Loading...
340 Camelia St environmental assessment O v�� MEMORANDUM TO: ATLANTIC BEACH BUILDING DEPARTMENT FROM: JONATHAN NAPIER SUBJECT: CAMELIA LOT DATE: AUGUST 4, 2016 Access Ecological Associates, Inc. (AEA), and our project team, which includes the landowners have been working diligently with Derek Reeves of the COAB and Mr. Rick Carper (representing COAB) in order to address initial concerns raised during a pre- application review of the parcel. Specifically the need for an undisturbed natural buffer along the jurisdictional wetland line as depicted within the attached package and correspondence. As you will see from the attached, it was determined through a review of historical aerial photographs and site inspections that much of the parcel in question has been mowed and maintained as "lawn" for the past several decades. These findings were presented to and discussed with Mr. Reeves and Mr. Carper during a May 11tH 2016 meeting. Both Mr. Reeves and Mr. Carper agreed that because of these findings an undisturbed buffer does not occur within the parcel and that "run-off' would be the primary concern with Mr. Carper asking that we place a berm along the rear of the lot to capture rear yard run-off prior to it discharging into the adjoining wetland. As you will see from the attached package this request has been incorporated into the design of the lot. At this time it is our understanding that the concerns have been addressed and we eagerly await the COAB Building Department approvals so that we may begin the construction of the landowners new home. Access Ecological Associates,Inc.2485 Pellicer Road,St.Augustine,FI 32092 904-584-1144 office 904-584-1143 fax socl June 26, 2016 Mr. Derek Reeves City of Atlantic Beach 800 Seminole Road Atlantic Beach, FL 32233 RE: Camelia Lot for Phyllis Arnold Follow up to our meeting of May 11th, 2016 Dear Mr. Reeves: As a follow up to the meeting we had in your office on May 11, 2016 in which yourself, myself, Mr. Rick Carper, Mr. Gary Moreau and Ms. Phyllis Arnold were in attendance I am providing a summary of the meeting as well as the materials requested by Mr. Carper relative to the lot drainage. Over the past several months it has been determined and demonstrated that the nature and present state of the lot is mowed and maintained. On May 2, 2016 you forwarded an email on to Ms. Phyllis Arnold that was provided to you by Mr. Rick Carper. In the email Mr. Carper provided the specific activities that are and are not permitted within the City of Atlantic Beach's development guidelines. It was that email which we reviewed as a group item by item, and it was during this review that it was determined that because of the maintained nature of the lot, that an undisturbed buffer would be possible as native vegetation does not currently exist. It was also during this discussion that Mr. Carper made mention and suggested that the project install a backyard treatment berm to allow for the capture, and storage of the backyard run-off. AEA has generated the requested drawing and has attached it to this correspondence for your review. Additionally, the project team did confirm as I understand it that the finished floor elevation of the proposed home will be situated at an elevation greater to the required 8.5 feet also as we discussed during the meeting. The elevation of the finished floor did not require the addition of fill, as the foundation itself is to be elevated to the appropriate height. J O / 7VIAN D/�z 1 A!—-Ab A I . at F hl A lido -- -� - ►� - T? r� p Proposed Drain to Wetland to North Proposed Berm N89'5 '50"E 102.33'(A) I / 4.0' w w 0000 � I F-- i w � i o 0 0 n o — a0 M J N O LJ O Z � S89'59'50"W 101.70'(ACT) CJ Proposed Berm Proposed Drainage Berm Berm to be constructed 18" wide and 6 " Tall To be constructed with 1:1 Side slopes and 6" Cap. Note: For Preliminary Planning Only. This is not a survey. Figure depicts the survey provided by All American Surveyors of Florida. Derr. P:\2015\78848-145309 ORDER N0. 145309 ACCESS ECOLOGICAL Camelia Lot — Proposed Drainage Berm J� 27P— INC.201 SCALE:DATE. 06.23.16 I"= 20' JQCkSOnvllle.FL 32205 Figure 1 AEA 15-1049-00 Ph_904-584-1144 Fnx'904-584-1143 Ref. All American Surveyors September 29, 2017 From: Ricky L. Carper, P.E., Carper Engineering, LLC To: Joseph Gerrity, City Manager Subject: Review regarding wetland issues with respect to a Building Permit Application for 340 Camelia St. Task: The City Manager requested review of the permitting process and issues regarding wetland impacts on proposed single-family home at subject location. Background: During pre-application discussions regarding development of this parcel, City staff noted there were wetland areas on the parcel and identified criteria applicant would have to meet to build on the lot. (See Comp Plan Map A-2, Wetlands). A wetland delineation for the parcel was completed in August 2015 by O.C. Reedy Associates. The delineation identified a small section of wetlands touching the southwest corner and approximately 650 SF of wetlands existed along the north and western sides (see attachment 1). Because this was a platted lot of record prior to 2002, the Land Development Regulations (LDR) 24-272 requirement for a 50-foot buffer to wetlands is not applicable 272 (d)(3)), but a 25-foot natural vegetative buffer is still required (272 (c)(2)). (Attachment 2- LDR Sec. 24-272. - Environmental assessment and protection of wetlands and environmentally sensitive areas). In May 2016, Owner, Builder and Environmental Consultant met with Derek Reeves and myself, assisting City Staff under a continuing engineering services contract, to discuss requirements for constructing on this parcel. During this meeting, applicant provided documentation showing that most of the central area of the parcel had been previously cleared and was being maintained as lawn, precluding the required 25-foot natural vegetative buffer. Because the primary purpose of a vegetative buffer is to filter runoff from developed areas before it enters the wetlands and much of the area that would have been included within a natural vegetative buffer had already been disturbed, I recommended the applicant construct a shallow berm between the construction and the wetlands to retain and filter runoff in lieu of the buffer. In September 2016, Owner submitted an initial Building Permit Application to construct a single-family residence at 340 Camelia St. The site plan with this application included a partial berm as discussed during the pre-application meeting. After multiple iterations responding to City Comments/ Questions and changes to the site plan, a Building Permit was issued on Sept. 7th. Subsequently, a Stop Work Order was issued on Sept. 26th, before earthwork could commence because silt fence, tree protection and other preliminaries had not been completed. Discussion: The Applicant seeks to build a 2,161 SF home with a proposed building envelope that intrudes significantly into the 25-foot buffer area (683 SF of buffer encroachment). The areas proposed by the applicant to meet the average 25-foot buffer width do not meet the intent of the requirement in that most of the proposed buffer mitigation area is located on the opposite (south) side of the house and provides no protection to the wetlands from development impacts. The City has two options: 1. Allow the construction as currently permitted, using a berm to provide the desired wetland protection from unfiltered runoff. (The berm proposed by the applicant would need to be extended along the north side of the parcel to the eastern property line to provide full wetland protection). 2. Require the applicant to reduce the size of building to be constructed, such that a natural vegetative buffer meeting the intent of the Land Development Regulations can be provided. Recommendation: I recommend the City consider revoking the current Building Permit and require the applicant to reduce the size of the proposed structure such that a buffer more nearly meeting the Land Development Regulations requirement could be provided. This standard will then have to be consistently applied to all future projects, reducing the area available for construction on numerous other lots throughout the Marsh Oaks/Section H area. Additional Comments on this application: 1. From file review, I noted that the applicant submitted a Tree Affidavit with the original permit application stating no regulated trees will be damaged, destroyed or removed for this construction. Site visit after the building envelope was staked shows construction would seem to require removal and /or significant trimming of several trees on site. 2. Plans do not show proposed improvements in the Camelia St. Right of Way, including the driveway-street connection. The driveway will require a side drain with mitered end sections or end walls in the roadside swale (recommend 15" minimum diameter). Side drain flow line to be confirmed by Public Works before paving. Additional topic related comment: 1. Recommend the City amend 24-272(c)(2) to include a minimum width for the average 25-foot buffer. In some instances, the SJRWMD dictates a 15-foot minimum width for a vegetative buffer. Respectfully submitted, Ricky L. Carper, P.E. Attachment 1 MAP SHOWING PLOT PLAN OF LOT 4 TOGETHER #77H THE NORTH 1/2 OF LOT 5, BLOCK 108 AS SHOWN ON MAP OF ATLANTIC BEACH SECTION 'H" AS AMMED W PUr 9"18 PACE 34 of ME CURRENT PUBLIC REMWS OF&ANL ,#,M f,A CERWTED M..ACKSONYaIE HN)MLS LLC/771 OLEMOER,UC/CSBo/EVE tr SHEF7/L7A nUS SSS,ELC/ MST AHERICW nrEE 05UAWE COMPANY LOT 3 LOT 3 J`t BLOCK 109 BLOCK 108 �! "2-00'(P) N89'58'50'E 102.33'(A) - a .10 get;" "' , z srn Fy a''I a Loi4 ^� ex5• ITE:•ST�� `, •�DD A'LN I v� e.Fw X-Mo C'o w.7i� i' . o BLOCK 109- _ U $ ar?\.lm �' i"sfr•' a^ E... igd" 7Ry' �dw'm�o��. $ l 'LOT 4 r / v t $�';Z.T' 'LL 108.5}: `�/�,'� �� e �,fir,,. 4nah=-+t_•� !''�' �d�° LAT 102.00'(P) =•i{<r'( !.'ul 08 U NORTH/7 OF 00 P + of `11`- LOT BL / o LOTS BLOCK 108 Si BLOCK 109 - z t j �• s>ea,;,E m S89'59150"W 101.70'(A) �)1 102A0'(P) SOUTH 1/2 OF R g 5 BLOCK 108 i'�^X�` NOT PART OF THIS SURVEY __-... � '.02.00' LOT r F LOT8 LOT W ao BLOCK 109 BLCCK tOF $ iM irc pro) £ w� as ' 3u�F� ,2 mEE �v o wNE =ND - WAER cu a+ - c nA SUPIDUS END!}!!QT WEST 3RD STREET SICNEC' (30'R'OHT OF WAY) w1Eu 1 H S[ieMks AND 1E5 AIR Me—Aw TO"H: NATE- S-L.DAx RHEA, OATS 1 M Le SHOFN NUtY ARE➢ER CREWR S Di`Mf TQS CAHWY TYKE ARES HFDAREO, R 1!RIO S NO LLOIVE"FAN Y,$MALL 6.M THE SAYE - _ _... SPECSS PCR APPR HDalOm—S'E RAI.. LOT 9S },axis 10,fE TOTA euLWW CCNUAOC 11a\s 56 fi._ a U.SCEIN_N—TIaTYgRN WALL AT A pTtfRAY 10 RIR 12»!S4 ri. WA-9.RAlIR'OIOR)A1 1,11 NW 25 R,afw 7aa2 SM I'll- l.aYMtUI,MTT—T ST.ANS COUNTY a ENTRT RAi1t SSL SQ K. BRIER M A6AAg1 aIS4 SO.R SUR AOA StINDMDS CPOR SEOres SHAIL BE NO apPRV!aNAIE SLEWN.N _ Dt!d.fT. - YORC LHAH 1:AYp flaR+T1O SlWE NOT TD mar-n-war LExc1H n fr. TVCE3)5% T.i praTON R;Hr SOL— STA 91WlXD ODKRATd zTalt S0.rt.mR Arne DEHOlEs RERMD RIA N1tliTe iRays+ERE.3 MS D:THE DRVFHAT AA1W Shall ASJ SECT T.15 AL—H, TOIA RR•EHVIDIIS CbVERIrOE }.a}I3�SO.rt.21R 9TOtE5 FQUXO Sja' A:SD.U!LLFsS IY-'.:A eGT1S YAVTL ElG) TOIA EASEMENT AREA a4 50 0 rtW ROD NO IA SHALU NO'BE rvS1AlLD WTNN ThE SUEHA., bOVF INLLSE:DL-}]-il)OFFw - YR,3 UHlFSS OIXEPYSE k01FD T Eedv10N EfMT10.REASIACY(Lt.-1'EHT2) NCHE Lf 3E:0\-ty-i>(OFTC 1-DEMOBS TfPm1A=MC n L 6E USM MWS'^.THE.ID ATY-V-1 NEN HOUS:WA.81-1.Of-13-i1(OFFCF7 SPD'GfVA;NN(fiDt,U SHOT) M gAEvEHT—Cl TO WYtEITi pRD➢ERl!E5. AM F1R9�.FLOOW EIEVATpF15:Afp/101E:R.O. (CIfOp n S=yAAATyUL9Ew_EN A/C PA�j AND➢ARCNT WT HttvpEp TD a1Dw 25 EE'LAXDS UHE Drr-5[T(O-LE) DEROTCS RS FT.SLEMO tHE OTSET DD-w-1a.!D'-0.01 Ptµ:D<-]2-13(OEM}) ➢ AR. AEVbEO DENOTES Wl—4EA EKA HVVULT T nglD Nf>!Ts Ta RE AODED}D efiRNGE. U's s—T+S PFef094ED MTlfytf THE SSTETr ora imE MLR,aI\EA'. TNTRF VAY HE A]0. 4%EASFYEYTS AND/OR RESmCT1016 TAT ATT NOT S— ® DENOLES WTER MIAGPON HE Ox THE SIIIVfl}INT WT DF rOVAfJ M T ➢uBR1C ALLOALS W lI6 0-- uHOatCRRAO ENQ1YpfYMlS NOT LDC4TEO TN�UL HE1ri0NryR m THE SP HL IL000 NAUM FDNC SWA�'Hf'a TC(421 S SHORX R Ube N TEq THE Ctry Or JaC160TnLL-ILDREA WiU 06-Q1-\3 ALL AMERICAN SURVEYORS OF FLORIDA, INC. IMO SMl2YgVW-3731 SIN.OSE PUKE SW7E 13-41C.YSOATL£,FLORMA.77257-90V771-0"-Lcwo EMD mroE35 Ma 307 THS S i0 CEHU-FY TINT THE aRcvE lµ95 WERE SURvEYEC LNDER MY RES POHNOLE - WOrr= �c -u xwvva SUPEmU6 ANO DRECT1ON,TEAT V 3M ARE NO ENCROACF ,S VXLTTi AS sHMrN =1 u.f(n•q hTUm., aID TUT THr SURVEY SHOWN HERCON MEETS THE Vl—TECFRICAL STANMRDS SET FORTH DY THE FLORM SOARD OF MnSSIOYN.SUTvLYORs ANO WPPERS rs+ PL'RSUAYT TO CHAP-EP 1]2.02]/CHAPTER 61017-6. 1LOa0A STA-UTFS. ALL Z A,o -r"Mairaa'E c i_ AAMWCAN Ir A SURVEY NOT VAMD UHLESS FWS-SEZ MY 5EAL SURVEYORS a'G si'p�n!R JAMES R MMRRE30N.JR 1b.2N7 OF 170MOA. IA{ d•ntrarAw rooca wrn. WK MEL A.WJWX E.NO.W43 , IHC. S .4E—_ .W M ROHM REGST-eREO A/RVEYg2µp kJ 0 F.B. DEL O.C. AS. dY CEI D,W, P.\20:5ata5ta _.__ LvdlpllN}1535D-PIOI.µv(2) EHE /86aH-15O5a)-IR Attachment 2 DIVISION 2. - PROTECTION OF WETLAND, MARSH AND WATERWAY RESOURCES Sec. 24-270. - Purpose and intent. The purpose and intent of this division is to provide regulations that contribute to the protection of the vast coastal marsh, estuarine and wetland system associated with the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway and its tributaries in conjunction with the state and federal regulatory agencies having jurisdictional authority over such resources. It is the express intent of the city that no net loss of jurisdictional wetlands occur through any development action within the city. Any impacted wetlands on a development site shall be replaced elsewhere on the same site or elsewhere within the City of Atlantic Beach where replacement onsite is not possible to achieve reasonable use of the property. Where jurisdictional wetlands have been damaged or degraded over time through previous development, storm events, improper drainage runoff or other adverse activities, but where wetland vegetation and habitat still are predominant in quantity on a proposed development site, all plans submitted for review or permitting shall demonstrate a plan for mitigation, restoration, replacement, enhancement or recovery of jurisdictional wetlands in the amount to be displaced by the proposed development. (Ord. No. 90-10-212, § 2(Exh. A), 3-8-10) Sec. 24-271. - Definitions. For the purposes of this division, the terms used herein shall have the meaning as set forth within this division, and also within section 24-17 and where applicable and appropriate to the context, chapter 23 of the Municipal Code, entitled Protection of Trees and Native Vegetation, as well as those definitions as may be established by applicable state or federal law. Specific to this division are the following terms: Environmental assessment shall mean a study and a written report prepared in accordance with the State of Florida's approved methodology for wetlands determination in accordance with Section 373.421, Florida Statutes and Section 62-340.300 of the Florida Administrative Code for verification and identification of environmental and habitat characteristics. The environmental assessment shall include a delineation of onsite wetlands and native upland habitat, as well as an identification of any protected animal species or habitat found on the site. The city may accept an assessment prepared by a licensed environmental professional and may also require the applicant to obtain a formal wetland determination by the St. Johns River Water Management District. Intertidal zone(or littoral zone) is the area along a shore that lies between the high and low tide marks, bridging the gap between land and water. At high tide, the intertidal zone is submerged beneath the water, and at low tide it is exposed to air. Isolated wetland shall mean a wetland area that is not part of a surface water tributary system and which is defined by the following characteristics: (a) Non-navigable tributaries that do not typically flow year-round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically at least three (3) months each year); (b) Wetlands that are adjacent to such tributaries; and (c) Wetlands that are adjacent to but that do not directly adjoin a relatively permanent non-navigable tributary. Mean high waterline shall mean that line established by a Florida Professional Surveyor and Mapper in accordance with Section 177.26, Florida Statutes, which establishes the boundary line along navigable waters between submerged lands including the foreshore, owned by the state in its sovereign capacity, and uplands which may be subject to private ownership. Natural resource based recreation shall mean activities, such as kayaking, canoeing, rowing, biking, hiking, bird-watching, fishing from small nonmotorized boats or the bank and similar activities that do not involve motorized vehicles or watercraft, but that allow interaction with nature in a manner that does not damage, disrupt of interfere with the natural setting of the resource. Upland buffer shall mean areas of upland surrounding a delineated jurisdictional wetland boundary set aside from development. Such buffers protect wetlands from the impacts of adjacent land use. Wetlands serve essential ecological functions such as reducing downstream stormwater flow, recharging ground water, improving water quality and providing wildlife habitat. Buffers help wetlands function by filtering storm runoff from surrounding development, trapping sediment, absorbing nutrients, and attenuating high flows. Buffers also provide high quality wildlife habitat areas and physically separate wetlands and estuaries from developed areas in order to lessen noise, light and chemical pollution and other associated disturbances by humans. Upland buffers shall remain substantially in their undisturbed and natural state as set forth within following subsection (e) of this division. (Ord. No. 90-10-212, § 2(Exh. A), 3-8-10) Sec. 24-272. - Environmental assessment and protection of wetlands and environmentally sensitive areas. (a) Environmental assessment required. The wetlands and the environmentally sensitive areas maps (Map A-2 and A-4)as contained within the city's comprehensive plan identify areas that are presumed to have wetlands or significant environmental features. Where a development permit is sought in such areas, an environmental assessment of the site and the potential for impacts to the presumed resource shall be provided by the applicant seeking such permit. (b) Where the environmental assessment determines that natural jurisdictional wetlands remaining on the site have been damaged or degraded over time through previous development, storm events, improper drainage runoff or other adverse activities, but where wetland vegetation and habitat are predominant in quantity on a proposed development site, all plans submitted for review or permitting shall demonstrate a plan for restoration, enhancement, mitigation or recovery of remaining jurisdictional wetlands. Restated, it is the express intent of the city that no net loss of jurisdictional wetlands occurs through any development action within the city. (c) Buffers required from wetlands. The following upland buffers shall be required, except for lands adjacent to isolated wetlands. Upland buffers shall be measured from the St. Johns River Water Management District or Florida Department of Environmental Protection Wetland jurisdictional line. (1) For development occurring following the March 8, 2010, effective date of these amended land development regulations, a natural vegetative buffer a minimum of fifty(50) feet in width shall be required and maintained between developed areas and the tributaries, streams, or other water bodies connected to the intracoastal waterway regardless of any other regulatory agency requirement of a lesser distance. Such portions of these tributaries, streams, or other water bodies subject to this buffer requirement shall be established by the presence of a mean high water line for the applicable tributary, stream or other water body. (2) A natural vegetative buffer, which is a minimum width of twenty-five (25)feet, shall be maintained between development and all other jurisdictional wetlands not described in the preceding paragraph. In cases where the minimum twenty-five-foot buffer is demonstrated to be unreasonable or impractical, an averaged twenty-five-foot undisturbed buffer may be provided. (d) Exceptions to the upland buffer requirements. (1) Man-made canals and stormwater facilities are not considered wetlands, although in some cases, man-made navigable canals connected to waters of the state are protected under these provisions or by regulations of state or federal agencies. Man-made canals and ponds clearly excavated in uplands are not considered wetlands and are exempt from the wetland buffer regulations. (2) Determinations of vested rights which may supersede the requirement for the fifty-foot upland buffer shall be made on a case-by-case basis in accordance with the land development regulations and applicable Florida law. (3) Single-family lots of record platted prior to January 1, 2002, shall be exempt from the fifty-foot wetland buffer requirement, but shall be subject to the twenty-five-foot upland buffer requirement as described in preceding subsection (c)(2). (4) Waivers from the requirement to provide and maintain an upland buffer may be requested in accordance with subsection 24-46(d)of this chapter, and where such waiver is approved, a berm or swale to retain and filter stormwater runoff from the lot shall be created. (5) Lots or portions of lots where a lawfully constructed bulkhead, retaining wall, revetment, or the placement of rip-rap was in existence prior to the enactment of these regulations shall be exempt from these buffer requirements. (e) Maintenance and permitted activities within upland buffers. To protect water quality and wetland functions, it is crucial to limit contamination, disturbance and clearing within upland buffer areas. It is the intent of the city that required upland buffers shall be maintained in a substantially natural and undisturbed state. With the exception of facilities to provide public access for the recreational use of intracoastal related natural resources, any disturbance or clearing of required upland buffers shall be in accordance with the following provisions. Native vegetation removed or destroyed within the upland buffer is a violation of this code, and the property owner shall be responsible for the restoration of the upland buffer upon order of the code enforcement board. (1) The following activities are expressly prohibited in any required upland buffer: a. Filling, dredging or soil compaction by heavy machinery; b. Dumping of any kind including brush, tree and yard waste, weeds, lawn clippings, animal or fish waste, litter and refuse of any type; c. Removal of healthy native trees; d. Clearing of any living native vegetation within the intertidal zone, which typically includes marsh grasses and submerged aquatic vegetation; e. Installation of sod, irrigation, non-native vegetation of any type or any type of plant materials typically requiring the use of lawn pesticides and fertilizers or chemicals of any kind. (2) The following activities are permitted within a required upland buffer subject to obtaining a buffer alteration permit from the city: a. Removal of invasive vegetation following documented verification by the designated administrative official. b. Clearing of understory vegetation as defined by chapter 23 of the city's Municipal Code of Ordinances, and any such clearing shall be approved by the city and if required, the appropriate state or federal agency prior to any form of clearing, alteration or disturbance of the required upland buffer. C. Minimum clearing of upland and wetland vegetation necessary to construct a properly permitted dock or other improvement to provide lawfully entitled access to navigable waters in accordance with a validly issued and unexpired permit from the City of Atlantic Beach, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, the St. Johns River Water Management District, and other entity having jurisdiction. d. Activities for the owner or occupant's enjoyment including typical backyard outdoor furniture, gazebos and screen structures not exceeding one hundred (100) square feet in size without electrical or plumbing service, but not swimming pools, spas or pool houses, and provided that all other conditions of this section are met. (Ord. No. 90-10-212, § 2(Exh. A), 3-8-10) Y YMf and 1 ;(Oric '� N _ Pre 1 v"' X1-0 wt Blount Islan + N ORT MEW 105 M 1 ` 6) 113 1 s 6 Atlantic i 0115 B +CHES ARLINGTON 10 t n_cr ,, E Neptune ' All eo I Jacksonvi Beach I 202 202r N, (15 Ponte 4e Beach L r S gra REFERENCE: Google.com AGES of JAX Inc. 9556 Historic Kings Rd. oFiut inc Jacksonville, Florida 32257 SITE LOCATION MAP 340 Camelia Street Atlantic Beach, Florida DRAWN: SKB DATE: 04/21/17 SCALE: CHECKED: TRW JOB NO: J17518 NTS I i 3 KEY TO SOIL CLASSIFICATION CORRELATION OF N-VALUE WITH RELATIVE DENSITY & CONSISTENCY ! i SANDS AND GRAVEL TS AND CLAYS 3 S NO.OF BLOWS,N` RELATIVE NO.bF BLOWS,N* CONSISTENCY i DENSITY € 0-2 VERYSOFT 0-4 VERYLOOSE 3-4 SOFT 5-10 LOOSE 6-8 FIRM 11-20 FIRM 9-15 STIFF a 21-30 VERY FIRM 16-30 VERY STIFF 31-50 DENSE 31-50 HARD OVER 50 VERY DENSE OVER 50 VERYHARD PARTICLE SIZE IDENTIFICATION {UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS CATEGORY DIMENSIONS Boulders Diameter exceeds 12 inches C i Cobbles 3 to 12 inches . _ 9 Gravel Coarse-0.75 to 3 inches in diameter l Sand Coarse-2.0 mm to 4.76 mm diameter Medium-0.42 mm to 2.0 mm diameter s Silt and Clay Less than 0.074 mm(Invisible to the naked eye) MODIFIERS 3 These modifiers provide our estimate of the amount of minor constituents(sand slit or clay size particles)in the soil sample. PERCENTAGE OF MINOR MODIFIERS CONSTITUENT i 5%to 12% Slightly Silty,Slightly Clayey,Slightly Sandy 12%to 30% Silty,Clayey,Sandy .. 30%to 50% Very Silty,Very Clayey,Very Sandy r These modifiers provide our estimate of the amount of other components in the soil sample. k APPROXIMATE CONTENT OF OTHER APPROXIMATE CONTENT OF COMPONENTS(SHELL,GRAVEL, MODIFIERS ORGANIC COMPONENTS ETC.) 4 } 0%t0 5% TRACE 1%t0 2% f 5%to 12% FEW 2%to 4% 1 12%to 30% SOME 4%to 8% 30%to 50% MANY >8% a wpdo6FoWsoil ti 3 TEST BORING RECORD JOB NO J17518 OFIAX,INC. BORING NO B1 Project 340 Camelia Street Sheet 1 of 1 Boring Location (See Field Exploration) Boring Begun 04/12/17 Ground Elevation NA Datum NA Boring Completed 04/12/17 Groundwater Depth 3.0' Time: Drilling Date: 04/12/17 Driller R. Epps Lat/Long N30.32 7 a�6 ni IW-8- .42268 Soil Inspected by T.Wheeler IETV DEPTH MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLE BLOW FT UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION No. BLOWS PER 6-IN.INTERVAL COUNT 1 2 2 1 2 3 VERY LOOSE Dark Brown Slightly Silty Fine SAND(SP-SM/A-3) 2 2 1 3 2 4 _ VERY LOOSE Dark Brown Slightly Silty 5 Fine SAND(SP-SM/A-3) 3 2 2 2 3 4 FIRM Grey Silty Fine SAND(SM/A-2-4) 4 3 6 6 8 12 5 6 6 8 9 14 10 FIRM Light Grey Slightly Silty Fine SAND(SP-SM/A-3) FIRM Light Grey Slightly Silty Fine SAND with Trace Organics(SP-SM/A-3) 15 6 6 6 8 14 Boring I ermina e 20 25 30 BORING&SAMPLING,ASTM D1586/CORE DRILLING,ASTM D213 BLOW COUNT IS THE NUMBER OF BLOWS OF A 140 LB.HAMMER J17518b1.gpw FALLING 30 IN.REQUIRED TO DRIVE 1.4 IN.I.D.SAMPLER 1 FT. awl TEST BORING RECORD JOB NO J17518 oFiax,INc. BORING NO B2 Project 340 Camelia Street Sheet 1 of 1 Boring Location (See Field Exploration) Boring Begun 04/12/17 Ground Elevation NA Datum NA Boring Completed 04/12/17 Groundwater Depth 3.0' Time: Drilling Date: 04/12/17 Driller R. Epps Lat/Long N30.3277 an .42268 Soil Inspected by T.Wheeler ELEV. DEPTH MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLE BLOW FT FT UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION No. BLOWS PER 6-IN.INTERVAL COUNT 1 1 2 1 2 3 VERY LOOSE to LOOSE Dark Brown Silty Fine SAND(SM/A-2-4) 2 4 3 2 1 5 LOOSE Dark Brown Silty Fine SAND with Some Organics(SM/A-2-4) 5 3 2 2 3 3 5 LOOSE Light Brown Slightly Silty Fine SAND(SP-SM/A-3) 4 3 4 3 5 7 LOOSE to FIRM Grey Silty Fine SAND(SM/A-2-4) 5 5 6 6 7 12 10 FIRM Light Grey Slightly Silty Fine SAND(SP-SM/A-3) 15 6 6 8 9 17 oring I ermina e 20 25 30 BORING&SAMPLING,ASTM D15861CORE DRILLING,ASTM D213 BLOW COUNT IS THE NUMBER OF BLOWS OF A 140 LB.HAMMER J17518b2.gpw FALLING 301N.REQUIRED TO DRIVE 1.4 IN.I.D.SAMPLER 1 FT. i TEST BORING RECORD OF1Ax,INC. JOB NO J17518 Project 340 Camelia Street BORING NO B3Sheet 1 of 1 Boring Location (See Field Exploration) Boring Begun 04/12/17 Ground Elevation NA Datum NA Boring Completed 04/12/17 Groundwater Depth 3.0' Time: Drilling Date: 04/12/17 Driller R. Epps Lat/Long N30.32773 and W81.42258 Soil Inspected by T.Wheeler ELEV. DEPTH MATERIAL DESCRIPTION SAMPLE BLOW FT FT UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION No. BLOWS PER 6-IN.INTERVAL COUNT LOOSE Dark Brown Slightly Silty 1 4 3 2 2 5 Fine SAND(SP-SM/A-3) i 2 2 2 3 2 5 LOOSE Brown Silty Fine SAND(SM/A-2-4) I 1 5 3 4 3 3 4 6 j LOOSE to FIRM Brown Slightly Silty j Fine SAND(SP-SM/A-3) li 4 5 7 7 9 14 f I 5 7 8 8 9 16 FIRM Grey Silty Fine SAND(SM/A-2-4) 10 FIRM Grey Brown Slightly Silty 15 Fine SAND(SP-SM/A-3) 6 6 6 9 15 s E f i r VERY FIRM Brown Slightly Silty Fine SAND(SP-SM/A-3) E 20 7 5 6 15 21 onng ermina e s a t I! 25 30 a s BORING&SAMPLING,ASTM D1586/CORE DRILLING,ASTM D213 BLOW COUNT IS THE NUMBER OF BLOWS OF A 140 LB.HAMMER J17518b3.gpw FALLING 30 IN.REQUIRED TO DRIVE 1.4 IN.I.D.SAMPLER 1 FT. l SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST DATA 340 Camelia Street eeAtlantic Beach, Florida F1AX,INC. AGES Job No J17518; Report No. 001 O Date Tested: 04/20/17 By: D.Middleton/S. Mardini eh U C AASHTO Moisture Fines —Atterberg Limits Organics Boring ID Sample (ft.) Symbol Symbol Content Content Liquid Plastic Plasticity Content % % Limit Limit Index % B1 4 6.0-8.0 SM A-2-4 23 20 B2 2 2.0-4.0 SM A-2-4 30 16 — — — 5 4 6.0-8.0 SM A-2-4 25 18 — — — --- B3 2 2.0-4.0 SM A-2-4 34 15 — — — 6 Notes: 1-Moisture Content represents the Insitu moisture content(Wn)and was determined In accordance with ASTM D-2216 2-Fines Content(FC)is defined as the percent of material by weight passing the#200 Sieve(ASTM 0-1140) 3-Organic Content conducted in general accordance with ASTM D2974 J175181ab.gpw • 1 T 3 LOT 3 X 109 BLOCK 108 y 102.00'(P) 9"PI �to (a.a) 11N, N89'58'50"E 102,33'(A) �a°� 610 I (0 1) _ _ 5' 6_R.L� ,y'L/ _ —�1Nti '_meg/ — �i572`50 3 l t S _��• �`� —. WO o vM NA41 �tiP1tip ' `59 23 12 7.P• 10 P ` 610 O 16.5"L �� �R5Sp1C�0 O S7237.6•P 6 + n to 610Cl o 1` V J p v n S78"15'16 '6.5'WO 20"WO {n�Z H O O p T 4 vRM ap��0 � o N �m 1 m O K 109 /' 0Encn� ���Wu7 �� pFF�SF� n p n-ID a 3 a M ti.� o a� 6 26.7 ,5� (!)491 7•ce , 21.4' ® B 1 -.f .. . 4.1 G Nml F^ c i 4 z QC:i OT aa_� o BLOCK lfl8rearofhoUse XM rr 00. 4,0 ^'.'. W ra (4,8� n LOT 5,- �S 0'(P) o • ';..�` . z a l ! r, .6.0• '5.7 a z0.0' < to �' B " b NORTH Y2 OF N ¢ o m 110 in* W 4 d f LOT 5 0 �o.(L o O w N o 0- 1 �r'$ a BLOCK 10B N Q IT 5 tnB is fn D .K 109 p a e t•i \. . N54.9 CZ 6.5'LOI& 'O Ui r�31) S'6o 26 - S89 91wow 101.70'(A) �5 ill•) -3 £'!n N -Ys->1 102.00'(P) a SOUTH 1/2 OF �O ul� ,rte-; V 1 LOT 5 oq C' 04 BLOCK 108 N NOT PART OF THIS SURVEY 102.00' a T 6 LOT 6 K 109 BLOCK 108 0 i O H to !, 7f 41 LEGEND: -r Penetration Test Boring Location (approximate) AGES of JAX Inc. OFIAX,INO 9556 Historic Kings Rd. Jacksonville, Florida 32257 REFERENCE: Plat Plan prepared by All American Surveyors of Florida, Inc. FIELD EXPLORATION PLAN Dated 04/09/15. 340 Cornelia Street NOTES: Atlantic Beach, Florida The boring locations were established by AGES personnel DRAWN:S DATE: 04/21/17SCALE: using handheld GPS Locater Units. Boring locations as shown on this plan are approximate. CHECKED:TRW JOB NO: J1751 1"=20' _ MAP SHOWING PLOT PLAN OF jr LOT 4 TOGETHER WITH THE NORTH 1/2 OF LOT 5, OCK 108 AS SHOWN ON MAP OF ATLANTIC BEACH SECTION 'H" AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 18 PAGE 34 OF THE CURRENT PUBLIC RECORDS OF DUVAL COUNTY, FLA. FEB 2 4 2011 41 MFIED T0: JACKSONVILLE HOMES LLC/221 OLEANDER, LLC/OSBORNE & SHEFFIELD 77TLE SERVICES, LLC/ FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY LOT 3 LOT 3 BLOCK 109 BLOCK 108 3 102.00'(P) 9"Pl `o N89"58 50.E 102.33'(A) 610 >' 5' 9 .L� � INE ^ — — T�PNOS L 12`' ,a^ "WO O V VIE _ ,Nj 2 7'Po 10'P a 6"LO L LO ri JUR15O1CT NP.11="L��572 �6-P L� • ..6"L O I �•' /�n ^ ^ 0.7 578.15'16"'N 276.5"W• •'WO W Z F-O O 0) Im O A✓O LOT 4 I µM 0 LTJ q q j 0) m IIn 00 o BLOCK 109 i 9'wo.w N W g 1 z a i•o6 I o a m-!2 1.1 L2 N Ia 56441�y4 64 T*9) 7"CB 26.7' 3 2 .JJ 21.a' .• ��, 4.1 v o �t,i00 .L.yIo.��y' N O �o LLl . .o Dw 3c.., Nwl'!4 -o 'c:• aa p "9Q. , Ia16Cn a BLOCK ad. N $a4. o O \ .J ED � oLOT 4 (4.8) o LOT 5,1 z 3 1 Sly ~a=' 'S.7 \ Q U 6.0' x 20.0' W 1 j o N NORTH )i OF I' < b m 00 Lo w o I LOT 5 boo a 3 O 0 w p N p`a I BLOCK 108 I a N 0:2 w LOT 5 O ��w BLOCK 109 O < 5a.o' a 9s N vii J o Z 6.5'LO r 0 O rs .a.. a \D e 7.1a N S89 9I1 " '(A)S's50W 101.70o ? o 0.9 93L �5�J 102.00'(P) (501 u o �a° SOUTH 1/2 OF a Z o b9. to LOT 5r 1 W co d'�� N BLOCK 108 N oW co NOT PART OF THIS SURVEY Ui i" z L� 102.00' ]C F o L o uJ Uzi ,a W Fn z LOT 6 LOT 6 ^ p BLOCK 109 BLOCK 108 g z Lo 0 M >t2 N Ld lull_j W TREE LEGEND P = PINE PI - PALM WO WATER OAK LO = LIVE OAK CH = CHINA BERRY BUILDERWEST 3RD STRUT SIGNED, ENDORSEMENT (50' RIGHT OF WAY) 1. NOTES:. ALL SETBACKS AND TIES ARE MEASURED TO THE NAME: FOUNDATION WALLS. DATE: 2. B.R.L.. SHOWN HEREON ARE PER COUNTY. 3. OF THE 70X CANOPY TYPE TREES REWIRED, NO MORE THAN Y,SHALL BE OF THE SAME LOTS 4 h P/0 5 SPECIES PER APPROVED NEIGHBORHOOD SITE PLAN. LOT SIZE 7,636± SO. FT. TOTAL BUILDING COVERAGE 2,1613 SO. FT. 4. ALL SIDEWALK AND FLATWORK SHALL, AT A DRIVEWAY TO R/W 4273 SO. FT. TOTAL BUILDING ENCROACHMENT INTO 25 FT. OFFSET 683± S0. FT. 31% MINIMUM, MEET CURRENT ST. JOHNS COUNTY AND ENTRY WALK 33± S0. FT. ADA STANDARDS. CROSS SLOPES SHALL BE NO APPROXIMATE SIDEWALK 0± SO. FT. MORE THAN 2X AND RUNNING SLOPE NOT TO RIGHT-Of-WAV LENGTH 75 FT. EXCEED 57L THE PORTION OF THE SIDEWALK WHICH TRANSVERSES THROUGH THE DRIVEWAY TOTAL BUILDING COVERAGE 2,161± SO. FT. 20% APRON SHALL ALSO MEET THIS REQUIREMENT. TOTAL IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE 2,621± SO. FT. 34R ALSO, UTILITIES(METER BOXES, VALVES, ETC.) TOTAL EASEMENT AREA O± SQ. FT. o DENOTES WETLAND FLAG SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED WITHIN THE SIDEWALK. MOVE HOUSE; -27-17 )OFFICE) DENOTES FOUND O 5. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES(I.E. SILT FENCE) ND 5/8" MOVE HOUSE; 01-18-17 (OFFICE) Q IRON ROD NO I.D. WILL BE USED AROUND THE PROPERTY BOUNDARY NEW HOUSE; W.O. #153567; 01-13-17 (OFFICE) rOUNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED TO PREVENT IMPACT TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES. REVISED FINISH FLOOR ELEVATIONS; ADD NOTE; W.O. #149676; 05-18-16 (OFFICE) OJ" - DENOTES TOPOGRAPHIC 6. BUILDER WILL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM 5(FIVE)FOOT REVISED TO SHOW 25' WETLANDS LINE OFF-SET (OFFICE) SPOT ELEVATION (GROUND SHOT) SEPARATION BETWEEN A/C PAD AND PARENT 09-30-15 JDY PLOT PIAN: 04-22-15 (OFFICE) PARCEL. REVISED CERTIFICATIONS: 04-13-15 (OFFICE) DENOTES 25 FT. WETLAND LINE OFFSET 7, FLOOD VENTS TO BE ADDED TO GARAGE. THIS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE COMMITMENT. DENOTES BUILDING AREA ENCROACHMENT THE MAY BE ADDITIONAL EASEMENTS AND/OR RESTRICTIONS THAT ARE NOT SHOWN ON THIS SURVEY THAT MAY BE FOUND IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF THIS COUNTY. UNDERGROUND ENCROACHMENTS NOT LOCATED THE LAND SHOWN HEREON IS IN THE SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD ZONE SHADED -X- k 'AE- (EL.5)AS SHOWN ON FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP 0408 H FOR THE CITY OF JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA, DATED 06-03-13 ALL AMERICAN SURVEYORS OF FLORIDA, INC. UW S1/RYElt71P5 - 3751 SAN JOSE PLACE; SUff 15 - JICKSOWU& FLORICK 52257- 904/279-WW - UCENSED LAND AfWNESS NO. 5857 end —5 F.F.E.. -FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE LANDS WERE SURVEYED UNDER MY RESPONSIBLE - FMD Le. -FOUND A/C -MR CONDRIONEn SUPERVISION AND DIRECTION, THAT THERE ARE NO ENCROACHMENTS EXCEPT AS SHOWN =4 13M"T - EASEMENT I.D. -IDENTIFICATION CONIC-CONCRETE P.R.M.-PERMANENT REFERENCE AND THAT THE SURVEY SHOWN HEREON MEETS THE MINIMUM TECHNICAL STANDARDS - MON. - MONUMENT P.T. MON-POINT OF TANGENCY MENT SET FORTH BY THE FLORIDA BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS I.P. -IRON PIPE P.C.P.-PERMANENT CONTROL POINT PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 472.027 / CHAPTER 61G17-6, FLORIDA STATUTES. ALL A - RODIRON DELTA ANCIE P R.C.-POINT OF REVERSE CURVE AMERICAN CH -CHORD P.C.C.-POINT OF COMPOUND CURVE SURVEYORS A - ARC LENGTH SURVEY NOT VAIJD UNLESS EMBOSSED BY SEAL R -RADIUS BAL -BUILDING RESTRICTION OF FLORIDA, (C -CALCULATED F.R&L-FLORIDA POWER k LIGHT JAMES D. HARNSON, JR., No. 2647 (D3 -DEED (TP.)-TYPICAL INC. P -PLAT NGVD -NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICIL DATUM MICFIAEI A. GARRETT, NO. 88'43 R -RADIAL UNE #AVO .NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM SCALE 1-=20' Ot`(•-16 E -CENTERLINE P.I. -POINT OF INTERSECTION R/N' -RIGHT-OF-WAY EOW - EDCE OF WATER // S (A) -ACTUAL TOB -TOP OF BANK - (w) -WITNESS LB - LICENSED BUSINESS DATE Oa-09-15 FL EGISTERED RVEYOR MAPPER -8 F.B. D.C. DR. By DEL DIR• P:\2015+78516\78848-153567-PLOTPLAN (2) ORDER NO. 153567 FILE 78848