Loading...
Item 7E ,~. CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH CITY COMMISSION MEETING STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM: Tree Canopy Preservation SUBMITTED BY: Jim DATE: February 26, 2004 AGENDA ITEM #7E MARCH 8, 2004 BACKGROUND: This staff report is intended to answer some questions raised by the City Commission relating to the recommendation from the Tree Board to designate the Selva Marina Subdivision as a "Tree Canopy Preservation Corridor", to share some observations about the proposed ordinance, and to make a recommendation to the Commission as to how to proceed. ~ First, it should be recognized that the Tree Board has contributed greatly to the quality of life in Atlantic Beach. Their decisions have caused for the preservation of numerous trees that would have been needlessly cut down by developers because of poor planning or lack of concern for the city's tree canopy. They have also approved many trees to be replanted on construction sites through the mitigation requirements and have caused for a significant amount of money to flow into the city's Tree Fund to allow for the many planting projects that have occurred over the last several years. Any recommendations here are intended to further enhance the city's tree ordinance and support the Tree Board's diligent work. A number of problems exist with the language of the proposed ordinance, and some other amendments to the tree ordinance should be considered. First, the proposed language allowing the Tree Board to recommend to the Code Enforcement Board a penalty not to exceed $500 per tree in the Selva Marina Subdivision would be more appropriately applied to illegal tree removal citywide. The ordinance as written would create a new "Tree Preserved Corridor" designation, which would be separate from the existing "Historic Tree Preservation" designation and would apply only to the Selva Marina Subdivision. The Code Enforcement Board presently has the authority to impose a fine not to exceed $5,000 where the Board finds violations to be "irreparable or irreversible in nature". Removal of significant trees clearly falls into this category. The Tree Board's intent is to their ability to not only impose mitigation for people who remove trees AGENDA ITEM #7E MARCH 8, 2004 without permits but to recommend fines to the Code Enforcement Board in addition to that mitigation spelled out in the Tree Ordinance. Second, the proposed ordinance would apply only to trees on the public right-of--way in the Selva Marina Subdivision. Both city projects and removal by private owners and developers would be covered by this new requirement to get Tree Board approval prior to cutting any tree on the right-of--way. In past years, private owners that have wanted to remove trees on city right-of--way have received permission from the Public Works Department, although in the last few years, it has been my policy to ask the Tree Board for review in permitting of any such proposed tree removals. It may be appropriate to consider an amendment to the ordinance, which clearly requires approval of the Tree Board before private individuals can remove trees from the public right-of--way in any part of the city and not just the Selva Marina Subdivision. Next, the reasons enumerated that would allow the Tree Board to issue a permit for removal of the trees onright-of--ways in this proposed new Tree Preserved Corridor is considerably more restrictive than those reasons in the present ordinance under the "Historic Tree" section. The proposed ordinance only allows removal when "the safety of the general public or j adjacent residence is threatened by such historic trees or landscaping or where the overall value of the corridor will be enhanced by such removal." The Historic Tree Ordinance (Section 23-48) also allows for the removal where it is necessary for ingress and or egress from a property, when special circumstances exist such as necessity of handicap accessibility or when there is another valid or legitimate reason for their removal. Consequently, the proposed ordinance may unduly constrain the Tree Board's ability to issue tree removal permits in the future. Both the proposed Tree Preserved Corridor designation for the Selva Marina area and the existing requirements of the Historic Preserved Corridor which apply to East Coast Drive and Ocean Boulevard would require that professional tree surveys be obtained and made part of the public record. The cost of the survey was over $6,000 for the East Coast/Ocean area. No price tag has been estimated for the survey in the Selva Marina Subdivision. The logic behind requiring a survey is to ensure that records exist in case trees are illegally removed and it is impossible to thereafter determine how large the trees were. The concern for illegal removal of trees on the right-of--way is legitimate on a citywide basis, but the cost for preparing such surveys citywide would be prohibitive. One alternative may be to prepare a videotape of city streets that could later be used in the case of illegal removals. The proposed ordinance would require that the City of Atlantic Beach also obtain permits from the Tree Board prior to the removal of any trees. ~. AGENDA ITEM #7E MARCH 8, 2004 The present tree ordinance (Section 23-17(d))2)(n) exempts "the City and its franchise agents from obtaining a permit to remove, trim, prune, cut, or disturb roots of any tree in the public right-of-way." The City's utility system work for water and sewer lines, street work and storm drainage +~ work and public safety considerations are often narrowly constrained by engineering demands and the work often is of an emergency or urgent nature. Consequently, the City's work within the public right-of--way is essentially different in many ways from a private owner's desire to remove trees. Requiring the City to get these permits would certainly delay any projects and may be unnecessary. ~. Last, there may be some additional amendments to the existing ordinance that should be considered. Among these would be increasing the fine for '"" clear cutting a lot before getting a permit. The impact of the $1/ square foot established when the Ordinance was originally passed may have been deflated over time so as to be easy to view by developers as just a "cost of """ doing business". BUDGET: The cost implications of this ordinance apply to the requirement to obtain professional surveys locating the trees along the right-of--way and their size. No estimate has been made yet as to the cost of these surveys either j in the Selva Marina Subdivision or citywide. RECOMMENDATION: The proposed ordinance should be sent back for further work to incorporate the recommendations listed above. ATTACHMENT: Ordinance 95-04-86 Ready for first reading as recommended by the Tree Board. ~• 0 ORDINANCE NO. 95-04-86 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH AMENDING CHAPTER 23, VEGETATION: CREATING A TREE '~"" CANOPY PRESERVATION PROGRAM; PROVIDING GEOGRAPHIC LIMITS OF THE PROGRAM; PROVIDING PRESERVATION INCENTIVES AND REQUIREMENTS; ~"" PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE: AGENDA ITEM #7E MARCH 8, 2004 WHEREAS, The City of Atlantic Beach has a number of tree lined streets which exhibit special scenic value to the citizens of the City, and WHEREAS, The City recognizes a duty to protect and enhance those public right of ways which serve as scenic corridors in the City, and WHEREAS, To protect and enhance these public right of ways, the City Commission has determined that certain public right of ways or portions thereof, shall be designated as Tree Canopy Preserve Corridors. ~"" NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH, FLORLDA: SECTION 1. Intent.~'It is the intent of the City Commission in designating Tree Canopy Preserve Corridors to protect significant tree canopy and landscaping from destruction and to enhance the aesthetic appearance of certain streets within the city. '~ SECTION 2. Designation of Tree Canopy Preserve Corridors. The City Commission may from time to time designate, by ordinance,-Tree Canopy Preserve Corridors. In so doing, the City Commission will specifically identify those streets, or portions thereof, which shall be so designated. In considering a.~ whether public right of ways or portions thereof shall be designated as Tree Canopy Preserve Corridors, the City Commission may consider the following criteria: (a) The presence of historically significant tree canopy or landscaping, as individual plants or in '~"' groupings. (b) The presence of significant historic or architectural structures with associated tree canopy or ~,,, landscaping. (c) The presence of culturally significant tree canopy or landscaping. (d) Request from private property owners that colonnades on their property shall be so designated. SECTION 3. Effect of Tree Canopy Preserve Corridor designation. (a) Trees or landscape groupings on public right of ways, or portions thereof, which have been designated as Tree Canopy Preserve Corridors shall not be damaged, mutilated or removed from public or private property by any entity, public or private, without prior approval of the Tree Conservation Board. Removal shall be permitted by the Board where the safety of the general public or adjacent residents is threatened by such historic trees or landscaping or where the overall value of the corridor will be enhanced by such removal. AGENDA ITEM #7E MARCH 8, 2004 (b) Trees, tree groups, or landscape groups designated by the City Commission as a part of the Tree Canopy Preserve Corridor shall be so designated by signs or markers of a type to be determined by the City Commission. Said signs or markers shall contain the words "Tree Canopy Preserve Corridor" and ~. shall denote the date of designation and the historic significance of the tree, tree group or landscape group. SECTION 4. Designated Corridors. Upon designation of corridors, professional tree surveys shall be obtained and placed in the public record. The City Commission hereby designates the following as a Tree Canopy Preserve Corridor: • .Saturiba Drive from Selva Grande westward to Selva Marina Drive to include Live Oak 'Lane, North Sherry Drive, Dale Lane and Hickory Lane; • Selva Marina Drive from Saturiba Drive to 19`h Street; • 19~h Street to Sea Oats to include the five cul de sacs on the north side of 19~h Street. SECTION 5. Penalties for violation. Unauthorized damage, mutilation or removal of any tree, which is a part of any designated Tree Canopy Preserve Corridor, shall constitute a violation of this ordinance. Examples of unauthorized damage or mutilation shall include, but are not limited to, girdling of trunks with string trimmers or other lawn equipment, punctures, including those caused by tree climbing spikes, removal of live green leaves or fronds, and destruction of the root systems. Each violation shall ~e reviewed by the Tree Conservation Board who will recommend to the Code Enforcement Board an appropriate penalty not to exceed $500.00 per tree to full replacement of the damaged tree(s). SECTION 6. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause, word, or phrase of this Ordinance shall be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, then said holding shall in no way affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. SECTION 7. This Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption. PASSED BY THE CITY COMMISSION ON FIRST READING: PASSED. BY THE CITY COMMISSION ON SECOND READING: John Meserve, Mayor ATTEST: Maureen King, City Clerk Approved as to Form and Correctness: Alan C. Jensen, Esquire City Attorney