1089 ATLANTIC BLVD - PLAN REVIEW CHARGE 0 CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH
\Sf 800 SEMINOLE ROAD
1; ATLANTIC BEACH,FL 32233
(904)247-5800
December 1, 2015
Re: Proposed storage building / „ (7 U
1089 Atlantic Blvd.
Atlantic Beach, Florida -7
BP# 15-CNEW-1297 ,r
Tod,
On November 23,2015, I notified you that Permit# 15-CNEW-1297 could be issued with multiple
notes and holds, after resolving the last remaining Zoning issue, the total building height. That part of
the email is copied below:
This permit can be issued, with multiple notes and holds,after the following issue is resolved.
Based on Detail 1/A 5.4 and Engineering Page E11 (only two examples)this structure appears to
exceed the maximum 35-foot building height by 8 inches or more.
1. Building height must be measured, starting at established grade, not FFE.
2. The height must be measured to the top of the highest point. The referenced details show
the building measured to points below the top of parapet.
Please submit a signed/sealed/dated letter, from the Designer of Record(DOR),referencing the above
Details and showing how this structure will be built to less than 35-feet above established grade.
Building height will be measured at framing inspection and must be less than 35-feet.
We would have expected revised, signed/sealed/dated,plans after the start of work to finalize the DOR
letter.
We regret to inform you that we cannot issue the building permit before the revised plans are
submitted,reviewed, and approved.
After discussions with the Architect,owner's representative, and internal staff discussions, it has been
determined that the DOR letter cannot ensure that this building will be built below 35 feet and we
cannot issue a building permit with plans that indicate a total building height that exceeds the
maximum 35 feet.
We understand that the owners are proposing a building height of exactly 35 feet,the maximum height
allowed in Atlantic Beach. With this in mind,the plans must show all details and consistently show
that the building will conform to City guidelines, including measurements from finished established
grade to the top of the highest roof structure. (Other than elevator roof structures)
1
Please submit two(2)complete revised sets of plans, including corrections for total building height
and all plan review comments and communications from the attached previous five (5)plan reviews.
ALL ITEMS changed or revised on plans and documents shall be identified by circling, clouding or
identified by some other legible method. ADDITIONAL ITEMS MAY BE REQUIRED-
DEPENDING ON NEW INFORMATION AND CLARITY OF FINAL PLANS SUBMITTED
FOR REVIEW.
Sincerely,
Dan Arlington, CBO
2
j
J � CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH
ss1
:' J 800 SEMINOLE ROAD
1T3 �` N ATLANTIC BEACH,FL 32233
(904)247-5800
\Ji31>'
PLAN REVIEW 1089 Atlantic Blvd. 15-CNEW-1297 6/29/15
General Notes: AM
1. Occupancy: Mixed; Business/Storage, S-1/Residential
2.Construction Type IIB, Sprinklered(NFPA 13), Unprotected
3.Risk Category II
4.Not in a flood zone(Zone X)
5.Wind speed 129 mph,Vult; Exposure C
Permit Application is denied for the following:
1. Engineering pages must be original pages, signed/sealed/dated,per FAC 61G15-23.002(facsimiles are not
acceptable). Please include all engineering details, including:
a) All wall construction details.
b) All roof construction details.
c) Shear wall and wall deflection calculations. Please clarify all shearwall dimensions and locations and
specifically how the north, south, and interior walls resist lateral loads imposed by the east and west walls.
Please include continuous uplift details and resistance to overturning of shearwalls.
d) Page SD4 is referred to,but not found.
2. Engineering design criteria states"Minor Storage Facility, Iw= .87". This is a Risk Category II Building,
not Category I,per FBC,Table 1604.5.
3. Please provide number, location, and details for accessible units,per FAC, Section 225.3.
4. Please submit all Florida Product Approval information.
5. Please provide minimum interior lighting,per FBC, Section 1205.3,with documentation.
6. Please submit details for roof drainage.
7. Please submit fire sprinkler and alarm details.
8. This building is open to the public, with multiple tenants, and therefore qualifies as Mixed Business/S-1
Occupancy. Plumbing requirements for this size building includes three water closets and three lavatories, for
each sex;two Hi/Lo drinking fountains; and one mop sink, per FBC-P,Chapter 4.
General Notes: Your re-submittal should include two complete sets of plans. Please insert the revised pages
into the plan sets, and pages removed from the stamped "Job copy" set, should be marked as "old set" and
should be included in the re-submittal.
If old "Job copy" drawings,are not resubmitted there will be additional plan review fee charged due to the
amount of time necessary to review entire drawing again.
ALL ITEMS changed or revised on plans and documents shall be identified by circling,clouding or identified
by some other legible method. ADDITIONAL ITEMS MAY BE REQUIRED-DEPENDING ON NEW
INFORMATION AND CLARITY OF FINAL PLANS SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW.
Dan Arlington 247-5813
1
PLAN REVIEW 1089 Atlantic Blvd. 15-CNEW-1297 9/21/15
Second review. (22.1)
Some revised, uncollated pages were submitted, addressing some of the Building issues.
Only one Planning and Zoning issues was addressed.
Please review all previous and current comments.
1. All pages produced by design professionals must be original, signed/sealed/dated pages. Please provide all
engineering details required to build and inspect this building. See original Comment.
2. Not done.
3. Twelve(12)accessible units are provided on revised floor plan. It appears that sixteen(16)are required.
Please clarify. Please provide a signed/sealed/dated letter from the Architect of Record specifying unit doors
and their operation, per FAC, Section 309.
4. Please submit two copies of all Product Approval documents for all applicable products; in two identical
packages.
5. Lighting is determined as average illumination of a room. An email, I sent earlier, is printed below that
further explains the requirement.
I am basing my plan review comment on the following Code Section:
Florida Building Code-Building
1205.3 Artificial light.
Artificial light shall be provided that is adequate to provide an average illumination of 10 footcandles (107 lux) over
the area of the room at a height of 30 inches (762 mm) above the floor level.
Because this floor plan is divided into a large number of individual(and individually leased) spaces(rooms), I
believe that 1205.3 applies to each room.
Hall way illumination between lights shows 12 footcandles. (I am assuming footcandles are used on your
layout)
Illumination at the back of the 15-foot units will not average 10 footcandles and I doubt that the back of the 10-
foot units will comply either. (30-inches above floor level)
I think I see what you meant about the program not sensing illumination through doors,but then the layout does
not verify minimum illumination.
It appears that the 15-foot units and the 10-foot units located between hall lights do not comply with 1205.3.
I need verification that it does.
It also appears that all of the units deeper then 15-feet have lighting and will comply with 1205.3.
6. Not provided.
7. Not provided.
8. Completed.
Except for Comment 1, it appears that no other Zoning Comments were addressed. Please see the Zoning
Comments attached to this document.
Please review Comment 1 and General Note, and provide two (2) complete and identical sets of plans, with
revised pages inserted into the complete set and one package of the original pages to facilitate the review.
A$50.00 Review Fee has been added for the second review.
2
PLAN REVIEW 1089 Atlantic Blvd. 15-CNEW-1297 10/08/15
C �
Third review.
Comments from first and second reviews were not addressed or corrected.
A $75.00 Review Fee has been added for the third review,per COAB, Section 6-26(b).
Please review all comments from all three reviews and address/correct the stated issues.
1. Not done. Review Comment 1,a—d.
2. Not done.
3. Complete.
4. Complete.
5. Please review my comments from the second review. PLEASE NOTE: per FBC, Section 104.11.2, a
lighting test will be required before Final Inspection to verify an average illumination of 10 foot candles over
the area of each storage unit,at 30-inches above floor level, per FBC, Section 1205.3. The test must be
performed by an approved agency at no expense to this City.
6. Not done.
7. Disapproved by Fire Marshal.
8. Complete.
General Notes: Your re-submittal should include two complete sets of plans. Please insert the revised pages
into the plan sets,and pages removed from the stamped "Job copy" set, should be marked as "old set" and
should be included in the re-submittal.
If old "Job copy" drawings, are not resubmitted there will be additional plan review fee charged due to the
amount of time necessary to review entire drawing again.
ALL ITEMS changed or revised on plans and documents shall be identified by circling, clouding or identified
by some other legible method. ADDITIONAL ITEMS MAY BE REQUIRED-DEPENDING ON NEW
INFORMATION AND CLARITY OF FINAL PLANS SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW.
Dan Arlington 247-5813
Fourth Review. 10/29/15
New engineering from new engineer submitted for this review.
Application is denied for the reasons listed below.
A $100.00 Review Fee has been added for the fourth review, per COAB, Section 6-26(b).
Please review all comments from all four reviews and address/correct the stated issues.
1. The new engineering Drawing Status is marked"Not for Construction", title block and number of detail
locations are not complete, Masonry connections are noted"Further design by FOR", and drawings are not to
scale. Please submit complete, final drawings, drawn to scale, signed/sealed/dated and approved by Designer of
Record. These plans were not reviewed. See Comment 4,below.
3
2. Foundation plans were not found.
3. Civil plans are not signed/sealed/dated. These plans indicate a 20-foot north side setback, which I
understand has been changed to 10-feet. The latest plans must show all current design information. The
correct, final plans will be forwarded to the Fire Marshal's Office for a final review of all changes from the
original approved plans. All plans must match and be signed off by the Designer of Record (DOR).
4. Please review F.S 471 and 481, and FAC 61G15 and submit a complete, organized plan set. All designated
engineering must comply with FAC 61G15-30—31. Identify Designer of Record. All designated engineering
must be signed off by DOR as meeting his/her design and DOR must verify a complete set of plans. All plans
must be signed/sealed/dated and signed off by DOR.
5. Metal building engineering. Please submit information and details for all metal liner panels, including type,
size, installation details of panels at specific locations.
6. Provide shear calculations to show how north and south walls(110-feet) resist the lateral wind loads from
the east and west walls (242-feet).
General Notes: Your re-submittal should include two complete sets of plans. Please insert the revised pages
into the plan sets, and pages removed from the stamped "Job copy" set, should be marked as "old set" and
should be included in the re-submittal.
If old "Job copy" drawings,are not resubmitted there will be additional plan review fee charged due to the
amount of time necessary to review entire drawing again.
ALL ITEMS changed or revised on plans and documents shall be identified by circling, clouding or identified
by some other legible method. ADDITIONAL ITEMS MAY BE REQUIRED -DEPENDING ON NEW
INFORMATION AND CLARITY OF FINAL PLANS SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW. •
Dan Arlington 247-5813
/ oCi -
UC%
.0 c)
) 2 v �
a �� ;��. G - 2 )
4