51 Roberts Street COMP19-0002 REZN 19-0001 Presentation
Request for map amendments to the zoning map for three parcels currently zoned as Residential, General (RG) to Commercial, General (CG).
COMP 19-0002
Request for map amendments to the future land use map of the 2030 comprehensive plan for three parcels currently designated Residential Low (RL) for a change to Commercial (CM). This
step is required in advance of the related request to amend the zoning map.
REZN 19-0001
1
Site Context and Detail
FUTURE INDEPENDENT
LIVING UNIT
FACILITY AND NONDEVELOPMENT AREA
Voo Swar (1971) restaurant and lounge – French for a wedge shaped element which is used in a building arch or vault.
2
Site Context and Detail
FUTURE INDEPENDENT
LIVING UNIT
FACILITY AND NONDEVELOPMENT AREA
Home directly to the east
3
Site Context and Detail
FUTURE INDEPENDENT
LIVING UNIT
FACILITY AND NONDEVELOPMENT AREA
Vacant Lot
4
Site Context and Detail
FUTURE INDEPENDENT
LIVING UNIT
FACILITY AND NONDEVELOPMENT AREA
Parcel Map
Voo Swar
House
Vacant Lot
FDOT Drainage Easement
5
1979 Zoning Map
350’
6
1982 Zoning Map
7
2004 Zoning Map
8
2005 Zoning Map
9
2007 Zoning Map
10
Comp Plan – Future Land Use Map
All three parcels Residential Low
Voo Swar
House
Vacant Lot
11
Comp Plan – Future Land Use Element
All three parcels: Residential, Low Density
Table A-1
Residential Land Use Classification and Permitted Density Residential
Residential, Low Density (RL) - Up to six (6) Dwelling Units Residential
A.1.11 Appropriate Land Use Patterns
g) Residential – Residential uses shall be permitted in those areas so designated in accordance with the applicable permitted density and as further controlled by the Land Development
Regulations and the Florida Building Code.
12
Current Zoning Map
(RG) Residential, General, Two-Family
(CG) Commercial, General
Voo Swar
House
Vacant Lot
13
Analysis and Concerns
History
Original BB – Business zoning was a applied a 350’ distance from Mayport Road and was not bounded by parcel lines.
Not clear why the zoning boundaries shifted over time.
Business has been in operation since 1971.
14
To Complete the Rezoning Request
Two steps:
All three parcels require FLUM amendments to Commercial (CM)
Two parcels require zoning map amendments to Commercial, General (CG)
15
COMP 19-0002: Recommend approval or Denial of amending the FLUM to Commercial for 1) 51 Robert St. 2) and 35 Robert St. and 3) 0 Lewis St.
Policy A.1.3.1 Additional commercial or industrial development shall be permitted only on those lands that are zoned to permit such development as of the adoption date of this Plan amendment,
or following adoption of an amendment to the Future Land Use Map (FLUM). In considering any such application for a FLUM amendment, the City shall find that each of the following conditions
are demonstrated by the applicant seeking said amendment.
(a) There are adequate public facilities available to serve the proposed development.
(b) The proposed commercial or industrial development shall not have adverse impacts to surrounding neighborhoods, other properties, the natural environment, the aesthetic qualities
of the City and shall not impair or degrade scenic natural views.
(c) There is a demonstrated deficiency of commercial or industrial lands within the City to serve the needs of residents of the City for such uses.
16
REZN19-0001: Recommend approval or Denial of amending the zoning map to from Residential, General Two-Family to Commercial, General for 1) 51 Robert St. 2) 0 Lewis St.
Per Section 24-62 (c)(2) of the Land Development Code, the Community Development Board shall “Indicate the relationship of the proposed rezoning to the comprehensive plan for the City
and provide a finding that the requested change in zoning is consistent with the comprehensive plan.”
17
REZN19-0001: Recommend approval or Denial of amending the zoning map to from Residential, General Two-Family to Commercial, General for 1) 51 Robert St. 2) 0 Lewis St.
Recommend Approval (Contingent on COMP19-0002)
Approval is consistent with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan.
Recommend Denial
Approval is NOT consistent with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan.
18