Agenda Item 7EAGENDA ITEM # 7E
JUNE 10, 2013
CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH
CITY COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
AGENDA ITEM: Introduction and first reading of proposed Ordinance No. 90 -13 -216,
related to application REZ -13- 00100048, Atlantic Beach Country Club
Special Planned Area (SPA), submitted by Rogers Towers, P.A. on behalf
of Atlantic Beach Partners, LLC, as authorized by owner of record Selva
Marina Country Club, Inc. Said ordinance seeks to rezone approximately
33.90 acres from Planned Unit Development to Special Planned Area.
The proposed plan of development consists of redevelopment of the
clubhouse and recreational amenities within the City of Atlantic Beach,
while a concurrent application to the City of Jacksonville proposes
redevelopment of the adjacent golf course parcel and the addition of up to
one hundred eighty (180) residential lots.
SUBMITTED BY: Erika Hall
Principal Planner
DATE: May 2, 2013
BACKGROUND: See attached staff report prepared for the Community Development Board
meeting of April 16, 2013.
BUDGET: No budget issues.
RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval upon first reading of proposed Ordinance No.
90 -13 -216, enacting Atlantic Beach Country Club Special Planned Area, consistent with the
recommendation of the Community Development Board. (Public Hearing scheduled for regular
City Commission meeting on July 8, 2013).
ATTACHMENTS: Staff report and draft minutes from the April 16, 2013 Community
Development Board meeting, proposed Ordinance 90 -13 -216, and supporting documents related
to the Atlantic Beach Country Club SPA.
REVIEWED BY CITY MANAGER:
May 28, 2013 Commission Briefing
AGENDA ITEM # 7E
JUNE 10, 2013
CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA ITEM 4.13.
CASE NO REZ -13- 00100048
Request to rezone approximately 33.90 acres from Planned Unit Development (PUD)
to Special Planned Area (SPA).
LOCATION 1600 SELVA MARINA DRIVE ( SELVA MARINA COUNTRY CLUB)
APPLICANT ATLANTIC BEACH PARTNERS, LLC REPRESENTED BY T R HAINLINE, JR
DATE APRIL 16, 2013
STAFF ERIKA HALL, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
STAFF COMMENTS
Background
The subject property consists of approximately
33.90 acres located within the City of Atlantic
Beach, and is currently part of the Selva
Marina Country Club Residential PUD, which is
a cross - jurisdictional PUD adopted by
Ordinance No. 90 -07 -202 on September 24,
2007, and amended by Ordinance No. 90 -09-
209 on September 14, 2009. The Conceptual
Site Plan of the approved PUD is Exhibit 1.
The current application is the pre- cursor to an
annexation initiative which would bring the
golf course property and the proposed
residential development entirely into the
Atlantic Beach jurisdiction. Compatibility with
established development patterns and
preservation of the natural environment are
significant factors to the residents of Atlantic
Beach. As such, there is to be a deed
restriction recorded that would designate the
remaining undeveloped golf course property
as perpetual green space upon the annexation
of the property into Atlantic Beach.
oc etNWALK
C1
i9f- 2A5561 � 19
HO
6
P
°wrs
g 20TH � pR
1 .p�
�
..22SR -M1 LpAY P9Rfi :
< L1
22003 M WORT
�
e
o
LET.
2200 -B MAYPOftT 'I �
2200,7 MAYPORT ii g
udAYWR�
�.
2,.
eAtMWO°n
'
ZL�,2,uwe�
inH
SWEALE
6SLLONRY-
q
(.
#� w p95- 240,0,..
U ;•LEARYIEW
N
a
NARVEL
_'A_. .. .
1'
46uNirtvcw8
4BLN
SOLEY WOLEY
o „ SILWONS
W LEY is Ob�
KK WALTER
n ROBERT
n
O
r
_
ZG7
£OGAR STANLEY �
Y _
UCKSON'..: V ¢
12TH
p
. —ELLA
jl-M
LEVY
OOfAlER
'...
14TH _ 14TH
vlo
rcOcI,; l3ry AWBERJACK
41H
;W ZrPlAZ BCNITA v IEiVALAY.E9
A Ie F
P
o
PLAZA
6;
ETH
0125 0.25
Milesip
AGENDA ITEM # 7E
JUNE 10, 2013
The current application seeks the following:
1. Exclusion of the Selva Preserve parcel (172027 -0100) from the overall project. (The reversion of this
parcel to its previous zoning classification (RS -1) is dealt with in REZ -13- 00100049, which is item 4.C.
on this agenda.)
2. Inclusion of the existing golf course parcel (169399 -0000) in the overall project.
3. Reconfiguration of the conceptual site plan, relocating all residential development to the center of
the golf course parcel. The proposed conceptual site plan, highlighted to show current jurisdiction,
is Exhibit 2.
Analysis
As a point of clarification, Special Planned Area (SPA) is a zoning classification that replaced the Planned Unit
Development (PUD) classification within the City of Atlantic Beach several years ago. This was due to the
fact that PUDs require a minimum of ten (10) acres, and there are no longer any such sizeable tracts of land
under unified control, not already part of an existing PUD. There are provisions in the code for amendment
of existing PUDs, but the proposed changes to the Selva Marina Country Club redevelopment substantiate
consideration as a completely new project. Still, as a starting point, it is worthwhile to compare the
previously approved PUD (Ordinance No. 90 -09 -209) to the proposed plan.
TABLE 1.
SITE SUMMARY COMPARISON
ORD NO 90 -09 -209
REZ -13- 00100048 (PROPOSED)
CoAB
COJ
TOTAL
CoAB
COJ
TOTAL
RESIDENTIAL
Acreage
32.54
8.14
40.68
0.08
34.36
34.44
Units
85*
34*
114*
1 **
169 **
169 * *'
* 5 units partially in CoAB /Col
** 1 unit partially in CoAB/CoJ
RECREATION & OPEN SPACE
Golf Course
N/A
N/A
N/A
26.14
91.25
117.39
Clubhouse, Amenities
8.50
0.00
8.50
6.74
0.00
6.74
INFRASTRUCTURE
Vehicular Access
NOTSPECIFIED
NOTSPECIFIED
NOTSPECIFIED
1.37
9.08
10.45
TOTAL
1 41.04
1 8.141
49.181
34.33
1 134.69
1 169.02
As shown in Table 1 — Site Summary Comparison, and noted in the background information above, the
approved Selva Marina Country Club Residential PUD consisted of about forty -one (41) acres within the City
of Atlantic Beach and eight (8) acres within the City of Jacksonville, for a total project area of slightly more
than forty -nine (49) acres. The approved PUD did not include the acreage currently dedicated to the golf
course. However, that acreage which is within Jacksonville's jurisdiction is now being added and the Selva
Preserve parcel which is within Atlantic Beach is being removed. The adjusted acreage for the new project is
approximately one hundred sixty -nine (169) acres, with a little more than thirty -three (33) acres in Atlantic
Beach, and nearly one hundred thirty -five (135) acres in Jacksonville.
The approved PUD provided for a total of one hundred fourteen (114) dwelling units, with eighty (80)
completely located within Atlantic Beach, twenty -nine (29) completely located within Jacksonville, and five
(5) partially located in each jurisdiction. One hundred sixty -nine (169) dwelling units are depicted on the
Conceptual Site Plan for the new project, though the narrative states a maximum of one hundred eighty
(180) units may be constructed, and of those illustrated, one hundred sixty -eight (168) dwellings are located
completely within Jacksonville, while one (1) is located partially in Atlantic Beach.
Golf course and related accessory uses will be allocated to just over one hundred seventeen (117) acres of
the total project area, while nearly seven (7) acres will be dedicated to the clubhouse facilities and other
Page 2 of 9
AGENDA ITEM # 7E
JUNE 10, 2013
recreational amenities such as tennis courts, swimming pools, etc. This is just slightly less than the eight and
a half (8.5) acres allocated to the clubhouse and associated amenities in the approved plan. Lastly, just over
ten (10) acres is designated as vehicular access, a use that was not enumerated in the approved PUD.
TABLE 2. ORD NO 90 -09 -209 REZ -13- 00100048 (PROPOSED)
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS COMPARISON SF MF CH SF80 SF70 I SF60 I SF55 I SFCY CH
NUMBER OF UNITS
94
20
N/A
169 DU on Conceptual Plan /180 DU max
N/A
MIN LOT STDS
Width (FT)
42
N/A
NS
80
70
60
55
50
NS
Area (SQ FT)
4,620
N/A
NS
8,000
7,000
6,000
5,500
4,000
174,240
MAX IMPERVIOUS SURFACE (%)
65
65
NS
65
65
65
65
65
85
MIN YD REQ
Front (FT)
10
10
NS
15
15
15
15
20
20
Side — Street (FT)
5
15
NS
10
10
10
10
10
10
Side — Interior (FT)
5
15
NS
5
5
5
5
5
10
Rear (FT)
10
10
NS
10
10
10
10
10
10
MAX HT (FT)
35
35
NS
35
35
35
35
35
35
Table 2 — Development Standards Comparison, details the mix of housing types, lot dimensions and
development standards for both the approved PUD and the proposed project. Of the one hundred fourteen
(114) dwelling units provided for in the approved PUD, a maximum of twenty (20) units were anticipated to
be multi - family with the remaining ninety -four (94) being single - family. The overall concept of the approved
PUD was based upon neo- traditional design principles, including narrower lots having a minimum width of
forty -two (42) feet and minimum lot area of four thousand six hundred twenty (4,620) square feet, as well
as reduced building setbacks. Approved front and rear setbacks for both single- and multi - family was ten
(10) feet, while side setbacks for single - family were approved to be five (5) feet; for multi - family, sides were
approved to be ten (10) feet.
The current proposal is for single - family dwellings only, and the minimum lot widths are consistent with
platted lot sizes found throughout Atlantic Beach, ranging from fifty (50) feet to eighty (80) feet. Likewise,
lot types —with the exception of the "courtyard" lots that are four thousand (4,000) square feet in area — are
consistent with platted lots sizes found throughout Atlantic Beach, ranging from five thousand five hundred
(5,500) square feet to eight thousand (8,000) square feet. A total of three (3) courtyards are depicted on the
submitted site plan, for a total of twelve (12) of these more compact lots.
The proposed plan includes an increase in required front yard setbacks, from the approved ten (10) feet to a
proposed fifteen (15) feet, while the required rear yard setback remains ten (10) feet and the required
interior side yard setback remains five (5) feet. Street side yard setbacks have been revised, from the
approved five (5) feet to a proposed ten (10) feet, which is consistent with current Atlantic Beach provisions.
The maximum impervious surface allowable on individual lots is maintained at sixty -five (65) percent, which
is greater than the typical Atlantic Beach residential standard of fifty (50) percent. However, the justification
for both the increased impervious surface area on individual lots and the reduced building setbacks is the
fact that the majority of acreage within the project is dedicated to open space and recreation. Similarly, the
maximum impervious surface area allowed for the clubhouse and recreational amenities, for which
specifications were not previously given in the approved PUD, is eighty -five (85) percent. Lastly, maximum
building height is thirty -five (35) feet, which is consistent with development standards throughout the City
of Atlantic Beach.
Staff has reviewed the proposal in light of the goals, objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan,
finding that it supports the following:
Page 3 of 9
AGENDA ITEM # 7E
JUNE 10, 2013
FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT
Goal A.1—The City shall manage growth and redevelopment in a manner which results in a pattern
of land uses that: 1) encourages, creates and maintains a healthy and aesthetically pleasing built
environment; and, 3) preserves and enhances coastal, environmental, natural, historic and cultural
resources.
• Objection A.1.3 — The City shall encourage future development and redevelopment, which
1) retains the exceptionally high quality of life and the predominantly residential character
of the City of Atlantic Beach... and, 3) provides for varied and diverse recreational
opportunities.
✓ Policy A.1.3.3 — The City shall continue to manage, preserve and construct facilities
that provide diverse opportunities to all residents for both passive and active
recreation, including parks, nature preserves, trails and bikeways, skateboard parks
and ball fields, dune crossovers, waterway accesses and associated amenities.
• Objective A.1.4 — Sites, structures, and neighborhoods which have been identified as having
historic, architectural, archaeological, civic or cultural importance shall be protected from
damage or destruction, and the preservation of such valuable resources shall be encouraged
by the City.
• Objective A.1.5 —The City shall maintain development patterns which... 2) foster diverse and
stable neighborhoods ... 4) provide proper locations for ... energy efficient land use patterns,
and 5) encourage healthy and aesthetically pleasing living conditions.
✓ Policy A.1.5.5 — Flexible regulatory methods shall be utilized to provide incentives
for achieving environmental enhancement, economical land development and
energy efficient patters of land use that provide for an appropriate mix of uses
within the City.
• Objective A.1.6 — The City shall preserve the sound structural condition and the diverse
character of the built environment of the City and shall encourage development programs
and activities that are directed at infill development as well as the conservation,
redevelopment and re -use of existing structures and the preservation of and re- investment
in older neighborhoods.
• Objective A.1.7 —The City shall coordinate its planning and development activities with the
resource management plans of the St Johns River Water Management District, the
Department of Environmental Protection, the City of Jacksonville and the City of Neptune
Beach, as well as with other private entities and public agencies, as may be appropriate.
• Objective A.1.10 — The City shall continue to maintain a development character which is
compact in form, orderly in its land use patter, and diversified in its makeup so as to ensure
employment opportunities, affordable housing, a pleasant living environment, and cost -
effective and energy efficient public services.
• Objective A.1.11— The City shall provide for land use, development and redevelopment in
an efficient manner, which supports the land use designations as set forth within the 2010-
2020 Future Land Use Map; which enforces the residential densities and the limitations
upon the type and intensity of uses, and which results in development appropriate to the
sensitive coastal location of the City, particularly with respect to the predominantly
residential character and small -town scale of the City.
RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT
Goal E.1 — The City shall maintain sufficient parks, recreation facilities and open space so as to
provide the citizens with a wide variety of leisure time activities in order that the City continues to
be a healthy, desirable and attractive community in which to live.
■ Objective E.1.1— The City shall inventory at least once every five years, public and private
recreation resources to identify service inadequacies and opportunities for sharing of
facilities and programs so as to provide safe, convenient access for all residents to beaches,
Page 4of9
AGENDA ITEM # 7E
JUNE 10, 2013
parks and other recreation facilities in accordance with Level of Service standards set for
within this plan amendment.
• Policy E.1.1.4 — The City shall continue to support efforts of other government
agencies and shall offer cooperation to achieve level of service standards for
regional recreation and open space facilities as set forth within this plan
amendment.
• Policy E.1.1.5 — The City shall maintain the existing recreation facilities, as identified
in Table E -2, or similar facilities so as to continue to meet or exceed the Level of
Service standards as set forth within this plan amendment.
• Policy E.1.1.10 — As of the date of this plan amendment, the City has exceeded the
adopted Level of Service standards for recreation facilities and open space area.
The adopted Level of Service, as set forth within Table E -1, shall be maintained as
minimum standards.
■ Objective E.1.2 — The City shall continue to provide varied and diverse recreation activities
to the community, and shall coordinate with public agencies, private organizations and
individuals, as well as adjacent local governments to supplement efforts and resources of
the City.
TABLE E -1
Recreation and Open Space Level of Service Standards
City of Atlantic Beach, 2010 -2020
TYPE OF FACILITY
LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARD
Playground (with equipment)
1 playground per 2,500 population
Baseball or Softball Field
1 field per 2,500 population
Soccer or Football Field
1 field per 5,000 population
Basketball Court
1 court per 2,500 population
Tennis Court
1 court per 2,500 population
Running /Hiking Trail
1 trail per 10,000 population
Community Center
1 center per 10,000 population
Beach Access
1 access per 2,500 population
Passive Park / Scenic Open Space
5 acres per 1,000 population
Golf Course* (Public or Private)
1 18 -hole course per 25,000 population
Regional Park/ Open Space* 5 acres per 1,000 population
*Regional facilities are defined as those, which may not be located within the City of Atlantic
Beach, but are in such close proximity so as to directly serve the daily recreational needs of the
residents of the City of Atlantic Beach, such as Kathryn Abby Hanna Park and area golf courses.
Page 5 of 9
FACILITY
2005 INVENTORY
2010 INVENTORY
Playground
5
7
Baseball or Softball Field
5
4
Soccer or Football Field
3
4
Basketball Court
5
5 full / 4 half
Racquetball /Handball Court
2
2
Volleyball Court
2
0
Tennis Court
5
9
Running /Hiking Trail
1
5
Community Center
1
3
Beach Access
21
21
Passive Park / Open Space
412 acres
412
Regional Park/ Open Space
450 acres
450
Skate Park
0
1
Golf Course
1
1
Page 5 of 9
AGENDA ITEM # 7E
JUNE 10, 2013
INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT
Goal G.1 — The City shall coordinate and cooperate with adjacent jurisdictions, other public and
governmental agencies to ensure: 1) equitable and reasonable sharing of authority, responsibility
and resources in the provision of services, education and housing; 2) the provision for effective
development review and permitting; and 3) the effective representation on behalf of the City in
decisions related to future growth management, planning and funding resources.
Further, staff finds the proposed plan to be generally consistent with the definition, purpose and intent of
the Special Planned Area zoning district, as follows:
• Section 24 -116 — The purpose of the special planned area district is to create a mechanism to
establish a plan of development or redevelopment for a site where the property owner and the
community's interests cannot be best served by the provisions of the conventional zoning districts,
and where assurances and commitments are necessary to protect the interests of both the property
owner and the public, and also the unique qualities of the City of Atlantic Beach which are expressed
through this chapter and the comprehensive plan.
The intent of this section is to provide an appropriate zoning district classification for new
development and redevelopment where specific development standards and conditions will be
established within the enacting ordinance. The quality of design and site planning are the primary
objectives of the SPA district.
• Section 24 -117 — For the purpose of this chapter, special planned area shall mean a zoning district
classification that provides for the development of land under unified control which is planned and
developed as a whole in a single or programmed series of operations with uses and structures
substantially related to the character of the entire development. A special planned area shall also
include a commitment for the provision, maintenance and operation of all areas, improvements,
facilities, and necessary services for the common use of all occupants or patrons thereof.
At this time, staff has identified the following areas of concern, and encourages the Board to make a
recommendation subject to the applicant's address of these issues:
EXHIBIT D — WRITTEN NARRATIVE OF PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT
SECTION III -A. Permitted Uses: Development Criteria
■ 1.d. —The applicant proposes that the "courtyard" lots, as described further in Section III -A-
9, may be used for daily /overnight rentals. Within the City of Atlantic Beach, short term
rentals — being anything less than ninety (90) days — are expressly prohibited in residential
zoning districts. Staff would recommend careful consideration as to whether or not short
term rentals should be allowed. If the Board is inclined to recommend short term rentals be
allowed within the "courtyard" lots, staff would suggest establishing the following:
✓ Maximum number of "courtyard" lots to be developed. Three (3) courtyards, for a
total of twelve (12) units are shown on the submitted site plan.
✓ Maximum number of guests per unit.
✓ Minimum stay.
11. — The applicant proposes that "spires, cupolas, steeples, chimneys and other
appurtenances not intended for human occupancy may be placed above the maximum
heights provided herein ". Within the City of Atlantic Beach, height of building is defined as
the vertical distance from the applicable beginning point of measurement to the highest
point of a building's roof structure or parapet, and any attachments thereto, exclusive of
chimneys only within the residential zoning districts. Staff would suggest revision of this
Page 6 of 9
AGENDA ITEM # 7E
JUNE 10, 2013
paragraph to conform with the provisions of the Atlantic Beach land development
regulations.
SECTION III -B. Clubhouse /Recreational Amenities
■ Activities held at the clubhouse and recreational amenities will potentially have impact on
adjacent residential properties, and the applicant has shown certain consideration by
providing for vegetative buffers and directional lighting. However, staff also suggests
inclusion of the following:
• Hours of operation for normal activities.
• Hours of operation for special activities involving additional lighting and public
address systems and /or amplified music.
SECTION III -D. Accessory Uses and Structures.
■ 1.a. — The applicant proposes detached accessory structures with a bonus room above be
required to have a minimum five (5) foot rear and side yard setback, and detached
accessory structures without a bonus room above be required to have a minimum three (3)
foot rear and side yard setback. Staff suggests revision of this paragraph such that all
detached accessory structures have a minimum five (5) foot rear and side yard setback.
3. — The applicant proposes land clearing and processing be considered an accessory use.
Staff recognizes that extensive maintenance of trees and landscaping is required in order to
support the function of the golf course and recreational amenities. However, staff suggests
that any land clearing activities that involves the removal of trees greater than three (3)
inches in diameter should require submittal of a current tree survey and a work plan to the
City of Atlantic Beach for review prior to the commencement of such activities.
SECTION III -E. Access
■ 4. —The applicant has provided here, and also in SECTION II -G, that pedestrian and vehicular
access at Dutton Island Road East "may" be secured inside the property to limit access to
residents of the development and commercial traffic to /from the golf course, clubhouse and
recreational amenities. Staff reminds the Board this was one of the major issues of the
previous proposals, and the approved PUD expressly states that "permanent access and
internal roadways shall be designed, developed and maintained such that [the
development] cannot be used as a 'cut- through' route from Selva Marina Drive to Mayport
Road ". [Item M(b), page 9, Exhibit B, Ordinance 90 -07 -202]. Staff strongly suggests revision
of all occurrences of this statement to reflect that this "shall" be secured access.
SECTION III -F. Signage
■ 7. —The applicant has included a provision to allow an unlimited number of banners, each
not exceeding fifty (50) square feet in area, to promote special seasonal, civic or community
events, and to allow "festival banners" be placed on street light poles. Section 17 -33 of the
Atlantic Beach Municipal Code of Ordinances regulates the use of banners, requiring that
they be registered with the city, generally limiting them to thirty (30) consecutive or
cumulative days within one calendar year and prohibiting them from containing an
advertising message and from hanging over or extending into rights -of -way. Staff suggests
that the Board may wish to require the incorporation of the following conditions on the use
of banners:
• Limitation on the number of events and /or number of cumulative days that event
banners may be displayed.
• Requirement that banners shall only be visible internally to the development.
Page 7 of 9
AGENDA ITEM # 7E
JUNE 10, 2013
SECTION III -H. Landscaping and Tree Protection
■ The applicant proposes that the golf course parcel, including all subsequent residential lots,
be subject to the City of Jacksonville landscape and tree protection regulations. However,
the City of Jacksonville minimum tree standards for residential lots are much less stringent
than those for the City of Atlantic Beach. Jacksonville requires one (1) four -inch caliper tree
per five thousand (5,000) square feet of lot area, whereas Atlantic Beach requires one (1)
four -inch caliper tree per two thousand five hundred (2,500) square feet of lot area. Staff
recommends that all tree removal and landscaping be done in accordance with Atlantic
Beach provisions, rather than applying Jacksonville standards to the golf course and
residential parcels. Doing so supports the intent to maintain consistency and compatibility
with existing residential development adjacent to the golf course, as well any future
designation of the golf course as a perpetual green space.
EXHIBIT H— TRAFFIC STUDY FOR PLANNED ATLANTIC BEACH COUNTRY CLUB
The traffic study prepared by Transportation Planners Enterprise, Inc, dated March 19, 2013 and
submitted as a supporting Exhibit H to the application, focuses on two intersections only — Mayport
Road / Dutton Island Road East and Seminole Road / Selva Marina Drive. Staff believes the
submitted study is faulty for three reasons: (1) It assumes that all residential traffic will utilize
Dutton Island Road for ingress /egress and therefore does not anticipate impacts (from residential
units) to Selva Marina Drive and Seminole Road; (2) in turn, it does not anticipate impacts to the
intersection of Seminole Road / Plaza / Sherry Drive, locally known as "Five Way"; and (3) the study
only analyzes the PM rush hour, while staff considers a significant impact will be on the AM
movement through the Five Way intersection. Staff would recommend that a revised traffic study
taking these factors into account be submitted prior to scheduling this application for public hearing
before the City Commission.
REQUIRED ACTION
The Community Development Board may consider a motion to recommend approval of the Atlantic Beach
Country Club SPA (Application REZ -13- 00100048) to the City Commission, a rezoning to Special Planned Area
for lands described within said application, approving the site development plan and adopting the
application and supporting documents, and all terms and conditions as set forth therein, subject to
conditions enumerated, and provided the following, or similar, findings of fact:
(1) The request for rezoning has been fully considered after public hearing with legal notice
duly published as required by law.
(2) The rezoning to Special Planned Area is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the
Future Land Use Designation of Residential, Low Density.
(3) The rezoning is consistent with the Land Development Regulations, specifically Division 6,
establishing standards for Special Planned Areas.
(4) The rezoning and the site development plan are consistent with the stated definition, intent
and purpose of Special Planned Areas.
(5) The zoning district classification of Special Planned Area, and the specific uses and special
conditions as set forth herein, are consistent and compatible with surrounding
development.
The Community Development Board may consider a motion to recommend denial of the Atlantic Beach
Country Club SPA (Application REZ -13- 00100048) to the City Commission, a rezoning to Special Planned
Area for lands described within said application, provided the following, or similar, findings of fact:
Page 8 of 9
AGENDA ITEM # 7E
JUNE 10, 2013
(1) The rezoning to Special Planned Area is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the
Future Land Use Designation of Residential Low Density because
(2) The rezoning is not consistent with the Land Development Regulations, specifically Division
6, establishing standards for Special Planned Areas because
(3) The zoning district classification of Special Planned Area and the specific uses and special
conditions as set forth herein are not consistent or compatible with surrounding
development because
ATTACHMENTS
■ Exhibit 1. The Cove & Selva Preserve Conceptual Site Plan
■ Exhibit 2. Atlantic Beach Country Club Conceptual Site Plan
Page 9 of 9
AGENDA ITEM # 7E
JUNE 10, 2013
_ Play -�4A
2
N
Y
U �
r
I
!\
U N
Q � 6T iJl
F N o O N
M - o p
NK�-K
u�
S OZ O Z
LJ m
G d d G p N
p U Z ti w
0 U
G a
Fw� 7
woJ o
G .U?
5�
U u=
�1 �d
® x;
oa '_ oaoaoaaao
5 d 'H.58f H
;Ra
-
9�
i9AJi9SGJCj Bn a
E
EO
E
I8 OACO aNJ.
7u�JU,dop J34 ryr,uJpYS3u
_>
o
o
0
r
D]
a
wue SAH��A
33
c6
3�v
r
�
� W
o.
_ Play -�4A
2
N
Y
U �
r
I
!\
U N
Q � 6T iJl
F N o O N
M - o p
NK�-K
u�
S OZ O Z
LJ m
G d d G p N
p U Z ti w
0 U
G a
Fw� 7
woJ o
G .U?
5�
U u=
�1 �d
® x;
oa '_ oaoaoaaao
5 d 'H.58f H
;Ra
AGENDA ITEM # 7E
JUNE 10, 2013
I I I
9 € s s
R
• �w�ta
Abj
��� a�� s o��[
8 &Sad
F&y
_.
ue�d a�ig
�en}da�uoQ
3namdolaeaQ �mn pawed
9nt�,Qjono�
ua of ue
R H l l�tl
I I I
9 € s s
Draft Minutes of the April 16, 2013 regular meeting of the Community Development Board
yS
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD
April 16, 2013
1. CALL TO ORDER. - 6:07pm
Chair Brea Paul verified the presence of a
Kelly Elmore, Kirk Hansen, Brea Paul, an
order at 6:07pm. Also present were NS
Matt Schellhorn, Principal Planner Erika:
Griffin. Board members Harley Parkes any
AGENDA ITEM # 7E
JUNE 10, 2013
orurrr w it h`the.attendance of Jason Burgess,
atrick Stratton:, .: The meeting was called to
�yport Liaison andex- officio board member
and Building and Zoning Director Michael
flvia Simmons were absent,
2. ADOPTION OF MEETING MINUTES - MARCH 19
Ms. Paul called for a motion to approve the r
meeting. Mr. Hansen moved that minutes be ap
the motion and it carried by a vote'of 5 -0
3. OLD
4. NEW BUSINESS",
A. ZVAR -13 -001
of the March 19, 2013 regular
is written. Mr. Elmore seconded
hoppes of Lakeside, Inc)
(f)(3), to allow non - residential off - street
JMs. Hall explained that the applicant is proposing to construct a
rt two -story structure, with the first floor dedicated to parking and
the"second floor dedicated to a seven thousand eight hundred ten
((7,810) square foot restaurant space, including three thousand
two hundred forty (3,240) square foot air - conditioned space, a two
thousand nine hundred seventy (2,970) square foot open -air dining
deck and a one thousand six hundred (1,600) square foot open -air
dining deck. The submitted conceptual plan shows a total of one -
hundred fifty -six (156) seats, and per Section 24- 161(h)(15),
required off - street parking for restaurants and bars is one (1) space
for each four (4) seats, including any outdoor seating where service
occurs. Thus, a minimum of thirty -nine (39) off - street spaces
would be required to accommodate the proposed seating. Forty -
four (44) off- street parking spaces were shown on the submitted
parking level plan, with a total of fourteen (14) accessed directly
from, and requiring backing into the Ahern Street public right -of-
Page 1 of 17
AGENDA ITEM # 7E
Draft Minutes of the April 16, 2013 regular meeting of the Community Development Board JUNE 10, 2013
way, which Ms. Hall said was contrary to the provisions of Section
24- 161(f)(3) which prohibits off - street parking for all uses other
than single- and two - family residential backing into public rights -
of -way.
Ms. Hall reviewed Section 24- 64(d), grounds of approval for a
variance, stating that neither (1) exceptional topographic
conditions (5) irregular shape of the property or (6) substandard
size of a lot of record, were applicable. She then focused on the
applicant's statements regarding the applicability of provisions (2),
(3) and (4).
The applicant had as's'erted that Secton24- 64(d)(2) — surrounding
conditions or circtaKnstances impacting the property disparately
from nearby properties — was applicable ,,,because there are
seventy -five (75) existing spaces, serving surrounding properties
that are. allowed to back onto,Alfiern Street Ms ;. Hall confirmed
there are twenty -seven (27) spaces serving the commercial uses at
Shoppes of North Shore, located directly west of the subject
property, vuhich `do :back onto `-Ahern Street. However, that
developmerif'Was constructed m 1990/91, and the parking plan
W#5 approved as of a use =by - exception on June 26, 1989, and
Iater; amended on February 26; 1990, more than 27 years prior to
the adoption of Ordinance No. 90 -07 -200 on July 9, 2007, which
�enactedd ether provisions of Section 24- 161(f)(3). The remaining
fortytwo (42); spaces with "direct access" to Ahern street serve
residential uses that are�either single- or two - family, and thus are
exempt .from the provisions of Section 24- 161(f)(3), or are multi-
family or condo units that were approved and in process and /or
con'structe&,prior to the adoption of Ordinance No. 90 -07 -200 in
is -Hall reminded the Board that per Section 24- 64(b)(4), the
onconforming use of adjacent or neighboring lands, structures or
uildings shall not be considered as justification for the approval of
a variance.
The applicant also claimed Section 24- 64(d)(3) — exceptional
circumstances preventing the reasonable use of the property as
compared to other properties in the area — was applicable, but
failed to explain how. Ms. Hall noted the proposed use was
entirely consistent with the permitted uses allowed within the
Central Business District, but she explained that the submitted
conceptual plan exceeded the development capacity of the site.
Page 2 of 17
Draft Minutes of the April 16, 2013 regular meeting of the Community Development Board
AGENDA ITEM # 7E
JUNE 10, 2013
Ms. Hall suggested that the property can still be developed to its
best and highest use, while respecting the capacity of the site, by
(1) reducing the structure size and seating capacity to the
minimum required to obtain a Series 4 -COP SRX alcoholic beverage
license, being two thousand five hundred (2,500) square feet in
area and one hundred fifty (150) seats, thereby reducing the
required off - street parking to thirty -eight (38) spaces; and (2)
reconfiguring parking level design,,,' so that vehicular circulation is
maintained on the subject propert; thus eliminating the need to
back into the Ahern Street . right -of -way. She projected an
alternative parking plan todernonstrate that this could be
accomplished.
Finally, the applican ,
t, "claimed that Sect - 64(d)(4) — onerous
:,24
effect of regulations ".enacted after platting 'or`'after development of
the property or after;, construction of improVements upon the
property -was applicable Ms Hall agreed the current provisions
of Sect166<24461(f)(3) were adopted after the applicant's purchase
of the subject property in 2000. However, she noted that the
applicant had ,pre vi`ously,submitted an application for a concurrent
rezone ana >use-D
month after adopt
noted in the offic,
Development Boai
narkin`dir' e4irrulation
rent Board,
lould work
exception on the,.,subject property just one
on 6f 0rdinance 90 =07 -200. At that time, and as
al minutes of the August 21, 2007 Community
d meeting, the applicant acknowledged the new
6'66 committed to complying with it. She said
;ho"OU•have the same expectation that the same
within the same regulations today.
II tl'en reviewed applicable provisions of Section 24- 64 -(c) —
s for denial of a variance — which state no variance shall be
I if the Community Development Board, in its discretion,
ines that the granting of the requested variance shall have
illy adverse impact upon (2) congestion of streets, or (3)
safety, including traffic safety, risk of fire, flood, crime or
oTner threats to public safety. She then read the Public Safety
review comments submitted by Police Chief Michael Classey:
"We have reviewed the request for the variance referenced above.
As you know, Sec 24- 161(f)(3) specifically prohibits constructing
parking spaces which require drivers to back up into the public
right -of -way. The applicant characterizes Ahern Street as more of a
"service alley ". While a vehicle volume study was not able to be
completed due to the very short turnaround time of the
evaluation, the police department does not concur with this
Page 3 of 17
Draft Minutes of the April 16, 2013 regular meeting of the Community Development Board
AGENDA ITEM # 7E
JUNE 10, 2013
description. While not to the level of a thru street such as
Seminole or Sherry, Ahern Street is a heavily traveled roadway. It is
used for much more than accessing the existing parking spaces as
the applicant contends and serves as a cut thru between Sherry,
East Coast, Ocean and Beach. Any parking plan that would cause
vehicles to back out into the roadway would create an unnecessary
hazard that could not be supported from a public safety
standpoint!
Ms. Hall concluded, reminding' tie Board that also according to
Section 24- 64(c), variances shelf tqt be granted solely for personal
comfort or convenience, 46'r' relief from financial circumstances or
for relief from situations %created by the.:property owner.
Applicant Richard Trendel, P,'kra Management, Inc Q440 Mayport Road)
Comment spoke on behalf of the applicant and reiterated the applicant's
claim that the parking ` prop, osed''to back onto Ahern Street was
consistent existing parking serving other properties which abut
Ahern Street:
Public ,.No one from .the audience came forth to give comment on the
Comment
Board Mr. E.In
Discussion ` d eve lot
ore statecle,th",t while he" would love to see something
ed on the site, which had long been an eyesore, he could
iporte this variance request. He disagreed with the
!rizatrion of.Ahern as a service alley, and he complimented
illustrating that parking requirements could be sufficiently
-51te,and without backing into the public right -of -way.
)tton'agreed, noting that the alternative plan drawn by staff
iot require a variance.
nsen added that the subject property requires a higher
of compliance with the regulations due to the fact that it is
a corner property. Visibility, and thus safety, is further impaired by
the jog in Ahern Street.
Motion Mr. Hansen moved that the Community Development Board deny
ZVAR -13- 00100047, a request for variance from Section 24-
161(f)(3), to allow required non - residential off - street parking that
backs into a public right -of -way, finding that there are no
surrounding conditions or circumstances impacting the property
disparately from nearby properties, but that certain other
properties were developed before the adoption of Ordinance No.
Page 4 of 17
Draft Minutes of the April 16, 2013 regular meeting of the Community Development Board
AGENDA ITEM # 7E
JUNE 10, 2013
90 -07 -200 and in accordance with an approved use -by- exception,
or they are exempt from the provisions of Section 24- 161(f)(3) due
to the nonresidential nature of their use; finding that there are no
exceptional circumstances preventing the reasonable use of the
property as compared to other properties in the area, but that the
applicant's proposal exceeds the physical capacity of the property
and there exists alternative design scenarios that would be in
accordance with the requirements., of Section 24- 161(f)(3); finding
that though regulation has been enacted after the platting of the
property, it does not have .an" onerous effect on the future
development of the property" e'cause it has been demonstrated
that the property can be "evelopeda"to its highest and best use
while meeting the requirements of Section 24- 161(f)(3); and,
finding that proposal'�would have a materially adverse effect on
public safety by creating traffic hazards impacting both motorized
and pedestrian traffic Mr. Elmore seconded `the motion and it
passed unanimously, 5 0
B. REZ -13- 00100048, 1600 Selva Marina Drive (Atlantic Beach Partners, LLC)
Request to rezone approxima f ely 33�90,acres from Planned Unit Development (PUD)
to Special Planned Area (SPA) :;, The subject propertVJs currently used as a golf
course and: coup ry club. The: proposed project is the !redevelopment of the Selva
Marina Country Club facilities, including the elubhouse and recreational amenities,
which may include a potol cabanal house, pro-shop(s), health /exercise facility,
offices, tennis courts) a..n field(s); parking, storage, and similar facilities.
vote.
nore"disclo, sed `that he is the landscape architect of record
project, and hraving a financial interest, he stated he would
i from debate and vote on this matter, though he would be
to answer any questions that the Board might have.
nsen disclosed that he is on the Board of Directors of the
Marina Country Club and that he has also served on an
-y committee investigating redevelopment options for the
ty. However, because he does not have a financial interest
project, he stated he would participate in the debate and
Ms. Hall summarized the applicant's request as being a
modification of an existing PUD, and explained that identical
documents have been concurrently filed with the City of
Jacksonville seeking the following changes: (1) Exclusion of the
Selva Preserve parcel (RE# 172027 -0100, located within the City of
Atlantic Beach) from the overall project; (2) Inclusion of the
existing Selva Marina Country Club golf course parcel (RE# 169399-
Page 5 of 17
Draft Minutes of the April 16, 2013 regular meeting of the Community Development Board
AGENDA ITEM # 7E
JUNE 10, 2013
0000, located within the City of Jacksonville) in the overall project;
and (3) reconfiguration of the conceptual site plan, relocating all
residential development to the center of the golf course parcel.
She stated that the current application is the pre- cursor to an
annexation initiative which would bring the golf course property
and the proposed residential development entirely into the
Atlantic Beach jurisdiction. As such, compatibility with established
development patterns and preservation of the natural
environment are significant factors to the residents of Atlantic
Beach, and there applicant has"fndicated that there will be a deed
restriction recorded,,,that" would -, designate the remaining
undeveloped golf course property as: ... erpetual green space upon
the annexation of h,at"property into AtlanticaGBeach.
She then explained "thatthe pr
with and ,,asupported a number
the adopted;Comprehensive F
Element, the 1 eereation an
Intergovernmenta[Coo rdinatio
Cou
Atla
)posed modification was consistent
of goals, objectives, and policies of
an, including the Future Land Use
,,,Open Space Element, and the
rElement.
all projected a table:entltled °Sit °eSummary Comparison" and
ved the acreage allocation the approved Selva Marina
rv. Club (SMCC)` Residential PUD as well as the proposed
Beach Country Club (ABCC) SPA /PUD. She noted the
d SMCC:Reside itial PUD consisted of a total of about forty-
) acres 00 _06 hundred fourteen (114) dwelling units,
ie, proposed ABCC SPA /PUD consists of about one hundred
ie(;169) acres and a maximum of one hundred eighty (180)
units: Thus the effective density of the project will be
from two and three - tenths (2.3) dwelling units per acre to
one -tenth (1.1) dwelling units per acre.
I then projected a table entitled "Development Standards
ison" and reviewed the approved and proposed housing
mix, as well as minimum lot standards, yard requirements,
maximum height and impervious surface standards. She noted the
approved SMCC Residential PUD consists of a mix of single and
multi - family units in a compact Neo- Traditional arrangement,
whereas the proposed modification consists only of single - family
dwellings in an arrangement more characteristic of a suburban
subdivision. She stated the lot development standards are
generally consistent with the those required by Atlantic Beach
single - family zoning districts, with the main differences being a
Page 6 of 17
AGENDA ITEM # 7E
JUNE 10, 2013
Draft Minutes of the April 16, 2013 regular meeting of the Community Development Board
slight reduction in front yard setbacks, from twenty (20) feet to
fifteen (15) feet and rear yard setbacks, from twenty (20) feet to
ten (10) feet, as well as a maximum impervious surface area of
sixty -five (65) percent as opposed to Atlantic Beach's current fifty
(50) percent. However, she explained these were acceptable
deviations from Atlantic Beach standards due to the fact that the
entire residential development would be surrounded by over one
hundred seventeen (117) acres ,of golf course that would most
likely be preserved with a deed restriction or conservation
easement
Ms. Hall then explained staff had collectively identified a number
of areas of concern described in her; original staff report to the
Board. She said th .6''applicant had met with staff and offered a
number of concessions based upon those discussions, in the form
of a revised narrative Exhibit D),�;,submitted to staff early this day
and provided to the Board tonight in the form of a strike -
through /underlaine draft: She then addressed each of these
concerns and h6iiv..the applicant 'was addressing each.
•
SECTION III A.1.d: USE ,OF COURTYARD LOTS FOR
DAILY /OVERNIGHT;i�ENTAB Within the City of Atlantic
Beach, ,short term rentals — being anything less than
ninety (90j days — are expressly prohibited in residential
zoning districts. Staff had recommended establishing a
rnia`ximum number of such Courtyard Lots that could be
used fo'r; short term rentals, as well as the maximum
number of guests to be allowed per unit and the
minimum stay. The applicant added language stating
that (1) the maximum number of Courtyard Lots to be
used for daily /overnight rental would be four (4) units
located within the same courtyard lot configuration; (2)
all such units shall be owned by the same entity, which
shall be the owner /operator of a hospitality business,
such as hotel(s) or resort(s), and shall be managed by an
entity with offices in Duval County; and (3) all such
units shall be subject to restrictive covenants, including
a provision such that if ownership passes from a
hospitality business to an individual, daily /overnight
rentals shall no longer be a permitted use.
• SECTION III.A.11: "SPIRES, CUPOLAS, STEEPLES,
CHIMNEYS AND OTHER APPURTENANCES NOT
INTENDED FOR HUMAN OCCUPANCY MAY BE PLACED
Page 7 of 17
AGENDA ITEM # 7E
Draft Minutes of the April 16, 2013 regular meeting of the Community Development Board JUNE 10, 2013
•
ABOVE THE MAXIMUM HEIGHTS ". Within the City of
Atlantic Beach, height is defined as the vertical distance
from the applicable beginning point of measurement to
the highest point of a building's roof structure or
parapet, and any attachments thereto, exclusive of
chimneys only within the residential zoning districts.
Ms. Hall reminded the Board that this provision is
included in the City ,,,Charter and is non - waiverable
within residential zoning districts, though there is a
provision for waiver 10 height, for inclusion of non -
habitable architectural;.,features on structures within
non - residential zoning districts, and the applicant could
seek such a,:.,waiver for structures on the non - residential
clubhouse parcel. As such, the:,,applicant revised this
section:to; conform to provisions of,Article XIV, Section
59 of the Charter off e City of Atlantic Beach and the
definition of "height" as provided m Chapter 24 (Land
Development Regulations).
SECTION I(I =B; iMPACT..QF CLUBHOUSE /RECREATIONAL
y:
AMENITIES ACTIVITIES ON °ADJACENT PROPERTIES. Ms.
Hall ,said thats while ;staff recognizes the applicant has
show "; :;consideration for adjacent residential properties
with the,: inclusion of vegetative buffers, directional
lighting and lighting timers, there is still concern as to
the impact activities held in conjunction with the
clubhouse. and recreational amenities will potentially
have on the surrounding neighborhoods. As such, staff
suggested that perhaps hours be established both for
normal (daily) operations and for special activities
involving additional lighting and public address systems
and /or amplified music. The applicant replied that the
property already functions as a golf and country club,
and there is no anticipated change in the hours of
operation. As noted, vegetative buffers, directional
lighting and lighting timers will be regularly utilized to
temper impact upon adjacent residential properties.
Further there will be immediate compliance with any
code enforcement directives regarding complaints
received.
• SECTION III -D.1.a — DETACHED ACCESSORY STRUCTURES
— SPECIFICALLY THOSE WITHOUT A BONUS ROOM
ABOVE — MAY BE LOCATED IN A REAR OR SIDE YARD
Page 8 of 17
AGENDA ITEM # 7E
Draft Minutes of the April 16, 2013 regular meeting of the Community Development Board JUNE 10, 2013
THREE (3) FEET FROM A LOT LINE. Ms. Hall noted that
although most lots within the proposed development
back up to the golf course, there are a number of lots
which abut other lots. Within the City of Atlantic
Beach, all detached accessory structures thirty (30)
inches or greater in height are required to comply with
a minimum five (5) foot rear and side yard setback.
Staff recommended compliance with this provision.
The applicant revis.' acl "this section to comply with
Atlantic Beach standards.
• SECTION 111 -D:3. LAND) :CLrEARING IS PROPOSED AS AN
ACCESSQO, USE. Ms. Halle reported that staff had had
an extensive discussion with `the applicant regarding
tree removal and land clearing related to
redevelopment of the: . roperty versus that which would
be considered norrrial maintenance essential to the
operation of the golf course and recreational amenities.
This provision remains as originally written, such that,
for maintenance pur` q es of the facilities, land clearing
remains an accessory use;; subject to applicable fire
codes;and other land,; eveFopment regulations.
•
SECTIONPajI -E.4 — PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICULAR TRAFFIC
ACCESS DUTTON ISLAND ROAD EAST "MAY" BE
SECURED INSIDE THE PROPERTY TO LIMIT ACCESS TO
RESIDENTS. OF THE DEVELOPMENT AND COMMERCIAL
TRAFFIC: THE GOLF COURSE, CLUBHOUSE
AND RECREATIONAL AMENITIES. Ms. Hall noted that
tte "securing of Dutton Island Road East access had been
a major issue in previous proposals and the approved
Selva Marina Country Club Residential PUD expressly
states that "permanent access and internal roadways
shall be designed, developed and maintained such that
the development cannot be used as a 'cut- through'
route from Selva Marina Drive to Mayport Road ". She
said she had spoken with the applicant who concurred
this provision was supposed to read "shall ", and it was
revised accordingly.
• SECTION III -F.7 — AN UNLIMITED NUMBER OF BANNER
SIGNS NOT TO EXCEED FIFTY (50) SQUARE FEET IN AREA
TO PROMOTE SEASONAL, CIVIC, OR COMMUNITY
EVENTS THAT OCCUR ON A TEMPORARY BASIS, AS WELL
Page 9 of 17
AGENDA ITEM # 7E
JUNE 10, 2013
Draft Minutes of the April 16, 2013 regular nteeting of the Community Development Board
AS FESTIVAL BANNERS PLACED ON STREET LIGHT POLES,
ARE PERMITTED. Within the City of Atlantic Beach,
banners must be registered with the City. Each
establishment or organization is limited to thirty (30)
consecutive or cumulative days per calendar year, and
the banner may neither contain an advertising message
nor hang over or extend into rights -of -way. Staff
recommended the prohibition -of banners on public
property, including the placement of festival banners on
street light poles located within the public right -of -way,
as well as a limitation on the number of events and /or
cumulative days that event, banners may be displayed,
and a requirement that banners shall only be visible
internally`to the development =..The applicant agreed
that banners would be permitted. °pursuant to Section
17 -33 and revised this: section accordingly.
•
SECTION III -H= PROPERTIES WITHIN THE JURISDICTION
OF THE CITY O; (JACKSONVILLE (GOLF COURSE,
RESIDENCES), SHALL BE SUBJECT TO COJ LANDSCAPING
AND•., TREE .; PROTECTION REGULATIONS, WHILE
PROPERTIES 'LOCATED WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF
THE "CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH (CLUBHOUSE,
RECREATIONAL AMENITIES) SHALL BE SUBJECT TO COAB
LANDSCAPING AND TREE PROTECTION REGULATIONS.
Nls �Hall sa &d staff had several concerns related to this
provisio`n First, there was the concern that the land
within Jacksonville would be cleared according to COJ
(regulations, and there would be a monetary payment to
COJ rather than replanting of trees to meet mitigation
requirements. Second, there was concern that due to
COJ's less stringent minimum tree standards — being
one (1) tree per five thousand (5,000) square feet of lot
area — as opposed to Atlantic Beach standards — being
one (1) tree per two thousand five hundred (2,500)
square feet of lot area — the new development would
have a residential tree canopy significantly different
from adjacent neighborhoods. According to the
applicant, the main reason to apply the COJ standards
for tree removal from the golf course and residential
area was to reduce the burden of mitigation that would
be associated with the many pine trees located on the
property. However, the applicant expressed a
commitment to meeting the Atlantic Beach minimum
Page 10 of 17
AGENDA ITEM # 7E
Dr aft Minutes of the April 16, 2013 regular meeting of the Community Development Board JUNE 10, 2013
tree standards for residential properties. Ms. Hall
reported that after a lengthy discussion, a compromise
was reached in which it was confirmed that all tree
removal, land clearing and landscaping would be
reviewed and permitted through the City of Atlantic
Beach, though the staff would apply the COJ standards
for tree removal on the golf course /residential parcel.
The language of this clarified to reflect this.
EXHIBIT H — TRAFFIC:.-STUDY FOR PLANNED ATLANTIC
BEACH COUNTRY.CLUB :, Ms. Hall said the original traffic
study prepared by Transportation Planners Enterprise,
Inc, dated Ma "rch 19, 201146, used on two intersections
only :... yport Road /Dutton ;;Island Road East and
Semi no" I : :,,Road / Selva Marina briVe. Staff found this
study to be faulty for three reasons (1) It assumed all
residential traffic.46uld utilize Dutton Island Road for
ingress /egress and therefore did not anticipate impacts
(from ;:residential units) to Selva Marina Drive and
Semmoie Road; (2) It did,, not anticipate impacts to the
intersection ,'of ,.,Seminole.. Road /Plaza /Sherry Drive,
local ly. known as ``F,Ive Way "; and, (3) It only analyzed
the PIVI;<<rusi hour, though staff suggests a significant
impact `will be on the AM movement through the Five
,Way intersection. Ms. Hall reported that an updated
traffic;,study, ;dated April 12, 2013, was submitted and
had been,;Jncluded in the materials Board members
received at the beginning of the meeting. She said this
,document addressed staff concerns as follows: (1) The
revised model dispersed thirty -three (33) percent of
residential traffic to Selva Marina Drive and sixty -seven
(67) percent to Dutton Island Road East by year 2016;
(2) New traffic counts were taken at the Five Way
intersection; and (3) New traffic counts were taken for
the AM rush hour. Ms. Hall explained that the projected
impact of the project is about a six (6) percent increase
in traffic by 2016. She then displayed a table from the
updated traffic study summarizing the estimated traffic
impacts on level of service, and noted that the overall
impact was below the established level of service for
each road, as provided in the Transportation Element of
the adopted Comprehensive Plan.
Applicant T R Hainline, Rogers Towers, PA, introduced himself as the
Page 11 of 17
Draft Minutes of the April 16, 2013 regular meeting of the Community Development Board
AGENDA ITEM # 7E
JUNE 10, 2013
Comment authorized agent for the applicant, which he said was a team of
local builders and developers with a great track record. He
thanked staff for the detailed and thorough review of the project,
and said he now wished to provide the Board with a broad view of
the goals the applicant wished to accomplish, namely (1) to
maintain the viability of the club; (2) to maintain the value of the
land; and (3) to maintain the natural environment, particularly the
viewsheds, important to this community.
Mr. Hainline noted that the proposed development represents a
dramatic change from the approved PUD, in which all the density
was loaded into less than ,,a quarter of the land of the new project,
but it is the applicant's, desire to create a development that is
consistent with jp '"existing character of Atlantic Beach. He
emphasized that the..proposal consists offhree distinctive uses —
single family residences, the gplfp course, and the clubhouse and
recreational amenities .He reiterated the applicant's commitment
to adequate.eb,uffers, secured access and a residential tree canopy
consistent with adjacent neighborhoods, and he emphasized the
updated traffic study's finding that, levels of service on impacted
roads would 'remain acceptable.
M r.
that
creeK.
dine theri�Acldressed 'aa'teit%2en concern regarding drainage
heard at a. community meeting held the previous Tuesday
2013). He e: plained that drainage will be reviewed by at
ee agencies the City of Atlantic Beach, the St Johns River
Vlanagemeht . District, and the Florida Department of
Rental Protection — and that the development would
M,f h,all pre - /post - development requirements. Stormwater
w" iil be added to accommodate all runoff associated with
ial development and the as part of the golf course
, the property will be graded and treatment basins will be
ated. He emphasized that stormwater runoff cannot be
the creek or adversely impact the storage capacity of the
Mr. Hainline then discussed annexation, stating that it is the
applicant's intent to seek annexation of the golf course and
residential properties into the City of Atlantic Beach. He said that
submittal of this concurrent rezone request to both jurisdictions is
the first step. The submittal of an interlocal agreement to each
jurisdiction will be an intermediate step.
Mr. Hainline concluded, emphasizing the applicant's commitment
Page 12 of 17
Draft Minutes of the April 16, 2013 regular meeting of the Community Development Board
AGENDA ITEM # 7E
JUNE 10, 2013
to continue working with staff and residents to meet the
overarching goals of the project (1) to maintain viability of the club;
(2) to maintain the value of the land; and, (3) to maintain the
natural environment, particularly the viewsheds, important to this
community.
Public James Wheeler (1404 Linkside Drive) stated he was concerned that
Comment there would be increased traffic .utilizing 11th Street and Donner
Road as scut- through between.,Seminole Road and Mayport Road.
Cindy Cain (1945 Francis,Avenue), questioned how Dutton Island
Road East, which is now" essentially one lane width, would be able
to accommodate traffI&,Jrom the development. Ms. Paul invited
Mr. Hainline to respond, and he verified that Dutton Island Road
East will be improved to City of Atlantic Beach standards, with a
minimum pavement width of twenty (20) feet aiid secured access.
Janet Allen (.1007 Big P
increased cut through ti
applicant desired short
Hainline said.:`that the:
provide an option
resor /hospitality'p,rovc
ove
'it stay cone
t One Ocear
seen :as,a u
sinesses
ne Key) also expressed concern regarding
affic onllth Street, and she asked why the
term stays, within the development. Mr.
inclusion of tithe short term units was to
fo .::collaborate with an established
er Mr. Elmore elaborated, stating that the
is part of the rebranding of the club. He
I expressed a desire to market golf junkets,
e opportunity to benefit both the club and
'ring, .(1580 Selva Marina Drive) asked what else could be
aed Qj aahe property according to this Special Planned Area
and if it is only single - family, why not change the zoning
classification of the property to one of the conventional
amily zoning districts. Mr. Hainline responded that the
i of the project currently within the City of Atlantic Beach is
redeveloped with a new clubhouse and recreational
amenities, that there will be no residential units on this property
(other than the one existing house on the parcel to the north of
the clubhouse parcel). He continued, explaining that in a Special
Planned Area, as in a Planned Unit Development, the narrative and
the site plan are binding. What is constructed must conform to
what is shown on the site plan and what is described in the
narrative.
Father Mark Water (1243 Linkside Drive) inquired about the
proposed Dutton Island Road East access and expressed concern
Page 13 of 17
Draft Minutes of the April 16, 2013 regular meeting of the Community Development Board
AGENDA ITEM # 7E
JUNE 10, 2013
regarding increased cut - through traffic on 11th Street and Parkside
Drive, noting that most people try to avoid Five Way. Mr. Hainline
responded that the Dutton Island Road East access will be privately
owned and maintained, and that it will be a secured ingress /egress
for residents and commercial (vendor) traffic only. He added that if
staff felt the traffic study needed to be revised to include impacts
to 11th Street, the applicant would certainly comply.
Monica Hayes (Sevilla) concurred hat traffic generally backs up a
block or more at the Five Waytersection during rush hour, and
most especially during <the. morning when the school traffic
controls are activated.,,. She"then asked if consideration had been
given as to the number of childre�n;.e�this development would
generate, thus increasing the traffic with a school destination
during the morning r,sh hour. Ms. Hall told,"," he Board that certain
demographic and destination °, assumptions Fare built into
transportation models, ,and thus` the estimated `"number of trips
provided in,1h,e traffic study takes into account these concerns.
Board M r.
Discussion __ L
woi
the
course ;w;
i1nded that
friot be ai
olf course
of Jac
�a.what the impact „on the project would be if the
s not annexed 16toa7.,Atlantic Beach. Ms. Hall
;,the annexation was` separate action and there
y change in how the land was developed, whether
a nd,'gresidential parcels were located in or out of
She reminded the Board that identical documents
,narrative and site plan — were submitted to both
mvllle and Atlantic Beach.
;ess.,summarized the differences in what is now approved
That: s�, proposed, stating that the most striking differences
he change the boundaries and acreage, which is now four
eater the adopted plan, but which also reduces the overall
of the project; (2) the relocation of the residential
'nent to the center of the golf course to create a more
onal residential golf community; and (3) the elimination of
multi - family housing.
Motion Mr. Stratton moved that the Community Development Board
recommend approval of the Atlantic Beach Country Club SPA
(Application REZ -13- 00100048) to the City Commission, being a
change in zoning district classification from Planned Unit
Development (PUD) to Special Planned Area (SPA) for lands
described within said application, approving the site development
plan and adopting the application and supporting documents, and
Page 14 of 17
Draft Minutes of the April 16, 2013 regular meeting of the Community Development Board
AGENDA ITEM # 7E
JUNE 10, 2013
all terms and conditions as set forth therein, subject to conditions
enumerated, and provided the following findings of fact: (1) The
request for rezoning has been fully considered after public hearing
with legal notice duly published as required by law; (2) The
rezoning to Special Planned Area is consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan and the Future Land Use Designation of
Residential, Low Density; (3) The rezoning is consistent with the
Land Development Regulations, specifically Division 6, establishing
standards for Special Planned Areas; (4) The rezoning and the site
development plan are consistertwith the stated definition, intent
and purpose of Special P;lanne& Areas; and, (5) The zoning district
classification of Special, Planned Area,, and the specific uses and
special conditions: as "set forth herein, are consistent and
compatible with §Urj unding d eve lop ment,;p,Mr. Burgess seconded
the motion and it .passed unanimously, : *`- p with Mr. Elmore
abstaining due to his previously:�stated conflict of'interest.
C. REZ -13- 00100049, 0 11tH Street, ( Selva Preserve, LLC)
Request to rezone approxim6t*7.05 acres fr m"m Planned Unit Development (PUD)
to Residential Single Family (RS 1) p The subject property is currently part of the
Selva Marina Residential PUD'as the result of a loitit venture Agreement. This action
seeks to remove the subject property from: the PUD approved by Ordinance No. 90-
09 -209 and , revert to � the RS -T zoning 'ae ' nation as previously approved by
Ordinance No. 90 -08 -205,
Ms Hall reported that,,this request is incidental to the previous
application ''`and .. hould be viewed as merely an issue of
housekeeping She `:explained this parcel came to be part of the
approved NSelva Marina Residential PUD in 2009 as the result of a
Joint Venture However, that venture was not realized
and;:the owners of this parcel are not partners in the Atlantic Beach
Coti try Club SPA request. Because this parcel is less than ten (10)
acres., in area, and thus does not meet the minimum area
requirements of a PUD, it must be rezoned. Because the owners of
this parcel do not currently have plans to develop this parcel, they
have asked that the zoning simply revert to the previous
classification, Residential Single- Family (RS -1).
Applicant T R Hainline, Rogers Towers, P A, stated he was the authorized
Comment agent for the applicant in this request also. He concurred with
staff's assessment that this request was a matter of housekeeping,
stating this property alone does not meet the minimum area
requirements to be considered as a Planned Unit Development,
and thus must be rezoned. He added the RS -1 zoning is consistent
and compatible with surrounding lands, and any future
Page 15 of 17
Draft Minutes of the April 16, 2013 regular meeting of the Community Development Board
AGENDA ITEM # 7E
JUNE 10, 2013
development of the property would have to comply with all
provisions of the adopted Comprehensive Plan and Land
Development Regulations for the City of Atlantic Beach.
Public Father Mark Waters (1243 Linkside Drive) expressed concern about
Comment the impact of future development of the parcel on 11th Street and
other infrastructure including the water /sewer capacity and
sidewalks.
Janet Allen (1007 Big Pine
future development on thi
density.
ressed concern regarding any
property, and questioned the
Board Ms. Hall was askedto;`respond to the`den'sity question. She stated
Discussion that the Future Land Use Designation is Residential, Low Density,
which allows a maximum of six ,(6) dwelling.un►tsper acre, or up to
forty -two (42) dwellings, ithout i ny consideration being given to
environmental factors, `infrastructure requirements or other
subdivis►on and land develOPT.. nt regulations. However, she told
the Board that a p'r`eliminary assessment conducted when the land
was previously zoned RS -1 estimated., that no more than eleven
's►ngle- family lots could be established on the parcel due to
environmental conditions.
r.
`ratton asked how this compared with what was currently
fired for .the parcel,. Ms. Hall reviewed the approved Selva
a Country Club Residential PUD site plan and replied that the
t parcel is shown to have a total of twelve (12) complete lots
ix (6),,partial lots. However, she noted the minimum lot
irds "'f "'::the RS -1 zoning district are greater, and therefore
restrictive, than those for the approved PUD.
urgess moved that the Community Development Board
mend approval of Application REZ -13- 00100049 to the City
iission, being a change in the zoning district classification
from Planned Unit Development (PUD) to Residential, Single -
Family (RS -1) for lands described within said application, including
all supporting documents and information contained therein, and
all terms and conditions as set forth therein, subject to conditions
enumerated, and provided the following findings of fact: (1) The
request for rezoning has been fully considered after public hearing
with legal notice duly published as required by law; (2) The
rezoning to Residential, Single - Family (RS -1) is consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan and the Future Land Use Designation of
Residential, Low Density; (3) Development pursuant to this
Page 16 of 17
AGENDA ITEM # 7E
Draft tllinutes of the April 16, 2013 regular meeting of the Communio, Development Board JUNE 10, 2013
rezoning to Residential, Single - Family (RS -1) shall be consistent
with the Zoning, Subdivision and Land Development Regulations
for the City of Atlantic Beach prior to issuance of local permits
authorizing construction or site alteration; (4) The zoning district
classification of Residential, Single - Family (RS -1) is consistent and
compatible with surrounding development, in that surrounding
uses are existing single - family or future single - family residential
uses. Mr. Stratton seconded;.: the motion and it carried
unanimously, with Mr. Elmore,; abstaining due to his previously
stated conflict of interest.
S. REPORTS. None.
6. ADJOURNMENT — 7:50 PM
Brea Paul, Chair
Attest
Page 17 of 17
AGENDA ITEM # 7E
JUNE 10, 2013
ORDINANCE NUMBER 90 -13 -216
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH, REZONING
LANDS AS DESCRIBED HEREINAFTER FROM PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT (PUD) TO SPECIAL PLANNED AREA (SPA), SAID
LANDS TO BE KNOWN AS THE ATLANTIC BEACH COUNTRY CLUB
SPA; PROVIDING FOR SPECIAL CONDITIONS; PROVIDING
FINDINGS OF FACT; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; REQUIRING
RECORDATION; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Atlantic Beach, Florida hereby finds
that the change in Zoning District designation enacted by this Ordinance shall provide for orderly
growth; encourage the appropriate use of land; protect and conserve the value of property;
prevent the overcrowding of land; promote, protect and improve the health, safety, comfort, good
order, appearance, convenience, and general welfare of the public and serve to establish
consistency with the Comprehensive Plan, and
WHEREAS, after required notice was published, a public hearing was held by the
Community Development Board on the 16th day of April 2013 at 6:00 p.m. Introduction and
first reading of the proposed Ordinance by the City Commission was held on the 10th day of June
2013 at 6:30 p.m. Second reading of the proposed Ordinance and a public hearing to hear,
consider and adopt said Ordinance was held on the 8th day of July 2013 at 6:30 p.m.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ENACTED BY THE CITY COMMISSION ON BEHALF OF
THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH, FLORIDA:
SECTION 1. That, as requested by Rogers Towers, P.A. on behalf of Atlantic Beach
Partners, LLC, as authorized by Selva Marina Country Club, Inc, the title owner of record as
identified in the application (File Number REZ- 13- 00100048) along with supporting documents
for the zoning change submitted to the City of Atlantic Beach, Florida on March 25, 2013
hereinafter known as the Atlantic Beach Country Club Special Planned Area (SPA)
application, which is attached to and made part of this Ordinance, the zoning classification of
lands as described by legal description within Exhibit A is hereby changed to Special Planned
Area.
SECTION 2. That development of the lands within this Special Planned Area shall
proceed in accordance with the Atlantic Beach Country Club Special Planned Area application
and exhibits, as attached to this ordinance, first filed March 25, 2013, and other supporting
documents, which are a part of File Number REZ -13- 00100048, and incorporated by reference
into and made part of this Ordinance. In the case of conflict between the application, the
Ordinance No. 90 -13 -216 /Page 1 of 3
AGENDA ITEM # 7E
JUNE 10, 2013
supporting documents, and the provisions of this Ordinance, the provisions of this Ordinance
shall prevail.
SECTION 3. Special Condition: Development within this Special Planned Area shall
be similar to and consistent with the design concept and architectural designs and styles depicted
within renderings and drawings as contained within the Special Planned Area application, which
are made part of this Special Planned Area Ordinance.
SECTION 4. Findings of Fact: The need and justification for approval of the Atlantic
Beach Country Club SPA have been considered in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan
and the Zoning, Subdivision and Land Development Regulations and, whereby, it is found that:
1. This request for rezoning has been fully considered following a public hearing before and
a recommendation from the Community Development Board and after public hearing
before the City Commission with legal notice duly published as required by law.
2. This request for rezoning, and the detailed plan of development, is consistent with the
2020 Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map, as amended, and the designations of
those lands as described within this application as Residential, Low Density.
This rezoning from Planned Unit Development to Special Planned Area is consistent with
the Land Development Regulations in that the specific land to be redeveloped pursuant to
this SPA has consisted of previous uses defined by the Land Development Regulations as
residential and recreational, and said lands to be redeveloped are not composed of open
land, water, marsh and wetland areas.
4. This Special Planned Area does not adversely affect the orderly development of the City,
as embodied within Chapter 24, specifically Article III, Division 6 of the Land
Development Regulations, and within Comprehensive Plan.
The proposed Special Planned Area is consistent with the Land Development
Regulations, specifically Division 6, establishing standards for Special Planned Areas.
This rezoning and development of this Special Planned Area will proceed in accordance
with Chapter 24, Article III, Division 6 and will accomplish the objectives and meet the
Standards and Criteria of Section 24 -121, as well as Article IV, Division 5, of this
Chapter.
6. The zoning district designation of Special Planned Area, and the specific uses and special
conditions as set forth within this Special Planned Area, are consistent and compatible
with surrounding development, and the proposed Special Planned Area will not adversely
affect the health and safety of residents in the area and will not be detrimental to the
Ordinance No. 90 -13 -216 /Page 2 of 3
AGENDA ITEM # 7E
JUNE 10, 2013
natural environment or to the use or development of adjacent properties or the general
neighborhood.
SECTION 5. To the extent they do not conflict with the unique specific provisions of
this Special Planned Area Ordinance, all provisions of the Land Development Regulations, as
such may be amended from time to time, shall be applicable to this development; except that
modification to this Special Planned Area by variance or special use shall be prohibited except as
allowed by the Land Development Regulations, and except to the degree that the development
may qualify for vested rights in accordance with applicable ordinances and laws.
Notwithstanding any provision of this ordinance, no portion of any Building Code,
Comprehensive Plan or any regulation aside from those set forth within the Land Development
Regulations shall be deemed waived or varied by any provision herein.
SECTION 6. This Ordinance shall take effect immediately upon its final passage and
adoption and shall be recorded in a book kept and maintained by the Clerk of the City of Atlantic
Beach, Duval County, Florida, in accordance with Section 125.68, Florida Statutes.
Passed upon first reading by the City Commission of the City of Atlantic Beach this 10th
day of June 2013. Passed and enacted, upon final reading and public hearing and adoption
this 8th day of July 2013.
Approved as to form and correctness:
Alan C. Jensen, Esquire
City Attorney
Attest:
Donna L. Bartle, CMC
City Clerk
Mike Borno
Mayor /Presiding Officer
Effective Date:
Ordinance No. 90-13-2161 Page 3 of 3
AGENDA ITEM # 7E
JUNE 10, 2013
APPLICATION FOR ZONING MAP AMENDMENT
for
SPECIAL PLANNED AREA — or — PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
City of Atlantic Beach - 800 Seminole Road • Atlantic Beach, Florida 32233 -5445
Phone: (904) 247 -5800 • FAX (904) 247 -5805 - http: / /www.coab.us
Date �2s�2ai3 FileN
1. Applicant's Name Atlantic Beach Partners, LLC
2. Applicant's Address 414 Old Hard Road #502, Fleming Island, FL 32003
3. Property Location Selva Marina Country Club
Application No. Rea 13- oolOU43
4. Property Appraiser's Real Estate Number See Exhibit D
5. Current Zoning Classification PUD, RS -L 6. Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Designation RL
7. Requested Action Rezone to SPA
8. Size of Parcel 169.02 acres
9. Utility Provider JEA
10. Provide a textual narrative and a composite site plan, which demonstrates compliance with Article III, Division 6 of
the City of Atlantic Beach Zoning, Subdivision and Land Development Regulations. The narrative, and any required
attachments, should concisely address each of the provisions and requirements of Section 24 -120 and should be
provided in an order and format consistent with this Section. Please provide a cover page and a table of contents
identifying each attachment to the application.
11. The following items must be submitted with the application:
a. List of adjacent property owners within 300 feet of the property including name, mailing address and Property
Appraiser's Real Estate number from most recently certified tax rolls. Address two (2) legal size envelopes to each
property owner on the list. Do not include a return address. Each envelope must contain proper postage. The order of
the envelopes must match the order in which the names aunear on the list.
b. Proof of ownership (copy of deed or certificate by lawyer or abstract company or title company that verifies record owner
as above). If the applicant is not the owner, a letter of authorization from the owner(s) for applicant to represent the
owner for all purposes related to this application must be provided.
c. Required number of copies: five (5) Please submit ten (10) copies of any plans or attachments that are larger than 11 x
17 inches in size, or any other items that cannot be easily reproduced.
d. Application Fee. ($500.00)
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ALL INFORMATION PROVIDED WITH THIS APPLICATION IS CORRECT:
Signature of owner(s) or authorized person if owner's authorization form is attached:
Printed or tyl
Signature(s):
ADDRESS AND CONTACT INFORMATION OF PERSON TO RECEIVE ALL CORRESPONDENCE REGARDING THIS
APPLICATION Name: T.R. Hairline
Mailing Address: 1301 Riverplace Blvd., Suite 1500, Jacksonville, FL 32207
Phone: (904) 346 -5531
FAX: (904) 396 -0663 E -mail: THainline @RTLaw.com
AGENDA ITEM # 7E
JUNE 10, 2013
ATLANTIC BEACH COUNTRY CLUB PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (PUD)/
SPECIAL PLANNED AREA (SPA)
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THAT CERTAIN TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND BEING A PORTION OF
GOVERNMENT LOTS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15 AND 16, OF SECTION 8; A PORTION OF
GOVERNMENT LOT 6 OF SECTION 9, A PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2 OF
SECTION 16, AND A PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOTS 1 & 2 OF SECTION 17,
ALL IN TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, AND ALL THE LOT 5, BLOCK 1,
DONNER'S REPLAT AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 19, PAGES 16 AND 16A OF
THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF DUVAL COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER
OF THE FERRER GRANT, SECTION 38, TOWNSHIP 2 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST;
THENCE NORTH 06 045'00" WEST, 2073.94 FEET TO THE LINE DIVIDING SAID
SECTION 8 AND 17 FOR A POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 89 028150"
WEST, ALONG SAID SECTION LINE, 106.50 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER
OF GOVERNMENT LOT 2 OF SAID SECTION 17; THENCE SOUTH 00 000130" WEST,
ALONG THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 2, 75.00 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 89 028'50" WEST, AND PARALLEL TO SAID SECTION LINE, 469.26
FEET TO THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF BLOCK 1 OF SAID DONNER'S REPLAT;
THENCE NORTH 00 011'34" WEST, ALONG THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID
BLOCK 1, 4.00 FEET TO THE SOUTH EAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 5, BLOCK' 1;
THENCE SOUTH 89 028'50" WEST ALONG THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID
LOT 5,176.00 FEET TO THE EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF FRANCIS AVENUE
AND THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 5; THENCE NORTH 00 011'34"
WEST, ALONG THE EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SAID FRANCIS
AVENUE, 71.00 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 5, SITUATED
IN SAID SECTION LINE; THENCE SOUTH 89 028150" WEST ALONG SAID SECTION
LINE, 12.27 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST (112) OF
GOVERNMENT LOT 15 OF SAID SECTION 8; THENCE NORTH 00 031110" WEST,
ALONG THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID EAST (112) OF
GOVERNMENT LOT 15, 1324.81 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF
GOVERNMENT LOT 10 OF SAID SECTION 8; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY
BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 10, SOUTH 89003'10" WEST, 355.77 FEET TO THE
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF FAIRWAY VILLA AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 39,
PAGE 22 OF SAID PUBLIC RECORDS; THENCE NORTH 01°23'15" WEST, ALONG
THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID FAIRWAY VILLA, 1875.00 FEET THENCE NORTH
88 036'45" EAST, 470.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 51 045'15" EAST, 404.23 FEET TO
THE MOST WESTERLY CORNER OF SEVILLA GARDENS UNIT 2, AS RECORDED
IN PLAT BOOK 45, PAGE 7 OF SAID PUBLIC RECORDS; THENCE
SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID SEVILLA
GARDENS UNIT 2 AND A SOUTHEASTERLY PROLONGATION THEREOF, ALONG
THE ARC OF A CURVE THAT IS CONCAVE TO THE NORTHEAST AND HAS A
RADIUS OF 4069.72 FEET, A DISTANCE OF 1088.60 FEET AS MEASURED ALONG A
AGENDA ITEM # 7E
JUNE 10, 2013
CHORD BEARING SOUTH 47 106135" EAST; THENCE NORTH 59 °36'55" EAST, 90.85
FEET; THENCE SOUTH 30 °27105" EAST, 187.60 FEET; THENCE ALONG A CURVE
THAT IS CONCAVE TO THE NORTHEAST AND HAS A RADIUS OF 4069.72 FEET, A
DISTANCE OF 118.00 FEET, AS MEASURED ALONG A CHORD BEARING SOUTH
58 °35'55" EAST; THENCE SOUTH 12 022105" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 46.00 FEET,
MORE OR LESS, TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY SHORELINE OF
A DRAINAGE DITCH AND /OR CANAL; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE
WESTERLY SHORELINE OF SAID DRAINAGE DITCH AND /OR CANAL, 2026.00
FEET MORE OR LESS TO A POINT WHICH IS 15.00 FEET EASTERLY OF A POINT
THAT IS SOUTH 12 022'05" EAST, 2071.75 FEET, FROM THE END OF THE LAST
DESCRIBED CURVED LINE COURSE, SAID POINT BEING ON A WESTERLY
PROLONGATION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 1, BLOCK 9, SELVA MARINA
UNIT 5, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 30, PAGES 29 AND 29A OF SAID PUBLIC
RECORDS; THENCE NORTH 78 003'10" EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY
PROLONGATION AND ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 1, 332.00 FEET MORE
OR LESS TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE
OF SELVA MARINA DRIVE (A 100 FOOT RIGHT OF WAY), SAID POINT BEING
THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE SOUTH 11056150" EAST,
ALONG THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SAID SELVA MARINA DRIVE,
750.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 78 003110" WEST, 450.00 FEET TO THE
NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF THE LANDS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL
RECORDS VOLUME 1270, PAGE 559; THENCE SOUTH 11 °56'50" EAST, 270.00 FEET
TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID LANDS SO DESCRIBED; THENCE
SOUTH 78 003'10" WEST, 250.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF
THE LANDS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 1270, PAGE 559; THENCE
SOUTH 11 056'50" EAST, AND PARALLEL TO THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY
LINE OF SAID SELVA MARINA DRIVE, 684.44 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 83 042110"
WEST, 669.45 FEET; THENCE NORTH 06 045100" WEST, 1322.13 FEET TO AN
INTERSECTION WITH SAID SECTION LINE DIVIDING SECTION 8 AND 17;
THENCE SOUTH 89 028'50" WEST, ALONG SAID SECTION LINE, 301.78 FEET TO
THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
TOGETHER 'WITH OFFICIAL RECORDS VOLUME 6444, PAGE 1270 AND
OFFICIAL RECORDS VOLUME 7910, PAGE 0958.
AND
LOT 1, BLOCK 9, SELVA MARINA, UNIT NO. 5, ACCORDING TO MAP RECORDED
IN PLAT BOOK 30, PAGE 29A, OF THE CURRENT PUBLIC RECORDS OF DUVAL
COUNTY, FLORIDA.
JAM1742627_1 -2-
'o U F°
ooia �.J u°i�a�lom�my�oFTy�zsmgQ "' F
^�^7�rc3rcUpUFZd' <Q�?�z<F N�uwi
v� U~Ofm NLL F
eaz<�� �nmmpW K�2 <�i�oo33a�
oOUmog�i�- ooW�aro`9oam�]oo
w
a Wp o ^ a �rc�rc5 °om •�
HE ry� b aO1• ¢�orck'allo
UW���H�.{3iaow�2or NVb�z
` <K oti inr° wwwww .`rz.z
0
°mW�>3p°n ° °mY10_1~yJ� r..o4�rc -W
i7{VI m0 �W4> W OUOJp' W SLL
, g z U4ryZ6 ^°N
�5f'�5 o ^ ^z��av��pzo mN ~nW$r
mow�NOVi <��or�aNx zsZ <K�c �iyn
~O I. Or�<ZwK ti -4 apW >>b .
p OII xw �0 W0 �y� O DOOM y1
WOVI=�2 Q�m..FOUZ� < ~Q °Nm0Z�3
o
�"��mbY erg• =ry <�'OK
c0 .+oicz- ¢�o���^5� °rn °tiwpzo��a°
�o
=moo <a °�ti�3o$r��5, zp�b? °O`^i
rc�`i Sw¢y3 'roFy,LL °��ucNOio5�3� 1, zzy�
op�c~z+wm¢�rc €m�8 °Nrc?o
pWU OW
�iw mhh�iO'�IWi N U U ° -v^I KJQw„Z
jzS
Y0w °°nUWO O O3Uo wb
mipz z - LL
o �a 1�,iw
W °` m -2 <u�i F "r WVai3XM-o
e <ffo$oN vw<m�xLLO °O -i���r
O 2 €O�O pozWS "'2�z °rcnW�W4 <ILLSm 3W
N< N J �"Ijou1 OJ 7 �1 F F 12 *51., cpi¢ ° ~KOm
ry Zooym <zoo� omW pa
oa 1`n ymj <m�11oLLpwnNrb <4rcW17'WWN^wo vn
m s�mB! ° -ar mp<5<u°voo <owWgoJ.
W Z
O n w5, jm.em..m .-u< r4< nw0
=
O zZiimi1'$c��n /yI��8 567� a�iN��W
2W 6 w<, 3 U W € V W w
S U WtmF Wm ]CF�F ¢O¢ b41
0< o S S n rm O p 2 O W Q
a Z�m ~YIW ••Z N N� Ytf <y, °Nn OW >Z.•m
zz°do�'�"cionrca�'W o�- wNOBWz
O
gJp0
8me H mr.�Qimjm °Y o <��aww°ma<
gry�vi S'� <m�pU JWZZ�K�mr:
0 nin"0�orm<c4QrQW y <,�zo
K�� ryOq Z.Soo2�2Y OW $o.
O jVIWrN m
q¢q¢
_ =0 W ¢ pW
m6( °9065= RNRoF ymj bUy�FQp
OK ° ° m ° J 7 W � W K < _ � ° � J S •- WO > W
oio�r�maN Z �hd obz F0 =0 ii= zm i� ��g�go g o11w �
<FSaWW,NWa j�VIF<bb-hZUf 1AW°
Kai€ M<F -3FZ. ��O2nwi�oi� K am
° <oWZa or OO on m!�1o}n�.�o ^�o3z
ze2i.!�oIm� °�I%�����m�ZJi-6
F Z< Z P C ~O o K Z
mOmm��,�.j8WWWK mvo400a g5
--------------------- -------
AGENDA ITEM # 7E
JUNE 10, 2013
Ho�y
FF
O
N
m
a '
g
m
K
C2
rl
m
O
K
O
5
z
J
EXHIBIT "B -1"
AGENDA ITEM # 7E
JUNE 10, 2013
•,t, [�,: ✓_•-J •t S: • -O tM:t • ,44 �1'$y•,•F..y,•s•+,,'••�, .:�i3: `a' • •` • ;'4' ' f •.1•. ti iti , • • _ - - •
.•fish :l tt %+i tt .w4•.
NIT
N.
IL
LL
Ao t
Fab,
.r • c.
0
_i• t
•4 1,
.�+ � i _ice :••
,,T • -
O'
't
.•f'_
�•3
j:
l •tf a. rl
_ \ r.r
••t-
:a
1 ir -
J -
s�
t
%! fI
• 1
T..
O N
Q
l
q t r
• � / � � .�..�t tIJ � . `. ' -}r � .. � `dry
.. ..rte Z l` W ;eq,.� S '•'� � t - • '.. ��. ; �' 1 t tj `�i �'w '
rl
LL
IL
Elz
v 0
IL
IL
0
1•
• { '•_J r 4.. F
- 1
ii,•
i.r i• -
•:t _
'r
r% -t• •
c F
i :c•
S � t•
N
r
.d.
Z
'Wr4• _.14F a .O .�f•F 1 U F w W IL
`1 U LL p• p • , .
as 'u 0 1.. - :• •I„ r.- `
J o } .
EXHIBIT "B -2"
LOT SIZE DESIGNATIONS
5SWIDE- 125
W WIDE- 125
7PWIDE- to
- 1a
IRD- �a
£IOZ `OI 3lmnf
AL # WA.LI VGM9DV
EXIHBIT "C"
m r-
m
�a
U
0 vi
U
q
N
S
-8,0,2
N ?
� U q Er
�.�
U�
agge
c�
a
v
d a
� R
0 p 433
�I €g H
ff
5
I
8
AGENDA ITEM # 7E
JUNE 10, 2013
Exhibit "D"
Atlantic Beach Country Club Planned Unit Development (PUD) /Special Planned Area
(SPA)
Written Narrative of Plan of Development
Date: April 16, 2013
Current Land Use Designation: LDR (City of Jacksonville); RL (City of Atlantic Beach)
Current Zoning District: RR and PUD (City of Jacksonville); PUD (City of Atlantic Beach)
Requested Zoning District: PUD (City of Jacksonville); SPA (City of Atlantic Beach)
REO: 169399 -0000; 169399 -0010; 172000 -0000; 172024 -0000; 172027 -0010; 172027 -0030;
172029 -0000; 172036 -0000; 172157 -0000
NOTE: The development described in this Written Narrative includes
property within the City of Jacksonville ( "COJ Property ") and property
within the City of Atlantic Beach ( "COAB Property ") (collectively, the
"Property "). This is intended to serve as a Written narrative both for a
Planned Unit Development (PUD) on the COJ Property and for a Special
Planned Area (SPA) on the COAB Property. The development described
in this Written Narrative is a single family residential development, golf
course, country club, recreational amenities, and associated roadways,
access, stormwater, maintenance, and related facilities and
infrastructure. All uses are part of a unified plan which will be
consistent with the comprehensive plans for both the City of Jacksonville
(COJ) and the City of Atlantic Beach (COAB) and will meet the intent of
the land development regulations in both jurisdictions as well. As is
permitted under the COJ regulations for a PUD and under the COAB
regulations for an SPA, this Written Narrative will allow for flexibility
from the application of these regulations where it is necessary for a
unified and internally consistent development.
OVERVIEW OF THE DEVELOPMENT
Selva Marina Country Club, Inc. (the Applicant) was incorporated in 1956 as a for - profit
corporation. The sole asset of the corporation is the Selva Marina Country Club ( "Country
Club "), which consists of a private eighteen -hole golf course, clubhouse, tennis courts, and other
recreational amenities. Membership in the Country Club has declined significantly over recent
years, and the Applicant desires to undertake an extensive redevelopment of the golf course,
including the construction of new single family homes, a new clubhouse, and other associated
facilities and infrastructure.
EXHIBIT on File
Page of
AGENDA ITEM # 7E
JUNE to, 2013
I. LAND USE, ZONING, AND USES: PROPERTY AND SURROUNDING
PROPERTIES.
A. The COJ Property lies within the LDR land use category of the COJ
Comprehensive Plan and is zoned RR and PUD. The COAB property lies within the RL land
use category of the COAB Comprehensive Plan and is zoned PUD and RS -L.
B. For all but the southwest corner of the Property, the Property is surrounded by
single family, multifamily, public use, and vacant properties which lie within the COAB. These
properties are within the RL, RM, RH, and P /SP land use categories of the COAB
Comprehensive Plan and are within the RS -L, RS -2, RG -M, PUD, and CG zoning districts of the
COAB Land Development Regulations. At the southwest corner of the Property, the Property
adjoins commercial and residential properties which lie within the COJ. These properties are
within the CGC, RPI, and MDR land use categories of the COJ Comprehensive Plan and are
within the CCG -2, CCG -1, CRO, and RMD -A zoning districts of the City of Jacksonville Zoning
Code.
II. GENERAL PLAN FOR THE DEVELOPMENT.
A. The development described in this Written Narrative is a single family residential
development, golf course, clubhouse, recreational amenities, and associated roadways, access,
stormwater, maintenance, and related facilities and infrastructure.
B. The Property is approximately 169.02 acres. The COJ Property is approximately
135.12 acres. The COAB Property is approximately 33.90 acres.
C. Consistent with the variety of residential densities and lot sizes which surround
the Property and which are typical of the COAB, the development will include a varied mix of
lot sizes and single family residential types. The Conceptual Site Plan filed with this application
shows a mix of lot sizes and types. The total number of residential units shall not exceed 180
units. However, subject to the minimums and maximums shown on the Conceptual PUD Site
Plan, the location and number of each of the varying lots sizes and types shown on the
Conceptual Site Plan is conceptual only and may be subject to change, due to site engineering or
other factors, without amendment or modification of the PUD /SPA. The single family
residential uses will comprise approximately 34.44 acres, including approximately 34.36 acres
within COJ and approximately 0.08 acres within COAB.
D. As shown on the Conceptual Site Plan, a golf course, related structures
(bathrooms, shelters /stops, bathrooms, food, drink, etc.), maintenance facilities, cart barn,
parking, and similar uses will be located around and among the single family residential uses.
The golf course and related uses will comprise approximately 117.39 acres, including
approximately 91.25 acres within COJ and approximately 26.14 acres within COAB.
E. Within the "Club Site" parcel as shown on the Conceptual Site Plan will be
located a clubhouse and recreational amenities, which may include pool, cabana/clubhouse, pro
shop(s), health/exercise facility, offices, tennis courts, other recreational court(s) and /or field(s),
JAX\ 1733919_8 -2-
AGENDA ITEM # 7E
JUNE 10, 2013
parking, storage, and similar facilities. The clubhouse and recreational amenities will comprise
approximately 6.74 acres, including approximately 0.00 acres within COJ and approximately
6.74 acres within COAB.
F. The "Club Site" parcel as shown on the Conceptual Site Plan includes a parcel of
1.12 acres (RE# 172000 -0000) which is located in COAB, currently zoned RS -L, and used for
single family residential use. That parcel either will be incorporated into the clubhouse and
recreational amenities use or will continue to be used for single family residential use consistent
with the RS -L zoning district in the COAB Zoning Regulations.
G. As shown on the Conceptual Site Plan and as described further below, structures
for vehicular access (secured gate and /or gatehouse) may be located at the entrance to the
development at Dutton Island Road East. Structures for golf cart access (such as bridges or
shelters) also may be located throughout the development. The development also will include
roadways, stormwater facilities, and other related facilities and infrastructure. The roadways and
other supporting facilities and infrastructure will comprise approximately 10.45 acres, including
approximately 9.08 acres within COJ and approximately 1.37 acres within COAB.
III. PERMITTED USES: DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA.
This section of the Written Narrative addresses the following items: Permitted Uses and
Structures, Permitted Accessory Uses and Structures, Minimum Lot Requirements
(width/density /area), Maximum Lot Coverage by all Buildings and Structures, Minimum and /or
Maximum Yard Requirements, and Maximum Height of Structures.
A. Single Family Residential.
Permitted uses and structures.
a. Single family detached dwellings.
b. Essential services, including water, sewer, gas, telephone, cable,
radio and electric.
C. Home occupations subject to the conditions in Section III.D. 5
below.
d. Courtyard Lots described below which are adjacent to the golf
course, permitted uses may include units for daily /overnight rental;
provided, however,
(1) That the maximum number of Courtyard Lot units which
may be used for daily /overnight rental is four (4) units
located within the same courtyard lot configuration.
(2) All such units shall be owned by the same entity, which
shall be the owner /operator of a hospitality business, such
as hotel(s) or resort(s), and shall be managed by an entity
JAX \1733919_8 -3-
AGENDA ITEM # 7E
JUNE 10, 2013
with office(s) in Duval County..
(3) All such units shall be subject to the restrictive covenants
described below.
2. Maximum total number of residential units: 180.
3. Lot requirements: As shown on the Conceptual Site Plan, lot
requirements within the development will vary. The lot requirements are
set forth below.
4. Membership in club: All owners of residential lots within the
development shall be members of the club.
Single Family- 40'( -89') Lots: Minimum lot requirement (width and
area), Lot coverage by all buildings, Minimum yard requirements, and
Maximum height of structure for each Single Family use.
a. Minimum lot requirement (width and area). The minimum lot
requirement (width and area) for single family uses is:
(1) Width — Eighty (80) feet.
(2) Area -8,000 square feet.
b. Maximum impervious surface. Sixty -five (65) percent.
Minimum yard requirements. The minimum yard requirements for
all uses and structures (as measured from the wall of the
structure)are:
(1) Front — Twenty (20) feet from face of garage to back of
right -of -way and fifteen (15) feet from building face or
porch to back of right -of -way; except corner /double-
frontage lots, for which the non - address front/side
minimum yard shall be ten (10) feet from garage or
building face to back of right -of -way.
(2) Side— Five (5) feet, provided that the combined side yards
shall not be less than ten (10) feet.
(3) Rear —Ten (10) feet.
d. Maximum height of structure. Thirty -five (3 5) feet.
6. Sinzle Family— 70'( - -79') Lots: Minimum lot requirement (width and
area), Lot coverage by all buildings, Minimum yard requirements, and
Maximum height of structure for each Single Family use.
JAX \1733919_8 -4-
AGENDA ITEM # 7E
JUNE 10, 2013
a. Minimum lot requirement (width and area). The minimum lot
requirement (width and area) for single family uses is:
(1) Width — Seventy (70) feet.
(2) Area -7,000 square feet.
b. Maximum impervious surface. Sixty -five (65) percent.
Minimum yard requirements. The minimum yard requirements for
all uses and structures (as measured from the wall of the structure)
are:
(1) Front— Twenty (20) feet from face of garage to back of
right -of -way and fifteen (15) feet from building face or
porch to back of right -of -way; except corner /double-
frontage lots, for which the non - address front /side
minimum yard shall be ten (10) feet from garage or
building face to back of right -of -way.
(2) Side— Five (5) feet, provided that the combined side yards
shall not be less than ten (10) feet.
(3) Rear —Ten (10) feet.
d. Maximum height of structure. Thirty -five (3 5) feet.
7. Single Family--60'(-69') Lots: Minimum lot requirement (width and
area), Lot coverage by all buildings, Minimum yard requirements, and
Maximum height of structure for each Single Family use.
a. Minimum lot requirement (width and area). The minimum lot
requirement (width and area) for single family uses is:
(1) Width —Sixty (60) feet.
(2) Area -6,000 square feet.
b. Maximum impervious surface. Sixty -five (65) percent.
C. Minimum yard requirements. The minimum yard requirements for
all uses and structures (as measured from the wall of the structure)
are:
(1) Front — Twenty (20) feet from face of garage to back of
right -of -way and fifteen (15) feet from building face or
porch to back of right -of -way; except corner /double-
frontage lots, for which the non - address front /side
JAX \1733919_8 -5-
AGENDA ITEM # 7E
JUNE 10, 2013
minimum yard shall be ten (10) feet from garage or
building face to back of right -of -way.
(2) Side— Five (5) feet, provided that the combined side yards
shall not be less than ten (10) feet.
(3) Rear —Ten (10) feet.
d. Maximum height ofstructure. Thirty -five (35) feet.
Single Family-- 55'09') Lots: Minimum lot requirement (width and
area), Lot coverage by all buildings, Minimum yard requirements, and
Maximum height of structure for each Single Family use.
a. Minimum lot requirement (width and area). The minimum lot
requirement (width and area) for single family uses is:
(1) Width —Fifty (55) feet.
(2) Area -5,500 square feet.
b. Maximum impervious surface. Sixty -five (65) percent.
C. Minimum yard requirements. The minimum yard requirements for
all uses and structures (as measured from the wall of the structure)
are:
(1) Front— Twenty (20) feet from face of garage to back of
right -of -way and fifteen (15) feet from building face or
porch to back of right -of -way; except corner /double-
frontage lots, for which the non - address front /side
minimum yard shall be ten (10) feet from garage or
building face to back of right -of -way.
(2) Side— Five (5) feet, provided that the combined side yards
shall not be less than ten (10) feet.
(3) Rear —Ten (10) feet.
d. Maximum height of structure. Thirty -five (35) feet.
9. Courtyard Sinp_le Family Lots: Minimum lot requirement (width and
area), Lot coverage by all buildings, Minimum yard requirements, and
Maximum height of structure for each Single Family use.
a. Minimum lot requirement (width and area). The minimum lot
requirement (width and area) for single family uses is:
(1) Width —Fifty (50) feet.
JAX \1733919_8 -6-
AGENDA ITEM # 7E
JUNE 10, 2013
(2) Area -4,000 square feet.
b. Maximum impervious surface. Sixty -five (65) percent.
C. Minimum yard requirements. The minimum yard requirements for
all uses and structures (as measured from the wall of the structure)
are:
(1) Front — Twenty (20) feet from centerline of private access
driveway, ten (10) feet from public street right -of -way, and
ten (10) feet from building face or porch to lot boundary.
(2) Side —Five (5) feet.
(3) Rear —Ten (10) feet.
d. Maximum height of structure. Thirty -five (35) feet.
e. Thematic plan. Attached as Exhibit — is a thematic plan depicting
a potential lot layout for the Courtyard Lots. Lot and access
configuration may vary from the thematic plan.
10. Patios. Patios, including screened patios (without a structural roof),
outdoor dining, terraces, courtyards, or similar exterior structures shall be
permitted for each unit and may be located within side or rear yards but
shall not be located within five (5) feet of any property boundary.
11. Maximum Heights. Maximum heights shall be subject to Article XIV,
Section 59, of the Charter of the City of Atlantic Beach and the definition
of "height" as provided in the COAB Zoning Regulations.
12. Impervious surface definition. As used in this PUD /SPA Written
Narrative, "impervious surface means: those surfaces that prevent the
entry of water into the soil. Common impervious surfaces include, but are
not limited to, rooftops, sidewalks, patio areas, driveways, parking lots,
and other surfaces made of concrete, asphalt, brick, plastic, or any
surfacing material with a base or lining of an impervious material. Wood
decking elevated two (2) or more inches above the ground shall not be
considered impervious provided that the ground surface beneath the
decking is not impervious. Pervious areas beneath roof or balcony
overhangs that are subject to inundation by stormwater and which allow
the percolation of that stormwater shall not be considered impervious
areas. Swimming pools shall not be considered as impervious surfaces
because of their ability to retain additional rainwater, however, decking
around a pool may be considered impervious depending upon materials
used. Surfaces using pervious concrete or other similar open grid paving
systems shall be calculated as fifty (50) percent impervious surface,
provided that no barrier to natural percolation of water shall be installed
JAX \1733919_8 -7-
AGENDA ITEM # 7E
JUNE 10, 2013
beneath such material. Open grid pavers must be installed on a sand base,
without liner, in order to be considered fifty (50) percent impervious.
Solid surface pavers (e.g., brick or brick appearing pavers as opposed to
open grid pavers) do not qualify for any reduction in impervious area,
regardless of type of base material used.
13. RS- L - -COAB Parcel of 112 acres (RE# 172000 - 0000). As described
above, as an alternative to the Clubhouse /Recreational Amenities use
described below, a COAB parcel of 1.12 acres (RE# 172000 -0000) may
continue to be used for single family residential use consistent with the
RS -L zoning district as described in the COAB Zoning Regulations.
B. Clubhouse/Recreational Amenities.
Permitted uses and structures.
a. Clubhouse (maximum of 30,000 sq. ft.) and recreational amenities,
which may include pool, cabana/clubhouse, spa, sauna, pro shop(s), health/exercise facility,
offices, tennis courts and associated lighting and fencing, other recreational court(s) and /or
field(s) and associated lighting and fencing, storage, and similar facilities.
b. Outdoor social events, including parties, weddings, and holiday
events, with associated uses including outdoor service of food and beverage, including alcoholic
beverages, outdoor music, fireworks, and similar activities.
beverages.
C. Sale and service of food and beverage, including alcoholic
d. Retail sales of recreation - related items at pro shop(s).
e. Golf cart maintenance and /or storage.
f. Essential services, including water, sewer, gas, telephone, cable,
radio and electric.
2. Minimum lot requirement. Four (4) acres.
3. Maximum impervious surface. Eighty -five percent (85 %).
4. Minimum yard requirements. The minimum yard requirements for all uses
and structures (as measured from the wall of the structure) are:
(1) Front — Twenty (20) feet.
(2) Side —Ten (10) feet, or five (5) feet with buffer as provided
below.
(3) Rear —Ten (10) feet, or five (5) feet with buffer as
JAX \1733919 8 -8-
AGENDA ITEM # 7E
JUNE 10, 2013
provided below.
5. Maximum height of structure. Maximum heights shall be subject to
Article XIV, Section 59, of the Charter of the City of Atlantic Beach and
the definition of "height" as provided in the COAB Zoning Regulations.
6. Recreational use buffers and lighting. The tennis courts, pool /cabana, and
other outdoor recreational court(s) or field(s) shall be buffered with a
minimum 5 -foot wide landscaped buffer from the Property boundary.
This buffer shall be planted and maintained with shrubs or trees that
provide an opaque vegetative buffer. Buffers as required above may
include fences or walls, provided that no solid fence or wall within any
such buffer shall exceed eight feet in height. This height limit shall not
apply to the types of fencing customarily used to enclose tennis courts.
Lighting in any location shall be directed away from residential dwellings,
and no tennis courts in any location shall be lighted later than 10:00p.m.
C. Golf Course.
1. Permitted uses and structures.
a. Golf course, practice facilities and associated lighting and fencing,
related structures (bathrooms, food, drink, etc.), "starter" or "half
way" houses or shelters /stops, maintenance facilities, and similar
uses.
b. Golf cart maintenance and/or storage.
C. Sale and service of food and beverage, including alcoholic
beverages, at "starter" or "half way" houses or shelters /stops or
from service carts.
d. Essential services, including water, sewer, re -use, gas, telephone,
cable, radio and electric.
2. Minimum lot requirement (width and area). None.
Maximum lot coverage by all buildings. None.
4. Minimum yard requirements. None.
5. Maximum height of structure. None.
D. Accessory Uses and Structures.
JAX \1733919 8 -9-
AGENDA ITEM # 7E
JUNE 10, 2013
Accessory uses and structures are permitted if those uses and structures are of the nature
customarily incidental and clearly subordinate to a permitted principal use or structure and these
uses and structures are located on the same lot (or contiguous lot in the same ownership) as the
principal use. Whether attached or detached to a building or structure containing the principal
use, the accessory structure shall be considered as a part of the principal building. Accessory
uses shall not involve operations or structures not in keeping with character of the district where
located and shall be subject to the following:
Accessory uses shall not be located in required front or side yards except
as follows:
a. Detached accessory structures such as carports, covered parking, or
garages for vehicles or golf carts which are separated from the
main structure may be located in a required side or rear yard but
not less than five (5) feet from a lot line. If bonus rooms are
located above such an accessory structure, then such structure also
shall be not less than five (5) feet from a lot line. The total number
of buildings on any lot zoned for single - family use shall not exceed
three (3) including the principal use structure, detached
carports /parking/garage, and any other detached building.
b. Air conditioning compressors or other equipment designed to serve
the main structure may be located in a required side or rear yard
and may be located not less than three (3) feet to the property line.
C. Swimming pools and associated screened enclosures (without a
structural roof) may be located in a required rear or side yard but
may not be located less than five (5) feet from the property line or
top of the bank of a pond, whichever is applicable.
2. Accessory uses and structures in a residential district shall include
noncommercial greenhouses and plant nurseries, servants' quarters and
guesthouses, private garages and private boathouses or shelters, toolhouses
and garden sheds, garden work centers, children's play areas and play
equipment, private ball courts, private barbecue pits, outdoor fireplaces,
ornamental pools, gazebos, and swimming pools, facilities for security
guards and caretakers and similar uses or structures which are of a nature
not likely to attract visitors in larger number than would normally be
expected in a residential neighborhood. Any structure under a common
roof and meeting all required yards is a principal structure. The maximum
height of an accessory structure shall not exceed twenty -five (25) feet.
3. Land clearing and processing of land clearing debris shall be accessory
uses; provided, however, land clearing debris may be processed only in
conformity with applicable fire codes and other chapters of the applicable
code to the extent those chapters are applicable.
JAX \1733919 8 _10-
AGENDA ITEM # 7E
JUNE 10, 2013
4. Essential services (utility systems) shall be allowed as a permitted use
subject to the following conditions:
a. Central water systems, sewerage systems, re -use systems, utility
lines, and easements shall be provided underground and in
accordance with the appropriate sections of the code.
Home occupations shall be allowed subject to the following conditions:
a. The use of the premises for the home occupation shall be
incidental and subordinate to its use for residential purposes by its
occupants and shall, under no circumstances, change the residential
character thereof.
b. There shall be no change in the outside appearance of the building
or premises or other visible evidence of the conduct of the home
occupation.
There shall be no equipment or process used in the home
occupation which creates excessive noise, vibration, glare, fumes
odors or electrical interference detectable to normal senses off the
lot.
d. In the case of electrical interference, no equipment shall be used
which creates visual or audible interference in the radio or
television receiver off the premises or causes fluctuations in line
voltage off the premises.
E. Access.
Access will be provided as shown on the Conceptual Site Plan via Selva
Marina Drive and Dutton Island Road East.
2. Golf cart access may be provided to adjoining properties pursuant to
private access agreements.
3. The location and design of the access at Selva Marina Drive shall be
subject to the review and approval of the COAB Planning and Zoning
Department and Public Works Department.
4. The location and design of the access at Dutton Island Road East shall be
subject to the review and approval of COAB. Within the existing right -of-
way, Dutton Island Road East shall be improved to a minimum pavement
width of twenty feet (20') to the specifications directed by COAB
Planning and Zoning Department and Public Works Department.
Pedestrian and vehicular access at Dutton Island Road East shall be
secured inside the Property to limit access to residents of the development
within the PUD /SPA, commercial traffic to and from the
JAx \1733919_8 -11-
AGENDA ITEM # 7E
JUNE 10, 2013
Clubhouse /Recreational Amenities uses and Golf Course uses, and
construction traffic for development within the PUD /SPA. Structures for
vehicular access [secured gate(s) and /or gatehouse, mail kiosk, community
bulletin board, etc.] may be located at the access inside the Property.
5. All internal roads will be dedicated public streets, designed to COJ
specifications, and dedicated to the COJ or COAB except (i) the portion of
the internal roadway system connecting the system to Dutton Island Road
East and (ii) internal driveways into Courtyard Lots as described above,
which may be an approved private road with access easements for
permanent access to the residential units.
6. The configuration and design of the internal road system, including roads,
any traffic circles, and intersections, shall be subject to the review and
approval of the COAB Planning and Zoning Department and Public
Works Department. Features which will be permitted include: Miami -
type curbing on landscape islands and other appropriate locations; sixteen
foot (16') pavement width at appropriate locations for traffic calming; and
brick pavers, stamped concrete, or stamped asphalt at appropriate
locations. The internal roadway system shown on the Conceptual Site
plan is schematic only and may be subject to realignment prior to
development, due to site engineering or other factors, without amendment
or modification of the PUD /SPA.
F. Si na e.
Community identification monument signs will be permitted within the
Property at the access points to the PUD /SPA at Selva Marina Drive and
at the terminus of Dutton Island Road East. These signs shall not exceed
eight (8) feet in height and thirty -two (32) square feet in area (each side)
excluding border and columns, may be two sided and externally
illuminated, and may identify the club, golf course, and residential uses.
Alternatively, these signs may be designed as entry towers, 1, 2, 3 or 4
sided (or cylindrical), an a maximum of thirty -two (32) square feet per
side excluding border, base or foundation, and tower cap, a maximum of
twenty -four (24) feet in height. The entry towers would be architecturally
consistent with the clubhouse and club facilities.
2. Existing signage for the club at the intersection of Selva Marina Drive and
Seminole Drive may be redesigned and updated for the club, golf course,
and residential uses, and continues to be maintained by the Country Club.
The sign may be externally illuminated.
3. At the Clubhouse /Recreational Amenities and the Golf Course, wall signs
are permitted and shall not exceed ten (10) percent of the square footage
of the occupancy frontage or respective sides of the building facing the
public rights -of -way. In addition to wall signs, awning signs are permitted
JAX \1733919_8 -12-
AGENDA ITEM # 7E
JUNE 10, 2013
and shall not exceed ten (10) percent of the square footage of the
occupancy frontage or respective sides of the building facing the public
rights -of -way; provided, any square footage utilized for an awning sign
shall be subtracted from the allowable square footage that can be utilized
for wall signs. Under canopy signs also are permitted. One (1) under the
canopy sign per occupancy is permitted not exceeding a maximum of
twenty (20) square feet in area per side; provided, any square footage
utilized for an under the canopy sign shall be subtracted from the
allowable square footage that can be utilized for wall signs.
4. Directional signs indicating activities, buildings, common areas, and other
features within the Clubhouse /Amenities and Golf Course uses will be
permitted. The design of these signs should reflect the character of the use
identity signs and may include the project logo and name. For
predominantly vehicle directional signage, such signs shall be a maximum
of four (4) square feet in area per sign face. For pedestrian directional
signage, such as privately maintained "informational side walk kiosks ", 1,
2, 3 or 4 sided (or cylindrical), such signs shall be a maximum of twenty
(20) square feet per side and a maximum of twelve (12) feet in height. All
Vehicular Control Signs shall meet the requirements of the Manual on
Uniform Traffic Control Devices; privately maintained street signage with
with decorative post(s) and finials are permitted.
5. Real estate and construction and temporary signs are permitted. Signs of a
maximum of thirty -two (32) square feet in area and eight (8) feet in height
for model homes also shall be permitted.
6. Because all identity and directional signs are architectural features
intended to be compatible with and complimentary of the buildings in the
PUD, they may be located in structures or frames that are part of the
architecture of the project. Accordingly, sign area for all such signs as
well as wall, awning, and under the canopy signs, shall be computed on
the basis of the smallest regular geometric shape encompassing the
outermost individual letters, words, or numbers on the sign.
7. Banner signs may be permitted pursuant to Section 17 -33 of the COAB
Ordinance Code.
Signs required by environmental permitting to be posted in common areas
such as stormwater facilities shall be permitted.
G. Construction offices /model homes /real estate sales.
On -site, temporary construction offices /model homes /sales offices /club
membership marketing will be permitted until build -out. Real estate sales
activities and club membership marketing are permitted within model
homes. Associated parking for sales activities is permitted adjacent to
JAX \1733919 8 -13-
AGENDA ITEM # 7E
JUNE 10, 2013
model homes. Upon the approval of construction plans for the
infrastructure improvements for residential development within the
PUD /SPA, the Applicant may seek and obtain building permits for the
construction of up to twenty percent (20 %) of the residential units prior to
the recordation of the subdivision plat(s) for the residential lots.
H. Landscaping and Tree Protection.
For the Single Family Residential and Golf Course uses, tree protection during
development will be governed by Section 656.1204 et seq. of the COJ Zoning
Code. Landscaping will be governed by the design standards in Section 24 -176 et
seq. of the COAB Ordinance Code. In tree protection efforts and landscaping
design, maintenance of existing trees or re- planting of trees on site shall be
preferred to mitigation.
For the Clubhouse /Recreational Amenities use, landscaping and tree protection
will be provided in accordance with Section 24 -176, et seq. (landscaping) and Part
II, Chapter 23 (tree protection), COAB Ordinance Code.
I. Parking.
For the Clubhouse /Recreational Amenities and Golf Course uses, parking shall be
provided in accordance with Sections 24 -161 and 24 -162, COAB Ordinance
Code.
J. Sidewalks/Pedestrian Circulation.
For the Single Family Residential and Golf Course uses, sidewalks and pedestrian
circulation will be provided in accordance with the COJ Comprehensive Plan and
Code of Subdivision Regulations. In particular locations, sidewalks may
accommodate golf carts. As provided in Section III.E.4 above, pedestrian access
to Dutton Island Road East may be secured.
For Clubhouse/Recreational Amenities uses, sidewalks and pedestrian circulation
will be provided in accordance with Part II, Chapter 19, COAB Ordinance Code.
K. Restrictive Covenants.
Restrictive covenants will be recorded prior to the sale of Single Family
Residential lots to provide for thematic consistency and for the review of
individual building plans by an architectural review board.
L. Owners' Association
An owners' association will be established to maintain common areas.
M. Golf Cart Usage and Circulation.
JAX \1733919_8 -14-
AGENDA ITEM # 7E
JUNE 10, 2013
Notwithstanding any COJ or COAB Ordinance Code provisions to the contrary,
golf carts may be used on all internal roadways and sidewalks within the
PUD /SPA. Unless otherwise lawfully permitted, no golf cart shall be used on
Selva Marina Drive.
N. Supplementary Regulations.
For the Single Family Residential and Golf Course uses, to the extent not
otherwise addressed herein, any matters addressed in Part 4, Subpart B
"Miscellaneous Regulations" of the COJ Zoning Code shall be governed by such
provisions.
For the Clubhouse /Recreational Amenities use, to the extent not otherwise
addressed herein, any matters addressed in the Part II, Chapter 24, Article 111,
Division 7 "Supplementary Regulations" COAB Ordinance Code, shall be
governed by such provisions..
O. Site Development Data
Total acreage 169.02 Acres
Allowable uses, by acreage:
Single Family Residential
Max.
180
units
Acres
34.44
COJ --
34.36
COAB-
-0.08
Number and Type of Dwelling
80' min.
Min.
Max.
Units by Each Type
width
15 units
45
units
70' min.
Min.
Max.
width
10 units
40
units
60' min.
Min.
Max.
width
25 units
60
units
55' min.
Min.
Max.
width
25 units
65
units
Courtyard
Min.
Max
0 units
30
units
JAX \1 733919_8 -15-
AGENDA ITEM # 7E
JUNE 10, 2013
Clubhouse /Recreational
Amenities
Max.
Acres
6.74
COJ --
Sq. ft.
0.00
COAB-
-6.74
Golf Course
Acres
117.39
COJ --
91.25
COAB-
-26.14
Total amount of active recreation
Total amount of passive
open space
Amount of public and private right -of -way
Maximum impervious surface
124.13 acres
0.0 acres
10.45 acres
Single Family Residential 65%
Clubhouse /Recreational Amenities 85%
IV. ADDITIONAL SECTIONS REQUIRED BY CITY OF JACKSONVILLE
a
C
Pre - application conference.
A pre - application conference was held regarding this application on March 7,
2013.
Justification for the PUD Rezoning.
As described above, Selva Marina Country Club, Inc. was incorporated in 1956 as
a for -profit corporation. The sole asset of the corporation is the Country Club,
which consists of a private eighteen -hole golf course, clubhouse, tennis courts,
and other recreational amenities. Membership in the Country Club has declined
significantly over recent years, and the Applicant desires to undertake an
extensive redevelopment of the golf course, including the construction of new
single family homes, a new clubhouse, and other associated facilities and
infrastructure. This redevelopment is essential to ensure the continued viability of
the Country Club and, further, is consistent with the surrounding zoning and
existing uses.
PUD/Difference from Usual Application of the Zoning Code
The PUD differs from the usual application of the Zoning Code in the following
respects: it binds the Applicant and successors to this Written Narrative and the
Conceptual Site Plan; it provides for a mix of uses which are thematically
JAX \1733919 8 -16-
AGENDA ITEM # 7E
JUNE 10, 2013
consistent and compatible with each other; it provides for a single regulatory
system which crosses two local government jurisdictions; it requires specific and
unique yard and patio requirements; it provides for a unique Courtyard Single
Family Homes concept; as to the Clubhouse /Recreational Amenities use, it
provides specific and unique buffer requirements; for the Clubhouse/Recreational
Amenities and Golf Course uses, it also specifically lists numerous permitted uses
commonly associated with these uses but not otherwise listed in the Code; it
provides for unique and site - specific access requirements; it provides for unique
and site - specific signage requirements; it contains unique and specific provisions
regarding construction offices and model homes; it contains unique, cross -
jurisdictional provisions regarding landscaping, parking, and sidewalks; and it
contains unique provisions regarding restrictive covenants and golf cart usage.
D. Permissible Uses by Exception.
There are no permissible uses by exception.
E. Continued Operation of Common Areas.
Regarding the intent for the continued operation and maintenance of those areas
and functions and facilities which are not to be provided, operated, or maintained
by the City of Jacksonville or other public entity: it is the Applicant's intent for
the Applicant or successor developer to operate and maintain these matters
initially and, ultimately, for an owners' association to operate and maintain these
matters in perpetuity.
F. Approximate Dates of Phases
Regarding phasing, construction of the horizontal improvements for the Single
Family Residential and improvements for the Golf Course uses shall be initiated
in approximately 2013 -14 and be completed approximately in 2014 -15.
Construction of single family residential units will be initiated when the market
dictates and will be completed as the market dictates. Construction of the
Clubhouse /Recreational Amenities will be initiated when needed and feasible and
will be completed within a reasonable time thereafter.
G. Names of Development Team
Developer: Atlantic Beach Partners, LLC
Planners and Engineers: Taylor & While, Inc.
Architects: None at this time.
H. Land Use Table
A Land Use Table is attached hereto as Exhibit "F."
JAX \1733919_8 -17-
AGENDA ITEM # 7E
JUNE 10, 2013
PREPARED BY: TRANSPORTATION•PLANNERS ENTERPRISE, INC-
JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA
TPE JOB NO. 13 -2654
DATE: APRIL 12, 2013
TRAFFIC STUDY FOR PLANNED
ATLANTIC rBEACH �COUNTRY - CLUB^_
Introduction_
AGENDA ITEM # 7E
JUNE 10, 2013
The existing Selva Marina Country Club is planned to be redeveloped
into 169 single - family residential dwelling units and a complete redesign
of the 18 -hole golf course and clubhouse. Figure 1 shows the general location
of the development. Figure 2 and 2A show aerial views of the area.
Figure 3 shows conceptual site plan.
Traffic impact is always a major concern with relatively large developments.
Hence, this traffic study focuses on:
1) the AM and PM peak hour traffic at:
a)Selva Marina Drive and Seminole Beach Road,
b)Seminole Beach Road at the five -way road intersection with Plaza Drive
and Sherry Road,
c)Selva Marina Drive at the main entrance to- the Country Club - Golf Course,and
d)Mayport Road at East Dutton Island Road which leads to the planned main
gated entrance for the Atlantic Beach Country Club residential development).
Transportation Planners Enterprise, Inc. (TPE) was retained to:
1) estimate the AM and PM peak hour traffic generation, 2) estimate the average
trip distribution to adjacent roads during this peak hour and 3) determine if
any traffic safety and intersection improvements will be needed due to the
development's traffic impact.
2013-AM-and-PM-Peak Hour Traffic
TPE's initial major work effort was to conduct peak period traffic surveys
at the above four mentioned intersections. AM counts were made during 7:00 -8:45
while PM counts were made from 4:00 -5:45• The count at the present main
entrance to the Selva Marina Country Club and Golf Course was made during
3:15 -5:45 PM. No AM surveys were made at the Country Club or at Mayport Road
and Dutton Island Road.
1
AGENDA ITEM # 7E
JUNE 10, 2013
,and at the Seminole Beach Road five -way intersection at Plaza Drive and
Sherry Road. Hence, TPE's 2007 PM peak period traffic count is'ahown.
This is more consistent with the above referenced 2013 counts.
PM peak hour traffic on Selva Marina Drive totaled 161 (L.O.S. "B ")
while Seminole Beach Road traffic totaled.618 south of Selva Marina
(L.0.S. "C" ).
Figure 7 provides the April 10, 2013 7:30 -8:30 AM peak hour traffic
• entering and exiting the five -way intersection of Seminole Beach Road,
:Plaza Drive and Sherry Road.'818 vehicles entered the intersection during
the AM peak hour.•The primary movements were to and from Seminole Beach
.Road and to and from North Seminole Beach Road and Sherry Road..
TPE's observation revealed very efficient traffic 'flow. (note - less
delay time'than if a traffic signal was in operation..)
Figure 8 shows the 4:30 -5:30 PM peak hour traffic movements at the
five -way intersection. 847 vehicles entered and exited during the peak hour.
Again the traffic safety and flow was very good. The highest vehicle
back -up was 8 -10 vehicles on Seminole Beach Road.; southbound. The end vehicle
took about 35 -45 secondq to enter the intersection. The estimated average
for all 847 vehicles was 12 -20 seconds.'
Figure 9 shows the 4:30 -5:30 PM peak hour traffic survey at the existing
Selva Marina Country Club main entrance. During the 3:15 -5:45 PM survey there -
were 33 inbound trips•and 38 outbound vehicle trips. During the PM peak hour,
as shown, there were 14 inbound and 26'outbound vehicle trips. The expected
PM peak dour traffic generated by the planned Atlantic Beach Country Club
clubhouse and golf course is expected to have slightly more trips than the
existing Selva Marina Country Club. it is significant to note that nearly
20% of the present outbound traffic uses Country Club Lane.
3
AGENDA ITEM # 7E
JUNE 10, 2013
On March 13, 2013, TPE conducted 4:00 -6:00 PM traffic counts at
two key residential streets on Mayport Road at Dutton Island Rd. and at
Levy Road /Donner Road. In addition, a traffic count survey was also
completed at the Selva Marina Drive and Seminole Road intersection.
It should be noted that traffic to and from the Chevron gas station
and the Hardees restaurant at the corner of Levy Road is not included
in the traffic results. Figure 4 shows the 2013 PM peak hour traffic data.
A summary of the left and right -turns to and from Mayport Road for the
combined two residential streets is given below:
PM Peak Hour
Traffic
(4:30 -5:30)
volume
% of total
Inbound traffic
Inbound Traffic Outbound Traffic'
From North From South To North To South.
86 236 82 133
26.7% 73.3% 38.1% 61.9%
The PM peak hour during the two hour survey was 4 :30 - 5:30. A total of
322 inbound and 215 outbound vehicle trips to and from:-the two primarily
residential streets represent an estimated 500 -600 homes. These trip
distribution results were used for the Atlantic Beach Country Club
residential development traffic estimated to use Hayport Road.
Figure 5 shows the AM peak hour traffic at Selva Marina Drive and
Seminole Beach Road. Traffic on Selva Marina Drive is relatively low
with a total of 129 vehicles (93 southbound and 36 northbound). The level
of service (LOS) is "B" or better. Seminole Beach Road traffic is much
higher (610). However, the L.O.S. is satisfactory at "C."
Figure 6 shows the PM peak hour traffic at Selva Marina Drive and
Seminole Beach Road. The traffic count made on March 13, 2013(see Figure 4)
appeared low compared with TPE's traffic counts at the Country Club entrance
AGENDA ITEM # 7E
JUNE 10, 2013
Estimated PM Peak Hour Traffic
Generated by Planned
Atlantic Beach Coun try __ Club - Development ------------
TPE used the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) trip generation
manual to estimate the average weekday PM peak hour traffic expected by
the development. The 169 single - family homes will average 107 inbound and
63 outbound vehicle trips during the PM peak hour according to ITE Code 210
(single - family detached housing). During the AM peak hour, the residential
units will average 32 inbound and 96 outbound vehicle trips. The Country Club
will be private and is expected to average 22 inbound and 28 outbound vehicle
trips during the PM peak hour. Many of these trips are expected to be made
within the development (20 %). Hence, 18 inbound and 24 outbound vehicle trips
will leave or enter the golf course during the PM peak hour. TPE assumes
that only one -third of these trips will be "new" trips. (See Figure 9).
These golf trips are expected to use the Selva Marina Drive access.
This is the case at present.
Figures 10 and 11 show TPE's trip distribution.on Mayport Road of the
expected AM and PM peak hour traffic generated by the development at build -out,
_ assumed by Year 2016. In order to be conservative, TPE assumed that 33% of
the residential development traffic to and from the site will use Selva Marina
Drive. TPE believes that it will be much less (e.g. 25 %).
The estimated PM peak hour residential development traffic (40 outbound
and 68 inbound - see Fig. 11) is based on TPE's traffic counts on Mayport Road,
as mentioned earlier.-26.5% of the total inbound trips or 18.will come from
Mayport Road north and 73:5% or 50 will be from the south. The estimated
outbound trips during the PM peak hour are 15 rights north onto Mayport Road
and 25 lefts south onto Mayport Road. The existing traffic signal will be able
to accommodate these movements.
Figure 12 shows the estimated new traffic along Selva Marina Drive at the.
main entrance for the Country Club to Seminole Beach Road. As mentioned above
4
i
AGENDA ITEM # 7E
JUNE 10, 2013
most the existing Country Club •- golf traffic generated by Selva Marina
will be included in the Atlantic Beach Country Club - golf traffic.
However, TPE assumes there will be 6 inbound :and 8 outbounnd "new" trip's
related to the new Country Club. As shown, an estimated 3� inbound and
19 outbound vehicle trips are estimated to be generated by the new
residential development.
Figures 13 & 14 show the expected 2016 total traffic at the Selva
Marina Drive and Seminole Beach Road intersection. The-Year 2013 1traffic
plus the estimated new traffic generated by the planned Atlantic Beach
Country Club is shown. .
Year 2007 (previous TPE study), Year 2013 and estimated 2016 traffic
is shown below with and without the Atlantic Beach Country Club PM peak
hour traffic.
A summary of the estimated 2016 PM peak hour traffic compared to
Year 2013 is given below:
�.. Year
Road 2007
1)Mayport Rd. (4-- lane) .
a)north of Dutton Island Rd.
2,912
b)-south of Dutton Island Rd.
3,023
Year
2016(1)
Year Without
2013(4) Development
2351
2674
2)Seminole Beach Rd.(2)
a)south of Selva Marina Dr.' 618 618
3) Selva Marina Dr. (2) 161 161
2628(4)
2755 (4)
637
161
Service Volume /'.
With
Development L-O.S.
2,646/C 4200/C
2,805/C 4200/C
695/C 87'0/C
223/B 500 /C
Even with the development traffic, the above roads will not have traffic over
the capacity of the roadway.
(1) assume 1% annual growth rate from 2013 to 2016 for non - development traffic
(2) YM peak hour 4:30 -5:30
5
j
AGENDA ITEM # 7E
JUNE 10, 2013
Figures 15 & 16 show the 2013 AM and PM-peak hour traffic and the
estimated Atlantic Beach Country Club new traffic traveling through the
five -way intersection at Seminole Beach Road and Plaza Drive. The-existing
traffic distribution to and from North Seminole Beach Road from and to
the other fpur roadways was used to estimate the development's traffic.
During the AM peak hour the development will add 52 new vehicle trips
through the intersection or'an increase of 6.36 %. The development's 57
new vehicle trips will add 6.73% to the existing 847 entering traffic
during the PM peak hour.
The increase in traffic will average about one vehicle per minute.
Hence, the traffic impact will be very minor and is not expected to
significantly increase the average delay time per all vehicles,
Recommended Road Improvements
for Planned Atlantic Beach Country Club
Dave] apment�_.,____.._� -------------
The following road improvements are for the new residential development.
(1) Construction of a 2 -lane east -west roadway from the development westerly
to Mayport Road with a direct connection at the Dutton Island'Road traffic signal-.
A left-turn lane and thru -right lane'at Mayport Rd. will be provided along with
appropriate traffic signal modifications4e.g. cluster head, loops, retiming
operation, etc.) Design and permit application will be submitted to the
Florida Department of Transpprtation as well as the City of Atlantic Beach
for review and,-:approval.
6
AGENDA ITEM # 7E
JUNE 10, 2013
2) Construction of the development 2 -lane connection to Selva Marina
Drive using the southern main entrance at the present Selva Marina
Country Club. For Selva Marina Drive; traffic safety control devices
(e.g.- signs, pavement markings, speed limit signs, etc.) will be
determined as needed for convenient and safe traffic . An improved
northbound left -turn lane for access into the new clubhouse will be made.
3) The outbound right -turn radius on Selves Marina Drive will be improved
and pavement striping may be provided to better separate inbound and
outbound traffic.
Conclusion
The planned Atlantic Beach Country Club development should be approved
by the City of Atlantic Beach and other agencies as required for design
plan approvals and permits. The expected traffic impact on Mayport Road,,
Selva Marina Drive, Seminole Beach Road and at the Seminole Beach Rd. -
Plaza Drive - Sherry intersection will be minor.
Ward Koutnik, President
_C1 It I
7 Wayne L. Oehlman.. P.L.
FL 21434 4112 1/2d U ' -
AGENDA ITEM # 7E
JUNE 10, 2013
38 9 � A Katherine rine A iflavy
.
%
"i's'CA-ep 0 s gg
?'t STQgl
Em
F �T 6 --,-'Dl
CYPRE9 n q S4
G 4
3:
P 6VAGMAD
o .14ar
poll
E 'emp r IREEZE nil
SIEW4 Q E;
pt"d
A E REACH
wE tl 111311D B68ch
s s scij.�
61
UM-SESSUPWNG CT
A." OU c LN -t C I E* E G TNS
"aX'yCaVeCr AlA tq T
DFt
co
!Q
AT.A AGA9V.!
. L
Y INC
-OR F NT
va
Mann
PLANNED
PAuvMNDWW
ATLANTIC BEACH
X
COUNTRY CLUB
EWLN
PRYROA,
E4S
Zia I
r
A til r it n tic
OR
E
each
'_D ST
A RD
Dit,
at
-1 tDR
VALLEY • r-
ST pe
JAW ST
DAYS
P�
to
tp-
GENERAL LOCATION
7 R A FUMMS ION OP -PLANNED ATLANTIC
IPLLA" .96 81-W INC,- BEACH COUNTRY CLUB
"N
1A �t�,Wffii
FIGURE 1
co
AT.A AGA9V.!
. L
Zia I
r
A til r it n tic
OR
E
each
'_D ST
A RD
Dit,
at
-1 tDR
VALLEY • r-
ST pe
JAW ST
DAYS
P�
to
tp-
GENERAL LOCATION
7 R A FUMMS ION OP -PLANNED ATLANTIC
IPLLA" .96 81-W INC,- BEACH COUNTRY CLUB
"N
1A �t�,Wffii
FIGURE 1
MUi , D 1 ; `,� 5 y
r` 1f` ) S 4 v
Mpg S i +- >p -GS, .:..,, `- •....,.ri :. S.aa -,-�r a . -.
U_'
�` �Wy �� r
oa
..x ra}i�`�,6,- '�-- •. "" °,a# xi'"� � {r' > r twt x` y� k.' �.� ti hl 'i _ i ..
O. Ji`a --sn S "S �i V) R t't;1 {x
i ; - R - — -' . s r'ly a+T - °" 3 *•r aEr �.#.� >t � �� ,,,• i' is � I° MW_
�i , t - � -,a g ti- S.._ � taztir p :f wYa "� W'f
Wof { [° 2.� zr, - , , � _- � ,, _ "7F`•*f�,.+ ;a :: C -�, � n -.f ) 1 rail ,�.
°._� �iit S - � �y -:•� 4c � } �'�rn� -Z,r � ,�''T£.tt-+.- "z'•� � t
) t* � ri k✓ti �4 c - A s r � dry�iF�'4 '- � � °r � �'t'. -., �'-n.'�'rF'����'` ..,,;Ey,�F"'�' �-��3
J
0401 to J
TV
�, µad: ,3 $: j 7a rsr �`� t +
yq" {-• ry?rrn_ 3•t, t�f
:SAP t1 r£ f +�y><j 3, tiJ� s� N
c 2 �3��
S 7 w
T� f
m y 4 c f
WAR
KOMx
' t k x ` r tlltts
t x
Y
f
�'��•W - .4 � t '�" .rte -+-+ , rx °r n s ;k - � ♦:. LP `� —� �� t
AS 7
't yy 5F ir'k_,v" ..13 t. i
•t
.f
.,.
�.
":
.,
=�
w
w O
O_
Qw
Q
w�
C7
PLANNED ATLANTIC BEACH
COUNTRY CLUB
(169 SINGLE FAMILY AOMES
AND REDEVELOPED COLT COURSE)
PLANNED ATLANTIC BEACH
COUNTRY CLUB
.KQS
AGENDA ITEM # 7E
JUNE 10, 2013
38 z Katherine ABBY
A.
I o *g fanrla Park
b .�:p,,�ni ��j• 4y
v i1EtUUll1
m�D
55t �A/A}ESiiC°' - SESiT 1 Fi r�t7a
� Q puz . f ST, o� a Sj te1" al�N
�
UvAGiw RD J 1
Y� Z� Majporl
Eem 1 ! EN DR
`TgR �� 0 . t_ •• w
m
�w �,P rj� ..e ono_.
AS
011 PH PW HOUR TRAFFIC AME :xAY Z; VC
Beach
4 :30 - 5 :30
MARCH 13, 2013 �l otlqq���� - -w
1160 CYPRESS1i11t0+NG�i S10gGS 1
1%A10SA CAVE CT E try S
1YI1LON COVE CT Al A
S
13911 CONElMDibTx0
WAhojA R_
V6�lCF�Tr � `�pTC�. r
27' 28 2 PAtffiLM t�
14 .
y 9 _°
25 1336 5
SeNa Mann
5 F�ue S0,Wolllli,1 . -C ° Countr/Clu :
11ze `' 6 ooRQnIYCiRs i._ o EAR9EptW
RY
DUVOH - 3 11� 'S 11yRD Ho
ISLA" RD. 8 Sn,
1391.5 Ti ca:xtl
4 j 1279 z „'
AR qx' RAO G F
I.r0RSYLH, AD
,y31
LEVY v t J
48 516NAt 4= 1
83 g Fsrt
PM PEAK HOUR
TRAFFIC h 7qD >, 49
4:30 - 5:30 'Nq RD
r
!� ...__....__._.._ "V'7
jjj
MARCH 13, 2013 � - f� � t
F. 9T
ri_�Wt ;
im I I
Ip
ESPt�T
PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
5:3
4:30 - 0
Ti1AN8Ptv5ifTAT3H
P1AN1V� i1 1 &E (Mff.
S -AQA# MARCH 13, 2013
JAL"iGdfl:i -- �A aass FIGURE 4
PH pjW HOUR TRAFFIC
3:30 - 4:30
MARCH 13, 2013
BEACHDfl � � 1y JP
9T
r
ry 0
1 /
AVE s
7 zr
it
7 5 !80
ST
229x•
ST
255
T•
F
rf�'_
an / !�
Beach
ri_�Wt ;
im I I
Ip
ESPt�T
PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
5:3
4:30 - 0
Ti1AN8Ptv5ifTAT3H
P1AN1V� i1 1 &E (Mff.
S -AQA# MARCH 13, 2013
JAL"iGdfl:i -- �A aass FIGURE 4
93 p
3b
93
T.,PE
TAANsPQRTATION
.PLANN!RS ENTERPRISE; INC,
1O77V CaQBEWICKe ROAD
J4OK®ONVILI9,1LORI0A (122,66
(904) i96-11U
by '^O'
3
o CA1
AGENDA ITEM # 7E
JUNE 10, 2013
N
PEA K
� 3 o e og rv\ atd
I3
4453 4 57
2013 AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
FIGURE 5
wz
AGENDA ITEM # 7E
JUNE 10, 2013
• O
I
� I
140
QkTE
TFE
TRANSPORTATION 2013 PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
-PLANNERS ENTERPRISE; INC.
1,0771r 60085WIOKS ROAD
JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA 0226. T' IG 6
(904) 296 -1104
t
1.
y
tvF-
TRANSPQRTATIQN
PLANNERS SNTERPRIM IN
io�fv. 6 #o90Wlo'Ae ROAD
oAatssoavttu, nvntva 0�26d,
(904) 296 -1104
o..
y
3
`!b3
it$
3
3 �o
90+ 1'1' as
il-
t-�a _ In9
2013 AM
PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
AGENDA ITEM # 7E
JUNE 10, 2013
Ack
G
r •, � r
- ffi4b
.o
o
v
W r-b.
` m WE
FIGURE 7
r
r)
r
l
.�.
r�
■ A Iic
TRANSPORTATION
1'0? ?y 09088W10ke ROAD
JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA 02266,
(904) rZ6 -1104
a.
yV 58
t93
ag � �, vs's y
AGENDA ITEM # 7E
JUNE 10, 2013
-
a0
So q4
t 61
1
2:oy
2013 PM
PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
S.o
y -
l� •
RTE
FIGURE 8
i � i b ♦ •
a66
T.
TRANSPORTATION
,PLANNRRS ENTERPRISE; INC,
1O97Y. ()RQ96WIM MAO'
JAO1(9ONVILU, FLORIDA 022.56,
(904 ) 296 -17114
AGENDA ITEM # 7E
NNE 10, 2013
oA
3 ..1a +6i
3
P EAK
30 "3a p �Z4013
FIGURE 9
MAYPORT RD. I
AGENDA ITEM # 7E
JUNE 10, 2013
TO SELVA MARINA DRIVE
FROM SELVA MARINA DRIVE
ST+Rio
(� AM PEAR HOUR TRAFFIC
IN 32
OUT 9.6 t
4N
E.
TRAN5PQRT 2016 AM. PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
•PLANNSf4S IamunpE iq$j. iNq, ATLANTIC BEACH COUNTRY flLUB.
1'077W 6A08SW10k9 ROAD
JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA 32266 s
(904) 296 -1104
FIGURE 10
�I
MAYPORT RD. I
AGENDA ITEM # 7E
JUNE 10, 2013
TO SELVA MARINA DRIVE,
FROM SELVA MARINA DRI
• � 33
• �4UN'#'RY
CLIAR /GOLF
(t8) (6)-
cts) .�
i
o'
PM PEAK 'HOUR TRAFFIC
110
TRANSPORTATION
PLANNERS ENT6RPRi &E, iN
~0719 6A0SSWI0kS ROAl
JACKRONVILL9, FLORIDA 02266,
(904) 296 -1184
ti
IN*
107
OUT 63
2016 PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
ATLANTIC BEACH COUN'T$Y CLUB:
FIGURE 11
11 1
ATLANTIC BEACH -T
COUNTRY CLITBC
T
AGENDA ITEM # 7E
JUNE 10, 2013
TRANSPORTATION
i-ANNRRS ENTERPRI$B; INC. ; 2016 PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
tigosawloxa aenb ATTLMTTC BEACS COUNTRY .CLUB FIGURE 12
d0l(GONVILLE, FLORIDA 322,66 i
(904) 296 -1734
JV
q3
6
1N� x
o
�3 + 10 *1
AGENDA ITEM # 7E
JUNE 10, 2013
3bo
I�l t4
LEGEND
" " 6 2013 PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
tQ NEW RESIDENTIAL TRAFFIC
COUNTRY CLUB - GOLF TRAFFIC
...TE
TRANSPQI ION
pIANNFtS INC,
11072F 6A0i$'wl0k8 IWAD' 5
JAOK80NVILLE, FLORIDA 02M6 • ` 5
(904) 896 -Ito*
ESTIMATED TOTAL 2016
AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
ATLANTIC BEACH COUNTRY CLUB TRAFFIC
FIGURE 13
Mo
aK LEGEND
�b
1-(4) 2013 PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
3 NEW RESIDENTIAL TRAFFIC
COUNTRY CLUB — GOLF TRAFFIC
AGENDA ITEM # 7E
JUNE 10, 2013
= TRANSPORTATION ESTIMATED TOTAL 2016
.ANNRRS ENTERPRISE; IN-O,".; pM FEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
1091$ bf108QWEQkli AQAb
JaoKOONVILU, FIORIWA 022JSd,
(904) 296 -11
or
FIGURE 14
0
z
u.
3y
' a3
AGENDA ITEM # 7E
JUNE 10, 2013
l � 4 +fib
� "I,
Lis 6
Alt-
wa,f(ia�
TOTAL TRAFFIC'ENTERINf3 INTERSECTION
818 AM PEAK HOUR
NEW TRAFFIC ADDED .BY
ATLANTIC BEACH' COUNTRY CLUB
_
52 (+ 6.36 %)
TVE
TRANSPORTATION
1'47tt Cmog'OWICRQ ROAb ..
JAOISBOHVILLE, FLORIDA 32266
(904) 296 -1104
ESTIMATED TOTAL 2016
AM PEAR HOUR TRAFFIC
O 4=
+ �?
;,o
2�
lea
y
.i
wo
FIGURE 15
z
yi 58
AGENDA ITEM # 7E
WNE 10, 2013
. M ,
•`i � sal ,
14
--- '" 5 705�
TOTAL TRAFFIC)NTERING INTERSECTION
847 PM PEAK HOUR
NEW T'RAhFIC ADDED .By .' ..
1�.•,'
ATLANTIC BEACH COUNTRY CLUB
5'7 (+
T P it-71
--m a N � ESTT,�IATED TOTAL 2016
TRANSPORTATION FIGURE 16
PLANNERS 6NTERPRIS k INC,
dc}sawFaks fla,ao. -M PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC
diCK80NVILLQ, FLORIDA 322A6.
(904) 296 -1104