Loading...
Exh 8BAGENDA ITEM NO. 8u DATE: // -' 0~' 9`9 CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH CITY COMMISSION MEETING STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM: Application for Use-by-Exception to operate a stone cutting and fabrication business in the CG, Commercial General district at 20 West Third Street. SUBMITTED BY: George Worley, Community Development Director C-~~~ DATE: November 2, 1999 BACKGROUND: The applicants desire to operate a natural stone cutting and polishing business at 20 West Third Street. The property is zoned CG, Commercial General and as a use permitted by exception in that district, the Board has determined in the past that stone cutting and finishing businesses are equivalent to Cabinet Shops in their function and impact. The proposed business is relatively small in scale, but will have a small display area/showroom included. Based upon its size, approximately 1200 square feet, and the proposed uses, showroom and cutting floor, the building will require 4 parking spaces. The building is new and overall provides 16 parking spaces. All work is to be performed within the building and within normal working hours.. The business will receive material deliveries by truck approximately weekly. The Board has reviewed and recommended approval of similar businesses and Staff is not aware of any obvious harm or disruption to businesses adjoining those previously approved. The typical conditions placed upon those previous businesses have limited hours of operation, outside storage and delivery truck traffic. BUDGET: None RECOMMENDATION: The Board reviewed this application and recommended approval with the conditions that five parking spaces be provided for this use, that no outside storage be permitted, that delivery truck traffic avoid the nearby residential neighborhood, and that the Exception be granted to the applicant only and for this location only. ATTACHMENTS: Application and Draft Minutes REVIEWED BY CITY MANAGER: Please Type. or Print itr Intc Application F'ee X100.00 APPLICATZUt1 FUR "U5E 6Y EHCEPTIUN" i]] t/ l Date Fileds (1_~ 1_______-__-- 21ame and Address of Uwner or Tenank ---- _~L~t~ri~ ~c~lc_~t-~ - ~1~~3.~ - in Possession of Premises s Phone Hark, _~U f!_ a Y~__~J'D~ ----- Street address and legal daeariptian pf the premises as to wh.[ch ttre 'Uae by Exception" is requeateds _~------YlL._J~i--, _.._J~ _-___-_-_~-____._--_._-_._____ ____________________ ---------------------- A description of ttre "Use by Exception" desired, whictr shall etpecifically arrd particularly ciesaribe tire type, cirareoter and extent of t.tre proposed "Uae by Exception"r ---- ------------ - ------ ----- -- - - ---------------- _s~o~-~ -------------------------------------------------------------- Speeifia reasons wiry th/e appliosr-n~t feels ttie ~r7e~q~ue~t shoulyd~Jnb/e~ granCted: ~~4"~ ~~~t; l `.7___l_~~1~~ `!~F~~IIJfC _LVr ~t'~'\ __ lYlitlt9CGilJ~__J_j`Ol-~_~-~C,~L-___- --._.J----..-..-- .~__-- ------- -~6L-_~JT~~1~--~--.W ~ ~C1 iA.j --~ ~LL'?---~--"ICt=Y~ _----~~-~`----C~SL __!N_LL(-?-~---- _r"`~sSS7__f~G7.~tQ~__4~CY.CSS_~\IJC~-_ iN'JC,2Vtc~M~Ni' l,Jr><G7 '~~~ ~cP=~!C _ ~"vh~r~-- Zoning Claesi ionr___~__L__ __-- - ----=-1------------------ Sig. to a of bpplicant/applicant's out ^rized agent or attorney, Zf agent or attorney, include Letter f.ro>w appliosnt to ttrt?,t of#eot, -___ ~,• , Ci,gn tune of owner of ttre proper Application cannot be processed xittrout owners eignaturE~. ....__..........-~....-..~..~__..~........,..-~~...,--_..~..~.._.._..__-....-~..-~ -.~_y_ ___..__- Applicentt Do not'fill-1n t~eynnd this point. t{owever,- die prepared to respond to the fallowing itemsr ~ ',•'.'.C~t . I . ' FItiDIHt3S OF FACT' i -- ' -~I 1. InQrers and rflrrwN to proprrty ^nd proposrd YB5 ND rtruaturrs is adrquatr. Partioul~r rrf•rrnar in wadr to autoMOtivr wnd prdrattrian sairty and convenience, traffic floc and control ^nd aco•=^ in cas• of aatastropttr{ ___ ___ 2. Off-str:rt parking end loading is •drquat+. Particular ^ttrntion is paid to th• StrM^ in 1. abav• wnd thr raonow~io, noisy, Qlarr and odor effrcts of th• sproial rxorption on adjoining '- praprrtirs and proprrtirs prnrrally in the district{ ~ ~ ___ ___ 3. Location^ of rrfusr •nd srrviar wrwa^ ar• cowpatiblr with surrounding poprrtirs and arr racily aaorrriblr. - ___ ___. i. Looationr, availability and aorpatibility of utilltiw^ arr ^drquatr. ~__ ___ 5. Typv, diwsrnsionr end aharactrr of ^orrrning and buffrrinp ar• wdrquwtr. ___ ___ 6. 51gnr and proporrd rxtrrior lighting, rith rwirrenar to glary and traffio rafrty, are in harwcny and ^rr oo~patibl• xith other proprrtir• 1n thr dlstriat. ___ ___ 7. Rrquired yardr and other oprn rpacrs •rr adequate. --- --- 8. Thr urr is prnerally ooepatiblr rith adjaoent properties and other property in th• district. ___ ___ GOririUHITY D£V£LOPtf£tiT BOARD RRPORT AND RECOtttt£NDATIORS: i ACTIDNS BY TtiE CITY COririI58I01{t i t J ~'' sir ~ ~' ~~ Q C jaJW~ 1/Z~ ~R'JN ?IPE ~~4 r t, n0 z x N `~ Q' O O '-y _ r r ~ ~ b~ ~ ~ v o~ ~ r --- ,: ~,d~ 6 .. _ ~.... ~.. _ _ ~ ': b ~ _ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~+ ~ w ~ ~ ~ .... _.. _.. _ -~ - ~ ~ 'rg g ~',~ S <4•sr2s' w 102.06' (MEAS~REp) ' ` ~ ~ o ~/ ----i-~-~- _ _ _ __ =cum - ---~-- ~% = ~,~~.Yoc;~~r Roan ~$ ' ~1oc.o Ru;Hr of wAY) Q~ 3 ' Igpif vW£ ~ ~lS X864' =l ., l ~~~~ ~~~ e~~ ! ! Y~~~i ! ~a"~~ "tf I! ~~~Ij i ( Bfl ~ v /~j,I I ~. I ~ ~ r~ i ~ r*1 i o ~'~ --~,/ ; -; ~ ~ ~", s it ~ J. 5~ II # li I ~ `~ ~ I! ~ I i I i \~ ~a ~ ~ n` I $~ 1 ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ F' . '_~ aA (. ~~~ MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE ~,~ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BOARD OF THE CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH, FLORIDA October 19, 1999 7:00 P.M. CITY HALL PRESENT Don Wolfson Robert Frohwein Pat Pillmore Sharette Simpkins Craig L. Burkhart AND Alan Jensen, Esquire George Worley, Director Pat Harris, Recording Secretary ABSENT Mary Walker Dezmond Waters Buzzy Grunthal ~d ~ i?~s Chairman Don Wolfson called the meeting to order and asked for approval of the minutes of the meeting on September 21, 1999. After correcting two scriveners errors, on motion made and seconded, the minutes were approved as corrected. The Chairman welcomed new member Craig Burkhart. OLD BUSINESS I. Application for Variance filed by William and Tricia Huggins to construct an addition to an existing nonconforming residence at property located at 1258 Beach Avenue. Mr. Huggins introduced himself and explained that he and his wife desired to construct an addition to their deck. He stated that he first applied for a variance at the last meeting and at the board's suggestion the plans were revised indicating no attachment between the addition and the accessory structure at the rear of the property and thereby complies with the rear yard setback requirements. After discussion, Mr. Frohwein moved to grant the variance as amended and Mrs. Pillmore seconded the motion.. Responding to a question from the Chairman regarding permeable surfaces, Mr. Worley stated that there is currently rio ordinance or standard to operate with and thereby at present was not applicable in the variance procedures. He added that the board cannot take the matter into serious account unless there is reason to believe that the addition will immediately adversely affect the adjacent property owners After further discussion, the variance was granted unanimously. NEW BUSINESS ~~ 1. Application for Use-by-Exception filed by G. G. Stones, Inc. to operate a business for fabrication of natural stone at property located at 20 West 3~d Street and owned by Dale Christenson. Mr. Christenson introduced himself to the board and explained that he owns the property which will be leased by the applicants for the operation of a stone cutting business. He stated that the tenants will operate a small showroom as well as finishing work on surfaces of the products they offer. He stated that he was familiar with the conditions outlined on the application and staff report. Gerardo Gonzalez introduced himself to the board and stated that his business deals with natural stones and ceramic tiles and the storage thereof would be inside the building. He stated that he is familiar with the staff report and understands the conditions contained therein. He stated that there are two employees as we!I as himself and would comply with alt required parking regulations. Responding to a question from Mr. Frohwein, Mr. Worley stated he merged two parking requirement regulations as the use is more a warehouse type use requiring parking spaces based on the number of employees as well as the square footage of the display area and assigned parking spaces to that area and the result was four parking spaces. Mr. Frohwein voiced his recommendation that five parking spaces be provided for the business to which the applicant agreed. Mr. Worley stated that the lot on the west side of the building is not a spare lot but part of the building site for this building. After discussion, Mr. Frohwein moved to recommend approval of the use-by- exception based on staffi's recommendation with a modification that five (5) parking spaces be provided, that no outside storage be permitted, that delivery truck traffic avoid the nearby residential neighborhood and the exception be granted to the applicant only and this location only. Mrs. Pillmore seconded the motion and it passed by a unanimous vote. 2. Conceptual Subdivision Plat Reviewfiled by Bestcon, Inc. for property known as Part of Government Lot 1, Section 18, Township 2 South, Range 29 East. Jim Lucas introduced himself to the board and stated that he is the architect for the project and presented to the board a large scale drawing of the proposal. He explained that the property is located on Main Street north of Kestner and is zoned RG-1. He stated that the property is bordered on the north by a paved road called Kestner and on the east side by Main Street and both are swale section roadways. Mr. Lucas explained that the applicant desires to subdivide the property into lots for single-family and duplex residential units. The subdivision will create lots that are substandard by lot dimension but will meet the minimum lot area requirement for the RG-1 district. They propose to create lots measuring 62 feet by 85 feet and create a new street north of Kestner to provide access to the majority of the new lots. He stated that the purpose of the plan review is for the Board to consider the overall concept and indicate to the applicant concerns and suggestions so they may proceed with a more detailed review by the board regarding the variances which will be required. Paul Nichols, President of Bestcon, Inc., introduced himself and presented proposed floor plans of the units. He stated that each unit was approximately 1400 square feet and will be selling them in the $80,000 range. Mr. Worley explained to the board that code requires a 60-foot right of way width with a pavement width of 20 feet. Mr. Burkhart stated that cul-de-sac regulations also references dead end streets which require a minimum of 100 feet. Mr. Worley stated that dead end streets require cul-de-sac right-of-way width diameter of 100 feet at the property line and the City may permit a Y or T design at those locations rather than a cul-de-sac turn around. Responding to a question from Mr. Burkhart, Mr. Worley stated that after the conceptual review and recommendations bythe board the designers will resubmit at a staff level an engineered design which is reviewed by the Public Works Department. Responding to the Chairman, Mr. Worley explained that the board could determine during platting process which road will be the front of the property. He stated that at this point the board is providing input to the developer matters that are appropriate to platting of the area and he would prepare a preliminary plat showing more detail and individual lot dimensions which will be reviewed before returning to the board for civil engineering purposes. Mr. Wolfson stated his inclination to go back to 22 lots for density purposes as well as being more conforming to related setbacks. Mr. Burkhart stated that he had no problem with the 50-foot right-of-way but would like to see 24 feet of paving. He also voiced his concern with addressing the code issues of the cui-de-sac and would like to see them abandon Lot 9 and make it a loop road. Responding to questions from Mr. Frohwein, Mr. Lucas explained that everything that the City will require regarding the streets and sewer will have to meet rigorous tests before acceptance. He added that putting sewers in the street will have to be inspected prior to being turned over to the city and the city would be supervising the installation thereof. The Chairman stated that he liked the lower density of 22 lots with 44 families as opposed to 26 lots and 52 families; the idea of the 24 feet of paving and 60 foot right of way as well as eliminating the cul-de-sacs and putting in a loop road or the cul de sacs being reviewed by the Public Safety Department for safety in the emergency vehicular turn around. He added that with the 60 foot right of way there would be room for the swales and would like to see through lots. Mr. Frohwein stated that conceptually with the alternate plan of 22 lots he concurs with the Chairman regarding limiting density and creating larger lots. Responding to a question regarding fencing from Mrs. Simpkins, the Chairman stated that through lots or double fronted lots are limited to four feet in height but lots with a rear lot could have six foot fences. Thereafter, the Chairman wished the applicants luck with their proposals and will look forward to reviewing their revised concept. 6. Application for Variance to Minimum Lot Dimensions for duplex construction on Lot 6, Block 160, Section "H" and zoned RG-1A. There being no one in attendance to address this application the matter was deferred until the next meeting. DISCUSSION 1. Establishing a Central District Zoning Classification and Cafe' style outdoor seating. Mr. Worley explained that a central business type district zoning district would allow for more flexible use of certain types of property, specifically, the Town Center area which unique in the City and may lend itself to a more liberal approach to zoning such as a reduction to required parking, allowance for use of public right of way for seating or other activities and possibly the reduction of the required minimum pavings. Mr. Worley stated the City Commission addressed a request for the exception by Ragtime and the use of the public right of way came up in their discussion and they chose to defer action on the exception and defer action on the use of public right of way pending some recommendation by the Community Development Board as to whether they wanted to proceed with the ordinance and if so would await a recommended ordinance change from the board before proceeding with the request. He suggested that the board submit their recommendation regarding the separate ordinance along with their review of the proposed revision to the zoning code. The consensus of the board was to put together a checklist of issues that need to be addressed and incorporate them in their recommendation to the commission. They specifically addressed the issue of notifying adjacent property owners and businesses prior to any public hearings on the proposal. 2. Traffic problems created by the Mayport Flyover Mr. Worley explained that the Mayport Flyover will split Mayport Road in half between West 1 st Street and approximate{y West 7th and nowhere in between will residents and business owners be able to cross Mayport Road. He stated there will be additional traffic flow in the residential neighborhoods to get to lighted intersections. Mrs. Pillmore stated that the potential of closing access to the community and the level of income of the area will eventually create a slum as there will be no interest in the community. She stated that one would have to travel North to a lighted intersection and then south on Mayport Road to be able to cross. She stated that the only lighted intersections were Plaza, Levy and Church Roads. Mr. Wolfson stated that the flyover would not be at grade level anti[ West 8th Street and the only streets available for crossing are Levy and Church Roads. Traffic will increase in the residential community in order to get to other areas in the City. He suggested that the Public Safety Director or his designee be requested for his input on the matter. He stated that Orchid Street should be limited to non-truck traffic. Mr. Worley stated he would request input from the Police Department on the traffic problems being created and possible solutions. There being no further business to come before the board the meeting was adjourned. SIGNED: ATTEST: