Exh 8D AGENDA ITEM SD
JUleTE 9, 2003
CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACIi
CITY COMMISSION MEETING
STAFF REPORT
AGENDA ITEM: Hopkins Creek Basin Retention Pond Project
Design Contract
SUBMITTED IIY: Robert S. Kosoy, P.E.
Director of Public Works
DATE: June 2,2003
BACKGROUND: At the Apri128; 2003 Commission meeting, the City Commission
authprized staff to begin negotiations with the top-ranked firm,
Camp, Dresser. & McKee (CDM), for engineering services for the
Hopkins Creek BasinRetention Pond Project.. On May 30, 2003,
CD1YI submitted a proposal, which is broken down into three
phases. The first phase is for a preliminary. design report and
extensive survey services. The second phase is for environmental
-site assessment, special services, design, permitting. assistance,
bidding and public presentations... The final phase is for services
during construction.
The cost is as follows:
Phase A: $ 42,022.00
..Phase B: $106,989.50
Phase C: $ 10,142.00
Total: $159,153.50 -
BUDGET: This will be funded as a budget modification to the 470-0000-538-
6300 account.
COMMENDATION: Award the contract for Phase A only at this time for Hopkins
Creek Basin Retention Pond Project to Camp, Dresser & McKee in
the amount of $42,022.
ATTACFIENT: l . Letter from CDM dated 5/28/03.
2. Scope of Services and Cost Proposal dated 5/27/03...
VLEWED B4' CITE' AGER:
AGENDA ITEM 8D
JUNE 9,.2003
8659 Baypine Road, Suite 200
Jacksonville; Florida 32256
tel: 904 731-7109 ~.,
fax: 904 731-0465
May 28, 2003 ~~f' ~ .,'
Mr. Robert S. Kosoy, P.E.
..Public Works Director
City of Atlantic Beach
1200 Sandpiper Lane -
Atlantic Beach,. Florida 32233-4318
Subject: City of Atlantic Beach
..Hopkins Creek Regional Stormwater Facility
Scope of Services and Budget
Dear Mr. Kosoy:
CDM is pleased to submit this scope of services for the design of the Hopkins Creek Regional
Stor>,nwater Facility for your review and comments. This scope was developed based on
previous conversations and. modified based on our latest meeting of May 22, 2003. As we
Have discussed at our last aneeting, the following items were modified from the original scope
and budget:
^ Added tree survey
® Chaizged the number, of plans submittal for reviews from 4 to 3
® Reduced the number of construction drawings. from 25 to 19
~ Reduced the. number of meetings for. certain. tasks
® Moved the services during construction and the outside professional costs to a
not-to-exceed section of the budget.
We trust that the enclosed proposal meets your expectations for a comprehensive scope of
services that will contribute t® t11e successful development of Plans and Specifications for the
above referenced project.
e are lookingward to working dvith you on this project. If you have any questions or
comments regar'~ i g this scope of services, please callus at (904) 731-7109..
.Sincerely,
~~ ~ ti..-
Patrick R. Victor, P.E.
Principal
Ca>np Dresser & McKee-.Inc.
Ha20376_Atlantic BeachlHopkins_Scope_Transmittal.doc
consulting • engineering • construction • operations
AGENDA ITEM 8D
JUNE 9, 2003
City of Atlantic Beach
Hopkins Creek Regional Storrnwater Facility..
Design and Permitting
Scope of Services
CDM
May 27, 2003.
L Background and Purpose
In 2002, CDM' updated the City of Atlantic Beach Storrnwater Master Plan (SWMP)
and recommended the construction of a stormwater regional facility to reduce
flooding problems in the Hopkins Creek watershed. Problems. on Aduatic Drive,
Forrestal Road, and Cavalla Road. range from nuisance road. to home flooding. As part
of the SWMP Update, CDM identified a site for the construction of 6.5-acre
stormwater facilitythat was phased into three distinctprojects. Phase I (this project)
c®nsists of the construction of a 1.7-acre facility, as shown on Figure 1. CDM will
provide the following. services to assist the City of Atlantic. Beach (City) in designing
' and permitting Phase I of the Hopkins Creek facility.
The project scope consists of generating the preliminary design report,.. survey,
geotechnical exploration, wetland determination, environmental assessment,
permitting, and development of construction plans and specifications. The specific
tasks to perform the work are as follows:
IL Scope of Services
CDM intends to use Ghiotto & Associates as part of its project team to collect the
survey, Geoengineering and Testing (GTI) for geotechnical services, Environmental
Resource Solutions (FRS) for the wetlands Environmental Resource Permit (ERP)
support services,. and Aerostar Environmental Services Inc. (Aerostar) for a Phase 1
Environmental Site Assessment for the parcel.
The CDM team shall complete. the following tasks:
..Task 1-Preliminary Design Report `:
.CDM will use'the Hopkins Creek primary storrnwater management system (PSWMS)
'RUNOFF and EXTRAN hydrologic/hydraulic models developed for the S4VMP (and
as modified for the SWIVIl' Update) and modify the models as necessary. These
revisions, as determined by CDM, will be based on latest available topographical
survey. CDM will prepare two refined alternatives for the detention area in the.
seleetedl.7-acre area in various configurations. The alternatives will identify new
conveyance systems to the proposed detention area and modification of existing
- conveyance systems.
µ_ AGENDA ITEM 8D
~ > ~ ~ ~ «w, { _ y~ ~ ~~ 1~ ?~ ~ "~,. ~,, ~,~P JUNE 9; 2003
S ,..r ~ r ~ ! JJCCC _ t _ ~ ~ _ -1` ~ J lc ~. r. E -_... y
•il. • r - 4 7 F~ ~ ~ ` ~ ,i a y I,.~.+•k' 'P -0 ~r ~i ~y7711
° ~F ,. ;~ t . i,,~ - is -. .1 '}"S..' j !' .~~}~y~, r € *'+-fin' ~.. ~' ~ a. :;~
..~ '4 ..•~ ~ ~~, X ~ .~e'r*r~i s .,e 4 r ,a~`* vrl {.! .s ~ y 4 ~i
r~i.~~~d _- ~ ~ ^k ~ } ~- ~(~y',f _~„,,~ ~+.,.t, '.mil "~ry' S ~• ~~~~y ,~A •~{~".~, ~A+
.`.Y' 1~ 1, .l ~ 41 Y.. ~ V~ i :`'~~~ +.• '~ ...~ ~ _i ai_ , '~' ~a. !~ 0 ,~'~ 1 ~'~. T ry `t(~
- Pr "'~ ~ # ~• n~`T- an.f F' , .. ~ 514 ,y L r ~, T -iA~.a~l<A ':-.T,~~ ~~ i `-~ t~ yy[F. ~ ~+~.~'~ ~'~
rn - ~ ,~"' ~' ~' ~ '~ I ' '~ ,`~- ~ f .. y -rte
'~ ~''~ ~;. `~-~~ X : 1~Ss. r , S +'9~t ~"+, . ~_ i"a.S t tr~, r,P ~~ y , 4r~ ,fi ;"Y F,Z ~~ ~ ~ y~e # t__
~ ~ ~~
~ I
' r T fIT ,i"f 'n~ ~ k nip ,2^Y..~
~ ~ P f ~.
.#~_s._ ~~ ' }„sib ~ti s ~~ ~ #~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ Y ~ 1*n ~ _ d~ „~ ~ .'(~• ~ ~~4
' ,.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ R'~ $ '3
, -. x . f ' ~., a '~ - ~`
'_
~ [ ~ ~,.. _ _ .1 *.. ~. ~v,' '~'~
•
~-~ -.
~ i" '6~.. ~', a `t' ~ s , ~, a '~ ~..- ~ a . :fir • ~kx.:,~.
~ .~ " -yK }~ ~~~ ~ d i"V Fs:,., ~ rKV .. ••fi `SY~~ g4-:.~~~a"~' i'ce','
9 ~r is + '1 - C ~ `lti' ~~ r~~~~~~ ?'. ~~ JI - 4 _ ~~
~ _ ~ rM r ~ry35~ ..t~ ter' ~ ~- i ~ ~ ~~ - ...~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~#~;
yy g r "~ ., ~ ~. F H ~LW ~ ~ i
~. ~, ;, .q~.,,tt-~+F,;~:,...• , _,.. ,q ~ ,«J''?`n-~u.r.,::_:> 1 -,._,Y.~ ° ~t:-y#~..t # , .. _ - .-..:,y._..e _ + _- J~.r"~ 4.+,c..
~~
..-_ .... _.._ ~ .,. , - _._. '., { '. _.. a®~4w:~v~ $;-.~,.,W~ awe .`".. ... ... m
SCALE
200 0 200 400 Feet Fig.1
..City of Atlantic Beach
Napkins Creek Regi®r-al Storm~r/ater Facility
AGENDA ITEM 8D
JUNE 9, 2003
CDM will calculate the "live" and permanent detention pool volumes for the regional
detention pond to quantify the.treatment provided (ac-ft and inches) for the
watershed.
The model results will be presented in tabular form for peak stages iri the PSWMS
and peak flows at the outfall. These tables will be used as the supp®rting
documentation for the permit application package to be submitted to SJRWMD as _
described in Task 6 below.
Task 2 -Survey Services
CDM will coordinate-the work to be completed. by the subconsultant under this task.
.The subconsultant will collect the topographic and utility survey information
.necessary to design the proposed: improvements defined. in this. task: 'The survey
..services will include a boundary survey with legal description for the parcel to
construct the proposed regional stormwater facility and topographic information as 1-
ft contours of the acquired parcel{s) for design and preparation of construction plans.
The subconsultant willcontact utility companies to obtain utility locations: Theutility
location, both horizontal and vertical, shall be surveyed by the utility owner and
shown in the construction plans.
The. survey will establish a State Plane Coordinate NAD 83/1990 baseline for
horizontal and NGVD 1929 for vertical control, cross sections, wetlands flagging, soil
borings location, soft digs to locate potential utilities conflicts, and invert elevations of J
utilities within the project area. The survey services. will also include a depiction an
the construction plans of existing rights-of-way and easements.
The following survey work will be provided by the subcansultant:
^ Tree survey. to Atlantic. Beach requirements (locate. trees greater than 6 inches- at
breast height).
^ Research and` acquire horizontal and vertical control near the project and deeds for
property owners. along the project including existing easements or right-of-ways.
^ Establish State Plane Coordinate control at the project by GPS methodolagy for
three points using City of Atlantic Beach, FDOT, and/or Jacksonville
monumentation.
^ Locate and map up to 10 soil borings within the project area.
^ If necessary, locate and map up to 1,0001inear feet of jurisdictional wetland
flagging Placed by ERS.
®Horizontal and vertical verification of existing underground utilities, where
potential conflicts exist in the proposed design.. Four soft digs are estimated for
budget purposes.
2
C:Wroja~ FoldersWtlanfic_Beach\Scope_Budga6Fiopkins_Cesign_final9.doc
AGENDA ITEM 8D
JUNE 9, 2003
^ Project documents will be produced and submitted to the City in AutoCAD 2000
and Microsoft Word.
^ Right-of-Way maps and Topographic Survey will be delivered on 24"x36" heats at
1"=40' scale showing parcel data, plotted line work, baseline of survey and
monumentation.
Task 3 - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Aerostat will provide a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) for the xegional
stormwater facility parcel: The Phase I ESA will be performed by Aerostat in
compliance with the American Society for Testing and 1VIaterials (ASTIVI)
specifications developed for performing ESAs (E-1527-00, 2000). ASTM E-1527-00
segregates the ESA process into four sections: The efforts to be completed under this
task are defined by the following, subtasks: .
- Task 3.1 Records Review
Principal elements of this part of the ESA will be performed by Aerostat to determine.
if there are environmental conditionsassociatedwith the site and surrounding area,
which are the subject of regulatory agency actions, and to evaluate the history of the
ESA'site.
Evaluating .the environmental status of the site with respect to regulatory actions will.
be completed by Aerostat by reviewing information contained in agency databases,
and by reviewing files maintained by Ioca1 office of the Florida Department of
Environmental Protection (FDEP), City of Jacksonville, and the City of Atlantic Beach.
DataMap Technology Corporation (DataMap} or EDR are- companies that routinely
perform database searches. Aerostat will provide the site location and the search
radius. The minimum search radius will be one mile in accordance with ASTM
standards. The databases for the: following will be searched:
^ 1Vational Priorities List (NPL)
^ Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information
System (CERCLIS)
^ Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System (RCRIS}-Treatment,
.Storage, or Disposal Facility (TSD}
^ Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System (RCRIS)-Generators
(GEN)
^ State Hazardous Waste Sites (SHWS)
^ Solid Waste Landfills (SWL)
^ Leaking Underground Storage Tanks. (LUST)
3
C:~Pmject_FolderslAganlic_Beach\Scope_BodgeNHopkins_Oesign futall.doc - - -
AGENDA ITEM 8D
.JUNE. 9, 2003
s Registered Underground Storage Tanks- (RUST)
^ .Emergency Response Notification System. (ERNS)
Information regarding the stormwater facility site and adjacent. parcels identified in
the database search will be confirmed by reviewing files maintained by FDEP, City of
Jacksonville, and City of Atlantic Beach.. File searches will be conducted after an initial
reconnaissance of the site-and surrounding-area and facilities in the vicinity of the
ESA site are identified. '
Historical aerial photographs of the site and adjacent areas will be provided, obtained,
and examined to evaluate.the history of thesite. In addition to the obvious changes of
the..property such as landuse and/or development, more subtle features such as
disturbances of the Iand, significant discharges of pollutants, and the general effects of
- site use and operations will be interpreted from historical aerial photographs. Large-
scale aerial photographs from the 1940s are available from the City of Jacksonville.
Task 3.7 Site Reconnaissance
The main objective of the site reconnaissance is to identify environmental conditions
associated with-the current and historical uses of the property and potential off-site
conditions which could affect the subject properties. Aerostar will perform the site
inspection in a phased approach. The first phase will be a preliminary inspection
performed after results of the database search are reviewed. This .preliminary
inspection will be used to confirmresults of the database search, identify potential off-
site sources of contamination and to identify physical features in the vicinity of the
site. such as drainage features. Utility services, such as water and sewer service, and
dates of connection will- also be identified.
The second phase of the site inspection will be performed by Aerostar after
completion of the record review/ historical evaluation of the property and-will
include the actual examination of the subject properties. At this time, evidence of
actual and/ or potential environmental conditions, including stained soil, stressed
vegetation and sheen/discoloration of surface water will. be identified. Condition of
surrounding areas will also be visually examined. Site boundaries that are visible
from the subject parcel will be examined. General housekeeping practices of the
operations. on neighboring. parcels will be noted.
Task 3.3 Interviews
Reasonable and practical efforts will be made to speak with those people who are.
knowledgeable about the site and its history (e.g., site owners). In order to ensure that
information .obtained from interviews is reliable, the same questions-are typically
asked of more than one interviewee. Information provided in interviews will be, if
possible, confirmed by reviewing written documentation.
Prior t® the interviewing process, most of the historical information regarding the site
has been reviewed. The person being interviewed will. be asked ab®ut the person's
4
C:\Projacl_FoldersWlantic BeacMScope_BUdgetUiopkins_Design flnaN.doc
AGENDA ITEM 8D
.JUNE 9, 2003
knowledge of the history of the site, operations and personal knowledge of potential
environmental conditions. The person. may also be queried on information contained
in agency files. There is no setrequirementfor conducting an interview; however,
reasonable attempts will be made to obtain as much reliable information as possible
without the interview being perceived as an adversarial interrogation:
Task 3.4 Report
The Phase LESA report will be prepared following the. format recommended in ASTIVL
E-1527-00. Prior to finalization of the report and at the request of the City of Atlantic
Beach, associated costs for additional services for any environmental unsafe parcels
(Phase II) investigations will be provided: A Phase II ESA report (if necessary) will be
additional services to this Scope of Services.
Task 4 - Geotechnical Data
CDM will coordinate the'work to be completed: by the subconsultant. The work. to be
completed by the geotechnical subconsultant is defined below.
Task 4.1 Subsurface Investigations
Based on the proposed. design, the geotechnical program shown in Table 1 is
..recommended.
TABLE 1
.Proposed Struc4ures Number 0 Type of Borings Depth Below Ground
!Improvements Surface. (feet)
10 Augers
1.7-Acre Detentian Pond Site 5 Field Permeabilities 30
2 Muck probes
The auger borings will be drilled by the subconsultant using a 4-inch diameter. truck-
mounted continuous flight auger or a 3-inch diameter hand bucket auger. Each
sample. will be removed from the auger in the field and then examined and visually
classified by the crew chief. Water level observations will be made in the boreholes.
during the drilling operation. The boreholes will be backfilled with soil cuttings upon
completion.
Hand probes (muck probes) will be conducted. by the subconsultant at the. proposed
inflow and outflow structure locations to preliminarily measure the depth of soft
organic soils. These probes are performed by hand-pushing 1/2-inch diameter steel
pipe into: the ground until penetration is refused. The depth is recorded as the
estimated depth of soft sediment/muck.
Additionally, the field permeability tests will include'installing asolid-walled PVC
casing, snugly fit, into a 4-inch diameter.-auger borehole. The depth of the tests will
5`
C:\Project_FPWersWtlanGc Beach\ScoPe_BudgetWOPkiris_Design_ffiall.doc
AGENDA,I'TEM 8D
JUNE 9, 2003
..depend on the anticipated depth of the pond. The bottomof the pipe will be open and
raised 1 foot above the bottom of the boring. The bottom 1 foot of the boring will be
gravel-packed. The testswill be run as "constant head" tests by maintainingthe water
level in the. casing at the top of the casing. If relatively high permeability soils are
present, the tests will be run as "falling head" tests in which the rate of water drop
within the casing will be measured.
Task 4.2 Laboratory Testing
Routine laboratory visual classification will be performed by Aerostar, along with
specific tests deemed necessary (i.e., sieve analysis, Atterberg limits and organic
contents). The soils encountered will be classified in accordance with the AASHTO
Soil Classification System and/or the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS). Series
corrosion tests will be conducted to determine the environmental classification for
substructures. ,
Task 4.3 Geotechnical Analysis and Report
The subconsultant will analyze the collected data to evaluate general subsurface
.conditions and provide engineering recommendations to guide site preparation and
earthwork construction. Soil permeablities and pond geotechnical design parameters
will be provided. The report will state whether any unsuitable soil types such as
organic muck, rock, or hardpan soils are present. In addition; Aerostar will provide. an
estimate of the seasonal high groundwater levels and saturated hydraulic
conductivities at the boring locations., Two copies of the report will be provided, along
with separate copies of our soil boring profiles for inclusion on the plan cross sectians.
.Task 5 -Construction Documents
CDM will prepare construction documents-for the regional detention facility and the
inflow and outflow structures.
,Task 5.1 Construction Plans and Specifications
CD1VI will. prepare plans and specifications: for the construction of the proposed
regional.. detention pond and the inflow and outflow structures:
Construction plans and specifications shall confarm to FDOT (as applicable) design
.criteria, including clear zone. requirements and format. CDM will prepare 11-inch by
17-inch plans (1 inch = 40 feet). CDM will work with City staff to develop the layout
plan for the proposed improvements within the parcel to the extent possible without-
impacting adjacent properties and/or identified utilities.
CDM will submit 50, 90 and 100 percent plans to the City for review. This task
includes three review meetings with City. staff at :50,.90 .and .100 .percent design
'milestones. CDM will prepare an opinion of the construction cost of the proposed
..improvements (Task 5.2 below), at the 50, 90 and 100 percent submittals.
After the 50 percent design milestone has been reviewed and. approved by the City,
CDM will. prepare the design .documents for the 90 percent design plans. At this .time,.
6
C:\Pmlect_FaklersWNantic_6eachlScoPe_Bud9et\HOPkins_Design_finali.doc -
AGENDA ITEM 8D
.JUNE 9; 2003
CDM will. provide a constructbility review of proposed minor modifications in the
design.by the City, and update the hydraulic modeling if necessary..
The construction plans will consist of up to 19 plan sheets listed in Table 2 below and
include the performance of specific work and preparation of details. and documents as
follows:
^ Pond Typical Sections -
^ Plan and Profile of improvements (inflow and outflow points)
^ SoiI and geotechnical survey _
^ .Access road details (if necessary)
^ Stormwater structures
`^ Pond Details
® Control structures and details (including weir details)
^ Crass Sections
^ Erosion and sediment control Plan
FDOT standards and. specifications shall be used or may be modified as
.recommended by CDM with City approval. Table 2 describes the sheet count for the
construction. plans:
- ~
C:V'mjed_Folders~AtlenUC_Beaeh~.Scope_BudgeflHopkins_Design_finall.doc
-_ -
--_.-__~€-1~ET-CJ ~S~Fvl9~~l~l6'F ~ :-t`a~Irl Lc~d`i ~1' ~f~~. _„_-_..__--__._
Cover 1 --- -
Index/Ke and General Notes 1
Wetland Areas Summa and Tree Surve 1
Lake Control Structures Inflow and Outflow 2
Existing Plan SectiomCorner
References/Horizontal Control i
Plan and Profile 2
Pro .used Pond Plan and Surve 1
Soil and Geotechnical Surve 1
Pond Cross Sections 1
Dewaterin Plan 1
Access road detail 1
Channel Cross Sections 1
Erosion and Sediment`Control 1
Miscellaneous Details and Culverts 2
Miti ation, Plantin Plans, and Landsca e 2
TOTAL 19
CDM will submit five copies of 11" x;17" (half sizes) format at each scheduled design
milestone for City review.. The City's review comments will be incorporated into: the
final construction documents (Plans and specifications) as mutually agreed upon.
CDIWI will furnish one reproducible (22" x 34") set of final construction documents to
the City prior. to bid advertisement.
Task 5.2 Probable Construction Cost Estimate
CDM will provide an opinion of the probable cost of construction for the project at the
50, 90 and 100 percentcompletion milestones and prepare a final opinion of the
probable construction cost estimate at the completion of the design.
-Task 6 -Permit Assistance
CDM shall prepare and. submit an ERP package to the St. Johns River Water
Management District (SJRWMD) and United States Army Corp. of Engineers (USACE)
for their review and approval for the regional facility. CDM will monitor the permits
throughout the approval process.
CDM will prepare and submit a permit package application. to the SJRWMD and
USACE and respond to up to two Requests for Additional Information (RAIs) to
clarify information in the permit application package.
Task 6.1 Meetings with the SJRWMD and USACE
CDM will meet with representatives of the SJRWMD-and USACE to discuss the
objectives of the. overall project and to clarify the level of permitting needed for. the
8
C:V'rojecl_FoltlersVWantic_Beach\Scope_BudgefWopkins_Design fnaH.doc -.
AGENDA ITEM 8D
JUNE 9, 2003
proposed regional detention facility. A total of two. meetings are estimated for
budgeting purposes..
Task 6.Z Permit Application
CDM will work with SJRWMD and USAGE to facilitate the permitting of this projects
CDM. will prepare an ERP application and coordinate work efforts with SJRWMD.
The following elements are typically required in the ERP application:
^ Brief report of project
^ Basin delineation
^ Peak flow quantities and analysis (Mean Annual, 25 year,. and 140 year-24 hour
storms)
e .Construction sequence or phases (if applicable).
^ Proposed construction Layout
^ Construction techniques
^ Stormwater treatment and control techniques
m Wetland delineation and mitigation plan (if necessary)
^ Construction plans
The City will pay. all permit application fees.
Task 6.3 Wetlands Assessment
ERS will prepare a wetlands assessment report addressing wetlands and other
potential environmental impacts, on-site mitigation, and/or planting plans for the
parcel if necessary, ERS shall evaluate the feasibility of providing mitigation within
the proposed flood attenuation/water quality facilities (regional stormwater facility).
If feasible, on-site mitigation shall be incorporated in the final design and construction
plansfor the regional flood attenuation/water quality facility..
ERS will delineate and flag wetlands within the project per theUSACE and SJRWMD
methodologies. The survey subconsultant will perform survey of the established
wetland line(s). If necessary, ERS.will also coordinate with the- City to prepare an
onsite mitigation plan to offset identified wetland impacts. The mitigation plan may
include a monitoring plan and maintenance program. The monitoring. and
maintenance programs are not included in this scope of work.
ERS will perform a Threatened and Endangered (T&E) Species Survey and prepare a
report for submittal to SJRWMD and USAGE as part of these work efforts. CDM. and
ERS will coordinate with the City to respond to up to-two RAI comments pertaining
- C1Prgect_FoldersWtlantic Beacht.Scope_ButlgeflHOpkins_Design_finall.doc
AGENDA ITEM 8D
JUNE 9, 2003.:
to wetland and environmental issues. The following elements are typically required in
the: environmental assessment report: .
^ Threatened and Endangered Species Classification System.
^ Methodology
^ Results
^ Summary
^ Wildlife Methodologies Guidelines
^ Threatened and Endangered Species Observed on the Site
^ < Field Data Logs for Pedestrian Surveys
^ General Description of Wetland Communities
^ .Wetland Qualitative, Evaluation Summaries..
Task 7 -Bidding Services
CDM shall. assist the City in preparing bid documents. Construction specifications
shall refer to the FDOT specifications as applicable. CDM shall. only be required to
-prepare Special Provisions or Technical Specifications for items not covered by the
FDOT specifications to be incorporated to the City's front-end contract documents.
CDM- will attend the pre-bid and pre-construction conferences, and interpret. and
clarify plans and specifications as necessary at the meetings and during the bidding
process. Up to three meetings are estimated for budgeting purposes. CDM will assist
the City and provide issue clarification related to the construction plans during the
bidding phase of the project. The City will be responsible for the bid tabulation.
evaluations. The City will preside over the pre-bid conference with the bidders:
CDM will prepare up to two addendums, if necessary; to clarify bidders questions
during the bidding period.
CDM will assist the City. to determine the "Amount of Liquidated Damages''per
delay days for failure to complete the work by the construction contractor based on
FDOT Standard Specifications Road and Bridge Construction (2000). This. amount will
be included in Biddocuments. Procurement of the bids will be the City's
responsibility.
- Task 8 -Public Presentations
CDM will assist the CITY in preparing the materials necessary for three public
information meetings to be held at a time and. place to be determined by the City
within Atlantic Beach. IJp to three "E" size board will be prepared for each meeting as
well as one PowerPoint (Up to 20 slides) presentation relevant to the design and affect.
_ io
C:\Pmjecl_Folders\Atlantic_Beach\Scope_BodgetWopkins_Design finalt.doc- -
AGENDA ITEM 8D
JUNE. 9; 2Q03
of the improvements on the. community and property owners. CDM has budgeted
time to prepare the necessary. information for. up to three public presentations..
Task 9 -Services During Construction (Not.to exceed.portion of scope)
The City will be responsible for the general administration of the construction
contract. The City. will provide all. resident inspection and provide construction
administration during construction. CDM shall have no responsibility or authority
over the construction contractor s means, methods or techniques of construction, nor
for construction, site safety or safety programs incident to the construction contracfor's
work. ,
The City will prepare record or "As-built" drawings as required for submittal to the
SJRWMD. CDM will provide the City a Project Certification letter based on the °'As-
built" drawings provided by the City indicating that the project has been_cornpleted
according to plans. The following services are included by CDM:
® Prepare one addendum to clarify bidder's questions during the bidding period. Bid
tabulation will be performed by the City.
® Attend apre-construction conference with the City's Construction Manager
present.
s Conduct tip to three site visits to confirm that the work is being performed.
according to the Contract bocuments, and will .make recommendations.regarding
resolrxtion of issues that may arise during the caurse of the project related to the
construction documents.
® Respond to contractor Requests for Information (RFIs). Up to five RFIs are
.budgeted for this project.
e Review the shop drawing submittals for compliance with the requirements of the
Contract Documents. Ten shop drawings are budgeted-for this project. Re-
submittals of rejected shop drawings. will be counted within he ten shop drawing.
budget for this task.
III. Schedule
.Within one month after the Notice to Proceed, CDM shall provide. a project schedule.
The total time for. completing CDM's design services required under this Work Order
is 12 months from the date of the Notice to Proceed.. The issuance of the ERP is
.dependent upon the SJRWMD and the USAGE. The completion of the construction
services (Task 9) will be dependent on the construction contractor.
IV. Budget
The CDM Team will complete the services listed in Tasks 1 through 8 for a lump sum
.fee showm on Table 3. CDM will invoice monthly,based upon the percentage of
11
C:\Pmjecl_FoldersV~tlantic Beach\Smpe_8udgetWopkias_Design finaN:doc
Table 3
City of Atlantic Beach
Hopkins Creek .Regional Stormwater Facility
Design and Permitting
Budget Estimate
May 27,`2003
CDM
Senior CAD Total Loaded
Technical Project Design Operato Dollar Per.
Task Descrf tion Princi al Advisor Mana er En ineer Desi ner r Clerical Total Hour Per Task Task.
1.0 Preliminar desi n re ort 2 16 40 60 100 8 24 250 $ 20,658.
2.O Surve services - 0 0 4 6 0 4 4 18 $ 1,364
3.0 Phase I enviromnental Site Assessment 0 0 4 4 0 0 4 12 $ 957
4:0 Geotechnical data 0 0 4 4 0 2 2 12 $ 990
5.0 Construction documents
5.1 Flans and S ecifications 2 24 70 110 160 350 40 756 $ $4,049
5.2 Probable costs 2 4 8 24 30 0 8 76 $ 6;248
6.O Permit assistance
6.1 Meetin s with S RWNID and USACE 0 12 16 4 0 -0 4 36 $ 4,257
6:2 Permit a lication 0 18 32 40 8' 24 40 162 $ 13,574-
6.3 Wetlands assessment 0 0 4 4 0 2 2 12 $ 990
7.0 Biddin services 0 2 30 0 0 0 32 64 $ 4,950
8.0 Public resentations 0 12 20 0 0 40 12 84 $ 6,985
9.0 Services Burin construction Not to exceed amount 0 2 40 24 0 40 24 130 $ 1Q142
Total Hours 6 90 272 280 298 470 196
Loaded labor $ 858 $ 14,850 $ 29,920 $ 24,640 $ 19,668 $27,143 $ 8;085
Other Direct Costs Number Cost ' Total
CAD Com uter GIS 105 $12.00 $1,260
Microcom uter 80 $6.00 $480
Ex iess Service 10 $10.00 $100
Co ies 1,000 $0.15 $150
Half Size Set Copies 950 $0.50 $375
Full Size Set Copies 100 $2.50. $250
Total $1,990
Total Labor Cost (Lump Sum) $ 115,022-
Total Labor Cost Not to Exceed Sum $ 10,142
Outside Professionals Not to exceed amount $ 32,000
Other Direct Costs Lum Sum $1,990
Total Lum Sum Cost $117,012
Total Not fo Exceed Cost $ 42,142
Total Bud et $159,154
SUrV@ 20,000
Phase I 3,500
Geotechi 5,000
Wetland 3,500
Phasin Breakdown
Phase A -..Tasks 1 and 2 lus Survey $' 42,022.00
Phase B -Tasks 3 through 8 lus-other Ops and ODCs $ 106,989.50
Phase C -Task 9 only $ 10,142.00
Total $ 159;154
G~
~ Z
t~ ~
ro ~
o ki
W -~--
- - AB Hopkins_Design_Scope_final~hased.xls d
Outside Professionals