Loading...
3-Information Technology2011-12 Information Technology Information Technology No increases in Personnel 3 Fulltime IT Staff Members No Major Changes in Operating Expenses One Large Capital Item: Increase of $50,000 to replace Enterprise Application Server Define Enterprise System Background Elephant in the Room: Staff has been evaluating the enterprise software for many years Identified deficiencies many of which are very visible to the public Staff has recognized that the existing system is outdated, inefficient, cumbersome, and expensive Historically, finding a reliable competitor who has converted the data into the new system has been a deal-killer Work Group In 2011-12, it was anticipated that we would need to purchase a new server: Approximately $50,000 A group was formed to research the best options and make recommendations Finance Director Nelson Van Liere, Deputy Finance Director Jeri Benjamin, IT Manager Keith Randich, Building Official Mike Griffin, and Asst. City Manager David Thompson Current Enterprise System Software: HTE/SunGard installed 20 years ago Hardware: IBM i-series Server: Purchase by the City, Maintained by IT Staff Deficiencies/Inefficiencies that can be corrected with a new enterprise system Issues 1. Customer/Citizen Service No Online Bill Pay: All manual processing Utility bills are still mailed instead of emailed… email is less expensive Sign-Up for City services requires presence at City Hall Building Permit Applications require presence at City Hall Issues Job Applications forms are available, but there is no database management system Business Tax Receipts are not automated online Code Enforcement complaints are not accessible for tracking online Access to data and reports for the public is very limited “Overwhelming” phone lines on due dates Issues 2. Inefficiencies Not Windows-Based System: Cumbersome, not user friendly Manual Processes require repetition and staff time: Example Code Enforcement: Present Processes: Upgrade Expensive plus maintenance Cashiers Finance Staff Issues 3. Incomplete: Lacks Community Development and Code Enforcement Modules 4. Extraction of information for decision making is difficult 5. Disaster Preparedness: Explain 6. Sustainability/Conservation: Paper intensive processes, printed forms, purchase orders, checks, AP Checks, AP Invoices, etc. 7. Future training for new employees, and obtaining the expertise for servicing equipment will be difficult Why not stay with current vendor? They are currently writing software for a Windows-based system, but much of the software is under development and unavailable The upgrade to the new software will not be free... It will still require substantial funding Lack of Staff Confidence Clarification on Impact: This is not being recommended to “make our work easier.” Changing this system will dramatically increase the workload on the work group and staff for 2 years. We unanimously agree that this is the best course of action for the City and its citizens Why Tyler Technologies The only company that has met all Work Group criteria Successful data conversions from HTE/SunGard Systems Large enough to provide reliable solution Demonstrations on the software show that its user friendly and it addresses inefficiencies Staff confidence Negotiation of costs: Current government contract with Sanibel that we can piggyback off of Why now? 1. Decision Point: To buy or not to buy a new server (which would probably lock us into the existing system for another 5-6 years… and 2. People are leaving the existing company for more features.. and the competition is offering packages well below their list prices to establish their client bases. Example: Tyler list pricing for AB was $1.148 million… and they are offering to match a previous contract with another local government: Lowering the price by $470,000 Budget 2011-12 To maintain the present system: $105,000 is budgeted in 2011-12 plus staff time to purchase, program, transfer data, troubleshoot, and upgrade to new server Present system: $69,285 per year average Proposed system: $43,231 per year increase To move to Tyler Technologies 2011-12 Need a total of $157,000 which includes some one- time costs and training Current 2011-12 Budget $105,000 Need to increase 2011-12 budget by $52,000 Options If the City Commission authorizes staff to proceed with this project (to replace the existing enterprise software), then staff will bring back specific purchasing details, recommendations, and contracts for consideration Questions/Comments