4-29-97 CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH
CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD AGENDA
7:30 P.M., APRIL 29, 1997
Call to order
Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag
Roll Call
1. Approval of the Minutes of the Regular Meeting held March 4, 1997.
2. Recognition of Visitors and Guests regarding any matters that are not listed on the agenda
3. OLD BUSINESS:
11110 Code Enforcement Official Karl Grunewald will present follow-up reports on the following
properties:
Case No. 97-5532-Pulte Home Corporation/North Florida Classic Homes-West 5th Street.
The owner of the property is in violation of Chapter 23, Section 23-17 Code of the City of
Atlantic Beach in that there exists on the premises located at West 5th Street the following
condition(s): trees were removed from the property not authorized for removal by the Tree
Conservation Board - clear cut the property.
During the January 28, 1997 Special called meeting, the Code Enforcement Board imposed a
$5,000.00 fine on Pulte Home Corporation which was paid. During the March 4, 1997 Code
Enforcement Board Meeting, it was reported that Pulte Homes had offered to plant trees in
Section H, as recommended by the Tree Board, and were in negotiations at that time.
Case No. 97-5489-Gordon Ogburn, 440 Ocean Boulevard. The owner of the property is in
violation of Chapter 24, Section 157 and Chapter 24, Section 24-65-(c) Code of the City of
Atlantic Beach in that there exists on the premises located at 440 Ocean Boulevard the following
condition(s): a fence over six feet prohibited and permit required i.e., the fence is over six
feet tall and no permit for installation is on file.
During the March 4, 1997 Code Enforcement Board Meeting, the Board found Mr. Ogburn in
Code Enforcement Board
Agenda Page-2-
violation of Chapter 24, Sections 157 and 65-(c) of the Code of the City of Atlantic Beach and to
assess an amount of$100.00 for the city's administrative expenses involved in processing the
case.
Case No. 96-4629-Willie Knight- 790 Sailfish Drive. The owner of the property is in
violation of the Standard Plumbing Code Sections 601.2 and 604.3 and Chapter 22, Sections 22-
41 and 22-29, Failure to Pay Past Due Bill of the Code of the City of Atlantic Beach in that there
exists on the premises located at 790 Sailfish Drive the following condition(s): failure to be
connected to an approved water system and failure to pay past due water bills.
During the July 2, 1996 Code Enforcement Board Meeting, Mr. Knight was found to be a repeat
offender in violation of the Standard Plumbing Code and Chapter 22, Sections 22-41 and 22-29 of
the Code of the City of Atlantic Beach. The Board voted to imposed a one time $500.00 fine on
Mr. Knight for said violations and to remove the water meter serving the property as of July 3,
1996 to eliminate the possibility of a cross-connection.
Recent routine inspection of the property has revealed the house on the property to be unsafe,
uninhabitable, and generally run down, with broken windows and unsecured trash littering the
premises.
4. NEW BUSINESS:
Case No.97-5603-Bill Williams, President,Beaches Aquatic Pool, Inc., 297 Aquatic Drive.
The owner of the property is in violation of Chapter 12, Section 12-01-03 and Section 12-01-04
Code of the City of Atlantic Beach in that there exists on the premises located at 297 Aquatic
Drive a/k/a Tract 3, Aquatic Gardens, the following condition(s): trash and rubbish floating on
the water and in the vegetation on the pond, i.e., an accumulation of paper, plastic bottles
and similar items floating in the pond.
During the November 12, 1996 Code Enforcement Board Meeting, Bill Williams, the registered
agent for Beaches Aquatic Pool, Inc., was found to be in violation of Chapter 12, Section 12-01-
03 of the Code of the City of Atlantic Beach. No fine was levied against the property because it
was brought into compliance. However, if it was found to be in non-compliance of Section 12-
01-03 in the future, it was determined a fine may be levied by the Board from the day the property
is found to be in non-compliance by the Code Enforcement Official until compliance is reached to
the satisfaction of the Code Enforcement Official.
Code Enforcement Board
4fi, Agenda Page -3-
Case No. 97-4237-Linzy C. Lane, 1970 Park Street. The owner of the property is in violation
of Chapter 12, Section 12-01-08 of the Code of the City of Atlantic Beach in that theere exists on
the premises located at 1970 Park Street the following condition(s): The building has fallen into
a state of disrepair and is in an unsanitary and unsafe condition. It appears the owner has
abandoned the property.
5. REQUEST FOR LIEN ACTION:
Name Address Amount of Lien
6. BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS:
• 7. ADJOURNMENT
S
• CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH
CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD MINUTES
APRIL 29, 1997
Call to order: PRESENT: Edward Martin, Chairman
Ken Rogosheske
Theo Mitchelson
Lou Etta Waters
Richard S. Mann
Tammy Deitchman
ABSENT: Heywood (Pete)Dowling
AND: Suzanne Green, Prosecuting Attorney
Alan C. Jensen, City Attorney
Karl Grunewald, Code Enforcement Officer
Julie M. Brandt, Secretary
The meeting was called to order at 7:30 p.m. by Chairman Ed Martin, followed by the Pledge of
Allegiance to the Flag by all present. Board Member Dowling asked permission to be excused
• due to a family emergency and left the meeting at 7:35 p.m.
Chairman Martin congratulated Code Enforcement Officer Grunewald on attaining a State of
Florida Level III Certification in Code Enforcement.
1. Approval of Minutes of March 4, 1997
The minutes of the Regular Code Enforcement Board Meeting of March 4, 1997 were
approved as presented.
2. Recognition of Visitors and Guests regarding any matters that are not listed on the
agenda.
No one wished to speak.
3. OLD BUSINESS:
Case No. 97-5532-Pulte Home Corporation/North Florida Classic Homes-West 5th Street.
The owner of the property is in violation of Chapter 23, Section 23-17 Code of the City of
Atlantic Beach in that there exists on the premises located at West 5th Street the following
condition(s): trees were removed from the property not authorized for removal by the Tree
CConservation Board - clear cut the property.
I
• Minutes Page -2-
Code Enforcement Board
April 29, 1997
Code Enforcement Officer Grunewald reported during the January 28, 1997 Special called
meeting, the Code Enforcement Board imposed a $5,000.00 fine on Pulte Home Corporation
which was paid, and during the March 4, 1997 Code Enforcement Board Meeting, Pulte Homes
offered to plant trees in Section H, as recommended by the Tree Board, and were in negotiations
at that time. Mr. Grunewald passed around a letter from Pulte Home asking that the Tree Board
postpone any action on mitigation until the June Tree Board Meeting to allow Pulte Homes the
extended time to establish the integrity of their intentions.
Case No. 97-5489-Gordon Ogburn, 440 Ocean Boulevard. The owner of the property is in
violation of Chapter 24, Section 157 and Chapter 24, Section 24-65-(c) Code of the City of
Atlantic Beach in that there exists on the premises located at 440 Ocean Boulevard the following
condition(s): a fence over six feet prohibited and permit required i.e., the fence is over six
feet tall and no permit for installation is on file.
To update the Board, Code Enforcement Officer Grunewald reported that during the March 4,
1997 Code Enforcement Board Meeting, the Board found Mr. Ogburn in violation of Chapter 24,
• Sections 157 and 65-(c) of the Code of the City of Atlantic Beach and assessed him an amount of
$100.00 for the city's administrative expenses involved in processing the case. It was further
reported that Mr. Ogburn paid the $100.00.
Case No. 96-4629-Willie Knight- 790 Sailfish Drive. The owner of the property is in
violation of the Standard Plumbing Code Sections 601.2 and 604.3 and Chapter 22, Sections 22-
41 and 22-29, Failure to Pay Past Due Bill of the Code of the City of Atlantic Beach in that there
exists on the premises located at 790 Sailfish Drive the following condition(s): failure to be
connected to an approved water system and failure to pay past due water bills.
To recap the Knight Case, Code Enforcement Officer Grunewald reported that during the July 2,
1996 Code Enforcement Board Meeting, Mr. Knight was found to be a repeat offender in
violation of the Standard Plumbing Code and Chapter 22, Sections 22-41 and 22-29 of the Code
of the City of Atlantic Beach. The Board imposed a one time $500.00 fine on Mr. Knight for
said violations and had the water meter serving the property removed as of July 3, 1996, to
eliminate the possibility of a cross-connection.
It was reported the property has been cleaned up and properly connected to the city's water
system, and was in the process of being sold. The title company handling the property is aware of
the $500.00 fine.
4. NEW BUSINESS:
IF
I
• Minutes Page -3-
Code Enforcement Board
April 29, 1997
In reference to case No. 97-5603, Chairman Martin stated the duty of the Code Enforcement
Board, as a quasi-judicial body, was to determine if a violation of the city code exists and not to
establish ownership of property, which is outside the jurisdiction of the board.
Case No.97-5603-Bill Williams, President, Beaches Aquatic Pool, Inc., 297 Aquatic Drive.
The owner of the property is in violation of Chapter 12, Section 12-01-03 and Section 12-01-04
Code of the City of Atlantic Beach in that there exists on the premises located at 297 Aquatic
Drive a/k/a Tract 3, Aquatic Gardens, the following condition(s): trash and rubbish floating on
the water and in the vegetation on the pond, i.e., an accumulation of paper, plastic bottles
and similar items floating in the pond.
Chairman Martin read the case procedures and all witnesses in the case were sworn in.
Prosecuting Attorney Green read the charges against Beaches Aquatic Pool, Inc. and stated that
Mr. Grunewald would testify before the Board concerning the long history of the property and
that he would present a second violation citing the President of Beaches Aquatic Pool, Inc. for
• trash and rubbish floating on the pond and as to the date the occurrence took place.
Code Enforcement Officer Grunewald stated that during the November 12, 1996 Code
Enforcement Board Meeting, Bill Williams, the registered agent for Beaches Aquatic Pool, Inc.,
was found to be in violation of Chapter 12, Section 12-01-03 of the Code of the City of Atlantic
Beach. At that time no fine was levied against the property because it was brought into
compliance. However, the Board determined if it was found to be in non-compliance of Section
12-01-03 in the future, a fine may be levied from the day the property is found to be in non-
) compliance, which was January 30, 1997.
After the update, photos taken April 2, 1997, of the subject property were passed out showing
the floating debris and pond vegetation. Mr. Grunewald stated Mr. Williams was served notice
of the violation on February 17, 1997, which was signed for by his wife, June Williams. It was
further reported as of today's date, the pond was in much the same condition as depicted in the
photos. Mr. Grunewald stated he had contacted the St. Johns County River Water Management
District concerning the pond vegetation and was told it was a natural occurance and posed no
health problem, and the property owner would have to decide to remove it or not.
Code Enforcement Officer Grunwald further reported the property owner was responsible for
the upkeep of his property, regardless the source of the trash and debris and regardless the fact
the property is a pond. In its present condition, Mr. Grunwald indicated the property posed a
health hazard to those who live adjacent to the pond.
C
• Minutes Page-4-
Code Enforcement Board
April 29, 1997
Chairman Martin inquired as to the date of the pictures and the present condition of the pond.
Code Enforcement Official Grunwald stated the pond was in the same condition as shown in the
pictures except that some of the vegetation had disappeared.
Theo Mitchelson inquired as to the ownership of the property in question and was informed by
Chairman Martin the owner according to the tax records was Beaches Aquatic Pool, Inc.,
represented by Bill Williams. Code Enforcement Officer Grunewald pointed out ownership of
the property was clarified by City Attorney Jensen in his letter dated March 14, 1997, which is
attached and made part of this official record as Attachment A.
Mr. Mitchelson then inquired if any decision had been made by the City Commission to assume
responsibility for maintenance of the pond and was told it had no assumed any responsibility for
the maintenance. At this point, Chairman Martin reiterated the Board was not meeting to
determine ownership of the property.
Alan W. Potter of 374 Second Street, Vice-President of Beaches Aquatic Pool, Inc., spoke on
• behalf of Beaches Aquatic Pool. Mr. Potter read a prepared statement concerning his proposed
testimony in response to: the letter of notice dated 1-30-97, the subpoena dated 3-24-97 and letter
of notice and order dated 3-24-97 and steps to be taken should the decision by the Board be
appealed.
Chairman Martin stated that Mr. Potter could present evidence as long as it dealt with the
violation, not with ownership of the property. However, Mr. Potter then stated he may make
reference of necessity to certain items concerning the dedication of the pond to create a record for
appeal should it become necessary. Chairman Martin stated this would be acceptable as long as it
was relevant to the subject at hand.
Mr. Potter continued by stating Beaches Aquatic Pool, Inc. does not deny they own the land
under the pond and contend based upon the law of the public record that the city owns an
easement over the land and the enjoyment of that easement has caused the dispute.
Continuing, Mr. Potter stated that he wanted the record to reflect this information because
Florida Statutes state the entire case must be presented before the Code Enforcement Board, not
a circuit judge, who will only review on appeal.
Chairman Martin responded to Mr. Potter and stated the Board would decide if a violation of
Chapter 12 Sections 12-1-4 and 12-1-3 exists and nothing else. .
Mr. Potter responded that the question was who did the violation- Beaches Aquatic Pool or the
110 City of Atlantic Beach? Chairman Martin replied the only person the Board could look to is the
• Minutes Page-5-
Code Enforcement Board
April 29, 1997
owner of record. If the property is found to be in violation, then the owner of record, which in
this case is Beaches Aquatic Pool, Inc., will be cited. It was pointed out the issue was not who
committed the violation.
Mr. Potter then replied that he wished to establish whose water is on the pond and whose water is
holding the trash.
Chairman Martin then stated he was not interested in whose water was on the pond. He further
stated the legal owner of the pond is Beaches Aquatic Pool, Inc. and advised Mr Potter he could
establish all the case he wanted on whether or not there is a violation of the code, but the Board
will not allow him to establish a record for something beyond its jurisdiction.
Mr. Potter then stated he would skip that portion of the presentation but wished to enter his entire
presentation into the record for purposes of appeal, if necessary.
Chairman Martin then asked for a legal opinion on this request. Prosecuting Attorney Green
stated for the purposes of an evidentiary matter, the city would object to the admission of his
statement on relevancy grounds for the purpose of this hearing. The Board was advised they
could accept the statement and admit it into the record, but there will be an objection to anything
presented which is not relevant.
Mr. Potter then stated that Beaches Aquatic Pool, Inc. believes the allegations of Mr. Karl
Grunewald, Code Enforcement Officer for the City of Atlantic Beach, improperly identified
Beaches Aquatic Pool, Inc. for the alleged violations. Information was reviewed for relevancy by
Prosecuting Attorney Green and then given to the Board by Mr. Potter. All information
presented by Mr. Potter is attached and made part of this official record as Attachment A.
Mr. Potter stated the organization was not in violation of Section 12-1b(4)because the water in
the retention pond is not stagnant, there are no mosquito larvae and the waters are home to fish
and other wildlife. Mr. Potter also stated the organization was not in violation of Section 12-
1B(3) because the retention pond receives stormwater flow containing garbage and debris from
all areas in Aquatic Gardens Subdivision. Mr. Potter also pointed out other sources of debris and
garbage that end up in the pond and stated the Code Enforcement Officer had not been able to
prove any member of Beaches Aquatic Pool deposited rubbish and litter into the retention pond
and asked that both violations referenced be dropped.
Attorney Green showed Mr. Potter a copy of the tax rolls indicating the owner of the property
(retention pond) to be Beaches Aquatic Pool, Inc., and asked if they were the owners of Tract 3,
Aquatic Gardens and Mr. Potter replied yes. Attorney Green then inquired if there was rubbish
• Minutes Page -6-
Code Enforcement Board
April 29, 1997
floating on the pond as of today and Mr. Potter stated there was rubbish(plastic bottles, trash,
paper, etc.)floating on the pond. Thirdly, Mr. Potter was asked if there were young children
playing in the area, and Mr. Potter stated he did not know the ages of the children, but they did
play in the area and fish in the pond. Attorney Green then asked if was true the rubbish had been
in the pond for at least three months , and Mr. Potter replied that it probably had been in the pond
three months and perhaps longer. Attorney Green then inquired as to germs accumulating in the
rubbish and Mr. Potter replied that neither Mr. Grunewald nor he had identified any germs in the
pond.
At this point, Chairman Martin asked the Board if they had any questions for Mr. Potter and no
one spoke.
Mr. Potter then inquired as to Code Enforcement Official Grunewald's credentials and Mr.
Grunewald indicated he had among other certifications more than twenty years of experience,
including a Level III Certification in Code Enforcement. Mr. Potter then asked if Mr. Grunewald
was trained as a biologist or virologist and he stated he was not. Prosecutor Green objected to
1116 the question on the grounds of relevancy. Mr. Potter continued with regard to germs and the
Nuisance Ordinance terminology concerning"a detriment to public health"..., and Mr. Potter
then asked if Mr. Grunewald was qualified to confirm the presence of any harmful bacteria or
viruses in the pond as a result of the floating plastics. Mr. Potter then inquired as to how
ownership of the property was determined and Mr. Grunewald stated the information was
obtained from the Duval County Tax Roll. He then asked if Mr. Grunewald had ascertained that
the City was the beneficiary of a perpetual easement over Tract 3, and Mr. Martin stated the
question would not be allowed.
Considerable discussion concerning the pond continued with Mr. Potter quoting from the
Nuisance Ordinance and stating Mr. Grunewald was not qualified to determine if the pond was in
fact"a detriment to public health". Prosecuting Attorney Green objected and stated Mr.
Grunewald was not an expert witness, but a fact witness who brought information to the Board of
what he observed. At this point, Mr. Potter objected to being accused of something that might be
harmful which has not occurred he concurred the pond was unsightly, but maintained it
was not injurious to the health of anyone.
Mr. Potter then passed out photos of the pond taken on April 2, 1997. After viewing the
pictures, Mr. Potter stated Beaches Aquatic Pools, Inc. had limited funds and no action should be
taken against them to pay a fine or maintain the pond, which he contended should be maintained
I by the City, because the expenses would limit the ability of the organization to provide programs
for the public.
I
Minutes Page -7-
Code Enforcement Board
April 29, 1997
After a cursory review of a document given each Board Member, Prosecuting Attorney Green
stated for the record she had been handed a composite exhibit entitled"Alan W. Potter, Sr." and
indexed to the documents and objected to the document on grounds of hearsay, relevancy and
duplicity.
Chairman Martin then asked Mr. Potter if any of the documents presented addressed whether or
not the pond is in violation, and he replied yes and referenced the copy of the Vortex contract for
spraying of the pond between 1983 and 1995.
At this point, Chairman Martin asked Code Enforcement Official Grunewald for his definition of
"well being" as found in Section 12-1(3)...which may be injurious to the health and well-being of
the community. Code Enforcement Official Grunewald stated that from past experience as a
Code Enforcement Officer, when there is trash and rubbish which accumulates, whether on water
or on the ground, it breeds germs, mosquitoes, etc. Code Enforcement Official Grunewald
pointed out the section does not specifically say Mr. Potter or anyone threw the trash in the
pond, but states for any person to allow, suffer or permit this to happen. It was also pointed out
® the section stated" ... which may be injurious(with emphasis on may be)..." Mr. Grunwald
then stated it does not have to be injurious to the health and well-being of the community, but
shall be unlawful to deposit rubbish of any kind which may be injurious...also, it was emphasized
in Section 12-1(4)with regard to the water in the pond, that"necessary precautions to prevent
the propagation of mosquitoes therein" should be taken, and Beaches Aquatic Pool had not done
so. At this point, Mr. Potter objected and stated Mr. Grunewald was not describing the pond as it
now exists.
Board Member Rogosheske then asked Mr. Potter if Beaches Aquatic Pool, Inc. had been cited
before and Mr. Potter stated that they were previously cited for weeds, which were mowed. The
present citation is a new violation, has nothing to do with weeds, and never occurred before. Mr.
Rogosheske also indicated he had viewed the pond on the nightly news and saw all of the floating
debris and heard the neighbors' complaints asked Mr. Potter if it was Beaches Aquatic Pools
view of maintaining a neat and orderly property?
Mr. Potter replied it was not, however, the organization had tried to work the problem out with
the city and even offered the pond property to the city for a park on three different occasions
because the property served no purpose to Beaches Aquatic Pool. Mr. Rogosheske then asked
Mr. Potter if Beaches Aquatic Pool, Inc. owned the property and he stated it was his contention
they owned the land under the pond, but not the water. Mr. Potter then explained that recent
heaving rains conveyed rubbish and debris into the pond from other areas and his organization
could not be responsible for trash flowing in from the other areas.
S
• Minutes Page -8-
Code Enforcement Board
April 29, 1997
In closing, Mr. Potter stated Beaches Aquatic Pool, Inc. had been in existence since 1963 to
provide a public service not provided by any other group in Atlantic Beach and has limited funds
to provide its programs for youth of the area. He further stated the organization derives no
1 benefit from the pond, was not involved in the construction of the pond and is being harassed by
the city to maintain it. Mr. Potter continued that Beaches Aquatic Pool, Inc. did not own the
pond until 1987 and he does not know how or why it was deeded to them at that time by the
developers of the condominiums adjacent to the pond property. It was also stated that no
member of the pool put any of the trash and rubbish into the pond. Mr. Potter maintained
Beaches Aquatic Pool, Inc. was not in violation because he did not agree with the city's strict
interpretation of ownership of the land under the pond.
Prosecuting Attorney Green then stated, in response to Mr. Potter's comments concerning the
prior ruling by the Board on November 13, 1996, the Board did find that Beaches Aquatic Pool,
Inc. was in violation of Section 12-1 (3), the same subsection now being cited, and therefore
this is a second violation. Prosecuting Attorney Green pointed out that during the testimony
given, Mr. Potter admitted to the trash and rubbish being in the pond and did not deny that it has
• been there for several months. Mrs. Green continued by stating that the Board must now
determine whether the condition that exists"enhances the well-being of the community or does
not enhance the well-being, and therefore, may be injurious to the health and well-being of the
community". In conclusion, Prosecuting Attorney Green asked the Board to find Beaches
Aquatic Pool, Inc. in violation and assess a second time violation beginning from January 30,
1997, when he was notified of the violation.
Chairman Martin then asked Prosecuting Attorney Green to address Section 12-1 (4)and the
question of stagnant water. Mrs. Green clarified the terminology for the Board.
Mr. Potter objected to the use of the word"enhance" and the verbiage"may cause harm" because
he believed there was no evidence of past, present or future harm caused by the pond.
Board Member Deitchman inquired as to the date of the previous violation and was told
November 13, 1996 the Board found if there was another violation of Section 12-1 (3), they
would assess a fine from the day the property was found to be in non-compliance by the Code
Enforcement Officer until compliance is reached by the Code Enforcement Officer.
Bill Williams, President of Beaches Aquatic Pool, Inc., addressed the Board and stated the first
violation dealt with weeds, not trash in the pond and questioned if this was a second violation of
the ordinance. He also stated he would clean the pond under duress because they cannot use the
property and had to money to pay for maintenance of the pond. He also stated he believed the
410 city should be responsible for cleaning the pond.
Minutes Page -9-
%iv Code Enforcement Board
April29, 1997
June Williams, wife of Bill Williams, was sworn in at this time, and stated that due to limited
funds, she donates her time to Beaches Aquatic Pool, Inc. and the organization has not paid
property taxes on the pond in three years.
After hearing their testimony, Chairman Martin stated it was not the object of the Board to levy
great fines or put a financial hardship on Beaches Aquatic Pool, Inc. After some further
discussion concerning the duties of the Code Enforcement Board, a motion was made by Theo
Mitchelson and seconded by Ed Martin to find Beaches Aquatic Pool in violation of
Sections 12-1 (3) and 12-1 (4) of the Code of Ordinances.
Under discussion, it was determined the Board wished to decided each section separately and
Section 12-1 (4) was withdrawn from the motion. There being no further discussion, the
motion carried unanimously.
The wording stagnant water was discussed with several members having problems applying the
terminology to the pond. After some further discussion, a motion was made by Theo
• Mitchelson, seconded by Ed Martin and failed by a three to three tie vote to find Beaches
Aquatic Pool in violation of Section 12-1 (4),with Board Members Deitchman, Mann and
Martin voting nay.
At this point in the meeting discussion ensued concerning if violation of Section 12-1 (3)was a
first or second offense. After considerable discussion, a motion was made by Chairman
Martin, seconded by Theo Mitchelson and unanimously carried to find Beaches Aquatic
Pool in a first offense violation of Section 12-1 (3) in that the offense was trash, not weeds.
Discussion ensued concerning the amount of time needed to correct the violation, and Alan Potter
stated they needed a minimum of seven days because the volunteer labor would need to work on
the weekend.
A motion was made by Chairman Martin and seconded by Ken Rogosheske to establish a
fine for a violation of any part of Section 12-1 (3)would result in a $25.00 per day fine to
take effect the day the citation is issued and allow seven days to bring the property into
compliance and if it is not done in seven days, impose a fine of$25.00 per day for each day
the property remains in non-compliance until brought into compliance to the satisfaction of
the Code Enforcement Officer.
Some further discussion ensued with Board Member Mitchelson opposing the fine structure. It
was the consensus of the Board to vote on each item separately and Chairman Martin
withdrew the motion.
• Minutes Page-10-
Code Enforcement Board
April 29, 1997
A motion was made by Chairman Martin, seconded by Ken Rogosheske and unanimously
carried to establish a fine of$25.00 per day for a violation of any part of Section 12-1 (3)
and the motion carried by a four to two vote with Board Members Deitchman and
Mitchelson voting nay.
A motion was made by Chairman Martin, seconded by Ken Rogosheske and carried by a
five to one vote with Board Member Mitchelson voting nay, to give Beaches Aquatic Pool,
Inc. until May 12, 1997 to bring the property into compliance or a$25.00 per day fine will
be levied beginning May 13, 1997 for each day the property is in non-compliance and
continuing until compliance is reached to the satisfaction of the Code Enforcement Officer.
A motion to amend the motion was made by Board Member Mitchelson to levy a one time
fine of$100.00 to be assessed against the party for whom the responsibility of the pond
exists as determined by the City Commission and the city should take immediate steps,at
the expense of the city, to eradicate the health hazard which has been identified the cost of
which ultimately will be assessed against the responsible party, be it Beaches Aquatic Pool,
• Inc. or the City of Atlantic Beach. The motion died for lack of a second.
Case No. 97-4237-Linzy C. Lane, 1970 Park Street. The owner of the property is in violation
of Chapter 12, Section 12-01-08 of the Code of the City of Atlantic Beach in that there exists on
the premises located at 1970 Park Street the following condition(s): The building has fallen into
a state of disrepair and is in an unsanitary and unsafe condition. It appears the owner has
abandoned the property.
Code Enforcement Officer Grunewald explained he was seeking authorization from the Board for
the City to board up the building and photos showing the condition of the building were passed
out. Chairman Martin inquired if the building was in the same condition as shown in the photos
and Code Enforcement Officer Grunewald stated yes.
Much discussion ensued concerning the state of disrepair of the building and a history of the
property was given by Code Enforcement Officer Grunewald. Chairman Martin asked Mr. Lane
what his plans were for the building since more than two years had gone by since initial repair
efforts on the property had begun. Mr. Lane produced year old documents indicating payment
for work which had not been completed and stated he did not have the money to continue the
project at this time.
After some further discussion, it was the consensus of the Board to give Mr. Lane the opportunity
to properly secure the building.
S
Minutes Page-11-
Code Enforcement Board
April 29, 1997
A motion was made by Theo Mitchelson, seconded by Ken Rogosheske and unanimously
carried to find Linzy C. Lane in violation of Chapter 12, Section 12-1-8 of the Code of
Ordinances of the City of Atlantic Beach.
A motion was then made by Chairman Martin, seconded by Theo Mitchelson and
unanimously carried to give Mr. Lane five (5) days (until May 5, 1997) to secure the
property at 1970 Park Street in a manner approved by Code Enforcement Official
Grunewald.
A motion was made by Theo Mitchelson, seconded by Tammy Deitchman and unanimously
carried to fine Mr. Lane$10.00 per day for every day the property is in non-compliance
after the May 5, 1997 date until compliance is reached to the satisfaction of the Code
Enforcement Officer. Chairman Martin summarized the findings of fact.
5. REQUEST FOR LIEN ACTION:
Name Address Amount of Lien
None.
6. BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS:
There were no comments
7. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further discussion or business to come before the Board, the meeting adjourned at
9:25 PM.
• Vkr„,(Aiti-7,.G.E. Martin, C ai
Code Enforcement Board
Attest:
Qu &ond
M. Brandt, Secretary
ALAN W. POTTER, SR.
DOCUMENTS COMPILED FOR ATLANTIC BEACH
CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD HEARING
APRIL 29, 1997
INDEX TO THE DOCUMENTS
1. Letter to James R. Jarboe, City Manager, from City Attorney, Alan
Jensen -- March 14, 1997.
— 2. Letter from Maureen King, City Clerk, to Vortex Biological Services and
Vortex contract-- May 9, 1994.
3. Beaches Leader& Shorelines newspaper articles -- five articles.
4. Memorandum from Robert S. Kosoy, Director of Public Works to Mr.
Jim Jarboe, City Manager, and Ann Meuse, Finance Director--April 1,
1997.
•
JENSEN & HOULD
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
708 NORTH THIRD STREET
POST OFFICE BOX 50457
JACKSONVILLE BEACH.FLORIDA 32240-0457 •
Alan C.Jensen Telephone(904)246-2500
Stephen A.HouldMarch 14, 1997 Fax(904)246-9960
Mr. James R. Jarboe, City Manager
City of Atlantic Beach
800 Seminole Road
Atlantic Beach, FL 32233
RE: Aquatic Gardens Retention Pond
Dear Jim:
I am writing to you at the direction of the City Commission given at their meeting this past
Monday, March 10, 1997.
I have reviewed several documents in regard to the retention pond at Aquatic Gardens and it
appears there is no question that the property on which the pond is located is owned by Beaches
Aquatic Pool, Inc. The final plat for the Aquatic Gardens subdivision was approved by the
Atlantic Beach City Commission on February 14, 1983. The Adoption and Dedication part of
the plat dedicates to the City "...all street rights of way, private driveway easements, and
easements for drainage, utilities, and sewers, together with all water and sewer utilities and
drainage appurtenances lying therein..." I am of the opinion that this dedication does not include
any retention pond on tract 3 shown on the plat. Although I have not reviewed the actual docu-
ments, I believe the dedication language is fairly standard, used in other subdivisions such as
Oceanwalk, and obviously the City does not maintain the retention ponds in other subdivisions.
Furthermore, after approval of the final plat for the Aquatic Gardens subdivision, and pursuant
to an agreement between Aquatic Gardens and the Beaches Aquatic Pool, Inc., tract 3 was
deeded back to Beaches Aquatic Pool, who continues to own the property. I am not aware of
any reason for the City to maintain a retention pond on private property.
This matter was previously addressed by the City Commission on January 12, 1987, when the
City was asked to accept the retention pond for maintenance. No action was taken at that time.
Subsequently, at a City Commission on August 22, 1988, the City authorized the purchase of
aerators for the retention pond and thereafter, in 1994, the aerators were removed by the City.
It was therefore the City removing its own equipment and no "grand larceny" was involved.
• I enclose copies of the minutes of the various meetings referenced above as well as
memorandums from the Director of Public Works dated April 29 and June 28, 1994. I would
Mr. James R. Jarboe, City Manager
March 14, 1997
Page 2
t
suggest that the City would be setting a dangerous precedent if it decided to maintain a privately
owned retention pond for which it has no responsibility. In reviewing the petition signed by
members of the Aquatic Gardens Association, they request that the City maintain the pond until
the City and the pool end their lengthy battle over who is responsible for the pond and its
upkeep is resolved. I would respectfully suggest that any battle over responsibility for
maintenance and upkeep of the pond should be between Aquatic Gardens and Beaches Aquatic
Pool.
If I can provide any additional information or assistance'.^. this regard, please do not hesitate to
contact me.
Very truly yours,
i/I
/ ALAN • JENSEN
•
Enclosures
cc: Mayor and Commissioners (w/enc)
Robert S. Kosoy, Director, Public Works
^-1 _ CITY OF
c' _/ /�
I j iitietsttie ' - T
� . .:
800 SEMINOLE ROAD
ATLANTIC BEACH,FLORIDA 32233-5445
TELEPHONE(904)247-5800
.Ø "
FAX(904)247-5805
•
May 9 , 1994
Vortex Biological Services
5800 Beach Blvd. #203, Suite 248
Jacksonville, FL 32207
RE: Bid No. 9394-9, Chemically Treat Ditches , Lagoons and Pond for
One Year
Dear Sir:
The City Commission at its regular meeting of May 9 , 1994 has
‘pr- selected your firm as the lowest bid and best bid for the above
mentioned project.
You have already received, or shortly will receive, a Purchase
Order reflecting your bid totaling $3, 588.00.
Should you have any further questions , please contact Bob Kosoy,
Public Works Director at 247-5834.
Sincerely,
,0/-26/(AW.--19/5-42%'--0
Maureen King
City Clerk
cc: City Manager
Public Works Director
Purchasing Agent
•
.1
BID NO. 9394-9
l
In the spaces provided below, indicate price bid for each location
for one year:
1. Ditch at Skate Road
(4/10 mile, .50 acres) $ 105. 60
2. Ditch as Cavalla Road
(2/10 mile, .15 acres) : 52. 80
s
3. Ditch behind Public
(2/10 mile, .15 acres) $52. 80
4. Ditch at Aquatic Drive
(3/10 mile, .18 acres) $79 . 20
5. Pond at Aquatic Drive
(.15 acres) $960. 00
6. Ditch at Police/Fire Dept./City Hall
(2/10 mile, .25 acres) $52. 80
7. Ditch at Howell Park $52. 80
(2/10 mile, .25 acres)
8. Lagoon in Howell Park $480 . 00
' (.10 acre)
9. Ditch at Selva Tierra 4 $52.80
(2/10 mile, .25 acres)
10. Ditch at Seminole Road $10 5. 60
(4/10 mile, .50 acres)
11. Ditch at 20th Street (Selva Madera Court) $7 9. 20
(3/10 mile, .18 acres)
12. Ditch at 20th Street (400 Block) $211 . 20
(8/10 mile, .75 acres)
13. Ditch at 20th Street (500 Block) $105. 60
(4/10 mile, .25 acres)
14. Ditch at 20th Street (Vela Norte) $105 . 60
(4/10 mile, .25 acres)
15. Ditch at Orchid Street to Main Street $52. 80
(2/10 mile, .45 acres)
16. Ditch at Stanly Road to East Church Street $79 . 20
• (3/10 mile, .20 acres)
BID NO. 9394-9
17. South Lagoon Plaza to 11th Street
(2.00 acres) $ 480. 00
18. North Lagoon 11th Street to Selva Marina CC
(2.50 acres) $480. 00
TOTAL PRICE BID FOR ALL LOCATIONS FOR ONE YEAR $ 3, 588. 00
Three Thousand Five Hunderd Eighty Eight (Dollars)
SUBMITTAL:
Vortex Biological Services, Inc. BY_ John F. Pastore
BIDDER
5800 Beach Blvd, # 203-248 �" 1
BUSINESS ADDRESS • GNATURE
(• Jacksonville, FL 32207 Owner
CITY, STATE & ZIP CODE TITLE
DATE: April 20, 1994 (904) 262-3875
BUSINESS TELEPHONE
•
"SHORELINES" April 26, 1996
54111,
Atlantic Beach
approves clean •
-
up of ditches
and park •
by.IRENE SMITH
STAFF WRITER
• The cleaning of ditches to
prevent flooding •problems and
cleaning up city-owned parkland to
prevent traffic accidents were both
addressed by the Atlantic Beach
City Commission this week.
Commissioners directed police
to check• sightlines at a triangular-
shaped park at 16th Street, Ocean
Boulevard and East Coast Drive.
Several citizens have complained
• r.overgrown vegetation is blocking
: motorists'vision.
Deputy Police Chief John
Campbell said there is a visibility
problem with traffic southbound on
Ocean Boulevard at 16th Street. A
motorist can have problems seeing
traffic eastbound on 16th Street at
the four-way intersection, he ex-
plained
Two days after the commission
meeting, Campbell recommended
that some of the overgrowth be
removed.
Cleaning up ditches at various
locations also drew the commis-
sion's attention this week.
In /order to comply with
stomlwater management re-
quirements, commissioners direc-
ted that a ditch running through
Selva Marina area from Fleet Land-
ing to Mayport Road be defoliated
and vegetation removed. Similar
clearing was directed for a ditch at
the west end of Plaza.
In addition, the city approved '
clearing a ditch at the west side of
C Skate Road,from Cutlass to Plaza.
Work on the ditch system that
parallels 20th Street starting at the t
retention pond in Oceanwalk was
also approved.
Total cost for the ditch cleaning t
contract is$11,491.
o
- .. a «s U cl Tj.•• U - e° E O "i .0 b u t ►. U .0 co a) bD O a)
• c3v,� 3 c c.,c •o E v) 0 o v? 3 E-• `� `xl� T w p cx] 3
f3. c3 c o C p0p'= •
If.E v) C 0 CT C .J o v) U 'C •C 'C 4) Cr a) ' C 'U y C N C
n O p V'c�� V 0 •S d0.0 O C > a.� 'S W ea.- .0
E o ,... c i .cEH �' 3 .� E, o' "'300: ac a. Oct• , eHc0. . 0.• 3 'ani
y •sc -
,,. al o h V E 0 0 o0. a) 0 •7 < C3 u o' ° t,.. u °l.°- � 'C3
8 oC7E55,.. .s r. -C :: <1N '�+ o0C •= O 3 '= 0-- ca cCC09I-
I-
a. �;It - y iv w e a� O N vi O w. •C g r u • o v) w
5 •� ti•cw • E 3 °' �d o�•.. o `" Z 8..S)=" °' 0 o 2 `2 l•c; to a�
s cr c ,- 0 � � u ' =.srs c sna. y - E a ai 'd o aVit ci • u c . (a ,o
=a a' o �r5 c aoc °-3 Scar CI
C <c < o .49 (.1 g r: -S 9 0 .s o4 - c
Oo a> ,I'� 0. `° .0° :b'a•.o.c -, 4Ci a cO o 0 Ca) c o e'> W '.5 0.
n � .B 0 0:,? 0 82 .= cS o v.c0:- y� aT � [ •• a) C:13 0 a �� 'c' ... c
1�1 0 13. 0 `v4 .0 .oH ao. .cnclE Ea.. mg :a o. 3 �A •a � E .� d� $.; o.
•
> J
'
OC �. 1+ k. .15to ON C N _TUTS.
C j " C '' 'Cvi+ . Q-s D.o 'S•s •o ,„ o 02v 0.o 3 .
lit:;
TI C3d � '-C o
vc •A h
, co ▪ o ci Q
Q.
0 • y
= D• �
00 C E
. 0O d•. bo >u`'i .co'o .� u du >, gvnb
t0 ya3bao °> o �: baaa 4) *V" c
CO 'tA g g 0 1 0 I •.'11. 8g 5 go.ru .144" .0 Ict-. '8 a
CI a >, ›. acyi a� ra ° eov c pa aai ^ 5 _:-75
u
• 0 o[•fill4 2 a Ft 9 .2 d ?_..) .g a. a. = G 9
= ca v'•5 cc (1a$ G• c ••5c� a' oami .
CC `'J Q o o •v ti
0 •0 r), 1 at go y C O 2 Oa g'd ,►a C o O •2 us N N G O .,
1� c g � 2. .041 E� p -a E. = p a. a
: ro
0 ,. DO Ja > . > I.:. a) CT J > H N t
.L• = -0 v9 •c vu •v 5 ( a-5 < c0 =.-t-oEn t
O C C
cvC
suSybg3 -. -o0 a o C C gCbta)
o acl 0" 3E
'
CA 411) " bO a8o ..
•
5 .6m >. a •5 0. 5cu o.c � C
.
•
illini (111)
t, x, 0.5 oEc•O�vu� o o � �
3 �: a, 0 s e 0 iv .5 •C b4 .E a.. 5 ;'
CI ;11111 9•28d c •d w °� 725 .0 = .S aBcb .
0 a ..5. 01 = 5 3 ..-. g"., 0. = 2 '.1:2 c F,' 2 '' .
11/ uE >. c > Emu yo•u ' ��
c 0.8 .`� S o :. E orsp .4 E °� X cl (.2>N1
• 0.5 ., 0 �. • s -, o c 0 o V a bo
J > -
xt � 3 � E � 8oa.., o o � d ,� � uoc •rd• c
w ¢ •B O o° $ 0 ° .2v 0 a' o a 00v c � 6•o y
clii)
a,a ac� ccT .ra � ca. �•[ ••• H o f U o.¢w a v.cit • c 3 ate.
- - 1
t � ;r;:Former Players P-R..•Marra is Most,Popufar_N>ant! ►f9�5><a ..
Midweek Edition
•• The Beaches Leader
AAAI 9.199— Ntrrport•\tLin,ic&c h•Neptunc Bench•JacksonvWe Bosch•Ponce Vrdn Brach VoL 3..,o.-9 •50'
Double-standards cloud
AB drainage pond issue
tby JEFF HAYNES company in 1994. The work was
I listed as costing S960.
STAFF WRITER "The basic issue is. we're spend-
Maintaining the pond by Aquatic ing public money for a public pur-
Gardens will mean eliminating the pose,and they [the city] don't have
practice of a double-standard. The right of way, and they don't have
• perpetrator of that double-standard, an easement," said Potter. "Do we
however,remains a question. not have unequal treatment under
"I am against the double-stan- the law?"
• Bard of what we do with public A 1996 report from Public Works
money,"said Alan Potter,vice pres- Director Bob Kosoy states that
ident of the Beaches Aquatic Cen- maintaining the Selva Marina ditch
ter(BAC)board.The city of Atlan- helps with the water flow and
tic Beach is paying for maintaining reduces flooding problems.
a privately owned drainage system Fletcher hesitated to compare the
in one part of the city and not in Selva Marina ditch to the Aquatic
another,he said. Gardens pond. "My impression is
On the flipside, Atlantic Beach that there's a significant distinction
Mayor Lyman Fletcher said the real between the two,"he said.
double-standard is employed by One is a creek that runs through
• people who only want public Howell Park,past City Hall and by
money where it will benefit them- Selva Marina,said Fletcher."That's
selves. a bit different of a drainage system
Residents of Aquatic Gardens re- than art artificial pond created by
cendy asked the city for help in the developer,"he said.
keeping up the pond, but City At- Sometimes developers looking
torney Alan Jensen advised against "to make a buck" will turn around
such action. Jensen wrote that the and try to leave the city to tackle
city should not maintain a retention the• problems they have created,
pond on private property, and that said Fletcher.
the BAC and the Aquatic Gardens "My impression is the pond is
homeowners should resolve the is- either the pool's responsibility or
sue. the homeowners' responsibility,"
Potter has contested this,present- said Fletcher.
ing dedication papers stating that When the city installed the
• the city assumed responsibility for aerator in the pond and included it
drainage e-erments and "appur- on the maintenance list, that was
tenances" in that development.The not the same as assuming respon-
sibility for the pond, said Fetcher.
pond,
tenance"of the drainage system. It was done to provide assistance,
• to not CO take over the problem, he
If the city is spendingopposed added.
money on private property for People do not want the govern-
drainage work, why is the city ment involved until it concerns
paying Vortex Biological Services them,said Fletcher.
to maintain the Selva Marina ditch "It's intellectual inconsistency of
• on the golf course,asked Potter. those preaching conservative
According to a bid accepted by government," said Fletcher. "It's
i the city last year, Atlantic Beach
dishonest."
. pays Vortex to maintain, defoliate The Beaches Aquatic Center has
' and de-vegetate a section of the been cited for a code violation due
. ditch located within the golf course. to trash on the pond's surface. That
That work comprises$9,050 of the hearing is scheduled to go before
total$35,758 bid. the Code Enforcement Board on
While-the Aquatic Gardens pond April 29. Potter has said he is con-
: is not listed on the 1996 bid, it was sidering getting an attorney to fight
• on a similar one from the same the citation.
1
> uo 1E uu • . 1, . o ,' (
g'c.c E` v)v.) c 9 E E
o
. Yit
--
' > -
jfl b Lc0 ��G
nT
C
ys
,-, ,,, c,-. c
•I Op 0x
vl uuo , C rn
1 In
3 ' Cu J3•S Cuoot . 0
r o u qy c E E at. u.mui
lai cF � , CrcEN-6t
`
o9rZ LlU1 °L
u eu .0
2 "u c � 4. ioq,�..,. a) :2.5 F" -'4r 5f ° b
E WAJ N.ypC E.
"ICI
U! iHFI
U l,d C V L > .p
n�� g `° _ o q g..
. el::
(n 0 n 3. H.3 Q o u ci vc v ,i
4d
-�"° c, uA >,is � �. VSE ,; ° ea' •E._
Oto) pins4 L.
u 3 o•— 2S$ g'� U a� °v•E
c U t._ O
o0 0 o E�H ., 2 o t •„, c ...;;
C ',;.E-5E.50sa. 'n' Eou'5eano ,.'
v Z
_V 0
li. 44 (1) I Z W Lmu
OraSt �• - b,_, Uto U$ �^ t1 • s 3 o
C o��� 3 *'d 3 0 3 E `_$
0 o o u c N
co) I Cid to bo
o LJH E g.-— n0 0 ,, v > gcn g
._
u 0.EEo c a
�Q K a'u o'a`f C 15ed U EF o c
`�+" CU df4 5° Lo '�� Q Y3s" deo '
C! o a �° 0 ' 0E �oe �
02 . g 8 = 13'0 xoo 'S0 0 vf Ks OF
O0 +111 u rJ' C o' •p'' T ` C 8 0. m
U •59 .i s8 .a cuENv ,
,� �y vv Mc�] o W N f
i..•I Cid m T1 O C 0 0 7 v 0 0 7
00 . < H x o•F
E •o c n u u L
,,t y b ° E 2E
.d u c 0 d t �55 v u O0,a 3 0 a _ :
`� FaI iS 0 rev eQ00 N c
�� E1.111111 w u ^L 1 , LLc 3 o u
R'•• V ° V-s V 1� f2 °1' N C -g L
.-i
+' o • a , c S t3 u `d o E z.•.�
n c F
n �: g 0' U S o��'
� ,c e w 6 3 g > N 4 o j
.':-I, - T r n.s 4:, 0 O Q u of u g
9 Cn O.j 8 u u v1 U L ..cis
pC
U4il
rim( - 3.5 > �
�,5'C ,u� E ., >
•
Weekend Edition
eThBeac es ea er
April.S.199' Nryport..\ILo
anUt Beach•Neptune Beach•JaJacksonvillePo
Beach• en'tetra Beach 34..4 si•50'
h
•
Your • • inion....
lTo the editor
AB needs a 'single standard'
g
To the editor: Clearly, maintenance of drainage should be praised and applauded
The April 9 Beaches Leader ar- ways within the city is a valid pub- that it has"for years, and has as of
tide "Double standards cloud AB lic purpose and such maintenance this date, a contract for the
drainage pond issue"elicited a let- deserves public funding. That pub- maintenance of all of this waterway
ter to the editor(April 16). lie purpose funding should include that passes through or borders on
The issue of "AB double scan- not only the non-dedicated Selva its property." Without the effort by
dard" rises from and rests with the Marina Lagoon and Outfall Ditch Selva Marina, recent flooding of
letter of opinion from the city at- but also the dedicated Aquatic Gar- the Howell Park vicinity would
torney(March 14, 1997) to the city dens retention pond. have been worse.
manager concerning Atlantic Beach The 124 property owners in A- It is my opinion that the Atlantic —
maintenance of the Aquatic Gar- quatic Gardens are assessed S3 per Beach city government should es-
dens retention pond.That pond Iies month each for a stormwater tablish a "single standard" of
within Tract 3 of Aquatic Gardens management fee; this totals maintaining the drainage systems
subdivision. The city received and $4,464.00 annually. If the retention that serve all of its citizens and as-
accepted dedication of a drainage pond is not to be maintained by the sure equal protection for all.
easement over the entire tract "in city, what is the legitimate expendi-
perpetuity."
ture for those fees each year? Alan W.Potter Sr.
The city attorney advised: "I am The Sclva Marina Cooney Club Atlantic Beach
not aware of any reason for the .
City to maintain a retention pond
on private property." Noteworthy,
the private property is, in its en-
tirety, subject to the dedicated and
accepted drainage easement.
The "double standard" is unmis-
takably identified by an examina-
tion of the city contract to maintain,
defoliate, de-vegetate, and to
chemically spray ditches and
waterways. For example, the city
contract requires the payment of
S10,210 for work along more than
a mile of the Selva Marina Lagoon
and Outfall Ditch,including:
The South Lagoon from Plaza to
11th Street; the North Lagoon from
11th Street to the Selva Marina
Country Club; the Selva Marina
Ditch from the second bridge at the
Selva Marina Country Club Golf
Course, terminating at the bridge at
Fleet Landing.
No public records have been
produced to demonstrate that the
city possesses either an easement or
411/ a right of way for the route of the
Selva Marina Lagoon and Outfall
Ditch that (at least for the past
year) is being maintained by a city-
paid contractor.
_ sa =11
y1 •.'�; CITY OF
' •
� •
lead - 7evu da
1 1200 SANDPIPER LANE
_ _ _ _ ATLANTIC BEACH, FLORIDA 32233-4381
• TELEPHONE(904)247-5834
X06 1,, 4 FAX(904) 247.5843
MEMORANDUM
DATE: April 1, 1997
TO: Jim Jarboe/City Manager
Ann Meuse/Finance Director
• FROM: Robert S. Kosoy/Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: Renewal of Vortex Contract
We recommend renewal of the Vortex contract in the annual amount of$2,304/Month, inclusive
of the$80.00 per month added for the Sevilla Ditch System to avoid issuing a separate check
request monthly. If approved, this work should be issued on an inverted purchase order.
Vortex has been doing a better job than previous firms and their costs have been lower than the
other Tums with similarly licensed personnel. .
RSK/cst
cc: Phil NodineJStreets&Maintenance Division Director
Contracts Binder
APPROVED BY CITY MANAGER:
•
.�'7 /. 4'y' l'.
•
ALAN W. POTTER, SR.
• 374 Second Street
Atlantic Beach,FL 32233
April 29, 1997
Code Enforcement Board
City of Atlantic Beach
800 Seminole Road
Atlantic Beach, Florida 32233
Re: Aquatic Gardens Retention Pond
Subject: (a) CEB Letter of Notice -- January 30, 1997
(b) CEB Subpoena-- March 24, 1997
(c) CEB Letter of Notice and Order-- March 24, 1997
Dear Board Members:
In response to your three written communications, (subj: (a), (b) and (c)), I am appearing in behalf
of the Beaches Aquatic Pool, Inc., a Florida non-profit corporation, which is the owner-operator-
manager of the public service Beaches Aquatic Pool.
4110 I am ALAN W.POTTER, SR. My residence, for more than 38 years, is 374 Second Street,Atlantic
Beach.
I am the vice-president of Beaches Aquatic Pool, Inc., and I am a member of the Board of Directors.
In that official capacity, I have proper standing to appear before the Atlantic Beach Code
Enforcement Board and to respond to the subject (three) CEB communications.
The respondent position of Beaches Aquatic Pool, Inc. is that the allegations of Mr. Karl W.
Grunewald, Code Enforcement Officer, City of Atlantic Beach, improperly identify the Beaches
Aquatic Pool, Inc. for the alleged code violations.
For your convenience, I hand you a photocopy of Chapter 12 NUISANCES of the Atlantic Beach
Code of Ordinances. Attached thereto is a copy of (a) the January 30, 1997 letter of notice of
violation(s), a copy of (b) the March 24, 1997 Subpoena, and a copy of (c) the March 24, 1997
Notice and Order to Appear.
A. For your_. irstsonsiderationand action, I request that you refer to subparagraph
12-1b(4) of Chapter 12. The Code Enforcement Board is respectfully requested to delete
all allegations that a violation of subparagraph 12-1 b(4) of Chapter 12 has occurred.
S
Code Enforcement Board
April 29, 1997
Page 2
In support of my request, the following valid points are offered:
1. The language of subparagraph 12-1b(4) does not describe nor should it apply to
the Aquatic Gardens Retention Pond.
2. The waters within Aquatic Gardens Retention Pond are not now nor have they
ever been"stagnant." The waters are the home for fish and other wildlife.
3. The waters of The Aquatic Gardens Retention Pond are not now nor have they
ever been the habitat for mosquito larvae.
4. The waters of the Aquatic Gardens Retention Pond do provide a growth area for
"duckweed," the smallest aquatic plant that is indigenous to Florida. This floating
plant growth provides shelter from the direct rays of the sun for the fish life and a
hiding place for those fish from bird attacks.
5. The allegation"I have found and determined that you are in violation of Atlantic
Beach Ordinance Chapter 12, Section 12-1b(4)" is a false allegation and warrants
deletion from further discussion.
B. For your second considerationand action, I request that you refer to Subparagraph
12-1b(3) of Chapter 12. The Code Enforcement Board is respectfully requested to delete
all allegations that Beaches Aquatic Pool,Inc. has either permitted or committed a violation
of subparagraph 12-1b(3) of Chapter 12.
In support of my request, the following valid points are offered:
1. The townhome residential community of Aquatic Gardens was designed and
constructed so that all stormwater falling upon the homes,the yards, the driveways,
and the streets therein would flow to and along the concrete curbs; thence to and into
curb inlets and catch basins; thence, via underground concrete culvert pipes to, into,
and across the retention pond; thence, exiting the retention pond by flowing into and
through a concrete culvert pipe and discharging into the Royal Palms drainage ditch.
2. The engineering plans and specifications for the Aquatic Gardens subdivision
were submitted to and approved by the Atlantic Beach City Commission prior to
construction of the development.
I
I
Code Enforcement Board
April 29, 1997
,r, Page 3
3. The construction of all of the Aquatic Gardens subdivision water, sewer, storm
drainage, streets, and retention pond were subject to inspection and approval by the
City of Atlantic Beach.
4. The "Record Plat" for the Aquatic Gardens subdivision was submitted to,
approved, and accepted by the City of Atlantic Beach. Integral and legally essential
parts of the Record Plat are:
ADOPTION AND DEDICATION
"...that all street rights-of-way, private driveway easements, and easements
for drainage,utilities,and sewers,together with all water and sewer utilities
and drainage appurtenances lying therein, are hereby irrevocably and
without reservations dedicated to the City of Atlantic Beach and its
successors."
and,
"Tract 3. Easement for drainage, utilities and sewers, (over entire tract)"
ler
and,
COMMISSIONER'S APPROVAL
"This is to certify that this plat has been examined, accepted, and approved
this 25th day of April A.D., 1983, By the Board of Commissioners for the
City of Atlantic Beach, Florida."
5. Confirmation of intent that resides with the adoption and dedication of"drainage
appurtenances" and with the "Tract-3" language is supported by the definitions
contained in"Black's Law Dictionary," Sixth Edition, West Publishing Company,
1990. I hand to each of you a photocopy of the definitions for EASEMENT and for
APPURTENANCE and a photocopy of the Record Plat for Aquatic Gardens.
Code Enforcement Board
April 29, 1997
Page 4
A reasonable reading of those definitions should assure you that (a) the retention
pond is a"drainage appurtenance,"(b)the retention pond--situated on Tract 3-- is the
subject and the purpose of the"drainage easement"over the entire tract, and, (c) the
retention pond (i.e., drainage appurtenance) was dedicated to and accepted by the
City of Atlantic Beach, "in perpetuity."
6. The City of Atlantic Beach possesses the undisputed"right of easement"to utilize
"the entire Tract-3" for its drainage purposes.
7. It is reasonable and clear that"plastic litter"is found in many places throughout
our community. It is also reasonable to acknowledge that heavy rainfall will "flush"
objects of litter and float those objects into the storm drainage system,the drainage
ditches, and the drainage pond(s).
An examination of the Aquatic Gardens Retention Pond should fairly disclose that
the plastic litter therein most probably was conveyed to the retention pond as a result
of storm water cleaning of the city streets in Aquatic Gardens. It is also well known
that some of the litter along Atlantic Beach streets results from the careless collection
of garbage and trash by the City-contracted refuse company.
During periods of heavy rainfall, the Royal Palms Ditch backs up into the Aquatic
Gardens Retention Pond, conveys flotsam and contributes to the overflow onto and
blockage of Aquatic Drive.
8. There has been no showing by the Code Enforcement Officer that any member--
1 either adult or child-- of the Beaches Aquatic Pool has deposited rubbish and litter
into the Aquatic Gardens Retention Pond.
9. Recent"Beaches Leader" and"Shorelines"printings (authored by journalist Jeff
Haynes,journalist Irene Smith, citizen G. E. Martin, and citizen A. W. Potter) have
documented that the City of Atlantic Beach does expend public funds to maintain
dedicated drainage rights-of-way, and non-dedicated drainage ways. For
approximately eleven years,the City funded maintenance of the dedicated easement
Aquatic Gardens Retention Pond. For the past two years the City has abandoned the
retention pond maintenance and, via the Code Enforcement Board, sought to compel
maintenance by the Beaches Aquatic Pool, Inc., the owner of the land UNDER the
I46 retention pond.
Code Enforcement Board
April 29, 1997
110 Page 5
10. Expenditure of public funds to serve a necessary public purpose is visibly
providing a"protection" under the law. To selectively omit the citizens of Aquatic
Gardens from municipal "protection" by refusing to provide maintenance of the
retention pond is a denial of"equal protection" for those citizens.
11. The City of Atlantic Beach and/or the Code Enforcement Officer have a double
standard for maintenance of drainage waterways.
For viewing by the Code Board members, I offer two photographs of the Aquatic
Gardens retention pond and eight photographs of drainage waterways in the
immediately adjacent neighborhoods. An examination of the photographs will
clearly show that City-maintained waterways are in worse condition than is the
Aquatic Gardens retention pond.
It is obvious from the photographs that the Code Enforcement Board is being placed
in a position of imposing "selective enforcement" of the nuisance law. You should
turn away from such an action.
C. The Officers and Directors of Beaches Aquatic Pool, Inc. request the City of Atlantic
Beach Code Enforcement Board to recognize the adverse economic impact upon the public
service performance of Beaches Aquatic Pool, Inc. that would result if the Code
Enforcement Board should disregard the facts of the retention pond matter and, as a result,
should proceed and impose fines upon Beaches Aquatic Pool, Inc. Imposition of fines and
the fear of future fines will require Beaches Aquatic Pool, Inc.,to expend its limited funds
on retention pond maintenance that, in my considered opinion (which is supported by the
facts), is the municipal duty of the City of Atlantic Beach.
D. It is my opinion that members of the Code Enforcement Board of the City of Atlantic
Beach should not, under color of authority of their appointed office, take any action that
is either harmful to or prejudicial to Beaches Aquatic Pool, Inc.and cause an impairment
of its public service purpose.
E. For the consideration of the Code Enforcement Board, an "Information Package"
deserving of review is herewith provided to each member of said Board; information
contained therein has been and continues to be readily available from the public records and
from the published media.
•
Code Enforcement Board
April 29, 1997
11111, Page 6
The considered review, attention and concern of each member of the City of Atlantic Beach Code
Enforcement Board is invited and requested to all information concerning the Aquatic Gardens
Subdivision, the Aquatic Gardens retention pond, the Beaches Aquatic Pool, Inc., the actions and
conduct of the City of Atlantic Beach in all maters concerning storm water ditches, storm water
ponds, and storm water lagoons-- whether rights-of-way, dedicated easements, or non-dedicated
waterways-- and all actions and contracts associated with the maintenance of the Atlantic Beach
storm water system. Such actions are warranted in the just resolution of the Aquatic Gardens
Retention Pond issue now before the Board.
Respectfully submitted,
Al W. /77A -,
, Sr.
Vice-President, Beaches Aquatic Pool, Inc.
AWP/amh
S
1646 1647 UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION
AMENDMENT XII [1804]
prior The Electors shall meet in their respective states and vote by ballot for President and Vice-Presi-
dent, one of whom, at least, shall not be an inhabitant of the same state with themselves; they shall
name in their ballots the person voted for as President, and in distinct ballots the person voted for as
Vice-President, and they shall make distinct lists of all persons voted for as President, and of all persons
voted for as Vice-President, and of the number of votes for each, which lists they shall sign and certify,
-eason- and transmit sealed to the seat of the government of the United States, directed to the President of the
cause, Senate;—The President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives,
)ersons open all the certificates and the votes shall then be counted;—The person having the greatest number of
votes for President, shall be the President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors
appointed; and if no person have such majority, then from the persons having the highest numbers not
exceeding three on the list of those voted for as President, the House of Representatives shall choose
immediately, by ballot, the President. But in choosing the President, the votes shall be taken by states,
on a the representation from each state having one vote; a quorum for this purpose shall consist of a member
in the or members from two-thirds of the states, and a majority of all the states shall be necessary to a choice.
for the And if the House of Representatives shall not choose a President whenever the right of choice shall
;e to be devolve upon them before the fourth day of March next following, then the Vice-President shall act as
w; nor President, as in the case of the death or other constitutional disability of the President.—The person
having the greatest number of votes as Vice-President, shall be the Vice-President, if such number be a
majority of the whole number of Electors appointed,and if no person have a majority,then from the two
highest numbers on the list, the Senate shall choose the Vice-President; a quorum for the purpose shall
consist of two-thirds of the whole number of Senators, and a majority of the whole number shall be
• by an necessary to a choice. But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible
ct shall to that of Vice-President of the United States.
:ion; to
3 In his AMENDMENT XIII [1865]
Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude,except as a punishment for crime whereof the
party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their
jurisdiction.
of trial
t of the Section 2. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.
AMENDMENT XIV [1868]
Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction
hments thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or
enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor
shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to
any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Section 2. Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their
sparage respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State excluding Indians not taxed.
But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice President of
the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the
members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being
twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for
States, participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the
proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens
twenty-one years of age in such State.
Section 3. No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and
Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who
equity, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a
izens or member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the
Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or
41111,
Appurtenant easement. An incorporeal right which is .
BLACK'S attached to a superior right and inheres in land to
which it is attached and is in the nature of a covenant
running with the land. Fort Dodge, D. M. & S. Ry. v.
L A �N�y� DICTIONARY' American Community Stores Corp., 256 Iowa 1344, 131
N.W.2d 515, 521. There must be a dominant estate and
servient estate. An easement interest which attaches to
Definitions of the Terms and Phrases of the land and passes with it. First Nat. Bank of Amaril-
American and English Jurisprudence, lo v. Amarillo Nat. Bank,Tex.Civ.App., 531 S.W.2d 905,
Ancient and Modern 907. An "incorporeal right" which is attached to and
By belongs with some greater and superior right or some-
thing annexed to another thing more worthy and which
HENRY CAMPBELL BLACK, M. A. passes as incident to it and is incapable of existence
separate and apart from the particular land to which it
SIXTH EDITION is annexed.
BY
THE PUBLISHER'S EDITORIAL STAFF Exclusive easement. Grant of"exclusive easement" con-
veys unfettered rights to owner of easement to use that
Coauthcrs easement for purposes specified in grant to exclusion of
JOSEPH R. NOLAN all others. Latham v. Garner, 105 Idaho 854, 673 P.2d
Associate Justice, Massachusetts Supreme Judiaal Court
1048, 1050.
AM
JACQUELINE M. NOLAN—HALEY Easement of necessity. One in which the easement is
Associate Clinical Professor• indispensable to the enjoyment of the dominant estate.
Fordham University School of Law
Such arises by operation of law when land conveyed is
Contributing Authors completely shut off from access to any road by land
retained by grantor or by land of grantor and that of a
M.J.CONNOLLY stranger. Tarr v. Watkins, 180 Cal.App.2d 362, 4 Cal.
a......Proi..fo,(Lrqua4c.1.
cow,.Of Ana&:,cr..<,..30.f0n coda). Rptr. 293, 296.
STEPHEN C.HICKS ..
Prof..,01 Ltw.Suffolk UrwefSIty
Law So .Boston.MA Private or public easements. A private easement is one 1
MARTINA N.AIJBRANDI in which the enjoyment is restricted to one or a few '
Cer4f..e Pubic Accountant.BOo0O.MA individuals, while a public easement is one the right to
the enjoyment of which is vested in the public generally
ST. PAUL. MINN.
'— WEST PUBLISHING Co. or in an entire community; such as an easement 0
f
1990 passage on the public streets and highways or of naviga-
tion on a stream.
Easement. A right of use over the property of another. •
Traditionally the permitted kinds of uses were limited, Appurtenance /ap6rt3nans/. That which belongs to
the most important being rights of way and rights something else; an adjunct; an appendage. Something
concerning flowing waters. The easement was normally annexed to another thing more worthy as principal,and .
for the benefit of adjoining lands, no matter who the which passes as incident to it, as a right of way or other
owner was (an easement appurtenant), rather than for easement to land; an outhouse, barn, garden, or or-
the benefit of a specific individual (easement in gross). chard, to a house or messuage. Joplin Waterworks Co.
The land having the right of use as an appurtenance is v. Jasper County, 327 Mo. 964, 38 S.W.2d 1068, 1076.
known as the dominant tenement and the land which is An article adapted to the use of the property to which it
subject to the easement is known as the servient tene- is connected,and which was intended to be a permanent
ment.
accession to the freehold. A thing is deemed to be
A right in the owner of one parcel of land, by reason incidental or appurtenant to land when it is by right
of such ownership, to use the land of another for a used with the land for its benefit, as in the case of a
way, or watercourse, or of a passage for light, air, or
special purpose not inconsistent with a general property heat from or across the land of another. See also
in the owner. Appendant.
An interest which one person has in the land of Appurtenant. Belonging to; accessory or incident to;
another. A primary characteristic of an easement is adjunct, appended, or annexed to; answering to ac-
■ that its burden falls upon the possessor of the land from cessorium in the civil law. Employed in leases for the
which it issued and that characteristic is expressed in purpose of including any easements or servitudes used
the statement that the land constitutes a servient tene or enjoyed with the demised premises. A thing is 'rap- •
ment and the easement a dominant tenement. Potter v. purtenant" to something else when it stands in relation
7r. Northern Natural Gas Co., 201 Kan. 528, 441 P.2d 802, of an incident to a principal and is necessarily connected
805. An interest in land in and over which it is to be with the use and enjoyment of the latter. A thing is
enjoyed, and is distinguishable from a "license" which deemed to be incidental or appurtenant to land when it
merely confers personal privilege to do some act on the is by right used with the land for its benefit, as in the
land. Logan v. McGee, Miss., 320 So.2d 792, 793. case of a way, or water-course, or of a passage for light,
air,or heat from or across the land of another. See also
Easement.
1 i2 k r` '} ' • z
O '4,DI.f ..nsunun•Yn,44.34 J r .Y Z 01...s: 1~''•••+ryM�f' Ya=C7 5 a a.wrw»+.en 2 "•oe�r Y' U�:•Q W $ %i g1, .umus,r,Aw*IN3O SWNse 9 •4yF y4 y•!":,x' Onn. t=n W y - •1.061,4,7E'n%� � oei'�� aF Ni0.�'oD s�r� a 33.eI4.`4
c, :..., m Q.
lit NI r t 4� 3a i 3 C u-I 3 q 1 O; o fD A
o �I - 3 e aq ua.l. 3 .a
.-M'a,l•3 a- M O O•• 4. .00•AL --------1 U !g V V 3 I"W o
X I � u a :_3 02 1 ' VV :ii 'i u_e F i ° < if.N u 3v 3 a•o%. °c k'3 °a i v� �� S.�Z� d�'•W
-a Q
p W o j K ? -$.01 ;`e j 1�,2 ',i •3.9e0,300.0onl I,: •------ CC'‘•
Ili
€R i _ m?-
CO I.
y N ? 6•of IC. 4l15.3t3837M1•3�.�r,"- i�,i•�, J:./ U ; 3iixi y WAR
I- Q ; v01 ,0.40 �.•nz,oli 1 o i w /9`/ i r I (nav . 0.7u ' (Xao
a E. .•.••• ,l <i1 m I JI:O: A/ ./ l' I; '---------4 _ y W F 3 Q
po an.u.rr 1 ;,S , t:t'��•! I= Q'Ir,1- i< R 2 • 2
J K Y� J t-y l l t .i/ry., [F b F p
[�. 'o , ' -0-b 1`-',,,;,..«I...1•:,.i 4t/f,�'y A I 09: I a\jo F®<Y<• ,t U
• Q L �. .'.•i Il�'.r,•�A......yN?ITC „� • 417'\in..h _-__-_.J Q l', y•t E6 2'4 4
1-
...I
v ``, 3 rte- . •� '••41.
ut L ` I >r w a y 5 E .
a a `, moi____ • •n 01.51 ; u --A.-.-I� 1 •i OF; .;41a8 Z
ow
O -'-- i 11• i :� 0•$ .• ir.a; -- j 11.01 i.:..r •t./..;A 1
t ) 7,a ) 0•bZ ii 7.91 • >o-s/ F; l I
a m II i F v t . ; al-O2 3;----,• .. tel ,t
G.PI / L-----'!___._6 $ • .,i Apt (MN.01J 8^ 1
TO vi _- i/O ti ...rn `..s..h.r..,i Y•12 i Y•)/ I - �T.- J m
CC N
41 41
i„.1-, -- r
o - 74,
``� - -+` i 0$. f_3-YE_ i ','Ll t I e i k{.
F- 1 J - ? O.41 ---- -?I/_' i u I 3 W 3
¢ •
.,A` ( is +_6_y ; i -tt 64; 4 k 4,-$./4 1 I Cl 'o
ati �iT_ i r - S o a
w NCL la '! , y ••�, , .'s 11.4: ;? Y-OZ i ? v_s/ fir.., 3 i < t i a- ; r +
o z i , 0.1...°m • Y•43 :) 6.0E t i p.s•/ IS r 4--_1 r" `� >,',
I-
l g ``! 0-.�_• _ 0.9E ; k • I I g'_ p
wmQ .a/�+a� ) e•9 3 d.4-' .t 1? e_vT_? o ;Ott o_s/ _ ; a• 8
CC¢C . :,,,'; : Y-9 •' ? 2.;; 1 3.9E ? .:11%r.r o , 3 2,1
.A =w d' -.�a• -.n,.;•1n• j 6_'!T `.i. d•OE 4 e.n S i t : ?. i :J P
" ,
o 0 LL ,'� ' i ! 7.5 $i . •, .,; Y-bd ; - }fii? 'I':
- i I "• - . , 3
0 •
-111 o y •IA --+ ?-_al:.
.5 a !-=Z_'i 211'1-
'bE ? 0-f/ ii Ois i i.. ..i. .w vI`•
F-. •
Z `t< I, , 1 1 ow IN o.yZ : '3 '-ei r' 'Ir67' OaV�3` �"' ii'vis
aFO •S I \• ION :_O.b- Q s-7TL_=.-•.. ..s Y•G/I? . 10c , �_ 08 altN,- --- -
z I,_w.V r iJ ?- -b I g_ i-t_y Ok _' _ -L/_� J ~-
Nr,Q `''' 1- .• I r L • ,,,..:o..4.1••"1.3.7:4---; ,.,•2 N_w� • K
0.1;
aQ _ r] / V I 7 'Q•fi •i i 9•IZ j----- ,r.a--,- -i- L.
t
X
- .<5'..........:-.;
... +,l04•? �•9 •sil?tr.l.r----_• • ov,••go8�"• :R.�.n"sh.'`yS2nnFnn2'.i,
m3U = 6•k) ? Y•IT 't F. iS:sa4r�< •vv „vv6 dvv
. _ ..J" y! I. 3� $:� r: 33•��,:on�tiR$ .Iwn,�n•.�
®a W W `I''y. 77:---
----. �.n.x...:-. •L" • • -�9,11 0;I O'1 I SI u v..`• i i
I''''.ti !•c 3 • er.d'.s,'3� ,t I. 051 I -
a Wim, N�;'�;:,ria i�ssa;� ?ail
wfm "s ti 1 .t •.••I .• •m..o.)I .. ‘%,�,`' w 'cj-------1 F i 3 S F chi:"wC y n y u:otiev?}.•ti o.
zw -r' 3 i '0.E e..... .rr V ‘4.c.•‘....1,1>,S "' . rq '. ' 'o Z•',o °•«wtAa a o.it o3:"�3'•:1
6 r3 t) .y• ; 7•E ... u o:1ipp;pi<�• c` ,2)`:r ' �111:1.."::::w«vt E`^vau ` `�a�'
b• , ••";r1l"I ..•I N?t - 1.`1%,'")'Z'.•' ,2 •T•2_ U i 334..v..3.3.3.3 4 N M'2 O Y
�yti a h H
�l a.Qul_ 1 : i_9.t i ...2i....,. :... 2 ..... ` ... »si...® 3 O.resraret "�
r�Q ::. •. 3.•3 IL J * • v, • 1
�¢V tl '•t :t-�_ 0 x: t �y yy_ o f
NRO it_0_o co '_? f '• r27�<,x�,SL k •-L _ - {"i rC` rvi2
4.
5 b
a cc r I u ••..^ •,:Ng. 3 --r-__- 'R Z g o e o C
0o as I • I. S Fi d j$� r�
:IrisS •
J x 1
y t0 4 i It i Y 1 �.,• •
w � � 4 ; W
e . a 3. tip 4
ou V� e4 ' cii r $sn,g 'IR F 3 fl ti4 40 I
ma _ r f F 1t
w In 5 z9 IM Y i p .y�
o m 3� sem: �./b%.// In.w I •
F'-
ZC$4i 3 tIr s
° $ 'M_65 4y.29'S I 9 / y,;g v i' 4/F F 3 t
r 14;'.4•,..,';ii svi�t
+ nnroAVW iii 8.4 .iiicI t
sIS ®°?® Rii °�9
d �i�llll y<
0Z;iao
. ♦z"' � ! �11l0`°,�`, il1! Q p♦",v)v-��J w: w1Y�♦t
1!1O M Waap'�'
co " t Mil! O W -2 v • a-11 'Ztata1a^A"{ZsD Sr i"1.N!C.y �o 1l.11 iD h Z i �t X !nn1-i7 13 D Zata` uA: a,
mo'•0I iE a finli ` %
11
T� Aa '-'vsw-:•*pa
l! !t!'er,c,a°w.
a!tiia -7, 1
!
n
gA",1gatiYuNa `w\ `1.1. cv> l ? g �I YA• 2,:^,ap\ Y,!`il ,a ho l A 4aY° \l ,w !°�,° i0$ $ In 1VY° itaZav�'�� � _<20° {
!'t
♦ 11 'lkt, " $ V cy ^00r�°lZt•'2aa pw3o
twa }Wi. a °il 3 A ^ o14pa�‘ 1A' 'e " �Op
,pO
!,m 21ppa p11v g24 liq 0ktlr:IM.”\ Dm! ° tae 4iaaai 1 5 R $�^ 9e.o. aa \a, ! ° rzv>20 0wa 'tw" pr i2 :•`i. Z10�o$l°YY° Z'1;D ,q !' ,at!; ♦ : ; gmai ai�Yt1l"@:^,p , AOO-AN �4: - a mu ` iii �$ poky F'aaituz ,tiv9.:4z OAt ,. 1a ai. WSe iv $ tii , geako,Ul1 , r mm.a` 1 1�� a a g . giy£ a°d 1!!! 0lAfm 1 p WW1 " $ � ^ialZ°t .aa TA! a !iw� ! ; 4R ° t > p2 ,1Oz11 ti''':“. n aay\i, ,prAte2> 0 C�P>3 ` 404 1; l • � ii—E3 Wpgf,aat^ D ;tta2 B 7 �pp 2 ` t A o1 p 1,o,i1°aap i t ti gw �° *i,p$ "`"wkl, si`1 CiO i :° a :3 a � a ,iiA . z isa ;CC ; 7L TCCa ,
av
li rtTr�
�A,wo*U) i 'WTI
2 rA 2 lsfA i • \�lc•,Q t t�� a • e•aa a`et O mr=1V/
`� ! ♦ 111ZC !!fir ZD r tA-1 t atpa♦ 1 a
a! A A r t o., � �r A a a�.l , , ^ D a aaa .,\� O z
}}}�����, t2ra a�� • � m � ° aD i. , ia2w.0 i o-i i?12 a,2w m�
�. aa°Za�1`,< t `I ; n3 1m , ",Ak c3> 'Z 1�' • tA� Z1,014 DAv
o as opm a C 7), ♦ o t:: o ! D ; w trr o ! D pir
ao.O , ^>1N , 1N . a �i !a 1� , i pia w,; '"O aDI
! a0 �. ��� iy � ^� vi ;aA�iO a ^o tva+, aAatO z
omim:
e�\�� ! a• ! A*O iii yA `°:,ice ! -77 \ ! �°\iZz“3 i 1SYA p`ir ' \ pA ap 1!Z t l p`1 y1a „ ”^ letm tm Qm a°�.t°, �o`p a a-n ap°� °tp� m'o ai �F�-i �(�� r ir0 A.� 2i,i„0 ` 2+p Ac.ioz,4: - rp k
t1,0.4 7 p — ' ::(/1 Y ° A a wta w-1
aA ti 'n i q; y!t 4 dp\* 1a,� m
�. tLi °0!i.4
°CA;A °c` �— ZI ° !!`.� � a� Q �w♦i - � en
inIN iiv V
1t r4i
rD ; s .� �Ai$ p; re� �wia°a!`An \r"'i \,•p ` DIs
r ,�;! O yo`'paaare� :tam 1a� 1` p, ` pr 141 . . n kyk^a Aaa.� i\^ UrO ZA ypa '•'I ' ti atO1 2 Plr-
�wt�i�:m til �< e� i Zr�� D z s i. a .i> D rov
• r 1. 2 p ^t A a p,D w C p \ ! , 1 ^,r D
.CI..� :i��ia :1a !ar oZ . awp� G7 °� + a;e? m m� "l�
...t owQ\r^�, °a�� w`y p"� ava� rn o'< • I 0°sim • c
° ii�io� 0 �2 a{ ;i1, "°O ^ °` ^ialt OzN
3'",..,, 2t t!e �! Ap a t�� o a' I t1Y:ai' D-
:°, alt 1 Ao ' ;T e �t'� 1� ° ' ,t�; rg NI
A .Z:1' CJ h, t Z °tl° �O �, t�2S. AfNI
aa,C� Int
A ot�,°,a a i12 ` :i y r � Oa r I � 1��a E.
♦ ° ,p a p a!t° a a a t♦ f� p D
Dlu :ly�� to ? t tae'' , , • D
`>c:U • 2 ' a t `a p t i t ;. t alas
wiaV. 0 .' A i`. p 1, as
"r- ,iZ1°i Z. a^a �� t `+ jai` : ' r n1�` i
U: `��tlr OAA w� >i1` i a ^� ° 1 cc
i3
ij1 C: 1� i kW. ` ; aai;21 O
as°CA a \ \ I* t♦ a2 A 7C
A-41 .10:0 y a a °"... 11 r
Nom A �lai Vi a� � A ,�`,�� ti`��,p� 4aj,;
ill `�`;F W
�' ^j;A, a p to !l,tt I ,A W,%
5D% alv:,°o
r
,..:\t at : I ae ,fit„° I�a� 'Y`��n� w
vy a ao ,'� a • ° Tali° ! iltw m D
FO °t aaa t
, D #u Ar+ po r R1
-a,� o < C �.