Loading...
Fleet Landing 17-REZN-389 Presentation CC 1st reading Request 389-REZN-APPLICATION NO. 17227-17-PUD ORDINANCE NO. 90.124-24Sectionbyasacres4.2saidincludeto218-13-90and152-90-90Numbersbyamendedas135-88-90NumberbycreatedLandingFleetasknownPUDapprovedprevi ouslythewhile(PUD)DevelopmentUnitPlannedto(CON)Conservationfrom,62-24SectionbyasBeachAtlanticofCitytheinlying0000-168341RE#ofacres4.2southerntheofrezoningafor Site Context and Detail AREANONDEVELOPMENT FACILITY AND LIVING UNITINDEPENDENTFUTURE OCEANWALKSELVA NORTEFLEET LANDING CENTERSHOPPING FOOD LION SUBJECTCOJ.living residential facility located in development of an independent in conjunction with the area temporary construction staging station, conservation area, and stormwater retention, sewer lift , Proposed development is an Communitycurrent zoning of the Fleet Landing Development to conform to : Planned Unit PUDto 2.4 ac. parcel Request rezoning of ConservationCON: Current zoning is Residential Medium DensityRM: Future land designation is Blue line is city limits Analysis and Concerns SITE hazard areasof Chapter 8 of the Atlantic Beach Code of Ordinances governing flood Year Floodplain. Development of the property is subject the provisions -the 100–The subject property is located with Flood Hazard Zone AE FloodplainThe area noted as “Nondevelopment Parcel” cannot be used for any commercial or residential purposes.Street gate and no direct access to Mayport Road is allowed th Access to site is limited to the existing 20-C zoning, but with a 60-Development permitted per COJ RMDrequirements, primarily affecting COJ part, include:and the City agreed to revisions to the covenants to reflect the proposed use by Fleet Landing. Relevant acre parcel, the applicant, Naval Continuing Care Retirement Foundation, Inc. -Prior to closing on the 29.35Covenants Recommended Special Conditions AREA SURVEYCONSERVATION Area.acre Conservation -1.47±No development of any kind shall occur within the renderings and drawings as contained within this Written Description.the design concept and architectural designs and styles depicted within Development within the Subject Property shall be similar to and consistent with The Community Development Board recommended the following special conditions: Recommended Special Conditions care beds (88 built) shall remain in effect.Jacksonville, the currently authorized 324 residential units (320 built) and 88 nursing independent living facility located on abutting property located in the City of Notwithstanding the additional limits set forth above and the addition of an forth in the Fleet Landing PUD, as previously and herein amended.of the City of Atlantic Beach Code of Ordinances, except as expressly set provisionsand other applicable Protection of Trees and Native Vegetation, Chapter 23 Protection, Flood Hazard Subject Property shall comply with the provisions of Chapters 8 , development of the Land Development RegulationsIn addition to the Chapter 24 the Independent Living facility.area reasonably restored within 90 days of receipt of a certificate of occupancy for A temporary construction staging area is permitted but shall be removed and the A conservation area; andAn elevated nature trail not to exceed a width of 10 feet; A sanitary sewer lift station;approved by the Fire Marshal; foot wide sidewalk, as -lane internal access roadway, including a 5 to 8-A twoExpansion of an existing adjacent stormwater retention pond;are limited to the following items as shown on the PUD Modification Site Plan:Permitted uses on the portion of the Subject Property west of the Conservation area  SUMMARY OF APPLICANT’S RESPONSE COVENANTSRESTRICTIVE EFFECT OF PONDRETENTION STORMWATER COVENANTSAREA OVER THE CONSERVATION INCREASE IN UTILITIESOWNERSHIP OF FLOODWAYSAND FLOOD ZONES  Action to be Taken must make the findings in support of its decision:In addition to the suggested special conditions, the Commission intensity of use, traffic impacts and compatibility with nearby uses.proposed Planned Unit Development zoning district with respect to consistent with permitted uses as authorized in the NOTThe use is 62.-24in compliance with the requirements of NOTApproval is consistent with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan.NOTApproval is Findings For Denial of the PUD Modification intensity of use, traffic impacts and compatibility with nearby uses.proposed Planned Unit Development zoning district with respect to The use is consistent with permitted uses as authorized in the 62.-24Approval is in compliance with the requirements of Approval is consistent with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan.Findings For Approval of the PUD Modification