Loading...
Exh 9C AGENDA ITEM #9C JANUARY 13, 2003 1 STAFF REPORT City of Atlantic Beach Commission Meeting ' AGENDA ITEM: Sight Distance Requirements at Intersections DATE: January 6, 2003 SUBMITTED BY: David E. Thompson, Chief of Police/DPS BACKGROUND: During the summer months of 2002, the use of the City right-of--ways was discussed at City Commission meetings. It was recognized that when citizens place items on the City right-of--ways without permission, they sometime create a safety hazard for motorists and pedestrians. Although the beautification of the right-of--ways is encouraged, there is a 1 need to establish guidelines to assure that dangerous or hazardous conditions are not created. 1 The language below, is being proposed as a means to provide limitations on trees, shrubbery, berms, fences, walls, or any other structure which might obstruct the vision of motorists passing through intersections. The restrictions do not apply to signalized intersections that control each roadway , entering the intersection. Intersections with traffic signals and multi-way stops would not be subject to these restrictions. The proposed ordinance will provide an open field of vision for motorists at intersections, and it provides for a safety zone within two (2) feet of the roadway. The proposed ordinance also provides a mechanism for the removal of obstructions that violate this code. "Intersections: Sight Distance Requirements/Safety Zones i " " ty is any intersection that has a C defined intersection For the purposes of this section, owned or maintained road, street, or any other type of roadway as one of the roadways comprising the intersection; except any such intersection where there is a required stop condition (multi-way stop, traffic signal, or continual flashing red signal indication) for each roadway traffic lane entering the intersection. To ensure adequate visibility at defined intersections, the occupant, owner or owners of private real property shall not: AGENDA ITEM #9C JANUARY 13, 2003 ' a. Plant or permit the growth of shrubbery or any other vegetation on the city right- of-way, above the height of thirty (30) inches from the surrounding Established Grade; ' b. Allow tree branches to extend below the height often (10) feet on the city right- of-way from the surrounding general ground level: or c. Allow any berm, fence, wall, or any other structure to be erected, placed or exist on the city right-of--way, ...which will obstruct a driver's view of approaching traffic at a defined intersection. ' A "Safety Zone" shall be defined as the unobstructed, relatively flat area provided beyond the edge of the roadway for the recovery of errant vehicles. The safety zone shalt be established as the area within two (2) feet from the edge of the pavement onto the non- paved right-of--way. No occupant, property owner or representative shall plant, erect, place, or allow any plant, wall, fence, structure or other object in the safety zone of a roadway with the exception of mailboxes, and sod or ground cover. h i i T e C ty reserves the r ght to remove all trees, shrubbery, vegetation, berms, walls, fences, structures or objects in violation of this section of the Code with or without notice. Removal costs may be charged to the occupant, owner, or his representative at the cost of the work, plus a charge equal to 100% of the cost of the work to cover the City's administrative expenses." ' From a policy perspective, the City will need to determine how they handle current violations of the proposed code. For the most part, the site triangles are public safety matters that require immediate correction. The public and the police will probably support any immediate action in this area. 1 However, the safety zones are a separate matter. There are numerous violations of the safety zones throughout the City. People have installed railroad ties, landscaping timbers, rocks, decorative stones, and retaining walls that violate the provisions of the safety zone. Some of these were costly projects, and some may even serve a public purpose relative to erosion and debris in the roadways. The immediate removal of these "violations" is probably not practical or desirable. Unless an infringement creates a specific hazard to public safety, we would be inclined to provide a mechanism to "grandfather" it with appropriate review from the Department of Public Safety. This will allow the hazardous violations to be corrected immediately, it will allow existing objects to remain as long as they don't create a specific hazard, and it will prevent future infringements into the safety zones. BUDGET: None RECOMMENDATIONS: AGENDA ITEM #9C JANUARY 13, 2003 1 To review, modify, and adopt an ordinance that will provide reasonable limitations on the objects, structures, and plants placed on the City right-of--ways. ' To approve/provide appropriate direction relative to the enforcement of the provisions of the proposed code. ' ATTACHMENTS: None REVIEWED BY CITY MANAGER: A DA ITEM NUMBER: