1-21-Full Agenda
CIT Y O F ATLANTI C BEACH
COMMUNIT Y DEVELOPMEN T BOARD
REGULA R MEETING AGENDA
Tuesda y | January 21, 201 3 | 6:00 pm
Commissio n Chamber s | 800 Seminol e Road
1. Call To Order And Roll Call.
2. Approval Of Minutes.
A. Draft minutes of the November 19, 201 3 regula r meetin g o f the Communit y Developmen t Board.
3. Old Business.
4. New Business.
A. UBEX - 13 - 00100077 (PUBLIC HEARING)
Reques t for use - by - exceptio n to allow a drive -thru permitte d service lane associated with a
restaurant per Land Development Regulations Section 24 -111 (c) (4).
B. ZVAR - 13 - 00100079 (PUBLIC HEARING)
Reques t for a zoning varianc e as permitted by Section 24 -64, to seek relief from the requirements of
Section 24 -171 (c) (1) relating to roof standards at a property located at 1021 Atlantic Blvd.
5. Reports
A. Tree Ordinance
6. Adjournment.
All information related to the item(s) included in this agenda is available for review at the City of
Atlantic Beach Planning and Zoning Department, located at 800 Seminole Road, Atlantic Beach, Florida
32233, and may be obtained at this office or by calling (904) 247 -5800. Interested parties may attend
the meetin g and mak e comment s regardin g agend a items , o r comment s may b e maile d t o the
addres s above. Persons appealing decision made by the Community Development Board with respect
t o any matte r considere d a t thi s meetin g may need t o ensur e tha t a verbati m recor d o f the
proceedings, including the testimony and evidence upon which any appeal is based, is made.
Notic e t o persons needin g specia l accommodation s and to all hearin g impaired persons : I n accordanc e wit h the
American s wit h Disabilitie s Act , person s needin g special accommodation s to participat e in this proceeding should
contact the City of Atlantic Beach, 800 Seminole Road, Atlantic Beach, Florida 32233, or (904) 247- 5800, not less than
five (5) days prior to the date of this meeting.
Draft Minutes of the October 15, 2013 regular meeting of the Community Development Board
Page 1 of 5
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD
November 19, 2013
1. CALL TO ORDER. – 6:06 pm
Chair Brea Paul verified the presence of a quorum with the attendance of, Kelly Elmore,
Harley Parkes, Patrick Stratton and Sylvia Simmons. The meeting was called to order at
6:06pm. Also present was the Building and Zoning Director, Michael Griffin,
Redevelopment and Zoning Coordinator, Jeremy Hubsch and Recording Secretary Jenny
Walker. Kirk Hanson arrived at 7:00pm, Jason Burgess was absent.
2. ADOPTION OF MEETING MINUTES – October 15, 2013.
Brea Paul called for a motion to approve the minutes of the October 15, 2013 regular
meeting. Kelly Elmore moved that minutes be approved as written. Patrick Stratton
seconded the motion and it carried by a vote of 7-0.
3. OLD BUSINESS. None.
4. REPORTS.
A. Boats and Trailers. Brea Paul asked for a vote by show of hands to take the
Agenda out of order and discuss Boats and Trailers ahead of New Business
based on the number of citizens in attendance to speak on this topic. Brea
Paul stated the Boats and Trailers Ordinance was discussed at the October 15th
meeting and the Board had asked staff for some additional details to include
the actual number of violations that were actually present. Michael Griffin
spoke stating the Board asked for some site boundary information, Code
Enforcement information and staff did a survey of 80% of Atlantic Beach and
f ound that there were 21 boat violations, 13 of the violations the boats could
be relocated on the property and be found in compliance. 28 boats were
found in compliance. Five trailers and campers were found in violation and 9
trailers and campers were found in compliance. On the Code Enforcement
issues we average 10 complaints per month for boats and trailers or
recreational vehicles in the front yard. Mr. Griffin refreshed the boards
memory that Jacksonville, St. Augustine, Neptune Beach and St. Johns County
has the same regulations of no boats or trailers in the front 20ft front yard
setback. Jacksonville Beach allows one 20 ft boat in the front yard setback.
Atlantic Beach is less restrictive than Jacksonville, Neptune Beach, St.
Augustine and St. Johns County by allowing the boat to be 15ft from the front
property line. The Board also asked for some boundary information. Mr.
Griffin showed a plat of the Park Terrace subdivision stated that when plats
are set up houses are set up on the lot with generally a 20ft setback, anything
Draft Minutes of the October 15, 2013 regular meeting of the Community Development Board
Page 2 of 5
beyond that 20ft setback is in the right of way. He then showed several
examples of compliant lots and noncompliant lots boats, trailers and campers.
Kelly Elmore questioned how long time wise can a boat or recreational vehicle
be in the right of way before Code Enforcement will ticket it. Mr. Griffin
responded stating Code Enforcement will leave a courtesy notice first giving a
reasonable time. Mr. Elmore asked and if the homeowner states that it is a
visitor and it will be removed in a few days, Mr. Griffin stated the City will
work with them before taking any code enforcement action. The first speaker
was Mr. Paul Gunsaulis, 780 Begonia Street. Mr. Gunsaulis stated that because
everyone in Atlantic Beach has different lot lines, he feels the only way the City
can uniformly enforce the Boats and Trailers Ordinance is to change the
wording on b (2) from stating “15 ft setback from the lot line” to read “15ft
setback from street pavement.” He states that would put him in compliance.
The second speaker was Michael Hampton, 651 Begonia Street. He stated
someone from the City came out to his property yesterday and told him he
could take down 2 trees on the lot and move his boat back and be in
compliance. He said it is absurd for him to remove trees and that too many
trees have been removed in Atlantic Beach already. He states again that “he
will not remove his boat, the City can fine him all they want, he will not move
his boat”. The third speaker was Linda Spencer, 282 Magnolia Street. She
agrees with homeowners having home rights but her neighbors have their
boat parked right underneath her bedroom window. She is in favor of the
Ordinance the way it is. Final speaker is Chris Lambertson, 357 12th St.
Believes the issues with Boats and Trailers started because of the lack of Code
Enforcement on this ordinance in the past. Mr. Lambertson believes that our
codes are too lax for boats aesthetically and the noise factor and that the City
should increase the setback for boats, trailers and recreational vehicles. Kelly
Elmore stated that this ordinance is in place for a reason and we do have the
most lax ordinance compared to surrounding municipalities. He feels the
ordinance should be left just as it is. The ordinance withholds the standard
aesthetic throughout the City. Harley Parkes stated that he agrees with Mr.
Elmore. Sylvia Simmons stated that she drove all over the City and was
surprised at how few violations she saw. Ms. Simmons stated reducing the
requirement may result in creating more boats and trailers. She doesn’t think
the Ordinance should be changed at all. Brea Paul says she concurs with all
the other board members, we have the most lax code already.
Kelly Elmore made a motion to keep the Boats and Trailers Ordinance as
written in place, unaltered. Harley Parkes seconded the motion and it carried
by a vote of 6-0.
5. NEW BUSINESS.
A. SPA-13-00100075 (PUBLIC HEARING)-201 Mayport Road
Request for Special Planned Area (SPA) rezoning as permitted by Sections
24-116 through 24-126, to allow a maximum of 80 residential units. The
property is currently zoned Commercial Limited (CL) and Residential
General-Multi-Family (RG-M). The Future Land Use Designation High
Density (RH).
Staff
Report
Jeremy Hubsch, Redevelopment and Zoning Coordinator gave a
Draft Minutes of the October 15, 2013 regular meeting of the Community Development Board
Page 3 of 5
presentation about SPA-13-00100075. Mr. Hubsch showed an
aerial of the site and described the neighboring sites. Stated that
the site was formerly a development of 96 units that had been
previously torn down roughly 10 years ago. He then showed a
Future Land Use Map and discussed density of surrounding
properties and the zoning. Subject property is 7.2 acres and the
applicants are proposing a maximum of 80 residential units.
Maximum allowable density is 20 units in a Residential High
Density Land Use, and the applicants are proposing a development
with 11.2 units per acre, so it is below the maximum density. The
applicants are proposing 4 unit types, Single family, duplex, triplex
and quadplex. As it is currently designed, there will be only one
single family home. They will be providing 2 parking spaces per
unit and 20 visitor parking spaces. There will be a 10ft landscape
buffer along Mayport Road, which is required per our Mayport
Corridor Standards. There will be a 5ft landscape buffer along the
entire Northern, Southern and Eastern property boundary, which
is not required by our code. The Commercial Corridor standards
for construction materials along Mayport Road will be met. It is
anticipated that the proposed 80 units will be mostly duplex,
triplex, and quadplex buildings. The applicants do not yet know
what customer demand will be like, and thus would like the
flexibility to alter the unit type shown on the site plan, while
maintaining the same general layout. The SPA clearly states that
any modifications that change the use, building height, density,
buffers and open space, and access points/driveways will need to
come back before the Community Development Board and
Commission as required per Section 24-124. Habitat for Humanity
plans to create an HOA to maintain the project in perpetuity, but
at this time the HOA documents have not yet been created. Mr.
Hubsch states that Per Section 24-62.c.2, the Community
Development Board shall “Indicate the relationship of the
proposed rezoning to the comprehensive plan for the city and
provide a finding that the requested change in zoning is consistent
with the comprehensive.” He then discussed some of the goals,
objectives, and policies of the comprehensive plan that are
relevant to this project. Mr. Hubsch gave an overview of the
thirteen waivers that the applicants are requesting. He also gave
an overview of the boards required actions. He also stated that
staff does not have any recommendations at this time and will be
leaving the decision up to the board.
Applicant
Comment
The applicant, Jay McGarvey, Chairman of Beaches Habitat stated
that they are very excited to present this model community for the
Draft Minutes of the October 15, 2013 regular meeting of the Community Development Board
Page 4 of 5
residents of Atlantic Beach. He states that this development will
dress up Mayport Road. He then introduced the Pre sident of
Beaches Habitat, Mr. Brian Wheeler. Mr. Wheeler presented
several examples of other neighborhoods that have developed
using the same traditional neighborhood design that Habitat is
proposing. He showed computer images of the before and after of
the site. He also showed example floor plans of the units. He
discussed parking, sidewalks, front and rear yards, landscaping and
drainage on the project. Kelly Elmore stated he is concerned given
the location and the density request, will crime and home values
become an issue. Mr. Wheeler stated that he feels there is a
difference in behavior of renters of high density apartments and
homeowners. He then discussed all of the requirements the
prospective homeowners must comply with before being given the
privilege of home ownership with Beaches Habitat. Mr. Elmore
then asked how the development is handling stormwater. Mr.
Wheeler pointed out that most of it will drain under the park to a
underground system created with the existing concrete that is on-
site and the rest is already currently flowing to Mayport Road.
Habitat will work with FDOT concerning the drainage issues.
Public
Comment
The first public speaker was Matthew Chimumento, 632 Main
Street, stated he is very glad to see something going into the
“bombed out” shelter. His concerns were regarding how many
more of these type homes or developments are going to be coming
up in Atlantic Beach? Is Atlantic Beach going to become totall y
focused on Beaches Habitat homes? He was also concerned about
the lack of storage with no garages and having the front and rear
porches start serving as garages with outside storage. The second
public speaker was Mike Whalen, business owner on Mayport
Road. Mr. Whalen stated he thinks this is the wrong location for
this project. Is Atlantic Beach going to become the “poster boy”
for Beaches Habitat. He thinks this is too many low income people
in one project and that this will turn back into what the Palms
turned into and that it will close businesses on Mayport Road.
Board
Discussion
Kirk Hanson had questions regarding if they grant the variances for
this SPA do they have to do the same for all future SPA’s. The
board decided they are decided on a case by case basis. Brea Paul
was concerned about the park being turned into a retention pond
for drainage. Mr. Hubsch stated that then that change would have
to come before the board again.
Motion Sylvia Simmons made motion to approve SPA-13-00100075 and it
Draft Minutes of the October 15, 2013 regular meeting of the Community Development Board
Page 5 of 5
was seconded by Harley Parkes. It was unanimously approved 6-0.
6. REPORTS.
A. Through Lots. Michael Griffin stated that this item is to request a
recommendation from the Community Development Board to the City
Commission to repeal Section 24-84. (c) The Land Development Code which
relates to double frontage lots which requires new structures built in between
Beach Avenue and Ocean Blvd. to actually front onto Ocean Blvd. Currently
there are only 4 lots with Ocean Blvd addresses and 10 lots addressed on Beach
Avenue, and 3 vacant lots with no address. Sylvia Simmons is concerned about
letting homeowners place 6ft tall fences right along Ocean Blvd. Mr. Parkes
stated that the economic value of having a Beach Ave. address is not arguable.
Kelly Elmore made a motion to amend the code to allow through lots between
Beach Ave. to Ocean Blvd. to front on Beach Ave. Mr. Stratton seconded the
motion. The motion was unanimously approved 6 -0.
B. Tree Ordinance. Michael Griffin stated that the Tree Ordinance is not up for
discussion for this evening. Mr. Griffin stated this is just a heads up that this will
be coming up in the December meeting. Mr. Elmore stated he will be missing
the December 17th meeting. Brea Paul stated that Jason Burgess will not be
staying on the board and the new board member will be Linda Lanier.
7. ADJOURNMENT – 8 :31 PM
_______________________________________
Brea Paul, Chair
_______________________________________
Attest
CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA ITEM 4A
CASE NO UBEX‐13‐00100077
Request for use‐by‐exception to allow for a drive‐thru service lane associated with a
restaurant, per Land Development Regulations Section 24‐111 (c) (4).
LOCATION 1021 ATLANTIC BOULEVARD
APPLICANT EQUITY ONE (FLORIDA PORTFOLIO) INC.
DATE JANUARY 14, 2014
STAFF JEREMY HUBSCH, REDEVELOPMENT AND ZONING COORDINATOR
STAFF COMMENTS
The subject property is located at 1021 Atlantic Boulevard. It is an outparcel in the shopping plaza that is
anchored by LA Fitness. The applicants are proposing a 4,125 square foot Panera Bread with a drive‐thru lane.
Section 24.111 (c) (4) of the Land Development Code requires a use‐by‐exception for “Restaurants with drive‐
through service where the site contains lanes dedicated solely to drive‐through business”. Restaurants with drive‐
thru lanes are required to get use‐by‐exceptions because they can potentially have negative impacts on
surrounding neighborhoods or properties. For instance, a 24 hour drive thru may make excessive noise or create
light pollution when adjacent to residential homes. There are also possibilities for negative impacts to traffic.
In this particular instance, staff is of the opinion that there will be minimal negative impacts (if any) as a result of
the drive thru lane. The outparcel where the Panera is proposed is located far away from any residential homes,
with the nearest being behind the LA Fitness on Cavalla Road. There are also three different ingress/egress access
points to the property. There is a signalized entrance on Atlantic Boulevard, and access driveways on Royal Palms
and Aquatic Drives. There are currently two restaurants with drive‐thru lanes on Atlantic Boulevard on the
Atlantic Beach side. They are McDonalds and Dunkin Donuts. The Dunkin Donuts was previously approved as a
use‐by‐exception in 2006 and McDonalds was grandfathered in.
Page 2 of 3
Subject Site and Surrounding Properties
Figure 1. 1021 Atlantic Boulevard and surrounding properties (Google Maps)
SUGGESTED ACTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL
The Community Development Board may consider a motion to recommend approval to the City
Commission of a requested Use‐by‐Exception (File No. UBEX 13‐00100077) to allow for a drive‐thru
service lane associated with a restaurant, within the Commercial General (CG) Zoning District and
located at 1021 Atlantic Boulevard provided:
1. Approval of this Use‐by‐Exception is consistent with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan.
2. Approval of this Use‐by‐Exception is in compliance with the requirements of Section 24‐63,
Zoning, Subdivision and Land Development Regulations.
3. The requested use is consistent with Section 24‐111(c) in that the proposed use is found to be
consistent with the uses permitted in the CG zoning districts and with surrounding development
along Atlantic Boulevard.
Page 3 of 3
SUGGESTED ACTION TO RECOMMEND DENIAL
The Community Development Board may consider a motion to recommend denial to the City
Commission of a requested Use‐by‐Exception (File No. UBEX 13‐00100077) to allow for a drive‐
thru service lane associated with a restaurant, within the Commercial General (CG) Zoning District
and located at 1021 Atlantic Boulevard provided:
1. Approval of this Use‐by‐Exception is not consistent with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan.
2. Approval of this Use‐by‐Exception is not in compliance with the requirements of Section 24‐63,
Zoning, Subdivision and Land Development Regulations.
3. The requested use is not consistent with Section 24‐111(c) in that the proposed use is found to
be inconsistent with the uses permitted in the CG zoning districts and is not compatible with
surrounding development along Atlantic Boulevard.
CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA ITEM 4B
CASE NO ZVAR-13-00100079
Request for zoning variance as permitted by Section 24-64. to seek relief from the
requirements of Section 24.171.c.1 relating to roof standards.
LOCATION 1021 ATLANTIC BOULEVARD
APPLICANT EQUITY ONE (FLORIDA PORTFOLIO) INC.
DATE JANUARY 14, 2014
STAFF JEREMY HUBSCH, REDEVELOPMENT AND ZONING COORDINATOR
STAFF COMMENTS
The subject property is located at 1021 Atlantic Boulevard. The applicants are proposing a 4,125 square foot
Panera Bread with a drive-thru lane. The project is within 100 feet of Atlantic Boulevard and thus must meet
commercial corridor development standards outlined in Section 24-171. Section 24-171 (c)(1) states, “roofs,
which give the appearance of a flat roof from any street side of the building, are prohibited. Roofs may be gabled,
hipped, mansard, or otherwise designed so as to avoid the appearance of a flat roof from the adjoining street.” The
intent of this policy is to prevent bland and boxy construction along Atlantic Beach’s commercial corridors of
Atlantic Boulevard and Mayport Road.
Panera Bread has roughly 1,700 locations across the United States and has a general design style for its projects.
This general style does not meet the requirements of the Atlantic Beach Code and thus the applicants are seeking a
variance. The applicants are claiming two grounds for approval of the variance:
1. There are surrounding conditions or circumstances impacting the property disparately from nearby
properties.
“The proposed architecture is a combination of flat and angled roof lines similar to the existing shopping
center and adjacent parcels to the east”.
2. There is an onerous effect of regulations enacted after platting or after development of the property or after
construction of improvements upon the property.
“The Corridor Standards were enacted after construction of the shopping center. The proposed project is an
expansion of the existing center.”
Page 2 of 3
Building Elevations
Page 3 of 3
SUGGESTED ACTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL
The Community Development Board may consider a motion to approve the requested Zoning Variance (File
No. ZVAR 13-00100079) to seek relief from the requirements of 24.171.1 relating to roof standards in the Commercial
General (CG) Zoning District and located at 1021 Atlantic Boulevard provided:
The proposed variance is consistent with the provisions of Section 24-64 (d) of the land development regulations
establishing ground for approval of a variance, as follows:
(1) There are exceptional topographic variations affecting the subject property.
(2) There are surrounding conditions or circumstances impacting the property disparately from nearb y
properties.
(3) There are exceptional circumstances preventing the reasonable use of the property as compared to
other properties in the area.
(4) There is an onerous effect of regulations enacted after platting or after development of the property or
after construction of improvements upon the property.
(5) The subject property has an irregular shape.
(6) The subject property is of substandard size
SUGGESTED ACTION TO RECOMMEND DENIAL
The Community Development Board may consider a motion to deny the requested Zoning Variance (File No.
ZVAR 13-00100079) to seek relief from the requirements of 24.171.1 relating to roof standards in the Commercial
General (CG) Zoning District and located at 1021 Atlantic Boulevard provided:
The proposed variance is inconsistent with the provisions of Section 24-64 (d) of the land development regulations
establishing ground for approval of a variance, as follows:
(1) There are no exceptional topographic variations affecting the subject property.
(2) There are no surrounding conditions or circumstances impacting the property disparately from nearby
properties.
(3) There are no exceptional circumstances preventing the reasonable use of the property as compared to other
properties in the area.
(4) There is not an onerous effect of regulations enacted after platting or after development of the property or
after construction of improvements upon the property.
(5) The subject property does not have an irregular shape.
(6) The subject property is of standard size.
1-15-14
899 Atlantic Blvd
177602-0040
CG CM
Section 24-171(c)(1) [Commercial Corridor Standards;
Building form and finish materials] which prohibits flat roofs
14.18 acres
x
x The proposed architecture is a combination of flat and angled roof lines
similar to the existing shopping center and adjacent parcels to the east.
x
The Corridor Standards were enacted after construction of the shopping center.
The proposed project is an expansion of the existing center.
Panera Bread is applying for variance to the no flat roof requirements in
the City of Atlantic Beach. Per our conversations and coordination of our
proposed elevations with Michael Griffin, Director of Building and
Zoning. Our main elevation facing Atlantic Blvd. has multiple elevation
changes, awnings and canopies to give the appeal of local beach
architecture. This design is a stray from the typical Panera design in the
attempt to appeal to the local flavor. We feel that adding a mansard or
gable roof would not compliment our building or the neighboring
buildings.
Atlantic Blvd.,
ATLANTIC BEACH, FL
#1781
#25116-1
X-249a
10/08/13
JIM M.
LOCATION
STORE NUMBER
PROJECT MANAGER
DATEDATECHECKED BY ARTIST
DRAWING NAME
APPROVALS
Engineering
Sales
Estimating
WORK ORDER NUMBER(S)
Signatures Required Before Release to Production
DATE
DATE
DATE
BY
BY
BY
REVISIONS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
NO.BY DATEDESCRIPTION
676 GEORGE WASHINGTON HIGHWAY
LINCOLN, RI 02865-4255
401-334-9100 401-334-7799
www.mandevillesign.com
CLIENT
PHONE
ARTWORK EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY OF
FAX
WEB
Production
Quality Control
VM PRODUCT NUMBER(S)
DATE
DATE
BY
BY
1917SINCE
WD
rev green to BM-HC-122 10/10/13JM
DO NOT SCALE DRAWING
.040 ALUM. CHANNEL
5"
6' ELEC. WHIP,
CONNECTION TO PRIMARY BY G.C.
TRIM CAP
3/16" ACRYLIC FACE
WHITE L.E.D. ILLUMINATION
REMOTE POWER SUPPLY
WEEP HOLES IN CHANNEL BOTTOM
TYP. FASCIA: E.I.F.S. OVER PLYWOOD
OVER METAL STUDS
TYPICAL CHANNEL
LETTER CROSS SECTION
LAGS INTO PLYWOOD BLOCKING
INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED CHANNEL LETTERS
& MOTHER BREAD LOGO
LETTERS:
• (#2447 WHITE) 3/16" ACRYLIC FACES WITH
(230-22 MATTE BLACK) VINYL BORDERS
MOTHER BREAD LOGO:
• (CLEAR) 3/16" ACRYLIC FACE
BACKSPRAYED PMS 1355u
• (BLACK 230-22) VINYL LOGO DETAIL
ALL:
• (BLACK) 1" TRIM CAP
• (BLACK) .040 ALUM. RETURNS, 5" DEEP
• .040 ALUM. LETTER BACKS
• (WHITE) L.E.D. ILLUMINATION
• LOW VOLTAGE POWER SUPPLIES
• U.L. AND MFG. LABELS
• WEEP HOLES REQUIRED
D/T CABINET DETAILS: X-249b
WEST ELEVATION: 1/8” = 1’-0”
SIGN ELEVATION: 1/4" =1'- 0"
61¾"
22
"
9.4 SQ.FT.7¼
"
31.7”
51.53 SQ.FT.
106"
70”
26"
9"
5"
B/O D/T AWNING
ELEV.: 9’-0” A.G.
AWNING DETAILS ON X-249e
SIGN CODE ALLOWANCE:
Total allowable sign area (all sides) = 200.0 sq. ft.
Total proposed sign area (all sides) = 154.59 sq.ft.
Total area of PB graphics on
directional signs =5.74 sq.ft.
WEST ELEVATION
Sign area allowed: ...100.0 sq.ft.
Sign area proposed: 51.53 sq.ft.
12
WD rev tower, bldg & awning colors 10/17/13
WD bldg. & color updates 10/21/13
JM bldg. canopy update 01/14/14
ILLUMINATED "DRIVE THRU"
• ALUMINUM CHANNEL LETTER TYPE CONSTRUCTION
• .040 ALUM. RETURNS, 5" DEEP, PAINTED BLACK
• 3/16" THICK WHITE ACRYLIC FACE WITH BISON BROWN
OPAQUE OVERLAY BM-2113-30 BISON BROWN
• WHITE COPY
• 1" x 5/8" ALUM. "F" RETAINER PAINTED BLACK
• WHITE L.E.D. ILLUMINATION
• WEEP HOLES REQUIRED
• LOW VOLTAGE POWER SUPPLY
• FLUSH WALL MOUNT
• U.L. LABEL
SIGN CABINET:
WHITE L.E.D. ILLUMINATION
BLACK ALUMINUM CHANNEL
5"
BLACK ALUM. "F" RETAINER
3/16" ACRYLIC FACE
LOW VOLTAGE POWER SUPPLY
3/8" LAGS INTO PLYWOOD
DRIVE THRU BOX SIGN SECTION: N.T.S.
6' ELEC. WHIP.
CONNECTION TO PRIMARY BY G.C.
WEEP HOLES w/ BAFFLES
SOUTH ELEVATION: 1/8” = 1’-0”AWNINGS, DETAILS ON X-249e
Atlantic Blvd.,
ATLANTIC BEACH, FL
#1781
#25116-1
X-249b
10/08/13
JIM M.
LOCATION
STORE NUMBER
PROJECT MANAGER
DATEDATECHECKED BY ARTIST
DRAWING NAME
APPROVALS
Engineering
Sales
Estimating
WORK ORDER NUMBER(S)
Signatures Required Before Release to Production
DATE
DATE
DATE
BY
BY
BY
676 GEORGE WASHINGTON HIGHWAY
LINCOLN, RI 02865-4255
401-334-9100 401-334-7799
www.mandevillesign.com
CLIENT
PHONE
ARTWORK EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY OF
FAX
WEB
Production
Quality Control
VM PRODUCT NUMBER(S)
DATE
DATE
BY
BY
1917SINCE
WD
DO NOT SCALE DRAWING
SIGN ELEVATION: 1/4" =1'- 0"
61¾"
22
"
9.4 SQ.FT.7¼
"
31.7”
51.53 SQ.FT.
106"
70”
26"
9"
5"
SOUTH ELEVATION
Sign area allowed: ...100.0 sq.ft.
Sign area proposed: 51.53 sq.ft.
REVISIONS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
NO.BY DATEDESCRIPTION
rev green to BM-HC-122 10/10/13JM
12
WD rev tower, bldg & awning colors 10/17/13
WD bldg. & color updates 10/21/13
JM bldg. canopy update 01/14/14
EAST ELEVATION: 1/8” = 1’-0”
Atlantic Blvd.,
ATLANTIC BEACH, FL
#1781
#25116-1
X-249c
10/08/13
JIM M.
LOCATION
STORE NUMBER
PROJECT MANAGER
DATEDATECHECKED BY ARTIST
DRAWING NAME
APPROVALS
Engineering
Sales
Estimating
WORK ORDER NUMBER(S)
Signatures Required Before Release to Production
DATE
DATE
DATE
BY
BY
BY
676 GEORGE WASHINGTON HIGHWAY
LINCOLN, RI 02865-4255
401-334-9100 401-334-7799
www.mandevillesign.com
CLIENT
PHONE
ARTWORK EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY OF
FAX
WEB
Production
Quality Control
VM PRODUCT NUMBER(S)
DATE
DATE
BY
BY
1917SINCE
WD
DO NOT SCALE DRAWING
SIGN ELEVATION: 1/4" =1'- 0"
61¾"
22
"
9.4 SQ.FT.7¼
"
31.7”
51.53 SQ.FT.
106"
70”
26"
9"
5"
AWNING DETAILS ON X-249e
EAST ELEVATION
Sign area allowed: ...100.0 sq.ft.
Sign area proposed: 51.53 sq.ft.
REVISIONS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
NO.BY DATEDESCRIPTION
rev green to BM-HC-122 10/10/13JM
12
WD rev tower, bldg & awning colors 10/17/13
ENTRY TOWER BEYOND
WD bldg. & color updates 10/21/13
JM updated gutters 01/14/14
Atlantic Blvd.,
ATLANTIC BEACH, FL
#1781
#25116-1
X-249d
10/08/13
JIM M.
LOCATION
STORE NUMBER
PROJECT MANAGER
DATEDATECHECKED BY ARTIST
DRAWING NAME
APPROVALS
Engineering
Sales
Estimating
WORK ORDER NUMBER(S)
Signatures Required Before Release to Production
DATE
DATE
DATE
BY
BY
BY
676 GEORGE WASHINGTON HIGHWAY
LINCOLN, RI 02865-4255
401-334-9100 401-334-7799
www.mandevillesign.com
CLIENT
PHONE
ARTWORK EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY OF
FAX
WEB
Production
Quality Control
VM PRODUCT NUMBER(S)
DATE
DATE
BY
BY
1917SINCE
WD
DO NOT SCALE DRAWING
NORTH ELEVATION: 1/8” = 1’-0”
B/O D/T AWNING
ELEV.: 9’-0”
EXTERNALLY ILLUMINATED DRIVE THRU AWNING:
• 1" x 2” ALUMINUM EXTRUSION WELDED
• FRAME POWDER COATED SEIBERT SILVER #189110
• TRUSS SPACING N.T.E. 36" APART O.C.
• LOUVERED METAL COVER (DETAILS TO BE DETERMINED)
PAINTED BM #861 “SHALE”
• MOUNTED USING Z-CLIPS & APPROPRIATE ANCHORS
• G.C. TO PROVIDE 2" x 6" BLOCKING AS NECESSARY
FRAME
4'-0"
1" ALUM.
EXTRUSION
FRAME (BLACK)
INTERIOR TRUSS
Z CLIPS / FASTENERS
N.T.E. 24” APART O.C.
4'
-
0
"
3/8" S.S. LAG SCREWS
INTO BLOCKING
W/ PIPE SPACERS
3/4" EXTERIOR
PLYWOOD
DRIVE THRU AWNING SECTION ONLY: 3/4" = 1'-0"
25
"
C
.
t
o
C
.
153” A.G.
129” A.G.
108” Above Grade
156” A.G.
AWNING DETAILS ON X-249eD/T AWNING
DETAIL BELOW
REVISIONS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
NO.BY DATEDESCRIPTION
rev green to BM-HC-122 10/10/13JM
12
WD rev tower, bldg & awning colors 10/17/13
TOWER BEYOND
WD bldg. & color updates 10/21/13
JM bldg. canopy update 01/14/14