Loading...
Exh 8BCITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH CITY COMMISSION MEETING STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM::... SUBMITTED BY: DATE: BACKGROUND: Roundabout at Five-Way Inter~sect~ion~ Robert S. Kosoy, P.E. ~~"- Q Director of Public Works November 14,2003 AGENDA ITEM #8B NOVEMBER 24, 2003 Since the late 1990's, there have been discussions. about the construction of a roundabout at the five-way intersection of Plaza, Seminole and Sheny Drive. Staff prepazed maps in 1999 demonstrating four configurations where a large truck would have conflicts with a 60' diameter roundabout. Recently, we contacted two engineering firms familiar with the Core City Improvements Project and asked their traffic engineers to provide a brief report.. Both Paul Vetter, P.E. from Edwazds and Kelcey (formerly Aikenhead & Odom) and Fraser Howe, P.E. from GAI Consultants were very gracious in providing the attached reports to the City, at no cost. Both reports indicate difficulties with the site: the proximity of the driveways, the need to shift the lineaz path of Sherry Drive to Seminole Road going north, and the five-legs to a proposed roundabout. Both engineers feel that a fire truck could be accommodated by redoing or relocating the driveway and constructing the outer portion (approximately 8-10') of the roundabout in concrete curb and brickpavers that could be driven upon by a fire truck, as necessary. Both firms suggested that aerogram called "Autoturn" could be used to simulate these movements by a fire truck very effectively. The next step would be to complete a Roundabout Justification Study. This step would compaze the operation of a roundabout to the current controls,. i.e. stop signs, and estimate the average delay for vehicles using the intersection. After this step, the traffic engineer will recommend how a roundabout: would affect the safety of the intersection. Although both firms could capably handle the project, we feel that based on the initial submittal, GAI's recent experience designing roundabouts in Florida,. and their involvement with the Core City Project, that they would be able to minimize costs and provide an innovative design. RECOMMENDATION: Authorize staff to negotiate with GAI Consultants to complete. a Roundabout Justification Study, and, if justified, famish a preliminary, design and cost estimate, for a cost Nof to Exceed $10,000. BUDGET: Commission to authorize from General Fund. .ATTACHMENT: Report from Edwards and Kelcey Report from GAI Consultants .- REVIEWED BY CITY MANAGER: "Nov - 10 03 0 2 : S l p AGENDA ITEM #8B NOVEMBER 24, 2003 ~drrr.~ 5730 Bowden Road, Suite 200 Sacksonville, Florida 32216 www.ekcorp.com Phone 904/636-5432. Rax 9041636-5433 THIS FAX MESSAGE CONTAINS (~ PAGES, INCLUDING THIS COVER SHEET. To: ~o/j /`c~UY Fax: (904 2.4.7- ~"~43 Fromi ~cx..u.~~'L= Re: ~-~-co-,.~y~~ti~x+.~ Date: / I ~ I C ~O.3 tVov _10 03 02:52p AGENDA ITEM #8B NOVEMBER 24, 2003 Seminole Road, Sherry Drive and Plaza Ronndabont I have reviewed the planspresented to me by Bob Kosoy on October 31,.2003 showing the concept design for a roundabout at the subject location.. The undated 1"=30 scale plans displayed a roundabout at the subject five-legged intersection with an inscribed (outside circle) diameter of ] 00 feet; a central island diameter of 60 feet and various islands channelizing traffic. I have reviewed these plans and offer the following' comments:.. L The five two-way legs create too many approach roadways to the roundabout and too many closely-spaced conflicts within the smallest roundabout recommended by the Federal Highway Administration in their published "Roundabouts: An Informational Guide". The fire station driveway, although low. volume, adds to the complexity with asixth leg. 2: The Informational Guide (supported by our experience in roundabout design} .recommends all approaches to the roundabout align to the center point of the roundabout to reduce the speed on the approach, eghasize the yield condition, create. a proper sight angle and align the roadways for good positions entering and exiting the roundabout. The subject roundabout has two approaches (Sherry Drive and the westbound approach of Plaza) wherein the approach aligns straight into the circular roadway and thus encourages higher speeds and disregard for the yield condition on the approach; the straight through movement on both of these approacheshas no curve alignment to it. These two approaches could be curved at the roundabout and aligned at the center of the roundabout; however, with the small radius of the roundabout there is insufficient room for the five approach roadways. Holding the outside edge of the roundabout at the fire station driveway and enlarging the roundabout to the northeast may provide enough length around the roundabout to fit the five approach roadways. This would require additional right ofway. 3. The best solution to retain the roundabout would be to relocate Seminole Road to intersect Sherry Drive approximately 180 feet from the centerline of Plaza and eliminate the approach to the roundabout. The roundabout should then be moved to be centered on the intersection of the centerlines of Sherry Drive/Seminole Road North and Plaza and redesigned with four. approaches. The alternative would provide the best condition and location for the roundaboutbut would requite right of way and property acquisiton. 4. A further study should be conducted for the roundabout to include a traffic/capacity analysis using aaSIDRA sofrware and a concept design investigation of the alternatives, ineludin -right of way acquisition. U52 /auto ~'u~'ril fo ShoaJ (,~,~si9 6/'ta/9~it4ih f~UStra%a ~oi^ ysUe~r~ aid r9ut. add s'-io' ~h~o c~~o% w/ dcco~ative p'aa/e~ Sly/?!/ltLfior~s ca.~ GC ~fohE by~,mode!/ir;9 ,,,.,"^-~--.~-- computer NOV-07-2003 FRI 04 ~ 26 PN GAI CONSULTANTS S, E, FAX N0. 9078431070 acENna ITEM #ss NOVEMBER 24, 2003 T RAN S M t T T A L .r~: Bob xosa,~ Company: ity of Atlantic Reach ,,,_ Phone "'- From: Date: 11/7/2003 ..__ Project No.: Pages (hie. cover): 8 _ _ ~..,_ ~~ Message: Grce Nettuno asked me to review the concerts you sent for the ~ ~ottndabout at Seminole Rd/Plaza/Sherry Dr. Attaclzod arc n~yy~reliminarv .thou htrr, s. Plcasc reviewthem and advise me or Cncg,ifyou would like us to nrocccd ~._~ Isl a CONSULTANTS GAI CONSCJi.TANTS ORIGINAL WILL: 618 East Soulh Strcct _ Follow via mail Follow via overnight delivery Orlando, Florida 32801 ~ Not be sent. Phone: (407)423-8398 If you have experienced a problem in receiving this transmission -please FAX: (407) 843-1070 contact us immediately, at (407) 423-$398, NUMBER FAXED TO: 904-247-5843 NOV-07-2003 FR I 04 ~ 26 PM GAI CONSULTANTS S. E, ..FAX N0. 4078431070 AGENDA tTEM asB NOVEMBER 24, 2003 n ~ CONSULTANTS MEMORANDUM ~°~~ To: GREG NETTUNO From: ~RASERHOWE Subject: PROPOSED ROUNDABOUTAT SEMINOLE RD/PLAZA/SFiERRY DR, ATLANTIC BEACH Date: 11l6/Z003 1 have reviewed the sketches from Bob Kosoy, Gity Director of Public Works, for the subject intersection. I referred to .the .Florida Roundabout Guide (FRG), 2°d Edition (FOOT, 5/98); .and Roundabouts: An Informational Guide (R1G), FHWA-RD-00-067, these are the references we used to design the roundabout. for the City of Kissimmee's MLK Blvd project. Please refer to the hand-drawn sketches :attached to the hard. copy of this memo. The geometry shown on the City's Apparent FRG Min sketches generally conforms to'the FOOT Approach ___ Width Width & FHWA guides, .using a 60-foot diameter NB Seminole Road 10' 19~~~ central island and 20-foot wide circulating NB Sherry Dr 10' 19' roadway for asingle-lane roundabout. A WB plaza exit 12' 15' few of the entry and exit lanes seem narrow, but could be modified. The major problem that I see with the layout is that the islands will not divert the path of vehicles going. from Ns Sherry Dr to NB Seminole Rd; nor for those going west on Plaza across the roundabout. To operate safely, the geometry of a roundabout must work to slow down entering .vehicles to a speed close that of vehiclescirculating around the central Island. This allows entering vehicles to merge into gaps between those already in the roundabout;. and allows vehicles exiting Che roundabout to weave across. entering traffic: This assumes that drivers obey the basic principle to yield to vehicles in the roundabout.. The splitter islands on each approach force the driver to divert to the right at the yield ..line and the position of the central Island forces the driver to circulate with traffic. The same thing happens to drivers exiting the roundabout -they must maneuver around the central island, then around a fairly tight radius (30-foot min) to depart. I have sketched in a few changes in the geometry to create diversions on the Sherry Dr and Plaza apprdaches that may help this situation. This effort to slowdown .vehicles (te about 20 - 30 MPH). also helps pedestrians crossing the approach roadways. Note that the recommended geometry places the splitter islands across. the crosswalks to give pedestrians a refuge to cross only dne ' direction of traffic at a time. This is a second problem with the conceptual layout -the splitter islands between Sherry dr and Seminole Rd are not Irr line withthe obvious pedestrian paths to cross those streets, i.e, people will probably cross before reaching the islands. (::\'l~ocumrncs and Settings\f~xscr\MyDoaiments\E'rasec's Documents\Trans~zterion ~;rnup I' coposals\GrNe3BOG.doc NOV-07-2003 FRI 04 27 PN GAI CONSULTANTS S, E, FAH N0. 4078431070. " AGENDA ITEM #8B NOVEMBER 24, 2003 The last issue 1 see is with several driveways fhat either enter. directly into the roundabout or onto the approaches, very close to the roundabout. I understand that the one into the roundabout is for a fire station; however I see 2 other drives entering Seminole just south of the intersection. Could the fire station use these? Also, the drive for #870 Seminole Rd is really too dose to the roundabout. Could they share a drivewith #888 Seminole Rd or shift their drive to Plaza, west of the intersection? I am most interested in supporting the City of Atlantic Beach to design in intersection improvement here. The next step would be to do a Roundabout Just cation .Study, as described in the PDOT Manual of Uniform Traffic Studies (NUTS), Form 750-020-18. We would need the following information: 1. An accurate-topographiq survey (in CAD} of the intersection and approach roadways. 2. 24-hour approach counts, peak hour turning movemen# counts and pedestrian/bicycle counts, and transit routes. 3. Location of adjacent signalized intersections (to avoid causing problems there). 4. Location of nearby traffic generators and special uses (school, hospital, sports ar entertainment facility). The justification procedure will compare the operation of the roundabout to stop-sign and traffic signal controls and estimate the average delay for vehicles using the intersectian. If the City can provide. us with all of the data listed above, I estimate that we could complete the report within about 32 hours of staff time. Please let know how you want to proceed. Attachments: 5 t, t+ ~ z ti i I ~~ ~ t / \ ( . d I t ~: SCALE ° C.r s~ N. i 0 / I~ 1 1 o ~/ ~ ~ t IJ TfZkV~.[.LttJCa SA57BouhTp z-n . \ ~ ~ J; pp I ,, DN PLEk24 ra ScMC~ot-E .-. ~ i' /i+ i i ~coaFa,cr~ ~ $ ~ .lr l sm~u~ ± it ~; 9 ~' ! - - -- /// _i ~ ~ E of l nl a LE ~ ~. gKERrZY -orwE ~ _ _ - - - -~--, x _~"_ x~,. o l ;.. - - }{ m "P' - I /_ y I Jai 1 S t Z i 4 I i~ ~ ~ ~uJf i ll~E'Y1i~ 1 eti4.5~t O. { 1 ~ I ry ~ SY ~ RL wuG n z~ ~~ z ~d ~~ ~' ~ ... .P N O ~ W~ ~~ \ \, ~ / ~` ,. ~ i \ -~ ~.` ~ { ~1t / \ `t (~ ~.` \ \ 6E '~ ` ; ~ ~o~~ ', ~ ~~~1t - ~ n. ~ ; ~ ~ i + ~; ~i N "i ~,: nd ,1II ~ ~I :Nr v +I i ~ ~~ ~ z ° G TKkVEi.L:NCB E,45rsoou~ oN ~uza ro susu~Y ~• o (co~JFUc'r~ -n I o .A N 3 I ~ ~.,. ,.~ w,. 4 - - o ~ L.- i _ _ - - . ~ ~ ~ z in i_ ~ ~ - % ~: ~ ~ -F__~r-- _ - ~ M _ - :=,T .., SH EK~`~ ~ a is x _ ~ ~" z o - I I _ _ -c . ~ ----_-_ _~ . ~ : -- - - - - o t ~ s ~ ; 0.,,_ ~~ ~,: f ~ iI ~ 1 J I lI~ f .. • is 1 y Ly u ~juyi l~/yI lV, r] N A N ik O 00 W ~ NOV-07-2003 FRI 04 ~ 28 PM GAI CONSULTANTS S, E, FAK N0, 4078431070 acENnA ITEM ass NOVEMBER 24, 2003 ~=~o~~~ ~v~tF~~17-~vir~~~, ~~ ~~I. ~s~r~~ r ,p ~ ~~ ~~ . I: ~ , ~6 . S 1~9 9 ~ I o. S „"'~ ` z tl;, ~y ~ 4' a Q ~ bw- 7O b C -ti ,p'a Sj 1 ~~ e~ I ti ?o~j' d~D jb~ ~~ p ~ Wslsrs l2 3b RGUNDA80UT GEOM~TRICS ~ r'-YP~ /or WI Legs? . /~ 3b ti ~', Figure 4-8, Minimum tonliguratioa for a dimple roandaboat ~.~ 419 NOV-07-2003 FRI 04 ~ 29 PN GAI CONSULTANTS. S, E, FAX N0. 4078431070 AGENDA ITEM ass NOVEMBER 24, 2003. /~ s-vfV~ ~t~~j`5 .~ sta.) ~N,~o~~fr-7'iaN~4~_ ~ ~.D E~ ~~~~~ .CONTENTS spends to less than 20 kmPo (12 mph) neattho crossing. Pedesvian crossings - across speeU tablos must Have detectable warning me[erlal as tlcscribedabove to .clearly delineate [ho edge. oP the street. Speed tables should gonerally be ussd .only on street with approach speeds of 55 km/h (35 mph) orless, as the in[rotluc- tion of a raised speed table fn higher speed environments niay increase the likcli• hood of singlc•vehicle crashes and is not consistent with thespeed consistency philosophy presented in this document. : 6.3.8 Splitter IS{ands - . Splitter islands (also called separator islands or median isiands} should be provided. Spliteer islands perform on all roundabouts, except those With very Small diameters at which the Splitter '. multiple functions and should Island would obstruct ilia visibility of thecentral island.. Their purpOSe i5to provide generany be provided. shelter For pedesvians (iricludinq wheelchairs.. bicycles,antl baby strollers), assts[ in controllingspeeds, guide vafhc inrothe roundabout, ptrysically separate enter- ing and exiting tragic 5tfeamS, and dcrer wrong-way movemeltts. Additionally, Splitter islanUS can bo used as a placo for mounting signs (see Chapter 7). 'the Splitter I„land envelope is formed by the entry and exit. curves on a leg, as shown previously in Exhibits 644 and 6-25. The totatlength of the tsland should. . generdlly be at leas[ 15 m {SOfq to provide sufficient protection for pedestrians and to alert approaching drivers to the roundabout geomevy. ~dtlitionally, the Splitter island should extend boyontl the end or the exit curve to prevent exiting VaFflc frbm accidenLallyerossinginto the pathbP approaching traffic. k:xhlbic ~-26shows the rninimum dimensions for a splftterisland at a single• lane roundabout. including the location of the pedestrian crossing as discussed in Section 6.3.7. ~, r, % ~~ r ~~ i , sm(~r~ i • ,.,.. ts.om (solU 4. m h5e) .' See bele4'A' • r. ,.•, 1~~u-N ~ DeledaEle wu1~Mr9 roUtlACO 50o mm (ze In) i '"~ •. •• ~ min. DETAIL"A" Roundabouts: An Informational Guitla s: GaomHric-0osign E:hibit 6.26. Minimum splidar Island dimensions. NOV-07-2003 FR I -04 ~ 29 PM GAI CONSULTANTS S, E. FAX N0. 4078431070 AGENnA ITE1Vi #sB NOV,yE~MBER 24; 2003 ra/ ttl 11VIHNMI(AVM1 ,. CONTENTS Exhibit BNi. Example of a .typical singio~Iane roundabout ~gp I Faderal Highway Adm4liaq~uon