10-9-06 Agenda Packet vcity Conrru»ioi'v
Aev4ct'
October 9, 2006
CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH
CITY COMMISSION MEETING OCTOBER 9, 2006
AfENDA
Call to order
Tnvocation and pledge to the flan
Approve minutes of the Regular Commission meeting of September 25, 2006.
Courtesy of Eloor to Visitors
A. Presentation of the Sewer Master Plan TTpdate OM from Grant Misterly
unfinished Business from previous Meetings
A. City Manager's Follow-up Report (City Manager)
Consent Agenda
4
A T .T . MATTERS T .T STF.T) T TNT)FR TNF. C ..T)NSF.NT A GENT) A ARF. C'.CINSTT)F.R FT)
TO BE ROUTINE RY IHE CITY COMIITSSTnN ANTI WTT .T . RF ENA CTFTI RV
ONE MOTION IN THE FORM LISTED BELOW. THERE WILL BE NO
SEPARATE. DTSCTTSSTON OE THESE. ITEMS. IF DISCUSSION IS DESIRED,
THAT ITEM WTT.T. RF. RF.MOVFT) ER OM THF. CONSFNT ACTF.NT)A AND WTT,T.
RF CCINSTT)FRF.T) SFPARATFT.Y. STTPPCIRTING TIOCTTMF:NTATTCIN ANT)
STAFF RECOMMFNT)ATTONS NAVE RFF.N PRF.VTCITTST.Y STTRMTTTF.T) TO
THE CITY COMMISSION ON THESE ITEMS
A. Acknowledge receipt of New Occupational Licenses issued in September 2006
(City Manager) — R. Award the hid for TTtility Contractor Annual Service Contract to CTrnhn May, Tnc,
at the prices specified in Rid No. n5Of-1 f (City Manager)
Committee Reports
None
6. A''tio On Reeolutione
None
7. Action on Ordinances
A. Reconsideration of Ordinance No. 90-06-195 with respect to FAR.
Miscellaneous Business
A. niscussion and related action on the City Manager's Compensation (T)nrnn)
9. City Manager
A. City Manager's Report
10. Repor fs and/or requests from City Commissioners and City Attorney
A. Recommendation for reappointments and One new appointment to the Cnmmunity
Development Board (Mayor)
1
R.
Adjournment
creation of a committee to study district representation (mayor Wolfson)
Tf any person decideq to appeal any decision made by the City Commission with respect to any
matter considered at any meeting. such person may need a record of the proceedings, and, for
such purpose, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. which record
shall include the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based.
Any person wishing to speak to the City Commission on any matter at this meeting should submit
a request to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. Eor your convenience, forms for this purpose are
available at the entrance to the Commission Chamhers.
Every effort is made to indicate what action the City Commission is expected to take on each
agenda item. However, the City Commission may act upon any agenda subject, regardless of
how the matter is stated on the agenda.
In accordance with the Americans with nisahilities Act and Section 9.86.76, Elnrida Statutes,
persons with disabilities needing special accommodation to participate in this meeting should
contact the City Clerk by 5:00 PM, Friday, October 6, 2006.
Attendance
MINUTES
REGITI AR CITY COMMISSION MEETING
Septemher 75. 2(111
CTTYHAT .T., Rf(1 SFMTNOT.F.ROAT)
IN ATTFNTIANCP:
Mayor Donald Wolfson
Mayor Pro Tem J. Dezmond Waters III
Commissioner Mike Borno
Commissioner Sylvia N. Simmons
Commissioner Jamie El etcher
City Manager Jim T-Tanson
City Clerk Donna L. Bussey
City Attorney Alan C. Jensen
Call to Order/Pledge Mayor Wolfson called the meeting to order at 7:15 p.m. The Pledge of Allegiance to
the Elag followed the Invocation, given by Commissioner Waters.
Approval of Minu es 1. Approval of the minutes of the Regular Commission meeting on pten u r
11, 2006
motion: To approve the minutes of the Regular Commission Meeting on
September », l.on6 as presented
Moved by Borno, seconded by Simmons
votes:
Aye: 5 - Borno, Fletcher, Simmons, Waters, Wolfson
Nay: 0
MOTION CARRIED
Courtesy of the Eloor 7.. Courtesy of the Floor to visitors
The Mayor opened the floor to visitors.
Pat i illmore, 995 Camelia Street, spoke regarding West 9,h Street often being blocked
by worlr trucks and vans parked on the street. the Beautification Project in Marsh oaks,
the speed limits in Atlantic Beach, and the lack of pedestrian signage and hike paths.
'le Carle, 51 Reach Avenue, suggested changing line two of the initial
requirement statement to read "...over 75% in size..." instead of "...add 95"-/,, or more
in size...". Mr. de Carle clarified that the phone po11 was not being done by the Save
Atlantic Beach group unlike the post cards which were.
Stephen Kuti, 1 117 T .inkside Drive, addressed the Town Center Overlay Project. He
advised the height limits at Town Center in Atlantic Beach is 74' and Neptune Beach is
35' and suggested the more restrictive height limit (>£ 24) he applied to Town Center
planning. Mr. Kuti spoke regarding the Mayport Road Medians designed to include
trees which will widen the median and reduce the size of the inside lane. He expressed
concern that the trucks with trailers in the turn lane will he forced to ride on the median.
He asked the Commission to get a professional opinion on the issue.
September 25, 2006 REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING
Mayor Wolfson clarified that Atlantic Reach has a 25' limit instead of 24'.
Paw. 7
Douglas speed Jr., 1787 Seminole Road, commented on the old Eamous Amos
building on Atlantic Boulevard. T -Te thanked the commission for the quick response to
concerns about sidewalks in the Selva Marina area. Mr. speed noted the corner at
Seminole Road and Selva Marina Drive still has a curb and should be marked more
clearly. Mr. Speed asked the Commission not to open the gate at the end of Selva
Marina Drive and Eleet T .anding except to allow emergency vehicles.
Sally Clemens, 1638 Park Terrace W., questioned the city's involvement in the recent
telephone survey regarding the community development standards and expressed
concern that tax dollars were being spent on it.
Mayor Wolfson and City Manager Danson both confirmed the city has no knowledge
of the organization behind the telephone poll and, also. is not paying for the survey.
.Tack Robbins, 1415 Linkside Drive, President of the Selva Linkside Association,
thanked the Commission for their hard work and dedication to the City. He expressed
concern regarding plans to develop around the Selva Marina golf course and expressed
opposition to allowing access into the Selva T inkside community.
A_ Presentation of the Proposed Town Center Overlay District by Niall Fallon
Niall Eallon explained that he would he presenting the Town Center overlay and hnped
for concurrence to move it forward through the proper city channels. He explained the
organized effort of Atlantic Reach, Neptune Beach and the Town Center Agency to
protect the integrity of Town Center through substantial improvements to hardscape
and landscape.
Mr. Eallon explained the purpose of the project was to propose changes to zoning. T -Te
referenced six letters of support that were received back from business owners in the
Town Center District.
Michael Dunlap gave a slide show presentation using the overhead. photographs of
different areas in Town Center were displayed with before and after comparisons. T -Te
presented the overlay outline addressing setbacks, height, use, lot coverage, lot area,
landscape guide. parking and signage.
After the presentation, he advised the next step would he to move it to the community
Development Board for comments and coordinate with the City of Neptune Beach.
Mr. Eallon and Mr. Dunlap answered questions from the Commission.
Mayor Wolfson thanked the gentlemen for their presentation and indicated that Town
Center is a huge asset to both city communities. He explained the Commission should
discuss the proposal during Strategic Planning in order to understand the concept and
priorit»e before sending it to the community Development Board for comments.
September 7.5, 211116 RECUT .AR C(lMMISST(lN HEFTING
Page 3
Mayor Wolfson requested feedback regarding Neptune Beach's position on the Overlay
once the presentation has heen made to them.
T Tnfinished Business 3. Unfinished Business from Previous Meeting
from Previous Meeting A. City Manager's Follow-up Report
city Manager Tim Hanson indicated he had no report.
Consent Agenda 4. Consent Agenda
A. Acknowledge receipt of Monthly Public Works and Public Utility
Departments, TTtility Sales and Financial Report (City Manager)
R. Waive the $111,111111 hid requirement and approve a one-time purchase order for
palm trimming to All State Iree Turf for $1 1.can fi11 (City Manager)
C. Extend the annual contract for Lawn Maintenance of City Parks for one
additional year to Cuyler's T. awn Service at the contract price (Bid No. 0304 -2 -
re -hid) (City Manager)
f. Extend the contract for Concrete P emirs for the Puhlic WorksTtilities
Deparh'nent with rruhn May. Tnc. for one year at the current prices (City
Manager)
F.. Extend the contract for Reach Cleaning for one additional year to
Beachcombers at the current price (Bid No. 0304-23) (City Manager)
F. Effective Octoher 1, 711116, adjust the pay of the City Clerk using the
classification as provided by the consultant (Springsted) using the same
procedures and pay increases as provided to all other City non-union Grade ')')
employees (City Manager)
(. Approve the T.ocal 630, Blue Collar, union contract for the period October 1,
')nn6 through ceptemher 311, 711119 (City Manager)
H. Approve the Local 630 White Collar union contract for the period ()cipher 1.
2006 through September 30, 2009 (City Manager)
T. Approve the Police union contract for the period of October 1, 2006 through
Septemher 311, 7007 (city Manager)
Mayor Wolfson read the Consent Agenda. Commissioner Fletcher left the meeting
while the Consent Agenda was being read.
commissioner Rorno asked that Ttem 4R, 4n, 4H and 4T he pulled from the Consent
Agenda for discussion.
Motion: To approve Consent Agenda as presented with the exception of Items 4B ,
d(: , dIT and 41.
Moved by Simmons, seconded by Pomo
Votes:
Aye: d - Porno, Simmons, Waters, Wolfson
Nay:
MOTION CARRIED
(Commissioner Fletcher was ahsent for the vote.)
September '75, 70116
Rpm -TT .AR C(IMMTSST(lN MFFTTN(,
Page 4
Commissioner Rorno addressed Ttem 41:1 explaining that separate action may he
required because of the waiving of the 10.nnn hid requirement. city Attorney Jensen
explained that the Commission would need to determine either an urgency or an
emergency to the issue in order to waive the bid requirements.
Tliscussion ensued and during discussion commissioner Fletcher entered the meeting.
Commissioner Bomo explained the urgency as referenced in the staff report.
Motion: Approve waiving the $10,000 hid requirement and approve a one-time
purchase order for trimming to A11 State Tree & Turf for $11,540.00 with a 3 and
Q proper pruning.
Moved by Romo, seconded by Waters
Votes:
Aye S - Rorno, Eletcher, Simmons, Waters, Wolfson
Nay:
MOTION CARRIED
Commissioner Rorno indicated he had pulled Items 4G, 4H and 4I in order to
congratulate and thank staff and the negotiator for their hard work and for completing
the process in time for the effective date of nctoher 1, 2nn6.
Motion! To approve Consent Agenda Items 4G , 4E1 and 4I collectively.
Moved by Rorno, seconded Hy waters
Votes:
Ave: 5 - Rorno, Eletcher, Simmons, Waters, Wolfson
Nay: (1
MnTInN CARRTFD
Committee Reports 5. Committee Reports
None.
Action on Resolutions
6. Actor on Resolutions
A. RESOLUTION NO. 06-11, Public Hearing and Einal Reading on adopting
a Tentative Millage Rate
A RPSOT.TTTT0N OE THF. CTTY OE ATT ,ANTTC BEACH, FT,ORTDA
LFVVTNC; TNF ATl VAT.ORFM PRfPFRTY TAX MTT,T.AGF. R ATP FOR
MUNICIPAL PURPOSES ON ALL TAYART.F PR()PFRIV WIIHTN THF.
CTTY FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING OCTOBER 1, 9nnANn
FNTITNCT SFPTRMRFR 30, 2007; STATING THE PERCENTAGE BY
WT-TTCT-T THF, MTT.T.AGP TO RF T,FVTFTI FXCFFDS THR ROT,T,RD-RACK
R ATF: ANTI_ PROVTTITNCT AN FEEF.C.TTVF, TIATF,
Mayor Wolfson opened the floor to a public hearing. No one from the audience spoke.
Mayor Wolfson closed the public hearing.
September 25, 2006
RF(`_TTT.AR CCM/PUTSCT(1N MFFTTN(_
page
Mayar Walfson read the Resolution by title. Ne explained the first item to he
considered is the adoption of Millage Rate, Resolution ND. 0-11. He stated the
Tentative Millage Rate is 2.9974, the Roll -Back Rate is 2.7213, the Tentative Millage
Rate is 10.1 S% higher than the Roll -Rack Rate, and the purpose for the increase in ad
valorem tax revenue is to maintain adequate fiinding for the existing level of service at
anticipated increased cost.
Motion: Adopt a Millage Rate of 2.9974, Resolution No. 06-11, for operating
purposes.
Moved by Borno. seconded by Waters
Mayor Wolfson opened the floor to a public hearing. Na ene frim the audience spelre.
Mawr Wolfson closed the public hearing.
commissioner Waters asked for an explanation of Millage Rate and Roll -Rack Rate.
Finance Director Van T dere explained both.
Commissioner Simmons pointed out the City of Atlantic Beach has the lowest millage
rate of any of the five incorporated communities in Duval County and the city only gets
baclr 17% of what is paid in.
Votes:
Aye: S - Rorno, Eletcher, Simmons, Waters, Wolfson
Nay: n
MATT(1N CARRTFT1
Actin on Ordinances 7. Action on Ordinances
A. Public Hearing and Final Reading on Ordinance No 20-06-R1 establishing
the Operating Budget for Fiscal Year 2006/2007
AN ORDTNANCF. ADOPTING THE FINAT, BUDGET FOR THE CITY OF
AIT.ANTTC REACH, ET,OR TT) A EOR ETSCAT, YEAR REG -INNING
OCTORFR 1 ?006 ANP FM -II -NCI SEPTEMBER 0, 7007
Mayor explained the second item to be considered is Ordinance Na. 20-06-81
establishing the Operating Rudget for fiscal year 2006/2007 of $26,059,756.
Motion: Adopt ordinance N0. ,711-06-R1 establishing the Operating Rudget for
fiscal year 2006/2007.
Moved by Doran, seconded by Waters
Mayar Wolfson opened the floor to a public hearing. No one from the audience spoke.
Mayor Wolfson closed the public hearing.
Captamhar 74, 7001 RF.(_TTT.AR fTlIVI1VITSSIC1N MFFTTNf
page 6
Commissioner Porno explained the proposed budget process by advising that three
budget workshops were held and adjus+men+s were made from the original proposal.
He believed Staff and the Commission worked diligently and did a good job this year.
Commissioner Waters advised the Commission that Former Commissioner Paul
Parsons contacted him to request an additional $1(1,(1(1(1 he placed in the budget for Art.
He explained Mr. Parsons believes additional money would enhance his negotiations
with other entities and would be appreciated.
Commissioner Porno believed the budget should be approved as presented and if the
Commission decided to consider additional amendments to the budget, it could he done
at a later time.
Commissioner Simmons reminded everyone that the item was already discussed during
a budget workshop. Mayor Wolfson agreed and indicated the Commission decided, at
the budget workshop, not to increase it.
Votes:
Aye: 5 - Porno, Fletcher, Simmons, Waters, Wolfson
Nay: 0
MOTION C"ARRIF1)
R. Ordinance No. 80-06-73, Public Hearing and Final Reading
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 22 TTTTLTTTF.S, ARTTCT,F TT,
SF.CTTON 77-77 C TTARCTF.S EOR WATRR SRRVTCE, TO INCREASE THP
WATFR BASF ANTI VC)T.TIMF CHARCTFS EOR RFSTDFNTIAT.,
IRRIGATION AND COMMERCIAL CUSTOMERS: AMENDING ARTICLE
TTT WASTEWATER SYSTEM, DIVISION SEVEN, SEWER USER RATES
ANTI CI -TAR GER, SECTION 99-166 MONTHT.Y WASTEWATER RASE
EA CTT .IIY CHARCTFS TO TNCRFASF RRSTDFNTTAT. AND
COMMERCIAL BASE CHARGE RATES: ANT) AMFNTITNCT SFC.TTON 77-
167 SCHEDULE OF WASTEWATER VOLUME CHARGES TO INCREASE
THE RATES EOR WASTEWATER VOLT TME CHARGES EOR
RFSTDRNTTAT. AND COMMFRCTAT. CTTSTOMRRS
Mayor Wolfson read the Ordinance by title only. He opened the floor to a public
hearing. No one from the audience spoke. Mayor Wolfson closed the public hearing.
Motion: Approve nr'linance No. R11-116-71 as read.
Moved by Porno, seconded by Waters
Commissioner Rorno pointed out the ordinance increases the base rate by three percent
(3%). He explained the rates are behind byabout eleven percent (11%) or twelve
percent (12%) which makes it necessary to adjust incrementally in the next few years in
order to bring it up to a stable condition and not supplementing it from other funds.
Sapfamhar 7G, 711116
12 VIZI TT.AR C(11VTMTCCT(1N MF.F.TTNC page 7
Votes:
Aye: 5 - Borno, Flet"her, Simmons, Waters, Wolfson
Nay: 0
MOTION CARRTF,1)
C- ordinance No. 46-(16-1 R. Public Hearini and Final Pearling
AN ORnINANcE Am -pm -yr -mg TNF COT)F. OF ORniNANCFS OF TNF.
CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH, AMENDING CHAPTER ?n, TAXATION.
ARTIC' ,R ITT, OCCIJPATTONAI. LICENSE TAX, AMENDING THE TERM
T.00AT. OCCTIPATTONAT. T,TCENSE TAX TO T,OCAT, RTTSINESS TAX;
A MFNT)TNC1 SPCTION 70-51, T)FFINTTTONS, IO CT-TANCTE THF' TERM
FOR ',Or OCCTTPATTONAI. T.TCFNSF. TO T.00AI. RTTSINFSS TAX
AND TO ADD A DEFINITION FOR RECPTPI AR TT RFT . A TFS TO
RT TSTNPSS TAXES; AMENDING SECTION 20-59, SCHEDULE OF FEES;
AMFNT)TNCG PROVISIONS IN ARTTCT,R TV. TNSTTRANCF PREMUM
TAXES, SPCTIONS 211-76 IHROTTCGTT 70-78, TO CONFORM TO TT -TIS
NPW TFRMTNOT.0CW: PROVTT)INCI AN FFFFCTTVF. T)ATF.
Mayor Wolfson read the ordinance by title only and opened the public hearing. No one
from the audience spoke. Mayor Wolfson closed the public hearing.
Motion: Approve Ordinance No_ 416-06-1R with two modifications, change the
effective date to January 1, 2007 instead of Octoher 1, 1(1(16 and the solicitation
door-to-door fee remain at $35.00 with no increase made to it.
Moved hy Porno, seconded hy Simmons
Votes:
Aye: 6 - Rorno, Fletcher, Simmons, Waters, Wolfson
Nay: 0
MOTION CAPRTF1I
Before addressing Miscellaneous Business Items, Mayor Wolfson made a motion.
Motion: To Re"onsider Ordinance No. 9n-06-196
Moved by Wolfson, seconded by Rorno
Mayor Wolfson explained that he had asked the City Attorney if it would he
permissible for him to do this by R ohe*'s Rules. He reported that he was on the
prevailing side on the Ordinance but not on the prevailing side on the amendment. He
asked that the City Attorney correct him if he is wrong. Mayor Wolfson expressed his
desire to make a reconsideration of the FAR from .54 to .60. Commissioner Rorno
asked if that was a motion. Mayor Wolfson explained he had a motion for discussion
and that he is asking for reconsideration for that part of the ordinance. commissioner
Simmons believed that a reconsideration can not be done. Mayor Wolfson asked for
clarification. Commissioner Simmons explained that if a vote on a motion is not
reconsidered on the day the vote was taken or on the next succeeding day, the vote
September /5, /006
RF(_TTT.AP C(1M T RUIN VIN.RTINC2 Page R
cannot he reconsidered at the next meeting. She read from Robert's Rules which stated
when a permanent organization has weekly or monthly meetings, and when usually
only a small percentage of the members are present, it seems best to permit a
reconsideration to hold over to another meeting so that a larger portion of the group
will he aware of what actions is taken. She pointed out the Commission meets twice a
month but that all of the members were present at the last meeting. for all the puhlic
hearings, for all the Commissioner comments and for the votes on the Ordinance.
Commissioner Fletcher indicated that was also his understanding.
City Attorney Tensen advised in Section 9-19 of the City Code states, rules governing
the conduct of the City Commission business. Rules of Conduct and procedure of
Meetings, Rule 20., after the decision of any question, it shall be in order only for a
member voting on the prevailing side to move a reconsideration at the same or next
regular meeting.
Commissioner Simmons asked for the meaning of "after some question". City
Attorney Jensen explained voting the question. ue reported that Mayor Wolfson voted
in favor of the Ordinance which contained the .54 FAR. Mayor Wolfson asked if
Commissioner Simmons understood that explanation, then asked Commissioner
Fletcher the same. Commissioner Simmons answered yes. Commissioner Fletcher
answered yes. hut raised an objection to consideration of the question which has no
debate (referred to Robert's Pules) requiring an immediate vote. Mayor Wolfson
believed that to not be valid. Commissioner Fletcher asked for guidance from the City
Attorney regarding the objection to consideration of the question, requiring no debate,
and requiring a two-thirds vote. City Attorney Tensen asked to clarify consideration of
what question. Commissioner Fletcher explained the Mayor's question of
reconsideration. Mr. Jensen advised the Mayor has a motion and a second on the floor.
Commissioner Fletcher indicated he did not hear a motion or a second. Mayor
Wolfson reported he had motioned to reconsider and Commissioner T orno seconded it.
Commissioner Fletcher expressed his desire to move to postpone indefinitely. T -Te
asked the City Attorney whether it would require a debate or an immediate vote. Mr.
.Tensen and Commissioner Simmons both referred to a list and found Commissioner
Eletcher's motion to postpone indefinitely as a debatable motion. Commissioner
Simmons explained there is a motion on the floor and a second to reconsider. hut then
another motion would be needed. Before she was able to finish, Commissioner
Fletcher indicated that he has a motion on the floor to postpone indefinitely. Mayor
Wolfson asked what he is postponing indefinitely. Commissioner Fletcher answered
this reconsideration which requires a second, a debate and a vote.
Motion: To postpone the reconsideration indefinitely.
Moved by Fletcher, seconded by Simmons
Mayor Wolfson moved the motion to a discussion.
Mr. Jensen raised a point of order indicating that he is not sure if that motion takes
precedence over the original motion that was made. Commissioner Torn agreed. Mr.
Tensen recommended that the Commission act on the motion for reconsideration.
Saptamhar 7S ?MA
RRGTTT.AR LYIMMTQQT(1N Mf .FTTN(, Para Q
T -Te went on to explain voting up or down a motion for reconsideration is not changing
anything, it just means that you are going ahead to reconsider it. Commissioner
Fletcher read from a book on Robert's Rules of Order, Subsidiary Motions- Number 1.
It stated, if an emharrassing main motion is brought before the assembly, a member can
propose to get rid of this question without hringing it (meaning main motion) to a direct
vote hy moving to postpone indefinitely. ROHR, Tenth Fdition, page 171-74. TTe
indicated it was a superseding motion. Mayor asked the City Attorney for his guidan'e.
Mr. Jensen indicated that the City's Ordinance does not address that. Mayor Wolfson
asked Commissioner El etcher to reiterate his position. Commissioner El etcher
explained he is moving to postpone indefinitely the mayor's motion and that it is a
subsidiary motion to dispose of a main motion. ue stated. again. if an emharrassing
main motion has been brought before the assembly, a member can propose to get rid of
this question without bringing it (meaning main motion) to a direct vote by moving to
postpone indefinitely. mayor Wolfson indicated they have a motion and a second and
it will require a vote. Commissioner El etcher believed his motion will supercede the
main motion made hy the mayor. Commissioner Eletcher apologized to the Mayo -r and
the Mayor explained no apologies are necessary that this is procedural and is not a
problem. Commissioner Borno asked if it was open for debate. Mayor Wolfson asked
if he was correct hy accepting this as superseding the motion. Mr. Jensen indicated he
did not know. mayor Wolfson believed Commissioner Eletcher's motion would need
to be debated. Commissioner Fletcher explained there was a motion and a second to
postpone indefinitely which requires debate and a vote. Commissioner Borno asked
whether everyone is following Robert's Rules or following the rules in the City
Ordinance of how we (the Commission) do husiness. Mayor Wolfson indicated his
Reconsideration Rule is in our ordinanCe and that should he used. T -Te indicated an
option would be to waive Robert's Rules and follow the city ordinance.
Commissioner El etcher asked for point of order. He explained there was a motion on
the floor. mayor Wolfson explained he was waiting for a response from the City
Attorney and asked Commissioner El etcher to allow the City Attorney to respond.
Commissioner Fletcher said he felt a little highjacked. Mayor Wolfson said he is not
being highjacked at all. Commissioner Fletcher repeated he feels highjacked. Mayor
Wolfson explained there is no highjacking here. Mayor Wolfson explained how he felt
about it and now he is following his last recourse. T -Te explained he has a right to make
a motion to reconsider which is the right and prerogative for any Commissioner.
Commissioner Waters added, who votes on the prevailing side. Mayor Wolfson
reiterated that with a vote on the prevailing side that is the right of any Commissioner.
Commissioner Eletcher asked if he wants to open it for debate. Mayor Wolfson
indicated he wants to wait for Mr. Tensen's response Hirst before moving forward.
Mr. Jensen indicated the Commission would have to determine if the motion that
Mayor Wolfson made to reconsider is an emharrassing main motion according to the
Rules. Commissioner Eletcher offered clarification for why that quote appears
somewhat valid although the word is strong. T -Te explained that two and a half to three
years have been spent reviewing proposals and considerations, that a fair vote was
taken after much public discussion (difficult public discussion) and that the motion to
reconsider would hring up a lot more contention which no one wants.
Ceptemher 25, 2006 RFf_T1T.AR ( QMMTCCT(lN 11,4F,F,TING
Page 10
Mayor Wolfson explained that the information he brought forward at the last meeting
regarding the fin FAR was considered and was moved to a motion and was moved for
discussion. He further explained that he pot it on the overhead and there is an avenue
in a motion to reconsider if you bring information to the table late for discussion. He
advised that Mr. Tensen had the book and it is in Robert's Rules. He reiterated that it
was not meant to highjack hut that said it was the last opportunity for any of the
commissioners to think about it fi,rther and revisit hefore it's finalized.
Commissioner Fletcher responded, like any zoning law, they are fairly fluent and the
Commission could return to them after a period of time to make changes as needed. He
indicated that he does not see this as a fixed FAR or a fixed ordinance. However, he felt
the commission took two and a half years and one hundred thousand dollars to do it the
right way with due process. thorough information and a lot of public debate that was
difficult. He expressed his satisfaction with the process.
Mayor Wolfson indicated no one is questioning the process. He indicated this was the
final piece of the process.
Commissioner Fletcher expressed he would have preferred to hear about the Beverly
Hills idea earlier in the process.
Mayor Wolfson indicated the Reverly Hills idea did not come to his attention until it
was written in the article on August 77th. so there was no way for anyone to hear it
before then. He explained the point was not for the city to follow Beverly Hills, but for
them to understand that the same measurement was arrived at within 100 square feet
using a different methodology.
Commissioner Cimmons noted that the discussion is way offhase. The Mayor agreed
and steered back to the debate.
Mr, Tensen reported, as he referred to standard descriptive characteristics in the
Roherf's Rules of order. the motion to reconsider with respect to making the motion
takes precedence over any other motion whatsoever and yields to nothing.
Mayor Wolfson clarified Commissioner Fletcher's motion is not appropriate.
Mayor Wolfson restated his motion to reconsider and pointed out the part that he wants
to reconsider is change from the .54 FAR to .60 FAR.
Commissioner Simmons indicated that she was confused explaining that there is a
motion to reconsider hut does not think you can reconsider parts of it. She also
indicated that they should reconsider that motion and should vote yes or no. Then,
should have a motion to change the FAR which would have to be done by someone on
the prevailing side of that vote.
Mr. Tensen explained the Mayor was on the prevailing side of that vote and he voted to
approve the ,54 FAR, commissioner Simmons asked if the motion is to Reconsider the
entire ordinance. Mr. Jensen disagreed. He believed the motion was to Reconsider the
FAR, in that, the portion of the Ordinance pertaining to FAR.
September '75. '711116
RF.GTTT.AR COMMISSION MEETING Page 11
commissioner Simmons asked if it could be done without an announced Public
nearing and the Mayor confirmed that it could according to Robert's Rules.
Commissioner Simmons acknowledged it may he 12ohert's Pules hut asked if is was
part of our code. She further explained that the city code says in order to make a
change to an ordinance, you must have a public hearing and an ordinance_ is on the
hooks as of September 1 1 th
,
Mr. Tensen suggested that if the commission is going to vote to reconsider this part of
the ordinance, that they then schedule that on the next agenda. Also, if it is voted
down, it is dead tonight, if it is approved, he suggested that the Commission consider
any change to that ordinance at the next meeting.
Commissioner Fletcher responded to the initial request by the Mayor by moving to
appeal his decision to revisit this issue and asked Mr. Jensen for his guidance.
Commissioner Fletcher read from Robert's Rules of Order regarding appeals. Mr.
Jensen asked what he exactly wants to appeal. Commissioner Fletcher said he wants to
appeal the Mayor's decision to bring this matter up and revisit the FAR. Mr. Jensen
explained that was nota decision of the Chair, like being out of order or something like
that, but was just a motion that he has brought to the commission.
Mayor Wolfson asked for clarification on whether his motion of reconsideration would
he for the entire Ordinance. Mr, Jensen indicated his understanding of the motion was
to reconsider that part of the Ordinance that addressed the FAR. Mayor Wolfson
confirmed. Mr. Jensen suggested that, especially in light of the public interest, if that
motion is passed tonight, any proposed change in the FAR should he brought up at a
fixture meeting by placing it on the agenda which makes it publicly noticed. He
explained that would help so the puhlic doesn't think the Commission is doing
something they didn't know about. Mayor Wolfson stated he understood.
Mr. Tensen reiterated that the Commission votes tonight on the motion to reconsider. if
that's approved, then they reconsider at the next meeting after public notice. If it is
voted down, then it is done with.
Mayor stated there is a motion on the floor to reconsider and asked if there is any other
discussion.
Commissioner Simmons asked the Mayor if he thought he caught the Commission off
guard tonight.
Mayor Wolfson reiterated that it is the privilege of a Commissioner and he is not trying
to catch anyone off guard. He farther explained it to he an effort for reconsideration of
the FAR to go from .S4 to .An and that he brought information forward for evaluation.
He explained that if the consensus is to not reconsider this then vote accordingly
tonight and if the motion fails, then there is nothing more that can be done and would
he over with. Mayor Wolfson expressed that he took offense to that and has not tried to
catch anyone off guard about anything. T -Te explained he has a right as a Commissioner,
to Robert's Rules, to make a motion as on the prevailing side to reconsider.
September 25, 2006 REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING
page 17
Commissioner Rorno stated that he had been contacted by several people. more than
three, regarding how he felt about the overall vote and the relationship to FAR and that
they had all read how he felt about the EAR to begin with. He reported that after
listening to them, they made good common sense and would like to say that he wants
all the citizens of Atlantic Beach to clearly hear and understand why he is considering
increasing the EAR from .54 to .60. Commissioner Borno stated the following: "Tt is
to provide for all the citizens that will be affected by the FAR to have enough
advantage as possihle, if needed, during this interim period when EAR is part of our
current ordinance. T wish for all the citizens of Atlantic Reach to know that T will
continue to work diligently to have FAR removed from our ordinance until that can
take place in the future. T have not changed my firm belief that any EAR number could
not have allowed the City of Atlantic Reach to exist as it does today and will never be
appropriate for use in determining what our city would look like in the future. I am
against McMansions and firmly believe the use of EAR is restrictive and not proper to
our homeowners that have had a need to either enlarge or construct new homes in the
fiture. That is my feelings right now. I am willing to give them the advantage of
looking at .6."
Mayor Wolfson believes that a .6n is a fair place to start and am iust looking for that
opportunity to reconsider that portion of it and have no intention of voting against this
if it is a .54 or a .60. He stated his position is that he will vote in favor of the
ordinance with a .54 or with a .60, but his preference would be to go with a .60. T -Te
reiterated that it was all he was asking for reconsideration on. He indicated that his
commitment is to the ordinance and would pTefer the reconsideration for the .60.
Commissioner Fletcher understood that they all have a right to reconsider. but felt a
little frustrated because it "pops" it up and he would prefer to be prepared and to think
about things thoroughly. He believed the Mayor was trying to reach a more
compromise of a FAR.
favor Wolfson answered that was part of what he was doing. He explained he sees the
divisiveness in the community beyond anything ever imagined. He indicated he was
looking for a way to start the healing process that Commissioner Waters mentioned in
his prayer tonight. He indicated he felt all along that the .6n is a fair position. He
advised he had discussed it with moderates and it was a concern. T -Te believed that
elected officials have that responsibility to find some way to start this healing process
sooner rather than later.
Commissioner Fletcher stated that was his impression. He believed that the
Commissioners tried all along to reach compromises. He explained he does not feel the
community has been split. He advised he had met a moderate, very reasonable minded
person of the core group over lunch on the Thursday before the Monday night final
vote to find out what was wanted. He reported that on a SO' by 110' lot, an X,Mm
square foot house was his offer. He explained he could not compromise. He does not
believe that the core group will see a .60 as a compromise. Mayor Wolfson stated that
is exactly his point. Mayor Wolfson believed the core group will never see anything
less than 7200 square feet as a compromise and that is unacceptable and not where the
moderates are. He indicated he spore to moderates who are very comfortahle with the
.fO EAR, He explained if the .60 doesn't work, the Community Tlevelopment Hoard
Septvmher 25 7.nn6
RFC -HEAR (T)MMTSSION MEETING Page 13
can come hack and make some suggestion that it should go to a .54. Commissioner
El etcher believed that it can go up hut not down.
Mayor Wolfson asked for reconsideration on the moderate position of a .60.
Commissioner Simmons added she had not heard any consideration of the moderates
on the other side who she said has expressed thanks for sticking to her guns and staying
where we we are which is already a compromise. she believed that side had been sold
out in the process and not considered. She believed the healthiest thing for the
community is to drop it at this point, see where it goes and then consider it down the
line. She indicated it had been quiet and peaceful for a few weeks. She felt to bring it
up again and put everryhody on the line, more puhlic hearings, another packed room,
another set of letters to the editor. and another set of anger is very unfair to the
community. Mayor Wolfson acknowledged Commissioner Simmons' points.
Commissioner Waters believed this to be a political compromise and was ready to vote.
Commissioner Waters called the question.
Mayor Wolfson advised the Commission there is a motion on the floor to reconsider the
EAR from a .54 to .60.
(Restated Motion)
Motion: To Reconsider the FAR from .Cd to .60 in Ordinance No. 9O -O(..195,
Roll Call Vote:
Rorno — ave
Fletcher — nay
Simmons — nay
Waters — aye
Wolfson — aye
Votes: z-1
MOTION CARRIED
Mayor Wolfson explained the reconsideration of .54 versus .60 will be addressed at the
next meeting.
Miscellaneous Business 8. Miscellaneous Business
A. Request from General Employee and Police Employee Pension Board of
Trustees for a one-time W% cost of living adjustment (COT ,A) for city retirees
and beneficiaries (City Manager)
City Manager Hanson reported the city's two pension boards recommended a three
percent cost of living be provided to the city retirees and referred the Commission to
the staff report for the explanation and cost.
Mr. Van Liere explained several options were discussed and the cost estimates for each
are within the attached Actuary Report for consideration.
SeP tamhar 7S Wnn6
RFrITL.AR COMMTCCTON MFFTING Page 14
Motion: To Deny the Request from General Employee and Police Employee
Pension Board of Trmstees for a one-time In/. cost of living adjustment (COLA)
for city retirees and beneficiaries
Moved by Borno, seconded hy Waters
Commissioner Rorno explained decent adjustments have heen made over the years and
expressed concern that the cost would total over a half million dollars ($Snn,nnn) over
the next fifteen years of a commitment. He expressed he cannot support it.
commissioner Waters helieved the request has merit but problems do exist. He
suggested deferring the request to allow the Commission to look into the issues more
closely while understanding that the retirees leave the city at an income in dollars that
are worth a lot less today. He believes the other options provided should he reviewed.
mayor Wolfson withdrew his second, Commissioner Borno withdrew his motion.
Motion: To defer nntil the meeting on nctoher �� 2006
Moved hy Waters, seconded by Fletcher
Commissioner Rorno pointed out each Commissioner should give direction to staff as
to what to bring back to them. Commissioner Waters agreed.
Mr. Van 1-.iere explained the boards position and further explained the 3% COLA can
not keep up with inflation which is understood hy the board, but could be viewed as a
periodic assessment that mayhe the—
y are due for an increase.
Votes:
Ave: S - Rorno, Fletcher, Simmons, Waters, Wolfson
Nay:
MOTION CARRIED
R, Annual renewal of City Tnsurance (excluding Employee Benefits)
City Manager Hanson explained the city's insurance is up for renewal each year and
earlier discussions took place during the hudget procesQ considering anticipated
increases. He reported the figures came in lower than estimated and recommended
approval of the City's insurance as listed in the staff report, which is attached and made
part of this official record ag Attachment A.
Mayor Wolfson pointed out the figure for the Au+omohile coverage indicates the dollar
amount went down but the percentage went up and asked for clarification. Human
R esource Manager George Foster reported the percentage was incorrect and that it
should he a decrease or (-) instead of an increase or (+).
Motion: Approve Annual Renewal of the City's insurance (excluding Employee
Benefits), as indicated below the column marked 10/1/06, effective October 1,
21111(,
Q P
tamhar 75, 711(1( RF.(_TTT.AR C MN
IVINTT CT(1N FFTTf
Page 15
Discussion ensued regarding the deductibles. Mr. Eoster reported the deductihles range
from $5,000 to $25,000 depending on the type of occurrence. He indicated that nett
year, the insurances are due to be studied thoroughly and deductibles will be part of that
study.
Votes:
Aye: 5 - Borno, Fletcher, Simmons, Waters, Wolfson
Nay: 0
MOTTON CARRIED
Mayport Road Medians — T andscape options
Public Works Director Rick Carper referred the Commission to his staff report and
explained a selection of a particular landscape option is necessary at this time. He
explained the various options and reported the comparisons related to maintenance,
cost. safety concerns and benefits of each. 1 -Te presented a slide show on the overhead
containing photographs and specifications of the plants and trees within the various
options for consideration. He answered questions from the Commission during the
presentation.
commissioner Dorno expressed concern whether the medians would need to he
handicap accessible. Mr. Carper indicated they would not since they are not at
crosswalks.
Eurther discussion ensued regarding each option being considered.
Motion: Approve Landscape Option A.
Moved by Romo, seconded Hy El etcher
Commissioner Borno recommended eliminating the Palm Trees and replacing them
with Crepe Myrtle. Discussion ensued regarding the different tree choices and how
they compare.
Commissioner Fletcher withdrew his second. Mayor Wolfson seconded.
Tssues were brought up regarding pedestrian crossing.
votes-
Aye: 2 - Borno, Wolfson
Nay: 3 - Fletcher, Simmons, Waters
MOTION FA IT Nil
Motion: To Recommend Approval of Landscape Option C.
Moved by Simmons. seconded by El etcher
City Manager
R eports/R eauests
City Commissioners
City A ttorney
Septemher 7S, inn(
PF,Gin•AR COMTvIISSION MEETING Page 16
Mayor Wolfson expressed his opposition to option C hecause of the safety concerns.
He believed the perception would he that it is a safe crossing and therefore, would
encourage crossing in mid median. Commissioner Borno agreed with the Mayor and
added it could be a liability issue.
votes:
Aye: 3 - Fletcher, Simmons, Waters
Nay: 2 - Borno, Wolfson
Mf)TTON f APRTF.TI
Motion: To add Crepe Mrytles to Landscape option C.
Moved by Simmons, seconded by Waters
Votes:
Aye: 5 - Borno, Flet'her, Simmons, Waters, Wolfson
Nay: 0
MOTION CARRIED
Commissioner Fletcher called a point of information going hack to the issues of
Robert's Rules of Order. He believes when they have called a previous question, the
Commission is being very loose with that, in that, it does require a two-thirds majority
Vote to even calla question hecause it limits debate.
Commissioner Fletcher requested that in the future a vote be taken whenever a question
is called.
9. City Manager
A. City Manager's Report
City Manager Tim Hanson announced the city will provide Flu shots to city employees
on Wednesday. nctoher 4th from 1 n:nn am until Noon and invited Commissioners to
get one.
10. Reports and/or requests from City Commissioners and City Attorney
Commissioner Rorno
➢ Thanked staff and particularly Nelson van T fere for their hard work on the
budget.
Commissioner Waters
Thanked the City Manager for his letter replying to Ann Winfree who sent
information on Palms. He indicated it was timely and informative.
Adjournment
Sapfamher 7.5, 7.11116
RFGTTT.AR fT ' MMTSST(1N MF.FTTNG
Page 17
Advised he received a call from a Mr. Stengel at 1411 Sailfish Drive indicating
his yard has been vandalized six times and is looking for relief from the
problem.
➢
Indicated that Selva Linkside made a request tonight and wanted to know if
Selva Marina is going to discuss, with the city, what their plans are at this point.
City Manager reported he has plans to meet with the Country Club
representatives in nctoher to discuss the proposed project.
➢ Commented on the vote on the FAR tonight advising he has a problem with
changing the FAR because of it affecting lots that are five thouQand Qquare feet.
He believed that if the EAR changed, other areas of the Ordinance would need
to he revised also. He requested that if any further information goes out to
include examples of the excluded areas.
Mayor Wolfson
➢ Commended the City Staff that was involved in the effort to acquire the
Buckman T -and Trust. He advised the Commission that the city has made the
cut and is now in the position for contingency fiinding from the state. He
expressed he is pleased with where the city is now on the effort.
Commissioner Borno
➢ Rorno requested a copy of the agreement between the City and Fleet Landing
regarding the use of the hack east gate. He believes it should he reviewed and
does not thin]` it will reveal the same as what the citizen presented earlier
tonight. Mayor Wolfson agreed and asked the City Manager to provide a copy.
There being no fiirther discussion, the Mayor declared the meeting
adjourned at 1 11:1 pm.
ATTEST:
Donna T 1 usQey
City Clerk
Donald M. Wolfson, Mayor/Presiding Officer
AGENDA ITEM a lA
OCTOBER 9, 2006
Fnal Submittal
City of Atlantic Beach
PRFPARFIl RY;
APPLIED TECHNOLOGY,gpin MAblArFMFNT, INC,
JACKSONVILLE RFAr_I-1 FI nRInA
AIirIis7-29, 2006
AGENDA ITEM # 2A
OCTOBER 9, 2006
CNA/ of Atlantic Rearn
2006 Sewer Master Plan and r_pi+ni Imprnwement plan Up-+a+e
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
ThP City of Atlantic Reach authorized Applied 2Prhnoingy R ManagPmPnt, Inc (ATM), to
prepare the 7nnF Sewer Master Plan Update and 10 -Year Capital Improvement Plan (7nnA
SMP Update). The uprate includes cnndjtinn assessments and capital improvement
rernmmendatinns fnr the:
• Gravity sewer collection system (laterals, manholes, and gravity pjp#S)
• I ift Station pumping systems (lift stations and forrPmainc)
• WactPwatPr treatment plants (WWTPs)
In addition to the general capital improvements assoriatPrt with typical future npPration5 of the
sewer system, the City iS also anticipating more stringent nutrient riicrharge limits nn their two
WWTPs associated with future Total Maximum Daily I nad (TMDL) legislation. In conjunction
with the 7nnA SLAP Update, we are evaluating CevPral options for meeting the anticipated TMDL
IPgiclatinn,
The City's sewer collection system is maintained well, from a day to day operations standpoint.
I ift Ctatinns are clean and well cared for, which is indicative of the rest of the system, The main
issue facing the r..ity'C CPWPr s\/tem is age. A significant portion of the sewer collection
infrastructure; whether gravity pipes. lift stations, nr fnrr.Pmains is at nr heynnd its typical life
PxpPrtanry, This issue is (especially evident in the gravity sewer piping, where older vitrified
clay pipes are crarkPd and have deteriorated, These damaged pipes are allowing significant
amounts of rainwater and groundwater. known as inflow and lnfiltratinn (I/1), to enter the City's
CPwPr system. The resulting increase in flow not only imparts the rapacity of downstream pipes
and lift station, hiit also affects the flnwrates at the WWTPs. With potential costly upgrades to
the WWTPs to address TMn1 jegidation the addjtior al flow frnm I/I has a significant impact on
plant operatinn and associated costs. To address iheCP issi les in a manner that is ecnnnrnically
feacihle fnr the (:ity, IMP have developed 2 systematic approach where a portion of the nity's
infrastructure is rehahilitated every year, This approach divides the City's infrastructure into
sections, such that the sections in the worst cnndjtinn are addressed first, and the projects are
divided over the CIP's ten year time frame. The costs fnr these improvements are detailed in
the respectiue Certinns of this report and are summarized in the CIP tahle at the end of this
section.
This Master Plan also includes analysis of the City's two waStPwater treatment plants (\MNTPs),
which were not considered in the 7nnn master plan, This report identifies capital improvements
necessary to meet both the TMDL (dicrucCP( in the folinwing paragraph) and general
improvements necessary fnr cnn_tinued high quality and cafe operation of the facilities. Note
that the general improvements are a rnrnhination of site visits to the WWTPs by the ATLI
Project Team and working cloCPly with city staff,
Finn! Roo rt
1 APP' IED TECHNOLOGY & MANAGEMENT, INC.
AGENDA ITEM # 2A
�,,t �f OCTOBER 9, 2006
ItV uanuc o�ac�
2006 Sewer Master Plan and capital Imprwamant Plan I IDriate
The anticipated TMDL legislation will significantly reduce the City's allowable mass loading of
nitrngan to the St..lnhns River; the exact reduction amount is cti!I heing dehated. Redilctinn of
nitrogen ran hp achieved by either imprnvinq treatment at the WWTPs or implamanting a rel ICP
program. The City may be receiving grant money to fund a reuse project, which would remove
approximately n,275 million gallons per day (mgrl) of tha rity'c RR mgd of effluent discharge.
To address nitrogen reds infirm in the remaining effluent, we evaluated several options;
• fptimi7ing the existing plant designs while upgrading both plants for nitrogen
removal
• Upgrading the Atlantic. Reach WWTE for nutrient removal and pumping the
Ruccaneer WWTE's flow to it for treatment
• rnnstn Icting a nutrient removal system to treat Pffll lent from all of the Reaches
rnmrnunitiPs, and locating jt at the Ruccaneer WWTP.
• Upgrading the Atlantic Reach WWT2 and performing minor process improvements at
Buccaneer. This nptinn only meets the anticipated initial TMDL limit, but does not
meet the future limit.
As described in this report. there are multiple variahlks outside of this analysis that should be
rnnsidered when the City decides which TMni nptinn fin purse IP, Fnr that reasnn, this Report
does not make a distinct recommendation regarding the best option. Instead. WP prPSPnt the
advantages. disadvantages, and costs for each. The City should use this information. in
rnnjunctinn with infnrmat!on relating to stormwater TUN s, the futl Ire I Ise of RI Iccaneer WWT2,
future plans for implerPntatinn of reuse, etc... to ultimately decide hovo to pr cePri, Fnr the
purposes of preparing the rity'c 10 -year Sewer Capital Improvement Plan. we have used
Option 4, the Hybrid Option (meets the interim limit) ac it appears to ha the Option that the City
is most jnterPctPri in hased nn our meetings at 90%.
The table presented on the following page outlines the City's 10 -year CIE. Note that certain
items in the tahle are presented in line item form, such as `rnllection System Improvements."
Fnr a mnrP dPtalled hrPakdnwn of what those improvements involve, %//P havP referenced the
section of this report vniherP the information is presented in a more detailed form. Also note that
the jmprnvements are broken down by the timeframes 7nnZ, 2nmR-7mn, and 2011-2010. We
havP chosen to use timeframes rather than specific year, cn that the ray may adjust this plan
as new information becomes available, Cjty staff identify new issues, and to mesh it ‘niith
budgetary constraints. Additionally, Parh line item includes a ranking (High, Mid, Low), such
that tha City ran readily discern which improvements are the most important with respect to
each timeframe. We rernmmend that the City revisit this plan annually and reprinriti7P the
improvements based on the changing criteria noted earlier in this paragraph.
Final Reo_rt
II APP' IED TEruNni my & MANAGEMENT, Idr.
Ci .y of Atla n tic Beac h
2005 Sewe • Master Plia n and Capital Im )rDvement P1131 U ?Mate
,, JL^ II .':} 111,11 :, 1 111 11:I 1Yr 1111 P N
I I I 1 .I I.I I .,.1f• r:, 41 ht � 't1,1 T}I}.1 ,. 1 l 'ti r.+l L it ..,.: II1� � W �r'i I��1 td.>rllll l. rt !„I.�I � ,�C
1 - 1J I k a lu.
II III 1 , t c..1 '_ i, t 'i : 1,r�,d,. I ., `
[ 1,0,Yalr Capp al lmprovemeni Plant
I 1 1 .t ,. 1 I rC ,, 1 7.. 1 t711{r 'Cr t -� III ,., n•;I-,: 11! 1 Ij., �r LI -1 1 1..1 �h 1 .I, '.0
11 41 .l.w 'r. 11 f Il u •( ,'� ISIt j'I `hlgi"Y i{^ict'_Y Is, I,,, tla rr�� 1111,,.1 `� ,G I. �i ! 11 a ,+;� .I ,1':.,4,
4 I .,..11 i{I .� „� � I.,u„ r11, !I .s ,. P1 1.. 1;.. . S. r 1.d .:l .1'Itr117.{I..,C.ri4 rl, 7I,.I�,HI {.�It.I,vRn G„OL fMG: k II „ .IVJAiI rIll,r � I,JIII s, is r �I ".i,.-trt
'11I L j ! r [GI )^ C4�ll 11j ;.Jr
11 I.. J IIA .ill,l
C +„f a 4 t 1 1
b ` 1 .� I1 ,1 Il f� I .. f 1.x;1”
t
lr .. x n71 .r 1a
IE J'I..I J it 11.. ,�li `., d1,:,.'r }
€ 1aL �IEI.,.I rat I .. ,� td., � ;....,[rx t �1r1�)1�I,2 f,
,. u.1 1 i'rl
.I I III..:
1 k '� ,.. , r Ix.,
,I. 1J'N
YI 4 'L5
�. Ia ... I..
,I:
Descrl tion I
p
I ;
Es imated�
, 1
Cost .
early;
_Priority
Ranking
Ye13. 2Z0D 7
Collectio 1 System
Phrase 1 - Collection Syste n Impro re Tie -AB see details in Section 21)
16 B1315, 4I)04
Hila 1
13crease puma cycle lime at Lift Station = jaise float11
-
Hi8 1
Atla lb 13eacn Miscella neons _ift Station I n PI o remelts ;Bee Iletails 11 Se cti ) n ?)
I£ 25,000
Hila 1
Buc;3 neer Mis:ellaneoluB Lift Station 1 n )10 remelts ;Bee IJetailB 11 Sectio 1 ?)
16 21),000
Hi8 1
I icreiie pum) cycle time at MD 'Areal Lift Station-
Hign
IVVVTP6
1 nitial TMDL Engi leeri 113 ;bl3sell D n pursuing ID Clio n 411
$ 13150,1)00
HiI] n
Re node) Lab/IDI•fi :e Area AB)
16 20,000
Mill
Re )lace roof o n _abl'Olffice 413)
16 130,1)00
till
Redace HVAC for Llab/IDffice ;ABS)
16 12,00D'
Mill
Replace tw) Ileteriorl3teli nyllroscreen6 4611
$ 131),01)04
Mill
AI d )ortable rotor ) )erlatDr to CCC sluice Bates (4B)2
$ 130,1)1)04
Vlid
20ID7 Subtotal
—$ 8B15,ID00
Year 21)1)13 — 201ID
Cone ;Hon Syste In
mase 11, I11, IV - CDlle cion Syste n Im )rD lame 'AB :see het 3i1B 11 Se ai )n 2)
16 4,B 14,100
High
Re )I are DIJ n )s, notors, electric, a rill i nstrume it alio 1 syste ns 3t Lift St tit 1 E wit 1 13rger plumps,
not)rs, electri: anIl instrume1la[ion improve ne Its; In rease wit well vDIlume at Lift Stab )1s C
3n11 E
$ 91)15,1)1)0Mide
1-3
Final Rep D Yt
4PP .IEI) TECHN) .OGY Il< 14ANAI3EMENT, INC.
City of 4tlantic Beach
ZOO 3 Sewer Master Pl1a n as nd IC a Pit 31 ImprDly ?m a it 'Ian Upd at:
Ir -. 11 7 1.11 (rel II i' II Ill t1 r
1
Yearl�aplta�
ll I1 IIIr11<� � ,t(I I,rtn[r'Irrr,,ililf
II II, I , � � 1� 1111 ,�: ,
... .. ^-'' ...... .:.::... 4 L,''w�.-.. ....-:, _a �.. w,.L .:r ,,d ..
I I'1r.hx flt� i9,,iflf 111 I flnl i,; �Illlli 1:: ltl ti a'i li Irt tll rp t 1111 {j
I I I 4111
�n%jarovenpent Planl 11 ,I, L' ; ,. ;Li.!t ..,1,=;
I j1, !Ir ' t;tr I.,;;11 nr u: r I r
r III 11 I r�I l: G'11 � I I >i I" I'�
,,.r,. I�Ir ..,, NI a: [I, .,._,.4 16r1., ,.-. I 111 � L :� L `i' h l f „. =1rI'.
lirl ,4-...
Increase pu 1131 i13 i.la 313C1:y aid we: well yob ne 13t Mi nos13 Li :t Station
1$ 21)0,000
V1i1U2
Replace 6n3ngri-L3 Lift Station wit] 1?w gr3vi:y s?wer line to Cypress Creek _ift S:ation
I$ 1130,1)0D
v1i1d
Lit StlatiD1 Upgn3dDB
IS 151)0,1)OD1
Vlild
Repllace _ift S:a:ion E FDrce main
1$ i 20,1)0D
VIid
R?place _ift Eta tion A FDrcI31131n
1$ 4175,I)0D
All
IJWVfPs
TMD _ Impr3ve-neits ConritructiDn 113 mad D1 3urBIaing 03 :ion 411
$ 4, 75D,ODD
-lig1
I n clement Reuse p-Djec: [costs 3-e based 3n 311y to 3 Cit is shar3 Df tle no ley)
16 1,077,4))
-li31
R?place fiberglaBsblower eiI;IDBun?wit n 3.03al. buildin3 wit 1 tre1s1dr3ins a 11 3deeluate
wen till3ti 3 i.
1$ 75,000
dign
I istall scree ling; compactor and nDdify screeiingi Id )mpster 3re3 ;AB1)
1$ 151)0,1)0D
Hip
Add manN3ys 3t Aerl3tiDn Basins ;ABI)
1$ 2131),DOD
-lipn
Re )lace 3 imps, motors 3 nd waives at ekis :ing Yard Pump St3 con (AB()
1$ 130,1)00
-lig 1
R?place Nalkways0nBlApe tanksland 3d11W3sndown facilities. ;BUCI1
1$ 12,1)00
-lipn
R a )lace a nd relocate tie )um 3 control p13 lel 3t the v1 aster Li 't Station ;RUGA
1$ 1313,1)00
-lig n
Add a watertig it man may a: ?ach 6BR sideNI311 ;2 3t each SBR for wen til 3tiD1 during Nor( ilside
tank. Total manways = 6). (BUC)
$ 60,000
Digi
Modify eKisti ig drain )i )ing at CCC BD that it con iects to eKisti ig 'I3 i1 Yard Pump Station.
Modify CCC si that it can 13c: as two inlJapenldent :auks. (BUC)
$ 61 7,000
Hip
RIB )taca plug valines at pretrela:me 1: [A1311
$ 215,1)00
VliIJ
Re )lac ? g as f ?elf c Mori 1 3tDrs 3 id rebuild exi;ti ng e quip r ? it for )s a 313 5 3 ar?B ;A 311
$ 24, )00
V1ilt
Re )lace th a air supply Ii les 3 id diffusers at :he Atlla itis Beach IVVWTP
I$ 113 ),I)00
Milt
Alid harper notDrs and i istall neN pulleys to two or he eKis:hp Master _ift 6ta:ion pu-nDB [BUC)
I$ 115,1)00
AU
Re )air a nIi - a- 3i )e BiDIIub a® odor co it -o1 system ;BUC1I
I$ 6,1)00
Old
1 is tall 3 Bc-e311 igs compactor and „Dldify Bc-ee11 igs IJ J 11 )s ter a -ea and (disposal net nod (BUCI)
I$ 1156,1)1)0
VliIJ
1-4
Filial Report
APPLIED TECHN )LD 3Y & 44N 43EINENT, INC.
;ity ofAlta itic Beach
201)13 Sewer VI aster PI a i J capital 1m )rDvement Piia i U hate
-r..v l ....
li I i,. , I✓, 1 0 3 t`il Il lla+� �I G I II •; r rl 1f.,1 G
- u I
pitallmpro�iement,Planl r III
;* a ,i. Year Ga jlill' 4 ;I,,, [I 1! i�111
1 .I l, .. l ! � I .I ]d ...e.„._t.. ��. i, �. ... .. M��IL �I ,.'�,�il IIIA I.4fIL 4V �i.t I..I h...
71r1 ,a I t
i r. i,,, •'.
Replace eKis ting aenatiD1 system with CDI31se bubble aeration s(sten. Re )lace existin13 niKer
pumps and piping aL each SBR. (BUC)
16 465,000
Mid
Repl3Ce eKiri ting )ositi✓e ldis)liace nent blDwers with ce itrifugal blowers. CI) IstrIJ1)L 13 new central
SB R BlDwer Buillbi -q3 to su )ply Iaen3 Lio n 10 eac h Df t he three SB Rs. I ncliude adequate ven 1111311/) n i i
lew S 3R Blower Building. (BUC)
161, 300,001)
Mid
U )grade (3r111 pi pill) around Biucl.a-leer tD allow better use DF e<istin1D t13i cape. 1115tall UeldicIafeld
(aloes 11) Ia111)w w131311 ng sludge from 3uccaneer.
16 75,001)
Mid
U )siee su per iatant Idecialt Dies Di Di13esters 1 and P at Burcianeer.
16 15,001)
Mid
Add yard siuperna1aiL )um) sta3lion 3l Buccaneer.
16 25,001)
Mild
Install one 13111di tiDna1 blDwer to nerve SIudd1) s Holldi nl3 ria nke 1 a nd 2. 1 istall Dne aldldi LiD 1131 bliwer
to sely? Sludge Holding Tank 13. ImprDve ✓entilatiin system within each Blower RD1)m. (BUC)
16 1333 001)
Mid
Replace one e<istinlJ W315te ACti✓3ted Sludge ;WASII Pun). (BUC)
16 14,001)
Mid
Install new Iabo✓e-13rade. ?fflue it me ter on the disrhIarga pi )i ig 1)f the exii3tiig sfflueit puns.
(BUC)
1$ 35,000
Mild
21)1)8 — 2011) SubtDtial
— 16 17,6DD,DDO
Year 21)11 — 21D1 3
CollectiD i Syst sm
P hase V, VI, VIII, IX, X — CDIlertion S /ste n (Bee Idehails 11 SectiD n 21
$ 4,1300,000
Hig 1
1 ncrease ppm pin1) DaDI3City a 11 wet well ✓DIU ne 131 Lift 3hatio1 0
1$ 1131),D0D
OH
JVVVfPI5
1 n)rD✓e veitilaLion ist BlDwer Builtuin13s:ABIl
$ 38,1)013
Hilin
CD IsLnur,L i term in3Cti ig wal ova (s between a <istin1g SBR to i (s. (BUC)
1$ 2 33,1)013
1101
Molli fy C nlDri n 3 C1)n Lact C -umber 10 allow For (better D )en3 LDr I3CCese. (BUCp
1$ 131,1)00
-HID 1
Add enlarged sump and If9I)or sII)pa to sach Sludge -1DIldi rig Tank. (BUC)
1$ 38,1)00
lig i
Add new 1 '/z' hDs3 bibs tiroughoul WVVfP site. ;BUCII
$ 131,1)00
1101
1-6
Filial Report
APPLIED TECHNDLDI3IY I& 114N %GEMENT, INC.
City of A:IIa itis; Beach
201)13 Bewer IVhaster Plan land Capital Improvement Plan Update
�- , I I r tti:I. � �
__.. !� .. ; , + . r; _ ..r1i1 : .,J. L: � n� In .,:�i1 I. _ �..�..c. �,aw
1t 1''' I .k1°1h I ! s r,-' .'G,
lrCapitaImprovernenPa.:
r it lra I
l : •i ,fli !4 1 "' tlllr r ,{�M!,r II : lilt'III e
r .r __! , �..�s r r i I .. ;.,.. w. I I .. �:, elt . L�,lt�r .,.. _ �.. �,.a .,lh I .h.._.a..... },�{._..,,. ,... k .ii
I II Il rl
�:. ,..., I .�t. _ .... ..
,.,
I
t #1ji :.�,. ,_. , � `' 1,
I.
a
Add floccull3tiD1/settlingEon's aluipmeit to :Aar' len; AB1I
16 5413,01)1)
Mid
Replace eK)anrionjointsI3id OIDicrrte under truck loadingEDne;AB1)
16 61,DDI)
Mid
UpUJl3ta s urvey of i ndlustrial and semi-inIJustril3l disrhia p e s. Prouiid a ellucl3tiD 1 program II'
necessary. (AB)
16 6,01)1)
Mid
Relocat a land upgrali a JVI/VTP antra ice (AB)
16 913,000
Mid
Add new IJpen3tions Building ;AB11
16 700,01)0
Mid
C mstrl)cI nelN Equi) n ant 1' V e hicl a Stu a13 a BIuiIIJi ig :AI311
16 1570,001)
Mili
U )grade the sllud1ge pump, i ncreasing the ca pacify In n 300 g )m to 760 g) n, and p )I (mer DIJ 11 )s
from 6 gpm ti) 11) gpm at Atll3ntic 13nrac1 JVWTP.
16 60,000
Mili
Install new 1J acl3nt piping, ittings, tear and maival uiah✓es DaI)w each existing not)rizad decant
u✓ialva 131 3BR. (BUC)
1£ 133,000
Mili
U psiee Bucci3near's sludge I3 id )oly n ar )lumps.
16 150,1)00
VIM
Mo1Ji fy a Kisting sl _IJge ren )v13l Di )i ig within each 3BR. B J C1I
16 138,1)0D
Mid
Renollvi3te Dr replace the polymer B_illJi110 and add I3 C )n trot RD )m at t ie Atlantic B each WWTP.
16 11)0,001)
L)w
De polish un _Bed grit facilities (BUC11
16 46,000
Low
2011) - 2) 16 S _b :otial
$17,560,01)0
1D Year C a )i t al 1 n pro ✓ ame it Nal Total
— $126, DI)0, )0 D
1— Colstls 13(e in 200 71io11an3.
P— Trim) improvlmments ane I,13nied Dierfn) 71 the 2001) SMP. City staffshodd continue tl) mDiilor Nese 151191/0 113 h) )riorifize the
improvements in futon years.
3— Jsiig costs Ii)rICptiDn I. The City should u)Nate Ihie :,ID once the 13IJfue' TMDL a)prol3i,h is d3i3idlelti.
11—The CVPf)r2007h1nsbeen adjuistledbraisedonIai,tual'200715udgl=l`. Irte 7113 recommlendidFor LI)07that Nene iotfund 3dhave Jeer)
ml)vle 11`o rhe 20013-21)10 category.
1-6
Final Repot
4P1'LIED TECHNOL )GI(li M 4NAGE HENT, INI..
PREPARED L0/01/06,1.7:53:53 LICENSE ACTIVITY REPORT BI' BUSINESS NAME ?AGE 1
City Df Beis_h NEW LICENSER FDR YEAR: 1006 BETWEEN: 09/01/36 TO 09/30/06
PRDGR4M OL122L DEPT: ALL DEPARTMENTS CLASS: ALL CLASSES
LIC # BUSIIESS NAME
ISSUED TETE CLASSIFICATIOIN
BUSINESS (ADDRESS BUS PHDNE
D6-00006538 B IP REED, IIJ_.
1508 JDRDAN RT
ATLANTIC BEACH FL 32233
06-30006546 FIRST rRUSr REALTY
V25 ATLANTIC BLVD _MIT )5
ATLANTIC BEACH FL 31233
06-D0006547 FIRST TRUST REALTY
725 ArLANrIC BLVD JNIr D5
ATLANTIC BEACH I?L 32233
9/D1/06 NEA MASONRICCERAMIC TILE
9/11/06 NEA REAL ESTATE AGENCY
9/11/06 NEA REAL ESTATE BRDKER
06-D0006499 FLDRIDA NETWORC, LLC, D/B/A 9/D1/06 NEA REAL ESTATE SALES AGEING
363 ArLANrIC BLVD JNIT 12
ArLANrIC BEACH Ii L B223 3
06-00006545 REEDY'S FLDOR COIVERIIN3, INC.
1665 A I?ARC TER
ArLANrIC BEACH FL B2233
06-D0006540 UNITED DISTRIBUTORS, INC.
DUIrI;IDE CIICIC
ATLANTIC BEACH FL B223B
06-D0006541 UNITED DISTRIBUTORS, INC.
OUTRIDE CITY
ATLANTIC BEACH I?L 3223B
06-50006542 UNITED DISTRIBUTORS, INC.
OUTSIDE CITY
ATLANTIC BEACH I?L 32233
06-00006543 UNITED DISTRIBIJTDRS, INC.
OUTSIDE CITIC
ATLANTIC BEACH I?L B223B
904-B86-3567
904-249-2840
904-549-2840
904-241-2417
9/L8/06 NEW FLOOR COIVERLN30: CARPET, TILE, ETC.
904-483-7412
9/D8/06 NEW SDLICITAIrION, DODR TO DODR
9/D8/06 NEA SDLICITATION, DOOR TO DOOR
9/00/06 NEA SDLICITATIDN, DOOR TO DOOR
9/D8/06 NE4 SDLICITATIDN, DOOR TO DOOR
06- D0006601 UNITED (STATES CAFE INS CD OF 9/E7/06 NEA IIJISURANCE COMPANY
OUTRIDE CITIC
ATLANTIC BEACH P[ B223B
06-00006549 WALTER WILLIAMS REALTY, IJE. 9/26/06 NEW REAL ESTATE SALES AGENT
615 ATLANTIC BLVD
ATLANTIC BEACH FL 32233
GRAND TOTALS
904-646-9000
904-646-9000
904-646-9300
9D4-646-9000
732-922-7276
804-435-D131
NEW LICEIJISEB RNW LICCENSES • - TRN LICENSES
AC: 11 AC: 0 AC: 0
P I? : 0 PP: 0 PP: 0
IN: 0 IIJ: 0 IN: 0
IJD: 0 VD: 0 VD: 0
PG: 0 PG: 0 PG: 0
LIC: 11 LIC: 0 LIC: 0
AGENDA ITEM:
SITRMTTTFT) RV:
DATE:
CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH
CITY COMMISSION MEETING
STAFF REPORT
TTtility Contractor Annual Service Contract
Rid No. 0506-16
ninina Kaluzniak. CEP. Utility Director
September 78, 2nnA
AGENDA ITEM # 4B
Oc`T'UT'ER 9. 2006
RACKGROTTNT): The City uCes an annul contractor to perform »tility repairs in the water,
sewer and stnrmwater systems. and occasionally to perform site work for other departments. The
contract was advertised and four bidders attended the mandatory pre -hid ,neetina. one
contractor submitted a bid, including all required documents:
Description
Gruhn May, Inc.
Hourly Rates for:
Regular Time
3 Man Crew
$12n
6 Man Crew
5240
Equipment, TraekeI Excavator
$75
Equipment, Front End T.oader/Rackhoe
$45
Dewatering Equipment
$140
Lifting Hydraulic Crane
$65
Overhead and Profit %
20042
Premium Hours Factor
1.5
Holiday Hours Factor
2.0
Emergency Callout Mobilization
4 hour minimum
Gruhn May, Inc. is the responsible bidder meeting all requirements. This contractor has heen
doing utility repairs for the City foc- many years, and the City has heen miff)/ pleased with their
performance. The bid prices represent no increase over current prices, which have been in effect
the last three years, and include a 6"A reduction in the cost of dewatering equipment.
BUDGET: Funds are budgeted in the amount of $140,nnn in the fnllnwina accounts frnm the
Water, Sewer and Stormwater Funds: 400-550'x-511-3400. a00-5504-533-3400.410-5506-535-
3400.4.10-5508-535-3400 and 470-0000-538-3400.
PFCniumFRNDATiON: Award the bid for Utility Contractor Annual Service Contract to
Gruhn May, Inc. at the prices specified in Bid No. 05n6-1 h.
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Bid tabulation form
REVIEWED RV CITY MANAGER:
1
Lity of Atlantic Beach
UTILI TY I'ONTRACTOR FOR ANNU _ SERVILE CON rRAIC r
September 1211, 2006
131 D # 051)13-16
1)91VQ7/ )13
13:00 PM
Required D D rumen is
Gruhn May
Sub nissio n i n Tripli ;ate
X
Alili a nda - Do:u ne nta 1io n of Receipt
NA
Certifiei Final :ial Statement for art Tw3 Years (copies acceptable)
X
Do :lumen t Requirements Cn3:dist
X
Drug =ree Workplace = )rm
X
I nruna nc. Certifi ;ate . Origi nal
X
Proof - 1 D Yeans Experience
X
Proof - Fire Line Con :ria :t )r V Li ::ense (copies acceptable)
X
Proof - Horan Plumbing Li;ense (copies acceptable)
X
Proof - Underground Utility C ) ntnactor's Li :e nse (copies acceptable)
X
Public Entity :.rime 3 tat a n i nt
X
RBierancB15 - Three (3)
X
W- 9 =Drm
X
Hourly Rates:
13 Mia 1 C113w
$ '1 Q0.1)1)
6 M 3 i Cnaw
$ R40.01)
Excav 3 toi •
$ 75.1)1)
Front E nd _13 3Iie •16 31, (hoi.
$ 45.1)1)
Draw 3tering Equipment
$ 140.1)1)
Lifting Hydraulic ;,rane
$ 65.1)1)
Tot 31 :,ost Without 13 rerhead
$ 13135. )I)
Curt for ID ria • 113 3d & Profit (%)
21)
Tr3irialIMileage Costs (baseli on one rola ill trip)
$ -
Total Cost for One Hour Project
$ 1322.1)0
Emergency 3allout Mobilization =iee
4 Hbiar Minimum
Hours: Ir:3D am - 3:131) pm M - F. After Hours Rate
1.5 X Standard
Holiday's Are Double-time At The Rahe Of
Q.0 X Standard
Award Dr Bid baseli 01 DeDiatri entA1131/sis alIi Conmisrii)n Apprbval
AGENDA ITEM # 7A
OCTOBER 9, 2006
ORDINANCE NUMBER 90-06-195
AN ORDINANCE nF TAE f!TV nF ATI ANTIC REACH, COUNTY OF
DTTVAT., RTATE. nF FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER
9n -n1-177, SAID ORDINANCE RE -ADOPTING CHAPTER 24, AND
INCLUDING ALL SITRSFQTTFNT AMENDMENTS THERETO, THIS
ORDINANCE SPECiFiCAT.i.V AMENDING ARTTCi.F. III,_ i)TViSION 7
STIPP!EMENTARV RF.(:TTi.ATWINS 3 nF TAF. CODE OF
ORDINANCES FMR TUE CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH, FLORIDA IS
IFFREBY AMENDED TO ADD NEW SECTION 24-172, RESIDENTIAL
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, PROVTDiNG FOR RECORDATION
AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE,
RECITALS
WAER E AR, the City of Atlantic Beach, under the authority of Chapter 166, Part I,
Florida Statutes, The Municipal Home Role Powers Act, such authority being restated within
Section 4, General Powers of the City Charter, as reaffirmed, and also under the anthnrity of
Chapter 163, Part TT, Florida Statutes. Sertinn 1 A131(4, T.ocal (Tnvernment comprehensive
Planning and T.and Tlevelopment Regulation Act, estahlishing authority to adopt Land
1levelnpment Regulations and issue Development Orders; all providing broad authority to plan
for and regulate the use and development of land on the basis of the impact such development
may have on the City, and
WTIVRF.AR_ pursuant to such authority, the City has di,> ded lands into Zoning Districts,
has adopted a Comprehensive Plan, and has adopted regulations to guide the future use and
development of lands within the City. Said Land Development Regulations, inclusive of the
Comprehensive Plan, applicable Rnilding Codes and also the requirements of other agencies
having regulatory authority over the City. are intended tn, among other things, promote the
general health, peace, safety and welfare of the inhahitants of the City: and
WHEREAS, the City of Atlantic Reach further intends to promote, protect, and improve
the good order, appearance, and general welfare of the City and also to prevent the overcrowding
of land and to protect natural resources and the traditional residential development patterns
within the City, and
Page 1 _f 7
Ordinance Numher On -n6-1 OS
Effective hate: 9/1 1 /(1F
AGENDA ITEM # 7A
OCTOBER 9, 2006
WHFRFAS, the City Commission fmds that existing T.and Tlevelnpment Regulations
allow for development to nccui in residential areas of the City, particularly in older established
neighborhoods within the City. which may be incompatible with such neighborhoods because of
excessive size and mass, and proximity to neighboring properties, and which may also result in
the excessive destruction of vegetation and tree canopy and the excessive loss of light, air and
breezes, and
WHEREAS, such Land Development Regulations have also proved inadequate to limit
or preclude new development, which is out of scale and with established traditional residential
hnildings within in the City's older estahlished neighhorhonds, and such regulations also fail to
discourage the redevelopment of residential lots in ways that may be inconsistent and
incompatible with the historic and existing built environment as required by Policy A.1.4.4 of the
Comprehensive Plan. and
WHT,RF.AS, such excessive development negatively changes and impacts such
established neighhorhnods thrnngh loss of character, open space, views, hreezes, tree canopy and
a sense of privacy; and
WNFRFAC, it is the stated p„hlic policy of the City of Atlantic Reach, as set forth
within objectives A.1.4 and A.1.5 of the 2015 Comprehensive Plan. which is adopted by
Ordinance Number 31-04-01, to encourage future development and redevelopment, which
retains the exceptionally high quality of life and the predominantly residential character of the
City of Atlantic Beach and which provides for the preservation and protection of the dense tree
canopy of the City. It is the expressed intent of the City to protect and maintain the unique
neighhorhood character of established and traditional residential areas throughout the City, and
WHEREAS, following puhlic hearings, public participation workshops with interested
citizens, the Community Development Rnard and the City Commission, public hearings to enact
th;s Ordinance were held by the Cites Commission for the City of Atlantic Rear+ on August 2R,
20m and September 11, 2006. In consideration of public participation and comments. and in
support of stated policies of the City, including applicable goals, objectives and polices as set
forth within the adopted 2015 Comprehensive Plan, the City Commission hereby finds that
adoption of this Ordinance and these Residential Tlevelopment Standards shall be in the best
interests of the citizens of the City of Atlantic Reach and shall serve to implement such goals,
nhiectives and policies.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ENACTED BY THE CITY COIN/EMISSION ON
BEHALF OF THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH,
FLORIDA.
Page 2 of 7
Ordinance Number 90-0-195
Effective
Effective Date: 9/11/06
AGENDA ITR" A # 7A
OCTOBER 9, 2006
SECTION 1. Chapter 24, Zoning, Subdivision and T.and Development Regulations
Article TTT, Zoning Regulations, Division 7, Supplementary Regulations. of the Code of
nrdinances for the City of Atlantic Reach, Elorida is hereby amended to add new Section 24-
177, Residential Development Standards, and upon enactment shall read as follows.
SECTION 24-172. Rksidenti91 Deveinpment Standards
(a) Purpose and Intent. The purpose and intent of these new regulations is to implement the
goals, ohiectives and polices as set forth within the adopted 2015 Comprehensive Plan,
restated in Part below.
coal A.1 The cites shall manage growth and redevelopment in a manner, which results in
a pattern of land uses that: 1) encourages, creates and maintains a healthy and aesthetically
pleasing built environment, 2) avoids blighting influences, 3) preserves and enhances
coastal, environmental, natural, historic and ciltural resources, and 4) maintains the City's
distinct residential community character.
Objective A.1.1 Maintaining Residential character - The cites shall encourage future
development and redevelopment. which: 1) retains the exceptionally high quality of life
and the predominantly residential character of the City of Atlantic Beach, and 2) provides
for the preservation and protection of the dense tree canopy.
Policy A.1.4.3 By December 31, 2005, the City shall consider amendments to its T.and
Development Regulations, which include provisions intended to retain the »pique
community identity, the architectural character. and the residential scale of that area of the
city known as old Atlantic Reach.
policy A.1.A.4 Within Old Atlantic Beach, the City shall consider options to discourage
the redevelopment of residential lots in ways that are inconsistent and incompatible with
the historic and existing built environment.
The diversity of residential types is recognized as an asset to this Community's »pique
character. The purpose of these regulations is also to regulate the fi,ture use and
development of land in a manner that minimizes incompatible relationships within
neighborhoods that may result from new Development. which because of excessive height,
mass or bulk may result in new Development that excessively dominates established
development patterns within neighborhoods or excessively restricts light, air, breezes or
privacy on adjacent properties.
The further intent of these regulations is to appropriately limit height and hnik and mass of
residential structures in accordance with the expressed intent of the citizens of Atlantic
Reach, and also to support and implement the Recitals of nrdinanCe 9(1-(16-195 and as more
specifically enumerated below.
(1) To ensure that buildings are compatible in mass and scale with those of buildings seen
traditionally within the residential neighborhoods of Atlantic Beach.
(2) To maintain the traditional scale of buildings as seen along the street.
(3) To minimize negative visual impacts of larger new or remodeled buildings upon adjacent
properties.
(d) To promote access to light and air from adjacent properties.
(c) To preserve and enhance the existing mature tree canopy, particularly within front yards.
Page 3 of 7
Ordinance Number 90-06-195
Effective Date: 9/11/06
AGENn A ITEM # 7A
OCTOBER 9, 2006
(b) Applicability. The Development Standards and provisions set forth within this Section shall
apply to Development of Single-family and Twn-family Dwelliners within that area of the
City depicted by Attachment A and generally referred to as Old Atlantic Reach_ which for the
purposes of this Section shall be bounded by:
- Ahern Street and Sturdivant Avenue, between the beach and Seminole Road nn the south;
• Seminole Road. extending north to 1 lth Street on the west;
1 1th Street extending east to Fast Coast Drive. and also including T.nts 7. 4. 6 8. 1n. 17.
14, 16, 1R, 7n, 27, 74. 76, 7R. l(1 and 37 within Rlnch 14 located on the north side of 1 lth
Street and west of East Coast Dri"e, and
Fast Coast Drive extending nnrth to its terminus, then along Seminole Road to 16th
Street, and 1 6th street extending east to the heanh, with the beach being the eastern
houndary of this area.
nevelopment, as used within this Section, shall also include total redevelopment of lots and
certain renovations and additions to Single-family and Two-family Dwellings as set fnrth
herein.
(c) Additional Residential Development .Standards. The following standards and requiremnents
shall apply to that area defined in preceding paragraph (h), and ac fi,rther and more
specifically deccrihed for each particular standard or requirement.
(1) Floor Area Ratio (FAR). Flnnr Area Ratin limits are estahliched to prevent incompatihle
mass and scale where new Development might otherwise eYceCsively dominate the
existing streetgcape and existing adjacent residen"es. FAR shall be defined as the ratio of
total counted above -grade floor areas of certain Buildings on a Lot or Parcel compared to
the total Lot Area.
FAR = Tnt21 cnnnted Flnnr Arps _ Tntal Lnt Area
Tl1e following FAR provisions shall apply new Single-family and Two-family
Dwellings and additions, whish expand interior Floor Area by more than twenty-five
percent (25%).
i. Lots or Parcels that contain 6000 square feet of Lot Area or less shall be assumed to
contain 6000 square feet of T.ot Area, and Floor Area Ratio limits and provisions as
set forth within this Section shall apply. Eor example, maximum Eloor Area Ratio for
a 5,700 square foot lot shall he calcilated as if the T.nt is 6000 square fe t in size.
ii. A maximum Eloor Area Ratio limit of .54 shall apply_
EAR calculations shall he included on all Single-family Dwelling and Two-family
Dwelling Construction plans suhmitted to the City for review and permitting.
2fiae d nf7
Ordinance Numher 90-06-195
Effective nate; 9/11 /M
AGENDA I'T'EM # 7A
OCTOBER 9,7006
iv. The following elements of a Single-family or Two-family Dwelling shall he counted
in the FAR calculation.
• interior heated and cooled areas.
• Porches, balconies. patios and breezeways with a solid cover or roof when
enclosed by solid walls on more than two sides.
• That portion of an attached garage exceeding 500 square feet of Eloor Area.
v. The following elements of a single-family or Two-family Dwelling shall be excluded
from the FAR calculation.
• Porches. balconies, patios, breezeways, and decks (as well as overhangs. eaves,
cantilevers. awnings and similar features) with a solid cover or roof. but not
enclosed by walk on more than two sides. Such porches, balconies. patios.
breezeways, and decks shall remain open on at least two sides and shall not later
he enclosed in any manner.
▪ Detached private Garages that are incidental to the Principal Use n a Tot.
Detached Private garages shall remain subject to established size, height and
placement regulations.
• carports that are open On two or more sides.
(") Side wall planes. To avoid stark, exterior side walls from facing the sides nf adiacent
residences, particularly on two-story and three-story residences, the following standards
shall apply to new two-story and three-story Single-family and Two-family Dwellings; to
renovations involving Structural Alterations or additions to the sides of existing Single-
family and Twp -family Dwellings, and where a second or third -story is added to an
existing single-family and Two-family Dwelling.
i. Second and third -story exterior side walls, which exceed 35 -feet in length. shall
provide horizontal offsets of at least four feet, or architectural details, design elements
or other features, which serve to break-up the appearance of the side wall, such that
adjacent properties are not faced on the side by Manic two or three-story walls void of
any architectural design other than siding material or windows.
ii. such design features may also include balconies, bay windows and other types of
projecting windows or architectural details provided that these shall not extend more
than 24 -inches into the Required Side Yard, and that a minimum separation of 10 -feet
is maintained between such eletencinns into the Required Side Yard and any other
existing adjacent residential Buildings.
(3) Freight to Wall Plate. For Single-family and Two-family Dwellings, the maximum
height to the top horizontal framing member of a wall from the first floor finished floor
elevation shall not exceed 22 -feet.
(41 Third Flnnr Footprint. Tn order to reduce the marc nf taller Single-family and Two-
family f)wellings, the interior footprint of any third floor area chill not exceed fifty
percent (5n^/„) nf the sire of the second floor interior footprint.
Page 5 of 7
Ordinance Number 90-06-195
Effective Date: Q/1 1 /nh
AGENDA ITEM # 7A
pCrpnnn g /pp�
(5) Shade Trees. Tn order to sustain the City's existing tree canopy and to provide shade
along the City's residential streets and sidewalks, one shade tree shall be provided within
the Required Front Yard and an additional shade tree shall be required on the Lot in a
location at the property owner's discretion in accordance with the following provisions:
i. This requirement shall apply to the construction of new Single-family and Two-
family Dwellings and to Structural Alterations of any Single-family and Two-family
nwe11ing. Such required Trees shall be installed prior to issuance of a Certificate of
nccnpancy or prior to final inspections, as applicable. (The requirements of Chapter
23 of this Code shall also apply.)
ii. Required Shade Trees shall have a minimum size of 4 -inch caliper at the time of
installation. A list of recommended tree species is available from the City.
iii. Credit shall he provided for the following, and additional Front Yard Shade Trees
shall not he required in such cases.
(a) Where healthy canopy frees exist in the Required Front Yard, which are listed
on the recommended tree list and are at least 4 -inch caliper; or
(b) where oak trees exist in the Required Front Yard. which are at least six (6)
feet tall; or
(c) where healthy street trees exist in the adjacent right-of-way, which are listed
on the City's recommended tree list and are at least 4 -inch caliper. Where
installation of a Front Yard Shade Tree is required, such tree shall not be
planted within right-of-ways or over underground utilities.
iv. Similarly, credit shall be given for the second required Shade Tree where such
tree, as deccrihed ahnve, exists elsewhere on the Lot.
(d) Special Treatment of Lawfully Existing Single-family and Two-family Dwellings, which
would otherwise he made Nonconforming by enactment of .section 241-172, estahliching
these Residential Development Standards. Any lawfully existing Single-family or Two-
family Dwelling, which has heen constructed pursuant to properly issued Building permits
prior to the effective date of th=se Residential Development Standards. adopted on
September 11, ')(0A by Ordinance Number 90-06-195, shall - be deemed a Vested
Development, and any such Single-family or Two-family Dwelling shall be considered a
lawful permitted Structure within the Lot or parcel containing the Vested Development, and
shall not he considered as a Nonconforming Structure with respect to the regulations
contained within this Section.
Tt is fi,rther the intent of this Section to clarify when these Residential Development
Standards shall apply in the case of reconstruction or redevelopment fo11owing:
(1) a nat„ral act such as a hurricane, wind. flood or fire; or
(2) redevelopment initiated by a property owner or authorized agent for a property owner.
The following provisions shall be limited only to those characteristics, which would
ntherwise he made nnncnnforming from the requirements of this Section, which provides
Residential nevelnpment Standards. The provisions of Section 24-85 shall otherwise apply
to Nonconforming T ots, T Tses and Structures.
Page 6 of 7
ordinance Numher 90-06-195
Effective nate: 9/11 /06
AGENDA ITFMM 7A
OCTOBER 9,2006
1. Structures damaged or destroyed hy natural acts or hy any means not resulting from
the actions of the Property owner. Any lawfi,lly existing single-family or Two-family
DWelling. which has been constructed pursmnt to properly issued Building Permits prior
to the effective date of these Residential Development Standards, adopted on September
11, 2006 by Ordinance Number 90-06-195, shall be deemed a Vested Development, and
any Single-family or Two-family Dwelling shall he considered a lawl i1 permit—teal
structure within the T.ot or parcel containing the Vetted nevelopment. Furthermore, an
exiting single-family or Two-family Dwelling for that particular Structure, shall not be
considered as a Nonconforming Structure such that it may be fully replaceable in its
existing footprint and of the same size and architectural design, subject to all applicable
building codes and other T.and nevelopment Regulations contro1ling nevelopment and
redevelopment of such T or parcels. Any construction that exceeds the existing
footprint shall he in compliance with all applicable provisions of this Chapter including
minimum Yard Rpquiremeents.
ii. Structures damaged, destroyed nr demolishad or expanded, by any means resulting
from tho actions of the property owner or authorized agent for a property owner.
Single-family or Two-family Dwellings, which are rebuilt or renovated, or expanded by
more than twenty-five percent (25%) in Floor Area, shall be subject to applicable
provisions of these Residential nevelopmet Standards for that portion of the Structure
that is rebuilt, renovated or expanded.
RF'.CTTnN 2, This flydinanre shall tape effect immediately upon itq foal passage and
adoption and shall be recorded in a book kept and maintained by the Clerk of the City of Atlantic
Beach, Duval County, Florida, in accordance with Section 125.68, Florida Statutes.
Passed upon first reading and public hearing by the City Commission of the City of Atlantic
Beach this 28th day of August, 2006. Passed upon final reading and public hearing this 11th day
of September, 2006.
Approved as to fo I and correctness:
AN C. "rN, ESQITTRE
City Atto ee
AT
ftlAita
DONNA BUSSEY
City Clerk
Page 7 of 7
DONALD M. WOLFS
Mayor/aresiding office
Ordinance Number 90-06-195
Effective nate: 9/11/06
Ordinance 90-06 195 ATTACHMENT A
City of Atlantic Beach
Area subject to section 24-1172_ Residential Development Standards
AGENDA ITEM It 7A
OCTOBER 9,2006
s
0 500 1.000
2,000 Feet
AGENDA ITEM:
SITRMITTED BY:
DATE:
R A Lica"? OUND :
CITY flti ATLANTIC REACH
CITE' COMMISSIONER MEETING
REPORT
niczcnssion and related action on the City Manager's
compensation
Mike Rnrno, Commissioner
October 1. ?nn6
AGENDA ITGM # 8A
OCTOBER 9,2006
Article III of the City Charter estahlishecl the City Manager
as appointed hy the City Commission and states that the
City Manager shall he compensated at a rate set by the City
Commission.
ATTACHMENT: List of City Accomplishments as provided hy the City
Manager.
RF.Cf1MMF.N1I A Tif1N:
consider the pay of the City Manager and the effective date
of any changes per Article III of the City Charter.
AGENDA ITEM # QA
OCTOBER 9,2006
City of Atlantic Beach Accomplishments
October 2005 through Septemher 7nnA
✓ Class 3 fire rating receivers; improved scores for both fire and water since
last evaluation in 1996; Inwer insurance costs for many policy hnldars in
COAR
✓ post nfcp access; completion of imprgvemPnts at Eost of ire tn gAt
pi Vic access from Plaza Drive
✓ Hopkins Creek; agreement with Siinrice Church to purchase property for
construction of retention pend; approved by commission 8/06
✓ Hopkins Crank grant; approved agreement w/ state for $400,0n0
n/joins
✓ other Grants Received;
D Homeland Security; $119,nnfl fnr ceriirity in r_ity buildings
D Homeland Security; $d!,nnn for SWAT vehicle
➢ Rec jnnal flnmectic Security; $20.000 for SWAT and tactical
equipment
➢ Bulletproof Partnership; $4,500 fnr vests
D JAG I; $73,000 fnr Crime Suppression I Init
D JAG Il; $Rs.nnn fnr computer aided dispatch program
➢ Wastewntf_r rel Tse from DEP $920,000
➢ walkover for 3rd St. beach access; grant approved from
Jacksonville to pay 100% cost $48,000 c-�nstnictjnn awaiting
DEP approval after sea turtle nistjna sPacnn)
✓ Community nharantar process completed on 9/11/06 after 8 meetings
open to puhljr participation, 4 joint workshops with Community Development
Rnard. d other meetings of CDB, and 3 focus group meetings
✓ Rezoning of Selva Marina subdivision to new RS -L district w/ Inn'
minimum frontages
✓ Beard Memhar Rnvinw Cnmmitina amendments passed by mayor and
commission at 7/13/nR meeting; note by advertising increased to 17
applicants for CD Board in 9/06
✓ ped paths;
• completino of Playa Rd. path w/ hridaP ronnertinn to 5 -points;
April 200A
D. Seminole Rd. ped path; completion between Garden Lane and
nreanfnrrect Drive
➢ Rose Park to Main St.; plan approved and construction
authorized
✓ Jordan St Community CPntnr; agreement w/ Habitat for expansion of
center and PYpancinn of after school tutoring program approved
✓ Skatp park crimpetition; 1st annual; held on Saturday May 13th
✓ other New events;
D Bicycle Tour of City Parks
1
AGENDA ITEM # 8A
OCTOBER 9,2006
> Zoo Outreach at Dutton and Tideviews Parks
➢ Unity Festival at flnnnPr Community Canter
➢ I andsraDe Classes at Adele (rage community Center
✓ New sidewalks installed on Frances, Royal Palms and Sailfish
✓ Adopt a Tree program expanded for Royal Palms Planted 110 trees in
ROW with money frim tree fund
✓ Post Office drop holies
➢ reti irned to Adala (raga after ramOVai by Post Office
➢ Mandalay Park island constructed by City and drop box installed
by Post Office
✓ Cable TV franchise agreement and ordinance completed: joint
negotiations with Cnmrast and .larksonville RParh took nvar 3 years
✓ completion of s_points intersection improvements: including improved
traffir flow
✓ Hurricane protection for commission chambers complete
✓ Welcome signs improved by relocation, repainting, lighting (new sign nn
Atlantic Blvd. received hilt ypt to ha installed)
✓ f)rainagp imprnvpmentc at ocean/ 1lth St. complete
✓ Sower Master plan update completed, presentation to Mayor &
commission at budget workshop in August, 2006
✓ Security system enhancements installed at water & wastewater plants,
other city hi iildings (inrli ming rarr1 readers for doors)
✓ IT infrastructure: improved to increase reliahility: including back up
server and fiber line being installed to Public Works
✓ Ordinances passed
➢ Sexual offenders/ predators 10/05
➢ Establishing RS -1 7nninq requiring minimum 1n0' frontage and
10.nnn s.f. Infs. than re7nning SPIva Marina sphdivisinns 7/11A.
a/nR
D Amending subdivision regulations to eliminate pervious
treatment for most types of pavers 3/06
> Amendments to Dangerous Dnq Ordinance 2/06, 4/06
➢ Amendments to Park n ilPs a/OA
➢ (:hanging ganaral amployaa rontrihutinn rata tO pension funds
4106
> Short term rentals; clarifying ordinance 5/06
> Cable TV Franchise ordinance 5/06
> Height referendum 7/06
➢ Cnmwi inity C:harartar Inning standards MR
AGENDA ITEM# 9A
OCTOBER 9, 2006
nctoher 2, 2006
MEMOR ANTIT TM
TO: The Honorahle Mayor
and Members of the Commission
FROM:
Tim uanson
city Manager
ST TRJECT: City Manager's Report
Hazardous Waste Co1lection nay; The next Hazardous Waste Collection nay has heen
scheduled in the City Nall parking lot in Atlantic Beach on Saturday, March 10, 2007. past
hazardous waste collection events at the heaches have set records for the amount of turnout in
nuval County.
Recycling and Green Waste Collections; The city's sanitation company collects approximately
12,400 tons of solid waste per month in Atlantic Reach. Of that amount, approximately '4n0
tons (19.25%) is green waste which is sent to a special landfill site and another 1,150 tons (9.3%)
is recycled. Consequently, almost 30% of the waste stream originating in Atlantic Beach is
being kept out of the regular landfill. This certainly implies a commitment of Atlantic Beach
residents to uCe environ entally sound solid waste disposal practices.
Jeff Minton moves on to another job: Teff Minton has announced that he will be leaving the
Beaches Leader to take a job with a private company in the Jacksonville area. He has worked as
the government reporter for the Leader since May of inn 1. A s of the date of the writing of this
report, there has been no announcement about who will take his place.
MTN[JTF.S
Board Member Review Committee Meeting
September 20, 2006
1. Call to order
AGENDA ITGM # 10A
OcTOBED 9.2006
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Pro Tem Dezmond Waters at 5:00 pm. These in attendance
were Mayor Pro Tem Dezmond Waters, City Manager Jim -Hanson, Memher (len Fisher, Member Casey
Quinif, City Clerk Donna Bussey, Cnmmunity Development Board chair Ram Jacobson and Community
Development Directnr Sonya Doerr.
City Manager Hanson reminded the Committee this is the remainder of applicants for consideration to the
Community Development Board and that the previous two groups are also to he considered.
2. Discuss/review new applicants for the Community Development Board
A. Rohan Gray
B. Jerome Hixon
C. Paul Sapia
1). Jeff Turner
F. Carol E. Anderson
E. Christopher "Blane" Adams
The Committee interviewed each of the applicants except Teff Turner whn did not show. The purpose of
the interview and an overview of the duties and responsihilities of the Community Development Board
were provided to each candidate. The candidates explained their personal accomplishments, their goals
and their interest in the community. The Committee offered each applicant the opportunity to ask
questions. The Committee responded to those questions.
After the interviews were cnnducted, the committee discussed these candidates.
3. Discuss and review current members of the Community Development Board
A. Samuel Jacohson
R. Craig Burkhart
C. Carolyn Words
Sonya Doerr explained that three of the current members, Samuel Jacobson, Craig Burkhart and Carolyn
Woods, whose terms have expired, are interested in heing reappointed. She noted that Steven Tenkins is
not interested in reappointment.
Ms. Doerr gave her evaluation of Samuel Jacobson. Mr. Jacobson and Ms. Doerr gave their evaluation of
Craig Burkhart and Carolyn Woods. They discussed each member's attendance record and contribution
to the Community Development Board. The Committee expressed absenteeism is a concern and
emphasized the importance for members to attend the meetings in order to have a quorum. Further
evaluation and discussinn ensued.
The consensus was to recommend reappointing Samuel Jacobson, Craig Burkhart and Carolyn
Woods to serve on the Community Development Board for an additional term.
Minutes of the Board Member Review Committee Meeting on September 20, 2006 Page 1 of 2
AGEu-A ITEM # 10A
The committee discussed all the new a licants and believed to h ocroRER 9,2006
p
phave a strong applicant pool.
The e_nsPns»»s was t_ recommend appointing David Boyer to the Community >nevelopment Board.
The Committee suggested information he sent out to each member of hoards explaining the roles and
expectations to include attendance and noti_fica+ion ifunahle to attend. Also, behavior and public
expression of personal views were discussed and believed to be an important issue to address in that
information.
4. Adjournment
There being no other husines z. the meeting adjourned at 7:45 pm.
Donna T., Rnssey, City Clerk
Min,,tee of the nnard Member Review Committee Meeting on September 20, 2006 Page 2 of 2
CITY OF ATLANTIC REACH
BOARD / COMMITTEF. MEMBER APPLICATION 'ARM
Please check (Al) beside each Board or Committee that you are applying to terve pn:
(A surmnary of each board/committee is available on page 2 of this form.)
AGENDA ITEM # 1oA
OCTOBER 9,2006
ri Code Enforcement Poard X Community Development Board
ri Pension 'Board of Trustees + Tree Conservation Board
E Cultural Arts and Recreation Advicnly Committee ❑ Board Member Rei'iew Committee
APPi ICANT'c NAME: • 7 \J 197 ` 0,, n c) t1 C1�Z,
ADDRESS:"-77?-PkQJ
DAYTIME PHONE: — ig(4 1 FVFNiNCT PH(NF: M (7,
F._MATT ADDRESS: ---0' I r tti ')' p t
FAX: )4\
Please explain any employment experience, hoard/committee experience, and(or community volunteer eirperienee
relative to the board/committee applying for.
-125-T i2 cet) %Zx. cTr\/ 3 Lam .
Please provide a brief explanation of your interest or any spar -Jai Qualifications you have in this field and ypiir reasons
for wishing to he app_inted to this hoard/committee.
-I-'2 i iJ( cr=pee \v7.6vt Lu75g Q1)/ /7,To T
i C (Ll Te„
L
Please return completed form to
Donna L. Bussey, City Clerk. RM Seminole Road. Atlantic Reach. FL 32233
1