ER ~e0<~ 6BB-06~~ _ ~ C ~ [ n 9 [ ~ ~[ .` .° April 3 1992 ~w.°" .`~°S ` f e y , Mr. Kim Leinbach, City Manager (904) 247-5800 Business ~o. (904) 247-5805 Fax NO. City of Atlantic Beach, City Hall Atlantic Beach, Florida Mr. William I. Gullif ord, Mavor (904) 268-6711 Business No. (904) 268-1803 Fax No. City of Atlantic Bch., City Hall Atlantic Beach, Florida Mr. Alan C. Jensen, City Attorney (904) 246-2500 Business No. (904) 246-9960 Fax No. City of Atlantic Beach, City Hall Atlantic Beach, Florida Re: Improper Rejection of ortega's Low Bid and Onlawful Expenditure of Additional Public Funds Regarding Water Treatment Plant Improvements For the City of Atlantic Beach, Florida Gentlemen: I have been retained by Ortega Industrial Contractors of Jacksonville, Florida to review the above matter and the proposed action last night when the Commissioners of the City of Atlantic Beach voted on a recommended award of the above contract. The facts as reported to me by Ortega are as follows: THE FACTS 1. WPC Industrial Contractors, Inc. bid was disqualified. 2. Ortega submitted the low responsive bid: 51,207,295. 3. Meadors Construction Company, Inc. submitted the second low bid in the amount of 51,224,950. 4. The difference in price of these two lowest responsive bids was 517,655. 5. The three lowest responsive bids were evaluated by price. Also, each bidder was evaluated for responsibility in accordance with eight factors listed in the City of Atlantic Beach Code of Ordinance Section 2-335 which was referenced in the Invitation to Bid. ON S. Reoai ~ e vehicles "~"'^"~ nuthortnation gerM•; *+rohibited. It shall be unlawful for any parson to dlsmentle or to withoutp the ~ written lconsentd signed by its sowneremore hi ehduly authorized agent. SECTION 6.. E••°^~'O° nate. This Ordinance shall take effect immediately upon its final passage and adoption. PASSED by the city commission on first reading this dey of , 1992. PASSED by the City Commiss1992 n second and final reading this day of . ATTEST: NAUREEN KING I. RD, JR. City Clark Nayor, Presiding Officer Approved as to form and correctness: ALAN C. JENSEN, ESQDIRE City Attorney Y' (3) Class C Wrecker Any truck or unit of ten tons or greater weight $75.00 per hour towing charge for a truck or unit transportable as a whole, but in no event less than $75.00 charge for such towing, or, $100.00 per hour towing charge for a truck or other unit not transportable as a whole, but in no event less than a $100.00 charge for such towing; and not more than $100.00 per hour for cleanup, extra labor or waiting time. DAYTIME NIGH'1TIHE (6:OOam - 6:OOpm) (6:OOpm - 6:OOam} Sunday a Legal Holidays (4) Over +rn d Vehicles Regular price plus $25.00 $25.00 (5) On ocean 35.00 Driver and/or wrecker 25.00 must enter water regular price plus (6) IIse of Dollies Regular price plus 25.00 30.00 (b) The charges for storage of vehicles by wrecker service operators shall be as follows: Storage - outside per day $ 5.00 Storage - inside pez day 6.00 (c) When a wrecker is called and the owner arrives to claim his vehicle before it can be removed, a partial fee is allowefl of $10.00, if the wrecker has been physically attached to the vehicle. If the owner arrives before the wrecker is attached, no fee will be charged. (d) The above charges may be changed by Resolution adopted by the City Commission 6ECTIOR 3. All wreckers must be equipped at all times with amber flashing lights and all necessary working tools, including but not limited to bolt cutters, crowbars, shovel, broom, axe and fire extinguisher. BECTIOH •. All wreckers must have, maintain and keep in full force and effect liability insurance in amounts not less than one hundred thousand to three hundred thousand dollars ($100,000.00 - $300,000.00) and property insurance in an amount not less than fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00). onalNAxcs No.:.S'/- 9,2- /~ AN ORDINANCE OF THS CITY OF ATLANTIC REACH, EBTAHLZHHINO REQ IO RATEMENTS FOE NRECEER BERVZCE6,BPAOVIDZNO AN EFFECTIVE DATE. AREREAB, the City often needs the services of a towing company and wrecker service for the towing and storage of vehicles, and NHERBAB, the City desires to establish standards and rules for the administration of a rotating wreckez call list to provide safe and dependable wrecker service to the City and its departments. NON THEREFORE, EE IT ORDAINED 8Y TMS CITY COMMIBBION OF TEE CITY OF ATLANTIC HEAC8, FLORIDAi s*CTION 1. Fist blishment of rotating ' n ker call 1'st The Chief of Police, subject to approval by the CZty Managez, is authorized to establish standards and rules for the administration of a rotating wrecker call list to provide safe and dependable wrecker service to the city. All wrecker end towing firms, companies, or corporations licensed to conduct that business may apply for a listing by the police department on the rotating wrecker call fist. 8EC'~'ION 2. ~ ~^~ *^"ing and s*oraae. (a) The charges for towing and otherwise removing any damaged motor vehicle from any point within the City limits shall be as follows: DAYTIME NIG9TTIME (6:OOam - 6:OOpm) (6:OOpm - 6:OOam) Sunday ~ Legal Holidays (1) Mass A Wrecker $45.00 Passenger Cars and $35.00 light vans Trucks (half ton 35.00 45.00 to two tons) Campers, trailers 50.00 50.00 E mobile homes 75.00 45.00 Motorcycles (2) class B wrecker Any truck, unit or part $50.00 pez hour towing Charge, thereof, from more than but in no event less than a two tons to ten tons of 550.00 charge for towing, and weight not more than $SC.00 per hour for cleanup, extra labor and waiting time. ^ ~- 1 ~ :; ORDINANCE H0. 45-92-LO AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER 20, TAXATION, ARTICLE III, OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE TA%, SECTION 20-59, SCHEDULE OF FEES, TO ADD A CLASSIFICATION AND SET A FEE FOR MICRO BRENERY, AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE BE Ii ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH, FLORIDA: Section 1. The following occupational license classification is added under Section 20-59 of the Code of Ordinances: 061 BREffERY, MICRO ..............................545.00 (Requires licensing by the Department of Business Regulation, Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon ita final passage and adoption. PASSED BY TBE CITY COMMISSION an first reading this day of 1992. PASSED BY TAE CITY COMMISSION on second and final reading this day of 1992. NILLIAM I. CULLIFORD, JR. Mayor/Presiding Officer A T T E S T: MADREEN T. RING City Clerk Approved as to form and correctness: ALAN C. JENSEN, ESQUIRE CS[y A[torney ORDINANCE N0. 5-92-22 AN ORDINANCE AHENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE ' CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER 2, ADMINISTRATION, ARTICLE VII, FINANCE, DIVISION 2, PURCHASING, AMENDING SECTION 2-331, BIDS -WHEN - REQUIRED, TO PROVIDE THAT FORMAL BIDS SNAIL RE REQUIRID FOR PURCHASES OF SUPPLIES OR SERVICES FROM ENTERPRISE FUNDS IN EXCESS OF 55,000, AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE , BE IT ORDAINED by the City Commission of the Ci[y of Atlantic Beath, Florida, as follows: Sett ion 1. Chapter 2, Article VII, Division 2, Section 2-331 is hereby amended to read as follows: Section 3-331. Bids - When Required All supplies and contractual services, except for the Enterprise Funds or as othetvise provided Sn this division, when the estimated cost thereof shall exceed two thousand five hundred dollars (;2,500.00) shall be purchased by formal, written contract from the lowest responsible bidder after due notice inviting proposals. For the Enterprise Funds, nn n,nnltas and rontractual services. when the estimated cost thereof Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect upon its final passage sad adoption. passed by the City Commission on First Reading this day of . 1992 Passed by the City Commission on Second and Final reading this day of 1992. WILLIAM I. GULLIFORD, JR. Mayor/Presiding Officer A T T E S T: NAUREEN KING City Clerk Approved as to form and correctness: ALAN C. JENSEN, ESQUIRE City Attorney ..: - ORDINANCB ND.: 40-92-17 AN ORDINANCB ANENDINO T8H CODS OP ORDINANCES 07 TSE CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH, BZTENDII(O T8E EZIBTINO FRANCHIHL OF CONTINHNTAL CAHLEVZBION TEROOOH HAY, 8005, REDIICIDTO THE BOHD REQIIIRBNBNTB, AND PROVIDING AN SFFECTZVE DATE. WHEREAe, continental Cablevision of Jacksonville, Inc., currently hoe a franchise to operate in the City of Atlantic Beach granted under prior ordinances, to wit: ordinance 40-79-9, 40-80-10, 40-80-i1, 40-82-12, d0-65-13, 40-87-15,and 40-89-16, and REEREAH, Continental CableV181on of Jacksonville, Inc., desires to extend its franchise in the city of Atlantic Beacn through Nay, 2005, in order to make long range plane, financial commitments, and capital improvements to the facilities now or hereafter existing in the City. NOR TEEREFORE, HE ZT ORDAIBED 8Y TSE CITY COMlSIHHION OF THB CITY OP ATLANTIC BRACH, FLORIDAC SECTION 1.. The franchise now held by Continental Cablevision of Jaakaonville, Inc., to construct, operate, and maintain a cable television system in the.City of Atlantic Beach, ie hereby renewed and extended through Nay, 2005. SECTION 2. The performance bond required to be maintained by Continental Cablevision of Jacksonville, inc., shall ba in an amount no leas than $50,000.00. BECTZOY 3. All other terms and conditions of the existing franchise granted to Continental Cablevision of Jacksonville, Inc., as set forth in the above-listed ordinances, shall remain in Pull torte and effect. HECRION 4. This Ordinance shall take effect immediately upon its final passage and adoption. PASSED by the City Commission on first reading this day of February, 1992. PASSED by the City Commission on second and final reading this _ day of Pebruary, 1992. ATTEST: MAVREEN KING WILLIAM I. GULLIFORD, JR. City Clerk Mayor, Presiding Officer Approved as to form and correctness: AN C. SEN, ESQUIRE City racy RSBOLDT208 f2_7 A REBOLDTIOS OP TRS CITY OP RTLRRTIC BBRCR PROVIDIRO 10R THS fiONHER OP D,YB PBR •SSS OF BOLID AABTE COLLECTIOR pROVIDIRO AN BPPSCTIVS RATS. ~. NSSREAB, the City Commission pessed Ordinance No. 55-92-26 on March 23, 1992, which rewrote in its entirety Chapter 16 of the Code o1 Ordinances relating to Solid Waste, and AHERSAB, Sec. 16-x of Chapter 16 provides that the City Commission shall set by resolution the number of days per week of solid waste collection. RO1f THEREPORS, HS IT R880LVED HY T8S CITY CO10[IBBIOS OP THS CZTY OF ATLASTIC HS11CH AB 10LL0*Bt BSCTION 1. The number of days par week of solid waste collection shall be as follows: (a) Garbagi: Two (2) days per week (b) Yard Trash: Two (2) days par week (c) Recyclable items: One (1) day per week SBCTION 2. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its final passage and adoption. PARSED by the City Commission or Atlantic Beach, Florida this day of March, 1992. ATTEST: MAUREEN KING City Clerk WILLIAM I. G O JR. Nayor, Presiding Officer Approved ac to form and correctness: ALAN C. JENBEN city Attorney PASSED by the City Commission on first reading this 11th day of March, 1992. PASSED by the City Commission on second and final reading this day of 1992. William I. Gulliford, Jr. Mayor, Presiding Officer A T T E S T; Maureen xi City Clerk Approved as to form and correctness: Alan C. Jensen, Esquire City Attorney b. The city shall inform each person wishing to dispose of any white good of the date to place any white good at curbside for removal and disposal by the City, and all persons must provide the above information and be placed on the list for removal of white goods prior to placing any white good at curbside. c. It shall be unlawful to place any white good at curbside unless the above procedure is complied with; it shall also be unlawful to place any white good upon vacant or unoccupied premises in the city, or upon any street, alley or park. (2) The city may collect a fee for the removal and disposal of each white good if deemed necessary by the City Manager. The amount of such fee shall be approved by resolution of the City Commission. Sec. 16-14. Enforcement. This chapter shall be enforced by the Atlantic Beach Police Atlaant~icnBeach City CommissiBOn c the City Manager ophi sdesigneee the Building Inspector and the Code Enforcement Officer. All parties herein referred to are hereby authorized to sign complaints for violation of this chapter. Sec. 16-15. Violations and penalties. The violation of any provision of this chapter shall be punished by a fine not exceeding S500.00, or imprisonment for a term not exceeding 60 days, or by both fine and imprisonment. Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon final adoption. -~- ~` ,r_-. Sec. 16-11. Removal of lot clearing, contractors' debris; oil and grease. Trash and debris caused from the operation of lot cleaning or clearing and contractors' debris caused from building, rebuilding or otherwise altering of buildings or structures shall be removed by the owner or contractor performing the work. Spent oils or greases accumulated at garages, filling stations or similar establishments will not be removed by the city. Sec. 16-12. Prima facie evidence of production of garbage; duty of city to inspect premises. Any place of abode or any place of business occupied or in operation shall be prima facie evidence that garbage is being produced and accumulated on the premises. It shall be the duty of the proper representatives of the city to inspect and supervise the premises and remove all refuse and garbage found on the premises, provided the required fees as required by this chapter have been paid by the resident or occupant, or to notify the proper persons if the removal is not the duty of the city. Sec. 16-13. white goods: Procedure and fees for removal. All residents, occupants and owners of residential premises in the city who have not arranged for private disposal of white goods as elsewhere authorized in this article shall have said white goods removed and disposed of by the Sanitation Division of the city according to the following procedure: (1) For each separate white good, the person wishing to dispose thereof shall provide to the city, either in person or by telephone, a sufficient description of the white good in order for the city to adequately identify said white good. a. The city shall obtain from any person wishing to dispose of any white good that person's name, address, and telephone number, together with a description of the white good, and said information will be placed on a list for removal and disposal by the Sanitation Division. -6- (a) Residence A unit: For each residence A unit, (1) There shall be a charge of forty-eight dollars (S48.00) per quarter, payable to the City of Atlantic Beach, for each residence A unit. (b) Residence B unit: For each housekeeping unit in a residence B unit. 1 (1) There shall be a charge of forty-eight dollars ~ (548.00) per quarter, payable to the City of i Atlantic Beach, for each such housekeeping unit. (c) Residence C unit: A container or dumpster will be furnished and maintained by the City and there shall be a charge of 5167.50 per cubic yard per quarter for each container or dumpster. (d) Commercial A unit: For each commercial A unit, there shall be a charge of 5167.50 per cubic yard per quarter for each dumpster. Note: Charge includes dumpster maintenance and replacement. (e) Commercial B unit: Ali business, professions and occupations not required to have a commercial dumpster. (1) There shall be a charge of forty-eight dollars (S48.00) per quarter, payable to the City of Atlantic Beach, for each commercial B unit. Sec. 16-9. Anuual review of fees. A review of residential and commercial solid waste rates shall be conducted annually by the Director of Finance and completed by August 31 of each year. Sec. 16-10. Noncompliance. The city shall not be required to collect any garbage, recyclable items or garden trash which does not comply with this chapter. -5- Sec. 16-6. Leaves and grass clippings; tree trunks. Leaves and grass Clippings shall be placed for Collection at the curb in either a receptacle meeting the standard for garbage collection or a disposable plastic or waterproof paper bag securely fastened at the opening. Tree trunks, stumps, limbs, trimmings or waste building materials shall be collected; these items shall not exceed five (5) feet in length nor shall any single item exceed a weight of fifty (50) pounds. Sec. 16-6. Burial of solid waste. No solid waste shall be buried upon the premises of the person by whom the solid waste is accumulated. No solid waste shall be buried elsewhere in the city except upon written permission o the City Manager. Composting shall not be considered burial. C1 .c~r~ ak Sec. 16-7. Depositing on vacant lots, streets, parks, etc., prohibited; compost piles. (a) It shall be unlawful to deposit garbage, trash, recyclable items or any other solid waste including old furniture, appliances, bed springs, tires, building materials or auto parts upon any vacant. or unoccupied premises of the city, or upon any street, alley or park. (b) It shall be unlawful for any person to deposit garden trash upon any adjoining lot or premises, whether vacant or improved, occupied or unoccupied, or upon any other lot or premises, or a street, plaza, alley or park, or in any canal, waterway, leke or pool within the city. Garden trash containing no combustible matter or matter which will, during decay, give off offensive odors, may be accumulated by the owner as a mulch or compost pile in the rear of the premises upon which accumulated. Sec. 16-5. Fees for collection. All residents, occupants and owners of premises in the city shall have accumulations of solid waste removed and disposed of by the Sanitation Division of the City, and for the service of solid waste removal shall pay the City of Atlantic each the sums shown below for each type of service: 1. -4- t+. (a) Containers. No garbage shall be collected unless it is placed in a closed garbage container. Said container shall be waterproof and shall in no event exceed the dimensions of a standard thirty-two gallon garbage can or bag. Nothing shall be picked up, collected or removed by the Atlantic Beach Public Works Department unless it is within a garbage container as defined herein. (b) Set out and storage. No person shall place a container in front of a residential unit in which he dcea not reside. Garbage containers set out for garbage collection shall be placed at the curb of the street from which garbage service is rendered except as otherwise provided herein. Garbage containers shall beset out no earlier then 6:00 p. m. the day prior to collection and shall be returned to their regular place of storage no later than 12:00 midnight on the day of collection. Garbage container blinds, which are in architectural harmony with the building, or underground containers, may be placed anywhere between the building and the street from which garbage service is rendered, but in no case shall they be located on public property. If garbage is stored underground or behind a garbage container blind which is not located at the curb, the garbage container must be moved to the curb for pickup. Any residence or commercial unit to which this section creates a hardship to either the resident of the property or the city sanitation department for placement of containers for garbage service shall apply to the Director of Public Works or his designee, who shall thereupon determine the location at which garbage containers shall be placed. Garbage containers located other than as described in this section shall not be emptied. In cases where lcts run from street to street, the provisions of this section applicable to front yards shall also apply to rear yards. (c) Inspection and approval. All garbage and trash containers shall be subject to inspection and approval or condemnation by the Director of Public Works. Appeals of his decisions may be made to the City Manager. (d) Dwnpsters required. All Commercial A and Residence C type units shall be required to have a commercial dumpster for disposal of garbage and trash. It shall be the duty of the Director of Public Works to determine the size dumpster required. Appeals of his decisions may be made to the City Manager. Sec. 16-4. Alternate disposal of recyclable items. Any person may donate or sell their own recyclable items referred to herein to any person, partnership or corporation, whether operating for profit or not for profit. -3- ~: Carden trash or yard trash or trash shall mean all the organic refuse accumulated from the care of lawns, shrubbery, vines and trees. Residence A unit shall mean a residence occupied by and the place of abode of a single family where one (1) kitchen only is provided and maintained. Residence B unit shall mean duplex residences under a single roof, or apartments consisting of two (2) and not more than ten (10) housekeeping units under a single roof, or a primary and secondary dwelling on the same lot. Residence C unit shall mean a group of more than ten (10) housekeeping units where it is not feasible to have garbage picked up from each individual residence and where a dumpster is required for central pick-up of garbage and trash. Solid waste shall mean the solid portion of the waste stream including but not limited to garbage, refuse, rubbish, recyclable items and garden trash. White goods shall mean appliances such as refrigerators, freezers, stoves, ovens, washing machines, dryers, water heaters, air conditioners, compressor units, microwave ovens, television ~ se*_s and the like. 'r~ Sec. 16-2. Solid waste collection. J~ /l~ u All solid waste accumulated in the City shall be c//ollected, transported and disposed by the City or a contractor :designated by the City Manager. No person shall collect, transp t through the streets or alleys of the City, or dump, incinerate, or in any other manner dispose of solid waste originating in he City except through written agreement with the City Manage ~ Each residence and commercial unit shall separate the solid was a it generates into garbage, yard trash and recyclables for co lection. (All garbage containers shall be emptied and the content thereof s all be disposed of at least once each week in residentia distric s and as designated by the City Manager in the business istricts All yard trash shall be picked up and disposed of at east on each week. All containers for recyclable items shal be emptied at least once each week. The number of days per wee of solid waste ~ collection shall be set by res lution of the City Commission. / 1 ~sa~i%: _~~ ,~vr/ Sec. 16-3. Garbage and trash containers. 7 - ~,~~ ~~ r ~~_~ l ~.~-~~~G-'.~~ 2 ~/ `. ~ ~~ ORDINANCE NO. 55-92-26 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH, REWRITING IN ITS ENTIRETY CHAPTER 16, REFUSE AND GARBAGE, AND PROVIDING AN EPFECTIVE DATE BE IT ORDAINED by the City Commission of the City of Atlantic Beach, Florida, as follows: Section 1. Chapter 16, Refuse and Garbage, is hereby rewritten to read as follows: Chapter 16 SOLID WASTE Sec. 16-1. Definitions. For the purposes of this chapter, the following words and phrases shall have the meanings respectively ascribed to them by this section: Co®ercial A unit shall mean any business establishment required to have'a commercial dumpster. Within this classif±cation are, by way of example, stores, shops, grocery stores, food stores, amusement houses, drug and sundry stores, dry goods and hard goods stores, package stores, filling stations, shopping centers and restaurants. Commercial B unit shall mean any businesses, professions or occupations not required to have a commercial dumpster. Garbage shall mean every refuse accumulated from cooking, cleaning and housekeeping. Garbage container shall mean a metal or plastic container of the type commonly sold as a garbage container, in good condition with a tight seal. A plastic bag at least 1.3 mil thick which is tightly sealed shall also be considered a garbage container. Recyclable items shall include but not be limited to metal cans, glass bottles and jars, and plastic (including soft drink, milk, water, juice and detergent) bottles and jugs, newspapers, magazines, telephone books, corrugate.? cardboard, metal coat hangers and any other materials which are designated by the Director of Public Works. T g5.vw..~ _._. _,......_. ,.. ~. .: is deemed to be in the best interest of [he Ciry of Atlantic Beach. PUBLIC ENTITY CRIMES - Any person submitting a bid or proposal in response to [his Invitation must execute Form PUR 7068, SHORN STATE- MENT UNDEA SECTION 287.133(A), FLORIDA STATUTES, ON PUBLIC ENTITY CRI:fES, including proper check(s) in the space(s) provided and enclose is with the bid or proposal. However, if you have provided the com- pleted form co the submittal address listed in this invitation and it vas received on or after January 1, 1992, the completed form is not required for the balance of the calendar year. IDENTICAL TIE BIDS - In accordance with Section 287.087, Florida Statures, of tectlve January 1, 1991, preference shall be glven to businesses with drug-free workplace programs. Nhenever two or more bids which are equal with respect to price, quality, and service are received by the State or by any political subdivision for the procurement of commodities or ~. contractual services, a bid received from a business that certifies [hat it has implemented a drug-free workplace program shall be given preference in the award process. Established procedures for processing bids will be followed if none of [he tied vendors have a drug-free workplace program. A form for this tent if Station is included with [he bid form and must be submitted with the bid or proposal. Joan LaVake Purchasing Agent ** k* k k k* k k k k k k* k* k* t** k k***** FLORIDA TZNES-UNION: Please publish one time on Priday, March 13, 1992. Submit [ed by Joan LaVake - 247-5818. CITY OF r~lla«tce ~eaa4 - ~lasida eooseAUNOtE BOw -- _._ _ ATLA.\TIC BEMH, £IARDH J33J}StiS TELFAiOME (Map u'1-380a _ `l ' FA%19a1)2SF51a5 March 13, 1992 CLTY OF ATLANTIC BEACH INVITATION TO BID NOTICE is hereby given [ha[ [he City of Atlantic Beach, Florida, will receive sealed bids in Che Office of Che Purchasing Agent, Ci[y Mall, 800 Seminole Road, Atlantic Beach, Florida 32233-5445, until 2:00 PM, Tuesday, March 31, 1992, after vh ich time bids will be publicly opened and read aloud Co Install Aluminum Railing and Stairvays a[ [he Atlantic Beach Sewage Treatment Plan[. Bids shall be enclosed in an envelope endorsed "Bid No. 9192-9, Sealed Bid Co Install Aluminum Railing and Stairways at the Atlantic Beach Sewage Treatment Plane, To ee Opened After 2:00 PM, Tuesday, March 31, 1992." Specifications and Bid Forms, and information regarding the bid, may be obtained from Che Office of the Purchasing Agent, 800 Seminole Road, Atlantic Beach, Florida, telephone (904) 247-5800. Bidders must visit [he job site before bidding [o ensure accuracy and compatibility. The successful bidder shall be responsible for field verification of :he fit and interface of the railings and stairvays. All bidders must furnish the following WITH THE BID 1. Bid Bond Sn the amount of SS of the bid. 2. References ces [Sfying to the quality of work on similar projects. 3. Insurance certificates, naming [he CI[y of Atlantic Beach as Certificate Holder, shoving [hey have obtained and will Continue to carry Workers' Compensation, public and private liability, and property damage insurance during the life of the contract. A Performance and Paymenc Bond will be required of the successful bidder. Bid prices must remain valid for sixty (60) days after Che public opening of [he bide. Goods and services proposed shall meet all requirements of Che Ordi- nances of [he City of Atlantic Beach. The Ci[y of Atlantic Beath reserves the right to reject any cr all bids or parts of bids, waive informalities and [echnicalltles, make award in whole or part with or without cause, and [o make the award in what 1 ~[,,, ~ ~ a 0 0 N \ 1 N P C1 PI ~ Q a Y O G Y ° I d u a n d o v i M y y y W Q A oN ~ i W y U , e W ~ V YYY °1 w '' o , , P! ~ > o G z o V 2 Vf ~ N 5 Y Cf ~ U K 6 y V U '~ P v .] W ~ J w W x . .1 i S W . b > {~ O ~! ° arO • h 6 n ° v n n~ a y a~S"5 ~ r, °J e W .l Y. Z ~ i w H H „ B w ~ W ~~ ~ Y ~ 6 "~ U ~z a M w w ~ y \~ ~ ~ Y m N m 6 .l Z a .i O ~ W ~ V W i a w '~ W H F ~ o. ~ F Z i 4n M M C ' ~ ~ s ` y z 6 " F y ~ a 3 ~ H r o G _ N ~ \ W T V C E s 0. O ~ O I N T M m L~ ti U O I y O O C W . m a w n Y ~ ~^ O p Z O U 0 N O N.A G N O O W G w L 'a ~ W M U 2 W ~ - F r.t ~ N N .> N F 2 ,~y ~ U O N ~ X '~c°a y v p a ~ ~ w y y 4 p a w N W W p H a U ~ -1 .Wi _ ~ H D > Z O O x H •p U 4 M N ' ~ ° um f Y Oma ~6 p -i ` °` U n ~ ~ pp VV ~ U ~ ~ y j G s z ~ W A p . .tON W M N 3 H > p U p U N p y . N M m W H <'a Y '? cwti U w ~ iO W ~ . a ~ p p I ~ M [-1 N ~ I Xs¢ lt . ~ ~ ~- a ~ . ~y ° S ~ °J y ~ ~ U H ~ Q Q ~ N N G N O N (] ' j W 5 Q Y F G ' S Z ~ O w ~ H y G V ~ m m ~2 ~ N H ' . i ~ a a p, 6L P H a ti o a ~ i v o a ~ ~ 6 w m 0. p w F n ~ .a F p ~ ~ r S a ~ S~ d ~ H 6 6 H p~ K D H ~ ~ I i c ~ C 0 c E ~. P p __- Bid No. 9192-9 - Install Aluminum Railing and S[ai ays t W4fPP Mailing Lisc: Dial's Welding S Fabrication 1511 Harchek Street Jacksonville, FL 32211 Parker b Hick Welding d Machine Works 3451 West Beaver Street Jacksonville, FL 32205 Gruhn-Hay Contractors 6897 Phillips Parkway Drive Jacksonville, FL 32256 J. W. Meadors S Co. 4855 Lenox Avenue Jacksonville, PL 32205 Mechanical Technicians 211 North 20th S[ree[ Jackaonville Beach, FL 32250 r. that S[ recommend co the City Commission that St accept the low bid from Chancey Metal Products. Inc., in the amount of 338,425.00, as the the lowest responsible bid meeting bid specifications, and make [he award accordingly. Respectfully, Joan LaVake, Purchasing Agent CITY OF ~'Qtlartle ~eaek - ~lauda eoo sE+nXO~e HOAD ATLA.ITIC aFACH, FLORIN J311}5H5 TELEPHONE (900 L1'1-Staa FAX 190112lLSl0J April 13, 1992 AWARDS COMMITTEE MINUTES THURSDAY, APRIL 2, 1992 The Awards Committee met on Thursday, April 2, 1992, at 2:00 PH, [o , receive bid advertised as Bid No. 9192-9, Install Aluminum Railings and Scairvays at Wastewater Treatment Plan[. Present a[ [he bid opening were Commissioner Glenn Edwards, Chairman, City Manager Kim Leinbach, Public Works Director Robert S. Kosoy, ', Utilities Plant DSvision Director Tim Townsend, Building Official Don Pord, and Purchasing Agent Joan LaVake. Invitations to Hid ve re mailed to five (5) prospective bidders shown on the attached mailing list. Seven (7) bids were received as follows: TOTAL PRICE BID Apex Netal Pabrica[ion, Inc. 'S Palatka, FL 45,316.00 DSal's Welding b Fabrication, Inc. Jacksonville, FL 47,878.00 Arko Industrial Group, Int. Jacksonville, FL 39,975.00 Chancey Me [al Products, Inc. Jacksonville, FL 38,425.00 Pove 11 Custom McCal Jacksonville, PL 57,289.00 Parker b Hick Welding Jackscnville, FL 43.333.00 Gruhn-Hay Jacksonville, PL 49,432.00 The low bidder, Chancey Metal Products. Inc., met all bid requlrementa. including a reference check, and it is the consensus of [he committee `, IDENTICAL TIE BIDS - In accordance with Section 287.087, Florida Statutes, effective January 1, 1991, preference shall be given [o businesses with drug-free workplace programs. {lhenever two or more bids are received by the Slate or by any political subdivision for [he procurement of co®odities or contractual services, a bid received from a business that tertif ies that i[ has implemented a drug-free , workplace program shall be given preference in the award process. Established procedures for processing bids will be followed if none of [he tied vendors have a drug-free workplace program. A form for this certification is included with [he bid form and must be subm it led with [he bid or proposal. Joan LaVake Purchasing Agent * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * t t * * t * * * * * * * * * * t t * FLORIDA TIMES-UNION: Please publish one time on Monday, March 9, 1992. Submitted by Joan LaVake - 247-5818. CITY OF ~a.rtie E~atek - ~lmuda CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH INVITATION TO BID 800 SENINOLE R(1\II ATLMTIC BFA('H, FLORm1132/.~5M5 TELFAfOrE /9001 Lt1-Y00 FA%19W~ N1-S805 NOTICE is hereby given that the City of Atlantic Beath, Florida, will receive sealed bids in [he Office of the Purchasing Agent, Ci[y Nall, 800 Seminole Road, Atlantic Beath, Florida 32233-5445, until 2:00 PM, Thursday, March 26, 1992, after which time bids will be publicly opened and read aloud for Three (3) Roll-On, Roll-Off Sludge Containers as Specified, With Stainless Steel Flcor and A36 Hild Steel for the Body. Bids shall be enclosed in an envleope endorsed "Bid No. 9192-8, Sealed Bid for Three (3) Roll-On, Roll-Off Sludge Containers, To Be Opened of cer 2:00 PH, Thursday, Harch 26, 1992." Spec lfications and Bid Forms, and information regarding [he bid, may be obtained from the Office of the Purchasing Agent, 800 Seminole Road, Atlantic Beach; Florida, telephone (904) 247-5800. Bidders must visit the site before bidding [o ensure chat the design proposed is compatible to the roll-on, roll-off hydraulic hoists. All bidders must furnish references test £fying to the quality of their work. Bid prices must remain valid for sixty (60) days after the public opening of bids. Goods and services proposed shall meet all requirements of the Ordinances of the City of Atlantic Beath. The Ci[y of Atlantic Beach reserves [he right to reject any or all bids or parts of bids, waive informalities and technicalities, make award in whole or part, with or without cause, and to make the award in what is deemed Co be in [he best interest of the City of Atlantic Beath. PUBLIC ENTITY CRIHES - Any person submitting a bid or proposal in response [o this invitation must execute Form YUR 7068, SWORN STATElOiNT UNDER SECTION 287.133(A), FLORIDA STATUTES, ON PUBLIC ENTITY CRIHES, including proper check(s), in the space(s) provided, and enclose i[ with the bid or proposal. However, if you have provided [he completed form to the submittal address listed in this invitation and it vas received on or after January 1, 1992, the completed form is not required for the balance of [he calendar year. m. March 9, 1992 Bid No. 9192-8 - Three (3) Roll-On, Roll-Off Sludge Containers Nailing List: Jim Hardee Equipment 5801 E. Broadway P. 0. Box 5537 Tampa, FL 33675 Ray Pace 9365 Phillips Highway Jacksonville, FL 32256 Attn: Dick Hilliard General Truck Equipment b Trailer Sales 5310 Broadway Avenue Jacksonville, FL 32205 Nichols Truck Bodies, Inc. 1168 Cahoon Road Jacksonville, Ft 32221 Rivers Body Fac COry, Inc. 10620 General Avenue Jacksonville, FL 32220 CITY OF tie S"tatk - ~leuda eas seawotE awn ATLA.~l1C aEAC'N, FILRaN 3221}56L5 TEI,FPIIONE 180012A'Z3800 FAX 19061 2!13803 AWARDS COMMITTEE MINOTES TNDRSDAY, MA.RCR 26, 1992 The Awards Committee met on Thursday, March 26, 1992, a[ 2:00 PH, to receive bld advertised as Bid No. 9192-8, Three (3) Roll-on, Roll-Off Sludge Containers. Present ac the bid opening were Commissioner Clenn Edwards, Chairman, City Manager Kim Leinbach, Assistant Public Works Director Ernie Beadle, Utilities Plan[ Division Director Tim Townsend, Building Official Don Ford, and Purchasing Agent Joan LaVake. Invitations to eid were sailed to five (5) prospective bidders. Only one (1) bid vas received, from Jim Nardee Equipment of Tampa, and there were errors in calculations contained in thac bid which would have caused it to be rejected had there been more than one bid received. Based on the poor response of potential bidders on [his project, the Committee recommends [he one bid be rejected and the job re-bid. Since [he bid opening, staff has searched for another area of interest in bidding this project, with some success. We will make every endeavor to achieve a productive re-bid. Respectfully, Joan LaVake, Purchasing hgent April 13, 1992 Ms. Maureen King March 20, 1992 Page 2 G I~livery - t. Entire Code ................................................... 4 months 2. Chapter 24 .................................................... 45 days D. Updating Diskettes. Updated diskettes of the entire Code or Chapter 24 would be available within ten (10) days of shipment of future Supplements. The magnetic media delivered after supplementation will reflect [he entire Code or Chapter, as updated through the most recent Supplement. Previotu disks may be retained for archival purposes. The cost of obtaining updated diskettes would be ........_ 51.50 per page in addition to the regulaz Supplement charges. ]Jazuse the enclosed sample dish' contains data in ASCII, it should be compatible with WordPerfect and most other word processing programs. The individual files on the disk may be retrieved in the same manner as your normal data files (by using the "RUtieve' command m WordPerfect, for example). Please refer to the enclosed brochure Cor further information. We appreciate every opporturtiry to be of service to the Ciry and trust the above in[ormation will be of interest Sincerely, Gloria P. Jacobs Director of Marketing By ~ Gayle White Marketing Ass¢tant GPJ:gw enc. Y x- r r • •' Municipal Code Corporation March 20, 1992 Ms. Maureen King City Clerk City of Atlantic Brach 800 Seminole Aoad Atlantic Beach, Florida 32733-5445 Dear Ms. King: It waz a pleazure talking with you on the telephone yesterday relative to the Atlantic Beach Code of Ordinances. Pursuant to our discuuion, MCC offers to furnish the entire Atlantic Beach Code or cNy Chapter 24, Zoning5ubdivisioq on diskette az follows: A. Disk Specifications: • 3-12 inch diameter disks, double sided, double density, 720 KB; _ • 3-12 inch diameter disks, double sided, high density, 1.44 MB; • •3-1/4 inch diameter disks, double sided, double density, 360 KB; • Disks formatted for DOS 3.3 (Disk Operating System), with data in ASCD or WordPerfect. ' Disks do not reflect pagination. • ltte enClre Code of Ordinances would currently require approldmately 1.6 MB on your hard drive. B. Cost Data in either ASCD or WordPerfect - 1. Entire Code ................................................... 52.000.00 2. Chapter 24, Zoning5ubdivisions ............... S 375.00 Post OIfKe Box 2235 1700 Capiel Cink. S.w. Tallahasze. F132316 (904)576-3171 1-80026 2-CODE (trauonal) I -800342-CODE (Fbddal Pg 2 of 2 Continued Since the for bidder did not submit a complete bid package, it roe agreed to disqualify the bid. Since the other Dids rare eo close, it ras agreed that the overall rating would reigh strongly in favor of the award of the Contractor. NOTE: The recommendation roe to award the Contract to Neadore Construction, Inc. 3. N1YAL CNILD CARE FACILITY This permit rea an Agenda Item in January 1992. Staff rill investigate further the statue of the permit for raaterater. 4. 01NS OF ATLANTIC BEACN The Committee reviered the letter submitted by Jim Lucas dated February 2B, 1992 on behalf of the Oake of Atlantic Beach proposed serer charges. The Committee agreed that 81.28 for each gallon is the City of Jacksonville ordinance end since others an the Buccaneer ayetem do not receive this rate, it could be unfair to provide this rate for Oaks of Atlantic Beach. Bob Noeoy rill check rith {he Building Department to see if a precedent has been establimhvd for trailer parka rich only serer service and send a letter to Mr. Lucse advising him of chat the City has required. This letter rill advime that any application Sor •a hardship' could have to be directed to the City Manager. RSK/tb ccx Commimmioner Fletcher Ernie Beadle/Assistant to PN Director Harry E. NeNally/Utility Plant Division Director Ti^ N. Tornaend/Utility Plant Division Director Dr. Ray Selman Alan Potter File - 92 NSCR CITY OF Pie beat/ - ~lauda uao uvone::aa uvF AMYfIC BFAI'N, FIURm132TJJ 1)81 iELFPHO~'E l9M) Ll%N FAX leWl 2(F56U Pg 1 of 2 April 6, 1992 N E M O R A N D U K TO: Kies D. Leinbach/City Manager FRON: Robert S. Koeoy/Director o£ Public Mocks ~~ RE: MATER AND SEMER COMMITTEE REPORT t15 On April 1, 1992 Coawieeioner Lywan Fletcher, Dr. Ray Salwan, Ernie Beadle, Harry McNally, Alan Potter, and Bob Koeoy set to diseuse current rster and serer concerns and projects. A brief suwwary follore: 1. BUCCA~ER 1111TP EYPAtSIO! fSNHGE TAOK) The sereene are still overloaded and the conveyor belts are not carrying the grit to the chutes. Bob Koeoy outlined the correspondence trail Detreen the City to the Engineer, the Engineer to the Contractor and the Contractor to the Engineer and City. Sines the co.pletion date of April 21, 1992 ie approaching East, it ras agreed thst Bob Koeoy rill trite to Gee and Jenson and request ^ westing at the jobeite on Friday at es00 •.^. to discuss operational proDlewe rith the careens and conveyors. In this letter, a mitten racowsendation frog the Project Engineer •ill be required outlining chat should be done to correct the problewe. This reeowwendatlon rill be requested to be delivered to the City by no later than April 10, 1992. 2. ATLOTLC RP.ACR PATER TREATNE~T PLA07' it Am I2 I~ROYE®:' The Did analysis rse prepared by Gee and Jenson and reviered by the Cowwittee. An extensive re£erenee cheek aatrix prepared by Ernie Beadle, Tiw Torneend and Bob Koeoy ras discussed. Nuwericsl values rare assigned to the ratings, i. e., Excellent 9-10, Very Good 7-B, Good 5- 6, Fair 3-4, and Poor 1-2. ;. Page Tvo Nemo to Hayor and Ci[y Commission April 2, 1992 date. At [his time I would like to recognize the additional reapona ibili[1ea she has assumed, as yell as her anniversary date, and increase her rate of pay from ;7.28 to E7.64 per hour. Trudy's experience vi th the Ci[y of Jacksonville Beach has provided her with strong secretarial skills and municipal experience and she has assumed her responsibilfties in this office better than I could have hoped. I would also like to recognize her capab ili[ies and experience by reclassifying her to "Secretary," at an hourly rate of ;7.28, to more accurately reflect her responsibilities. The monies saved by eliminating [he benefits will more than adequately cover these recommended pay increases for both employees. Ne plan to try this job sharing arrangement for the summer months and review i[ in about three months, but see no reason to discontinue it as long as it proves [o be beneficial to all concerned. I, respectfully, request your consideration and approval of [he requested changes. ,„,. ~,.: CITY OF rsttlartie " - ~ldacila x00 tiF.NItiOLF RINU i_. _- _ _-___~ _ _ _-_ - ._. AT)d]TIC tlF.LL'H. FLUR)UA )EU}5M5 TFlFPf1U~K (40x1 Et)-Ex00 ~~ FA%(4001 Cti5xa5 April 7, 1992 To: The Honorable Mayor and Ci[y Commissioners From: Maureen K£nF,. City Clerk As you knw, Trudy vas hired in December 1991 to replace Dorothy who had resigned her full time position vi [h the city. Ne were lucky enough [o be able to retain Dorothy in a part-time capccity for a few hours each week while Trudy vas learning the job. However, Dorothy felt she needed more income Chan the par[ time hours were providing. I felt ve were fortunate to have these [vo competent, conscientious employees so we have worked out a job sharing arrangement which will meet both [heir needs and will, apparently, also benefit the city. The job sharing arrangement became effective on March 18, with Dorothy working mornings and Trudy working afternoons with a hour or two overlap mid day, Trudy will also attend Ci[y Commission meetings. The hours are flexible to provide chat one of these employees will be in the office at all times and neither one will work in excess of thirty hours per ve ek. Trudy has assumed many of the secretarial responsibilities including typing correspondence ana minutes while Dorothy is more comfortable working with figures and has done an outstanding job se [t ing up the Sett ion H assessments and coordinating the collection of annual payments with the Duval County Tax Collector's office. The Section H infrastructure project has certainly been one of the most significant projects [he city has undertaken in recent years and [he coordination of [he assessments been a huge undertaking and Dorothy is to be commended for her work in [his area. Harry Royal had determined chat the benefit package (owe r[1me/ compensatory time, health insurance, paid holidays, vacation pay and pension benefits) amounts to about one third of actual salary paid. The job sharing arrangement provides no benefits, representing a considerable savings to the city. You may recall that Dorothy vas reclassified from Records Management Clerk to Secretary at the end of her probationary period. Had she continued in her full time position, she would have received an evaluation and merit increase on her employment anniversary dale (Decembez 2, 1991). Instead she continued to work in her part time position aC [he rate of pay she vas receiving prior co her anniversary CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH CITY CONt1I99ION )fEEI'ItiO ' -STAFF REPORT - AOIIiDA ITEN~ REPORT OF USUAGE OF ADELE;.CRAGE COM!{UNITY CENTER b PARKS, MARCH 1992 9UBNITTED BYE ROSE N. BLANCNARD, PARKS b RECREATION DIRECTOR DATEi APRIL 1. 1992 HACKOROUNDt pER REQUEST'OF COI4IISSIOti, THE FOLLONING REPORT ON THE HONTHLY USAGE OF THE ADELE GRAGE COlDfUNITY CENTER b PARKS NARCH 1992 COHIHINITY CENTER SERVED 3 rd TAX NEtP ~ 6 people 10th ELECTION DAY 675 10th TAX HELP ~ H 12L'h RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD HEFTING 6 17th TAX HELP 10 19th NENCOHBERS CRAFTERS 10 24th ~ TAX HELP- 6 25th UNF CLASS 10 31st. TAX HELP ~ 10 TOTAL 741 people TENNIS COURTS 6 PARRS 3rd - Children - Field Trip 60 4th " " 14 5th S 6th NO ACTIVITIES SCHEDULED.CREN PAINTED PAVILION b PICNIC TABLES 7th BIRTHDAY PARTY l2 k2[h Children - Field Trip ~~ l2 13th Reserved-Tennis Courts.- 10 13th Children - Field Trip ~ 60 14th Birthday Party SO 18th Children - Field Trip 24 2 0 t h R e s e rv ed Te n n i s C o U rta - 10 g 2 2g 1 1,, ***ZB~Ii 7 e p ii ~.. ~i1 ~ ~ 7 Sc //P G Gi 2 n L~117.EtQ~GUEtOPINL~~tYIAY ~ ;9 TOTAL 308 people AECOMMENDATION~ ~ NONE AT THIS TIHe *** GRAND TOTAL 1049 *** ATTACHMEtffBi NONE REVIEWED BY CITY NANAOER~ AGENDA IT1iTf N0. L ` oL ~` ~ °t ~i, .~' '• i?; , P °y /' ~ 6 ~~~ p .t , \ ` l% ' / ~. .- ~~' `~ ~\~ r .~ ~~ :,:.,, a, ,. M1 .~" >~ /\ ~ ~~ ~' " ALL ANEpICAN~SUiYEYLWS IAC. . ~~ V~ ".~ • a .J~ l (- M4V SwOU/~u4 S~/l`~lY ,WY u 0 ~ ~s~u~ Mi~mY_u ~1~~ awl. •ti~w1~~~ •M~~w'swY~u~ IwY tl~~ m~~ ~~ Y~ Y~ Y s Ylh~in Yr ~~ ~~ rmi~4Y~nnr v sow w v ~mw o~~iwu ~~w ~ =. _ ~ v~ ~ ~~ i~ _ ~w~ ~~~~w~~ ~ ~ ~ u r ar. w~~i r v~~r r~~s. t \\~ \~ f' ~ .~ .. .~ 1~ ~j~ ~~ ~i e~°j ~~ S ~~N 5 ~~ ~,~.a„ ~ y > i" N' ~. ~~ ~ ~\ /. ~/`U ~_ +'? ,~« _ NOTICE OF ILLEGIBILITY ILLEGIBILITY OF SOME OF THESE DOCUMENTS IS DUE TO THE POOR QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL. THE FAULT DOES NOT LIE WITH THE CAMERA OR ITS OPERATOR. .~~. it--~- ii~ii \L__JI ~~~~ w .MM,e...~,.d .~.~..~. I. Application for Variance filed by Neren and Dan Arlington to conetruet a porch that encroaches _tback requirewents Sur property knorn as 3950 Ocean Grove Driv~o Sam Jseobaon introduced hiweelf to the board snd explained the reasons a variance rae being requested. Ne relayed to tt,e board the Aietory of the residence. Attar discussion, Mr. Horse coved to approve the application. The lotion rae seconded by Mra. Gregg and paeaed by a vote Qf 5 - 2. There being no further business to core before the Hoard anq upon motion duly cede end seconded the seating ree adjourned. SIGNED: ATTEST:___________________________ ~. i MINUTES OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD OF THE CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH, FLORIDA r MARCH 17, 1992 7:00 P. M. CITY HALL PRESENT Gregg NcCeulie Ruth Gregg Samuel Horie Robert Frohrein Nark NcGoren Don Yolfson Pat PSllsore AND Alan Jensen, City Attorney George Yorley, II, CD Director Pet Harris, Recording Secretary The Chairman, Gregg NcCeulie, called the meeting to order and asked for approval of the minutes frog the westing of February 1B, 1992. Upon notion duly cede and seconded said minutes rare approved. N'eM BUSINESSt I. Application to subdivide a large oceanfront lot iwmedietely soutA of Ocean Breeze tacrosa from Oceanralk) rith dlsensione of 75 feet ride by 629 feet deep Siled by Dr. and hrs. Robert B. Van Cleve. Mr. JS^ Dupree, architect for the Van Cleves, introduced Himself to the board and explained the reasons for the request to sudlvide said property. Attar discussion, Nr. Molfaon saved to approve the request and recommend to the City Cosmiseion approval with the condition that the oceanfront lot be lFwited to one Single-Saeily resi5fence. The motion rae seconded and peeled by a vote of 6 - 1. ' II. Application for Variance tiled by Kent N. Baines to construct a patio and screened porcA on property encroaching rear setback line for property located at 1958 Beacheide Court. Mr. Nainee introduced himself to the board end elated the reasons a variance ram Deing requested. f After diecueeion Mr. Yolfeon coved to deny the application, Mr. McGoran seconded the wotlan and the application ram denied by e vote of 5 - 2. i) Minutes of Community Development eoartl. 2) Proposetl Final Plat drawi g. REVIEMED BY CITY MANAGER,.,. ~~/- ~ /u// AGENDA ITEM NO. `~ --- CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH CITY COMMISSION MEETING STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEN: Replat of One lot into two lots SUBMITTED BY: George Worley, City Planner ~~L)~ DATE: April 9, 1992 BACKGROUND: ~~.~~~~ The aDPlicants.dwn a large ocean front lot immediately south of BeatTStde~(across from Ocean--Walk) with dimensions of 75 feet wide by 624 feet deep. They desire Lo subdivide the large lot into two smaller lore, an ocean front lot 75 feet wide by 434 feet deep, and a street front lot 75 feet wide by 790 feet deep. An ingress/egress and utility easement is proposed through the street lot to service the ocean front lot as shown on the attached D?at. The plat has been reviewed by the Community Development Board and recommended for approval provided that the oceanfront lot is developed only as a Single-family residence. Permanent access to Lhe oceanfront lot must be provided for by perpetual easement shown on Lhe final plat. The dimensions of this easement are partly dictated by the Fire Departments minimum Flre access requirements. Ae proposed by the applicant, modification of the secondary dune on the oceanfront lot will be minimized by cutting only one narrow driveway through Lhe dune. The oceanfront hou6e will not encroach beyond the Coastal Construction Control Line. RECOMMENDATION: Both the proposed lots far exceed the minimum dimensions of Lhe RG-2 Zoning District. The access easement sheultl be incorporated into the plat Lo provide perpetual access Lo the ocean front lot from Seminole Rond. The Subdivision procedures require that the Preliminary Plan be directed by the Commission to Lhe Community Development Board for a review and recommendation. The plat, along with the Community Development Board recommendation, will then be submitted back Lo the Commission for review and approval. Thi° process has been followed. Upon approval by the Commission of this plan, the Applicant will prepare a final plat (on mylar) for the Mayors signature and to be recorded with the Clerk of the County Courts. Staff recommends approval of this proposal as recommended by the Community Development Boartl. ATTACHMENTS: E. Page 2 Eesolution No. 92-9 Passed by the City Commission on April 13, 1992. William 1. Gulliford Mayor/Presiding Officer Approved as to form and correctness: Alan C. Jensen, City Attorney ATTEST: Maureen zing, City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 97.-9 WHEREAS, from time to time uncertain it becomes necessary for certain signatures to be rendered on various and sundry checks, drafts, notices, acceptances, bills of exchange, orders, etc., for the payment and withdrawal of monies, credits, items and property on behalf of the City of Atlantic Beach, and WHEREAS, due to vacations, illnesses, and other matters, those individuals authorized to sign on behalf of the City of Atlantic Beach may be unable to do so for one of the above or other reasons, and WHEREAS, it is proper and appropriate to have other selected officials and/or officers of the City to sign in lieu of the Finance Director, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COtM1ISSION OF THE CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH, DWAL COUNTY, FLORIDA, THAT: Section 1. Any two (2) of the following officials, the Finance Director, the City Manager, the City Clerk, and the Accountant are hereby authorized to sign any and all checks, drafts, notes, acceptances, bills of exchange, orders or other instruments for the payment and withdrawal of any and all monies, credits, items and property at any time held by the Banks and Federal Savings and Loan Associations, for accounts of the City of Atlantic Beach, and EE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT: Section 2. All the foregoing authorities shall be and continue in full force and effect until revoked or modified by written notice actually received by said Banks and Savings and Wan Associations, setting forth a resolution to that effect stated to have been adopted by the City Commission of the City of Atlantic Beach, Florida. Section 3. Any two (2) of the following persons, whose genuine signatures appear below, are authorized signers for the said City in the capacity set opposite their respective signatures, to-wit: Kirk R. Wendland, Finance Kim D. Leinbach, City Maureen King, City Section 4. Any and all resolutions in conflict herewith are hereby rescinded. x ^ x x : x x : ^ ~ : : : ~ • * • x * • * • : • f Page Four Minutes of Special Called Meeting April 2, 1992 Prosecuting Attorney Ballot Each Commissioner vas provided with a ballot and asked to rank the three applicants in order of preference wi [h three points being given to first place, two points [o [hose ranked second, and one point for third plate. A tabulation of [he votes, which are attached hereto and made a par[ hereof, indicated Ms. Green had received l2 points, Mr. Allen had 10 points, and Mr. Arnold had 8 points. The City Manager and City Attorney were directed to enter into negotiations with Ms. Green [o establish a fee to be paid to the Prosecuting Attorney. Ne requested a contract be drafted for execution by [he prosecuting attorney and the city, such contract to be renewed annually by approval of the CS[y Commission. There being no further business to come before the Ci[y Commission, the Hayor declared the meeting adjourned at 9:45 PM. Hil liam I. Gulliford, Jr. Mayor/Presiding Officer Maureen King, Ci[y Clerk f mow- ~.~_ Page Three Minutes of Special Called Meeting April 2, 1992 whether a bidder who had been ranked "Good" could do a satisfactory job, to which Mr. Kosoy responded "Yes." Lamar Braxton of Ortega Industrial Contractors, the second low bidder, said he did not understand the system used by the city in the selection process. He felt his company vas a responsible bidder and had never been denied a contract on which [hey had been [he lw bidder. John Be lloit of WPC Industrial Contractors, suggested if the city vas concerned about the capabilities of the bidders, staff should consider pre-qualifying [he bidders on future projects. He said he vas not informed until two weeks after the bid opening Chat required documents had not been included with his bid, and questioned whether the city could have misplaced the documents. He felt the reading of [he bid should include a check of the required documents. The City A[[orney asked Andy Nay of Gee S Jenson vhe [her he had any knowledge of whether the bids met or failed [o meet the qualifications and criteria se[ forth in [he invitation. Hr. May responded Cha[ [he bids had been submitted in duplicate and his office had checked the bids for items such as insurance documents, and bid bonds, etc. but had no[ been involved in evaluating the references. Tim Tow send said he vas present at the bid opening and had pointed out immediately after the bid opening while some of the bidders were still present, [hat WPC had not submitted a list of references. Bidders had an opportunity to inspect the bids of other contractors and vhlle other bidders did examine the WPC bid, only those portions of the bids involving prices were made available [o [hose contractors. Theresa Green, 1946 Beachside Court, expressed the opinion that I[ vas in the best interest of the citizens of the city to award the contract to the loves[ bidder. Coaadasioner Fletcher awed to accept the recoaaendatioa of the Pater aad Saver Coaad.ttee asd award the bid for eater treatment plant i~rovenenta to Meadors Construction Co. The notion van seconded by Coaadssioner Paters. Commissioner Fletcher said the eater and sever committee had spent about [vo hours reviewing the bids and examining the relevant documents. He felt in recommending [he award of the contract to Meadors Cons trot [ion, the committee had complied with [he requirements of the city code. After further discussion, [he question vas called and w roll call vote the ~o[ioo carried on a 3 - 2 vote as follws_ Coaadssioner Edwards, Mo; Coaadsaiooer Ple[che:, Yes; Coa~issiooer Tucker, Yes; Coaalssioner Paters, Yes; and Mayor Culliford, Po. Page Two Minutes of Special Called Meeting April 2, 1992 that firm understood he was seeking this position and i[ would no[ be a problem. Ne felt he would be accessible and could be helpful to the city. Following the interviews [he Mayor sought the wishes of [he City Commission. Commissioner Waters coved to select a prosecuting attorney that evening using written ballots. The motion vas seconded by Co~iasioner Fdvards and vas unanimously approved. A[ [his tile, Mayor Gulliford called a short recess and it was agreed [o complete the written ballots following Age¢da Items Mo. 2. TLe meeti¢q reco¢ve¢ed at 8:35 PM. 2. Renor[ and reeammendation fr¢~ the chairman of the Awards Public Works Director, Bob Kosoy, reported six bids were opened for this project on Hatch ll, 1992, all bids coming within the Gee b Jenson ea [imate. efds were Chen tabulated by Gee and Jenson anL a copy of the bid tabulation is attached hereto and made a part hereof. City staff - Bob Kosoy, Ernie Beadle, and Tim Townsend - then extensively checked the references provided by the bidders and rated them using a uniform racing scale. The low b£dde r, WPC Industrial Contractors, Lnc., did no[ submit references as required by the invitation [o bid, and vas disqualified. Perry-McCall Construction, Inc. and Arko Construction d Engineering, Inc., received no~rating since [heir work vas no[ related to water and sever projects. Mr. Kosoy explained that [he overall ratings methodology vas discussed at [he Water and Sever Committee meeting on April 1. He said [he award of contract procedures as outlined in Section 2-335 of the City Code had been strictly fol loved. It vas [he recommendation of [he committee [hat the bid be awarded to Meadors Construction Co. Inc., based on the fart [hat their bid vas only 1.465 higher than Che second lw bid, but [heir overall performance rating vas 31S higher. Commissioner Fletcher inquired further into the reference checks made by city staff and Hr. Kosoy reported [hat all references provided by the bidders relating [o eater and sever projects were checked but any comments received from sources other than [hose provided by the bidders, were not considered. Mayor Gu111ford inquired whether by the committee's recommendation, more weigh[ had been given to references than the price quoted for [he project, [o vh ich Hr. Kosoy responded "No." The Mayor [hen inquired MINUTES OF 2HE SPECIAL CALLED MEF.TINC OF ATLANTIC BEACH CITY CO.~RII SSION HELD IN CITY MALL, H00 SEMINOLE ROAD, ATLANTIC BEACH AT 7:30 PM ON THURSDAY, APRIL 2, 1992 The meeting was called to order a[ 7:30 PM b7 Mayor Gulliford. Present. in addition to [he Mayor, were Commissioners Eduard s. Fletcher, Tucker, and Yaters. Also present were City Manager Leinbach, City Attorney Jensen, and Ci[y Clerk King. 1. Discussion a~ related action concerning interviews with applicants fo [b po ition of Prosecuting Attorney [o the Code Enforcement Board: a. J. James Allen - 7:30 PM b_ Suzanne Yorrall Green - 7:45 PM c. Mark M. Arnold - 8:00 PM The throe applicants were interviewed individually at the times indicated. Each vas invited to make an opening statement, following which the City Commissioners asked each of the applicants about his/her qualifications and experience. Jaws Allen introduced himself as a general trial lawyer with twelve years experience. Ne said he vas an Atlan[SC Beach resident and had recently moved his practice to the beach. He looked forvard to broadening the scope of his business to include code enforcement. Discussion ensued regarding [he extent to which the code vas violated in Atlantic Beach and it vas the general consensus chat efforts needed to be stepped up to bring the areas with the most violations into compliance. Suzame Yorrall Green said she had practiced primarily as a prosecutor and had two years experience in Pinellas County and two years Sn [he Slate Attorney's Office and had now opened her own practice a[ the beach. Hs. Green said she vas inclined to be lenient with first offenders but felt penalties should be stiff for repeat offenders. Discussion ensued regarding filing and collecting liens and Hs. Green said she had considerable experience with homeowners' associations and mechanics liens. The City Manager explained that [he Prosecuting Attorney worked with city staff and inquired into how available Ms. Green would be to staff members. .~ Ms. Green felt since she lived and had her office at the beach, this would be advantageous [o [he city. Mark Arnold ex_lained he had several years experience in rode enforcement with the City of Jacksonville Beach and he felt his experience would be helpful in persuading the board to assess fines and clean up [he areas in violation, and in [he process, derive revenue for [he city. Mr. Arnold said he vas ioining a larper law firm in June but fi-- PAGE TWELVE MINUTES, MARCH 23, 1992 The Mayor indicated he felt the pension request of the employees should be addressed and he requested that this natter be placed on the agenda for the next meeting. The Clty Manager indicated the city had not heard from the actuary, and the Mayor indicated the actuary should be giving the City a report soon. The Mayor would like this to be a city commission agenda item at the next meeting, or as soon as possible. There being no further business the meeting adjourned at 10:45 p. m. A T T 6 S T: William I. Gulliford, Mayor/Presiding Officer Maureen Ring, City Clerk NAME OF COMMAS. M S V Y V N t t 3 PAGE ELEVEN MINUTES, MARCH 23, 1992 NAME OF COMMRS. M S V Y V N The Mayor indicated the City Manager's proposal indicated "subsequent to identification of adequate funding within the current fiscal year budget." The Mayor stated there is a limitation on the funding. The question was called and the motion carried with a vote of 3 - 2 with Commissioner Edwards and Mayor Gulliford voting Nay.. Commissioner Tucker indicated that if an agenda item is not included in the material on Friday, the Commission is not obligated to take action. Co®isaioner Fletcher asked if it would be possible to receive agenda packets earlier than Friday evening. This was discussed, and the City Manager indicated his willingness to try to get packets out earlier. He explained that there was a cut off day on Wednesday to get items to the City Manager's office, prior to sending out the agenda on Friday. He indicated that he also had a short period of time to go over agenda items in order to get them out by Friday. No decision was reached concerning this matter. Co®issioner Fletcher would like the request for the authorization of the plans for the Town Center Project to be placed on the next Commission agenda. He indicated the Commission would be requested to approve the plans and dedicate the right-of-ways according to the plans. Co®issioner Waters indicated he attended the last Community Development Board Meeting and he pointed out what he felt was a discrepancy in the process of granting variances. He suggested that clarifications may be necessary when granting variances in PUD neighborhoods. Coaiasioner Waters indicated he would like to have a short synopsis of what transpired at board meetings held during each month. A discussion ensued and it was decided that minutes of board meetings were available. Commissioner Waters lndicated he would like minutes of all board meetings placed in his mailbox at the City Hall. Co®issioner Waters gave a report concerning the Royal Palms area and he said he had received indications that residents of Royal Palms feel intimidated and, thus, do not wish to become involved in code enforcement. He indicated he will pursue in the work with the Royal Palms Committee. PAGE TEN MINUTES, MARCH 23, 1992 NAME OF COMMAS. M S ~ Y ~ N 7. Discussion and related action regarding Fire Marshall position TAe City Manager stated there is a need in the community for the establishment of a Fire Marshall. The City Manager asked the Commission for authorization to create the position of Fire Marshall, and he distributed a review of the duties of this position. The City Manager recommended Chief Rew for the position of Fire Marshall. He indicated he would fill the position of Fire Chief, should Chief Rew be appointed to the position of Fire Marshall. Edwards x ' Fletcher x x Motion: Defer until the next City Commission Tucker x x meeting waters x Gulliford x Commissioner Fletcher indicated he had just received the information concerning this matter and he was not prepared to vote tonight. The question was called and the motion was defeated by a vote of 2 - 3 with Commissioners Edwards, Waters, and Mayor Gulliford voting Nay. Edwards x Motion: Approve the recommendation of the Fletcher City Managerto establish the position of Fire Tucker Marshall waters x Gulliford Commissioner Fletcher asked for a point of clarification: he inquired if the recommendation was simply to create ~ the position, to which the City Manager responded the i ~ recommendation he made in his memorandum was to create the position subject to delineating the funds within the current fiscal year. Commissioner Fletcher asked, if the position was created, would it be with the understanding that it would be funded for the balance of the year, to which the City Manager replied that was correct. Edwards x substitute motion: Create the position but Fletcher x x defer action on funding of the position Tucker x x Waters x Commissioner Fletcher indicated the amount of 532,000 was Gulliford x being discussed for this position and he thought the commission should have information as to how the position would be funded. He indicated he was not opposed to the concept of creating the position but he indicated he did not understand the urgency that was involved. He added he would like to know how the position was going to be funded, what impact it would have on overall salaries, and where the money was coming from. £ ..~-. PAGE NINE MINUTES, MARCN 23, 1992 Barbara Bonner, 463 Selva Lakes Circle, suggested opening up rights-of-way at beach accesses to create some new spaces. The City Manager indicated the city was continuing to study the feasibility of opening street ends. Be reported the city would be conducting a study and this would be used by city staff to recommend additional residents-only parking spaces. Co~ieaioner Edwards referred to the old AfiP parking lot and suggested contacting the person who owned the property with the intent of the city running a shuttle back and forth to the beach, with the help of Jacksonville. The Mayor indicated the city had contacted JTA concerning this. John Baillie encouraged the Commission to adopt a policy of reopening rights-of-way so that additional parking is available to those who wish to use the beach. There being no further comments from the floor the Mayor declared the public hearing closed. Notion: Authorize the designation of Resident Only Parking Sticker spaces on the 18th and 19th Street pazking areas as recommended by staff No discussion before the vote. Motion carried unanimously. Commissioner Waters suggested reserving parking spaces neat to the Sea Turtle parking lot, along Ocean Boulevard, for Atlantic Beach residents, and also the north side of the Community Center parking lot. The Mayor agreed with Commissioner Waters and he asked the City Manager and staff to give a recommendation concerning the aforementioned proposed spaces, as well as any other spaces that could be utilized. D. Report regarding the Co®ittee reviewing City Code and updating same Commissioner Fletcher indicated a meeting was held concerning the zoning code review. An agenda was decided upon and a meeting will beheld every Wednesday, 4:00 p. m. in the Conference Room of the City Rall. This will be a public meeting and public, press, and Commissioners are invited. NAME OF COMMRS. M S V Y V N Edwards x x Fletcher x Tucker x aters x x Gulliford x PAGE EIGHT MINUTES, MARCH 23, 1992 NAME OF COMMHS. M S ~ Y y N Motion: 8pprove passage of Ordinance No. 57- Edwards x x 92-18 on its First reading and set public Fletcher x hearing for April 13, 1992 Tucker x Waters x x No discussion before the vote. Motion carried Gulliford x unanimously. 6. Hew Business: A. Short list of attorneys for Code Enforcement Board The City Attorney presented a recommendation of three candidates for the Commission to interview for the position of Code Enforcement Attorney: Suzanne Green, Mark Arnold, and Jim Allen. It was determined the interviews will be conducted prior to the next City Commission meeting, Monday, April 13, 1992, at 5:30 p. m. H. Recommendation for draft ordinance relating to gazage sales The City Manager recommended the City Attorney draft an ordinance based upon several provisions as set forth in his memorandum dated March 23, 1992, copy attached. The Mayor indicated he does not feel the adoption of this ordinance is in the city's best interest. Commissioner Waters indicated he felt garage sales were an unregulated business in the city. A discussion ensued concerning the possibility of regulating garage sales, as well as the possibility of having to obtain an occupational license to have a garage sale. Commissioner Fletcher reminded everyone that complaints had been received on only one abuser in the entire city. He indicated he would be in favor of regulating garage sales through the occupation license system. Commissioner Tucker agreed. The Mayor asked City Clerk Maureen Ring to investigate the possibility of having garage sales regulated by the occupational license system. C. Public hearing relative to reserved pazking spaces regarding Residential Parking Sticker Program The Mayor referred to a recommendation from the City Manager for designation of parking spaces and he briefly eaplained to the audience the streets that were involved (18th and 19th Streets). The Mayor opened the floor for a public hearing. ~~ ,-_ PAGE SEVEN MINUTES, MARCH 23, 1992 C. Ordinance No. 45-92-10 - First Reading AN ORDINANCB AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER 20, TARATION, ARTICLE III, OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE TAX, SECTION 20-59, SCHEDULE OF FEES, TO ADD A CLASSIFICATION AND SET A FEfi FOR MICRO BREWERY, AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE Mayor Gulliford presented in full, in writing, Ordinance No. 45-92-10 on first reading. Motion: Approve passage of Ordinance No. 45-92-10 on first reading and set for public hearing on April 13, 1992 No discussion before the vote. The motion carried unanimously. D. First reading of Ordinance 65-92-21 renaming W. 12th Street as a continuation of Plaza The City Attorney reported since there already was an existing street named W. Plaza Street it was not possible to rename W. 12th Street as a continuation of Plaza. The City Manager explained what was now W. 12th Street was to ba renamed W. Plaza; however, in research it was found there was an existing W. Plaza which is located near Carnation Street, Section H. The Mayor asked staff to research further to determine if W. Plaza Street was being utilized. If it was not being utilized, it was suggested w. Plaza Street be eliminated, and it would then be possible to rename W. 12th Street. E. First reading of Ordinance 57-92-18 relating to rotation wrecker call list AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH, ESTABLISHING A ROTATING WRECKER CALL LIST, SETTING FORTH CERTAIN REQUIREMENTS FOR WRECKER SERVICES, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Mayor Gulliford presented in full, in writing, Ordinance 57-92-18 on first reading. NAME OF COMMAS. M S ~ Y Y N Edwards x Fletcher x x Tucker x x Waters x Gulliford x i PAGE SIX MINUTES, MARCH 23, 1992 NAME OF COMMAS. MI I S V Y V N Along discussion ensued, and changes and additions were suggested and agreed upon relative to both residential and commercial garbage pickup. Edwards x Motion: Defer final action and continue the public Fletcher x x hearing at the next meeting. Refer the ordinance Tucker x barJc to the Solid Waste Co®ittee with the Waters x aaaiatance of the City Nanager and City Attorney Gulliford x The Commission indicated their desire to have the ordinance prepared in its clean form, without old language indicated by a dark background. The question was called and the motion carried unanimously. Edwards x Motion: Defer action on Resolution 92-7 Fletcher x x (establishing the number of days for solid waste Tucker x collection) Waters x Gulliford x No discussion before the vote. The motion carried i unanimously. The Mayor thanked Theresa Todd and the members of the Solid Waste Committee for their hard work in the preparation of the ordinance. 8. Ordinance No. 5-92-22 - First Reading AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER 2, ADMINISTRATION, ARTICLE VII, FINANCE, DIVISION 2, PURCHASING, AMENDING SECTION 2-331, BIDS - WHEN REQUIRED, TO PROVIDE THAT FORMAL BIDS SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR PURCHASES OF SUPPLIES OR SERVICES FROM ENTERPRISE FUNDS IN EXCESS OF 55,000, AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE Mayor Gulliford presented in full, in writing, Ordinance No. 5-92-22 on first reading. Edwards x ~ Fletcher x x l Motion: Approve passage of Ordinance No. 5-92-22 Tucker x on first reading and set for public heaving on Waters x April 13, 1992 Gulliford x No discussion before the vote. The motion carried unanimously. ,.,,,... PAGE FIVE MINUTES, MARCH 23, 1992 NAME OF COMMRS. M S ~ Y ~ N City Manager Kim Leinbach reported a meeting was held between representatives of Haskell Company, Greg Criatovich from Selva Marina Country Club, Alan Potter, and Hob Kosoy, Public Works Director, concerning the status of drainage problems at Fleet Landing. The City Manager reported there was an agreed upon plan to relieve the drainage problem. The Army Corps of Engineers and St. Johns Water Management District considered the changes as minor. The DER, however, is considering it may require a full review which could hold up the process. The City Manager suggested lobbying the DER to encourage them to approve the modifications as soon as possible. Alan Potter gave a report concerning the meeting and he indicated after the work is completed the situation would be the same as it was before Haskell came on the scene. 5. Ordinances- A. Ordinance If55-92-26 - Public Hearing AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH, REWRITING IN ITS ENTIRETY CHAPTER 16, REFUSE AND GARBAGE, AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE Mayor Gulliford presented in full, in writing, ordinance No. 75-92-9, said ordinance having been posted in accordance with Charter requirements. He opened the floor for a public hearing and invited comments from the audience. John Weldon indicated he thought the ordinance was difficult to read. The Mayor introduced Theresa Todd, Chairman of the Solid Neste Committee, and he indicated Ms. Todd would explain the language contained 1n the new ordinance. Ms. Todd explained the old language was indicated by a dark background and the new language was underlined. She answered questions from the audience and from the Commissioners regarding the work the Committee had done to come up with the proposed ordinance. The proposed ordinance would increase the cost of solid waste collection from S36 per quarter to S48 per quarter for single-family curbside pickup. A proposed resolution would be introduced in conjunction with the solid waste ordinance that would reduce service from six days per week pickup to two days per week each for garbage and yard trash collection, and one day for recycling. PAGE FOUR MINUTES, MARCH 23, 1992 added the city presently fixed pot holes and maintained the streets so that fire trucks and garbage trucks were able to get through the neighborhood. The question was called and the motion carried unanimously. B. Discussion and related action regarding request to waive impact fees for Reaches Habitat Mayor Gulliford introduced Peggy O'Neill, President of Beaches Habitat. He explained Beaches Habitat was concerned because the impact fees they paid on the first house they built amounted to 51,738. Beaches Habitat planned to build two more houses and they were requesting that the city waive the impact fees. Peggy O'Neill introduced John Hass. Mr. Bass thanked everyone who helped on a recent Habitat work day, and he explained the goals of Habitat. The Mayor asked George Worley, Community Development Coordinator, if Community Development Grant money could be applied to this situation. It was determined the city had a contract with Jacksonville HUD that specified certain work the city hoped to accomplish, but that it was not uncommon to re-address the matter and possibly amend the contract. A discussion ensued concerning having the impact fee spread over a five year period for the homeowner, to which Peggy O'Neill replied this would be an extreme hardship for the homeowner. The Mayor asked George Worley to look into this and dateraiae if the wording in the HUD contract could be mended to enable the city to allocate 51,738 to Beaches Habitat. The Mayor asked that this be an agenda item for the nest Commission meeting. 5 Committee Reoorts• Water and Sewer Committee report Commissioner Fletcher briefly outlined the Water and Sewer Committee Report and indicated he would be happy to answer questions. Since there were no questions the report was accepted and a copy of the complete report is attached hereto and made a part hereof. B. Fleet Landing report NAME OF COMMRS. M S V Y V N PAGE THREE MINUTES, MARCH 23, 1992 NAME OF COMMAS. I M S ~ Y y N Rea Rogosheske, Sevilla Condominiums, stated before George Bull passed away he indicated the streets were dedicated to the County. Alan Jensen replied according to the plats, the streets were not dedicated to the county. Stan Jones, Seminole Road, indicated he thought the money to maintain streets in Selva Marina should come from gas tax money, to which the Mayor replied the city could not use gas tax money to maintain streets that the city does not own. William McGee, 1831 Selva Marina Drive, indicated Selva Marina residents pay taxes like everyone else in the city and, thus, gas tax should ba used to repair the streets. Commissioner Waters indicated he thought the only thing the city could do would be to repair pot holes. He felt this was a unique and attractive area. He added the city could adopt a long range policy over a ten year period. Alan Potter indicated Mr. Bull intended to give the streets to homeowners when the McCormick agreement eapired. He indicated it was the plan of Mr. Bull to create as part of each plat a homeowners association, and it was the intention of Mr. Bull to transfer ownership of the streets to the homeowners association for the purpose of maintaining the streets. Mr. Potter urged the city to look for a document indicating the streets were dedicated to the homeowners. A discussion ensued regarding the possibility of the streets being dedicated to the county some time during the early 1930'x. Edwards x Motion: Refer the question to the City Fletcher x x Manager and the City Attorney to explore some Tucker x x of ibe points made from the floor and talk to Waters x the developer Gulliford x John Sale, 1791 Salve Marina Drive, indicated he felt the people in this area are entitled to a safe place to live, and the maintenance of streets by the city, to which the Mayor replied the situation will be looked into by the city. Co~isaioner Waters indicated several streets in the area are beautiful. He felt homeowners knew when they bought the property what the condition of the streets were. He PAGE TWO MINUTES, MARCH 23, 1992 3. Old Business: A. Report on ownership of streets in the Selva Marina area City Attorney Alan Jensen reported he received correspondence from the Chief of Police and the Director of Public Works regarding an evaluation that was done relative to streets and units in Selva Marina. He indicated the evaluation was done by England and Thims in 1983, and he indicated he also received maps of the property and a maintenance agreement, signed by the original developer of the property. The documents revealed Units 10 through 12, which included basically everything north of Saturiba Drive and west of Selves Tierra, were all private streets. When the streets were platted, the City Attorney explained, they were retained for the sole and exclusive property of the developer, which is Sevilla Development Corporation. The City Attorney reported there is nothing in the city records which would support the city had ever accepted or owned the streets. Nith reference to Selva Marina Drive, north of Saturiba, there is no evidence in the city that reflects this is a county street. In order to determine the actual ownershlp of the streets, the City Attorney explained, a title search would have to be done by a title company, but he indicated he felt very confident that, except for Selva Marina Drive, north of Saturiba, all the other streets are privately owned. He explained the city had all rights on these streets, other than ownership, that it would normally have on any municipal street. He eaplained the streets were not accepted for maintenance and they were not dedicated to the city because they were not built to city specifications. He explained the construction and width of the streets, the turning radius, the intersection, and the failure to remove certain trees so that fire equipment could get through, all contributed to the streets not being built to city specifications. Commissioner Edwards indicated he felt it would be another burden on the city to take on the maintenance of the streets, as they are not built to specifications. It was determined the developer had a maintenance agreement with H.B. McCormick to maintain the streets; however, it expired three years ago. NAME OF COMMRS. M S V Y V N -~_r_. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF ATLANTIC BEACH CITY COMMISSION RELD IN CITY HALL, B00 SEMINOLE ROAD, AT 7:15 PM ON MONDAY, MARCH 23, 1992 PRESENT: William I. Gulliford, Jr., Mayor Glenn A. Edwards Ly,nan T. Fletcher Adelaide R. Tucker, and J. Dezmond Waters, III, Commissioners AND: Kim D. Leinbach, City Manager Alan C. Jensen, City Attorney i Maureen King, City Clerk The meeting was called to order by Mayor Gulliford. The invocation, offered by Commissioner Fletcher, was followed by the pledge to the flag. 1. Aparoval of the minutes of the regular meeting of w~~.~w o 1992 and anecial called meeting of March it 1992. Motion: Approve minutes of the regular meeting of March 9, 1992. In discussion before the vote, Commissioner Edwards requested a correction of the vote o£ the motion directing the City Manager to draft an ordinance regulating garage sales, page one; vote should indicate all ayes. Also, on page four, vote of motion to deny request to have a trailer on Sea Turtle parking lot should indicate a vote of aye by Couwissioner Tucker. The minutes were unanimously approved as corrected. Motion: Approve minutes of the special called meeting of March 11, 1992. No discussion before the vote. The motion carried unanimously. Commissioner Waters referred to Wednesday meetings that were set for himself and Commissioner Fletcher to meet with the City Manager concerning the budget process. He indicated the meetings have been changed from 4:00 p. m. to 3:00 p. m. every Wednesday in the City Hail. 2. Recocmition of visitors: Jim Lucas, Oceanwalk, thanked the Commission for the outstanding efforts that were made to put in the sidewalk on Seminole Road. ME OF COMMAS. M O T f O N S E C O N D Y O T E D Y E S V O i E D N O Edwards x x Fletcher x Tucker x x waters x Gullifor x Edwards x Fletcher x Tucker x x Waters x Gullifor x ~~ 10. New Business: A. Discussion and related action concerning hydraulic shares for Harry Warnock (City Attorney Alan Jensen) B. Recommendation authorizing employment of attorney for Code Enfor<emen[ Board (City Attorney Alan Jensen) C. Approval and authorization for Hayor to sign CDHG contract with Jacksonville (City Planner George Worley) D. Discussion and related action requesting authorization for repairs and rehabi li[a[ion of sewer lines and manholes in Russell and Howell Parks and request to bid (Public Works Director Robert Roeoy) I1. City Manager Reports and/or Correspondence: A. Discussion and related action regarding Fire Marshall position 12. Mayor [o r.rt on City Coa~issionera, City Attorney and City Clerk: A. Garage sale report (City Clerk Maureen Ring) Adj our®en[ CITY OP ATLANTIC BEACtl BECDLAB NESTING OF SHE CITY COMMISSION, APRIL 13, 1992, 7:15 P.N. AGENDA Call to Order Invocat Son and pledge Co the flag 1. Approval of the minutes of the regular meeting of March 23. 1992, and Special Called meeting of April 2, 1992 "~ 2. Recognition of Visitors: 3. Presentations: A. Tow Center (Commissioner Fletcher) 4. Appearances: A. Nary Carson Bailey 5. Besolutiom: A. Resolution 192-9 removing the name of Harry Royal from check signing and replace it with Kirk Nendland 6. Old easiness: A. Report oa owerahip of streets is the Selva Marina area (City Attorney Alan Jensen) B. Discussion and related action relating to [he adoption of subdivision of Van Cleve property (City Plainer George Morley) 7. Consent: A. Report on usage of the Adele Grage Community Ctr. for March B. Action by the City Commission [o approve the recommendation of [he City Clerk regarding clerical staff e. Committee Beports: A. Haler 6 Sever Committee report (Commissioner Fletcher) B. Zoning Committee repot[ and proposal to purchase Code of Ordinance on computer disk (Commissioner Pletcher) C. Report and recommendation by Awards Committee Chairman Commissioner Edwards on Bid 19192-6 roll-oa roll-off of sludge containers D. Beport sad recommendation by Awards C~i[tee Chairman Commissioner Edwards on Bid 19192-9 installation of railing and stairways at wastewater treatment plan[ 9. Ordinances: A. Continuation of Ordinance /55-92-26 regarding solid waste and Resolution -92-7 establishing the number of days for solid waste toile[ [Son B. Continuation of Ordinance 040-92-17 regarding Continental Cablevision Franchise extension C. Final reading and public hearing of Ordinance 8i-92-22 raising threshold for bids from ;2,500 to 55,000 for ente_ryrise funds D. Final reading and public hearing of Ordinance 545-92-]0 [o add a classification and set a fee for micro brevery- E. Final reading and public hearing of Ordinance 557-92-18 relating to rotation vreckex call list F. Reconsideration of water treatment plan[ bid s;. ~ bfm~sta a/ 3~ 1~~~