Loading...
Agenda Item 8AAGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: DATE: AGENDA ITEM It 8A OCTOBER 14, 2013 AGENDA ITEM NO. DATE: CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH CITY COMMISSION MEETING STAFF REPORT Public Hearing for UBEX -13- 00100065 Jeremy Hubsch Redevelopment and Zoning Coordinator September 11, 2013 STRATEGIC PLAN LINK: Goal Number 7, Mayport Corridor. This goal is to build, encourage, and support a vibrant commercial corridor and strong residential neighborhoods along Mayport Road and adjoining neighborhoods. BACKGROUND: Request for a use -by- exception to allow for a general contractor, not requiring outdoor storage within a Commercial General (CG) zoning district. The applicant, Tier 1 Construction is a roofing and general contracting company. Section 24 -111 (c) (6) outlines specific conditions for the approval of contractors through a use -by- exception. It states, "Contractors, not requiring outside storage, provided that no manufacture, construction, heavy assembly involving hoists or lifts, or equipment that makes excessive noise or fumes, shall be permitted. Not more than one (1) contractor related vehicle shall be parked outdoors on a continuous basis." The applicant is located in an existing building on West 6th Street, just off Mayport Road. The current building meets zoning setbacks, impervious surface ratio, and minimum lot size. The nearest residential home is 150 feet away and the site has a 6' wooden fence in the side and rear yards. Per the applicant, the site will be used as a general office and there will be no outdoor storage of materials. The applicant stated at the Community Development Board meeting that employees who work in the field take their trucks home with them, and they will rarely, if ever come to the proposed site. The Community Development Board considered this request along with comments from staff and the applicant in attendance at the August 20th meeting, and the Board recommended approval by a vote of 7- 0, finding the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan as well as Section 24 -63 and Section 24- 111(c) of the Land Development Regulations. BUDGET: None. RECOMMENDATION: Approval, recommended by the Community Development Board. ATTACHMENTS: Draft minutes of the August 20, 2013 Community Development Board meeting; copy of Community Development Board staff report; copy of UBEX -13- 00100065 application. REVIEWED BY CITY M • GER: AGENDA ITEM # 8A OCTOBER 14, 2013 Tier 1 Construction Inc, 13245 Atlantic Blvd Suite 4 -212 Jacksonville Fl. 32225 (904) 731 -3905 Re: Application for a Use by Exception City of Atlantic Beach 800 Seminole Rd. Atlantic Beach Fl. 32233 (904) 247 -5826 Dear Ladies & Gentlemen, This letter has been prepared as a narrative to describe the proposed use of the property located at 33 West 6th Street Atlantic Beach Fl. 32233. Tier 1 Construction proposes to use this location as general office space to accommodate three employees. We plan to conduct day to day office duties that include office desk work, secretarial work, filing, customer service via telephone ect. Brent Parrish Tier 1 Construction Inc, Property Appraiser - Pkoperty Details CHRISTENSON DALE 52 W 3RD ST ATLANTIC BEACH, FL 32231-3306 Property Detail' Primary Site Address Official Record Book /Page 33 W 6TH ST 07421 -02245 Atlantic Beach FL 32233 RE # 2OU Cer ite4 70746 -0050 Tax Dili# USD3 Income Property Use 1700 OFFICE 1 -2 STY $0.00 # of Buildings $0.00 Legal Esc 8 -034 38- 2S -29E 0.117 TLANTIC BEACH SEC H Subdivision 3119 ATLANTIC BEACH SEC H Total Area 4889 $0.00 The sale of this property may res It in higher property taxes. For more Information go to Save Our Homes and our •r.. a .- _.v u.. . Property values, exemptions and other information listed as 'In Progress' are subject to change. These numbers are part of the 2012 working tax roll and will not be certified until October. beam how the Prooertv 1.•• [% •i /R' ..'.n Sales Histo Value Summa AGENDA ITEM # 8A OCTOBER 14, 2013 Tile # 9417 Book/Page 2OU Cer ite4 2012 In Prorgre Value Method Income Income Total Building Value $0.00 $0.00 Extra Feature Value $0.00 $0.00 Land Value (Market) $33,150.00 $33,150.00 Land Value (Agri ) $0.00 $0.00 Just (Market) Value $123,000.00 $130,400.00 Assessed Value $120,831.00 $130,400.00 Cap DiffJPortability Amt $2,169.00 / $0.00 $0.00 / $0.00 gxemptlons $0.00 See below Taxable Value $120,831.00 See below Book/Page Sale Date I f Sale Price I Aced Instrument ype code Qpaiifredlunqualiffed Vacant /Improved 07421 02245 9/16/1992 I $17,000.00 WD - Warranty Deed Qualified Vacant 1 Extra Features LN ture Code Use Description Feature Description Bldg. Length Width Total Units Value 1000 1 PVCC1 0.00 1 0.00 ICommon Paving Concrete 1 0 0 _I 1,020.00 $1,065.00 2 FWDC1 Heating Fuel Fence Wood 1 0 0 164.00 $489.00 3 FCBC1 Air Conditioning Fence Chain Barbed 1 0 0 50.00 $180.00 Land & Legal Land LN I Code Use Description Zoning J Front I Depth Category Land Units LandTvoe Land Value 1 1000 COMMERCIAL ACG 0.00 1 0.00 ICommon 5,100.00 Square Footage $33,150.00 Buildings Building 1 Building 1 Site Address 33 W 6T1-I ST Atlantic Beach FL 32233 Building Type 1701- OFFICE 1 -2 STY Year Built 1993 1500 Building Value $88,531.00 Total Type Gross Area Heated Area Effective Area Base Area 1500 1500 1500 Total 1500 1500 1500 httn://anns.coi.net/nan Element Code Detail Exterior Wall 25 25 Modular Metal Roofing Structure 9 9 Rigid Fr/Barjoist Roofing Cover 12 12 Modular Metal Interior Wall 5 5 Drywall Int Flooring 14 14 Carpet Int Flooring 3 3 Concrete Finished Heating Fuel 4 4 Electric Heating Type 4 4 Forced- Ducted Ceiling Wall Finish 5 5 S Ceil Wall Fin Air Conditioning 3 3 Central. Comm Htg & AC 1 1 Htg & A/C Pkg Comm Frame 5 5 S -Steel Element Baths ._._......_._._,v Stories Rooms / Units Avg Story Height Code 2.000 1.000 5.000 16.000 aQQ Lega LN Legal Description 1 18- 034 38 -2S -29E 0.117 2 ATLANTIC BEACH SEC H 3 LOT 4 BLK 34 nronertvSearch/Rasi c/Detai l.asnx ?RE= 1707460050 9/21/2012 AGENDA ITEM # 8A OCTOBER 14, 2013 LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION ,,� f ,J rr ✓5� / (le, p..cf-aco, City of Atlantic Beach Department of Community Development 800 Seminole Road Atlantic Beach, FL 32233 (P) 904 247 -5800 (F) 904 247 -5845 is hereby authorized to act on behalf of the owner(s) of those lands described within the attached application, and as described in the attached deed or other such proof of ownership as may be required by the City of Atlantic Beach in applying for a development permit. BY: ~Printed Name Signature of Om) Signature of Owner Printed Name Phone Number Signed and sworn before me on this % day of / e el; rrs/ e-Sew Identification verified: Oath sworn: r Yes 26/3 by I— No State of Florida County of Duval BRENT PARRISH Notary Public, State of Florida My Comm. Expires May 14, 2016 Commission No. EE 198158 My Commission expires: Zd /4. Letter ofAuthorization_versionoi.oi.o9 AGENDA ITEM # 8A OCTOBER 14, 20I3 APPLICATION FOR A USE -BY- EXCEPTION City of Atlantic Beach • 800 Seminole Road • Atlantic Beach, Florida 32233 -5445 Phone: (904) 247 -5826 • FAX (904) 247 -5845 http: / /www.coab.us Date File No. Receipt 1. Applicant's Name 2. Applicant's Addres1 3. Property Location 33 \x c51 - r_n ii i-rL 6a-et, -F(_ 4. Property Appraisers Real Estate Number i ? 01 144 -00.5-0 Block No. � Lot No. 5. Current Zoning Chssification Co,piett Cj c„ f„-] 6. Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use designation C�,r, pi-. crc. 4 7. Requested Use-by-Exception h vv ` A LJ' pee 1 Cbn Ffit, 4 33 `.�. f cs/- L 4' �`i) -r-r). A4-1 c, 3-c L.tn F.0 332z 3 3 8. Size of Parcel S4 't4,) x I DZ' Deer 9. Utility Provider .1"- -A 10. Statement of facts and special reasons for the requested Use -by- Exception, which demonstrates compliance with Section 24-63 of the City of Atlantic Beach Code of Ordinances, Zoning and Subdivision Regulations. Attach as Exhibit A. (The attached guide may be used if desired. Please address each item, as appropriate to this request.) 11. Provide all of the following information. (All information must be provided before an application is scheduled for any public hearing.) a. Site Plan showing the location of all structures, temporary and permanent, including setbacks, building height, number of stories and square footage, impervious surface area, and existing and/or proposed driveways. Identify any xisting structures and uses. b. Proof of ownership (deed or certificate by lawyer or abstract company or title company that verifies record owner as above). If the applicant is not the owner, a letter of authorization from the owner(s) for applicant to represent the owner for all purposes related to this application must be provided. c. Survey and legal description of property sought to be rezoned. (Attach as Exhibit B.) d. Required number of copies. (Two (2) copies of all documents that are not larger than 11 x 17 inches in size. If plans or photographs, or color attachments are submitted, please provide eight (8) copies of these.) e. Application Free ($250.00) I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ALL INFORMATION PROVIDED WITH THIS APPLICATION IS CORRECT: Signature of owner(s) or authorized person Printed or typed na ): Signature(s): /„ ADDRESS AND CONTACT ORMATION OF PERSON TO RECEIVE ALL CORRESPONDENCE REGARDING THIS APPLICATION i Name: cep, - r'.:54 Mailing Address: (3,1 t.J,sI t ?'J 4f4„), I c eL4 A-/ 322J �f� / Phone: (y� 29/,- !x?�'fa FAX:Cjp % 2VG -l7U°J / E-mail: 63.�P.•�7f- 0 Ter 1 owner's authorization form is attached: Alb AGENDA ITEM # 8A OCTOBER 14, 2013 11$ £ J AA/ A..W i 2418 ..'0 3egb" ,e' 1o'D p* -Qom_ S r a' r /2-1 j 1-,,:56)- f+�n AGENDA ITEM # 8A OCTOBER 14, 2013 ot Lay_ `Nl a.®�. to O" µD b 'PIO to`v z Om. Ova✓ I .2 n 411 Ram' 0 _ , it-V, w hnaOW £J; '41jB,ai / /.r /2..I Caycic�c 1 C. c. P CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM 4.A. CASE NO AGENDA ITEM ll8A OCTOBER 14, 2013 UBEX-13-00100065 Request for use -by- exception as permitted by Section 24- 111(c)(6), to permit a contractor, not requiring outside storage, to be located on a property within a Commercial General (CG) zoning district at 33 West 6u Street. LOCATION 33 WEST 6TH STREET APPLICANT TIER 1 CONSTRUCTION INC (BRENT PARRISH) DATE AUGUST 20, 2013 STAFF ERIKA HALL, PRINCIPAL PLANNER STAFF COMMENTS Background Tier 1 Construction Inc is a roofing and general contracting company. Owner Brent Parrish seeks a use -by- exception so that he may obtain zoning approval for a Local Business Tax Receipt to operate his contracting business at 33 West 6th Street. The subject property has a Commercial (CM) Future Land Use Designation and is located within a Commercial General (CG) zoning district. According to the provisions of Municipal Code Section 24- 111(c)(6), within CG zoning districts, "Contractors, not requiring outside storage, provided that no manufacture, construction, heavy assembly involving hoists or lifts, or equipment that makes excessive noise or fumes, shall be permitted. Not more than one (1) contractor related vehicle shall be parked outdoors on a continuous basis." 33 W 6TH ST +rN F4,1 °ter e I Figure 1. Location map for 33 West 61I° Street- Co Ai3 GCs, July 22, 2013. Analysis AGENDA ITEM M # 8A OCITOBER 145 2013 According to Section 24- 63(d), the review of any application for a use -by- exception shall consider each of the following: (1) Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to vehicular and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control and access in case of fire or catastrophe. (2) Off-street parking and loading spaces, where required, with particular attention to the items in subsection (1) above. (3) The potential for any adverse impacts to adjoining properties and properties generally in the area, resulting from excessive noise, glare and lighting, odor, traffic and similar characteristics of the use - by- exception being requested. (4) Refuse and service areas, with particular reference to items in subsection (1) and (2) above. (5) Utilities, with reference to locations, availability and compatibility. (6) Screening and buffering, with reference to type, dimensions and character. (7) Signs, if any, and proposed exterior lighting, with reference to glare, traffic safety, economic effects and compatibility and harmony with properties in the district. (8) Required yards and other open space. (9) General compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the surrounding zoning district as well as consistency with applicable provisions of the comprehensive plan, (10) For those properties within the commercial corridors, consistency with the intent of Section 24 -171, commercial corridor development standards. (11) Number of similar businesses that existing in the area with consideration that such uses are intended to be an exception and not to excessively proliferate in one area of the city. Figure 2. Google Maps aerial view of 33 West 6th Figure 3. Google Maps street view of 33 West 6th Street, Imagery dated March 2011, accessed online Street. Imagery dated 2013, accessed online July 22, July 22, 2013. 2013. The subject property consists of a platted lot — Lot 4, Block 34, Section H — located midway the block, one hundred fifty (150) feet from the Mayport Road right -of -way, and thus not subject to commercial corridor development standards of Section 24 -171. The property measures approximately fifty (50) feet in width by one hundred two (102) feet in depth, with a total lot area of five thousand one hundred (5,100) square feet, and it is improved with a modular metal structure consistent in appearance to others in the vicinity and Page 2 of 4 AGENDA ITEM # 8A OCTOBER 14, 2013 measuring thirty (30) feet in width by fifty (50) feet in depth, or fifteen hundred (1,500) square feet in area. The structure, built in 1993, conforms to current yard setbacks. There are no proposed changes to established utility services, and refuse service will continue as standard curb pick -up. Security lighting exists on the east, south and west sides of the building, but neither additional lighting, nor signage is currently proposed. Property ingress /egress is direct to /from the West 6th Street right -of -way. A thirty (30) foot wide by thirty (30) foot deep concrete driveway /parking pad extends from the West 6th Street pavement to the building foundation. The twenty (20) feet of depth fully on private property is sufficient to accommodate three parking spaces — including one ADA, though none are marked as such — consistent with parking space design standards specified in Section 24- 161(g). However, Section 24- 161(h)(3) requires that "business, commercial, retail, or service uses not otherwise specified [shall provide] one (1) space for each four hundred (400) square feet of gross floor area," or a total of four (4) spaces for a building of these dimensions. There is a gravel area directly to the east of the parking pad which appears to have been previously used for spillover parking. Section 24- 161(b)(2) provides that "all parking areas shall be paved unless an alternative surface is approved by the Director of Public Works. Any such alternative surface shall be maintained as installed and shall be converted to a paved surface if a failure to maintain results in adverse drainage or aesthetic impacts." The building is accessed via a central entrance and two roll -up doors fronting on West 6th Street, and concrete walkways on both east and west sides of the building lead to side door entrances. Considering the building footprint, the concrete parking pad and the sidewalks leading to side entrances, it is estimated that the total impervious surface coverage is approximately forty (40) percent, which is significantly lower than the maximum seventy (70) percent allowed within non - residential zoning districts. However, there are no trees or landscaping on the property. Because nearly the entire front of the property is utilized for access and parking, it is not feasible to implement provisions of Division 8, Landscaping standards, but it is recommended that the property be required to come into compliance with Section 23- 30(b), minimum tree requirements for commercial uses, which states "For each parcel upon which a commercial structure or associated accessory use is proposed, or where the primary activity is commercial in nature...one (1) four - inch caliper tree shall be planted and /or preserved for every eight thousand (8,000) square feet of parcel area or portion thereof ". Therefore a minimum of one (1) tree is required. The subject property is in the middle of a commercial block, at least one hundred fifty (150) feet in all directions to the nearest residential property. However the side and rear yards are surrounded by a six (6) foot high wooden privacy fence and this should provide sufficient buffering considering no outdoor storage is permitted for contractors within CG zoning districts. Additionally, the applicant has stated in his submittal cover letter "Tier 1 Construction proposes to use this location as general office space to accommodate three employees. We plan to conduct day to day office duties that include office desk work, secretarial work, customer service via telephone, etc." While Tier 1 Construction Inc is a contracting business, the nature of work to be performed onsite is typical of permitted office uses normally found in the CG zoning district. So, no adverse impacts to adjacent properties are anticipated. REQUIRED ACTION The Community Development Board may consider a motion to recommend approval of the Tier 1 Construction Use -by- Exception (Application UBEX -13- 00100065) to the City Commission, to permit a contractor, not requiring outside storage, to be located within the Commercial General (CG) zoning district at 33 West 6th Street, provided the following, or similar findings of fact: (1) Approval of this Use -by- Exception is in compliance with the requirements of Section 24 -63, Zoning and Subdivision and Land Development Regulations, and is also consistent with Section 24 -111 defining the Commercial General Zoning District. Page 3 of 4 AGENDA ITEM # 8A OCTOBER 14, 2013 (2) The request is not contrary to public interest and is not detrimental to the health, safety and welfare of the general public. (3) The proposed use is compatible with adjacent properties and other properties in the surrounding area. (4) The Community Development Board may consider a motion to recommend approval of the Tier 1 Construction Use -by- Exception (Application UBEX -13- 00100065) to the City Commission, to permit a contractor, not requiring outside storage, to be located within the Commercial General (CG) zoning district at 33 West 6th Street, provided the following, or similar findings of fact: (5) The Community Development Board may consider a motion to recommend approval of the Tier 1 Construction Use -by- Exception (Application UBEX -13- 00100065) to the City Commission, to permit a contractor, not requiring outside storage, to be located within the Commercial General (CG) zoning district at 33 West 6th Street, provided the following, or similar findings of fact: The Community Development Board may consider a motion to recommend denial of the Tier 1 Construction Use -by- Exception (Application UBEX -13- 00100065) to the City Commission, to permit a contractor, not requiring outside storage, to be located within the Commercial General (CG) zoning district at 33 West 6th Street, provided the following, or similar findings of fact: (1) The request is contrary to public interest and may be detrimental to the health, safety and welfare of general public because (2) The proposed use is not compatible with adjacent properties and other properties within the surrounding area because ATTACHMENTS None. Page 4 of 4 ACi1 NOA I'fI'M }I 8A OCTOBER 14, 2013 Dry y Minutes. ra(the Augrrxi 20. 2013 regular• meeting of the Community Development Board MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD August 20, 2013 1. CALL TO ORDER. - 6:05pm Chair Brea Paul verified the presence of a quorum with the attendance of Jason Burgess, Kelly Elmore, Kirk Hansen, Harley Parkes, Patrick Stratton and Sylvia Simmons. The meeting was called to order at 6:05pm. Also present was Redevelopment and Zoning Coordinator, Jeremy Hubsch. 2. ADOPTION OF MEETING MINUTES - July 16, 2013. Mr. Hansen called for a motion to approve the minutes of the July 16, 2013 regular meeting. Mr, Burgess moved that minutes be approved as written. Mr. Parkes seconded the motion and it carried by a vote of 7 -0. 3. OLD BUSINESS. None. 4. NEW BUSINESS. A. UBEX -13- 00100065, Tier One Construction, 33 West 6th Street. Public hearing- Request for use -by- exception as permitted by Section 24- 111(c)(6), to allow a contractor, not requiring outside storage, to be located on a property within the Commercial General (CG) zoning district at 33 West 6th Street. Staff Report Applicant comment Jeremy Hubsch, Redevelopment and Zoning Coordinator gave a presentation about Use By Exception 13 -65. Mr. Hubsch noted that the business is currently in operation in is located in an existing building, located just off Mayport Road. He stated that the existing building was built in 1993 and meets all setbacks, impervious surface ratio, and lot size requirements. He then gave an overview of the type of businesses that could come into the CG zoning district. Mr. Hubsch stated that the use is similar to other uses in the immediate area and fits in with the general character of the area. The applicant, Brent Parrish then stated that the site will be used as a general office with 3 employees and that there will be no outdoor storage. He stated that there won't really be any trucks on Page 1 of Draft Minutes of the August 20, 2013 regular meeting of the Community Development Board Public Comment Board Discussion Motion AGENDA ITEM # 8A OCTOBER 14, 2013 the site on a continuing basis. The employees keep their trucks at home and take them directly to sites, not the office. He stated that he does not own the property and does not intend to purchase it. He was asked how his business operates, and stated that the business does not store materials on site and that they outsource all of their waste management. Mr. Parrish also stated that they don't store trailers on site either. No one from the public came forward to comment on the request. Mr. Hubsch clarified to the Community Development Board that if the proposed business were to use the property more intensively and do things that weren't approved by the Use -by- Exception, that the use -by- exception could be revoked by the city. Mr. Parrish mentioned that they plan to use the property for approximately 36 months and seeing where their business is at that point. Mr. Hubsch mentioned that the Use -By- Exception does not run with the property and would be void whenever the applications leave the location. Mr. Hansen moved that the Community Development Board recommend approval of the Tier One Construction Use -by- exception (Application UBEX -13- 00100065) to the City Commission, to permit a contractor, not requiring outside storage, to be located within the Commercial General (CG) zoning district at 33 West 6th Street, provided the following, or similar findings of fact: (1) Approval of this Use -by- Exception is in compliance with the requirements of Section 24 -63, Zoning and Subdivision and Land Development Regulations, and is also consistent with Section 24- 111 defining the Commercial General Zoning District. (2) The request is not contrary to public interest and is not detrimental to the health, safety and welfare of the general public. (3) The proposed use is compatible with adjacent properties and other properties in the surrounding area. Mr. Burgess seconded the motion and it passed unanimously, 7 -0. B. ZVAR -13- 00100067, 34510th Street Public Hearing — Request for variance from the provisions of Section 24- 106(e)(3), to reduce the required side yard setbacks for a principal structure from a combined fifteen (15) feet, with a minimum five (5) feet on either side, to a combined twelve and four - tenths (12.4) feet, with a minimum of four and five - tenths (4.5) feet on one Page 2 of 5 AGENDA ITEM # 8A OCTOBER 14, 2013 Draft Minutes of the August 20, 2013 regular meeting of the Community Development Board side of an existing single - family dwelling located on a property within the Residential Single - Family (RS -2) zoning district at 345 10th Street. Staff Report Applicant Comment Public Comment Mr. Hubsch gave a brief overview of the property and the requested variance. He stated that the property was platted in 1913 as two lots 50' wide by 150' deep. He stated that the owner would like to split the property into those two previously platted lots. Mr. Hubsch said that the property was built in 1948 and the property is zoned RS -2. He stated that if the property is split into two lots, the RS -2 zoning setbacks will have to be met. The RS -2 Zoning district requires a combined 15' of setbacks on the side yards, with a minimum of 5' on either side. Mr. Hubsch stated that the existing home does not meet the current zoning setbacks and thus, the applicant needs a zoning variance in order to split the lot into two. Board Member Simmons had a question about whether or not Impervious Surface Ratio would be met by the applicant if the property was split. Jeremy Hubsch stated that he had done measurements and that the ISR would be sufficiently met. Mr. Bill Bacher, a friend and realtor of the applicant spoke on his behalf at the hearing. Mr. Bacher stated that the applicant is 82 years old and does not leave his house very often. He stated that the applicant has a wife in an Alzheimer's facility and that he would like to sell part of his property in order to be able to move her to Fleet Landing. Mr. Bacher provided information about the neighboring properties and the applicant's situation. Mr. Hubsch pointed out that if the variance is granted and the applicant sells the property, the buyer of that property will know exactly what situation they are coming to. He also pointed out that the variance could not be granted based on financial reasons or comfort, but instead strictly on the merits of the case itself. Bo Halton 349 10th Street is an adjacent neighbor to the applicants. He says he has been neighbors with the applicant for years and is friends with him. He wanted to ensure that if a new home was built on the site, that sufficient setbacks would be met where it borders his property. Board Member Simmons clarified to him that the new home would have to meet existing RS -2 setbacks and that Page 3 of 5 Draft Minutes of the August 20, 2013 regular meeting of the Community Development Board Board Discussion Motion AGENDA ITEM # 8A OCTOBER 14, 2013 the variance was solely for the existing home, which does not border his property. Board member Kelly Elmore stated that he doesn't have a problem with the variance, as the side of the lot that will be split does meet the minimum required setback. He also stated that he believes the existing home on the lot will someday be torn down and replaced based on the current market forces in Atlantic Beach. He then pointed out that a new home on that lot would have to meet the current zoning setbacks and regulations. Therefore, allowing this variance will potentially result in 2 new homes that are both in compliance with the current zoning regulations. Mr. Parkes moved that the Community Development Board vote to approve ZVAR -13- 00100067, request for variance from the provisions of Section 24- 106(e)(3), to reduce the required side yard setbacks for a principal structure from a combined fifteen (15) feet, with a minimum of five (5) feet on either side, to a combined twelve and four - tenths (12.4) feet, with a minimum of four and five - tenths (4.5) on one side of the existing single - family dwelling located within a Residential Single - Family (RS -2) zoning district at 345 10th Street, upon finding this request is consistent with the definition of a variance, and in accordance with the provisions of Section 24 -64, specifically one or more of the grounds for approval delineated in Section 24 -64(d) Mr. Burgess seconded the motion and it carried by a vote of 7 -0. 5. REPORTS. Paul Gunsaulies 780 Begonia Street spoke regarding possible modifications for the city code relating to recreational vehicles, boats, and trailers. Mr. Gunsaulies presented his case for why he believes the code should be modified for more flexible regulations. He stated that he has spoken to the city commissioners and that they intend to kick the issue back to the Community Development Board for discussion. Jeremy Hubsch mentioned that the commission did indeed ask to have the item discussed for a recommendation. However, he said staff had not yet had time to prepare a report for the Community Development Board. Mr. Hubsch told the board that they could anticipate the item coming back to them in the near future. The board members briefly discussed the issue, but decided to wait until staff made a formal report to them prior to making any decision or recommendation. Page 4 of 5 Draft Minutes of the August 20, 2013 regular meeting of the Community Development Board 6. ADJOURNMENT - 7:10 PM Brea Paul, Chair Attest Page 5 of 5 AGENDA ITEM # 8A OCTOBER 14, 2013