Loading...
1730 Ocean Grove (Mitigation assessment draft) 05.15.2008 May 15, 2008 Michael Altenbach – by certified mail Ocean Boulevard Development, Inc 60 Ocean Boulevard, Suite I Atlantic Beach, FL 32233 RE: 1730 Ocean Grove Drive / tree removal Mr. Altenbach: This letter is notification of assessment for violation of provisions of Chapter 23, Vegetation, of the City of Atlantic Beach Municipal Code of Ordinances. In particular, subsequent to approval by the Tree Conservation Board and issuance of a tree removal permit (TREE 08-00100011) by this department on April 10, 2008, the City received notice that a number of trees beyond the scope of the original permit were marked for removal, and in fact, were being removed from the subject property. You were notified of this violation, in addition to the inadequate marking of property boundaries, inadequate marking and barricading of trees in the 17th Street right-of-way, and lack of display of site address and issued permits, as required by this chapter [Section 23-17(f)] and Chapter 6, Buildings and Building Regulations. As a result, you were asked to correct the on-site issues and to submit a revised tree survey accounting for all trees removed or proposed for removal. A first revision to the tree survey was received by this department from you on April 28th, and review was scheduled for the May 14th Tree Conservation Board meeting. A second revision to the tree survey, received on Wednesday, May 7th, was immediately forwarded to Tree Board members, again for consideration at the May 14th meeting. Staff made visits to the site on both Saturday, May 10th, and Monday, May 12th, finding no evidence of correction of on-site issues. At the May 14th Tree Conservation Board meeting, Chairperson Maureen Shaughnessy and board member Carole Varney shared findings from their independent site visits earlier that same day. Both reported that on-site issues previously described had not been resolved, and both expressed concern that the current version of the tree survey is still not an accurate representation of pre-development site conditions. Further compounding the issue is the fact that a number of trees have been removed and a true accounting of the original state of the lot is now unattainable. City of Atlantic Beach 800 Seminole Road Atlantic Beach, Florida 32233 Phone: (904) 247-5800 Fax: (904) 247-5845 www.coab.us 1730 Ocean Grove Drive / tree removal mitigation assessment May 15, 2008 Page 2 of 3 As administrator of the Tree Protection Ordinance, I advised board members at the meeting of their options according to Chapter 23. The first option would be to accept the second revision of the survey before them and assess mitigation on that basis, according to the provisions of Section 23-17(g)(3)a, b. The second option would be to find that it was impossible to determine with reasonable certainty the number of protected trees removed from the exterior zone (the area of dispute), and assess mitigation on that basis, as provided in Section 23-17(g)(3)c. The Board held discussion with you and received comment from adjacent property owners. This was followed by a lengthy debate amongst board members, before they finally came to the conclusion that they were unable to reach a decision based upon the available evidence. Thus, a motion to defer this item to the next regular meeting, scheduled for Wednesday, May 28th, was unanimously approved, with a new request that the on-site issues be resolved and a further-revised survey be submitted for consideration at that meeting. However, based upon previous response on your part to such requests, and the exorbitant amount of time and energy that staff has already invested in the processing of this application, including site visits, phone calls, emails and meetings with you, adjacent property owners, board members and other staff, I am taking administrative action, under the direction of Community Development Director Sonya Doerr and City Attorney Alan Jensen, to bring this item to resolution. According to Section 23-17(g)(3)c: If the site has been cleared and the trees have been removed from the site so that the director is unable to determine with reasonable certainty the number of protected trees removed in violation of this subpart [section], the violation shall be corrected by paying a civil fine of up to five dollars ($5.00) per square foot of land cleared, which fine shall be assessed by the code enforcement board. The contributions and fines assessed under this subsection shall be payable to the city immediately within seven (7) days after assessment. All amounts received by the city pursuant to this subsection shall be deposited in the tree replacement account. No work shall continue on the site until the tree replanting plan has been approved or the contribution and/or fine has been collected. As designated director charged with administration of the Tree Protection Ordinance, I hereby find that removal of trees from the interior zone of the subject property was previously approved by issuance of tree removal permit TREE 08-00100011, and is consistent with the requirements of that permit. Further, I find it is not possible to determine with reasonable certainty the number of protected trees existing in the exterior zone prior to the commencement of tree removal, and I hereby apply the provisions of Section 23-17(g)(3)c to the sum total area of the exterior zone as follows: 1730 Ocean Grove Drive / tree removal mitigation assessment May 15, 2008 Page 3 of 3 EXT ZONE (SECTION) LENGTH (FEET) WIDTH (FEET) AREA (SQ FT) MITIGATION ($5.00/ SQ FT) East 70.74’ 20.00’ 1,414.80 $7,074.00 West 77.01’ 20.00’ 1,540.20 $7,701.00 North 85.00’ 7.50’ 637.50 $3,187.50 South 85.16’ 7.50’ 638.70 $3,193.50 TOTAL $21,156.00 As further clarification, this amount is in addition to the mitigation requirements (27.5” of hardwoods) for the tree removals from the interior zone, demonstration of which is due before issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. Payment of this assessment ($21,156.00) is due and payable to the city as prescribed above, within 7 days of this notice. Finally, upon payment of this assessment, work on the subject property may resume. This information is being forwarded to the Code Enforcement Board to ensure collection according to their authority. Additionally, this information is being conveyed to the Building Official who has the authority to enforce compliance with the on-site requirements of construction site management throughout the development process. Contact me if you need further information regarding this decision at (904) 270-1605, or ehall@coab.us. Sincerely, __________________________________ Erika Hall Planner __________________________________ ____________________________ Concur: Sonya B. Doerr, AICP Concur: Alan Jensen, Esquire Community Development Director City Attorney cc: Alex Sherrer, Code Enforcement Officer Michael Griffin, Building Official