The URL can be used to link to this page

55 W 8th St (vault) 1 CITY OF 716 OCEAN BOULEVARD - ---- -- - - P.O.BOX 25 - -" ATLANTIC BEACH,FLORIDA 32233 TELEPHONE(904)249-2395 April 12, 1989 Mr. John Becker DBA Suncoast Classics 1820-4 Mayport Road Atlantic Beach, FL 32233 Dear Mr. Becker: City Commission at its official meeting on Monday, April 10, 1989 approved your application for Use by Exception at 55 West 8th Street for the sale of used cars and car kits. The application is granted contingent upon your construction of a fence and your agreement that no more than five vehicles are to be utilized at the site at any one time. Please be sure to obtain the necessary licenses from the Office of the City Clerk before proceeding. Sincerely, Richard C. Fellows City Manager RCF/dh cc: City Clerk Community Development Director 000699 DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH PERMIT LOCATION INFORMATION permit Humber : 55 WEST 8TH STREET Permit TyP&2 BUILDING ATLANTIC BEACH, FLORIDA class of Workt ADDITION LEGAL DESCRIPTION ---- -- - Constr. Type; WOOD FRAME Lot: Block- Section: Proposed Use: SINGLE FAMIL'e Plat Book: Page- Dwellings% 0 Code: 0 Subdivision: Estimated Value' 491000. 00 OWNER INFORMATION Improv. Cost - $0. 00 Name: JOHN BECKER Tota,l Fe0s: $0. 00 Address- 55 WEST 8TH STREET Amouint ,Pnid; $0. 00 ATLANTIC BEACH. ri. nPTr1.A aid. pl-lone. (904)223--0366 A DDrrioN OF FFNcE, 'I, AGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE APPLICATION FEES ,I t.II"iGtOhl PERMIT *0. 00 FENCE WATER IMPACT FEE *0. 00 FEC jFwER 'IMPACT WATER METER RADON, GAS--H. R. S. $0. 0f," RADON GAS 5k $0. 0(_ WATER TAP $0. 00 SEWER TAP $0. 00 HYDRAULIC SHARE $0. 00 RE-INSPECT FEE *0. 00 ENGINEERING $dj,550 I L, .i/ : OTHER $0. 0C, NOTES: NOTICE —ALL CONCRETE FORMS AND FOOTINGS MUST BE INSPECTED BEFORE POURING PERMIT VOID SIX MONTHS AFTER DATE OF ISSUE BUILDING MATERIAL, RUBBISH AND DEBRIS FROM THIS WORK MUST NOT BE PLACED IN PUBLIC SPACE,AND MUST BE CLEARED UP AND HAULED AWAY BY EITHER CONTRACTOR OR OWNER. "FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE MECFOR ' INE PROPERTY OWNER PAYING TWICER BUILDING IMPROVEME TS.33 ISSUED ACCORDING TO APPROVED PLANS WHICH ARE PART OF THIS PERMIT AND SUBJECT TO REVOCA_ ION FOR VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF LAW. ATLANTIC BEACH BUILDING DEPARTMENT By: 000699 DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH LOCATION INFORMATION f'LhKlT Lffl- STREET . Permit Number'. Address: 55 WEST STH Permit Type: RU I LD I NG ATLANTIC BEACH, FLORIDA 71alas of Work: ADDITION LEGAL DESCRIPTION ' constr . Typet. WOOL) FRAME Lots Blucki Sectioni propooed Uses SINGLE FAMILi plat Books Page, Dwellings: 0 Code: 0 3ubdiviniolf) ; INFORMATION Estimated Values $1000. 00 OWNER INFORM Improv. Cost : $0. 00 N a toe JOHN BECKER Tat o� AddAt--sa* 55 WEST 8TH STREET A 73'.2 $0. 00 ATLANTIC BF-AS Hr FLORID $0. 00 A 11404 )223 f-6 Lit..L WN OF -.E TU PP CATION FEE $0. 0d WATER'; M At T FEE t ClI00 EX J. lle SF.WER CT F "TtR 40" RADON GA.:4, WATEtJAIP60 SEWE *Tjp ft. t -IJYDRAL161C SHARE Vol OU NOTES: NOTICE ALL CONCRETE FORMS AND FOOTINGS MUST BE INSPECTED BEFORE POURING PERMIT VOID SIX MONTHS AFTER DATE OF ISSUE BUILDING MATERIAL, RUBBISH AND DEBRIS FROM THIS WORK MUST NOT BE PLACED IN PUBLIC SPACE,AND MUST BE CLEARED UP AND HAULED AWAY BY EITHER CONTRACTOR OR OWNER. "FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE MECHANICS' LIEN LAW CAN RESULT IN THE PROPERTY OWNER PAYING TWICE FOR BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS.�5 ISSUED ACCORDING TO APPROVED PLANS WHICH ARE PART OF THIS PERMIT AND SUBJECT TO REVOCATION FOR VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF LAW. ATLANTIC BEACH BUILDING DEPARTMENT By: APPLICATION FOR FENCE PERMIT 3 Owners name_�J�[ iU _ �� -------------------------phone �2'3 Job address_55 _O -S-j`-- ----------------------------------------- Lotblock and/or unit, #-------------subdivision-----______--_--____ Contractor if different from owner__ 1L1/C1CzT_6n.) L. X CD___________ ----------------------------------------- Valuation of fence S_�O-1�� L&�5 _ Corner or interior lot__1NJ'6--k d Type construction_COOZ)D-_�&'VA-'C ____________ Show location and height of fence as well as location of street(s) . l 50 s Owner signature___ ----------------Date_.----------- Contractor signature----------------------------------Date----------------- r r { (CITY OF Feacl - 94ud4 800 SEMINOLE ROAD ATLANTIC BEACH,FLORIDA 32233-5445 TELEPHONE(904)247-5800 FAX(904)247-5805 March 11, 1992 Crawford J. Cox, III 427 Florida Boulevard Neptune Beach, FL 32266 Re: USE BY EXCEPTION 55 WEST EIGHTH STREET, ATLANTIC BEACH Dear Mr. Cox: This will advise the Atlantic Beach City Commission, at its regular meeting on Monday, March 9, 1992, granted your request for a Use by Exception to operate a micro-brewery at 55 West Eighth Street. Please be advised the exception has been granted to you, personally, for that location and is non transferable. In the event you move from that location the exception will become null and void. A license fee of $45.00 has been suggested for the operation of a micro-brewery. An ordinance setting this fee will be presented to the City Commission for first reading on March 23, 1992, and public hearing and final passage of the ordinance will be on April 13, 1992, following which you should contact this office and make application for your occupational license. If we can assist you in any way please do not hesitate to let us know. Sincerely, Maureen King City Clerk 3 i CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH CITY COMMISSION MEETING STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM: Use-by-Exception to operate a "Micro Brewery" SUBMITTED BY: George Worley , City Planner DATE: March 17 , 1992 BACKGROUND: Applicant desires to operate a "Micro Brewery" business in at 55 West 8th Street. This location is Zoned CG - General Commercial . The business is engaged in brewing and whole-sale distribution of Beer . No retail sales or on-site consumption are proposed. All operations will be carried out within the building and all parking and loading will be done off-street. Vehicular traffic will be limited to employee automobiles and a single delivery truck or van . Operation of this type of business is heavily regulated by both the Bureau of Alcohol , Tobacco, and Firearms, as well as the State Department of HRS and the Department of Alcoholic Beverages. RECOMMENDATION: After thorough review the Community Development Board unanimously recommended approval of the Use-by-Exception provided that it be granted to the APPLICANT ONLY and NOT run with the property . ATTACHMENTS: 1 ) Application and attachments 2 ) Minutes of the February CDB Meeting REVIEWED BY CITY MANAGER , i AGENDA ITEM NO. �� MINUTES OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD OF THE CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH, FLORIDA FEBRUARY 18, 1992 7:00 P. M. CITY HALL PRESENT Gregg McCaulie Samuel Howie Ruth Gregg Don Wolfson Mark McGowan Pat Pillmore AND George Worley, II, CD Director Pat Harris, Recording Secretary Alan Jensen, Esquire ABSENT Robert Frohwein The Chairman, Gregg McCaulie, called the meeting to order and asked for approval of the minutes from the meeting of January 21, 1992. Upon motion duly made and seconded, said minutes were approved. NEW BUSINESS: I. Application for Use by Exception filed by Watch Care to operate an adult day/health care center for property located at 100 West 1st Street. Ms. Lena Sturm introduced herself to the Board and explained the reasons a Use by Exception was being requested. After discussion Mrs. Gregg moved that the application be approved, Mr. Howie seconded the motion and the application was approved for recommendation to the City Commission by a unanimous vote. II. Application for Variance filed by Paul S. Ferber to decrease the front setback line for proposed enclosed "greenhouse" dining room at North Shore Grille located at 363 Atlantic Boulevard. Mr. Ferber introduced himself to the board and stated the reasons said variance had been requested. After discussion Mr. Howie moved to approve the application, Mrs. Gregg seconded the motion and the motion was unanimously passed with the recommendation to submit an appropriate landscape plan ensuring vegetative buffering with the building permit application. III. Application for Use by Exception filed by Crawford J. Cox, III to operate a micro-brewery on property located at 55 West 8th Street. Mr. Cox introduced himself to the board and explained the reasons said Use by Exception had been requested. After discussion Mrs. Gregg moved to approve the application with the stipulation that said Use by Exception be limited to the applicant. Mr. Howie seconded the motion and the application was unanimously approved for recommendation to the City Commission. IV. Application for Variance filed by Mike and Debbie Smith to r-onstruct a residence on a non-conforming lot at property known as Lot 8, Park Terrace, also known as the Southwest corner of Plaza Drive and Ocean Boulevard. Mr. Mike Smith introduced himself to the board and explained the reasons said Variance was being requested. ' Mr. Smith submitted an artist's rendering of the proposed residence as well as pictures of the lot as it currently sits. Also in attendance were Dave Willis, contractor for the applicant. , The chairman read a letter from Martha J. Coleman objecting to said variance. Ms. Coleman's nephew, Harry Deighton, was in attendance and stated that their main concerning was the drainage situation. Mr. John Long also introduced himself to the board and asked questions of the applicant regarding the setback lines. After discussion, Mr. Wolfson moved that the application be granted, Mr. Howie seconded the motion and it was unanimously passed. OLD BUSINESS Mr. Wolfson mentioned that election of officers should have been on the agenda. Thereupon the Chairman called for nominations for Chairman and Co-Chairman. Mrs. Gregg nominated Gregg McCaulie and Sam Howie as Chairman and Co-Chairman respectfully. There being no further nominations, it was unanimously agreed by the Board that these officers remain in their like offices. Mrs. Gregg questioned the matter of recommendations from staff. Mr. Jensen stated that recommendations of staff were initiated by the City Manager and filtered down in an effort to provide assistance to the board as to staff interpretations but the decision making was entirely up to the board. REQUEST FOR ZONING EXCEPTION FOR Iron Dog Brewing Company, Inc. February 4, 1992 i 8 F tQ - 41992 Building and Zonin ; t I.) Description of the "Use by Exception": I am requesting an exception to operate a micro-brewery. A micro-brewery is a small regional brewery which produces less than 5,000 barrels of beer annually. Our intention is to be the first micro-brewery in North Florida (in particular Atlantic Beach). All our beer will be sold in kegs and delivered to local restaurants and caters. The micro-brewery will not be a retail location. II.) Specific reasons why the applicant feels the request should be granted: I believe we will have a positive impact on the area by providing jobs and opportunities for local merchants. Our entire production will be monitored by the health department and the ATF (Department of the Treasury, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms). The micro-brewery Should not create additional traffic in the area, because we are not a retail establishment. All our solid waste is bio-degradable and non-toxic. We are a small "cottage industry" and will be compatible with the adjacent properties. Finding of Fact: 1.) Reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control and access in case of catastrophe: The micro-brewery should not create additional traffic in the area, because we are not a retail establishment. All our beer will be delivered to local restaurants and caters. We are a very small (cottage industry) operation with only 2 employees at the moment. 2.) Off-street parking and loading is adequate. Particular attention is paid to the items in 1 above and the economic, noise, glare and odor effects of the special exception on adjoining properties and properties generally in the district. Traffic Flow: Off street parking and loading should not be problem. As mentioned in the above paragraph we are a very small operation with only 2 employees working part- time. The building has a loading door in the front and will not block traffic. Our delivery truck will be a small commercial van or truck. Noise: All operations will be contained within the building and the micro-brewery in not considered a noisy operation. Glare: We do not intend to have a neon sign or any sign on the outside of the building. Odor: There is an small odor when brewing the beer, however the odor is very similar to the smell of baking bread. We will only be brewing the beer one or two days of the week. The remainder of the time the boiler will sit inactive. The vapor is non-toxic. 3.) Locations of refuse and service areas are compatible with surrounding properties and are easily accessible. We should have less than 3 trash cans of solid waste per week (during times of maximum production). As mentioned above, we will be a very small operation and all our solid waste is bio-degradable and non-toxic. We should produce the same amount of waste as a small household. 4.) Location, availability and compatibility of utilities are adequate. The building is attractive and all the utilities are more than adequate. We are regulated by the Health department on a scheduled basis. Our operation must be sanitary at all times and comply with extremely high health code standards. a 5.) Type, dimensions and character of screening and buffering are adequate. There is a 6 foot high privacy fence surrounding the building and proper buffering has been established. 6.) Signs and proposed exterior lighting, with reference to glare and traffic safety, are in harmony and are compatible with other properties in the district. We do not intend to have any exterior signs on the building. Of course we will have a sign on the door and the window. 7.) Required yards and other open spaces are adequate. A yard is not required for our operation, 90% of our operation is conducted within the confines of the building itself. 8.) The use is generally compatible with adjacent properties and other property in the district. The micro-brewery will be compatible with adjacent properties (cabinet shops,automotive repair, etc.) 9.) Hours of Operation Monday thru Saturday 8am to 8pm i - I, D rc O A i i - U m a Zx 1 CD ba Cr N n CD m r„ li ry a T �j z � N(] O N ^` _ O N N N = 10 O N A c 3 N m N r N m O A N r a y tn"O a o� "o.4 2 C7-D -- -I O r- � O D p m rn o ,x T T : 'n n rr, a L-1 O a r ^ r1 rl r c O rn 2 _ � r C7, �� f m N r •---1 r Z m N L9lel m r Irl >0 no ^ xr —O m- a 0 O U 000 : '✓ 00 O 00 N 3o D .r, M3 Z t a:2 ^ O a a � -Tl 00 �� To rnm I �- .- < O N11hCCS = V A N CJ) O 1" ►y I�l U,f I Please Type or Print in Ink Application Fee 575. 00 APPLICATION FOR "USE BY EXCEP. i hr°'`;3�`�-=� �e! Date Filed: February 4 , 1992 ---------------------- ouilding and Zoning Name and Address of Owner or Tenant in Possession of Premises: ___ Crawford J. Cox III ------_--_- Phone ----------- --- - 427 Florida Blvd. Work: 399-5888 ---------------------------------- ------------------------- ___ Neptune Beach,_ Florida - 32266 - Home: 246-9375 _ Street address and legal description of the premises as to whiph the Use by Exception" is requested: 55 West 8th Street, Atlantic Beach, Florida 32266 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- A description of the "Use by Exception" desired, which shall specifically and particularly describe the type, character and extent of the proposed "Use by Exception" : Ilam requesting an exception to operate a micro-brewery. A micro- - ------------------------------------------------------ brewery is a small regional brewery which produces less than 5,000 --e. --------------------------------------------------------------------- barrels of beer annually. All our beer will be sold in kegs and delivered to local restaurants and caters. The micro-brewery will not be --------- ----- a retail location. Specific reasons why the applicant feels the request should be granted: I believe we will have a positive impact on the area by providing jobs ------------------------------------------------------------------------- and opportunities for local merchants. Our entire production will be ------------------------------------------------- FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Ingress and egress to property and proposed YES NO structures is adequate. Particular reference is made to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control and access in case of catastrophe; ,c 2. Off-street parking and loading is adequate. Particular attention is paid to the items in 1. above and the economic, noise, glare and odor effects of the special exception on adjoining properties and properties generally in the district; 3. Locations of refuse and service areas are compatible with surrounding poperties and are easily accessible. 4. Locations, availability and compatibility of utilities are adequate. 5. Type, dimensions and character of screening and buffering are adequate. 6. Signs and proposed exterior lighting, with reference to glare and traffic safety, are in harmony and are compatible with other properties in the district. ' 7. Required yards and other open spaces are adequate. ___ --- 8. The use is generally compatible with adjacent properties and other property in the district. ___ --- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Please Type or Print in Ink Application Fee $75. 01 APPLICATION FOR "USE BY EXCEF:TION" a rEP — 1.9 February 4, 1992 _- G`�?; j�� and Z0.9j Date Filed:_-___-_- Y Name and Address of Owner or Tenant in Possession of Premises: Crawford J. Cox III ___________ Phone 427 Florida Blvd. __- Work: 399-5888 ---------------- ------------------------ ___ Neptune Beach, Florida 32266 Home: 246-9375 ---------------- ------------------------ Street address and legal description of the premises as to which the 'U by Exception" is requested: 55 West 8th Str.eet� Atlantic Beach, Florida 32266 -1-------------_............. --------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ A description of the "Use by Exception" desired, which shall specifical] and particularly describe the type, character and extent of the propose "Use by Exception" : Ilam requesting an exception to operate a micro-brewery. A micro- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ brewery is a small regional brewery which produces less than 5,000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ barrels of beer annually. All our beer will be sold in kegs and ------------------------------------------------------------------------ delivered to local restaurants and caters. The micro-brewery will not --------- ---- a retail location. Specif4c reasons why the applicant feels the request should be granted: I believe we will have a positive impact on the area by providing jobs and opportunities for local merchants. Our entire production will be ------------------------------------------------------------------------- monitored by the health department and the ATF (Department of the Treas ---------------- ---------------- Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms) . The brewery should not create ------------------------------------------------------------------------- additional traffic in the rea. Zoning Classifications_—----- o -rrlcrcf<�`___ Git,nata� n Bann �l AtatlAOnli[!RRt�a Si Aturc� e Pr of t rtv FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Ingress and egress to property and proposed' YES NO structures is adequate. Particular reference is made to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control and access in case of catastrophe; a --- --- 2. Off-street parking and loading is adequate. Particular attention is paid to the items in 1. above and the economic, noise, glare and odor effects of the special exception on adjoining properties and properties generally in the district; 3. Locations of refuse and service areas are compatible with surrounding poperties and are easily accessible. 4. Locations, availability and compatibility of utilities are adequate. S. Type, dimensions and character of screening and buffering are adequate. 6. Signs and proposed exterior lighting, with reference to glare and traffic safety, are in harmony and are compatible with other properties in the district. 7. Required yards and other open spaces are adequate. 8. The use is generally compatible with adjacent properties and other property in the district. --- --- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: f REQUEST FOR ZONING EXCEPTION i FOR i Iron Dog Brewing Company, Inc. February 4, 1992 F EB 1992 Building and Zoning W I.) Description of the "Use by Exception": I am requesting an exception to operate a micro-brewery. A micro-brewery is a small regional brewery which produces less than 5,000 barrels of beer annually. Our intention is to be the first micro-brewery in North Florida (in particular Atlantic Beach). All our beer will be sold in kegs and delivered to local restaurants and caters. The micro-brewery will not be a retail location. II.) Specific reasons why the applicant feels the request should be granted: I believe we will have a positive impact on the area by providing jobs and opportunities for local mert;hants. Our entire production will be monitored by the health department and the ATF (Department of the Treasury, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms). The micro-brewery should not create additional traffic in the area, because we are not a retail establishment. All our solid waste is bio-degradable and non-toxic. We are a small "cottage industry" and will be compatible with the adjacent properties. Finding of Fact: 1.) Reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control and access in case of catastrophe: The micro-brewery should not create additional traffic in the area, because we are not a retail establishment. All our beer will be delivered to local restaurants and caters. We are a very small (cottage industry) operation with only 2 employees at the moment. 2.) Off-street parking and loading is adequate. Particular attention is paid to the items in 1 above and the economic, noise, glare and odor effects of the special exception on adjoining properties and properties generally in the district. Traffic Flow: Off street parking and loading should not be problem. As mentioned in the above paragraph we are a very small operation with only 2 employees working part- time. The building has a loading door in the front and will not block traffic. Our delivery truck will be a small Commercial van or truck. Noise: All operations will be contained within the building and the micro-brewery in not considered'a noisy operation. Glare: We do not intend to have a neon sign or any sign on the outside of the building. Odor: There is an small odor when brewing the beer, however the odor is very similar to the smell of baking bread. We will only be brewing the beer one or two days of the week. The remainder of the time the boiler will sit inactive. The vapor is non-toxic. 3.) Locations of refuse and service areas are compatible with surrounding properties and are easily accessible. We should have less than 3 trash cans of solid waste per week (during times of maximum production). As mentioned above, we will be a very small operation and all our solid waste is bio-degradable and non-toxic. We should produce the same amount of waste as a small household. 4.) Location, availability and compatibility of utilities are adequate. The building is attractive and all the utilities are more than adequate. We are regulated by the Health department on a scheduled basis. Our operation must be sanitary at all times and comply with extremely high health code standards. 5.) Type, dimensions and character of screening and buffering are adequate. There is a 6 foot high privacy fence surrounding the building and proper buffering has been established. 6.) Signs and proposed exterior lighting, with reference to glare and traffic safety, are in harmony and are compatible with other properties in the district. We do not intend to have any exterior signs on the building. Of course we will have a sign on the door and the window. 7.) Required yards and other open spaces are adequate. A yard is not required for our operation, 90% of our operation is conducted within the j confines of the building itself. 8.) The use is generally compatible with adjacent properties and other property in the district. The micro-brewery will be compatible with adjacent properties (cabinet shops,automotive repair, etc.) 9.) Hours of Operation Monday thru Saturday 8am to Bpm V rnn Dr c x - z V b-4 cl > N D • DCD y N rn Rl C'Y o z • N•� rn N f- T - o N r� � N Z � - N 3 N I T N N m N T O In � N r = N O Y rl V C, = o� iO C)-a -- 0 r � O D • f 10 rnrn N xCD T _ T \\ r o m T A � „ n n n r m I n A C O � (r1 2 O z 1 n r- n N r I r1 n M m I v0 n —U x0 M- N W m o 000 C = _'ill `000 Z_ n ;:300 N C D -� 3a Q N n N � _ OI UV a o ,n 00 �� m Dr o D n'S .�1 M(D 0 w L � - _m U C� n U T co s CFri 0 I FTIO V1 U -I a% Iron Dog Brewing Company, Inc. Information Packet Prepared for the City of Atlantic Beach February 12, 1992 Iron Dog Brewing Company, Inc. Information Packet Prepared for the City of Atlantic Beach February 12; 1992 Joe Cox and Nick Delmedico, founders of Iron Dog Brewing Company, Inc., wish to test the feasibility of marketing "Hand Crafted" or "Home Brewed" malt beverages. With the rise in popularity of Brew Pubs such as Ragtimes, Hand Crafted beer has come of age. The desire for new and different products is a social trend that creates a market demand, and beer is no different. Surveys indicate that many restaurants would like to feature Hand Crafted beers, but lack the brewing expertise, technology, or capital to support an on site brewery. The answer to their problem is a micro-brewery, as all brew pubs are limited to on-site production and consumption. Our process differs from Ragtimes in several ways. The first and primary being starting materials. Ragtimes, like many brew pubs, uses pure grains in which malt and fermentable sugars are extracted by passing warm water over the cracked grains. This is called sparging, and results in solid waste in the form of spent grain. The spent grain is damp and messy. Iron Dog ale is made with malt extracts, a caramel like syrup that dissolves in boiling water and leaves no residue. Instead of whole hops, pelletized hops are used and this also leaves no residue when added to the mixture. The end result is a clean mixture ready for fermentation. Odor during cooking is fragrant but is not unlike baking bread. Cooking fumes are vented as in a restaurant, with exhaust fans. At maximum capacity we will be able to produce six runs per week with an approximate combined boiling time of less than 12 hours. Yeast is added and the mixture bubbles carbon dioxide as alcohol is formed over the next few days. When finished, the resulting beer is filtered and kegged and can be carbonated naturally or by placing approximately 15 lbs. of head pressure on each keg. The beer must age in the keg a minimum of two weeks before it is ready for shipment. Our system is a two barrel (60 gallon) system whereas Ragtimes operates a seven barrel (387 gallon) system. Producing at maximum capacity will enable us to manufacture 24 kegs (12 barrels) per week. This inventory can be removed with one or two standard size trucks on a weekly basis. The main source of waste in the production cycle is cleaning water. Good brewery operations require hospital clean conditions and a sterile environment, stricter than required health department requirements. Deviations from cleanliness can result in bad or bitter beer. Cleaning water will be used in washing returned kegs, the boiler, the fermentation tanks, and general brewery cleanup. We expect to clean approximately 24 to 30 kegs a week and the fermentation tanks must be cleaned after every cycle (once a week). The boiler must be cleaned at least twice a week. The sterilization solution used to clean the equipment is a standard solution used by all restaurants. 13REWING 6A REELS (626ALS-U, i), sysTEm No T Et-S Q�k R� STAV RANTS .1==, FES ®� 0MALT EXTRACT DR, 6rKA IN QSIAIL T� ESS STEEL COA15TROCTtON 0 EFF ( CIENT A COMPLETE F ROM BREW To BEE ER IN LESS TgA N 3 WHKS �•� 7?4R006N THE EASY S7rps - ) — OF MA)el VC BEER wirN KIT./ Ak ce �� tsc l7s �� • ' '�i J PvM P IN ?fi F /'�l.4SH 7, �1/K -r#E WATER RE-QUIRED FOR 7?�E l' RE- AKF SURF THAT YOU NAVE �NOUGf! CI PF. ADo -rYE CRUSff•ED /Y41-7'NOT WATER //V Tf{E BREW KETTLE', ��'• SRAR6F ` WATER 70 Q AND ToAiySFE2 '�. yo uR \\ �--- FFR MEW TERo MEW "-r? L 1 . , STI,e TO E7JUAL/ZE TXE TEYIPE- ` R,4TU2E• COVE-R AND LET REST s FOX / To 7- Hovl2.S • . • — v DRAW yOdR WO-47- FRoM -r#6- AMsy 7A� x 1,v70 7 E GR.9N2 Punk P FROM 7NFRE To Tf/E QREw KETTLC AND L.�G//T ycuR ��„ F S rovE 06'r"P ,47E,2 FROM TO 74E S407P S fl CROSS SPAR6E Is v b , . �s � ,�„ �� Sir �•� .:• :i s• cru o . C to T. AS SOON ASST ti BoIL5 ADD YOUR t S tgop5 AYD BDAL FA2 oNE A vD HALF HOUR MEANWF41LE EMPTY 57-010 -THE BO/C. AND PUMP -r'YE BOIL-- 7-ME v/[TNE SPENT GRAN /N4; WAR T /N 71f E W#/R Poe L TANK. w#EN rkoM -r#E M,4SH 7.4NK CLEAN /r AN D INSTALL THE W#IRPooL CoNNEC7oQ FlLL6D WAIT ?!LL /T 570P ROTATING• TNRov6N 7f�E =�:� ^��;--.. ' . � - `�. "`�G �L.T4V �• PUMP 7HE Wok- ' W091 Coo LEA al R f C TL Y To 7N E ',�*" •!, fes w C yU.v DR o C DN1 cAL FCA MEN T ER tK y. jaF y1i to V SAMPLE.!.. h �, 1`•1 s WNEN 7Flf FERMfN s J 747W/ 15 AN/SJfF.O R'CH ove ?NE YEAST ADD OUR y6AsTANb //vS7,4Ll— 7µ�pv�N TSE YOUR BLoW 8y YALVE . At 47 Al ftV y�� ,��:. S il' � �' .:�!'f it. ,/•' �. •�;f;: .;1? , �c r!• H PN i, 4Zt. itp ��..,.�rt�.'�y.•i�T;w4's� r� �' .�;�; 3r'- .,:fir ^. n , v iC e � • � ! . �� MAY-JUNE 1991 VOL. 8 7N 0. 3 THE MAGAZINE FOR MICRO AND PUB - BREWERS i M� o a — W n«.�M�pu�Opvnpyp G.nrw ww-N bp�p.r�M 1 aW Grsuw�p I .a..•G.a• p• ty BRcW1yGIL 1 1991 Industry Review Numbers Add Up to Growth Exporting to Japan • Micro Talk at ASBC 0 Beer of a Root COVER STC ! 1991 ' i a INDUSTRY1 . REVI W ' i An analysis of the statistics and notable trends in the U.S. and Canadian beer indus1`71'. with a special focus on nucrobreweries and pubbreweries. By David Edgar i LAST YEAR WAS BOTH GOOD AND price with imported beer brands. The bad for the U.S. brewing industry as a exact impact of the new tax will not be I tti whole: known for a while. however. because the j *The "big three" largest breweries posted increase only went into effect January 1. significant gains and the "little 200' mi- 1991. j crobreweries and brewpubs experienced O%erall.the U.S. brewing industry pro- considerable growth. but two large duced 184,478.000 barrels in 1990. an in- breweries closed and the regional and crease of 0.5 percent. During the year. the small-scale breweries continued to notions three largest breweries each post- struggle. ed significant gains. •Small breweries were virtually unaffect- U.S. Microbreweries ed by a new increase in the Federal Ex- The microbrewing industry enjo-ed cise Tax while the large breweries felt another year of growth in 1990. Total - its sting. production of micros and brewpubs was - -The state of Missouri passed a law al- 350.000 barrels. according to an estimate lowing brewpubs while the state of by the Institute for Brewing Studies. Michigan voted down a similar proposal. I While the industry grew just 22 percent _ Undoubtedly. the industry's most sig- in number of facilities — less than the _ nificant event of the year was the new in- rate of growth in 1989. it grew by 45 per- crease in the Federal Excise Tax (FET) cent during 1990 in total beer production. on beer. The FET doubled on beer pro- duced by large breweries. going from S9 to S18 per barrel. Smaller breweries (de- fined as those producing no more than 2 wBrewery. Boulder. Colo., is one successful brewpub that opened in 199 million barrels annually) received an ex- Bowen(left) Shown brewing are assistant Tom B (left) emption from the new tax on their first and brewmaster Mark Youngquist. 60.000 barrels of beer. The net effect for regional and micro breweries is that their brands still compete well in terms of 8 MAY-JUNE 1991 Percent Company Name Locatlon 1989 1990 Growth Nevada City Brewing Co. Nevada City,CA 639 660 3 Columbus Brewing Co.' Columbus,OH 230 600 N/A Santa Fe Brewing Co. Galisteo,NM 800 600 -25 Dallas Brewing Co. (formerly West End Brewing Co.)' Dallas,TX 200 500 N;A Lird Brewing Co.' San Leandro,CA 126 500 N/A Golden Pacific Brewing Co. Emeryville,CA 200 450 125 Electric Dave Brewery' South Bisbee,AZ 70 330 NiA Friends Brewing CoJ Helenboch Brewery" Helen,GA N/A 300 N/A Otto Brothers Brewing Co.' Jackson,WY 99 205 N/A Durango Brewing Co." Durango,CO N/A 200 N/A Oregon Trail Brewery Corvallis,OR 400 200 -50 Lakefront Brewery Milwaukee,WI 100 150 50 i Maritime Pacific Brewing Co." Seattle,WA N/A 150 N;A Charter Oak Brewing Co." Bristol,CT N/A 93 N:A Roslyn Brewing Co." Roslyn,WA N/A 82 NiA Etna Brewing Co." Etna,CA N/A 45 N/A I Bar Harbor Brewing" Bar Harbor,ME N/A 17 N"A J&L Brewing Co." San Rafael,CA N/A 7 N/A Albuquerque Brewing and Bottling Co. (closed in 1990) Albuquerque,N'M 150 N/A N/A Angeles Brewing Co. Chatsworth,CA N/A N/A NIA Chicago Brewing Co." Chicago,IL N/A N/A N/A Los Angeles Brewing Co./ Eureka Restaurant" Los Angeles,CA N/A N/A N/A Mad River Brewing Co." Blue Lake,CA N/A N/A N/A Obispo Brewing Co.' San Luis Obispo,CA NIA N/A N/A Pacific Brewing Co.(closed in 1990) Wailuku,Maui,HI N/A N/A N/A Paso Robles Brewing Co.'(closed in 1990) Paso Robles,CA 53 N/A N/A Reinheitsgebot Brewing Co. (closed in 1990) Plano, TX 900 N/A K'A Saxton Brewery(closed in 1990) Chico,CA 60 N/A `%A Snake River Brewing Co. Caldwell,ID N/A N/A NIA Among the top 30 micros in 1989• only allow for continued growth in production. i ter combined, and is the state's only four reported selling less beer in 1990. They were Mendocino Brewing Co.. De micro to package its beer for off premise Several micros dramatically increased schutes Brewery. Lakefront Brewer%. sales. their sales.The top two in growth, both in Catamount Brewing Co.,and Wild Goose Three draft-only micros opening in the Oregon. were Hood River Brewing Co. I Brewery. Widmer Brewing increased its I West were Maritime Pacific Brewing Co. — up 81 percent. and Widmer Brewing overall capacity by 4,000 barrels by in Seattle. Roslyn Brewing Co. in nearby Co. — up 62 percent. Growing by more I opening a new facility. Roslvn. Wash., and Durango Brewing than 30 percent were Han Brewing Co. Microbreweries that did not f_e so Co. in Colorado. and Hale's alenor s in Washington: Bridge- well in 1990 included D.L. Geary Brew- California added three more draft-and- inCo. in Maine, which suffered a 25 bottling micros, all in thethern half of port Brewing Co. and Deschutes Brewery in Oregon: Coeur D'Alene Brewing Co. I percent decline in sales compared to the state: Etna Brewing Co..1 & L Brew- in Idaho: and in California, Mendocino I 1989, and Boulder Brewing Co. in Col- ing Co.. and Mad River Brewing Co. Brewing Co.. Bay Brewing/Devil Moun- I orado. off by 32 percent for its second Connecticut sot its second and third tain. Anderson Valley Brewing Co., San straight year of decline. At one point micros: New England Brewing Co. and Andreas Brewing Co.. and North Coast Boulder Brewingnearly shut do%, but Charter Oak Brewing Co. Georgia got its Brewine Co. ` attracted new investors. first when Friends Brewing Co./Helen- Farther east. micros with similar gains In 1990. 16 micros opened in the U.S. boch Brewery opened in the tiny moun �� Fa Summit Brewing with is Minnesota. Two high-profile. well-capitalized macros tain town of Helen. Helenboch products Sprecher Brewin: Co. and Lakefront i that opened were Chicago Brewin_ Co. formerly were brewed under contract at Brewery both in Wisconsin, Franken- 1 in Chicago and Los Angeles Bre•ging August Schell and have been on the mar mUth Bfe��eCv IR Michigan. Mass. Bay Co./Eureka Restaurant in Los An_eles. ket in the Atlanta area for a year. Brewing Co. in Boston, and Clement The smaller-scale micro Old Don-:nion Also opening in 1990 were three Brewing Co. (formerly Vernon Valley) in Brewing Co. is the first in the Wa.nins "backyard" or "basement" micros — so- Brewing lersev. ton. D.C. area. Buffalo Brewing Co. Ab- called because the breweries are installed A number of successful microbrew- bott Square in New York is a micro]-rev on property of private residences. Thev eves expanded their facilities in 1990 to ery. restaurant, beer hall and banquet cen- are Great Northern Brewing Co. in %ton 1991 MAY-JUNE 11 Estimated Taxable Production of Canadian Microbreweries :k11 figures in hectoliters. 'Denotes new in 1989. (Percent change not applicable since 1989 figures do not represent a full year of production.) ••Denotes new in 1990. Percent Comoany Name Locatlon 1988 1990 Growth The Northern Algonquin Brewing Co.' Formosa,ON N/A 16,000 N;A Granville Island Brewing Co. Vancouver,BC 12,000 11,000 -8 Vancouver Island Brewing Co. (formerly Island Pacific) Victoria,BC 8,000 11,000 38 Creemore Springs Brewery Creemore,ON 7,500 9,500 27 Brasserie McAuslan' Montreal,PQ 3,827 8,600 N%A Brasal-Brasserie Allemande" Lasalle, PQ N/A 8,000 N%A Les Brasseurs du Nord Inc. St.Jerome, PQ 4,300 8,000 86 Les Brasseurs G.I.T. Montreal,PQ 4,300 5,600 30 Bavarian Specialties(Canada)Ltd. Hans Haus Brewery Riverview,NB 4,000 5,000 25 Shairebury Brewing Co.Ltd. Vancouver,BC N/A 5,000 N;A Whistler Brewing Co.' Whistler,BC 900 4,600 N/A La Brasserie Portneuvoise• St.Casimir,PQ N/A 4000 N/A Massawippi Brewing Co.Inc. Lennoxville,PQ 3,100 4,000 29 Niagara Falls Brewing Co.' Niagara Falls,ON 1,030 3,300 N;'A Strathcona Brewing Co.Inc. Edmonton,AB 3,200 2,000 -38 Golden Lion Brewing Co. Lennoxville,PQ N/A 1,000 N/A York Brewery Brampton,ON N/A 1,000 NA Horseshoe Bay Brewery Horseshoe Bay,BC N/A 984 N/A Bixel Brewery" Brantford,ON N/A 246 N.'A Sunshine Coast Brewers Ltd. Sechelt,BC N/A 93 N,A Burlington Brewing Co.(closed in 1990) Burlington,ON 200 N/A NIA Conners Brewing Co.(closed in 1990) Don Mills,ON 8,400 N/A N:A Great Lakes Brewing Co. Brampton,ON 980 N/A N;A Renegade Brewery Corp.(closed in 1990) Thunder Bay,ON 2,700 N/A N.'A Sculler Brewing Co.Ltd.(closed in 1990) St.Catharines,ON 840 N/A NIA The Ottawa Valley Brewing Co.Inc. (closed in 1990) Nepean,ON 4,000 N/A N;'A Wallington County Brewery Ltd. Guelph,ON 5,000 N/A NrA Wheatley Brewery(closed in 1990) Wheatley,ON 500 N/A N,A Bavarian Specialties/Hanshaus Brewery. While each case is different.the factors i fident that the industry will survive. Al- the only micro in New Brunswick, was j contributing to the six Ontario closings i ready there are two micros under con- up by _26 percent. were attributed to lack of operating capi- ! struction in Ontario set to open by sum- Ontario Aas beset by closures includ- tat. poor management. and insufnciem i mer 1991. ine Conners Brewing Co.. Ottawa Valley I sales. In addition, the competition for j Br_win2 Co.. Renegade Brewery, Sculler shelf and tap space is fierce because most Canadian Brewpubs Brewin, Co.. Wheatley Brewery, and Ontario micros are in the Greater Toronto In terms of beer sales. Canadian brew Burlington Brewing Co. Not all the news area. According to Charles MacLean of pubs fared well. was bad. ho«ever. One brewery opened j CIBA. by mid-1990. the Toronto market Ontario's Amsterdam Brasserie in —the Bi.xel Brewery in Brantford. was flooded with 40 brands of micro- Toronto sold 1.500 hi. 46 percent more At its peak. Ontario had 14 micros in a brewed beer. than in 1989. Its sister brewpub. Rotter- province of 9 million people — a very 1 Furthermore. extremely high taxis and ! dam Brewing Co.. sold 1.000 hl, a 31 hi,-,h densit,,. For example. if California high raw materials costs contribut. to a percent increase.The third Toronto brew- were to reach the same level of saturation very low margin for Canadian n::cros. pub. Denison's Brewing Co./Growlers as Ontario in terms of micros per capita. Taxes account-for more than 50 percent Restaurant sold 1.250 hl in its first year it would need 37 — 17 more than it now of the retail price of beer in Canada. and in operation. The Master's Brasserie and has. Ho%�e\,er. the average capacity of a only Norway. Ireland. and lcelan� ha\.e Brewpub in Ottawa also reported good California micro is roughly two-thirds of ! higher tares. Canadian micros pa\ t%%o sales. with a 39 percent increase. its counterpart in Ontario. To reach the Federal tares: Excise Duty [S_-.936 In British Columbia. Swans Brew Same level of capacity that Ontario had at Canadian per hectoliter (hl)) and G.S.T. pub/Buckerfield Brewery enjoyed Sales its peak in terns of per capita. California (7 percent). Additionally. Ontario micros of 1.500 hl in 1990. would need 62 micros.or more than three pay four other provincial taxes. In Quebec. La Cervoise (formerly Le times its current number. Despite the closures. MacLean i> con- Bar Cervoise) in Montreal sold 426 hl. 1991 MAY-JUNE 15 Estimated Taxable Production of Large North American Breweries X11 figures in U.S. Barrels. Percent Company Nama Location 1989 1990 Growth Anheuser-Busch Inc. St. Louis,MO 50,700,000 83,300,000 5 Mixer Brewing Co. Milwaukee,W'I 41,780,000 43,300,000 4 Coors Brewing Co. Golden,CO 17,370,000 19,000,000 8 Stroh Brewery Co. Detroit,MI 18,460,000 16,400,000 G. Heileman Brewing Co.Inc. LaCrosse,WI 13,200,000 12,000,000 9 Pabst Brewing Co. Milwaukee,W1 6,330,000 6,600,000 Genesee Brewing Co.Inc. Rochester, NY 2,240,000 2,200,000 -2 Latrobe Brewing Co. Latrobe, PA 630,000 700,000 5 Hudepohl-Schoenling Brewing Co. Cincinnati,OH 420,000 515,000 23 Evansville Brewing Co. Evansville,IN N/A 330,000 N A Joseph Huber Brewing Co. Monroe, WI 70,000 83,000 2' .august Schell Brewing Co.Inc. New L1m,MN 20,000 N/A `A Carling O'Keefe Ltd. North York,ON N/A N/A N A Cold Spring Brewing Co.Inc. Cold Spring,MP1 10,000 N/A N A F.X.Matt Brewing Co. Utica,NY 150,000 N/A N/A Falstaff Brewing Corporation Fort Wayne,IN 520,000 ti/A `%A Labatt Brewing Co.Ltd. London,ON N/A N/A VIA Lion IncJGibbons Stegmaier Brewery Wilkes-Barre,PA 170,000 N/A N,A Molson Breweries of Canada Ltd. Toronto,ON N/A N/A `ua Moosehead Breweries Ltd. Saint John,N$ N/A N/A NiA Oland Breweries Ltd. Halifax,NS N/A N/A N/A Pear?Brewing Co. San Antonio,TX 340,000 N/A NiA Pittsburgh Brewing Co. Pittsburgh,PA N/A N/A N/A ;hart and making it the second most pop- irl St. Paul, and in early 1991 filed Chap- Liquors-3 percent: Dry Beers-3 per- -ular beer in the nation for the eighth year ter 11. Pabst Brewing Co. staved rlat. cent: and Super Premium— .4 percent. in a row. The Milwaukee's Best brand 1 Genesee Brewing Co. was off slightly: crew by 9 percent. and its 4.2 percentI and Latrobe Brewing Co . increased '-) 15 Overaajorll Ca adian Breweries i Canada was marketshare bumped Miller High Life out percent. of the `umber Six position. High Life 1 Hudepohl-Schoenling sold 31`.000 down 0.5 percent. according [o figures fell by 10 percent. making its market- ; barrels in 1990, a 31 percent increase. from the Brewers Association of Canada. share 3.5 percent. Sales of Miller Gen- The S & P Corp. family of bre«enes. Total sales of bottled beer tell by 2.8 per uine Draft increased by ?4 percent(or 3.3 which includes Pabst. General. Pear'.. and i cent. Canned beer sales rose by 7.9 per- million barrels), giving it a 3 percent Falstaff Brewing Companies, closed the ; cent. Draft sales were up :.4 percent. marketshare 1.25-million barrel Falstaff brewery in I This marks the third straight year of Coors Brewing Co. posted a 9 percent Ft. Wayne. Ind. decline for the Canadian brewing indus- lain in 1990. the largest gain posted by a On a more positive note. Miller Brew- try. One reason cited is an aging Canadi- lar_�e brewery. Coors now commands a ing Co. will be opening its multi-million- an population that is trying to live health- l0 percent marketshare. It moved from barrel Trenton.Ohio facility this year. ier. and thus is drinking less. Another fac being 770.000 barrels behind Stroh Light beers, dry beers and non-.ilco- for is price: the less-expensive U.S. im- Brewery Co. to being 3 million barrels holic "brews" won increased mirket ports such as Lone Star, Olympia and ahead of it. Coors Light increased by 11 share in 1990. The "premium" seznent Rainier are available to compete with percent. holding on to the Number Three (including products such as Budweiser Canadian beers on which are levied exor- spot with a 6.1 percent marketshare. Its and Miller High Life) decreased. The bitant federal and provincial taxes. On the flagship Coors brand slipped 18 percent. -popular" or"price" brands (such as Nlil- average. taxes make up 53 percent of the do%\,n to a 2.2 percent marketshare. The waukee's Best and Old Milwaukee, de- retail price of Canadian domestic beer. company was bolstered by the success of creased just slightly. Malt liquors showed to Cne of the shutdown inen larae 1990 atfere henMes olsond- its new popular-priced entry. Keystone, no change in marketshare. The "aper which performed remarkably well in its premium" segment (represented by Trod Carling O'Keefe mercer in 1989 was put first full year on the market. uc[s like Michelob) continued its eighth chased by its employees and renamed Great western Brewing Co. The 250.000- Stroh declined by t'_ percent. Its t6 straight year of decline. Sas- million barrels sales represented an 8 per- According to Beverage Industre raga hl facility is located in Saskatoon. Sas cent marketshare. Its best selling brand, zine. the marketshares of the diff.-rem katchewan. Great Gwestern Litern La2er an ght�are�its new brands. 01�i ylilwaukee, fell by S percent in 1990. segments are as follows: Premium—,I., Great e early 1991 the owners of Labatt G. Heileman Brewing Co. was down percent: Light-28 percent: Popu:ar- 5.7 percent. It closed its Schmidt brewery I ?1.9 percent. Imports--4.5 percent: Malt Brewing Co. held talks with several com 1991 MAY–JUNE 17 Estimated Sales of United States Contract Brewing Companies All figures in U.S. Barrels. •Denotes new in 1989. (Percent change not applicable since 1989 figures do not represent a full year of production.) ! •'Denotes new in 1990. Percent Company Name Locatlon 1999 1990 Growth Boston.Beer Co.(includes in-house production) Jamaica Plain,MA 80,000 113,000 41 New Amsterdam Brewing Co. (formerly Old New York Brewing Co.) New York,NY 13.000 13,300 3 Pate's Brewing Co. Palo Alto,CA 3,000 11,700 134 Dock Street Brewing Co. Bala Cynwyd,PA 9,800 10,000 2 Brooklyn Brewery Brooklyn, NY 5,000 7,000 40 Pennsylvania Brewing Co. Pittsburgh, PA 3,500 6,000 71 Gator Lager Beer Inc.' Orlando,FL N/A 5,803 NIA Connecticut Brewing Co.' Elmwood,CT N/A 5,000 N, i Kershenstine Diamond Europa,MS 4,528 4,354 4 Mill Bakery,Brewery&Eatery Gainesville,FL N/A 2,623 NiA Dakota Brewing Co." Grand Forks,ND N/A 2,000 N,A Olde Heurich Brewing Co. Washington,D.C. 1,814 1,995 10 Telluride Beer Co.Inc. Telluride,CO 1,368 1,436 5 Alabama Brewing Co.(closed in 1990) Huntsville,AL 1,130 1,400 22 Old City Brewing Co. Austin,TX N/A 1,389 N;A { Sun Valley Brewing Co. Sun Valley,ID 680 1,100 62 Old Marlborough Brewing Co.' Marlborough,MA 378 1,078 N(A Georgia Brewing Co.' Atlanta,GA 330 990 NiA j Stoudt Brewing Co. Adamstown,PA N/A 900 NiA ! Atlantic City Brewing Co." Atlantic City,NJ N/A 385 N/A Blue Hen Beer Co.*' Newark,DE N/A 259 NIA Aspen Beer Co.' Aspen,CO 200 218 N/A j I Ambler Brewing Inc. Milwaukee,WI 312 1 -100 Brardevor Inc. Seattle,WA N/A Braumeister Inc. Drexel Hill,PA N/A N;A N,A � i Cajun Brewing Co.(closed Nov.89)' Paw Paw,MI NIA NZA N A j Cleveland Brewing Co. Cleveland,OH N/A N/A N A Coastal Brewing Inc. (formerly Maine Coast Brewing) Portland,ME 2,000 N/A N/A Eugene City Brewing Co.(closed in 1990) Eugene,OR 260 N/A N/A Federal Hill Brewing Co.' Forest,VA N/A N/A N/A Friends Brewing Co.' Atlanta,GA 300 N/A N A Hope Brewing Corp. Providence,RI 4,000 N/A NiA Jersey Lager Beer Co.' Bordentown,NJ N/A N/A N/A Long Island Brewery Co.' Huntington,NY 580 N/A N/A Manhattan Brewing Co. New York,NY 1,403 N/A N/A Mass.Bay Brewing Co. Boston,MA 3,500 N/A N%A McGuire's Irish Pub&Brewery" Pensacola,FL N/A N/A N.'A McKenzie River Corp. San Francisco,CA 40,000 NIA NIA Smith and Reilly Vancouver,WA N/A N/A NiA Stillwater Brewing Co. Whitefish,MT N/A N/A NiA Thousand Oaks Brewing Co. Berkeley,CA N/A N/A NA Vail Brewery Co. Vail,CO 550 N/A N/A William Penn Brewing Co. Langhorne,PA 36 N/A N/A William S.Newman Brewing Co. Albany,NY N/A N/A N/A Z616 Brewing Co. Seattle,WA 900 N/A N'A - { I I The Boston Beer Co. continues to ex- by its flagship Samuel Adams Boron states lacking micros or brewpubs. Frank emplify success in contract brewing. Laser. Boston Beer sold 113.000 b�-rels Jones Ale is New Hampshire's new beer. pro\ing, perhaps. that the consumer is in 1990. 41 percent more than in 1u39. an India pale ale from D. Jones Ltd. Pres more concerned wi[h the quality and caste Besides using the Pittsburgh Bre,. ing ident Don Jones discovered that he is a of a beer than where the beer comes Co.. Boston now also contracts with Ore- distant relative to Frank Jones of the from. . good illustration of this, accord gon's Blitz-Weinhard. giving it a pr.�uc Frank Tones brewery that operated in ing to owner Jim Koch. is that the tom- tion site more proximate to westem -tar- New Hampshire from the late 1800s to 19x9. Don found the brewery's original pan,,*s sales did not increase after it kets. opened its microbrewery in Boston. Led Three new contracted brands arri«1 in recipes and followed them in formulating 1991 MAY-JUNE 19 small-brewer rate of S7 per barrel on the No More Best Beers aluminum is greater than the cost to recy- first 60.000 barrels produced. Production ONE INTERESTING NOTE CON- Cie it. beyond 60.000 is taxed at the new higher ceming the Association of Brewers' California's new recycling tax applies rate of S 18 per barrel. Great American Beer Festival: last to all beer and soft drinks sold in Califor- The initial Federal Budget proposal in- year it discontinued its Consumer nia. Besides the tax on glass containers. ,:luded a change in the definition of a Preference Poll, a popularity contest there are also new recycling tares on small brewer. It put the small brewer at a in which Festival attendees voted for plastic and non-aluminum metal contain- 60.000-barrel annual production. and the their favorite beer. ers. The tax does not affect Mass jars. small brewer's exemption was applicable When GABF directors realized wine bottles. or juice containers. and ap- only to its first 30.000 barrels produced. that participation in the poll had pears to have been targeted pnmarily at Had this initial proposal passed. it would dwindled to 10 percent, they con- beer and soft drink manufacturers. ha,e been a damaging blow to regional ceeded the poll no longer truly repre- breweries. many of which already are sented the audience's preferences. The Future struggling. and to the larger micros on the Furthermore it stole the show from i What doth the crystal stein behold" ht's ,.erge of expanding to regional stature. the GABF Professional Panel Blind difficult to say: there's a slight chill haze But thanks to a number of small brewers Tasting, which uses qualified brew- clouding our vision of the future. It's and their congressional representatives. ers to judge the beers according to likely. however. that overall U.S. beer [he definition remained at 2 million bar- style. And so. the Consumer Prefer- sales will be flat or slightly off in 1991 rely production.and the tax exemption for ence Poll was terminated. It was not because of the combined effects of the the first 60.000 barrels. missed at the 1990 GABF, and many new FET and the nation's current eco This was a major triumph for small brewers hailed the decision to can it. nomic recession. "Popular" or "price" brewers. Those who worked hard to help May it rest in peace. brands may see the greatest gains. secure the small brewers' exemption i The older regional breweries already were the Small Brewers Coalition led by Imports operating on slim profit margins may fall Ken Lichtendahl of Hudepohl-Schoen- TOTAL SALES OF IMPORTS IN victim to the sluggish economy. But the ting. Kurt Widmer of Widmer Brewing the U.S. in 1990 stood at 8.783.000 small brewers' tax break provided a good Co.. Jim Koch of Boston Beer Co.. Steve barrels, up 3 percent over 1989. but shot in the arm for those that have been Dinehart of Chicago Brewing Co., and overall, the marketshare of imports struggling. Chris Welles of Virginia Brewing Co. remained at 4.5 percent. Existing micros and brewpubs proba- .All members of the brewing industry The leading import, Heineken. bly will continue to Co. This might be need to be wary of neoprohibitionist, or was down by 4 percent. Nonetheless. tempered. however. if consumersweak- --temperance." measures, occurring at the brand still accounts for a quarter ened buying power makes them more city. county. state. and Federal levels. of the category's sales, far ahead of price conscious and less inclined to These measures may include proposals second-place Corona Extra. which choose a microbrewed beer when they for higher tares on alcohol. restrictions makes up 10 percent of import sales. brei[ a bar or package shore. The small brewer tax exemption should help keep on the availability of alcohol, or efforts for regulations or limitations on produc- Sales of Corona decreased by 24 the price of micro and brewpub beers percent. level. however, and consumers may ers. distributors or retailers of alcoholic A close third is Beck's. which in- choose microbrewed brands over import- beyerages- creased slightly in 1990, command- ed brands when seeking a full-flavored The State of Florida established a new ing a 9.2 percent marketshare. product. type of tax that is levied at the retail level as of Jul1. 1990. The new tax is l0 Imports in the U.S. are likely to New micros and brewpubs will contin- y suffer greater losses in 1991 because ue to open although the growth in the cents per ounce of liquor, 10 cents per of the excise tax exemption for small number of operations may be less than it four ounces of wine. and 4 cents per 12 p p ounces of beer that retail establishments i domestic brewers. This exemption was in 1990. Despite the economic cli- w- means that most microbres and se- mate. however. there will remain un- purchase and serve. Restaurants and bars lected brewery regional ds will must pay the tax to the state based on the g ry brantapped markets that are ripe for the ar volume of their purchases and subsquent be more price-competitive with the rival of fresh.craft-brewed beers. imports than they have been in the Meanwhile, keen attention must be sales. past. In California in 1990.citizens defeated I paid to the activity of state legislatures. Proposition 13.1, known as the "nickel a lest measures restricting alcohol and fa- Proposition the will of groups drink" tax, by more than two to one. The "temperance" proposal would have raised taxes by 30 value of containers and the cost of ^:cy- be passed through state legislatures be cents per six-pack of beer. 25 cents per cling and processing the containers. The fore brewers and consumers are even bottle of wine. and $1.27 per bottle of processing fee is .00659 cents per =lass aware of them. Forming state associa- distilled spirits. container. which amounts to 15.6 rents tions of breweries. such as those that at However. California brewers were sur- per case of 24 bottles, or S2.18 per -an el ready exist in Oregon and California. is prised in early 1991 to team of a new tax of bottled beer sold. For beer packa_:d in one way small brewers can strengthen imposed by the State Department of Con- '_2-ounce bottles. it works out to .ent their forces in the face of neoprohibition seri ation. Division of Recycling. The tax per case. or S 1.19 per barrel. Draft te.r is ist activities. This can ensure that brew is called a "processing fee." and was de- not affected. Nor is beer packaged 17 alts- ers' opinions will be heard and their vised to cover the gap between the scrap minum taxed because the scrap va'.-e of needs addressed. 1991 MAY—JUNE 21 Estimated Taxable Production Estimated Taxable Production of United States Microbreweries of Canadian Mlcrobreweries (figured in US barrels) 2'4'M (figured in hectoliters) 74 out of 85 microbreweries reporting. 20 out of 26 micro- ;a 5ca Figures from 1979 to 1984 breweries reporting. Induce brewpubs. Begiring 1969, Figures from 1979 totais from Serra Nevada Brewing Co. to 1984 Included and Redhook Ae Brewery no brewpubs. Beginning longer Induced. 1988, totals from Upper Canada Brewirg Co. no longer included. 3•.sr9t37 n5 Beginning 1990,total from Okanagan Sonrg Brewery no'•anger Included. tm.�22 tS62� Ie,rQf e2t2 t e.779 952 2.250 7.S0 •.!m e,eeo eA5 tsar MMO 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 67 88 89 90 82 33 84 85 86 97 88 89 30 i Alt Estimated Taxable Production Estimated Taxable Production of United States Brewpubs 8249 of Canadian Brewpubs (figured in US barrels) (figured in hectoliters) 107 out of 124 brewpubs reporting. 1990 estimated for 42 brewpu--s based on 16-495 hi reported by 33 brewpubs. ++9a u.as 32.� a 992 7.9at 2.3M 11,113 t•em 4n L—��, 1 -1 85 88 87 88 89 90 85 86 87 dd 89 90 1991 MAY-JUNE 7-3 9 DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING PERMIT NO._��. -- } CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH,FLORIDA 1 j Q•rnVT- PERMIT TO BUILD 1 /� / • THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOB �OpCACG i Date March 3 19 8R t7fJi1I Valuation$ 34.540.00 Fee$___148.�50 j ( This permit not valid until above fee has been paid to City Treasurer,and is subject to revocation for violation of applicable provisions of law. i This is to certify that Call (' trnr-1-inn P O.Box 50614 J.B. 32240 I , has permission to build Office with Warehousing i Variance Granted 9/15/87 Classification New Commercial Zone CG Owned by Callander Wh eler 7 Block 38 S/D SPS - Lot House N7 55 West Eighth Street According to approved plans which are part of this permit NOTICE— IL CON ETE FORMS I = AND FOOTINGS MUST BE IN- SPECTED BEFORE POURING. PERMIT VOID SIX MONTHS _n AFTER DATE OF ISSUE O Building material, rubbish and debris --' Z from this work must not b plat d in public space, and must ale e up and hauled away by ei eit, co 1 or or owner. t B ' 'ng Official. FOR OFFICE PERMIT DATE CONTRACTOR USE ONLY NOTE: PLUMBING NOTE: Ex e tion re ired to ELECTRICAL of ice with s orage/warehousem gg • I SEWER WATER '3o- 14- Address /Address O T, � � 9 S D ft J'� Q @ $ �1. $ Mated Square Footage .. er sq 30 � � @ $ ,oe er sq _ / fCa $ Garage/Shed . @ $ per sgfcb $ Carport/Porcher s ft " $ q Deck mer• sq ft = $ Patio @ $ — '10'1'AL VALUA:IION t 54 �oCai�a�ual oillsc $ :�5�0. BO . . �• • a o a 1Lai�aiii�ValvaCiott •'' �ousatt or • .. • ` �-�3 - - portion-thereof 'local Building Fee :. NJUITjQj,L,1L, L I' 1ZILU •S acid/orILLS MQUIiu:D - i -} Filing Fee,.- 'Fireplaces ee ''Fireplaces @ J 5.00 $------___—� l� 11ecltatiical BUII,UING1PEiZMIT Plulbilig Electric/Nett ✓ �____ ____________ _ Electric/TEiiq) c/ BUILDOG•PEUlj: ' Septic TalkWAiLIt ML1LIt.C11 cal $ $�.� DU SL sWillidlig Pool — WA1M 7MP11CC ILL Sign r11SCuJim,OUS $ Water Cotuiectiott ✓ :. • ' " ' $ Sewer Cotutectiott c/ $ 1-later Meter Elevation Certificate' GiZANll TU1L1L DUE $ 3 .�— --------------- CALCUL rjOt,dS-and/or-NOI'LS- V . • • . �,r,�•.•:�;•• ..�. � gni i - City of Atlantic Beach Fixture Unit Worksheet :dor Water .Impact Fee FIXTURE UNITS ARE ESTABLIS14ED AS THE MEASUREMENT OF WATER DEMAND FOR EACH WATER FIXTURE UNIT' INSTALLED AND CONNECTED .TO THE CITY WATER SYSTEM. THE WATER SUPPLY CHARGE IS HEREBY FIXED AT TEN DOLLARS PER FIXTURE UNIT CONNECTED TO TIMCITY WATER SYSTEM. v' SE D BATHROOl1 GROUP CONSISTING OF ___ RVICE SINKTRAP STAND (8) -WATER CLOSET, LAVATORY & BATH TUB OR SHOWER STALL (6) _ _WATER CLOSET VALVE • YALVE 2_ WATER CLOSET, TANK OPERATED (4) OPERATED (8) BATIITUB/SHOWER ' (2) _ ___URINAL WALL LIP (4) FLOOR DRAIN ( 1) SHOWER GROUP PER HEAD (3) D--SHOWER STALL .DOMESTIC (2) _LAUNDRY TRAY (2) /__LAVATORY ( 1 ) _ _ _COMBINATION SINK AND TRAY (3 -�_WASHING MACHINE (3) --- -POT, SCULLERY SINK (4) DISHWASHER (2) _WASH SINK EACH SET OF FAUCETS (2) __KITCIIEN SINK (2) DENTAL LAVA'T'ORY (1) _KITCHEN SINK WITH WASTE DENTAL UNIT OR CUSPIDOR (1) GRI14DEII (3) --- _ _ BIDGET (3) _ __URINAL STALL, WASHOUT (4) - -FLUSHING RIM SINK '(8) ' __ __COMBINATION SINK AND TRAY WI FOOD DISPOS. (4) _ URIIIAL, PEDESTAL, SYPHON JET DRINKING FOUNTAIN (1/2) BLOWOUT (8) --- - . LAVATORY, BARBER/BEAUTY ` LAVATORY, SURGEONS (2) SHOP (2) ----- • SURGEONS SINK (3) �-ICE MAKER (1/2) _ ---- 00 TOTAL FIXTURE UNITS__Z� @ X10. 00 EACIT /_�;_________--- JOB IN FOR HAT IOU__,L__T_ CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT Owner11 -F Addreszip -----� ob r 1 h �� Phone Z�� ' Z 6 `S Architect Address zip Phone Contractor, e,. �. Address Q Qox 5 (,1y Q zip y 0 Phone_Z - Contractor's License Number (, b0 I 1 g 9 3 Expiration Date Copy on File Lot �� Block or Section # 3 S Subdivision 6, H zoning--L(7, Street Between �0," � �� and O��`, l`. side Valuation $ Type of Construction p cy Purpose of Building ,c tWa e V- o u 5 e Nu-nber of Units Fireplaces - O - Utility Service: Water V Sewer ✓ If the City if providing water or sewer service, do we need to make taps? Dimensions : Building 30 X Sl Lot Size Footings (Q X Z Sz. Piers Sz. Sills Greatest Span Sills 20 1 Sz. Ceiling Joists Distance on Centers Greatest Span Sz. Floor Joists Distance on Centers Greatest Span Sz. Rafters - �� Distance on Centers �\ Greatest Span c36 �, Method of Heating Solid-Filled Ground Roof � �Ih S�ec _ Flood Zone If located within a FLOOD HAZARD complete page 2 SUBMIT: Two complete sets of plans, including a detailed site plan. Florida Energy Efficiency Code Sheets Recent Survey Inspections Required: _ r©oT,AD 6S- 1. When steel is in place and ready to pour footings. L�7h�3f�b 2. When steel is in place and ready to pour columns/li nt 5 e rt o N o I When steel is in place and ready to pour beam. 4. When framing, mechanical, pllmnbing, electrical, fireplace, is completed and ready to cover up. 5. Final inspection. SETBACKS NO INSPECTION WILL BE MADE IF BUILDING CARD IS NOT POSTED ON JOB. Rear Lot Line In case of rejection, reLnspection MUST be called for after ✓ _ corrections are made. kn In consideration of permit given for doing the c„ 3©, S' work as described in the above statement, we a hereby agree to perform said work in accordance with the attached plans and specifications, �' c which are a part hereof, and in accordance v� with the building regulations of Atlantic Beach. r' Signature Owner-d Signature Contracto ✓ O N Tont Lot Line PLANS REVIEW CHECK LIST Address -------Owner-� - ----------------- Legal Descriptionc_7 f� 3LContractor -------------- -------------------License Number_FQx- 0019923 j --------- License on File YES NO Section 24-101 * Zoning Regulations Zoning District _ GProposed Use Required Lot Size_11 ---- Actual Lot Size2D Setbacks Required Provided Section 24-17 front _ � _ CORNER LOT INTERIOR LOT rear Flood Zone I side-1 side-2 j Required Elevation-/')/7___ Max. Height Allowed yProposed Height_ /_ Section 24-82 * Minimum Lot Coverage Required Heated Area -_._____ Proposed Area....Lo-(____ Section 24-161 * Offstreet Parking Number Spaces Required__lr` ` ¢/ Spaces Provided i � T ib.eA-tee- - -- Section 24_82 * Duplicate Buildings Is there a similar building within 500' of proposed building?YES Utilities Water and sewer service is to be provided by: Buccaneer Utilities City of Atlantic Beach Utilities Private Source SEPTIC TANK WELL Plans Reviewed b Dateq/ko"�3��F0 y ---------- ---------------- --------- Building Permit #_?6-y-___ ISSUED DENIED MAP SHOWING SURVEY OF LOT 7 BLOCK 38, SECTION "H" ATLANTIC BEACH AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 18 PAGE 34 OF THE CURRENT PUBLIC RECORDS OF DUVAL COUN'T'Y, FLORIDA. 1 66 � 1 39 ( ro �OOG� �GGG �OOG� FND. //1"REBAR FNO. 11Z'I.P. L.BNo. Jl0/ S. 6948'00"E. 50.00NO CAP O.J � �Ohc�� t• 1!) O �%'A IV O 6 WOOD (v 1 PRIVACY FENCE Q) ro 1 8 ro '! 3 �OGS �rk o o n N r ?AR j<� N & N 320.0 FND.//1 REBAR J N. 6 9 48'00"W `��C 0.00 I ` L.B.NO.3/01 FND. 1/1"/.P. / _�FNO. J/I /. P. R.L.S. No. 3195 NO C A P MAP SHOWING SURVEY OF LOT 7 BLACK 38, SECTION "Li" ATLANTIC BEACH AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 18 PAGE 34 OF THE CURRENT PUBLIC RECORDS OF DUVAL COUNTY, FTARIDA. ro ( 63 �0� G� X00 �0 C, 9 g�00 FND. //2"REBAR FND. //2"I.P. L.BNo. 3/0/ NO CAP S. 69°48'00"E. 50.00' 0.5' O 6, W000 N nl PRIVACY FENCE O � ro 0� 69 �� OG � OG W LAJI Ot W 3 N Q) o Q) a 320.0 FND.//2"REBAR f N. 6 9°48'00"W. 50.00' \ L.B.No.3/0/ FND. l/2"/.P. / \ FNO. 3/I" /. P. R.L.S. No. 3293 \ NO C A P WEST 8th. S T REE T NO T£S: 50 ' R/W (PAVED) ttt��--- /J BEAR/NGS AS PER PLAT 2) NO B. R. L . AS PER PLAT I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE PROPERTY SI1CWN HEREON LIES IN FTAOD ZONE "C" AS SHOWN ON THE FLOOD HAZARD BOUNDARY MAP FOR ATLAN'T'IC BEACH, FLORIDA. I HEREBY CERTIFY TO ALLAN S. WHEELER, ROBERT J. CALLANDER, AMERICAN TITLE THAT I HAVE r BtT.: Henry Dean, Executive Director Mildred G.Horton,Assistant Executive Director WATER John R.Wehle,Assistant Executive Director MANAGEMENT POST OFFICE BOX 1429 • PALATKA,FLORIDA 32078-1429 DISTRICT 904/328-8321 ❑2133 N.Wickham Rd. ❑7775 Baymeadows Way ❑618 E.South St. Melbourne,FL 32935-8109 Suite 201 Orlando, FL 32801 (407)254-1761 Jacksonville, i730FL 32256 (407)894-5423 Hand Delivery 70 April 21, 1989 Mr. David Callender Callender Construction Company P. O. Box 50614 Jacksonville Beach, Florida 32240 Re : Application No. 42-031-1255 AN Warehouse Facility Dear Mr. Callender: The St. Johns River Water Management District has reviewed the above referenced project and has deterined it to be in com- pliance with Rule 40C-42, F.A.C. A permit has been issued and will be mailed to you shortly. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, Everett Frye, Engineer Department of Resource Management EF:ot cc : Records Larry Gerry KELLEY R. SMITH, JR. SAUNDRA H. GRAY RALPH E. SIMMONS JOHN L. MINION Secretary-DeBary Treasurer-Fernandina Beach Chairman-Vero Beach Vice Chairman-Palatka JOE E. HILL SAM L. SWETT ALICE J. WEINBERG JIM T. SWANN THOMAS L. DURRANCE Leesburg Jacksonville Longwood Cocoa Holly Hill CITY OF 716 OCEAN BOULEVARD _ P.O.BOX 25 ---- -- ATLANTIC BEACH,FLORIDA 32233 TELEPHONE(904)249-2395 April 3, 1989 Mr. Robert Callander Callander Construction Company P. O. Box 50614 Jacksonville Beach, Florida 32250 RE: 55 West Eighth Street, Atlantic Beach Commercial/Office Building Dear Mr. Callander, This is to advise that the final building inspection has been made for the above referenced project and has been found to be satisfactory. When the St. John's River Water Management District issues the storm water runoff permit please bring a copy to our office so that we can issue a Certificate of Occupancy and release the building to JEA for electrical service. Tcer�l Se y, ,SneAnrs Community ve ee e. 'Director cc:file 000219 DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH INFORMA pE:Rt1i'1' INFORPIATIOU -._ _-__. _. J -- - ('max m.it Numt��r : 2.1'9 Adcixess c- - ----- WEST 8TH 's'fRE.k:T A'T'LAtJ FLORIDA 3223 E?Ersn)it. 'F'yE� FLE.CTRICAL -- - -- ------ LEGAL UE:SCRIPrioti _ _--____ WOL k : NEW : Section: C fyFt : Lut s Block iayrO jPlat Buck P1 opc_ised Use: COMMERCIAL Subdivision: I'sweli.inys ' U Ccid -: O - - _ OWNER 1NF'ORHATION ------ ' :-A £ timated Value: '3U. 00 _ _ -- Improv. GOOL : �U. 00 Karn BOB CALL.At[UE:F2 fFl F��eua 1940. 00 Addrets�s 3 55 WEST f3' S'CREF."f v40. 00 ATLANTIC BEACH, FLORIDA 3223 3 Amount Paid: F'i)canF: (904)29f, -�i'l'31 yjf?i"Ir [)Pf;�:. : �':�• '�,/).ir '�.r)�1<3111�,11-`., F�.IlAlil, 1�1:1y 150amp 1p1,, 3w, 240vol L, 1 -'?t)OA t14:'1'E:R CAtI C(?NTFiA�'Tftfl(S) -_.__._. _ - ..,- - "APPLICATION FEE'S PERMIT BAfti:Q KS(� F:LFC'EE2IC: SERVICE WATER , IMPACT FEE `'o. 00 Li..r '. SEWER .:INPACT FEE r,Cl. (i(l i,:', .t. 4!A'{' R .MITr K ,riad�r� I .+' I I RADON GAS-11- R. S. �C►. �t RADON GAS 5% 17 t) o { I I WATER TAP -aO. 00 t � ._...._. SEWER TAP _ ;o. C-10 _-- HYDRAULIC SHARE: O. UC:a RC-I?JSF'ECT FEE SO. 00 O E'E{ R �O, C30 NOTES: NOTICE —ALL CONCRETE FORMS AND FOOTINGS MUST BE INSPECTED BEFORE POURING PERMIT VOID SIX MONTHS AFTER DATE OF ISSUE BUILDING MATERIAL,RUBBISH AND DEBRIS FROM THIS WORK MUST NOT BE PLACED IN PUBLIC SPACE,AND MUST BE CLEARED UP AND HAULED AWAY BY EITHER CONTRACTOR OR OWNER. ICSLIEN LAW CAN RESULT "FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE MECHANUILDING (IMPROV MENTS,I95 N THE PROPERTY OWNER PAYING TWICE FOR B ISSUED ACCORDING TO APPROVED PLANS WHICH ARE PART OF THIS PERMIT AND SUBJECT TO REVOCATION FOR VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF LAW. ATLANW BEACH BUILDING DEPARTMENT CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH, FLORIDA Approved by APPLICATION FOR ELECTRICAL. PERMIT TO THE CHIEF ELECTRICAL INSPECTOR: DATE: _ '2 T 19 S'e IMPORTANT NOTICE: ` r M1 61 IN CONSIDERATION OF PERMIT GIVEN FOR DOING THE WORK AS DESCRIBED IN THE FOLLOWING, WE HEREBY AGREE TO PERFORM SAID WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ATTACHED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, WHICH ARE A PART HEREOF, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ELECTRICAL REGULATIONS, CODES AND CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH ORDINANCES. ELECTRICAL FIRM MASTER ELECTRICIAN SIGNATURE JOURNEYMAN NAMELX2h , a 1l0 r1C n r ADDRESS: ' " SRFD BOX BLDG.SIZE BETWEEN: RES.( 1 APT. ( 1 COMM. X PUBLIC ( 1 INDUS. ( 1 NEW ( ) OLD ( 1 REW. ( 1 ADDITION ( 1 TRAILER ( 1 TEMP. ( 1 SIGNS ( 1 SQ. FT. FEE SERVICE: NEW 1 INCREASE ( 1 REPAIR ( 1 L 110 - O� CONDUCTOR SIZE AMPS COPPER ( 1 ALUM. ( 1 SWITCH OR BREAKER -Z� AMPS PH � W 2-Y,d VOLT RACEWAY EXIST.SERV.SIZE AMPS PH W VOLT RACEWAY FEEDERS Nj* SIZE NO. SIZE NO. SIZE LIGHTING OUTLECONCEALED OPEN TOTAL RECEPTACLESCONCEALED OPEN TOTAL 31-100 AMPS. SWITCHES INCANDESCENT FLUORESCENT&M.V. FIXED 0.100 AMPS. OVER APPLIANCES BELL TRANSF. AIR H.P. RATING H.P. RATING CONDITIONING COMP.MOTOR OTHER MOTORS AMPS CELL HEAT: KW HEAT 0.1 OVER MOTORS H.P. I VOLTAGE PHS NO. 1 H.P. VOLTAGE PHS MISCELLANEOUS Tr,A kl�c^MIACDC. I INf1FR BOO V. OVER 600 V. ADDRESS___�s_- WA44 ---------- ------------------- CONTRACTOR -----" �G(�C.C�Q.%j( --- ------------- ---- ----------- OWNER ---- ------------------- BUILDING__q5 t�` q- MECHANICAL 9�.SO / PLUMBING_�__S__S_�_ ELECTRICAL�PO-3f; TEMP POLE____ _____ MISC70/VS ELECTRICIAN ----- DATE FAILED DATE PASSED TEMP POLE JEA FOOTING GAJ 9'�5- ROUGH PLUMBING07 fa �' � - 2�------ - SLAB FRAMING ----------- MECHANICAL/FIREPLACE TOP OUT PLUMBING ----------- ROUGH ELECTRIC ----------- FINAL ELECTRIC FINAL BUILDING ----------- ------/-- - ELEVATION SUBMITTED CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY ----------- DATE ORDERED DATE ISSUED CITY OF � �edrl- Aida Office of Building Official REQUEST FOR INSPECTION q Date 1 Permit No. CA l Time Received District No. Ad\dr�esss Locality Owner's Name o- aa�Contractor C5�&n 4j4,— BUILDING J4,—BUILDING CONCRETE ELECTRICAL PLUMBING MECHANICAL Framing = Footing ❑ Rough Wiring Rough ❑ Air.Cond.& ❑ Re Roofing - Slab ❑ Temp Pole - Top Out ❑ Heating Lintel Final Sewer C Fire Place ❑ READY FOR INSPECTION Pre Fab —AM--7,1 Mon. Tues. Wed. T urs. Friday A.M. Inspection Made P.M. Inspector ✓ Final Inspection ❑ Certificate of Occupancy Date CITY OF Vim-3&46d4 Office of Building Official REQUEST FOR INSPECTION Permit No. Date A.M. istrict No. Time P.tv1. Received Locality I Job Address ��`\ Owner's Contractor — PLUMBING MECHANICAL Name v CONCRETE ELECTRICAL Rough - Air.Cond.& BUILDING Rough Wiring _-- Heating FootingTop Out Temp Pole Framing Blab - — Sewer L Fire Place Re Roofing Final Pre Fab Lintel — A.M. READY FOR INSPECTION P.M. A M Thurs. Friday�-- Tues. Wed. ` " A.M. Mon. P.M. Inspection Made Final Inspection G Inspector Certificate of Occupancy Date — CITY OF Office of Building Official REQUEST FOR INSPECTION �5T/ /0214, �/ Permit No. Date O A.M. District No Time i Received !lLLocalit r Jo dress owner's Contractor oPLUMBING MECHANICAL Name CONCRETE ELECTRICAL Rough Air.Cond.& BUILDING _J Rough Wiring ToOut J Heating Footing Temp Pole p — Framing = Slab r Sewer _ Fire Place Re Roofing — L Lintel Final Pre Fab ` Thurs.gFOR INSPECTION P.M. / Friday�— Tues. Wed. A.M. Mon. _P.M. Inspection Made Final Inspection❑ Inspector Certificate of Occupancy Date CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH BUILDING DEPARTMENT vo 1116, INSPECTION REPORT 55 WEST STH STREET 9549 JOB LOCATIOµ,, PERMIT# fLANTIC BEACH, FLORIDA 32233 SUBDIVISION U OWNERNAME PHONE ¢� BUILDING L7 GAL DESC: LOT BLOCK SECTION PERMIT TYPE NEW CLASS OF WORK SINGLE FAMILY w PROPOSED USE CONTRACTOR z � WORK DESCRIPTION 4 COVER-UP INSPECTOR M INSPECTION REQUIRED // � � REJECTED ❑ DATE INSPECTED4� O-Jg BY�� _ ej' ate�"� APPROVED COMMENTS CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH BUILDING DEPARTMENT INSPECTION REPORT JOB LOCATION PERMIT# 55 WEST STH STREET SUBDIVISION 9549 ' ATLANTIC BEACH, FLORIDA 32233 PHONE OWNER NAME >4 cc ) — I LEGAL DESC: LOT BLOCK SECTION PERMIT T PE z CLASS OF WORK f PROPOSED USE BUILDING a CONTRACTOR NEW40 < SINGLE FAMILY 2 Z 0` WORK DESCRIPTION 40 cr U. INSPECTION REQUIRED INSPECTOR 12 FINAL ELECTRIC PM "o DATE INSPECTED_— 9BY �"��i APPROVED REJECTED ❑ 46, COMMENTS CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH BUILDING DEPARTMENT INSPECTION REPORT �. JOB LOCATION PERMIT# 55 WEST 8TH STREET SUBDIVISION 9549 ATLANTIC BEACH, FLORIDA 32233 OWNERNAME PHONE LEGAL DESC: LOT BLOCK SECTION PERMIT TYPE U) CLASS OF WORK 9 — BUILDING CONTRACTOR PROPOSED USE N E W w z SINGLE FAMILY z LU a WORK DESCRIPTION z a z INSPECTION REQUIRED INSPECTOR 0 13 FINAL BUILDING PM a o C APPROVED ©/ REJECTED ❑ LL ,,� DATE INSPECTED. -��' �Jgy z COMMENTS 000596 DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH 0 PERMIT INFORMATION LOCATION INFORMATION Permit Number : 596 ddree55 WEST STH STREET permit Type: UTILITIT-C', ATLANTIC BEACH, FLORIDA 32233 Class of Work: NEW LEGAL DESCRIPTION Constr. Type% N/A fit : Block. Section: proposed Use: WAREHOUSE plat Book! Page, 0 Dwellings: 0 Cade: 0 ubdivision: SECTION H �90. 00 OWNER INFORMATION .:��timated Value: Name: CALLANDER CONSTRUCTION Improv. Cost - $0. 00 55 WEST STH STREET 193.2� Total Fees ; $193. 23 P ATLANTIC BEACH, FLORIDA M 0 - Amt-111* !0193. 23 17>A I -')'a A -ONTRACTOR S) APPLICATION FEES ------ - C STRUCTTON PERMIT $0. 00 ON WATER IMPACT FEE lioi, 00 ,,sEwEp IMPACT FEE WATER METER RADON UAS -H. R. S. so. RADON GAS - 5% $0. 1 WATER TAP 5193. SEWER TAP $0. 00 HYDRAULIC SHARE $0. 00 RE-INSPECT FEE $0. 00 ENGINEFRT11r, SO. 00 OTHER NOTES: NOTICE —ALL CONCRETE FORMS AND FOOTINGS MUST BE INSPECTED BEFORE POURING PERMIT VOID SIX MONTHS AFTER DATE OF ISSUE BUILDING MATERIAL, RUBBISH AND DEBRIS FROM THIS WORK MUST NOT BE PLACED IN PUBLIC SPACE,AND MUST BE CLEARED UP AND HAULED AWAY BY EITHER CONTRACTOR OR OWNER. "FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE MECHANICS' LIEN LAW CAN RESULT IN THE PROPERTY OWNER PAYING TWICE FOR BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS-93 ISSUED ACCORDING TO APPROVED PLANS WHICH ARE PART OF THIS PERMIT AND SUBJECT TO REVOCATION FOR L ISSUED OF APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF LAW. IC BUILDING it ATLANTIC BEACH BUILDING DEPARTMENT By: i I DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING 9551 CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH,FLORIDA PERMIT NO. PERMIT TO BUILD THIS PERMIT MUST BE POSTED ON JOB Date rdarch 3 19 £8 20*00 T PCI.CQCKT Valuation$ Fee$ 2n nn 1307 1 A 7/26/91 ,OOrAC This permit not valid until above fee has been paid to City Treasurer,and is 1 307 1 A subject to revocation for violation of applicable provisions of law. (noo i I This is to certify that DAVID R. BUTLER has permission to i n St al 1 pl tunh i ng Classification New Commercial Zone CG Owned by Callander/11heeler Lot_ 7 Block 38 S/D Section H House No. SS West Eighth Street According to approved plans which are part of this permit NOTICE—ALL CONCRETE FORMS AND FOOTINGS MUST BE IN- SPECTED BEFORE POURING. PERMIT VOID SIX MONTHS „ AFTER DATE OF ISSUE 4 011 4 ii O Building material, rubbish and debris zi from this work must not be placed in public space, and must be cleared up and hauled away by either con- tractor or owner. t. Building Official. 1/ FOR OFFICE PERMIT DATE COBACTOR USE ONLY NUMBER PLUMBING ELECTRICAL SEWER WATER } CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH APPLICATION FOR PLUMBING_PERMIT JOB LOCATION PLUMBING CONTRACTOR Dgvlb 2 � LICENSE NUMBERS Cfc o4oa 4) OWNER BUILDING CONTRACTOR TYPE OF BUILDING (A)14 e-, e-, SINKS SHOWERS _LAVATORY WATER HEATERS BATH TUBS DISHWASHERS URINALS DISPOSALS 1 CLOSETS WAS111NG MAC111NE FLOOR DRAINS OTHER TOTAL FIXTURE COUNT . INSTALLATION OF PLUMBING AND FIXTURES MUST BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MOST RECENT EDITION OF THE SOUTHERN STANDARD PLUMBING CODE. CITY OF - 716 OCEAN BOULEVARD P.O.BOX 25 ATLANTIC BEACH,FLORIDA 32233 TELEPHONE(904)249-2395 DATE : /f_/f SJ PRE-SERVICE DIVISION JACKSONVILLE ELECTRIC AUTHORITY 233 NEST DUVAL STREET JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA 32202 THE FOLLOWING FINAL INSPECTIONS) HAVE: BEEN MADE AI4D ARE SATISFACTORY : 1 - �1__ __�S__Q ✓_�- -------------------------------- ------ ---------------------------- ------ ------------------------------------------------- ------ ' ----------------------------------- ------ ------------------------------------------------- SINCE�R LY, BUI ING INSPECTION DIVISION cc : FILE APPLICATION FOR WATER METER DATE:----G la 3 egg ------ CONTRACTOR : \_"�" '�a� Q t� BILLING ADDRESS: - P-0 __ Q�9�_ 5 b(o1 ------------------------- - -°`'�------ --4-F I---3-----`-o------------ SERVICE ADDRESS: SS w %4:h 54 4&-t ------------------------------------------------- LOT: ---I_--BLOCK:-3 S --UNIT:---------SUBDIVISION: &C-� 14 --------------- ACCOUNT NUMBER: cl METER SIZE: 4-2 Uv�`�� -------------- I HEREBY REQUEST THAT A WATER METER BE SET AT THE ABOVE SERVICE ADDRESS. I UNDERSTAND THAT I WILL BE BILLED FOR TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION WATER UPON SETTING OF THE METER. I FURTHER UNDERSTAND THAT I AM RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES TO THE METER, BOXES, VALVES, LINES, AND ANY PARTS THEREOF, UNTIL PERMANENT WATER SERVICE HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED BY THE CUSTOMER. CONTRACTO ---------------- CI Y O ATLANTI BEACH ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT Post Office Box 1429 Palatka, Florida 32078-1429 Ai K1 7, - y DATE ISSUED PERMIT NO. (�X A PERMIT AUTHORIZING: A NEW DIEC.rif RGE :F{tGILI 1 Y _{:.I�tuST.S� iN.C� �►r...,.1~E3.rc�Tluiv ..T C1 NERVE ...y. _. it AVEHC ILJSi� r AC=s L I TY A . 1 1 T lY�.i E s=t:;�i tC.T TO uE CUNSTnUG TEu AS F'ER PLANS RECEIvED L-Y iriL DI'�a`fFiICJ ON /17/89. LOCATION: ' Sect i on L T;;W1..151'1 i P t„1Z U`c , lunge 79 East Duva I C.'unty ISSUED TO: (owner) CALLAtvDER L"0NS C:rjMF ANY 1 ACr--:.SC'NV I LLE L'LAC•H, 1=L 4i 1 Permittee agrees to hold and save the St. Johns River Water Management District and its successors harmless from any and alf damages, claims, of liabilities which may arise from permit issuance. Said application, including all plans and specifications attached thereto,is by reference made a part hereof. This permit does not convey to permittee any property rights nor any rights or privileges other than those specified herein, nor relieve the permittee'from complying with any law, regulation or'requirement affecting the rights of 'other bodies or agencies, All structures and works installed by permittee hereunder shall remain the property of the permittee. This Permit may be revoked, modified or transferred at any time pursuant to the appropriate provisions of Chapter 373, Florida Statutes: PERMIT IS CONDITIONED UPON: "A � }y{� 6PRIiL �� .-7 See C r1 r,d ► t 1 c�ri s ��rl h t•t;�►c l-I�. :i L AUTHORIZED BY.St.Johns River Water Management District Department of Resource Management. C o rang Board„.-, AA tftratr of mrrupaurg CITY OF Own& •� a Drj3tjrtrdMt of nilaing Jn"Wrtinn This Certificate issued pursuant to the requirements of Section 109 of the Southern Standard Building Code certifying that at the time of issuance this structure was in compliance with the various ordinances regulating building construction or use. For the following. 9 S 4 ,1 Bldg.Permit No. 9 New Commercial usectasti6catia� �__FiT Block Atlantic Beach — rc District GAF P.C.Box 50614 J.B. x2240 Owner of Building Call ander 111hee a Addre%_ i 55 West Eighth Streetoca li _—Section .—.._CJe Ct lOn 11 ty Building Address fes _ BY R,,ene' M�fTs u h: Bui►dins oascid =�--— roOT Its A emnpieuo" "AM v BUILDING, PLANNING AND ZONING INSPECTION DEPARTMENT CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH, FLORIDA CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WORK SHEET Date Requested 1 Building Contractor: Callander Construction Building Permit Number: 9549 Address: S5 West Eighth Street Legal Description: Lot 4 Block 38 Section H Improvements to the above described property have been completed in accordance with the terms of the permit and is certified to be ready for occupancy as New Commercial-Office AMM Lowest Floor Elevation: _________ __ XXXXXXX _ required as built n/a Sales Tax Certificate: _________ ate submitted BEFORE ISSUING CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY THE FOLLOWING MUST BE COMPLETE DEPARTMENT DATE NOTIFIED: DATE .APPROVED: BY: Fire Chief _ 5ji-L$5_______ Public Works _______________ Planning Director --------------- _______________ --------- Building Inspector