Exh 9A'I 7
MEMORANDUM
November 18, 1998
TO: James R. Jarboe
City Manager
FROM: Robert S. Kosoy
Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: Private Roads in Selva Marina Units
9A
i~-z~-98
We are attaching a copy of the original report by England, Thims & Miller dated
~` May 11, 1983 regarding the Evaluation of Paving, Drainage and Roadway Geometry
in Selva Marina Units 10, 11 and 12. Also attached is a letter from former City Manager
Kim Lienbach to then Mayor Gulliford. There was a public meeting held on May 18,
1992 and I have attached my notes from the meeting. The report by ETM estimated
the costs to do Roadway Geometry Modifications, Drainage and Pavement
Improvements to be $254,795 in 1983 to bring the road up to City standards at that
time. The design and construction standards are covered in Sec. 24-251 of the City
Code and this section refers to conformance with three Florida Department of
Transportation Manuals (Latest Editions). These manuals are on file at the Department
of Public Works.
Other considerations not addressed in the ETM report are sight distances at
intersections, new pavement cores and reports, adjusting sewer manholes,~lowering
water mains to provide minimum cover, adjusting valves, adjusting sewer lines and
laterals to provide proper cover, levelling courses for new pavement, additional limerock
or flowable fill, and easement acquisitions. Total estimated cost in today's dollars is
$1,000,000 to bring the roads up to City standards for acceptance.
RSK/Imh
cc: Chief Thompson
f
r ~ ,
h
'" ~
800 SE•fINOLE ROAD
ATLAIr?IC BEACH, FLORIDA 32233-5445
TELEPHONE (404) 237-5800
FAX (904) 247-5805
May 20, 1992 -
William I. Gulliford
Mayor
City of Atlantic Beach, Florida
Dear Bill:
Even though not specifically requested to do so, I would like to
make a brief staff report for your edification in relation to the
issue of ownership and maintenance of the streets in the Selva
Marina area.
Perhaps this is redundant, however, there are a number of issues
that you and the Commission may want to take into account. The
first involves the distinction between maintenance and major
reconstruction. While the City Attorney has indicated the City
may intrude into repair of private streets should there be an
emergency type of public purpose at stake, my question concerns
the drawing of the line between maintenance and major repair.
Second, who and• under what criteria is an emergency declared?
Are the streets indeed so deteriorated to threaten the health and
welfare of the public? I think this needs to be carefully
scrutinized. Third, wha t precedence will be established in
regards to the other private developments throughout the
community? Will we now be expected to maintain these streets as
well? I believe we must take this into consideration as a
distinct possibility.. Fourth, will the City assume any greater
liability should there be a lawsuit or other legal action in
reference to the additional level of service provided if so
chosen by the Mayor .and City Commission? Finally, does the
developer and/or those receiving the benefit of what I presume to
be less costly improvements have any responsibility including
financial for their (ie. the roads) upgrading?
Should you and this Commission establish a policy wherein the
City will accept maintenance of the streets as noted above, there
are a few alternatives you may wish to consider. The primary
purpose is to establish the vehicle wherein ownership is retained
by the residents and/or development company with a provision
allowing the City to make repairs. One suggestion encompasses
the establishment of some (super) homeowners association. A
~~econd might be the granting of easements for the purpose of
maintenance of the streets although this may be a very cumbersome
h `+
enterprise with all the owners involved. A third could include
~' the establishment of some sort of special district, the legality.
of which needs to be checked. A fourth alternative could involve
the creation of a special assessment project. Ultimately, the
owners may wish to dedicate the rights-of-way to the City for
perpetual maintenance and care.
These are only some ideas~or concepts you may wish to consider.
I concur with Commissioner Fletcher and point out we do have time
to evaluate the matter thoroughly. Perhaps you might wish to
'consider the,~appointment of~ a committee consisting of myself
and/or applicable staff members, one or two residents of the
Selva Marina area and an elected official such as•yourself or
other Commission member. I would think the City Attorney should
be an ex-officio• member and called upon as needed in terms of
providing legal answers as necessary. This committee could
evaluate the various alternatives and suggest a course of action
for your consideration.
I hope this information is of use to you and will be most happy
to pursue whatever course of action you choose to proceed.
~'~ ..
`-
KDL.dst
REF: KDL•.6
Sincerely,
K'm D: Leinb.ach
City Manager
1 `~
SELVA MARINA ROAD COMMITTEE
Kim D: I,einbach
City Manager
City of Atlantic Beach
800 Seminole Road
Atlantic Beach, Florida
247-5800
David E. Thompson
Chief of Police
City of Atlantic Beach
850 Seminole Road
Atlantic Beach, Florida
249-5606
J. Dezmond Waters, III
City Commissioner
1835 Seminole Road
Atlantic Beach, Florida
241-2984
PRIVATE CITIZENS:
r'~'~
Eugene Barnette
1841 Selva Marina Drive
Atlantic Beach, Florida
249-9021 (w)
John Mann
1907 Hickory Lane
Atlantic Beach, Florida
247-2233
Chuck Metzler
1800 Live Oak Lane
Atlantic Beach, Florida
249-2912 (h), 765-4453 (w)
James Porterfield
1825 Hickory Lane
Atlantic Beach, Florida
241-3206 (h), 355-7521 (w)
Kenneth Rogosheske
1810 Sevilla Blvd., ~~306
Atlantic Beach, Florida
249-4417
~,
~_
:,
/~, •~
~'
~~
~97~ 1 a ~ 3
... S~8/92 ~/vQ /1~arina /1~ @ Comm - Chainbe~s
... l/~/Gd ~fd /C'Ol~/ {/5. P/'ivaf~e CrN~er'sh ip
..._ Co/I. f~dv~sy 6~fw, C~i~y ~ Co~~•rac fay ~e = Cify J'~als . .
.... t9ah-r S. ? , r9Z/ sue, /f'la~ Or
8e6 ~1,~~~ ~ ~q/g C!'tC,~CS/C7G O
- lQd ~! fi~3 dcec/ , hovsc rrvs/ 6c ZO' /ro,-~ Sf,
C,` MR Or
"" //19/'GSS/~res5 fo eve%prrcnf -' Uh
(~/~ to standa.~d,
~1v/es off' PcID~ ~S'dl~d~/lsic~ o~dri~ahres cry
~ ~ ~rvw~I ovt fie tNi~c?~cys! ~.
L~a??1ir~^~F/efchc~
. !'/a~hf~jahcc /~reCmchf (Docv~eat 2~ - 6e%y~ ~lia~ ~'~n-cvlurf
Shows UwrJ~er'S/ii~0 passes fo I~evcloper
~rrr Walk~re , l9/Z ~{~cko~y ~a -
I~l~rna9e ? Pa/`f o!' jIGS~,~ Lrife.,~ia
Taxes ?
CCiM~. /~f l~. IYfiil c/feS ? yeS
..0~: Boh G~prasfu~,~°ao~~s Busril~ss ~55dc. - iPca~ ~e~so/vfion
S~~p~%,y Ta~t/c ~,
. ~(~fi~iarl fa Ci4~B ~v n~a~i~{zr~n
-•~mah ~ S/is M~q) v~%%`Q 1.r1~IG[o5 '' • '¢ ~ ~e ~ /// ~csra~er>fs
Co/~!/!1 ~vc~lcr ~ .
... ~y ~/i!/~:~r,css ~or,~ fo cvf down feces as ~~c/ ~
... ,~
... T ~%E /~S Live Qz~ - ~ sa //s oulcs {~ ~7~e~ate o ~ ~'t~ec z~ .
~acMr~t f~ .
...~qr~a Barku'~ l~l7 Gov m~rirrfain rr/s noun, achy Hof co/~t~~uc ?
. - we dh/y pAfch ro~ho/cg .
Ca~r-r~ l~atcrs ~ Pa~lwdrk ,Jvs f~Xieo~ ~ Java ~slncc fait fa oa`t o~~! I .Ffrc~.
CiiF ~cti,~Ies cn',~ d~ is~'~ G~
y , e•fc. ~`cR ~ ~, -~~- sou-ea~-/
i
'.' . ~ ~' ~ sh f 2 ~' 3
~ ..
... f Vii/ ~°cf~ ~ ~. 3~0 /9 r" Sf. - ~1ewu^ work ~ J`he~~y ,~q~~ ~odd,~a~;
.. ~; ~~ .,~.riy , l~s ~,~~y la
" ~// fl c~or !a
~Cfifcdxe ~ ~~ 1 area -.
sc~je¢r~' who% area ~ cohsc~erteal.
/y accrc~chf was ah Scl. /1'kxr. Dv~. (p~6/~c
.. ~'/~ Y ~ / y ~(.br'f~, ~ ~on'f a9~rc ilia f si. ~~ a cuss
j~ic,~ F~u//~,, 37/ l9'r'~cSf ~ ha~secrr ncs~nse ti~rc
.. ~vz ~ d~7G, a ~~a~`inal /L9veSf~ ~~
7
Wa~r,~ u~ ,f~ cc~ ~o q~ Tii~le ~~,~,(1 34'n~
~`' ~1 v~ cos '~S-.G ~ ?~f~e c~eau.~.
`u1 ~~ f ~ who pays .
G~'o ~~1~ ~T~. 193 ~tv171~ ~~~ w, - s~ ~ 9 ~ Pd ~ 6y c~~y, ~~ y
~, 1 d~n~ ~~y ~,y -~ ~ fly ,~.~~
Sli'~~~ s T err, ~p . ocuno a ~/ ,mow -~ .
.~, ~. ~ovl~ ~-n~y ~ c,~y .
/~ar,~ Leh ? ~S'l~~{ CCo~oc Cain' - Per~/i~.,
~/~~Cc~ Land/~y~ - LGV~ vLt S~N~a ~tc~o, pi~~ --~'
~GYX~~~t,(X.to sP~ret /I~di ~ a~~~c-tovz~.Q ~o rocess
f /?tt~ ~yYJ' f 147 ~ Ql~s I~fe //~ p ~~s . -' C'//z~ ~h9/' /Yi a~a1
Sao ,aG~acvu,~ ~ /1~a ~ , ao Lo. ~1.
.. ~~~,.
crO~t~yj sail ~ 1 qZ/ ~µ~ ~ - l q 7'~ ~ c~~ ,Uo~ -~ 1,y1 ~. ~s~a~
~~
~- ~mz /-c.2po .
- carYi~ see r~ll~hin ~ ~ d~. you ,
. ~o Sl~vir~dis- 330 /9~Sf, - GtlhQ ~.~1~// ,b~ sve~ i~ cam ~v~s v~o a f•~c~
man ~_ /1/li9hf sv/ disco%a C~~p. w~ Na .~ssefs .
~~~o~P .
-,. s~I f• 3 of 3
~..~, ...
~a~~ ' l f s do ~df s ~`i~hf ~`- Hof be scared bey ~~~cQ~s ~
.. ~f/9df~~ .
. (, ,ao~-~J4~r ~12r a~l~q~ , .aa~-~ f -
~ w~'~~y
® ~azv' ~.a~td is ~f ~ ~~ ~ w~~le OAJn//?~ f~• ?
Comm Flekl~,~
D ~1ha~ d~ d~ ~ ~~ ~,~ ~,~ S~~
~.~
PT ~ C~ - ~~ .t7~7.eLC0 " vs • I~C~I~!'1 /JO/"/7000~ /rl~~' .
~`' 0 ~s ~~ a .n~dr/~e y~ond ?
floy¢ssaC. Got//~l 6e ~G~~ 1~0 ~o~~ v~ ~.~
INOST G~Q!~ritCL~ . ~.9. ~rur6a9e v~ c~r
~/~ yr - we ~~ h~ ~ snc~r ~~o~ ~,~ ~dwh yo~
Who ~ a~)~un Who oc~ns s-~i~ecfs .
.. ~ ~.~eQO r~e4 0~ N0~1 h ~~a~eal
`'`'''`9
C~`
~a~ ~.S'a//i~am~ ~~,~ Su~C~,~Ga - fib a weed ~o c~e~ ~urn~,~lup i
~~ iPo~ds~xs,~ic~ J~iTla C~do. - `iayr ah N0~4 ~ cclat~I~ lsavr ~ J.aur aya~ r
'~:q'r1pANTIC . ; .. ^..~~...... 19.2 •..., . - rr.•:.,~,..:iti ~: t-i 1,•~•.,:;' 'i Y: rt, i
' ^r•~ .~7 ~.~r ~fi. j '4
:•~ „S~.'~..:~'•y4. ':. l;~ti: ,:,..,• `..,3...2'7 .,~ ,, .t~tti i:,~ ,:•N ::~.,. a:Z4^- ;7 •''~:~'•' :.r f;.. .;;~
••t"y1 •,yYk-. y}• ,~ Y •~, r~,•.' •e^' .i '.:', .: •. f:. y..l~ • 1 S%•.:{a yG tt'A.'} ' lr' .t ut'x~3S'~.:5 i• S-
-~-R1 '7'y`f r,• •:Y L7 :;ti~: •Jtt;:~ .a.. i'•.~.: r•%,_•~:i' '. •:. :}• '.x•.'?i r.~~'''a w~u•~ '+~i ~' *°~~.~`
.. ' at. .~` 7 ~ r^ r5• ~ , '1., a. .l r•'.~.. pt„Q ;,:wa. ta',r f.1S ~'.,. < K~t r.
j'.,~yyyy ~'~'f{, y~ ~ ,. •, ; • 1:~ ~ -'9«.'~ ' ~ i.{~rr3,: ; y q j:=: t rr,.; ...a<z:r•~ t b•:' .
Y. •? t~;: •!Mf••Iif ~'i.' .Ltl.rv ^~f~t•`~,'C ~'~ : yS':• .l'tC.~'~1! ~~.f•S'L• ~.~ rt• C•',,a.1 !tif.•ft::.i: ~l•0~•• 1•
' • roads,: but • the .developer, ~Sevilla'~~~ .streets ~ndjbrees.•:are:beauuful -and
:;by1ENNIFER T~VISE •: .. ,•, „~:. ,.•.::.-~.~-~., 5; ~.,.,-. ... .:~; ..,. ,•~,:
^~ STAFF WRfiER ~`" ' • • • ••D.eveloprrient ! Compariy,~::probably;• ;:. there's; not ~inuch;maintenance :;ej
"~Thecci •of:~tlaritic:Beach"ziia ~= still owns•those:$treets;hesaid;'-'-~:• ~uued^other.~t}iari~filling~poiholes,?
Y . >`ry .. .,.,... .: .. Y; .. Thee :' •' existed ;~ l ~ a' i • 0-year • .: ,.... i • , .
~notiakeres~pons-bili'tyfor'maintain-~ r .•,:~ 'he said:: ,:~;~.; •~..:; .._• :::, , ;-..::
x-• =~'' maintenance '.;.contract,:, for• ' llie •~ .•'•-~ie•cost to ~r`ebuild~those~streets
ring ,certain rstreets •r:}n tsthe, Selva .. .. - ,
t~viaiina nei~ libortiooii: ~+~••.,l ~ ;• :~ ;- .streets; but •it`expired a'~coaple' of ' to city .standards would have to ink'
•-; , a
'.r •.g •' • •r. • • • ~: years ago; Jen'seri said. ~•:~'••s` :~ ~ '•_~ ~ •. , elude •'the'cost to reconstruct `the
~~'E~e stieets•..in"Selya Ivianna•b%~•.' • . .. 5: .. .
-F.. ~ :- 'This •liody~•[City •Coinmission]• water' .and •sewer'lines: since they
~~dered~tiy""f~Saturiba'-brive"~on..tlie: _ } •~•.• • ~.•
~,south,'Seiva~MaiiciaDrive. on; the'` Y~ ••"ago•`'tlid:rriot :'accept':~those t' follow.the:path~:Of.the,streets ;Alan
~west„1.9t1i Stree~on•thenorth; ands 'streets=as~'dedicated rights:.ofway.~. ~otEer; irieinber~oftHe~city~:water
~.- ~ r•'and•one.dayAwe~will have ;to reckon .and`sewer.comtiutiee'said: '"•`~~`=°•
Sea'O``ats;Drive'oh~th`e4east;•except•; s- '.dr: • ,;,•.• . r-.. •-, •;;;';,
for=~he• Selya'Tiei"ra`•~'sulidivision,l: tvith• that;:%'said'IGia}!or%'Bill:•GuI,- ~w=...:t;??.,,.,.%4~~`.•~u; ':•:~• ,,..zc;;;_:.;:
• • • ~ } •r,%Res~dents:in•:the area pay.gas ttvc
~5~;ere %•riot,~ built ;:according".~o~,the s ~1fSome day~''when'~the•~road:•is.tin ~ •just:~as'~ otherssesidents .of the~,city
city's~'•cn3nimum'. design and'`con-~'; worse ~•shape;~ the %residents'~'aie''~:and:deserve':to.have their'•streets in
~"strucdon''standards and were neverE ~ ~; ~ ood: iepair;`isaid•resident William•
~accepteci.by.:the city,; said ;City At •• ~ going to•be `sking:when is the city;.••g ,
a • -" g'oing'to fix"tfie roads; he said:'..."....` ,..•,.:...~..-,~_. - ..z... ,:......-~._....
tomey Alan Jensen..~,~ _. - •'McGee.~ • _ • •
k •+ ..,rl° 'r'•.• •••~ ••.~ '~~~ t•• •;`-It would~be,a.=`burden~t0 the city---~• =The commission directed thecitq•-
"`Wth~: the ~,possibl ;exception •of~--• io'accep[~:tfio~e.=streets," said Com=;~_•manager:and city attomey;io gather
~Selva"Ivl'ai~ina%Drive, those'; streets;; '.inissioner.GlennEdwarcis: ;::. 4 '~; addidona]~:infoimadori =about•this
tare:privatie loads Elie said. '~';~ ~ • ' s' ~ •Thi ztci - ~stiould. • "leave well ,issue;tncluding tlie,prospect of. the
°'°:A~ptle'searchl ., tY~••. r( •
•. ~~voiilcl be'requirecl .' enough =alone,":said Commissioner • develpper'~.successors conveying
F~o.determine'y ho~a""dually owns the; Deunoriti Waters.• •The ,winding `the streets to the city.' .
:;r~.q..
i t: . i ••. -'«t'~,• r .,+yT - M' ~~ °; ::; ~, :•,' •• •'%1~7••::. p••i1~.?^: .. t7 ° :';.. •. •i :: yl:':.yYr "•:^. ~.1<,;• .:r• • •i
F, S. w .~;~~• _ ~:7(_:. i-• ;_:,•::~?;t••.';'~j~i°' t .L'5,~:.f.. •L'v l.t `~ >;. t.. ..
.•i: r y'.. t' t1 :• .:a%!t t:}-• 'c ~: i iciCt`?,' it•C~• 5. :a. ''•1••:•t!.
:.wh~.• .Ap ' r ::.: ~ ~nj •.t~-~ //ma~yy '" •:.y i~' ::.~ 1': c ,,,.,~~`-0e" ~ , ~... , ... ,..~; . ~ ,
," !•~i ° ~.i: ' •~:~":~~ ~? . .~'`u.il'~i• i'~S }: •r' ~: •.~; 't'+~~, . tii ~`' ?t: cr, ~,; - :r.•=•
J ^F~' a. ••T 5j.• :1•;0. .`: .., J~• ~. r,y~.~. y:.•}~.%3'•=.~. ,, •~ .. ,•CC~ ~ti}'u!`
• 7 °'' •'•~.~.;`•„1 +,i..-~•.~y. :Y, .L •ti.~.i,.7..j1~.;i•+>,F~"1bL~~ i~~c~.~::x :•~.'~
, 1~it .~~ Yt.,'~.s'.a:'_ t ,~~-r.~7:i:: •t~•:':7~7?•y#1J •~SLr ~ 3 7. •~1.... ~r~•.•:,,
~~ ~1' ;'~ • .~Sa_~ . •~.: ~ 5 ~S: ~ ~. ' i ;. r e4 ~.• ~••h,.. t :.. •~..•:,q :~•7;.:~rF..'ii..• jF~. rlli.::,, ~ v: , ~ •
•~: ".t': :'•.'.j1•.!'Jl4'.K.il''r.''~}~.JJ,/•.•b~•'~. ~'. :tii:i'!;.•~:f>1'i~Y: .,;n ~•c..,l..._ . -.. !1~•a •^. •••t
'1 • • '13t ti~`~: • •~'i Y •• ~•y~,(^ Y•: ~ :,:~ S tom. • _
re~•e..~l;+:' .•,~N. •~..`. -.;fi1.:':•,1 _+.,e-'= !•, '.. ~:•j- ~ ~~.i.J.Meb•Y;~'.'.-.;~;'w:;: ••• .=: ;:
b; j- .....:L' : j t.~_f;' i :•rS-~'•• ^5_7~:::~•~ja:.... ~ • ti .s : • - . • i.,',,.., ~ ' .
I ..•vey(~y/`y[ '-r'h^ _.(~!{,_-^t '" r• .:~:.'i... ..v..6:• ~a wl rY/ Y.
~,~ S"~, ••• .'1 ~/..{•~tT ~' •t'i~ ... ~..'>i J~+:1~•~.•~` •• •.ra•Tf S;(~,r n•.~. '•'
.*at Sr _ •; .r.•t `: t ~h~' -Li ~ SL:~`.~v ~~r. .r...~.. r-.~- .. At.-~n• ..r
~~
Q
~41
1
.i
EVALUATION
Of
Paving, Drainage lend I~,oadway Geometry
In
Selva IVlarina ZJ'nits 10, 1~. And 12
~"®l~
amity Of .l~tlantic ]Beach
716 Ocean Boulevard
.l~.tlantic Beach, Florida
R06ERT PERSONS, JR.
MAYOR ° COMM1SS10NER
Wallace Bowles
_ Public Works Superintendent
PREPARED BY
A. William Moss
City Manager
PROJECT NO. E82-65
ENGLAND G Tl-fIMS, ING
~ E~GLAt~D ~. Ti-IIMS, INC
~cOeNSU~TING ANO OESG~ENGIF Eye S
CONSULTING ANO DESIGN ENGINEERS
B 7 3G ATL.J4NT1(~ 6LVD J4CKSL7NV ~l t P FL 3.'21 1
f96d1 T2a•9a36
DATE ~ MA
DATE = MAY I I, 1983
.;1.
~~(t
7~1 .
r
~ ~ IM INGI.
EN~C-BLAND ~, TN 5,
i CONSULTING AND DESIGN ENGINEERS
6136 ATLANTIC BLVO. JACKSONVILLE. FL 3221 1
(904) 724-9436
• May 11, 1983
Mr. A. William Moss
City of Atlantic Beach
716 Ocean Blvd.
Atlantic Beach, FL 32233
Reference: Evaluation of Paving, Drainage and Roadway Geometry in Selva
•• h1arina Units 10, 11 and 12.
Dear Mr. Moss:
Pursuant to the authorization by the City Commission of the City of Atlantic
Beach, England & Thims, Inc. is pleased to submit herein the evaluation
of the paving, drainage and roadway geometry on Selva Marina Units 10, 11
and 12. Additionally, as you requested, you will find cost estimates for
~] any modifications recommended.
~=,^~ Should you, the City Commission or other interested parties, have any
questions or require additional information, I remain available for dis-
cussions.
Thank you for this opportunity to be of professional service.
Sincerely,
. ENGLAND & TNIhiS, INC.
/~ /~~.
:~1
Douglas C. Miller, P.E.
Vice President
DCM/cwb
a.
~. _
~''~
:^
:~
:: ~'
.;~~
.,
.,
INDEX
C~
BACKGROUND 1
ROADWAY GEOMETRY ANALYSIS 2 - 4
PAVEMENT ANALYSIS . ' . 5
DRAINAGE ANALYSIS 6 - 8
CONCLUSIONS 9
RECOMMENDATIONS 10 - 13
COST ESTIMATES 14 - 15
APPENDIX:
LOCATION MAP A-7
ADOPTION AND DEDICATION CERTIFICATION A-2
SELVA MARINA UNITS 10, 11 AND 12 MAP A-3
SELVA h1ARIrlA DRIVE - 19th ST. INTERSECTION A-4
19th STREET -SIGHT DISTANCE .'. A-5
I
DALE LANE -SIGHT DISTANCE
A-6
FLOOD PLAIN MAP A-7
` PAVEMENT CORING REPORT A-8
PHOTOS ~. .A-9 - A-14
~''~
EVALUATION
( of
- SELVA MARINA UNITS 10, 11 and 12
BACKGROUND
Selva Marina Units 10, 10A, IOB, IOC, 11, 12A, 126, and 12C Replat, in
total encumbering 133 single family lots, were developed by the Sevilla
Development Corporation and became subdivisions of record between April,
1978 and September, 1980. This development is located in North Atlantic
' Beach east of Selva Marina Drive (Old Sherry Drive) and north of Saturiba
Drive (See Appendix for study area). The street right of ways and ease-
ments encompassed by these platted subdivisions remain the sole and ex-
clusive property of the Sevilla Development Corporation (See typical
"Adoption and Dedication" certification in appendix). Based on this con-
dition the road4ray and drainage facilities were constructed with ownership
and maintenance liabilities held by the property owner, i.e. Sevilla De-
velopment Corporation.
On April 11, 1983 the City Commission of the City of Atlantic Beach authori-
zed England & Thims, Inc. to conduct an investigation and evaluation of the
paving drainage and roadatay geometry on the private streets. In particular
England & Thims, Inc. was directed to evaluate the existing facilities as
they relate to maintenance, flooding, service life and public safety.
In the course of meeting these objectives, an attempt was made to review the
construction plans and engineering calculations relating to this project.
However, because this was a private construction project, the City was not
able to provide any construction documents. Therefore the evaluation and
recommendations contained herein are based on the as-built conditions as they
existed at the time of this report and no attempt has been made to correlate
any design documents with the as-built conditions.
The criteria used in evaluating these facilities includes the "Manual of
Uniform Minimum Standards for Design, Construction and Maintenance for
Streets and Highways", State of Florida, 1976, "A Policy on Design of Urban
Highways and Arterial Streets'; AASHTO, 1973 and sound professional engineer-
ing practices.
-1-
C~'~
ROADWAY GEOMETRY ANALYSIS
I. GENERAL -
The road network within Selva Marina Units 10, 11 and 12 is generally
composed of meandering curvelinear streets with numerous tree filled islands.
The total length of 2-lane roadway approximates 7000 linear feet (1.32 miles).
The roadaray profile follows the contours of the surrounding natural topography.
Elevations vary significantly as the roads cross the remains of secondary dune
lines which traverse North and South through the project. .The basic traffic
patterns are generated from a group of seven North-South cul-de-sacs which use
19th Street and Saturiba Drive as East-West collector roads. Six of the seven
cul-de-sacs are accessed from 19th Street.
II. HORIZONTAL ALIGNMENT
The existing streets meander to miss oak, palm and hickory trees. The
geometric alignment is generally considered adequate with the following excep-
' tions.
1. 19th Street - Oak Circle to Hickory Lane: This 400± linear foot sec-
( (~~ tion of 19th Street has a severe reverse curve arhich requires modifica-
tion of the east bound lane. (See Photo No. 2). The current geometry
requires the east bound driver to come over a hill with inadequate sight
distance then traverse a reverse curve with inside radii of less than
60 feet.
2. Se1va Marina Drive-19th Street Intersection: This intersection has
a major traffic flow conflict which requires remediation. (See Appendix
draaring). In particular the South bound driver on Selva Marina Drive
turning left onto 19th Street is aligned with the West bound traffic on
19th Street. At the point of conflict, the taro-way pavement is only
14 feet. Additionally, the right turn radii on Selva Marina Drive needs
to be modified to provide a minimum turning radius of 25 feet.
3. North Sherry Drive-19th Street Intersection: The median located at -
this intersection requires modification to adequately accommodate left
hand turn movements from North Sherry Drive onto 19th Street.
4. Oak Circle-19th Street Intersection: The median located at this
~'~ intersection requires modifications to adequately accommodate left hand
turn movements from 19th Street.
-2-
~• 5. Sea Oats Circle-19th Street Intersection: The median located on
19th Street extends past the Sea Oats Circle intersection making left
hand turns difficult off 19th Street and encourages left turn traffic
exiting Sea Oats Circle to travel east bound along 19th Street in the
west bound lane.
6. Live Oak Lane-Dale Lane Intersection: The median located on Dale
Lane requires modification for left hand turns onto Live Oak Lane.
III. SIGHT DISTANCE (STOPPING)
Safe stopping sight distance is a mandatory requirement for all public
streets. The minimum requirement outlined in the "Manual of Uniform Minimum
Standards for Design, Construction and Maintenance for Streets and Highways"
is 200 feet of unobstructed view based on a height of the driver's eye equal
to 3.75 feet and a height of the obstruction to be avoided equal to 0.5 feet.
Two sections of roadaray within the study area do not meet this minimum re-
quirement. These are:
19th Street bet;veen Oak Circle and Hickory Lane and Dale Lane be-
~` tween Live Oak Lane and Hickory Lane. (See Appendix for the roadtivay
profiles at these locations.)
IV. ROADSIDE RECOVERY AREA~(SHOULDER)
"The roadside recovery area is that area outside of the traveled tvay which
can, in an emergency, be travelled by a vehicle with moderate safety. Vehicles
'frequently leave the travelled way during avoidance maneuvers, and due to loss
of control by the driver (falling asleep, etc.) or due to the collisions with
other vehicles. The primary function of the roadside recovery area is to al-
low space and time for the driver to retain control of his vehicles and avoid
or reduce the consequences of collision with roadside objects. This area also
serves as an emergency refuge location for disabled vehicles." (1) "Manual
on Uniform Minimum Standards for Design, Construction and Maintenance for
Streets and High rays"
The minimum recommended width of roadside recovery area is 4 feet for a
urban suburban travelway, with 6 feet being preferred. The absolute minimum
allowed is 2.5 feet of clearance between the edge of pavement and any ob-
~~ struction. Because the Study Area has so many specimen trees adjacent to
the driving lanes which enhance the integrity of the neighborhood, the ab-
-3-
~ ~,
~,
•
-~, solute minimum recovery width of 2.5 feet was utlized to evaluate the roadv~rays
for safety. Based on this criteria, the following number of trees would re-
quire removal:
Street Number Primary Type
Selva Marina Drive 15 Hickory & oaks
North Sherry Drive 11 Palms
Hickory Lane 26 Palms
Live Oak Lane 8 Oaks
Oak Circle 2 Palms
Creekside Circle 4 Palms
Sea Oats Circle 1 Oak
19th Street 14 Oaks & palms
In addition to these trees which are in the minimum roadside recovery area,
various other obstructions, such as mail boxes, fences, palm logs,~etc., re-
quire removal. These items are parti cularly dangerous when located on the
• inside radii of curves where drivers have a natural tendency to leave the
travel gray.
Since this is a residential area Frith much pedestrian activity, it
should be noted that no sidewalks or bicycle paths are provided.
V. PAVEMENT WIDTH
4
The average tv~ro-lane pavement width within the Study Area is ZO feet.
The one-lane pavement widths vary from 10 feet to 12 feet in width. The min-
imum state requirements designate 10 feet of lane width per lane with 12 feet
preferred. This condition is met except at the Selva Marina Drive-19th Street
intersection previously addressed v~rhich has 14 feet of pavement width for two-
way traffic.
-4-
. ,
~~.
PAVEMENT ANALYSIS
I. GENERAL
Structural pavement requirements vary based on the subsoil conditions
and the traffic loadings anticipated. However, the generally accepted pave-
ment design used for residential streets is listed below.~~
Surface Course 14" DOT Type II Asphaltic Concrete
Base Course 6" Limerock (LBR 75) compacted to 1009
maximum density
subgrade 12" Stabilization (LBR 30) compacted to 959
maximum density
~~.
(~
The pavement investigation of the streets within the Study Area was limited
to a visual inspection of all the pavement surface and a series of 10 corings
to determine subsurface construction. (See Appendix for Coring Logs). The
results of this investigation revealed a majority of the roadway is in poor
condition for having been in service for less than 5 years. In particular the
pavement is stressed with multiple longitudinal cracks. (See Photos No. 5 & 6).
Additionally, in several isolated areas the pavement shows signs of settlement.
(See Photos No. 9 & 10).
The pavement corings indicate an average asphaltic concrete surface course
of la" with an average Limerock base course of 5". The samples taken from the
subgrade indicate the native material has not been stabilized. This subgrade
material is generally a fine loose`sand trhich would normally require mixing
with Limerock to achieve an adequate foundation material for residential road
construction. No evidence of stabilization tras found. This lack of stabi-
lized subgrade coupled frith poor compaction is the cause of the longitudinal
pavement cracks. As the cracks allotr water to penetrate into the Limerock base,
which is water soluble, the deterioration of the roadtray will increase. As the
base degrades, a depression in the pavement trill form, trapping more water and
accelerating the process. (See Photo No. 10). This is the beginning of a "pot
hole" being formed.
The roadside shoulder is also composed of unstabilized sandy soils. This
condition causes the pavement to ravel along the edges of the travelway. (See
Photo No. 7). This problem is amplified by the curvelinear streets which are
more subject to vehicles traveling near the edge of pavement.
-5-
i, ~ .
-7 '
r
~~
DRAINAGE
I. GENERAL
The drainage facilities for the majority of Selva Marina Units 10, 11
and 12 consist of an overland flow system which carries runoff onto the pave-
ment surface. Normal practice would dictate using roadside swales on streets
without curb and gutter. This provides a positive drainage system and pro-
tects the roadbase from degradation from high water tables. However, in this
development the travel ray becomes the drainage conveyance system. The North-
South cul-de-sacs follow the natural South to North slope of the land and
carry the stormwater runoff to its discharge point at the northerly end of each
cul-de-sac. From this point the runoff is discharged off the end of pavement,
betareen lots, via a poorly defined swale. (See Photo No. 11). At the North
boundary of the subdivision the swale discharges runoff onto the undeveloped
property to the North.
:~ The Study Area is generally composed of loose sandy soils which in their
natural condition have high percolation capacities which limit runoff.. Ho~rr-
~, ever, as the land develops a significant portion of the soil .is covered with
impervious roads, houses, driveways, patios, etc. This limits the soils
available for percolation and correspondingly increases the rainfall runoff
to the ends of the cul-de-sacs. As the development matures, typically the
amount of impervious area ~rillincrease. The ultimate runoff rates from full
development of the Study Area will be more than double the pre-developed runoff
rates. Additionally a substantial portion of the Study Area lies tirithin the
100 Year Flood Plain. (See Flood Plain Map in Appendix).
II. SELVA h1ARINA DRIVE DRAINAGE
Se1va Marina Drive has no improved drainage system. As with most of. the
Study Area this street relies on overland flotir for drainage relief. No major
drainage problems 4rere identified. However, most of the lots remain unde-
veloped. _
III. NORTH SHERRY DRIVE DRAINAGE (SATURIBA TO I9th STREET)
The drainage on this street appears to function quite t•rell. This is due
primarily to the homes and roadway being constructed on the higher ground.
This allotirs the runoff to be conveyed via the roadway northerly across 19th
-. Street.
-6-
~".
~~
a
IV. LIVE OAK LANE DRAINAGE
The Live Oak Lane drainage functions very similarly to Sherry Drive.
The exception is this street terminates as a cul-de-sac before it reaches
19th Street. Therefore positive runoff is partially blocked by the lots
on 19th Street. This causes minor ponding to occur in isolated low areas,
particularly between Lots 6 and 7 of Unit 12-C Replat. As long as these
lo4r areas remain undisturbed providing storage for percolation, the exist-
ing drainage system will continue to function.
V. HICKORY LANE DRAINAGE (NORTH OF 19th STREET)
This street's drainage facilities approximate that of Sherry Drive.
VI. NORTH SHERRY DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC DRAINAGE
This cul-de-sac is at the lower end of a 91 Ac. drainage basin. The de-
veloped runoff from this area is conveyed by sheet flow to the end of the cul-
de-sac. Drainage outfall is provided by a poorly defined swale located be-
tween Lots 10 and 11. This s~rale discharges into an irregular ditch located
on the undeveloped property to the north. This ditch is filled to its banks
with Crater trhi ch appears stagnant.
The homes on this street are built significantly higher than the roadway.
Therefore it appears no homes are in danger of flooding; however, the street
experiences minor flooding and ponding which 4ri11 reduce its service life.
• VII. HICKORY LANE CUL-DE-SAC DRAINAGE
The Hickory Lane cul-de-sac drainage functions similarly to that of the
North Sherry Drive cul-de-sac. That is, it accepts runoff from the higher
elevations of Nickory Lane and attempts to convey this runoff via a stivale be-
tareen Lots 6 and 7. However, two fundamental differences are evident. First,
the land adjacent to the end of the roadway does not have the elevation re-
quired to provide relief from flooding. Secondly, no defined outfall ditch
exists to the north.
•! The garage of the house located at 1915 Hickory Lane is subjected to
intermittent flooding. Its finish floor elevation is .86 feet (101 inches)
above the elevation of the pavement. Water has been observed 12"± deep on
the roadtiray during moderate rainfalls. The end of the cul-de-sac generally
has water ponding 2-3 days after a rainfall. This of course degrades the
roadway base in this area.
-7-
f
VIII. OAK CIRCLE CUL-DE-SAC DRAINAGE
This street's drainage system is similar to Hickory Lane's although
not as severe. Ko evidence of homes flooding was observed. (See Photo No.17),
IX. SEA OATS CIRCLE CUL-DE'SAC DRAINAGE
Sea Oats Circle drains in a similar fashion to the cul-de-sacs previously
described. Ho~•rever, the drainage basin is much smaller, 3.5~- Ac., and the
natural ground appears to be some higher.
X. CREEKSIDE CIRCLE CUL-DE-SAC DRAINAGE -
Creekside Circle has the only piped storm setiver system in the Study Area.
This system is composed of 24" to 42" Ch1P which conveys stormtivater runoff from
an upland drainage basin of approximately 106± Ac. in size. (See Appendix
for pipe location.) This is a complex drainage system frith two interconnected
outfalls. A portion of the drainage basin is outfalled by a 36" Ci~1P along
Saturiba Drive draining to the Selva Marina Lagoon System. The second outfall
is the pipe along Creekside Circle. A detailed analysis of this large drain-
age basin is beyond the scope of this study. Hotirever, a preliminary hydraulic
analysis sho~rrs the existing system through Creekside Circle to be signifi-
cantly undersized for a 5-year design storm event. (Standard design criteria
for subdivisions). Additionally, no easements were reserved by plat to main-
tain the existing outfall where it encroaches onto Lots 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 of
Unit 12. (See Photo No. 12).
The drainage outfall for this piped system consists of a poorly maintained
ditch that flows approximately 1400 feet to the North where it outfalls into a
drainage canal which runs westerly to Sherman's Creek. The outfall ditch is
undersized and partially obstructed causing the piped system to be surcharged
even during dry weather.
-8-
~ f
~' ~ r ~
A18
CONCLUSIONS
The roads and drainage facilities in the development known as Selva
Marina Units 10,'11 and 12 have not been constructed in accordance with ac-
ceptable criteria established by the City of Atlantic Beach and the State of
Florida for public streets. In particular, portions of the road network
are deficient geometrically relating to turning radii, sight distance and
roadside recovery area.
The structural condition of the pavement is considered in poor condi-
tion for a relatively new road. This is caused by an unstabilized subgrade,
poor compaction and the ponding of water on the pavement surface.
The drainage system functions adequately in the upper elevations of the
Study Area. However, the drainage in the lower elevations, particularly the
five cul-de-sacs is inadequate and subject to flooding during moderate rain-
fall. This condition is expected to worsen as the development matures.' The
major drainage way which drains through the development along Creekside Circle
is inadequate and may cause major flooding upstream from a 5-year Design Storm
Event.
~` In conclusion, the roadway and drainage facilities of Selva Marina Units
10, 11 and 12 are considered unacceptable for dedication as public streets
;; in their existing condition, based on the minimum criteria outlined in the
"Manual of Uniform Minimum Standards for Design, Construction and Maintenance
'~ for Streets and Highways." t
3
-9-
RECOMMENDATIOPIS
Pursuant to the City of Atlantic Beach's request contained herein is
a list of recommendations and corresponding cost estimates to bring the
roadway geometry, paving and drainage facilities of Selva Marina Units
10, 11 and 12 into compliance with minimum standards. It should be under-
stood that the recommendations presented are rehabilitative in nature and
not intended to provide "City Standard" subdivision streets with curb and
gutter, piped storm sewer systems, sidewalks, etc. Rather, the modifi-
cations proposed are intended to allow the original development concept
to function ~~rhile maintaining public safety and adhering to minimum de-
sign criteria. The following recommedations are based on the City of
Atlantic Beach accepting the roadway and drainage facilities.
I. ROAD'tIAY GE014ETRY MODIFICATIONS
1. The following intersections should be modified to provide 25 feet
turning radii:
A. Selva Marina - 19th Street
B. North Sherry Drive - 19th Street
C. Oak Circle - 19th Street
:~ D. Sea Oats Circle - 19th Street
E. Live Oak Lane - Daie Lane
2. 400± feet of 19th Street between Hickory Lane and Oak Circle should
be reconstructed to provide a minimum of 200 ft. sight distance and
to remove the existing reverse curve.
3. 200± feet of Dale Lane should be reconstructed to provide a minimum
of 200 feet of sight distance.
4. The median at the intersection of Selva Marina Drive and 19th Street
should be reconstructed to eliminate the traffic flotir conflict.
5. All trees within 2.5 feet of the travelway should be removed to be-
loar natural ground. It is anticipated that as the stumps deteriorate
some settlement in the adjacent pavement can be expected. However,
the cost of removing the stumps and repairing the pavement appears to
be prohibitive.
• -10-
l1
t
,.~ 6. Due to the curvelinear nature of the roadways and the limited road-
~ side recovery area available the roads should be posted with a
15 m.p.h. speed limit. Additional signage should be considered
for pedestrian as well as vehicular safety.
II. DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
1. The. drainage swales at the end of each cul-de-sac should be con-
structed in the following manner.
A. Clear and grub - 20 foot easement.
6. Regrade a 2'~bottom width swale with 6:1 side slopes 18"± deep
from the end of the cul-de-sac to the proposed East-West out-
fall ditch.
C. Sod 20 foot wide Swale.
D. Construct concrete spillways at the end of the cul-de-sac and
arhere the Swale discharges into the proposed ditch.
2. An East-West drainage outfall should be constructed along the North
boundary of the project from North Sherry Drive to Sea Oats Circle.
~ This outfall would discharge into the proposed North-South outfall
located at the end of Creekside Circle. (See map in Appendix.)
This outfall would require a 50 foot easement on the undeveloped
' property to the North. The outfall ditch should be constructed as
fo 11 o4rs
A. Clear & grub 50 foot easement.
6. Construct ditch with 3' bottom t~ridth and 3:1 side slopes.
C. Stabilize a 15 foot maintenance berm on the North side.
D. Grass and mulch all disturbed areas.
3. The existing undersized storm piping along Creek Side Circle should
be replaced with approximately 650- L.F. of 60" RCP including inlets,
endwalls, etc. This pipe size is subject to minor modifications
based on final design and analysis of the upland drainage basin.
These improvements would require a 25 foot easement from the
property owners along the route of the storm seti~rer.
-11-
LJ
i . '
•~
~~,
4. A North-South outfall should be constructed 1400± L.F. from the
end of Creekside Circle to the existing East-West drainage canal
which runs along the City limits. This North-South outfall would
be a reconstruction of the existing ditch where possible. A 60
foot easement would be required across the undeveloped property .
to the North. The outfall should be constructed as follo~t~s:
A. Clear and grub - 60 ft. easement.
B. Construct ditch with 8 ft. bottom t~ridth and 3:1 side slopes.
C. Stabilize 15 ft. maintenance berm. '
D. Grass and mulch all disturbed areas.
III. PAVEh1ENT IMPROVEMENTS
1. The existing roads are deteriorating due to poor subgrade conditions.
This cannot be corrected u~rithout reconstruction of the entire roadway
system. Since this is considered an impractical solution, it is recom-
mended that a maintenance fund be established to provide street re-
surfacing at more frequent intervals. The normal service life of a
~, roadway surface is'20 years. It is estimated that the street surface
t•~ithin Selva Marina Units 10, 11 and 12 will have a service life of
10 years due to the outlined deficiencies. Since the streets are
currently 3 to 5 years old a one time resurfacing fund is proposed.
This fund would be based on present t•~orth dollars for resurfacing that
would occur 7 years hence. Interest has been computed at 8o with con-
struction costs based on constant dollars.
It should be noted that resurfacing these streets will not solve the
foundation problem and therefore longitudinal cracking can be expected
to occur in the new surface. Hoarever, resurfacing will provide .another
10± years of service life.
2. The shoulders along the existing roadway should be stabilized frith
limerock for a minimum of 12" outside of the pavement to prevent
raveling of the edge of pavement.'
-12-
~i
~ ~
~ ~y
IV. MISCELLANEOUS RECOMMENDATIONS
~ ` 1. An as-built survey should be prepared to determine if all of the road-
way pavement is located within the street right of ways.
2. Easements should be acquired over all existing drainage ways.
1
1
1
1
1~
1
1
1
3
a
-13-
~.
i
COST ESTIMATES
I ~
i
I. ROADWAY GEOMETRY MODIFICATIONS
~ Description Cost Estimate
1. Selva Marina - 19th Street Median $ 5,000.00
Modifications
2. No. Sherry Drive - 19th St. Median $ 1,000.00
I Modifications -
3. Oak Circle - 19th Street Median $ 1,000.00
Modifications
4. Sea Oats Circle - 19th St. Median $ 1,000.00
Modifications
5. Live Oak Lane - Dale Lane Median $ 7,000.00
Modifications
6. 19th St. - Oak Circle to Hickory $ 20,000.00
~, Reconstruction
7. Dale Lane - Reconstruction $ 10,000.00
8. Tree Removal
$
8,100.00
ITEt4 I ~ SUB-TOTAL $ 47,100.00
II. DRAINAGE Ih1PROVEh1ENTS
Description Cost Estimate
1. No. Sherry Drive Swale Construction $ 1,900.00
2. Hickory Lane Swale Construction $ 1,900.00
3. Oak Circle Swale Construction $ 1,900.00
4. Creekside Circle Swale Construction $ 2,660.00
5. Sea Oats Circle Swale Construction $ 1,900.00
6. Creekside Drive Storm Sewer Outfall $ 82,278.00
~~
-14-
~,
~ ~,
i~
II. DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Description
7. East-West Outfall Ditch
8. North-South Outfall Ditch
ITEM II
SUB-TOTAL
III. PAVEMENT IMPROVEMENTS
Description
1. Resurfacing Fund (1983 dollars)
2. Roadway Shoulder Stabilization
ITEM III SUB-TOTAL
Construction Costs
l0Y Contingency
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS
Engineering Services
Surveying Costs
* TOTAL ESTIMATE •
it
* ITEMS NOT INCLUDED
1. Cost of easement acquisition.
Z. Soils investigation.
3. Construction representation.
-15-
Cost Estimate
$ 13,285.00
$ 18,613.00
$124,436.00
Cost Estimate
$ 22,692.00
$ 12,440.00
~ 35,132.00
$206,668.00
$ 26,667.00
$227,335.00
$ 22,460.00
$ S,OOD.00
$254,795.00
.... ...... .a: ~. .+tt, :6.->"y.s c`"'. ,r:' •x~: T; ...,~ .. .. .t.•..:~a:~• .. -. i~- ern...;. ~T1p;:L! --r. _ .. .. .. '
/ l~
Y
APPENDIX
~'
(~
J~ /
r ' ~ .J • y.~ .~ s :< • ;>tif~t"~~~:"=:~ :' •.: } ;'~. ~ 1- .'{fl~)~..;<-;•'•-: is
EDW ROS AVE ..i.rii'~:. ~:>:::~ '•~t~~•'"`' • ;,t:;.{.a~+`F' .:r d•'1`1 •~,r::~.r%• ••''
a:.:;
/'~~ tap! F'inr nn r',.t:^; •. ~- 1- -.r. - ~,t'.y~;•: ••
~t~ 1:•Ir.rn Schl247 •;r:;%~'.:.:''r1.a . .yi~ i, ~.:•'?' . • ,: `~~'•':,;.? s
r :: ~:aj:j•+=•`,~+t~~^R'~ji',~'r~'~"i,.. ....•,.:.• ~i„ -•~'~,•-`•1-L.J\:'t
J8 ,.tc o Katharine bbe t,r.~ ~ _,.~:} .i,.:~•,, '~:., •'j' ~'' T - ~ i'~i`+•
~ ?z a a ark Z` .. ~•S..•r.e.~,c'rv~rt"~.~~.":~i7::~;E-r Y. g•.•r.'• i:~'''?v:•~
-•~ (" •• _ 88~ ~ {5TH ~T."• ~»i~..~. .1.~':: >; .~(T~~. ~..• ..: 7J •: .;.i.s. •!,~., Ai+ f?~.Z'3•`z•'
' \S~• - a + o .+¢ :y~ iT~ I ~:'t~:~j :_ftk :4,<'.~,i3t. ~: r.. y 1 ~ ^.i~~~y9I~,• .•
• - f* t v AULT Ufl z ~j~¢¢¢ vlu "t • ,~ . }'.! S%•! ti:.. '.Y+.•• ''''• ~' ;,~ :,~~:s: ;~.i<
Pp t~1 P10NE OR ~ o Pt0 EA ¢ ¢ xzx'- ~x¢ ,1 •'. a•:. snti.•• ' ` .a.,..t ,;~
!0 pERI ~ tV W o ° UH ~~-~~s .. .. ~ . .. ;• '.y A(i •.` tr••.. • '+ •.:.
N' dtE t1'J• ~`> > '~ e:~ °v '. [. tJ• .,: •: •_ .s•..;.+~i•'•,.'•TN~. '°:
y 1 SS ~ R ¢ ¢ --f=~ .+o~f 5 Manhltfatn • Bateh. ,} ~ .••=i..'^,;;.•,_ •+':'~•'~~"
AEGAS R f W -• > o c •. ::a •• ~ .:,. ~ :I~' .A.'-r; ~:~• '.
SY J' z GAVAGAN ~ > ~ 'tt~ •.~ ,~.:~'+ '.: 1' ~ :~T`• .?. i `•' ..°i: •'t,
iANTA RD ° ~ .1P R tl r. •.. Hj i''• %~'y:i,• .. ! -~~" t•^"'('Y'ti}IS
W z a Flrrn is/l as tea r" s~~ W 'i.•,. ~~' r.~J``•'. ~ .. :~' r ~:;~;T;~_F~µ
Q~ 227 • RO = "^ H°O`~?••NO 35TH iiT• •+ ... •.• .. i1• ~ +. • •rS• 4`+`~{ .~ ~r~ ~~~'•M
`. vii SOQ' OO «W .. O¢J~NmO Jp~W °¢ } •~4 •~ 't ~ ~A :•:`ti~.. ,{"=•~.'~. ~•~r+
1VE ..+yF @ ~ ~ o ° N°-F¢••_ WJ= u ••t•ry7_•ti.r,j•. ;:A'.`_,d'a:
I J ~ f T ¢~•'~ old ~ W ~•.I'~~.• • ' I(~'A'~{+
A •c _ ~+'~
BD ~ ~ a-~ ~ t~ '~
.. r..:
~ LANDING RDt .. . • • • • :+; .iZ: :. ~J5';s.r ».~':
I - assts) Lrl -- ~- .. :s• •^`~~ :':Y1+,' •. !~
"iF:•.
1lrrypurl SELV.~ W T N
254 q " ~ W ` . ~ ~ ::' i ~ • f• "~` `~l'•• ~ : ~ •.i ;,.i:
o ~ - sip .,~;.,: .. :• <<Z;... •y:.t~
- ¢ 19TH .s.T H 1 HST . r •. • t • .•..J. , y.. • .. .. a ••'~L•~•~ ~ }r. •! • , :~'.
Trailer r M ~ _ .~.+- :.:. ~ ', ~ ..
Park •~ 'T 2 Y .< ~ '.Y:~i~ - ~1.f '=' %J.• :••:+j': ~. ~~
~. w pq "'"a'A~ Ifl N ST +~ ••'•' .• ;r:.t'• "~:./.~:
•' D ~ W ¢ .r.
t' DOROTHY CIF N~ Golf;; Course °y 3 zo }( •' + ~ ''y'~ ~' `' ,.
trt OOR IIY IRS ~ p ttl ¢o C tT H
N ¢ s ¢ /
+ W ~ ntLLaRD W ~(' w W
%c ~ RO o ~Selva h1a a '" •' '~ i ° E EES '
+ ~'-I' ~ CNUHCti `a RD j Country lub '~ ° A E
N ~+ ••1 H~ CSOU TRY CL 8 LN t. MST 1500 , • -
r
ST :.AHT TN LEVJIS ST ~.t::~Jf a W ~ a J 1• N .. •
=i _ R 9ERT Si qq ¢ W °o. ° ~,( ~ ~ [
Sit. q -~.+' H ~ EDGAR TAN 1f~ ~ x N= '' 17 M T •'r . ~ • . ,
RD <=STJACK tl ii~YJTnIRORv+O 12it d K t N .••.
• ~~ C ~•:
EEVY AO ~ ° aRUE La RO; c` z ~,,+-,,. ° no o It H T T ]• ` •.
s N G `~ OOt J R `, , ° ~' 11TH ST ¢ ,~ H ~A z~iAJ~ j 'A~'..~
sr _ Qr.D Y_ W oo
_ ~ W JTM ST 4~,A51Rf 1tJ- }~ f N . ItAY ~ 9TH ST r 9 + ST _ .BEACH' . •
°
~ N ~ °¢ r?TH ST ~ ONITA p0 ~ uV CT 1~, < '
CJ ST w h p["'r4 -LA2A -, °J' St ."' PLAZa ° CLU17 R •
~ Z 8TH ST BiN S
N ~ r T •JTM T °yT - t REOF N OR , R ]11tP lU2EPNE • .
•^~^ '^ m 9T ST •• » J •"`^ ~ i.. T :ir SARAl0 v LN `+ h ST ~ ' 7TIt ST > ~ .
¢ u - r H T 1; • qq Z ~ y a°< UR t-. s % c; ~J{•i GTN ST °
_; < ,o-„ ~ r .. ' JR EST ~ ° ~ ~ ° a' J'r.,, NQ [ r ., 00 .' • . " •..
i 6 r ST T •~qq S o CL l SS o i N {rgAr iSFa »! r i P l l 5TH ST W " ,:...." • •'• :?;:. .. ~ ; ~=y .! ~ .:, : -• :..•; ::: '•..
STM k' S•igar ~tC D y ~ - 3 AN c q Y V ~ iTN ST 'i-+,y::'c33.:.r:.1`•:., .''ct.-P'~t:.*i•'~;F~~' .•C`• •.
Sl OC
lqT~ ST I.tt Sgq~TDCa C}
N s I• :• n L. 1'Oy O ~ ~ ~
o ~ TRITON RD a ~+" ~
h ti '~ 111111' ~1 V II 7R ST
j ~I
~ LT
Jq
DST
y 1
VECUNA
`'
-
•
: TN
'lrn1.
~•1 p~
F
7r
rD ST = [[ [
N
w ~
a Pq
RD
4
nCAVALLA RO 0 2 k v .1E t C
0 N LD
1ST ST
''r
'"
l( \ =~
STS '9,
r
w ~
r < P
Q
~
4 ~ '
° W
ANf HN P MST
`c
~
-` -•-~' »..
y a
v
o -`'. STU VIVANT
1 .,, ,. R
1~'t• AtOtJ ST ~ T ~-
LEh10t1 '^
W T
OQ' y o RAY DH ~' OCE Ntv000 We;,,, v.
c Z ,,¢ C~9 O ~ 9~
+ OR Na moo ORANGE T
7 .
~ r,
`
J
~ O
~ O L• ¢ CNEfI
5T 5
r
H.
.
...aUNS
/l/ ..
O >
11
~~
~•,
1
t
Y
O
O
~~
i
N
O
i `-
. ~ •.
!•~
t,...w - zC N
QF-Nx~ N?~ OULL Z JC
J
Q ~ 0 0
O
OC ....
CJ6.NN OF--
W W G C n. W W W F-- •• Z O m U
2 N W O J O C U O x N- W
•
}-~}- J W UZC7ZG.Z W C. .
Qa.x sw xQ-oo3 0-
N UO U= F -- Z N N C- O Z O
N ~
N
N w
N Q W W N O J
x
O V-
Z Q m W t -O - t- ZQ > t'- C7 O
ox>- z t-oc-aoo c
~- m U F - Z J F- C Z Z }• O
---I•-W -J 20Q0 WG.-Q mC
Q- C F-- Q Z U Z x C.. J 'q
C WZr CQ JQUCC:~ •• O
OF-2aC C7 SWZOW W m
d Q J O ~'a r N d- x S Z
ocxNt-Y ra~t- cat- C7N
O t--• - Q U
- 00 J -~Z O W
W WtS7COZUZLs- - t--
N-
U
p .LL.= CxWO a W00
Q Z ~- O W t- S N C N W LL
OQ W ~ ZUQ F-W W dCt- m0
~• >- Z - t•-• = C7 > W C
CmCt- NQ
C
~
N WN
G.
C7NZ t'-'F-
N
U!- OWpUH=Q} -
LL.- Z O~ W-CJ Z?• N C
pW W Ot•-CODU.Q2 F--O
•d -x ~ ZO-t-~•x0 Q ZZ
OQt- W O ZU W O WI--
.ZN to -O= W LL_ Nt-Z NO
O Q F- Z J O Z N O W Q
OF--SF-- W QQ W pWN C
z-t- ~ 3 NzJNw aw
- Z- O F- O N Q W C O W U =
=3wo a.wJwwwCCZ w•t-
t"'O CW JOxQC.7Q N t-
Z Q W Q LL. O F- W- J f- a7 Z N W S Z
• OZUU U-x>O W-- xt•-• L+-~
- Z - O > F-' z = C = t-- L~
t- oc Q C N • z o w >- z 3
--LL W
' ~~~G • OYt-QZWd G W
O O F- to .. U Q Z Q O N Z C
dQ Utn W NNQ~C7J C =Q d
2 C> U- W t- W e d- O O Q
• Q
O w~~ ~m
; jw
N~
c W
o Wt-cN
• °NZO Cn -~-Z-OOF-U N
•~ t- -Z F-C7C~= YS2 •a ^
ZN Q S O t•-~-UC7.Q x}
r
~ WQ WJ 1- OC CUSS Q--m ._...~
~ O p O-F--UZ~S~CC .W
dZQO- d. W=QO S .>
03f.- cL=Qw wcwt- c,~-
.~ O Q N O F- m Z~ Z t- N = t-
W Zt-NQ U C 3-4=- -U
>YQ O W UOt- JO W
W JLL.1- O ZZ-S t-O .G.
nZG.O d - 1-t-NOW N•Q ZN
O J •G O Z t•-' W m O W
QWNt-d v7l-- QG CQZ C
JC-C OJZWt- - t•-
JW SQN ILJZF-•Q~Nn .Q}
TF-6..- dQQJ- ZW CC
z _
~ t- z a t- o Q
WZF-Ot•- ~N W u..w H Q G.t-
O N O Q Z 1- - =+ C E O ZT. O O d C W
Z
= CS•1-- t-O- W_ CC
- . t
t= . O w ,--...., ~- C t- U U v
ca N a. ot--wLL.cc~- w
t- WQ DC D O Za.-> --F- t-N
Z U Z Z W C O U C Z a C C Z
C G7 Q •Q f- d W p N F•-• Q W D
-W JQ ZNC;~Cn- N d ~Z
U NsC z w3wZ t-~w a..Q
Ct-wCC~ >oc~-oQNOCC o
- W ~-- -'•'-Ot-COZO Jt-•
OZ-Q N CntA ~O OC= W Z
p Z-> V) W = C J Z n- U w > W
n JCn WUOCQ WF•- WO
W O DLL UI-N2-O S4 O-
wwa:o~- xo -Hvch-w N
C =m= r- wJZ a z oc Qw
F'-•-NF-•C ONCOQN U JC
C QtL O W-Wp- W JO..
D Q N Z d O Q t•- U t-- C N W C Q >
-'-wQ C w-o >w~ w3
Z f-Q F--D.. W LL{-JU W pN NQ
O N
Q ~- N W W W O
C t-- O F-• N C O tl
LL.OrCS NNa-S- N O W
-Z WCt- C QN WZt- W~
>-
C
Q
1--
w
C
U
W
N
N
~
.
Q ; W
O F- Z C. ~ '
• 2.O
C W ~ • r O
t- d ~ ~ ' ~07 1. W
NOU •- C
-~-t- x
Z W Q U i-- d
->wQ x
awn .. W
O O W Q
Q
Z O
Q
H O
O J - C
-- J O N O N
- C:J Q J N
C > w w -
J
N to O LL. ~
LL. - O O
CLL. Z U
O O W •Q W
F•- r F-- Z Q ~
C S t-
Q N
H W O W
?- W }- > t'7
J C ~, J C
OWWZ > .~
N XQ
W ~ C
Wp
} '
UZO J LL`s
Q O
3 W
LL C
LL H C }• 1 O
O Z O LL t-- • 1
w z z rs
0Q = O
4
~ O '
N Z Q U 'ti.
W W - N
J ~ C W ~
n..Cw x
•c
w w = I
~ m ~ !
• > 03-
ta•• •C C p -
W .'~- U W
mCnNH GQ
C W W
HO
W
W Q IU
C • N X W -
lL Q m Z W m ,~
L_' O m
O d}• N} U I O
6.JCaJ - p.,
QCWZ t-
W a. t-- z ~ >--
}- ~- ~• Q C
J W W •- J C
F-- J m = C f- }-
a t-- x •r o
Z Z O f- Z
O Z W t-
N c m W .Q
~
O W J O _.-~
d J t-- W Q
U = C W
} m O N
Q la..
O W O W J
C7 Z m Q
Q N C Y
- O D U
D S W J W -
t-- C7 J C7 W
- w c w
z ^3 W O ss
~ °
~
~
-• W ~ C d ~
O i--• Z O O Z O
Q W Z Q
J ~ O Y
~
~ Q
W ^
<L C
7 C
r G
=
i. W . }.
l t
"
- J U J Q Q
z F-Q>o wwwtLNQCOQ C LL- t-3zJ z~1
ZJ CULL ZZCO G7-C W//_1~' CO-Q C7
O W O OF-3- >-NZt-O ~SJm O WZ C - ,~
U_W V: t~ OLLNmZ-Qd UY .•W N
- - J C W O C C U Z>
OF-- W'a..t Z ~O>Otn 000 N.J 040 W }
t- t-W m WQSO•Q F-N WQCU•Q W W W t-W~N .%.
d N 0 0= W 1-- a- d O n J Z> N N F-- N Y Q O ~N
t'• C U F- O O. t- C N U- d t- W N N - a C ~C N W
p C t-- - Z'C u.. O Z O C N Q C] W W Q F-- 0 3 W O
N w w J> Y w= w w c N N $ Z Z to a z
~C -zxwm-CC~Nt-s C-- - n t- t- t- -cCn I-}
---3-as=zz-.wot-c~QtL= zz ^-zoz -'a
•~ t-oNt-n..a.aa.CCOwN~ot- -Q 3 3 cn t=cc~•a 3c
O
.r •
a.
o --
lJL ' ~; 2
j
Il ~ I I
P,FOPO S E D N• ' S.
:l~~t~hlT~ C!4'00'~`- L. F.) ~ ~lopREASEJ~1EIuT 0
OtlTFALL p/TC N
DOSED E. -W. OUTFACE L7lTCH _ _ _ _ _~ ` 1 _ ii
-~_
-~--~ ~ 1 ~
I
~ ..
i ~, I Exisr. ti I o r I 9 iar: a' ~t,cr. ~ ~~ ~ P 1 EiosT ~
8 I1 i i 8 9 ~ ~. i~ 3 ~
~~ 1
N
~~
~ 4 12 V , ~ N~ 5 ~ e0W 7
Y V
3 o i I ld I 13 ~ ~ 12 I I W V 4 1 ~~ -~-
V` 0 v.• tW ~ 8 9
~~ ~ • / 9 rH S RED ` `--
i ~
'- 13 12 1~ 2 3 4!~ 1, I l i i 3 I~
Pz~PCr.~ 25 ~MT. ~
i
W )a s ~
,~
'-~ v 14 ~ 9 ~ ~ ~
:7 ~ 1 I~j 10 ~ L/M/TS GF STUDY ~i
I ~ Q
0 ~i'' S
v ICS 1 (~ 4 ~ ~
~ - ~ Q
'- % SAL ~ CAME 111 ~ ~
~' ~ ; ~ W
?4 ! 17 12 v
~ 'x~ 2 d
~~ Is, I I~ I ~ ~ .~
0 i 1 > ~
~- I ~ ~ ~
:2 ]q ~ 1u1; W i W
~ ~ ~.~ ~ I -
` 21 20 \ ~ ~ ! ~
2 t
T; ~
~~ ~~• /•
~`. / ~ 7 ~ ~
( /
`~ 9
' Nv
j
i i ~
1
3
a
°L
wi
EVALUAT/ON
OF PAV/NG, ORA/NAGS
~ ROADWAY GEOMETRY /N
SELV~ MAR/NA UN/TS /D, //8/
~ ENG~.AND ~ TNiMS; .1i~tG
CQfyS~jLT~Nf: ANO pEBKiN ENC.+rJEERS
~~]e ~~VMC 4v0 - yC.t~O.IrW Kid
~,
No SCALE
it
i
a
~r
a
.5'ELVA R N DR ! V ~
-2 '?
20"y/c,CO,ey ~4 ~ { 20"OAK
'. f3 ' /'
-- N w.
2 ~o'
~ ~TRAFFIC
W FLOW
W CO~/FL /CT
h
0~
SELV.4 MAR/NA OR/VE
& /9 th STREET
/N TERSECT/ON
~ ENGLAND ~. TNIMS, ING
CONSULTWG ANO DESIGN ENGINEERS
• ~ s ~.TVwr~c ww .+•rxaawua n. am ~ ~
4
.i
---r ,
~~~'V
~ N b~0 ~. }
I m
i
i
'~
Q`
1
N
~.
~-~~
Q
m
d
o+
~ ~ ~IYV'7 ~O`~/D/H
0
j0
~a
~~
~V
~Q
~~
~~
~O
0 ~'
N ti~j
Q
Q
4
~~
~ ~l
0 1
Z
X
.~
N
0
O
~~
a
~~~
SZ2 R
o~~~
o~s~
~~
~~
N~
~W v:
{..L_~
~~
W Z
1
h ~
~~ s+
~~
v
v ~`
~W
Q~
o `~
~~
W
. .
l
~~
~'Nb'? Nbo ~n~?
Nt
I
'~
~ ~ ~
I ~
1l1
-~
Q
o=
~Nb' ? iC ~O }~a! 1~
~'~
~~
v
Q ~~~
~~ A
~~R
J
O ~u ~
Z ~+~
z
'Q
~ 4 ~~
~~
~ L~
to O
~ ~
m
4
'6U
W
JQ
~W
m~
JV •~
~C~.
IQ. ~ So ~
N ~ Yu- 1
~: Q a ~ ~ ~
o~ N ~ ~
N~ Q ~ ~
~ ~
w ~ o
~ W
N
v ~ 0
j ~
;,n `0
x u
~~
~; w
~ o Q
6
` i
tf
__
.~ -
' `
e
?" "' CORPOR
-,..,. ~.. ,:~;-~*;---.,;,.,, nTE LIMITS
r~ ~,. .r , t ~.'
~.~
ZONE B ~ '.°
Y.s. iT
\ y
~ ~~ ~~
~ !
ZONE
11 B
~~ 1
l~
N.
\\ l~
. ~~ ZO N a !
I 1 ''
\ c}c DALE ZONE A
\ ~ LANE /00 YEAR t~`
\\ s FLOOD PLA/N;:~ m ~
_ ~~ ~ `~~ D
.: Q .~ ..,
v ~ ='~:~~ii +i
.~';yx t
k :tom.
iv:,.' Y •r .P zit Tai, ,~
0 .e.~ •.ti. ~'~
N
-:,~ m .a~
~' ~.~
ZO N E C .. a ;-. ,~ .. t-.,, ;, ,
Jr.. ti •!:f r ~ ~ .G t 4:
. t 9 '.'.r t .i..~ ~ 1.
. }ti .t
„ x c.,,
REPRD,000EO FRO.t~ =
FL OOL) /n/SU~PAIVCE RATE' it-fA P ~ : y:
ATLAi(/T/C ~3EACH FL ti~~
,..
.OATEO :APR/G /~~ /983 i~~~ ,
~~
.t
:~
i~(' ~'
1:..
7
FL 000 PLA/N MAP
~ ENGLAND G. TI-IIMS, LNG
CONSU<_TNG ANO DESIGN ENGWEERB
a ~ 7m /171XR1C ava d..cxtiOrwaLi R Inn ~ ~
tno+~ a7..w~e
i
~~
;. ~ ~
i
• JOHN E. ELL1S. P.E.
GREG A. EOMONDS. P.E.
TERRtLL V. SMITH, P.E.
P.O. BOX 9913 • JAGKSONVtLLE. FLORIDA 32239
904-733-0960
Order No. 83_376
Report No. 1
Lsb No.
Date: 5-09-83
~EPORT OF: Asphalt and Limerock Thickness
rROJECT: Atlantic Beach Streets Evaluation
REPORTED T0: England b Thims, Incorporated
6136 Atl antic Boulevard
Jacksonville, Florida 32211
DATE SUBMITTED: 5-06-83 DATE TESTED: 5-04-83
ASPHALT LIMEROCK
`i0. THICKNESS THICKNESS SUBGRADE LOCATION
1 5/8" 4.5" Not Stabilized Selva Marina Drive 75' North of Saturiba
2 1.0" 7.0" Not Stabilized Selva Marina Drive 25' North of 19th St.
Contains Roots
1 5/8" 5.0" Not Stabilized 19th St. 50' North of Sherry Drive
~ 15/8" 8.0" Plot Stabilized North End of Hickory Lane
Contains Coquina and
Roots
5 1 1/8" 5.0" Not Stablized 19th St. 200' East of Oak Circle
Some Roots
R
6 1.0" 5.0" Plot Stabilized Creek side Drive 100' Plorth of 19th St.
Some Roots
7 1 1/8" 4.5" Not Stabilized - Trace 19th Street at Seak Oaks Drive
of Organic Material
8 1.0" 4.0" Not Stabilized ~ Live Oak 300' North of Saturiba
9 1 1/4" 4.75" Not Stabilized South End of Hickory
Some Organic
10 1 5/8" 4.0" Not Stabilized North of Sherry 500' North of Saturiba
INSP ECTORS: C. O'Steen & J. E11is, II
r
'EE/kjd
It: r_ :client
Respectfully submitted,
ELLIS & ASSOCIA~T~ES~, INC.
G~%~%'~
J n Ellis, P.E.
8
~ ~~
NOTE: LIMITED ROADSIDE RECOVERY AREA
~'
. ~,
NOTE: SEVERE REVERSE CURVE
9
Photo No. 1 - Hickory Lane
Photo No. 2 - 19th Street
. ~
h
! !
•~ ~ ~ r
1
t
I~~
~,, ` ..l ~~~ / r
.'~'~!\ i~ z. ~:..i ~.i±'.•~::.~ ••a~i'•rJ!-i ~•e:~ !~ :7.`~,~t..:.=s. Y~^1'+~'TrC•
i ~~ .+'a J"' :i ••t~' ;~ i•~ r' ;: ^ti•it;. r.. .. •- 7 ~~.Y'tJ T+~`•.~.''t'ty' y,~+
9~ ~• ; S%u'2~; ."•,Ci'~t~= J" ';"',!: 3: -^tis a,•~,7•:.~~,~.~L•.- TLt '
.!o , •s-' •Y..~-:... .•+ :~~. .rte.
-Zavy~ '•~r-at,_-.r •.>••'i -'~"t';a'.,4 ;• J';it`~::f. ~t,,.r~..~i=~•?' h~~~:a~
^'iV~~'t::: b+~~.'~i.~~.~',~~~~~~~..::.1....Svb!s:bf?~tiKtl`L~'a~`JY.~37.
Photo No. 6 - 19th Street
NOTE: LONGITUDINAL PAVEMENT CRACKS
II
Photo No. 5 - 19th Street
NOTE: LONGITUDINAL PAVEMENT CRACKING
t. ~~ r.
~ ~
`i
~'
~~
NOTE: EDGE OF PAVEMENT RAVELING
NOTE: TRANSVERSE PAVEMENT CRACKING
~~
Photo No. 7 - Hickory Lane
Photo No. 8 - Selva Marina Drive
f .,
~~
® ~~
J
n
a
a,,
Photo No. 9 - 19th Street
NOTE: PAVEMENT SETTLEh1ENT
Photo No. 10 - Sea Oats Circle
NOTE: PAVEMENT SETTLEh1ENT AND LONGITUDINAL CRACKING
13
1,
~ } 1 1
~t
t
t
-~
t
Photo No. 12 - Creekside Drive
NOTE: STORM SEIJER OUTFACE - LOOKING NORTH
14
Photo No. 11 - Hickory Lane
NOTE: TYPICAL DRAINAGE OUTFACE
i
/' .
~ i, 1
EVALUATION ON SELVA MARINA UNITS 10, 11, AHD 12
DOCUMENT 1
There are many details requiring consideration:
Sight distance (State Law), flood plain maps, pavement
reports, easements rights, drainage lines, lowering and
raising manhole tops, lowering water mains to provide minimum
cover, valve box tops raise/lower, sanitary sewer lines,
sanitary sewer services adjusting to provide proper cover,
leveling out high spots, low spots and new catch basins, new
drainage lines (not existing) curb and gutter and removal of
trees. In wet areas, a sand/cement base might be needed.
Presently, not enough limerock exists under the asphalt and
all roads must be reconstructed.
The cost for units 10, 11 and 12 is estimated to exceed one
half million dollars. This cost does not include costs for
Consultant Engineering Fees, easement acquisitions or soils
investigations. If other areas 10-A, 10-B, 12-A, and 12-B
are also included, the cost will exceed one million dollars.
These areas are all private property.
t
~_ ~
,. ,
OVERALL PROBLEMS OH SELVA MARTHA
UNITS 10, 10-A, 10-B, 12, 12-A AHD 12-B UNDER DOCUMENT 2
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
1) Developer did not nor intended to make a full public
dedication of the streets in said subdivisions.
2) Street does not conform to the configuration of street
pavement required by the City under its subdivision
ordinances.
3) The City may receive a request(s) from the owners of lots
in said subdivision for the maintenance of the street
pavement. _
~~ Document 2 was a maintenance agreement between a
Developer and a Contractor. Ho signature of any City
official was affixed on this agreement. Therefore,
neither the Developer nor the Contractor would appear to
have a right to include any references to action on the
City of Atlantic Beach's part.
4) Since this development is private property, the City
Attorney should rule whether public funds may be used for
private streets.
~~ ~M i '
1 ~ ~ ~
CITY OF
~~~,°cus~cc ~eac~ - ~~cvric~
800 SEAIINOLE ROAD
ATLANTIC BEACH, FLORIDA 32233-5435
TELEPHONE (904) 247-5800
FAX (904) 247.5805
April 21, 1992
Dear Selva Marina Property Owner:
Over the last several weeks, the Atlantic Beach Mayor and City
Commission have reviewed the matter of ownership of streets
within the Selva Marina development.
Upon review of plats and
Attorney, we have been ad
remains with the property
maintenance of all streets
residents in the Selva Marina
other documentation by our City
wised the ownership of these streets
owners. Therefore the repair and
within this •area rests with the
development.
Our Mayor and City Commission members wanted you to be aware of
this information so as to hopefully avoid any misunderstanding.
In order to further discuss the Selva Marina street system, our
elected officials have called ,for a workshop to be held on May
18, 1992 beginning at 7:30 p.m. in the City Commission Chambers
adjacent to City Hall, 800 Seminole Road. You are invited to
attend this session and discuss this matter with the Mayor and
City Commission members if you so desire.
Thank you for your interest and concern and I would urge you to
consider attending the meeting as,noted above.
Sincerely,
Kim D. Leinbach
City Manager
KDL.dst
cc: Honorable Mayor
~, City Commission Members
City Attorney
City Clerk
REF: KDL.92
. J
7/2s/79 .~~xurvtEt~~-
;'
' MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
. ~J
/~~ ~ V~"
( THIS AGREEMENT made this ~ day of July, 1979, by and
lll~~• ~ r between SEVILLA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, INC., a Florida cor-
1 ~ poration, $EVUE, LTD,, a Florida limited partnership, GEORGE
~~ ~
BULL and MARY T, BULL, their successors, heirs and assigns,
~' ~ the address of all being 1800 Selva Marina Drive, Atlantic Beach,
~ ~.
~('` Q - Florida 32233, all of whom separately and collectively are here-
,~S" 1~ inafter referred to as "Developer", and B. B. McCORMICK & SONS,
a ~ ~ INC,, a Florida corporation, whose address is 430 First Avenue
`` South, Jacksonville Beach, Florida 32250, hereinafter referred
to as "Contractor",
WITNESSETH, That:
WHEREAS, the Developer has developed certain subdivisions in
the City of Atlantic Beach, Florida, according to plans approved
by the City under its planned unit development ordinances, known
~~ as Selva Marina Units Nos, 10, 10-A, 10-B, lI, 12, 12-A and 12-B
and intends 'to similarly develop additional subdivisions in the
area having similar approvals, and
WHEREAS, the Developer has not and does not intend to make
a full public dedication of the streets in said subdivision, and
WHEREAS, the limited dedication of the streets grants to all
' public authorities all rights normally enjoyed by them, except
the fee ownership, and
WHEREAS, the scenic and enviromental configuration of the
'street pavement does not conform to the configuration of street
pavement required by the City under its subdivision ordinances,
and, ~
t
WHEREAS, the Developer has constructed, or caused to be con-~
structed street paving (including compacted subgrade, base and
RECEIVED wearing surface) designed to best serve the uniqueness of these
DEC 1 1 1991 residential streets, and
WHEREAS, the City may receive requests from the owners of
7~tiB1;1C ~l1lQRtC~
G
.. ~• ,~
. ~.. r
f ~,
,, ,
von 4 ~ 6~ E~~ 7u ~
~ OFFIC1Ai. _ RECORDS
~ ~
•
-J
~ ° n7.11` L.
' ~ I n
+ O
+ -
1. J' ,. <.'
1 a a
., -a•
L
/9
•
/
08
~
~ ~
l}
~ L
Y r
<~:i..
~
9
:
.
- /902 ~
`
r ~ _ ... _ ,~ ,.; a... ~_ v
~ r I
-z
~o >
r
r' ° -
.. G
o
° ! ~
J
I
- -
• ~~• 0
~ ~ v ~ V
tj
~
x r
~
& •~ /907
/RBI
~. ~ ~
• u• ,tlAl'
Z~ • V v o0'02'.a,"w 171.21' . .
_
•
" ..-+ ..-cwoao ... ~...- -...7 O
•
r
t ` I o~~
'
~ I I
`
~~ ~. ~. .,...s, '--'~
1
1
vl
_T
:v
_--- - ~ I~rl I ~ 11'~
~ ~._ ~ t '~o .:b
ice. ~ ~ ••
~~~~. -• ,~.• V
- -. a N
~ i~T c
L
r
O ~
r r
<
~ L.t
,. ,. o
F
E z o .+
-•'lf -C
~
..
0
1\ ~ r~~
IN
I;
o i
o
I •
.
r c -' ~"'
t ~o~k°
0
. 0 ° 1- '~
--
.r I _ ~~T
p, p.
i ~
r O
.
7 n e
c =
r
o
-~ `
-
r `
•
-.
w' ~
v i
<
T
- ~ ~
r~
i
~ ..
~
F
p
e r
•.
t i .~
~
r ai ~ ~ r
~ J
r i
= ' ~
r .r
= v
•
r
~ r
1'
.
. ° t
.
J 0
C
:.
wo r j1
° : _
~ ~
•° ° O <
w - V
o rn r o ~
< r n
v
r _
F T L e _
Y
C
... Y
O O° .y rr ~ r
e
- ro Cr r~w~Lo
z w n = i - T v ° O~ r
.. O z o r^_
I
r o ~ ~ ~ r n
r
v
r..Cp~
I ~~~
:
t
i+ ~'
~a ,te
~sur
°~
rri~
I
'
~ o L+ =
~ oOO ~::n
ne
O -- -O
r =_
JI~.
lO
.
J~r11~
r -t
w
o I
Ik-_
T
°
.p~ ~
ppp~ J
n ~- ..
i
r ~
r.
t
'~u i
~~ `
s
t
=~ s ~ ~~ ~ V^~ V r
n~+ ~r:l>
L. u r •, r J r l• h
~ S 7 a •~ ~.' 1 0~~ s L
1-r:izI- <o~ -
^~r= Lz•
w : P ^ ^ - -
.r -~ '• ± 1• R T. c
o - . _ ~
6 r O -
.~. L ' + ° r
1 n 1'~..I O n
o~ „. C..~ •> z ° oTa L
L r ~ o c v
~ J` o ~
Or+- ~r0 n>~~ e
~~ I Lr~..~ G v e=i.~.
~~ o~ 1',L,rFoon: ~i. o
[ a . .a t ' Iw, r G
r = i D •
z~ r z' O r n i s ~= ~-
V, ~r+c.~
o+-:r-- T s=rEe
"Crro:.zn°~~T..
~ ~~ n d c ~
fi=t,.<~..oitp' z
~° L~~re°.rc o-Jii~
~ _
=~ •+-,L ~,• r o n~ c
- = C V>r.L i L r.T..r
O Z T A w ~, f i r
O P tif•c .~. 0~0 • 4r+
1 ~=Pe ~.p°• ~ • 7 T°
n ~ " c ;r ~ ~ QQ, ^ =:
.wi~~~+r~ ~ * Z o-z+T~
~ ra.~wT ~~i o=,i ^
=rr~-t r0"~ ter:
~ N O LYL P .1 o r Z .•. i
-_o~r za'r~~
~ ~. 'r e n 0 0°~ f C i
0 1 "i':i d 'a c C
i r 0 0 ~ T
r.
~ r J< r- r o z o T 7 t o s r° T O
c Zr r ~+ ~ ° n ~.° O
T of : p<'iy z..+< 30~ ru•sOr L
+ ~ ~~ r~ r r n y 1 r+~ r ~ T Z~>
•'r T retlJrao~ O > i O
Don r _ ~7
r ~ Z O r < O r r r' L< y °
r n
•
. 1
.,_ ~„ .-
lots in said subdivisions for the maintenance of the street
~ 1 pavement, the removal of obstructions which might occur in the
future, or to perform other services, and
WHEREAS, the City may feel obliged to respond to the afore-
said requests, and
WHEREAS, it is the intention of the Developer and the' City
that access to residential lots by residents, and future residents,
be not impaired by the lack of maintenance to the aforesaid
streets;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed between the Developer and the
Contractor as follows:
1. This agreement shall inure solely to the benefit of those
persons who acquire residential lots in said subdivisions.
2. The Developer shall respond to justifiable requests for main-
/~ tenance as aforesaid, by directing the Contractor to perform
i said maintenance work.
3. The Contractor agrees to respond with reasonable diligence
- to the directives received from the Developer, as aforesaid.
4. The Contractor shall look solely to the Developer for payment
for services rendered, as aforesaid, and shall not look to, or
expect, any payment for work performed hereunder from the
City.
5. To assure or guarantee payment by the Developer to the Con-
tractor, a satisfactory bond has been tendered by the Developer
to the Contractor and accepted by the Contractor, the sufficiency
whereof is acknowledged by the execution of this agreement.
This agreement shall remain in full force and effect for a
periof of ten (10) years, if not sooner terminated by mutual
consent.
~^'~, IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Developer and the Contractor have
2.
i
:~ i
.- ,. ,
executed this agreement on the date hereinabove stated. ~,:•;.,,-'••
^~ ,
SEVI DEVELOPME CORPORdTIO;:,;INC,
' Presiders .......
BY:
t
~I
1. nuts.
~~ ~ ~ .
'~--
..! ~~ .
As c~ormick.
~ ` eeorge Bul~ `•
J ~ c2tic~ ~ 1~ etc, rte`.
Mary T. Bull
!~~ B, cC0 . SONS~I~C.
BY: _ '~
/ ~ ~~ .
~ '
~~
~~' ...
3.